All education (primary, secondary and further education) should be free to all people and paid and managed by the government. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Sample 1:

It is often argued that education, including elementary, secondary, and higher education, should be available to all individuals free of cost and managed by the government. I strongly support this viewpoint and believe that free education is a fundamental right of every individual.

Education is a crucial aspect of an individual's personal growth and development, and providing free education to all will ensure that everyone has access to it, regardless of their socio-economic background. By providing free education, we can help reduce the gap between the rich and the poor and provide equal opportunities to all. Moreover, government funding of education can ensure that the quality of education is maintained, and all students have access to the best resources and facilities. This can also help reduce the burden on families and allow them to invest in other essential needs.

Furthermore, education is essential for a country's economic growth and development. With an educated workforce, a country can become more competitive in the global market, attract foreign investment, and create new job opportunities. Therefore, it is in the government's best interest to ensure that education is accessible to all individuals. 

Finally, free education, paid for and managed by the government, can help to reduce inequality in society. When education is only available to those who can afford it, it leads to a gap between the rich and poor, resulting in unequal opportunities and limited social mobility. However, when the government provides education for free, it ensures that every citizen has equal access to education, regardless of their financial background.

In conclusion, education is a right and not a privilege, and it should be accessible to all individuals regardless of their financial status. By providing free education, the government can ensure that every individual has equal opportunities to learn and grow, and thus, contribute to the country's economic and social development.

Sample 2:

In recent years, there has been much debate around the question of whether all education should be state-funded and managed by the government. While some argue that this would be an effective way to promote equal access to education, I disagree with this statement for several reasons.

Firstly, providing free education for all would be an enormous financial burden on the government, which would likely result in higher taxes for citizens. Moreover, such a policy could lead to a decline in the quality of education, as institutions may struggle to maintain their standards with limited resources. Additionally, the idea that all education should be free may not incentivize students to work hard or take their studies seriously. If education were free, some students might not feel motivated to study, as they would not have the same financial investment in their education as they would if they were paying for it themselves.

Furthermore, there is value in having private institutions that are independently managed and funded. These institutions often offer specialized programs and resources that may not be available at public institutions and can offer students a unique educational experience. Private institutions can also be a source of innovation, as they are often able to respond more quickly to changes in the job market or emerging technologies. This is why the government should not take steps that would abolish private educational institutions.

In conclusion, while it is important to promote equal access to education, I do not believe that all education should be free to all people and paid for and managed by the government. This would be financially unsustainable and could result in a decline in the quality of education.

Sample 3:

Education is an important part of everyone's life, and it plays a very important role in the growth of an individual. Making education free for everyone and managing all by the government will be a very big step towards the rapid growth of a society. All parents want to make their children educated by sending them to schools and colleges but sometimes due to the lack of resources, they have to deprive their children even of basic education. Making education free of all will ensure that nobody will miss education just because they can’t afford to pay.

A government's step of making education free will set an example in our society. It will show that if you have a strong will and determination to study and prosper, not having any money or resources will not stop you from making a paradigm shift.

Education with no fees will identify all those talents which can be at top given education and guidance but get lost because their parents can’t afford to pay for schools. Everyone will stand an equal chance to succeed. It will increase the literacy rate of that country and will improve the growth of that country as well. It was seen in the past that countries having higher literacy rates have been more successful. By making education free, a majority of people will be educated, making overall a positive environment in our society. There will be fewer crimes in society. Educating people will be making them more responsible.

Governments should put more emphasis on education by making it free. Just like food and shelter, education should also be a basic right and free for everyone.

Sample 4:

The opinion that every citizen should have the right to study at school or university for free is a very controversial one. Those who disagree, refer to enormous expenditures of government in case of establishing such laws. Although, I hold the viewpoint that not charging people for education could become very beneficial for a country and its economy.

First, young people from poor families could be very smart. Looking back to history and biographies of distinguished people, raised in poverty can illustrate this best. Making schooling available only for the fortunate is not fair. Moreover, the state’s well-being could also be affected, because there would be a lack of talented specialists, whose skills were not discovered and developed by proper training.

Another advantage of making education free of charge is the happiness of the nation. An individual's inability to collect the amount of money he needs to pay school or university fees causes stress and anxiety in middle-class society, which can even keep them from having children. Nowadays we can see that the lowest birthrate is in countries where prices of enrollment to highest education institutions are very high. This clearly indicates the fact that citizens of rich countries do not feel able to provide their future offspring with a proper education.

Finally, nothing seems to be more beneficial to a country's economy than an educated and intelligent nation. Free courses and study programs can prepare excellent specialists, who would work to bring profit themselves and hence their country. That would surely compensate for most expenses of the state budget caused by education of no charge.

To sum up, even though making all schools free can be very expensive for a state's economy, advantages are invaluable. After several years such improvements would bear fruits of a happy, intelligent nation confident about its future.

Sample 5:

It is a well-known fact that education can play an important role in people's lives. Today, the number of people going to school or university is rapidly increasing. Some people claim that people should pay their education expenses from their own budget. Others believe that all education should be free for all people who want to study. It has been a controversial issue for a long time. It seems to me that governments should provide free education to all their citizens.

