In many nations, people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units, instead of in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Giải bởi Vietjack
Sample 1:
In many large cities around the world, it has become quite common for people to either live alone or in a small family, as opposed to living in large extended family households. This essay will take a closer look at some of the positive and negative aspects that arise with this trend.
On the one hand, this trend does have some positive aspects. For example, different generations want and value different things these days. Many young people do not wish to live the traditional lifestyles of their parents and grandparents. Therefore, living alone allows them the freedom to do as they please without having to face constant judgement or criticism. Furthermore, many older people do not wish to live the hectic, fast-paced lifestyle of modern city life and prefer to live a slower-paced, healthier life in the countryside during their retirement. Living alone, or in smaller family groups allows each generation to live their preferred lifestyle.
However, this trend also brings several drawbacks. Firstly, as parents and grandparents get older, they may face a number of physical and mental health problems, and by living alone, they may lack the care and attention they need from their children. Secondly, children will have less interaction and influence from grandparents, and potentially miss out on important life lessons that can be taught from grandparents who have a lot of valuable life experience. Important traditions and customs may also be lost from generation to generation. And finally, living alone, or in small family groups can lead to poor family bonds between generations.
In conclusion, I believe that while this trend does bring some benefits, overall, they are definitely outweighed by the drawbacks.
Sample 2:
The number of people opting to reside in small apartments by themselves has been steadily increasing. While some argue that the disadvantages of this trend outweigh its merits, I firmly believe that it is a positive development as it signifies positive personal growth and economic development.
Living alone or with a small family allows individuals to experience greater freedom and personal space. It becomes more convenient for them to engage in their passions and hobbies outside of work without being accountable to extended family members. In a nuclear family, which is small by nature, responsibilities are divided and assigned, enabling family members to dedicate more time to pursuing their interests. Furthermore, when living independently, individuals do not have to concern themselves with the opinions or responsibilities of other family members. This provides them with additional time for reflection and self-improvement, which is crucial for personal growth.
Moreover, economic stability plays a significant role in the decision to live in a small family or independently. It is notably easier to manage financial responsibilities when living alone or with a partner and only one child. This allows for better financial planning, as it can provide a higher quality of life for their children and savings for emergencies. Additionally, living independently encourages individuals to develop essential life skills such as personal financial management, household chores, cooking, and shopping. Independent living also means not having to provide for other family members continually, which helps avoid excessive expenses.
In conclusion, I am confident that the trend toward smaller households and independent living is beneficial for society as a whole. It offers increased personal space and freedom, along with financial advantages and valuable life skills.
Sample 3:
In numerous nations today, more people are living by themselves or in small units rather than living in large families like in the past. Personally, I think that this complex new development is on the whole more negative than positive, as although it can afford young people some independence, it can also create feelings of loneliness for many parts of the population.
From one point of view, one could argue that living alone has also granted young people the ability to do more of what they desire. Without having to spend time taking care of their families, many young people today can instead focus on what makes them tick, socially and professionally. This in turn leads to them going into different fields from their parents, allowing them to craft their own creative projects. In developing nations such as Vietnam, for instance, many young people have been able to engage in their own start-ups, positively improving their career and the national economy.
Conversely, the advent of smaller family units has helped to drive up a sense of isolation and a disconnect with one’s own roots. Living alone diminishes one's primary source of social interaction, which comes from the family, possibly resulting in psychological symptoms of loneliness or even depression. This is why despite being one of the most financially independent generations, millennials today report feelings of low mood more than any other previous generations. The prioritization of work and personal ambition, hence, could come at a cost of a diminutive social life.
In conclusion, I argue that while young people can be more independent living alone, this arrangement also brings with it the comparatively worse effects of worse mental health. Therefore, the trend described in the question is one I argue is unwanted.
Sample 4:
The size of families is shrinking when more people live in nuclear families, have no children, or even live alone. This trend has both merits and demerits that will be analyzed in this essay.
Living in smaller family units has proved its positive influences on many. Indeed, people have more independence when they can support their own lives living in their own space rather than depending on their parents or siblings. In order to afford such a condition, they need to be more responsible in building their independence, starting with striving for excellent education, working hard for skills, experience, and income, and finally managing finance well to buy real estate. Looked at this angle, living in smaller families obviously provide more impetus for people to make the most out of their time to be able to stand on their own two feet as soon as possible. Without any doubt, personal development through edification, professional diligence, and well-prepared life plans will encourage personal development which is the atom of social progress.
However, the preference for smaller family sizes also posts some palpable threats to society. First as the demand for private living space escalates, more pressure will be exerted on urban sprawling with land scarcity. It will give rise to skyscrapers, the reduction of green zones for housing construction, and the destruction of the natural surroundings for urban infrastructures. The nature will have to sacrifice to provide for the need of more accommodation. Second, when people do not live with their parents, old people may be left abandoned. This phenomenon especially causes inhumane consequences to senior citizens when nursing homes are restricted in services and are willing to reject those with poor health. Third, leading an independent life also means one may not have help when in critical need. A family member may be alone at home and is seriously ill or suffers fatal accidents like getting burned, cut, or shocked by electricity. Such situations may cost them their lives because no one is around to give them care, first aid, or a call to the hospital.
In conclusion, a smaller family unit renders both good and bad for those who chose it and for the society as a whole. Whether this trend has more positive or negative impacts depends on how much people are aware of two sides of the issue.
Sample 5:
There is an increasing number of individuals choosing to live by themselves in small apartments. While there are those who believe the drawbacks of this trend outweigh its benefits, I personally think this is a good sign of personal growth and economic development.
Living alone or in a small family allows people to enjoy more freedom and personal space. They find it more convenient to pursue their passions and hobbies outside of work when they know they are not answerable to anyone from the extended family. As the family size is small and responsibilities are divided and assigned, members can seek more time in pursuing their hobbies in a nuclear family. Furthermore, when it comes to a living alone lifestyle, people do not have to be worried about other family members’ opinions nor bear responsibilities of them. As a result, they find extra time to think and spend their own, which is incredibly essential for their personal growth.
In addition, economic security is another major reason behind living as a small family because it is obviously easier to shoulder financial responsibilities when someone lives by self, or just a couple, or having only a single child along with them. That means, they can easily make extensive calculations as to how they can afford a better life and take adequate care of their children, as well as put apart specific amounts as savings so that they have a handy reserve to fall back on in case of any emergency. In addition, when someone is living alone, they know that there is no one to give hands in their daily life, which pushes them to avail themselves of some essential self-living skills, such as personal financial management, household chores, cooking, and shopping etc. Also, living alone individuals do not have to always fend for other members, which allows them to avoid unmanageable expenses.
In conclusion, I am convinced that smaller households are a good trend for the whole society because it gives extra personal space and freedom along with offering some important financial advantages and essential household trainings.
Sample 6:
In contemporary urban settings across the globe, the shift towards solitary or nuclear family living arrangements marks a departure from traditional extended family living. This transformation, while reflective of modern societal norms, harbors both positive and negative ramifications. This essay will explore the autonomy and privacy afforded by such living conditions, alongside the erosion of familial bonds and support networks.
The trend towards individual or small family units primarily fosters personal independence and privacy. In cities, where pace and privacy are prized, living alone or with immediate family members enables individuals to cultivate self-reliance. For instance, young adults navigating the complexities of urban careers and lifestyles develop robust coping mechanisms, unencumbered by the obligations often imposed by extended family living. This autonomy not only bolsters personal growth but also encourages the pursuit of personal aspirations, making it a decidedly positive development for the individual.
Conversely, this shift has contributed to a weakening of extended family ties, a cornerstone of social support systems in many cultures. The traditional extended family structure provided a network of support for childcare, eldercare, and shared financial responsibilities. With the disintegration of such units, these benefits are compromised, leading to increased isolation and diminished communal support. For example, elderly family members may find themselves in solitude, lacking the care and companionship once guaranteed within a larger family setting. This loss of communal support and the resultant social isolation represent the negative consequences of the trend towards smaller living units.
In conclusion, while living alone or in small family units in cities offers autonomy and caters to the privacy desired in modern urban life, it simultaneously undermines the traditional extended family support network. This dichotomy suggests that the trend has multifaceted implications, beneficial in fostering individual independence but detrimental in eroding communal bonds. As society continues to evolve, finding a balance between these aspects will be crucial.
Sample 7:
The recent urban trend of individuals opting for solitary or small familial dwellings over traditional extensive kin networks presents a complex narrative of progress and loss. This evolution, while a testament to individualism and modernization, invites a nuanced examination of its impacts on personal development and societal cohesion.
Central to the appeal of smaller living units is the unparalleled autonomy they offer, serving as a crucible for personal and professional development. In the labyrinth of urban existence, the ability to navigate one's path without the constraints of extended familial expectations empowers individuals. This is illustrated by the burgeoning number of young professionals who, by living independently, learn to balance the rigors of their careers with personal well-being, thus sculpting a more resilient and adaptive populace. Such environments, by virtue of their privacy and independence, foster a breed of individuals equipped to contribute innovatively to the societal fabric.
However, this shift is not without its detriments, chiefly the dilution of intergenerational wisdom and the fabric of support traditionally woven by extended families. The atomization of family units severs individuals from the rich tapestry of collective memory and support that extended families provide. For instance, the mentoring roles traditionally played by grandparents are diminished, depriving younger generations of valuable life lessons and the sense of belonging that comes from deep familial connections. The resulting societal landscape is one where the invaluable resource of elder wisdom is untapped, and individuals, though independent, navigate life's vicissitudes in relative isolation.
In synthesizing these perspectives, it is evident that the trend towards smaller family units is a double-edged sword, offering autonomy at the expense of communal wisdom and support. As societies continue to morph, striking a harmonious balance between these polarities is imperative. This will ensure the preservation of individual autonomy while retaining the invaluable societal glue provided by extended familial networks.
Sample 8:
An increasing number of city dwellers prefer living independently or with their nuclear families to co-living with relatives. There are various positive effects following this trend which benefits individuals alone and the society as a whole.
Firstly, renting or buying an estate encourages young people to become more independent. There are a lot of responsibilities accompanying the ownership of a home, including paying rent or a mortgage, bills and house maintenance. Additionally, living away from their parents, young adults must do house chores by themselves since they are responsible for their homes. Moreover, living in small family units reduces the chance of conflicts between family members. For example, in a large, extended family, grandparents and grandchildren can have a lot of disagreements due to the generation gap originating from dissimilar social standards. Meanwhile, family connection is still maintained since it is easy for family member to visit each other in cities.
Secondly, this trend potentially supports the economic growth of the city. Since more people choose to live alone, the number of estates in cites must rise as well, which substantially benefits real estate agencies and construction companies. Furthermore, to compete in the market, real estate corporations usually invest in facilities such as schools, hospitals, supermarkets, etc. to attract customers. Although some people are concerned that this trend would result in the tremendous increase of property value and shortages of houses, many economic analysts are positive that it would help rural areas develop as well.
It is understandable that the majority of young people in cities nowadays wish to live alone or in a nuclear family rather than an extended family. This trend is becoming more popular because many are seeing the benefits of having their own homes.
Sample 9:
Single-person households and nuclear families have gained increasing popularity in recent years, especially in big cities. From my perspective, while this way of life is beneficial to a certain extent, it is more likely to have negative impacts on family core values and the well-being of the elderly.
Living alone or living in small family units can be deemed advantageous and necessary for some reasons. To a certain degree, living alone offers people a sense of freedom. Issues inherent in living with others such as hygiene and private spaces are non-existent if one lives in solitude.
Furthermore, some people believe that a small family consisting of only the parents and their children are financially stable. Smaller families mean the expenses are also minimal, and money-related issues can be handled more easily compared to bigger ones.
However, this trend can also be very harmful in several ways. Firstly, the bonding between generations, which can be found in extended families, may become weakened. This is especially true to people who are forced to study or work far away from their relatives, especially grandparents.
For the elderly, living alone leaves them in a vulnerable state. Besides the feeling of loneliness brought by the lack of emotional support, old people normally encounter difficulties in doing daily tasks since they are physically weak. As a result, casualties or even death cases owing to unfortunate accidents are inevitable.
In conclusion, my firm conviction is that while living alone or in a nuclear family is somewhat beneficial, it has more negative influences on the family bonds and leaves aged people susceptible to many potential risks.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
The issue of addressing the global challenge of feeding a rapidly expanding population has spurred discussions about potential solutions, including the adoption of Genetically Modified (GM) foods. While some proponents argue that GM foods present a viable answer to this problem, I fundamentally disagree. The potential risks associated with GM foods and the availability of alternative sustainable approaches make me skeptical about their efficacy as a long-term solution.
To begin with, Genetically Modified foods often involve the manipulation of organisms' genetic makeup to enhance desirable traits, such as increased crop yield or resistance to pests. While this may seem promising in theory, the unintended consequences of genetic modification could pose significant risks to human health and the environment. For instance, allergens or toxins could be inadvertently introduced into GM crops, leading to adverse effects on consumers. The release of genetically modified organisms into the environment could also disrupt natural ecosystems and harm biodiversity.
Additionally, the push for GM foods detracts attention and resources from more sustainable and holistic agricultural practices that have the potential to address food security challenges without compromising safety. Agroecological approaches, such as crop rotation, agroforestry, and integrated pest management, offer environmentally friendly alternatives to intensive monocultures and chemical-based farming. These methods promote soil health, water conservation, and biodiversity, all of which are crucial for ensuring the long-term sustainability of food production.
In conclusion, while the growing global population necessitates innovative solutions for food security, I am opposed to the idea that GM foods offer a viable remedy. The potential risks to human health and the environment, coupled with the availability of more sustainable agricultural practices, make me doubtful about the long-term efficacy of genetically modified foods. Instead of relying solely on GM foods, it is imperative to explore diverse and sustainable approaches that prioritize both human well-being and the planet's health.
Sample 2:
To tackle food shortages, many scientists recommend genetically modified (GM) food as a solution. Despite some concerns regarding this solution, I strongly believe that this is the future for food security.
The first benefit that GM foods offer is that it has significantly higher yield compared to traditional crops. GM foods have their genes altered to reproduce their cells quicker, leading to faster crop productions. Also, GM foods are capable of withstanding harsh environments, such as during winters and dry summers. Another benefit of consuming more GM foods is that they require fewer pesticides, contrary to popular belief. Because scientists design GM foods to be resistant to common pests, farmers do not need to spray pesticides as regularly as they would growing traditional crops.
However, despite these benefits, there are some concerns that researchers should revisit before populating GM foods. The first concern is the impact GM crops have on the ecosystem. Because these crops are known to be resistant to pests, it could lead to the eradication of pest species. As a result, this can disrupt the ecosystem’s balance. The second concern is that, due to GM crops’ high efficiency and rapid growth, they can easily become an invasive species with unhealthy farming practices. This problem, aside from damaging the ecosystem, also has adverse effects on the economy. For example, if one plot destined to grow a certain plant gets invaded by another species, farmers will experience a loss of income.
In conclusion, although admittedly, there are some legitimate concerns for GM foods, I still strongly agree that GM crops are the most feasible solution to the global food shortage.
Sample 3:
Feeding the ever-growing world population is undoubtedly a significant challenge that needs to be addressed. Some individuals argue that genetically modified (GM) foods could provide a viable solution to this problem. In my opinion, while GM foods may offer certain benefits, they also come with potential risks and drawbacks that need to be carefully considered.
Proponents of GM foods argue that they can help increase crop yields, improve nutritional content, and enhance resistance to pests and diseases. This, they claim, would enable farmers to produce more food on less land, ultimately helping to feed a larger population. Additionally, GM foods have the potential to withstand harsh environmental conditions, such as drought or extreme temperatures, making them more resilient and reliable sources of food.
However, it is important to acknowledge the concerns surrounding GM foods. Critics argue that the long-term health and environmental impacts of consuming and cultivating GM crops are not yet fully understood. There are also ethical considerations, such as the potential for corporate control over the food supply and the loss of biodiversity. Furthermore, the introduction of GM crops into natural ecosystems could have unforeseen consequences, disrupting delicate ecological balances.
In conclusion, while GM foods may offer some potential benefits in addressing the challenge of feeding a growing world population, the risks and uncertainties associated with their widespread adoption cannot be ignored. It is crucial to conduct thorough research and risk assessments to ensure that the benefits outweigh the potential drawbacks. Ultimately, a balanced approach that takes into account the needs of both current and future generations is necessary to tackle this pressing issue.
Sample 4:
Whether GM foods are the ultimate answer to address the need to feed the ever-growing global population has been a topic of fierce argument recently among intellectuals across the world. However, I fully agree with the statement that such foods are an effective remedy to worldwide food scarcity.
One obvious advantage of GM foods is better production in lesser time which will ensure food for more people that too utilizing a few resources. In addition, these foods and their cultivation are a lot more environmentally-friendly than normal foods because the former are highly resilient to diseases, pests and insects which reduces the need to use harmful herbicides, pesticides, insecticides and so on. This also ensures that people get pure fruits and grains, for example, free from chemicals.
Better texture, varied flavors and improved nutritional values are some other qualities which make genetically modified foods a viable solution to shortage of food. When such high-quality foods are made available at cheaper prices, it will sure save governments and individuals substantial sums of money, not to mention the obvious health benefits for people. Further, longer shelf-life makes bioengineered foods easier to transport to distant places and store them. Last but not least, their potentially non-allergenic nature makes them Manna from heaven for the hungry millions.
In short, GM foods are the need of the hour. Therefore, the authorities across the world need to spring to action to mass-produce genetically-engineered foods and make them available to people thereby saving hundreds of thousands of lives from malnutrition and starvation.
Sample 5:
As the population is increasing at a fast rate across the world, a shortage of food is becoming a perplexing problem. Some individuals suggest that this can be addressed by genetically modified foods. In my opinion, I totally disagree with the statement since engineering genetic foods have a high risk of potential problems and negative environmental impacts.
The main issue of genetic modification organism is a risk of potential problems after having the food for a long-term. This is because scientists or nutritionists are not sure about the long-term effects and safety as it is a relatively new practice. For example, food allergic reactions have risen in the last decade such as nuts or dairy products, which resulted from consuming GM foods. In addition, there are also a large number of people who hold concerns about the potential risks to human health affected by GM crops such as inducing mutations in human genes. Therefore, numerous people have an inclination toward eating organic food rather than GM foods.
Another thing to consider is that the agricultural method of GMOs brings harmful effects on the environment and ecosystem. Firstly, the changes in the agricultural practice affect on the farming and where weeds or other harmful factors become stronger. This results in overuse of the toxic sprays such as pesticides and herbicides. Secondly, the new cultivation method is harmful for non-GMO crops and also insects or animals, which can lead to loss of biodiversity. To illustrate this, bees play an important role in the pollination of various food crops, but they are vulnerable from the sprays.
In conclusion, I am strongly opposed to the opinion that genetically modified foods can deal with
a shortage of food due to the world demographic growth. This is for the reason that it has potential problems affecting people’s health and it has negative effects on environmental impacts and biodiversity.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
There is a great number of people travelling and visiting other nations, these days. This can be caused by several reasons and personally, it is a positive development.
To begin with, there are two contributing factors behind people’s motivation to travel. First, many of them may want to learn more about unfamiliar cultures as during their trip, they are allowed to get exposed to local people and observe cultural differences here. This gives them a chance to make a comparison of cultural traits in different nations, which helps them enrich their knowledge and have a more profound understanding of the world. Second, a number of people decide to go on a trip to another nation so that they can visit their relatives or family members who live overseas. Video calls or photos only help them see each other’s faces without hugging or holding hands, and therefore, they desire to travel abroad so as to meet their beloved ones in the flesh.
I believe the prevalence of cross-border trips brings about great positive effects on society. With many travellers coming to a country, the demand for housing and food here will likely grow, so local people can earn a great amount of money through providing shelters and selling their traditional cuisines. For instance, Thailand is a country that welcomes millions of travellers from around the world annually, thanks to which the tourism industry here can flourish. Thousands of jobs have also been created, such as workers in travel agencies, taxi drivers or tour guides, to serve the great number of international tourists. Therefore, many Thai residents working in this industry have escaped poverty, avoided unemployment and enjoyed a better life quality.
In conclusion, people these days travel across the border in order to acquire new knowledge and see one another. In my opinion, this development is positive due to its various social benefits.
Sample 2:
More and more people today are choosing to travel internationally. This positive development is mainly because of a rise in middle-class income coupled with advances in aviation.
People today can afford to travel as it has become more convenient. The last half century has seen wages in both developed and developing companies climb with the concomitant expansion of the global middle class. Workers have the disposable income to travel that they lacked in the past. This has been complemented with safer airplanes, so individuals are not afraid to fly. Airfares have also become cheaper as companies like Boeing produce more efficient planes, competition intensifies between competing airlines, and the supply more than meets demand for flights. These factors combined have spawned a golden age of international travel.
Looking at the opportunity in perspective, it is hard to see the advent of international travel as anything less than one of mankind’s greatest achievements. For the entirety of human history, most people lived and died near to where they were born. Anyone who wanted to travel to another country had to possess enormous wealth, time, and courage. Today, the average employee can save up and travel to see the wonders of the Renaissance in Southern Europe, the vast monuments to history and modernity in China, or explore any other corner of Earth that has piqued their interest. This is an unprecedented opportunity unavailable to past generations.
In conclusion, international travel is a byproduct of the modern age, and we should all be grateful for its possibility. There are clear environmental drawbacks but those should not blind people to its benefits taken as a whole.
Sample 3:
In recent years, there has been a surge in the number of individuals traveling to foreign countries. This trend is fueled by various reasons, all of which contribute to a wide range of positive developments. In this essay, I will explore why numerous people choose to explore novel locations and argue that this trend has an overall positive impact on individuals and society.
One of the primary factors driving the escalating number of international travelers is globalization. As the world becomes more interconnected, people grow increasingly interested in different cultures, traditions, and ways of life. Consequently, traveling to other nations assists them in cultivating cross-cultural comprehension and insights. Moreover, this trend offers significant educational advantages as learners can pursue academic knowledge in developed countries with high-quality educational systems. This allows them not only to acquire academic knowledge but also to gain valuable skills such as problem-solving and effective communication. For instance, students studying abroad will be well-prepared with essential competencies for a lucrative career.
I firmly believe that the growth of international tourism positively impacts the domestic economy of host countries. The influx of foreign tourists and their spending on local services provide a lucrative stream of revenue that can significantly improve the lives of people in these nations. Additionally, tourists benefit from cultural exchanges and eye-opening experiences during their visits. Furthermore, the profits generated from these activities can be utilized by local governments to upgrade infrastructure such as accommodations or roads. For example, Ha Giang province allocates 35% of its tourism revenue annually to construct new buildings and maintain local heritages.
In conclusion, the rise in the number of international visitors can be attributed to globalization and the pursuit of educational opportunities. In my opinion, this trend will continue to yield positive outcomes for individuals and societies by fostering cross-cultural understanding and contributing to economic growth.
Sample 4:
In recent years, there has been a significant surge in the number of people traveling abroad for leisure and various other purposes. This essay will explore the factors driving this growing trend and propose that the benefits of international tourism outweigh its potential drawbacks.
Overseas destinations have become increasingly popular vacation spots in recent years, primarily due to two factors. The first is the reduction in travel costs and increased accessibility, making international trips more affordable and convenient for a larger population than ever before. The emergence of budget airlines and early booking discounts have made airfare more affordable, enabling vacationers to plan ahead and save money. The second driving factor is the explosive growth of social media, which has broadened people's access to information about diverse cultures and remote locations, inspiring them to seek new experiences. Tourist review videos can easily go viral on popular platforms such as TikTok and YouTube, motivating millions of viewers to step beyond their comfort zones and consider embarking on their own enlightening adventures.
This trend of increased international tourism is positive for several compelling reasons. Firstly, overseas tourism can significantly impact the economy of host countries. Holidaymakers typically spend money on a range of goods and services, such as accommodation, food, transportation, and souvenirs, which can stimulate job creation and economic growth. This, in turn, can lead to improved infrastructure and enhanced living standards for the local population. Secondly, travelling globally promotes cultural exchange and understanding among people from diverse geographical backgrounds. By visiting foreign countries, visitors can learn about new cultures, customs, and traditions, broadening their perspectives and fostering mutual respect. This cultural exchange can help dismantle stereotypes and prejudices, leading to a more tolerant and inclusive global society.
In conclusion, the trend of global travel, driven by affordable travel costs, increased accessibility, and the growth of social media, is a predominantly positive development, offering numerous benefits for both tourists and host countries.
Sample 5:
More people today find themselves interested in travelling to foreign nations. I believe that this phenomenon is a result of increased access to information on social media, and yet is fundamentally adverse to the local cultures that experience mass tourism.
Firstly, I believe that social media has allowed people to catch a glimpse of foreign locales, which in turn entices them to visit destinations that they otherwise would not have before. When people see travel adverts through online platforms, they are compelled to explore it themselves and showcase their experience on social media. This is why many people on the internet today have been able to create a career out of travelling and posting pictures on the internet alone: there is a huge market for the advertisements of travel destinations on apps such as Instagram and Facebook today.
However, increased travel to tourist destinations has inadvertently internationalized them over time as governments and urban planners aim to make the stay of rich foreign tourists more comfortable and luxurious. Gradually, little by little of what makes the place special is replaced by a generic, commercialized shell. This creates a situation in places such as Angkor Wat in Cambodia, where the serenity of the temples is destroyed by the overwhelming number of tourists.
Overall, I believe that the rise of the internet and social media in particular has contributed to the proliferation of global travel. Nevertheless, tourism has thrived at the expense of the destinations' local cultures. On the whole, I therefore argue that this development has been an unwanted one for most local populations.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Nhắn tin Zalo