Câu hỏi:

07/01/2025 280

Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified
Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

It is believed that career satisfaction can be achieved by working a job consistently from early on, rather than by changing jobs regularly. In my opinion, having a consistent job history has its advantages and disadvantages when it comes to career satisfaction. This essay will discuss some crucial elements involved.

On the one hand, maintaining stable employment offers numerous advantages. First of all, by being a long-tenured employee, an individual can develop deeper relationships with colleagues and customers. They may also have more opportunities for advancement and growth within the company. Secondly, having a consistent job history can enhance the appearance of one’s curriculum vitae, which shows a potential employer a candidate's commitment, reliability, and level of experience.

On the other hand, staying in the same job for an extended period of time does not always create a fulfilling career. To some people, working the same job may lead to boredom and complacency. They may feel the need to explore new challenges and opportunities in order to continue growing and developing professionally. Moreover, exploring a range of different career paths may ultimately lead to the discovery of a career that suits a person better for the future. For example, since most young people have limited experience, they lack the insight to determine which job is for them. Therefore, changing career paths may help them seek suitable professions.

In conclusion, maintaining a steady work background has its benefits and drawbacks. How an individual can achieve a satisfying career will depend on one’s personal goals, skills, and preferences. It is important for individuals to assess their own needs, values, and aspirations, and to make decisions that align with these factors.

Sample 2:

People have different views about whether they should switch jobs regularly or stick to the same occupation. While it is true that having the same job for years is beneficial for workers to some extent, I would argue that those who frequently try different careers tend to be more satisfied and happier at work.

On the one hand, there are several advantages of having only one job for a long period of time. Firstly, as employees work with the same colleagues and in an unchanged environment, they can feel comfortable and are less likely to suffer from stress. By contrast, if they change their jobs too often, trying to adapt to a new workplace could be a challenging experience. Secondly, when workers are responsible for the same tasks, they gradually gain more experience and sharpen their skills at work. This helps them to be increasingly competent over the years. For example, people who stay in one area can learn from their mistakes, enhance productivity and move up the career ladder.

On the other hand, I believe it is important for workers to experience several occupations. The first reason is that not everyone knows exactly what career they want to pursue immediately after graduating from universities, and young people need to try various jobs to recognise their passion. For instance, when a teacher realises that she does not love teaching, it is advisable to quit her job and look for another. Additionally, moving between jobs allows individuals to constantly find new challenges and learn how to get used to different kinds of environment, which makes working more exciting for them. By contrast, if workers just stay with one job for a long time, they might feel bored due to too much repetition at work.

In conclusion, while it can be beneficial to select a job and stay with it, I believe switching occupations tends to bring more satisfaction for employees.

Sample 3:

Many argue that deciding on a career path early and staying with it leads to a more fulfilling professional life compared to frequently changing jobs. In this essay, I will elaborate on why I strongly support this perspective.

The primary reason is that individuals who choose a specific career path early on can experience stability and concentration. They invest their time and effort in mastering their chosen field, continuously improving their skills and knowledge. This prolonged dedication enables them to advance in their careers, attain expertise, and feel a profound sense of accomplishment. This can be seen across various fields, one of which is medicine. Typically, physicians invest years in studying and practicing medicine, thus garnering profound insights into their field. Through persistent engagement in this chosen pursuit, they gradually refine their expertise, fostering a sense of mastery and fulfillment.

Another reason for my agreement is that committing to a particular career path is often linked with better opportunities for financial stability. This is because those who commit to a specific field early on often have more predictable income paths, allowing for better financial planning and security. Conversely, changing jobs frequently can potentially result in periods of unemployment or underemployment, causing financial strain and uncertainty in such times. This means that the financial security that comes with long-term career commitment can enhance overall job satisfaction.

In conclusion, I firmly support the idea that deciding on a career path early and sticking to it can lead to a more gratifying professional life as it allows individuals to focus on their chosen field, promoting personal growth and expertise, while also providing financial stability. By making an early commitment to a career path, individuals can set themselves up for a successful and fulfilling career journey.

Sample 4:

It is sometimes asserted that those who persist in a career path chosen early on tend to enjoy greater job satisfaction than people that hop between different jobs. I mostly disagree with this assertion given the possible change in people’s working preferences and the acquisition of diverse skills despite a possibly lower level of expertise as a result of job switching.

The foremost rationale for my approval of employees changing their jobs lies in the common shift in career orientation. This might stem from various factors encompassing changes in the job market and personal interests. For instance, some bankers might gradually lose their motivation due to a heavy workload and an increased pressure from their employers, which causes them to switch to more relaxing occupations such as teachers or shop owners.

Another reason why I support people to redirect their career path is the opportunity to become more well-rounded. In reality, job hoppers can be exposed to not only diverse work responsibilities but also various working environments, which is conducive to the learning of new competences and qualities. As a result, this enables them to address ever-changing working conditions with greater confidence.

However, I acknowledge that employees who commit to a specific career choice for a long time might develop further proficiency. It is because they generally possess a more profound understanding of their job’s nature as well as a specialised skill set as the result of years of experience in their given domain. These advantages can foster their productivity at work, which in turn makes them more ideal candidates for a pay rise and promotion.

In conclusion, I am largely in disagreement with an early determined career path leading to a gratifying working life given people’s change in job orientation and conduciveness to a well-rounded development that job switching offers despite a less competitive proficiency. That is why people should not aim to have a fixed plan but willingly embrace flexibility and reap the most benefits from their working life.

Sample 5:

It is claimed that people embarking on their career early and keep pursuing it for a long time are more likely to gain job satisfaction than those who usually switch their job. From my perspective, I firmly hold the view that though both trends may bring people job pleasure in different ways, being loyal to one position would make them more satisfied.

Borne employees have a propensity to change their job since they desire to find their real career passion which is integral to job satisfaction. After some time working in a company, those who find it monotonous to continue staying in the current position may change their direction. By doing this, they have ample opportunities to challenge themselves in different working environments, which afford them chances to build up their social network and a wide range of necessary job skills. For this type of employees, it is undeniable that a larger circle of network and skills acquirement bring them occupational pleasures.

However, I believe that the better opportunity for professional promotion by committing to one company is preferable. Long-time employees can gain profound experience and trust from other colleagues, especially their superiors who could offer them opportunities to climb up their career ladder. This promotion method is applied in countries with deep-rooted employment norms such as Korea and Japan, where employees get a fixed career promotion path based on their working time and loyalty rather than outstanding performance. Professional advancement can not only secure employees a better salary, allowing them to live a better life, but also help them earn the feelings of being highly esteemed. This is where job satisfaction commonly comes from.

In conclusion, although occupation switch stills offer employee benefits, I opine that people should be loyal to one organization for the professional promotion prospect, which would bring them a satisfactory career and secure a better livelihood.

Sample 6:

If asked whether it is keeping a job or switching jobs that gives more job satisfaction, many would struggle to make the final choice. In my opinion, while job hopping has its own benefits, choosing a job earlier on and keeping it would provide people with a greater sense of fulfillment.

On the one hand, there are several merits to job hopping. Firstly, by switching from one job to another, people have the chance to try their hands in different fields and thus acquire more skills. Job hoppers may find job satisfaction in being able to put the knowledge gained from previous employment into practice at the new workplace and receiving recognition for their capabilities. Secondly, people who change work more often and experience various working environments have the opportunity to find what suits them best. For example, many young people dislike the idea of having a steady job or a desk job and therefore, switch career to seek more dynamic opportunities that could later prove more fulfilling.

On the other hand, there are strong reasons why holding down the same job for a long time appeals to many adults. First, people would benefit from better job prospects, which include promotion opportunities and pay rises, if they stayed in a job long term. As experience and commitment are both taken into consideration when a company decides who to promote or to dismiss, those who work longer for an organization stand a higher chance of moving up the ladder and earning a more lucrative living. Besides, there are various perks that follow when people keep the same job, namely sick leave, holiday entitlement, a generous retirement package or yearly bonuses. In addition to improved job prospects, people who stay in the same job may establish a wide and steady network of partners as well as gain supportive long-term colleagues.

In conclusion, I believe that despite the excitement that changing jobs entails, whether for people bent on pursuing a successful career or for those with few career ambitions, it is staying with the same job that is more likely to bring greater job fulfillment.

Sample 7:

Opinion on career satisfaction is largely divided when it comes to whether or not people should choose a consistent profession. While the idea of changing occupations frequently is reasonable to some extent, I am more convinced by working for a job for the long term.

It is justifiable that experiencing several occupations offers people some fundamental merits. The opportunities for them to correct the mistakes when they make impulse decisions about their career developments may be effectively remedied. In other words, people who feel dissatisfied with their present job can step out of their comfort zone and continue to try another suitable one, by doing so they will obtain more work experience in severe domains and improve different skill sets. Therefore, many of them could become more confident when being given important tasks if they are equipped thoroughly with a multitude of work-related experiences. In addition, switching jobs regularly also assists them in choosing which occupations they have a true passion for. To put it more simply, many students now may not be sure that their options to choose which career they want to pursue are satisfying. As a result, the span of being involved in many companies may encourage them a lot in the future life and help them realise their passion.

Despite the aforementioned ideas, I am of the opinion that working consistently in one profession provides them with more overwhelming benefits. A sense of greater job satisfaction becomes more evident. That is to say, changing work environments frequently may impede people from ascending the career ladder, also working in an unchanged environment offers them harmony amongst colleagues and more career prospects alike. Moreover, following their career path for a long period of time enhances their appearance of personal curriculum vitae, which shows a potential employer ability employer's ability to adapt to new cases, and their level of task experience. 

In conclusion, while it can be beneficial to switch severe jobs, I believe selecting a job and staying with it tends to bring more satisfaction for employees.

Sample 8:

Many people believe that those who settle early in their career and stick to it can achieve greater job satisfaction than job hoppers. I partly agree with this notion since it only holds true for those who discover their strength and interests early in life.

Young people who settle early in their careers can achieve job satisfaction in several ways. Sticking to their career early facilitates young people’s work performance, as they can gain insights into their fields, learn and adapt through trial and error. This paves the way for career progression, one major contributor to job satisfaction. In addition, people who can decide on a career path early are often those who have discovered their strengths and can envision themselves thriving in their chosen field. This demonstrates strong intrapersonal skills and vision, the qualities that employers actively seek. As a result, these employees experience heightened job security and satisfaction.

However, settling early in a career does not necessarily guarantee job satisfaction in many other contexts. For those who have yet to discover their strengths and interests early in life, changing jobs frequently provides them with exposure to different roles or industries and discover their true interests and strengths. This can lead to greater job satisfaction as they will eventually find roles that align with their skills and passions. In addition, changing jobs often requires people to build new relationships and learn a new way of doing things, which can foster valuable skills such as communication and adaptivity. This process of skills acquisition is a contributor to job satisfaction for those who aim for increased personal development.

In conclusion, both settling early in a career and frequent job changes can lead to job satisfaction, depending on an individual’s self-awareness of their strengths and interests.

Sample 9:

It is believed by some that choosing a career path early and adhering to it throughout life leads to greater job satisfaction compared to frequently changing careers. Personally, I partly agree with this statement, recognizing the value in both consistency and flexibility in professional development.

Individuals who decide on a career early and commit to it benefit from a deep, nuanced understanding of their field. This commitment allows for the accumulation of specialized knowledge and skills, fostering an environment where significant achievements and recognition are more attainable. For example, a person who has dedicated decades to the field of academic research in biology might discover groundbreaking information that contributes to their field, achieving a high level of personal satisfaction and professional acclaim. This example underscores the relationship between sustained effort in a single direction and the fulfillment derived from mastery and contribution to one’s field.

However, the evolving nature of the global job market and individual growth trajectories suggest that frequent career changes can also lead to a fulfilling working life. The ability to adapt to new roles and industries fosters resilience, broadens skill sets, and can lead to unexpected opportunities that align more closely with an individual’s evolving interests and passions. Consider the case of someone who transitions from a career in finance to pursue a passion in technology and subsequently launches a successful startup. This transition exemplifies how flexibility and the willingness to embrace change can also lead to professional satisfaction and success, challenging the notion that a single, early career choice is always preferable.

In conclusion, while I recognize the benefits of choosing a career path early and dedicating oneself to it, I also see the merits of adaptability and openness to change. Both steadfast commitment to a chosen field and the flexibility to navigate through various careers can lead to a satisfying working life, depending on individual circumstances, market conditions, and personal growth goals.

Sample 10:

It is said that those who pursue and continue with a particular career choice early in life are more likely to experience greater fulfilment in regard to their work than those who tend to switch jobs more regularly. In my opinion, career satisfaction is not determined by when someone chooses a career path or for how long someone pursues it. This essay will outline some important factors believed to be involved.

Choosing a career early in life and pursuing it for an extended period of time can have many great benefits. For example, starting a career early can provide someone with a better financial situation later in life, and hence greater satisfaction. In addition to this, remaining on a particular career path for a long period of time may allow someone to advance to the top of their chosen field through promotion, which may also possibly lead to greater career fulfilment.

On the other hand, those who change jobs or career paths more regularly may also experience many benefits. For example, some people’s personalities are not suitable for staying in a particular job for long periods of time, and they may need to change career paths more regularly to stay satisfied. In addition to this, choosing a career path can be an overwhelming decision for young people without much real-world experience, and therefore exploring a range of different career paths early on may lead them to eventually finding a career that will be more suitable for them in the long term.

In conclusion, how one person gains satisfaction from their career may be different from another. Some may gain job satisfaction from how big their salary is, how far they have advanced within a particular company or field, or how much fame or praise they have earned. Others may be just as content or satisfied in knowing that their chosen career is beneficial towards serving the needs of others. Either way, I believe that choosing a career early in life and staying on this career path does not guarantee job satisfaction later in life.

Sample 11:

People believe that it is easier to gain satisfaction in a career for those who committed to a job for a long period of time, which seems unachievable with frequent job changers. I personally do not agree with that. I think both can bring people contentment in different ways, but a fulfilled career is not entirely determined by the length of time people stay in a job.

It is undeniable that entering a profession early and continuing working in it for a long time is beneficial. For example, while others are struggling to figure out what they will do for a living, it is probably a head start for someone who manages quickly to determine their choice of occupation. Additionally, a long-term commitment to a job, which is highly appreciated in most companies, will help them to develop their expertise in their field so that they can climb up the career ladder. If the ultimate goal of someone is to be promoted and successful in a particular profession, then the longer the tenure is, the more likely his contentment will be met.

On the other hand, there are many advantages for job changers, too. When people are still young and lack experience, it is too early and difficult for them to make a decision on their career, thus, switching jobs may help to find out what is the most suitable path for them. And by doing so, people can have a larger network as well as a wide range of experience. For those who love to challenge and refresh themselves incessantly, staying in one profession for so long can be tedious and job-hopping is apparently the best way for them to stay satisfied.

In conclusion, the definition of career satisfaction varies from person to person, and sometimes, it has nothing to do with the amount of time people have devoted themselves to a job. In fact, it depends mostly on how much the job lives up to their expectation. So, switching jobs frequently or committing to one job only, as long as all the things they have ever wanted in a job are fulfilled, they will be satisfied.

Sample 12:

Today’s generation has become extremely competitive and leaves no stone unturned in terms of getting the best pedestal for them to walk upon. To this, some people expound that the people who take upon a career path and stay stuck to it are more likely to prosper, while another school of thought considers that not to be true. I disagree with this lookout of staying glued to one’s initial career trajectory and shall propagate my point of view in this regard in the paragraphs to come.

The strife to live and survive the sharp-edged pace of the world has become remarkably herculean today. Right from the ground to the sky, almost everyone is seen toiling hard and working their fingers to the bone to manoeuvre better than others. Hence the choices one makes in one’s career happen to sculpt the future concerning the decisions one makes during their lifetime and switching and adapting is a cardinal part of it. Gone are the days when one had to stay clinging to the domain one had chosen for oneself at the beginning of their career. Today is the era of dynamism. Thanks to the pangs of digital contrivances, one can hone their skills and become the best in multiple domains, which zero in on one’s discretion and likelihood to the job they do or choose to switch on to.

Time and again, it has been how the efficacy of an individual has been rendered lackadaisical owing to one’s lost spark for a particular job one is employed for and thereby diminishing the productivity of the organization they are a part of. The cases of people following their passion and making a career switch have not skipped the seams of attention. It keeps one going on the path of accomplishment and instills one with a sense of aligning with their penchant. In such a case it would not at all be factual and pragmatic to believe that one who remains gummed to one’s initially chosen career path would be better than those who change it. There have been countless incidents where one has chosen an entirely distinct stream of a career with regards to what one was recruited for during the dawn of one’s career, and not only has it made such people materialistically sufficed but also mentally stabilized.

Though some might say one has a better chance of promotion when one sticks to one’s career stream, that’s not always true, and that too with the expense of going against one’s mental inertia.

Conclusively, we may therefore say that change is the need of the hour today, and people who manage to adapt to the dynamic waves of the world are the ones who would emerge triumphant in their respective careers. A right switch at the right time is all that makes a difference.

Sample 13:

It is often said that individuals settling down with a permanent career soon seem to experience further satisfaction in their work than some members regularly changing their employment. However, from my standpoint, both these options could bestow comparable feelings of fulfillment.

On the one hand, it is undeniable that numerous people who can opt for a job early and maintain it may reap pleasure in their work. When realizing the job they have a craving for earlier in their life and might land this kind of job, individuals are likely to grasp privileges to expose the majority of their aptitudes, skills and their expertise to their work. As a result, it is easy for them to achieve progress in their career and receive a high salary which may satisfy their requirements for entertainment or education. It is unquestionable that these appear to help create satisfaction with their job.

Notwithstanding, it is my conviction that individuals, who frequently hopping their position, can be likewise content with their employment. The first explanation is that when regularly changing their jobs, they may have multiple opportunities to accumulate diverse majors, skills and knowledge. Thus, they may step out of their comfort zones in order to experience feelings of satisfaction. Another cause could be that by virtue of regularly shifting their employment, social workers are likely to find the most appropriate position with their personal competences and aspiration. Hence, it would seem that job hoppers can also achieve exaltation in working.

Overall, it is sensible to conclude that not only people making an early choice of work and pursuing it for their whole life but also individuals often changing their position can equally get satisfactory in their career.

Sample 14:

It is argued by many that people who pursue a particular career choice early in life and spend the rest of their life in the same profession tend to lead a fulfilled professional life than those who switch jobs very often. This essay entirely agrees with this opinion because it will make the job easy and also confer special job benefits that lead to a pleasing professional life.

Being in a job for many years means that one can gain vast experience in it. In fact, she is familiar with the subtle nuances here and knows how to handle each and every individual situation that may emerge from the course of her work. As a result, things get easier not just for the employee but also for her supervisors. This means that if something goes wrong, they know they have someone who has the expertise and experience to tackle the situation. The experience will not only make an employee very good at what she does but will also help her accomplish the same with minimal effort on her part. This will naturally help people achieve a more fulfiling working life.

Likewise, there are some special advantages pertaining to any profession that only come to employees who have been in the organization for a certain period of time. This would include financial benefits like that of pension and gratuity. A substantial number of companies offer these advantages only to those who have completed a minimum period in the company. Besides, many transnational corporations adopt a certain policy wherein promotions are determined by seniority basis. It is an undeniable fact that people are uplifted by the monetary gains and promotions in such companies.

To conclude, people who are loyal to a profession and work for a company for years on end have a fulfilling professional life because it makes the task easier and also reaps special benefits.

Sample 15:

Choosing a job and sticking to it is often seen as the key to a successful and satisfying career life. However, this is not necessarily the case, as there are many advantages to frequently changing jobs. This essay will discuss the merits of both approaches and argue that neither is necessarily more likely to lead to a satisfying career life.

There are great benefits to choosing a job early and keeping doing it. Those who do it are likely to benefit from the stability and security that comes with staying in the same job. This can provide a sense of comfort and assurance, as they will be familiar with the job and the workplace. Furthermore, they will be able to build up a network of contacts and gain valuable experience in their chosen field.

On the other hand, those who frequently change jobs may gain other advantages. They may first benefit from the variety and challenge that comes with new roles. This can help to keep them motivated and engaged, as they will be constantly learning new skills and gaining new experiences. Additionally, they may be able to progress more quickly in their career, as they will be exposed to different roles and environments.

In conclusion, neither approach is necessarily more likely to lead to a satisfying career life. Those who choose a job early and keep doing it can benefit from the stability and security, while those who frequently change jobs can benefit from the variety and challenge. Ultimately, it is up to the individual to decide which approach is best for them.

Bình luận


Bình luận

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Although fossil fuels still remain the most important energy sources in many places, some countries are now already using alternative sources like solar or wind power. In my opinion, it can be difficult for a country to move towards using alternative energy at first, but this development brings about several benefits in the long run.

On the one hand, the change towards using alternative types of energy would probably put a heavy financial burden on the government and companies as they will have to invest millions of dollars in purchasing and developing new equipment and facilities for harnessing solar, wind or hydro-electric power. For example, the average cost of installing a wind turbine for generating electricity is about $3 million, and an average country would require a wind farm with hundreds of turbines to supply power to all companies and households. In addition, the production cost of large solar panels is still very high, which is why many countries, especially those with a poor economy, are still unable to use this power source.

However, I still believe that shifting towards using alternative energy is a worthwhile investment due to the great benefits it brings. Firstly, fossil fuels are the main cause of air pollution nowadays since petroleum-powered vehicles and factories are releasing tremendous amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere every day. Therefore, replacing coal and petroleum with wind or solar power will help to reduce the level of emissions in the atmosphere and improve air quality. Secondly, fossil fuels, like natural gas or oil, are finite resources and will soon be depleted, which will potentially threaten the economy if there are no alternative sources. This fact emphasizes the need to develop renewable energy to gradually replace traditional sources when fossil fuels inevitably run out.

In conclusion, I hold the view that despite the high initial cost of new equipment and facilities, the switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources is still necessary for the long-term development of the planet.

Sample 2:

The debate around our primary sources of energy has been intensifying in recent decades, with some pushing for more sustainable energy while others arguing that fossil fuels should remain the main source of power globally. I personally think renewable energy production should be encouraged, since it’s important that nations should seek to reduce their own carbon emissions to divert the dangers of climate change as well as build a more sustainable economy.

Firstly, fossil fuel should be discouraged because it could bring about the existential threat of climate change. As a result, biodiversity is at an all-time low, with shifting climates and rising sea levels slowly eroding the delicate tapestry of food webs across the globe. As scientists are convinced this is directly the cause of human activity, such as in agriculture and fossil fuel consumption, renewable energies would help slow this threat immediately and might be our only solution to salvaging the planet.

Secondly, one could argue that renewable energies are more sustainable and would therefore be better for the economy in the long run. While oil and coal are a finite resource and take millions of years to replenish, energy from wind and solar can in theory never run out. Therefore, making a switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy can be a solution that thinks of the longer term, since it could avert an economic crash when oil fully depletes. Many analysts have warned that with the current trajectory, oil could run out by 2050; when this happens, it could sharply affect the biggest economies in the world that are still heavily dependent on oil.

Overall, I argue that the climate effects as a result of fossil fuels consumption combined with the economic benefits of renewable energies mean that we should encourage the development of these forms of energy.

Sample 3:

Fossil fuels, such as coal, oil, and natural gas, have long been the dominant sources of energy in many countries. However, their extensive use has resulted in significant environmental harm, prompting the need for alternative sources of energy. In response to this, many countries are encouraging the adoption of renewable energy sources like wind and solar power. This essay will discuss the reasons behind the promotion of alternative energy sources and argue that it is a positive development.

One of the key reasons for the promotion of alternative energy sources is their potential to mitigate the negative environmental impacts associated with fossil fuels. Unlike fossil fuels, renewable energy sources produce little to no greenhouse gas emissions during operation, thereby reducing the contribution to climate change. For instance, countries like Germany have implemented strong incentives and subsidies to support the development of solar power, leading to a significant increase in the share of renewable energy in their energy mix. This shift towards cleaner sources of energy is driven by the recognition of the urgent need to combat climate change and reduce dependence on finite fossil fuel reserves.

The encouragement of alternative energy sources has numerous positive implications and is a positive trend. It promotes energy diversification, reducing reliance on a single energy source and increasing energy security. By harnessing the power of wind, solar, and other renewable sources, countries can decrease their vulnerability to fluctuations in fossil fuel prices and geopolitical tensions related to energy resources. Additionally, the transition to renewable energy stimulates innovation and job creation. As governments invest in renewable energy infrastructure and technologies, new industries and employment opportunities emerge.

In conclusion, the encouragement of alternative energy sources, such as wind and solar power, is driven by the need to address environmental concerns and promote sustainable development. By reducing greenhouse gas emissions, diversifying energy sources, and fostering economic growth, the adoption of renewable energy brings numerous benefits. Therefore, it is crucial for countries to continue investing in research, technology, and policy frameworks that support the widespread adoption of renewable energy, ensuring a cleaner and more sustainable energy future.

Sample 4:

Fossil fuel, though extensively used, is not eco-friendly, and its usage comes with huge environmental costs. Considering global warming and climate change, and the detrimental effects fossil fuels have on the environment, green fuel, such as solar, hydro and wind power, is increasingly being used in many countries. It is a good thing that many countries have already started using these green power sources.

The promotion of alternative sources of energy has gained significant momentum in numerous countries because of a growing concern about the adverse effects of fossil fuels on the environment such as greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution. Governments and environmental organizations recognize the urgent need to transition to cleaner and more sustainable energy options. For instance, countries like Germany have implemented ambitious renewable energy targets, investing heavily in wind and solar power to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels and combat climate change.

The stock of fossil fuels is limited and would get exhausted at a certain point. So, alternative and green sources, which are renewable, would be the main source of our energy in the future. Despite the shift from fossil fuel to green energy being expensive and labour-intensive, green energy like wind and solar energy is renewable, their use should be as much encouraged as possible from right now, and it is a good thing that the trend has already started. Alternative sources of power, such as solar and wind power, do not pollute the environment, have lower carbon emissions and are eco-friendly. So, their use could save the planet from the disaster of global warming which is already visible around us. Wind power and solar power are in use in countries like Denmark, Germany and France, and more and more countries are joining the list. We already have extremely efficient technology to produce solar and wind power, and the trend is quite encouraging.

To conclude, the energy demand is increasing at a fast pace, and the stock of fossil fuels is diminishing. So, we should turn to alternative green energy sources and share the technology and expertise with all nations so that the transition happens all around the world to save our otherwise dying planet due to climate change and greenhouse effects.

Sample 5:

Every year the energy demand is increasing globally. So, the strains on the current and already limited resources are high. Since these energy resources, like fossil fuels, are mostly imported by countries, some countries have opted for alternative sources of energy to enjoy greater energy security. I wholeheartedly believe that it is a positive trend.

Alternative sources of energy offer greater energy security and independence and that is why their production and use is increasing. Relying on traditional energy sources, often imported from other countries, can leave nations vulnerable to price fluctuations and geopolitical tensions. Embracing renewable energy sources, such as hydroelectric, geothermal, or biomass, allows countries to tap into their own natural resources and reduce dependence on foreign energy imports. This is why it has already gained popularity.

Fossil fuels, like coal and oil, are not unlimited. A few countries like Germany and Japan, for example, are completely dependent on the import of such resources. For all these countries, alternative energy, also known as green energy, is the answer for the future, and it is a welcoming trend that many countries have already started producing green energy. By embracing renewable energy options, countries can address climate change, enhance energy independence, create employment opportunities, and drive technological progress. Countries like France and Norway, among others, have invested in the technology needed to produce extremely efficient solar panels to store energy from the sun or produce wind power. The positive impacts of this development are innumerable, and many countries are following in their footsteps.

In conclusion, the use of green energy sources is gaining traction because many countries want to become energy self-sufficient. This is definitely a positive trend as it reduces reliance on energy imports, helps countries fight climate change, advances technology and creates more employment.

Sample 6:

These days, the environment is being severely affected by the excessive use of nonrenewable energy resources, such as petrol, diesel, coal and natural gas. However, eco-friendly and renewable power sources like wind and solar power are being adopted in many countries mainly because they do not harm the environment, and I wholeheartedly think that it is a positive trend.

The shift towards renewable energy sources in many countries is primarily to fight global warming and climate change. Fossil fuels are often the reason climate change is so severe and threatens the existence of humans on the mother planet. Many countries, including Germany, Norway and France, have adopted the use of green energy like solar and wind power to reduce our dependency on fossil fuels to save the environment.

It is a positive trend as it greatly reduces the carbon content of the environment and makes the planet more sustainable. Without extensive use of green energy, we will soon transform our planet into an uninhabitable one. To save our planet from destruction, we need to produce and use more green and renewable energy. Moreover, it is cheaper to produce such clean energy than to extract coal or natural gas which makes these eco-friendly energies affordable to mass people. A recent study by Oxford University reveals that the production of solar power is 30% cheaper than that of fossil fuel. This finding again emphasizes how important it is for all nations to opt for renewable energy sources, and how beneficial it is that many countries have already invested in generating clean power.

In conclusion, even though we have harmed our mother planet to a great extent by indiscriminately using fossil fuels, some countries have already shown us a better way to produce and use power. It is expected that more countries will invest in alternative sources of energy to make the planet green again and make energy affordable for all.

Sample 7:

While fossil fuels have been the backbone of our energy supply for centuries, they have severe harmful impacts on our environment. Therefore, some countries have started relying on green energy to reverse the situation. And it is a positive trend that we have started researching and using alternative sources of energy, also known as green energy, that are sustainable and do not cause long-term damage to our environment.

One of the main reasons alternative energy sources are being used to produce green energy in many countries is their ability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which are a major contributor to climate change. According to the International Energy Agency, the use of renewable energy sources can help reduce global CO2 emissions by up to 70% by 2050. This is a significant step towards protecting our planet from the devastating effects of climate change, including rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and loss of biodiversity.

The use of renewable sources to generate energy is a positive development for a variety of reasons. For instance, investing in renewable energy can also create jobs and boost the economy. According to the Renewable Energy and Jobs Annual Review 2020, the renewable energy sector employed around 11.5 million people worldwide in 2019, a 6% increase from the previous year. This growth in employment opportunities can help to stimulate local economies and provide new job opportunities for people in both developed and developing countries. For example, in Germany, the government's decision to phase out nuclear power plants and invest in renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar power, has created over 300,000 jobs and contributed to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.

In conclusion, the shift towards green energy sources is a positive development that can help to protect our environment and create new job opportunities. While it may take time and investment to transition away from fossil fuels, it is a necessary step to ensure a sustainable future for generations to come.

Sample 8:

Many nations are now supporting the adoption of various energy alternatives in order to reduce fossil fuel consumption. In my opinion, though there may be short-term economic downsides, this is a decidedly positive development due to the implications on the environment generally.

Those who feel the sudden adoption of alternative energies is a negative point out the financial repercussions. There are economies around the world that are currently dependent on exporting fossil fuels, in particular in The Middle East, South America, and Eastern Europe. Many of these countries are still developing and have few other natural resources or industries that could replace a decline in the energy sector. The economic effects will extend far beyond exporters though. Both developed and developing nations ranging from the United States and Vietnam to China and Russia exploit oil for private vehicles and various industries. Substituting cheap oil for a more expensive alternative might result in economic catastrophe with wide-ranging repercussions.

However, the environmental effect is overwhelmingly more important for the long-term health of the planet. The economic results of less dependence on fossil fuels will cause short-term problems but the issues caused by climate change are also becoming a present reality. For instance, there has been a rise in the number of cataclysmic natural disasters related to rising ocean temperatures and deforestation. Even more troubling are the less noticed problems such as habitats being destroyed in remote areas like Antarctica and the Amazon Rainforest. Beyond the animals becoming endangered and extinct, it is only a number of years before human life is affected. This existential threat is the reason alternative energies are a pressing need.

In conclusion, despite the economic drawbacks of a sudden shift to alternative power sources, this reorientation will have a markedly positive long-term impact on the environment. Governments should therefore implement and bolster alternative energy initiatives.

Sample 9:

The development of renewable energies like wind power, wave power, or solar energy to replace the electricity generated from burning fossil fuels has become an increasingly popular trend in the world. I believe this is a green movement in the energy sector with countless benefits that people should welcome.

The most palpable advantage one can recognize at once when mentioning renewable energies is that they reduce the burden on the environment. The use of solar power creates no emission at all, and thus provides for the need of power at almost no environmental cost. It is similarly clean and sustainable when wind, wave, and water moving around the Earth eternally can be used in energy production. Also, the independence from fossil fuels in electricity generation saves the world from a rapid depletion of coal, oil and natural gases, and slow down the imminent energy crisis which may even cause wars over energy sources among countries.

Moreover, the production of green energy also benefits individuals and the country as a whole. Thanks to less burning of fossil fuels in thermal energy plants, workers in energy companies face less risks of occupational health problems especially those related to respiratory diseases and may lead to early death. On the large scale of a country, the utilization of wind, wave, sunlight, and even geothermal heat to produce electricity will diversify the energy portfolio of different nations, making them free from reliance on limited natural resources to generate electricity due to their unfavourable geographical locations.

In conclusion, the movement of the world towards more use of renewable energy is completely positive when it solves multiple problems of environmental pollution, dependence on natural resources for energy, and poor health of workers in thermal power plants.

Sample 10:

Governments across continents have turned their attention to more sustainable sources of energy as alternatives to fossil fuels. In my opinion, this could be seen as a progress for the following reasons.

First, there is no arguing that producing energy from buried dead organisms lacks sustainability, which means such production could not guarantee the survival of humans in the long term. In fact, the consumption of energy generated from fossil fuels tends to accelerate in direct correlation with the growth of the world population. With the current rate of exploitation, this valuable resource would dwindle away in no time, leaving no other choice than seeking additional reserves such as nuclear power or hydroelectricity. This is a safe solution to the fear of energy scarcity and ensures the future development of the human race.

Second, dependence on fossil fuel for worldwide energy supply would cause environmental degradation while using solar power, for example, is considered an ultimate choice of energy conservation. The combustion of fossil fuels is the culprit of greenhouse gas emissions and other air pollutants, leading to tremendous damage to the environment. Such suffering of the Earth could not be justified by the growing need of humans. By contrast, this would never be the case when it comes to other alternatives as mentioned above. If governments continue to invest in exploiting those new sources, there will be an unlimited amount of inexpensive energy in the long run.

In conclusion, I believe that the use of other potential energy sources to replace fossil fuels is obviously an important step forward.

Sample 11:

Fossil fuels, such as coal, oil, and natural gas, are extensively used in many countries and cause harm to the environment. The use of alternative sources of energy, including wind and solar power, however, is being encouraged in many countries. Is this a positive or negative development?

In several nations, non-renewable sources of energy, namely coal, petroleum, and gasoline, are used inordinately, which is severely damaging the ecosystem. However, other countries are promoting the usage of non-conventional sources of power, such as wind and solar energy. I personally consider that this has been a positive development because the non-traditional approach will aid in efficient energy output and protect the ecosystem from feasible hazards.

Primarily, the remarkable advantage of the aforementioned alternative sources is that they are renewable. These energy sources have a constant supply of power and there is no requirement for significant raw materials. Although it could be argued that the initial cost of setting up solar panels and wind farms is extremely high, I would assert that once the installation cost has been met with, their maintenance is practically negligible. Apart from this, it is widely accepted that fossil fuels take millions of years to form, and once consumed, they cannot be re-used. To illustrate, if modern individuals burn immense petroleum and coal, these resources are likely to vanish, and future generations would not be capable of using these precious energy sources.

Another major benefit of eco-friendly energy sources is their non-polluting nature. The intensive usage of natural resources forms carbon emissions and emits noxious gases that are nurturing global warming and depleting the ozone layer. Even worse, by inhaling such poisonous gases and carbon fumes, human beings are susceptible to various health ailments such as asthma and lung cancer. However, when energy is harnessed from wind turbines and solar panels there are no such deleterious by-products. Unlike other automobiles, for instance, commuting through a solar car would not emit carbon dioxide.

In conclusion, not only do alternative sources provide an inordinate amount of energy supply constantly, but they also preserve the environment in a very effective way. Therefore, I completely believe that this trend is a wholly positive development and one that authorities ought to promote.

Sample 12:

In this day and age, the consumption of non-renewable resources is burgeoning day by day. Owing to this it reached an alarming rate. It takes millions of years to form. However, some nations are taking a step forward and using non-conventional sources of power. This essay will highlight that this is certainly an optimistic approach that needs to be opted.

At the outset, non-conventional sources can be recycled and utilized again. Although, the use of alternative sources has some hurdles like the initial cost of setting up solar panels and wind farms is very high and these also rely on geographical locations. When masses use this energy source for a long period of time, the energy can be renewed and produced, no extra cost will have more economic benefit than the others. Besides this, the use of renewable energy could help to conserve foreign exchange and generate local employment if conservation technologies are designed, manufactured, assembled, and installed locally.

Moving further, alternative sources- wind power, tidal power, solar power – sources are totally safe for the environment, have lower carbon emission, and are eco-friendly. The research concluded that there are some countries that have utilized alternative sources namely German, France, and Denmark as these nations save the planet from a disaster of global warming. Some countries use automobile cars that work on solar power. Consequently, it has reduced the carbon footprint of such countries and made its greenery.

Based on this study it can be reiterated that the use of alternative sources of energy is an optimistic evolvement, which can save the whole globe from the catastrophic impact of greenhouse emissions as well as global warming. Furthermore, more and more folks should adopt renewable sources to ameliorate the conditions of the environment. In this way, by taking joint efforts individuals can preserve the world.

Sample 13:

Due to the shortage of fossil fuels, whether other natural power resources should be encouraged to harness or not, becomes a paramount concern for many countries. I believe, while this advancement may decrease awareness among people about protecting the fuels, it also solves the problem of the lack of energy sources.

First of all, fossil fuels which are the major energy resources in many nations are facing the threats of becoming obsolete due to the overuse by the human race in daily life. As a result, people should be encouraged to raise awareness of fuel conservation. However, the utilization of alternative natural energy sources could prevent people from doing this by reducing the fears of coal or oil that might be running out. Because there are other sources to use, they would use more energy generated from gas or oil without hesitation. In my personal opinion, the negative sides of using different resources of power could deteriorate the shortage of fuels.

Harnessing alternative power sources (such as solar or wind power), in contrast, could reduce the usage of fossil fuels in generating energy for a range of demanding activities such as heating and driving. While coal and oil mines are limited, natural resources such as wind and solar power are considered unlimited. This wind power or solar energy is consequently able to produce enough energy for human demand without the help of fossil fuels. As a result, it should be encouraged to be utilized in more countries in the world to gradually cut down the usage of fossil fuels.

To sum up, the encouragement of using natural resources (such as solar or wind) for producing energy has both negative and positive sides. However, I deem that humankind should consider using more power from solar or wind and less from coal and gas to protect the remaining parts of fossil fuels.

Sample 14:

Coals, oil, and gas are some fossil fuels that are the most common sources of energy for the majority of countries. On the other hand, some countries encourage the use of renewable resources like wind and solar energy. I believe this is a strongly positive development as we will be in grave danger if the world runs out of these natural non-renewable resources like fossil fuels.

Fossil fuels are used in almost all industries and for running motor vehicles. We can minimize this by using alternatives wherever possible. If it goes on like this, we will soon have such a shortage of these fuels that can pose a threat to running things efficiently. For example, some industries can only run on coal or oil, though this is not the case for cars. Automobiles can easily run on electricity, and so we should limit the use of such fuels. Burning too much of these fossil fuels also contributes to air pollution. Thus, it is important to minimize usage wherever possible.

On the other hand, wind energy and solar energy take comparatively longer time to generate, and they are largely dependent on the sun and the wind. We do not have any control over them, so the production of goods might slow down if there is less generation of energy as we cannot, in fact, control the weather. Perhaps tropical countries, where there is an abundant amount of sunshine and wind, can be encouraged to use these natural sources and not waste fossil fuels. However, for temperate climates, this might not be an option. Dependency on nature can have slower production rates and lead to not meeting the deadline or having scarcity in the market.

On the whole, I believe all the countries should be aware of the hazards of wasting too much of our natural reserves of energy and use them consciously and responsibly. Initiatives such as building consciousness about the issue should be taken to build a more environmentally friendly atmosphere.

Sample 15:

Fossil fuels harm the environment and to save our planet we need to encourage the use of green energy. The use of alternative sources of energy, or ‘green’ energy, is a positive trend of development, and indeed their use should be encouraged further.

As the demand for energy worldwide is increasing the strains on the existing and already limited resources also increase. To solve this problem, we must consider two issues: how to better use the existing, limited fossil fuel resources and how we can encourage the use of alternative energy sources.

It is universally acknowledged that there is a limitation on the use of fossil fuels, especially coal and oil. Some countries are rich in oil deposits like OPEC, whereas China is rich in coal deposits and Russia in natural gas. Others, such as Japan and Germany, are completely dependent on the import of resources. For all countries- resource-rich versus resource-poor, alternative energy should be encouraged and utilised to reduce the dependence on fossil fuels as well as to keep the global environment in balance and ‘healthy’.

The only way is to turn to other sources to get energy supply. Wind power and solar power are at present feasible alternatives. France is one country that has the advanced technology needed to produce extremely efficient solar panels to store energy from the sun. Both kinds of power can reduce a country’s dependence on fossil fuels. Furthermore, they do not pollute the environment and in turn, help keep the ecosystem stable.

To conclude, while fossil fuel resources are diminishing, the energy demand continues to increase year after year. It is a positive trend to develop other alternative sources of power and experiences should be shared and promoted. If this switch to alternative energy is encouraged early enough, then we may yet avoid the pending energy crisis and environmental disaster.

Lời giải

Sample 1:

It is argued that watching television has an adverse impact on children, whereas other people believe that it brings various benefits to them. I personally agree with the second group.

On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why some people think that children’s development would be negatively affected by watching TV. The first reason is that sitting in front of TV screens for too long is detrimental to children’s health. Many kids these days suffer from various health problems such as obesity, eye strain or fatigue due to prolonged television watching. Another reason is that many TV programmes and movies contain violent contents or sexual images which are inappropriate for children to watch. Heavy exposure to violent movies can put a child at a higher risk of violent behaviour, which could ruin their future.

On the other hand, I personally believe that television has an essential role to play in the development of children. Watching educational TV programmes gives children the opportunity to widen their horizons and enrich their knowledge of the world they live in. Planet Earth and Discovery Channel are prime examples. Their programmes not only take the viewer into unknown natural habitats which are home to various plants and animals, but also educate them about the importance of preserving the wonders of the Earth. In addition, many TV shows and channels provide children with limitless knowledge of almost every aspect of life. A programme called ‘Talent show for kids?’, for example, not only gives children enjoyable moments but also informs them about various subjects.

In conclusion, although some people say that watching TV is harmful to children, I would argue that it is very beneficial for them.

Sample 2:

The matter of screen time for children is open to debate, with some arguing against it while others highlight the benefits it could bring. This essay will examine both stances and present my personal opinion on the issue.

There exist certain health risks associated with TV-viewing for children. In terms of physical health conditions, excessive screen time can result in a wide range of health problems, from eye strain and back pain from prolonged periods in front of the TV, to weight gain and lethargy due to lack of exercise. These risks are also present in the adult population, but much more worrying for young children, who often lack self-control and thus are more prone to addiction. Regarding their mental well-being, children could develop behavioural problems from exposure to explicit content on screen, especially when there is no parental control installed on the device. The effects of violent or sexual acts on young minds are well- documented, with disobedience, aggression, and risk-taking tendencies being the most common issues.

Nevertheless, the advantages of watching TV for children should not be dismissed. One of the most significant benefits is language acquisition. The availability of shows in native tongue or foreign languages, coupled with subtitles and audio-visual aids, allows young children to grasp new vocabulary, as well as its usage. In fact, many children in Vietnam have eagerly learned English from watching shows from channels like Disney and Cartoon Network. Aside from language, TV shows also offer knowledge on numerous areas, including science, environment, history, etc. Vivid imagery and amusing delivery of hosts on kids' educational shows can help children better understand difficult concepts like multiplication compared to traditional textbooks.

In conclusion, after considering both sides of the argument, I believe that children stand to benefit academically from TV shows; however, to minimise the potential drawbacks of screen time, parental guidance and supervision are needed.

Sample 3:

It is pointed out that some individuals believe that viewing television apparently has an adverse bearing on children, while others argue that it brings numerous benefits. This essay discusses both points of view before shedding light on why I side with the latter view.

On the one hand, watching television is conspicuously conductive to children in terms of inventiveness and also enhances language development. To begin with, conveying knowledge through television gives children exposure to a plethora of cultures and perspectives, hence fostering creativity through imaginative storytelling. It is apparent that some television programmes such as Cartoon Network often feature interactive activities and problem-solving challenges, and thus inspire children to think outside the box and explore their creativity. Furthermore, the collosal of children's TV programs incorporate repetition, which is a key element in language reception. To elaborate further, repeated interaction with words, sentences and concepts helps reinforce learning and thus linguistic development.

On the other hand, viewing television takes a toll on children in terms of their mental and also physical health. To start with, TV shows have a lot of negative content that cannot be avoided and thus when the children are exposed to this content such as pornagraphy content that directly affects people who are almost in puberty. A propelling testament of the harmful impact that exposure to erotic material can be captivating to their developing minds, potentially evoking sexual desires that could lead to annulment for their mind and also their mental health. Moreover, viewing television can have disadvantages for children due to binge-watching and prolonged exposure to screen time, which may lead to sedentary behavior and a lack of physical activity. As a result, excessive TV watching can impact attention span, interfere with sleep patterns and even nearsightedness.

In conclusion, both perspectives hold their justifications. From my point of view, I firmly believe that prioritizing their health for the long-term life should outweigh the sake of television brings. Ultimately, moderation and content selection are key.

Sample 4:

In today’s modern society, the issue of whether watching television is beneficial or detrimental to children has sparked a controversial debate. While some individuals argue that television viewing has negative effects on youngsters, I firmly believe that it can be an educational tool for children. In this essay, I will present my reasons to support this viewpoint.

Firstly, television offers a wide range of educational programs that can enhance children’s knowledge and cognitive development. Channels dedicated to educational content, such as documentaries, science programs, and historical shows, provide valuable information that can expand children’s understanding of the world. By watching these programs, children can learn about diverse cultures, scientific concepts, and historical events, fostering their intellectual growth. For instance, renowned educational programs like “Planet Earth” or “Cosmos” captivate young audiences and expose them to the wonders of nature and the universe.

Secondly, television can serve as a powerful medium to promote creativity and imagination among children. Many animated series and children’s shows encourage imaginative thinking and storytelling. By watching these programs, youngsters can be inspired to create their own stories, draw pictures, or engage in imaginative play. This imaginative process is crucial for their cognitive and emotional development, allowing them to explore their creativity and express themselves in unique ways. Moreover, educational cartoons often incorporate moral lessons, teaching children important values such as honesty, empathy, and teamwork.

However, it is important to acknowledge the potential drawbacks of excessive television viewing. Parents should exercise responsible supervision and ensure that children have a balanced viewing experience. Excessive exposure to violent or inappropriate content can have adverse effects on children’s behavior and mental well-being. Therefore, parents should guide their children’s television choices, set limits on screen time, and encourage participation in other activities such as outdoor play, reading, or social interaction.

In conclusion, despite the concerns raised by some individuals, I am of the opinion that watching television can be educational for children. The availability of educational programs and the promotion of creativity and imagination outweigh the potential negative effects. However, parental guidance and responsible viewing habits are crucial to ensure a well-rounded development for children. By striking a balance between television viewing and other activities, children can benefit from the educational and imaginative aspects of television while avoiding its potential pitfalls.

Sample 5:

There is much debate regarding the effects of TV viewing on children. In my opinion, when watched in moderation, educational TV shows can be beneficial for children because they help them develop positive values as they grow up.

On the one hand, those who believe that TV viewing harms children in every way may argue that it is a passive activity that encourages sedentary behavior and limits meaningful play. This can lead to a range of problems, such as poor health and cognitive development. However, I believe that this argument is only valid if children spend too much time in front of the screen. Parents can protect their children from the potential dangers of TV viewing by setting reasonable time limits and providing adequate supervision.

On the other hand, there are people who argue that many TV programs are educational and can instill good values in children. For example, Disney movies often portray characters with admirable traits, such as courage, kindness, and perseverance, which can inspire children to emulate these values and become better individuals. This has led me to believe that educational & television programs can be excellent tools for teaching children moral lessons as they grow and develop. Many children find traditional forms of education boring or difficult, but the visual and interactive nature of TV can make learning more engaging and enjoyable.

In conclusion, although prolonged passive television viewing can be detrimental, watching educational TV shows in moderation can have a positive impact on children's development. Such shows can effectively impart valuable lessons and teach positive values in an engaging and entertaining manner.

Sample 6:

The role of television in children's development has been a subject of ongoing debate, with some individuals vehemently opposing it, while others advocate for its potential benefits. From my perspective, television can be beneficial if appropriately utilised.

Those who argue against children watching television often raise valid points. Primarily, they cite the negative impacts on children's physical health as a concern. With prolonged screen time, children are less likely to engage in physical activity, potentially leading to health issues such as obesity. Furthermore, they worry about the influence of harmful content. Children, being impressionable, can easily internalise violent or inappropriate behaviour depicted in certain shows, leading to negative behavioural outcomes.

On the other hand, advocates for children's television viewing highlight its educational benefits. Many television programmes are designed to be both entertaining and instructive, providing children with a wealth of knowledge about the world, aiding their cognitive development. Shows that portray different cultures, wildlife, or scientific concepts can stimulate children's curiosity and broaden their understanding. Television can also teach moral values and social skills through well-crafted narratives and character interactions.

In my opinion, the key lies in moderation and guidance. While unrestricted, unmonitored television viewing can indeed have detrimental effects, a balanced approach can turn television into a valuable educational tool. Parents and caregivers should control the amount of screen time and ensure that the content children watch is age-appropriate and beneficial.

In conclusion, while the concerns about children watching television are justified, its potential as a developmental tool cannot be dismissed. The onus is on parents and caregivers to utilise it judiciously to foster a balanced growth environment for children.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Vietjack official store
Đăng ký gói thi VIP

VIP +1 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 1 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +3 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 3 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +6 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 6 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +12 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 12 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay