Popular events like the football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Popular events like the football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
It is argued that popular international sporting events like the football World Cup can potentially ease international tensions and provide a safe outlet for patriotic emotions. However, I would like to express a more cautious stance on the extent of their impact.
While sporting events have the potential to bring people together and create a sense of unity, it is important to recognize that their influence in easing deep-rooted international tensions may be limited. Political conflicts and complex issues cannot be resolved solely through sports competitions. These events may provide temporary distractions or moments of friendship, but they often do not address the underlying causes of conflicts or contribute to sustainable solutions.
Moreover, while sporting events can stir patriotic emotions, they can also reinforce nationalism and solidify divisions between nations. Extreme forms of patriotism can lead to unhealthy attitudes, rivalries, and even aggression both within and outside the sporting arena. It is crucial to strike a balance between healthy competition and fostering a sense of global cooperation and understanding.
Additionally, the social impact of these events should be critically examined. While they can generate economic benefits and promote tourism, the massive resources invested in hosting such events often divert attention and funds from pressing social issues like poverty, education, and healthcare. It is important to weigh the potential benefits of these events against the long-term needs of the host communities and countries.
In conclusion, while popular international sporting events can create moments of unity and evoke patriotic emotions, their ability to ease international tensions in a substantial and sustainable way is limited. It is essential to approach these events with a balanced perspective and recognize that addressing complex political issues requires comprehensive and dedicated efforts beyond the realm of sports.
Sample 2:
It is considered that events like the International Olympic games, Commonwealth games have a positive influence on the totality of international tensions and implies a safe reveal of patriotic emotions. I partially agree with the statement.
On the one hand, participants from different countries respect each other before competing and while playing against each other, they perceive each other with a spirited attitude. Organizing such events itself is considered an attempt towards peace, and the participation of several nations justifies it very well. Achievement of any country amongst all is entertained and celebrated equally, which highlights a public expression of joy and pride. Even after winning a competition, positive and encouraging comments are received from significant personalities like dominant political leaders and famous charity group founders across the globe and published by the media.
On the other hand, popular events like the football world cup may heat up a discrete competition within the audience belonging to different nations. Elaborating it, challenging or offensive comments towards other groups might be intended in the name of cheering up the players. The unpredictable human nature and emotions are another cause of justifying how athletes get aggrieved by each other, and the situation adds up to the tensions.
To conclude, it cannot be denied that organizing famous international competitions contributes towards global peace as its positive outcomes can be seen clearly by the public. However, public disputes and controversies among the players are probable to occur anytime due to the competition and tension.
Sample 3:
There is no doubt that famous events like the World Cup are necessary for reducing diplomatic tensions as well as expressing one's emotions regarding the nation healthily. Yet, nowadays, in a fast-growing political world, it has not been purely the case.
When an event happens, all citizens engage in watching it. This mass involvement implies a deduction in the rate of crime and accidents all over the countries. All the teams and audiences live under a similar atmosphere and initially same emotions together. Moreover, people consider their nation’s participants as their representatives and soldiers, so they express patriotic emotions by cheering the team enthusiastically.
However, it is often noticed that sometimes casualties in the heat of the moment are formed during sports. It can be misunderstood as an intended action by a player because of his temper or ego. Seeing this can lead to a large public fight too, in case they have also been offended. Furthermore, some claim that the world play involves politics that automatically spreads rumors, even before the event begins. Rumors invite differences in opinions initially, which might lead to offense to some communities of a nation. Large discussions among political leaders can take place, and in an active economy, the markets get affected by such events.
In conclusion, conducting international sports and games is a fine way to convey nationalistic emotions, but it does not diminish the probability of miss-happeneings. Among the large audience, misunderstanding is common to occur, hence, leading to ill-motivated actions.
Sample 4:
Events like the World Football Cup are favored in almost every nation. Citizens from different parts of the world have always been eager to find ways in which they can express their emotions regarding their nation. Dominant events like the FIFA World Cup are seen as the best way to do so. But there are few incidents that have occurred on the negative implication side of the purpose.
On the one hand, sports events like the World Football Cup aids people in becoming aware of the achievements and norms of their rival countries. It also serves as the best tool to effectively show dedication and commitment towards the nation as people put their efforts into cheering the team up. People take pride in small achievements made in the game by their nation’s team.
On the other hand, political quarrels can take place if any action or decision is misunderstood as an outcome of political involvement, which has been very common these days. National leaders have left no stone unturned in utilizing the role of sports in the name of ministerial interests. For instance, in the United States, in 1980, the summer Olympics was canceled in response to the Soviet Union’s invasion of Afghanistan sports scandal.
To conclude, people pursue popular events like international sports as an efficient way to express their interest and patriotic feelings but invasion of politics, which is a very active group of the society, might end up to big changes and other negative outcomes over the economies. Uncertain incidents are rare but not unnoticeable.
Sample 5:
Throughout human history, conflicts have occurred between different races, sections, and more recently, countries. The disjointed world of the olden times could perhaps afford the repercussions of war. But today, with globalization and intricate dependency on each other for trade and relations, countries have put more effort into maintaining peace and steady relations to avoid conflicts and mend ties with each other. One such way to thaw hostile tensions is through sporting occasions which are seen as a peaceful interaction between international rivals. Indeed, this is necessary.
Many people believe that when someone cheers for his team, he expresses his love for his country without feeling superior to the other team. Moreover, such events are a testament to international inclusivity and togetherness, for athletes try to remain within the boundaries of sportsmanship. It shows that the world really is one place for everyone regardless of his origins. As a result, harmony and peace are often a result of such sporting events.
Sports events are occasions that one cherishes. On top of that, sports events are a wonderful way of generating money, which can eradicate problems in one country. Lastly, the people who believe in the positive influence of international sporting events conclude that such events indeed allow people to ease tension and express patriotism.
On the flip side, many people believe the fact that the race to victory among different nations could spark arguments and one-upmanship. It can result in fights and leave a bitter memory, going against the values of sports itself. But, as we saw earlier, the positives of such global events cannot be ignored as they indeed bring the world together.
In conclusion, the positives outshine the negatives of hosting international sporting events. These events are the epitome of togetherness, promote cross-cultural awareness, develop mutual understanding, respect the opposition, and are a safe place to showcase patriotic emotions.
Sample 6:
Many renowned sports events, such as the Football World Cup, Cricket World Cup, and other international sports competitions, are imperative to ease the border pressure. It will also be a way to express patriotic feelings in a safe mode. I agree with the statement because it paves the way to deliver everyone’s devotion towards the nation.
To begin with, every individual has patriotism towards their own country. However, they cannot portray it in public every time, and, moreover, everyone cannot join the army to show it. The one way to explore their flag-waving is through the games. A real-time scenario held in 1983 was a wonderful ceremony where India won the International Cricket World Cup by defeating Pakistan in the finals. That was the first cup for an Indian country, and the whole nation celebrated like a festival by burning crackers, sharing sweets, and so on. In addition to this, on the day of the finals, most of the public did face painting, tattoos, karaoke, and many more. Each person got indulged in the game and exposed their emotions in the stadium, giving a supportive voice to the Indian players.
Furthermore, in many other sports events, such as the Olympics, hockey, tennis, and football, everywhere people support their home country as much as possible. Likewise, they treat athletes as their family members. So, conducting all the international sports events on a decided schedule is necessary. That will be helpful to the audience to give moral support and express their patriotic feelings as this is one secure way of showing their nationalism.
To conclude, patriotism is an in-built function in each and every human blood. The feelings mentioned above are automatically attached to their hearts when they are born. Evidently, games are the only way to deliver patriotic emotions without harming others.
Sample 7:
In this contemporary era, due to globalization, it is very common to play various sports with other nations’ athletes. One school of thought believes this is pivotal to reducing stress between two nations and giving the players a patriotic feeling, whilst another perspective encounters this. Hence, I partially concur with the laid statement, and the reasons for my inclination are articulated in trail paragraphs.
On the one hand, organizing such an event requires a hefty amount of money as well as human resources. For instance, if a country wants to celebrate worldсuр, they have to take care of other players’ living arrangements, sports facilities and their families. Thus, they have to put a high effort into the success of that event, and it not only requires government money but also the valuable time of citizens. Eventually, this is a bad idea because of time and money.
Nevertheless, the organization of such an event is an important part of establishing relations between two governments. To cite an example, after organizing such events, two or more nations come together and exchange their culture, history, and lifestyle, which is fruitful to know each other very well. Along with that, ruling parties also talk with each other and try to solve the country’s problems; resultant, they make good friends with each other, which is beneficial in the future and mitigates the stresses between each other.
In addition, while playing in such an event, sportspeople feel that they are just not only themselves but also the whole country. So, they feel proud on their selves and give their best in their game. Consequently, it inculcated a patriotic emotion in them.
On close scrutiny, I conclude that organizing the world cup helps to lessen the issues between the two nations and also gives a proud moment for players towards their nations. However, the country has to look out for their budget.
Sample 8:
The World Cup football match and the Olympics are held worldwide with great national support and expectations. As a fan of those competitions, I am totally convinced that sporting events can be necessary for international relations and national unity.
First of all, the World Cup, Olympics, and other international games work for easing tensions among different nations. For example, South and North Korea have football games regularly, which gives the two countries a chance to understand each other deeply. In the mid-1990s, hundreds of North Korean supporters came to South Korea with the footballers, and they were very excited during the sporting events. Even if it sounds ridiculous, many South Koreans were quite surprised at that moment when North Koreans shouted and cried during the match. We all realized that they were very ordinary sports fans even though they were occasionally very secretive. Through sports, two divided nations could reduce their political and ideological tensions and could feel patriotic unity.
On the other hand, some sports matches can make international relations worse. For instance, football or baseball games between Korea and Japan are always big matches in the two countries where full tensions overflow. Sometimes, after the matches, the two rivals blame each other, and their patriotic emotions explode in an aggressive way. Even a much worse scenario is that the troubles caused by losing games affect the players directly. As far as I know, a couple of Korean players in Japan are suffered from invisible discrimination after the match between the two countries.
In conclusion, I think that international sporting occasions can be one of the good ways to ease tensions or to release patriotism safely. However, I believe that games can not be the fundamental way for sound patriotism or peaceful international relations.
Sample 9:
It is believed that international events such as the Olympic Games or football World Cup play a vital role in maintaining world peace and to show nationalism in a proper way. To a certain point, I would agree with the statement but some fights among the supporters have been reported in past venues.
On the one hand, it is true that events such as the World Football Cup or the Commonwealth Games can be used as a tool to maintain the world peace and to show patriotism in a secure way. It can be seen that during international tournaments, athletes from various nations are competing against each other in a sportive way. Although their countries of origin might be at war or conflict, they shake hands and greet each other. And during these moments, the sports people can show their nationalism by giving their best effort in the games, since they are the representative of their own countries.
On the other hand, although the tournaments positively affect world peace, sometimes the athletes and the supporters get carried away with their emotions. In certain cases, several athletes had fought against each other because they could not manage their temperament, and the situation had triggered the supporters to fight against each other as well. As a result, it caused some tensions between countries as well. Therefore, many experts have suggested that athletes should be given a proper explanation about controlling their emotions during the games because it could give negative effects to the supporters and the relationship among nations.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that international sport & games such as the European Football Cup or SEA Games are an effective tool in easing the tensions among nations, and to show the patriotism in the right way. I personally agree with the statement, but I think it is also important for the athletes to be trained about controlling their emotions.
Sample 10:
History has proved that people from each country had always been looking for some ways to response to their patriotic emotions. So over different eras, various ways have been taken to show these feelings. But these days, international sporting matches are considered as the best occasions for mentioned purpose besides their deep effects on improving international tensions.
Obviously, no one can ignore that has no emotion about his country and traditions. Perhaps there is something in human nature which has encouraged him to show the interest of his culture to other nations. This tendency was one of the main reasons for many wars in the past when two nations fought each other to show their abilities and powers. But over the last several decades, sporting matches has replaced those wars and people consider their nation sports team’s members as their country soldiers. In other words, people protect and encourage their national sports teams to win the match, and, in this way, they respond to their patriotic emotions.
However some international sporting festivals such as football world cup have become very popular occasions to satisfy mentioned instinct, they have had undeniable effects on international tensions. For example, during a football match between two nations, people from other countries obtain suitable information about those cultures, traditional and religious. Hence, it helps governments to have a proper background from each other. So, it directly affects international relations and in most of the cases makes a potential for countries to be more closed.
I think, therefore, people not only do pursue international sporting matches just as an entertainment, but they are interested in them because of other aspects of a sports match which relates to patriotic emotion and politics.
Sample 11:
International sporting events are always a source of attraction for everyone, and a large number of people used to attend these events to express their love and support for their country. Many people argue that such occasions are mandatory for exhausting their hate and tension for their rival country. Others state that these events could boost up tension between countries and deteriorate their relation. I agree to some extent that such opportunities could be a menace to the people of nations.
It is often seen that people start fighting over supporting their country. Sometimes the situation goes out of control and causes lots of casualties. Many unbiased people are also hurt in these riots. This will end by leaving bad impressions of their country to the world.
However, events like football or cricket world cup provide an opportunity for people to understand and explore the cultures and norms of their rival country. They closely observed and spend time with each other. This will surely help in removing their conflicts and disputes to some extent.
In some cases, such as in football world cup 2014, after elimination of North Korea, the supporters of both South and North Korea supported South Korea by sidelining their personal differences. This is the perfect example to demonstrate the worth of these events.
In conclusion, I believe that international events are not proved to be fruitful in lessening high temperature between nations. They seem to be more destructive and violent while supporting their teams. However, people could become normal by increasing the frequency of these events.
Sample 12:
No doubt, different types of international world cup games like the football, cricket, hockey, volleyball etc. are becoming very popular in many countries due to the fact that they think to win these international games are a prestigious matter.
However, it is considered that these international occasions can reduce international pressure, and it can be relieved the emotional patriotism in a safe way. While I accept this policy sometimes will not work properly, I believe it is one of the greatest ways to increase the good relationship with several countries.
One the one hand, there are some good reasons why the international game cannot minimise the universal problems of the different countries. Firstly, although the international games are very pleasant among several countries, only a few countries can participate in these games. Finally, conflicts are happening with various countries when discrete cultured people watch the play in the same field. Therefore, it is fairly easy to comprehend that sometimes controversy has arisen.
On the other hand, these international games open new avenues in the world that bestow an enormous number of boons for different enemy countries in many ways. One important point is when international play has occurred, the president of many countries goes to the spot for watching the games. This could result in an opportunity to discuss any issue between the foe countries. For instance, although Pakistan and India have several types of problem, in the World Cup Cricket they forget their internal trouble and they have only one target to win the world cup.
Another benefit is whenever the international sporting games are commenced, the whole people of the world look at the games; as a result, the crimes are reduced dramatically in many countries. Thus, from these explanations, it is clear that universal sporting games reduce pressure and relieve the patriotism in a safe way.
In conclusion, it is clear that both sides of view have some logical points after the debate is explored. However, in my opinion, the tremendous advantages of international gaming occasions fortify my argument that it is auspicious for different countries.
Sample 13:
The claim that popular events such as the World Cup and other international sporting events are essential for reducing international tensions and unleashing patriotic feelings is debatable. Some argue that these events have a unifying effect, but I believe their influence on international tensions is limited and should be viewed in a broader context.
Popular sporting events, according to their proponents, provide a forum for countries to engage in amicable competition. Such events foster a sense of camaraderie and cultural interchange, thereby potentially fostering greater mutual understanding and reducing hostility between nations. Additionally, the demonstration of national pride and support for athletes can foster a positive sense of patriotism and national unity.
Nevertheless, it is essential to recognise the limitations of these events in terms of alleviating entrenched international tensions. Despite the fact that they may provide transient relief and moments of unity, the root causes of conflicts and divisions between nations are frequently complex and multifaceted. International relations are shaped by political, economic, and historical factors that cannot be readily resolved by sporting competitions alone.
In addition, the patriotic emotions elicited by these events can sometimes result in jingoistic or exclusive behaviour. When competitions become contentious or controversial decisions are made, overzealous nationalism and excessive rivalry can exacerbate tensions and divisions. It is essential to cultivate a sense of sportsmanship and pride that transcends limited nationalistic sentiments.
In conclusion, while popular events such as the World Cup can foster unity, cultural exchange, and a sense of national pride, their impact on reducing international tensions is limited. To address the root causes of conflicts, comprehensive efforts in diplomacy, dialogue, and understanding are required. Sporting events can play a role in fostering temporary unity and goodwill, but they should be regarded as part of a broader approach to international relations.
Sample 14:
There is little question that sports are critical to preserving international peace and demonstrating nationalism.
In recent years, the number of sporting events has risen. As a result, they are rapidly gaining popularity among children. It has been observed that these events contribute significantly to the de-escalation of hostilities among nations. I wholeheartedly concur with this assessment. However, I believe that these occurrences occasionally result in confrontations between the athletes and supporters of contesting countries.
Indeed, there are several reasons why attending sporting events is one of the most secure ways to cultivate patriotism. To begin with, athletes of different nationalities participate on the same stage. Second, they demonstrate mutual respect and sportsmanship. As a result, these sorts of gestures are critical in relieving tensions between the participants. According to a poll done by "The Sports Organisation of India," India and China began trading on a significant scale, following the 2010 Commonwealth Games.
However, it is not always effective. The most concerning occurrence from the past is a cricket match that generated considerable amount of tension between the two nations. It is a known fact that India and Pakistan have been bitter rivals for decades. Additionally, if a national player behaves inappropriately on the pitch with an opponent, this may spark controversy and conflict between them. As a result, many experts argue that athletes should be adequately reprimanded for failing to manage their emotions on the field, as this might have a detrimental effect on their respective nations' reputations.
To conclude, while these sports appear to be a simple way to demonstrate patriotism, athletes need to be educated to regulate their emotions both on and off the field.
Sample 15:
International Sporting events are always a source of attraction for everyone, and a large number of people used to attend these are events to express their love and backing for their motherland. Majority of plebeians that such occasions are mandatory to de-escalate the hype among Nations and satisfy the feeling of superiority over others. The upcoming paragraph sheds light upon various ideas and examples which help to understand why this is an optimistic statement.
At the outset, a large number of fans of eminent skill holders come along to rejuvenate themselves by focusing areas on the flexibility and application of scales. Moreover, they interact with the followers of other performers and also shout with them as they easily become counterparts of each other. Consequently, it banishes the difference between them and makes them feel proud of each other releasing their will of patriotism inner harmless way. To site for example, after the world war, regular Olympics are conducted so that the aggression among the natives of a particular area can be excreted by hard work, and winning a match against other area-specific residents does reduce the violence.
In addition to this, on multifarious events due to politics, a country can support another but at the same time, this backing may cause problems between the first nation and the third one. Eventually, balancing becomes paramount, and sports events are the best to rescue another such circumstance as this allows a series of official meetings. These conversations not only alleviate the issue but also generate opportunities to escalate trade and perform many other operations so that losses can be compensated which occurred because of the support of other nations done by the first one to the third one. To elaborate, Tennis games are conducted in different provinces so that benefits can be enjoyed all around the world keeping are hesitant to view by everyone towards conflicts.
To recapitulate, it is observed that after the Olympics many other events like Commonwealth Games and Asian Games are started on the basis of the same methodology to enjoy benefits at their best. Does a consider citizen word reiterated that Sporting events are crucial to ease out international stresses and reduce the chances of conflict among dwellers of this globe.
Sample 16:
Every four years, the whole world stops to watch international sporting events such as the Olympics and the Football World Cup in which athletes show their best performance to make their country proud. These sporting occasions have proved to be helpful in easing international tension in difficult times when powerful leaders were trying to control the world’s economy and other governments were fighting over the land.
The Olympic Games are one of the best examples which prove how sporting events can bring nations together, at least temporarily. From the ancient history, when Greeks and Romans would interrupt battles to participate in the games, to the more recent international disputes, when athletes from Palestine and Israel would forget their differences, compete peacefully and even embrace each other after an event. Moreover, these popular events have called the world’s attention to the terrible consequences of wars; thus, some leaders have tried to reach agreements to end their disputes and live peacefully.
Similarly, international sporting events show benefits in some developing countries which live in a daily internal civil war. For example, Brazil has a high rate of unemployment, lack of education, hunger, crime, poverty, and corruption which leads to an immense embarrassment of being Brazilian and a low self-esteem. However, when the Football World Cup starts, the Brazilian squad, which is considered the best team in the world, provokes an amazing feeling of pride in their country. Most people seem to forget all their problems and even the criminal activity decreases. They paint roads with the national colors, wear the Brazilian team shirts and buy national flags. Moreover, the competition brings families and neighbors together and even rival gangs watch the games and celebrate peacefully.
In conclusion, popular sporting events play an important role in decreasing international tensions and liberating patriotic feelings as history has shown.
Sample 17:
Games and sports connect people and serve a patriotic feeling among individuals. Any big sporting event evoke question of one’s country prestige and reputation. Numerous live sports events connect people as one. It has been attributed that popular events like football world cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way. I fully agree with the statement.
Every country competes with each other in one way or another to prove their dominance over other country and instead of rampant wars, sports are the best way to enjoy and prove themselves over the world. Sports play a pivotal role, the live sporting event like cricket and football world cup has been played and celebrated as a festival for example in India, cricket is considered as religion and has got substantial fan following same goes with football, the most famous game over globe and in addition to this tennis also got a significant role in society. In 21st century every country runs a rat race after money, in increasing defensive power etcetera and at that point of time sporting events are essential in easing international tension.
Moving further, an individual can be seen with their national flag solely in live tournament this defines the patriotic feeling at that moment and todays youth do not believe in wars and violence, they try to find a midway to solve the crucial aspect and competing in sports is one of them for example the old world known rivals India and Pakistan had world cup final, in that much crowd gone mad, they cried, they shout, they haul this clearly shows the importance of that game and the patriotic feeling among people.
To recapitulate, I would like to say that sports is the ultimate and most astonishing method to ease international tensions, evoke a sense of patriotism, and unite people within a country, transcending religious differences. Let us enjoy sports and witness the creation of wonders.
Sample 18:
International sporting tournaments bring nations together, reduce cultural barriers and foster patriotism among people and thus have immense importance in maintaining global peace. Major football or cricket competitions and the Olympics events and people’s spontaneous participation in these performances definitely outline the need for such events. I believe that it has an unfathomable impact on maintaining global harmony while giving us reasons to show our love for our country.
To commence with, close-door summits like the UN conference and EU summits are often political and people have no way to participate or enjoy them. The decisions made at such meetings are often controversial. Thus, global sporting events open ways for nations to come closer and show their devotion to their countries. Such events are highly entertaining on the one hand and are the only platform where competitors perform in a friendly manner, on the other hand. The whole nation relies on its best sportsmen and athletes to bring fame and glory. Moreover, the world knows about countries that they have never heard of. For instance, most of the small South Asian countries are known by the British or Australians for their performance in cricket competitions, not for other achievements.
Moreover, when people around the globe travel to a country to enjoy a sporting event, they learn more about the host country and many misconceptions and cultural barriers get eliminated. This is undeniably a great way to banish hatred, racism and class division. On top of that, when a country participates in a big sporting event, the whole country forgets its political, religious, economic and social divisions, and cheers at a common platform. Perhaps no other event in the world can bring the whole nation together in the way sporting events can.
To conclude, the world is already in turmoil with discrimination, wars, and political instabilities and sporting events can act as a remedy by offering peace, joy and a universal platform for all.
Sample 19:
Ultra-nationalism is a risky prescription and according to many, international tension and conflicts are stemmed from it. In many circles, it is argued that popular events, such as the Football World Cup and other international sporting occasions, are of crucial importance in pacifying global stress and evoking mild patriotic sentiment. To my way of thinking, it does not seem it promotes international harmony.
Popular sporting events fuel the flames of ultra-nationalism. That is to say that these occasions evoke intense national spirits and people, many a time, are maddened by crude jingoism. In consequence, the playground may translate into a battleground. Flush with national pride, two nations may wage a war against each other. El Salvador and Honduras, for instance, went to war arose from the qualifying matches for the 1970 FIFA World Cup. The war took hundreds of lives, thousands of people were maimed and wounded, and hundreds of thousands of people were rendered homeless. The popular football event, thus, started a war.
Likewise, solidarity with a team leads spectators to consider opposing teams as the enemy and it boosts hostility toward opposing supporters. As a result, the supporters of the opposing team are turned out to be the antagonist. The burning fuel of hostility ends up in conflicts.
To conclude, popular sporting occasions usually exhilarate intense nationalism, which in turn lights the fire of hostility. Besides, many media deteriorate the situation igniting warmongering. All things considered, it seems reasonable to conclude that international sports competitions are unable to curb global tensions and conflicts, let alone nurture peace.
Sample 20:
International sporting events, such as the football World Cup, Olympic Games, Cricket Works Cup and so on, have become significant platforms for fostering international harmony and channelling patriotic emotions in a safe and constructive manner. I wholeheartedly agree with the opinion that these events play a crucial role in easing international tensions and providing a platform for individuals to express their patriotic sentiments.
One compelling reason why I support the idea is that international sporting events bring people from diverse backgrounds together, promoting unity and understanding. These events provide an opportunity for individuals to set aside their differences and come together to support their favourite teams or athletes. For example, during the Olympics, nations put aside political conflicts and compete on the basis of merit and skill, fostering a sense of camaraderie among participants and spectators alike.
Furthermore, international sporting events offer a safe and controlled environment for people to express their patriotic emotions. Rather than resorting to aggressive or confrontational means, individuals can rally behind their national teams, waving flags, singing national anthems, and showing their pride in a peaceful and non-threatening manner. This outlet for patriotic expression helps to release tensions and build a sense of collective identity. For instance, the FIFA World Cup has a long history of fans from various countries coming together, celebrating their shared love for the sport, and appreciating the cultural diversity on display.
In conclusion, international sporting events serve as crucial catalysts in easing international tensions and providing a platform for the safe expression of patriotic emotions. Through promoting unity and understanding among diverse populations and providing a peaceful outlet for national pride, these events contribute to a more harmonious global community.
Sample 21:
In recent years, popular events such as the Football World Cup, Cricket World Cup, the Olympic Games, and other international sporting occasions have been considered by some as a means of reducing international tension and fostering patriotic emotions safely to bring people together. I completely agree with this statement and believe that such events can have a positive impact on international relations.
It is sometimes important to acknowledge that international sporting events cannot completely eliminate tensions between nations. Despite the friendly and competitive nature of these events, they do not address underlying political, economic or social issues between countries. For example, the 1936 Olympics in Berlin did not prevent the outbreak of World War II.
Having said that, international sporting events can still play an important role in promoting peace and goodwill among nations. For instance, the 2018 Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang led to the easing of tensions between North and South Korea. The two countries marched together during the opening ceremony and even formed a joint women’s hockey team.
Moreover, international sporting events can also promote patriotism and national unity. For example, when the English national team won the Football World Cup in 1966, it brought the entire nation together, creating a shared sense of pride and unity. Similarly, when Iceland qualified for the European Championships for the first time in 2016, it ignited a sense of national pride and joy in the country.
In conclusion, while international sporting events may not be the only and complete solution to erasing international tensions, they do have the potential to bring nations together and promote unity and peace. As such, it is important that such events are continued to be organized in a safe and secure manner.
Sample 22:
International sporting events, like the Olympics, Para Olympics, FIFA World Cup, international leagues and matches are running globally every year. Most of them are between national teams from all over the world. Many people hold the opinion that these events may contribute to reducing international tensions and also releasing nationalistic feelings. But some of them do not support this opinion. However, I completely believe this is true.
Generally, international games such as football World Cup and the Olympics are held worldwide regardless of government relations. These competitions are happening even if two countries have political problems with each other. Fortunately, this is the nature of sport games and will lead to preparing a positive atmosphere, even if it is temporary. For instance, there is a non-friendly relationship between the USA and Iran’s government, and when the Olympics come through, national teams of these two countries play games face to face.
In addition, there is another important fact about positive effects of sporting events on social affairs. When the national team of a country participates in an international tournament, an extraordinary national support will happen. No matter if that nation has spread out of the homeland, they will join together and will strongly support their national team. For example, when the national football team of Iran has a match in the FIFA World Cup, the stadium will crowd by Iranians from all around the world and they united to support their national team. This is what we called patriotic feelings and it shows itself when a national matter happening.
In conclusion, the idea that international sporting competitions have positive effects on decreasing political tensionsis an undeniable truth. These events, also strengthen the national unity and refreshthe nationalistic emotions.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
- 250+ Công thức giải nhanh môn Toán 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay Vật lí 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay lớp 12 các môn Toán, Lí, Hóa, Văn, Sử, Địa, KTPL (chương trình mới) ( 36.000₫ )
- Tuyển tập 30 đề thi đánh giá năng lực Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội, TP Hồ Chí Minh (2 cuốn) ( 150.000₫ )
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
In recent years, there have been a number of everyday problems that people in big cities have to cope with. This essay will discuss two major problems, pollution and information overload, which I believe should lead governments to encourage people to move to regional areas.
These days, increased levels of pollution have been a great cause for concern among residents of big cities. Due to high volumes of traffic, large quantities of pollutants are being released into the atmosphere, causing the degradation of air quality, which is said to be a significant contributor to various types of respiratory disease, such as lung cancer. Additionally, people in big cities are being bombarded with too much information from the media, including TV, social media, and advertising, with a large proportion of this information being fake or exaggerated. This can lead to confusion or, in some cases, social anarchy.
In my opinion, governments should do what they can to encourage city residents to move to regional areas. Firstly, it will reduce the number of vehicles in cities, which will definitely reduce the levels of air pollution, which is hazardous to the health of citizens. Furthermore, fewer people living in big cities will relieve the pressure on the housing supply, where many people are forced to live in small, uncomfortable spaces. Studies have shown that people’s living spaces have a direct impact on their mental health and how they perform at work.
In conclusion, severe air pollution and a bombardment of information are among the most serious problems facing city residents nowadays, and personally, I feel that authorities should encourage people to relocate to other areas to live.
Sample 2:
It is true that nowadays city residents have to encounter a large number of problems, especially those concerning environmental and social factors. However, encouraging people to migrate to smaller provincial towns, in my opinion, is not a viable solution to these problems.
As living in a metropolis, people are confronted with high level of air pollution, which is caused mainly by the exhaust fumes released into the atmosphere from petrol-driven vehicles. The more populated the city is, the higher the demand for traveling becomes, and as a result, the higher the level of air pollution will be. Living in this environment for a long time is supposed to be detrimental to human’s health as polluted air is the main contributor to respiratory diseases. Another problem involves social aspects such as the issue of unemployment. As many people moving to big cities do not have any skills or qualifications, they are unlikely to find a job. This higher unemployment rate can give rise to the increased criminal activities threatening inhabitants’ life.
Since dwelling in urban centers can have negative impacts, some governments tend to encourage the citizens to relocate to smaller regional towns, but I do not think this will be effective. The first reason for my belief is that this policy cannot guarantee a reduction in air pollution because people still have to commute to their workplace, which is usually located in city center. Indeed, living far away from cities means that people even have to travel a much longer distance to work, which, in fact, can increase the amount of exhaust emissions. The second reason is that finding jobs in the countryside is certainly not easier than in urban areas. Job opportunities in these places are much lower and people usually have to do low-paid jobs if they work in smaller and less developed towns.
In conclusion, it is obvious that living in big cities can create a number of problems, but encouraging people to migrate to suburban areas is, in my opinion, totally not a viable measure at least when it comes to addressing the problems concerning pollution and unemployment.
Sample 3:
It is true that people in major cities are confronting a number of problems in their routine life. This essay will discuss some of these problems and explain the writer’s view that citizens should be encouraged to relocate to the countryside or regional towns.
The urban population is grappling against two main problems out of many. The first issue is the lower quality of life due to the increasingly heavier burden on the existing urban infrastructure. This is because rural immigrants in pursuit of employment opportunities keep inundating the downtown areas of most major cities. For example, most schools and hospitals located in XYZ city are frequently overloaded, making these services inaccessible to the majority of people of lower classes. The second issue is the traffic jam due to the burgeoning car ownership. Arguably, cars take up more space than a motorbike while its capacity to accommodate passengers is far inferior to that of a bus. This weakness results in bumper-to-bumper traffic, particularly in downtown areas where many drivers have to inch along to get away from the terrible traffic.
I think government should encourage citizens to move away from major cities. This is due to the fact that this would relieve the current pressure on the infrastructure. Fewer people would need public services such as hospitals or schools and the roads would be more spacious, ensuring a smooth traffic flow with its resultant fewer accidents for city dwellers. In addition, the resources in the countryside or other less developed regions would be better exploited as there might be available workforce there. For instance, there would be more laborers during harvesting time in the countryside, or skilled or knowledgeable people would help with the construction work in smaller regions, spurring the growth of the local area as well as the nation as a whole.
In conclusion, there are many problems that people in cities are facing, and it is advisable that government encourage the residents to consider relocation to smaller regional areas with a view to solving these issues.
Sample 4:
It is true that nowadays people are shifting to larger cities. There are several negative consequences of this moot issue, and to cope with the current problems, the authorities should encourage individuals to move to smaller cities or even to the countryside.
To begin with, an enormous number of people create problems. One negative consequence is that the urban population would go on increasing and cause housing problems. This leads to the creation of underdeveloped slum areas, where underprivileged individuals must live in poor living conditions like lacking medical care or even drinking water. Another issue is the traffic jam due to the burgeoning car ownership. Arguably, cars take up more space than a motorbike while its capacity to accommodate passengers is far inferior to that of a bus. This weakness results in bumper-to-bumper traffic particularly in downtown areas where many drivers have to inch along to get away from the terrible traffic.
Governments should take steps to move a certain number of city dwellers to less populated areas. The main reason is that shifting people to towns or even the countryside helps to decrease the unemployment rate. This is because as more and more people apply for the same position within a company, it may intensify the competition among employees, making it significantly more difficult to be chosen. Towns, however, due to industrialization, are now able to provide different jobs for engineers or officers in new factories. Therefore, by encouraging job seekers to move to these newly developed areas, the government can lower the number of unemployed individuals in cities.
In conclusion, an increasing number of people living in cities certainly creates housing problems and traffic congestion, and governments should encourage its citizens to migrate to towns.
Sample 5:
More and more people live in cities today than at any point in the past and this trend will likely continue in the future. This has resulted in many problems including extreme overcrowding and governments should take measures to make living outside cities more attractive.
There are a wide range of drawbacks associated with the rise of modern cities but one of the most obvious issues is related to population density. The large number of people crammed into a relatively small area has caused expensive housing, increased traffic and severe pollution. For example, apartment prices in mega-cities like Tokyo and New York have soared to the point where only the wealthiest inhabitants can afford decent living standards. Regardless of financial status, all city dwellers have to deal with more and more traffic jams as the population increases while the area of cities remains fixed. Finally, all these people living and travelling in one place puts a tremendous strain on the environment and some cities, like Beijing in China, have become dangerously polluted.
In my opinion, governments have a duty to encourage citizens to move to more rural areas. If cities continue to expand unabated then the above problems will only get worse. We might one day find ourselves living in densely packed, heavily polluted cities that resemble scenes from a dystopian science fiction film. In order to prevent this from happening, the government can give tax breaks to companies that choose to locate offices and production facilities outside the city. This will provide more jobs for people who are willing to live in the countryside.
In conclusion, the concerns related to overcrowding in cities can and should be somewhat countered by governments incentivising living in rural areas. If this is done then we may still face problems related to cities in the future, but at least they will not be as serious.
Sample 6:
Residing in metropolitan cities has been stimulating some crucial issues in daily activities. Congestion and air pollution are problems related to living in big cities. Thus, these issues have to be tackled by governments through plausible actions such as enhancing numerous public transportations and controlling the price of basic needs instead of encouraging societies to relocate to smaller regional towns.
Societies face many issues in metropolitan cities as traffic jams and quality of air pollution. In big cities, some roads are dominated by private cars, then the number of people using these private cars is higher than in other cities. As a result, there is a phenomenon like congestion in the road that can occur with long duration. Mostly, people who are workers have to go to office and back home regularly using private cars. This situation has a bad impact on utilizing time because they spend more time just on the road and have a chance of becoming late to go to office. Another problem that has influenced widely on people is reducing air quality. When individuals live in larger cities is a risk to the respiratory system, an individual usually takes breath frequently which contains more emissions produced by private cars. Thus, individuals are able to get some diseases such as asthma.
What authorities should do is to deliver better public transportation. These facilities have to consider integration on reaching some ways, an efficiency of time and cost of transportation. If the government ponders this solution, individuals will use this type of transportation. For instance, after the government applied an integration of public transportation in Bandung, societies directly used public transportation. Therefore, the number of private cars has dropped.
To sum up, congestion and quality of air quality are common issues in metropolitan cities. Considering encouraging relocation to smaller cities is not the best solution, but governments can tackle some problems regarding living in metropolitan cities through improving of public transportation.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
The relationship between equality and personal accomplishments has gained significant attention in the last few years. Some claim that a fair society can encourage their people to succeed as they treat everyone in the same manner, while others oppose that personal achievement as a result of success and failure is based on their merits. I firmly believe that a combination of both equal and individualistic approaches is the key to success.
To begin with, gender equality is not only a fundamental right but also a necessary foundation for a peaceful and prosperous life. It is quite essential to utilize the full human potential for sustainable development. For example, in western countries, women are equally respected and given opportunities as men. However, in middle east countries or Eurasia, they do not have the same mindset, and women are still referred to be inferior to men. We observe an understandable difference in both western and eastern countries’ prosperity which gives us an understanding of the egalitarian society’s role in giving equal opportunities to men and women, to rich and poor, to upper class and lower class.
On the other hand, an individualistic approach is the second step after getting equal opportunities from an egalitarian society as it only creates favourable conditions, but an individual is responsible for taking the opportunity and making an effort to achieve the goal for its positive outcome. If we take an example of the ranking scoreboard, it can help evaluate the individuals’ performances on their merits.
To conclude, both equality and personal success are interdependent. Giving equal opportunities to all individuals is the first step to fair inclusion, and individual performance is the second step to thriving.
Sample 2:
There is a strong interest in equality and personal achievement in today’s world. In my opinion, these terms are different from each other. There must be equality in human beings’ rights, but equality in achievement can not be considered fair.
There must be quality in education for each person irrespective of their religion or family status. Everyone has the right to get a good education, and the government should provide facilities so that education will be free for all. If it is not free, then it should be less cheap so that no one hesitates to get an education. For example, to get admission to a well-known school/college, sometimes we need to pay some extra money, and it is not a good sign in our society, and due to this, some students cannot afford their expenses and miss the chance to join their preferred institute.
On the other hand, equality in job achievement is not a good sign, and one should get a prize as per their merits. For example, IT sector jobs have different roles, and everyone employed has to work as per their task assignments. If we give equal importance to each one, then the one who is giving extra effort to the work will feel demotivated, affecting their performance. Also, if we give equal salary to each one, it may help maintain a good work environment, but it will be a disgrace for the one who has the highest knowledge compared to the others.
In conclusion, it is good to have equality in some areas, but we should also pay attention to people’s knowledge.
Sample 3:
According to the Ecological Systems Theory, the environment that a person lives in has the most significant influence on his/her personal development. Some argue that certain personal traits are closely associated with a person’s achievement. However, I will argue in this essay that social equality is the key to an individual’s success in general from two aspects: gender equality and education equality.
The roles that women play in societies often vary significantly among different regions of the world. Societies, that offer women more freedom in terms of educational and vocational choices, could possess more desirable opportunities to facilitate women in pursuing their dreams and achieving their potentials. Women in Australia, for example, where the equality between males and females is considerably advance, could be more likely to achieve higher personal successes than women in Pakistan where females often remain inferior to males in society.
Education equality is another effect that could largely influence on one’s accomplishment. As human society develops, the ability of literacy and the access to modern technologies become increasingly important in individuals’ personal development. Residents of regions where free fundamental education and better access to technologies, such as the internet and computers, are provided, could have increasing numbers of opportunities to exercise their personal traits, thus, to succeed in the fields of their choices.
To conclude, an egalitarian society can facilitate more achievements among individuals. The gender and education equalities are two fundamental ones that could ensure everyone in the society, both males and females, to have the relatively equal opportunity to succeed.
Sample 4:
The concern and ongoing debate in the relationship between equality and personal success have developed recently. Some are convinced that individuals have marvellous opportunities to gain their success in egalitarian societies where everyone is treated in the same manner no matter what their educational, economical and intellectual levels are. While the opponents conceive that the high level of attainment will happen only if the individuals are free to achieve both the success and failure based on their own capabilities. I entirely believe that there is a strong connection between equality and personal success and this essay aims to elaborate that the egalitarian society is the best option for people.
As the era is developing, some aspects among the general public are changing and equality is one of those aspects. The concept of equality has been spread in the whole world and it results in many successes in egalitarian communities. Egalitarian gives fantastic chance to people to gain their achievement since there is no restriction for people in order to reach their success. In this situation, skill and knowledge are the main factors to achieve it. In Indonesia, for example, it was hard for women to have positions in certain sectors such as politics and military because most people were convinced that it was not appropriate for women to become either politician or a defence personnel. Yet, as the people is more open-minded now, it is no longer an issue and women can achieve their success in any sectors based on their ability. Thus, the egalitarian trend has influenced the society’s achievement.
Besides, equal rights and opportunities trigger people to become more competitive in a positive way and have more spirit to achieve something. Furthermore, people can get motivation from their surrounding that has similar objectives. In a classroom, for instance, every pupil has the same rights to be the champ without be differentiated by the teacher. While the students are surrounded by spirited fellows, they will learn better. In this case, having equal opportunities and rights urge people to gain the best achievement. Therefore, egalitarian concepts provide more chance to every people to become successful.
In conclusion, equality motivates people to work together and help each other. In a society where discrimination is present, even based on people’s capability, greater good can never be achieved.
Sample 5:
Some people believe that an egalitarian society engenders greater personal achievements for its people. However, others reject this notion as they believe such achievements can only be obtained based on internal factors such as individual strengths. While there is a directly proportional relationship between equality and personal achievements, I only partly agree with this notion as equality can only contribute so much to an individual’s success.
Admittedly, a fair society does provide a good foundation for personal achievement. With every person being given the same opportunities and rights, everyone would have the appropriate foundation to try and excel at what they do. As such, people would likely be given the same career opportunities and privileges, which can facilitate an equal chance for success among them. The practicality of such a society can be seen in the case of Sweden and Norway, where tertiary education is provided equally and free of charge to citizens. With everyone being given the chance to pursue higher learning and by extension better job opportunities, the workforce of these two countries display a higher level of education and far better earnings compared to the average nation.
However, it is also my firm conviction that there are other individual factors contributing to personal accomplishments besides equality. This is because equality can only go so far as to offer an initial head start for people on the long road to greater accomplishment, which is not sufficient to guarantee their success. By contrast, individual qualities have a much more extensive and long-term impact on any individual’s career. Only with qualities such as perseverance and determination can a person be willing to try and fail over and over in order to gain experience and achieve what they want. This is precisely why among millions of people that are given an equal chance to succeed, only those who are truly determined and resilient can find success.
In conclusion, despite my acknowledgement of the positive relationship between an egalitarian society and the achievement of its people, I also contend that this correlation is limited due to the greater importance of individual merits. Since the prospect of an all-equal society is somewhat negligible, it is advisable that people strive to improve their personal qualities to stand a better chance of success.
Sample 6:
The connection between equality and personal success is a complex topic that has been extensively discussed. Some argue that individuals can accomplish more in societies that prioritize equal treatment, while others believe that personal achievement is only possible when individuals have the freedom to succeed or fail based on their abilities.
Some individuals argue that in egalitarian societies, people can achieve greater success. This is because when individuals are in a fair society, they can accomplish more with the assistance of others. Additionally, there are more opportunities available when society is fair in all aspects. An egalitarian society refers to a society where everyone is treated equally, regardless of their race, gender, religion, or age. For example, India is often seen as a representation of an egalitarian society due to its constitution and various practices that promote equality.
However, there are others who argue that individuals can only achieve significant personal success if they have the freedom to either succeed or fail based on their own abilities. I personally share this viewpoint because in a society that is highly competitive, success can only be attained when individuals have the liberty to make their own choices. By being able to choose their own path and pursue their own aspirations rather than conforming to others' expectations, individuals can truly achieve self-fulfillment. This can only be accomplished through the utilization of one's full potential and dedication to hard work.
In conclusion, both viewpoints had equal advantages and disadvantages. However, I agree with the viewpoint that high levels of personal achievement are possible only if individuals are free to succeed or fail.
Sample 7:
An egalitarian society is one where all people are considered equal in everything such as rights and opportunities. For instance, education plays a crucial role in everyone’s life and their success. Everyone in society has the right to get free schooling, which is offered by the government of a nation. Personally, I believe that people living in such a society have the potential to accomplish more.
Furthermore, attaining personal accomplishments will serve as a guide for enhancing ourselves and enable us to reach our utmost capabilities. Moreover, we can enhance different facets of our lives, including self-assurance, communication abilities, productivity, and more.
However, there are some individuals who hold the belief that individuals can only achieve high levels of personal success if they have the freedom to either succeed or fail based on their own abilities. I believe that equality does not hinder people's freedom to succeed or fail. In fact, I argue that individuals would be motivated and perform well in a society that promoted equality. Moreover, the inequality in a society will lead to social cohesion, negative impact on health and well being, economic growth, etc.
To sum up, I think it is important to strike a balance between both perspectives as they have their own advantages and disadvantages. Also promoting equality in society can also positively impact an individual's personal accomplishments.
Sample 8:
In today's world, the environment has a significant impact on people's growth in various ways. While some argue that personal success can only be attained when individuals have the freedom to succeed or fail based on their own abilities, I firmly believe that a fair society that highly values equality allows individuals to achieve even greater success.
Equality means that every individual should be considered of equal worth and should be treated fairly, regardless of their personal characteristics, skills, or way of life. This implies that everyone should have equal rights, opportunities, and be treated with the same level of respect. By promoting equality in society, individuals can benefit in various ways, including fair treatment, respect, access to opportunities, economic efficiency, and enhanced education. For instance, countries like Pakistan, Syria, Mauritania are considered as an unfair country because of various reasons, such as gender-based violence, discrimination. And in these countries still personal success is out of reach for women.
Furthermore, education significantly contributes to individual achievement. Despite the presence of social inequality, numerous countries continue to struggle with high levels of illiteracy. For example, nations such as Norway, North Korea, and Lithuania boast a 100% literacy rate, while countries like Niger, Armenia, and Azerbaijan have alarmingly high rates of illiteracy, with citizens unable to read, write, or comprehend. The disparity between possessing education and lacking it is immense, and it greatly impacts personal success.
To sum up, I firmly believe that people can accomplish greater things in a society that promotes equality. This is because when individuals have equal opportunities and fair treatment, they are able to achieve more.
Sample 9:
Many research studies have highlighted a causal connection between utopian societies and personal growth, which has prompted the contention that individuals can accomplish more in more egalitarian societies. In my opinion, one can only grow when given the liberty to commit to personal causes.
A utopian society provides its constituents with sustenance but not necessarily individual growth. This can be evidenced both economically and socially. In developed countries, there is typically a social safety net in the form of food banks, soup kitchens, or free healthcare to support less privileged citizens. Though the unemployed or people living below the poverty line can rely on these benefits for sustenance, this arguably deprives individuals of personal incentives to exert themselves, find decent employment, and in part, escape from poverty. An egalitarian society can also stifle growth in the workforce. If companies around the world embraced a hypothetical system of equal pay for all employees, such a policy would likely cause economic stagnation, stifle innovation, damage companies’ reputations, and hamper personal motivation generally.
As far as I am concerned, success is not linear, and one can only see high levels of achievement when granted the freedom to make mistakes. A relevant example would be Rishi Sunak, the current Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. He was born into humble beginnings with both parents originally immigrants from India who sought asylum in the UK for the promise of a better life. Though the UK welcomed the family as asylum seekers and provided Rishi with education opportunities, he still applied himself, studying earnestly at school, securing quality employment at investment banks, and later entering the political world. Despite an early defeat in his bid to become prime minister against Liz Truss, Rishi continued to persevere with his campaigns and political beliefs, and finally managed to ascend to the position of Prime Minister after several debates. Similar instances of success can be seen in all industries, but the overlapping commonality is the liberty to pursue one’s purposes and the freedom to fail.
In conclusion, high achievers tend to be those who are free to pursue their personal causes despite the safety net provided by an egalitarian society. One should try to capitalise on all opportunities being presented.
Sample 10:
In the present era, emphasis is increasing towards equality in society and achieving success. Some argue that chances of success are higher in a society where everyone has equal rights and opportunities. In contrast, others think that it would be more beneficial if people had the freedom to achieve or fail according to their results. I believe that an egalitarian society is better as every person has a chance to succeed, regardless of gender or background.
A fair society that supports talent has a chance to achieve growth much better than a biased society. If society is biased towards some cast or wealthy people, then the only people who can achieve success are the ones who belong to affluent families. However, children from wealthy families don’t need to have more talent. It depends on the dedication and hard work of individuals. Suppose each individual has given a chance, then people will put more effort into achieving something. For instance, if admission to the university depends upon how individuals perform in exams instead of their background, people would work hard to succeed.
Furthermore, if society is biased and does not allow everyone to grow, there would be no harmony among the individuals in society. Such a society will always face struggles, and nobody will feel happy in such an environment. When people in the community feel they are not given equal rights, they start protesting, which affects the peace. To cite an example, a few years ago Patel community gathered and demanded their cast to be included in the minority because they felt that their community was not getting the same opportunity as compared to other communities, which led to massive destruction in some states of Gujarat. Moreover, if people do not have equal rights, they prefer to migrate to a place where they have equal opportunities.
To conclude, having equal opportunity to succeed is a fundamental human right, and if society wants to achieve something, then it must be unbiased and preference given to deserving people, regardless of their gender or religion.
Sample 11:
It is an irrefutable fact that equality plays an essential role in societies. Some populace thinks that individuals can achieve more success in an egalitarian society. In contrast, others think that a high level of success depends on an individual’s merits, hard work and dedication. However, I firmly believe both equality and personal merits play paramount roles among people. This essay will analyze both views using examples to demonstrate points and prove arguments.
On the one hand, equality is essential in many aspects, such as men and women. In the past, only men tend to go to school or do work at the office, while nowadays, the majority of women work. Anyone has the right to have an education and work, whether poor or rich. In other words, people have to judge them on their talent, not on their social status or family status. For instance, many higher-level schools take donations in order to get admission to that school. Therefore, poor people cannot get admission because of the financial crisis. At this moment, the government should provide free or low-budget education so that everyone can get an education. Thus, equality plays a significant role in order to become successful.
On the other hand, individual achievement is equally important because, without failure, they cannot learn and achieve new things. To be more precise, failure is the key to success. If the person does not go through failure, they do not know the value of success. We learn lesions as well as mistakes through failures. Not only failure but hard work and dedication are also equally important. Everyone should get merits for their hard work. To exemplify, the IT sector’s job has different roles, and every employee has to work on the task assigned to them. If we give equal importance to each one, then the one who is giving extra will feel demotivated, affecting their performance. Another thing is that if we give equal salary to each one, it may help to maintain a good workplace environment but, it will be a dishonour for the one who has the highest knowledge compared to others. Hence, only equality in job achievement is not a good sign, and also one should get a prize as per their merits.
To sum up, promoting an egalitarian society motivates individuals to strive for personal excellence, but we should also pay attention to people’s knowledge. Hence, both are equally important to achieving achievements in their life.
Sample 12:
In recent decades, there has been considerable debate about whether or not individual achievement is greater in egalitarian or more hierarchical societies. In my opinion, despite the benefits of egalitarianism as a political principle, it should not be pursued as a social ideal.
Those who argue egalitarian societies are better for achievement point out the benefits of opportunity. The most well-known examples of this are in socialist nations in Europe like France where income disparity is less pronounced than in more capitalist countries. In such liberal countries, a person can receive a good education, secure stable employment, receive unemployment benefits in the case of an economic downturn, and support the rest of society by paying high taxes. Being part of such a community is itself a motivation for individuals to perform well at work and pursue life goals. This is especially the case as a person will not have to feel anxious about the possibility of being left behind by society at large.
I would contend that when conditions are generally equal individuals should then be permitted to compete without considerable governmental regulation. The standout example for this situation would be in the United States. Although there are more problems related to income inequality, there is also greater innovation across a variety of sectors. One cause of this is that individuals are motivated by the desire to excel and earn the financial rewards that accompany success. A person is therefore encouraged to attain their own definition of success, or they might be forced to live on the fringes of society.
In conclusion, though there is a cruel element to competition, it is the best way to encourage innovation and growth in an individual and society as a whole. Naturally, such an approach is only possible when systemic problems related to discrimination have first been eliminated.
Sample 13:
In my opinion, an egalitarian society is one in which everyone has the same rights and the same opportunities. I completely agree that people can achieve more in this kind of society.
Education is an important factor with regard to personal success in life. I believe that all children should have access to free schooling, and higher education should be either free or affordable for all those who chose to pursue a university degree. In a society without free schooling or affordable higher education, only children and young adults from wealthier families would have access to the best learning opportunities, and they would therefore be better prepared for the job market. This kind of inequality would ensure the success of some but harm the prospects of others.
I would argue that equal rights and opportunities are not in conflict with people's freedom to succeed or fail. In other words, equality does not mean that people lose their motivation to succeed, or that they are not allowed to fail. On the contrary, I believe that most people would feel more motivated to work hard and reach their potential if they thought that they lived in a fair society. Those who did not make the same effort would know that they had wasted their opportunity. Inequality, on the other hand, would be more likely to demotivate people because they would know that the odds of success were stacked in favour of those from privileged backgrounds.
In conclusion, it seems to me that there is a positive relationship between equality and personal success.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.