Nowadays, women as well as men work full-time. Therefore, women and men should share household tasks evenly. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Giải bởi Vietjack
Sample 1:
Given that both males and females these days often have full-time jobs, some argue that they should share household chores equally. In my opinion, although this is a significant step towards gender equality, I believe it is not strictly necessary to share housework evenly as this could increase the burden on those who have a heavy workload or poor physical health.
On the one hand, sharing household tasks evenly can promote greater equality between the sexes. In the past, while most men were breadwinners, women were more likely to be restricted to domestic chores, such as cleaning the house, doing laundry and cooking. This was broadly unfair to limit women to housework and restrict them from exploring their potentialities. Therefore, men being responsible for an equal amount of housework would enable women to have more time for their career and leisure activities and should be seen as a welcome development.
However, sharing household tasks evenly can be detrimental when each individual's health condition and workload are ignored. For example, some women may not have sufficient stamina to work for long hours compared to men. Therefore, it is best for their husbands or partners to help by doing extra housework, otherwise they may be easily exhausted, and it could affect their productivity and quality of life. The amount of work each person undertakes also needs to be taken into consideration. Particular professions require employees to complete assignments or undertake analyses after work at times, leaving these employees little time or energy for housework. In this case, their spouse should be willing to be responsible for more domestic chores if their schedule is not as hectic as their significant other's.
In conclusion, although dividing household chores evenly encourages gender equality, I believe we should not be excessively strict about the general application of this rule because one's physical health and work schedule matter. Distributing the same amount of housework to both sexes is ideal; however, depending on circumstances, certain exceptions can be justified.
Sample 2:
Both men and women have full-time employment nowadays. It is argued that both sexes should divide household chores such as cleaning and child-rearing equally among themselves.
While I agree with this view, I also believe that there are some cases where it is hard for this proposal to be carried out.
On the one hand, it is perfectly reasonable that men and women should each be responsible for half of the household tasks. First, since women are generally the ones who do most of these tasks, sharing will help lessen the burden on women, especially now that many of them are working full-time. As a result, women will have more time to relax or engage in other things such as listening to music or learning something new. Secondly, if husbands and wives share housework, they could learn to cooperate better to solve problems. For example, the husband can clean the dishes while his wife dries them and puts them on the rack. This could help families avoid conflicts as well.
On the other hand, there are certain situations where equally distributing housework is unnecessary. For one thing, one spouse may have more work than the other, thus making the former handle half of the chores places them under a lot of strain. In this case, the latter can help by taking on more tasks. Moreover, in the family, there may be one person who is better at doing household chores. Thus, they can be given more housework to do since they are more efficient.
In conclusion, although it is a good idea to have men and women being responsible for an equal amount of housework, some people may be busier with work or be better at doing household tasks, so they can take care of fewer or more tasks depending on their circumstances.
Sample 3:
Some people think that household chores should be shared equally among men and women as they now both work fulltime. Personally, I completely agree with this statement as doing housework is the responsibility of every family member, and this change is necessary to avoid causing stress to both men and women.
An equal distribution of housework can reduce the day-to-day pressure on both men and women as they will not have to do too many things during a day. In fact, everyone only has 24 hours a day, and the amount of time left after work of both men and women is nearly the same when they both have a full-time job. Forcing either men or women to do all household chores will place a huge burden on them as they may barely have any time left to rest or do any other activities. Therefore, sharing housework equally is necessary to reduce the pressure placed on either wife or husband.
In addition, completing household tasks, such as cleaning and washing up, is the responsibility of everyone in the family, regardless of their gender. When men and women live together as a family, they should both contribute to maintaining their home and making it a better place. Doing housework is a part of this process and therefore should be done by both wife and husband, rather than just one of them.
In conclusion, I agree with the idea that household tasks should be equally shared among men and women as this change can reduce the pressure placed on them when they both work fulltime. Doing housework is also the responsibility of all family members, whether they are men or women.
Sample 4:
Nowadays an ever-increasing number of women work full time, and in this reality, it is widely believed that house chores should be shared between men and women equally. I strongly agree with this statement.
One of the reasons for sharing housework between males and females is to promote gender equality. A stereotype that has existed a long time is that females ought to stay home, taking care of the family once they got married. This includes looking after the children and doing all of the housework, which is fairly labour-intensive. However, this approach could have quite a few disadvantages. It would render women less able of keeping abreast of what is happening in the job market, thus forming a lifestyle where they might find it arduous to step into the society again. To avoid this, many women are willing to get back into the workforce soon after their maternity leave, and once they do, it makes sense that their husbands should share part of the household chores, to fulfill their family responsibilities.
Nevertheless, we cannot be oblivious of several drawbacks of this trend. One potential downside is that men are less experienced in dealing with household tasks. This is because many seldom take an active role in doing housework, according to customs of many countries. As a result, they may end up doing household tasks in a less than perfect way, which could contribute to some unnecessary quarrels between partners, hindering their family bond. However, the likelihood of this happening isn't very high, because wives can offer some tips or guidance to their husbands when they learn how to share house chores such as mopping floors or doing laundry.
To sum up, although some conflicts might be triggered when equally sharing the duties of household tasks, the benefits of this trend are relatively oblivious.
Sample 5:
It is said that domestic duties need to be divided equally between today’s males and females since they are all in fulltime employment. Although it is beneficial for family members of both genders to share housework, I believe that making such responsibilities even is unnecessary.
The division of household chores is advantageous in some respects. Firstly, it enables people, especially women, to have more spare time for themselves. For example, a Vietnamese wife with a nine-to-five job has to spend extra three to four hours on cleaning, cooking and doing the laundry after work. If their husband could give them some help, these tasks will be done faster, and they can have some time for relaxation. Secondly, doing unpaid work together is a great way to cement family relationships. Because people tend to interact a lot when they do things together, it allows them to develop mutual understanding and avoid possible conflicts.
However, I am convinced that men and women doing the same amount of housework has more noteworthy counter-effects. As a matter of fact, each individual has different schedules with distinct responsibility at work. Some may suffer from heavy workload while others are free of pressure. For such a reason, flexibility needs to be taken into consideration to make sure that household chores do not become a burden to anyone. In addition, some types of unpaid work are only suitable for a specific gender. For instance, the preparation of family meals has long been considered women’s duty in many societies as it helps them show their care to their spouse and children. The equality associated with housework, therefore, is not justifiable in those cases.
In conclusion, housework sharing has certain merits, but it does not necessarily mean that people have to split it evenly.
Sample 6:
It is true that in many nations, both men and women must work full-time. That is to say, they should split up domestic chores regardless of gender. I completely concur with this, in my opinion, for the reasons listed below.
The tension in the family will be reduced firstly if men and women share household duties. There will also be fewer disputes or disagreements when people share work. For instance, both men and women can divide the household activities into morning and evening sessions to ensure that each task is completed on time.
Additionally, breaking conventional gender stereotypes might be accomplished through collaborating on domestic tasks. They may both clean the house together rather than the men going to work and the ladies staying home. For instance, in a married couple's situation, if the lady goes to work first, the husband should then take care of the housework. And vice versa, to prevent the wife from becoming overworked from performing all the domestic tasks.
You have less time to spend with your family while you work all day. Parents aim to complete their tasks as quickly as possible for this reason. As a result, parents rush home from work to spend as much time as possible with their kids. Last but not least, their workday is still ongoing after they go home. They have household chores waiting for them. This is typically a woman's responsibility in many houses. In our past, it has been customary for women to be housewives. Men therefore return home with more spare time than women.
Finally, dividing up domestic chores might help reduce the workload. One can avoid endangering their health by becoming overworked and injured by spreading out their workload fairly. It is essential that family members help balance the tasks at home.
Men and women ought to shoulder an equal amount of responsibility, to sum up. I think they will be able to reduce stress and enhance physical fitness by splitting the effort.
Sample 7:
Since more and more women are working full-time nowadays, it is universally accepted that men and women should divide household duties equally. I wholeheartedly concur with this assertion. To advance gender equality, men and women should divide household duties equally. The idea that women should stay at home and care for their families after being married is a long-standing stereotype. This involves taking care of the kids and performing all of the labour-intensive housekeeping.
This strategy, nevertheless, can have a number of drawbacks. It would make women less able to keep up with changes in the employment market. This will lead to a lifestyle where it might be difficult for them to reintegrate into society. In order to prevent this, many women are eager to return to work quickly after giving birth. Once they do, it only makes it right that their husbands share some of the domestic duties in order to uphold their obligations to their families.
However, we cannot ignore the fact that this tendency has a number of negative aspects. The fact that men have less expertise doing household chores is one potential drawback. This is due to the fact that, in many nations, it is uncommon for people to actively participate in doing housework. As a result, they can end up performing home duties less than perfectly. This might lead to some pointless arguments between couples and weaken their family's unity. The possibility of this occurring. However, it isn't extremely great because wives can help their husbands by giving advice when they learn how to divide household tasks like laundry and mopping.
In conclusion, although some disagreements may arise when family chores are shared equally, the advantages of this trend are largely hidden.
Sample 8:
Women are choosing to work full-time in many countries; thus, it is crucial that a married pair divides up household duties equally. This article concurs with this assertion since it evenly distributes the workload at home and reduces family strife.
First off, splitting home responsibilities lightens the load on one person when married couples work full-time jobs. This is so that household tasks can be finished more quickly when two individuals share the workload. They are able to peacefully finish their housework and arrive at work on time as a result. For instance, a recent Cambridge University study discovered that households where both partners share housekeeping. And work full-time had less chaos in the morning and arrived at work on time. Opponents counter that women should be in charge of household chores.
Second, households where both spouses work experience less conflict when they assist one another with domestic chores. Nobody complains that one spouse is doing more work than the other when both the husband and wife participate in home duties. Having a contented family and a prosperous life are the results of this. For instance, I assist my working wife by cleaning the floors of the house while she makes breakfast in the kitchen. As a result, we never fought over domestic tasks.
The burden of performing household chores alone is reduced. And the likelihood of family conflict is decreased, thus helping a spouse with their schoolwork is a smart idea.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
The issue of addressing the global challenge of feeding a rapidly expanding population has spurred discussions about potential solutions, including the adoption of Genetically Modified (GM) foods. While some proponents argue that GM foods present a viable answer to this problem, I fundamentally disagree. The potential risks associated with GM foods and the availability of alternative sustainable approaches make me skeptical about their efficacy as a long-term solution.
To begin with, Genetically Modified foods often involve the manipulation of organisms' genetic makeup to enhance desirable traits, such as increased crop yield or resistance to pests. While this may seem promising in theory, the unintended consequences of genetic modification could pose significant risks to human health and the environment. For instance, allergens or toxins could be inadvertently introduced into GM crops, leading to adverse effects on consumers. The release of genetically modified organisms into the environment could also disrupt natural ecosystems and harm biodiversity.
Additionally, the push for GM foods detracts attention and resources from more sustainable and holistic agricultural practices that have the potential to address food security challenges without compromising safety. Agroecological approaches, such as crop rotation, agroforestry, and integrated pest management, offer environmentally friendly alternatives to intensive monocultures and chemical-based farming. These methods promote soil health, water conservation, and biodiversity, all of which are crucial for ensuring the long-term sustainability of food production.
In conclusion, while the growing global population necessitates innovative solutions for food security, I am opposed to the idea that GM foods offer a viable remedy. The potential risks to human health and the environment, coupled with the availability of more sustainable agricultural practices, make me doubtful about the long-term efficacy of genetically modified foods. Instead of relying solely on GM foods, it is imperative to explore diverse and sustainable approaches that prioritize both human well-being and the planet's health.
Sample 2:
To tackle food shortages, many scientists recommend genetically modified (GM) food as a solution. Despite some concerns regarding this solution, I strongly believe that this is the future for food security.
The first benefit that GM foods offer is that it has significantly higher yield compared to traditional crops. GM foods have their genes altered to reproduce their cells quicker, leading to faster crop productions. Also, GM foods are capable of withstanding harsh environments, such as during winters and dry summers. Another benefit of consuming more GM foods is that they require fewer pesticides, contrary to popular belief. Because scientists design GM foods to be resistant to common pests, farmers do not need to spray pesticides as regularly as they would growing traditional crops.
However, despite these benefits, there are some concerns that researchers should revisit before populating GM foods. The first concern is the impact GM crops have on the ecosystem. Because these crops are known to be resistant to pests, it could lead to the eradication of pest species. As a result, this can disrupt the ecosystem’s balance. The second concern is that, due to GM crops’ high efficiency and rapid growth, they can easily become an invasive species with unhealthy farming practices. This problem, aside from damaging the ecosystem, also has adverse effects on the economy. For example, if one plot destined to grow a certain plant gets invaded by another species, farmers will experience a loss of income.
In conclusion, although admittedly, there are some legitimate concerns for GM foods, I still strongly agree that GM crops are the most feasible solution to the global food shortage.
Sample 3:
Feeding the ever-growing world population is undoubtedly a significant challenge that needs to be addressed. Some individuals argue that genetically modified (GM) foods could provide a viable solution to this problem. In my opinion, while GM foods may offer certain benefits, they also come with potential risks and drawbacks that need to be carefully considered.
Proponents of GM foods argue that they can help increase crop yields, improve nutritional content, and enhance resistance to pests and diseases. This, they claim, would enable farmers to produce more food on less land, ultimately helping to feed a larger population. Additionally, GM foods have the potential to withstand harsh environmental conditions, such as drought or extreme temperatures, making them more resilient and reliable sources of food.
However, it is important to acknowledge the concerns surrounding GM foods. Critics argue that the long-term health and environmental impacts of consuming and cultivating GM crops are not yet fully understood. There are also ethical considerations, such as the potential for corporate control over the food supply and the loss of biodiversity. Furthermore, the introduction of GM crops into natural ecosystems could have unforeseen consequences, disrupting delicate ecological balances.
In conclusion, while GM foods may offer some potential benefits in addressing the challenge of feeding a growing world population, the risks and uncertainties associated with their widespread adoption cannot be ignored. It is crucial to conduct thorough research and risk assessments to ensure that the benefits outweigh the potential drawbacks. Ultimately, a balanced approach that takes into account the needs of both current and future generations is necessary to tackle this pressing issue.
Sample 4:
Whether GM foods are the ultimate answer to address the need to feed the ever-growing global population has been a topic of fierce argument recently among intellectuals across the world. However, I fully agree with the statement that such foods are an effective remedy to worldwide food scarcity.
One obvious advantage of GM foods is better production in lesser time which will ensure food for more people that too utilizing a few resources. In addition, these foods and their cultivation are a lot more environmentally-friendly than normal foods because the former are highly resilient to diseases, pests and insects which reduces the need to use harmful herbicides, pesticides, insecticides and so on. This also ensures that people get pure fruits and grains, for example, free from chemicals.
Better texture, varied flavors and improved nutritional values are some other qualities which make genetically modified foods a viable solution to shortage of food. When such high-quality foods are made available at cheaper prices, it will sure save governments and individuals substantial sums of money, not to mention the obvious health benefits for people. Further, longer shelf-life makes bioengineered foods easier to transport to distant places and store them. Last but not least, their potentially non-allergenic nature makes them Manna from heaven for the hungry millions.
In short, GM foods are the need of the hour. Therefore, the authorities across the world need to spring to action to mass-produce genetically-engineered foods and make them available to people thereby saving hundreds of thousands of lives from malnutrition and starvation.
Sample 5:
As the population is increasing at a fast rate across the world, a shortage of food is becoming a perplexing problem. Some individuals suggest that this can be addressed by genetically modified foods. In my opinion, I totally disagree with the statement since engineering genetic foods have a high risk of potential problems and negative environmental impacts.
The main issue of genetic modification organism is a risk of potential problems after having the food for a long-term. This is because scientists or nutritionists are not sure about the long-term effects and safety as it is a relatively new practice. For example, food allergic reactions have risen in the last decade such as nuts or dairy products, which resulted from consuming GM foods. In addition, there are also a large number of people who hold concerns about the potential risks to human health affected by GM crops such as inducing mutations in human genes. Therefore, numerous people have an inclination toward eating organic food rather than GM foods.
Another thing to consider is that the agricultural method of GMOs brings harmful effects on the environment and ecosystem. Firstly, the changes in the agricultural practice affect on the farming and where weeds or other harmful factors become stronger. This results in overuse of the toxic sprays such as pesticides and herbicides. Secondly, the new cultivation method is harmful for non-GMO crops and also insects or animals, which can lead to loss of biodiversity. To illustrate this, bees play an important role in the pollination of various food crops, but they are vulnerable from the sprays.
In conclusion, I am strongly opposed to the opinion that genetically modified foods can deal with
a shortage of food due to the world demographic growth. This is for the reason that it has potential problems affecting people’s health and it has negative effects on environmental impacts and biodiversity.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
There is a great number of people travelling and visiting other nations, these days. This can be caused by several reasons and personally, it is a positive development.
To begin with, there are two contributing factors behind people’s motivation to travel. First, many of them may want to learn more about unfamiliar cultures as during their trip, they are allowed to get exposed to local people and observe cultural differences here. This gives them a chance to make a comparison of cultural traits in different nations, which helps them enrich their knowledge and have a more profound understanding of the world. Second, a number of people decide to go on a trip to another nation so that they can visit their relatives or family members who live overseas. Video calls or photos only help them see each other’s faces without hugging or holding hands, and therefore, they desire to travel abroad so as to meet their beloved ones in the flesh.
I believe the prevalence of cross-border trips brings about great positive effects on society. With many travellers coming to a country, the demand for housing and food here will likely grow, so local people can earn a great amount of money through providing shelters and selling their traditional cuisines. For instance, Thailand is a country that welcomes millions of travellers from around the world annually, thanks to which the tourism industry here can flourish. Thousands of jobs have also been created, such as workers in travel agencies, taxi drivers or tour guides, to serve the great number of international tourists. Therefore, many Thai residents working in this industry have escaped poverty, avoided unemployment and enjoyed a better life quality.
In conclusion, people these days travel across the border in order to acquire new knowledge and see one another. In my opinion, this development is positive due to its various social benefits.
Sample 2:
More and more people today are choosing to travel internationally. This positive development is mainly because of a rise in middle-class income coupled with advances in aviation.
People today can afford to travel as it has become more convenient. The last half century has seen wages in both developed and developing companies climb with the concomitant expansion of the global middle class. Workers have the disposable income to travel that they lacked in the past. This has been complemented with safer airplanes, so individuals are not afraid to fly. Airfares have also become cheaper as companies like Boeing produce more efficient planes, competition intensifies between competing airlines, and the supply more than meets demand for flights. These factors combined have spawned a golden age of international travel.
Looking at the opportunity in perspective, it is hard to see the advent of international travel as anything less than one of mankind’s greatest achievements. For the entirety of human history, most people lived and died near to where they were born. Anyone who wanted to travel to another country had to possess enormous wealth, time, and courage. Today, the average employee can save up and travel to see the wonders of the Renaissance in Southern Europe, the vast monuments to history and modernity in China, or explore any other corner of Earth that has piqued their interest. This is an unprecedented opportunity unavailable to past generations.
In conclusion, international travel is a byproduct of the modern age, and we should all be grateful for its possibility. There are clear environmental drawbacks but those should not blind people to its benefits taken as a whole.
Sample 3:
In recent years, there has been a surge in the number of individuals traveling to foreign countries. This trend is fueled by various reasons, all of which contribute to a wide range of positive developments. In this essay, I will explore why numerous people choose to explore novel locations and argue that this trend has an overall positive impact on individuals and society.
One of the primary factors driving the escalating number of international travelers is globalization. As the world becomes more interconnected, people grow increasingly interested in different cultures, traditions, and ways of life. Consequently, traveling to other nations assists them in cultivating cross-cultural comprehension and insights. Moreover, this trend offers significant educational advantages as learners can pursue academic knowledge in developed countries with high-quality educational systems. This allows them not only to acquire academic knowledge but also to gain valuable skills such as problem-solving and effective communication. For instance, students studying abroad will be well-prepared with essential competencies for a lucrative career.
I firmly believe that the growth of international tourism positively impacts the domestic economy of host countries. The influx of foreign tourists and their spending on local services provide a lucrative stream of revenue that can significantly improve the lives of people in these nations. Additionally, tourists benefit from cultural exchanges and eye-opening experiences during their visits. Furthermore, the profits generated from these activities can be utilized by local governments to upgrade infrastructure such as accommodations or roads. For example, Ha Giang province allocates 35% of its tourism revenue annually to construct new buildings and maintain local heritages.
In conclusion, the rise in the number of international visitors can be attributed to globalization and the pursuit of educational opportunities. In my opinion, this trend will continue to yield positive outcomes for individuals and societies by fostering cross-cultural understanding and contributing to economic growth.
Sample 4:
In recent years, there has been a significant surge in the number of people traveling abroad for leisure and various other purposes. This essay will explore the factors driving this growing trend and propose that the benefits of international tourism outweigh its potential drawbacks.
Overseas destinations have become increasingly popular vacation spots in recent years, primarily due to two factors. The first is the reduction in travel costs and increased accessibility, making international trips more affordable and convenient for a larger population than ever before. The emergence of budget airlines and early booking discounts have made airfare more affordable, enabling vacationers to plan ahead and save money. The second driving factor is the explosive growth of social media, which has broadened people's access to information about diverse cultures and remote locations, inspiring them to seek new experiences. Tourist review videos can easily go viral on popular platforms such as TikTok and YouTube, motivating millions of viewers to step beyond their comfort zones and consider embarking on their own enlightening adventures.
This trend of increased international tourism is positive for several compelling reasons. Firstly, overseas tourism can significantly impact the economy of host countries. Holidaymakers typically spend money on a range of goods and services, such as accommodation, food, transportation, and souvenirs, which can stimulate job creation and economic growth. This, in turn, can lead to improved infrastructure and enhanced living standards for the local population. Secondly, travelling globally promotes cultural exchange and understanding among people from diverse geographical backgrounds. By visiting foreign countries, visitors can learn about new cultures, customs, and traditions, broadening their perspectives and fostering mutual respect. This cultural exchange can help dismantle stereotypes and prejudices, leading to a more tolerant and inclusive global society.
In conclusion, the trend of global travel, driven by affordable travel costs, increased accessibility, and the growth of social media, is a predominantly positive development, offering numerous benefits for both tourists and host countries.
Sample 5:
More people today find themselves interested in travelling to foreign nations. I believe that this phenomenon is a result of increased access to information on social media, and yet is fundamentally adverse to the local cultures that experience mass tourism.
Firstly, I believe that social media has allowed people to catch a glimpse of foreign locales, which in turn entices them to visit destinations that they otherwise would not have before. When people see travel adverts through online platforms, they are compelled to explore it themselves and showcase their experience on social media. This is why many people on the internet today have been able to create a career out of travelling and posting pictures on the internet alone: there is a huge market for the advertisements of travel destinations on apps such as Instagram and Facebook today.
However, increased travel to tourist destinations has inadvertently internationalized them over time as governments and urban planners aim to make the stay of rich foreign tourists more comfortable and luxurious. Gradually, little by little of what makes the place special is replaced by a generic, commercialized shell. This creates a situation in places such as Angkor Wat in Cambodia, where the serenity of the temples is destroyed by the overwhelming number of tourists.
Overall, I believe that the rise of the internet and social media in particular has contributed to the proliferation of global travel. Nevertheless, tourism has thrived at the expense of the destinations' local cultures. On the whole, I therefore argue that this development has been an unwanted one for most local populations.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Nhắn tin Zalo