Câu hỏi:

07/01/2025 419

Today, TV channels provide more men’s sports shows than women’s sport shows. Why? Should TV channels give equal time for women’s sport and men’s sport?

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified
Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

Television channels today regularly devote more airtime to men’s sporting events than women’s. Personally, I believe that the reasons for this are financial, and whilst efforts should be made to give equal time to men’s and women’s sports, viewership means that this would be a difficult task.

Firstly, the main consideration of television channels and studio executives to prioritise men's sports is viewership, as more views mean more advertising revenue. Television channels need to make a decision on how best to utilize the amount of time they have in order to secure the highest ratings, and the reality is that men’s sports tend to be more popular than women’s sports. The men’s World Cup Finals, for example, had viewership in the billions, whilst this number was much lower for the womens’ World Cup. Since TV channels’ main purpose is to make money, it is not difficult to see why they would prefer to showcase men’s sports over women’s.

However, there is the consideration that giving women sports more publicity can help to alter public perception over time. If something gets a huge amount of newspaper, radio, and television coverage for decades, it is unsurprising that it would eventually become popular. Therefore, what may help make the world of sports coverage less divided would be to report more on women’s sports and to increase its airtime. The overwhelming popularity of women’s football in the United States, for example, provides a stunning testament to the ability of the media to be able to thrust women’s sports into the limelight. Applying this method to other sports might mean they can become popular as well.

In conclusion, I argue that the reason why men’s sports have been given more coverage than women’s is due to ratings playing a fundamental role in how media companies operate. Nonetheless, by shifting the attention to female sports, the media can make them as successful as men’s sports in the long run.  

Sample 2:

These days, there is a significant difference between men and women’s sports coverage on television channels. I believe that women’s sports should get just as much coverage as men’s and will outline my reasons in the following essay.

To begin with, there are many reasons for the dominance of men over women’s sports programs on TV. Due to a large proportion of male sports viewers, TV channels tend to produce sports programs for men to maximize their ratings and profits. Take football as an example. When entering a coffee shop, it is easy to catch groups of men having discussions about a recent men’s football match, while women show greater preference for shopping or lifestyle channels. Besides, because men usually perform better than women in sports such as boxing and bodybuilding, they play at a much higher level, which makes men’s sports more exciting to watch.

On the other hand, I am of the opinion that it is necessary for TV channels to provide equal coverage for both genders. First, it creates gender equality in society and increases the rate of women’s sports participation. In fact, every time women go out on the field, they give it their all knowing that their best will likely go unnoticed. Therefore, just like men, female athletes should receive full recognition for their effort. Secondly, better TV coverage also enables women to make money off from endorsements and enhance their living standard. That is to say, more TV exposure for the female players will lead to major deals with endorsers and higher salaries in the future through advertising contracts.

In conclusion, why women’s sports shows do not receive enough coverage in this day and age results from those aforementioned reasons, and I truly believe that it is necessary to ensure equal coverage of women’s sports.

Sample 3:

These days, when it comes to sport, a higher number of games played by men are broadcast, compared to that of women. A growing number of people having more interest in men’s sporting events is the main reason for this and I believe that equal attention should be paid to women’s sport.

The major factor leading television producers to prioritise men’s sport is the audience watching male athletes competing considerably outnumbers people watching shows of their female counterparts. More viewers mean more profits, advertising contracts and sponsorship investments for the TV channels broadcasting the shows. Take football in Vietnam as an example. Men’s football match at the 30th SEA games attracted millions of people both from different parts of Vietnam and other neighbouring countries, while the figure for women’s match was significantly lower. Giving men’s sport a higher priority is, therefore, a wise strategy to earn large profits and attract more investment.

However, I would argue that TV coverage should not be biased towards men’s sport and that female athletes should be given equal opportunities. If men’s sports programmes continue to receive significantly more coverage than the programmes of their opposite sex, it might increase gender inequality, which is one of the most serious issues in many parts of the world today. Another thing is that there has been a dramatic increase in the number of people who have interests in women’s sport in recent years, and hence, television coverage should focus more on this area.

In conclusion, a wider audience watching men’s sports channels is the most important reason why TV producers provide more men’s shows than women’s shows, and I am of the opinion that there should be a greater equality in the coverage of men’s and women’s sport.

Sample 4:

It is true that men’s sport events generally receive wider coverage from media outlets, particularly television, than those of women. I personally believe that although TV channels are tempted to broadcast men’s sport more because of its greater appeal to viewers, women’s sport should be given equal airtime.

To begin with, sport events with male participants are admittedly more entertaining and competitive in most cases, which makes them more attractive to TV viewers and, therefore, TV stations. With their superior physical strength, sportsmen are able to perform skilful but taxing feats that most sportswomen cannot when they compete. For instance, it is common to see a male football player deftly dribble the ball with great speed multiple times during a match, something that female football players do not do very often due to the lack of stamina.

That being said, ignoring women’s sport events is, in my opinion, discriminatory and unjust. Just like those of their male counterparts, women’s sport events deserve public attention and media coverage, not because they are exciting to watch but because it is a sign of equality between sportspeople of both genders. Furthermore, giving more time for female sport shows might encourage more girls and women to partake in sports and motivate female athletes to always improve their skills and competence, thereby enhancing the quality of these events. This, in turn, will possibly attract more coverage as well as investment in female sport shows.

In conclusion, despite being less appealing to the general television viewer, women’s sport events should still be given as much airtime as those of men to promote equality and encourage their development in the future.

Sample 5:

Some people say that TV should present an equitable amount of showtime for women’s and men’s sports. In this essay, I will explain why I think it is not a good idea.

People who support the idea of equal coverage of male and female athletes on TV think that this would empower the women’s role in sport and discourage gender discrimination. They assumed that if the media gave more exposure to female sporting events, it would arouse public attention to women’s sports, thereby decreasing the gap between women’s and men’s sports. However, it is a fact that men still play an important role and they are the overwhelming majority of sports participants despite some improvements in the proportion of airtime covered by women sports. Therefore, if one believes that a quantitative change in showtime might promote gender equality in sports, I think that they are too optimistic, and the situation is much more complicated.

I believe that the root cause for less coverage on women’s sports lies on the fact that female athletes are barely acknowledged and have been stigmatised because of their sex and household duties. As a result, their participation in sports is not welcomed in some countries or is even devalued in media reports. A research also pointed out that the performance of women in athletic competition is considered as less important and less exciting by women themselves, let alone men. TV and the mass media are simply driven by what their audience wants, so the situation will look rosy, provided that we give women’s sport a stronger preference and an acknowledgement.

In conclusion, while increasing the showtime of women’ sports seems to be a too simple option, it is better to raise the public awareness about female sports to end gender discrimination.

Sample 6:

When watching sports channels on TV, there appears to be a clear disparity between male and female sportsmen these days. This essay will first discuss the origins of this unbalanced situation, and then it will consider whether broadcast authorities have a responsibility to reduce gender inequality. There are currently a large number of TV networks that broadcast men's sports rather than women's games. Several reasons may be contributing to this tendency; I would say that TV channels should equalise the amount of time spent on men's and women's competition shows.

To begin, this is mostly due to the fact that male sports are more popular than those practised by female athletes. There is an outdated stereotype that physical activities are exclusive for guys. Although certain competitive female sports, such as rhythmic gymnastics and figure skating, are actively publicised, many sports women are generally regarded as outsiders in various professions, such as football and swimming. In the case of women's soccer in South Korea, even after the national team achieved first place, just a few media sources covered the storey.

On the one hand, there are some reasons why this occurs. To begin with, men's sports have more viewers than women's games, which may cause TV stations to prioritise men's athletics shoes. For example, in football, men's matches draw millions of viewers, whereas women's matches draw far less. As a result, in order to improve rates, TV broadcasters would emphasise men's sports shows. If television networks pay more attention to women's sports, they may lose money. Furthermore, many people believe that sports are only for males because they require strength, stamina, and agility. This could lead to a decrease in the number of women competing in sports compared to men. As a result, the number of girls playing the game is insufficient to propagate.

To go on to the following problem, stations must make an effort to equalise the broadcasting hours of the two different sexes. As a result, society can compensate for the dearth of strong female role models that young people perceive succeeding in their careers. As a result, future great athletes who show promise as children will be nurtured. Figure skating, for example, was once considered an unattractive sport in South Korea, but since the appearance of Yuna Kim, the best figure skater in the world, it has grown in popularity to be the most favoured winter Olympic sport in South Korea, and a number of teenagers have begun to train to become figure skaters.

To summarise, the imbalance in sports programming on television is generated by the popularity of athletes. From my perspective, it is critical for media firms to broadcast both male and female athletes without bias in order to promote the field of women's exercise. In conclusion, while some factors may force TV channels to devote more time to men's sports, I believe television should devote equal time to both.

Sample 7:

In today's modern world, there are various reasons why TV coverage tends to make sports shoes for men while women are underrepresented. I believe that television channels should devote equal attention to shows of both genders.

There are numerous reasons why males are paid more than women in sports that are broadcast on television. To begin with, males have more time than females. Obviously, women are usually responsible for their children and families, therefore they do not set aside time to watch television. For example, Vietnamese women are frequently conventional females who spend money on the family; as a result, husbands can watch television. Second, creating sports programmes for men provides more benefits in terms of finance. Males clearly have more favourite sports than girls. For example, as the shares of money climb, so do the rates of watching sports shows.

Sports broadcasters, in my opinion, should have the same air hours for men and women. The first is that women are getting more modern in today's society, and as a result, they are beginning to focus on self-care through exercise. For example, thanks to television sports programmes, ladies can practise at home instead of going to sports centres. The second point is that women are more likely to participate in sports; therefore, broadcasters should produce more sports shows to encourage ladies to exercise more frequently.

In conclusion, broadcasters have a tendency to do more sports shoes for men than for women for a variety of reasons, including the fact that men have more leisure time than women and sports programmes for men earn more money. TV coverage, in my opinion, should establish broadcast times for both gender equality because the number of women watching sports is increasing and women need to participate in sports.

Sample 8:

Gender equality on television sports networks has been skewed over the years. This tendency, I feel, has its own set of reasons; yet I strongly believe that female athletes should be given more televised time.

Although gender equality has come a long way, including UNESCO's designation of sport and physical activities as a human right in 1978, gender equality in sports is still far from complete, particularly in television shows. There are, in my opinion, two major causes of this problem. To begin with, male sports always receive more attention from the audience; as a result, TV producers have a broader strategy to display men's games on their networks. As a result, these programmes received increased media attention and sponsorship cash. Second, some people argue that "women's sports aren't interesting enough." Despite the fact that women's sports are becoming more popular, some people say that "no matter how hardy a sportswoman may be, her body is not cut out to absorb certain shocks." Consider the Women's World Cup soccer final from last July. With almost 25.4 million people, it was the most viewed soccer match - or men's women's - ever in the United States. Nonetheless, the players were paid significantly less than their male counterparts.

However, I'd like to highlight two reasons why we should pay greater attention to women's sports shows. For starters, the more female athletes there are in sports, the more female audiences are driven to exercise on a regular basis. It has the potential to have a long-term impact on women's health and contribute to a healthy lifestyle in the community. Second, everyone should have the same opportunities to be anything they choose to be. There should be no discrimination in athletics, business, or in life. Gender should not be used to define us or prevent us from expressing our talents.

To summarise, the domination of men's athletics on television has been monetarily beneficial to programme producers while also meeting the need of mass viewers. As a result, in order to ensure the long-term growth of a healthy lifestyle and equal rights for both genders, producers must plan a balanced programming schedule for both genders.

Sample 9:

It is common practice for most TV networks to focus more on men’s athletics rather than women’s. In my opinion, this is a natural byproduct of the history of sports and there should be more equal emphasis depending on the sport in question.

Men’s sports are more popular because they have developed further. In the past, athletics was always the primary domain of men and women were relegated to more domestic roles. Modern society understands this was discriminatory but the result, higher quality of play among male sports, cannot be argued. A good example of this would be professional basketball where the male leagues, such as the NBA, feature some of the greatest athletes in the world, executing complex coaching schemes, and consistently showcasing high skill levels. Women’s basketball, while it has developed considerably in the last two decades, is not the same level of entertainment though this may change in the coming years.

As this situation may require time to remedy, only the ratings can justify equal programming time. There are sports where this is already the case essentially, such as tennis, where women receive equal prize money, and the ratings are comparable. In the United States, this also applies for international football tournaments, where the female team regularly advances far beyond their male counterparts. In these examples, it is warranted to give female athletics at least, if not more, broadcast time. However, mandating this policy for all sports before they are ready, and the audience exists is likely to produce a strong backlash and in fact hinder the progress of women’s sports.

In conclusion, there are institutional reasons for the disparity in the time television channels dedicate to men’s and women’s sports and this should be corrected on a case-by-case basis. Viewers will decide themselves which sports deserve the most attention, regardless of gender.

Sample 10:

TV networks have been prioritizing men’s sport programmes over those of women. Several factors are responsible for this gap in popularity, and I do not think that both deserve an equal amount of air time.

This imbalance by TV stations is believed to emerge from financial interest.

As men’s sports shows are generally more well-received than women’s, the channels have to satisfy the market by showing more of such programmes to generate more revenue. This dominance of men’s sports over their counterparts in TV shows demand stems from the differences in male and female preferences, which is males are often into sports while females are not. Obviously, having a low player pool means that women’s sports shows have less to offer to the audience, bringing less profits to TV providers when compared to men’s. For example, the Men’s World Cup, which is a quadrennial international football event, is broadcast all over the world while Female’s World cup is often neglected by TV providers. It is commercial benefits that incentivize TV channels to favour the Men’s World Cup to Women’s.

It is not advisable that TV channels impose the same broadcast time for two categories as the decision should be based on the commercial potential. If TV channels cut down the airtime of men’s sports shows to force a statistically balanced amount for both genders, they could face losses in revenue. This reduction in profit is due to the viewers’ lack of interest in women’s sports. As the shift is implemented, the viewers who have no interest in women’s sports are unlikely to welcome women’s sports shows, thus, possibly cancelling their subscription to the channel.

In conclusion, the uneven airtime between men’s and women’s sports shows could be explained from an economic standpoint. It is also not beneficial for TV channels to push a balanced airtime for both shows in terms of finance.

Sample 11:

In today’s TV shows, one of the most interesting and well-known genres for people is sports. However, instead of presenting equal amount for men’s sports shows and women’s sports shows, TV programmers tend to increase airtime for men’s sports shows. The reason and further discussion of this phenomenon will be addressed in this essay.

The reason why women’s sports shows are fewer than men’s sports shows is based on two characters: the participants and the viewers. It’s undeniably true that men are stronger than women, so they play sport better than women. Men have the tendency to involve in sports that is physically demanding, which attracts more viewers because those sports are enticing to watch, especially when the players score a goal. For example, men play sports that highly demand strength such as baseball, weightlifting and American football. Although women do play these sports but because of the weaker strength, a women’s sport show seem to not attractive as men’s ones. Moreover, the viewers of sports shows are usually men, while women prefer soap opera, reality shows or game shows.

Although providing equal time for both shows does encourage the women’s sports shows, considering the positive and negative effect, I still stand on the other side. Due to all of the reasons above, I strongly believe that we should not provide equal time for men’s sports and women’s sports. If people provide equal time for both shows and the viewers are not interested in women’s ones, they will not continue watching the shows and as a result, the view rate decreases, and a huge amount of money is wasted.

In conclusion, that women’s sports shows are fewer than men’s sports shows has its own reasons. And people should not change the situation which only makes things worse.

Sample 12:

For a long time, television coverage of men's sports has drastically increased while female sports receive little media coverage. This essay will mention the two reasons for this tendency, along with my opinion in support of increasing women's sports coverage.

To begin with, two main factors can be proposed to explain this trend. First, men's sports have such a long-term development that players' skills are improved and become professional while women's sports only begin to be popular within half a decade. Therefore, TV channels will earn a huge amount of money if they prioritize men's sports shows which are more eagerly awaited than women's. Second, as the sport's viewers mostly are men, broadcasters will maximize profits by casting their favorite shows, men's sports competition shows. It is not difficult to come across a men's group in a discussion of recent men's football matches in a cafe while women are rarely seen talking about sports shows.

Although women's shows are less popular, I am convinced that these shows should have opportunities to be broadcast widely. On one hand, in the modern era, as gender equality is a hot topic, TV show producers can gain more attention and benefit their channels by increasing content relevant to women's matches to ensure gender equality. On the other hand, the trend of gender equalization in various fields including sports is rising. broadcasters, as well as viewers, should support sports shows for women, as a good way to educate younger generations about gender nondiscrimination in general and equality in sports showtime.

In conclusion, while gender priority in sports shows can bring channels more money, they should balance the showtime not only for their own advantage but also for the community.

Bình luận


Bình luận

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Although fossil fuels still remain the most important energy sources in many places, some countries are now already using alternative sources like solar or wind power. In my opinion, it can be difficult for a country to move towards using alternative energy at first, but this development brings about several benefits in the long run.

On the one hand, the change towards using alternative types of energy would probably put a heavy financial burden on the government and companies as they will have to invest millions of dollars in purchasing and developing new equipment and facilities for harnessing solar, wind or hydro-electric power. For example, the average cost of installing a wind turbine for generating electricity is about $3 million, and an average country would require a wind farm with hundreds of turbines to supply power to all companies and households. In addition, the production cost of large solar panels is still very high, which is why many countries, especially those with a poor economy, are still unable to use this power source.

However, I still believe that shifting towards using alternative energy is a worthwhile investment due to the great benefits it brings. Firstly, fossil fuels are the main cause of air pollution nowadays since petroleum-powered vehicles and factories are releasing tremendous amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere every day. Therefore, replacing coal and petroleum with wind or solar power will help to reduce the level of emissions in the atmosphere and improve air quality. Secondly, fossil fuels, like natural gas or oil, are finite resources and will soon be depleted, which will potentially threaten the economy if there are no alternative sources. This fact emphasizes the need to develop renewable energy to gradually replace traditional sources when fossil fuels inevitably run out.

In conclusion, I hold the view that despite the high initial cost of new equipment and facilities, the switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources is still necessary for the long-term development of the planet.

Sample 2:

The debate around our primary sources of energy has been intensifying in recent decades, with some pushing for more sustainable energy while others arguing that fossil fuels should remain the main source of power globally. I personally think renewable energy production should be encouraged, since it’s important that nations should seek to reduce their own carbon emissions to divert the dangers of climate change as well as build a more sustainable economy.

Firstly, fossil fuel should be discouraged because it could bring about the existential threat of climate change. As a result, biodiversity is at an all-time low, with shifting climates and rising sea levels slowly eroding the delicate tapestry of food webs across the globe. As scientists are convinced this is directly the cause of human activity, such as in agriculture and fossil fuel consumption, renewable energies would help slow this threat immediately and might be our only solution to salvaging the planet.

Secondly, one could argue that renewable energies are more sustainable and would therefore be better for the economy in the long run. While oil and coal are a finite resource and take millions of years to replenish, energy from wind and solar can in theory never run out. Therefore, making a switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy can be a solution that thinks of the longer term, since it could avert an economic crash when oil fully depletes. Many analysts have warned that with the current trajectory, oil could run out by 2050; when this happens, it could sharply affect the biggest economies in the world that are still heavily dependent on oil.

Overall, I argue that the climate effects as a result of fossil fuels consumption combined with the economic benefits of renewable energies mean that we should encourage the development of these forms of energy.

Sample 3:

Fossil fuels, such as coal, oil, and natural gas, have long been the dominant sources of energy in many countries. However, their extensive use has resulted in significant environmental harm, prompting the need for alternative sources of energy. In response to this, many countries are encouraging the adoption of renewable energy sources like wind and solar power. This essay will discuss the reasons behind the promotion of alternative energy sources and argue that it is a positive development.

One of the key reasons for the promotion of alternative energy sources is their potential to mitigate the negative environmental impacts associated with fossil fuels. Unlike fossil fuels, renewable energy sources produce little to no greenhouse gas emissions during operation, thereby reducing the contribution to climate change. For instance, countries like Germany have implemented strong incentives and subsidies to support the development of solar power, leading to a significant increase in the share of renewable energy in their energy mix. This shift towards cleaner sources of energy is driven by the recognition of the urgent need to combat climate change and reduce dependence on finite fossil fuel reserves.

The encouragement of alternative energy sources has numerous positive implications and is a positive trend. It promotes energy diversification, reducing reliance on a single energy source and increasing energy security. By harnessing the power of wind, solar, and other renewable sources, countries can decrease their vulnerability to fluctuations in fossil fuel prices and geopolitical tensions related to energy resources. Additionally, the transition to renewable energy stimulates innovation and job creation. As governments invest in renewable energy infrastructure and technologies, new industries and employment opportunities emerge.

In conclusion, the encouragement of alternative energy sources, such as wind and solar power, is driven by the need to address environmental concerns and promote sustainable development. By reducing greenhouse gas emissions, diversifying energy sources, and fostering economic growth, the adoption of renewable energy brings numerous benefits. Therefore, it is crucial for countries to continue investing in research, technology, and policy frameworks that support the widespread adoption of renewable energy, ensuring a cleaner and more sustainable energy future.

Sample 4:

Fossil fuel, though extensively used, is not eco-friendly, and its usage comes with huge environmental costs. Considering global warming and climate change, and the detrimental effects fossil fuels have on the environment, green fuel, such as solar, hydro and wind power, is increasingly being used in many countries. It is a good thing that many countries have already started using these green power sources.

The promotion of alternative sources of energy has gained significant momentum in numerous countries because of a growing concern about the adverse effects of fossil fuels on the environment such as greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution. Governments and environmental organizations recognize the urgent need to transition to cleaner and more sustainable energy options. For instance, countries like Germany have implemented ambitious renewable energy targets, investing heavily in wind and solar power to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels and combat climate change.

The stock of fossil fuels is limited and would get exhausted at a certain point. So, alternative and green sources, which are renewable, would be the main source of our energy in the future. Despite the shift from fossil fuel to green energy being expensive and labour-intensive, green energy like wind and solar energy is renewable, their use should be as much encouraged as possible from right now, and it is a good thing that the trend has already started. Alternative sources of power, such as solar and wind power, do not pollute the environment, have lower carbon emissions and are eco-friendly. So, their use could save the planet from the disaster of global warming which is already visible around us. Wind power and solar power are in use in countries like Denmark, Germany and France, and more and more countries are joining the list. We already have extremely efficient technology to produce solar and wind power, and the trend is quite encouraging.

To conclude, the energy demand is increasing at a fast pace, and the stock of fossil fuels is diminishing. So, we should turn to alternative green energy sources and share the technology and expertise with all nations so that the transition happens all around the world to save our otherwise dying planet due to climate change and greenhouse effects.

Sample 5:

Every year the energy demand is increasing globally. So, the strains on the current and already limited resources are high. Since these energy resources, like fossil fuels, are mostly imported by countries, some countries have opted for alternative sources of energy to enjoy greater energy security. I wholeheartedly believe that it is a positive trend.

Alternative sources of energy offer greater energy security and independence and that is why their production and use is increasing. Relying on traditional energy sources, often imported from other countries, can leave nations vulnerable to price fluctuations and geopolitical tensions. Embracing renewable energy sources, such as hydroelectric, geothermal, or biomass, allows countries to tap into their own natural resources and reduce dependence on foreign energy imports. This is why it has already gained popularity.

Fossil fuels, like coal and oil, are not unlimited. A few countries like Germany and Japan, for example, are completely dependent on the import of such resources. For all these countries, alternative energy, also known as green energy, is the answer for the future, and it is a welcoming trend that many countries have already started producing green energy. By embracing renewable energy options, countries can address climate change, enhance energy independence, create employment opportunities, and drive technological progress. Countries like France and Norway, among others, have invested in the technology needed to produce extremely efficient solar panels to store energy from the sun or produce wind power. The positive impacts of this development are innumerable, and many countries are following in their footsteps.

In conclusion, the use of green energy sources is gaining traction because many countries want to become energy self-sufficient. This is definitely a positive trend as it reduces reliance on energy imports, helps countries fight climate change, advances technology and creates more employment.

Sample 6:

These days, the environment is being severely affected by the excessive use of nonrenewable energy resources, such as petrol, diesel, coal and natural gas. However, eco-friendly and renewable power sources like wind and solar power are being adopted in many countries mainly because they do not harm the environment, and I wholeheartedly think that it is a positive trend.

The shift towards renewable energy sources in many countries is primarily to fight global warming and climate change. Fossil fuels are often the reason climate change is so severe and threatens the existence of humans on the mother planet. Many countries, including Germany, Norway and France, have adopted the use of green energy like solar and wind power to reduce our dependency on fossil fuels to save the environment.

It is a positive trend as it greatly reduces the carbon content of the environment and makes the planet more sustainable. Without extensive use of green energy, we will soon transform our planet into an uninhabitable one. To save our planet from destruction, we need to produce and use more green and renewable energy. Moreover, it is cheaper to produce such clean energy than to extract coal or natural gas which makes these eco-friendly energies affordable to mass people. A recent study by Oxford University reveals that the production of solar power is 30% cheaper than that of fossil fuel. This finding again emphasizes how important it is for all nations to opt for renewable energy sources, and how beneficial it is that many countries have already invested in generating clean power.

In conclusion, even though we have harmed our mother planet to a great extent by indiscriminately using fossil fuels, some countries have already shown us a better way to produce and use power. It is expected that more countries will invest in alternative sources of energy to make the planet green again and make energy affordable for all.

Sample 7:

While fossil fuels have been the backbone of our energy supply for centuries, they have severe harmful impacts on our environment. Therefore, some countries have started relying on green energy to reverse the situation. And it is a positive trend that we have started researching and using alternative sources of energy, also known as green energy, that are sustainable and do not cause long-term damage to our environment.

One of the main reasons alternative energy sources are being used to produce green energy in many countries is their ability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which are a major contributor to climate change. According to the International Energy Agency, the use of renewable energy sources can help reduce global CO2 emissions by up to 70% by 2050. This is a significant step towards protecting our planet from the devastating effects of climate change, including rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and loss of biodiversity.

The use of renewable sources to generate energy is a positive development for a variety of reasons. For instance, investing in renewable energy can also create jobs and boost the economy. According to the Renewable Energy and Jobs Annual Review 2020, the renewable energy sector employed around 11.5 million people worldwide in 2019, a 6% increase from the previous year. This growth in employment opportunities can help to stimulate local economies and provide new job opportunities for people in both developed and developing countries. For example, in Germany, the government's decision to phase out nuclear power plants and invest in renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar power, has created over 300,000 jobs and contributed to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.

In conclusion, the shift towards green energy sources is a positive development that can help to protect our environment and create new job opportunities. While it may take time and investment to transition away from fossil fuels, it is a necessary step to ensure a sustainable future for generations to come.

Sample 8:

Many nations are now supporting the adoption of various energy alternatives in order to reduce fossil fuel consumption. In my opinion, though there may be short-term economic downsides, this is a decidedly positive development due to the implications on the environment generally.

Those who feel the sudden adoption of alternative energies is a negative point out the financial repercussions. There are economies around the world that are currently dependent on exporting fossil fuels, in particular in The Middle East, South America, and Eastern Europe. Many of these countries are still developing and have few other natural resources or industries that could replace a decline in the energy sector. The economic effects will extend far beyond exporters though. Both developed and developing nations ranging from the United States and Vietnam to China and Russia exploit oil for private vehicles and various industries. Substituting cheap oil for a more expensive alternative might result in economic catastrophe with wide-ranging repercussions.

However, the environmental effect is overwhelmingly more important for the long-term health of the planet. The economic results of less dependence on fossil fuels will cause short-term problems but the issues caused by climate change are also becoming a present reality. For instance, there has been a rise in the number of cataclysmic natural disasters related to rising ocean temperatures and deforestation. Even more troubling are the less noticed problems such as habitats being destroyed in remote areas like Antarctica and the Amazon Rainforest. Beyond the animals becoming endangered and extinct, it is only a number of years before human life is affected. This existential threat is the reason alternative energies are a pressing need.

In conclusion, despite the economic drawbacks of a sudden shift to alternative power sources, this reorientation will have a markedly positive long-term impact on the environment. Governments should therefore implement and bolster alternative energy initiatives.

Sample 9:

The development of renewable energies like wind power, wave power, or solar energy to replace the electricity generated from burning fossil fuels has become an increasingly popular trend in the world. I believe this is a green movement in the energy sector with countless benefits that people should welcome.

The most palpable advantage one can recognize at once when mentioning renewable energies is that they reduce the burden on the environment. The use of solar power creates no emission at all, and thus provides for the need of power at almost no environmental cost. It is similarly clean and sustainable when wind, wave, and water moving around the Earth eternally can be used in energy production. Also, the independence from fossil fuels in electricity generation saves the world from a rapid depletion of coal, oil and natural gases, and slow down the imminent energy crisis which may even cause wars over energy sources among countries.

Moreover, the production of green energy also benefits individuals and the country as a whole. Thanks to less burning of fossil fuels in thermal energy plants, workers in energy companies face less risks of occupational health problems especially those related to respiratory diseases and may lead to early death. On the large scale of a country, the utilization of wind, wave, sunlight, and even geothermal heat to produce electricity will diversify the energy portfolio of different nations, making them free from reliance on limited natural resources to generate electricity due to their unfavourable geographical locations.

In conclusion, the movement of the world towards more use of renewable energy is completely positive when it solves multiple problems of environmental pollution, dependence on natural resources for energy, and poor health of workers in thermal power plants.

Sample 10:

Governments across continents have turned their attention to more sustainable sources of energy as alternatives to fossil fuels. In my opinion, this could be seen as a progress for the following reasons.

First, there is no arguing that producing energy from buried dead organisms lacks sustainability, which means such production could not guarantee the survival of humans in the long term. In fact, the consumption of energy generated from fossil fuels tends to accelerate in direct correlation with the growth of the world population. With the current rate of exploitation, this valuable resource would dwindle away in no time, leaving no other choice than seeking additional reserves such as nuclear power or hydroelectricity. This is a safe solution to the fear of energy scarcity and ensures the future development of the human race.

Second, dependence on fossil fuel for worldwide energy supply would cause environmental degradation while using solar power, for example, is considered an ultimate choice of energy conservation. The combustion of fossil fuels is the culprit of greenhouse gas emissions and other air pollutants, leading to tremendous damage to the environment. Such suffering of the Earth could not be justified by the growing need of humans. By contrast, this would never be the case when it comes to other alternatives as mentioned above. If governments continue to invest in exploiting those new sources, there will be an unlimited amount of inexpensive energy in the long run.

In conclusion, I believe that the use of other potential energy sources to replace fossil fuels is obviously an important step forward.

Sample 11:

Fossil fuels, such as coal, oil, and natural gas, are extensively used in many countries and cause harm to the environment. The use of alternative sources of energy, including wind and solar power, however, is being encouraged in many countries. Is this a positive or negative development?

In several nations, non-renewable sources of energy, namely coal, petroleum, and gasoline, are used inordinately, which is severely damaging the ecosystem. However, other countries are promoting the usage of non-conventional sources of power, such as wind and solar energy. I personally consider that this has been a positive development because the non-traditional approach will aid in efficient energy output and protect the ecosystem from feasible hazards.

Primarily, the remarkable advantage of the aforementioned alternative sources is that they are renewable. These energy sources have a constant supply of power and there is no requirement for significant raw materials. Although it could be argued that the initial cost of setting up solar panels and wind farms is extremely high, I would assert that once the installation cost has been met with, their maintenance is practically negligible. Apart from this, it is widely accepted that fossil fuels take millions of years to form, and once consumed, they cannot be re-used. To illustrate, if modern individuals burn immense petroleum and coal, these resources are likely to vanish, and future generations would not be capable of using these precious energy sources.

Another major benefit of eco-friendly energy sources is their non-polluting nature. The intensive usage of natural resources forms carbon emissions and emits noxious gases that are nurturing global warming and depleting the ozone layer. Even worse, by inhaling such poisonous gases and carbon fumes, human beings are susceptible to various health ailments such as asthma and lung cancer. However, when energy is harnessed from wind turbines and solar panels there are no such deleterious by-products. Unlike other automobiles, for instance, commuting through a solar car would not emit carbon dioxide.

In conclusion, not only do alternative sources provide an inordinate amount of energy supply constantly, but they also preserve the environment in a very effective way. Therefore, I completely believe that this trend is a wholly positive development and one that authorities ought to promote.

Sample 12:

In this day and age, the consumption of non-renewable resources is burgeoning day by day. Owing to this it reached an alarming rate. It takes millions of years to form. However, some nations are taking a step forward and using non-conventional sources of power. This essay will highlight that this is certainly an optimistic approach that needs to be opted.

At the outset, non-conventional sources can be recycled and utilized again. Although, the use of alternative sources has some hurdles like the initial cost of setting up solar panels and wind farms is very high and these also rely on geographical locations. When masses use this energy source for a long period of time, the energy can be renewed and produced, no extra cost will have more economic benefit than the others. Besides this, the use of renewable energy could help to conserve foreign exchange and generate local employment if conservation technologies are designed, manufactured, assembled, and installed locally.

Moving further, alternative sources- wind power, tidal power, solar power – sources are totally safe for the environment, have lower carbon emission, and are eco-friendly. The research concluded that there are some countries that have utilized alternative sources namely German, France, and Denmark as these nations save the planet from a disaster of global warming. Some countries use automobile cars that work on solar power. Consequently, it has reduced the carbon footprint of such countries and made its greenery.

Based on this study it can be reiterated that the use of alternative sources of energy is an optimistic evolvement, which can save the whole globe from the catastrophic impact of greenhouse emissions as well as global warming. Furthermore, more and more folks should adopt renewable sources to ameliorate the conditions of the environment. In this way, by taking joint efforts individuals can preserve the world.

Sample 13:

Due to the shortage of fossil fuels, whether other natural power resources should be encouraged to harness or not, becomes a paramount concern for many countries. I believe, while this advancement may decrease awareness among people about protecting the fuels, it also solves the problem of the lack of energy sources.

First of all, fossil fuels which are the major energy resources in many nations are facing the threats of becoming obsolete due to the overuse by the human race in daily life. As a result, people should be encouraged to raise awareness of fuel conservation. However, the utilization of alternative natural energy sources could prevent people from doing this by reducing the fears of coal or oil that might be running out. Because there are other sources to use, they would use more energy generated from gas or oil without hesitation. In my personal opinion, the negative sides of using different resources of power could deteriorate the shortage of fuels.

Harnessing alternative power sources (such as solar or wind power), in contrast, could reduce the usage of fossil fuels in generating energy for a range of demanding activities such as heating and driving. While coal and oil mines are limited, natural resources such as wind and solar power are considered unlimited. This wind power or solar energy is consequently able to produce enough energy for human demand without the help of fossil fuels. As a result, it should be encouraged to be utilized in more countries in the world to gradually cut down the usage of fossil fuels.

To sum up, the encouragement of using natural resources (such as solar or wind) for producing energy has both negative and positive sides. However, I deem that humankind should consider using more power from solar or wind and less from coal and gas to protect the remaining parts of fossil fuels.

Sample 14:

Coals, oil, and gas are some fossil fuels that are the most common sources of energy for the majority of countries. On the other hand, some countries encourage the use of renewable resources like wind and solar energy. I believe this is a strongly positive development as we will be in grave danger if the world runs out of these natural non-renewable resources like fossil fuels.

Fossil fuels are used in almost all industries and for running motor vehicles. We can minimize this by using alternatives wherever possible. If it goes on like this, we will soon have such a shortage of these fuels that can pose a threat to running things efficiently. For example, some industries can only run on coal or oil, though this is not the case for cars. Automobiles can easily run on electricity, and so we should limit the use of such fuels. Burning too much of these fossil fuels also contributes to air pollution. Thus, it is important to minimize usage wherever possible.

On the other hand, wind energy and solar energy take comparatively longer time to generate, and they are largely dependent on the sun and the wind. We do not have any control over them, so the production of goods might slow down if there is less generation of energy as we cannot, in fact, control the weather. Perhaps tropical countries, where there is an abundant amount of sunshine and wind, can be encouraged to use these natural sources and not waste fossil fuels. However, for temperate climates, this might not be an option. Dependency on nature can have slower production rates and lead to not meeting the deadline or having scarcity in the market.

On the whole, I believe all the countries should be aware of the hazards of wasting too much of our natural reserves of energy and use them consciously and responsibly. Initiatives such as building consciousness about the issue should be taken to build a more environmentally friendly atmosphere.

Sample 15:

Fossil fuels harm the environment and to save our planet we need to encourage the use of green energy. The use of alternative sources of energy, or ‘green’ energy, is a positive trend of development, and indeed their use should be encouraged further.

As the demand for energy worldwide is increasing the strains on the existing and already limited resources also increase. To solve this problem, we must consider two issues: how to better use the existing, limited fossil fuel resources and how we can encourage the use of alternative energy sources.

It is universally acknowledged that there is a limitation on the use of fossil fuels, especially coal and oil. Some countries are rich in oil deposits like OPEC, whereas China is rich in coal deposits and Russia in natural gas. Others, such as Japan and Germany, are completely dependent on the import of resources. For all countries- resource-rich versus resource-poor, alternative energy should be encouraged and utilised to reduce the dependence on fossil fuels as well as to keep the global environment in balance and ‘healthy’.

The only way is to turn to other sources to get energy supply. Wind power and solar power are at present feasible alternatives. France is one country that has the advanced technology needed to produce extremely efficient solar panels to store energy from the sun. Both kinds of power can reduce a country’s dependence on fossil fuels. Furthermore, they do not pollute the environment and in turn, help keep the ecosystem stable.

To conclude, while fossil fuel resources are diminishing, the energy demand continues to increase year after year. It is a positive trend to develop other alternative sources of power and experiences should be shared and promoted. If this switch to alternative energy is encouraged early enough, then we may yet avoid the pending energy crisis and environmental disaster.

Lời giải

Sample 1:

It is argued that watching television has an adverse impact on children, whereas other people believe that it brings various benefits to them. I personally agree with the second group.

On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why some people think that children’s development would be negatively affected by watching TV. The first reason is that sitting in front of TV screens for too long is detrimental to children’s health. Many kids these days suffer from various health problems such as obesity, eye strain or fatigue due to prolonged television watching. Another reason is that many TV programmes and movies contain violent contents or sexual images which are inappropriate for children to watch. Heavy exposure to violent movies can put a child at a higher risk of violent behaviour, which could ruin their future.

On the other hand, I personally believe that television has an essential role to play in the development of children. Watching educational TV programmes gives children the opportunity to widen their horizons and enrich their knowledge of the world they live in. Planet Earth and Discovery Channel are prime examples. Their programmes not only take the viewer into unknown natural habitats which are home to various plants and animals, but also educate them about the importance of preserving the wonders of the Earth. In addition, many TV shows and channels provide children with limitless knowledge of almost every aspect of life. A programme called ‘Talent show for kids?’, for example, not only gives children enjoyable moments but also informs them about various subjects.

In conclusion, although some people say that watching TV is harmful to children, I would argue that it is very beneficial for them.

Sample 2:

The matter of screen time for children is open to debate, with some arguing against it while others highlight the benefits it could bring. This essay will examine both stances and present my personal opinion on the issue.

There exist certain health risks associated with TV-viewing for children. In terms of physical health conditions, excessive screen time can result in a wide range of health problems, from eye strain and back pain from prolonged periods in front of the TV, to weight gain and lethargy due to lack of exercise. These risks are also present in the adult population, but much more worrying for young children, who often lack self-control and thus are more prone to addiction. Regarding their mental well-being, children could develop behavioural problems from exposure to explicit content on screen, especially when there is no parental control installed on the device. The effects of violent or sexual acts on young minds are well- documented, with disobedience, aggression, and risk-taking tendencies being the most common issues.

Nevertheless, the advantages of watching TV for children should not be dismissed. One of the most significant benefits is language acquisition. The availability of shows in native tongue or foreign languages, coupled with subtitles and audio-visual aids, allows young children to grasp new vocabulary, as well as its usage. In fact, many children in Vietnam have eagerly learned English from watching shows from channels like Disney and Cartoon Network. Aside from language, TV shows also offer knowledge on numerous areas, including science, environment, history, etc. Vivid imagery and amusing delivery of hosts on kids' educational shows can help children better understand difficult concepts like multiplication compared to traditional textbooks.

In conclusion, after considering both sides of the argument, I believe that children stand to benefit academically from TV shows; however, to minimise the potential drawbacks of screen time, parental guidance and supervision are needed.

Sample 3:

It is pointed out that some individuals believe that viewing television apparently has an adverse bearing on children, while others argue that it brings numerous benefits. This essay discusses both points of view before shedding light on why I side with the latter view.

On the one hand, watching television is conspicuously conductive to children in terms of inventiveness and also enhances language development. To begin with, conveying knowledge through television gives children exposure to a plethora of cultures and perspectives, hence fostering creativity through imaginative storytelling. It is apparent that some television programmes such as Cartoon Network often feature interactive activities and problem-solving challenges, and thus inspire children to think outside the box and explore their creativity. Furthermore, the collosal of children's TV programs incorporate repetition, which is a key element in language reception. To elaborate further, repeated interaction with words, sentences and concepts helps reinforce learning and thus linguistic development.

On the other hand, viewing television takes a toll on children in terms of their mental and also physical health. To start with, TV shows have a lot of negative content that cannot be avoided and thus when the children are exposed to this content such as pornagraphy content that directly affects people who are almost in puberty. A propelling testament of the harmful impact that exposure to erotic material can be captivating to their developing minds, potentially evoking sexual desires that could lead to annulment for their mind and also their mental health. Moreover, viewing television can have disadvantages for children due to binge-watching and prolonged exposure to screen time, which may lead to sedentary behavior and a lack of physical activity. As a result, excessive TV watching can impact attention span, interfere with sleep patterns and even nearsightedness.

In conclusion, both perspectives hold their justifications. From my point of view, I firmly believe that prioritizing their health for the long-term life should outweigh the sake of television brings. Ultimately, moderation and content selection are key.

Sample 4:

In today’s modern society, the issue of whether watching television is beneficial or detrimental to children has sparked a controversial debate. While some individuals argue that television viewing has negative effects on youngsters, I firmly believe that it can be an educational tool for children. In this essay, I will present my reasons to support this viewpoint.

Firstly, television offers a wide range of educational programs that can enhance children’s knowledge and cognitive development. Channels dedicated to educational content, such as documentaries, science programs, and historical shows, provide valuable information that can expand children’s understanding of the world. By watching these programs, children can learn about diverse cultures, scientific concepts, and historical events, fostering their intellectual growth. For instance, renowned educational programs like “Planet Earth” or “Cosmos” captivate young audiences and expose them to the wonders of nature and the universe.

Secondly, television can serve as a powerful medium to promote creativity and imagination among children. Many animated series and children’s shows encourage imaginative thinking and storytelling. By watching these programs, youngsters can be inspired to create their own stories, draw pictures, or engage in imaginative play. This imaginative process is crucial for their cognitive and emotional development, allowing them to explore their creativity and express themselves in unique ways. Moreover, educational cartoons often incorporate moral lessons, teaching children important values such as honesty, empathy, and teamwork.

However, it is important to acknowledge the potential drawbacks of excessive television viewing. Parents should exercise responsible supervision and ensure that children have a balanced viewing experience. Excessive exposure to violent or inappropriate content can have adverse effects on children’s behavior and mental well-being. Therefore, parents should guide their children’s television choices, set limits on screen time, and encourage participation in other activities such as outdoor play, reading, or social interaction.

In conclusion, despite the concerns raised by some individuals, I am of the opinion that watching television can be educational for children. The availability of educational programs and the promotion of creativity and imagination outweigh the potential negative effects. However, parental guidance and responsible viewing habits are crucial to ensure a well-rounded development for children. By striking a balance between television viewing and other activities, children can benefit from the educational and imaginative aspects of television while avoiding its potential pitfalls.

Sample 5:

There is much debate regarding the effects of TV viewing on children. In my opinion, when watched in moderation, educational TV shows can be beneficial for children because they help them develop positive values as they grow up.

On the one hand, those who believe that TV viewing harms children in every way may argue that it is a passive activity that encourages sedentary behavior and limits meaningful play. This can lead to a range of problems, such as poor health and cognitive development. However, I believe that this argument is only valid if children spend too much time in front of the screen. Parents can protect their children from the potential dangers of TV viewing by setting reasonable time limits and providing adequate supervision.

On the other hand, there are people who argue that many TV programs are educational and can instill good values in children. For example, Disney movies often portray characters with admirable traits, such as courage, kindness, and perseverance, which can inspire children to emulate these values and become better individuals. This has led me to believe that educational & television programs can be excellent tools for teaching children moral lessons as they grow and develop. Many children find traditional forms of education boring or difficult, but the visual and interactive nature of TV can make learning more engaging and enjoyable.

In conclusion, although prolonged passive television viewing can be detrimental, watching educational TV shows in moderation can have a positive impact on children's development. Such shows can effectively impart valuable lessons and teach positive values in an engaging and entertaining manner.

Sample 6:

The role of television in children's development has been a subject of ongoing debate, with some individuals vehemently opposing it, while others advocate for its potential benefits. From my perspective, television can be beneficial if appropriately utilised.

Those who argue against children watching television often raise valid points. Primarily, they cite the negative impacts on children's physical health as a concern. With prolonged screen time, children are less likely to engage in physical activity, potentially leading to health issues such as obesity. Furthermore, they worry about the influence of harmful content. Children, being impressionable, can easily internalise violent or inappropriate behaviour depicted in certain shows, leading to negative behavioural outcomes.

On the other hand, advocates for children's television viewing highlight its educational benefits. Many television programmes are designed to be both entertaining and instructive, providing children with a wealth of knowledge about the world, aiding their cognitive development. Shows that portray different cultures, wildlife, or scientific concepts can stimulate children's curiosity and broaden their understanding. Television can also teach moral values and social skills through well-crafted narratives and character interactions.

In my opinion, the key lies in moderation and guidance. While unrestricted, unmonitored television viewing can indeed have detrimental effects, a balanced approach can turn television into a valuable educational tool. Parents and caregivers should control the amount of screen time and ensure that the content children watch is age-appropriate and beneficial.

In conclusion, while the concerns about children watching television are justified, its potential as a developmental tool cannot be dismissed. The onus is on parents and caregivers to utilise it judiciously to foster a balanced growth environment for children.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Vietjack official store
Đăng ký gói thi VIP

VIP +1 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 1 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +3 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 3 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +6 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 6 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +12 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 12 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay