Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 1,157 Lưu

Today, TV channels provide more men’s sports shows than women’s sport shows. Why? Should TV channels give equal time for women’s sport and men’s sport?

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

Television channels today regularly devote more airtime to men’s sporting events than women’s. Personally, I believe that the reasons for this are financial, and whilst efforts should be made to give equal time to men’s and women’s sports, viewership means that this would be a difficult task.

Firstly, the main consideration of television channels and studio executives to prioritise men's sports is viewership, as more views mean more advertising revenue. Television channels need to make a decision on how best to utilize the amount of time they have in order to secure the highest ratings, and the reality is that men’s sports tend to be more popular than women’s sports. The men’s World Cup Finals, for example, had viewership in the billions, whilst this number was much lower for the womens’ World Cup. Since TV channels’ main purpose is to make money, it is not difficult to see why they would prefer to showcase men’s sports over women’s.

However, there is the consideration that giving women sports more publicity can help to alter public perception over time. If something gets a huge amount of newspaper, radio, and television coverage for decades, it is unsurprising that it would eventually become popular. Therefore, what may help make the world of sports coverage less divided would be to report more on women’s sports and to increase its airtime. The overwhelming popularity of women’s football in the United States, for example, provides a stunning testament to the ability of the media to be able to thrust women’s sports into the limelight. Applying this method to other sports might mean they can become popular as well.

In conclusion, I argue that the reason why men’s sports have been given more coverage than women’s is due to ratings playing a fundamental role in how media companies operate. Nonetheless, by shifting the attention to female sports, the media can make them as successful as men’s sports in the long run.  

Sample 2:

These days, there is a significant difference between men and women’s sports coverage on television channels. I believe that women’s sports should get just as much coverage as men’s and will outline my reasons in the following essay.

To begin with, there are many reasons for the dominance of men over women’s sports programs on TV. Due to a large proportion of male sports viewers, TV channels tend to produce sports programs for men to maximize their ratings and profits. Take football as an example. When entering a coffee shop, it is easy to catch groups of men having discussions about a recent men’s football match, while women show greater preference for shopping or lifestyle channels. Besides, because men usually perform better than women in sports such as boxing and bodybuilding, they play at a much higher level, which makes men’s sports more exciting to watch.

On the other hand, I am of the opinion that it is necessary for TV channels to provide equal coverage for both genders. First, it creates gender equality in society and increases the rate of women’s sports participation. In fact, every time women go out on the field, they give it their all knowing that their best will likely go unnoticed. Therefore, just like men, female athletes should receive full recognition for their effort. Secondly, better TV coverage also enables women to make money off from endorsements and enhance their living standard. That is to say, more TV exposure for the female players will lead to major deals with endorsers and higher salaries in the future through advertising contracts.

In conclusion, why women’s sports shows do not receive enough coverage in this day and age results from those aforementioned reasons, and I truly believe that it is necessary to ensure equal coverage of women’s sports.

Sample 3:

These days, when it comes to sport, a higher number of games played by men are broadcast, compared to that of women. A growing number of people having more interest in men’s sporting events is the main reason for this and I believe that equal attention should be paid to women’s sport.

The major factor leading television producers to prioritise men’s sport is the audience watching male athletes competing considerably outnumbers people watching shows of their female counterparts. More viewers mean more profits, advertising contracts and sponsorship investments for the TV channels broadcasting the shows. Take football in Vietnam as an example. Men’s football match at the 30th SEA games attracted millions of people both from different parts of Vietnam and other neighbouring countries, while the figure for women’s match was significantly lower. Giving men’s sport a higher priority is, therefore, a wise strategy to earn large profits and attract more investment.

However, I would argue that TV coverage should not be biased towards men’s sport and that female athletes should be given equal opportunities. If men’s sports programmes continue to receive significantly more coverage than the programmes of their opposite sex, it might increase gender inequality, which is one of the most serious issues in many parts of the world today. Another thing is that there has been a dramatic increase in the number of people who have interests in women’s sport in recent years, and hence, television coverage should focus more on this area.

In conclusion, a wider audience watching men’s sports channels is the most important reason why TV producers provide more men’s shows than women’s shows, and I am of the opinion that there should be a greater equality in the coverage of men’s and women’s sport.

Sample 4:

It is true that men’s sport events generally receive wider coverage from media outlets, particularly television, than those of women. I personally believe that although TV channels are tempted to broadcast men’s sport more because of its greater appeal to viewers, women’s sport should be given equal airtime.

To begin with, sport events with male participants are admittedly more entertaining and competitive in most cases, which makes them more attractive to TV viewers and, therefore, TV stations. With their superior physical strength, sportsmen are able to perform skilful but taxing feats that most sportswomen cannot when they compete. For instance, it is common to see a male football player deftly dribble the ball with great speed multiple times during a match, something that female football players do not do very often due to the lack of stamina.

That being said, ignoring women’s sport events is, in my opinion, discriminatory and unjust. Just like those of their male counterparts, women’s sport events deserve public attention and media coverage, not because they are exciting to watch but because it is a sign of equality between sportspeople of both genders. Furthermore, giving more time for female sport shows might encourage more girls and women to partake in sports and motivate female athletes to always improve their skills and competence, thereby enhancing the quality of these events. This, in turn, will possibly attract more coverage as well as investment in female sport shows.

In conclusion, despite being less appealing to the general television viewer, women’s sport events should still be given as much airtime as those of men to promote equality and encourage their development in the future.

Sample 5:

Some people say that TV should present an equitable amount of showtime for women’s and men’s sports. In this essay, I will explain why I think it is not a good idea.

People who support the idea of equal coverage of male and female athletes on TV think that this would empower the women’s role in sport and discourage gender discrimination. They assumed that if the media gave more exposure to female sporting events, it would arouse public attention to women’s sports, thereby decreasing the gap between women’s and men’s sports. However, it is a fact that men still play an important role and they are the overwhelming majority of sports participants despite some improvements in the proportion of airtime covered by women sports. Therefore, if one believes that a quantitative change in showtime might promote gender equality in sports, I think that they are too optimistic, and the situation is much more complicated.

I believe that the root cause for less coverage on women’s sports lies on the fact that female athletes are barely acknowledged and have been stigmatised because of their sex and household duties. As a result, their participation in sports is not welcomed in some countries or is even devalued in media reports. A research also pointed out that the performance of women in athletic competition is considered as less important and less exciting by women themselves, let alone men. TV and the mass media are simply driven by what their audience wants, so the situation will look rosy, provided that we give women’s sport a stronger preference and an acknowledgement.

In conclusion, while increasing the showtime of women’ sports seems to be a too simple option, it is better to raise the public awareness about female sports to end gender discrimination.

Sample 6:

When watching sports channels on TV, there appears to be a clear disparity between male and female sportsmen these days. This essay will first discuss the origins of this unbalanced situation, and then it will consider whether broadcast authorities have a responsibility to reduce gender inequality. There are currently a large number of TV networks that broadcast men's sports rather than women's games. Several reasons may be contributing to this tendency; I would say that TV channels should equalise the amount of time spent on men's and women's competition shows.

To begin, this is mostly due to the fact that male sports are more popular than those practised by female athletes. There is an outdated stereotype that physical activities are exclusive for guys. Although certain competitive female sports, such as rhythmic gymnastics and figure skating, are actively publicised, many sports women are generally regarded as outsiders in various professions, such as football and swimming. In the case of women's soccer in South Korea, even after the national team achieved first place, just a few media sources covered the storey.

On the one hand, there are some reasons why this occurs. To begin with, men's sports have more viewers than women's games, which may cause TV stations to prioritise men's athletics shoes. For example, in football, men's matches draw millions of viewers, whereas women's matches draw far less. As a result, in order to improve rates, TV broadcasters would emphasise men's sports shows. If television networks pay more attention to women's sports, they may lose money. Furthermore, many people believe that sports are only for males because they require strength, stamina, and agility. This could lead to a decrease in the number of women competing in sports compared to men. As a result, the number of girls playing the game is insufficient to propagate.

To go on to the following problem, stations must make an effort to equalise the broadcasting hours of the two different sexes. As a result, society can compensate for the dearth of strong female role models that young people perceive succeeding in their careers. As a result, future great athletes who show promise as children will be nurtured. Figure skating, for example, was once considered an unattractive sport in South Korea, but since the appearance of Yuna Kim, the best figure skater in the world, it has grown in popularity to be the most favoured winter Olympic sport in South Korea, and a number of teenagers have begun to train to become figure skaters.

To summarise, the imbalance in sports programming on television is generated by the popularity of athletes. From my perspective, it is critical for media firms to broadcast both male and female athletes without bias in order to promote the field of women's exercise. In conclusion, while some factors may force TV channels to devote more time to men's sports, I believe television should devote equal time to both.

Sample 7:

In today's modern world, there are various reasons why TV coverage tends to make sports shoes for men while women are underrepresented. I believe that television channels should devote equal attention to shows of both genders.

There are numerous reasons why males are paid more than women in sports that are broadcast on television. To begin with, males have more time than females. Obviously, women are usually responsible for their children and families, therefore they do not set aside time to watch television. For example, Vietnamese women are frequently conventional females who spend money on the family; as a result, husbands can watch television. Second, creating sports programmes for men provides more benefits in terms of finance. Males clearly have more favourite sports than girls. For example, as the shares of money climb, so do the rates of watching sports shows.

Sports broadcasters, in my opinion, should have the same air hours for men and women. The first is that women are getting more modern in today's society, and as a result, they are beginning to focus on self-care through exercise. For example, thanks to television sports programmes, ladies can practise at home instead of going to sports centres. The second point is that women are more likely to participate in sports; therefore, broadcasters should produce more sports shows to encourage ladies to exercise more frequently.

In conclusion, broadcasters have a tendency to do more sports shoes for men than for women for a variety of reasons, including the fact that men have more leisure time than women and sports programmes for men earn more money. TV coverage, in my opinion, should establish broadcast times for both gender equality because the number of women watching sports is increasing and women need to participate in sports.

Sample 8:

Gender equality on television sports networks has been skewed over the years. This tendency, I feel, has its own set of reasons; yet I strongly believe that female athletes should be given more televised time.

Although gender equality has come a long way, including UNESCO's designation of sport and physical activities as a human right in 1978, gender equality in sports is still far from complete, particularly in television shows. There are, in my opinion, two major causes of this problem. To begin with, male sports always receive more attention from the audience; as a result, TV producers have a broader strategy to display men's games on their networks. As a result, these programmes received increased media attention and sponsorship cash. Second, some people argue that "women's sports aren't interesting enough." Despite the fact that women's sports are becoming more popular, some people say that "no matter how hardy a sportswoman may be, her body is not cut out to absorb certain shocks." Consider the Women's World Cup soccer final from last July. With almost 25.4 million people, it was the most viewed soccer match - or men's women's - ever in the United States. Nonetheless, the players were paid significantly less than their male counterparts.

However, I'd like to highlight two reasons why we should pay greater attention to women's sports shows. For starters, the more female athletes there are in sports, the more female audiences are driven to exercise on a regular basis. It has the potential to have a long-term impact on women's health and contribute to a healthy lifestyle in the community. Second, everyone should have the same opportunities to be anything they choose to be. There should be no discrimination in athletics, business, or in life. Gender should not be used to define us or prevent us from expressing our talents.

To summarise, the domination of men's athletics on television has been monetarily beneficial to programme producers while also meeting the need of mass viewers. As a result, in order to ensure the long-term growth of a healthy lifestyle and equal rights for both genders, producers must plan a balanced programming schedule for both genders.

Sample 9:

It is common practice for most TV networks to focus more on men’s athletics rather than women’s. In my opinion, this is a natural byproduct of the history of sports and there should be more equal emphasis depending on the sport in question.

Men’s sports are more popular because they have developed further. In the past, athletics was always the primary domain of men and women were relegated to more domestic roles. Modern society understands this was discriminatory but the result, higher quality of play among male sports, cannot be argued. A good example of this would be professional basketball where the male leagues, such as the NBA, feature some of the greatest athletes in the world, executing complex coaching schemes, and consistently showcasing high skill levels. Women’s basketball, while it has developed considerably in the last two decades, is not the same level of entertainment though this may change in the coming years.

As this situation may require time to remedy, only the ratings can justify equal programming time. There are sports where this is already the case essentially, such as tennis, where women receive equal prize money, and the ratings are comparable. In the United States, this also applies for international football tournaments, where the female team regularly advances far beyond their male counterparts. In these examples, it is warranted to give female athletics at least, if not more, broadcast time. However, mandating this policy for all sports before they are ready, and the audience exists is likely to produce a strong backlash and in fact hinder the progress of women’s sports.

In conclusion, there are institutional reasons for the disparity in the time television channels dedicate to men’s and women’s sports and this should be corrected on a case-by-case basis. Viewers will decide themselves which sports deserve the most attention, regardless of gender.

Sample 10:

TV networks have been prioritizing men’s sport programmes over those of women. Several factors are responsible for this gap in popularity, and I do not think that both deserve an equal amount of air time.

This imbalance by TV stations is believed to emerge from financial interest.

As men’s sports shows are generally more well-received than women’s, the channels have to satisfy the market by showing more of such programmes to generate more revenue. This dominance of men’s sports over their counterparts in TV shows demand stems from the differences in male and female preferences, which is males are often into sports while females are not. Obviously, having a low player pool means that women’s sports shows have less to offer to the audience, bringing less profits to TV providers when compared to men’s. For example, the Men’s World Cup, which is a quadrennial international football event, is broadcast all over the world while Female’s World cup is often neglected by TV providers. It is commercial benefits that incentivize TV channels to favour the Men’s World Cup to Women’s.

It is not advisable that TV channels impose the same broadcast time for two categories as the decision should be based on the commercial potential. If TV channels cut down the airtime of men’s sports shows to force a statistically balanced amount for both genders, they could face losses in revenue. This reduction in profit is due to the viewers’ lack of interest in women’s sports. As the shift is implemented, the viewers who have no interest in women’s sports are unlikely to welcome women’s sports shows, thus, possibly cancelling their subscription to the channel.

In conclusion, the uneven airtime between men’s and women’s sports shows could be explained from an economic standpoint. It is also not beneficial for TV channels to push a balanced airtime for both shows in terms of finance.

Sample 11:

In today’s TV shows, one of the most interesting and well-known genres for people is sports. However, instead of presenting equal amount for men’s sports shows and women’s sports shows, TV programmers tend to increase airtime for men’s sports shows. The reason and further discussion of this phenomenon will be addressed in this essay.

The reason why women’s sports shows are fewer than men’s sports shows is based on two characters: the participants and the viewers. It’s undeniably true that men are stronger than women, so they play sport better than women. Men have the tendency to involve in sports that is physically demanding, which attracts more viewers because those sports are enticing to watch, especially when the players score a goal. For example, men play sports that highly demand strength such as baseball, weightlifting and American football. Although women do play these sports but because of the weaker strength, a women’s sport show seem to not attractive as men’s ones. Moreover, the viewers of sports shows are usually men, while women prefer soap opera, reality shows or game shows.

Although providing equal time for both shows does encourage the women’s sports shows, considering the positive and negative effect, I still stand on the other side. Due to all of the reasons above, I strongly believe that we should not provide equal time for men’s sports and women’s sports. If people provide equal time for both shows and the viewers are not interested in women’s ones, they will not continue watching the shows and as a result, the view rate decreases, and a huge amount of money is wasted.

In conclusion, that women’s sports shows are fewer than men’s sports shows has its own reasons. And people should not change the situation which only makes things worse.

Sample 12:

For a long time, television coverage of men's sports has drastically increased while female sports receive little media coverage. This essay will mention the two reasons for this tendency, along with my opinion in support of increasing women's sports coverage.

To begin with, two main factors can be proposed to explain this trend. First, men's sports have such a long-term development that players' skills are improved and become professional while women's sports only begin to be popular within half a decade. Therefore, TV channels will earn a huge amount of money if they prioritize men's sports shows which are more eagerly awaited than women's. Second, as the sport's viewers mostly are men, broadcasters will maximize profits by casting their favorite shows, men's sports competition shows. It is not difficult to come across a men's group in a discussion of recent men's football matches in a cafe while women are rarely seen talking about sports shows.

Although women's shows are less popular, I am convinced that these shows should have opportunities to be broadcast widely. On one hand, in the modern era, as gender equality is a hot topic, TV show producers can gain more attention and benefit their channels by increasing content relevant to women's matches to ensure gender equality. On the other hand, the trend of gender equalization in various fields including sports is rising. broadcasters, as well as viewers, should support sports shows for women, as a good way to educate younger generations about gender nondiscrimination in general and equality in sports showtime.

In conclusion, while gender priority in sports shows can bring channels more money, they should balance the showtime not only for their own advantage but also for the community.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Some argue that offering free bus and rail passes to all who need them is the best solution to traffic congestion. While this might be effective for many, I believe the government should also explore other strategies to address this problem.

On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.

However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.

In conclusion, while providing free public transportation can indeed help reduce traffic, it should not be the sole focus of government efforts to solve this issue.

Sample 2:

It is generally believed that if the government wants to solve the traffic congestion problem, the most effective solution is to provide free public transportation, such as buses and trains. In my opinion, I agree with this idea because it really helps to ease the situation.

Firstly, I believe that free public transportation can reduce people's dependence on cars and improve traffic congestion. People who live outside the city centre tend to go to work because there are no buses or train stations around the area. Therefore, the government should consider building railway and bus lanes to cover all remote areas. In addition, dedicated lanes can be allocated to buses to avoid traffic jams. For example, Japan has done a very good job with its advanced subway system. Their stations are always overcrowded, and trains and buses are always on time. People rarely own cars and they rely on public transportation.

Secondly, the government should always carry out publicity activities to promote the advantages of using free public transportation. By doing so, people can break the mentality that public transportation is dirty, slow, and unreliable. As long as more people know, the transportation system is well designed, more comfortable and more convenient; people will soon start using public transportation. For example, Singapore has implemented 24/7 free public transportation, and its roads are unobstructed.

In short, I firmly believe that free transportation will reduce congestion by promoting awareness-raising campaigns and investment in buses and trains. Although it is a difficult task for the government to implement free public transportation in the community, once the government implements it successfully, it will have a major impact on everyone's life.

Sample 3:

Today with the increasing population and the exponential growth of urbanization, the transportation needs of the people have increased rapidly. Due to increasing transportation and the need for vehicles, traffic congestion has become a major problem of the countries with increasing populations. Therefore, looking into the problem deeply, I find that the best way to control this traffic congestion is for the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities. There are certain reasons for increasing traffic congestion as discussed below.

Firstly, the faster pace of population growth has increased the demand for more vehicles on the road. Since the transport facilities are less as compared to the people traveling, the demands have increased day by day which has contributed to more vehicles on the road and hence contributing to traffic congestion. Secondly, the increasing urbanization has caused more of the rural population to migrate to urban cities and metropolitan cities to find jobs and work. This increased migration of the population to urban cities is also one of the major causes of the traffic congestion on roads. For example, metropolitan cities of India like Delhi, Mumbai, Ahmedabad are highly traffic-congested cities of India due to increased urbanization and rapid migration of the rural population.

Traffic congestion is one of the major causes of carbon dioxide emission and increasing global warming of the earth. The harmful gases emitted from these vehicles pollute the environment. For example, the highly populated city of India is Delhi due to increased traffic congestion. The government must provide free transportation facilities to reduce the number of private vehicles on the road and must also encourage the population to compulsorily use these free public transportation facilities to reduce the problem of traffic congestion. Besides, in public transport, the use of environmentally-friendly electric vehicles like metro services, electric trains, electric buses, and taxis must be encouraged instead of fuel vehicles to reduce the emission of harmful gases in the environment.

Therefore, after analyzing all the points above, the conclusion drawn upon is that traffic congestion is the major problem faced by many countries at large and the best solution to this problem is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities to the people.

Sample 4:

The population has been increasing day by day and with the increasing number of people, urbanization is also at its peak. In such situations, the huge demands of vehicles have caused rapid traffic congestion on roads. However, some people argue that the best way to control traffic congestion is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, but in my opinion, this may not be the correct way to control the traffic congestion.

Some of the major reasons for traffic congestion are urbanization and the migration of the people. This has caused an increased demand for vehicles in the market. Nowadays people tend to travel a lot, and, in such conditions, they find it easier to use their own vehicles rather than opting for public transport. A survey conducted in China states that a majority of people prefer their own vehicles rather than public transport and this has increased more vehicles on road contributing to the traffic congestions. Secondly, people find it easy to carry their own vehicle to travel to different corners of the country as it is more comfortable than public transport. Also, the conditions of the public transport facilities have also deteriorated, they are also very congestive and unhygienic. Besides, the public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners due to non motorable roads and hence, the best option for traveling to these areas are the private vehicles. Secondly, private vehicles like cars and motorbikes have become more affordable and budget-friendly for people.

For the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, it will be a big burden on their exchequer. Instead, the government must focus on other measures like encouraging bicycles for school and college-going students, build wide tracks with separate lanes, build more expressways and flyovers to reduce the congestion. Also, they must subsidize the public transport fares but not completely free. A separate track for pedestrians and cyclists must be built to limit the number of vehicles on the road. Besides, an awareness campaign must be launched to inform people of the traffic rules and safety measures. Strict traffic rules must be followed, and a compulsorily fine system should be introduced.

Instead of providing free transport facilities for the public, the above-mentioned measures must be given more importance.

Sample 5:

To reduce traffic congestion, the government must provide free transport facilities to the public. But this step can be moderately implemented to reduce the congestion on roads. Some other measures should also be taken in equal proportion to deal with the issue of traffic congestion. Therefore, the statement, Government should provide 24/7 free public transportation to reduce traffic congestion is moderately correct. There are several reasons for the increasing traffic congestion on roads as mentioned below.

Population in many of the developing countries like India and China has been increasing at an alarming rate. This has caused an increasing number of people on the road either using public transport, their own vehicles or pedestrians resulting in increased traffic congestion. Also, a large-scale migration of the population to urban cities for work had deteriorated the traffic conditions of big cities. Secondly, the fares of the public transport are quite high compared to the service they render and are more congested and unhygienic. Now, when automobiles have become more affordable and fuel-efficient, people opt for quality and comfort over public facilities. Thirdly, people have started to travel more these days and public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners of the cities or towns. In such situations what people find better is the use of the facilities of the private vehicle. However, the use of private vehicles has resulted in increased traffic congestion and besides, these are the major cause of concern as they contribute to the emission of harmful gases polluting the environment.

To deal with the problem of traffic congestion, providing only free public transport may not contribute much. Besides, the government must encourage the use of electric vehicles and bicycles amongst the population. Secondly, it must focus on building more expressways and highways and separate lanes to reduce the congestion. Enough attention must be paid to constructing road facilities in remote corners of the cities and towns and especially in rural areas so that public transport can easily reach every corner of the world. Strict adherence to the traffic rules must be followed.

All these steps along with free transport facilities by the government together can contribute to reducing traffic congestion.

Sample 6:

The incidents of traffic congestion are increasing along with the population growth. Some contend that in order to lessen traffic congestion, the government ought to offer free public transportation. This solution, in my opinion, can only partially resolve the issue.

Most individuals now prefer to live in cities or towns rather than rural areas due to urbanisation. This is one of the primary causes of the heavy traffic on the roadways. At the same time, cars have also gotten cheaper and more fuel-efficient as a result of technological improvement. The number of automobiles on the roads has also increased as a result.

The government is undoubtedly attempting to reduce traffic by enhancing the efficiency and speed of public transit. For instance, the DMRC system, which facilitates bus stops across the entire city, has been installed in Delhi, a densely populated metropolis. The public can utilise this bus service 24 hours a day, seven days a week, but it is not free, thus many people opt to drive their own car instead. Because buses and trains are crowded and uncomfortable, many individuals will still choose to use their own vehicles even if public transportation is free. Free public transportation will also put a strain on the exchequer.

In my opinion, the government can take a number of additional steps to lessen traffic on the roads. For instance, it needs to create bigger roadways, additional flyovers, and separate lanes for cyclists and pedestrians. It should also strictly enforce traffic regulations and promote the use of environmentally friendly transportation.

In conclusion, making public transportation free will undoubtedly encourage more people to use it, but since those who value comfort and convenience over cost will still drive privately, this strategy is ineffective in easing traffic congestion.

Sample 7:

The traffic is getting worse in contemporary society, some citizens suggest that the authorities should provide free public transport every day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it's extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken at the same time.

We have to admit that this policy can increase the usage of public transport. Inhabitants will take it into consideration if it's free when they are facing traffic jam. To some extent, it can reduce traffic congestion. But we cannot turn a blind eye to the problems it caused.

This initiative will sharply increase the national budget. It's generally acknowledged that national funds are limited and should be used in a large variety of social aspects from education to environmental protection. The initiative will leave a burden on the financial budget and let the infrastructure cannot be maintained and guaranteed.

Furthermore, this policy cannot address the root of this issue. People use private cars not because of the high cost of the public transportation system, but because the line and route don't cover their destination or the low efficiency when they plan for a long-distance trip. No matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. In addition, traffic congestion only accrued during the rush hours, so it's pointless to provide it for free all day.

To sum up, I think the authority should reduce the price and develop the traffic infrastructure if they want to address this issue, rather than provide it for free simply.

Sample 8:

Some contend that the best way to combat traffic congestion is to always provide free bus and rail passes to everyone who needs them. While I acknowledge it may work for the vast majority of individuals, I think the government ought to offer other options to address this issue.

On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.

However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.

In conclusion, it is undeniably true that providing free public transit to citizens may be a significant element in reducing traffic, but this is by no means the main component that governments should take into account when trying to address this issue.

Sample 9:

In recent years, traffic jams have been increasingly ubiquitous particularly in big cities which cause great fatigue for commuters. In order to tackle this problem, it is argued by many that government should provide free public transport all day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it is extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken.

First of all, it is an indisputable fact that traffic congestion is not only attributed to the vast amount of private transport but also road systems. Moreover, no matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. Thus, providing free public transport alone just contributes to cutting down the volume of traffic to some extent. In fact, many big cities like Ho Chi Minh still suffer from traffic jams in narrow roads with obsolete infrastructure in spite of the rise in availability of public transport. Therefore, I strongly believe that road needs to be widened, and traffic lights and signs should be made more state-of-the-art to stem the root causes.

More importantly, though providing free public transport 24 hours per day is not necessary and what is more is that it may leave a burden on the national budget. According to the majority of reports, traffic jams mainly occur during the rush hours, so it is pointless to provide public transport all the time. On top of that, providing free public transport in the long term may be unachievable due to its tremendous cost. This measure not only costs governments a fortune but it is also unable to address the root of the issue. It would be far more economical if this amount of money was invested in enhancing road facilities.

By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that other measures rather than making public transport available may be far more efficient to traffic congestion. In years to come, I strongly believe that more investments in road systems should be adopted to make commuting more comfortable and time-saving.

 

Lời giải

Sample 1:

These days, people’s workplaces are constantly changing and evolving to meet the demands of modern society. Furthermore, the roles and responsibilities of jobs are also undergoing changes to adapt to new ways of working and living. This essay will discuss the possible reasons for these changes and suggest some ways that people can better prepare themselves for their future careers.

Firstly, due to the developments in hi-tech machines and artificial intelligence, millions of people all around the world are losing their jobs and being replaced by automated processes. For example, millions of factory workers have lost their jobs because they have been replaced by machines that are able to do their job quicker and more effectively. Furthermore, as a result of the ever-increasing desire to cut expenses and increase profits, many jobs are being outsourced to countries where the wages are lower. For instance, when a person calls a tech support help line in an English-speaking country, they will most likely be connected to someone in another country, like India or Philippines, where the wages are lower.

However, there are a number of ways that people can prepare for changes in their workplaces in the future. Firstly, students preparing to leave high school need to be advised about the sustainability of the career path they are choosing. To illustrate, autonomous vehicles are predicted to replace most delivery and taxi driver jobs in the very near future, so this is not a job that someone should expect to have for a very long time. Furthermore, while some jobs are being replaced by technology, many jobs are simply incorporating technology into their process, and therefore people will need to be able to keep up to date with these changes. To help achieve this, specific courses could be designed to help educate people on the use of modern technology in their workplaces.

In conclusion, although there are many changes in the workplace these days, educating people to carefully choose their career and to keep up to date with modern technology is the key to avoiding any major problems.

Sample 2:

The nature of labor in our modern world is changing at a fundamental level, with many workers worried that they will not be able to maintain their job conditions for long periods of time. Personally, I think this is the result of stagnating wages and the advances of automation, and can only be resolved with a universal basic income for the whole population.

Firstly, I argue that society is witnessing the worst wage stagnation in generations, which is causing people to constantly look for better paying jobs. As cost increases yet wages are not following suit, most of the workforce have to scramble to reach for managerial positions or risk losing their disposable incomes. This in turn creates a situation where many people have to take up multiple jobs in order to make ends meet. In the US and UK, for instance, it is estimated that millions of workers are on zero-hour contracts, which does not guarantee a set number of hours of work.  

Secondly, as corporations seek to reduce expenditure as much as possible, they aim to replace the workforce with machines, leading to higher levels of unemployment and less stable job conditions. As machines encroach on the workforce, jobs become focused on the maintenance of the robots running our factories, and therefore there is higher competition for the dwindling number of jobs with gradually raising entry barriers. The end result is sure to be tension amongst socio-economic classes that can afford entry into the workforce if the effect of automation is not being mitigated.

I argue that in order to solve this, it is important to implement Universal Basic Income, which is an equal lump sum of money given to all citizens of countries every month or year. This would help people to keep their jobs and not have to take up precarious work, since they have enough money to buy basic necessities. This scheme can already be seen in Canada during the COVID-19 outbreak, for example, with citizens getting 2000 Canadian dollars a year. This has been hugely popular, as it allowed Canadians to have some level of stability even as the economy came to a halt.

Overall, I believe that stagnant wages and automation is leading to volatile work conditions, and as such, I contend that UBI is needed to stabilize this situation.

Sample 3:

It is a tendency that many people change their careers many times during their lifetime. This essay will identify the causes for these changes and recommend some ways to prepare for working in the future.

There are many reasons why one job for life seems to be over. One of the major reasons is our consumerism society. Therefore, job hopping for higher paid jobs or doing multiple jobs is no longer simply an option. Another reason is that the development of technology has changed the structure of work at such a fast pace that people have to constantly update themselves with the latest working methods. However, many are unable to adapt to the changes. For example, older workers might find it difficult to compete with younger workforce and have to find a new job or change their career field.

For those who want a stable life even in the rapidly changing future, they should realise that as long as we find a job which gives us satisfaction, there would be no need to change. My advice for those people is that if we stick to one job, life can be more stable. Of course, if one wants some employment changes, they should prepare for new job openings with a variety of working experience and skill set. Some should return to school to pursue courses that can lead them into new careers. Otherwise, some should take a fresh environment in which they can use and improve their skills and experience.

In conclusion, the process of job hopping is becoming very common because of social and technological development. I suggest that our knowledge and skills should be updated regularly, and we should have a balance between career changes and job satisfaction.

Sample 4:

It is true that the present working environment has witnessed a radical change. People now tend to switch jobs more frequently rather than have their occupations remain stable. While this phenomenon can be caused by several reasons, there are certain recommendations to help future workers prepare themselves for their careers.

First and foremost, the introduction of new technology might be the greatest cause for such changes. In other words, millions of workers all around the world are being replaced by high tech machines and artificial intelligence. For example, some staff working in the service industry are now on the verge of unemployment due to the rapid growth of online shopping websites and self-service supermarket checkouts. Another reason leading to this phenomenon is globalization. Due to globalization, employees have a wide range of choices between different positions among countries. As a result, many individuals tend to shift from one job to another with a view to higher salary as well as better standard of living.

However, there are several ways that people can get ready for changes in their future workplace. Firstly, workers should be well equipped with various skills by attending vocational courses and job training. Thus, they might keep up to date with the rapid development of robots and automated processes. In addition, individuals can get advice about the sustainability of their future position. This helps them to excel in one job rather than multiple, which lifts up the burden of switching jobs regularly.

In conclusion, although cutting-edge technology and globalization have made a great impact on the world of work, employees must be well-informed and flexible to achieve expected goals.

Sample 5:

It is irrefutable that the work scenario is altering at a fast pace. Working conditions are also different and the process of job-hopping is very common. This essay shall delve into the possible causes for these changes and suggest ways to prepare for work in the future.

To begin with, the development of science and technology has changed the structure of work. For example, people no longer need to do some heavy work by themselves. Instead, they can use machines. Secondly, competition has become intense, and people have to constantly update themselves with the latest materials and methods. Sometimes they cannot compete with the new techno-savvy workforce and so have to change jobs out of compulsion.

Furthermore, we belong to an era of consumerism. Being surrounded by so many choices, people today want to buy new things and for that, they do multiple jobs. In addition, the 24/7 society of today provides us with the opportunity to workday and night. For instance, in earlier times, there were very few jobs which were round-the-clock jobs. But, today, globalization has brought in a multitude of options of working day and night. The line between day and night has become dim and people have become workaholics.

There could be many suggestions to prepare for work in the future. People should have a set goal in their mind and get training accordingly. Moreover, it is important to draw a line somewhere. The stress and strain of the fast modern workplace is leading many to nervous breakdowns. In the developed countries, a new term called downshifting has already come where after a certain stage, people are saying ‘no’ to promotions and showing contentment with less. We should also realize that if we stick to one job, then life can be more stable, and we can enjoy our leisure also.

To put in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, although work conditions are different today and we have a need to update our knowledge regularly, we can plan our life in a meticulous way and have a balance between work and leisure.

Sample 6:

In today’s modern world, people tend to change jobs more often than before and don’t want to work permanently in one environment. I would like to explore the sources of this issue and suggest several solutions for future work.

Firstly, due to the global recession, many employers have to downsize and restructure their businesses. This leads to a number of redundant employees being forced to leave their jobs and find other ones. Another reason is that, as living costs are getting higher and higher, people want to earn as much money as they can to meet their needs. Hence, they seek better opportunities and well-paid jobs everywhere, every day. Some also look for new challenges. Last but not least, thanks to new technology, people nowadays are able to access information more easily, including information about job recruiting.

One of my suggestions for this problem is to create a comfortable working environment and build strong relationships between colleagues and between managers and workers. These will make employees find it harder to leave. To achieve this, courses such as leadership training and communication skill training should be carried out to help supervisors lead their team efficiently without causing any stress, and help employees fit inconveniently.

In conclusion, I would like to state that changing jobs is one of the notable signs of our technological times, and soft skills training courses can help people adapt to the working environment instead of seeking to escape it.

Sample 7:

Work culture lately has been dynamically transformed, mainly due to improvements in technology like transport and communication. Job security has become a dicey issue as employees now need to keep themselves updated with the advancements around them. This essay shall further explain the reasons and offer probable solutions.

In the last two decades, we have seen a remarkable spread of technology in all wakes of life. With easy access to the Internet and computers, work has become faster and easier. Innovation of office tools is encouraged everywhere so as to not let anything hinder the growth of trade and commerce. With each task becoming effortless, manual intervention at many places has been reduced. Ergo, rising insecurity is seen among employees. Additionally, employees are expected to multi-task in their jobs making it more difficult for older workers to sustain.

The remedial measures for such a situation are very few as of now. First of all, state-of-the-art employee training centers to help the employees stay well-versed with the high-tech upgradations. To solve this problem from an earlier level, universities should start imparting practical training in their curriculum, with the know-how of current on-the-job scenarios to prepare potential workers better. All this needs to be done as the employees losing their jobs also lose financial security for their families, and it is very difficult to start again from ground zero.

To conclude, I’d say we should accept the ever-changing technological advancements as they’re unlikely to stop. Better would be to equip ourselves and become flexible accordingly so as to welcome such developments.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP