Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 494 Lưu

Some people say that what children watch on TV influences their behaviour while others say the amount of time children spend watching TV influences their behaviour. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

There is a debate whether the program content or the duration of watching television impacts children’s behaviour. I believe it is the amount of time that affects most because though the children are prone to learn everything they see; they are more likely to absorb the ones that they are exposed to over a long period of time. I will elucidate both views followed by my opinion in the essay.

Children learn best by observing and imitating their surroundings, whether in real life or in visual media, as they are dependent on their environment for their growth. As a result, the idea of role modeling has enormous potential for their implicit learning. In essence, the emotional state and conduct of youngsters are directly influenced by the personalities shown on television, as well as by the mannerisms, speech, clothes, and cultural standards that actors and actresses display. Children may imagine themselves as Sherlock Holmes after watching his adventures, for instance, while exposure to Harry Potter may inspire fantasies of living in a mysterious world. The same logic applies to being exposed to violent images. Recent studies have demonstrated that 65% of individuals with a history of criminal behavior were exposed to violent media during their formative years.

On the other hand, the amount of time kids spends watching TV is another major factor in how they behave. In reality, viewing too much television not only encourages addiction, but also negatively impacts other areas of a child's life. American Paediatric Association advises that each age group should only be permitted to watch TV for a certain amount of time every day in light of this grave result. Children under the age of two are not supposed to be permitted to watch any TV, and those between the ages of two and three are only supposed to watch for a maximum of two hours a day. In addition, a recent study indicated that 70% of students who struggle to pay attention in class lectures watch TV for longer than five hours every day.

In conclusion, the amount of time spent watching TV and the sort of shows children see both have an impact on how they behave in one way or another, but in the long term, I think the time spent is what really mobilizes them.

Sample 2:

The debate surrounding the impact of television on children's behaviour has been long-standing, with opinions divided between the content of what children watch and the quantity of time they spend in front of the TV screen. Both aspects carry significant implications for young minds, shaping their perceptions, values, and behaviors. This essay aims to dissect both views, offering insights into how each factor influences child development, before concluding with a balanced perspective.

Firstly, the content of what children watch on television is undeniably influential. Programs imbued with violence, aggression, or inappropriate themes can seed similar tendencies in young viewers. For instance, children exposed to aggressive characters may mimic such behaviors, misunderstanding the consequences of their actions in real life. This correlation between on-screen content and behavioral outcomes underscores the argument that "what children watch on TV influences their behaviour" profoundly. Educational shows, on the other hand, can foster positive learning, creativity, and moral values, illustrating the dual-edged nature of television content.

Conversely, the argument focusing on the amount of time children spend watching TV suggests that excessive viewing can lead to detrimental effects, regardless of content. Prolonged screen time has been linked to obesity, sleep disturbances, and decreased academic performance, highlighting a different dimension of influence on children's behavior. This perspective suggests that moderation is key, advocating for a balanced approach to screen time to mitigate potential negative impacts.

In summary, the content and duration of TV viewing significantly impact children's behavior and development. Content shapes values and behaviors, whereas excessive viewing can harm physical and cognitive health. Thus, a balanced approach to quality content and viewing time is crucial, with caregivers, educators, and content creators playing key roles in fostering positive viewing habits in children.

Sample 3:

There is a discussion among people whether children are immensely impacted by what is being displayed on TV or it is the amount of time spent on TV programs that guides their actions. I, personally, believe that the amount of time spent in front of TV definitely has much more effect on children than that of any other factors. In my essay, I am going to elucidate both these views and my opinion with relevant arguments.

Adults are prone to spend their free time in front of TV, and undoubtedly, it leads the children to wilfully join them too. Sadly, they witness some improper broadcasts such as violence or extreme action films which exert enormous influence on their behaviour. Statistical analysis reveals that children endeavour to bully each other right after watching detective or similar kind of movies. For example, children who watch the film called “Terminator”, a superhero movie, feel themselves as a hero and tend to act accordingly. However, if the content is controlled by parents, it will only generate some benefits for children such as learning languages, widening their outlook or getting new experience. In that regard, cartoons and educational programs are irreplaceable.

On the other hand, the other group of people ignore the influence of content, rather they argue that the amount of time spent in front of TV drives children’s activities. They propose that children must engage in useful things to learn and watching TV must only take a small portion of this time. Moreover, once children tend to watch TV rather than studying, it will cause a long-standing addiction and misbehaviour. For example, an addicted child will not be satisfied with what is being told him/her until he or she is fed up watching TV that day and finally voluntarily commence studying. I am of the same idea since children turned into lazy ones today because of the amount of time spent on inappropriate items for their age.

To conclude, the content and timing ought to be chosen meticulously since children are not aware of danger. Parents should strictly follow the time spent on TV programs, build discipline, ban inappropriate content and pursue time limit.

Sample 4:

The influence of television on children's behavioral development is a topic of considerable debate. Critics argue that the content viewed plays a crucial role, while others highlight the significance of viewing duration. This essay endeavors to explore both perspectives, articulating the nuanced ways in which television affects young minds, and will argue for the importance of a balanced and informed approach to television consumption.

On one hand, the argument that "what children watch on TV influences their behaviour" is compelling, given the persuasive power of visual media. Television content acts as a virtual tutor, educating and socializing with children outside the traditional classroom setting. For instance, educational programs like 'Sesame Street' have been lauded for enhancing literacy and numeracy skills among preschoolers, demonstrating how positive content can promote cognitive development and positive behavior. Conversely, exposure to violent or inappropriate content can foster aggression and desensitization to violence, underscoring the need for careful selection of what children watch.

On the other hand, the amount of time spent in front of the TV is equally critical. Excessive television viewing can lead to sedentary lifestyles, contributing to obesity and related health issues. Furthermore, it can encroach on time that could be spent engaging in physical play or reading, activities known to be beneficial for cognitive and physical development. Thus, while "what children watch on TV influences their behaviour," the quantity of viewing time also has profound implications for their overall well-being.

In conclusion, the impact of TV on children hinges on both what they watch and how long they watch it. Ensuring a mix of educational content within set viewing limits is crucial. Collaboration among parents, educators, and content creators is key to promoting beneficial viewing habits, ultimately fostering the development of well-rounded, healthy children.

Sample 5:

The influence of television on children's behavior is a topic of considerable debate. While some argue that the content children watch directly shapes their behavior, others contend that the sheer amount of time spent in front of the television screen is the primary factor.

On one hand, the programs and media consumed by children play a pivotal role in shaping their attitudes, values, and behaviors. In particular, exposure to violence, aggression, and other negative themes in television shows or movies can lead to desensitization and mimicry among young viewers. Moreover, the portrayal of certain lifestyles or behaviors as glamorous or desirable can influence children's perceptions of social norms and impact their choices.

On the other hand, the amount of time children spends watching television is another major factor shaping children's development. Excessive screen time can displace time that could be spent engaging in physical activity, socializing with peers, or pursuing other constructive activities, thereby hindering healthy development and contributing to issues such as obesity and social isolation.

In my opinion, although both content and duration of television viewing are influential factors, the quality of content holds greater significance in shaping children's behavior. Parents and caregivers must prioritize monitoring and regulating the types of programs and media accessed by children, ensuring that they are age-appropriate and aligned with positive values. Additionally, by adopting a comprehensive approach that addresses both content and duration, we can mitigate the potential negative impacts of television on children's behavior and maximize its educational and entertainment benefits.

Sample 6:

Television has become an integral part of modern society, and its impact on children’s behavior is a topic of debate. Some argue that the content children watch on television directly influences their behavior, while others believe that the amount of time spent watching television is the key factor. In my opinion, both views have merit, but the influence of content is more significant.

Those who believe that television content influences children’s behavior argue that exposure to violent or inappropriate content can lead to aggressive behavior, desensitization to violence, and a distorted view of reality. Research has shown that children who watch violent television programs are more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior and have lower empathy towards others. Additionally, children often mimic the behavior they see on television, whether it is positive or negative. Therefore, it is crucial to monitor the content that children are exposed to on television.

On the other hand, proponents of the view that the amount of time spent watching television influences behavior argue that excessive screen time can lead to sedentary lifestyles, poor academic performance, and decreased social interaction. Children who spend long hours in front of the television may not engage in physical activities or interact with their peers, which can have long-term implications on their physical and social development.

In my view, while the amount of time spent watching television is important, the content children are exposed to has a more significant impact on their behavior. Parents and caregivers should be mindful of the programs and movies their children watch and ensure that they are age-appropriate and align with positive values. Moreover, setting limits on screen time and encouraging a balance of activities can help mitigate the negative effects of excessive television viewing.

In conclusion, both the content and the amount of time spent watching television can influence children’s behavior, but the influence of content is more profound. It is essential for parents and society as a whole to recognize the impact of television on children and take proactive measures to ensure that they are exposed to positive and enriching content.

Sample 7:

Some people suggest that it is not how much time children spend watching television that has an impact on their behaviour, but rather the content of what they watch, while others disagree. Personally, I think both of these factors can have an impact on a child’s behaviour, especially when the two factors are combined.

Firstly, over the last decade or two, there has been a steady increase in the amount of inappropriate content that has been allowed to be televised. Television programmes and commercials these days are full of graphic violence, sex scenes and sexual connotations, amongst other topics that are considered unsuitable for children’s viewing. Even cartoon programmes these days are full of violence. Young children are the most affected by this issue due to the fact that they are still learning and developing ideas about the world. Being exposed to such content can negatively shape their views and personal relationships, and therefore affect their behaviour.

However, not only does the content of what children watch affect their behaviour but also how much time they spend watching television. In most modern societies it is very common for young children to spend hours of their day with their eyes glued to the television screen. Many children watch television as soon as they wake up in the morning and as soon as they come home from school. Many parents even consider the television to be like a babysitter, something to keep their children occupied. Unfortunately, this has many detrimental effects on children’s behaviour, the primary reason being that most children suffer from a severe lack of outdoor activity and exercise, which are vital for a child’s well-being and development.

In conclusion, I believe that both what children watch and how much time they spend watching television can impact their behaviour. Governing authorities should consider more stringent regulations when it comes to television programme content and parents need to be more careful about how much time their children spend watching television every day to avoid the negative implications that it can have on their children’s behaviour.

Sample 8:

The impact of television on children’s behavior is a subject of much debate, with two distinct perspectives emerging. While some argue that the content of television programs significantly shapes a child’s actions, others believe the amount of time spent watching television holds greater influence. This essay will examine both viewpoints and present my own perspective on this complex issue.

On the one hand, the content of television programs can have a profound effect on children’s behavior. Studies have shown that exposure to violent content can desensitize children to aggression and increase their likelihood of engaging in aggressive behavior. Conversely, programs that promote empathy, cooperation, and positive values can have a positive influence on children’s social development. For example, educational shows that focus on problem-solving and critical thinking can enhance a child’s cognitive skills and encourage a love of learning.

On the other hand, the amount of time spent watching television can also have a significant impact on children’s behavior. Excessive screen time can lead to a decline in physical activity, which can contribute to health issues such as obesity and cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, spending excessive time in front of the television can limit opportunities for social interaction, creative play, and other enriching activities, potentially leading to social isolation and a lack of imagination.

In my opinion, both the content and the amount of time spent watching television play a crucial role in shaping children’s behavior. While the content of programs can influence their attitudes and values, excessive screen time can have detrimental effects on their physical and social development. Therefore, it is essential for parents and educators to be mindful of the television programs their children watch and to encourage a balanced approach that limits screen time and promotes active engagement in other enriching activities.

Sample 9:

Television has become an integral part of children's lives, raising concerns about its potential influence on their behavior. The debate regarding the impact of television on children revolves around two main arguments: the influence of television content and the amount of time spent watching it. While some argue that the content of television programs shapes behavior, others believe that the sheer amount of time spent watching television has a greater impact.

Those who advocate for the influence of television content argue that the messages and behaviors portrayed on screen can shape children's behavior. Research has shown a correlation between exposure to violent or aggressive content and aggressive behavior in children. When children consistently witness acts of violence or aggression on television, it may desensitize them and normalize such behaviors. Conversely, positive role models and educational programming have been found to promote pro-social behavior in children, emphasizing empathy, cooperation, and critical thinking skills.

However, it is important to acknowledge the counterargument that children can differentiate between fictional content and reality. Studies indicate that children can distinguish between fantasy and reality in television programs, understanding that what they see on screen does not always reflect real life. Additionally, parental guidance and media literacy play a crucial role in helping children interpret and understand television content. By engaging in open discussions and providing context, parents can help children discern between appropriate and inappropriate behaviors depicted on television.

Another aspect to consider is the amount of time children spend watching television. Excessive television viewing has been associated with negative outcomes such as reduced physical activity, poor academic performance, and unhealthy eating habits. The constant exposure to advertising and commercial influences can also shape children's behavior, encouraging materialism and influencing their preferences and choices.

On the other hand, moderate television viewing can have educational and entertainment benefits. Well-designed educational programming can enhance children's cognitive skills, language development, and knowledge acquisition. Quality media content that promotes creativity, critical thinking, and cultural awareness can contribute positively to children's overall development.

In conclusion, the influence of television on children's behavior is a complex issue. While television content can shape behavior to some extent, the amount of time spent watching television also plays a significant role. A balanced approach is essential, considering both the content and the duration of television viewing. Parental guidance, media literacy, and promoting diverse and quality programming are vital for maximizing the positive impact of television and mitigating any potential negative effects. Ongoing research and awareness are necessary to ensure informed decisions are made regarding children's television viewing habits.

Sample 10:

While it is true that watching TV affects children, it is difficult to determine whether it is the content of the programs, or the length of time spent watching them that has a more significant impact on children. It seems to me that although the amount of time does affect youngsters, it is the content of the programs that has a more marked influence on them.

On the one hand, the consequences of watching TV for long periods of time can be deleterious. Firstly, the longer children are exposed to TV programs, the more likely it is for them to become addicted to watching television. When children become over-reliant on television for entertainment, they might neglect engagement in outdoor activities.

This may result in a sedentary lifestyle that is highly detrimental to their physical health. More importantly, excessive TV watching impairs children's communication abilities, so they find it hard to play or live in harmony with others. As a result, children would feel discouraged from having real interactions with people around them if they spent a huge amount of time in front of the screen, which may hinder their development of social skills.

On the other hand, it is the broadcasted images that have the most direct effects on young viewers. Firstly, in most countries the majority of TV shows present glamorized depictions of inappropriate materials such as violence, drug abuse or casual sex, thus youngsters may adopt unhealthy habits and improper behavior. For example, they might fall under the impression that the use of alcoholic drinks is fashionable without being aware of the health risks they carry and later end up consuming these substances.

Besides, in our modern consumer society, commercials also affect how children behave. Unwary young viewers could be easily swayed by captivating advertisements for junk food or video games, products whose target audience includes children, and so may pester their parents to buy these goods impulsively.

In conclusion, although both factors have their own implications, I believe the element with more considerable impacts on children is the content. Hence, parental involvement is essential in controlling children's TV viewing habits and in shaping a child's values to help them enter adult life with a healthy mind.

Sample 11:

Watching television plays an integral part in the development of children’s understanding as well as their behaviour. Many people think that the content of programmes delivered by channels on TV has negative impacts on youngster’s action while others believe that the most influential factor/effect to the young is the amount of time that they invest in television. From my perspective, both these elements have undesirable influences on children, but I would argue that the subject matter/subject/theme/message of programs on television has more disadvantages.

First of all, the amount of time that children spend on television does more harm than good for their behaviour. Firstly, by dint of investing a lot of time on watching television, the young would waste much time while they can use this time to focus on broadening their own knowledge and mastering their vital soft skills. Indeed, by no means can youngsters enhance their level of education performance if they only stay at home to stick their eyes to the television. Secondly, when young people are addicted to watching television, they might put their health in danger. For example, there are a large number of children who spend much time on television facing with several serious mental and physical diseases such as obesity and poor eyesight.

On the other hand, I reckon that children are negatively affected by what they watch on television. In fact, the government cannot filter all information through a variety of social channels so young people may be impacted by the bulk of sex-provocative images and violent videos. For example, by accessing the television programs, a student who comes from America has become a murderer by killing hundreds of people in a town. Moreover, the content of many advertisement programs on television might endanger children’s attention. Undoubtedly, no sooner do young people watch television than they want to own many products, and hence, their parents would meet their demand.

In conclusion, I reaffirm my standpoint that both these problems have several drawbacks for youngsters’ behaviour but the content that they watch is more harmful.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Some argue that offering free bus and rail passes to all who need them is the best solution to traffic congestion. While this might be effective for many, I believe the government should also explore other strategies to address this problem.

On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.

However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.

In conclusion, while providing free public transportation can indeed help reduce traffic, it should not be the sole focus of government efforts to solve this issue.

Sample 2:

It is generally believed that if the government wants to solve the traffic congestion problem, the most effective solution is to provide free public transportation, such as buses and trains. In my opinion, I agree with this idea because it really helps to ease the situation.

Firstly, I believe that free public transportation can reduce people's dependence on cars and improve traffic congestion. People who live outside the city centre tend to go to work because there are no buses or train stations around the area. Therefore, the government should consider building railway and bus lanes to cover all remote areas. In addition, dedicated lanes can be allocated to buses to avoid traffic jams. For example, Japan has done a very good job with its advanced subway system. Their stations are always overcrowded, and trains and buses are always on time. People rarely own cars and they rely on public transportation.

Secondly, the government should always carry out publicity activities to promote the advantages of using free public transportation. By doing so, people can break the mentality that public transportation is dirty, slow, and unreliable. As long as more people know, the transportation system is well designed, more comfortable and more convenient; people will soon start using public transportation. For example, Singapore has implemented 24/7 free public transportation, and its roads are unobstructed.

In short, I firmly believe that free transportation will reduce congestion by promoting awareness-raising campaigns and investment in buses and trains. Although it is a difficult task for the government to implement free public transportation in the community, once the government implements it successfully, it will have a major impact on everyone's life.

Sample 3:

Today with the increasing population and the exponential growth of urbanization, the transportation needs of the people have increased rapidly. Due to increasing transportation and the need for vehicles, traffic congestion has become a major problem of the countries with increasing populations. Therefore, looking into the problem deeply, I find that the best way to control this traffic congestion is for the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities. There are certain reasons for increasing traffic congestion as discussed below.

Firstly, the faster pace of population growth has increased the demand for more vehicles on the road. Since the transport facilities are less as compared to the people traveling, the demands have increased day by day which has contributed to more vehicles on the road and hence contributing to traffic congestion. Secondly, the increasing urbanization has caused more of the rural population to migrate to urban cities and metropolitan cities to find jobs and work. This increased migration of the population to urban cities is also one of the major causes of the traffic congestion on roads. For example, metropolitan cities of India like Delhi, Mumbai, Ahmedabad are highly traffic-congested cities of India due to increased urbanization and rapid migration of the rural population.

Traffic congestion is one of the major causes of carbon dioxide emission and increasing global warming of the earth. The harmful gases emitted from these vehicles pollute the environment. For example, the highly populated city of India is Delhi due to increased traffic congestion. The government must provide free transportation facilities to reduce the number of private vehicles on the road and must also encourage the population to compulsorily use these free public transportation facilities to reduce the problem of traffic congestion. Besides, in public transport, the use of environmentally-friendly electric vehicles like metro services, electric trains, electric buses, and taxis must be encouraged instead of fuel vehicles to reduce the emission of harmful gases in the environment.

Therefore, after analyzing all the points above, the conclusion drawn upon is that traffic congestion is the major problem faced by many countries at large and the best solution to this problem is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities to the people.

Sample 4:

The population has been increasing day by day and with the increasing number of people, urbanization is also at its peak. In such situations, the huge demands of vehicles have caused rapid traffic congestion on roads. However, some people argue that the best way to control traffic congestion is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, but in my opinion, this may not be the correct way to control the traffic congestion.

Some of the major reasons for traffic congestion are urbanization and the migration of the people. This has caused an increased demand for vehicles in the market. Nowadays people tend to travel a lot, and, in such conditions, they find it easier to use their own vehicles rather than opting for public transport. A survey conducted in China states that a majority of people prefer their own vehicles rather than public transport and this has increased more vehicles on road contributing to the traffic congestions. Secondly, people find it easy to carry their own vehicle to travel to different corners of the country as it is more comfortable than public transport. Also, the conditions of the public transport facilities have also deteriorated, they are also very congestive and unhygienic. Besides, the public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners due to non motorable roads and hence, the best option for traveling to these areas are the private vehicles. Secondly, private vehicles like cars and motorbikes have become more affordable and budget-friendly for people.

For the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, it will be a big burden on their exchequer. Instead, the government must focus on other measures like encouraging bicycles for school and college-going students, build wide tracks with separate lanes, build more expressways and flyovers to reduce the congestion. Also, they must subsidize the public transport fares but not completely free. A separate track for pedestrians and cyclists must be built to limit the number of vehicles on the road. Besides, an awareness campaign must be launched to inform people of the traffic rules and safety measures. Strict traffic rules must be followed, and a compulsorily fine system should be introduced.

Instead of providing free transport facilities for the public, the above-mentioned measures must be given more importance.

Sample 5:

To reduce traffic congestion, the government must provide free transport facilities to the public. But this step can be moderately implemented to reduce the congestion on roads. Some other measures should also be taken in equal proportion to deal with the issue of traffic congestion. Therefore, the statement, Government should provide 24/7 free public transportation to reduce traffic congestion is moderately correct. There are several reasons for the increasing traffic congestion on roads as mentioned below.

Population in many of the developing countries like India and China has been increasing at an alarming rate. This has caused an increasing number of people on the road either using public transport, their own vehicles or pedestrians resulting in increased traffic congestion. Also, a large-scale migration of the population to urban cities for work had deteriorated the traffic conditions of big cities. Secondly, the fares of the public transport are quite high compared to the service they render and are more congested and unhygienic. Now, when automobiles have become more affordable and fuel-efficient, people opt for quality and comfort over public facilities. Thirdly, people have started to travel more these days and public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners of the cities or towns. In such situations what people find better is the use of the facilities of the private vehicle. However, the use of private vehicles has resulted in increased traffic congestion and besides, these are the major cause of concern as they contribute to the emission of harmful gases polluting the environment.

To deal with the problem of traffic congestion, providing only free public transport may not contribute much. Besides, the government must encourage the use of electric vehicles and bicycles amongst the population. Secondly, it must focus on building more expressways and highways and separate lanes to reduce the congestion. Enough attention must be paid to constructing road facilities in remote corners of the cities and towns and especially in rural areas so that public transport can easily reach every corner of the world. Strict adherence to the traffic rules must be followed.

All these steps along with free transport facilities by the government together can contribute to reducing traffic congestion.

Sample 6:

The incidents of traffic congestion are increasing along with the population growth. Some contend that in order to lessen traffic congestion, the government ought to offer free public transportation. This solution, in my opinion, can only partially resolve the issue.

Most individuals now prefer to live in cities or towns rather than rural areas due to urbanisation. This is one of the primary causes of the heavy traffic on the roadways. At the same time, cars have also gotten cheaper and more fuel-efficient as a result of technological improvement. The number of automobiles on the roads has also increased as a result.

The government is undoubtedly attempting to reduce traffic by enhancing the efficiency and speed of public transit. For instance, the DMRC system, which facilitates bus stops across the entire city, has been installed in Delhi, a densely populated metropolis. The public can utilise this bus service 24 hours a day, seven days a week, but it is not free, thus many people opt to drive their own car instead. Because buses and trains are crowded and uncomfortable, many individuals will still choose to use their own vehicles even if public transportation is free. Free public transportation will also put a strain on the exchequer.

In my opinion, the government can take a number of additional steps to lessen traffic on the roads. For instance, it needs to create bigger roadways, additional flyovers, and separate lanes for cyclists and pedestrians. It should also strictly enforce traffic regulations and promote the use of environmentally friendly transportation.

In conclusion, making public transportation free will undoubtedly encourage more people to use it, but since those who value comfort and convenience over cost will still drive privately, this strategy is ineffective in easing traffic congestion.

Sample 7:

The traffic is getting worse in contemporary society, some citizens suggest that the authorities should provide free public transport every day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it's extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken at the same time.

We have to admit that this policy can increase the usage of public transport. Inhabitants will take it into consideration if it's free when they are facing traffic jam. To some extent, it can reduce traffic congestion. But we cannot turn a blind eye to the problems it caused.

This initiative will sharply increase the national budget. It's generally acknowledged that national funds are limited and should be used in a large variety of social aspects from education to environmental protection. The initiative will leave a burden on the financial budget and let the infrastructure cannot be maintained and guaranteed.

Furthermore, this policy cannot address the root of this issue. People use private cars not because of the high cost of the public transportation system, but because the line and route don't cover their destination or the low efficiency when they plan for a long-distance trip. No matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. In addition, traffic congestion only accrued during the rush hours, so it's pointless to provide it for free all day.

To sum up, I think the authority should reduce the price and develop the traffic infrastructure if they want to address this issue, rather than provide it for free simply.

Sample 8:

Some contend that the best way to combat traffic congestion is to always provide free bus and rail passes to everyone who needs them. While I acknowledge it may work for the vast majority of individuals, I think the government ought to offer other options to address this issue.

On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.

However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.

In conclusion, it is undeniably true that providing free public transit to citizens may be a significant element in reducing traffic, but this is by no means the main component that governments should take into account when trying to address this issue.

Sample 9:

In recent years, traffic jams have been increasingly ubiquitous particularly in big cities which cause great fatigue for commuters. In order to tackle this problem, it is argued by many that government should provide free public transport all day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it is extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken.

First of all, it is an indisputable fact that traffic congestion is not only attributed to the vast amount of private transport but also road systems. Moreover, no matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. Thus, providing free public transport alone just contributes to cutting down the volume of traffic to some extent. In fact, many big cities like Ho Chi Minh still suffer from traffic jams in narrow roads with obsolete infrastructure in spite of the rise in availability of public transport. Therefore, I strongly believe that road needs to be widened, and traffic lights and signs should be made more state-of-the-art to stem the root causes.

More importantly, though providing free public transport 24 hours per day is not necessary and what is more is that it may leave a burden on the national budget. According to the majority of reports, traffic jams mainly occur during the rush hours, so it is pointless to provide public transport all the time. On top of that, providing free public transport in the long term may be unachievable due to its tremendous cost. This measure not only costs governments a fortune but it is also unable to address the root of the issue. It would be far more economical if this amount of money was invested in enhancing road facilities.

By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that other measures rather than making public transport available may be far more efficient to traffic congestion. In years to come, I strongly believe that more investments in road systems should be adopted to make commuting more comfortable and time-saving.

 

Lời giải

Sample 1:

These days, people’s workplaces are constantly changing and evolving to meet the demands of modern society. Furthermore, the roles and responsibilities of jobs are also undergoing changes to adapt to new ways of working and living. This essay will discuss the possible reasons for these changes and suggest some ways that people can better prepare themselves for their future careers.

Firstly, due to the developments in hi-tech machines and artificial intelligence, millions of people all around the world are losing their jobs and being replaced by automated processes. For example, millions of factory workers have lost their jobs because they have been replaced by machines that are able to do their job quicker and more effectively. Furthermore, as a result of the ever-increasing desire to cut expenses and increase profits, many jobs are being outsourced to countries where the wages are lower. For instance, when a person calls a tech support help line in an English-speaking country, they will most likely be connected to someone in another country, like India or Philippines, where the wages are lower.

However, there are a number of ways that people can prepare for changes in their workplaces in the future. Firstly, students preparing to leave high school need to be advised about the sustainability of the career path they are choosing. To illustrate, autonomous vehicles are predicted to replace most delivery and taxi driver jobs in the very near future, so this is not a job that someone should expect to have for a very long time. Furthermore, while some jobs are being replaced by technology, many jobs are simply incorporating technology into their process, and therefore people will need to be able to keep up to date with these changes. To help achieve this, specific courses could be designed to help educate people on the use of modern technology in their workplaces.

In conclusion, although there are many changes in the workplace these days, educating people to carefully choose their career and to keep up to date with modern technology is the key to avoiding any major problems.

Sample 2:

The nature of labor in our modern world is changing at a fundamental level, with many workers worried that they will not be able to maintain their job conditions for long periods of time. Personally, I think this is the result of stagnating wages and the advances of automation, and can only be resolved with a universal basic income for the whole population.

Firstly, I argue that society is witnessing the worst wage stagnation in generations, which is causing people to constantly look for better paying jobs. As cost increases yet wages are not following suit, most of the workforce have to scramble to reach for managerial positions or risk losing their disposable incomes. This in turn creates a situation where many people have to take up multiple jobs in order to make ends meet. In the US and UK, for instance, it is estimated that millions of workers are on zero-hour contracts, which does not guarantee a set number of hours of work.  

Secondly, as corporations seek to reduce expenditure as much as possible, they aim to replace the workforce with machines, leading to higher levels of unemployment and less stable job conditions. As machines encroach on the workforce, jobs become focused on the maintenance of the robots running our factories, and therefore there is higher competition for the dwindling number of jobs with gradually raising entry barriers. The end result is sure to be tension amongst socio-economic classes that can afford entry into the workforce if the effect of automation is not being mitigated.

I argue that in order to solve this, it is important to implement Universal Basic Income, which is an equal lump sum of money given to all citizens of countries every month or year. This would help people to keep their jobs and not have to take up precarious work, since they have enough money to buy basic necessities. This scheme can already be seen in Canada during the COVID-19 outbreak, for example, with citizens getting 2000 Canadian dollars a year. This has been hugely popular, as it allowed Canadians to have some level of stability even as the economy came to a halt.

Overall, I believe that stagnant wages and automation is leading to volatile work conditions, and as such, I contend that UBI is needed to stabilize this situation.

Sample 3:

It is a tendency that many people change their careers many times during their lifetime. This essay will identify the causes for these changes and recommend some ways to prepare for working in the future.

There are many reasons why one job for life seems to be over. One of the major reasons is our consumerism society. Therefore, job hopping for higher paid jobs or doing multiple jobs is no longer simply an option. Another reason is that the development of technology has changed the structure of work at such a fast pace that people have to constantly update themselves with the latest working methods. However, many are unable to adapt to the changes. For example, older workers might find it difficult to compete with younger workforce and have to find a new job or change their career field.

For those who want a stable life even in the rapidly changing future, they should realise that as long as we find a job which gives us satisfaction, there would be no need to change. My advice for those people is that if we stick to one job, life can be more stable. Of course, if one wants some employment changes, they should prepare for new job openings with a variety of working experience and skill set. Some should return to school to pursue courses that can lead them into new careers. Otherwise, some should take a fresh environment in which they can use and improve their skills and experience.

In conclusion, the process of job hopping is becoming very common because of social and technological development. I suggest that our knowledge and skills should be updated regularly, and we should have a balance between career changes and job satisfaction.

Sample 4:

It is true that the present working environment has witnessed a radical change. People now tend to switch jobs more frequently rather than have their occupations remain stable. While this phenomenon can be caused by several reasons, there are certain recommendations to help future workers prepare themselves for their careers.

First and foremost, the introduction of new technology might be the greatest cause for such changes. In other words, millions of workers all around the world are being replaced by high tech machines and artificial intelligence. For example, some staff working in the service industry are now on the verge of unemployment due to the rapid growth of online shopping websites and self-service supermarket checkouts. Another reason leading to this phenomenon is globalization. Due to globalization, employees have a wide range of choices between different positions among countries. As a result, many individuals tend to shift from one job to another with a view to higher salary as well as better standard of living.

However, there are several ways that people can get ready for changes in their future workplace. Firstly, workers should be well equipped with various skills by attending vocational courses and job training. Thus, they might keep up to date with the rapid development of robots and automated processes. In addition, individuals can get advice about the sustainability of their future position. This helps them to excel in one job rather than multiple, which lifts up the burden of switching jobs regularly.

In conclusion, although cutting-edge technology and globalization have made a great impact on the world of work, employees must be well-informed and flexible to achieve expected goals.

Sample 5:

It is irrefutable that the work scenario is altering at a fast pace. Working conditions are also different and the process of job-hopping is very common. This essay shall delve into the possible causes for these changes and suggest ways to prepare for work in the future.

To begin with, the development of science and technology has changed the structure of work. For example, people no longer need to do some heavy work by themselves. Instead, they can use machines. Secondly, competition has become intense, and people have to constantly update themselves with the latest materials and methods. Sometimes they cannot compete with the new techno-savvy workforce and so have to change jobs out of compulsion.

Furthermore, we belong to an era of consumerism. Being surrounded by so many choices, people today want to buy new things and for that, they do multiple jobs. In addition, the 24/7 society of today provides us with the opportunity to workday and night. For instance, in earlier times, there were very few jobs which were round-the-clock jobs. But, today, globalization has brought in a multitude of options of working day and night. The line between day and night has become dim and people have become workaholics.

There could be many suggestions to prepare for work in the future. People should have a set goal in their mind and get training accordingly. Moreover, it is important to draw a line somewhere. The stress and strain of the fast modern workplace is leading many to nervous breakdowns. In the developed countries, a new term called downshifting has already come where after a certain stage, people are saying ‘no’ to promotions and showing contentment with less. We should also realize that if we stick to one job, then life can be more stable, and we can enjoy our leisure also.

To put in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, although work conditions are different today and we have a need to update our knowledge regularly, we can plan our life in a meticulous way and have a balance between work and leisure.

Sample 6:

In today’s modern world, people tend to change jobs more often than before and don’t want to work permanently in one environment. I would like to explore the sources of this issue and suggest several solutions for future work.

Firstly, due to the global recession, many employers have to downsize and restructure their businesses. This leads to a number of redundant employees being forced to leave their jobs and find other ones. Another reason is that, as living costs are getting higher and higher, people want to earn as much money as they can to meet their needs. Hence, they seek better opportunities and well-paid jobs everywhere, every day. Some also look for new challenges. Last but not least, thanks to new technology, people nowadays are able to access information more easily, including information about job recruiting.

One of my suggestions for this problem is to create a comfortable working environment and build strong relationships between colleagues and between managers and workers. These will make employees find it harder to leave. To achieve this, courses such as leadership training and communication skill training should be carried out to help supervisors lead their team efficiently without causing any stress, and help employees fit inconveniently.

In conclusion, I would like to state that changing jobs is one of the notable signs of our technological times, and soft skills training courses can help people adapt to the working environment instead of seeking to escape it.

Sample 7:

Work culture lately has been dynamically transformed, mainly due to improvements in technology like transport and communication. Job security has become a dicey issue as employees now need to keep themselves updated with the advancements around them. This essay shall further explain the reasons and offer probable solutions.

In the last two decades, we have seen a remarkable spread of technology in all wakes of life. With easy access to the Internet and computers, work has become faster and easier. Innovation of office tools is encouraged everywhere so as to not let anything hinder the growth of trade and commerce. With each task becoming effortless, manual intervention at many places has been reduced. Ergo, rising insecurity is seen among employees. Additionally, employees are expected to multi-task in their jobs making it more difficult for older workers to sustain.

The remedial measures for such a situation are very few as of now. First of all, state-of-the-art employee training centers to help the employees stay well-versed with the high-tech upgradations. To solve this problem from an earlier level, universities should start imparting practical training in their curriculum, with the know-how of current on-the-job scenarios to prepare potential workers better. All this needs to be done as the employees losing their jobs also lose financial security for their families, and it is very difficult to start again from ground zero.

To conclude, I’d say we should accept the ever-changing technological advancements as they’re unlikely to stop. Better would be to equip ourselves and become flexible accordingly so as to welcome such developments.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP