It is generally acknowledged that families are now not as close as they used to be. Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together.
It is generally acknowledged that families are now not as close as they used to be. Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together.
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
There is much discussion nowadays as to whether or not the relationship between family members is as close as before. Diverse contributing factors can be identified. In the following, I would like to present my point of view.
Great changes have taken place in family life along with the development of society. One of them is that the once-extended family tends to become smaller and smaller. Many children have to leave their parents at an early age to study or work elsewhere. As time passes, children become emotionally estranged from their parents.
Compared with the past, social competition is becoming increasingly fierce. People are urged to concentrate their efforts on their work so that they can achieve success or at least a good standard of living. As a result, they can’t afford to spend their leisure hours with their families. The importance of bonds of kinship is gradually fading from their minds.
In addition, the availability of various kinds of recreational facilities also diverts people from enjoying chats with the members of their families. Their free time is mostly occupied by watching TV, surfing the Internet or playing video games. They come to lose interest in communicating with the other members of their families. In view of such alienation within families, urgent steps must be taken, in my opinion. For members of families who live away from one another, regular contact on the phone can bring them the care that they need. Family reunions on holidays or other important occasions can make a difference as well. For those living together, it is a good idea to take some time off work or recreation periods to spend more time with each other.
In the final analysis, a close family relationship can surely be maintained as long as we realise the significant role it plays in our lives, and we attach importance to it.
Sample 2:
In the past, people mostly preferred to stay in extended families. Today, it is observed that many individuals have their own nuclear families. In this essay, we will discuss how professional commitments forced people to opt for this kind of families. To tackle this, an organisation’s role will be analysed.
To begin with, individuals focus on their career development to a greater extent. A good illustration of this is the group of professionals who spend most of their time in their companies. As a result, they do not have much time for themselves and hence, prefer staying in small families with less contact with other members. Thus, it is obvious that they are not much involved with other family members leading to the lack of closeness with them.
To overcome this, companies can play a crucial role. The first step which a firm can take is to provide the work from home access to the employees. By doing this, they will allow their staff to spend more time with their families. The other steps which can be taken include declaring holidays on all festivals and organising family day in a company. This will allow them to spend more periods with their families and hence, can help them to recuperate their relationships.
From the above, it is clear that hectic work schedule act as a major hindrance for creating close bonds with family. Therefore, the companies should allow remote work, increase holidays and announce family days at workplaces for enforcing individuals to concentrate towards their relationships.
Sample 3:
Most people favoured to live with their extended families in the past. Many people now choose to have their own nuclear families. This essay will discuss how work obligations compelled people to choose these families. We will examine the role of an organization in order to address this.
First, people devote more of their attention to developing their careers. An excellent example of this is the professional group that works in their companies for the majority of their workdays. They prefer living in small families with limited interaction with other family members because they have less time for themselves as a result. As a result, it is clear that their lack of involvement with other family members contributes to their distance from them.
Companies can play a critical role in overcoming this. Enabling employees to work from home is the first action a company can take. They will enable their employees to spend more time with their families by taking this action. Taking other actions involves planning a family day at work and declaring holidays for all festivals. They will be able to spend more time with their families as a result, which may aid in the healing of their relationships.
As we can see from the preceding discussion, a demanding work schedule significantly interferes with the development of strong family ties. Consequently, in order to force people to focus on their relationships, businesses ought to permit remote work, extend holidays, and declare family days at work.
Sample 4:
It is a widely acknowledged fact that families are not as close as they used to be. Parents and their kids hardly communicate with each other in most families. Young people may talk to their mom three times a day, but they talk to their friends all day long. Mom is the least of their contacts. In this essay, I will explore the possible reasons and solutions to this problem.
There are several reasons for this tendency. First of all, crowded modern life makes being alone a luxury enjoyment. When working under pressure every day, people want to be alone in their scarce spare time, they are sick of discussions and arguments more and more. Moreover, nowadays there are more choices in entertainment and amusement, which can be enjoyed on one’s own, which makes conversation unnecessary at home. Thirdly, the generation gap also contributes to this trend.
How can family members create a better common topic at home? First of all, improving communication skills is one of the solutions. We should be supportive, but not over-bearing: incisive, but not judgmental towards our family members. Parents should try to talk the same talk with their children. Most importantly, people in the same family should always temper their criticism. Parents should not offer too much-unsolicited advice to adult children. A parent’s voice, even when whispered, is louder than anyone else’s voice in their children’s ears.
Home is a place where we can rest, and a close family relationship can surely be maintained as long as we realize the significant role it plays in our daily life.
Sample 5:
Gone are the days when families used to stay close. Four main causes have primarily contributed to the phenomenon of family detachment. I, however, personally believe that a few factors still can strengthen family ties.
Estrangement depends on several factors, like different expectations, mismatch in values, emotional abuse and urban lifestyle. Financial factors coupled with other factors, for example, education, also fuel it up. In simple words, highly educated family members with financial independence are not dependent on each other, thereby they are likely to live separately. Research has shown that highly educated adults are associated with higher rates of family breakdown.
Besides, a mismatch in values is another prominent reason. If a father has a deeply entrenched belief in male superiority and the daughter violates that, the father views it as offensive. And, how one can forget about extramarital affairs as many women in the USA, for instance, often mention it as the reason for their estrangement from their husbands. Finally, with the emergence of urban lifestyles, people no longer have joint families. This has made their bond with close family members like grandparents, uncles and aunts very distant.
However, some factors can foster closeness – priority, expert opinion, regular interactions and forgiveness, for instance. The first factor that can promote closeness is giving children priority. That is to say that parents ought to spend sufficient time with their children. When children see their parents sacrificing for them, they will possibly never leave their parents in old homes. The next factor that can ameliorate relationships is expert opinion. People should seek help from psychologists who can advise them on how to avoid pitfalls in a relationship. Finally, regular interaction and forgiveness can flourish closeness to a great extent.
To conclude, a family’s chance to drift apart is high in modern days. Several factors such as independence, mismatch in values, and extramarital affairs, need to be considered when the family gets broken. However, priority, expert opinion and forgiveness are the key to reconciliation.
Sample 6:
The family was the kernel of people’s lives, and a strong family bond was a common phenomenon in the past. But sadly, we have shifted to a more self-centred urban lifestyle where we are busy outside. We think little about our kinship and interact less with our relatives, which has unfixed our bonds to a great extent. A few useful measures can, however, still improve it.
To begin with, a growing percentage of the population now lives in cities and many of them work hard to make ends meet. Others are busy making their fortune. Both of these groups have become selfish enough to sail away from their family and live on their own. They have little time to think about their family members either because they can’t or they won’t! For instance, the number of joint families in suburban and rural areas was quite high but with a city-centric lifestyle, we do not take our grandparents, uncles or aunts to live with us, and even leave our parents after we get a job and thus the nuclear family has become the norm in the modern era. Devastatingly enough, people do not have time for their own children and when those children grow up, they feel little connection to their families. This is an atrocious circle that floats us away from our family relationship.
Perhaps the best way to strengthen our family bonds is to get back to a traditional lifestyle away from cities. But since it is not practically possible, we should still prioritise our family over everything else. We can interact more often with our close relatives, spend quality time with our family members, sacrifice our luxury for them, be loyal to them and teach them how to value the importance of family. Perhaps then we would have a much stronger family connection. Research indicates that the divorce rate is high in cities among busy executives who prioritise their careers over their families. We still have time to build a career for the family, not the other way around.
In conclusion, a family is perhaps the single most important thing in this world, and we should take every possible initiative to keep it intact and strong before it is too late for us.
Sample 7:
In recent times, there has been a transformation in the way families used to be formed in the past, and families, the most fundamental constituency in society, are no longer as closely bonded as they used to be in our ancestor’s time. This essay will discuss the reasons for this change and suggest ways in which families can be brought closer together.
One of the primary reasons for the breakdown in family relationships is the advent of modern technology. With smartphones, social media platforms, and video games, individuals spend more time in isolation with their gadgets than in the company of their family members. In addition, long working hours, commuting times, and social commitments take up much of the time that would have been spent interacting with family members.
Another reason for the lack of closeness in families is the fact that people today are more career-driven and independent. With more job opportunities and better educational prospects, people are no longer tied to their hometowns and often relocate to different cities or countries, leading to a lack of proximity and interaction with extended family members.
To bring families closer together, a conscious effort needs to be made by all members. This can be achieved through regular communication, setting aside time for family activities, and celebrating family traditions and occasions. For instance, a family can plan a regular game or movie night, take annual vacations together, or gather to celebrate birthdays and festivals.
In conclusion, the breakdown of family relationships is a multifaceted issue that has emerged due to the advent of modern technology and changing social dynamics. However, by making a conscious effort to spend quality time together, participate in joint activities, and cherish family traditions, families can be brought closer together.
Sample 8:
The perceived decline in the closeness of families is a widely acknowledged phenomenon. The objective of this essay is to examine the impact of societal changes and technological progress on the decline of family closeness, as well as the potential of promoting open communication and quality time to enhance familial ties.
Firstly, changing lifestyles and societal norms have led to increased time pressures and individual pursuits. To brief, amidst the rapid pace of contemporary life, families frequently encounter the challenge of balancing numerous obligations and engagements, leaving little room for collective pursuits and substantial exchanges, ultimately leading to the gradual deterioration of familial ties and a diminished scope for cherished moments spent together. Additionally, the prevalence of technology has resulted in a decline in meaningful personal interactions. Overdependence on digital gadgets and social platforms can impede authentic familial bonds by disregarding the significance of in-person connections and emotional attachments.
However, prioritizing open and meaningful communication within the family is crucial. Promoting regular conversations where family members actively listen to one another and express their thoughts and emotions can strengthen understanding and empathy. Moreover, allocating dedicated quality time for shared activities is essential. Encouraging engagement in activities that promote bonding and creating lasting memories, including family outings, cooking together, or family vacations, can bring families closer together, reinforcing emotional bonds and a sense of togetherness.
In conclusion, the decrease in familial bonds stems from contemporary life's rapid pace and ubiquity of technological advents; nevertheless, by stimulating meaningful dialogues and assigning specific time for group activities among family members, the stated challenges can be mitigated.
Sample 9:
There has been a trend over recent decades for families to become less close than they were in the past and this situation is largely accepted in society. This essay will discuss the reasons for this and examine the benefits and drawbacks of this development.
One of the first reasons for a decline in the closeness of families is connected to the busy lifestyles that we now lead. Most people have to work longer hours and often both parents work, so they simply do not have as much time to spend with each other as they did in the past. Another factor is the materialistic and consumer-driven culture we now live in, which has led to less value being placed on family relationships. Modern technology also means that people are more interested in their online life than interacting with their family in their free time.
It could be argued that this has benefits. If people are not so close with their family, they are free to pursue their own dreams and aspirations, and to focus on improving their own lifestyle. However, I believe that there are far more negative outcomes. The most important factors leading to a fulfilled and happy life are emotional security and comfort. Without these we are in danger of feeling lost. It is a difficult world we live in, and we need the support of people close to us to cope with modern life. We are seeing a rise in mental health problems in many countries, and this may well be a factor in this.
To conclude, busy modern lifestyles, changing cultural values and modern technology are causing families to become less close. We should try to halt this trend as it has more negative than positive outcomes.
Sample 10:
Today’s family life has changed a lot. Many parents are divorced, and a lot of mothers and fathers have jobs far away from home. As a result, children are often alone and lonely. But what are the reasons for this happening?
First of all, I think that modern technology is one of the main reasons for this problem. Many parents work in their nearest cities from their home. They work with the computer in big offices and came home late at night. However, they have no time to look after their children.
In the past, families used to work as a family. Every member worked hard and helped the family to survive, for example, farmers. Furthermore, the education used to be controlled by the parents, not like today’s day-schools with teachers and professors. On the other hand, there must be a solution to bring separated families together. at my point of view, families should spend their free time together. I am thinking about weekends or the time after work. children need their parents even when they are older. to give a reasonable example: I often go out with my parents, mostly for a dinner. Then my brother and I speak about our future plans or something else. An intensive conversation is a possible solution. A similar way is to divide your job into half-part worktimes and spend your free time leftover with your loved persons. A point against this statement is to have financial problems.
In conclusion, I wish that every family is as close as possible with each other if they like that.
Hot: 1000+ Đề thi cuối kì 1 file word cấu trúc mới 2025 Toán, Văn, Anh... lớp 1-12 (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay
- Sổ tay Giáo dục Kinh tế & Pháp luật 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay Lịch Sử 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay lớp 12 các môn Toán, Lí, Hóa, Văn, Sử, Địa, KTPL (chương trình mới) ( 36.000₫ )
- Tuyển tập 30 đề thi đánh giá năng lực Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội, TP Hồ Chí Minh (2 cuốn) ( 150.000₫ )
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
The issue of addressing the global challenge of feeding a rapidly expanding population has spurred discussions about potential solutions, including the adoption of Genetically Modified (GM) foods. While some proponents argue that GM foods present a viable answer to this problem, I fundamentally disagree. The potential risks associated with GM foods and the availability of alternative sustainable approaches make me skeptical about their efficacy as a long-term solution.
To begin with, Genetically Modified foods often involve the manipulation of organisms' genetic makeup to enhance desirable traits, such as increased crop yield or resistance to pests. While this may seem promising in theory, the unintended consequences of genetic modification could pose significant risks to human health and the environment. For instance, allergens or toxins could be inadvertently introduced into GM crops, leading to adverse effects on consumers. The release of genetically modified organisms into the environment could also disrupt natural ecosystems and harm biodiversity.
Additionally, the push for GM foods detracts attention and resources from more sustainable and holistic agricultural practices that have the potential to address food security challenges without compromising safety. Agroecological approaches, such as crop rotation, agroforestry, and integrated pest management, offer environmentally friendly alternatives to intensive monocultures and chemical-based farming. These methods promote soil health, water conservation, and biodiversity, all of which are crucial for ensuring the long-term sustainability of food production.
In conclusion, while the growing global population necessitates innovative solutions for food security, I am opposed to the idea that GM foods offer a viable remedy. The potential risks to human health and the environment, coupled with the availability of more sustainable agricultural practices, make me doubtful about the long-term efficacy of genetically modified foods. Instead of relying solely on GM foods, it is imperative to explore diverse and sustainable approaches that prioritize both human well-being and the planet's health.
Sample 2:
To tackle food shortages, many scientists recommend genetically modified (GM) food as a solution. Despite some concerns regarding this solution, I strongly believe that this is the future for food security.
The first benefit that GM foods offer is that it has significantly higher yield compared to traditional crops. GM foods have their genes altered to reproduce their cells quicker, leading to faster crop productions. Also, GM foods are capable of withstanding harsh environments, such as during winters and dry summers. Another benefit of consuming more GM foods is that they require fewer pesticides, contrary to popular belief. Because scientists design GM foods to be resistant to common pests, farmers do not need to spray pesticides as regularly as they would growing traditional crops.
However, despite these benefits, there are some concerns that researchers should revisit before populating GM foods. The first concern is the impact GM crops have on the ecosystem. Because these crops are known to be resistant to pests, it could lead to the eradication of pest species. As a result, this can disrupt the ecosystem’s balance. The second concern is that, due to GM crops’ high efficiency and rapid growth, they can easily become an invasive species with unhealthy farming practices. This problem, aside from damaging the ecosystem, also has adverse effects on the economy. For example, if one plot destined to grow a certain plant gets invaded by another species, farmers will experience a loss of income.
In conclusion, although admittedly, there are some legitimate concerns for GM foods, I still strongly agree that GM crops are the most feasible solution to the global food shortage.
Sample 3:
Feeding the ever-growing world population is undoubtedly a significant challenge that needs to be addressed. Some individuals argue that genetically modified (GM) foods could provide a viable solution to this problem. In my opinion, while GM foods may offer certain benefits, they also come with potential risks and drawbacks that need to be carefully considered.
Proponents of GM foods argue that they can help increase crop yields, improve nutritional content, and enhance resistance to pests and diseases. This, they claim, would enable farmers to produce more food on less land, ultimately helping to feed a larger population. Additionally, GM foods have the potential to withstand harsh environmental conditions, such as drought or extreme temperatures, making them more resilient and reliable sources of food.
However, it is important to acknowledge the concerns surrounding GM foods. Critics argue that the long-term health and environmental impacts of consuming and cultivating GM crops are not yet fully understood. There are also ethical considerations, such as the potential for corporate control over the food supply and the loss of biodiversity. Furthermore, the introduction of GM crops into natural ecosystems could have unforeseen consequences, disrupting delicate ecological balances.
In conclusion, while GM foods may offer some potential benefits in addressing the challenge of feeding a growing world population, the risks and uncertainties associated with their widespread adoption cannot be ignored. It is crucial to conduct thorough research and risk assessments to ensure that the benefits outweigh the potential drawbacks. Ultimately, a balanced approach that takes into account the needs of both current and future generations is necessary to tackle this pressing issue.
Sample 4:
Whether GM foods are the ultimate answer to address the need to feed the ever-growing global population has been a topic of fierce argument recently among intellectuals across the world. However, I fully agree with the statement that such foods are an effective remedy to worldwide food scarcity.
One obvious advantage of GM foods is better production in lesser time which will ensure food for more people that too utilizing a few resources. In addition, these foods and their cultivation are a lot more environmentally-friendly than normal foods because the former are highly resilient to diseases, pests and insects which reduces the need to use harmful herbicides, pesticides, insecticides and so on. This also ensures that people get pure fruits and grains, for example, free from chemicals.
Better texture, varied flavors and improved nutritional values are some other qualities which make genetically modified foods a viable solution to shortage of food. When such high-quality foods are made available at cheaper prices, it will sure save governments and individuals substantial sums of money, not to mention the obvious health benefits for people. Further, longer shelf-life makes bioengineered foods easier to transport to distant places and store them. Last but not least, their potentially non-allergenic nature makes them Manna from heaven for the hungry millions.
In short, GM foods are the need of the hour. Therefore, the authorities across the world need to spring to action to mass-produce genetically-engineered foods and make them available to people thereby saving hundreds of thousands of lives from malnutrition and starvation.
Sample 5:
As the population is increasing at a fast rate across the world, a shortage of food is becoming a perplexing problem. Some individuals suggest that this can be addressed by genetically modified foods. In my opinion, I totally disagree with the statement since engineering genetic foods have a high risk of potential problems and negative environmental impacts.
The main issue of genetic modification organism is a risk of potential problems after having the food for a long-term. This is because scientists or nutritionists are not sure about the long-term effects and safety as it is a relatively new practice. For example, food allergic reactions have risen in the last decade such as nuts or dairy products, which resulted from consuming GM foods. In addition, there are also a large number of people who hold concerns about the potential risks to human health affected by GM crops such as inducing mutations in human genes. Therefore, numerous people have an inclination toward eating organic food rather than GM foods.
Another thing to consider is that the agricultural method of GMOs brings harmful effects on the environment and ecosystem. Firstly, the changes in the agricultural practice affect on the farming and where weeds or other harmful factors become stronger. This results in overuse of the toxic sprays such as pesticides and herbicides. Secondly, the new cultivation method is harmful for non-GMO crops and also insects or animals, which can lead to loss of biodiversity. To illustrate this, bees play an important role in the pollination of various food crops, but they are vulnerable from the sprays.
In conclusion, I am strongly opposed to the opinion that genetically modified foods can deal with
a shortage of food due to the world demographic growth. This is for the reason that it has potential problems affecting people’s health and it has negative effects on environmental impacts and biodiversity.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
An increasing concern for many governments around the world is the declining health of their citizens due to a poor diet. While some people believe governments should be responsible for improving the health of their nation, others believe it is up to the individual. This essay will examine both sides of the argument.
There is no doubt that individuals must take some responsibility for their diet and health. The argument to support this is the fact that adults have free will and make their own choices about what they eat and the exercise that they do. Children are also becoming less healthy. However, their parents are the ones who provide their evening meals, so it is their responsibility to ensure these meals are nutritious and encourage them to avoid junk food and sugary snacks during the day.
Despite these arguments, there is also a case for advocating the intervention of the state. People these days often have little choice but to depend on fast food or ready meals that are high in sugar, salt and fat due to the pressures of work. Governments could regulate the ingredients of such food. Some governments also spend huge amounts of tax money on treating health problems of their citizens in hospitals. It would be logical to spend this on preventative measures such as campaigns to encourage exercise and a good diet.
Having considered both sides of the issue, I would argue that although individuals must take ultimate responsibility for what they eat, governments also have a role to play as only they can regulate the food supply, which openly encourages a poor diet. It is only through this combination that we can improve people’s health.
Sample 2:
It is observed that few citizens think that ruling authorities must take care of the habit of eating of the citizens. On the other hand, few people think that it is their own duty. There is a divided opinion on this. My preference is explained further.
Examining the former view, the propionate claim that it is the duty of the government to take care of the food habits of people. To a large extent, it is like imposing the rules if there are strict rules for junk food availability. For example, if there are limited outlets, many people will avoid going to such places. Also, they can put restrictions on the production of certain food. To add to that, the government also can put a restriction on soft drink products. So as much as less availability as less use. So by that, they can control the uses.
On the other hand, many believe that it is their responsibility of own to take care of their health. Nowadays youngsters prefer to eat outside food, but their parents should take care of their eating habits. As they are the pioneers of their children. All the good and bad things taught by elders to their kids. And kids also listen to their parents only. So, it becomes their own duty to look after this.
All in all, it can be said that the government is not responsible for the eating habits of people. It is an individual’s duty to take care of their diet. Government cannot control diet because it will have a bad impact on the ruling authorities.
Sample 3:
The increasing focus on health has sparked a debate regarding the responsibility for dietary decisions. Some argue that individuals should have the autonomy to choose their diets, while others believe governments should ensure their citizens adopt healthy eating habits. In my view, achieving the best health outcomes requires cooperation between individuals and governments.
On one hand, individuals bear the primary responsibility for their dietary choices. With a wide array of food options available, people can create balanced diets rich in essential nutrients. This flexibility allows for personalized approaches; for example, vegetarians can opt for protein-rich beans, while those who consume meat can choose leaner protein sources. Moreover, individuals have a unique understanding of their own bodies and preferences, enabling them to tailor their diets for optimal health and well-being.
However, governments also wield considerable influence over food choices. Their role extends beyond ensuring food safety to include implementing regulations that restrict the advertising of unhealthy foods, especially those aimed at children. Additionally, governments can subsidize the production and sale of nutritious foods, making them more accessible to all citizens, particularly those facing financial challenges. Educational campaigns advocating for balanced diets and highlighting the risks of unhealthy eating further empower individuals to make informed dietary decisions.
In conclusion, promoting a healthy populace requires a multi-dimensional approach. While individuals are ultimately responsible for their choices, governments can play a significant role in creating an environment conducive to healthy eating. Through regulatory measures, educational initiatives, and economic incentives, governments can empower citizens to prioritize their well-being and make informed choices. This collaborative effort will contribute to the overall health and wellness of the population.
Sample 4:
Nowadays an increasing number of people are becoming concerned about their health and the quality of their diet. There are two diametrically opposed opinions on the matter. Some people believe that each and every individual is responsible for their own health while others state that it is the government that must ensure that the citizens have healthy eating habits.
Personally, I believe that people bear full responsibility for their diets for a number of reasons. First, nowadays there is a vast variety of products that everyone can choose from, ensuring a balanced diet consisting of different types of products with sufficient vitamins, proteins, carbohydrates and fats. Everyone can balance their diets according to these factors and also based on their taste preferences. For example, vegetarians will prefer beans rich in protein while omnivorous eaters might opt for meat instead. Secondly, while governments cannot considerably vary in their healthy eating programs usually adhering to 'one size fits all' approach, individuals know exactly what they need in order to keep fit and healthy both generally speaking and in terms of food. We take a tailored approach as we know exactly what we need to succeed in life, be strong and healthy.
However, others argue that the government is fully responsible for the kind of food its population consume because they make decisions regarding the quality of food their country produce and import as well as prices. For instance, in many developing countries people rarely have access to high quality food, thus being forced to choose something cheap like fast food. Moreover, the government can introduce legislation as regards to what kind of food can be promoted, seen for example in many European countries where the advertising of fast food, alcohol and cigarettes is prohibited. These measures, it is argued, can affect the way we eat and control the diets of the whole population.
In conclusion, while the governments may play a role in the choice of food of its citizens, it is still the responsibility of every individual whether to eat healthy diet or not due to many reasons being that a variety of methods to balance their diets or their finances. After all our life is in our hands!
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.