In many places, people’s lifestyles are changing rapidly, and this affects family relationships. Do you think the advantages of such developments outweigh the disadvantages?
In many places, people’s lifestyles are changing rapidly, and this affects family relationships. Do you think the advantages of such developments outweigh the disadvantages?
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
In the present age, people have dramatically changed the way they live, which in turn affects their family relationships. Personally, I think this tendency comes with both positive and negative effects.
On the one hand, changing lifestyles bring about various positive impacts on family connections. Firstly, people are paying more attention to their well-being nowadays, and therefore family members tend to go to fitness centres together to lead healthier lifestyles. As a result, spending time working out together will help to bridge the generation gap and promote better communication between family members. To illustrate, when a child takes part in some forms of sport or physical activities with their parents, they will feel more open to sharing things and seeking advice from them. Secondly, thanks to developments in technology, devices such as smartphones, tablets, and laptop computers have not only become an indispensable part of our lives but have also helped to make communicating with our friends and families much easier, particularly between those who are separated by long distances.
On the other hand, changes in lifestyles also have their downsides when it comes to family relationships. To begin with, the overuse of the technological devices mentioned above can also hurt family relationships. For example, if family members become too immersed in using their devices for individual recreational purposes, like checking their social media accounts or browsing their favourite websites, they may neglect their relationships with other family members. Consequently, the amount of quality time that a family spends together is likely to reduce, negatively impacting family relations. Furthermore, these days, people are becoming more and more career-oriented and are subsequently losing the balance between work and family life. In fact, it has become more common that family members are less available at home, even outside of official working hours, leading to weakened family interactions
In conclusion, while some changes in lifestyle are advantageous to family relationships, the opposite is true for other changes.
Sample 2:
Nowadays, in a large part of the world, human life is experiencing quite considerable changes which are impacting on their familial interaction. Though the busy modern lifestyle, based on technological revolution, has brought an opportunity to maintain a constant online contact, this essay believes that this trend is never compensating the gap of a real connection, rather it is inviting serious drawbacks. I am going to elucidate the idea in more detail.
To begin with, previously there was a time when people needed to travel to see their families, whereas now, regardless of their distance, family members can stay connected via different online platforms. Without going anywhere, they can establish real time audio-visual contact via different incredible online platforms, such as Facebook, Skype, Zoom etc. Not merely communication, they are also giving instant support by means of ubiquitous shipment services. For instance, now parents can pay their child’s abroad tuition fees instantly just by a click on their online account, or simply by tapping on their smartphone.
On the other hand, the modern lifestyle is not free from blame when it comes to a true relationship. Due to the unprecedented ease of connection, people are mostly unintentionally stuck in multitasking, such as they are talking over phone, watching tv, and working on laptop simultaneously. This type of communication is creating an insidious damage in terms of deep and natural familial interaction. This contact style lack of attentive listening and understanding the speaker, thereby missing a vicarious presence in the conversation. As a result, family members are losing the feeling of attachment and ending up with breaking down, which has a trickledown effect in their overall life.
To conclude, despite some minor advantages regarding the effect of fast and advanced form of human life on family, I believe that the serious drawbacks like unstable relationship and vulnerable mental condition in between family members obviously have more weight to consider.
Sample 3:
In today’s rapidly evolving world, shifts in lifestyle have become increasingly prevalent. While these changes can offer certain benefits, such as promoting individual growth and embracing new technologies, I believe the disadvantages, particularly in terms of weakening family bonds and reducing meaningful interactions, often outweigh the advantages. This essay will discuss how these changes can lead to a decrease in family cohesion and an increase in financial strain, ultimately having a more negative impact on family relationships.
One significant benefit of changing lifestyles is the promotion of personal development and technological advancement. For instance, digital platforms provide unprecedented access to educational resources and professional opportunities that can enhance individuals' skills and knowledge. Moreover, the integration of technology into daily routines, such as fitness apps and productivity tools, encourages healthier habits and more efficient time management. These advancements can lead to a more informed and health-conscious society, demonstrating the positive effects of lifestyle changes on personal growth.
However, despite these benefits, the disadvantages, especially concerning family relationships, are more profound. A key issue is the erosion of family bonds due to the prevalence of individualistic activities. With the rise of personal entertainment devices and social media, family members often spend less time interacting with each other. For example, a family that once enjoyed communal meals might now find each member focused on their screens, leading to a significant reduction in shared experiences and meaningful conversations. This shift can create emotional distance and weaken the unity that is essential for strong family relationships. Additionally, the pursuit of modern lifestyle trends often results in financial strain, which can further damage family dynamics. For instance, teenagers who constantly desire the latest fashion items or gadgets may place undue pressure on parents who cannot afford such luxuries. This financial tension can lead to conflicts and misunderstandings, creating a stressful home environment and potentially causing lasting rifts within the family.
In conclusion, while changing lifestyles can provide individual benefits such as personal growth and technological integration, the negative impacts on family relationships, including weakened family bonds and increased financial strain, often outweigh these advantages. Therefore, it is clear that the disadvantages of such developments are more significant when considering their overall effect on familial cohesion.
Sample 4:
In today’s world, changes are happening to people’s way of living quickly. I think if this modification in lifestyle is positive, it causes more benefits; otherwise, it mostly damages the relationships among family members.
Change of lifestyle can adversely impact familial bonds. Consider, for example, a father who has started to watch his favourite TV show, which is broadcasted from a streaming service like Netflix, while having dinner. This new behavioural habit means there is less probability of family members engaged in meaningful conversations during dinner. In extreme cases, the shared meal might even be removed from the family’s daily life. Since parents lead by example, this behaviour detracts from the importance of family conversation during shared meals, resulting in family members spending less time together. In another case, a child who is heavily influenced by fashion trends might decide to update their footwear and clothes every month to keep up with the latest trends. Over time if parents are not financially capable to meet his demands, the child will complain and parents probably will criticize them, leading to a family conflict.
Incorporating new routines into our lives, however, can also cause positive changes in the relationships within families. Take, for example, a boy who has begun a wellness routine by going to the gym on a daily basis. Seeing him sticking to this fitness routine, his siblings can be fuelled by this behaviour, particularly when they realize that their brother is getting in shape and healthier. The family’s other children then will join him, and they do exercise altogether, which increases the intimacy between siblings. Another example of a positive modification is when a family tries to stay current through the use of social media platforms. This way, family members can potentially find more common grounds to reflect on. When all family members are aware of the latest developments, no one feels left out and they can easily converse with one another and get feedback on their opinions, resulting in closer relationships among them.
In conclusion, I believe that whether bringing a change to people’s lifestyles is advantageous or not for their familial bonds depends on the nature of the alteration. Families need to have transparent conversation to discuss the upsides and downsides the change in their lifestyle can cause.
Sample 5:
Nowadays, the way families are living their everyday life is changing fast. This trend has both benefits and drawbacks in terms of its influence on the interaction between family members. However, I think that this change has more negative effects than positive ones since it will ultimately change what family really means.
On the one hand, it has become nearly difficult for families to spend meaningful time together as a result of the fast-paced atmosphere of people's lives. Nowadays, the majority of families require both parents to work full-time. Kids have eaten their lunch by the time they get home, resulting in the absence of the vital time spent together between parents and children. For instance, one of the most significant meals in traditional households is supper, when parents may teach their children etiquette or other essential things. Thus, parents would miss the opportunity to engage with their kids emotionally and listen to what they have to say.
On the other hand, in the majority of our families both parents are working full time, so children can learn to be more independent in the future because they have probably already mastered the skills necessary to prepare simple meals for themselves, carry out other tasks, and schedule time to manage their homework after school. Additionally, this benefit enables parents to advance in their careers and increase family income. For instance, feelings do not have to stay home to just cook and clean the house as, nowadays, they are able to work and be financially independent.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that these quick changes had far greater negative consequences on familial ties in the long term, even though this trend has some positives, such as the independence of kids and financial gain for the families.
Sample 6:
All over the world, people’s lifestyles are altered by their busy work schedules. These modifications are seen negative by many, as they can lead to a lack of communication between family members. However, others think that such development results in a better income for families. The following paragraphs will discuss why the disadvantages of these alterations outweigh the advantages.
To begin with, the alteration in people’s daily lives leads to a lack of communication among family members. People are becoming busier at work, thereby spending less time with their families. As a result, families are lacking in proper communication and bonding. As caregivers, for instance, are becoming busier at work, nuclear families are no longer gathering to eat together. Therefore, the relationship between the two parties is harmed, which might even result into worse in the long run.
On the other side, people working overtime means better resources. With this higher income, parents can afford to own more for their offspring. But this financial well-being comes at the expense of family ties. That is why, in terms of children’s proper growth, phycologists tend to give more emphasis on parents’ mental and physical presence, rather than merely obeying their every material demand. In other words, being present physically to your family is more beneficial than just giving financial support.
To conclude, the fast changes in people’s lifestyles are heavily affecting family relationships, since it leads to a less communicating and an inadequate interaction among the members. Although this modification means a better income for families, it affects them negatively in the long term. Therefore, considering the familial bonding, the disadvantages of people’s fast lifestyle changing are clearly outweighing advantages.
Sample 7:
All over the world, people’s lifestyles are transforming with their busy work schedules. Though some people consider such a development result in a better income for families, in my opinion, they lead to a lack of communication between family members on the long run. The following paragraphs will elucidate why the disadvantages of these alterations outweigh the advantages.
Nowadays, the fast-paced environment of people’s lives has been changing the boundary of the families, it is almost impossible that they could spend quality time together anymore. These days, the general level of income has become relatively lower. That is why, to stretch out salaries all through the month, most of the parents are required to work full-time. As a result, by the time they arrive home, the offspring have had their meal. Eventually, parents and children cannot have the valuable time together which is a must for the children’s proper raising.
In addition, parents would lose the chance to listen to their children or build a strong emotional connection with them. For example, dinner was one of the most important meals in the traditional families, it used to give both parents and children a chance to interact closely and convey messages to the Kids regarding the right manners or other valuable lessons. But this incredible chapter is becoming obsolete because of the unprecedented changes in the modern lifestyle. As a result, lesser parental time is not only depriving children from gaining a proper growth, but also it is breeding childhood traumas which can eventually lead to an adult mental illness.
To conclude, with the advent of modernization and the resulting financial strain, parents are getting heavily involved in their professional aspect and earning better money, but it has an extremely detrimental impact on their children’s proper growth in the long run. This is how the disadvantages of people’s new lifestyle are obviously outweighing its advantages.
Sample 8:
Changes in society in economy, culture, entertainment, and other fields have resulted in the emergence of some new features of lifestyles which influence family relationships. I believe these new ways of life have more negative than positive connotations.
The bond among family members is weakened because of the new lifestyle. First, people love to travel more than before, and for the young, their journeys are more for enjoyment among friends rather than for quality time with their family. This contributes to reducing time spent with family members and thus loosens the ties between parents and children and among siblings. The situation is even exacerbated when the hectic learning and working schedules strip households of their meals together. Talks during meals are undoubtedly a crucial piece to complete the puzzle of healthy family relationships, but by eating out, people have lost their opportunities to develop mutual understanding and to update about each other.
However, new traits in the modern lifestyles can also be beneficial for family relationships at times. A typical example is that the habit of communication via social networks rather than face-to-face meeting helps family members who live far away from each other to show love and care through exchanges of messages and emoticons, or via voice or video calls. This new way of connection reduces trips back home of children but still keep a strong attachment with their family members. Besides, fast meals out instead of family cooking allows people to have more time for their business and cope better with the fast pace and heavy demand of the modern industrial lifestyle.
In conclusion, there are two sides of the impacts that changes in lifestyle have caused to connections among family members. However, it is the new way of life that slices off valuable family time, leading to broken relationships, and thus resulting in more detriments than benefits.
Sample 9:
In recent years, more and more individuals have turned their attention towards the busy lifestyle while pursuing their careers and social lives, which negatively affects the connection with other members of their families. In my opinion, while this development has some influence on family relationships, the advantages of which are far more beneficial.
To begin with, there are several side-effects on the family when people chase after a modern lifestyle. Unlike the old days when close relatives used to get together to have dinners in the evening, individuals nowadays tend to spend more time at work and skip family meals. Thus, these people distance themselves from other members. Gradually, the communication between individuals has become less frequent, which damages the familial bond significantly. Furthermore, since people now actively desire to hang out with colleagues after work hours in order to socialize and boost their careers, parents may be disappointed with the young ones. It can lead to a domestic conflict which is an extreme factor to tear families apart.
However, the way of life of many people has dramatically improved and positively affected their families and society at large due to the development through learning and acquiring knowledge. The lifestyle change has led to people preferring to spend time indoors than outdoors. It increases the time people spend with each other. For example, instead of playing sports outside today, people stay inside and watch TV with each other at home. When people sit together, they talk more, and thus it strengthens the bond between family members.
In conclusion, the changes in people’s lifestyles are rapid. In some cases, they have an effect on the relationship. But, if people are careful to balance their professional and personal lives, they will reap a huge benefit from the professional zeal and achieve more for the happiness of their family.
Sample 10:
Many individuals currently adopt new lifestyles due to rapid changes in all aspects. This tendency certainly has both benefits and drawbacks, which will be discussed in this essay.
To begin with, there are several merits of modern lifestyle to society and family relationship. The first one is that technological innovations like the Internet have revolutionized human communication in many ways. For example, services like Skype facilitate connection between an overseas student and his beloved ones in faraway places. As a result, people can get in touch with others faster and more conveniently, leading to an intimate family bond due to frequent contacts. Secondly, thanks to changing modern world, women nowadays can have the same access as men in educational and professional opportunities. For example, it has become normal for women to gain qualifications and pursue a career, while it has become socially acceptable for men to stay at home and look after their children, contributing to more gender equality.
However, there are some challenges caused by changes in families. Firstly, due to the pressure to support their families, today's parents have to work harder than those of previous generations, leading to reduced time for their offspring. Consequently, an increasing number of children are now growing up in an environment lacking parental guidance and support, and thus they can become alienated or even worse may join gangs. Secondly, advanced technology is believed to break down family communication. For instance, many children tend to spend too much time at computer terminal rather than relate to people in the real world, causing them to ignore their siblings and parents or even lead to social isolation.
In conclusion, I believe the advantages of people adopting various lifestyles outweigh its disadvantages, and this is a positive development.
Sample 11:
In today’s world with rapid changes in all aspects, people need to adjust themselves and adapt to new trends. However, some people argue that new lifestyles may have some negative influences on family connections. This essay will discuss/examine/analyze the pros and cons of this trend in depth.
To start with, there are several merits resulting from the modern lifestyle to families and family relationship. First, the immense effects of technological innovations on our modern world seem to change us in many ways. Modern people across national borders can easily keep in touch with their family members via modern internet applications and this phenomenon does help people to connect with each other conveniently and fast. As modern people are more likely to interact with others of different nationalities, the direct outcome is the tremendous change in people’s frame of mind. There is now a sense among most people that parents appear to be more open-minded and easy-going. Most parents now allow kids to speak their mind and choose their job based on their own volitions. The modern lifestyle surely encourages freedom and independence among people of the same family and most young people now bear less pressure from their parents when it comes to making decision with regard to their personal lives.
However, it is rather simple to name the challenges brought by these changes to families. One major problem is that technologies also separate people and deter them from connecting with each other in a meaningful way. Some people think that they are with their children, but the fact is that they just stay in one place with their children while different people do different things in the same house. Another major drawback is the less respect for elderly people and parents in families. It seems that Western cultures have a great effect on the whole world and some young people seem to underestimate or even ignore some traditional values of families. With the fast pace of life combined with mounting pressure, people are always busy and time with their children or parents or spouses is so scarce. Some people also express their concern about the selfishness of people these days when people live for themselves instead of sacrificing for others. Finally, the direct consequence of the modern lifestyle is the high divorce rate in most nations across the world.
By way of conclusion, no matter how the modern lifestyle affects family relationship, it is our job to preserve precious values handed down through generations. Families must be perceived as the sweet home of people and the driving force behind their success in life.
Sample 12:
Quickly shifting paradigms in the way people are living today is impacting their interaction with their families. This transformation does have certain benefits and drawbacks, but do they outshine each other, is a matter worthy of deep analysis.
Undoubtedly, switchovers in lifestyles, often resulting in nuclear family settings, has rendered more independence to individuals. They no longer need to be dependent on the moods and preferences of others to do something. This has, in a way, helped fetch extremely satisfying experiences for many where they are able to lead a life as per their choice and, consequently, avoid clashes.
Having said that, despite many virtually venerating this new shift in their ways of life, it is really disheartening to see the way people are struggling to cope with the challenges posed by living away from their families. The emotional connect, the bonhomie, and the bonding seem to have gone missing, and it has been replaced with a strange sense of competition, where each one is trying to prove their superiority over their once closed ones with whom they shared feelings of endearment.
Moreover, the enstrangement is a common sight between ones who lived and shared the space, resulting in disappearance of family and social values. The hardest hit of this change are the young ones born in nuclear families: they are never able to familiarize themselves with their own relatives and end up drifting away from their family identity. In the long run it is feared that this might undo the social fabric and harm the society.
Hence, I can clearly assert that even though hard to avoid, the contemporary way of living has brought in more misery, for all, than promises. It is clear that if this trend continues, society will soon be populated with those apathetical to others.
Sample 13:
It is irrefutable that in recent years, people's lifestyles have changed a lot, and this has influenced familial relationships in many ways. Although the changing lifestyles have brought families closer in some ways, I still believe that the disadvantages of this trend outweigh the advantages.
The main advantage of changing lifestyles, especially people preferring to spend time indoors than outdoors, is that it increases the time people spend with each other. For example, instead of playing sports outside today, people stay inside and watch TV with each other together at home. When people sit together, they talk more and thus it strengthens the bond between family members.
Despite the increased time spent with each other, I feel the disadvantages of these changing lifestyles are much greater. Firstly, the boundaries between professional life and personal life have disappeared. People are always working, even when they are on vacation they are working. Thus, though people spend more time with each other, it is not quality time as they are focused on their work rather than on their family members. The growing addiction to the internet also has the same effect. Family members might be sitting together at home, but they are mentally not present. They are engaged in talking with their friends.
Furthermore, the increasing preference for living alone is making people much more isolated. The lack of social connection with family members is leading to an increase in feelings of depression and loneliness. The connection through phones and internet can never match the feeling of security and calm that the physical presence of a family member brings. Thus, because of these reasons I feel that changing lifestyles have harmed family relationships.
In conclusion, while there has been some increase in the time family members spend together due to changing lifestyles, overall, the effect has been largely detrimental.
Sample 14:
It is an irrefutable fact that family is an essential aspect of everyone’s life. In this day and age, the individual’s way of living is transforming quite fastly and due to this their bond with the family has been impacted. This approach has both upsides and downsides; however, upsides seem to be more prominent.
In today’s fast life, people like to eat fast food, which can be ready to eat quickly. Owing to this practice, elderly people in families have disputes over the eating habits of the young generation, thereby causing huge arguments among the members of the family. Thus, relationships have been influenced badly due to such scenarios.
The first and foremost reason is that these days people prefer to move out of joint families. By living in a nuclear family, they get a lot of time to focus on their career, which eventually not possible in the joint family because they may have to get involved in household chores or they have obliged to take care of the dependent members of the joint family. For example, when a young college-going boy lives in a joint family, he has to help his family members to do some task such as for taking aunt to the doctor because she does not know how to drive whereas this kind of situation happens the least when the same young boy lives with his parents only because most parents do not like to disturb their children since they care immensely for them. Consequently, it does not only make the boy more productive but also enhances the love among the members of the nuclear families.
To fortify further, people go abroad to do jobs. For improving the living standard, talented people like to join prominent multinational companies, which pay them lucrative salaries. However, they still can stay connected with their loved ones by using technology. A case in point is that if a girl goes to work in a foreign nation, she still can stay in touch with her mother and father by using Skype for calling video and audio calls anytime whether it is day and night. Resultantly, technology helps to keep the bond stronger with the family members even when they are overseas.
While there could be some downsides of changing lifestyle on the relationship, overall, it is a positive development, which enables people to achieve their career goal by staying closer to the families with the help of technology.
Sample 15:
With a rapidly changing business and technological atmosphere, the family structure is transforming throughout the world. I think this has numerous advantages ranging from better career opportunities to greater independence. This has a major disadvantage of lack of emotional bond among family members.
The structure is changing from joint family to nuclear family. This allows younger family members to focus more on career and less on family obligations. Members of a joint family are often engaged in taking care of elderly and dependent members. A nuclear family is free of such compulsions and allows youngsters to spend more time on economically productive tasks.
Moreover, a nuclear family allows all members to stay free of any interference. A joint family not only has more than two generations living under the same roof but also several uncles, aunts, and cousins in close vicinity. This leaves little room for privacy and almost no independence. The changing family structure, on the other hand, allows separate rooms for all members and, hence, they have the independence to act according to their wish.
However, this often leads to weakening of emotional bond among people. When the family structure breaks, it leads to lesser responsibility towards others and greater individuality. This results in a selfish culture in which each member looks after her interests and not that of others. Consequently, people become more materialistic and less human. For example, the changing family structure in Europe has resulted in more materialism while the tribals in Asia follow the traditional family structure and have strong emotions for other members of the family.
In conclusion, though the changing family structure results in a lack of emotional bond, it is beneficial for the individual and the economy.
Sample 16:
It is commonly seen that these days, family relations are being affected by the rapid change in people’s lives, particularly because of social media. This essay will argue that despite there being some dangers of conflicts within families, the benefit of interacting with others far outweighs any drawbacks.
The primary disadvantage of using social networking sites is that individuals spend less time with their family members. This is because young people spend more time interacting with others online than talking physically. This often leads to them having disputes with their loved ones because of a lack of communication. For instance, it has been found in a recent study by The Sunday Times that individuals who spend more than two hours daily on social media apps are 48% more likely to have conflicts with family members than those who do not. However, these issues can be avoided by using the internet in moderation.
The main advantage of utilizing social media applications is that it gives people the opportunity to interact with one another, regardless of where the person is from. This is because there are many apps that allow us to communicate with anybody at the touch of a button because of the internet, whereas this was not possible in the past. This significantly helps people strengthen their relationships with their loved ones. Facebook and Skype are the prime examples, which allow individuals to converse with anybody around the world. Therefore, I believe this is beneficial for people because it facilitates interaction with others.
In conclusion, the benefit of communication with each other using social media far outweighs the supposed disadvantage of disputes with family members.
Hot: 1000+ Đề thi cuối kì 1 file word cấu trúc mới 2025 Toán, Văn, Anh... lớp 1-12 (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Some argue that offering free bus and rail passes to all who need them is the best solution to traffic congestion. While this might be effective for many, I believe the government should also explore other strategies to address this problem.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.
However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.
In conclusion, while providing free public transportation can indeed help reduce traffic, it should not be the sole focus of government efforts to solve this issue.
Sample 2:
It is generally believed that if the government wants to solve the traffic congestion problem, the most effective solution is to provide free public transportation, such as buses and trains. In my opinion, I agree with this idea because it really helps to ease the situation.
Firstly, I believe that free public transportation can reduce people's dependence on cars and improve traffic congestion. People who live outside the city centre tend to go to work because there are no buses or train stations around the area. Therefore, the government should consider building railway and bus lanes to cover all remote areas. In addition, dedicated lanes can be allocated to buses to avoid traffic jams. For example, Japan has done a very good job with its advanced subway system. Their stations are always overcrowded, and trains and buses are always on time. People rarely own cars and they rely on public transportation.
Secondly, the government should always carry out publicity activities to promote the advantages of using free public transportation. By doing so, people can break the mentality that public transportation is dirty, slow, and unreliable. As long as more people know, the transportation system is well designed, more comfortable and more convenient; people will soon start using public transportation. For example, Singapore has implemented 24/7 free public transportation, and its roads are unobstructed.
In short, I firmly believe that free transportation will reduce congestion by promoting awareness-raising campaigns and investment in buses and trains. Although it is a difficult task for the government to implement free public transportation in the community, once the government implements it successfully, it will have a major impact on everyone's life.
Sample 3:
Today with the increasing population and the exponential growth of urbanization, the transportation needs of the people have increased rapidly. Due to increasing transportation and the need for vehicles, traffic congestion has become a major problem of the countries with increasing populations. Therefore, looking into the problem deeply, I find that the best way to control this traffic congestion is for the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities. There are certain reasons for increasing traffic congestion as discussed below.
Firstly, the faster pace of population growth has increased the demand for more vehicles on the road. Since the transport facilities are less as compared to the people traveling, the demands have increased day by day which has contributed to more vehicles on the road and hence contributing to traffic congestion. Secondly, the increasing urbanization has caused more of the rural population to migrate to urban cities and metropolitan cities to find jobs and work. This increased migration of the population to urban cities is also one of the major causes of the traffic congestion on roads. For example, metropolitan cities of India like Delhi, Mumbai, Ahmedabad are highly traffic-congested cities of India due to increased urbanization and rapid migration of the rural population.
Traffic congestion is one of the major causes of carbon dioxide emission and increasing global warming of the earth. The harmful gases emitted from these vehicles pollute the environment. For example, the highly populated city of India is Delhi due to increased traffic congestion. The government must provide free transportation facilities to reduce the number of private vehicles on the road and must also encourage the population to compulsorily use these free public transportation facilities to reduce the problem of traffic congestion. Besides, in public transport, the use of environmentally-friendly electric vehicles like metro services, electric trains, electric buses, and taxis must be encouraged instead of fuel vehicles to reduce the emission of harmful gases in the environment.
Therefore, after analyzing all the points above, the conclusion drawn upon is that traffic congestion is the major problem faced by many countries at large and the best solution to this problem is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities to the people.
Sample 4:
The population has been increasing day by day and with the increasing number of people, urbanization is also at its peak. In such situations, the huge demands of vehicles have caused rapid traffic congestion on roads. However, some people argue that the best way to control traffic congestion is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, but in my opinion, this may not be the correct way to control the traffic congestion.
Some of the major reasons for traffic congestion are urbanization and the migration of the people. This has caused an increased demand for vehicles in the market. Nowadays people tend to travel a lot, and, in such conditions, they find it easier to use their own vehicles rather than opting for public transport. A survey conducted in China states that a majority of people prefer their own vehicles rather than public transport and this has increased more vehicles on road contributing to the traffic congestions. Secondly, people find it easy to carry their own vehicle to travel to different corners of the country as it is more comfortable than public transport. Also, the conditions of the public transport facilities have also deteriorated, they are also very congestive and unhygienic. Besides, the public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners due to non motorable roads and hence, the best option for traveling to these areas are the private vehicles. Secondly, private vehicles like cars and motorbikes have become more affordable and budget-friendly for people.
For the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, it will be a big burden on their exchequer. Instead, the government must focus on other measures like encouraging bicycles for school and college-going students, build wide tracks with separate lanes, build more expressways and flyovers to reduce the congestion. Also, they must subsidize the public transport fares but not completely free. A separate track for pedestrians and cyclists must be built to limit the number of vehicles on the road. Besides, an awareness campaign must be launched to inform people of the traffic rules and safety measures. Strict traffic rules must be followed, and a compulsorily fine system should be introduced.
Instead of providing free transport facilities for the public, the above-mentioned measures must be given more importance.
Sample 5:
To reduce traffic congestion, the government must provide free transport facilities to the public. But this step can be moderately implemented to reduce the congestion on roads. Some other measures should also be taken in equal proportion to deal with the issue of traffic congestion. Therefore, the statement, Government should provide 24/7 free public transportation to reduce traffic congestion is moderately correct. There are several reasons for the increasing traffic congestion on roads as mentioned below.
Population in many of the developing countries like India and China has been increasing at an alarming rate. This has caused an increasing number of people on the road either using public transport, their own vehicles or pedestrians resulting in increased traffic congestion. Also, a large-scale migration of the population to urban cities for work had deteriorated the traffic conditions of big cities. Secondly, the fares of the public transport are quite high compared to the service they render and are more congested and unhygienic. Now, when automobiles have become more affordable and fuel-efficient, people opt for quality and comfort over public facilities. Thirdly, people have started to travel more these days and public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners of the cities or towns. In such situations what people find better is the use of the facilities of the private vehicle. However, the use of private vehicles has resulted in increased traffic congestion and besides, these are the major cause of concern as they contribute to the emission of harmful gases polluting the environment.
To deal with the problem of traffic congestion, providing only free public transport may not contribute much. Besides, the government must encourage the use of electric vehicles and bicycles amongst the population. Secondly, it must focus on building more expressways and highways and separate lanes to reduce the congestion. Enough attention must be paid to constructing road facilities in remote corners of the cities and towns and especially in rural areas so that public transport can easily reach every corner of the world. Strict adherence to the traffic rules must be followed.
All these steps along with free transport facilities by the government together can contribute to reducing traffic congestion.
Sample 6:
The incidents of traffic congestion are increasing along with the population growth. Some contend that in order to lessen traffic congestion, the government ought to offer free public transportation. This solution, in my opinion, can only partially resolve the issue.
Most individuals now prefer to live in cities or towns rather than rural areas due to urbanisation. This is one of the primary causes of the heavy traffic on the roadways. At the same time, cars have also gotten cheaper and more fuel-efficient as a result of technological improvement. The number of automobiles on the roads has also increased as a result.
The government is undoubtedly attempting to reduce traffic by enhancing the efficiency and speed of public transit. For instance, the DMRC system, which facilitates bus stops across the entire city, has been installed in Delhi, a densely populated metropolis. The public can utilise this bus service 24 hours a day, seven days a week, but it is not free, thus many people opt to drive their own car instead. Because buses and trains are crowded and uncomfortable, many individuals will still choose to use their own vehicles even if public transportation is free. Free public transportation will also put a strain on the exchequer.
In my opinion, the government can take a number of additional steps to lessen traffic on the roads. For instance, it needs to create bigger roadways, additional flyovers, and separate lanes for cyclists and pedestrians. It should also strictly enforce traffic regulations and promote the use of environmentally friendly transportation.
In conclusion, making public transportation free will undoubtedly encourage more people to use it, but since those who value comfort and convenience over cost will still drive privately, this strategy is ineffective in easing traffic congestion.
Sample 7:
The traffic is getting worse in contemporary society, some citizens suggest that the authorities should provide free public transport every day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it's extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken at the same time.
We have to admit that this policy can increase the usage of public transport. Inhabitants will take it into consideration if it's free when they are facing traffic jam. To some extent, it can reduce traffic congestion. But we cannot turn a blind eye to the problems it caused.
This initiative will sharply increase the national budget. It's generally acknowledged that national funds are limited and should be used in a large variety of social aspects from education to environmental protection. The initiative will leave a burden on the financial budget and let the infrastructure cannot be maintained and guaranteed.
Furthermore, this policy cannot address the root of this issue. People use private cars not because of the high cost of the public transportation system, but because the line and route don't cover their destination or the low efficiency when they plan for a long-distance trip. No matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. In addition, traffic congestion only accrued during the rush hours, so it's pointless to provide it for free all day.
To sum up, I think the authority should reduce the price and develop the traffic infrastructure if they want to address this issue, rather than provide it for free simply.
Sample 8:
Some contend that the best way to combat traffic congestion is to always provide free bus and rail passes to everyone who needs them. While I acknowledge it may work for the vast majority of individuals, I think the government ought to offer other options to address this issue.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.
However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.
In conclusion, it is undeniably true that providing free public transit to citizens may be a significant element in reducing traffic, but this is by no means the main component that governments should take into account when trying to address this issue.
Sample 9:
In recent years, traffic jams have been increasingly ubiquitous particularly in big cities which cause great fatigue for commuters. In order to tackle this problem, it is argued by many that government should provide free public transport all day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it is extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that traffic congestion is not only attributed to the vast amount of private transport but also road systems. Moreover, no matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. Thus, providing free public transport alone just contributes to cutting down the volume of traffic to some extent. In fact, many big cities like Ho Chi Minh still suffer from traffic jams in narrow roads with obsolete infrastructure in spite of the rise in availability of public transport. Therefore, I strongly believe that road needs to be widened, and traffic lights and signs should be made more state-of-the-art to stem the root causes.
More importantly, though providing free public transport 24 hours per day is not necessary and what is more is that it may leave a burden on the national budget. According to the majority of reports, traffic jams mainly occur during the rush hours, so it is pointless to provide public transport all the time. On top of that, providing free public transport in the long term may be unachievable due to its tremendous cost. This measure not only costs governments a fortune but it is also unable to address the root of the issue. It would be far more economical if this amount of money was invested in enhancing road facilities.
By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that other measures rather than making public transport available may be far more efficient to traffic congestion. In years to come, I strongly believe that more investments in road systems should be adopted to make commuting more comfortable and time-saving.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
These days, people’s workplaces are constantly changing and evolving to meet the demands of modern society. Furthermore, the roles and responsibilities of jobs are also undergoing changes to adapt to new ways of working and living. This essay will discuss the possible reasons for these changes and suggest some ways that people can better prepare themselves for their future careers.
Firstly, due to the developments in hi-tech machines and artificial intelligence, millions of people all around the world are losing their jobs and being replaced by automated processes. For example, millions of factory workers have lost their jobs because they have been replaced by machines that are able to do their job quicker and more effectively. Furthermore, as a result of the ever-increasing desire to cut expenses and increase profits, many jobs are being outsourced to countries where the wages are lower. For instance, when a person calls a tech support help line in an English-speaking country, they will most likely be connected to someone in another country, like India or Philippines, where the wages are lower.
However, there are a number of ways that people can prepare for changes in their workplaces in the future. Firstly, students preparing to leave high school need to be advised about the sustainability of the career path they are choosing. To illustrate, autonomous vehicles are predicted to replace most delivery and taxi driver jobs in the very near future, so this is not a job that someone should expect to have for a very long time. Furthermore, while some jobs are being replaced by technology, many jobs are simply incorporating technology into their process, and therefore people will need to be able to keep up to date with these changes. To help achieve this, specific courses could be designed to help educate people on the use of modern technology in their workplaces.
In conclusion, although there are many changes in the workplace these days, educating people to carefully choose their career and to keep up to date with modern technology is the key to avoiding any major problems.
Sample 2:
The nature of labor in our modern world is changing at a fundamental level, with many workers worried that they will not be able to maintain their job conditions for long periods of time. Personally, I think this is the result of stagnating wages and the advances of automation, and can only be resolved with a universal basic income for the whole population.
Firstly, I argue that society is witnessing the worst wage stagnation in generations, which is causing people to constantly look for better paying jobs. As cost increases yet wages are not following suit, most of the workforce have to scramble to reach for managerial positions or risk losing their disposable incomes. This in turn creates a situation where many people have to take up multiple jobs in order to make ends meet. In the US and UK, for instance, it is estimated that millions of workers are on zero-hour contracts, which does not guarantee a set number of hours of work.
Secondly, as corporations seek to reduce expenditure as much as possible, they aim to replace the workforce with machines, leading to higher levels of unemployment and less stable job conditions. As machines encroach on the workforce, jobs become focused on the maintenance of the robots running our factories, and therefore there is higher competition for the dwindling number of jobs with gradually raising entry barriers. The end result is sure to be tension amongst socio-economic classes that can afford entry into the workforce if the effect of automation is not being mitigated.
I argue that in order to solve this, it is important to implement Universal Basic Income, which is an equal lump sum of money given to all citizens of countries every month or year. This would help people to keep their jobs and not have to take up precarious work, since they have enough money to buy basic necessities. This scheme can already be seen in Canada during the COVID-19 outbreak, for example, with citizens getting 2000 Canadian dollars a year. This has been hugely popular, as it allowed Canadians to have some level of stability even as the economy came to a halt.
Overall, I believe that stagnant wages and automation is leading to volatile work conditions, and as such, I contend that UBI is needed to stabilize this situation.
Sample 3:
It is a tendency that many people change their careers many times during their lifetime. This essay will identify the causes for these changes and recommend some ways to prepare for working in the future.
There are many reasons why one job for life seems to be over. One of the major reasons is our consumerism society. Therefore, job hopping for higher paid jobs or doing multiple jobs is no longer simply an option. Another reason is that the development of technology has changed the structure of work at such a fast pace that people have to constantly update themselves with the latest working methods. However, many are unable to adapt to the changes. For example, older workers might find it difficult to compete with younger workforce and have to find a new job or change their career field.
For those who want a stable life even in the rapidly changing future, they should realise that as long as we find a job which gives us satisfaction, there would be no need to change. My advice for those people is that if we stick to one job, life can be more stable. Of course, if one wants some employment changes, they should prepare for new job openings with a variety of working experience and skill set. Some should return to school to pursue courses that can lead them into new careers. Otherwise, some should take a fresh environment in which they can use and improve their skills and experience.
In conclusion, the process of job hopping is becoming very common because of social and technological development. I suggest that our knowledge and skills should be updated regularly, and we should have a balance between career changes and job satisfaction.
Sample 4:
It is true that the present working environment has witnessed a radical change. People now tend to switch jobs more frequently rather than have their occupations remain stable. While this phenomenon can be caused by several reasons, there are certain recommendations to help future workers prepare themselves for their careers.
First and foremost, the introduction of new technology might be the greatest cause for such changes. In other words, millions of workers all around the world are being replaced by high tech machines and artificial intelligence. For example, some staff working in the service industry are now on the verge of unemployment due to the rapid growth of online shopping websites and self-service supermarket checkouts. Another reason leading to this phenomenon is globalization. Due to globalization, employees have a wide range of choices between different positions among countries. As a result, many individuals tend to shift from one job to another with a view to higher salary as well as better standard of living.
However, there are several ways that people can get ready for changes in their future workplace. Firstly, workers should be well equipped with various skills by attending vocational courses and job training. Thus, they might keep up to date with the rapid development of robots and automated processes. In addition, individuals can get advice about the sustainability of their future position. This helps them to excel in one job rather than multiple, which lifts up the burden of switching jobs regularly.
In conclusion, although cutting-edge technology and globalization have made a great impact on the world of work, employees must be well-informed and flexible to achieve expected goals.
Sample 5:
It is irrefutable that the work scenario is altering at a fast pace. Working conditions are also different and the process of job-hopping is very common. This essay shall delve into the possible causes for these changes and suggest ways to prepare for work in the future.
To begin with, the development of science and technology has changed the structure of work. For example, people no longer need to do some heavy work by themselves. Instead, they can use machines. Secondly, competition has become intense, and people have to constantly update themselves with the latest materials and methods. Sometimes they cannot compete with the new techno-savvy workforce and so have to change jobs out of compulsion.
Furthermore, we belong to an era of consumerism. Being surrounded by so many choices, people today want to buy new things and for that, they do multiple jobs. In addition, the 24/7 society of today provides us with the opportunity to workday and night. For instance, in earlier times, there were very few jobs which were round-the-clock jobs. But, today, globalization has brought in a multitude of options of working day and night. The line between day and night has become dim and people have become workaholics.
There could be many suggestions to prepare for work in the future. People should have a set goal in their mind and get training accordingly. Moreover, it is important to draw a line somewhere. The stress and strain of the fast modern workplace is leading many to nervous breakdowns. In the developed countries, a new term called downshifting has already come where after a certain stage, people are saying ‘no’ to promotions and showing contentment with less. We should also realize that if we stick to one job, then life can be more stable, and we can enjoy our leisure also.
To put in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, although work conditions are different today and we have a need to update our knowledge regularly, we can plan our life in a meticulous way and have a balance between work and leisure.
Sample 6:
In today’s modern world, people tend to change jobs more often than before and don’t want to work permanently in one environment. I would like to explore the sources of this issue and suggest several solutions for future work.
Firstly, due to the global recession, many employers have to downsize and restructure their businesses. This leads to a number of redundant employees being forced to leave their jobs and find other ones. Another reason is that, as living costs are getting higher and higher, people want to earn as much money as they can to meet their needs. Hence, they seek better opportunities and well-paid jobs everywhere, every day. Some also look for new challenges. Last but not least, thanks to new technology, people nowadays are able to access information more easily, including information about job recruiting.
One of my suggestions for this problem is to create a comfortable working environment and build strong relationships between colleagues and between managers and workers. These will make employees find it harder to leave. To achieve this, courses such as leadership training and communication skill training should be carried out to help supervisors lead their team efficiently without causing any stress, and help employees fit inconveniently.
In conclusion, I would like to state that changing jobs is one of the notable signs of our technological times, and soft skills training courses can help people adapt to the working environment instead of seeking to escape it.
Sample 7:
Work culture lately has been dynamically transformed, mainly due to improvements in technology like transport and communication. Job security has become a dicey issue as employees now need to keep themselves updated with the advancements around them. This essay shall further explain the reasons and offer probable solutions.
In the last two decades, we have seen a remarkable spread of technology in all wakes of life. With easy access to the Internet and computers, work has become faster and easier. Innovation of office tools is encouraged everywhere so as to not let anything hinder the growth of trade and commerce. With each task becoming effortless, manual intervention at many places has been reduced. Ergo, rising insecurity is seen among employees. Additionally, employees are expected to multi-task in their jobs making it more difficult for older workers to sustain.
The remedial measures for such a situation are very few as of now. First of all, state-of-the-art employee training centers to help the employees stay well-versed with the high-tech upgradations. To solve this problem from an earlier level, universities should start imparting practical training in their curriculum, with the know-how of current on-the-job scenarios to prepare potential workers better. All this needs to be done as the employees losing their jobs also lose financial security for their families, and it is very difficult to start again from ground zero.
To conclude, I’d say we should accept the ever-changing technological advancements as they’re unlikely to stop. Better would be to equip ourselves and become flexible accordingly so as to welcome such developments.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.