Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Giải bởi Vietjack
Sample 1:
In today's society, advertising plays a crucial role in the sales of popular consumer goods. It is a commonly held belief that the significant sales figures of popular consumer goods are a result of the influence of advertising rather than the genuine necessities of the society in which they are marketed. I completely agree with this belief.
Firstly, advertising techniques have become increasingly sophisticated over the years, making it difficult for consumers to differentiate between their actual needs and the wants created by advertisers. For example, companies use social media platforms to target specific groups of consumers and manipulate their emotions by creating a sense of need for products they may not have even thought about before.
Secondly, companies often spend a significant portion of their budget on advertising and promotion rather than on improving the quality of their products or providing better services to their customers. This can be seen in the case of many fast-food chains that spend a large portion of their revenue on advertising, rather than focusing on providing healthier food options.
Finally, there is evidence to suggest that consumer behaviour is often driven by external factors, such as peer pressure and societal norms. Advertisements capitalize on these societal norms and manipulate consumers into purchasing products they may not necessarily need. For example, consider the trend of using expensive and trendy smartphones among young people. While some may genuinely require the features and capabilities of such devices, others may simply be influenced by the social pressure to own the latest and most popular brand. Advertisements featuring celebrities or social media influencers using these smartphones can exacerbate this pressure and create a desire to conform to the norm, leading to unnecessary purchases.
In conclusion, advertising plays a significant role in shaping consumer behaviour and driving sales of popular consumer goods. Therefore, it is crucial that consumers become more aware of the influence of advertising and make informed decisions about their purchases.
Sample 2:
These days, with a plethora of consumer products available in the market, some people have difficulty deciding which products they really need and what they just want to have. Cut-throat competition among brands to win consumers has become widespread, and advertisements play a key role in today’s marketing. However, only advertisement is not what forces people to buy things, their real needs are still a powerful factor.
Brands apply various marketing techniques to sell their products to consumers, and advertisement is one of them. Tempting adverts on billboards, TV, radio or the web are constantly pushing us to buy things that they claim are the best. This has an impact on consumers' purchasing decisions, but a great proportion of customers are still driven by their needs rather than the adverts they see. Rampant recessions and soaring living costs have also forced people to cut necessary items from their shopping list, let alone have the luxury of buying whatever they wish.
Moreover, an intensive growth in sales of popular consumer items has resulted from people's modern lifestyle where they need far more things than their ancestors. The role of advertisement, in this case, is confined to helping people choose the products and not persuading them to buy unnecessary goods. For instance, electronic gadgets and household appliances that people use today were not widespread in the past. They came into our life as a natural requirement from our modern lifestyle and were not just pushed by luring advertisements from different brands.
In conclusion, advertisements are a powerful tool for brands, and they can affect many purchasers' decisions, but they cannot shape what people, as a whole, buy. Modern lifestyle and our real needs are more powerful in this regard.
Sample 3:
Nowadays, millions of companies produce billions of consumer products each year, and the role of advertising is quite obvious here - to attract more consumers and make more sales. Adverts are supposed to help customers find goods or services that match their requirements. However, they are also the most powerful tool to shape consumers' purchasing habits in society. I believe that modern commercials are not merely matchmakers of a product and a buyer, rather they actively interfere with buyers' desires, developing artificial needs.
Advertisements are supposed to guide people to learn about different features of various products and make them conscious of what to expect from a service. However, behind the scenes, such adverts create artificial needs in our minds and constantly push us to buy the latest models or new products bypassing our real needs of them. When such advertisements falsely promise that we will be younger and more attractive if we buy and use their products, we often become puppets in their hands. Market-full of cosmetics, which have even overgrown the necessary sectors in many countries, just indicate how advertisements shape consumers' buying habits rather than their real needs.
Unfortunately, promoters of goods and services now control our minds more aggressively. Commercials no longer promote products, but lifestyles. They tell us to purchase things just because they are fashionable or up to date with the image of a successful person. And we buy new cars, gadgets and clothes in order to match this image and not because old ones are no longer usable.
In conclusion, I think that high sales of popular commodities in modern society are the result of new promotional technologies and tactful advertisement policy rather than people's real needs.
Sample 4:
The issue of whether popular consumer goods' high sales are a result of advertising influence or genuine societal needs has been a subject of much discussion. In my opinion, I disagree with the statement that advertising is solely responsible for the high sales of consumer goods.
While it is true that advertising plays a significant role in promoting products and increasing sales, it is not the only factor that determines consumer behaviour. In fact, consumers often purchase products based on their needs and preferences, which are shaped by a variety of factors such as culture, lifestyle, and personal values. For instance, in countries with a high population density, small household appliances such as rice cookers and washing machines are in high demand due to their practicality and convenience, regardless of their brand or the amount of advertising they receive. Similarly, health-conscious individuals may prioritize purchasing products that align with their values, such as organic food or eco-friendly cleaning products. In these cases, advertising may play a minimal role in the consumer's decision-making process.
Moreover, the rise of e-commerce and social media platforms has democratized the advertising industry, allowing smaller brands with limited advertising budgets to effectively reach their target audience through influencer marketing and targeted ads. This indicates that while advertising can certainly influence consumer behaviour, it is not the sole determinant of product sales. In fact, people have become so used to advertisements that they pay little attention to them.
In conclusion, while advertising plays a role in promoting consumer goods and increasing sales, it is important to recognize that consumer behaviour is influenced by a variety of factors beyond advertising alone. Therefore, the high sales of popular consumer goods cannot be solely attributed to the power of advertising but are rather a reflection of a complex interplay of various societal and personal factors.
Sample 5:
In today’s consumer-driven society, the high sales of popular goods often seem to reflect the power of advertising more than the genuine needs of the community. Advertising plays a significant role in shaping consumer behavior and preferences, often persuading people to purchase items that they do not necessarily need. This essay will argue that the influence of advertising on consumer choices is indeed more powerful than the actual necessities of society.
Firstly, advertising creates a perceived need for products through persuasive techniques. Marketers use various strategies such as emotional appeal, celebrity endorsements, and appealing visuals to make products seem desirable. For instance, a luxury watch ad might suggest that owning the watch is a symbol of success and sophistication, even though most people do not need an expensive timepiece to tell the time. This illustrates how advertising can manipulate perceptions and drive sales by creating artificial needs rather than addressing real ones.
Secondly, the success of popular consumer goods often relies on the effectiveness of their marketing campaigns rather than their utility. Companies invest heavily in advertising to ensure their products are at the forefront of consumers’ minds. For example, the massive advertising budgets of major smartphone manufacturers ensure their latest models are perceived as must-have items, despite the fact that previous versions still function adequately for most users. This demonstrates how advertising can overshadow practicality and genuine necessity, leading to high sales based on brand image and perceived prestige.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising more than the real needs of society. Advertising often creates artificial desires and drives consumer behavior based on perception rather than necessity. For the future, it is essential for consumers to develop critical thinking skills and discern between genuine needs and artificially created wants.
Sample 6:
In today's world, technology has a significant effect on people’s lives. Advertisements are now considered the most important way to introduce new products to people and influence them to purchase those goods. However, the real purpose of buying the products has changed by these false promotions. I completely agree with this statement and will point out some reasons how advertising affects society in a pessimistic way.
As more people have access to technology, the selling sector is experiencing fiercer competition. Companies utilize public advertising theory to boost their brand recognition. Furthermore, it is undeniable that a product's selling rate increases when more of its image appears online. For instance, businesses that wish to improve the quality of their products can pay celebrities to promote them and increase the demand for their products. As a result, individuals are tricked into purchasing unneeded goods because of renowned people who act in the advertisement.
Moreover, advertising and goods go hand in hand. Consumers complain about costly goods resulting in public advertising campaigns. A lot of selling information is spread to people through TV shows, the Internet, and street pamphlets. People dispute how terrible the products, after they purchased them and how irrational the pricing was. From this angle, it is obvious that advertising fills the gap between products and the reality of their true quality.
In conclusion, consumers believe what the promotions have shown when they see the products on TV or on the Internet. But customers cannot rely on the advertisements and should also consider the feedback and reviews of the products.
Sample 7:
The last few decades have seen more advertising than ever before, which has had a greater impact on the customers. Many people feel that the influence of advertising on consumers has affected their buying behavior significantly. Although I partially agree with the viewpoint, in my opinion, the majority of consumers are capable of making the appropriate decisions on their own.
To begin with, public exposure to repetitive commercials is one of the key elements that influences people's decisions to buy items, particularly new ones. However, some customers are not able to differentiate between their wants and their fundamental needs. For instance, many teens are utilizing costly smartphones on the street as a result of the widely disseminated commercials that would make them appear more stylish to their mates. But having an expensive smartphone seems pointless for someone who just wants to browse the internet, attend calls and listen to music.
On the other hand, other groups of people believe that advertising only has a minor impact on people's judgments and other elements such as providing additional information and innovative ideas, are more important. Additionally, there are rare chances when people are completely interested. Based on their values and experiences, they interpret and assign meaning to what they observe. The majority of people have various preferences and make decisions based on what suits them best.
To conclude, there are reasons in favor of and against the significant impact of advertising on consumer decisions. However, I believe that the majority of individuals can assess what kinds of products are necessary and use advertising to make wise decisions.
Sample 8:
Nowadays we are living in a technological world where everything moves as fast as an airplane, including people’s lives. Therefore, considering the rapid pace of modern life, commercial publicity is considered important. The advertisements make us aware of the newest amenities and give us opportunities to choose from a wide range of products. We hence forget whether we need the product or not. I completely agree with this opinion and will discuss the same in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, there are times when we fail to avoid our temptations and buy unnecessary things, ignoring our genuine needs. We get inclined toward the pictures, captions, or movies which create an impact on our mind. For example, the media is flooded with advertisements for an energy drink that claims to boost our energy and give us wings. These days, not only adults but youths also get influenced by such products and purchase them without any thought and also not bothering to consult their doctor first.
However, there are some popular as well as necessary goods which people need in their day-to-day life. Sales of these products increase directly as a society cannot do without them. The widely used medicinal and pharmaceutical products cannot be denied. Hence, it is correct to say those famous, yet basic goods do not just have high sales because of the commercial advertisement but also because of their requirement.
To conclude, I believe that advertisements are responsible for the high sales of some or the other items, but it is not wrong to say that individuals do purchase some materials out of the basic requirements and not because of promotions.
Sample 9:
Nowadays, there are lots of advertisements on television or on the streets. Some people think that advertising boosts the sales of goods, and it encourages people to buy things unnecessarily. This argument may be true. In my country, many advertising companies produce advertisements with famous and popular actors or singers. People, especially youngsters, buy goods that their favourite singer advertises, although they do not really need the products.
Also, on the television screen, a product may look gorgeous and good quality. As a result of it, people often buy goods without enough consideration. Consumers may not actually need it but they buy goods impulsively soon after they watch the advertising. Furthermore, as many customers buy a particular product due to its advertising campaign, the other people may be affected by the trend, even if the product is not of the real needs of society.
On the other hand, there are various aspects against these arguments. Moreover, it is people's choice to make a decision to buy goods. Advertising may not be a cause of customers' buying habits. Individuals have their own spending habits. If they have enough disposable income, then the right to make a decision is given to them. No one actually can fudge whether the goods sold are the real needs of society or not.
In addition, as there should be a limited amount of disposable income consumers are able to spend, people try to allocate their budgets. They cannot be simply swayed by those advertisements.
In conclusion, as customers have their own strong opinions and standard of good quality goods, it’s better to leave them to make their own decision in buy goods. It’s fairly difficult to say everyone’s swayed by advertising and buys good impulsively. However, in sensitive areas of businesses such as toy industries, it may be necessary to band advertising to those children as children have not got enough ability to control themselves or to know what they need.
Sample 10:
In our contemporary, fast-paced world driven by consumerism, the surge in sales of popular consumer goods has become a subject of heated debate. Many contend that the primary catalyst behind this phenomenon lies in the pervasive and persuasive nature of advertising, positing that these sales predominantly showcase the prowess of marketing rather than the authentic needs of the society they cater to.
Undoubtedly, advertising assumes a central role in influencing consumer choices. The ceaseless barrage of captivating advertisements across diverse platforms - television, billboards, and the internet - meticulously crafts narratives around certain products. Marketers aim not just for utility but for an irresistible allure, transforming these goods into coveted essentials. Consequently, the inundation of these products in the market is often attributed to the triumph of these advertising campaigns.
Yet, the question lingers: do escalating sales figures genuinely mirror the authentic needs of society? The answer is nuanced. While advertising undeniably shapes consumer behavior, it does not operate in isolation. Genuine societal needs, molded by technological advancements, shifting lifestyles, and evolving preferences, contribute significantly to the demand for specific products. For example, the widespread adoption of smartphones owes its success not only to persuasive advertisements but also to a societal inclination towards heightened connectivity and convenience.
Furthermore, the economic backdrop plays a pivotal role in shaping consumer behavior. In times of prosperity, consumers may gravitate towards indulging in luxury goods touted by advertising. Conversely, during economic downturns, pragmatism often takes precedence, prompting individuals to prioritize essential needs over mere wants. In conclusion, attributing the surge in sales of popular consumer goods solely to the power of marketing is overly simplistic. The intricate interplay between advertising, societal needs, and economic factors illuminates the multifaceted nature of consumer behavior. It’s a dynamic where the allure of advertisements converges with the genuine needs and economic realities of society, creating a nuanced landscape that continually molds and reshapes the market for popular consumer good.
Sample 11:
It is true that we are increasingly surrounded by advertising by companies that want to sell us their products. To some extent I agree that advertising has an impact on sales, but I would also argue that we do need most of the goods that we buy.
Advertisements can certainly tempt people to buy products that they might not otherwise want. A good example could be the mobile phone. Every year people can be seen queuing to buy the latest models, even when they already have a perfectly good phone that does not need replacement. Perhaps it is the influence of marketing that leads us to make these kinds of decisions; we want to stay up to date with the latest fashions or own the newest high-status device. The high sales of the iPhone seem to support this idea.
On the other hand, I believe that most people do not buy products because of advertising alone. There are other good reasons why we make these choices, and there must be some kind of need before a person makes a purchase. New versions of products almost always have improved features that buyers may want. A new car, for example, may have greatly improved safety features, or it may be more economical to run, or it may pollute less. A new phone may allow the user to communicate more quickly or effectively, thus enhancing their quality of life.
In conclusion, while advertising obviously influences our buying behaviour, I do not agree that people make decisions that go against their real needs.
Sample 12:
Nowadays, popular consumer products sell well because advertising is so powerful, not because society really needs them. I agree with this statement for two reasons.
Firstly, advertisers are very good at tricking consumers into believing their products can make them happier. They do this by depicting the lives consumers want to live and the people consumers want to become. Take for example a Gillette commercial in which a clean-shaven man is getting a promotion and marrying a beautiful woman. After watching this commercial, men may think if they have a smooth face like that, they might get more out of life. As a result, they may buy some Gillette razors even though their old ones still work perfectly.
In addition, repeated targeted advertising can increase the desire to buy. Consider those who have looked at a Nike backpack on Amazon. They might have been able to resist the temptation to purchase at first, but targeted advertising means they will see advertisements for the backpack everywhere online: they will see them when they scroll through their Facebook feeds; they will see them when they watch YouTube videos. This repeated exposure will heighten their desire to buy. The result may be that they cannot contain themselves anymore and finally purchase one even though they do not need it.
In conclusion, the high sales of trendy consumer goods do reflect how powerful advertising is. For one thing, it is extremely effective at making people believe they would be happier with the products being promoted. For another, repeated targeted advertisements can intensify consumers' desire to buy.
Sample 13:
The effect of advertising on consumer behaviour has been the topic of extensive discussion. Some argue that advertising is primarily responsible for the high sales of popular consumer goods, rather than the genuine requirements of society. Despite the fact that advertising plays a significant role in shaping consumer preferences, I believe that it is not the sole determinant, as actual societal requirements also impact purchasing decisions.
Advertising has a substantial influence over product promotion and consumer preferences. Companies create a desire for their products through persuasive marketing strategies and endeavour to establish strong brand identities. Clever advertising campaigns can affect consumer perceptions and create a sense of necessity or desire for particular products. The shear volume and pervasiveness of advertisements contribute to the perception that advertising is the primary driver of sales.
However, it is essential to recognise that advertising does not create all consumer needs and desires. There are actual societal requirements, and businesses frequently seek to meet them with their products and services. The pursuit of solutions to practical problems, convenience, comfort, and quality drives the purchasing decisions of consumers. Certain goods' availability and popularity can be attributed to their capacity to effectively meet these requirements.
In addition, consumers are not passive recipients of marketing messages. They have the freedom to make decisions based on their own preferences, values, and practical considerations. While advertising may raise awareness and shape perceptions, it is ultimately up to individuals to determine whether a product meets their requirements and provides value for their money. Additionally, positive word-of-mouth recommendations, product evaluations, and personal experiences impact purchasing decisions, indicating that advertising alone cannot sustain long-term sales success.
In conclusion, while advertising has an undeniable impact on consumer decisions, it would be an oversimplification to attribute high sales to advertising alone. Real societal requirements and personal preferences also play a significant role in determining consumer behaviour. Understanding consumer trends and behaviours requires balancing the influence of advertising with a critical evaluation of authentic requirements.
Sample 14:
In today’s consumer-driven society, the influence of advertising on the sales of popular consumer goods cannot be denied. However, to claim that high sales are solely a result of advertising and not a reflection of real societal needs is a simplistic view. In this essay, I will argue that while advertising plays a significant role in driving sales, the popularity of consumer goods is also influenced by genuine societal needs and preferences.
It is undeniable that advertising has a powerful impact on consumer behavior. Through strategic marketing campaigns, companies are able to create a demand for their products, often persuading individuals to purchase items that they may not necessarily need. The use of persuasive techniques, celebrity endorsements, and emotional appeals can lead to impulse buying and inflated sales figures for certain consumer goods.
However, it would be inaccurate to dismiss the role of real societal needs in driving the sales of popular consumer goods. The demand for certain products is often a response to genuine needs and preferences within a society. For example, the popularity of smartphones can be attributed to the increasing reliance on technology for communication, work, and entertainment. Similarly, the demand for eco-friendly products reflects a growing societal concern for the environment.
In conclusion, while advertising undoubtedly plays a significant role in driving the sales of popular consumer goods, it is overly simplistic to attribute high sales solely to the power of advertising. Real societal needs and preferences also play a crucial role in shaping consumer behavior. It is important for marketers and consumers alike to recognize the complex interplay between advertising and genuine societal needs in the consumption of consumer goods.
Sample 15:
One of the highly controversial issues today relates to whether consumers are tricked by different forms of advertisement into buying goods unreasonably or that advertisement helps them make informed decisions to buy what they want. I partially agree with the latter opinion due to several reasons that I will discuss in greater detail in my essay.
On one side of the argument there are people who argue that advertisement agencies nowadays have become extremely clever in convincing people to buy certain products. People often have this opinion because many people are making purchases that simply do not reflect any of their personal or household needs. A second point is that many advertising agencies are now using subliminal messages to convince consumers subconsciously to buy products that they may not really want. A particularly good example here is a non-formal study conducted in the USA that revealed that 25% of the goods bought by an average American household was not necessary. Thus, it goes without saying that this viewpoint is credible and realistic too.
On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that the benefits of advertisement considerably outweigh its disadvantages. The main reason for believing this is that there are many products competing for the consumer’s undivided attention. It is also possible to say that there are a lot of new useful products coming out every day, and the only way to get more information about them is through advertisements. One good illustration of this is the promotion of new medications to prescribing doctors and educating them about the benefits of these medications to patients. Therefore, it is easy to see why this argument has gained support.
After having discussed the most pertinent points of this issue, I feel that the only logical conclusion is that the advantages brought about by advertisements such as helping people make informed decisions regarding a certain product outweigh their disadvantages. Hence, I am partially inclined to the opinion that advertisements are beneficial to society.
Sample 17:
The use of advertising by manufacturers and businesses to encourage the sale of their products is not a new practise. The goal is to capture the attention of the target audience and convert them into potential, if not actual, consumers. According to research, most companies that have spent a lot of money on advertising have made a lot of money. Those who believe in the effectiveness of advertising, on the other hand, feel that high sales indicate a large desire for consumer products. It might not be true, in my opinion.
To begin with, advertising informs the public about the function and qualities of a product. When you enter a department shop, for example, there are many different items on the shelf, yet they all look very similar to each other if you simply glance at the product brochure. Which one do you think would be the best fit for you? In this way, we owe a debt of gratitude to advertising. Through this kind of access, both the quality of life and the prospective need for us can be fully realized and even provoked. The influence of advertising on a consumer's decision is undeniable.
Advertising is a strong tool, but it isn't always as effective as it could be. Some people are inspired or misled to acquire products or goods because they lack the ability to distinguish between advertisements in terms of "excellent quality," which is overblown in reality. This circumstance has resulted in a cosmetic product being the unintended victim. We constantly see the same thing on TV: an elderly lady would look younger and more attractive after using a skin lotion. We may never know what the real situation is behind the screen. The real truth is that several statistics demonstrate that the distance between an advertisement and a brilliant product is far wider than we anticipated.
To summarise, advertising accounts for a major portion of the justifiable benefits brought to consumers, but the government and authorities should put more effort into preventing ill-intentioned marketing.
Sample 18:
Increased sales of well-known consumer goods indicate the power of advertising instead of the needs of society as a whole. According to me, the advertisement successfully captures viewers' attention, increasing sales of the purchased items.
On the one hand, customers disregard the utility of the goods in favor of the information they get from an advertisement while making purchases. Businesses are selling more and more as a result of this trend. A significant PR effort drives its selling power under these circumstances. For instance, thanks to Tiger Woods' extensive marketing campaign over the previous three years, from 2016 to 2019, revenues from protein powder have surged dramatically. People didn't research the effectiveness of the product before buying it; instead, they bought it because a well-known celebrity had promoted it.
However, since they are necessities for humans, several consumer products have seen a surge in sales. There is no publicity of any sort for these products. Instead, individuals purchase the goods because they need them on a regular basis; no one needs to coerce them into doing so. For instance, toothpaste had an astounding surge in sales while having no advertising. This demonstrates that consumers carefully differentiate between necessities and luxuries before reviewing and purchasing a product.
In conclusion, it can be observed that advertising largely motivates people and raises sales of consumer products, either because a renowned personality has promoted the product or because consumers learn directly from the advertisement. A small percentage of people, however, simply make purchases based on necessity and do not depend on advertisements of any kind.
Sample 19:
Manufacturers and corporations have long used advertising to stimulate the purchase of their products. The goal is to attract the target audience's attention and turn them into potential, if not real, customers. Most companies that have spent a lot of money on advertising have made a lot of money, according to a study. Those who believe advertising is effective, on the other hand, believe that high sales reflect a big need for consumer goods. In my opinion, it is possible that this is not the case.
To begin, advertising informs the public about a product's function and attributes. When you walk into a department store, for example, there are many different items on the shelf, but if you just glance at the product brochure, they all look extremely similar to each other. Which one do you believe is the best match for you? We owe advertising a debt of gratitude in this sense. Both the quality of life and the potential need for us can be fully realized and even aroused with this kind of access. Advertising has an unmistakable impact on a consumer's decision.
Although advertising is a powerful weapon, it is not always as effective as it may be. Some people are influenced or misled into purchasing products or services because they are unable to discriminate between advertisements that claim "great quality" but are overstated in reality. As a result of this occurrence, a cosmetic product has become the unintentional victim. We see it on TV all the time: an elderly lady looks younger and more attractive after using a skin lotion. It's possible that we'll never know what's going on behind the scenes. The truth is that various statistics show that the gap between a great commercial and a great product is far bigger than we thought.
To summarise, advertising provides a significant percentage of legitimate advantages to consumers, but the government and authorities should devote more resources to avoid deceptive marketing.
Sample 20:
It is widely believed that advertising, not the real need of consumers, leads to the popularity of a product. Personally, I strongly agree with such a statement.
Firstly, advertising promotes the sale of products by providing necessary information for potential customers through the means of media, particularly TV, with huge coverage. As a matter of fact, when in possession of a TV or a computer connected to the Internet, everyone would see advertisements almost everywhere, which would help them to know more specifically about desirable goods. Compared to the past, when the power of advertising would not be enough to spark attention, people now have closer access to modern commodities. Without advertising, producers would not be able to reach out to their buyers, owing to a struggle to introduce or promote their new lines of product.
Secondly, I would say that under various circumstances, influential advertisements manipulate people into purchasing something they have no need for. It is common that images of sport or entertainment celebrities would be selected for commercial purposes, inflicting huge impact on buyers, especially their fans. For example, if Ronaldo, who is a famous football player, participated in a commercial advertisement on TV about a new product line of men’s perfumes, an enormous number of his loyal fans would buy those goods. This is because they want to be like their idols or simply it is a way to express their admiration and support.
Although I am familiar with the other side of the picture that makes advertisement a necessary in the present scenario; the drawbacks seem to be overpowering.
In conclusion, I think advertising is factored in boosting the sales of a product in spite of the insignificance of social needs for it.
Sample 21:
Nowadays, we are constantly inundated with commercials of all sorts. Many people contend that the sales of popular consumer goods are soaring because of advertising power and techniques rather than any dire need to purchase them. In this case, although I agree with the view up to a point, I find it hard to believe that this is true in every case.
Over the years, sales promotion has become more prevalent and innovative to attract more customers. In fact, sales promotion is a marketing strategy that stimulates consumer demand for goods and thereby increases sales. For instance, ‘buy one get one free’ is a popular kind of sales promotion where two goods are offered at a price of one, which in turn generates massive sales. Similarly, brand promotion is another important factor that profoundly influences consumers to drive their decision towards buying products. A case in point is the brand ambassador; a company usually employs a celebrity as an ambassador, who embodies the brand, creates a positive image in the minds of consumers, and thereby generates sales opportunities.
Having said that, consumers do not always succumb to the temptation of advertisements. Advertisements only provide consumers with information about the goods. In fact, consumers consider several factors, for instance, price, their necessity and the quality of the product before they make any purchase. Take economic factors as an example. Consumer buying decisions largely depend on the economic condition of a nation or a market. When a country is prosperous, the economy is robust, which in turn increases the purchasing power of the consumers. In simple words, when people experience a positive economic ambience, they gradually grow more confident to spend money on purchasing consumer products. While the scenario for poor people, who form the majority of the world population, is not the same.
In conclusion, it seems reasonable to assume that advertisements sometimes entice people to buy products, but consumer product sales soar as the country continues to prosper.
Sample 22:
It is commonly believed that the high sales of popular consumer goods are not driven by the real needs of society, but by the power of advertising. I completely agree with this view, as I believe that advertising has a significant impact on consumer behaviour and decision.
One of the main reasons for this is that advertising creates artificial needs in consumers. For example, advertisers use emotional appeals and clever marketing techniques to make products seem more desirable than they actually are. As a result, consumers feel pressured to buy these products, even if they do not need them. This can lead to a cycle of consumerism, where people continue to buy more and more products in order to satisfy their desire for material possessions.
Another reason for the power of advertising is that it can manipulate consumer preferences. Advertisers often use subliminal messaging and other techniques to influence how people think and feel about certain products. For example, they might use images of celebrities or attractive models to make products seem more appealing. This can create a false sense of value in the minds of consumers, who may be willing to pay more for products that they believe are of higher quality or status.
Finally, advertising can also be used to create brand loyalty. By associating products with positive emotions and experiences, advertisers can create strong emotional connections between consumers and their products. This can lead to repeat purchases and a sense of loyalty to certain brands, even if there are other, more affordable options available.
In conclusion, I believe that the increased sales of popular consumer goods are largely driven by the power of advertising, rather than the real needs of society. Advertising creates artificial needs, manipulates consumer preferences, and fosters brand loyalty. To reduce the influence of advertising on consumer behaviour, governments can regulate the advertising industry, promote consumer education, and encourage sustainable consumption practices.
Sample 23:
While advertising may have an impact on consumer behaviour, it is too simplistic to say that high sales of popular consumer goods are solely due to the power of advertising. There are several other factors at play, and to ignore them is to oversimplify the situation. In this essay, I will explain why advertisements are not the sole reason for increased sales of goods from different brands and why people’s purchasing decisions are not entirely influenced by adverts.
Firstly, the quality of the products themselves plays a significant role in their popularity. If a product is of high quality, it is likely to sell well regardless of the advertising behind it. Consumers tend to be loyal to brands that consistently provide high-quality products and services, and this loyalty can be difficult to break even with extensive advertising efforts.
Secondly, word of mouth plays an important role in consumer behaviour. If a product is good, people will talk about it, and this can generate more sales than any advertising campaign ever could. For example, the success of popular restaurants often comes from recommendations from satisfied customers rather than extensive advertising campaigns.
Lastly, the societal needs and preferences of a particular culture or region are important in determining which products are popular. Advertising campaigns may be effective in generating initial interest, but if a product does not meet the needs and preferences of the society in which it is sold, it is unlikely to be successful. For example, a product that is popular in one culture may not be as successful in another culture with different values and needs.
In conclusion, while advertising is undoubtedly a powerful tool for influencing consumer behaviour, it is not the only factor at play. The quality of the products themselves, word of mouth, and societal needs and preferences all contribute to the popularity of consumer goods. Therefore, it is an oversimplification to suggest that high sales of popular consumer goods are solely due to the power of advertising.
Sample 24:
Consumerism in the 21st century has been at the fastest pace compared to all the previous centuries. There could be the effect of promotions to some extent that people are increasingly buying the essential commodities. However, I do not agree with the statement that advertisements have a major role in the same, rather there are other factors as well which influence the selling of consumer goods.
Rational thinking suggests that the demand for famous consumer items has been proliferated because, in modern society, people prefer to live an easygoing, comfortable and trendy life. For the same, they need more possessions to follow trends and stay updated. For instance, aggressive shopping in the case of clothing and food items is a common affair among the masses and classes. The next factor which has a significant contribution to the high sales of consumer products is the increased buying capacity of the consumers. This has a direct relation with the proliferation of the demand for popular commodities.
On the other hand, persuasive advertisements have no impact on the adults of civilized society in terms of shopping. However, these are successful to some extent in enticing the children in buying fancy edibles and toys. And in rare cases, the folks who are oblivious of the marketing tactics of the companies fall into the traps of advertisements. Otherwise, people nowadays are very aware of the misleading adverts, therefore they buy commodities only out of their needs and buying capacity.
In my opinion, sales of popular consumer goods are soaring due to the rapidly growing needs of people in the present times. Advertisements have a lesser impact in this regard.
Sample 24:
Throughout the last decades the role of commerce has changed. In my opinion, at the beginning of the advertisement, it was just an information message. Nowadays it seems to be more of a tool of pressure for the masses. Therefore, I am convinced that highselling of goods is more an effect of omnipresent advertisements than real needs of people.
To begin with, the society wants to make their lives easier; however, there is aquestion: do they need new mobile phone every year or new model of a car every twoyears? I firmly believe that is a clear example of the power of commercials and not thereal customers need. In my opinion, a one-year-old mobile phone and a two-year-old car are still in good condition and work properly.
Moreover, seasonal advertisement which tries to tell us that we need new Christmasdecoration every year just because trends have changed. I think that new “Christmasfashion” is created every year by companies only to increase their profits.
On the other hand, freedom of choice is important for customers. Advertisement iscrucial to fulfil this need. Therefore, honest commercials give us a wide view of the market. Society can compare products of different brands and make their own decisions. In addition to that, selective and critical customers can consider what they really need and what is only pressure made on them by different companies. Nonetheless, we do not often receive honest and true pictures of a product so customers should be careful.
Taking these points into consideration, I would say that the sales of consumer goods reflect the power of advertising. Finally, I think that a great part of our needs is artificial land created by a specialist in marketing. However, we still need to watch commercials and read advertisements for a clear picture of the market.
Sample 25:
Some people have a perspective that advertisements lure us to purchase goods that are not of necessity. But others are of the view that advertising enlightens us of new items which might ameliorate our lives. I strongly agree that ads motivate consumers to buy unwanted things.
To begin with, there are compelling reasons why advertisements encourage people to own unneeded items. First of all, multinational corporations create meticulously crafted ads to entice consumers to purchase their products. For instance, the fast-food chain McDonald's advertising artifacts tries to lure children with toys and playrooms in order to sell a kid's meal. Moreover, vigorous advertisement campaigns are promoted across a plethora of channels such as TV, billboards, online, and so on to gauze consumer attention to purchase goods that may be of no need to them. Consequently, people become more materialistic as advertising compounds their desire to own more items.
However, there are some merits of ads. The primary advantage to consumers is the awareness of new products. There are certain circumstances in which informative advertisements can benefit people in their daily lives. For example, campaigns of medicinal fluid to remove minuscule warts can greatly help people with removing dead skin cells from their body and hence benefit them.
To conclude, I firmly believe that advertising lures us to buy unwanted items through meticulously crafted ads and an influx of campaigns across various channels. On the bright side, advertisements can be informative and influence the pricing of goods.
Hot: 1000+ Đề thi cuối kì 1 file word cấu trúc mới 2025 Toán, Văn, Anh... lớp 1-12 (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay
Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:
- Sổ tay dẫn chứng nghị luận xã hội năm 2025 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay Giáo dục Kinh tế & Pháp luật 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay lớp 12 các môn Toán, Lí, Hóa, Văn, Sử, Địa, KTPL (chương trình mới) ( 36.000₫ )
- Tuyển tập 30 đề thi đánh giá năng lực Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội, TP Hồ Chí Minh (2 cuốn) ( 150.000₫ )
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
In the current era, with the level of scientific advancement that has been achieved, technology has become a necessitous part of our existence and has eased many issues in our lives. This has led many people to think that all vehicles will be automated and will no longer require drivers in the imminent decades. From my perspective, I think the advantages of driverless automobiles eclipse their drawbacks.
Firstly, automated conveyances will reduce the risk of accidents caused by drivers. The element of human error, which is responsible for making 94% of all accidents, will be terminated. People will be able to travel safely even when they are too weary or otherwise unfit to drive. Additionally, senior citizens and others who may have problems with driving can commute safely in driverless cars. It will allow people to disburse the time spent commuting in other ways. Lastly, research has suggested that the introduction of automated vehicles on roads will reduce energy expenditure and pollution, which indicates that they will be a much more environmentally friendly option of transport.
However, there are some disadvantages to ushering in driverless modes of transport. Firstly, it will eliminate the jobs of several drivers whose livelihoods are directly contingent on them driving vehicles. Some people may also struggle with comprehending the technological aspects of automated transportation which may lead them to be fearful of such vehicles. Lastly, the costs involved in driverless conveyances may not be affordable, leading those to be inaccessible to several people.
Thus, in conclusion, it can be said that while automated transportation may have a few shortcomings, its beneficial aspects largely overshadow them, making driverless vehicles a welcome technological innovation for the future.
Sample 2:
In the future, vehicles can function without drivers, and the only ones inside will be passengers. In my opinion, the benefits this trend can bring totally outweigh the drawbacks.
On the one hand, the use of driverless vehicles may put human drivers out of work, which increases the unemployment rate in this sector. This situation can cause a number of financial and social problems that both the unemployed drivers and the authorities have to deal with. However, it can soon be compensated as there are still a range of other employment opportunities for unemployed bus or truck drivers. For example, businesses that use driverless vehicles will need more people in other departments such as vehicle maintenance, and this can bring work to those who have lost their job as drivers.
On the other hand, autonomous cars can offer a number of benefits once broadly developed. First, they can reduce the number of road fatalities as computer drivers are not prone to common mistakes like drunk driving or speeding that human drivers often make. This can ensure better road safety in general. Second, this development is beneficial for those who are restricted from driving, such as the handicapped or the elderly. With driverless cars, they can travel by themselves and no longer have to depend on other people or public transport.
In conclusion, I believe that the development of driverless vehicles is a beneficial trend. It may cause human drivers to lose their jobs, but these vehicles can increase road safety and allow even those unable to drive, like the handicapped, to travel on their own.
Sample 3:
In the face of rapid technological advancements, the emergence of driverless vehicles has become a reality, and it is projected that within a couple of decades, all cars will operate without human intervention. From my perspective, the benefits of driverless cars will far outweigh the potential drawbacks.
Firstly, it is important to acknowledge that driverless cars pose certain risks, including accidents and casualties, in the event of technological malfunction. As these vehicles are controlled by software and technology, the risk of devastating accidents due to bugs or hacking cannot be entirely eliminated. Furthermore, not all roads, particularly those in developing nations with poor infrastructure and insufficient road signals, are suitable for autonomous vehicles to operate smoothly.
However, the benefits of driverless cars far outweigh the potential risks. In terms of road safety, technology-made mistakes are significantly fewer than those made by human drivers. According to statistics, human drivers are responsible for hundreds, if not thousands, of casualties each day worldwide. With the introduction of autonomous cars, accidents would reduce dramatically, making roads safer for all. Additionally, millions of hours could be saved each day as individuals would no longer need to spend time driving, leading to increased productivity and a boost in the national economy.
In conclusion, driverless vehicles offer numerous benefits such as road safety and economic benefits. While there are potential drawbacks, these can be mitigated through proper regulation and addressing software-related issues. Overall, driverless cars represent a revolutionary technology that has the potential to greatly benefit society.
Sample 4:
As technological advancements continue to accelerate, the emergence of autonomous vehicles has become a tangible reality, with projections suggesting that within the next several decades, all cars will operate without the need for human intervention. In my opinion, the advantages of these driverless cars will far outweigh any potential drawbacks.
One of the primary drawbacks of autonomous cars is the risk of accidents and casualties resulting from technological malfunctions. The vehicles are controlled by software and technology, and while efforts are being made to minimize the potential for bugs or hacking, the possibility of devastating accidents cannot be entirely eliminated. Additionally, not all roads, particularly those in developing nations with inadequate infrastructure, are suitable for the operation of these vehicles.
Nevertheless, when it comes to road safety and casualties, technology-related mistakes are significantly fewer than those made by human drivers. Despite isolated incidents involving accidents with driverless cars, it is important to note that human drivers are responsible for a vast number of casualties on a daily basis worldwide. The widespread implementation of autonomous cars has the potential to greatly reduce accidents and improve road safety for all. Furthermore, the elimination of the need for human drivers would result in saving millions of hours each day, increasing productivity and boosting the national economy.
In conclusion, while there are potential drawbacks to the widespread use of driverless vehicles, the advantages, particularly in terms of road safety and economic benefits, far outweigh any potential negatives. It is expected that through proper regulation and addressing software-related issues, we can fully realize the benefits of this revolutionary technology.
Sample 5:
A future filled with driverless vehicles is an inevitability. In my opinion, though there are concomitant moral risks, the practical import for health of such a seismic shift will be positive on the whole.
Critics of this trend suggest that machines should not be responsible for the potential loss of human life. This argument rests on the fact that when there is an accident involving humans, it is possible to either assess blame and assign punishment or accept that human error played a role. In contrast, an individual severely injured as the result of a collision caused by a machine may justly feel that all human autonomy and free will is absent from their fate. This is analogous to a natural disaster with the crucial distinction being that humanity has engineered the situation. It is human nature to prefer to control a situation rather than surrender the outcome to an autonomous machine.
Proponents of automated vehicles, on the other hand, argue the tangible ramifications concerning public safety. The evidence overwhelmingly suggests that driverless vehicles cause fewer accidents than humans. The reason for this is that humans are prone to errors related to fatigue, distractions such as smartphones, and, in some cases, altered states. Machines might experience the occasional technical error; however, they are far more consistent by comparison. In fact, the few accidents that have occurred with automated vehicles were the fault of human drivers. If all cars were driverless, this would enable a greater level of sophistication that could, theoretically, all but eliminate automobile accidents.
In conclusion, though many accidents will occur without human agency playing a role, safer roads fully justify this innovation. Companies and consumers must be wary of the influence of automation while also embracing its most transparent benefits.
Sample 6:
Autonomous technology and its implementation vehicle manufacture have gained enormous publicity in the past few years. Since the first car with limited self-driving capabilities was on trial, progress in this field has gathered pace rapidly. For this reason, driverless vehicles are believed to rule the roadways in the future. While such development brings certain benefits, I believe that the drawbacks are far more significant.
On the one hand, there are some major advantages when automated vehicles are delivered on the roads. Firstly, these models provide easy access to individuals with physical difficulties. To illustrate, disabled travelers normally have to rely on other people if they need a ride. Yet when their cars can automatically handle driving, they enjoy the travel autonomy, getting food from a restaurant or picking up the laundry themselves. In other words, the mobility obstacles they have to encounter day to day will be surmounted. Secondly, automation may help reduce the detrimental effects that regular vehicles have on the environment. As drivers often misuse gas and brakes, they carelessly allow the car to burn more fuel than it needs; conversely, self-driving vehicles can be programmed to work in an energy-efficient way, and to travel on the most convenient routes, hence consuming less fuel, curbing the emissions released into the air.
On the other hand, I think the hurdles that stem from hands-free driving cannot be overlooked, one of which includes the difficulties in ensuring its reliability. Resembling a computer system, programmable driverless vehicles are prone to technical glitches, which cause them to malfunction on their journey. To make matters worse, if a collision occurs with passen- mat gers (occupants) on board, the consequence must be destructive. In addition, the fact that drivers are no longer needed for vehicle operation can deprive people of their livelihoods. For example, those who work in trucking, public transits, and delivery services would find their roles obsolete in an autonomous future. This can contribute to the increasing unemployment rate of the nation.
In conclusion, although the introduction of fully driverless vehicles could lead to both positive and negative consequences, I am of the opinion that its advantages are shadowed by the grave disadvantages.
Sample 7:
The advent of autonomous vehicles heralds a transformative era in transportation, envisaging a future where cars, buses, and trucks navigate without human intervention. This essay contends that the benefits of driverless vehicles, particularly in enhancing safety and optimizing traffic flow, substantially outweigh their potential drawbacks. The ensuing discussion will delve into the implications for road safety and traffic efficiency.
Primarily, the integration of driverless technology promises a significant reduction in traffic accidents, which are predominantly caused by human error. Autonomous vehicles, equipped with advanced sensors and artificial intelligence, can react to hazards more swiftly than a human driver, thereby mitigating the risk of collisions. For instance, Google's autonomous car project has demonstrated an exemplary safety record in trial phases, underscoring the potential for such technology to save lives. Moreover, driverless vehicles can communicate with each other to maintain optimal speed and distance, effectively reducing the incidences of traffic congestion and enhancing the overall flow on roadways.
Furthermore, the advent of autonomous transport systems offers the prospect of optimizing traffic management, leading to more efficient use of infrastructure and reduced environmental impact. Driverless vehicles can operate closer together and at higher speeds in a coordinated manner, maximizing road capacity and significantly curtailing traffic jams. This coordination could lead to smoother traffic patterns and lower emissions due to decreased idle times. Additionally, the increased efficiency and predictability in transportation networks can bolster economic productivity by reducing the time wasted in traffic, showcasing a profound impact beyond mere convenience.
In summary, despite challenges such as technological reliability and legal hurdles, the merits of driverless vehicles, notably in enhancing safety and improving traffic flow, are persuasive. They offer a significant reduction in road fatalities and the promise of transforming urban mobility into more efficient, less congested systems. Thus, the advantages of adopting autonomous vehicles decidedly eclipse the drawbacks, heralding a major leap towards a safer, more streamlined future in transportation.
Sample 8:
The horizon of transportation is on the brink of a revolution with the advent of driverless technology, promising a landscape where vehicles operate without human drivers, ferrying passengers alone. This essay posits that the advantages, particularly in revolutionizing urban mobility and reducing environmental impact, significantly outshine the drawbacks. The focus will be on the transformation of urban spaces and the environmental benefits.
Driverless vehicles stand to redefine urban landscapes significantly by liberating vast tracts of land currently consumed by parking lots and garages. With these vehicles in constant use rather than sitting idle, cities can repurpose these areas to facilitate the creation of lush green spaces and vibrant pedestrian zones, thus markedly enhancing the quality of urban life. For example, Singapore's ambitious Smart Nation initiative aims to reduce the need for private vehicle ownership, envisioning a future city enriched with more green spaces and communal areas, made possible through the adoption of autonomous vehicles. This visionary approach exemplifies how driverless technology could transform urban environments, making them more livable and sustainable.
Furthermore, the environmental advantages of driverless cars are both profound and wide-reaching. By utilizing advanced algorithms to optimize routes, these vehicles can significantly reduce traffic congestion, thereby lowering emissions. Additionally, autonomous vehicles can accelerate the shift towards electric cars, as their efficient operation aligns perfectly with the charging requirements of electric batteries. In pioneering cities like Los Angeles, where pilot programs for autonomous, electric fleets are already making strides, early data suggests a potential reduction in carbon emissions by up to an impressive 60% with a full transition to these cleaner, more efficient fleets. This underscores the critical role driverless technology can play in achieving environmental sustainability goals and reducing our carbon footprint on a global scale.
In conclusion, despite potential cybersecurity and ethical challenges, the benefits of driverless vehicles - transforming urban spaces and enhancing environmental sustainability - are clear. They promise a future of efficient, eco-friendly transport, leading to more livable, greener cities. Thus, embracing driverless technology is a key step forward in solving today's urban and environmental issues.
Sample 9:
While transportation revolution, driven by the relentless evolution of artificial intelligence, might introduce new concerns such as technological reliability and job displacement, the potential of these vehicles to significantly enhance road safety and boost productivity, coupled with the emergence of new job opportunities in sectors related to autonomous technology, solidifies my belief that the advantages of this transportation revolution outweigh the associated drawbacks.
Delving into the potential pitfalls first, one major apprehension is the reliability of this advanced technology. For instance, a glitch in the machine learning algorithms or sensor systems that guide these autonomous vehicles could have catastrophic implications for passenger safety and broader traffic flow. In addition, the transition towards driverless vehicles could significantly impact on the livelihood of those employed in the transportation industry, from taxi drivers to truck operators. This abrupt shift could exacerbate unemployment rates and subsequently stir social unrest. Nonetheless, juxtaposing these challenges with the benefits offered by autonomous vehicles offers a brighter outlook.
Technological concerns, while valid, are mitigated by the fact that meticulously maintained machines are less error-prone than humans, who often cause accidents due to driving under the influence, fatigue, or distraction. Thus, autonomous vehicles could contribute markedly to road safety enhancement. Additionally, self-driving vehicles could revolutionize productivity. Freed from the necessity to drive, professionals could utilize travel time for work tasks. A recent McKinsey study predicts productivity gains equivalent to 50 minutes per person per day with widespread adoption of autonomous vehicles. In addition, the technological shift causing job displacement is undoubtedly a pressing concern. However, history shows that when certain jobs become obsolete, new opportunities arise. The autonomous vehicle industry could create jobs in areas like data analysis, vehicle service, and software development.
In conclusion, despite apprehensions regarding technology reliability and job losses, I maintain that, with prudent regulation, autonomous vehicles hold the potential to significantly improve road safety and productivity. Therefore, while cars, buses and trucks will be driverless, the transition to this phase will promise a safer and more efficient journey in the future.
Sample 10:
As we witness the relentless march of technology, the prophecy of fully autonomous vehicles becoming the norm rather than an exception looms on the horizon. Despite the plausible challenges that this transition might present, I am firmly convinced that the potential benefits engendered by driverless vehicles profoundly outweigh the attendant disadvantages.
One of the fundamental challenges of this evolution pertains to the reliability of artificial intelligence. A slight malfunction in the system, such as a flaw in the navigation algorithms or sensor technology, could have dire implications for passenger safety and could disrupt the harmony of traffic flow. Furthermore, the tidal wave of automation threatens to engulf countless jobs in the transportation industry, potentially triggering spikes in unemployment and consequent social instability.
Nevertheless, these prospective impediments should be assessed in the context of the transformative advantages offered by autonomous vehicles. Technological worries, albeit valid, can be alleviated by the reality that machine errors, assuming regular maintenance and software updates, are substantially less frequent than human-induced accidents. Current traffic mishaps primarily stem from human fallibility, such as impaired or distracted driving. Autonomous vehicles, devoid of these frailties, could significantly elevate road safety standards.
Moreover, the dawn of self-driving vehicles could herald an era of unparalleled productivity. Liberated from the reins of the steering wheel, individuals could effectively utilise travel time for personal or professional purposes. A study by Stanford University suggests that the widespread adoption of autonomous vehicles could potentially save billions of productive hours annually. Furthermore, the challenge of job displacement, while significant, could trigger the emergence of new, unforeseen employment sectors, such as advanced vehicle maintenance, autonomous vehicle route management, and data analysis related to autonomous transport.
In conclusion, although the advent of autonomous vehicles presents genuine concerns pertaining to technological reliability and job loss, the potential for significant enhancements in road safety and productivity, coupled with the emergence of new employment sectors, tips the balance in favour of this technological revolution.
Sample 11:
There is a belief that some land vehicles such as cars, buses and lorries will serve without any drivers in the coming years. So, people in these machines will just be passengers. This situation may result in a lack of job opportunities and immediate interventions. In contrast, transferring drivers’ salaries into other areas and decreasing traffic accidents are essential benefits. In my opinion, considering these positive effects the advantages of non-driver vehicles outweigh the disadvantages.
Firstly, driverless vehicles mean losing jobs for some people. In this case, it will be hard to learn a new skill to afford living costs and it cannot be achieved in the short term. To be more precise, most drivers are non-university graduates, and they do not have any option to work except their current jobs. Secondly, there may not be any individuals to take action in an emergency, such as heart attack, to administer first aid or take the person to the hospital quickly.
On the other hand, it is an advantage to invest in other areas such as proper vehicle maintenance and purchasing environmentally-friendly ones. Thus, it will be more beneficial for society in the long term. These investments will be possible because there will not be any drivers who must be paid wages. Additionally, the most important benefit of this attempt is the possibility of less traffic accidents. According to a survey which was done globally by Allianz, being sleepy and exhausted are mostly the reasons for car crashes. The rate of accidents can be decreased by eliminating drivers from the traffic.
In conclusion, there is an increasing trend to release driverless vehicles into the market. Although there are drawbacks such as less job positions and a lack of expert in emergent cases in vehicles, advantages, namely decreased traffic accidents and increased investments, outweigh disadvantages.
Sample 12:
Driverless vehicles, such as automobiles, buses, lorries, and public transportation, will be available in the future as technology advances. Personally, I feel that automated cars will offer more advantages to traffic participation than drawbacks.
To begin with, self-driving automation can assist people reduce traffic accidents since some individuals do not follow traffic regulations. Furthermore, while employing autopilot vehicle services, businesses. It would not need to engage drivers to deliver their items to clients and assure the safety of passengers. Furthermore, it is appropriate for older and impaired travellers while moving someplace and reacting swiftly. When there is an impediment ahead or something unexpectedly passed by, such as animals or reckless pedestrians. For example, if you utilise a vehicle with an automatic driver, you may spend more time doing other things while driving.
Meanwhile, we still have numerous disadvantages, such as the loss of drivers, which will result in increased unemployment in the future. Another concern is that autonomous cars would have substantial repair or yearly maintenance expenditures, which would be both inconvenient and costly. For example, it would be a long-term procedure that wastes time and money for organisations. This would have removed all old moto drivers instead of driverless autos with training that costs an arm and a leg. However, if the government has a suitable policy for the people, problems will be handled, and automation may assist to drastically lowering the rate of accidents.
Finally, as far as I am concerned, I believe that autonomous cars will have more advantages than disadvantages. Furthermore, in recent years, numerous firms and academics have developed autonomous automobiles to meet the needs of inhabitants.
Sample 13:
Some individuals are opposed to self-driving automobiles, claiming that such technology would reduce driver employment prospects. Nevertheless, I feel that the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the negatives.
There are several benefits to autonomous automobiles, but I believe the most important thing is their safety. Vehicle-control technology can prevent major accidents by eliminating human mistakes. Despite the development and installation of new features that protect drivers' or passengers' safety. Such as airbags and alarm systems, the number of individuals killed in automobile accidents is steadily increasing nowadays. The rationale for this is that if humans continue to grasp handles in the driver's seat, stupid mistakes will never be avoided. On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that a level 4 automatic driving system. It allows driving entirely without human intervention and may reduce incidents by more than 90%. This point is important because life should come first.
In terms of opponents' arguments emphasizing the significance of safeguarding present employees, our history gives a remedy to such worry. Whenever a new technology developed, such as during the industrial revolution. With the introduction of the Internet, the general people were concerned about their job security. Nonetheless, in such times, there were plenty of employment opportunities in the workplace, and totally new occupations were created instead of being lost. As a result, worrying about opponents is pointless.
In conclusion, while some individuals may be concerned about their jobs, the benefits of autonomous automobiles outweigh the risks. Safety considerations, per se, directly connected to human life, should be the most vital to account for.
Sample 14:
All vehicles, including automobiles, buses, and lorries, will be operated autonomously by artificial intelligence. The only individuals inside the car are passengers. When communities embrace driverless vehicles, I believe there will be more benefits than drawbacks.
For starters, having a driverless vehicle allows society to be more productive since people have time to do so while riding in the automobile. People can, for example, join an online meeting, read a book, or take a break while driving to work or another location. Furthermore, because autonomous cars do not require drivers, they can save money on driver expenses. This circumstance will have a favorable influence on the overheating costs of firms that have a large number of drivers to deploy their staff.
Then, because the cars will be handled by a robotic system rather than people, communities will gain from driverless vehicles. This is in terms of resource efficiency, particularly in public transit. For example, public transportation just needs a skilled programmer in the control centre to manage its mobilisation. They do not require driver allocation in all buses or other modes of transportation. Despite certain security concerns, researchers are creating artificial intelligence behaviour technology to minimise vehicle accidents. So robotic systems may learn from human behaviour when they have to make a judgement on the road.
In conclusion, driverless technology will provide more advantages to society in terms of effectiveness and efficiency. Nevertheless, there is a basic worry connected to security technology, which researchers will tackle.
Sample 15:
Some people have speculated that in the near future some modes of transport will be automated. Although there could be certain dangers connected to unemployment and flexibility, I tend to believe that there are more benefits.
Foremost amongst these advantages is the likelihood that less time would be spent on driver training. If driving is computerised, there will be less need to learn how to drive, so more time could be spent on more productive activities such as work. Related to this idea of efficient time use, less time will also be spent on reading maps and programming GPS for human use. Once cars, buses, and trucks have become driverless, people will be less distracted by having to read maps which could reduce traffic congestion and some road accidents. Similarly, driverless vehicles do not require sleep, so the chances of accidents related to the drivers falling asleep while driving could be minimised.
However, there could be certain risks connected to vehicles operating without a driver. In the case of driverless buses and lorries, people who used to drive such vehicles will be made redundant which could contribute to high levels of unemployment. Though this may be a problem in the short term, in the long term it may be possible for jobless drivers to find a new field. For example, former drivers can become new mechanics for driverless cars, so this could address any employment deficit. Less easily addressed might be the benefits that come with having a human driver. For instance, people may be more adept at driving in certain places such as mountain ranges which may require more versatile off-road driving skills.
To conclude, there are numerous positive aspects to the implementation of driverless vehicles including greater efficiency and safety. While these advantages may have drawbacks connected to unemployment, there is reasonable scope to address them.
Sample 16:
All automobiles, buses, and lorries will be operated automatically by artificial intelligence. Only passengers are present inside the car. When towns embrace autonomous cars, there will be more benefits that outweigh the drawbacks, in my view.
First, when societies have autonomous vehicles, they will be more efficient with their time since they will be able to become more productive in the automobile. People may, for instance, participate in an online meeting, read a book, or relax while travelling to the workplace or another location. Moreover, it may cut costs since autonomous cars do not need drivers, which eliminates driver-related expenses. This circumstance will have a good effect on the cost of overheating for companies with a large number of vehicles used to transport personnel.
Then, communities will get resource efficiency benefits from autonomous cars, particularly in public transit, since the vehicles will be driven by a robotic system rather than people. For instance, a skilled programmer in the control room is sufficient to oversee the mobilisation of public transit. They do not need driver assignments for every bus or other mode of transportation. Even if there are security concerns, researchers are creating behaviour technology in artificial intelligence to prevent vehicle accidents, so that robotic systems may learn about human behaviour while making decisions on the street.
In conclusion, driverless technology will give higher benefits to society in terms of efficacy and efficiency, despite a fundamental security risk for which researchers will uncover a solution. These benefits will come about despite the fact that driverless technology poses a lil danger.
Sample 17:
I feel that the advantages of autonomous vehicles outweigh their disadvantages, despite the fact that some individuals are opposed to them on the grounds that they may reduce employment prospects for drivers.
There are several benefits to autonomous automobiles, but I believe their safety is the greatest. As vehicle control technology may minimise human mistakes, it can lessen the severity of collisions. Despite the development and installation of new safety features for drivers and passengers, including airbags and alarm systems, the number of individuals killed in automobile accidents is rising quickly in the present day. The reason for this is because careless errors cannot be eliminated as long as humans continue to grasp handles in driving seats. On the other hand, it has been shown that a level 4 automated driving system, which permits driving without any human input, may reduce incidents by more than 90%. As life should take precedence over everything else, this notion is crucial.
Regarding the opposition's arguments emphasising the significance of safeguarding present employees, our past offers a remedy for this worry. Whenever a new technological innovation appeared, such as during the industrial revolution or the introduction of the Internet, the general population expressed concern about their job security. However, throughout such epochs, there were many employment prospects in the workplace, and instead of job loss, totally new occupations had been established. Therefore, worrying about adversaries is pointless.
In conclusion, the benefits of autonomous automobiles exceed the potential concerns of a part of the population over their employment. Safety problems per se, which are directly tied to the priceless lives of humans, should be given the highest priority.
Sample 18:
Current developments in the automotive industry indicate a future with self-driving automobiles, buses, and trucks. It may seem to be a scenario from a science fiction film, but the likelihood that it will become a reality is strong. This invention based on artificial intelligence may seem to be the perfect situation, but I believe the drawbacks outweigh the benefits.
People's trust is the most crucial element for the success of such developments; however, it seems that people are dubious. For instance, a pedestrian was recently killed in an accident involving a Tesla autonomous vehicle. People cannot accept even 0.1% inaccuracy, which is the primary drawback of this invention. Some may claim that, just as individuals do damage to others when driving, so do these vehicles. However, it is difficult to determine liability and administer justice in incidents involving autonomous cars.
On the other side, the primary argument in favour of these cars is that driving patterns will be uniform if all vehicles are driverless. Even if accidents occur, they may also attempt to limit the damage to human beings. Again, this needs people to constantly adhere to rules. It is practically difficult to attain such perfect conditions, and undesirable occurrences will occur. Extremely unusual situations are exceedingly challenging for artificial intelligence to predict. During each of these circumstances, the media will focus more on the negatives than the positives. It will build distrust among the populace.
Because it is a question of life and death, the disadvantages outweigh the rewards. Even the loss of one life is unacceptable, and people would see it as an injustice if no one is to blame. People may use AI in any other gadget except for automobiles and buses.
Sample 19:
Recently, there have been great strides made in technology required to transition to a system of driverless cars and it has been suggested that one day all vehicles will be automated, with humans merely passengers. This essay will argue that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
The primary reason for adopting driverless cars is the improvement in safety that would inevitably come. At present, cars are immensely dangerous and yet humans continue to drive them. The vast majority of accidents are caused by human error, but this would be totally eliminated in a system whereby all vehicles are automatically updated on the presence of other vehicles. Accidents would be reduced, thereby saving millions of lives per year. Beyond that, the system on which these cars function would ensure that they optimise their routes to avoid traffic, which would not only save people time but reduce the number of emissions produced by idling engines.
Of course, there are some disadvantages, but these are comparatively minor. One thing that worries most people is the loss of freedom that will come from driverless car systems. At present, in most western countries, the road is viewed as a symbol of freedom and people enjoy getting behind the wheel to move around. In a driverless car, this small pleasure would be diminished. However, this is of course trivial in comparison to the safety and environmental benefits of the proposed driverless system.
In conclusion, the advantages of driverless vehicles vastly outweigh the disadvantages. Although there are a few negatives, the fact that so many lives would be saved makes this future comparatively bright.
Sample 20:
With the rapid technological development, driverless vehicles are becoming a reality, and within a couple of decades, all cars will run without the intervention of a human driver. I personally believe that driverless cars will bring far more benefits than the possible drawbacks they have.
To begin with the drawbacks, driverless cars pose some risks, including accidents and casualties, should technology malfunction. Since the vehicles would be run and controlled by software and technology, the risk of devastating accidents due to bugs or hacking could not be eliminated. It will make us more susceptible to hackers and software glitches. An accident, in which a woman died, caused by a driverless car while still in beta mode, caused a great uproar a few years ago. Moreover, not all roads, especially those in poor nations with ditches, holes and insufficient road signals, are suitable for those automated cars to run smoothly.
However, technology-made mistakes are astronomically fewer than man-made blunders when it comes to road safety and casualties, and this is where driverless automobiles can make a significant improvement. Though we point out a single accident made by a driverless car, human drivers are responsible for hundreds, if not thousands, of casualties each day all around the world. With the introduction of automated cars, accidents would reduce remarkably, making roads safer for all. On top of that, millions of hours could be saved each day since we would no longer need to sit behind the wheel. It will increase our productivity and boost the national economy.
In conclusion, driverless vehicles have many great benefits including road safety and economic benefits, and it is expected that we could eliminate the software related issues to reap the maximum benefits of this marvellous technology.
Sample 21:
Driverless cars, thanks to the phenomenal development of technology, are no longer fiction, but a reality, and it is expected that most vehicles will be autonomous in the future. Despite both benefits and demerits, the writer of this essay does think that the advantages of driverless vehicles do not outweigh the disadvantages.
One of the major advantages of driverless vehicles is that they reduce the number of accidents on the road. Such cars provide better traffic efficiency since driverless vehicles can travel efficiently at an optimized and safe distance from each other by communicating among themselves in real-time, on the road, and by telling which routes to take. It reduces accidents and casualties to a great extent.
However, the systems or the technologies used to operate driverless vehicles can malfunction or stop working at any time, without any prior notice. And, if that happens, an autonomous vehicle could actually put the passengers in more danger than if a human driver was driving it. Besides, self-driving cars lack the ability to make judgments among multiple unfavourable scenarios and outcomes. For example, let’s say that a self-driving car had to face a situation with only two possible options: one is to veer to the left and strike a pedestrian, and the other one is to turn to the right and hit a tree, potentially injuring the passengers inside the vehicle. Now, since both options are undesirable, which option would the driverless car choose? The Moral Machine, developed by a group at MIT in the USA, is seeking to address this critical issue by collecting data on real-life people’s decisions, but the data collected, so far, shows broad differences amongst different groups of people, making it very difficult to programme any definitive answer for autonomous cars. Thus, autonomous cars are good to have but are not great to ride in!
So, based on the discussion above, we can fairly conclude that the shortcomings of driverless automobiles outweigh their possible benefits.
Sample 22:
The concept that all cars will be driverless has been gaining traction lately as advancements in technology have made it increasingly feasible and demonstrations have already been successful. The concept of a future where vehicles are solely occupied by passengers presents both benefits and drawbacks. However, in my opinion, the benefits of driverless vehicles outweigh the potential disadvantages.
One of the main drawbacks of driverless cars is the potential loss of jobs for millions of drivers. This is particularly concerning in industries, such as trucking, taxi service and ride-sharing, where driving is the primary occupation. Another major shortcoming of fully automated vehicles is the potential for hackers to gain control of the vehicle and cause mayhem. This could be a significant security concern, as technology is still in its infancy, and vulnerabilities may not yet have been identified.
On the other hand, several major advantages of driverless vehicles make them an attractive option for the future. To begin with, driverless automobiles are expected to remarkably reduce the number of road accidents caused by human error, as the vehicles are controlled by advanced software and sensors that are less prone to mistakes. Additionally, automated vehicles have the potential to improve traffic flow and reduce congestion, as they can communicate with one another and adapt to changing traffic conditions in real-time. Furthermore, driverless vehicles could also have positive impacts on the environment as they will reduce fuel consumption and emissions, for example.
In conclusion, while there could be some disadvantages to the notion of driverless conveyances, the advantages of such vehicles far outweigh the drawbacks. The fewer road accidents, improved traffic conditions, and environmental benefits that driverless vehicles will bring us, make them an appealing choice for the future.
Sample 23:
Due to the rapid development of technology, it is reasonable to claim that a wide range of vehicles will be autonomous in the near future. In my opinion, although this development raises certain safety concerns, the benefits in regard to reduced accidents and costs involved in traffic facilities make this development a change for the better.
Detractors of driver-free vehicles point out the potential unreliability of such vehicles. Specifically, some worry that when there is a technical problem such as malfunction of the navigation system, this may jeopardize passengers in both the vehicle and traffic. In fact, Tesla, a prominent corporation specializing in driverless automobiles, has received a number of complaints regarding the reliability of its driverless cars, making some skeptical about whether such cars are sophisticated enough to work consistently in varied weather and road conditions. However, the aforementioned issues have been minimized as technological advances.
I believe the popularity of driverless automobiles should be encouraged as it helps reduce human errors and expenditure on traffic facilities. Given numerous road accidents result from reckless driving behaviors such as speeding and driving while intoxicated, automated cars are a practical solution for such causes of accidents. This does not imply that automated cars are not prone to technical errors; however, these errors are rare, and in most cases, incidents with these cars have been the fault of human drivers. The wide application of driverless cars can also help governments save budgetary expenses on maintaining and upgrading traffic facilities. When vehicles are controlled by machines, there would be fewer need for installing speeding cameras, maintaining road signs and paying traffic police, allowing more funds for other key areas.
In conclusion, although some worry about the consistency of self-driving vehicles, I believe decreased spending on traffic facilities and increased road safety fully justify this innovation. Governments and corporations should therefore invest more in this promising technology.
Sample 24:
Recent years have seen the emergence of technologies to develop vehicles that can effectively drive themselves, and this may eventually make human drivers redundant. On the whole, I think that the benefits of this development will outweigh any drawbacks.
Automated vehicles have the potential to massively improve road safety because they could massively reduce accidents caused by human error. People are prone to making mistakes, often caused by getting tired or distracted while driving, leading to serious accidents. Computers which control vehicles don’t suffer from these weaknesses, and so as long as they are programmed correctly, errors like these should be eliminated. For instance, cars can be made to brake automatically in emergencies or if the distance from the car ahead is too small. Admittedly, we occasionally hear of fatalities caused by driverless vehicles being tested, but these are statistically insignificant when compared to deaths caused by human error both now and in the future.
An additional benefit to driverless vehicles would be a reduction in transport and haulage costs since there is no driver to pay. This would make food and other goods cheaper. For example, a major factor in food prices in supermarkets is the wages paid to delivery drivers.
However, there is a downside to this since drivers would lose their jobs. In modern economies, tens of thousands of people are employed as HGV drivers, as well as drivers of taxis and delivery vans, so the widespread adoption of automated vehicles would have a major impact on job opportunities. Nevertheless, this problem can be mitigated against with investment in training and job creation in other areas.
In conclusion, I do feel that despite the job losses it will entail, the benefits in terms of cost and road safety make driverless vehicles something to welcome.
Sample 25:
The debate relating to transportation has been in the spotlight for an extended period of time. Recently, there is a belief that automated vehicles like cars, buses and trucks will be dominated in the future. From a personal perspective, such a trend, though detrimental to a certain extent, could be considered as a major step forward.
On the one hand, the driverless system of transportation has proven itself to be adverse. To begin with, personal driver's security may be deteriorated. In fact, many criminals now are gradually having more sophisticated and cunning plans in stealing the important information of other people. Thus, just by successfully accessing the storage systems, hackers can take the necessary data and control over a whole engine, easily triggering accidents on the road. Moreover, this trend may cause people to be unemployed. To illustrate, thousands of individuals are likely to lose their job as a taxi driver or bus controller since all the vehicles are substituted by automated ones, which may affect negatively their quality of life.
On the other hand, this trend seems to be advantageous from two aspects, as follows. First, humans' safety will be guaranteed. There is no denying that the majority of accidents nowadays are attributed to drivers' inferior awareness like using stimulants or crossing the traffic light. Therefore, driverless vehicles are promised to decrease unwanted cases as they can automatically control the speed themselves and utilize computer-based system to avoid collisions. Second, this trend may bring about a civilized traffic system. The fact is that there will no longer be traffic congestion and need police on the road since no more human could break the rules and the distance between two cars might be rigorously calculated in order to minimize collisions.
In conclusion, in spite of several demerits mentioned above, this essay still believes that putting more driverless vehicles on the road is revolutionary to the contemporary society.
Sample 26:
In the future, all vehicles will be autonomous. Passengers will be the only people inside them. I believe businesses can cut costs by using driverless cars, and this advantage far outweighs any potential disadvantages.
One downside of self-driving cars might be that they could lead to large employment losses. Nowadays, in many countries, a great number of people are making a living by driving, be they truckers, bus drivers, or delivery couriers. Imagine all these people are made redundant by autonomous cars. That would raise the unemployment rates in these countries significantly. However, I think this can be avoided if drivers reskill to get themselves a job in a new sector.
On the positive side, driverless cars could help businesses reduce operating expenses. This is because, with these cars, they would not need to hire drivers to deliver their products or services to their customers. For example, the American logistics company UPS currently has hundreds of thousands of truck drivers and pays them an average of 60,000 dollars per year, which adds up to tens of billions of dollars annually. Replacing these drivers with autonomous cars would mean that these huge salary payments could be eliminated. I think this could create a great advantage for society as a whole because companies could devote the money they save on labor to other aspects of their business, which could mean cheaper, better goods for consumers.
In conclusion, although self-driving vehicles would result in many job losses, I believe this downside is greatly outweighed by the upside that these vehicles could help businesses save operating costs.
Sample 27:
Technological advancements in automobile industries are leading toward a future when vehicles would be driverless. The benefits of autonomous vehicles, run by artificial intelligence and software technology, would far outweigh the disadvantages.
The possible downside of autonomous vehicles pertains to the technology itself. Since they would be run by software technology, hackers could take control of a vehicle and use it for their own nefarious purposes. They could even evade police chasing or use vehicles to cause vandalism. Moreover, the situation would lead to an increase in unemployment in many parts of the world where millions of people are employed as drivers.
But the advantages of autonomous vehicles are many. To begin with, it would allow people to use their travel time more constructively. Imagine the millions of hours saved each day because manual driving would no longer be required. It would be added up to the total man-hours of people to boost the national economy. Moreover, human drivers often compete on the roads and create traffic gridlocks. It would be a thing of the past with driverless, AI-driven cars. Finally, driverless cars would eliminate the drunk-driving, man-made blunders behind the wheels and make the roads safer. It would thus save thousands of lives each year that are lost due to road accidents. A recent research data by the automobile industry points out that road accidents with driverless cars would reduce by 85% – which is a hugely encouraging figure.
In conclusion, autonomous vehicles can reduce accidents and make the road safer while also allowing people more time to enjoy or work. Considering the benefits it offers; it is realistic to conclude that its advantages far outweigh its drawbacks.
Sample 28:
All vehicles, including cars, buses and trucks, are expected to go driverless in the future, leaving behind the passengers travelling inside. In my view, the benefits cannot outweigh the disadvantages because driverless cars will lead to unemployment and financial burden.
Admittedly, there are certain benefits of driverless cars such as smooth drive and fewer accidents. Firstly, driverless vehicles can ensure a smoother drive because these are going to be equipped with adequate technology to follow exact traffic rules, managing a safer ride. Secondly, these cars will eliminate the risk of accidents caused by drunken or sleepless drivers. For instance, most of the accidents in my country occur on highways due to sleep deprived and overworked drivers.
On the other hand, despite the latest sophisticated technology, going driverless in public transport is very risky. If there is a medical emergency, for instance, the driverless car will not be able to stop instantly and reroute to hospital if required. Another notable point is the need to adjust decisions according to road traffic, driverless cars can never match a real person in this case.
Launching driverless vehicles will also mean snatching jobs away from a significant portion of the population. Most of these drivers have no other skills, therefore managing the economic burden of this unemployed lot will be difficult for many countries. Additionally, although some people might be able to afford these expensive cars, lower socio-economic countries are not financially ready for such a big change in their transport system.
In conclusion, despite the few benefits, there is compelling evidence that not all types of vehicles can be driven without drivers, and it will be deleterious in many scenarios.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Some people opine that trees should be planted in the unoccupied regions of significant towns and cities. Others insist that it is more critical to build residential complexes there. In my opinion, planting trees in vacant cities is more effective than building homes there.
On the one hand, there are numerous benefits of planting trees for residents. Firstly, it is omniscient that in the present times, air pollution and noise pollution are booming with every passing day due to fewer trees leading to harmful diseases. Therefore, sowing plants and trees in the city’s open space is indispensable for living things and the environment. To illustrate, plants take up dust and harmful gases like carbon dioxide and provide pure air. With the help of trees, the air pollution levels would decrease. Secondly, planting trees gives shelter to numerous birds. Several bird species have become bygones, and some are on the verge of extinction with the minuscule number of plants. Hence, more and more dreams in cities are required.
Additionally, these plants assist in keeping the environment cool by various natural processes. Experts have discovered that tree leaves are excellent absorbers, especially carbon dioxide and dust, giving out oxygen and water vapour. Besides, trees play a consequential role in bringing rain, thereby making it a crucial factor in maintaining a balance in the environment that is being disturbed by humans.
On the flipper side, lack of shelter will have many extreme downsides. Firstly, in urban regions, the majority of people migrate. Undoubtedly, the price of rented houses is too high. More masses might become homeless, resulting in crime rates increasing. Secondly, economic development may suffer if there are only a few buildings in the town. Subsequently, fewer shopping malls, banks, restaurants, and other shops will impact financial earnings and affect daily lives. Ultimately, the construction of more houses in an urban area is essential.
In conclusion, I believe that a significant part of the vacant spaces should be utilised for afforestation. This will help enrich the area with pure air and oxygen, allowing people to have a healthy life.
Sample 2:
The utilization of open areas for planting or building more houses has become a debatable issue. In my opinion, I agree that trees and gardens play a vital role in human development. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I shall explain my point of view and give supporting reasons.
To begin with, the cultivation of more trees in urban settings benefits city dwellers in a variety of ways. For example, extra tree shade is generated when more trees are planted in open areas, which not only promotes the aesthetics of the city but also helps to lower the city’s temperature. Also, it provides more space for elderly people and youngsters to do some physical activities in this relaxing environment.
Additionally, these plants assist in reducing urban air pollution and noise levels and promote higher living standards. Experts have discovered that tree leaves are great absorbers, especially of carbon dioxide and dust. In addition, trees generate oxygen, which can help to reduce pollution in cities and improve air quality.
However, it is true that more housing means more places to live. But it cannot be ignored that people are suffering from urbanisation induced air pollution and the only solution to protect them is to plant more trees.
To sum up, due to mass urbanization, the need for trees and gardens has drastically increased to improve the quality of life in overcrowded cities. Moreover, trees and gardens are natural combats that can help protect against various man-made disasters.
Sample 3:
Many city and town planners believe that trees, instead of residential buildings, are crucial for the development of the modern city. In my agreement, I agree with this contention despite the legitimate benefits to increased housing in cities.
Those who would rather build more residential buildings argue that both town and city populations are surging. Population figures globally are on the rise, and it is logical to provide quality housing for all citizens. This is particularly true in rapidly growing nations such as China and India. The migration of individuals from the countryside to cities and outlying towns means that higher residential numbers have led to deteriorating sanitary conditions and increased pressure on the services that sustain cities such as public transportation. More housing would at least partly alleviate the issues that urban planners face and allow for more cogent plans for densely populated environments.
Nonetheless, the importance of trees transcends the purely practical. For the average city and town resident, trees have aesthetic value. Take for example some of the best-known cities in the world including Paris and New York City. The parks and gardens stand out and mitigate living apart from the natural world. Moreover, the more underprivileged segments of society are unlikely to be able to afford trips outside their immediate living vicinity. There is therefore a good chance that many younger children, particularly those in inner cities, will rarely experience nature and their lives will be limited to the dreary confines of the city. Over time, this can have a demoralising effect that is evidenced in the defeatist attitude common among less affluent children.
In conclusion, the importance of housing to meeting rising population demands does not overshadow the importance of trees. Towns and cities must naturally balance these concerns to foster better living environments for residents.
