Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 909 Lưu

Some people think that the range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has the opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

Some people argue that in modern society, technological advancements are increasing the gap between the wealthy and the poor while others believe that technology is decreasing the gap between them. In my opinion, while certain innovations are inaccessible to the poor because of their high cost, certain technologies are available to all people in society and help reduce the gap between the rich and the poor.

Some inventions and discoveries decreased the gap between people of different income levels. This is because they are accessible to all people due to their availability at cheaper rates. For example, internet technology is available to almost all sections of society. It is affordable to all people, and certain places such as railway stations, bus stations, and airports are WiFi hotspots where the internet is freely available. Online shopping facilities, e-learning opportunities and social networking sites are available to both affluent and poor people in society and they decrease the gap between the rich and the poor.

However, certain advancements in technology are not affordable for the poorer sections of society. In fact, new drugs, diagnostic procedures, and even modern medicines are very costly. Therefore, only rich people can access these treatments and improve their health by spending only a small portion of their income. For example, affluent people who developed cancer took treatment with a special kind of protein which was very expensive but had fewer side effects compared to conventional chemotherapy. Poor people, on the other hand, have to spend all of their money for conventional treatments and yet there is no guarantee that their condition will improve.

In conclusion, certain innovations in technology bridge the gap between the rich and the poor while certain developments make society more polarized.

Sample 2:

It is true that the advent of technology has brought tremendous benefits to human life. While technology can narrow the gap between social classes to some extent, I believe that some technological products have set affluent individuals apart from others, as will now be discussed.

On the one hand, it is true that technology has transformed our lives and reduced the gap between individuals. The availability of technological products has allowed massive numbers of people to live a comfortable life in almost the same way. For example, today, nearly every household has at least a television, a fridge, or an air-conditioner, all of which help increase the overall standard of living and narrow the gap between the haves and the have-nots in society. The spectacular growth of low-cost airlines also means that more people can take a flight to the place they want to go to.

Looking at the argument in this light, some feel that technology has bridged the gap between the rich and the poor. On the other hand, I side with those who argue that some technology has separated wealthy individuals from poorer ones. Many technological products are prohibitively expensive, and only the rich are able to afford them. Luxury cars and private jets, for instance, have created a shining image for the owners, giving them an aura of confidence when they appear in public. Those who live on a meager income, in contrast, could merely enjoy a frugal life with mediocre but necessary consumer products. The idea of possessing the latest technology in the home might be far-fetched to bourgeois individuals.

In conclusion, although some technological products are produced for the masses, I believe that some others contribute to the difference in lifestyles between rich people and poor ones.

Sample 3:

It is often thought that the wide variety of technological advancements are raising the gap between rich and poor people, whilst others think these advancements are bridging the gap between rich and poor. Many arguments have been made for and against the effect of technological inventions on rich and poor people. In this essay, I will discuss both views and give my own position.

On one hand, many people think that the growth in technology reduces the difference between the rich person and poor person. This can be attributed to the growing inventions in all fields, which facilitate people to use a range of machinery for accomplishing the tasks, that in turn reduce the dependency on people for accomplishing the task. A good illustration is the invention of machinery for weeding, planting, harvesting and food processing which evidently reduce the time and people involved in these tasks and result in huge profit for agrarian society.

On the other hand, technology has spread over many areas which act as a trigger point for the increase in gap between wealthy and needy person. Even though there is plenty of new machinery rushing to the market each day, they are almost extremely costlier, which cannot be afforded by an indigent person. This, in turn, results in the needy person to go penniless, in contrast, facilitate moneyed man to become wealthy individual.

Finally, in my opinion, we are in the 21st century where tremendous growth in technology facilitates people to lead a better life with high quality. There are a lot of positive outcomes due to technological innovations which play a key role in bridging the gap between rich and poor people.

In conclusion, with the recent technological invention, there is a lot of scope for poor people to get rid of manual work and thrive towards raising their standard of living. Therefore, new innovations play a vital role in reducing the gap between rich people and poor people.

Sample 4:

Some argue that technological availability is widening the gap between the affluent and the underprivileged groups of people, while some people view it the other way around. However, although the poor are unable to afford high end technologies and the associated wellness benefits, in my opinion, the easy access to some technological platforms have created incredible opportunities for the common people to gain required skills that bridge the gaps between rich and poor.

On the one hand, as high-tech devices are very costly, not all the people in a society could access to such type of products. For example, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Internet of the things (IoT), both technologies are facilitating rich people to lead a more productive life which helps them keep growing even more in their career. Furthermore, the cutting-edge expensive technologies are not only favouring rich, but also creating barriers for the poor people in availing some fundamental rights such as health and wellness services, as these sectors are mostly relying on high-tech appliances. For instance, private hospitals are normally equipped with the most advanced technologies which are only available to individuals who could financially afford their services.

On the other hand, certain types of technologies are available for the majority of people around the world. These days almost everyone has access to the Internet and smart phones which brings a vast number of opportunities for people to develop their skills and knowledge. In addition, regardless of the business size, individuals are able to promote their products and showcase their talents through social networks. Furthermore, not only wealthy people have access to the world class knowledge and education nowadays, but also poor people can avail the opportunity to reach smart-pay jobs by acquiring the necessary skills using the online open learning platforms and showcasing their talent through social media networks. Thus, when poor people get better in terms of knowledge and earnings, the gap between the well-off and the less privileged individuals declines.

To conclude, it is true that wealthy people have exclusive access to certain types of technologies that can make them richer. Nevertheless, easy access to some essential technologies, such as free online portals, is broadly helping everyone to nourish their knowledge and expertise, which is eventually contributing to narrowing the gaps between the rich and poor.

Sample 5:

Some people believe that technology has made people become closer, whereas others think that a wide range of technology nowadays increases the gap between the rich and the poor. In fact, there are both sides, regardless of reach or poor, people are easily connecting with each other using the advantages of technology, although the poor are getting deprived of wellness service because of its heavy dependence on sophisticated technology. This essay firmly believes that if people can make good use of different technologies, it could help to reduce the gap between people who are and who are not wealthy. I am going to elucidate the idea in detail in the following paragraphs.

First of all, technology plays an important role in reducing the gap among people from all walks of life. It is without a doubt that wealthy people would prefer to go to prestigious private schools. They, therefore, make friends the people who are with similar family backgrounds. With the help of technology such as social media applications, nowadays they can make friendship with diverse groups of people. In fact, technology provides a platform for the rich and the poor to get to know each other. In other words, it enables them to connect without boundaries. For instance, poor people would try to get into the field of technology in order to change their life. That means, by resorting to technology, they not only gain the scope to work for wealthy people, but also create connections with them, which eventually results in narrowing the gaps between them.

However, high-end technologies are very costly, all the people in a society cannot get access to them. As a result, it is not only increasing the gap in terms of accessing to cutting edge products but also creating barriers for the poor people in availing health and wellness services, as these sectors are mostly relying on high-tech equipment, whereas poor people are lagging behind. For instance, reputed advanced hospitals are normally equipped with the most expensive and advanced technologies, which are beyond the reach of the poor people in terms of both complexities and cost.

To conclude, technology plays a crucial role in connecting people among the different strata of a society. However, it is not free from downsides, as the service sector is becoming heavily based on complex and expensive technology, poor people are being pushed out of reach. Weighing both sides, I must say, people have to use technology wisely in order to see its benefits. Otherwise, it might further widen the gap between the poor and the rich.

Sample 6:

The debate over whether the burgeoning range of technology available to people is widening the socioeconomic divide is multifaceted. On one hand, it is argued that technology exacerbates the gap between the affluent and the indigent, while on the contrary, some believe it acts as a great equalizer. This essay will examine both perspectives, ultimately advocating that technology's role is nuanced, influencing both sides of the socioeconomic spectrum in complex ways.

Advocates for the viewpoint that technology is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor cite the digital divide as a primary concern. The argument rests on the premise that access to cutting-edge technology, including high-speed internet, sophisticated devices, and advanced educational tools, is predominantly within the reach of the wealthy. This access not only enhances their economic opportunities but also augments their educational and social advantages, perpetuating a cycle of inequality. For instance, remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted this issue, as children from affluent families could continue their education seamlessly online, while those from poorer backgrounds often struggled without the necessary technological resources.

Conversely, proponents of the idea that technology can diminish economic disparities point to its democratizing effects. They argue that technology, especially the internet, has drastically reduced the barriers to information, education, and business opportunities. Platforms such as MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) provide free or low-cost education to anyone with internet access, potentially leveling the playing field. Additionally, the rise of e-commerce and digital entrepreneurship allows individuals from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds to start businesses with minimal capital, challenging traditional economic barriers.

In conclusion, while technology's proliferation can indeed accentuate the gap between different socioeconomic groups by privileging those with access, it also harbors the potential to bridge these divides through its democratizing capabilities. The crux of the issue lies in ensuring equitable access to technological resources, thereby harnessing its potential to empower rather than exclude. As such, the relationship between technology and socioeconomic disparities is not one-dimensional but deeply intertwined with broader societal structures and policies.

Sample 7:

It is true that technological improvements have brought tremendous benefits to human life. While technology can narrow the gap between social classes, I would argue that innovative products have separated wealthy individuals from poorer ones.

On the one hand, technological innovations have decreased the gap between people of different income levels. This is because the availability of high-tech facilities has helped those living in poverty lead a more comfortable life compared to the earlier time. For example, nowadays blue-collar workers can easily afford to buy a multi-tasking smartphone, allowing them to gain equal access to abundant sources of online information and entertainment regardless of their social status. As a result, their living standard and life quality have been enhanced considerably. Similarly, the popularity of the Internet enables students with financial hardships to approach affordable high-quality e-learning from reputed websites like Udemy without worrying about tuition fees, contributing to greater equality in life.

On the one hand, I believe technological advances have set the affluent apart from others. In terms of medical sectors, although a great number of advanced medical treatments for fatal ailments like cancer can save thousands of individuals worldwide, the price of those medications is still beyond the purse of many, and therefore only the wealthy can afford them, which is unfair. In terms of luxury goods, as high-tech firms seldom make products for poor customers, only the rich can afford the leading brands like Ferrari or Vertu, so the chance to possess tech and luxury items is far-fetched to bourgeois individuals, contributing to the growing inequality.

In conclusion, although scientific breakthroughs can lead to a better life, it seems to me that the gap between the haves and the have-nots is being widened.

Sample 8:

The rapid advancement of technology in recent years has sparked a debate regarding its impact on socioeconomic disparities. Some argue that the widening range of technology is exacerbating the gap between rich and poor individuals, while others contend that it has the opposite effect. In this essay, we will explore both perspectives and provide an informed opinion on this critical issue.

Advocates of the view that technology widens the gap between rich and poor individuals highlight several compelling points. Firstly, the high cost of cutting-edge technology places it out of reach for many low-income individuals, limiting their access to tools that could enhance their skills and opportunities. Additionally, technology’s integral role in modern education creates an education divide, with economically disadvantaged students lacking access to the resources and tools that their wealthier peers enjoy. Furthermore, as technology advances, job automation becomes more prevalent, resulting in job displacement for those in low-skilled sectors. This exacerbates income inequality, as individuals with the skills to work with technology benefit from job opportunities and higher wages. Lastly, digital literacy is increasingly crucial for accessing essential services and employment opportunities, further marginalizing disadvantaged individuals who lack these skills.

Proponents of the opposite view argue that technology can actually narrow the gap between rich and poor individuals. One argument in favor of this perspective is that the internet provides access to a wealth of information and educational resources, empowering individuals from all socioeconomic backgrounds to acquire knowledge and skills. Moreover, technology facilitates economic opportunities through online platforms and e-commerce, allowing individuals, including those from disadvantaged backgrounds, to start businesses and access global markets. Additionally, technology has made remote work more feasible, enabling people in remote or economically disadvantaged areas to participate in the global job market without the need to relocate. These factors suggest that technology can, in fact, mitigate socioeconomic disparities.

In conclusion, the impact of technology on the gap between rich and poor individuals is a multifaceted issue. While technology offers access to information, economic opportunities, and remote work possibilities, it also exacerbates disparities through limited access, education divides, job automation, and digital literacy gaps. Considering these factors, it is our belief that the increasing range of technology available today tends to widen the gap between rich and poor individuals.

Sample 9:

There is no doubt that modern technology is reshaping our planet and affecting every aspect of human lives. From a social perspective, many people argue that the gap between the upper class and lower classes is widening as a result of technological advancements. Others, however, believe the opposite.

There are several reasons why one could think that wealth inequality is, indeed, increasing. The most common reason is the automation. Driven by technology, automation reduces the need for manual labour. As a result, less work opportunities are available for unskilled people. With each iteration of the cycle the competition increases and wages decrease. Secondly, technology has increased the minimum level of needs that should be satisfied. Nowadays, everybody should have a mobile phone and an internet connection, including the poor. This increases the monetary burden on them as they must borrow to cover these new needs.

However, I firmly believe that the aforementioned opinion is ludicrous. The most obvious reason is that modern technology has facilitated the road to riches in an unprecedented manner. For instance, many of the internet billionaires are from lower and middle classes. Moreover, the major leaps in agricultural technologies have magnified food production. As a result, food has become more affordable and available. Finally, leveraging technology has dramatically increased workers' productivity. Consequently, compensations and salaries have increased.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that technology could possibly narrow the difference between social classes. Increased food production, opportunities and productivity are just a few examples of technology's contribution to bridging the wealth gap.

Sample 10:

A group of people think that the rich-poor gap is widening because of modern technology, while others oppose this view. In my opinion, modern technology plays a key role in minimizing this gap to a great extent.

Even though technology has developed to a great extent, not all of it is accessible to all classes of the society. Some technological developments require immense research and heavy investment. As a result, such state-of-the-art technology is often priced high and is very much aimed at a niche market mainly consisting of the affluent who are willing to pay a high sum to access such sophisticated technology. In such cases, those belonging to the low economic class would be denied or would find it extremely challenging to access such high-end technology even if it is of a dire need contributing to the economic gap in society.

On the contrary, one cannot deny the fact that the gap between the rich and poor has been reduced to a great extent as a result of growth in modern technology. In the past, technological developments and inventions were seldom. However, over the last few years monumental changes can be seen in the field of technology like telecommunication, automation and robotics which are available in a range of prices making it affordable to many. This has aided in reducing the opportunity gap and has made it a lot easier for people to gain access to different technologies and employ the same in their day-to-day life as well as in the industrial activities thereby minimizing the rich-poor gap in society.

In my view, technological inventions with advanced features are available in the market in a range of prices making it easy for everyone to gain access to technology regardless of their economic background. This has significantly helped in bringing down the rich- poor differentiation at present in society.

In conclusion, although people have different opinions regarding the impact of modern technology on the rich-poor gap in society, I believe that it has played a considerable role in bringing down the inequality curve.

Sample 11:

Technology has undoubtedly become an integral part of our lives, and its impact on society is a topic of much debate. Some argue that the increasing range of technology is widening the gap between the rich and the poor, while others believe that it is actually bridging this divide. Both views have valid points, and in this essay, I will discuss these perspectives and provide my opinion on the matter.

On one hand, those who argue that technology is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor point to the rising cost of advanced technology. The latest smartphones, computers, and other gadgets are often unaffordable for those in lower income brackets, leading to a digital divide. Additionally, the access to high-speed internet and digital resources is often limited in economically disadvantaged areas, further exacerbating the gap. This means that the wealthy have greater access to information, education, and opportunities, while the poor are left behind.

On the other hand, proponents of the opposite view argue that technology has the potential to level the playing field. They argue that advancements in communication technology have made it easier for people from all backgrounds to connect and collaborate. The rise of e-learning platforms and online resources has also provided access to education and skill development for those who may not have had the opportunity otherwise. Furthermore, the increasing affordability of basic technology, such as smartphones, has allowed even the poorest individuals to access information and services that were previously out of reach.

In my opinion, while it is true that technology has the potential to bridge the gap between the rich and the poor, the current reality is that it is widening this divide. The high cost of advanced technology and the unequal access to digital resources are clear indicators of this trend. However, with the right policies and initiatives in place, technology can be harnessed to create more equitable opportunities for all members of society.

Sample 12:

Today, modernization has revolutionised humans’ lifestyles fundamentally. Industrialisation has made our world a better place to live, although some individuals believe that this has been more useful to more affluent citizens. From my perspective, these advancements have led all humans to live better, even the deprived ones.

On the one hand, those who believe that by the development of technology, the rich have gained more beneficiaries have their own reasons. One is that luxury lifestyle has become more popular globally. The more luxury goods are produced by different companies, the more well-to-do citizens have more choices to purchase more variety of magnificent items. For instance, in 2015, Apple, a well-known electronic corporation in the USA, produced a new version of Apple cell phone as size as a watch with the price of over $20000. Therefore, this watch will be affordable to those having tremendous saving. In addition, in trading, richer countries have a better access to the latest technology of e-commerce, while the poor ones, higher expenditure avoids them to compete with the former and the globalisation has increased the gap between the developed and underdeveloped nations.

On the other hand, I personally agree with those believing that modernization has had more positive influences on both rich and poor people. One important impact is that all nations have better access to more highly developed health systems. For example, even in remote areas of Africa, MRI is used for diagnosing diseases, and its technology can be compared to the one which is being used in the USA. In addition, travel facilities have been altered dramatically. Had aviation technology not been developed so fast, less general people would have used low-cost airlines. In the past, only the rich could pay for the ticket of an airplane, but now even a simple worker and his family can afford the fee of a flight annually.

In conclusion, some may believe that the more technology develops, the more wealthy citizens have better living conditions. However, I personally agree that this can influence the level of access to medical services and travelling facilities, and the poor’s lifestyles have been and will be improved far significantly.

Sample 13:

Modern technology has played a crucial role in molding and shaping society and the world the way it is today. Some people believe that the upcoming modern technology has resulted in an increased gap between the rich class and the poor people of society. But, in my opinion, modern technology has resulted in closing the gap between the two classes rather than increasing the gap and has proved to be a bane in the lives of the people.

One of the major reasons which make people believe in this ideology is because of the fact that modern technology is expensive and cannot be afforded by everyone in the society. For example, with the commencement of the lockdown due to COVID-19 and the digitalization of teaching via online classes, almost every family had to buy a new gadget such as a smartphone, laptop, computer, or tablet to ensure uninterrupted studies. As we know that the prices of electronic gadgets are very high, it becomes tough for poor people to afford such gadgets. Thus, many people fail to buy them, which in turn affects their education.

However, technology is one of the areas which has turned many people filthy rich. The individuals running their businesses in technology are some of the richest people worldwide, for example, Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp altogether, and Bill Gates, the owner of Microsoft has become the richest man worldwide because of his software business i.e., technology.

Though modern technology is expensive, but several measures have been taken by the Indian Government to ensure that technology reaches to several people in the old households, the made in India project, the cheap network plans, and cheap smartphones provided by the Indian companies like Jio, makes it possible for several people to get the gadgets and become aware with the technology.

Sample 14:

Some people believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people, and I completely agree with their opinion. In my point of view, technology plays a crucial role in increasing the gap and barrier between the rich people and the poor people of the society. This topic is one of the most controversial topics of all time, however, I would like to state a few relevant points and examples that would justify my opinion.

Everyone knows that the technology of the present generation and the gadgets that support it are very expensive and always come at a price. Thus, this technology is way more affordable for the rich people as compared to the poor people. Let us be practical, for example, in a developing country like India, where several people are below the poverty line and have a daily income of 50 to 100 rupees, it is hard for them to buy electronic gadgets worth 7000 rupees or even get a net plan worth rupee 20. In the current scenario of the pandemic, where online education is the most preferred way of education, the lack of resources makes it difficult for poor people to pursue their education. This is clearly one of the best examples to prove how rich people and poor people are indifferent because of technological barriers.

Moreover, even if someone buys a gadget, the lack of electricity in the rural areas is a barrier, preventing them from using the gadgets or the technology. However, the lack of money is one of the biggest barriers which further increases the gap between these two classes in the society, but one should never lose hope and get disheartened.

However, the advancing technology has been a gift to the human population, everything is available at a click, thus measures should be taken to ensure its availability to everyone.

Sample 15:

Technology is constantly modernizing, improvising, and advancing and thus in turn is reshaping people’s lives, which have affected everyone in several ways. While many people accept the fact that technology has heightened the gap between rich and poor people, I would like to argue that it is the opposite. In my opinion, modern technology has successfully reduced these barriers and gaps amongst these two classes of people and would soon equate them.

It is true that, in the past years, the barriers between rich and poor people have been widely seen amongst groups of people in society. For example, the possession of luxurious and expensive Apple products by most of the rich individuals is still commonly viewed as a symbol of being a part of the upper class of society, since Apple products are having high popularity and high value. Despite these factors, technology has entered and improvised as years passed by, allowing everyone in the society to enter the world of the wealthy. I would like to give a clear example, the use of the online stock market has become easily accessible to the market at minimum fees due to its availability on the internet, and now everyone can access it online. Online conferences, webinars, seminars, courses can be conveniently viewed on social media accounts such as LinkedIn, Facebook, WhatsApp, Snapchat, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube. Signing in on such websites has now become an easy task, since everyone can do it, and is not limited to the richer people only now. To conclude, although technology has resulted in generating a gap between wealthy and deprived people of society in the past, I now believe that it has successfully created a bridge between these people too, thus reducing the gap of the societies they live in and improving their lives further through constant awareness and knowledge.

Sample 16:

Some people believe that modern technology is widening the gulf between rich and poor, whereas others feel that it is bridging it. I agree with the former point of view because technology by and large benefits wealthy people.

On the one hand, it can be argued that the poor can now educate themselves online for free. In the pre-Internet era, those who had little education almost had no opportunity to 'escape' to better employment. They had to do low-skilled jobs and earn minimum wages all their working life. However, now poor people can acquire knowledge by reading articles and watching tutorials on the Internet without charge. The knowledge they have gained can help them change their fate. However, I disagree with this argument because those that are truly destitute might not have access to a computer or the Internet.

On the other hand, technology mainly works to the advantage of the rich. This is because they can afford to use advanced technology to create more wealth. Manual workers, in comparison, are being replaced by automation. For example, while Amazon founder Jeff Bezos is getting richer and richer as he keeps investing in logistics automation for the company's warehouses, farmers and miners are losing their jobs to robots. I agree with this opinion because the poor cannot even keep their manual labor jobs, let alone close the gap with the rich.

In conclusion, I think modern technology is exacerbating economic inequality because it is primarily in favor of already wealthy people.

Sample 17:

There have always been considerable discussions in terms of the influence of technology on human beings. It is argued by some that the advent of technology is responsible for expanding the gap between social classes, I believe that technology is an ideal vehicle for people to get closer to each other.

On the one hand, I understand why some people think that technological devices increase the gap between rich and poor people. They argue that technological advances have led to the appearance of various luxurious products which are so costly that only the rich in the society are able to afford. Take supercars as a typical example, these cars are often equipped with upper-level performance engines and other state-of-the-art equipment. Also, they must under rigorous safety tests before delivering to customers, and therefore they are too expensive in the market. It is impossible for poor people who live on a small salary to buy this kind of car which may cost them a fortune, but many rich people buy exorbitant cars to separate them from their society.

On the other hand, I believe that there do exist many technological inventions which reduce the differences between wealthy and poor people. The advancement of technology has brought many opportunities for most people from a variety of backgrounds to approach a range of technological products which are affordable in the market. It is exemplified by a high proportion of families in Vietnam who use air conditioners and washing machines on a daily basis. In the past, it was difficult for impoverished people to possess these products which are limited in numbers and expensive. However, not only well-off households in cities but also rural families in the countryside can buy them to improve their living standards as they are not only diverse in size and quantity but also cheap.

In conclusion, there are some high-tech devices which are prohibitively expensive for poor people, but I believe that many low-cost technological products help to reduce the gap between rich and poor people.

Sample 18:

It is considered by some that the extensive use of modern technology is widening the gap between affluent and poor people, while others refute the statement. Although affordable technologies continue to permeate the developing world and help reduce the disparity between the rich and the poor at the initial stage, I believe, it risks widening the divergence between the rich and impoverished in the long run by shifting investment to advanced economies and wealthy people.

On the one hand, poor nations narrow the gap between people from different walks of life with the use of affordable technology such as computers, laptops and the internet when the technology is embraced by all. In simple words, access to technology allows lower-income groups to develop specialised skills and, help connect to employers to find jobs online. A good example here is “impact sourcing”, which refers to the businesses employing underprivileged people to carry out processing tasks that need human interaction but can be carried out on an outsourced basis. A study commissioned by the Rockefeller Foundation revealed that the market for impact sourcing was $30 billion in 2020. However, this is just the initial state, and the rich start to reap the wider benefits of technology by controlling that in the long run and eventually being richer. This risks the wealth disparity among people even more.

Moreover, many technologies like robotics, computer architecture, artificial intelligence, and machine learning also widen the discrepancy between the rich and the poor by shifting investment to either the developed world or to wealthy investors. This means that robots replace many unskilled workers, and the artificial intelligence revolution causes an increase in productivity, this in turn fuels overwhelming demand to invest in robots. Consequently, investment diverts from the poor nations to finance robot accumulation in the developed world, thus resulting in a decline in GDP in the developing nations. A recent study carried out by the World Bank revealed that the divergence in per capita income between the rich and the poor has increased dramatically because investment gets to divert to industrial countries.

To conclude, although access to affordable technology initially helps bridge the gap between the rich and poor people, costly technology makes society more polarized. Therefore, the government should invest in raising skill levels so that the labour force can complement sophisticated and complex technologies like robotics and artificial intelligence.

Sample 19:

People are divided on the role of technology in our lives. Some individuals opine that technology increases wealth inequality, whereas others believe that technology has brought the rich and the poor closer. I believe, although wealth inequality has increased in the last few years, technology is not the reason. Technology has actually reduced the gap between the rich and the poor.

There are many reasons why some people think that technology increases the gap between the rich and the poor. To begin with, new technology tends to be affordable by only the affluent sections of the society and the poorer elements are denied the opportunities that this provides. In other words, new technologies favour the rich as they can afford them and use these technologies to further earn more money. Furthermore, technologies in the form of machines are being used by rich corporations to either replace labour or force them to work for cheap. Thus, while the profits of the rich are increasing, the poor are losing jobs and becoming poorer. It is a fact that real wages have not increased in the past few decades in most of the developed countries.

On the other hand, those who believe that technology is actually beneficial, cite the following reasons. Firstly, technology has created huge opportunities for the poor where none existed previously. For example, some technologies such as communications or networking give poor people a chance to earn a better living and also increase their education opportunities. To cite an example, online education is not only cheaper but also much more affordable and this has enabled many poor people to access university education which they previously couldn't. What is more, technology has been the answer to many problems faced by the poor like water purification without electricity, cheap transportation and so on. Last but not least, technology has increased transparency in governance, bringing down corruption and thus helping the poor immensely.

I believe that technology is not the reason for the increase in the gap between the rich and poor. The real reason for the increasing gap is actually the lack of regulation on new technologies, which allows their benefits to be hoarded by the rich. For example, no price control on even life-saving medicine and latest research, which makes these medicines unaffordable for all but the super-rich. The same medicines after price checks and regulations can not only save lives but also save the poor from falling into poverty. Thus, technology, when regulated properly, decreases the rich-poor gap rather than increasing it.

Summing up, technology can actually lessen the gap between the rich and the poor. It is not the technology to blame for the gap, it is the access to technology, which is to blame.

Sample 20:

In the contemporary era, perspectives vary regarding the impact of modern technology on the socio-economic gap between affluent and impoverished individuals. While some contend that technological advancements are reducing disparities, others argue that they further exacerbate the divide. From my standpoint, technology tends to escalate the gap between the rich and the poor due to various reasons, primarily the unequal access to and utilization of technology.

Advocates of technology's role in diminishing the wealth gap argue that advancements provide broader access to information and opportunities. For instance, internet connectivity and e-learning platforms offer educational resources to underprivileged communities, potentially enabling them to acquire skills for better job prospects. Similarly, technological innovation in microfinance and online entrepreneurship might facilitate economic empowerment for marginalized populations.

Conversely, the proliferation of technology predominantly benefits the affluent, perpetuating the wealth gap. Wealthier individuals have superior access to cutting-edge technology, leading to better education, healthcare, and employment opportunities. This unequal distribution of resources widens the economic chasm between the rich and the poor. For instance, the digital divide persists in many developing regions, hindering equal access to quality education and job opportunities for disadvantaged populations.

In my opinion, technology tends to widen the socio-economic gap due to its uneven distribution and utilisation. While it offers prospects for advancement, the unequal access to resources and opportunities exacerbates existing disparities. The disproportionate technological access between the rich and the poor perpetuates socio-economic inequality rather than mitigating it.

In conclusion, while technology can provide avenues for socio-economic upliftment, its unequal distribution and utilisation aggravate the wealth gap. Bridging this gap requires addressing the disparities in access and ensuring equitable technological distribution to harness its potential for all strata of society.

Sample 21:

Modern technology is a matter of intense debate concerning its impact on the socio-economic disparity between wealthy and destitute individuals. While some assert that technological advancements are widening the gap, others argue that it plays a pivotal role in bridging this divide. In my opinion, technology has the potential to reduce the gap between the rich and the poor by offering new opportunities and resources to underserved communities.

Those who claim that technology is exacerbating the wealth gap argue that it primarily benefits the wealthy, leading to further disparities. Wealthier individuals have more access to cutting-edge technology, superior educational resources, and employment prospects, leaving the less privileged at a disadvantage. For instance, the digital divide persists in many developing regions, where limited access to technology impedes education and job opportunities for marginalized populations.

Conversely, proponents of technology fostering equality believe that it can serve as an equalizer. Technological advancements have brought about innovative solutions in various sectors, providing opportunities for socio-economic advancement. For example, internet connectivity and online educational platforms offer resources to underprivileged communities, empowering them with knowledge and skills. Additionally, advancements in mobile banking and e-commerce have facilitated financial inclusion, allowing access to markets and services previously unavailable to the marginalized.

In my view, while technological disparities exist, the potential for technology to reduce the gap between rich and poor is substantial. With initiatives focusing on providing equal access and opportunities, technology can bridge the divide by empowering the disadvantaged.

In conclusion, while technology has its disparities, its potential to provide opportunities and resources to underserved communities makes it a valuable tool in reducing the socio-economic gap. Initiatives for broader access and equal opportunities through technology can significantly contribute to a more equitable society.

Sample 22:

Modern technology, without a doubt, has revolutionised the world and has touched almost every aspect of human life. Some people opine that the gap between the wealthy and the poor is widening as a result of technological advancement. Others, however, disagree and say that the poor can take advantage of it and improve their condition like never before, and I support the opinion of the latter group.

According to some, wealth inequality is increasing between the upper class and lower class due to unprecedented technological advancement and automation. As technology reduces the need for manual labour, unskilled poor people find it hard to secure a job. Using advanced tools and machines, rich people increase their production capacity and make a huge profit as a result. Technology is at the centre of all modern innovations and inventions, and as a result, poor people are left out of this amelioration.

However, according to others, the most obvious reason technology can effectively decrease the wealth disparity is that most important technologies are open to all. Anyone from any part of the world can access the internet, develop skills, access important information and educational materials and walk the road to riches in an unprecedented manner. For instance, many modern billionaires are from the lower and middle classes, and they have changed their fates and the fates of millions of others with the help of technology.

To conclude, technology has already reduced the difference between social classes and has created millions of jobs just for anyone with the right skill set. It is expected that it will further narrow the gap between the rich and the poor in the future.

Sample 23:

Modern technology has revolutionised various aspects of our lives, and its impact on social and economic inequality is a topic of debate. While some argue that technology is widening the gap between the rich and poor, others hold a contrasting view. This essay will explore both perspectives and present that technology is enlarging the gap between the wealthy and the impoverished.

Those who believe that modern technology is exacerbating inequality argue that access to advanced technology is often limited to those with greater financial resources. High-tech gadgets, high-speed internet, and cutting-edge devices are often expensive, making them inaccessible to the economically disadvantaged. This digital divide further deepens existing disparities and prevents equal opportunities for education, employment, and economic advancement.

Contrarily, proponents of the opposing view assert that modern technology has the potential to bridge the gap between the rich and the poor. They argue that technological advancements have led to the creation of innovative solutions, such as affordable smartphones and low-cost internet access. These advancements have enabled individuals from low-income backgrounds to access educational resources, remote job opportunities, and e-commerce platforms. Furthermore, technology has facilitated the dissemination of information and ideas, empowering marginalised communities and enabling social mobilisation.

In my opinion, technology has actually dilated the gap between the rich and the poor. Undoubtedly, there are instances where technology perpetuates inequality, such as when access to quality education or healthcare becomes reliant on digital platforms. Since poor people use basic technology and most of it for entertainment or personal communication, they cannot harness the true power of technology the way rich people do. This is widening the gap even further.

In conclusion, the impact of modern technology on inequality is a complex issue. But overall, it contributes to the widening gap between the rich and poor due to unequal access. Unless we allow poor people the opportunities for the use of advanced technology in education, employment, and empowerment, this gap will continue to get bigger.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Some argue that offering free bus and rail passes to all who need them is the best solution to traffic congestion. While this might be effective for many, I believe the government should also explore other strategies to address this problem.

On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.

However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.

In conclusion, while providing free public transportation can indeed help reduce traffic, it should not be the sole focus of government efforts to solve this issue.

Sample 2:

It is generally believed that if the government wants to solve the traffic congestion problem, the most effective solution is to provide free public transportation, such as buses and trains. In my opinion, I agree with this idea because it really helps to ease the situation.

Firstly, I believe that free public transportation can reduce people's dependence on cars and improve traffic congestion. People who live outside the city centre tend to go to work because there are no buses or train stations around the area. Therefore, the government should consider building railway and bus lanes to cover all remote areas. In addition, dedicated lanes can be allocated to buses to avoid traffic jams. For example, Japan has done a very good job with its advanced subway system. Their stations are always overcrowded, and trains and buses are always on time. People rarely own cars and they rely on public transportation.

Secondly, the government should always carry out publicity activities to promote the advantages of using free public transportation. By doing so, people can break the mentality that public transportation is dirty, slow, and unreliable. As long as more people know, the transportation system is well designed, more comfortable and more convenient; people will soon start using public transportation. For example, Singapore has implemented 24/7 free public transportation, and its roads are unobstructed.

In short, I firmly believe that free transportation will reduce congestion by promoting awareness-raising campaigns and investment in buses and trains. Although it is a difficult task for the government to implement free public transportation in the community, once the government implements it successfully, it will have a major impact on everyone's life.

Sample 3:

Today with the increasing population and the exponential growth of urbanization, the transportation needs of the people have increased rapidly. Due to increasing transportation and the need for vehicles, traffic congestion has become a major problem of the countries with increasing populations. Therefore, looking into the problem deeply, I find that the best way to control this traffic congestion is for the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities. There are certain reasons for increasing traffic congestion as discussed below.

Firstly, the faster pace of population growth has increased the demand for more vehicles on the road. Since the transport facilities are less as compared to the people traveling, the demands have increased day by day which has contributed to more vehicles on the road and hence contributing to traffic congestion. Secondly, the increasing urbanization has caused more of the rural population to migrate to urban cities and metropolitan cities to find jobs and work. This increased migration of the population to urban cities is also one of the major causes of the traffic congestion on roads. For example, metropolitan cities of India like Delhi, Mumbai, Ahmedabad are highly traffic-congested cities of India due to increased urbanization and rapid migration of the rural population.

Traffic congestion is one of the major causes of carbon dioxide emission and increasing global warming of the earth. The harmful gases emitted from these vehicles pollute the environment. For example, the highly populated city of India is Delhi due to increased traffic congestion. The government must provide free transportation facilities to reduce the number of private vehicles on the road and must also encourage the population to compulsorily use these free public transportation facilities to reduce the problem of traffic congestion. Besides, in public transport, the use of environmentally-friendly electric vehicles like metro services, electric trains, electric buses, and taxis must be encouraged instead of fuel vehicles to reduce the emission of harmful gases in the environment.

Therefore, after analyzing all the points above, the conclusion drawn upon is that traffic congestion is the major problem faced by many countries at large and the best solution to this problem is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities to the people.

Sample 4:

The population has been increasing day by day and with the increasing number of people, urbanization is also at its peak. In such situations, the huge demands of vehicles have caused rapid traffic congestion on roads. However, some people argue that the best way to control traffic congestion is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, but in my opinion, this may not be the correct way to control the traffic congestion.

Some of the major reasons for traffic congestion are urbanization and the migration of the people. This has caused an increased demand for vehicles in the market. Nowadays people tend to travel a lot, and, in such conditions, they find it easier to use their own vehicles rather than opting for public transport. A survey conducted in China states that a majority of people prefer their own vehicles rather than public transport and this has increased more vehicles on road contributing to the traffic congestions. Secondly, people find it easy to carry their own vehicle to travel to different corners of the country as it is more comfortable than public transport. Also, the conditions of the public transport facilities have also deteriorated, they are also very congestive and unhygienic. Besides, the public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners due to non motorable roads and hence, the best option for traveling to these areas are the private vehicles. Secondly, private vehicles like cars and motorbikes have become more affordable and budget-friendly for people.

For the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, it will be a big burden on their exchequer. Instead, the government must focus on other measures like encouraging bicycles for school and college-going students, build wide tracks with separate lanes, build more expressways and flyovers to reduce the congestion. Also, they must subsidize the public transport fares but not completely free. A separate track for pedestrians and cyclists must be built to limit the number of vehicles on the road. Besides, an awareness campaign must be launched to inform people of the traffic rules and safety measures. Strict traffic rules must be followed, and a compulsorily fine system should be introduced.

Instead of providing free transport facilities for the public, the above-mentioned measures must be given more importance.

Sample 5:

To reduce traffic congestion, the government must provide free transport facilities to the public. But this step can be moderately implemented to reduce the congestion on roads. Some other measures should also be taken in equal proportion to deal with the issue of traffic congestion. Therefore, the statement, Government should provide 24/7 free public transportation to reduce traffic congestion is moderately correct. There are several reasons for the increasing traffic congestion on roads as mentioned below.

Population in many of the developing countries like India and China has been increasing at an alarming rate. This has caused an increasing number of people on the road either using public transport, their own vehicles or pedestrians resulting in increased traffic congestion. Also, a large-scale migration of the population to urban cities for work had deteriorated the traffic conditions of big cities. Secondly, the fares of the public transport are quite high compared to the service they render and are more congested and unhygienic. Now, when automobiles have become more affordable and fuel-efficient, people opt for quality and comfort over public facilities. Thirdly, people have started to travel more these days and public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners of the cities or towns. In such situations what people find better is the use of the facilities of the private vehicle. However, the use of private vehicles has resulted in increased traffic congestion and besides, these are the major cause of concern as they contribute to the emission of harmful gases polluting the environment.

To deal with the problem of traffic congestion, providing only free public transport may not contribute much. Besides, the government must encourage the use of electric vehicles and bicycles amongst the population. Secondly, it must focus on building more expressways and highways and separate lanes to reduce the congestion. Enough attention must be paid to constructing road facilities in remote corners of the cities and towns and especially in rural areas so that public transport can easily reach every corner of the world. Strict adherence to the traffic rules must be followed.

All these steps along with free transport facilities by the government together can contribute to reducing traffic congestion.

Sample 6:

The incidents of traffic congestion are increasing along with the population growth. Some contend that in order to lessen traffic congestion, the government ought to offer free public transportation. This solution, in my opinion, can only partially resolve the issue.

Most individuals now prefer to live in cities or towns rather than rural areas due to urbanisation. This is one of the primary causes of the heavy traffic on the roadways. At the same time, cars have also gotten cheaper and more fuel-efficient as a result of technological improvement. The number of automobiles on the roads has also increased as a result.

The government is undoubtedly attempting to reduce traffic by enhancing the efficiency and speed of public transit. For instance, the DMRC system, which facilitates bus stops across the entire city, has been installed in Delhi, a densely populated metropolis. The public can utilise this bus service 24 hours a day, seven days a week, but it is not free, thus many people opt to drive their own car instead. Because buses and trains are crowded and uncomfortable, many individuals will still choose to use their own vehicles even if public transportation is free. Free public transportation will also put a strain on the exchequer.

In my opinion, the government can take a number of additional steps to lessen traffic on the roads. For instance, it needs to create bigger roadways, additional flyovers, and separate lanes for cyclists and pedestrians. It should also strictly enforce traffic regulations and promote the use of environmentally friendly transportation.

In conclusion, making public transportation free will undoubtedly encourage more people to use it, but since those who value comfort and convenience over cost will still drive privately, this strategy is ineffective in easing traffic congestion.

Sample 7:

The traffic is getting worse in contemporary society, some citizens suggest that the authorities should provide free public transport every day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it's extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken at the same time.

We have to admit that this policy can increase the usage of public transport. Inhabitants will take it into consideration if it's free when they are facing traffic jam. To some extent, it can reduce traffic congestion. But we cannot turn a blind eye to the problems it caused.

This initiative will sharply increase the national budget. It's generally acknowledged that national funds are limited and should be used in a large variety of social aspects from education to environmental protection. The initiative will leave a burden on the financial budget and let the infrastructure cannot be maintained and guaranteed.

Furthermore, this policy cannot address the root of this issue. People use private cars not because of the high cost of the public transportation system, but because the line and route don't cover their destination or the low efficiency when they plan for a long-distance trip. No matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. In addition, traffic congestion only accrued during the rush hours, so it's pointless to provide it for free all day.

To sum up, I think the authority should reduce the price and develop the traffic infrastructure if they want to address this issue, rather than provide it for free simply.

Sample 8:

Some contend that the best way to combat traffic congestion is to always provide free bus and rail passes to everyone who needs them. While I acknowledge it may work for the vast majority of individuals, I think the government ought to offer other options to address this issue.

On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.

However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.

In conclusion, it is undeniably true that providing free public transit to citizens may be a significant element in reducing traffic, but this is by no means the main component that governments should take into account when trying to address this issue.

Sample 9:

In recent years, traffic jams have been increasingly ubiquitous particularly in big cities which cause great fatigue for commuters. In order to tackle this problem, it is argued by many that government should provide free public transport all day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it is extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken.

First of all, it is an indisputable fact that traffic congestion is not only attributed to the vast amount of private transport but also road systems. Moreover, no matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. Thus, providing free public transport alone just contributes to cutting down the volume of traffic to some extent. In fact, many big cities like Ho Chi Minh still suffer from traffic jams in narrow roads with obsolete infrastructure in spite of the rise in availability of public transport. Therefore, I strongly believe that road needs to be widened, and traffic lights and signs should be made more state-of-the-art to stem the root causes.

More importantly, though providing free public transport 24 hours per day is not necessary and what is more is that it may leave a burden on the national budget. According to the majority of reports, traffic jams mainly occur during the rush hours, so it is pointless to provide public transport all the time. On top of that, providing free public transport in the long term may be unachievable due to its tremendous cost. This measure not only costs governments a fortune but it is also unable to address the root of the issue. It would be far more economical if this amount of money was invested in enhancing road facilities.

By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that other measures rather than making public transport available may be far more efficient to traffic congestion. In years to come, I strongly believe that more investments in road systems should be adopted to make commuting more comfortable and time-saving.

 

Lời giải

Sample 1:

It is argued that watching television has an adverse impact on children, whereas other people believe that it brings various benefits to them. I personally agree with the second group.

On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why some people think that children’s development would be negatively affected by watching TV. The first reason is that sitting in front of TV screens for too long is detrimental to children’s health. Many kids these days suffer from various health problems such as obesity, eye strain or fatigue due to prolonged television watching. Another reason is that many TV programmes and movies contain violent contents or sexual images which are inappropriate for children to watch. Heavy exposure to violent movies can put a child at a higher risk of violent behaviour, which could ruin their future.

On the other hand, I personally believe that television has an essential role to play in the development of children. Watching educational TV programmes gives children the opportunity to widen their horizons and enrich their knowledge of the world they live in. Planet Earth and Discovery Channel are prime examples. Their programmes not only take the viewer into unknown natural habitats which are home to various plants and animals, but also educate them about the importance of preserving the wonders of the Earth. In addition, many TV shows and channels provide children with limitless knowledge of almost every aspect of life. A programme called ‘Talent show for kids?’, for example, not only gives children enjoyable moments but also informs them about various subjects.

In conclusion, although some people say that watching TV is harmful to children, I would argue that it is very beneficial for them.

Sample 2:

The matter of screen time for children is open to debate, with some arguing against it while others highlight the benefits it could bring. This essay will examine both stances and present my personal opinion on the issue.

There exist certain health risks associated with TV-viewing for children. In terms of physical health conditions, excessive screen time can result in a wide range of health problems, from eye strain and back pain from prolonged periods in front of the TV, to weight gain and lethargy due to lack of exercise. These risks are also present in the adult population, but much more worrying for young children, who often lack self-control and thus are more prone to addiction. Regarding their mental well-being, children could develop behavioural problems from exposure to explicit content on screen, especially when there is no parental control installed on the device. The effects of violent or sexual acts on young minds are well- documented, with disobedience, aggression, and risk-taking tendencies being the most common issues.

Nevertheless, the advantages of watching TV for children should not be dismissed. One of the most significant benefits is language acquisition. The availability of shows in native tongue or foreign languages, coupled with subtitles and audio-visual aids, allows young children to grasp new vocabulary, as well as its usage. In fact, many children in Vietnam have eagerly learned English from watching shows from channels like Disney and Cartoon Network. Aside from language, TV shows also offer knowledge on numerous areas, including science, environment, history, etc. Vivid imagery and amusing delivery of hosts on kids' educational shows can help children better understand difficult concepts like multiplication compared to traditional textbooks.

In conclusion, after considering both sides of the argument, I believe that children stand to benefit academically from TV shows; however, to minimise the potential drawbacks of screen time, parental guidance and supervision are needed.

Sample 3:

It is pointed out that some individuals believe that viewing television apparently has an adverse bearing on children, while others argue that it brings numerous benefits. This essay discusses both points of view before shedding light on why I side with the latter view.

On the one hand, watching television is conspicuously conductive to children in terms of inventiveness and also enhances language development. To begin with, conveying knowledge through television gives children exposure to a plethora of cultures and perspectives, hence fostering creativity through imaginative storytelling. It is apparent that some television programmes such as Cartoon Network often feature interactive activities and problem-solving challenges, and thus inspire children to think outside the box and explore their creativity. Furthermore, the collosal of children's TV programs incorporate repetition, which is a key element in language reception. To elaborate further, repeated interaction with words, sentences and concepts helps reinforce learning and thus linguistic development.

On the other hand, viewing television takes a toll on children in terms of their mental and also physical health. To start with, TV shows have a lot of negative content that cannot be avoided and thus when the children are exposed to this content such as pornagraphy content that directly affects people who are almost in puberty. A propelling testament of the harmful impact that exposure to erotic material can be captivating to their developing minds, potentially evoking sexual desires that could lead to annulment for their mind and also their mental health. Moreover, viewing television can have disadvantages for children due to binge-watching and prolonged exposure to screen time, which may lead to sedentary behavior and a lack of physical activity. As a result, excessive TV watching can impact attention span, interfere with sleep patterns and even nearsightedness.

In conclusion, both perspectives hold their justifications. From my point of view, I firmly believe that prioritizing their health for the long-term life should outweigh the sake of television brings. Ultimately, moderation and content selection are key.

Sample 4:

In today’s modern society, the issue of whether watching television is beneficial or detrimental to children has sparked a controversial debate. While some individuals argue that television viewing has negative effects on youngsters, I firmly believe that it can be an educational tool for children. In this essay, I will present my reasons to support this viewpoint.

Firstly, television offers a wide range of educational programs that can enhance children’s knowledge and cognitive development. Channels dedicated to educational content, such as documentaries, science programs, and historical shows, provide valuable information that can expand children’s understanding of the world. By watching these programs, children can learn about diverse cultures, scientific concepts, and historical events, fostering their intellectual growth. For instance, renowned educational programs like “Planet Earth” or “Cosmos” captivate young audiences and expose them to the wonders of nature and the universe.

Secondly, television can serve as a powerful medium to promote creativity and imagination among children. Many animated series and children’s shows encourage imaginative thinking and storytelling. By watching these programs, youngsters can be inspired to create their own stories, draw pictures, or engage in imaginative play. This imaginative process is crucial for their cognitive and emotional development, allowing them to explore their creativity and express themselves in unique ways. Moreover, educational cartoons often incorporate moral lessons, teaching children important values such as honesty, empathy, and teamwork.

However, it is important to acknowledge the potential drawbacks of excessive television viewing. Parents should exercise responsible supervision and ensure that children have a balanced viewing experience. Excessive exposure to violent or inappropriate content can have adverse effects on children’s behavior and mental well-being. Therefore, parents should guide their children’s television choices, set limits on screen time, and encourage participation in other activities such as outdoor play, reading, or social interaction.

In conclusion, despite the concerns raised by some individuals, I am of the opinion that watching television can be educational for children. The availability of educational programs and the promotion of creativity and imagination outweigh the potential negative effects. However, parental guidance and responsible viewing habits are crucial to ensure a well-rounded development for children. By striking a balance between television viewing and other activities, children can benefit from the educational and imaginative aspects of television while avoiding its potential pitfalls.

Sample 5:

There is much debate regarding the effects of TV viewing on children. In my opinion, when watched in moderation, educational TV shows can be beneficial for children because they help them develop positive values as they grow up.

On the one hand, those who believe that TV viewing harms children in every way may argue that it is a passive activity that encourages sedentary behavior and limits meaningful play. This can lead to a range of problems, such as poor health and cognitive development. However, I believe that this argument is only valid if children spend too much time in front of the screen. Parents can protect their children from the potential dangers of TV viewing by setting reasonable time limits and providing adequate supervision.

On the other hand, there are people who argue that many TV programs are educational and can instill good values in children. For example, Disney movies often portray characters with admirable traits, such as courage, kindness, and perseverance, which can inspire children to emulate these values and become better individuals. This has led me to believe that educational & television programs can be excellent tools for teaching children moral lessons as they grow and develop. Many children find traditional forms of education boring or difficult, but the visual and interactive nature of TV can make learning more engaging and enjoyable.

In conclusion, although prolonged passive television viewing can be detrimental, watching educational TV shows in moderation can have a positive impact on children's development. Such shows can effectively impart valuable lessons and teach positive values in an engaging and entertaining manner.

Sample 6:

The role of television in children's development has been a subject of ongoing debate, with some individuals vehemently opposing it, while others advocate for its potential benefits. From my perspective, television can be beneficial if appropriately utilised.

Those who argue against children watching television often raise valid points. Primarily, they cite the negative impacts on children's physical health as a concern. With prolonged screen time, children are less likely to engage in physical activity, potentially leading to health issues such as obesity. Furthermore, they worry about the influence of harmful content. Children, being impressionable, can easily internalise violent or inappropriate behaviour depicted in certain shows, leading to negative behavioural outcomes.

On the other hand, advocates for children's television viewing highlight its educational benefits. Many television programmes are designed to be both entertaining and instructive, providing children with a wealth of knowledge about the world, aiding their cognitive development. Shows that portray different cultures, wildlife, or scientific concepts can stimulate children's curiosity and broaden their understanding. Television can also teach moral values and social skills through well-crafted narratives and character interactions.

In my opinion, the key lies in moderation and guidance. While unrestricted, unmonitored television viewing can indeed have detrimental effects, a balanced approach can turn television into a valuable educational tool. Parents and caregivers should control the amount of screen time and ensure that the content children watch is age-appropriate and beneficial.

In conclusion, while the concerns about children watching television are justified, its potential as a developmental tool cannot be dismissed. The onus is on parents and caregivers to utilise it judiciously to foster a balanced growth environment for children.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP