Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 954 Lưu

In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might this be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

Many countries around the world have seen a trend towards owning your own home instead of renting. This essay will consider why this is the case, and whether or not this is beneficial.

The first reason why people wish to buy their own home is because it provides them with a sense of stability. Rental contracts are temporary agreements, often just between 6 and 12 months in duration, at the end of which you may have to leave and find alternative accommodation. Owning a home means you get to live there permanently.

The second reason, and one which has grown in importance in recent years, is that owning your own home is seen as an investment. Property prices generally rise, so real estate can be a safe place to invest your surplus income. House prices in the UK, for example, rise by around 4%per annum whereas interest on bank deposits is close to zero.

For individuals, then, there seem to be clear positive benefits to owning your home. But overall, I feel there are considerable downsides, both for individuals and for society as a whole. For most people, buying property requires taking out a mortgage, typically for a length of 25 years, and if at any time during this period borrowers are unable to maintain mortgage payments, they risk losing their property. For society as a whole there are also negatives. The demand for buying property leads to house price inflation, which can mean people on low incomes, such as young people, can find it impossible to buy their own home, forcing them to rent.

In conclusion, a desire for stability and seeing a return on your investments are key reasons behind the trend towards buying property, but despite these benefits, there are serious problems.

Sample 2:

The idea of homeownership is highly valued in many nations because of the status it represents as a mark of financial security and individual success. This essay investigates why, for some cultures, homeownership is a moral imperative and then supports the idea that this is, on balance, a good thing. The goal of owning a house is well-founded when one considers the social, economic, and psychological benefits that come with it.

Homeownership is highly regarded in several countries because of the favourable effect it has on social stability. People who own their own houses are more likely to put down permanent roots in their neighbourhoods. Homeowners are more likely to form lasting friendships with their neighbours, which strengthens community bonds. Crime rates, mental health, and overall well-being all improve when people feel safe in their communities.

The economic benefits that come with homeownership are another strong reason for the focus put on it. A home's value tends to rise with time, making it a good investment option for many people. Homeowners can save their equity for things like a child's college fund, a company startup, or retirement. In addition, those who own their own homes are more likely to practise fiscal restraint and make wise budgetary decisions since they will want to ensure they can afford their mortgage payments and secure their financial future.

The financial advantages of homeownership are not the only ones. Homeownership is seen as a concrete indication of personal achievement, and as such, it is often connected with feelings of pride and accomplishment. One's happiness and contentment might increase when they have the freedom to make their home unique and special. The stability and safety provided by owning one's own home are essential to building a strong foundation and creating a safe haven in which to raise children.

The enormous social, economic, and psychological benefits of house ownership explain, in part, why homeownership is so highly valued in some nations. Being a homeowner is a desired life goal because of the security, feeling of community, financial benefits, and improved mental health it brings. Although there are some possible negatives, such as start-up costs and hazards, the effects are generally good. Because of the positive effects that homeownership has on individuals and communities, it is reasonable that these cultures place such a premium on it.

Sample 3:

In numerous nations, the desire to own a home is profoundly ingrained in the values and aspirations of the populace. This essay intends to investigate why homeownership is so important to individuals. In addition, it will argue that this tendency towards property ownership is a positive phenomenon.

Homeownership provides stability and security for individuals. In contrast to renting, homeownership provides a permanent living arrangement, eradicating the uncertainty associated with frequent relocations. It enables people to establish roots in a community, promoting a sense of belonging and strengthening social ties.

Homeownership is frequently regarded as a significant investment opportunity and a means of accumulating wealth. The appreciation of property values over time enables homeowners to amass wealth and achieve financial stability. A residence can be a valuable asset that can be passed down to future generations, securing a family's legacy.

Individuals who own their own residence have greater control over their living environment and greater freedom. Homeowners have the option of customising and personalising their living space to their liking. They can make enhancements, modifications, and renovations to create a space that truly reflects their personality and way of life.

Homeownership is frequently viewed as a symbol of success and accomplishment. It represents the culmination of diligent effort, commitment, and fiscal responsibility. The ability to purchase a property demonstrates a person's financial management and long-term planning skills, boosting their self-esteem and overall life satisfaction.

Although purchasing a home entails substantial up-front expenses, it can be financially advantageous in the long haul. Over time, monthly mortgage payments create equity and reduce overall debt. This is in contrast to renting, where there is no return on investment from the payments. Homeownership has the potential to eradicate housing costs in retirement, resulting in a more secure financial future.

Owing to the stability, investment potential, control, accomplishment, and long-term cost advantages it provides, home ownership is extremely important for individuals. This tendency towards homeownership should be viewed as a positive trend that promotes financial security, personal fulfilment, and community stability, as opposed to a negative occurrence. Individuals who are encouraged and supported in their pursuit of homeownership can contribute to the well-being and prosperity of society as a whole.

Sample 4:

There is no doubting the fact that owning a property is a normal human ambition. Thus, the fact that individuals have shifted priorities towards buying a home rather than renting is true for numerous countries throughout the world. While it has both positive and negative implications, I believe this movement presents both opportunities and challenges.

To begin with, living in a self-owned house is a beneficial thing for several reasons. First, having a place to call one's own gives a feeling of stability and security without the worry of losing it. The second thing to consider is that if the home is already owned, one has the unrestricted freedom to remodel it in the way one sees fit. Individuals who own a house are not bound by a landlord and are not required to pay monthly rent. As a result, people may adapt their homes to their requirements and desires. Besides, some individuals see their property as an investment that they anticipate will rise in value in the future.

Despite the numerous advantages of homeownership, a critical disadvantage is that high demand for property results in house price inflation, making it difficult for people on low salaries to own their own home, forcing them to rent one. To make this happen, such people have to incur substantial debts. Sometimes, they are unable to repay their loans, which eventually results in losing their lifelong investments.

In conclusion, I feel that one's distinctive circumstances dictate whether or not one should rent or purchase a property.

Sample 5:

Having more assets than liabilities is certainly beneficial in today's competitive climate. The argument over whether owning a house is an asset or a liability is heating up. Some feel that renting a house would save them money, while others believe that owning a home has more benefits. To my mind, if a person is astute, converting a house from a liability to an asset may offer financial benefits.

Purchasing a home rather than renting one has more benefits than drawbacks. Among the benefits is the long-term security that comes with owning a place to call home. If you own a house, you are not responsible for the monthly expenses associated with maintaining a roof over your head. Another advantage of owning a home is the flexibility to design and decorate it as you want. For instance, if you rent a property, you are restricted from making major changes to the layout, while if you own the home, you are free to make whatever changes you want at any time.

Many people opt to rent in order to save money. They think that rather than investing a large amount of money in a house, they can save the difference by paying less rent. There is no sense of security in this arrangement since the landlord has the right to reject tenants at any time.

To conclude, I think it is better to invest once in a lifetime in building one's own house in order to experience the sense of security that comes with it rather than live in continuous dread of losing one's property.

Sample 6:

There is no question that having more assets than liabilities is critical in today's competitive environment. Now, the debate rages over whether having a home is considered an asset or a burden. Some think that renting a house saves money, while others believe that owning a home offers many advantages. To my mind, if a person is prudent, he or she may gain financially by changing the home from a burden to an asset.

Purchasing a house vs. renting one offers more advantages than disadvantages. One of the advantages is the lifelong security that comes with having a roof over one's head. If you own a home, you are not responsible for the monthly costs associated with providing a roof over your head. Another benefit of having your own house is the freedom to design and decorate it according to your preferences. For instance, if you rent a home, you cannot make significant modifications to the layout, but if you own the house, you may make whatever alterations you desire.

People choose to live on a rental basis in order to save money. They believe that rather than spending a large sum of money on a home, they may pay less rent and save the remainder. There is no feeling of security in this situation since the owner has the right to refuse renters at any moment.

To conclude, I believe it is preferable to spend once in a lifetime constructing your own home in order to enjoy the feeling of security that comes with it rather than live in fear of losing your property at any moment.

Sample 7:

In today’s modern world, to accomplish the basic necessity of having a shelter, a common man prefers the possession of a house instead of a tenancy. Although the prices of houses are skyrocketing, the ownership of a home, in my opinion, provides a sense of financial stability and security to an individual in some nations and thus certainly is a positive trend.

To commence with, there are many reasons why people usually have a keen inclination towards owning an apartment or a house. Primarily, as compared to certain terms and conditions in rented accommodation people enjoy living freely in their own homes. For instance, abiding by the stringent rules of the landlords as well as facing difficulties from shifting one occupancy to another which incur heavy losses to the household articles. In contrast, if a person resides in his private property, he can enjoy his freedom at the utmost level. Moreover, investing the finance in a residential space makes a person feel more secure for his future as well as his family. As a result, every person puts his efforts to the extreme to save the maximum from his income to purchase his dream house and get out from the cumbersome life of being a tenant.

According to my perspective, this is indeed an advantageous situation because of numerous causative factors. Predominantly, having the possession of a domestic property offers a person to grow personally and professionally. This not only strengthens a great family bond amongst the family members but also feels satisfied with investing appropriately in his house and can work more productively with a stress-free mind. Additionally, the liability of frequent payments for the rent also drops significantly. According to a recent survey conducted by the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), USA, in June 2019, revealed a report about the significant rise in the prices of apartments in many countries has urged many people to buy their own apartments.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that while considering the possession of a house, the factors of stability and safety are indispensable; it is undeniable that it is indeed a beneficial trend.

Sample 8:

In recent years, the number of residential property buyers has soared with an unmatched speed. In my opinion, this is an adverse development, and I will explain it in this essay.

One of the key reasons why owning a property is preferred is due to the appreciation of the price in a short period. Consequently, more people can make money investing in houses. Everyone involved in the process makes money, for example, the seller, the commission agent, municipal office, and also the buyer by reselling the property. However, there are potential risks here if financial institutes are involved. This will result in impacting the global economy if people default on the loans. Also, this will create a virtual inflation scenario and increase the burden on the people who genuinely need housing and impede their growth.

Moreover, another reason is that statistically the majority of house buyers using bank loans are in their thirties or forties. They want to get over with the house owners prior to their offspring is ready for college education. As a result, they could use the house as the mortgage for education loans or at least avoiding house rent payments alongside college fees.

Sense of belonging and social status are also essential reasons for owning a house. A number of people consider rented houses as stop-gap arrangements and strive to own a house, consequently, they can live the way they want. In numerous circles, match-making is challenging if a groom could not afford his own house. This is leading to a stressful situation as people ought to work on tedious jobs to fulfill the commitment even if their physique and psyche are affected.

In conclusion, it can be comprehended that aspirants who want to own a house for various reasons such as profit, better lifestyle, sense of ownership, or social obligation, therefore, property price is increasing. This trend would be insidious to both economic growth and individual well-being. Personally, I think this is a negative development.

Sample 9:

People in some nations consider owning a home much more important than renting one. Living in a self-owned home gives a feeling of stability, comfort and security. In my opinion whether it is a positive or negative situation depends on many factors.

People owning a home do not have to worry about the landlord nor do they have to pay a monthly rent. Hence, they can modify their home according to their needs and wants and feel secure in it. For many, the home is like a heaven and so they spend quite a fortune on designing and decorating it. Some people, on the other hand, consider their home as an investment which they expect to appreciate in value in the future.

All in all, I feel that whether owning a home is a positive or negative situation is quite subjective, depending on the circumstances of the person. For people who have the money to buy a big house and few financial liabilities, their house is an asset and owning a house is a positive situation for them. However, most middle-class families buy a big house which is often out of their budget. They fund this by taking out huge loans and end up repaying the amount over a very long time. This increases the interest they have to pay. In addition to this, they have to pay property taxes and insurance which are directly proportional to the area of a home. Furthermore, the electricity and maintenance costs get added to their everyday expenses.

To conclude, I feel that owning a home can be a pleasurable experience if done within a budget. However, it could turn into a negative situation when a person buys a home by getting a loan that is way beyond his repaying capacity.

Sample 10:

In numerous societies, the preference for homeownership over renting is deeply ingrained, reflecting both cultural values and economic aspirations. This essay posits that such a trend is primarily motivated by the desire for financial security and cultural significance attached to property ownership, and argues that while this has positive aspects, it also introduces challenges.

Firstly, homeownership is often equated with financial stability and investment acumen. Owning property is seen not just as a shield against the unpredictability of rent increases but also as a strategic means to accumulate wealth over time through property appreciation. Additionally, homeowners can leverage their property as collateral for loans, facilitating access to funds for other investments or personal needs, enhancing their financial flexibility. This economic rationale underscores the preference for owning homes as a foundational step towards achieving financial independence and prosperity, highlighting its importance in personal wealth strategy.

Secondly, beyond the economic perspective, homeownership carries significant cultural and emotional weight. In many cultures, owning a home is synonymous with achieving a key milestone in life, symbolizing stability, responsibility, and success. It fosters a sense of belonging and strengthens community ties, as homeowners are more likely to invest in their properties and actively engage with their neighborhoods, contributing to communal development. However, this deeply rooted value can also exert pressure on individuals to pursue homeownership, potentially leading to financial overextension. The societal expectation for owning a home underscores its perceived importance but can also inadvertently contribute to economic vulnerabilities for some individuals.

In conclusion, the inclination towards homeownership is shaped by its economic advantages and cultural significance. It presents both a route to financial stability and fulfillment of societal expectations, yet carries risks of financial strain and societal pressure. Balancing these elements is essential in evaluating its overall benefit, with an evolving understanding necessary to keep homeownership a positive and achievable aspiration for all.

Sample 11:

Across the globe, the aspiration for homeownership over renting is a testament to its deep-seated value within various cultures and economies. This essay contends that this preference stems from the quest for financial autonomy and the cultural emblem of success that homeownership represents, ultimately concluding that while beneficial, it demands a nuanced understanding of its implications.

Financially, homeownership is a cornerstone of personal wealth and security. It serves as a bulwark against the volatilities of renting, such as unpredictable rent hikes, offering a stable living cost over time. More so, properties typically appreciate in value, presenting an avenue for wealth accumulation that transcends generations. This aspect of homeownership not only promotes financial prudence but also empowers individuals to leverage their assets in ways renters cannot, such as securing loans against property equity for further financial endeavors or emergencies. This strategic advantage underscores the economic logic behind prioritizing homeownership as a pivotal financial strategy.

Culturally, owning a home transcends material possession, embodying a rite of passage that signals financial maturity, social stability, and success. In many societies, it anchors individuals and families, fostering a sense of identity, community engagement, and generational legacy. This cultural valuation enriches the homeownership narrative, embedding it within the fabric of societal achievements. However, it's paramount to acknowledge the potential for financial overreach, driven by societal expectations to own property, which can lead to unsustainable financial commitments for some.

In summary, the inclination for homeownership, shaped by its financial and cultural significance, offers pathways to stability and esteem. However, its pursuit demands judicious assessment of financial realities and future impacts. Embracing a balanced view on homeownership is vital as we evolve, ensuring its role as a positive goal in changing economic and cultural terrains.

Sample 12:

The debate over owning versus renting a home has been ongoing for years, and more people seem to be inclined towards buying homes instead of renting them. In this essay, I will elaborate on the reasons behind this trend and why it can be seen as a positive development.

Firstly, owning a home provides financial security and stability, which is not the case with renting. When you own a home, you don't have to pay rent every month to someone else, which can be a significant expense over time. Additionally, homeowners have the flexibility to decide how they want to maintain and improve their property, without worrying about violating any rental agreements or risking their security deposit. With the potential of selling their property at a higher value, homeowners can also accumulate wealth and have a valuable asset for the future.

Secondly, owning a home offers the ability to enjoy the independence and convenience of a comfortable lifestyle. Homeowners can personalize their living space, making it truly their own, without the limitations that renters face. For instance, they can have the freedom to remodel, paint or design their home in any way they please. Furthermore, owning a home also provides a sense of permanence and stability, as they can stay in the same place for as long as they desire.

Despite these advantages, some might argue that owning a home can have its drawbacks. For example, purchasing a property typically requires taking out a mortgage, which can be a long-term financial commitment that some people may not be prepared for. Additionally, homeowners are responsible for the upkeep and maintenance of their homes, which can be expensive and time-consuming.

In conclusion, the trend towards owning a home can be seen as a positive development for individuals who seek financial stability and personal independence. By owning their home, they can have complete control over their living environment and benefit from the long-term financial rewards of property ownership. However, it is essential to weigh the pros and cons before making a decision, as owning a home is not without its challenges.

Sample 13:

In many cultures, owning a home is considered a sign of success and stability. This desire for homeownership is often fuelled by a variety of factors, including the need for security and the opportunity for investment. In my opinion, this trend has both positive and negative outcomes, depending on individuals’ circumstances.

Firstly, owning a home provides individuals with a sense of stability and permanence. Unlike rental agreements, which can be terminated by landlords or subject to rent increases, homeownership offers a more stable living situation. Homeowners have the freedom to customize and renovate their property to their own tastes, making it a truly personalized and comfortable living space. Another important factor is the financial benefit of owning a home as an investment. The value of property has historically increased over time, which can make owning a home a wise investment. Additionally, paying a mortgage can be more cost-effective in the long run than paying rent, as the monthly payments go towards building equity in the property.

Despite the benefits of homeownership, there are also potential downsides. For instance, owning a home can be a significant financial burden, requiring a substantial down payment and mortgage payments that may last for decades. Moreover, homeowners must bear the responsibility of maintaining and repairing their property, which can be costly and time-consuming. Additionally, there is a risk of property values declining or stagnating, which can result in homeowners losing money on their investment. Furthermore, the demand for homeownership can drive up property prices, making it difficult for low-income individuals or first-time buyers to enter the market.

In conclusion, while owning a home can provide a sense of stability and financial security, it is not without its drawbacks. The decision to buy a home should be carefully considered, taking into account both the financial and personal aspects of homeownership.

Sample 14:

In some countries, owning a home is considered more important than renting one. This essay will explore the reasons why this preference exists and argue that it is a positive situation.

One reason why people prefer to own a home is because of the sense of stability and security it provides. For instance, owning a house enables individuals to put down roots, establish a community, and create a sense of belonging. It also ensures that individuals have a fixed abode and do not have to worry about finding a new place to live every few years, which can be a significant source of stress. Another reason why owning a home is viewed as desirable is that it provides a source of wealth accumulation. This is because property prices tend to appreciate over time, and owning a house enables people to build up equity that they can tap into in the future. For example, they can sell the property and use the proceeds to fund their retirement or to buy a larger home if their family expands.

In addition, owning a home provides individuals with a greater degree of autonomy and control over their living space. They can decorate and renovate their house to suit their tastes without having to seek the approval of a landlord. Additionally, they are not subject to the whims of a landlord who may increase the rent or decide to sell the property, forcing them to move. However, despite the many benefits of owning a home, there are some potential downsides. For instance, homeowners are responsible for the maintenance and repair of their property, which can be costly and time-consuming. Moreover, they may be vulnerable to fluctuations in the property market, which could result in a decline in the value of their home.

In conclusion, owning a home is considered important by many people due to the sense of stability, wealth accumulation, and autonomy it provides. Although there are potential drawbacks, the benefits of owning a home outweigh the negatives.

Sample 15:

In some nations, people think it is very important to be a homeowner rather than a renter. I believe the primary cause of this phenomenon is that becoming a homeowner changes how a person's financial status is evaluated by others. However, it should be seen as a negative situation for homeowners since they may become less happy as a result of mortgage loans.

Owning a home means higher perceived financial status. Nowadays, house prices are extremely high, which means a home is not something someone in the lower middle class or working class can afford to buy. That is to say, if a person owns a home, others will think that this person has a high- paying job and is doing very well financially. For example, in China, many women will only consider marrying men who own their own homes because they think these men have enough money to provide a comfortable family life.

However, I think purchasing a house or an apartment can make a person less happy. Many people have borrowed hundreds of thousands of dollars from their bank to buy a home. After paying their mortgage every month, they may not have much money left to spend on activities they enjoy, such as visiting another city and dining in a nice restaurant.

In conclusion, the main reason why home ownership is important for people in some countries is that these people think it can increase their perceived financial standing. Nevertheless, it can lead to a decrease in happiness and as a result is a negative situation for them.

Sample 16:

Many people today value owning their own home over renting. In my opinion, this is part of a natural human desire for security and prestige, but it contains risks.

The source of this desire is a need for stability and respect. An individual who does not own their own home must pay rent to a landlord. This hangs over them and necessitates maintaining a job with a steady salary and balancing rent against other living expenses. Once a person owns their own home, they are then able to spend their money more freely and consider different employment without the fear of becoming homeless. Moreover, having a home lends an air of respectability. Only the wealthy are able buy a house and most homeowners take pride in the size and condition of their home as a sign of their social standing.

Nonetheless, home ownership is a negative trend as it forces unrealistic expectations on millions. Most people live in city apartments with rent and are not capable of buying a house. The pressure to buy one is likely to engender feelings of inadequacy and resentment towards the upper classes. This famously fueled the sub-prime mortgage scandals of the early 2000s in the United States when millions borrowed more than they could afford to buy homes, then defaulted on their payments and lost a lifetime of investment. Had these same people opted to rent, they would have saved more money and could have invested in other forms of capital such as the stock market.

In conclusion, owning a home is innately desirable but, in the end, causes more harm than good due to the pressure it places on individuals. Many people have learned this lesson and home ownership may begin to decline in the future.

Sample 17:

People in some countries now consider owning a home to be more important than renting one. This essay will discuss the underlying reasons for this preference and elaborate on why it is a negative development.

There are two main reasons for people’s preference for home ownership. First, for some people, owning a house or an apartment means that they do not have to waste time on accommodation hunting when a rental contract expires. Therefore, they can just focus on their career goals or other important things, such as marriage. Second, nowadays many people buy a home with a mortgage, and so they know the exact amount of money they owe and also the regular amount they have to pay. This allows people to make a clear long-term financial plan for the future. However, this is not the case when they rent a home because they are subject to changes in the rental price made by landlords.

The trend that many people value home ownership over rented accommodation is negative due to the following reasons. Most houses or apartments have low liquidity, which means they cannot be easily exchanged for cash. As a result, people who are still redeeming their mortgages may not be able to spend money on other big investments.

In addition, while a tenant can easily terminate a rental contract and find a new place if they are not satisfied with their current accommodation, it is very difficult for homeowners to do the same. In other words, once a person makes an unwise decision and buys a home that they later regret, they are usually left with only two options: either make the home available for rent or accept living in a place they are not happy with.

In conclusion, people in some countries now prefer to buy their homes because they value the stability that owning a home provides and want to have clear future plans. However, unless thorough considerations are made, homeowners may have to face undesirable outcomes from such a decision.

Sample 18:

In many countries, many young adults set out to be homeowners by 30 years old, not opting for renting. I think there are multiple motivations for this aspiration, and this is a positive way of thinking.

One of the most important reasons why people do not want to rent houses or apartments is because they are dependent on landlords or potential roommates. Owning a home means you are in total control of how your house looks like, how many people it hosts, or even how many utilities it uses. Landlords can also throw people out at any moment during their rent or, in many cases, can break into tenants’ space at their convenience. Moreover, owning a home also means an elevated social status. You are now considered a functional, successful, responsible adult. For most men, you are also considered a better candidate for marriage because you are now ready to welcome a new family into your home.

I think, generally, this is a positive development for individuals. Switching from a rented property to an owned home benefits individuals financially. Because tenants depend on landlords to control the rent, they usually waste more money renting a place for a long time than owning one. Owned houses are also an investment as many houses can gain value over the time that owners stay there. For example, houses in Go Vap District now triple in value compared to what they used to be a decade ago. Another reason why people want to be a homeowner is due to the positive correlation between owning a home and better mental health. Owning a home usually means a sign that adults have made it in their lives, which in turn eases the mind of adults. For some, home-owning even means increased privacy.

In conclusion, wanting independence from landlords and elevating their social status are reasons people want to own a home. I think this is generally a positive development because it can be a future investment, while also easing individuals’ minds.  

Sample 19:

Owning a home is often considered an essential element of a dream come true. In fact, it is often viewed as a symbol of success and stability. This essay will explore the reasons why owning a house is so important to people and why this is a positive development.

One of the main reasons why owning a home is so important to people is that it provides a sense of security and stability. Renting a place of residence can often be unpredictable, as landlords may raise rent prices or decide to sell the property. In contrast, homeowners have more control over their living situation and are not subject to the whims of landlords. For instance, consider a family who has been renting an apartment for several years. They have established a comfortable life in the neighbourhood, with their children attending nearby schools and forming friendships within the community. However, the landlord unexpectedly informs them to vacate the house because he himself has decided to live there. It would be a very depressing situation for the tenant.

I believe this is a positive trend because owning a home provides a sense of permanence and belonging. It allows people to put down roots in a community and become more invested in their surroundings. Moreover, owning a home can be a good investment. Over time, real estate tends to appreciate in value, meaning that homeowners can potentially make a profit if they sell their abodes later on. For example, during the housing market boom in the early 2000s, many people who owned homes in desirable locations saw their property values skyrocket.

In conclusion, owning a house provides homeowners with a sense of security, stability, and belonging to a community, and can also be a good investment. While there may be some minor downsides to homeownership, ultimately, owning a home is a goal that many people, all around the world, aspire to, and it is a worthy one.

Sample 20:

In some countries, possessing a house is seen as an essential aspect of life and often a life-long dream. But this, in my opinion, is not necessarily a positive situation. While there might have some advantages to owning a home, there are also significant drawbacks to this mentality making it mostly a negative trend.

Many people want to own a place to live in because it provides a sense of stability and security. Renting a property means that the tenant is at the mercy of the landlord, who can decide to increase the rent or even ask the tenant to vacate the property at short notice. In contrast, owning a home provides a sense of permanence, as the homeowner has control over their living situation and can make changes to the property without needing to seek permission from a landlord.

Overemphasis on home ownership is a huge negative consequence of this trend because of the financial burden it puts on the shoulder of the buyer. Many people stretch their budgets to buy a home, taking on substantial debt in the process. This can limit their financial flexibility and increase the risk of default if unexpected expenses arise. A colleague of my mother purchased a home a few years ago with a substantial mortgage, assuming that her stable job will ensure a steady income for the foreseeable future. However, she unexpectedly lost her job due to the economic downturn. As a result, she had to sell the property at a loss to avoid defaulting on the loan.

Another negative consequence of the trend towards home ownership is the impact on geographic mobility. When individuals commit to owning a home, especially in a rapidly changing job market, it can tie them down to a specific location. This lack of mobility can be detrimental to career opportunities and professional growth. For instance, my younger uncle purchased a home in a suburban area many years ago. A few years later, when he received a lucrative job offer in a different city, he was hesitant to uproot their family and chose to decline the job offer and miss out on a potential career breakthrough.

In conclusion, while owning a home is a popular goal for many people, it is not necessarily a positive situation for everyone. It is important to consider the potential financial, professional and social drawbacks of this mentality, particularly in the context of a changing economy and society.

Sample 21:

The aspiration for homeownership has been deeply ingrained in the cultural fabric of many societies, where owning a home is often viewed as a symbol of stability, success, and social status. This essay will explore the underlying reasons for the significance of homeownership and argue that, on balance, it represents a positive development.

The emphasis on homeownership in certain cultures can be attributed to several factors. Firstly, owning a home provides a sense of permanence and security. Unlike renting, where tenancy agreements are subject to change, homeownership offers individuals and families a stable environment to establish roots and create lasting memories. Additionally, property ownership is seen as an investment for the future, allowing families to build equity and pass down wealth through generations. For instance, in many Asian societies, homeownership is deeply ingrained in traditional values and is often associated with familial honour and prosperity. In India, the concept of owning a home is closely linked to the pursuit of “gruhapravesha,” a traditional housewarming ceremony that marks the beginning of a new chapter in one’s life.

In my opinion, the emphasis on homeownership can be viewed as a positive development. Beyond the emotional and cultural factors, owning a home also offers tangible benefits. Homeownership provides a sense of autonomy, allowing individuals to personalize their living spaces, make long-term plans, and contribute to community stability. Moreover, it fosters a sense of responsibility and commitment to maintaining the property and its surroundings.

In conclusion, the cultural importance of homeownership in certain countries can be attributed to its association with stability, investment, and traditional values. This emphasis is positive as it fosters stability, community ties, and individual responsibility. Homeownership transcends economic benefits, representing a valuable aspiration that enhances personal well-being and contributes to the fabric of societies.

Sample 22:

In many countries, owning a home is considered a major achievement and a symbol of stability and success. This is due to a number of factors, including cultural norms, economic benefits, and personal preferences. In this essay, I will discuss why owning a home is important for people in some countries. Personally, I believe that this is a negative situation.

One of the main reasons why owning a home is so important for people is that it is seen as a wise investment. Property values tend to increase over time, so buying a home can be a smart financial decision. Moreover, homeownership allows individuals to build equity, which can be used to secure loans or provide a sense of financial security. Additionally, owning a home provides a sense of stability and permanence that many people desire, as it allows them to establish roots in a community and create a stable living environment for themselves and their families.

However, there are also potential negative aspects of prioritizing homeownership over renting. For one, buying a home is a significant financial commitment that can put people in debt and restrict their financial mobility. I personally know a couple of people who got into huge debt due to taking bank loans to purchase homes. After a few years, they had to sell the house and incur huge losses due to increasing interest rates and their inability to pay the loans. Additionally, homeownership can require a significant amount of upkeep and maintenance, which can be time-consuming and costly. Moreover, prioritizing homeownership over other aspects of life, such as travel or experiences, can limit an individual’s opportunities for personal growth and development.

In conclusion, the importance of owning a home is gaining popularity in many parts of the world. While owning a home can provide financial benefits, stability, and a sense of permanence, it can also limit personal and financial freedom and can be a reason for huge distress and economic burden. Therefore, owning a home should not be the sole priority of the majority of people.

Sample 23:

In some countries, the ownership of peoples' home is an important matter. In these countries it is very important to own your own home rather than renting it. It might be indifferent for some, but for these people it matters.

Why is that the case? you might wonder. I think it is because your home is supposed to be exactly what it sounds like, your home. As a human, I think we long after having stuff to call our own, doesn't matter what it is, but humans will always want to claim ownership. This is nothing new and it has been like this throughout human history, like colonies for example, which later once again became the same country as before lead by its own inhabitants. People will always want to be the one to decide what happens to them and when you rent your home you can't even paint it without the owner’s permission.

If you as a person are renting an apartment there might be a lot of stressors in your life. A scratched wall can cause you a major headache, because the wall was not yours. The bedroom you are currently sleeping in might not be available as long as you hope, things happen in life and maybe the next landlord won't want to have you as a tenant.

In other perspective, not owning your home could be a relief when it comes to your finance. As a renter you won't have to pay the mortgage, take loans or spend an awful lot of money on buying the property. You wouldn't have to worry about the house market crashing or a natural disaster destroying your expensive home.

Bottom line, as a human I feel like we need to have a home and calling it your own can make that more special. I personally would rather own my house, because then whatever happens it is on me and no one else.

Sample 24:

In some countries, people often choose to own a home instead of renting it. There are several reasons for this phenomenon, and although it is beneficial for the buyer, I generally think it is not economically beneficial to society.

Homeownership is preferred in some East Asian countries such as Vietnam because it is considered by many to be an asset that they have a responsibility to preserve for their children. They themselves may have also inherited these properties from the previous generation and are worshipping their ancestors there, which their children are expected to continue. Living in a rented house for a lifetime, many people will consider it a failure in their lives. Homeownership can also be driven by an unstable economy, causing a sense of insecurity for people about risks such as job loss or rising prices. Owning a shelter is definitely more secure than renting a home without knowing whether the owner is going to raise the rent.

Although the desire to own a home may make people feel more secure, it is generally not economically beneficial to society. The capital value of a habitation is often very large, so investing it in business will create jobs and greater total assets for society. One might argue that if people want to own a home, then the housing project owners will be able to sell it. This is true, but if more people do not, the rental market will be more developed, and the houses and apartments will still be in demand. The only difference is that housing services will grow, creating more jobs and a more dynamic society.

In short, in my opinion, although house ownership has some spiritual benefits for individual owners, economically it is not good for society.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Some argue that offering free bus and rail passes to all who need them is the best solution to traffic congestion. While this might be effective for many, I believe the government should also explore other strategies to address this problem.

On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.

However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.

In conclusion, while providing free public transportation can indeed help reduce traffic, it should not be the sole focus of government efforts to solve this issue.

Sample 2:

It is generally believed that if the government wants to solve the traffic congestion problem, the most effective solution is to provide free public transportation, such as buses and trains. In my opinion, I agree with this idea because it really helps to ease the situation.

Firstly, I believe that free public transportation can reduce people's dependence on cars and improve traffic congestion. People who live outside the city centre tend to go to work because there are no buses or train stations around the area. Therefore, the government should consider building railway and bus lanes to cover all remote areas. In addition, dedicated lanes can be allocated to buses to avoid traffic jams. For example, Japan has done a very good job with its advanced subway system. Their stations are always overcrowded, and trains and buses are always on time. People rarely own cars and they rely on public transportation.

Secondly, the government should always carry out publicity activities to promote the advantages of using free public transportation. By doing so, people can break the mentality that public transportation is dirty, slow, and unreliable. As long as more people know, the transportation system is well designed, more comfortable and more convenient; people will soon start using public transportation. For example, Singapore has implemented 24/7 free public transportation, and its roads are unobstructed.

In short, I firmly believe that free transportation will reduce congestion by promoting awareness-raising campaigns and investment in buses and trains. Although it is a difficult task for the government to implement free public transportation in the community, once the government implements it successfully, it will have a major impact on everyone's life.

Sample 3:

Today with the increasing population and the exponential growth of urbanization, the transportation needs of the people have increased rapidly. Due to increasing transportation and the need for vehicles, traffic congestion has become a major problem of the countries with increasing populations. Therefore, looking into the problem deeply, I find that the best way to control this traffic congestion is for the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities. There are certain reasons for increasing traffic congestion as discussed below.

Firstly, the faster pace of population growth has increased the demand for more vehicles on the road. Since the transport facilities are less as compared to the people traveling, the demands have increased day by day which has contributed to more vehicles on the road and hence contributing to traffic congestion. Secondly, the increasing urbanization has caused more of the rural population to migrate to urban cities and metropolitan cities to find jobs and work. This increased migration of the population to urban cities is also one of the major causes of the traffic congestion on roads. For example, metropolitan cities of India like Delhi, Mumbai, Ahmedabad are highly traffic-congested cities of India due to increased urbanization and rapid migration of the rural population.

Traffic congestion is one of the major causes of carbon dioxide emission and increasing global warming of the earth. The harmful gases emitted from these vehicles pollute the environment. For example, the highly populated city of India is Delhi due to increased traffic congestion. The government must provide free transportation facilities to reduce the number of private vehicles on the road and must also encourage the population to compulsorily use these free public transportation facilities to reduce the problem of traffic congestion. Besides, in public transport, the use of environmentally-friendly electric vehicles like metro services, electric trains, electric buses, and taxis must be encouraged instead of fuel vehicles to reduce the emission of harmful gases in the environment.

Therefore, after analyzing all the points above, the conclusion drawn upon is that traffic congestion is the major problem faced by many countries at large and the best solution to this problem is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities to the people.

Sample 4:

The population has been increasing day by day and with the increasing number of people, urbanization is also at its peak. In such situations, the huge demands of vehicles have caused rapid traffic congestion on roads. However, some people argue that the best way to control traffic congestion is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, but in my opinion, this may not be the correct way to control the traffic congestion.

Some of the major reasons for traffic congestion are urbanization and the migration of the people. This has caused an increased demand for vehicles in the market. Nowadays people tend to travel a lot, and, in such conditions, they find it easier to use their own vehicles rather than opting for public transport. A survey conducted in China states that a majority of people prefer their own vehicles rather than public transport and this has increased more vehicles on road contributing to the traffic congestions. Secondly, people find it easy to carry their own vehicle to travel to different corners of the country as it is more comfortable than public transport. Also, the conditions of the public transport facilities have also deteriorated, they are also very congestive and unhygienic. Besides, the public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners due to non motorable roads and hence, the best option for traveling to these areas are the private vehicles. Secondly, private vehicles like cars and motorbikes have become more affordable and budget-friendly for people.

For the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, it will be a big burden on their exchequer. Instead, the government must focus on other measures like encouraging bicycles for school and college-going students, build wide tracks with separate lanes, build more expressways and flyovers to reduce the congestion. Also, they must subsidize the public transport fares but not completely free. A separate track for pedestrians and cyclists must be built to limit the number of vehicles on the road. Besides, an awareness campaign must be launched to inform people of the traffic rules and safety measures. Strict traffic rules must be followed, and a compulsorily fine system should be introduced.

Instead of providing free transport facilities for the public, the above-mentioned measures must be given more importance.

Sample 5:

To reduce traffic congestion, the government must provide free transport facilities to the public. But this step can be moderately implemented to reduce the congestion on roads. Some other measures should also be taken in equal proportion to deal with the issue of traffic congestion. Therefore, the statement, Government should provide 24/7 free public transportation to reduce traffic congestion is moderately correct. There are several reasons for the increasing traffic congestion on roads as mentioned below.

Population in many of the developing countries like India and China has been increasing at an alarming rate. This has caused an increasing number of people on the road either using public transport, their own vehicles or pedestrians resulting in increased traffic congestion. Also, a large-scale migration of the population to urban cities for work had deteriorated the traffic conditions of big cities. Secondly, the fares of the public transport are quite high compared to the service they render and are more congested and unhygienic. Now, when automobiles have become more affordable and fuel-efficient, people opt for quality and comfort over public facilities. Thirdly, people have started to travel more these days and public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners of the cities or towns. In such situations what people find better is the use of the facilities of the private vehicle. However, the use of private vehicles has resulted in increased traffic congestion and besides, these are the major cause of concern as they contribute to the emission of harmful gases polluting the environment.

To deal with the problem of traffic congestion, providing only free public transport may not contribute much. Besides, the government must encourage the use of electric vehicles and bicycles amongst the population. Secondly, it must focus on building more expressways and highways and separate lanes to reduce the congestion. Enough attention must be paid to constructing road facilities in remote corners of the cities and towns and especially in rural areas so that public transport can easily reach every corner of the world. Strict adherence to the traffic rules must be followed.

All these steps along with free transport facilities by the government together can contribute to reducing traffic congestion.

Sample 6:

The incidents of traffic congestion are increasing along with the population growth. Some contend that in order to lessen traffic congestion, the government ought to offer free public transportation. This solution, in my opinion, can only partially resolve the issue.

Most individuals now prefer to live in cities or towns rather than rural areas due to urbanisation. This is one of the primary causes of the heavy traffic on the roadways. At the same time, cars have also gotten cheaper and more fuel-efficient as a result of technological improvement. The number of automobiles on the roads has also increased as a result.

The government is undoubtedly attempting to reduce traffic by enhancing the efficiency and speed of public transit. For instance, the DMRC system, which facilitates bus stops across the entire city, has been installed in Delhi, a densely populated metropolis. The public can utilise this bus service 24 hours a day, seven days a week, but it is not free, thus many people opt to drive their own car instead. Because buses and trains are crowded and uncomfortable, many individuals will still choose to use their own vehicles even if public transportation is free. Free public transportation will also put a strain on the exchequer.

In my opinion, the government can take a number of additional steps to lessen traffic on the roads. For instance, it needs to create bigger roadways, additional flyovers, and separate lanes for cyclists and pedestrians. It should also strictly enforce traffic regulations and promote the use of environmentally friendly transportation.

In conclusion, making public transportation free will undoubtedly encourage more people to use it, but since those who value comfort and convenience over cost will still drive privately, this strategy is ineffective in easing traffic congestion.

Sample 7:

The traffic is getting worse in contemporary society, some citizens suggest that the authorities should provide free public transport every day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it's extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken at the same time.

We have to admit that this policy can increase the usage of public transport. Inhabitants will take it into consideration if it's free when they are facing traffic jam. To some extent, it can reduce traffic congestion. But we cannot turn a blind eye to the problems it caused.

This initiative will sharply increase the national budget. It's generally acknowledged that national funds are limited and should be used in a large variety of social aspects from education to environmental protection. The initiative will leave a burden on the financial budget and let the infrastructure cannot be maintained and guaranteed.

Furthermore, this policy cannot address the root of this issue. People use private cars not because of the high cost of the public transportation system, but because the line and route don't cover their destination or the low efficiency when they plan for a long-distance trip. No matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. In addition, traffic congestion only accrued during the rush hours, so it's pointless to provide it for free all day.

To sum up, I think the authority should reduce the price and develop the traffic infrastructure if they want to address this issue, rather than provide it for free simply.

Sample 8:

Some contend that the best way to combat traffic congestion is to always provide free bus and rail passes to everyone who needs them. While I acknowledge it may work for the vast majority of individuals, I think the government ought to offer other options to address this issue.

On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.

However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.

In conclusion, it is undeniably true that providing free public transit to citizens may be a significant element in reducing traffic, but this is by no means the main component that governments should take into account when trying to address this issue.

Sample 9:

In recent years, traffic jams have been increasingly ubiquitous particularly in big cities which cause great fatigue for commuters. In order to tackle this problem, it is argued by many that government should provide free public transport all day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it is extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken.

First of all, it is an indisputable fact that traffic congestion is not only attributed to the vast amount of private transport but also road systems. Moreover, no matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. Thus, providing free public transport alone just contributes to cutting down the volume of traffic to some extent. In fact, many big cities like Ho Chi Minh still suffer from traffic jams in narrow roads with obsolete infrastructure in spite of the rise in availability of public transport. Therefore, I strongly believe that road needs to be widened, and traffic lights and signs should be made more state-of-the-art to stem the root causes.

More importantly, though providing free public transport 24 hours per day is not necessary and what is more is that it may leave a burden on the national budget. According to the majority of reports, traffic jams mainly occur during the rush hours, so it is pointless to provide public transport all the time. On top of that, providing free public transport in the long term may be unachievable due to its tremendous cost. This measure not only costs governments a fortune but it is also unable to address the root of the issue. It would be far more economical if this amount of money was invested in enhancing road facilities.

By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that other measures rather than making public transport available may be far more efficient to traffic congestion. In years to come, I strongly believe that more investments in road systems should be adopted to make commuting more comfortable and time-saving.

 

Lời giải

Sample 1:

These days, people’s workplaces are constantly changing and evolving to meet the demands of modern society. Furthermore, the roles and responsibilities of jobs are also undergoing changes to adapt to new ways of working and living. This essay will discuss the possible reasons for these changes and suggest some ways that people can better prepare themselves for their future careers.

Firstly, due to the developments in hi-tech machines and artificial intelligence, millions of people all around the world are losing their jobs and being replaced by automated processes. For example, millions of factory workers have lost their jobs because they have been replaced by machines that are able to do their job quicker and more effectively. Furthermore, as a result of the ever-increasing desire to cut expenses and increase profits, many jobs are being outsourced to countries where the wages are lower. For instance, when a person calls a tech support help line in an English-speaking country, they will most likely be connected to someone in another country, like India or Philippines, where the wages are lower.

However, there are a number of ways that people can prepare for changes in their workplaces in the future. Firstly, students preparing to leave high school need to be advised about the sustainability of the career path they are choosing. To illustrate, autonomous vehicles are predicted to replace most delivery and taxi driver jobs in the very near future, so this is not a job that someone should expect to have for a very long time. Furthermore, while some jobs are being replaced by technology, many jobs are simply incorporating technology into their process, and therefore people will need to be able to keep up to date with these changes. To help achieve this, specific courses could be designed to help educate people on the use of modern technology in their workplaces.

In conclusion, although there are many changes in the workplace these days, educating people to carefully choose their career and to keep up to date with modern technology is the key to avoiding any major problems.

Sample 2:

The nature of labor in our modern world is changing at a fundamental level, with many workers worried that they will not be able to maintain their job conditions for long periods of time. Personally, I think this is the result of stagnating wages and the advances of automation, and can only be resolved with a universal basic income for the whole population.

Firstly, I argue that society is witnessing the worst wage stagnation in generations, which is causing people to constantly look for better paying jobs. As cost increases yet wages are not following suit, most of the workforce have to scramble to reach for managerial positions or risk losing their disposable incomes. This in turn creates a situation where many people have to take up multiple jobs in order to make ends meet. In the US and UK, for instance, it is estimated that millions of workers are on zero-hour contracts, which does not guarantee a set number of hours of work.  

Secondly, as corporations seek to reduce expenditure as much as possible, they aim to replace the workforce with machines, leading to higher levels of unemployment and less stable job conditions. As machines encroach on the workforce, jobs become focused on the maintenance of the robots running our factories, and therefore there is higher competition for the dwindling number of jobs with gradually raising entry barriers. The end result is sure to be tension amongst socio-economic classes that can afford entry into the workforce if the effect of automation is not being mitigated.

I argue that in order to solve this, it is important to implement Universal Basic Income, which is an equal lump sum of money given to all citizens of countries every month or year. This would help people to keep their jobs and not have to take up precarious work, since they have enough money to buy basic necessities. This scheme can already be seen in Canada during the COVID-19 outbreak, for example, with citizens getting 2000 Canadian dollars a year. This has been hugely popular, as it allowed Canadians to have some level of stability even as the economy came to a halt.

Overall, I believe that stagnant wages and automation is leading to volatile work conditions, and as such, I contend that UBI is needed to stabilize this situation.

Sample 3:

It is a tendency that many people change their careers many times during their lifetime. This essay will identify the causes for these changes and recommend some ways to prepare for working in the future.

There are many reasons why one job for life seems to be over. One of the major reasons is our consumerism society. Therefore, job hopping for higher paid jobs or doing multiple jobs is no longer simply an option. Another reason is that the development of technology has changed the structure of work at such a fast pace that people have to constantly update themselves with the latest working methods. However, many are unable to adapt to the changes. For example, older workers might find it difficult to compete with younger workforce and have to find a new job or change their career field.

For those who want a stable life even in the rapidly changing future, they should realise that as long as we find a job which gives us satisfaction, there would be no need to change. My advice for those people is that if we stick to one job, life can be more stable. Of course, if one wants some employment changes, they should prepare for new job openings with a variety of working experience and skill set. Some should return to school to pursue courses that can lead them into new careers. Otherwise, some should take a fresh environment in which they can use and improve their skills and experience.

In conclusion, the process of job hopping is becoming very common because of social and technological development. I suggest that our knowledge and skills should be updated regularly, and we should have a balance between career changes and job satisfaction.

Sample 4:

It is true that the present working environment has witnessed a radical change. People now tend to switch jobs more frequently rather than have their occupations remain stable. While this phenomenon can be caused by several reasons, there are certain recommendations to help future workers prepare themselves for their careers.

First and foremost, the introduction of new technology might be the greatest cause for such changes. In other words, millions of workers all around the world are being replaced by high tech machines and artificial intelligence. For example, some staff working in the service industry are now on the verge of unemployment due to the rapid growth of online shopping websites and self-service supermarket checkouts. Another reason leading to this phenomenon is globalization. Due to globalization, employees have a wide range of choices between different positions among countries. As a result, many individuals tend to shift from one job to another with a view to higher salary as well as better standard of living.

However, there are several ways that people can get ready for changes in their future workplace. Firstly, workers should be well equipped with various skills by attending vocational courses and job training. Thus, they might keep up to date with the rapid development of robots and automated processes. In addition, individuals can get advice about the sustainability of their future position. This helps them to excel in one job rather than multiple, which lifts up the burden of switching jobs regularly.

In conclusion, although cutting-edge technology and globalization have made a great impact on the world of work, employees must be well-informed and flexible to achieve expected goals.

Sample 5:

It is irrefutable that the work scenario is altering at a fast pace. Working conditions are also different and the process of job-hopping is very common. This essay shall delve into the possible causes for these changes and suggest ways to prepare for work in the future.

To begin with, the development of science and technology has changed the structure of work. For example, people no longer need to do some heavy work by themselves. Instead, they can use machines. Secondly, competition has become intense, and people have to constantly update themselves with the latest materials and methods. Sometimes they cannot compete with the new techno-savvy workforce and so have to change jobs out of compulsion.

Furthermore, we belong to an era of consumerism. Being surrounded by so many choices, people today want to buy new things and for that, they do multiple jobs. In addition, the 24/7 society of today provides us with the opportunity to workday and night. For instance, in earlier times, there were very few jobs which were round-the-clock jobs. But, today, globalization has brought in a multitude of options of working day and night. The line between day and night has become dim and people have become workaholics.

There could be many suggestions to prepare for work in the future. People should have a set goal in their mind and get training accordingly. Moreover, it is important to draw a line somewhere. The stress and strain of the fast modern workplace is leading many to nervous breakdowns. In the developed countries, a new term called downshifting has already come where after a certain stage, people are saying ‘no’ to promotions and showing contentment with less. We should also realize that if we stick to one job, then life can be more stable, and we can enjoy our leisure also.

To put in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, although work conditions are different today and we have a need to update our knowledge regularly, we can plan our life in a meticulous way and have a balance between work and leisure.

Sample 6:

In today’s modern world, people tend to change jobs more often than before and don’t want to work permanently in one environment. I would like to explore the sources of this issue and suggest several solutions for future work.

Firstly, due to the global recession, many employers have to downsize and restructure their businesses. This leads to a number of redundant employees being forced to leave their jobs and find other ones. Another reason is that, as living costs are getting higher and higher, people want to earn as much money as they can to meet their needs. Hence, they seek better opportunities and well-paid jobs everywhere, every day. Some also look for new challenges. Last but not least, thanks to new technology, people nowadays are able to access information more easily, including information about job recruiting.

One of my suggestions for this problem is to create a comfortable working environment and build strong relationships between colleagues and between managers and workers. These will make employees find it harder to leave. To achieve this, courses such as leadership training and communication skill training should be carried out to help supervisors lead their team efficiently without causing any stress, and help employees fit inconveniently.

In conclusion, I would like to state that changing jobs is one of the notable signs of our technological times, and soft skills training courses can help people adapt to the working environment instead of seeking to escape it.

Sample 7:

Work culture lately has been dynamically transformed, mainly due to improvements in technology like transport and communication. Job security has become a dicey issue as employees now need to keep themselves updated with the advancements around them. This essay shall further explain the reasons and offer probable solutions.

In the last two decades, we have seen a remarkable spread of technology in all wakes of life. With easy access to the Internet and computers, work has become faster and easier. Innovation of office tools is encouraged everywhere so as to not let anything hinder the growth of trade and commerce. With each task becoming effortless, manual intervention at many places has been reduced. Ergo, rising insecurity is seen among employees. Additionally, employees are expected to multi-task in their jobs making it more difficult for older workers to sustain.

The remedial measures for such a situation are very few as of now. First of all, state-of-the-art employee training centers to help the employees stay well-versed with the high-tech upgradations. To solve this problem from an earlier level, universities should start imparting practical training in their curriculum, with the know-how of current on-the-job scenarios to prepare potential workers better. All this needs to be done as the employees losing their jobs also lose financial security for their families, and it is very difficult to start again from ground zero.

To conclude, I’d say we should accept the ever-changing technological advancements as they’re unlikely to stop. Better would be to equip ourselves and become flexible accordingly so as to welcome such developments.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP