People who have original ideas are of much greater value to society than those who are simply able to copy the ideas of others well. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Giải bởi Vietjack
Sample 1:
The debate on whether people who have original ideas are of much greater value to society encompasses diverse viewpoints, revealing its advantages and drawbacks. This essay critically assesses these perspectives.
There are myriad arguments in favour of my stance. Recent research not only outlines the significance of studies as well as people, but also points out the importance of education and coping with vicissitudes. Besides, it provides a brief overview of expanding cultural understanding, followed by enhancing global perspectives. Examples of this can be seen all over the world, especially in affluent nations. Further, the implications of technological advancements on these views are significant, justifying widespread support for the idea that people who have original ideas are of much greater value to society.
However, there are some arguments against the aforementioned view. Besides, its impact is far-reaching indeed as its influence extends to various facets of society, shaping not only individual experiences but also impacting the academic research landscape. Therefore, it is apparent why many are against the notion that people who have original ideas are of much greater value to society.
In conclusion, while the viewpoint that people who have original ideas are of much greater value to society presents a complex array of advantages and disadvantages, my analysis leads me to firmly support the notion that its benefits substantially outweigh the drawbacks.
Sample 2:
I certainly agree that people who come up with new ideas; in other words, those who 'invent' or 'discover' things are terribly important to society as a whole. However, I also think there is a role in society for good imitators.
No one would deny that key individuals must be thanked for providing us with certain facilities that we use every day. Where, would we be, for example, without basic items such as the washing machine, the television and, more recently, the computer? These items are now used so regularly that we tend to take them for granted.
In fact, the society we live in today has become increasingly consumer-oriented, and while it may be possible to constantly update and improve consumer goods, not everyone where I live can afford the prices of these innovations. Furthermore, not everyone lives in an area that has accessibility to the latest models on the market. For this reason, there is a value to be placed on being able to provide good copies of expensive items.
Having said that, certain innovations have a more serious impact on our lives than consumer goods and cannot easily be replicated. Vital medicines like penicillin and vaccines against dangerous diseases also exist because people made continual efforts to develop them. Scientific ideas such as these enable us to live longer and escape illness.
Sample 3:
Nowadays, there are various types of people in every civilisation. As a result, some of them are intelligent enough to come up with a groundbreaking idea, while others work very hard to make these ideas a reality. In general, this article will explain this problem utilising instances and supporting evidence.
First of all, the foundation of any potential creation is a concept. Additionally, this idea is crucial because not everyone is endowed with the creativity and aptitude to think of it. For instance, Da Vinci created a beautiful plane layout. However, it took countless centuries for this plan to become a reality.
Dreamers with innovative and distinctive ideas are also the force behind progress. They develop a notion, and others can use it in their daily lives because they created it. Because of this, civilisation will gain from it. For instance, the first design of a submarine was created in the 17th century by a self-taught designer from a Russian town, and now scientists utilise it to research deep oceanic zones.
However, it has been argued that without adequate implementation, an idea is only a wish. In other words, individuals were only able to make these goals come true after making a great deal of attempts and exerting a great deal of work. As a result, even when people duplicated a theory, they fixed many issues by enhancing its weaknesses. As a result, these individuals are far more valuable to society and an important force in progress.
In conclusion, our society needs both types of individuals; some develop an idea, while others make it a reality. Overall, I concur that it is more helpful for society if people duplicate someone else’s idea but better realize it.
Sample 4:
In today’s rapidly changing world, the ability to generate original ideas has become increasingly important. While it is true that there is value in the dissemination of existing knowledge, I firmly believe that individuals who come up with original ideas contribute far more to the progress and development of society.
First and foremost, original ideas have the potential to revolutionize the way we live and work. Innovations such as the internet, smartphones, and renewable energy sources have all stemmed from original ideas. These groundbreaking inventions have not only improved our quality of life but have also created new industries and job opportunities. In contrast, individuals who simply copy existing ideas do not contribute to the advancement of society in the same way.
Furthermore, original ideas often spark further creativity and innovation. When a new concept or invention is introduced, it can inspire others to build upon it, leading to a ripple effect of progress. This collaborative and iterative process is essential for driving society forward and addressing complex challenges.
Additionally, individuals who generate original ideas are often at the forefront of change. They challenge the status quo and push boundaries, leading to paradigm shifts and breakthroughs in various fields. In contrast, those who merely copy others are unlikely to drive significant change or make substantial contributions to society.
In conclusion, while there is value in the dissemination of existing knowledge, I strongly believe that individuals who have original ideas provide much greater value to society. Their ability to innovate, inspire creativity, and drive change is crucial for the progress and development of our world.
Sample 5:
People are born with different abilities and talents. Some being unique and some are common to all. Sometimes those with unique talents come up with ideas that are completely new, creative and astonishing. However, there lingers this question “Are they greater than us?”.
In my honest opinion, every single human being should be treated and valued the same. No single person is greater than another. From the start of the human race to the present, no society was made by one man. It has always been a combined and a collective effort of everyone.
Sir Isaac Newton, the great physicist was someone who revolutionised the field of physics. Every single individual respects and acknowledges him for his achievements and contribution to the human race. But does that mean only people of his stature are needed in the society? I say NO. Ideas of Newton have been taken by other individuals to come up with wonders that even Newton could not have imagined of. The Space Shuttles, Aircraft, Architectures, Construction, Sports are all based on ideas of another person. The computer was a machine that was created by an individual. However, this idea was copied by others to build things which are even greater. From simple electronics like calculators to marvels such as supercomputers, Artificial Intelligence, Robots.
As a conclusion, like Ying and Yang, a society co-exists with the talents and ideas of all people combined. No individual is of much greater value than another. The day society starts considering that people with original ideas are of much greater value, will be the downfall of that society.
Sample 6:
It is believed that people who have genuine ideas bring more benefits to the communities rather than those who duplicate the thought of other people. To a certain extent, I would agree that having pure and original ideas have a higher value than to copy the works of other people. But from the copying activities, other people have developed the work to become more effective and useful.
On the one hand, it is true that the public should respect those who have genuine and original ideas. These people have sacrificed and spent a lot of their time for thinking, studying and doing some research, in order to get new ideas or inventions. And many of the results bring a lot of benefits for the humankind. One of the examples would be Thomas Alva Edison, who had spent most of his time in experimenting so many things. He had tried for almost 1000 times before he invented the bulb light. Therefore, it is believed that people should appreciate their hard work, the eagerness and the sacrifice these people had been through, in order to get the innovative ideas.
On the other hand, there are groups of people who copy ideas from other people. Although some people might disrespect this kind of act, but certain people have developed the ideas into something greater than the original ones. For example, it is undeniable that during the 1950's, Japanese car producers were copying the designs of the American and Europeans car manufacturers. But instead of copying the ideas, the Japanese conducted some extensive development programs. As a result, the Japanese could make a more efficient car than the European and American, such as the Toyota Prius which used the hybrid technology.
In conclusion, I would agree that some innovative and creative thinkers and inverters should be fully appreciated for their original concepts, as they bring so many positive aspects to the society. But sometimes the copying activities could not be judged as a negative thing since there are other people who could copy the ideas and then developed it well.
Sample 7:
In the history of humankind, people have been attempting to facilitate numerous leaps and bounds in their life by sharing their idea to each other. In this regard, societies highly appreciate those who provide their original opinions while those who emulate others idea considered less valuable. From my point of view, this is open to debate.
The first justification that supports those copying other instructions is that they realised any pros and cons of the dilemma that might occur, and the outcome is almost obvious for all. In addition, it is noteworthy that people prefer to put forward those opinions which have tested several times. Taking teachers as an example, they have an inclination to mimic the skills that precedence ones applied in the educational system to transfer knowledge to students, so it is unfair if we underestimate their efforts.
Despite those points mentioned above in favour of emulators, an overt advantage of having creative people in a society is novel solutions for some problems which will appear. An innovative person is admirable in each country due to the fact that he/she has a power of thinking quickly and making an appropriate decision. Furthermore, these people are considered as intelligent and bear dynamism either in the work ambience and their family. Therefore, on the ground of these positive elements, they are much more admirable.
To summarise, although emulating others idea is considered boring and under value, we should not overlook the side of the fact that it has several valuable experiences behind itself. However, I believe that innovative people are much more worthwhile.
Sample 8:
Society respects both types of people because inventing itself does not add value to the mankind but implementing and improvising on original ideas are equally important. At the same time, innovators should be credited as they are the ones that triggered minds of others.
It is good to copy ideas of others if someone adding value to original thought. For example, Right brothers invented flying machines couple of generations ago. Several engineers, scientists and researchers improved this idea and made flying safer and accessible to wide range of people. Had this not happened, today we had to travel for months to reach from one corner of the globe to other. If we consider examples of healthcare, lots of improvements have been done over the past ages to original ideas to save lives of people effectively and efficiently. We can find this pattern not only in these industries but in almost all luxuries and comforts we have today. Original ideas laid the foundation for modern innovations of today. So, society respects both categories of people.
On the contrary, original ideas should be credited because without their ideas, things would not have been how they are today. For instance, telecommunications industry developed rapidly in last decade. Without the invention of smartphones today, communications would have been dulled and difficult. In this ever-improving world, new ideas will be developed by organisations and individuals and well recognised by the society. There have been awards and prizes like Nobel Prize that are globally recognised and helped to reach ideas masses and impact day-to-day lives of people throughout our world.
To summarise, societies have been recognising both original innovators and the ones who improved original ideas. Without continued efforts of both, lifestyle stagnates.
Sample 9:
"An idea can change your life", this famous advertisement tagline points towards a debatable topic, whether an original idea is more important to the society or a copy of the idea.
In the world, if the product has a monopoly, then it might be difficult for mass to enjoy the advantages of it. In such cases, a competition could help to keep the prices grounded. For example, Apple had launched an iPad to enjoy music which was very expensive due to its unique features. However, when the other companies launched similar products and that could be one of the reasons for the reduction of the pad prices.
The original is always considered as a masterpiece and the copied versions are called extensions of it. That is why ‘Taj Mahal’ is one of the Seven Wonders of the World and ‘Bibi Ka Makbara’ which is a copy of it is known by local people only. Nevertheless, few ideas have to be original only and should not be experimented extensively for the safety of the planet. For instance, when scientists found nuclear power, they might have thought about its positive sides like cheaper energy. However, during the copy of this idea, some destructive mindset people might have changed it completely and developed nuclear weapons. Another example could be a sword. Our ancestors invented it to kill animals and feed the families. Unfortunately, over a period of time, its real use was forgotten and humans started using it to kill other humans in the wars.
I believe the original idea whose intention is to make human life better should not be copied by those people whose intention is just to make money even if it is in the price of human life.
Sample 10:
The world is shaped by the ideas of few people who played the role of pioneer in the society. Their ideas contributed greatly to the enhancement of social, economic and political conditions across the globe. It is agreed that such people who contribute to the world with their thoughts are valuable legends of the society. This apparent when we see how such ideas help in social reforms and technological innovations.
The society is continuously improving and aligning to the needs of new generations. Sometimes, this requires a social reformation idea of some great people who have an extraordinary vision for the future of the society and nations. Leaders like Margret Thatcher, Nelson Mandela and Abraham Lincoln had such an extraordinary vision to change the society. For example, the idea of non-violence agitation of a single person helped India to achieve independence in 1947. Even though the real power of such ideas is manifested when the mass follow it, it is the original thoughts that bring in the change in society.
Technological innovations often changed the way we live in this world by bringing in more efficiency and comfort. Such innovations are great ideas of fewer people and later copied by the rest of the world. For instance, Wright brothers, who invented the first airplane; Thomas Edison, who invented the electricity, have moved the world to the next level. The whole humanity is benefited from such people's idea and their contributions to the society are exponential compared to those who use these ideas.
In conclusion, it is a known fact that an idea can change the world, and the people who innovate such an idea are invaluable to the society. Nevertheless, the people who copy their ideas and concepts indeed help the society to realise their benefits and thus contribute to the society as well.
Hot: 1000+ Đề thi cuối kì 1 file word cấu trúc mới 2025 Toán, Văn, Anh... lớp 1-12 (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay
Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
In recent years, there have been a number of everyday problems that people in big cities have to cope with. This essay will discuss two major problems, pollution and information overload, which I believe should lead governments to encourage people to move to regional areas.
These days, increased levels of pollution have been a great cause for concern among residents of big cities. Due to high volumes of traffic, large quantities of pollutants are being released into the atmosphere, causing the degradation of air quality, which is said to be a significant contributor to various types of respiratory disease, such as lung cancer. Additionally, people in big cities are being bombarded with too much information from the media, including TV, social media, and advertising, with a large proportion of this information being fake or exaggerated. This can lead to confusion or, in some cases, social anarchy.
In my opinion, governments should do what they can to encourage city residents to move to regional areas. Firstly, it will reduce the number of vehicles in cities, which will definitely reduce the levels of air pollution, which is hazardous to the health of citizens. Furthermore, fewer people living in big cities will relieve the pressure on the housing supply, where many people are forced to live in small, uncomfortable spaces. Studies have shown that people’s living spaces have a direct impact on their mental health and how they perform at work.
In conclusion, severe air pollution and a bombardment of information are among the most serious problems facing city residents nowadays, and personally, I feel that authorities should encourage people to relocate to other areas to live.
Sample 2:
It is true that nowadays city residents have to encounter a large number of problems, especially those concerning environmental and social factors. However, encouraging people to migrate to smaller provincial towns, in my opinion, is not a viable solution to these problems.
As living in a metropolis, people are confronted with high level of air pollution, which is caused mainly by the exhaust fumes released into the atmosphere from petrol-driven vehicles. The more populated the city is, the higher the demand for traveling becomes, and as a result, the higher the level of air pollution will be. Living in this environment for a long time is supposed to be detrimental to human’s health as polluted air is the main contributor to respiratory diseases. Another problem involves social aspects such as the issue of unemployment. As many people moving to big cities do not have any skills or qualifications, they are unlikely to find a job. This higher unemployment rate can give rise to the increased criminal activities threatening inhabitants’ life.
Since dwelling in urban centers can have negative impacts, some governments tend to encourage the citizens to relocate to smaller regional towns, but I do not think this will be effective. The first reason for my belief is that this policy cannot guarantee a reduction in air pollution because people still have to commute to their workplace, which is usually located in city center. Indeed, living far away from cities means that people even have to travel a much longer distance to work, which, in fact, can increase the amount of exhaust emissions. The second reason is that finding jobs in the countryside is certainly not easier than in urban areas. Job opportunities in these places are much lower and people usually have to do low-paid jobs if they work in smaller and less developed towns.
In conclusion, it is obvious that living in big cities can create a number of problems, but encouraging people to migrate to suburban areas is, in my opinion, totally not a viable measure at least when it comes to addressing the problems concerning pollution and unemployment.
Sample 3:
It is true that people in major cities are confronting a number of problems in their routine life. This essay will discuss some of these problems and explain the writer’s view that citizens should be encouraged to relocate to the countryside or regional towns.
The urban population is grappling against two main problems out of many. The first issue is the lower quality of life due to the increasingly heavier burden on the existing urban infrastructure. This is because rural immigrants in pursuit of employment opportunities keep inundating the downtown areas of most major cities. For example, most schools and hospitals located in XYZ city are frequently overloaded, making these services inaccessible to the majority of people of lower classes. The second issue is the traffic jam due to the burgeoning car ownership. Arguably, cars take up more space than a motorbike while its capacity to accommodate passengers is far inferior to that of a bus. This weakness results in bumper-to-bumper traffic, particularly in downtown areas where many drivers have to inch along to get away from the terrible traffic.
I think government should encourage citizens to move away from major cities. This is due to the fact that this would relieve the current pressure on the infrastructure. Fewer people would need public services such as hospitals or schools and the roads would be more spacious, ensuring a smooth traffic flow with its resultant fewer accidents for city dwellers. In addition, the resources in the countryside or other less developed regions would be better exploited as there might be available workforce there. For instance, there would be more laborers during harvesting time in the countryside, or skilled or knowledgeable people would help with the construction work in smaller regions, spurring the growth of the local area as well as the nation as a whole.
In conclusion, there are many problems that people in cities are facing, and it is advisable that government encourage the residents to consider relocation to smaller regional areas with a view to solving these issues.
Sample 4:
It is true that nowadays people are shifting to larger cities. There are several negative consequences of this moot issue, and to cope with the current problems, the authorities should encourage individuals to move to smaller cities or even to the countryside.
To begin with, an enormous number of people create problems. One negative consequence is that the urban population would go on increasing and cause housing problems. This leads to the creation of underdeveloped slum areas, where underprivileged individuals must live in poor living conditions like lacking medical care or even drinking water. Another issue is the traffic jam due to the burgeoning car ownership. Arguably, cars take up more space than a motorbike while its capacity to accommodate passengers is far inferior to that of a bus. This weakness results in bumper-to-bumper traffic particularly in downtown areas where many drivers have to inch along to get away from the terrible traffic.
Governments should take steps to move a certain number of city dwellers to less populated areas. The main reason is that shifting people to towns or even the countryside helps to decrease the unemployment rate. This is because as more and more people apply for the same position within a company, it may intensify the competition among employees, making it significantly more difficult to be chosen. Towns, however, due to industrialization, are now able to provide different jobs for engineers or officers in new factories. Therefore, by encouraging job seekers to move to these newly developed areas, the government can lower the number of unemployed individuals in cities.
In conclusion, an increasing number of people living in cities certainly creates housing problems and traffic congestion, and governments should encourage its citizens to migrate to towns.
Sample 5:
More and more people live in cities today than at any point in the past and this trend will likely continue in the future. This has resulted in many problems including extreme overcrowding and governments should take measures to make living outside cities more attractive.
There are a wide range of drawbacks associated with the rise of modern cities but one of the most obvious issues is related to population density. The large number of people crammed into a relatively small area has caused expensive housing, increased traffic and severe pollution. For example, apartment prices in mega-cities like Tokyo and New York have soared to the point where only the wealthiest inhabitants can afford decent living standards. Regardless of financial status, all city dwellers have to deal with more and more traffic jams as the population increases while the area of cities remains fixed. Finally, all these people living and travelling in one place puts a tremendous strain on the environment and some cities, like Beijing in China, have become dangerously polluted.
In my opinion, governments have a duty to encourage citizens to move to more rural areas. If cities continue to expand unabated then the above problems will only get worse. We might one day find ourselves living in densely packed, heavily polluted cities that resemble scenes from a dystopian science fiction film. In order to prevent this from happening, the government can give tax breaks to companies that choose to locate offices and production facilities outside the city. This will provide more jobs for people who are willing to live in the countryside.
In conclusion, the concerns related to overcrowding in cities can and should be somewhat countered by governments incentivising living in rural areas. If this is done then we may still face problems related to cities in the future, but at least they will not be as serious.
Sample 6:
Residing in metropolitan cities has been stimulating some crucial issues in daily activities. Congestion and air pollution are problems related to living in big cities. Thus, these issues have to be tackled by governments through plausible actions such as enhancing numerous public transportations and controlling the price of basic needs instead of encouraging societies to relocate to smaller regional towns.
Societies face many issues in metropolitan cities as traffic jams and quality of air pollution. In big cities, some roads are dominated by private cars, then the number of people using these private cars is higher than in other cities. As a result, there is a phenomenon like congestion in the road that can occur with long duration. Mostly, people who are workers have to go to office and back home regularly using private cars. This situation has a bad impact on utilizing time because they spend more time just on the road and have a chance of becoming late to go to office. Another problem that has influenced widely on people is reducing air quality. When individuals live in larger cities is a risk to the respiratory system, an individual usually takes breath frequently which contains more emissions produced by private cars. Thus, individuals are able to get some diseases such as asthma.
What authorities should do is to deliver better public transportation. These facilities have to consider integration on reaching some ways, an efficiency of time and cost of transportation. If the government ponders this solution, individuals will use this type of transportation. For instance, after the government applied an integration of public transportation in Bandung, societies directly used public transportation. Therefore, the number of private cars has dropped.
To sum up, congestion and quality of air quality are common issues in metropolitan cities. Considering encouraging relocation to smaller cities is not the best solution, but governments can tackle some problems regarding living in metropolitan cities through improving of public transportation.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
In today's digital age, the prevalence of online shopping has soared, with more and more individuals opting for the convenience and accessibility it offers. This essay will explore the advantages and disadvantages of online shopping for both consumers and businesses.
Online shopping provides numerous advantages for buyers. For individuals, the convenience of shopping from the comfort of their homes, at any time, and from any location is a major draw. This accessibility allows busy professionals and individuals with mobility constraints to easily access a wide array of products and services. Furthermore, online platforms often provide comprehensive product information and customer reviews, enabling consumers to make well-informed purchasing decisions. For instance, a working parent with a hectic schedule can conveniently shop for groceries, clothing, or electronic gadgets online, saving valuable time that would otherwise be spent navigating through physical stores.
Businesses also benefit significantly from the online marketplace. Setting up an e-commerce platform requires lower initial investments compared to establishing physical stores. This cost-effectiveness allows small and medium-sized enterprises to compete with larger corporations on a global scale. Moreover, online platforms enable companies to reach a broader customer base, transcending geographical boundaries and creating new opportunities for growth and expansion.
While online shopping offers numerous advantages, it also presents certain challenges for both consumers and businesses. One prominent concern is cybersecurity. With the rising incidence of online fraud and data breaches, consumers may feel apprehensive about sharing personal and financial information online, which can hamper their willingness to engage in e-commerce.
Moreover, the surge in online shopping has raised concerns about the viability of traditional brick-and-mortar stores. The shift towards online retail has led to decreased foot traffic in physical stores, resulting in reduced revenue and job losses in the retail sector. Additionally, e-commerce giants may dominate the online marketplace, making it challenging for smaller businesses to compete and survive.
The increasing popularity of online shopping signifies its benefits for individuals and businesses alike, offering convenience and broader market reach. However, cybersecurity concerns and the impact on traditional retail should not be overlooked. It is important to ensure a secure and sustainable future for both e-commerce consumers and businesses.
Sample 2:
Online shopping has become increasingly popular in recent years, with more and more people choosing to purchase their needs and wants through digital platforms. This shift in consumer behavior has brought about numerous advantages for both individuals and companies, but it also presents certain disadvantages that need to be considered.
One of the primary advantages of online shopping is the convenience it offers. Individuals can browse and buy products anytime and anywhere, without the need to travel to physical stores. This not only saves time but also eliminates travel expenses. Moreover, online shopping provides access to a wide range of products. Consumers can explore a vast variety and selection that may not be available in their local stores. Additionally, online shopping allows individuals to explore international markets and purchase products from around the world.
For companies, online shopping opens up new possibilities for business growth. It provides a global reach and allows companies to expand their customer base beyond geographical boundaries. Furthermore, operating an online store can significantly reduce operational costs compared to maintaining physical stores. Companies can save on expenses such as rent, utilities, and staff. Additionally, online platforms enable businesses to collect and analyze valuable customer data, which can help them make informed decisions and tailor their marketing strategies.
However, there are certain disadvantages associated with online shopping. One of the main drawbacks is the inability to physically examine products before purchasing. This could lead to potential dissatisfaction if the actual item received does not match the expectations based on online descriptions and images. Additionally, assessing the quality and authenticity of products can be challenging without a physical inspection.
Another concern is the security risks and privacy issues associated with online shopping. Online scams and fraudulent activities are prevalent, and individuals need to be cautious while providing their personal and financial information. Data breaches and identity theft pose significant risks in the digital landscape.
For companies, online shopping comes with intense competition and difficulty in building brand loyalty. With numerous options available to consumers, businesses need to stand out and continuously engage with their customer base. Furthermore, logistics and customer service can be challenging to manage efficiently in the online space.
In conclusion, online shopping offers significant advantages in terms of convenience, access to a wide range of products, and cost savings. Companies benefit from global reach and reduced operational costs. However, the inability to physically examine products and security risks are notable disadvantages. To make the most of online shopping, individuals should exercise caution and research before making purchases, while companies need to focus on building customer trust and providing excellent online experiences. Ultimately, informed decision-making and careful consideration of the advantages and disadvantages are essential in the realm of online shopping.
Sample 3:
Online shopping has revolutionized the way we shop. Consequently, more and more people these days prefer purchasing products online over the traditional method of going to stores. This trend, however, exerts both positive and negative impacts on individuals and businesses as well.
The burgeoning popularity of online shopping can be attributed to several decisive advantages. First of all, the most distinctive benefit is convenience. To illustrate, people can buy products from the comfort of their workplace, own home or virtually anywhere without the pressure of a salesperson. Besides being able to purchase from the comfort of their homes or workstation, customers can also save money. With ever-growing fuel prices, shopping online saves them the cost of driving to and from the shop. They can also save time by avoiding getting stuck in gridlocked traffic. As for online business owners, the startup cost is lower compared to physical retail stores. And let’s not forget, the shop owners do not have to hire staff to work and run the shop, thus saving a substantial amount of expenditure. Apart from this, online business owners can easily sell their products to customers worldwide.
Despite some distinctive benefits, shopping online suffers from some obvious drawbacks. Fraud is the biggest downside of online trading. Put simply, there is a constant risk of fraud: debit or credit card scams, identity theft, hacking, phishing, and counterfeit goods to mention but a few. Likewise, cut-throat competition is making life tougher for business owners. Online trading is global and any customer from any part of the globe can purchase from any seller of their preference. That is to say, the competition with online business is not merely engaging customers, rather staying ahead of other sellers.
In conclusion, while e-commerce reaps distinct advantages, it also confers some obvious disadvantages. As a consumer or business owner, people should know about the downsides of it before switching to e-commerce.
Sample 4:
In recent years, the rate of in-store shopping has plunged due to vast opportunities for buying different products including daily necessaries from hundreds of online stores. This essay will try to demonstrate chances such as convenience and product availability as the reasons behind the popularity of e-shopping whereas it will focus on swindling and isolation as the pitfalls of this issue.
Initially, the prime reason behind the popularity of e-shopping is convenience which can be easily understood from the thousands of virtual shops all over the world. To illustrate, people nowadays are busier than ever because of the fast pace of the world, and they want to save as much time as they can for relaxation. Virtual shopping gives this magnificent prospect of time-saving and so people enjoy taking it. Besides, superstores sometimes run out of products in the precise moment when people need them which online shops rarely have this crisis. For instance, I needed a flat screen monitor a few months ago but my local store had it out of stock. When I peeped into some online stores I found it easily on eBay.
Meanwhile, though shopping on the internet looks very promising, it is not without its setbacks. Many people, mostly the newcomers, regularly complain of getting tricked on virtual shopping and the rate of complaints is increasing at a faster rate. To explain, one of my friends has recently got swindled when he paid in advance for a smartwatch. Additionally, people often become isolated in their rooms through e-shopping which can affect their feelings and behaviour. As an example, a friend of mine started shopping online a couple of years ago even though the nearest superstore was only 500 metres away. His neighbours, nowadays, describe him as an ill-mannered and antisocial person which, needless to say, is the result of being home and becoming isolated from the outer world.
In brief, virtual shoppers obtain greater benefits if compared to in-store shoppers. Converting such shopping to a stress-free experience, it is turning out to be progressively more convenient. However, as clients may sometimes get deceived and become cut off from the social world, concerned authorities should look into the matter cautiously.
Sample 5:
More and more people are purchasing products online instead of visiting brick and mortar stores nowadays. Doing online shopping brings numerous benefits to both individuals and companies. I believe the advantages of using e-commerce platforms outweigh the disadvantages.
Shopping online has the following two advantages. Firstly, people can save time and money by buying goods online. It can take a substantial amount of time for some people to get to a store. Not everyone lives or works near the city center where the high street is located. Also, the price of the cost is usually cheaper on e-commerce platforms than in stores. Secondly, people with disabilities, the elderly, and parents with young children can benefit from online shopping as it allows them to receive the products at home. Such people might find it difficult to shop at stores because some have limitations in their mobility due to their circumstances.
However, doing online shopping has the following two disadvantages. Firstly, the packaging required for online shopping creates quite a lot of waste that cannot be reused or recycled. Therefore, it can create detrimental effects to our precious environment. Secondly, you need to predict what you will need in advance, since it still takes some time to receive the product from when you order it online, even though delivery times are constantly decreasing.
In conclusion, the merits of online shopping far outweigh its disadvantages, and thus, it is expected to continue booming and grow in popularity, as more and more people are turning from shopping in-stores to online shopping due to its convenience and price competitiveness.
Sample 6:
Online shopping is becoming increasingly popular nowadays, and more and more people prefer to buy online instead of going to stores. However, this trend has both pros and cons for individuals and companies.
The burgeoning popularity of shopping online can be attributed to numerous decisive benefits. Firstly, the most distinctive advantage is convenience. For example, people can buy products from the comfort of their workplace, own home, or virtually anywhere without the pressure of a salesperson. Besides purchasing from the comfort of their homes or workstation, customers can also save money. With ever-growing fuel prices, shopping online saves them the cost of driving to and from the shop. They can also save time by eluding getting stuck in gridlocked traffic than physical retail stores for online business owners. Furthermore, the shop owners don’t have to hire staff to work and run the shop, therefore, saving a substantial expenditure. Apart from this, online business owners can sell their products to customers without being curbed by geographical distances.
On the flip side, there are security concerns associated with online shopping. To begin with, individuals may suffer from financial loss because computer viruses and hackers constantly tap into online companies and steal customer identities and financial information. Likewise, the lack of support can complicate the exchange or refund process. For example, if a customer finds that the purchased goods are faulty, it may take several days to rectify the issue. In addition, online shoppers have to deal with complaints from customers due to defective goods. And this can affect the credibility of the online stores and eventually influence their business.
In conclusion, although shopping online has made one’s life easy and helped vendors eliminate global boundaries, it has equal cons that cannot be overlooked in this digital era.
Sample 7:
In today’s digital age, the trend of purchasing goods and services online has become increasingly popular. This shift towards online shopping has both advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies.
For individuals, the primary advantage of shopping online is convenience. With just a few clicks, they can browse through a wide range of products, compare prices, and make purchases without leaving the comfort of their homes. This not only saves time and effort but also provides access to a variety of products that may not be available locally. Additionally, online shopping often offers better deals and discounts, allowing individuals to save money on their purchases.
On the other hand, there are also disadvantages for individuals when it comes to online shopping. One of the main concerns is the risk of fraud and identity theft. Providing personal and financial information online can make individuals vulnerable to cybercrime. Furthermore, the inability to physically inspect products before purchase can lead to dissatisfaction with the quality or fit of the item.
For companies, the advantages of online shopping include the ability to reach a wider audience and reduce overhead costs. By having an online presence, companies can target customers beyond their local market and expand their customer base. Additionally, operating an online store eliminates the need for physical storefronts, reducing expenses related to rent, utilities, and staffing.
However, companies also face challenges when it comes to online shopping. One of the main disadvantages is the intense competition in the online marketplace. With countless businesses vying for attention, companies must invest in marketing and advertising to stand out. Additionally, the logistics of shipping and handling returns can be complex and costly for companies.
In conclusion, while online shopping offers convenience and cost-saving opportunities for both individuals and companies, it also presents risks and challenges. It is essential for both parties to weigh the pros and cons before engaging in online transactions.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Nhắn tin Zalo
Hỏi bài tập