Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Sample 1:

Education plays a pivotal role in a child’s life as it allows them to think critically and creatively, increasing their creativity and logical thinking. Similarly, it is thought that universities should embrace the idea of equal seat distribution between girls and boys. In my perspective, I completely agree with this statement, as all individuals deserve an equal right to education. In the following paragraphs, I shall explain my point of view in detail.

Universities should support educational equality since it is founded on the notion of justice in the distribution of resources, opportunity, treatment, and achievement for all students, regardless of gender. If all students do not receive equal education, then human talent that could contribute to society is not nurtured properly. For example, suppose only male children receive education and participate in everyday activities that contribute to the growth of society and families. In that case, we deny female students the opportunity to follow their skills and passions.

Additionally, each student’s skill is distinct from that of another. Gender-equitable education systems empower both girls and boys by encouraging the development of life skills such as self-control, communication, and critical thinking. Boys gain directly from an education devoid of harmful gender stereotypes. Masculine standards can drive disengagement from education, child labour, gang violence, and recruitment into armed organisations in many nations. Also, many boys walk out of secondary school due to a necessity or desire to earn money, as many of them think the curriculum is unrelated to job prospects.

However, student numbers are indeed determined by the number of applications received by the institution, and if the university decides on equal education, the university will not receive enough applicants. But, failing to provide sufficient opportunity for both genders would raise the likelihood of prejudice in society.

In conclusion, education is necessary for the overall development of children regardless of their gender. Education equality amongst students won’t just avoid prejudice but will also foster the notion of justice.

Sample 2:

Education is crucial in everyone’s life as it sets the route to achieve their full potential. Similarly, it is claimed that educational institutions such as universities should accommodate men and women equally rather than making a visible distinction between them. However, I do not agree with this notion from my perspective.

The university enrolls students based on their application and merit; therefore, it is unfeasible to intake the same number of students for all degree programs. There would be insufficient applications if educational institutions admitted students depending on their gender. Furthermore, many courses are more popular with one gender than the other, making equal proportions unachievable. For instance, most female students pursue teaching and nursing courses in large numbers than engineering courses, which are more appealing to male students. As a result, filling these above-mentioned courses based on gender equality would be onerous.

In addition, it would be prejudiced to base admissions to the degree courses on gender equality. The universities should follow the age-old method of admitting students for each course based on their qualifications and merit. This would ensure that both male and female students had equal opportunity in the university and their careers.

Although gender-equitable education empowers both male and female students, it would be erroneous to reject a male student with high grades in favour of accepting a female student because of the university’s gender equality.

To sum up, the sophisticated, developed, and industrialized world runs on the wheels of education; as a result, both genders need to obtain education to be able to survive in the competitive world. Thus, the university’s selection procedure should be based on merit, and changing the age-old selection method based on gender equality would be inappropriate.

Sample 3:

Needless to say, gender equality is a crucial topic in today’s society. Some are of the notion that there should be equal genders in each and every subject taught at the university. I firmly agree with such a viewpoint. My opinion is discussed in the following paragraphs.

To begin with, by accepting the equivalent ratio of both male and female the universities promote gender egalitarianism which will help people to break all the odds and fear to study together without any hesitation. For instance, in nations like Hungary many universities enrol an equal number of male and females in order to surge the economic conditions; for instance, nowadays females are becoming as active as males in the business and industrial sector and these genders work simultaneously with each other’s new ideal versions. Thus, this makes the nation a better place not only in terms of work but also to become a developed from developing nation.

In addition to this, if a woman is at home and a man dominates the fields of education, research, art and history, nothing constructive can be achieved. But we cannot ignore the contributions of Mother Teresa and Madame Mary Curry, who have devoted their lives to making the world a better place. It is true that more male students will dominate over female students if the competition is gender independent. Universities should continue to accept the same number of applicants.

To put it in a nutshell, If universities enrol an equal number of male and females than their will be a better exchange of an ideas will occur between both the genders which will not only result in a greater contribution to the nation by a surge in employment rates but it will also have a great impact on the country’s economy.

Sample 4:

Since the last few decades, the educational system has been changed gradually and it has become possible for girls to study in university along with boys. Moreover, in many universities female students exceed the male students in various subjects. I strongly disagree with the idea of granting the same number of boys and girls in every subject offered at the university. My justification is explained below.

The first and foremost reason for my inclination is that the university’s mission is to educate and equip students to lead the country in the future. If the admission process prioritises and attempts to enrol the same number of male and female students in each subject, it is not beneficial to the country. Instead, the students should focus on abilities, and the areas they are particularly interested in. If they follow their desired course, they will surely form an expertise in that particular subject.

Furthermore, merit and academic performance are the most important qualifications. In this scenario, gender does not matter. It would be absurd to request the same number of boys and girls in all the subjects by robbing many of the bright male students. As there is no limit to the female students who can enrol in any subject, so one can compete fairly without resentment at the rules. Moreover, not both the genders have the same interest in studying every subject as each has its own taste. 

All in all, it can be eventually commented that the universities should not accept men and women equally. The method proposed above is far more beneficial to all students.

Sample 5:

When the topic of studying equal numbers of male and female in a subject arises there are divided opinions. Some are of the viewpoint that it is the best way to receive an equal number of both the genders in particular subjects. However, I do not agree with such an occurance. My opinion and justifications are elaborated in the paragraphs below.

To begin with, certain different professions require different genders. For example, a recent study in Dusk newspaper of Bangalore has stated that nearly 60% of the female students do not practise nursing after completing Bsc. nursing as they were not able to complete further studies after graduation due to looking after children and other household works. As a result of this, such losses kept an additional burden on the healthcare system. This makes it clear that universities should not accept the same number of male and female students in all subjects.         

Most importantly, in my opinion, more capable people should be prioritised. The goal of all universities is to accept the best candidates, male or female. As a result, the proportion of male and female students is expected to vary by region. Men were unable to compete with women in some areas and vice versa.

To recapitulate, I believe different professions require different genders. Therefore, one should choose a subject accordingly and it is the responsibility of the university to give priority to the individuals with better performance. Of course, it is true that there are certain fields in which males are better than females and vice versa. Thus, universities should be wise enough to give admissions accordingly rather than equallying the genders for a particular study.  

Sample 6:

It has been proposed that tertiary institutions should accept the same proportion of students to each course. I totally agree with this notion as it is in accordance with the principles of gender equality, and it will also serve to create a more harmonious society and reduce gender discrimination.

I believe that universities must accept equal numbers of students from each gender for a particular course that they wish to apply to. The reason for this is because favouring one sex over the other is a form of discrimination, which should not be accepted in any civilised society. This is because it influences the ability for people to pursue careers and have equal rights in society. For example, in Cambodia, where women are not allowed to study at university, they are severely disadvantaged in the workforce and very few are able to establish satisfactory careers.

Another benefit of accepting a similar number of students from each gender is that it will lead to a society with less gender discrimination. The basic logic here is that if tertiary students have a chance to study with members of the opposite sex, they will be more likely to be able to interact and communicate with the opposite gender outside of school. For instance, my cousin studied engineering in an almost exclusively male class and as a result, he is very shy of the opposite sex and gets nervous every time he has to talk to a girl.

In conclusion, I absolutely believe that tertiary institutions should accept equal numbers of male and female students in order to avoid sexual discrimination and assure a harmonious society. Therefore, a policy of equal acceptance should be instituted in every country of the world, and any kind of gender-based quotas should be abolished.

Sample 7:

According to unlversities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. Therefore, this essay will show some reasons of argument for and argument against.

Firstly, I will discuss about two reasons of argument for to begin with universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject because it will be balance of idea while studying. In general, there usually are different ideas between man and woman. These lead to, new ideas from different vision will happen. Another reason is it display that have equal of society not eccept in each side. In addition, nowadays, the most societies become to accept ability of both in any way.

Secondly, I will discuss about one reason of argument against that s some subjects not suitable for each other. For example, some subject of sports such as weight putting. It is not suitable for female because there are different of body between male and female.

In conclusion, I agree with universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. Moreover, it depen on what the subjects that the students want to study, they can choose by themselve because I believe that if the students like to study their subjects, they will do it well so that I strongly agree with this topic.

Sample 8:

Universities should admit the same number of men and women in every subject. I completely disagree with this statement. My main reasons for this are that there might be natural differences in the interests and strengths of male and female students and forcing universities to pursue gender equality could lead to issues with merit-based admissions.

First and foremost, it is important to recognize that males and females have different strengths and interests, and it would be unfair to force a certain gender ratio in certain subjects. For example, it may be more common for men to be interested in engineering or computer science, while women may be more drawn to fields such as nursing or education. By requiring equal gender ratios in all subjects, universities would be limiting the choices and opportunities available to students based on their gender rather than their individual strengths and interests.

Additionally, it is important to consider the fact that there may not always be an equal number of qualified male and female applicants for certain subjects. Colleges should not lower the admission standards or accept unqualified applicants simply to meet a gender quota. The primary goal of universities should be to accept the most qualified and capable students, regardless of gender.

In conclusion, I totally disagree with the notion that universities should be held accountable to accept an equal number of males and females in every subject. It is essential to consider the unique strengths, interests, and qualifications of each student and base admissions decisions on merit rather than imposing quotas based on gender.

Sample 9:

In my opinion, men and women should have the same educational opportunities. However, I do not agree with the idea of accepting equal proportions of each gender in every university subject.

Having the same number of men and women on all degree courses is simply unrealistic. Student numbers on any course depend on the applications that the institution receives. If a university decided to fill courses with equal numbers of males and females, it would need enough applicants of each gender. In reality, many courses are more popular with one gender than the other, and it would not be practical to aim for equal proportions. For example, nursing courses tend to attract more female applicants, and it would be difficult to fill these courses if fifty per cent of the places needed to go to males.

Apart from the practical concerns expressed above, I also believe that it would be unfair to base admission to university courses on gender. Universities should continue to select the best candidates for each course according to their qualifications. In this way, both men and women have the same opportunities, and applicants know that they will be successful if they work hard to achieve good grades at school. If a female student is the best candidate for a place on a course, it is surely wrong to reject her in favour of a male student with lower grades or fewer qualifications.

In conclusion, the selection of university students should be based on merit, and it would be both impractical and unfair to change to a selection procedure based on gender.

Sample 10:

Higher colleges should not have gender disparity in offering seats to students for any subject, which is a bone of contention for some.

I strongly agree with this notion that male and female pupils should have freedom of choice. To prove my argument, I would like to elaborate further in the following passage.

To initiate, postgraduate studies have a vast number of subjects that one can opt for, but considering the study materials and length of education, pupils make their choices. To illustrate, women have a strong inclination and lengthy concentration span when it comes to studying. Therefore, they go for subjects like science and research. Which suits them, and mostly, the studies are indoors in laboratories where they don’t have to commute to remote places. If any institute has limitations on this seat sharing, they should expand their horizon, and no matter what, all interested female candidate should be getting their preferred subjects.

On the other hand, men have short attention and are impatient. They have responsibilities, and that’s the reason they want to get into the income group at the earliest. Therefore, they choose a banking, accounting, arts, teaching, etc., which leverages them into payroll immediately. These streams are not meticulous and require less work compared to science. The duration of studies is also less. Considering the above factors, the organizations should not discourage males from taking the subjects stating there is a reservation for another gender.

To conclude, universities should allot equal seats for both genders and allow them to have freedom of their choice.

Sample 11:

Nowadays, education is the first priority for parents to provide for their children. And they work hard in their lives for their children, so their children go to schools and universities. Every parent’s children are the same, even if they are girls or boys. So in every university, authorities need to share an equal number of seats for males and females. I think seats should go to a capable person who is knowledgeable in their field.

To begin with, in this present era, there is no gender difference in human society. Not only are men successful in every industry, but women are also wealthier than men. Moreover, giving the same seats to girls as boys in university provides an opportunity to girls whose parents are underprivileged and cannot afford the fees of their peers. For example, in India, the government provides many facilities for women, such as free transportation, some discounts on flats when the apartment’s owner is a woman, for women.

In addition, there are fewer girls in school today as compared to boys, so if the university provides the same number of seats as boys, how is it possible? For instance, if the state government allows both girls and boys, some boys who are much more capable will not get any seats at the university.

In conclusion, it is good to allow the same number of seats at universities for girls. However, girls are now not participating as much as boys, so it’s not possible to provide equal seats to girls. And in my view, I think talented people need to get a seat at the university.

Sample 12:

In today’s society, the issue of gender equality has become increasingly important, and this extends to the education sector as well. The idea of universities accepting equal numbers of male and female students in every subject is a topic that has sparked much debate. While some argue that this approach is necessary to achieve gender balance, others believe that it may not be the most effective solution. In my opinion, I agree that universities should strive to achieve gender equality, but I also recognize that there may be practical limitations to implementing this in every subject.

On one hand, there are clear benefits to having equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. This approach can help break down traditional gender stereotypes and promote inclusivity. It can also create a more diverse and enriching learning environment, as students from different backgrounds bring unique perspectives to the table. Furthermore, achieving gender balance in all subjects can help address the underrepresentation of women in fields such as science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), where they have historically been marginalized.

On the other hand, it is important to consider the practical implications of implementing such a policy. In some subjects, there may be a natural imbalance in the number of male and female students who are interested or qualified to study a particular field. For example, STEM subjects have traditionally attracted more male students, while fields such as education and social sciences may have a higher proportion of female students. Therefore, enforcing an equal gender ratio in every subject may not be feasible or realistic.

In conclusion, while I support the idea of promoting gender equality in education, I believe that a more nuanced approach is necessary. Instead of focusing solely on achieving equal numbers of male and female students in every subject, universities should strive to create an inclusive and supportive environment for all students, regardless of their gender. This can be achieved through targeted outreach programs, mentorship initiatives, and efforts to challenge gender stereotypes. Ultimately, the goal should be to create equal opportunities for all students to pursue their interests and talents, regardless of traditional gender norms.

Sample 13:

There is an old saying - 'Give me an educated mother and I will give you an educated nation'. This prover emphasises the women education. Throughout the history men and women both worked together to build a better world and whatever stage the current world is in, that has been contributed both by male and female - surely not by one gender. As university education is so important for the full bloom of one person's merit, skill and knowledge, equal opportunity for both male and female students should be ensured.

To begin with, if only men go ahead in education, research, arts, history and women stay home, then no good can be done. The history suggests that men are dominant in numbers in science, arts, engineering, creativity and business sectors. But we cannot deny the contribution of Mother Teresa and Madam Merry Currie who have devoted their whole life to the betterment of the world. It is true that if the competition is arranged regardless of gender, more male students will be ahead of women. But still, universities should accept an equal number of students. If fewer females hold the important sectors of a country, naturally women will feel deprived, and this will lead them to compete with men.

It is a mother who is much more emotionally attached to their children and friendlier to children than fathers. So they help the children in their study. So the importance of female education in the higher level should get a priority considering this single issue.

In conclusion, universities should accept the same number of students from both sexes and give an equal opportunity at every level.

Sample 14:

The society and educational system have changed significantly from the old era when it was almost impossible for a girl to study in a university while only boys were allowed to do so. Now a girl can enrol to a university at her wish and merit. In many universities, female students exceed the male students in many subjects. I oppose the idea of granting the same number of male and female students in every subject offered in a university bypassing the merit list.

First of all, a university aims to educate people and prepare them for the future and those students would lead the country in the future. If the admission process prioritises sentiments and tries to accept the same number of students from both genders in each subject, it would not be a good idea for the country. Rather they should focus on talent and there is no harm if more female students can get admitted to the university based on talent.

Second, the important qualifications are the academic performance and merit. Here gender issue should not be considered. The equal number of male and female students in every subject is a whimsical idea that would deprive many talented male students. Third, since there is no restriction on the number of female students allowed for a subject, they can naturally compete in a fair fight and show they competence rather than being pitied by a policy. Again, not all male and female are equally interested in studying in every subject, they have their own choices. Implementing the equal number of male and female students in each subject would take away the freedom from students to study in their favourite subject.

In conclusion, the idea of admitting the same number of male and female students in university level in each subject is not a good idea and the admission should strictly be based on choice and merit rather than emotion.

Sample 15:

Universities are the places for higher education that straightly directs one’s future career. Since today’s belief is to obtain the equality between male and female, some may say that women are able to do whatever men can do and thus, a university should maintain the same number for both genders in every course. This is a very controversial issue, and I shall hold the opposite opinion.

Although male and female students can share the same ability to obtain and convey knowledge of one specific expertise to the practical work, some majors just prefer one gender to the other. For example, the job of civil engineering seems to fit better for men than women since it requires strong physical ability. Or though not impossible, it is hard for a woman to work as a firefighter or policeman. On the other hand, a fewer male would apply to work as nurses or baby sisters since these jobs require some delicate touches or “a woman’s hand”.

Moreover, universities provide necessary education to train limited number of qualified candidates and thus, there should be a fair competition for all who wish to receive this education. Balancing between genders may strip away the opportunity of some male or female candidates. It should be let for the natural selection as the survival of the fittest that encourages both men and women to fight for their right to pursue their dream jobs.

In conclusion, it is not necessary to hold a balance between male and female students in every university course since different majors attract different genders and one has his or her free will to join in any part of life with a fair fight.

Sample 16:

Many argue that to avoid any gender discriminations, an equal number of male and female students should be accepted in every subject. This is a very controversial issue; however, I hold the opposite opinion.

First of all, I strongly believe that occupations are gender related. There are some tasks that women do better than men. It may not be easy to admit that men, for example, make better civil or electrical engineers. Although not impossible for a woman to be the police or a firefighter, but due to the high physical demand for these jobs very few women would opt to be one. Hence it seems useless to accept male and female students in such fields.

More importantly, I believe that the priority should go to the more capable individual. The aim of all universities should be to accept the best candidate whether it is a male or a female. As a result of this, we would expect to see varying proportions of male and female students in different fields. Men would not be able to compete with women in some fields and vice versa hence overall, this would be a fair approach.

Furthermore, this would encourage all male and female students to try hard to achieve a place. A form of natural selection will take place: survival of the fittest and the end result would benefit us all. The individual with the highest level of capability would be allowed to pursue the career, and hence is more likely to be successful in the future.

To conclude, I hold the opinion that universities should not accept male and female students equally. Using the above-mentioned techniques would be far more advantageous for all of us.

Sample 17:

Universities are the pillars of a society and build a sophisticated civilisation in this modern era. Therefore, the standard of education should be maintained at an optimum level in order to ensure that the education. Many believe that university admission should be based on the ratio males and females for each major to maintain the equilibrium among women and men. I strongly believe that the taking up of students for each major should be based on the academic grades as well as the talent.

I understand that the whole point of higher education is nothing but the opportunity which is given to each and every one of us, to choose from a variety of fields, a suitable subject, which serves the purpose of interest which in turn will help us to enjoy our future. Pupils often show some sort of talent from childhood towards learning a specific subject which ultimately attributes to their career. In this case, I presume the selection criteria should be the skills or grades which they possess in that specific major, should be the most important thing to consider. For instance, a doctor who has passed out of a university ought to have good hard-working skills and the interest in that profession, as his responsibility towards people is higher than any other profession. Hence, such a person should be graduated only due to his excellence in that field, not mere the gender reservation.

When thinking about equal reservations to men and women, it is significant to note that, there are many varieties of education branches which are particularly suitable for a certain gender. Though subjects like medicine, business and arts are equally attractive and productive for both male and female students; we cannot deny that the jobs or field of studies which require more of physical strength are best suitable for men. Needless to mention, such jobs are most commonly chosen by boys, nowadays. Being said that I do think that the equality in the number of admission of males and females is a very bright idea in some parts of the world, in order to promote women empowerment. Having said that, I certainly do not think that this practice is of any benefit globally as a standard.

At the end of the day, though both opinions are valid enough, I shall not agree to the point that the admission should be strictly based on the same number of men and women, rather than grades or interests, when it comes to the global university education pertaining to each major, I insist on implementing such practice to selected areas across the globe.

Sample 18:

Many people argue about the number of university students from both genders are accepted in each program. Some people debate that it is the best to receive an equal number of both sexes in each subject. However, personally, I incline to believe that it should not be an equivalent proportion of men and women students in every discipline. This essay will take a look at this issue from the preference we have in society and a different number of students enrolled in a university.

Preference may be a considerable aspect in determining the subject of the student. Some subjects are generally suitable for the different sex. Midwife, for instance, is only appropriate and has been selected by women only. However, engineering is mostly preferred by men students. Thus, it is hard to make a balanced number of students accepted in subjects especially for those which are mostly preferred by one sex.

Furthermore, the different number of registered students in a university regarding sex might be quite important. Since the number of male and female is also may not be equal, it does not necessarily worthy to put both men and women students in an equal number for every subject. For example, in engineering faculty, mostly there will be a higher number of men students than women. Hence, it might be complicated to receive an equal number of students when the proportion of registered student is also significantly dissimilar.

All in all, there should be no similar number of male and female scholars in each subject at university. Women may enrol to the same subject as men and reversely, however, it is difficult to ensure the number or accepted students will be equal in both sexes. It might be essentially important to not stress the same quantity of different sex scholars in every single subject in university.

Sample 19:

Arguments over the proportion of male and female students in different universities have been going on since the practice of teaching began. Despite this, it has disagreed that allocation of seats in universities should be equal between male and female students. This will be proven by looking at how different professions are gender-based and how females in certain professions cannot proceed further in their career due to other responsibilities.

Firstly, different kind of professions demands one gender more than the other to cater its specific requirements. For instance, a friend of mine worked as an intern in gynaecology department, which he joined immediately after his graduation and end up with frustration because of the non-cooperative behaviour of female patients. As most would agree, expecting young female patients to interact with male doctors regarding their gynaecology problems would be unrealistic in many parts of the world; the argument that universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students can be debunked.

Secondly, it is easy to see the progressive rate at which females after graduation fail to proceed further in their career due to the responsibilities of looking after children and other household works. For example, a recent study published in Dawn newspaper in Pakistan has stated that nearly 70% of the female students do not practice medicine after completing M.B.B.S. As such a loss would impose an additional burden on the healthcare system if universities continue to accept an equal number of female students. Thus, this makes it clear that universities should not accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.

The above look illustrates that certain jobs and certain profession may be more fitted for the different genders. It is thus recommended that regulating bodies of universities should weigh the pros and cons before allocating equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.

Sample 20:

Around the world, university studies are highly popular and every year millions of students enrol for various short-term and long-term courses. Although most experts emphasise on the requirements to improve the quality of university education, many believe the idea of equal sex ratio is also important. The base of this ideology is in the theory of egalitarianism and is especially backed for women organisations, working for the uplift of women.

First of all, equal sex ratio ensures the burgeoning of respect for each other among both genders. Moreover, this also fuels security, especially, in the minds of women students. To bolster the statement, worldwide university crime-related data show low crime against women in universities which have equal or approaching equal sex ratios across all subjects. Some governments have even ratified reservation rules for maintaining a minimum percentage of seat allocation in universities to women.

Secondly, some experts believe that this idea helps to create an environment of diversity where healthy ideas and activities prevail. As a proof, we know that many organisations, especially service industry companies, always maintain a ratio of gender diversity as it has been proved by research that such workplaces produce high standard results.

In my opinion, it is paramount to maintain diversity in university studies to a certain extent as I strongly support the idea of admission based on merit more. While universities should declare a minimum percentage of women students in every course, there should not be any obligation to enrol exactly 50% of each gender. Of course, I understand some courses like mechanical engineering demand strenuous physical activities, and women students generally do not prefer such courses at all. Hence, there should be enough provisions for exceptions too.

Sample 21:

The debate surrounding gender parity in university admissions across all disciplines is a poignant one. Advocating for equal representation of male and female students in every subject, I posit, overlooks the intricacies of individual choice and aptitude, yet simultaneously underscores the critical need for gender equality in education. This essay will explore both the impracticality of strict gender quotas in admissions and the importance of nurturing a more inclusive educational environment.

Firstly, the imposition of equal gender quotas in university subjects fails to consider personal preferences and talents. Fields such as engineering and nursing have historically seen a gender imbalance, attributed not solely to societal biases but also to personal interests. For instance, efforts to enforce equality in STEM fields have not always resulted in increased female participation, suggesting that factors beyond mere availability of positions influence career choices. Such policies might inadvertently limit the potential of individuals who are genuinely passionate and skilled in their chosen fields, thereby detracting from the principle of meritocracy that underpins academic excellence.

Conversely, the argument for gender equality in academia is not without merit. The underrepresentation of women in certain disciplines, particularly in STEM, is a testament to the barriers they face, ranging from societal stereotypes to the lack of role models. Therefore, universities play a pivotal role in dismantling these barriers, not through rigid quotas, but by creating an empowering environment. This includes offering scholarships, mentorship programs, and targeted outreach initiatives that encourage underrepresented groups to pursue their interests freely and confidently.

In conclusion, enforcing equal gender quotas in university subjects, though well-meaning, overlooks the complexities of individual choice and societal factors. The priority should be on providing equal opportunities for all genders to follow their academic interests. By valuing diversity and supporting underrepresented groups, universities can play a crucial role in achieving true gender equality in education and beyond.

Sample 22:

The proposition that universities should mandate equal male and female enrolment across all subjects is a contentious one. This essay argues that while equality is paramount, such a policy may not address the root causes of gender imbalance in education. Instead, a more nuanced approach is required, focusing on removing barriers to entry and encouraging equal participation based on interest and aptitude.

Firstly, the practicality of enforcing gender parity in every academic field is questionable. For instance, subjects like mechanical engineering or early childhood education, traditionally dominated by one gender, reflect deeper societal norms and interests rather than outright discrimination. Mandating equal numbers could lead to a scenario where qualified candidates are turned away simply to fulfill a quota, potentially compromising the quality of education and expertise in these fields. Moreover, such policies might not respect individual choice, forcing students into subjects they have little interest in, purely for the sake of statistical equality.

However, the absence of women in STEM fields or men in humanities does highlight an underlying issue of accessibility and societal expectation. To counter this, universities should invest in targeted initiatives that challenge stereotypes, such as mentorship programs, scholarships, and awareness campaigns, which encourage all genders to explore their interests freely. This approach acknowledges the complexity of the issue, addressing not just the symptoms but the societal attitudes that contribute to gender disparities in higher education.

In conclusion, while achieving gender balance in every university subject is an admirable goal, it should not come at the expense of individual choice and educational integrity. A more effective strategy is to create an environment that supports and inspires all students to pursue their passions, irrespective of gender. Such a focus not only fosters genuine equality but also enriches the academic community and society at large.

Sample 23:

There is an argument that higher educational institutions should enrol the same number of students in each subject. This essay strongly disagrees with this statement, because it believes that delivering a quality education is the prime objective of a school, and the equal presence of both sex students does not necessarily mean an efficient outcome, rather the same opportunity for both genders is the key to avail a quality outcome.

It is a natural phenomenon that human preferences and choices are driven by their genders. Some disciplines like engineering are evidently a male-dominated one while teaching considerably prevails among female students, and medical science is accommodated with almost equally by both genders. This discipline wise domination (which subject areas are efficiently attached with which sex group) is well established, because it is tested and proven effective by the long course of time. This is why some courses have inevitably unequal sex ratios among the students.

However, though it is true that equality is a vital virtue, but in my point of view, universities should not interfere in the structure of course in relation to the students’ genders. That means, instead of focusing strongly on acceptance of the equal number of male or female students, universities ought to create equal opportunities to both genders so that they can enjoy an absolute freedom of choice in case of selecting their interest study areas. Well, there might have some courses where one sex domination is discouraged, hence the institutes can run motivational campaigns among the minor sex groups.

In conclusion, it is important for universities to ensure equal opportunities for the students regardless of their sextual orientation, they should not aim for making equal presence of all the genders in each subject. The reason is mere gender equality might not necessarily bring an efficient educational outcome, rather this institutional interference could hamper proper education to the proper sex group.

Sample 24:

Education is important and should be equal for all, regardless of gender. Everyone has a right to education. I partially agree with the statement that Universities should accept an equal number of students for each subject. This essay will delve into both aspects in the upcoming paragraphs.

To begin with, if universities start enrolling students on the basis of their gender for different subjects, then there would be partiality as everyone can have similar interests. To illustrate, earlier boys opted for engineering subjects as it was said that these subjects were made for male students. But with the pace of time, female students broke this stereotype and are successfully enrolling in those fields. Similarly, in a fast-paced life nowadays, everyone works equally. If we have equality in working, then it is necessary to have the same in education as well. Researchers have shown that gender-based quality in subjects brings more effective global results than others that do not do this. The labor market would also be affected in a good way by this.

On the contrary, it is important to recognize that the strengths of males and females usually vary, and it would be unfair to force some gender into those uncertain subjects. Also, the admission process cannot be based solely on ‘Gender Quota’; rather, it should be based on the qualifications and capabilities of the students. This will lead to efficient and effective education. Colleges cannot focus mainly on gender ratios as it will limit the number of seats in each subject, and the students will suffer this loss. Universities should not impose subjects on their pupil to fulfill equal proportions. However, this will increase the competition amongst students who want to reserve their seats in the course they are interested in.

To conclude, studying both genders is necessary. Accepting an equal number of applications for both genders can help minimize the gap between them, but this, too, should not be done to an extent as it might create chaos amongst students.

Sample 25:

In society, education is one of the most significant factors. A child's life is shaped by it. They can develop their creative and logical thinking skills thanks to education. It is crucial that every child in the nation has an equal education and a fair chance to go to school. I wholeheartedly concur that every person, boy or girl, should have equal access to education. In every topic, colleges and universities should accept an equal number of male and female students. Schools, colleges, and universities should support educational equality. All students ought to be able to access equal possibilities in their academics and professional lives, regardless of their gender. There are numerous justifications for why this should be done.

Every single person has special abilities. In any subject or field, students will have the opportunity to learn more and develop their talents. They won't be able to develop their skills if they aren't given equal opportunity. This could result in previously unknown abilities that the nation could have employed to advance. Both boys and females are capable of manipulating others. Boys are good at physical traits like strength. The academic disciplines they studied in high school and college are useless in the workplace. Teaching all subjects will therefore enable students to learn about the outside world. This will aid in their adjustment to their new lifestyle. In the same vein, girls shouldn't be denied access to any subject. Girls are skilled at interacting with others and having conversations. Strength and intelligence together can work miracles. I think that granting all genders equal access to opportunity and education will contribute to the development of the country. There are numerous women in higher positions today in the political, legal, and educational spheres, among others. If girls had not been given equal opportunity, this would not have been possible. They would not have become national leaders if universities had not admitted girls to study politics. I think that everyone should fight using their knowledge and skills, not their gender.

Sample 26:

Education is important for everyone regardless of gender. With education, children can soar to new heights and efficiency. Schools, colleges and universities can help the children reach their potential by providing equal opportunities for boys and girls. I believe that children should have the opportunity to study subjects as per their preference. Every child should be treated equally. They should not feel that they are forced into something. This can have severe consequences. They might get mentally distracted and affect the future. Children might feel that the management is being partial towards one gender. I feel that providing equal education for all genders is necessary. Every child has their unique way of learning things. The management should allow everyone to participate in the subject of their choice. There should be no discrimination among students. There are multiple scenarios where students have the responsibility of the family. This forces them to walk out of the secondary school to earn money. The government should ensure that the students can continue their further studies. The subjects they were taught in schools and universities do not come in handy in their work life. Hence, teaching every subject will help them gain knowledge of the outside world. This will help them to adjust to the new life. Similarly, girls also should not be deprived of any subject. They should be allowed to learn the subjects which they want to pursue in future and make a career out of it. It is, hence, equally important for all genders to learn the subjects of their choice. This will not only help them but also produce excellent results in their exam. The country will get brilliant people who can run the economy, politics, authority and excel in every genre.

Sample 27:

Many people believe that universities and colleges shape the future of children. There are institutions which allow everyone a chance to build their future. Hence, they should also have gender equality in subject selection. Universities also should teach every subject to students so that the knowledge can help them in future. In my perspective, I believe that each and every student must get the opportunity to learn the subjects. Universities should allow equal opportunities to male and female students for every subject. If equal opportunities are not given to the students, we will not be able to nurture the talent which might contribute to society. In most cases, male members of the family receive higher education which helps them grow as a person. They also contribute largely towards society. In doing so, the female members are deprived of education, though they have the talent. Each and every university should promote and support equal education. Students differ in their skills, mental ability and performance. If the universities do not nurture these skills, we will not be able to discover new talents. Not only the students will be benefited, but the universities will also have more exposure. If the university allows equal opportunities, they will receive more applications from students. This will help the university to grow. However, failing to do so might bring prejudice to society. I believe that education is necessary for the overall development of children regardless of their gender. Education equality amongst students won’t just avoid prejudice but will also foster the notion of justice. This will also bring development to the country’s success.

Sample 28:

Human right has provided the equality of right for males and females living in this planet. Based on this right, many people think that male and female students should be recruited equally in every university subject while another group of think differently.

To begin with, male and female students should be selected in the same number because they are humans, and they have their own passions and goals. Many people believe that people who desire to do something, they always try their best to do it, and normally they get better result than people who work without any purposes. Furthermore, by giving the same chance to every student without discriminate genders, the societies will give more value on women, and women can work as men. They can earn their own money to support their own family without depend on their husbands.

In contrast, males and females have their own capacities, so they cannot be the same and they cannot be chosen equally in every university subject. In order word, males like to involve with technical studies and risky jobs rather than females do. Most engineers, astronomers and policemen are men, and these jobs are not fit well with female, and there are not many females interested in these majors. Another point to consider is that females are more patient than male. Therefore, they are recommended to be tailors, designers and other soft works.

In conclusion, even though human right tries to balance males and females, but they cannot be the same because they born with different talents and interests. As a result, universities should consider on making proportion for males and females with their majors and try to give chance to them equally.

Sample 29:

It is believed and women should have the same educational opportunities. However, I do not agree with the idea accepting equal proportions of each gender in every university subject. This essay will explain the reasons why admitting numbers of male and female students in every major is impractical.

First, having the same of men and women on all degree courses is simply unrealistic. Student numbers on course depend on the applications that the institution receives. If a university decided to fill courses with equal numbers of males and females, it would need enough applicants of each gender. In many courses are more popular with one gender than the other, and it would not be practical to aim for equal proportions. For example, nursing courses to attract more female applicants, and it would be difficult to fill these courses if fifty percent of the places needed to go to males.

Apart from the practical concerns expressed, I also believe that it would be unfair to base admission to university courses on gender. Universities should continue select the best candidates for each course according to their qualifications. In both men and women have the same opportunities, and applicants that they will be successful if they work hard to achieve good grades at school. If a student is the best candidate for a place on a course, it would be wrong to reject her in favor of a male student with lower grades or fewer qualifications.

In conclusion, the selection university students should be based on merit, and it would be both impractical and unfair to change to a selection procedure based on gender.

Sample 30:

The debate on whether universities accepting equal numbers of male and female students in every subject encompasses diverse viewpoints, revealing its advantages and drawbacks. This essay critically assesses these perspectives.

There are myriad arguments in favour of my stance. Recent research not only outlines the significance of studies as well as people, but also points out the importance of education and coping with vicissitudes. Besides, it provides a brief overview of expanding cultural understanding, followed by enhancing global perspectives. Examples of this can be seen all over the world, especially in affluent nations. Further, the implications of technological advancements on these views are significant, justifying widespread support for the idea that universities accepting equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.

However, there are some arguments aainst the aforementioned view. Besides, its impact is far-reaching indeed as its influence extends to various facets of society, shaping not only individual experiences but also impacting the academic research landscape. Therefore, it is apparent why many are against the notion that universities accepting equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.

In conclusion, while the viewpoint that universities accepting equal numbers of male and female students in every subject presents a complex array of advantages and disadvantages, my analysis leads me to firmly support the notion that its benefits substantially outweigh the drawbacks.

Sample 31:

Napolean Bonapart once said that “give me a good mother, and I will give you a good nation”. In fact, whatever has been accomplished in this world so far for the benefit of humanity, half the credit goes to males while the other half belongs to females. However, having said that, I don’t think that I can actually agree with the suggestion that universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject because of some realities on the ground.

Firstly, there just might not be enough male or female students to study a particular subject to fill either the quota of half males or half females simply because they might just not be interested to study that particular subject. Secondly, if we indeed have enough male and female students to fill the quota, then there is a very good possibility that the other deserving students, be them, males or females, with more talents and better qualifications, will get left out to accommodate the “not-so” deserving students unless, of course, the university has a system in place to choose students other than gender.

Moreover, if a university has a system of taking admission tests before admitting students at that particular university, then I just don’t see how it is possible to guarantee that an exactly equal number of male or female students will pass the admission tests without compromising the test standards. The fourth and final reason is that there are some subjects, like mechanical engineering or engineering core course at a military college, which can be really physically demanding, and female students just might not be interested enough to study the courses even though they may be equally talented like their fellow male students.

In conclusion, accepting an equal number of male and female students at university based on gender is not just impractical but also depriving for the society and nation.

Sample 32:

In today’s world, gender equality is one of the most pressing issues, and universities play a crucial role in shaping the future of our society. Therefore, I wholeheartedly agree that universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. In this essay, I will discuss the reasons why I believe in this idea.

Firstly, gender equality is a fundamental human right. By giving equal opportunities to both men and women, we can create a fair and just society where everyone has the chance to fulfill their potential. Universities are a place where individuals acquire knowledge, skills, and attitudes that are vital for their future careers. It is crucial to ensure that these opportunities are equally available to everyone, regardless of their gender.

Secondly, having an equal number of male and female students in every subject can foster a diverse and inclusive learning environment. Diversity is crucial in today’s globalized world, and universities must prepare students to work in diverse workplaces. By having a mix of male and female students, universities can promote cross-gender communication and understanding, leading to a more collaborative and productive learning environment.

Thirdly, an equal representation of male and female students in every subject can help break gender stereotypes and promote gender equality in the workplace. Historically, certain subjects have been considered “male” or “female,” leading to a gender imbalance in certain professions. By ensuring an equal representation of male and female students in every subject, universities can create a level playing field and break down these stereotypes, leading to a more diverse and inclusive workplace in the future.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. This is not only a matter of gender equality but also creates a diverse and inclusive learning environment that can benefit both male and female students.

Sample 33:

“Equal rights” and “women empowerment” are two movements that have influenced millions of people in the world, and it is no secret that if we want to make the world a better place to live in, we must empower our women as they consist half of the total world population. In this regard, accepting an equal number of male and female students at the university, which is considered the citadel of a nation, is the right decision.

To begin with, universities prepare today’s young minds so that they can lead the country in the future and if we only have male leaders in every sector of our country, “true progress” would still be unattainable. I strongly believe that we cannot go far ahead if we let half of our workforce be confined within the boundaries of our houses. We need to work together for a prosperous world and for that, we need to give our women an opportunity in education, and what better opportunity can be than letting them get an equal chance at university education?

No doubt, some would argue that admissions to universities should be based on merit and not based on sex. From a shallow perspective, this seems right and justified but if we want to progress as a nation, we need to educate our women who devote more of their time to teaching the children in a family. So, if we want an educated and enlighted future generation, we need to educate our women and ensuring their admissions in universities can be a great step to secure that. Moreover, women have been deprived of their rights for centuries and the time has come for us to build a platform for them, and allowing the same number of students in every department in a university should be a pillar of this platform, I believe.

To conclude, females are as good as males in everything, and they should be allowed to prove their worth for the overall progress of the world. Ensuring university education for them by accepting an equal number of male and female students could only make the world a better place.

Sample 34:

Gender issues have been increasing in importance through the centuries. In almost every sphere of human activity, there has been a movement towards greater equality between men and women. Although I agree that universities should open their doors to all students alike, in my view, they need not set a fixed limit on the number of men and women they accept in each subject. The bases for my views are psychological and personal.

Psychologically-speaking, men and women are simply different, though they have the same potential for greatness. For example, women tend to be more intuitive, sensitive to others and caring. This means they may feel drawn, on the basis of their personalities, to certain kinds of professions such as teaching, nursing, or psychology, even if all fields are open to them. In such a context, it is best for universities to choose the best applicants, regardless of gender.

Personally, students need to discover their true calling. This is an individual matter and is not influenced by the universities reserving seats for men or women. For example, if the majority of women shy away from math or engineering, perhaps it has to do with their upbringing, which has influenced their interests. The universities will not be able to reverse this trend, though they should always look out for the most qualified candidates.

In conclusion, equality cannot be forced upon people – not in the area of education, employment or family life. Equality is about having choices and those who prove themselves capable will qualify for university, regardless of gender. It is only right that universities reflect and respect these free and natural choices being exercised by their students.

Sample 35:

The demand for gender equality in all aspects has become a contentious topic, reflecting the ongoing discourse and arguments surrounding this issue. In a modern community, both men and women can perform similar tasks, and maintaining an equal representation of each gender in all institution courses is crucial. I strongly agree with this stance, and I will delve into the details in the following paragraph.

Firstly, educational institutions should prioritize a platform where students can enroll without facing discrimination, ensuring equal opportunities for both male and female members. For instance, Australia has implemented a policy requiring universities to enroll an equal number of students regardless of gender, driven by the nation’s need for a substantial labor force to boost its economic standing. Consequently, higher education institutions should actively admit an equal number of students in each subject, fostering gender equality.

Secondly, single-sex education has various drawbacks. When boys and girls are unable to interact with the opposite sex, it can lead to a lack of confidence when handling tasks simultaneously in shared spaces. For example, Canadian universities offer all students the same courses, resulting in better outcomes compared to institutions in other countries that limit specific subjects based on gender. Historically, women faced limited study options, impacting their lives significantly. Therefore, universities should actively cultivate diverse student bodies, challenging restrictive educational regulations, such as instances where Afghani women are not allowed to enroll in medical courses until marriage.

In summary, it is imperative that educational institutions actively break down barriers. Enrollment in all courses at higher education institutions must occur without gender considerations, providing both genders the freedom to choose how they pursue their education.

Sample 36:

The issue of whether universities should accommodate an equal number of male and female students in every field is the subject of ongoing debate. While I recognise the importance of gender equality, I believe admissions should be based on merit rather than quotas.

Proponents of equal gender representation argue, on the one hand, that it fosters a just and inclusive society. By guaranteeing equal opportunities for both genders, universities can promote diversity and dismantle traditional gender stereotypes, according to the authors. In addition, proportionate representation can improve collaboration and foster innovative thought because it brings together a variety of perspectives and experiences.

However, I believe that merit-based admission is a more effective strategy. Academic excellence and aptitude, not a student's gender, should be the deciding factors in their acceptance into a university. The implementation of quotas could compromise the quality of education and generate a sense of injustice among deserving candidates who are overlooked due to gender-based criteria.

In the education system, it is essential to aspire for equal opportunities and eliminate all forms of discrimination. Universities should actively encourage and support the pursuit of academic objectives by female students. Nonetheless, maintaining academic standards and ensuring that admissions decisions are based on the qualifications and merits of individual applicants are of equal importance.

In conclusion, while I support the objective of gender equality, I believe universities should prioritise merit-based admissions over mandating equal gender representation in every subject. Universities can create an equitable and inclusive environment that encourages excellence and equal opportunities by taking individual skills and qualifications into account.