Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 213

In some countries, small town-centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out-of-town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out-of-town stores, and it may result in an increase in the use of cars. Do you think the disadvantages of this change outweigh its advantages?

Xem lời giải

Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!

Bắt đầu thi

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

In various parts of the world, a number of small stores in the high streets of towns have gone bankrupt due to the dominance of large stores located on the outskirts. This has led to difficulty in accessibility for non-car owners and an increase in car usage. While there might be a positive influence on this change, I believe the negative impacts are by far more significant.

On the one hand, large-scale shopping centers may create more employment opportunities for local communities where they operate. These opportunities can vary, ranging from entry-level jobs to management positions. A good example in this case is Walmart. Each of the brand’s supermarkets is estimated to hire up to two thousand people working as customer assistants, goods couriers, or other back-office positions with competitive benefit packages. As many of these employees are from nearby areas, Walmart has been praised by some town councils for helping to curb unemployment, sustaining local development.

However, one of many drawbacks is that the prevalence of suburban shops causes great inconvenience to customers. Many shoppers now are unable to make a quick purchase at nearby convenience stores which used to be omnipresent in town centers, and instead they have to spend time traveling to shop instead of on other profitable endeavours such as studying, working and resting.

Another disadvantage is that the use of personal motorised vehicles is on the rise. As stores become more unreachable on foot, many urban denizens would switch to owning and driving cars, leading to a significant increase in the number of vehicles on the road. This inevitably gives rise to the quantity of exhaust fumes from car engines which exacerbate environmental pollution, as well as congestion and increased damage to road infrastructure.

In conclusion, I agree that the demerits such as inconvenience of shopping to local people and adverse impacts on the environment and traffic issues outweigh the merit of providing a certain number of jobs. Therefore, I maintain that authorities should provide financial and management support to encourage the development of small stores in the downtown.

Sample 2:

Around the world, consumers' behaviors are changing rapidly, with one key area being their shopping locations. More specifically, people's default option is now large out-of-town stores rather than small town-center shops, limiting access of those without cars to the former and prompting more frequent car travel. While there are positives s to this change, I believe the negatives are more significant.

The trend towards shopping outside urban areas may have some positives. Considering the demographics of towners without car ownership, they are likely to outsource delivery services more often to purchase from out-of-town units, which otherwise would be unreachable with their personal motorized vehicles. Concerning heavier automobiles use, job vacancies in this industry would also proliferate as a result of the growing personnel demand for car manufacturing and upkeep.

However, I would argue that the monopoly of suburban shops is still on the whole an unwelcome development. Its resulting higher recruitment rates, although present, benefit only an occupation. Meanwhile, significantly few more people who are in-town customers would incur added shipping or transportation costs, potentially curtailing their budget for the purchased items. In purchased items. In the worst-case scenario, these consumers' safety would even be jeopardized, for the long-range delivery of products like pharmaceuticals in emergency situations could be overdue. Another existential threat to urbanites when retailers are off-center is the degraded air quality. To specify, as cars run more often, airborne fine particles, a product of traffic exhaust, would rise in concentration, causing respiratory diseases like lung cancers.

In conclusion, retail decentralization is clearly more consequential, for it is at the expense of downtown residents' financial security and wellness, notwithstanding the benefits in terms of boosting job openings.

Sample 3:

In many nations, the phenomenon of small high-street stores going bankrupt due to the allure of large-scale shopping malls in the suburbs has become increasingly prevalent. This led to considerable hardships for non-car citizens and a rise in automobile use. All things considered; I contend that this trend does more harm than good.

On the one hand, proponents of this transition often claim that the closure of small-sized businesses in town centers can contribute to the effort of decentralization. This sentiment is rooted in the fact that when businesses in towns are no longer in operation, the drivers appealing to individuals to stay in the centers, like abundant job opportunities and enormous conveniences, also vanish. With the lessened attractiveness of town centers, many citizens may relocate to the suburbs, which helps ease a series of aching urban issues like housing crisis, pollution, and traffic congestion.

However, I am firmly convinced that the disadvantages of this transition overshadow its advantages. Firstly, the closure of town-center shops casts a shadow on residents' lives because these establishments serve a vital role in providing daily or urgent necessities like perishables and pharmaceutical products. This discomfort becomes more poignant with the demographics without personal vehicles. As a result, the closedown of small stores, which were once omnipresent on high streets for urbanites, leads to not only the diminishment of life quality but also the widened socio-economic disparity. Another pronounced negative is that the increased reliance on automobiles to access distant shopping centers causes environmental degradation in the suburbs. To be more specific, while the emission of car exhaust deteriorates the air quality, the constant rumbles of engines compromise the tranquility of the suburban landscape.

In conclusion, while the disappearance of small-sized businesses in town centers may act as a catalyst for decentralization and alleviate lingering urban issues, the disadvantages associated with limited access to essential goods and increased dependence on cars eclipse the upsides.

Sample 4:

The trend that people drive to large shopping malls located away from the central city threatens many small shops in central cities with going bankrupt, which also leads to great inconvenience to people without cars and a potential rise in car usage. Despite the downsides of these all-in-one locations, some positive aspects should be notably considered.

On the one hand, the popularity of large out-of-town malls will reduce the number of small shops clustered in urban centres. For example, small shops provide fresh vegetables and fruits for nearby residents as travelling to the outskirts cannot be an everyday affair, especially for the elderly and the disabled. Therefore, this change brings much inconvenience to daily shopping practices. In addition, the rise in car usage and the demand for long distances exacerbates environmental pollution. Frequent car travels contribute to a substantial increment in traffic exhaust which worsens pollution levels and jeopardizes human health in those places.

However, there are many benefits of having mega-stores in out-of-town sites. The main one is that consumers have more choices as various branded products can be displayed. People are able to purchase what they need at one time instead of hunting for different small stores, which greatly improves their shopping efficiency. Another advantage is that more city dwellers would choose to reside in suburban zones due to the change in their shopping preferences. Given the fact that modern cities are faced with overpopulation and consequently ever-growing pressure on housing supply systems, this could be considered a start of relieving such pressure.

In conclusion, the trend towards establishing supermarkets in outlying areas of urban locations has far more positives. These stores not only allow customers to have many products available for purchase in one location, but also help to tackle the population problems in modern cities.

Sample 5:

In many countries the world over, small shops in city centers cannot compete with large stores that are based on the outskirts; therefore, many of those small businesses are threatened with closure. This leads to a number of consequences, including a rise in car usage in these countries and access to large out-of-town stores becoming limited for those without cars. In my view, this change does more harm than good.

Increasing bankruptcies among small town-center shops are an unfortunate situation that puts local people to great inconvenience, with those who are not in possession of a car standing most affected, because they now have to travel to a distant place to shop. The time used for such journeys could be better spent on other activities that are of greater importance, be it work or entertainment. The situation’s impacts are also far beyond individual levels. It causes a significant loss for the economy of any city where large numbers of such businesses are forced to shut down. This may inflict unexpected damage on the national economy as a whole.

The rise in car usage caused by people’s demand for long-distance travel is also problematic. Traffic congestion will become worse due to the higher number of vehicles on the streets. Furthermore, the quantity of pollutants emitted from car engines will rise, which heightens pollution levels in those places and adversely affects human health.

However, this change in people’s shopping preference may encourage them to move to out-of-town areas to live. Given the fact that modern cities are faced with overpopulation and consequently ever-growing pressure on housing supply systems, this could be considered a start of relieving such pressure.

In conclusion, the trend towards shopping in large stores located away from city centers is having many negative impacts. Although it could encourage some people to move to places where these stores are established and help solve some population problems in modern cities, I doubt that the trend could promise any significant outcome.

Sample 6:

As cities have grown larger and spread out, there has been an increase in the number of large stores located away from the central city, which forces people to drive to them. This creates issues with smaller stores going out of business, people not having access to these stores, and growth in the use of cars. This essay will look at the benefits and drawbacks of this situation.

On the positive side, large stores are often able to offer cheaper prices, which is good for the buyer. Similarly, having many products available for purchase in one place is more convenient. Moreover, as cities spread out, many people will actually live closer to a large store or mall in the suburbs than a smaller one in the city center.

However, there are also some downsides. For one thing, encouraging people to drive increases traffic congestion and air pollution, while also making it necessary to build more roads, which makes the problem worse. Furthermore, small stores are often family-run businesses, whereas large stores are often owned by huge corporations that do not give back much to the community. Another issue is that people without private vehicles will have fewer options and be forced to buy whatever is available close to them.

Overall, it seems that the negative effects of large stores outweigh the positive ones. Although large stores may be convenient, they harm local businesses and affect the lives of people who live in the area whose communities end up being built around these large shopping centres.

Sample 7:

As a result of urbanization, cities are now surrounded by suburbs, and these areas often feature a large mall or shopping centre. The concentration of products in one location makes these retail outlets attractive destinations for consumers, who almost without exception drive to them. Despite the benefits of these all-in-one locations, there are some notable drawbacks that should be considered.

Beginning with the positive aspects, it is clear that a gigantic mall offers more choice to the consumer. Moreover, the large chain stores that populate these shopping centres generally offer cheaper prices due to economies of scale. A further convenience is that a considerable amount of the population resides in suburban zones, so these large shopping centers are actually closer to people than traditional stores situated in the central business district.

Nevertheless, there are some highly undesirable effects of this situation. For one, large stores and malls are operated by monolithic corporations who run small shop owners out of business, while not returning much to the local community. In fact, Walmart, one of the largest mega-stores in the United States receives a massive amount of government welfare, while locally owned businesses are forced into bankruptcy and even Walmart employees are paid minimum wage and often rely on government handouts. Not to mention, the almost ubiquitous practice of driving to malls and large chain stores puts a strain on local transport infrastructure, increasing traffic congestion and contributing to air pollution.

Overall, while having everything available in one location is undeniably convenient, the harm to local communities is similarly clear. As the saying goes, ‘You can’t have your cake and eat it too’, and in this instance it seems that the benefits of large stores is outweighed by the economic and social harm they cause.

Sample 8:

The evolving landscape of retail, characterized by the growth of large out-of-town stores, has ignited a discourse on its impact on small town-center shops and the wider community. While some argue that this trend is disadvantageous, particularly for those without cars, I believe that the benefits do significantly outweigh the potential drawbacks.

When it comes to price, the inception of larger retail outlets on the outskirts of towns has caused more vigorous market competition. With bigger stores competing for customer loyalty, there is an inherent drive to offer more competitive pricing and deals that smaller town-center shops may not be able to match. For example, out-of-town superstores often provide the same products as town-center shops but at a fraction of the price, thanks to their ability to buy in bulk and negotiate better deals from suppliers.

Moreover, these expansive stores boast a wider array of items, providing customers with a plethora of choices under one roof. This vast selection affords consumers the convenience of fulfilling all their shopping needs in a single trip, which can be particularly beneficial for those with busy lifestyles. For instance, in Vietnam many families choose to prepare for a new school term for their kids in an out-of-town superstore which can purchase school supplies, clothing, and weekly groceries at the same time instead of visiting multiple smaller shops, saving time and reducing problems.

The challenge of accessing out-of-town stores for those without cars can be mitigated by well-designed public transit routes. If public transportation systems are planned to provide convenient routes to these stores, the issue of limited access is largely resolved. Many cities in developing countries like Vietnam that have superstores outside of the central areas implemented bus services that run from town centers to shopping malls, with regular schedules and affordable fares, enabling those without cars to access these facilities with ease.

To conclude, the advent of large out-of-town stores, while often criticized for their impact on small town-center shops, actually offers substantial benefits that contribute positively to the consumer experience. Therefore, the merits of this retail evolution, I believe, are not overshadowed by its demerits.

Sample 9:

Many individuals opt to shop at larger stores outside urban areas rather than smaller ones within city centers in various countries. Consequently, this trend contributes to increased traffic on roads. While this preference has its advantages, I believe the disadvantages far outweigh them. This essay aims to analyze this scenario before drawing a reasoned conclusion.

On the one hand, it is true that some characteristics of the enormous out-of-town stores’ appeal may be advantageous. In the first place, there is no question that these larger businesses may have lower operational costs when they are constructed outside of the city, therefore this results in more reasonable prices for customers who purchase commodities there. Secondly, this can strengthen the local economy and help to relieve urban overcrowding. More city people will be encouraged to move to these areas as the lifestyles there grow more streamlined and convenient owing to the services—such as stores—that are offered there.

On the other hand, I am adamant that shopping at major retailers in the suburbs has more disadvantages than advantages. To be more precise, it would be expensive to refill cars and require a significant amount of time to get to the outskirts, which creates some unanticipated problems and wears people out once they reach these stores. Long distance travel can also produce a sizable amount of greenhouse emissions. In other words, by expanding their carbon footprint, stores moving to outlying areas exacerbate environmental issues, particularly air pollution.

In conclusion, despite the benefits of allowing customers to get lower rates and growing the economy in the periphery, I absolutely believe that the negatives, such as threats to environmental concerns and a waste of time and money for gasoline, outweigh the benefits.

Sample 10:

People have different views about whether the trend that now people tend to visit out-of-town stores instead of small town-centre shops is positive or negative. While big shopping centres have commercial values to governments and local residents, I believe that small town-centre shops are more essential to our life.

On the one hand, a big out-of-town chain retailing enterprise can provide better after-sales; for example, they have clear refund policies, which means you can easily get your refund if you are unsatisfied with the item you purchased. Also, the quality is generally better than in small shops, so you can use them for a much longer time. Besides that, there are many famous brands usually will be located in out-of-town shopping mall, for example, Nike, New Balance, Tasco, Adidas, and Guuci etc, most of them have good reputations. Most importantly, there are thousands of different kinds of goods, which means you can find whatever you want there.

On the other hand, small town-cnetre shopps are highly convenient for the local neighbourhood or communities; they are easy to access and especially for people who do not have cars, they can just walk to the shop. Also, the prices are normally lower than in big shopping centers, also, for daily groceries, small shops have fresh vegetables and meat for people to purchase. What is more important is that small town-centre shops are helpful in emergency cases. For example, you find out that you are already out of salt when you are cooking, at this time, a small, short-distance town-centre shop can help you; otherwise, you must start your car engine, and drive 30 minutes or longer to buy a bottle of salt.

In conclusion, the downsides are definitely outweighing the upsides of this change.

Sample 11:

Shopping patterns have been drastically changing in recent years, with the emergence of big out-of-town shops undermining small town-centre ones and giving rise to the increasing use of cars. While such a development is to a certain extent advantageous to consumers and retailers, I believe it does more harm than good due to its negative impacts on small shops, people who do not have cars and the environment.

The development of large shopping malls on the outskirts indeed offers shoppers and retailers some advantages. Large out-of-town stores benefiting from economies of scale have better prices and a wider array of commodities for consumers to choose from. Additionally, large shops often come with big parking spaces and leisure facilities such as restaurants, bowling alleys, and cinemas, which may provide better shopping experience. As a result, shoppers end up buying more, and retailers gain huge profits from growing consumerism.

Nevertheless, I believe the aforementioned advantages of such a trend pale into insignificance when compared with its tremendous disadvantages. One clear drawback of this phenomenon is that big shops sited on the outskirts may drive small ones to the brink of closure, thereby rendering people working for those shops unemployed. This is particularly the case with traditional, small-scale businesses that are unable to compete against big transnational corporations. Moreover, this shopping pattern is geared towards people with cars, so to some extent, it excludes certain underprivileged groups of people who do not own ones. Those large out-of-town shopping centers also bring in their wake increased traffic congestion in the suburbs especially at the weekends, and high emissions from influxes of vehicles travelling long distances.

In conclusion, my firm conviction is that whereas consumers and shop owners may reap some benefits from the growth of out-of-town shopping malls, this trend is more likely to bring negative consequences.

Sample 12:

The advent of large supermarkets on the outer fringes of cities has meant the ceasing of business for town centers and small shops in the cities. This, as per some, is a promising prospect that would help drive in several benefits, for others, there could not have been a worse proposal.

Opening up of big department stores on the outskirts of urban areas has helped decongest cities, especially the interiors; thus, making lives easier for city dwellers. No more do the centers and business districts face ugly scenarios of public spaces being encroached by parked vehicles which shrunk the pedestrian zones: making it harder for people to move around.

However, as many suggest, this trend has brought in more drawbacks than benefits, the most prominent being a staggering rise in air pollution. While in cities, people could afford to travel even by public transport, using personal conveyance has become a compulsion in this case. As the number of cars plying on the roads rises, there have been reports of a substantial increment in emissions in the suburbs, exurbs, and close vicinities of such stores.

Moreover, this new arrangement has left many sulking, those without personal conveyance, are unable to obtain goods of their choice, and must stay satisfied with whatever nearby shops offer them. Besides this, the experience of even those with cars, has not been too encouraging either. Shopping in distant locations has led to upsetting of monthly budgets: consumers must plan and buy in excess, as travelling to outskirts cannot be an everyday affair.

In a nutshell, I would not say that establishing supermarkets in outlying areas of urban locations is altogether laden with drawbacks; however, one can hardly ignore pitfalls this change has brought along. I believe town planning needs to be more prudent.

Sample 13:

The flourishing of large department stores in the outskirts has resulted in not only the abandonment of inner-town malls but also the proliferation in the number of vehicles. As far as I’m concerned, in spite of certain benefits, this trend brings about more far-reaching repercussions.

Admittedly, out-of-town supermarkets allow people to get access to a wide variety of commodities. While centre-town shops tend to be limited in quantity and diversity, suburban supermarkets can cater for every need of people with renowned brand names and high-quality goods in abundance. This can be attributed to the fact that these supermarkets are erected on vast expanses of land; therefore, they are capable of displaying a multitude of products. Additionally, they also provide customers with many recreational activities, which are aptly suited for family trips. This, in turn, enhances the living standards of townspeople.

However, there are more drawbacks to this change. Regarding the small stores in town, they are deprived of the chances to develop and prosper since the big ones attract and take away all their customers. As a result, a large number of these shops are driven to permanent closure. In addition, increased traffic volume compounds the situation of air pollution and also leads to serious health problems such as asthma and lung cancer. That hordes of people gather at one place can be uncomfortable and affect shopping experience in an unpleasant way.

In conclusion, the practice of townspeople going to mega-shopping malls on the outskirts has both merits and demerits. Nonetheless, I believe such a trend is more detrimental because it can put pressure on the environment and adversely influence the well-being of customers and shopping experience.

Sample 14:

In recent years, because of urbanisation, a mushroom growth of large shopping malls has been seen in the suburbs of the cities and towns. Many people are worried that this phenomenon may lead to the increase in use of cars, and this would not be good for the environment. Looking at the advantages of having large shopping malls on the outskirts of cities, I believe that the disadvantage of increased use of cars can be overlooked.

There are many benefits of having shopping malls in the out-of-town sites. To begin with, we all know that that the suburban land costs much less and therefore the rents and other operating costs of these shopping complexes are much less. Lower operating costs directly lead to lower prices. Secondly, the shopping centres in these areas would be definitely bigger because of more availability of land and so consumers will have more choices as more variety could be displayed.

Furthermore, it would help ease urban traffic and housing pressures in the city centre. The city centres are already too congested and opening big shopping centres here would worsen the situation. We all know that rapid urbanisation is taking place, and more and more people are shifting from the villages to the cities. If these shopping centres are on the outskirts of cities, they would be nearer to the neighbouring villages and many of them would not then need to move to cities as some comforts of the cities would be nearer to their homes.

Another big advantage would be that because of these shopping centres, more businesses would also relocate from the over-congested city centres to the suburbs, and this would also help to lessen the overcrowding within the cities. It has also been seen that when people have to go far to do shopping, they plan it well so that they don’t have to make very frequent visits and so it does not add a lot to the use of the car. Small town-centre shops are facing some challenges, no doubt, but they still have their place because of the personal touch and their ease of accessibility.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, having shopping centres in the suburbs definitely has more advantages than disadvantages.

Hot: 1000+ Đề thi cuối kì 1 file word cấu trúc mới 2025 Toán, Văn, Anh... lớp 1-12 (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay

Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:

Xem thêm »

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Câu 1

The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is by providing free public transport 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Some argue that offering free bus and rail passes to all who need them is the best solution to traffic congestion. While this might be effective for many, I believe the government should also explore other strategies to address this problem.

On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.

However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.

In conclusion, while providing free public transportation can indeed help reduce traffic, it should not be the sole focus of government efforts to solve this issue.

Sample 2:

It is generally believed that if the government wants to solve the traffic congestion problem, the most effective solution is to provide free public transportation, such as buses and trains. In my opinion, I agree with this idea because it really helps to ease the situation.

Firstly, I believe that free public transportation can reduce people's dependence on cars and improve traffic congestion. People who live outside the city centre tend to go to work because there are no buses or train stations around the area. Therefore, the government should consider building railway and bus lanes to cover all remote areas. In addition, dedicated lanes can be allocated to buses to avoid traffic jams. For example, Japan has done a very good job with its advanced subway system. Their stations are always overcrowded, and trains and buses are always on time. People rarely own cars and they rely on public transportation.

Secondly, the government should always carry out publicity activities to promote the advantages of using free public transportation. By doing so, people can break the mentality that public transportation is dirty, slow, and unreliable. As long as more people know, the transportation system is well designed, more comfortable and more convenient; people will soon start using public transportation. For example, Singapore has implemented 24/7 free public transportation, and its roads are unobstructed.

In short, I firmly believe that free transportation will reduce congestion by promoting awareness-raising campaigns and investment in buses and trains. Although it is a difficult task for the government to implement free public transportation in the community, once the government implements it successfully, it will have a major impact on everyone's life.

Sample 3:

Today with the increasing population and the exponential growth of urbanization, the transportation needs of the people have increased rapidly. Due to increasing transportation and the need for vehicles, traffic congestion has become a major problem of the countries with increasing populations. Therefore, looking into the problem deeply, I find that the best way to control this traffic congestion is for the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities. There are certain reasons for increasing traffic congestion as discussed below.

Firstly, the faster pace of population growth has increased the demand for more vehicles on the road. Since the transport facilities are less as compared to the people traveling, the demands have increased day by day which has contributed to more vehicles on the road and hence contributing to traffic congestion. Secondly, the increasing urbanization has caused more of the rural population to migrate to urban cities and metropolitan cities to find jobs and work. This increased migration of the population to urban cities is also one of the major causes of the traffic congestion on roads. For example, metropolitan cities of India like Delhi, Mumbai, Ahmedabad are highly traffic-congested cities of India due to increased urbanization and rapid migration of the rural population.

Traffic congestion is one of the major causes of carbon dioxide emission and increasing global warming of the earth. The harmful gases emitted from these vehicles pollute the environment. For example, the highly populated city of India is Delhi due to increased traffic congestion. The government must provide free transportation facilities to reduce the number of private vehicles on the road and must also encourage the population to compulsorily use these free public transportation facilities to reduce the problem of traffic congestion. Besides, in public transport, the use of environmentally-friendly electric vehicles like metro services, electric trains, electric buses, and taxis must be encouraged instead of fuel vehicles to reduce the emission of harmful gases in the environment.

Therefore, after analyzing all the points above, the conclusion drawn upon is that traffic congestion is the major problem faced by many countries at large and the best solution to this problem is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities to the people.

Sample 4:

The population has been increasing day by day and with the increasing number of people, urbanization is also at its peak. In such situations, the huge demands of vehicles have caused rapid traffic congestion on roads. However, some people argue that the best way to control traffic congestion is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, but in my opinion, this may not be the correct way to control the traffic congestion.

Some of the major reasons for traffic congestion are urbanization and the migration of the people. This has caused an increased demand for vehicles in the market. Nowadays people tend to travel a lot, and, in such conditions, they find it easier to use their own vehicles rather than opting for public transport. A survey conducted in China states that a majority of people prefer their own vehicles rather than public transport and this has increased more vehicles on road contributing to the traffic congestions. Secondly, people find it easy to carry their own vehicle to travel to different corners of the country as it is more comfortable than public transport. Also, the conditions of the public transport facilities have also deteriorated, they are also very congestive and unhygienic. Besides, the public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners due to non motorable roads and hence, the best option for traveling to these areas are the private vehicles. Secondly, private vehicles like cars and motorbikes have become more affordable and budget-friendly for people.

For the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, it will be a big burden on their exchequer. Instead, the government must focus on other measures like encouraging bicycles for school and college-going students, build wide tracks with separate lanes, build more expressways and flyovers to reduce the congestion. Also, they must subsidize the public transport fares but not completely free. A separate track for pedestrians and cyclists must be built to limit the number of vehicles on the road. Besides, an awareness campaign must be launched to inform people of the traffic rules and safety measures. Strict traffic rules must be followed, and a compulsorily fine system should be introduced.

Instead of providing free transport facilities for the public, the above-mentioned measures must be given more importance.

Sample 5:

To reduce traffic congestion, the government must provide free transport facilities to the public. But this step can be moderately implemented to reduce the congestion on roads. Some other measures should also be taken in equal proportion to deal with the issue of traffic congestion. Therefore, the statement, Government should provide 24/7 free public transportation to reduce traffic congestion is moderately correct. There are several reasons for the increasing traffic congestion on roads as mentioned below.

Population in many of the developing countries like India and China has been increasing at an alarming rate. This has caused an increasing number of people on the road either using public transport, their own vehicles or pedestrians resulting in increased traffic congestion. Also, a large-scale migration of the population to urban cities for work had deteriorated the traffic conditions of big cities. Secondly, the fares of the public transport are quite high compared to the service they render and are more congested and unhygienic. Now, when automobiles have become more affordable and fuel-efficient, people opt for quality and comfort over public facilities. Thirdly, people have started to travel more these days and public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners of the cities or towns. In such situations what people find better is the use of the facilities of the private vehicle. However, the use of private vehicles has resulted in increased traffic congestion and besides, these are the major cause of concern as they contribute to the emission of harmful gases polluting the environment.

To deal with the problem of traffic congestion, providing only free public transport may not contribute much. Besides, the government must encourage the use of electric vehicles and bicycles amongst the population. Secondly, it must focus on building more expressways and highways and separate lanes to reduce the congestion. Enough attention must be paid to constructing road facilities in remote corners of the cities and towns and especially in rural areas so that public transport can easily reach every corner of the world. Strict adherence to the traffic rules must be followed.

All these steps along with free transport facilities by the government together can contribute to reducing traffic congestion.

Sample 6:

The incidents of traffic congestion are increasing along with the population growth. Some contend that in order to lessen traffic congestion, the government ought to offer free public transportation. This solution, in my opinion, can only partially resolve the issue.

Most individuals now prefer to live in cities or towns rather than rural areas due to urbanisation. This is one of the primary causes of the heavy traffic on the roadways. At the same time, cars have also gotten cheaper and more fuel-efficient as a result of technological improvement. The number of automobiles on the roads has also increased as a result.

The government is undoubtedly attempting to reduce traffic by enhancing the efficiency and speed of public transit. For instance, the DMRC system, which facilitates bus stops across the entire city, has been installed in Delhi, a densely populated metropolis. The public can utilise this bus service 24 hours a day, seven days a week, but it is not free, thus many people opt to drive their own car instead. Because buses and trains are crowded and uncomfortable, many individuals will still choose to use their own vehicles even if public transportation is free. Free public transportation will also put a strain on the exchequer.

In my opinion, the government can take a number of additional steps to lessen traffic on the roads. For instance, it needs to create bigger roadways, additional flyovers, and separate lanes for cyclists and pedestrians. It should also strictly enforce traffic regulations and promote the use of environmentally friendly transportation.

In conclusion, making public transportation free will undoubtedly encourage more people to use it, but since those who value comfort and convenience over cost will still drive privately, this strategy is ineffective in easing traffic congestion.

Sample 7:

The traffic is getting worse in contemporary society, some citizens suggest that the authorities should provide free public transport every day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it's extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken at the same time.

We have to admit that this policy can increase the usage of public transport. Inhabitants will take it into consideration if it's free when they are facing traffic jam. To some extent, it can reduce traffic congestion. But we cannot turn a blind eye to the problems it caused.

This initiative will sharply increase the national budget. It's generally acknowledged that national funds are limited and should be used in a large variety of social aspects from education to environmental protection. The initiative will leave a burden on the financial budget and let the infrastructure cannot be maintained and guaranteed.

Furthermore, this policy cannot address the root of this issue. People use private cars not because of the high cost of the public transportation system, but because the line and route don't cover their destination or the low efficiency when they plan for a long-distance trip. No matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. In addition, traffic congestion only accrued during the rush hours, so it's pointless to provide it for free all day.

To sum up, I think the authority should reduce the price and develop the traffic infrastructure if they want to address this issue, rather than provide it for free simply.

Sample 8:

Some contend that the best way to combat traffic congestion is to always provide free bus and rail passes to everyone who needs them. While I acknowledge it may work for the vast majority of individuals, I think the government ought to offer other options to address this issue.

In conclusion, it is undeniably true that providing free public transit to citizens may be a significant element in reducing traffic, but this is by no means the main component that governments should take into account when trying to address this issue.

Sample 9:

In recent years, traffic jams have been increasingly ubiquitous particularly in big cities which cause great fatigue for commuters. In order to tackle this problem, it is argued by many that government should provide free public transport all day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it is extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken.

First of all, it is an indisputable fact that traffic congestion is not only attributed to the vast amount of private transport but also road systems. Moreover, no matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. Thus, providing free public transport alone just contributes to cutting down the volume of traffic to some extent. In fact, many big cities like Ho Chi Minh still suffer from traffic jams in narrow roads with obsolete infrastructure in spite of the rise in availability of public transport. Therefore, I strongly believe that road needs to be widened, and traffic lights and signs should be made more state-of-the-art to stem the root causes.

More importantly, though providing free public transport 24 hours per day is not necessary and what is more is that it may leave a burden on the national budget. According to the majority of reports, traffic jams mainly occur during the rush hours, so it is pointless to provide public transport all the time. On top of that, providing free public transport in the long term may be unachievable due to its tremendous cost. This measure not only costs governments a fortune but it is also unable to address the root of the issue. It would be far more economical if this amount of money was invested in enhancing road facilities.

By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that other measures rather than making public transport available may be far more efficient to traffic congestion. In years to come, I strongly believe that more investments in road systems should be adopted to make commuting more comfortable and time-saving.

Câu 2

The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life. Why is it the case? Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future?

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

These days, people’s workplaces are constantly changing and evolving to meet the demands of modern society. Furthermore, the roles and responsibilities of jobs are also undergoing changes to adapt to new ways of working and living. This essay will discuss the possible reasons for these changes and suggest some ways that people can better prepare themselves for their future careers.

Firstly, due to the developments in hi-tech machines and artificial intelligence, millions of people all around the world are losing their jobs and being replaced by automated processes. For example, millions of factory workers have lost their jobs because they have been replaced by machines that are able to do their job quicker and more effectively. Furthermore, as a result of the ever-increasing desire to cut expenses and increase profits, many jobs are being outsourced to countries where the wages are lower. For instance, when a person calls a tech support help line in an English-speaking country, they will most likely be connected to someone in another country, like India or Philippines, where the wages are lower.

However, there are a number of ways that people can prepare for changes in their workplaces in the future. Firstly, students preparing to leave high school need to be advised about the sustainability of the career path they are choosing. To illustrate, autonomous vehicles are predicted to replace most delivery and taxi driver jobs in the very near future, so this is not a job that someone should expect to have for a very long time. Furthermore, while some jobs are being replaced by technology, many jobs are simply incorporating technology into their process, and therefore people will need to be able to keep up to date with these changes. To help achieve this, specific courses could be designed to help educate people on the use of modern technology in their workplaces.

In conclusion, although there are many changes in the workplace these days, educating people to carefully choose their career and to keep up to date with modern technology is the key to avoiding any major problems.

Sample 2:

The nature of labor in our modern world is changing at a fundamental level, with many workers worried that they will not be able to maintain their job conditions for long periods of time. Personally, I think this is the result of stagnating wages and the advances of automation, and can only be resolved with a universal basic income for the whole population.

Firstly, I argue that society is witnessing the worst wage stagnation in generations, which is causing people to constantly look for better paying jobs. As cost increases yet wages are not following suit, most of the workforce have to scramble to reach for managerial positions or risk losing their disposable incomes. This in turn creates a situation where many people have to take up multiple jobs in order to make ends meet. In the US and UK, for instance, it is estimated that millions of workers are on zero-hour contracts, which does not guarantee a set number of hours of work.

Secondly, as corporations seek to reduce expenditure as much as possible, they aim to replace the workforce with machines, leading to higher levels of unemployment and less stable job conditions. As machines encroach on the workforce, jobs become focused on the maintenance of the robots running our factories, and therefore there is higher competition for the dwindling number of jobs with gradually raising entry barriers. The end result is sure to be tension amongst socio-economic classes that can afford entry into the workforce if the effect of automation is not being mitigated.

I argue that in order to solve this, it is important to implement Universal Basic Income, which is an equal lump sum of money given to all citizens of countries every month or year. This would help people to keep their jobs and not have to take up precarious work, since they have enough money to buy basic necessities. This scheme can already be seen in Canada during the COVID-19 outbreak, for example, with citizens getting 2000 Canadian dollars a year. This has been hugely popular, as it allowed Canadians to have some level of stability even as the economy came to a halt.

Overall, I believe that stagnant wages and automation is leading to volatile work conditions, and as such, I contend that UBI is needed to stabilize this situation.

Sample 3:

It is a tendency that many people change their careers many times during their lifetime. This essay will identify the causes for these changes and recommend some ways to prepare for working in the future.

There are many reasons why one job for life seems to be over. One of the major reasons is our consumerism society. Therefore, job hopping for higher paid jobs or doing multiple jobs is no longer simply an option. Another reason is that the development of technology has changed the structure of work at such a fast pace that people have to constantly update themselves with the latest working methods. However, many are unable to adapt to the changes. For example, older workers might find it difficult to compete with younger workforce and have to find a new job or change their career field.

For those who want a stable life even in the rapidly changing future, they should realise that as long as we find a job which gives us satisfaction, there would be no need to change. My advice for those people is that if we stick to one job, life can be more stable. Of course, if one wants some employment changes, they should prepare for new job openings with a variety of working experience and skill set. Some should return to school to pursue courses that can lead them into new careers. Otherwise, some should take a fresh environment in which they can use and improve their skills and experience.

In conclusion, the process of job hopping is becoming very common because of social and technological development. I suggest that our knowledge and skills should be updated regularly, and we should have a balance between career changes and job satisfaction.

Sample 4:

It is true that the present working environment has witnessed a radical change. People now tend to switch jobs more frequently rather than have their occupations remain stable. While this phenomenon can be caused by several reasons, there are certain recommendations to help future workers prepare themselves for their careers.

First and foremost, the introduction of new technology might be the greatest cause for such changes. In other words, millions of workers all around the world are being replaced by high tech machines and artificial intelligence. For example, some staff working in the service industry are now on the verge of unemployment due to the rapid growth of online shopping websites and self-service supermarket checkouts. Another reason leading to this phenomenon is globalization. Due to globalization, employees have a wide range of choices between different positions among countries. As a result, many individuals tend to shift from one job to another with a view to higher salary as well as better standard of living.

However, there are several ways that people can get ready for changes in their future workplace. Firstly, workers should be well equipped with various skills by attending vocational courses and job training. Thus, they might keep up to date with the rapid development of robots and automated processes. In addition, individuals can get advice about the sustainability of their future position. This helps them to excel in one job rather than multiple, which lifts up the burden of switching jobs regularly.

In conclusion, although cutting-edge technology and globalization have made a great impact on the world of work, employees must be well-informed and flexible to achieve expected goals.

Sample 5:

It is irrefutable that the work scenario is altering at a fast pace. Working conditions are also different and the process of job-hopping is very common. This essay shall delve into the possible causes for these changes and suggest ways to prepare for work in the future.

To begin with, the development of science and technology has changed the structure of work. For example, people no longer need to do some heavy work by themselves. Instead, they can use machines. Secondly, competition has become intense, and people have to constantly update themselves with the latest materials and methods. Sometimes they cannot compete with the new techno-savvy workforce and so have to change jobs out of compulsion.

Furthermore, we belong to an era of consumerism. Being surrounded by so many choices, people today want to buy new things and for that, they do multiple jobs. In addition, the 24/7 society of today provides us with the opportunity to workday and night. For instance, in earlier times, there were very few jobs which were round-the-clock jobs. But, today, globalization has brought in a multitude of options of working day and night. The line between day and night has become dim and people have become workaholics.

There could be many suggestions to prepare for work in the future. People should have a set goal in their mind and get training accordingly. Moreover, it is important to draw a line somewhere. The stress and strain of the fast modern workplace is leading many to nervous breakdowns. In the developed countries, a new term called downshifting has already come where after a certain stage, people are saying ‘no’ to promotions and showing contentment with less. We should also realize that if we stick to one job, then life can be more stable, and we can enjoy our leisure also.

To put in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, although work conditions are different today and we have a need to update our knowledge regularly, we can plan our life in a meticulous way and have a balance between work and leisure.

Sample 6:

In today’s modern world, people tend to change jobs more often than before and don’t want to work permanently in one environment. I would like to explore the sources of this issue and suggest several solutions for future work.

Firstly, due to the global recession, many employers have to downsize and restructure their businesses. This leads to a number of redundant employees being forced to leave their jobs and find other ones. Another reason is that, as living costs are getting higher and higher, people want to earn as much money as they can to meet their needs. Hence, they seek better opportunities and well-paid jobs everywhere, every day. Some also look for new challenges. Last but not least, thanks to new technology, people nowadays are able to access information more easily, including information about job recruiting.

One of my suggestions for this problem is to create a comfortable working environment and build strong relationships between colleagues and between managers and workers. These will make employees find it harder to leave. To achieve this, courses such as leadership training and communication skill training should be carried out to help supervisors lead their team efficiently without causing any stress, and help employees fit inconveniently.

In conclusion, I would like to state that changing jobs is one of the notable signs of our technological times, and soft skills training courses can help people adapt to the working environment instead of seeking to escape it.

Sample 7:

Work culture lately has been dynamically transformed, mainly due to improvements in technology like transport and communication. Job security has become a dicey issue as employees now need to keep themselves updated with the advancements around them. This essay shall further explain the reasons and offer probable solutions.

In the last two decades, we have seen a remarkable spread of technology in all wakes of life. With easy access to the Internet and computers, work has become faster and easier. Innovation of office tools is encouraged everywhere so as to not let anything hinder the growth of trade and commerce. With each task becoming effortless, manual intervention at many places has been reduced. Ergo, rising insecurity is seen among employees. Additionally, employees are expected to multi-task in their jobs making it more difficult for older workers to sustain.

The remedial measures for such a situation are very few as of now. First of all, state-of-the-art employee training centers to help the employees stay well-versed with the high-tech upgradations. To solve this problem from an earlier level, universities should start imparting practical training in their curriculum, with the know-how of current on-the-job scenarios to prepare potential workers better. All this needs to be done as the employees losing their jobs also lose financial security for their families, and it is very difficult to start again from ground zero.

To conclude, I’d say we should accept the ever-changing technological advancements as they’re unlikely to stop. Better would be to equip ourselves and become flexible accordingly so as to welcome such developments.

Câu 3