Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study at universities. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Giải bởi Vietjack
Sample 1:
The government, according to some, should cover the cost of higher education for everyone who wishes to attend. Even while I see the value of making higher education accessible to everyone, I worry about the potential adverse effects on the job market and academic outcomes that would emerge.
Investing in our youth by covering their college costs has several apparent benefits. First, this policy would inspire children from low-income or underprivileged backgrounds to attend college. Because of this, children from less affluent backgrounds may have the same possibilities to further their education as students from wealthier families. Second, investing additional funds into universities may boost the quality of the working population. This is because there would be a rise in the number of people with advanced degrees and well-developed skill sets, both of which are essential for sustained economic expansion.
Nonetheless, I feel the downsides of this approach are far more severe. Because of the high demand for making higher education accessible for all, colleges and their resources would quickly become overwhelmed. Higher education institutions are not yet equipped to handle a dramatic application surge, which would lead to a total collapse of the education system. In addition, increasing the number of people seeking work will likely result from making higher education more accessible. With universal access to higher education at no cost, the number of people who get their degrees will rise dramatically. Consequently, there will be a lack of labor for inferior vocations and a surplus of labor in other fields as university graduates seek employment in their respective fields, such as marketing and not construction.
In conclusion, although I agree that expanding access to higher education is desirable, I am concerned about the negative consequences this may have on campus resources and the labor market.
Sample 2:
It is argued that tuition fees for all students who desire to pursue tertiary education ought to be shouldered by the state. I mostly agree with this notion since it can provide better chances for such education for less well-off individuals and reduce socioeconomic inequality, although it can put pressure on the state budget.
The first justification why I agree that the government should bear the tuition fees for university students is that they can be offered equal opportunities for pursuing further education. More specifically, those who live under the poverty line could afford courses at university without worrying about their financial burden. To illustrate, without being financially supported by the state, most students from remote areas in Vietnam such as Ha Giang Province cannot afford university tuition fees and instead opt to do farming work, losing their chance to acquire a bachelor’s degree which can be beneficial to their future careers.
Another reason for my agreement is that this practice can bridge the gap between different classes in society. This is because families from disadvantaged backgrounds can avoid making sacrifices to save for their children’s education and allocate their budgets to other key matters such as healthcare and entertainment, enabling them to access the same facilities and services as those from better-endowed families. As a result, the socio-economic gap between individuals and families would likely be lessened, paying the way to an equal community.
However, subsidizing tuition fees for all students can trigger monetary burdens on the government. To be more specific, this requires greater spending allocation to education, potentially leading to a budget deficit for other key sectors such as national defense and commerce.
In conclusion, while I admit that fully subsidizing college tuition can pose a pressure on the state budget, I am mostly of the opinion that it is beneficial due to the provision of equal chances for education for future generations and the reduced gap between social classes. It is advisable that the government should give priority to those from families with lower incomes to reduce budget pressure.
Sample 3:
The government we have chosen must comply with all our needs, like paying for our education. There are various opinions on this, a group agrees with such a viewpoint while others have different thinking. If asked, I would take a position with the former group, my stance will be explained further.
To commence with, we have elected the candidates with the purpose and the trust that they will cater to all our needs; education being the most important aspect of our lives must be taken care of by the government. Many families are living below the poverty line, they cannot pay for their children’s tuition fees, and this will not henceforth give their wards equal opportunities. Moreover, even if parents just can provide their children with basic education, then the talent of many people will get wasted and lost.
Moreover, various countries give free education to all the students, if the government does not provide such help with the course fees the students are likely to flee the country. This would cause any country a serious problem which is brain drain.
On the contrary, if the government pays the fees, the funds for other areas will have a negative impact. Defense is one such area that constantly needs speculation and an upgrade, a weak defense can crumble a country as there will be constant fear of attack and conflicts on the borders of a country.
Overall, we can say that there are two sides to the government providing help for all students in terms of tuition fees. From the above discussion, we can conclude that the authority must aid all the people with education.
Sample 4:
As citizens of a country, we are the responsibility of the elected government. Education being a vital aspect of the growth of the country, I perceive that our government should pay for our course fees. My preference is explained in the ensuing write-ups.
A degree in most countries cost up to 15% of one’s entire savings. With the ever-increasing interest rate, it is unlikely to complete the entire loan in a decade after graduation. The suicides due to student loans in the United States of America are an issue known by us all. This can be eliminated if the governments put in the effort of paying for our course fees.
If the government will be paying for the fees of all students, the institutes will be under close surveillance of the authority. The fee structure and the admission procedure will be regulated by the government. The mal-practice of the unfair admission process will be shut down all at once. Thus, making all the academic institutes completely transparent in terms of process.
On the other side, if the authority pays the school fees, the institutes might not earn enough to keep up with the maintenance of the staff. The academicians will not be paid enough wages, and this in result will reduce their motivation to teach. Other areas such as cleanliness and cultural activities will be neglected to cut down expenses.
Overall, in my perception, the government making education free for all will have humongous benefits, while the drawbacks can be tackled if the government makes some strategic changes.
Sample 5:
The fees of the universities are worrisome for a huge mass of people. There is a group that believes that the government should give services regarding these fee structures. I completely agree with such a viewpoint, my opinion will be explained below with logical reasons.
The world is growing rapidly, in this education has a huge role to play. The advanced education taught by various institutes is inaccessible to a lot of people. Various talents are waiting to be discovered, but they remain hidden due to the hefty fees of colleges and schools. The authorities should take it upon themselves to assist such people by paying their fees, which will help in the progression of the country.
European universities are the best example of such a practice. They have not only advanced their education quotient but also attracted a lot of foreign students which later are likely to stay in that country, serving as an asset to the nation. This highly trained workforce will result in boosting the country's economy to a higher stage. Julia Cage, a French economist, stated that free education has dramatically accelerated the development of France.
On the contrary, it cannot be disregarded that government interference of the government in the education system might increase corruption and the quality of such degrees will decrease. We have seen that no matter which party is in power there is always the existence of corruption to a certain extent, if the ruling party gets control of the education system in any terms there is a high possibility of misuse of this power.
To conclude, it is evident that government paying students will surely benefit the whole country in various forms. This will boost the literacy rate of a country as well.
Sample 6:
A common school of thought is that the state should subsidize entire university costs for those who aspire to obtain tertiary qualifications. I completely disagree with this initiative.
Proponents of this reform may argue that free-of-charge higher education can level the playing field for all students irrespective of their financial backgrounds. This is based on the assumption that the open access to tertiary education offers students an equal opportunity to obtain a degree, which can render themselves more employable. Nevertheless, this proposal is not sound since the oversaturation of bachelor’s degrees will lessen the value of a university degree. This scheme, in fact, causes increased competition in the graduate job market, challenging bachelor’s degree holders to seek employment against an overwhelming number of other graduated candidates.
There are firm unfavorable arguments on both societal and personal levels for my opposition against this reformation. In developing countries, offering four-year financial aid packages can be a massive undertaking for many governments. Indeed, in places where impoverishment reigns supreme, it is more imperative that the state coffers are diverted to address more pressing social problems rather than sponsoring higher education. On a personal level, many students who receive full financial assistance for their university studies are likely to suffer from academic setbacks. With free university access, undergraduates may experience a lack of motivation whenever facing difficulties in their studies. For instance, the rate of chronic absenteeism would rise since there would be no financial loss when they fail a course or even drop out of university.
In conclusion, abolishing college tuition fees is not only infeasible to do for underdeveloped nations but also crippling for university students’ academic performance and future employability. I, therefore, strongly contend that university programs should not be free for all students.
Sample 7:
The debate on whether to exempt the expenses for pursuing higher education has been a dilemma among people for a long time. Although many academic institutions are known to provide financial support to meritorious candidates, it is a known fact that pursuing education beyond the school level is an expensive venture. I believe that even though cost-free university education might be a blessing for many, in a broader sense, it will prove to be disadvantageous for both the students and the government. I will elaborate on my views in the following paragraphs.
As we know, the number of aspirants who wish to study further in their field of interest has been skyrocketing lately. That being said, the expenditure on education has also been rising rapidly with better study material, improved classroom technology, and more. Thus, the responsibility of bearing these expenses for every student will put immense strain on government resources that are already meagre.
At the same time, the quality of the academic facilities and services that can be provided with the help of such limited finances is also questionable. Subsequently, a person with qualifications and training from an upmarket private institution will have better prospects than a person who hails from a government-financed institute where the level of schooling is mediocre at best.