Sample 3:
Many people argue that the planting of trees should take precedence over the construction of additional accommodation for residents in town and cities. I largely agree that planting more trees brings about greater environmental benefits overall, though erecting more residence is justifiably beneficial.
Supporters of added residential areas argue that they help combat overpopulation and stimulate economic growth. The growing influx of rural inhabitants seeking greater opportunities for education, healthcare, and services has recently driven a boom in the world populations and created the modern mega-city. While this trend is economically beneficial, it has also led to inflated real estate prices, higher rates of unemployment and exacerbated social issues related to overcrowding. Hence, the construction of residential properties would not only provide city dwellers with places to reside but also effectively offset potential bubbles in the real estate market. This development would also create millions of employment opportunities within the building sector.
Nonetheless, these temporary fixes have concomitantly brought about more pressing environmental hazards, all of which can be sustainably mitigated by growing more trees. One salient example of this is a natural phenomenon called "the urban heat island". Compared to natural landscapes, buildings absorb and reradiato a higher volume of sunlight which is then trapped by the city's smog, resulting in wider temperature fluctuations, deteriorating infrastructures, and compromised human health and comfort. Urban vegetation, in the forms of trees, provides shade, emits water vapors that cool infrastructures, and shields residents from extreme ultraviolet exposure. At the same time, they are also effective natural curtains that absorb and filter pollutant particulates out of the air by trapping them on leaves and bark, while simultaneously releasing oxygen into the atmosphere, thus contributing towards more habitable living conditions that are far more beneficial for human health in the long run.
In conclusion, despite the short-term economic gains that extra housing offers, I believe with few reservations that planting more trees would have a greater overall impact as it would significantly improve the standard of living and reduce the severity of environmental changes. In my opinion, a combination of both would ensure the sustainable development of cities.
Sample 4:
It is believed that it is more meaningful to plant trees in open urban areas, rather than building more houses. While housing is needed to meet the demands of the growing population, I strongly agree that trees should be planted in open areas as trees provide environmental, social, and economic benefits.
Admittedly, housing is essential to meet the demands of the burgeoning population; however, high-rise buildings should be constructed instead of spreading out low-rise houses, allowing open spaces to be preserved for planting more trees. New housing can also be built in the countryside to convert villages into towns. In fact, many people are opting to live there because of the fresh air and quiet atmosphere.
The main benefit of planting trees in cities is to the environment. Trees help purify the polluted air in the cities and towns. Research has proven that 100 trees can remove tonnes of carbon dioxide annually. Trees are also known to cut down the everyday noise of cities, thus tackling noise pollution. To add to it, rainwater doesn't run off into drains if there are trees in urban areas. It is filtered into the ground, thus saving the city money that is spent on drains and artificial controls. Finally, trees provide shade to homes, roads, office areas, and parking spaces, thus reducing energy consumption. In parking lots also, trees help keep cars cooler, which leads to less pollution.
Planting trees in cities helps the city grow socially and economically as well. They provide an area where people can meet, socialize, and also exercise. Children also get close to nature, where they can play. The commercial value of an urban property with trees is more than one without trees. Retail outlets and businesses located in areas with trees attract more customers.
To sum up, although houses are needed in cities to live in, trees are needed more to strengthen and improve the quality of life in overcrowded cities. They play a vital role in combating climate change and provide numerous economic and social benefits.
Sample 5:
Nowadays, there is an increasing concern about greenery around the country. However, whether these trees should be planted in a city’s open places rather than giving way to more accommodation remains a controversial debate. I agree with the view that if housing supply in a city has surpassed demand, the open areas should mainly be covered by trees.
Firstly, with enough housing for locals to live, trees are needed to cool down the cities and towns. While many cities have to heavily rely on air-conditioning to decrease the indoor temperature during summer, with more trees planted, the outside temperature can be adjusted to a lower level. As a benefit, it will be cooler in people’s homes.
Moreover, trees can function well to clean up the toxic substances in the air. If we want more people to stay away from some health issues that are caused by environmental degradation, trees can definitely help. And this is something those housing buildings cannot contribute to.
Of course, when the majority of residents in some towns cannot be provided with comfortable housing, it is a different case. As shelter is one of the most important elements for human survival, it should be considered as a priority in these places. As long as shelter is not an urgent problem, then greenery can be prioritised for open areas.
In summary, both trees and housing play an important role in urban lifestyle. When most city residents already have a home to live in, open spaces ought to be given to trees. On the other hand, building more accommodation on the available land is a wiser choice, vice versa.
Sample 6:
In present, there are a plenty of wide empty spaces in both cities and towns which can take advantage to plant trees or construct more building. Some opinions suggest planning more greenery in these spaces due to their necessity, I completely agree with that valuable statement.
Initially, the main benefit of growing more trees in cities and towns is that it will promote the amount of fresh air. More trees mean more carbon dioxide will be absorbed leading to more oxygen is produced. It is a nice way out for the hottest issues in some big cities and towns nowadays when these places release a large amount of air pollution every day because of the crowd and overpopulation. Secondly, planting more greens is directly raise citizen's awareness about protecting environment. Residents take more responsibility to conserving and develoing more green space in their living area. In addition, when more people are concerned about the environment and health, they will immediately lead to a healthier lifestyle.
Moreover, green trees also decorate the cities looking more peaceful and beautiful, which will attract more tourists to come. Because of the new trends of visiting an enviromentally-friendly place, a green city or town will be an interesting destination for all visitors. Therefore, national tourism will be developed while national reputation also significantly climbs. Another benefit is that more jobs will be created for the environment such as sanitation workers. Consequently, the unemployment rate of those cities and towns will dramatically decrease.
In conclusion, for several reasons mentioned above, I maintain the opinion that the government should reserve spare spaces for growing more greens instead of building more houses.
Sample 7:
Many people have views on how to absolutely utilize vacant spaces in cities and towns. While some believe that planting trees in blank spaces in cities and towns is more necessary than building houses, I partly agree with this method.
On the one hand, I agree that planting trees in open spaces in cities and towns is essential to help citizens get a fresher atmosphere in cities and towns. Firstly, the atmosphere in big cities and towns is getting worse than before due to the appearance of industrial parks and increasing in vehicles. Therefore, planting trees has contributed a pure green space to big cities and towns, helping people get a better life. Secondly, the forest area of the world has been narrowed nowadays, so a lack of wood resources to serve business activities as well as constructing activities is an unavoidably serious problem. Thus, cultivating trees becomes one of the most useful measures to help people to solve partially emptied wood resources today.
On the other hand, I do not believe that the benefits of building houses in cities or towns are outweighed by planting trees. First and foremost, the population of big cities or towns is increasing these days because of the immigration of people from the countryside or mountainous areas. Therefore, building houses or apartments to meet accommodation for everyone is really indispensable. Besides, some economic centers need to be constructed to widen infrastructure as well as provide jobs for citizens here. Secondly, planting trees in big cities or towns, especially big trees along streets, will cause some grave traffic accidents for citizens in the rainy season when these trees are fallen down by a storm, strong winds, or are struck by lightning.
In summary, I can clearly come to the conclusion that although growing trees in cities or towns help to avoid wasting blank spaces, this solution has its negative impacts.
Sample 8:
It is an irrefutable fact that, nowadays, a great deal of attention has been paid to Green or sustainable planting; while some believe that it must be necessary to plant trees everywhere in society rather than constructing mud and mortar building in open areas, others reject this notion. However, I totally agree with the former statement that will analyse my views by taking examples to demonstrate my points and prove my arguments.
On the one hand, the advantages of planting more trees are indisputable. The most significant benefit is that trees purify the air and reduce CO2 emissions in an environment polluted by transportation and construction. Furthermore, clean and fresh air contributes to a stress-free life and helps maintain a healthy atmosphere around living spaces. For example, floods in Jagrata affect health, safety, and prosperity due to soil erosion caused by deforestation for urbanization. Therefore, increasing green spaces could be an effective solution to avoid these predictable problems.
On the other hand, although there has been a dramatic rise in the population almost in all nations due to the enhancement in healthcare amenities. As a result, the average death rate has decreased, yet the majority of the populace still resides in countries. For example, the unemployment problem has been contributed significantly by increasing the number of people who have been residing in multicultural cities.
In conclusion, from my viewpoint, it is most agreeable to focus more on planting trees for a friendly environment, though building houses are essential. However, the balance between them should be an effective solution for environmental protection.
Sample 9:
It is argued that growing trees in vacant places in sub-urban areas or metropolitan areas are crucial rather than constructing homes for the people. I completely agree with the statement as it will make the place pollution-free, and linking people with nature can heal their mental and physical problems.
First off, planting trees in open spaces will make the urban and town areas pollution free. To elaborate on it, people drive their vehicles to move from one place to another. When the fuel burns, it produces toxic gases. These gases mix in the environment and create pollution. Therefore, having more trees will absorb them and purify the air, and our biodiversity will not experience the problem of pollution. The absence of vegetation and congested places due to having more homes can exaggerate this problem. Thus, it is better to grow more trees. For instance, Chandigarh is a beautiful city for having more green spaces, and the rate of pollution is less than in any other city.
Moreover, greenery helps establish a link between human beings and nature and cures the public of various physical and mental illnesses. To explain it, nature has the power to heal the illnesses of humanity. Having plants, trees, and flowers all around makes the individuals feel ecstasy. In the lap of nature, people forget their anxiety and sadness and develop strong feelings of positivity. In addition, they do some exercises or run in the parks for gardens and burn their extra fat as well as improve the functions of the body organs. Individuals can keep themselves fit both psychologically and physiologically. For example, many physicians advise patients to walk over grass or to do meditation or yoga in a park or a garden. So, these places help a lot of humanity to cure itself. Even great writers or storytellers consider green spaces ideal for writing any work of art. Their writings also remove the depression of the person and make them cheerful.
To conclude, it is clear that planting trees in unoccupied places in cities or towns will make the place clear, and nature has the power to treat the physical as well as mental problems of individuals. They can get a feeling of glee at those places.
Sample 10:
As metropolitan areas are becoming more overpopulated and tree density is dropping, many people think we should focus on planting more trees rather than building housing. I strongly support this idea.
There are many direct advantages as to why people should plant more trees in urban areas. Firstly, many scientists proved that trees improve a lot of environmental metrics within a short time. For example, planting more trees results in cleaner air, lower average temperature, and a reduced carbon footprint. Secondly, allocating more space to trees can improve the aesthetic look of cities. For example, cities can build more botanical gardens that host various flowers and other beautiful plants. From an architectural aspect, this can add more contrast between the sharp look of buildings and the softer look of plants and flowers.
Moreover, there are indirect benefits when there are more open spaces dedicated to trees. The first one is that to implement this policy, the government might need to demolish many old residential areas to have areas for parks. This decision is beneficial in many ways. For example, new apartment buildings can accommodate more people and ensure a higher quality of life. The second one is that with more parks, citizens can witness an improvement in both their physical and mental health. Children can hang out and exercise in these parks and botanical gardens, thus improving their physical health. Senior citizens and even working people can take afternoon or night walks to relax, thus improving their mental health.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that urban areas should plant more trees due to their various benefits, both directly and indirectly.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Nhắn tin Zalo
Hỏi bài tập