The majority of news being reported is bad news such as wars, famines, accidents, and crime. Why do you think that is? Do you think the news should be a balance of both good and bad news?

Sample 1:

In today's society, a large portion of the news being reported revolves around negative aspects such as wars, famines, accidents, and crime. While some argue that news should strive for a balance of both positive and negative news, others contend that it is crucial to highlight the negative aspects of society. This essay will examine this current phenomenon and provide my personal perspective on the matter.

On one hand, it is undeniable that there is a multitude of accidents and incidents occurring worldwide. Despite the rarity of broadcasters highlighting positive news like donations and charity activities, people are inherently drawn to negative news. News writers deliberately include negative articles to capture the public's attention and gain rewards, fame, and financial gains.

On the other hand, there are compelling reasons why the majority of reporters emphasize detrimental issues. Firstly, they have a responsibility to uncover unjust accidents and bring them to the attention of the public and the government. Moreover, highlighting destructive news brings awareness to societal issues and prompts people to take action. This may explain why news outlets focus less on the brighter side of society. While some individuals may prefer to consume content from uplifting channels or read optimistic articles, there is simply not enough time to cover both sides of the news.

In conclusion, although some proponents advocate for a balanced representation of news, I strongly believe that news should increasingly shed light on the negative aspects of society in order to protect the overall well-being of the community. Awareness of the weaknesses in our society allows individuals to reflect on areas that need improvement and confront societal challenges.

Sample 2:

Television news often inundates us with stories of conflict, disaster, and upheaval. Wars, famines, accidents, and crimes dominate the airwaves, prompting a debate about whether television news should strike a balance between good and bad news. I believe that television news should encompass both good and bad news for the following compelling reasons.

First of all, an incessant stream of negative news can significantly impact our emotional well-being. Being constantly bombarded with reports on conflicts, natural disasters and tragedies can instil anxiety and despair among viewers. So, it is vital to offset this with uplifting stories that offer hope and kindle positive emotions. Such stories, like successful rescue missions, scientific breakthroughs and people’s success stories, provide a much-needed respite from the constant deluge of grim news.

Additionally, presenting a mix of good and bad news offers a more accurate representation of our world. While it is essential to acknowledge the challenges and adversities in society, it is equally crucial to recognize the positive developments and acts of kindness that occur daily. Neglecting these uplifting stories distorts our perception of reality. For example, news reports about communities rallying during crises or individuals making significant contributions to society serve as powerful motivators for others to. These narratives inspire action and drive individuals to become actively engaged in efforts to improve their communities and the world at large.

In conclusion, the inclusion of both good and bad news in television broadcasts is essential for our emotional well-being, and for accurately representing our reality and motivating people to contribute positively to society. Striking this balance results in a more informed, hopeful, and empowered viewership, ultimately contributing to a better and more compassionate world.