However, there is indeed an umpteen number of individuals who have to sacrifice their dreams due to being underprivileged. For these people, the aid regarding their college fees will be a boon. But it is important to understand that not every applicant hails from a financially weak background and requires assistance. Thus, indiscriminate spending on every student is not the most prudent decision as other more crucial areas require monetary support from the government.
In conclusion, I would like to mention that although the idea of costless university courses sounds noble and can be a life-changing opportunity for many, there are many drawbacks to this notion and will prove to be unfavourable in the long run.
Sample 8:
Although the argument about high-level education tuition cost comes in various shapes and forms, one of the most heated debates yet must be whether or not a country’s administration should take full responsibility for these bills. While I believe that the authorities’ investment in students will be profitable, free university education is too excessive and has a high chance of backfiring.
On the one hand, some people argue that the lack of bills for students to pay would be beneficial for society. Because higher education is a public good that ensures a greater quality of the workforce, by making it accessible for everyone regardless of background or income, the government would be able to create a more diverse and inclusive society, where anyone can pursue their talents and interests equally. Moreover, by investing in human capital, the government would enhance the productivity and competitiveness of the workforce, which would generate more tax revenue and reduce social costs in the long run.
On the other hand, it would be unrealistic and inefficient for the government to pay everyone’s tuition fees. Through percentages solely in Vietnam, we can see that one-fifth of the population is at the age to go to university, which means that the funds needed to provide for them all would be immense. Furthermore, by spending more on higher education, the government would have less money to spend on other public services, such as health care, infrastructure, and social welfare, which may have a greater impact on the well-being of society. In addition, people tend to take free things for granted. When students do not have to pay a large sum for a course, there will not be economic consequences for failing, therefore making it highly possible that they will not put their all into the learning process. Thus, this situation creates a paradox where the more the government covers tuition fees, the worse the academic output becomes.
In conclusion, though the notion of free university education is noble, it is not entirely applicable in society. The government should find a balance point, which is to support students where they can through scholarships and policies, and at the same time allow the payment process to proceed naturally as it should.
Sample 9:
It is believed by some that the government should pay for the course fees for all of them who want to achieve a university degree. While I believe that the government should pay for a university degree, I also think that the government should pay half the fees needed. There are many reasons why the government should pay the course fees for students.
Firstly, it benefits the nation. If the government pays fees, individuals from poor families will be able to obtain a university degree. Secondly, it helps to develop various sectors like health, education, transportation, technology, etc. To cite an example, students have enough education then they find new equipment, they improve machinery, they make digital transportation systems. Furthermore, people get an education and then decrease poverty. Sometimes people do have not enough money to get an education at the university. So, the government should help them by giving them course fees. Last but not least, students who do higher studies in a particular field get a chance to study abroad. It helps them to make a career, and they support their family.
However, I believe that some students do not get an education properly and it is a waste of money. While the government pays half fees, they have to manage half fees by themselves and value the significance of money. If the government pays study fees, competition will become increase. To quote an example, more people like to study abroad nowadays but the competition level is very tough compared to the past.
To conclude, I would like to reiterate that although paying study fees for everyone by the government is acceptable, the government should pay half amount of the fees.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
The issue of addressing the global challenge of feeding a rapidly expanding population has spurred discussions about potential solutions, including the adoption of Genetically Modified (GM) foods. While some proponents argue that GM foods present a viable answer to this problem, I fundamentally disagree. The potential risks associated with GM foods and the availability of alternative sustainable approaches make me skeptical about their efficacy as a long-term solution.
To begin with, Genetically Modified foods often involve the manipulation of organisms' genetic makeup to enhance desirable traits, such as increased crop yield or resistance to pests. While this may seem promising in theory, the unintended consequences of genetic modification could pose significant risks to human health and the environment. For instance, allergens or toxins could be inadvertently introduced into GM crops, leading to adverse effects on consumers. The release of genetically modified organisms into the environment could also disrupt natural ecosystems and harm biodiversity.
Additionally, the push for GM foods detracts attention and resources from more sustainable and holistic agricultural practices that have the potential to address food security challenges without compromising safety. Agroecological approaches, such as crop rotation, agroforestry, and integrated pest management, offer environmentally friendly alternatives to intensive monocultures and chemical-based farming. These methods promote soil health, water conservation, and biodiversity, all of which are crucial for ensuring the long-term sustainability of food production.
In conclusion, while the growing global population necessitates innovative solutions for food security, I am opposed to the idea that GM foods offer a viable remedy. The potential risks to human health and the environment, coupled with the availability of more sustainable agricultural practices, make me doubtful about the long-term efficacy of genetically modified foods. Instead of relying solely on GM foods, it is imperative to explore diverse and sustainable approaches that prioritize both human well-being and the planet's health.
Sample 2:
To tackle food shortages, many scientists recommend genetically modified (GM) food as a solution. Despite some concerns regarding this solution, I strongly believe that this is the future for food security.
The first benefit that GM foods offer is that it has significantly higher yield compared to traditional crops. GM foods have their genes altered to reproduce their cells quicker, leading to faster crop productions. Also, GM foods are capable of withstanding harsh environments, such as during winters and dry summers. Another benefit of consuming more GM foods is that they require fewer pesticides, contrary to popular belief. Because scientists design GM foods to be resistant to common pests, farmers do not need to spray pesticides as regularly as they would growing traditional crops.
However, despite these benefits, there are some concerns that researchers should revisit before populating GM foods. The first concern is the impact GM crops have on the ecosystem. Because these crops are known to be resistant to pests, it could lead to the eradication of pest species. As a result, this can disrupt the ecosystem’s balance. The second concern is that, due to GM crops’ high efficiency and rapid growth, they can easily become an invasive species with unhealthy farming practices. This problem, aside from damaging the ecosystem, also has adverse effects on the economy. For example, if one plot destined to grow a certain plant gets invaded by another species, farmers will experience a loss of income.
In conclusion, although admittedly, there are some legitimate concerns for GM foods, I still strongly agree that GM crops are the most feasible solution to the global food shortage.
Sample 3:
Feeding the ever-growing world population is undoubtedly a significant challenge that needs to be addressed. Some individuals argue that genetically modified (GM) foods could provide a viable solution to this problem. In my opinion, while GM foods may offer certain benefits, they also come with potential risks and drawbacks that need to be carefully considered.
Proponents of GM foods argue that they can help increase crop yields, improve nutritional content, and enhance resistance to pests and diseases. This, they claim, would enable farmers to produce more food on less land, ultimately helping to feed a larger population. Additionally, GM foods have the potential to withstand harsh environmental conditions, such as drought or extreme temperatures, making them more resilient and reliable sources of food.
However, it is important to acknowledge the concerns surrounding GM foods. Critics argue that the long-term health and environmental impacts of consuming and cultivating GM crops are not yet fully understood. There are also ethical considerations, such as the potential for corporate control over the food supply and the loss of biodiversity. Furthermore, the introduction of GM crops into natural ecosystems could have unforeseen consequences, disrupting delicate ecological balances.
In conclusion, while GM foods may offer some potential benefits in addressing the challenge of feeding a growing world population, the risks and uncertainties associated with their widespread adoption cannot be ignored. It is crucial to conduct thorough research and risk assessments to ensure that the benefits outweigh the potential drawbacks. Ultimately, a balanced approach that takes into account the needs of both current and future generations is necessary to tackle this pressing issue.
Sample 4:
Whether GM foods are the ultimate answer to address the need to feed the ever-growing global population has been a topic of fierce argument recently among intellectuals across the world. However, I fully agree with the statement that such foods are an effective remedy to worldwide food scarcity.
One obvious advantage of GM foods is better production in lesser time which will ensure food for more people that too utilizing a few resources. In addition, these foods and their cultivation are a lot more environmentally-friendly than normal foods because the former are highly resilient to diseases, pests and insects which reduces the need to use harmful herbicides, pesticides, insecticides and so on. This also ensures that people get pure fruits and grains, for example, free from chemicals.
Better texture, varied flavors and improved nutritional values are some other qualities which make genetically modified foods a viable solution to shortage of food. When such high-quality foods are made available at cheaper prices, it will sure save governments and individuals substantial sums of money, not to mention the obvious health benefits for people. Further, longer shelf-life makes bioengineered foods easier to transport to distant places and store them. Last but not least, their potentially non-allergenic nature makes them Manna from heaven for the hungry millions.
In short, GM foods are the need of the hour. Therefore, the authorities across the world need to spring to action to mass-produce genetically-engineered foods and make them available to people thereby saving hundreds of thousands of lives from malnutrition and starvation.
Sample 5:
As the population is increasing at a fast rate across the world, a shortage of food is becoming a perplexing problem. Some individuals suggest that this can be addressed by genetically modified foods. In my opinion, I totally disagree with the statement since engineering genetic foods have a high risk of potential problems and negative environmental impacts.
The main issue of genetic modification organism is a risk of potential problems after having the food for a long-term. This is because scientists or nutritionists are not sure about the long-term effects and safety as it is a relatively new practice. For example, food allergic reactions have risen in the last decade such as nuts or dairy products, which resulted from consuming GM foods. In addition, there are also a large number of people who hold concerns about the potential risks to human health affected by GM crops such as inducing mutations in human genes. Therefore, numerous people have an inclination toward eating organic food rather than GM foods.
Another thing to consider is that the agricultural method of GMOs brings harmful effects on the environment and ecosystem. Firstly, the changes in the agricultural practice affect on the farming and where weeds or other harmful factors become stronger. This results in overuse of the toxic sprays such as pesticides and herbicides. Secondly, the new cultivation method is harmful for non-GMO crops and also insects or animals, which can lead to loss of biodiversity. To illustrate this, bees play an important role in the pollination of various food crops, but they are vulnerable from the sprays.
In conclusion, I am strongly opposed to the opinion that genetically modified foods can deal with
a shortage of food due to the world demographic growth. This is for the reason that it has potential problems affecting people’s health and it has negative effects on environmental impacts and biodiversity.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
There is a great number of people travelling and visiting other nations, these days. This can be caused by several reasons and personally, it is a positive development.
To begin with, there are two contributing factors behind people’s motivation to travel. First, many of them may want to learn more about unfamiliar cultures as during their trip, they are allowed to get exposed to local people and observe cultural differences here. This gives them a chance to make a comparison of cultural traits in different nations, which helps them enrich their knowledge and have a more profound understanding of the world. Second, a number of people decide to go on a trip to another nation so that they can visit their relatives or family members who live overseas. Video calls or photos only help them see each other’s faces without hugging or holding hands, and therefore, they desire to travel abroad so as to meet their beloved ones in the flesh.
I believe the prevalence of cross-border trips brings about great positive effects on society. With many travellers coming to a country, the demand for housing and food here will likely grow, so local people can earn a great amount of money through providing shelters and selling their traditional cuisines. For instance, Thailand is a country that welcomes millions of travellers from around the world annually, thanks to which the tourism industry here can flourish. Thousands of jobs have also been created, such as workers in travel agencies, taxi drivers or tour guides, to serve the great number of international tourists. Therefore, many Thai residents working in this industry have escaped poverty, avoided unemployment and enjoyed a better life quality.
In conclusion, people these days travel across the border in order to acquire new knowledge and see one another. In my opinion, this development is positive due to its various social benefits.
Sample 2:
More and more people today are choosing to travel internationally. This positive development is mainly because of a rise in middle-class income coupled with advances in aviation.
People today can afford to travel as it has become more convenient. The last half century has seen wages in both developed and developing companies climb with the concomitant expansion of the global middle class. Workers have the disposable income to travel that they lacked in the past. This has been complemented with safer airplanes, so individuals are not afraid to fly. Airfares have also become cheaper as companies like Boeing produce more efficient planes, competition intensifies between competing airlines, and the supply more than meets demand for flights. These factors combined have spawned a golden age of international travel.
Looking at the opportunity in perspective, it is hard to see the advent of international travel as anything less than one of mankind’s greatest achievements. For the entirety of human history, most people lived and died near to where they were born. Anyone who wanted to travel to another country had to possess enormous wealth, time, and courage. Today, the average employee can save up and travel to see the wonders of the Renaissance in Southern Europe, the vast monuments to history and modernity in China, or explore any other corner of Earth that has piqued their interest. This is an unprecedented opportunity unavailable to past generations.
In conclusion, international travel is a byproduct of the modern age, and we should all be grateful for its possibility. There are clear environmental drawbacks but those should not blind people to its benefits taken as a whole.
Sample 3:
In recent years, there has been a surge in the number of individuals traveling to foreign countries. This trend is fueled by various reasons, all of which contribute to a wide range of positive developments. In this essay, I will explore why numerous people choose to explore novel locations and argue that this trend has an overall positive impact on individuals and society.
One of the primary factors driving the escalating number of international travelers is globalization. As the world becomes more interconnected, people grow increasingly interested in different cultures, traditions, and ways of life. Consequently, traveling to other nations assists them in cultivating cross-cultural comprehension and insights. Moreover, this trend offers significant educational advantages as learners can pursue academic knowledge in developed countries with high-quality educational systems. This allows them not only to acquire academic knowledge but also to gain valuable skills such as problem-solving and effective communication. For instance, students studying abroad will be well-prepared with essential competencies for a lucrative career.
I firmly believe that the growth of international tourism positively impacts the domestic economy of host countries. The influx of foreign tourists and their spending on local services provide a lucrative stream of revenue that can significantly improve the lives of people in these nations. Additionally, tourists benefit from cultural exchanges and eye-opening experiences during their visits. Furthermore, the profits generated from these activities can be utilized by local governments to upgrade infrastructure such as accommodations or roads. For example, Ha Giang province allocates 35% of its tourism revenue annually to construct new buildings and maintain local heritages.
In conclusion, the rise in the number of international visitors can be attributed to globalization and the pursuit of educational opportunities. In my opinion, this trend will continue to yield positive outcomes for individuals and societies by fostering cross-cultural understanding and contributing to economic growth.
Sample 4:
In recent years, there has been a significant surge in the number of people traveling abroad for leisure and various other purposes. This essay will explore the factors driving this growing trend and propose that the benefits of international tourism outweigh its potential drawbacks.
Overseas destinations have become increasingly popular vacation spots in recent years, primarily due to two factors. The first is the reduction in travel costs and increased accessibility, making international trips more affordable and convenient for a larger population than ever before. The emergence of budget airlines and early booking discounts have made airfare more affordable, enabling vacationers to plan ahead and save money. The second driving factor is the explosive growth of social media, which has broadened people's access to information about diverse cultures and remote locations, inspiring them to seek new experiences. Tourist review videos can easily go viral on popular platforms such as TikTok and YouTube, motivating millions of viewers to step beyond their comfort zones and consider embarking on their own enlightening adventures.
This trend of increased international tourism is positive for several compelling reasons. Firstly, overseas tourism can significantly impact the economy of host countries. Holidaymakers typically spend money on a range of goods and services, such as accommodation, food, transportation, and souvenirs, which can stimulate job creation and economic growth. This, in turn, can lead to improved infrastructure and enhanced living standards for the local population. Secondly, travelling globally promotes cultural exchange and understanding among people from diverse geographical backgrounds. By visiting foreign countries, visitors can learn about new cultures, customs, and traditions, broadening their perspectives and fostering mutual respect. This cultural exchange can help dismantle stereotypes and prejudices, leading to a more tolerant and inclusive global society.
In conclusion, the trend of global travel, driven by affordable travel costs, increased accessibility, and the growth of social media, is a predominantly positive development, offering numerous benefits for both tourists and host countries.
Sample 5:
More people today find themselves interested in travelling to foreign nations. I believe that this phenomenon is a result of increased access to information on social media, and yet is fundamentally adverse to the local cultures that experience mass tourism.
Firstly, I believe that social media has allowed people to catch a glimpse of foreign locales, which in turn entices them to visit destinations that they otherwise would not have before. When people see travel adverts through online platforms, they are compelled to explore it themselves and showcase their experience on social media. This is why many people on the internet today have been able to create a career out of travelling and posting pictures on the internet alone: there is a huge market for the advertisements of travel destinations on apps such as Instagram and Facebook today.
However, increased travel to tourist destinations has inadvertently internationalized them over time as governments and urban planners aim to make the stay of rich foreign tourists more comfortable and luxurious. Gradually, little by little of what makes the place special is replaced by a generic, commercialized shell. This creates a situation in places such as Angkor Wat in Cambodia, where the serenity of the temples is destroyed by the overwhelming number of tourists.
Overall, I believe that the rise of the internet and social media in particular has contributed to the proliferation of global travel. Nevertheless, tourism has thrived at the expense of the destinations' local cultures. On the whole, I therefore argue that this development has been an unwanted one for most local populations.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Nhắn tin Zalo