The first reason why all education should be free is accessing academic skills. Academic skill is one of the essential things that people need to obtain. For instance, people having better academic skills always get higher scores in their education life. Therefore, the education system should be free for individuals to create an environment where they can improve themselves. Education fees can reduce students' motivation and distract their attention. Similarly, they can be concerned about how to pay the whole education expense. Instead of thinking of expenses, they should give importance to more academic issues.

Another reason why all education should be free is that they may quit school if they are not able to pay the school fees. No one can deny the fact that not all people can pay the whole education expenses so it can result in irreversible problems for people who want to take decent education and improve themselves. If education is not free, individuals might decide to drop out of their school. As a result of this, they can deal with some high stress. People who want to develop their skills should be encouraged by governments. Besides, governments should provide scholarships for individuals who cannot afford their education fees. It is a well-known fact that individuals receiving a proper education are likely to improve their countries in the future.

To sum up, people should be encouraged by governments, and they should provide free education. At least, governments should provide scholarships to all students who cannot afford their studies. By helping their society, governments can provide a better future for their citizens.

Sample 6:

Education makes a person able to earn bread on the butter. It has been suggested that it should be given free of cost at primary, secondary and tertiary levels. I disagree with it as a child can get free education up to 14 years and for senior secondary and tertiary education, if the government manages money, other sectors will be neglected such as medical, employment, etc. Moreover, free education will not make people feel proud of how they have obtained a degree.

To commence with, if a major share of the government’s budget is utilised to provide free education to all, a state must cut spending on other areas, such as medical and employment. To elaborate, when a youngster passes his/her senior secondary or graduation, he or she can do a job either by passing any entrance exam for the classical post or a managerial one. Then, young minds are able to bear their expenses, namely fees for further study, groceries and to name but a few. Therefore, if the government provides free education, it will enhance its financial burden, and the government will not be able to provide advanced facilities in the medical sector to the public, and nothing good will be done to reduce the redundancy.

Moreover, if it is free to all, the public will not understand the usefulness of higher education. They will not strive hard to clear the exams. Paying fees will remind them of their duties to study hard and obtain a higher status. That feeling they will get after working hard a lot can be experienced otherwise. For instance, when a student passes a higher level exam such as IAS or PCS. They recall the conditions they experienced and the ways they adapted to run their home and pay university fees. So, these things make them feel proud.

To conclude, making education free to all up to the university level will be impractical for the government. Primarily, individuals will not be able to get good medical treatment due to a lack of funds spent by the government. Also, people will not do hard labour to clear exams, and the underestimation of education is clearly visible. The feeling of pride in oneself cannot be experienced, especially when the masses get a higher destination after sacrificing a lot.

Sample 7:

Different countries have different education systems. I don’t know all the education systems in the world but all the ones I do know about have free school education at primary and secondary levels. I certainly agree with the statement that this should be the case. I believe university education is different.

No matter what standard of income someone has or what society someone comes from, everyone should have the opportunity to have a good standard of education. This is not always what happens, but it is what should happen. Private schools can be available for those who want and can afford them, but the free schools should always be there. This is certainly one of the best attributes of Western democracy and all countries seem to strive to attain situation although some have problems due to the economic and political situations in their countries. Governments should make sure that all their citizens have access to a good standard of free education at primary and secondary levels.

Further education is different. In an ideal world, this should be free, but governments have a lot of demands on their money. I think that students should have to pay, maybe not all, but at least a contribution towards their tuition fees. They will be able to earn it back once they have graduated. The UK has this system whereas in the US students have to pay all their high tuition fees which can run to the tens of thousands of dollars over a full course. I am not sure if I agree with this, but it certainly would make sure that students make the best of efforts to pass, or all their money would be wasted.

Therefore, I conclude that primary and secondary education should be freely available for all, if possible, but that further education should not necessarily be wholly free.

Sample 8:

Some advocate that education is a fundamental right that should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their socio-economic background. I strongly agree with the statement that all education, including primary, secondary, and tertiary education, should be free of cost to all people and paid for and managed by the state. In this essay, I will present reasons to support this viewpoint.

Providing free education to all individuals ensures equal opportunities and promotes social mobility. Education is a powerful tool that can break the cycle of poverty and empower individuals to pursue their dreams and ambitions. When education is accessible to everyone, regardless of their financial means, it levels the playing field and allows individuals to reach their full potential. For example, countries with free education systems, such as Finland and Germany, have achieved remarkable success in reducing educational inequalities and fostering social mobility.

Furthermore, government-funded education offers significant economic and societal benefits. Well-educated individuals contribute to the growth and development of a nation’s economy, driving innovation, productivity, and competitiveness. By investing in education, the government can cultivate a skilled workforce that meets the demands of a rapidly evolving job market. Additionally, an educated population is more likely to make informed decisions, participate actively in civic life, and contribute positively to the social fabric of society. For instance, countries with high literacy rates and well-educated citizens tend to have lower crime rates and better overall social indicators.

In conclusion, providing free education to all individuals and having the government bear the responsibility of its funding and management is crucial for a just and equitable society. It ensures equal opportunities, promotes social mobility, and yields significant economic and societal benefits. By investing in education, governments invest in the future of their nations and foster a more prosperous and inclusive society.