In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion?
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
In contemporary times, many do activities like shopping, working, and interacting with others through the internet without needing in-person interactions. Despite technology's great convenience, it can hinder people from forming profound and significant connections.
The rise of the internet and technology has allowed people to conduct various activities online, from shopping to working and communicating with others. This is because technology offers tremendous convenience, as individuals can buy products and services from the comfort of their own homes, work remotely from anywhere in the world, and communicate with people from different parts of the globe. This has dramatically improved the quality of life for many individuals, especially those living in isolated areas with mobility limitations. Additionally, online communication has brought about greater diversity and understanding, as people can connect with others from different cultures and backgrounds. As demonstrated, the ability to carry out various activities online has numerous advantages and has significantly impacted how people live.
Despite the benefits of online activities, there are also negative consequences associated with the lack of in-person interactions. The impersonal nature of online communication can prevent individuals from building deep, meaningful relationships essential to human connection. Furthermore, when people rely heavily on technology to communicate, they may experience social isolation, especially among younger generations who spend much time on social media. Social isolation has been linked to adverse mental health and well-being effects, such as anxiety and depression. Therefore, balancing online and offline interactions is vital to maintain healthy relationships and social connections in today's digital age.
In conclusion, while there are advantages to the ability to shop, work and communicate with people online, the lack of face-to-face contact can have negative consequences. Therefore, it is essential to balance using technology to our advantage and maintaining personal connections with others.
Sample 2:
Thanks to the wonders of the internet and computer technology, it has become possible in many places around the world to live and work without having to have any face-to-face contact with others. Although there may be some drawbacks to this development, I believe it is positive overall.
One of the main benefits of being able to shop, work, and communicate via the internet is the sheer convenience. Being able to order your groceries, buy new clothes, and even work from home on your computer has saved people countless hours of boredom sitting in their cars, dealing with traffic, commuting to and from their workplace or shops. This has freed up hours in people’s days, making their lives more productive and fulfilling. Furthermore, people can save thousands of dollars in transportation costs each year by staying at home to work or shop online, not to mention the decreased impacts on the environment from the reduced usage of automobiles.
In addition, living without face-to-face contact also has its benefits too. Thanks to social media applications, people are able to develop friendships and networks of like-minded people from all over the world without having to leave their home. Creating these kinds of large networks of people in person is actually not possible to do on a practical level and requires the use of the internet and non-face-to-face communication. Moreover, people can actually develop much deeper relationships with one another without the complications of face-to-face contact. By not knowing the colour of somebody’s skin, or their gender, people can communicate without any unconscious bias affecting their thoughts and words.
In conclusion, living and working without face-to-face communication can save people a lot of time and money, make their lives more productive and fulfilling, and improve their relationships and communication with people.
Sample 3:
In the modern world, it has become increasingly possible to shop, work, and communicate with people without any face-to-face contact. In my opinion, this trend is a positive development as it provides numerous benefits to people's daily lives.
One of the key advantages of being able to shop, work, and communicate without face-to-face contact is convenience. With online shopping, people can purchase products from the comfort of their own homes, without having to spend time and effort traveling to physical stores. For example, this can be particularly beneficial for those who live in remote areas or who have mobility issues. Similarly, working remotely allows individuals to save time and money on commuting and can offer greater flexibility in terms of scheduling.
Another benefit of living without face-to-face contact is the ability to communicate with people from all over the world. The internet has opened up new possibilities for social interaction, allowing people to connect with others from different cultures and backgrounds. This can lead to a greater understanding and appreciation of diversity. For instance, a person living in a small town with limited opportunities for travel or cultural exposure can use the internet to connect with people from different parts of the world. This type of global communication can foster understanding and tolerance, helping to break down barriers and promote peace and harmony between people of different nationalities and cultures.
In conclusion, the benefits of living without face-to-face contact are significant. Convenience, global communication, and enhanced privacy are just a few of the advantages that come with the ability to shop, work, and communicate without physical interactions.
Sample 4:
It is true that in contemporary life, people in many parts of the world are able to do their shopping, work, and communicate with each other via the internet. While there are clear positive aspects of this trend, there are also negative aspects of having less face-to-face contact with other people.
On the one hand, the internet can be very handy in many ways. Many people use it to keep in touch with friends and family, using Facebook, Skype, or WhatsApp to send instant messages or to enjoy a quick chat. Many also use the internet for online shopping, thus saving time and petrol on trips to the supermarket as well as hunting around different sites for bargains. However, it is in terms of work that the internet offers the most potential benefits. More and more people are working or even studying from home, at hours which suit their own schedules. Many hours are saved each week by eliminating the daily commute and the stress of coping with the rush hour.
On the other hand, as social beings, people need personal contact. Firstly, virtual friendships that are formed online may not be genuine. The media carries many horror stories of youngsters who have fallen prey to paedophiles, for example. Secondly, online shopping is not always appropriate, depending on the item. It is best, for instance, to try on clothes before buying, and while a bookworm can find almost any book title that they want online, they will certainly miss browsing the shelves of bookstores. Finally, personal interaction with work colleagues can generate ideas and avoid misunderstandings.
In conclusion, although there are positive aspects of this trend, there are also aspects of face-to-face contact, which it would be a shame to lose.
Sample 5:
With the ongoing development of technologies and now devices, all interpersonal communication and activities can be done through the online world. Despite some obvious benefits in terms of productivity and convenience, the lack of direct contact can potentially be disruptive to people’s daily courses of activity.
It is hard to deny the multiple benefits that the Internet brings to some fundamental aspects of people’s lives. In terms of daily commerce, online shopping allows consumers to make more informed decisions as they can access product reviews online while also being able to compare prices across stores. Moreover, because the Internet helps remove practically any geographical boundaries, users can conveniently communicate in real time from their own respective locations via online communication technologies like video calls and messaging softwares. Lastly, work productivity can be facilitated through remote work, since workers can save themselves the time and energy that might otherwise be lost in commuting trips or on idle chatter in the office.
However, the serious downsides associated with this development could outweigh the aforementioned benefits. Online shopping cannot substitute in-store tactile testing which is especially necessary for products like clothing merchandise or cooking goods that have tangible properties that require physical assessment. Additionally, non-verbal cues and nuances that can only be expressed through face-to-face interactions are often lost on the digital medium, which can diminish the authenticity and depth of conversations. Work-wise, the state of isolation could lead to a decline in their creativity and collaborativeness. Despite the ability to facilitate group work, online communication tools are prone to connection errors and bugs, which can leave participants out of sync at times. It is this lack of continuity in the collaborative process that diminishes the energy and spontaneity needed for streamlined work.
In conclusion, in spite of the many benefits regarding work, commerce and communication, I believe that the trend of taking these aspects into the digital realms can be more detrimental for people’s life in the long run.
Sample 6:
Virtual communication has been rapidly replacing its face-to-face counterpart in several aspects of life. I am convinced that such a trend might have far-reaching negative impacts if people overuse the former and ignore the latter.
Firstly, the consequences in terms of reduced social connections are undeniable. No matter how comfortable and realistic online conversations are, direct day-to-day interactions, which allow for verbal communication cues and eye contact, are instrumental in building sustainable relationships between people. Without such direct interactions, people might become disconnected and isolated from their own community or workplace, thus suffering from declined social wellbeing. On a larger scale, the dominance of e-commerce would mean the disappearance of physical stores and local businesses, which serve as community spaces for people to interact, thus resulting in the loss of a community’s social fabric. This trend could prevent people from developing a sense of belonging to their community.
Secondly, people’s over-dependence on technology and its related problems are also major consequences of this trend. Since a switch to virtual platforms for most daily activities would cause people to be more vulnerable to technological disruptions including device breakdowns, internet outages, or cyber-attacks. These failures can disrupt their work, shopping, and communication, causing frustration and financial losses. Besides that, constant exposure to screens and digital information on a daily basis can lead to digital fatigue and cognitive overload. As a result, many young people spending the majority of their time on the internet tend to have short attention spans, preventing them from concentrating on and performing well in their job and study.
In conclusion, in cases that virtual interactions completely substitute face-to-face ones, the undesired implications in terms hampered social relationships, over-reliance on technology, digital fatigue, and poor concentration would make this a largely negative tendency. It is feared by many that such immersion into the virtual world in many aspects of life would destroy the fabric of human society forever.
Sample 7:
The feasibility of shopping, working and communicating through the Internet is gradually eliminating the necessity of in-person encounters. I believe the merits of this opportunity outnumber its demerits and the lowered volume of traffic in addition to the possibility of long-range communication will be discussed as reasons for this claim in this essay.
One chief benefit of using the Internet as a means of making purchases, working and communicating would be the lowered demand for transport, through eradicating the need for face-to-face contact. Such decreased volume of transportation would result in fewer harmful gas emissions which could significantly contribute to creating a cleaner environment. Furthermore, reduced commuting burden yields more free time for individuals. It could be spent in various ways such as working, studying and socialising with family and friends to name a few, which would be more productive and enjoyable.
Another key merit of using the Internet would be the emergence of state-of-the-art telecommunication applications. These technologies have made it possible for those with access to the Internet to get in touch and send and receive audiovisual content by pushing just a few buttons. This presents a stark contrast to the situation only a few decades ago, when long-distance communication was possible solely through paper-based letters, which could possibly take months to reach the recipient.
There are, however, some drawbacks to online communication, in particular the possibility that the lack of contact brought by technological advancements could potentially weaken human bonds. Taking into consideration that humans are a social species, this could pose a dire threat to our mental health. This predicament, however, would be mitigated by the extra free time technological developments create for us. This free time could be spent with friends and family and in the long run would strengthen our relationships and improve our emotional well-being.
To recapitulate, the Internet's demolishing the need for person-to-person contact brings about numerous benefits. A more sustainable environment as well as more free time generated for individuals, a reduced need to commute in addition to the feasibility of conducting long-distance communication in the easiest way possible, are all instances of the above-mentioned merits.
Sample 8:
It is true that in today’s society, individuals around globe may buy, work, and connect with one another over the internet. Although there are apparent benefits to this trend, there are also drawbacks to having less face-to-face interaction with others.
On the one hand, the internet may be very useful in a variety of ways. Many use it to stay in contact with friends and family, sending instant messages or having a brief conversation via Facebook, Skype, or WhatsApp. Many people also use the internet for online shopping, saving time and money on groceries-picking and scouring other websites for offers. In addition, the internet provides the largest potential advantages in terms of labor work. More and more individuals are working or studying from home, at times that are convenient for them. By removing the daily trip and the stress of dealing with rush hour, several hours are saved each week.
People, on the other hand, need human interaction as social creatures. For starters, online virtual connections may not be real. There are several intimidating affairs on social media about children who have fallen victim to pedophiles, for example. Second, depending on the item, internet purchasing is not always acceptable. For example, it is essential to try on clothing before purchasing them, and although a bookworm can find practically any book title they desire online, they will undoubtedly miss exploring the shelves of bookshops. Lastly, personal connection with coworkers may spark ideas and prevent misunderstandings.
To summarize, although there are advantages to this trend, there are also advantages to face-to-face communication that would be a huge loss to society.
Sample 9:
Today, due to the popularity of the Internet, individuals tend to work, shop, and communicate online rather than in person. In my opinion, this trend is positive since it allows for greater convenience.
In terms of work, the Internet is efficient. Those who work online can significantly reduce their daily commuting time. This not only allows workers to gain extra time to get more work done, but also helps them avoid stress caused by severe traffic which is increasingly common in many urban areas. Additionally, businesses can benefit from this trend as they are likely to incur lower operating expenses. For example, virtual meetings can host nearly unlimited numbers of participants at the same time, removing the need for renting large conferencing rooms. The money saved can then be allocated for improving existing products and services or developing new ones.
Furthermore, shopping and communicating is easier nowadays as a result of the widespread use of the Internet. E-commerce platforms such as Shopee, Lazada, and Tiki allow users to compare products from a variety of online shops in order to be able to choose products with the lowest prices. These platforms also regularly offer attractive promotions as well as warranty policies, all of which used to be unique selling points for brick-and-mortar stores. Regarding personal communication, before the proliferation of the Internet, it was relatively inconvenient or costly for individuals to contact each other, especially when placing international calls. These days, due to the popularity of instant messaging and calling applications such as Messenger, Zalo, and Viber, Internet users regardless of geographical location can remain in touch with their friends and family members much more easily.
In conclusion, the advancement of the Internet results in greater numbers of people working, shopping, and communicating online. I believe this is a change for the better as it provides various conveniences and cost-saving implications. New technology may not be without its drawbacks; however, there is little question about the comforts it also affords the average citizen.
Sample 10:
With the Internet having a huge impact on our shopping, work and communication, we can now live without any face-to-face interaction with other people. Whilst making modern life more convenient in some ways, this situation is a negative trend in the long run.
In this day and age, we can literally stay at home and have almost anything delivered to our homes as most consumer goods are widely available for online purchase. We also have more opportunities in terms of employment because many applications like Skype or Google Hangouts allow employees to work from home. Members of an organization nowadays rely on email and other online platforms to maintain effective communication and ensure their businesses operate smoothly. When it comes to personal relationships, we use Facebook to connect and stay in touch with friends and relatives. The Internet, without doubt, enhances our shopping experiences, makes our workplaces more streamlined and efficient, and facilitates our communication with others.
However, we are faced with a foreseeable and unfortunate consequence due to our reliance on such technology. We are losing direct interactions that are deemed extremely important in this technological era. Children hardly spend time talking to their parents because they are too engrossed in media hype on Facebook. It is common to see both young and old people with their eyes glued to their phones instead of having conversations like they did before the advent of smart devices. This is leading us toward a society where people will turn to favoring virtual interactions and undervaluing real life relationships.
The influence of the Internet on many aspects of our lives is remarkable. However, the benefits it offers do not justify the fact that it is inflicting severe damage on our relationships, which can only flourish on the basis of true communication.
Sample 11:
The Internet is making everyone’s lives easier to live. Nowadays, it is more accessible to do online shopping, work, and facetime without going out through social media. Although they can get the advantage of saving schedules for other things, they will also struggle with a lack of understanding while communicating online. However, the disadvantages outweigh the advantages because people are far better off meeting in person and going out themselves despite the benefits they might gain.
The main benefit of working from home and buying stuff from websites is that it saves hours and money for other things which cannot be done while working on site. Because it gives more turn to stay with closed ones at home and spend quality space with children. And people spent less petrol to go out for these reasons. For example, due to pandemics, everyone depends on laptops or computers for work. Additionally, while malls were closed people were preferring electronic shopping more. For these reasons, individuals strengthen their relationships and improve their social well-being.
One possible drawback is that someone will face is the absence of human interaction and insufficiency in understanding. Because cyberspace will replace the desire for human touch which everyone needed. For instance, I have been living in Canada for two years in a long-distance relationship which sometimes causes misinterpretation of things that cannot be possible while living with someone. Similarly, advice cannot be given by retailers online which is only possible in person and helps to hide true identity to someone by promoting fake products. That’s why face to face interaction is really important to get away with uncertainties.
In conclusion, Advancement in technology releasing an individual’s tension. While a person will no doubt experience some understanding barriers that lead to the main advantage of using Cybernet which is less time-consuming.
Sample 12:
Digital technology and devices are pushing back the frontiers of convenience every day. People today can shop, work and communicate online without meeting in person. This essay will consider both positive and negative aspects of online shopping, communication, and telecommuting, and then state that on the whole, it is a positive development.
The Internet and digital devices, such as smartphones, tablets, and laptops, have revolutionized the way we live and work. People no longer go to physical outlets to shop. They can purchase goods from the comfort of their home. So, they do not need to bother with traffic congestion or wait in long queues at the cash counter to pay for the items purchased by them, and thereby saving time. Likewise, gone are the days when employees worked in their cubicles or followed the routine 9-to-5 office life. Nowadays, they can work from home with the help of cutting-edge devices and technologies. Similarly, online communication eliminates time and space barriers. It enables people to communicate anytime with others from anywhere as long as they have an internet connection.
This trend has some disadvantages too. In the case of online shopping, consumers cannot inspect goods physically or try on the product being considered for purchase, and therefore they can end up making a bad purchase. In the same token, employees may face more disruptions at home compared to the office which can result in low productivity. Besides, the security of a company could be jeopardized due to the remote workplace. But we, as informed users of technology, can overcome these barriers by being more cautious and prudent while using technology.
To recapitulate, people today no longer need physical presence to shop, work or communicate. These activities can be done online, which is much more convenient. Although this convenience has its own costs, it, in my opinion, is a positive development as the informed users can defeat the problems.
Hot: 1000+ Đề thi cuối kì 1 file word cấu trúc mới 2025 Toán, Văn, Anh... lớp 1-12 (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Some argue that offering free bus and rail passes to all who need them is the best solution to traffic congestion. While this might be effective for many, I believe the government should also explore other strategies to address this problem.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.
However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.
In conclusion, while providing free public transportation can indeed help reduce traffic, it should not be the sole focus of government efforts to solve this issue.
Sample 2:
It is generally believed that if the government wants to solve the traffic congestion problem, the most effective solution is to provide free public transportation, such as buses and trains. In my opinion, I agree with this idea because it really helps to ease the situation.
Firstly, I believe that free public transportation can reduce people's dependence on cars and improve traffic congestion. People who live outside the city centre tend to go to work because there are no buses or train stations around the area. Therefore, the government should consider building railway and bus lanes to cover all remote areas. In addition, dedicated lanes can be allocated to buses to avoid traffic jams. For example, Japan has done a very good job with its advanced subway system. Their stations are always overcrowded, and trains and buses are always on time. People rarely own cars and they rely on public transportation.
Secondly, the government should always carry out publicity activities to promote the advantages of using free public transportation. By doing so, people can break the mentality that public transportation is dirty, slow, and unreliable. As long as more people know, the transportation system is well designed, more comfortable and more convenient; people will soon start using public transportation. For example, Singapore has implemented 24/7 free public transportation, and its roads are unobstructed.
In short, I firmly believe that free transportation will reduce congestion by promoting awareness-raising campaigns and investment in buses and trains. Although it is a difficult task for the government to implement free public transportation in the community, once the government implements it successfully, it will have a major impact on everyone's life.
Sample 3:
Today with the increasing population and the exponential growth of urbanization, the transportation needs of the people have increased rapidly. Due to increasing transportation and the need for vehicles, traffic congestion has become a major problem of the countries with increasing populations. Therefore, looking into the problem deeply, I find that the best way to control this traffic congestion is for the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities. There are certain reasons for increasing traffic congestion as discussed below.
Firstly, the faster pace of population growth has increased the demand for more vehicles on the road. Since the transport facilities are less as compared to the people traveling, the demands have increased day by day which has contributed to more vehicles on the road and hence contributing to traffic congestion. Secondly, the increasing urbanization has caused more of the rural population to migrate to urban cities and metropolitan cities to find jobs and work. This increased migration of the population to urban cities is also one of the major causes of the traffic congestion on roads. For example, metropolitan cities of India like Delhi, Mumbai, Ahmedabad are highly traffic-congested cities of India due to increased urbanization and rapid migration of the rural population.
Traffic congestion is one of the major causes of carbon dioxide emission and increasing global warming of the earth. The harmful gases emitted from these vehicles pollute the environment. For example, the highly populated city of India is Delhi due to increased traffic congestion. The government must provide free transportation facilities to reduce the number of private vehicles on the road and must also encourage the population to compulsorily use these free public transportation facilities to reduce the problem of traffic congestion. Besides, in public transport, the use of environmentally-friendly electric vehicles like metro services, electric trains, electric buses, and taxis must be encouraged instead of fuel vehicles to reduce the emission of harmful gases in the environment.
Therefore, after analyzing all the points above, the conclusion drawn upon is that traffic congestion is the major problem faced by many countries at large and the best solution to this problem is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities to the people.
Sample 4:
The population has been increasing day by day and with the increasing number of people, urbanization is also at its peak. In such situations, the huge demands of vehicles have caused rapid traffic congestion on roads. However, some people argue that the best way to control traffic congestion is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, but in my opinion, this may not be the correct way to control the traffic congestion.
Some of the major reasons for traffic congestion are urbanization and the migration of the people. This has caused an increased demand for vehicles in the market. Nowadays people tend to travel a lot, and, in such conditions, they find it easier to use their own vehicles rather than opting for public transport. A survey conducted in China states that a majority of people prefer their own vehicles rather than public transport and this has increased more vehicles on road contributing to the traffic congestions. Secondly, people find it easy to carry their own vehicle to travel to different corners of the country as it is more comfortable than public transport. Also, the conditions of the public transport facilities have also deteriorated, they are also very congestive and unhygienic. Besides, the public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners due to non motorable roads and hence, the best option for traveling to these areas are the private vehicles. Secondly, private vehicles like cars and motorbikes have become more affordable and budget-friendly for people.
For the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, it will be a big burden on their exchequer. Instead, the government must focus on other measures like encouraging bicycles for school and college-going students, build wide tracks with separate lanes, build more expressways and flyovers to reduce the congestion. Also, they must subsidize the public transport fares but not completely free. A separate track for pedestrians and cyclists must be built to limit the number of vehicles on the road. Besides, an awareness campaign must be launched to inform people of the traffic rules and safety measures. Strict traffic rules must be followed, and a compulsorily fine system should be introduced.
Instead of providing free transport facilities for the public, the above-mentioned measures must be given more importance.
Sample 5:
To reduce traffic congestion, the government must provide free transport facilities to the public. But this step can be moderately implemented to reduce the congestion on roads. Some other measures should also be taken in equal proportion to deal with the issue of traffic congestion. Therefore, the statement, Government should provide 24/7 free public transportation to reduce traffic congestion is moderately correct. There are several reasons for the increasing traffic congestion on roads as mentioned below.
Population in many of the developing countries like India and China has been increasing at an alarming rate. This has caused an increasing number of people on the road either using public transport, their own vehicles or pedestrians resulting in increased traffic congestion. Also, a large-scale migration of the population to urban cities for work had deteriorated the traffic conditions of big cities. Secondly, the fares of the public transport are quite high compared to the service they render and are more congested and unhygienic. Now, when automobiles have become more affordable and fuel-efficient, people opt for quality and comfort over public facilities. Thirdly, people have started to travel more these days and public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners of the cities or towns. In such situations what people find better is the use of the facilities of the private vehicle. However, the use of private vehicles has resulted in increased traffic congestion and besides, these are the major cause of concern as they contribute to the emission of harmful gases polluting the environment.
To deal with the problem of traffic congestion, providing only free public transport may not contribute much. Besides, the government must encourage the use of electric vehicles and bicycles amongst the population. Secondly, it must focus on building more expressways and highways and separate lanes to reduce the congestion. Enough attention must be paid to constructing road facilities in remote corners of the cities and towns and especially in rural areas so that public transport can easily reach every corner of the world. Strict adherence to the traffic rules must be followed.
All these steps along with free transport facilities by the government together can contribute to reducing traffic congestion.
Sample 6:
The incidents of traffic congestion are increasing along with the population growth. Some contend that in order to lessen traffic congestion, the government ought to offer free public transportation. This solution, in my opinion, can only partially resolve the issue.
Most individuals now prefer to live in cities or towns rather than rural areas due to urbanisation. This is one of the primary causes of the heavy traffic on the roadways. At the same time, cars have also gotten cheaper and more fuel-efficient as a result of technological improvement. The number of automobiles on the roads has also increased as a result.
The government is undoubtedly attempting to reduce traffic by enhancing the efficiency and speed of public transit. For instance, the DMRC system, which facilitates bus stops across the entire city, has been installed in Delhi, a densely populated metropolis. The public can utilise this bus service 24 hours a day, seven days a week, but it is not free, thus many people opt to drive their own car instead. Because buses and trains are crowded and uncomfortable, many individuals will still choose to use their own vehicles even if public transportation is free. Free public transportation will also put a strain on the exchequer.
In my opinion, the government can take a number of additional steps to lessen traffic on the roads. For instance, it needs to create bigger roadways, additional flyovers, and separate lanes for cyclists and pedestrians. It should also strictly enforce traffic regulations and promote the use of environmentally friendly transportation.
In conclusion, making public transportation free will undoubtedly encourage more people to use it, but since those who value comfort and convenience over cost will still drive privately, this strategy is ineffective in easing traffic congestion.
Sample 7:
The traffic is getting worse in contemporary society, some citizens suggest that the authorities should provide free public transport every day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it's extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken at the same time.
We have to admit that this policy can increase the usage of public transport. Inhabitants will take it into consideration if it's free when they are facing traffic jam. To some extent, it can reduce traffic congestion. But we cannot turn a blind eye to the problems it caused.
This initiative will sharply increase the national budget. It's generally acknowledged that national funds are limited and should be used in a large variety of social aspects from education to environmental protection. The initiative will leave a burden on the financial budget and let the infrastructure cannot be maintained and guaranteed.
Furthermore, this policy cannot address the root of this issue. People use private cars not because of the high cost of the public transportation system, but because the line and route don't cover their destination or the low efficiency when they plan for a long-distance trip. No matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. In addition, traffic congestion only accrued during the rush hours, so it's pointless to provide it for free all day.
To sum up, I think the authority should reduce the price and develop the traffic infrastructure if they want to address this issue, rather than provide it for free simply.
Sample 8:
Some contend that the best way to combat traffic congestion is to always provide free bus and rail passes to everyone who needs them. While I acknowledge it may work for the vast majority of individuals, I think the government ought to offer other options to address this issue.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.
However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.
In conclusion, it is undeniably true that providing free public transit to citizens may be a significant element in reducing traffic, but this is by no means the main component that governments should take into account when trying to address this issue.
Sample 9:
In recent years, traffic jams have been increasingly ubiquitous particularly in big cities which cause great fatigue for commuters. In order to tackle this problem, it is argued by many that government should provide free public transport all day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it is extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that traffic congestion is not only attributed to the vast amount of private transport but also road systems. Moreover, no matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. Thus, providing free public transport alone just contributes to cutting down the volume of traffic to some extent. In fact, many big cities like Ho Chi Minh still suffer from traffic jams in narrow roads with obsolete infrastructure in spite of the rise in availability of public transport. Therefore, I strongly believe that road needs to be widened, and traffic lights and signs should be made more state-of-the-art to stem the root causes.
More importantly, though providing free public transport 24 hours per day is not necessary and what is more is that it may leave a burden on the national budget. According to the majority of reports, traffic jams mainly occur during the rush hours, so it is pointless to provide public transport all the time. On top of that, providing free public transport in the long term may be unachievable due to its tremendous cost. This measure not only costs governments a fortune but it is also unable to address the root of the issue. It would be far more economical if this amount of money was invested in enhancing road facilities.
By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that other measures rather than making public transport available may be far more efficient to traffic congestion. In years to come, I strongly believe that more investments in road systems should be adopted to make commuting more comfortable and time-saving.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
These days, people’s workplaces are constantly changing and evolving to meet the demands of modern society. Furthermore, the roles and responsibilities of jobs are also undergoing changes to adapt to new ways of working and living. This essay will discuss the possible reasons for these changes and suggest some ways that people can better prepare themselves for their future careers.
Firstly, due to the developments in hi-tech machines and artificial intelligence, millions of people all around the world are losing their jobs and being replaced by automated processes. For example, millions of factory workers have lost their jobs because they have been replaced by machines that are able to do their job quicker and more effectively. Furthermore, as a result of the ever-increasing desire to cut expenses and increase profits, many jobs are being outsourced to countries where the wages are lower. For instance, when a person calls a tech support help line in an English-speaking country, they will most likely be connected to someone in another country, like India or Philippines, where the wages are lower.
However, there are a number of ways that people can prepare for changes in their workplaces in the future. Firstly, students preparing to leave high school need to be advised about the sustainability of the career path they are choosing. To illustrate, autonomous vehicles are predicted to replace most delivery and taxi driver jobs in the very near future, so this is not a job that someone should expect to have for a very long time. Furthermore, while some jobs are being replaced by technology, many jobs are simply incorporating technology into their process, and therefore people will need to be able to keep up to date with these changes. To help achieve this, specific courses could be designed to help educate people on the use of modern technology in their workplaces.
In conclusion, although there are many changes in the workplace these days, educating people to carefully choose their career and to keep up to date with modern technology is the key to avoiding any major problems.
Sample 2:
The nature of labor in our modern world is changing at a fundamental level, with many workers worried that they will not be able to maintain their job conditions for long periods of time. Personally, I think this is the result of stagnating wages and the advances of automation, and can only be resolved with a universal basic income for the whole population.
Firstly, I argue that society is witnessing the worst wage stagnation in generations, which is causing people to constantly look for better paying jobs. As cost increases yet wages are not following suit, most of the workforce have to scramble to reach for managerial positions or risk losing their disposable incomes. This in turn creates a situation where many people have to take up multiple jobs in order to make ends meet. In the US and UK, for instance, it is estimated that millions of workers are on zero-hour contracts, which does not guarantee a set number of hours of work.
Secondly, as corporations seek to reduce expenditure as much as possible, they aim to replace the workforce with machines, leading to higher levels of unemployment and less stable job conditions. As machines encroach on the workforce, jobs become focused on the maintenance of the robots running our factories, and therefore there is higher competition for the dwindling number of jobs with gradually raising entry barriers. The end result is sure to be tension amongst socio-economic classes that can afford entry into the workforce if the effect of automation is not being mitigated.
I argue that in order to solve this, it is important to implement Universal Basic Income, which is an equal lump sum of money given to all citizens of countries every month or year. This would help people to keep their jobs and not have to take up precarious work, since they have enough money to buy basic necessities. This scheme can already be seen in Canada during the COVID-19 outbreak, for example, with citizens getting 2000 Canadian dollars a year. This has been hugely popular, as it allowed Canadians to have some level of stability even as the economy came to a halt.
Overall, I believe that stagnant wages and automation is leading to volatile work conditions, and as such, I contend that UBI is needed to stabilize this situation.
Sample 3:
It is a tendency that many people change their careers many times during their lifetime. This essay will identify the causes for these changes and recommend some ways to prepare for working in the future.
There are many reasons why one job for life seems to be over. One of the major reasons is our consumerism society. Therefore, job hopping for higher paid jobs or doing multiple jobs is no longer simply an option. Another reason is that the development of technology has changed the structure of work at such a fast pace that people have to constantly update themselves with the latest working methods. However, many are unable to adapt to the changes. For example, older workers might find it difficult to compete with younger workforce and have to find a new job or change their career field.
For those who want a stable life even in the rapidly changing future, they should realise that as long as we find a job which gives us satisfaction, there would be no need to change. My advice for those people is that if we stick to one job, life can be more stable. Of course, if one wants some employment changes, they should prepare for new job openings with a variety of working experience and skill set. Some should return to school to pursue courses that can lead them into new careers. Otherwise, some should take a fresh environment in which they can use and improve their skills and experience.
In conclusion, the process of job hopping is becoming very common because of social and technological development. I suggest that our knowledge and skills should be updated regularly, and we should have a balance between career changes and job satisfaction.
Sample 4:
It is true that the present working environment has witnessed a radical change. People now tend to switch jobs more frequently rather than have their occupations remain stable. While this phenomenon can be caused by several reasons, there are certain recommendations to help future workers prepare themselves for their careers.
First and foremost, the introduction of new technology might be the greatest cause for such changes. In other words, millions of workers all around the world are being replaced by high tech machines and artificial intelligence. For example, some staff working in the service industry are now on the verge of unemployment due to the rapid growth of online shopping websites and self-service supermarket checkouts. Another reason leading to this phenomenon is globalization. Due to globalization, employees have a wide range of choices between different positions among countries. As a result, many individuals tend to shift from one job to another with a view to higher salary as well as better standard of living.
However, there are several ways that people can get ready for changes in their future workplace. Firstly, workers should be well equipped with various skills by attending vocational courses and job training. Thus, they might keep up to date with the rapid development of robots and automated processes. In addition, individuals can get advice about the sustainability of their future position. This helps them to excel in one job rather than multiple, which lifts up the burden of switching jobs regularly.
In conclusion, although cutting-edge technology and globalization have made a great impact on the world of work, employees must be well-informed and flexible to achieve expected goals.
Sample 5:
It is irrefutable that the work scenario is altering at a fast pace. Working conditions are also different and the process of job-hopping is very common. This essay shall delve into the possible causes for these changes and suggest ways to prepare for work in the future.
To begin with, the development of science and technology has changed the structure of work. For example, people no longer need to do some heavy work by themselves. Instead, they can use machines. Secondly, competition has become intense, and people have to constantly update themselves with the latest materials and methods. Sometimes they cannot compete with the new techno-savvy workforce and so have to change jobs out of compulsion.
Furthermore, we belong to an era of consumerism. Being surrounded by so many choices, people today want to buy new things and for that, they do multiple jobs. In addition, the 24/7 society of today provides us with the opportunity to workday and night. For instance, in earlier times, there were very few jobs which were round-the-clock jobs. But, today, globalization has brought in a multitude of options of working day and night. The line between day and night has become dim and people have become workaholics.
There could be many suggestions to prepare for work in the future. People should have a set goal in their mind and get training accordingly. Moreover, it is important to draw a line somewhere. The stress and strain of the fast modern workplace is leading many to nervous breakdowns. In the developed countries, a new term called downshifting has already come where after a certain stage, people are saying ‘no’ to promotions and showing contentment with less. We should also realize that if we stick to one job, then life can be more stable, and we can enjoy our leisure also.
To put in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, although work conditions are different today and we have a need to update our knowledge regularly, we can plan our life in a meticulous way and have a balance between work and leisure.
Sample 6:
In today’s modern world, people tend to change jobs more often than before and don’t want to work permanently in one environment. I would like to explore the sources of this issue and suggest several solutions for future work.
Firstly, due to the global recession, many employers have to downsize and restructure their businesses. This leads to a number of redundant employees being forced to leave their jobs and find other ones. Another reason is that, as living costs are getting higher and higher, people want to earn as much money as they can to meet their needs. Hence, they seek better opportunities and well-paid jobs everywhere, every day. Some also look for new challenges. Last but not least, thanks to new technology, people nowadays are able to access information more easily, including information about job recruiting.
One of my suggestions for this problem is to create a comfortable working environment and build strong relationships between colleagues and between managers and workers. These will make employees find it harder to leave. To achieve this, courses such as leadership training and communication skill training should be carried out to help supervisors lead their team efficiently without causing any stress, and help employees fit inconveniently.
In conclusion, I would like to state that changing jobs is one of the notable signs of our technological times, and soft skills training courses can help people adapt to the working environment instead of seeking to escape it.
Sample 7:
Work culture lately has been dynamically transformed, mainly due to improvements in technology like transport and communication. Job security has become a dicey issue as employees now need to keep themselves updated with the advancements around them. This essay shall further explain the reasons and offer probable solutions.
In the last two decades, we have seen a remarkable spread of technology in all wakes of life. With easy access to the Internet and computers, work has become faster and easier. Innovation of office tools is encouraged everywhere so as to not let anything hinder the growth of trade and commerce. With each task becoming effortless, manual intervention at many places has been reduced. Ergo, rising insecurity is seen among employees. Additionally, employees are expected to multi-task in their jobs making it more difficult for older workers to sustain.
The remedial measures for such a situation are very few as of now. First of all, state-of-the-art employee training centers to help the employees stay well-versed with the high-tech upgradations. To solve this problem from an earlier level, universities should start imparting practical training in their curriculum, with the know-how of current on-the-job scenarios to prepare potential workers better. All this needs to be done as the employees losing their jobs also lose financial security for their families, and it is very difficult to start again from ground zero.
To conclude, I’d say we should accept the ever-changing technological advancements as they’re unlikely to stop. Better would be to equip ourselves and become flexible accordingly so as to welcome such developments.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.