Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 1,027

The tradition of families getting together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?

Xem lời giải

Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!

Bắt đầu thi

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

In many countries, the practice of families having meals together is becoming less and less common. There are various reasons for this trend, and the effects on both the family and society could be significant. This essay deals with the reason for this changing trend and its effects on families and society as a whole.

One reason why families are no longer having meals together is the busy lifestyles of parents and children. With long working hours, school, and extracurricular activities, it can be difficult to coordinate schedules to ensure that everyone is home at the same time for dinner. Additionally, the prevalence of fast food and takeout options makes it easier to eat on the go rather than sitting down for a meal at the table.

The effects of this trend could be damaging to both the family and society. Family mealtimes provide a crucial opportunity for members to connect and communicate with one another. Without these shared experiences, family bonds may weaken, and communication skills may suffer. Furthermore, eating alone or on the go can lead to unhealthy eating habits, which could contribute to health problems such as obesity.

On a societal level, the disappearance of family mealtimes could have broader effects. It could contribute to the breakdown of communities as families become more isolated and less connected to their neighbours. Additionally, research has shown that children who have regular family mealtimes are more likely to have better academic performance and social skills, which could have an impact on society as a whole.

In conclusion, the decline in family mealtimes is a concerning trend that has several potential negative effects. Families need to make an effort to prioritize and maintain this tradition, despite the challenges of busy schedules and easy access to fast food options.

Sample 2:

In recent years, the traditional practice of families congregating for meals has seen a notable decline. This essay posits that the primary reasons for this shift are the accelerating pace of life and the pervasive influence of technology, which have, in turn, led to significant social and health-related consequences. The ensuing paragraphs will delve into these causes and their implications in detail.

The frenetic tempo of contemporary life serves as a primary catalyst for the erosion of shared mealtimes. With adults ensnared in long working hours and children engaged in educational and extracurricular commitments, synchronizing schedules has become a Herculean task. This disjointedness is further exacerbated by the omnipresence of technology. Mobile devices and social media, while connecting us globally, paradoxically alienate us from those physically nearest to us, including our family members at the dinner table. The allure of screens often supersedes the appeal of sitting down for a shared meal, leading to a fragmentation of family bonds.

The ramifications of this trend are multifaceted. Socially, the diminution of family meals erodes the fabric of familial intimacy, as these gatherings traditionally served as a crucible for bonding, sharing experiences, and imparting values. Health-wise, there is a tangible shift towards convenience foods with compromised nutritional value, given the absence of communal cooking and eating. This shift predisposes individuals to lifestyle diseases such as obesity and diabetes. Moreover, the loss of structured mealtimes deprives family members of a crucial anchor in their daily routines, potentially exacerbating stress and feelings of isolation.

In conclusion, the decline of family meal traditions is symptomatic of broader societal shifts towards faster-paced living and the pervasive influence of technology. This evolution bears significant social and health consequences, underscoring the need to reassess and perhaps recalibrate our daily priorities and practices to nurture family cohesion and well-being.

Sample 3:

The ritual of family meals, once a cornerstone of domestic life, is gradually vanishing, a phenomenon driven by modern lifestyle changes and technological advancements. This essay contends that the erosion of this tradition stems from the accelerated pace of contemporary life and the pervasive reach of digital technology, leading to profound impacts on family dynamics and individual health.

The acceleration of daily routines, now marked by increasingly demanding work schedules and a multitude of educational commitments, significantly impedes the feasibility of regular family gatherings at the dinner table. In parallel, the digital age has ushered in an era of gadgets that command the undivided attention of individuals, further isolating family members from one another and curtailing meaningful interactions. The consequence of these dual forces is a notable decline in the opportunities for familial interactions, once readily facilitated by shared meals. These gatherings served not only as a nutritional necessity but also as a vital channel for communication and bonding, nurturing relationships and fostering a sense of belonging among family members.

This shift from traditional mealtimes significantly impacts social cohesion and nutritional habits in families. Less frequent shared meals reduce the transmission of family values and erode unity. Nutritionally, the preference for fast, often unhealthy options over home-cooked meals is linked to increased diet-related issues like obesity and heart diseases. This trend towards convenience undermines nutritional quality and disrupts eating patterns, which can heighten stress and affect mental well-being. Ultimately, these changes in dining habits have far-reaching effects on family health and unity, underscoring the importance of preserving mealtime traditions for the sake of both social bonds and physical health.

In summary, the diminishing practice of family meals reflects broader societal changes, with significant consequences for both the social fabric of families and the health of individuals. This trend calls for a conscious effort to reclaim these valuable moments of togetherness, highlighting the importance of prioritizing family interactions and well-being in the face of modern challenges.

Sample 4:

There is a popular view that a familial culture of having dinner together is becoming a thing of the past. It might be because parents’ excessive work stress is leaving less time for the children. However, it has a far-reaching consequence, as the children are getting deprived of familial connection and a proper raising. The following paragraphs are going to elucidate the idea with appropriate logic and examples.

Nowadays, the fast-paced environment of people’s lives has been changing the boundary of the families. It has become almost impossible that family members could spend quality time together. These days, people’s general level of income is relatively lower than ever before. That is why, to stretch out salaries all through the month, most of the parents are required to work full time. As a result, by the time they arrive home, the offspring have had their meal. Eventually, parents and children cannot have the valuable time together which is must for the children’s proper raising.

In fact, this absence of family gathering is coming up with a huge cost, as parents are losing the chance to listen to their children and failing to build a strong emotional connection with them. A proper family dinner used to give both parents and children a chance to interact closely and convey messages to the kids regarding the right manners or other valuable lessons. But this incredible chapter is becoming obsolete because of the unprecedented changes in modern lifestyle. As a result, lesser parental time is not only depriving children from gaining a proper growth, but also it is breeding childhood traumas which can eventually lead to an adult mental illness.

To conclude, with the advent of modernisation and the resulting financial strain, parents are getting heavily involved in their professional aspect which has an extremely detrimental impact on their children’s proper growth in the long run.

Sample 5:

In the past, family members tended to dine together on several occasions. While these events are disappearing due to the extended working schedules and family structures, this development would lead to the lack of communication and unstable relationship.

The reduction of family reunions results from the heavy workloads and increased nuclear family. Most of the companies set up the urgent and short time notice deadlines for employees. As a result, most of the employees require to work overtime to complete the given targets, which consumes their spare time that could be otherwise used to hang out with their family members. In addition, there is a rising trend of nuclear families, living away independently from their parents, grandparents, or other relatives. These unprecedented changes are leading to the reduced frequency of family gatherings and meals together.

However, the substantial reduction of family meals is detrimental to family members’ relationship and communication. To be specific, mealtimes are one of the most important times for a family since it gives the members a chance to interact closely and convey messages regarding several family decisions. Therefore, lesser mealtime is not only depriving from building a strong emotional connection, but also deepening any unsolved misunderstanding between family members. For instance, previously grandchildren used to meet their grandparents or other relatives at family festivals or reunion meals, whereas this generation is now mostly unfamiliar with older ones, and this is mainly attributed to the absence of family dining. These phenomena are deterring people from even meeting their family members, let alone close interactions.

In conclusion, extended working hours and the rise of nuclear family structure are the root reasons for the reduced culture of family dining. However, this development negatively affects the relationships and interaction between family members.

Sample 6:

The traditional family mealtime is indeed becoming a thing of the past. There are some reasons which can explain this changing pattern of behaviour, and there are significant impacts on family life and health.

There are two obvious reasons why families no longer share mealtimes as they used to do in the past. Firstly, children are often too impatient to eat at the table, and parents sometimes allow them to have their meal in front of the TV or sitting in front of the computer. Secondly, the close-knit family is disappearing in the face of economic pressures. In single-parent households or families with working mothers, it can be almost impossible to arrange regular times for meals when all the family is together.

The consequences for family life and children’s health are dire. From the perspective of the family, meals taken together are a critical feature of a stable family background. This stability of family routine is an essential factor in shaping children’s personalities during their formative years. Family mealtimes are a time to share news, give guidance and to make plans together. In terms of children’s health, family meals were an opportunity to provide all the family members with a healthier diet, based on wholesome home-made food. Without this routine, children are sometimes left to have snacks or eat junk food at fast-food chains. Health consequences such as obesity and hyperactivity often result when youngsters fail to eat a balanced diet, such as used to be provided at family mealtimes.

In conclusion, some reasons can be identified for the decline in shared family meals, and the impacts are overwhelmingly negative.

Sample 7:

Nowadays, it seems that families tend to eat together less frequently. This essay will put forward some explanations for this trend and an analysis of the potential impacts.

The fact that family members choose not to eat with each other can be attributable to two reasons. Firstly, since people these days tend to have heavier workloads and more hectic schedules than in the past, sitting down to share a meal with their family members might not be a convenient choice. Instead, these individuals usually eat out with their friends, colleagues or business partners near their workplace which can be more suitable for their timetable. Secondly, the fast-food culture of modern life can change people’s eating habits because fast food can be found everywhere and is usually an inexpensive food choice. For instance, young people in Vietnam often grab a quick meal after a busy day at work or school, which leads them to skipping meals with their family when they go home.

The trend has both positive and negative impacts on people. In terms of the benefits, people are able to be much more flexible with their time. They will not have to show up at a fixed hour to have meals with their family and can eat whatever and whenever they want. However, in terms of the negative effects, this can lead to a weaker family bond. If a family continuously eats separately, family members may not be able to share their thoughts, feelings with each other, and therefore may feel isolated from each other. This will result in a lack of deep family connection.

In conclusion, the tendency of family members eating separately is mainly caused by the difference in their schedules or the preference to eat fast food, which can have both positive and negative impacts.

Sample 8:

It is true that family members eat together less and less than before. This trend is caused by several reasons. Consequently, there are numerous negative effects that will arise.

The causes of various matters are most people are very busy with their work and eating habits nowadays. Firstly, it takes office workers a long time to return home and eat together meals with their family after work and they could work too late at night. Instead of eating with their family, people usually eat with their friends or co-workers because it is suitable for their schedule. The second is eating habits of people are changed by junk food. Nowadays, there are lots of fast food sold on the street. Employees choose it because fast food is convenient, and it has a very affordable price. For example, Vietnam's young people often eat junk food before going to work because it saves time and convenience. Therefore, they do not enjoy meals with family.

Both positive and negative problems can be anticipated when people are flexible in time and family members increasingly disconnect together. Firstly, on the positive side, people can be much more flexible in time, they can eat anywhere, anytime they want without the fixed schedule of their household. Nevertheless, the negative problem is that family members will be more distant from each other. For example, a family eats separately, family members may not be able to communicate, share their stories about them with each other. This can lead to a lack of a close-knit family.

In conclusion, the habit of eating junk food and the own's one schedules of a family are the reasons for the lack of connection with each other in a family which can have both positive and negative impacts.

Sample 9:

The gathering of the family for meals is an age-old tradition and is slowly lessening in the present day. The reasons are due to increased focuses on money and technology and this along with the impacts will be discussed herein.

There are several reasons as to why families spend less time together enjoying meals. Firstly, money continues to dominate the priority list for individuals and in order to continue to generate income, people must be willing to work at all hours of the day and this includes mealtimes. Examples can be seen by workers who are working during breakfast, lunch, and dinner time at restaurants, supermarkets, and businesses of all types. In my experience, I have to work through dinnertime at my job, so this has simply become a fact of life. Additionally, technology has only fueled this trend as it has helped society become a non-stop operational environment. Examples of this can be seen with computers, which allow us to be in communication and in productive states twenty-four hours a day and in my experience, I am often deep in work which often does not coordinate with family or traditional mealtimes.

There are indeed impacts due to this alarming trend. To begin, people are becoming more individualistic and less family oriented as they spend more time working and less time with family, especially during traditional mealtimes. Individuals are committing more energy to and connecting on deeper levels with their work at the expense of time spent with their family. This is happening with me as I do not think twice about eating a meal with my family or in a cafe as my work schedule demands must be met. Ultimately, this is weakening the bonds of the family to some degree for many people, including myself.

In a nutshell, money and technology are pulling people away from traditional family mealtimes and the impacts are far reaching as people are slowly being indoctrinated into spending more time working in place of family gatherings and I do not see this trend lessening in the future.

Sample 10:

People around the world no longer share meals collectively as often as in earlier times. There are some reasons for this tendency, and it could have some influence on family as well as society at large.

To begin with, there are several factors why many people rarely eat meals together. The first one is a hectic work schedule. As today's parents have to work harder than those of previous generations to support their families, they have limited time to prepare lovely home-cooked foods. Consequently, the option to eat separately at their convenience is preferred. Another contributing factor is changing food consuming habits of individuals. For instance, in many nations including Vietnam, while modern generations usually opt for fast-food meals at work due to its time-saving and convenient nature, elders with conventional thinking tend to choose traditional meals on a dining room table. This results in the less prevalence of family meals.

However, this tendency might bring about several effects on individuals and society. Firstly, families may become less close than in the past, leading to weak family relationships. To be specific, due to reduced time to share daily stories over meals, parents may find it hard to have mutual intimacy and sharing with their offspring, and thus an increasing number of young people may feel alienated. Secondly, some family values and cultures might be gradually forgotten if having meals together is less popular. For example, Lunar New Year is a special occasion to dine together, and if people refuse to share meals with their beloved ones, they might miss the chance to observe good manners and experience their family's traditions.

In conclusion, the disappearance of family meals is caused by several factors, and this tendency might bring about some impacts on both households and community.

Sample 11:

It is true that modem families do not have meals together as often as in the past. Reasons for this vary, and there are several impacts on both households and the community as a whole.

Family members today rarely eat meals together because of several causes. The hectic work schedule is often considered the main reason why individuals now tend to resort to prepared meals to save time for work. As such, the tradition that parents came back from work to cook lunch for children is no longer preferable in many countries, and this also explains why the fast-food industry is developing fast in this country. Another contributing factor is that culinary skills are no longer passed on to younger generations. Food outlets and restaurants today offer a wide range of food choices that can satisfy even fussy eaters, meaning that cooking is not necessarily a skill that young people need to learn to cook for the family.

The gradual disappearance of family meals has several effects. Firstly, having meals with family members is a great chance for them to bond with each other, so parents have less time to talk with their children, and spouses also lose an opportunity to share daily stories. On the social level, some traditions may be lost as a result of people eating out too often. Family values might not be appreciated when people do not feel the need to come back home after work for a meal. On special occasions such as New Year Eve, family feasts serve as an important event, and it is regretful that this tradition is gradually disappearing.

In conclusion, various factors are attributable to the disappearance of family meals. This has several damaging effects on both families and societies.

Sample 12:

The tradition of families eating together has been an important part of many cultures for generations. However, in many countries, this tradition is disappearing, with more and more families eating their meals separately. In this essay, I will discuss the reasons behind this trend and suggest some possible solutions.

One reason why families are no longer eating together is the busy and hectic lifestyles that many people lead. With both parents working and children involved in extracurricular activities, it can be difficult to find a time when everyone is available to sit down and eat together. In addition, the rise of technology and social media has led to a decrease in face-to-face interaction, making it less likely for families to come together for meals.

Another reason for the decline in family meals is the increased availability of convenience foods and takeout. Many families are opting for fast food or pre-packaged meals that can be eaten on the go, rather than taking the time to prepare and share a home-cooked meal. This trend is often driven by a desire for convenience and time-saving but can have negative impacts on both health and social relationships.

To address this problem, there are several steps that could be taken. Firstly, schools and workplaces could promote the importance of family meals and provide resources to help families plan and prepare meals together. This could include cooking classes, meal planning tools, and recipe ideas. Additionally, communities could organise events and activities that encourage families to come together for meals, such as potlucks or community dinners.

Another solution is to promote the benefits of family meals for both physical and mental health. Studies have shown that families who eat together have better nutrition, lower rates of obesity, and improved mental health. By highlighting these benefits, families may be more motivated to make the effort to eat together, even if it means adjusting their schedules or making other sacrifices.

In conclusion, the decline in family meals is a worrying trend in many countries. While the reasons behind this trend are complex, there are steps that can be taken to promote and preserve this important tradition. By emphasizing the benefits of family meals and providing resources and support, we can encourage families to come together, share meals, and strengthen their relationships.

Hot: 1000+ Đề thi cuối kì 1 file word cấu trúc mới 2025 Toán, Văn, Anh... lớp 1-12 (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay

Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:

Xem thêm »

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Câu 1

The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is by providing free public transport 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Some argue that offering free bus and rail passes to all who need them is the best solution to traffic congestion. While this might be effective for many, I believe the government should also explore other strategies to address this problem.

On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.

However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.

In conclusion, while providing free public transportation can indeed help reduce traffic, it should not be the sole focus of government efforts to solve this issue.

Sample 2:

It is generally believed that if the government wants to solve the traffic congestion problem, the most effective solution is to provide free public transportation, such as buses and trains. In my opinion, I agree with this idea because it really helps to ease the situation.

Firstly, I believe that free public transportation can reduce people's dependence on cars and improve traffic congestion. People who live outside the city centre tend to go to work because there are no buses or train stations around the area. Therefore, the government should consider building railway and bus lanes to cover all remote areas. In addition, dedicated lanes can be allocated to buses to avoid traffic jams. For example, Japan has done a very good job with its advanced subway system. Their stations are always overcrowded, and trains and buses are always on time. People rarely own cars and they rely on public transportation.

Secondly, the government should always carry out publicity activities to promote the advantages of using free public transportation. By doing so, people can break the mentality that public transportation is dirty, slow, and unreliable. As long as more people know, the transportation system is well designed, more comfortable and more convenient; people will soon start using public transportation. For example, Singapore has implemented 24/7 free public transportation, and its roads are unobstructed.

In short, I firmly believe that free transportation will reduce congestion by promoting awareness-raising campaigns and investment in buses and trains. Although it is a difficult task for the government to implement free public transportation in the community, once the government implements it successfully, it will have a major impact on everyone's life.

Sample 3:

Today with the increasing population and the exponential growth of urbanization, the transportation needs of the people have increased rapidly. Due to increasing transportation and the need for vehicles, traffic congestion has become a major problem of the countries with increasing populations. Therefore, looking into the problem deeply, I find that the best way to control this traffic congestion is for the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities. There are certain reasons for increasing traffic congestion as discussed below.

Firstly, the faster pace of population growth has increased the demand for more vehicles on the road. Since the transport facilities are less as compared to the people traveling, the demands have increased day by day which has contributed to more vehicles on the road and hence contributing to traffic congestion. Secondly, the increasing urbanization has caused more of the rural population to migrate to urban cities and metropolitan cities to find jobs and work. This increased migration of the population to urban cities is also one of the major causes of the traffic congestion on roads. For example, metropolitan cities of India like Delhi, Mumbai, Ahmedabad are highly traffic-congested cities of India due to increased urbanization and rapid migration of the rural population.

Traffic congestion is one of the major causes of carbon dioxide emission and increasing global warming of the earth. The harmful gases emitted from these vehicles pollute the environment. For example, the highly populated city of India is Delhi due to increased traffic congestion. The government must provide free transportation facilities to reduce the number of private vehicles on the road and must also encourage the population to compulsorily use these free public transportation facilities to reduce the problem of traffic congestion. Besides, in public transport, the use of environmentally-friendly electric vehicles like metro services, electric trains, electric buses, and taxis must be encouraged instead of fuel vehicles to reduce the emission of harmful gases in the environment.

Therefore, after analyzing all the points above, the conclusion drawn upon is that traffic congestion is the major problem faced by many countries at large and the best solution to this problem is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities to the people.

Sample 4:

The population has been increasing day by day and with the increasing number of people, urbanization is also at its peak. In such situations, the huge demands of vehicles have caused rapid traffic congestion on roads. However, some people argue that the best way to control traffic congestion is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, but in my opinion, this may not be the correct way to control the traffic congestion.

Some of the major reasons for traffic congestion are urbanization and the migration of the people. This has caused an increased demand for vehicles in the market. Nowadays people tend to travel a lot, and, in such conditions, they find it easier to use their own vehicles rather than opting for public transport. A survey conducted in China states that a majority of people prefer their own vehicles rather than public transport and this has increased more vehicles on road contributing to the traffic congestions. Secondly, people find it easy to carry their own vehicle to travel to different corners of the country as it is more comfortable than public transport. Also, the conditions of the public transport facilities have also deteriorated, they are also very congestive and unhygienic. Besides, the public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners due to non motorable roads and hence, the best option for traveling to these areas are the private vehicles. Secondly, private vehicles like cars and motorbikes have become more affordable and budget-friendly for people.

For the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, it will be a big burden on their exchequer. Instead, the government must focus on other measures like encouraging bicycles for school and college-going students, build wide tracks with separate lanes, build more expressways and flyovers to reduce the congestion. Also, they must subsidize the public transport fares but not completely free. A separate track for pedestrians and cyclists must be built to limit the number of vehicles on the road. Besides, an awareness campaign must be launched to inform people of the traffic rules and safety measures. Strict traffic rules must be followed, and a compulsorily fine system should be introduced.

Instead of providing free transport facilities for the public, the above-mentioned measures must be given more importance.

Sample 5:

To reduce traffic congestion, the government must provide free transport facilities to the public. But this step can be moderately implemented to reduce the congestion on roads. Some other measures should also be taken in equal proportion to deal with the issue of traffic congestion. Therefore, the statement, Government should provide 24/7 free public transportation to reduce traffic congestion is moderately correct. There are several reasons for the increasing traffic congestion on roads as mentioned below.

Population in many of the developing countries like India and China has been increasing at an alarming rate. This has caused an increasing number of people on the road either using public transport, their own vehicles or pedestrians resulting in increased traffic congestion. Also, a large-scale migration of the population to urban cities for work had deteriorated the traffic conditions of big cities. Secondly, the fares of the public transport are quite high compared to the service they render and are more congested and unhygienic. Now, when automobiles have become more affordable and fuel-efficient, people opt for quality and comfort over public facilities. Thirdly, people have started to travel more these days and public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners of the cities or towns. In such situations what people find better is the use of the facilities of the private vehicle. However, the use of private vehicles has resulted in increased traffic congestion and besides, these are the major cause of concern as they contribute to the emission of harmful gases polluting the environment.

To deal with the problem of traffic congestion, providing only free public transport may not contribute much. Besides, the government must encourage the use of electric vehicles and bicycles amongst the population. Secondly, it must focus on building more expressways and highways and separate lanes to reduce the congestion. Enough attention must be paid to constructing road facilities in remote corners of the cities and towns and especially in rural areas so that public transport can easily reach every corner of the world. Strict adherence to the traffic rules must be followed.

All these steps along with free transport facilities by the government together can contribute to reducing traffic congestion.

Sample 6:

The incidents of traffic congestion are increasing along with the population growth. Some contend that in order to lessen traffic congestion, the government ought to offer free public transportation. This solution, in my opinion, can only partially resolve the issue.

Most individuals now prefer to live in cities or towns rather than rural areas due to urbanisation. This is one of the primary causes of the heavy traffic on the roadways. At the same time, cars have also gotten cheaper and more fuel-efficient as a result of technological improvement. The number of automobiles on the roads has also increased as a result.

The government is undoubtedly attempting to reduce traffic by enhancing the efficiency and speed of public transit. For instance, the DMRC system, which facilitates bus stops across the entire city, has been installed in Delhi, a densely populated metropolis. The public can utilise this bus service 24 hours a day, seven days a week, but it is not free, thus many people opt to drive their own car instead. Because buses and trains are crowded and uncomfortable, many individuals will still choose to use their own vehicles even if public transportation is free. Free public transportation will also put a strain on the exchequer.

In my opinion, the government can take a number of additional steps to lessen traffic on the roads. For instance, it needs to create bigger roadways, additional flyovers, and separate lanes for cyclists and pedestrians. It should also strictly enforce traffic regulations and promote the use of environmentally friendly transportation.

In conclusion, making public transportation free will undoubtedly encourage more people to use it, but since those who value comfort and convenience over cost will still drive privately, this strategy is ineffective in easing traffic congestion.

Sample 7:

The traffic is getting worse in contemporary society, some citizens suggest that the authorities should provide free public transport every day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it's extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken at the same time.

We have to admit that this policy can increase the usage of public transport. Inhabitants will take it into consideration if it's free when they are facing traffic jam. To some extent, it can reduce traffic congestion. But we cannot turn a blind eye to the problems it caused.

This initiative will sharply increase the national budget. It's generally acknowledged that national funds are limited and should be used in a large variety of social aspects from education to environmental protection. The initiative will leave a burden on the financial budget and let the infrastructure cannot be maintained and guaranteed.

Furthermore, this policy cannot address the root of this issue. People use private cars not because of the high cost of the public transportation system, but because the line and route don't cover their destination or the low efficiency when they plan for a long-distance trip. No matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. In addition, traffic congestion only accrued during the rush hours, so it's pointless to provide it for free all day.

To sum up, I think the authority should reduce the price and develop the traffic infrastructure if they want to address this issue, rather than provide it for free simply.

Sample 8:

Some contend that the best way to combat traffic congestion is to always provide free bus and rail passes to everyone who needs them. While I acknowledge it may work for the vast majority of individuals, I think the government ought to offer other options to address this issue.

In conclusion, it is undeniably true that providing free public transit to citizens may be a significant element in reducing traffic, but this is by no means the main component that governments should take into account when trying to address this issue.

Sample 9:

In recent years, traffic jams have been increasingly ubiquitous particularly in big cities which cause great fatigue for commuters. In order to tackle this problem, it is argued by many that government should provide free public transport all day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it is extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken.

First of all, it is an indisputable fact that traffic congestion is not only attributed to the vast amount of private transport but also road systems. Moreover, no matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. Thus, providing free public transport alone just contributes to cutting down the volume of traffic to some extent. In fact, many big cities like Ho Chi Minh still suffer from traffic jams in narrow roads with obsolete infrastructure in spite of the rise in availability of public transport. Therefore, I strongly believe that road needs to be widened, and traffic lights and signs should be made more state-of-the-art to stem the root causes.

More importantly, though providing free public transport 24 hours per day is not necessary and what is more is that it may leave a burden on the national budget. According to the majority of reports, traffic jams mainly occur during the rush hours, so it is pointless to provide public transport all the time. On top of that, providing free public transport in the long term may be unachievable due to its tremendous cost. This measure not only costs governments a fortune but it is also unable to address the root of the issue. It would be far more economical if this amount of money was invested in enhancing road facilities.

By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that other measures rather than making public transport available may be far more efficient to traffic congestion. In years to come, I strongly believe that more investments in road systems should be adopted to make commuting more comfortable and time-saving.

Câu 2

The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life. Why is it the case? Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future?

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

These days, people’s workplaces are constantly changing and evolving to meet the demands of modern society. Furthermore, the roles and responsibilities of jobs are also undergoing changes to adapt to new ways of working and living. This essay will discuss the possible reasons for these changes and suggest some ways that people can better prepare themselves for their future careers.

Firstly, due to the developments in hi-tech machines and artificial intelligence, millions of people all around the world are losing their jobs and being replaced by automated processes. For example, millions of factory workers have lost their jobs because they have been replaced by machines that are able to do their job quicker and more effectively. Furthermore, as a result of the ever-increasing desire to cut expenses and increase profits, many jobs are being outsourced to countries where the wages are lower. For instance, when a person calls a tech support help line in an English-speaking country, they will most likely be connected to someone in another country, like India or Philippines, where the wages are lower.

However, there are a number of ways that people can prepare for changes in their workplaces in the future. Firstly, students preparing to leave high school need to be advised about the sustainability of the career path they are choosing. To illustrate, autonomous vehicles are predicted to replace most delivery and taxi driver jobs in the very near future, so this is not a job that someone should expect to have for a very long time. Furthermore, while some jobs are being replaced by technology, many jobs are simply incorporating technology into their process, and therefore people will need to be able to keep up to date with these changes. To help achieve this, specific courses could be designed to help educate people on the use of modern technology in their workplaces.

In conclusion, although there are many changes in the workplace these days, educating people to carefully choose their career and to keep up to date with modern technology is the key to avoiding any major problems.

Sample 2:

The nature of labor in our modern world is changing at a fundamental level, with many workers worried that they will not be able to maintain their job conditions for long periods of time. Personally, I think this is the result of stagnating wages and the advances of automation, and can only be resolved with a universal basic income for the whole population.

Firstly, I argue that society is witnessing the worst wage stagnation in generations, which is causing people to constantly look for better paying jobs. As cost increases yet wages are not following suit, most of the workforce have to scramble to reach for managerial positions or risk losing their disposable incomes. This in turn creates a situation where many people have to take up multiple jobs in order to make ends meet. In the US and UK, for instance, it is estimated that millions of workers are on zero-hour contracts, which does not guarantee a set number of hours of work.

Secondly, as corporations seek to reduce expenditure as much as possible, they aim to replace the workforce with machines, leading to higher levels of unemployment and less stable job conditions. As machines encroach on the workforce, jobs become focused on the maintenance of the robots running our factories, and therefore there is higher competition for the dwindling number of jobs with gradually raising entry barriers. The end result is sure to be tension amongst socio-economic classes that can afford entry into the workforce if the effect of automation is not being mitigated.

I argue that in order to solve this, it is important to implement Universal Basic Income, which is an equal lump sum of money given to all citizens of countries every month or year. This would help people to keep their jobs and not have to take up precarious work, since they have enough money to buy basic necessities. This scheme can already be seen in Canada during the COVID-19 outbreak, for example, with citizens getting 2000 Canadian dollars a year. This has been hugely popular, as it allowed Canadians to have some level of stability even as the economy came to a halt.

Overall, I believe that stagnant wages and automation is leading to volatile work conditions, and as such, I contend that UBI is needed to stabilize this situation.

Sample 3:

It is a tendency that many people change their careers many times during their lifetime. This essay will identify the causes for these changes and recommend some ways to prepare for working in the future.

There are many reasons why one job for life seems to be over. One of the major reasons is our consumerism society. Therefore, job hopping for higher paid jobs or doing multiple jobs is no longer simply an option. Another reason is that the development of technology has changed the structure of work at such a fast pace that people have to constantly update themselves with the latest working methods. However, many are unable to adapt to the changes. For example, older workers might find it difficult to compete with younger workforce and have to find a new job or change their career field.

For those who want a stable life even in the rapidly changing future, they should realise that as long as we find a job which gives us satisfaction, there would be no need to change. My advice for those people is that if we stick to one job, life can be more stable. Of course, if one wants some employment changes, they should prepare for new job openings with a variety of working experience and skill set. Some should return to school to pursue courses that can lead them into new careers. Otherwise, some should take a fresh environment in which they can use and improve their skills and experience.

In conclusion, the process of job hopping is becoming very common because of social and technological development. I suggest that our knowledge and skills should be updated regularly, and we should have a balance between career changes and job satisfaction.

Sample 4:

It is true that the present working environment has witnessed a radical change. People now tend to switch jobs more frequently rather than have their occupations remain stable. While this phenomenon can be caused by several reasons, there are certain recommendations to help future workers prepare themselves for their careers.

First and foremost, the introduction of new technology might be the greatest cause for such changes. In other words, millions of workers all around the world are being replaced by high tech machines and artificial intelligence. For example, some staff working in the service industry are now on the verge of unemployment due to the rapid growth of online shopping websites and self-service supermarket checkouts. Another reason leading to this phenomenon is globalization. Due to globalization, employees have a wide range of choices between different positions among countries. As a result, many individuals tend to shift from one job to another with a view to higher salary as well as better standard of living.

However, there are several ways that people can get ready for changes in their future workplace. Firstly, workers should be well equipped with various skills by attending vocational courses and job training. Thus, they might keep up to date with the rapid development of robots and automated processes. In addition, individuals can get advice about the sustainability of their future position. This helps them to excel in one job rather than multiple, which lifts up the burden of switching jobs regularly.

In conclusion, although cutting-edge technology and globalization have made a great impact on the world of work, employees must be well-informed and flexible to achieve expected goals.

Sample 5:

It is irrefutable that the work scenario is altering at a fast pace. Working conditions are also different and the process of job-hopping is very common. This essay shall delve into the possible causes for these changes and suggest ways to prepare for work in the future.

To begin with, the development of science and technology has changed the structure of work. For example, people no longer need to do some heavy work by themselves. Instead, they can use machines. Secondly, competition has become intense, and people have to constantly update themselves with the latest materials and methods. Sometimes they cannot compete with the new techno-savvy workforce and so have to change jobs out of compulsion.

Furthermore, we belong to an era of consumerism. Being surrounded by so many choices, people today want to buy new things and for that, they do multiple jobs. In addition, the 24/7 society of today provides us with the opportunity to workday and night. For instance, in earlier times, there were very few jobs which were round-the-clock jobs. But, today, globalization has brought in a multitude of options of working day and night. The line between day and night has become dim and people have become workaholics.

There could be many suggestions to prepare for work in the future. People should have a set goal in their mind and get training accordingly. Moreover, it is important to draw a line somewhere. The stress and strain of the fast modern workplace is leading many to nervous breakdowns. In the developed countries, a new term called downshifting has already come where after a certain stage, people are saying ‘no’ to promotions and showing contentment with less. We should also realize that if we stick to one job, then life can be more stable, and we can enjoy our leisure also.

To put in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, although work conditions are different today and we have a need to update our knowledge regularly, we can plan our life in a meticulous way and have a balance between work and leisure.

Sample 6:

In today’s modern world, people tend to change jobs more often than before and don’t want to work permanently in one environment. I would like to explore the sources of this issue and suggest several solutions for future work.

Firstly, due to the global recession, many employers have to downsize and restructure their businesses. This leads to a number of redundant employees being forced to leave their jobs and find other ones. Another reason is that, as living costs are getting higher and higher, people want to earn as much money as they can to meet their needs. Hence, they seek better opportunities and well-paid jobs everywhere, every day. Some also look for new challenges. Last but not least, thanks to new technology, people nowadays are able to access information more easily, including information about job recruiting.

One of my suggestions for this problem is to create a comfortable working environment and build strong relationships between colleagues and between managers and workers. These will make employees find it harder to leave. To achieve this, courses such as leadership training and communication skill training should be carried out to help supervisors lead their team efficiently without causing any stress, and help employees fit inconveniently.

In conclusion, I would like to state that changing jobs is one of the notable signs of our technological times, and soft skills training courses can help people adapt to the working environment instead of seeking to escape it.

Sample 7:

Work culture lately has been dynamically transformed, mainly due to improvements in technology like transport and communication. Job security has become a dicey issue as employees now need to keep themselves updated with the advancements around them. This essay shall further explain the reasons and offer probable solutions.

In the last two decades, we have seen a remarkable spread of technology in all wakes of life. With easy access to the Internet and computers, work has become faster and easier. Innovation of office tools is encouraged everywhere so as to not let anything hinder the growth of trade and commerce. With each task becoming effortless, manual intervention at many places has been reduced. Ergo, rising insecurity is seen among employees. Additionally, employees are expected to multi-task in their jobs making it more difficult for older workers to sustain.

The remedial measures for such a situation are very few as of now. First of all, state-of-the-art employee training centers to help the employees stay well-versed with the high-tech upgradations. To solve this problem from an earlier level, universities should start imparting practical training in their curriculum, with the know-how of current on-the-job scenarios to prepare potential workers better. All this needs to be done as the employees losing their jobs also lose financial security for their families, and it is very difficult to start again from ground zero.

To conclude, I’d say we should accept the ever-changing technological advancements as they’re unlikely to stop. Better would be to equip ourselves and become flexible accordingly so as to welcome such developments.

Câu 3