Nowadays people use bicycles less as a form of transport. Why is this the case? What can we do to encourage people to use bicycles more?
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
It is less common for people to use bicycles as a mode of transport. This essay will explore the reasons behind this phenomenon and then suggest some viable solutions to it.
The decline in bicycle usage as a form of transport can be attributed to inadequate infrastructure and safety concerns. Regarding the former, as cities grow and become more densely populated, there is often a lack of adequate infrastructure to support safe and convenient cycling. Narrow roads, limited bike lanes, and inadequate cycling facilities can deter people from using bicycles as a mode of transport, especially in areas with heavy traffic or poor road conditions. Concerning the other reason, certain perceived risks associated with cycling, including accidents, collisions with motor vehicles, and theft of bicycles, can deter people from using this mode of transport, especially in busy urban areas with high levels of traffic congestion. This is the case of Vietnam where cyclists often voice their concerns with potential collisions with motorcycles when navigating busy roads, which has undermined confidence in cycling as a viable mode of transport.
To encourage people to use bicycles more as a form of transport, several measures can be implemented. To begin with, governments and urban planners can invest in building and improving cycling infrastructure, including dedicated bike lanes, separated cycle tracks, bike-sharing programs, and secure bike parking facilities. By creating safe, convenient, and accessible cycling routes, more people may be encouraged to cycle for transportation purposes. Another possible approach is to launch education and awareness campaigns that can help promote a positive cycling culture and encourage people to view cycling as a viable and attractive mode of transport. These campaigns can highlight the health, environmental, and economic benefits of cycling, as well as showcase successful examples of cycling-friendly cities and initiatives.
In conclusion, the declining interest in cycling stems from worries related to infrastructure and safety. By investing in cycling infrastructure, and promoting cycling culture, the authorities can create cities that are safer, healthier, and more sustainable for cyclists.
Sample 2:
The popularity of bicycles as a means of transportation has declined in recent years. This stems from the growth of sedentary lifestyles and electric vehicles but can be tackled through measures implemented by governments and companies.
To begin with, the fact that fewer people cycle these days can be attributed to two reasons. The most compelling one is the rise of a more passive way of living. As a result, individuals often prefer less physically demanding modes of transportation, such as taxis or buses, over bicycles. This has led to the number of people using bicycles significantly decreasing. Additionally, those who previously cycled because of environmental reasons now have a greater variety of choices. Companies such as Tesla and Vinfast have convincingly promoted environmentally friendly features of electric cars and motorbikes, undermining the urge for some cyclists to opt for bicycles to protect the environment.
However, a joint effort by the authorities and companies might buck the trend. For governments, they can launch a nation-wide campaign to promote the health benefits of cycling, which include building up muscle strength and resistance to diseases, while detailing the potential consequences of inactivity. If citizens are better informed of the pros of using bicycles, they will be more willing to use them when commuting. Businesses, furthermore, might introduce an incentive program to reward employees who cycle to work. In reality, some Vietnamese corporations such as VNG have established a small fund to partly financially support bike purchase and offer presents for those who cycle regularly, reportedly leading to increased bicycle usage among their workforces.
In conclusion, the decreasing trend of traveling by bicycle can be explained by the increase in a passive lifestyle and electric vehicle usage. Nevertheless, it can be addressed effectively by awareness campaigns by governments and encouragement programs by companies. If these solutions are executed systematically and wholeheartedly, we might well see the growth of the cycling community in the coming years.
Sample 3:
In recent times, people have been using bicycles less as a primary form of transportation. This essay will discuss the reasons for this decline and propose measures to encourage more people to use bicycles.
One reason for the decline in bicycle use is the lack of proper infrastructure. Many cities lack dedicated bicycle lanes and secure parking facilities, making cycling inconvenient and unsafe. For instance, in Ho Chi Minh City, the absence of continuous bike lanes often forces cyclists to share the road with fast-moving motorbikes and cars, increasing the risk of accidents. Another factor is urban sprawl, which leads to longer commutes that are impractical by bicycle. In Hanoi, many residents live far from their workplaces due to rapid suburban development, making it challenging to rely on bicycles for daily commuting.
To increase bicycle usage, one solution is to improve infrastructure. Cities should build more dedicated bicycle lanes and provide secure parking facilities. In Da Nang, efforts have been made to create bike lanes along the Han River, encouraging more people to cycle. However, these initiatives need to be expanded nationwide. Another solution is to implement bicycle-friendly policies. Governments can offer subsidies for bicycle purchases and enforce congestion pricing for cars in city centers. In Ho Chi Minh City, the government could follow the example of European cities by providing financial incentives for purchasing electric bicycles and creating car-free zones in downtown areas to make cycling a more attractive option.
In conclusion, the decline in bicycle usage is primarily due to inadequate infrastructure and urban sprawl. By improving infrastructure and implementing supportive policies, cities can incentivize more people to embrace cycling as a sustainable and healthy mode of transportation.
Sample 4:
Cycling has long been known as an effective way to improve physical health and reduce the risk of obesity. However, in recent decades, there has been a prevalent trend that people use bicycles less to commute. This trend could be ascribed to a few reasons, and definite actions must be taken to promote the use of bicycles.
There are evident reasons as to why people hesitate to choose bicycles as a form of transport. The most prominent reason is the over-reliance on modern means of transport, such as cars and motorbikes. These modes of transport are obviously faster and more suitable for long journeys than bicycles. Another convincing reason is that in many places in the world, including Vietnam, there are no dedicated cycling paths for bicycles. This means that cyclists in these regions would have to ride in the same lane with motor vehicles, which is without doubt a dangerous practice.
To boost the use of bicycles, the government should adopt both of the following measures. First, the government may impose a heavy tax on motor vehicles. This tax would discourage people from using motor vehicles, and thus encourage them to switch to bicycles, the single most efficient human-powered land vehicle. Second, the government may allocate more money to the construction of cycling paths for citizens. When a system of cycling paths is well-developed, people would consider bicycles a safe and convenient mode of transport.
In conclusion, the unpopularity of bicycles could be attributed to the overdependence on modern means of transport and the scarcity of dedicated cycling paths. To encourage people to cycle more, the government may introduce a tax on motor vehicles and invest money in building dedicated paths for cyclists.
Sample 5:
The use of bicycles to commute has declined in this modern age, which can be attributed to the prevalence of advanced traveling alternatives and safety concerns from cyclists. To motivate individuals to take up cycling, vehicle restrictions on certain days or areas should be regulated, along with the enhancement of road safety for bicycle users.
The drivers of this phenomenon are multifaceted. The primary reason for bicycles gradually disappearing is the innovation of modern vehicles. Indeed, advanced technology has offered various types of personal transportation that transcend the benefits brought by bicycles. Electric vehicles, as an example, have provided society with an alternative to bicycles that is both faster and less energy-consuming, while being equally eco-friendly. Additionally, concerns for safety discourage people from cycling. Specifically, the fast pace of urbanization has led to heavier traffic, which presents a greater probability of accidents for cyclists, thereby deterring individuals from choosing this mode of transport.
Promoting cycling can be initiated through various approaches. One effective solution involves implementing vehicle-free days. The authorities should impose restrictions on vehicles in designated zones or on certain days of the week, therefore incentivizing dwellers to utilize bicycles. The city of Hanoi serves as a prime example of this strategy, where automobiles and motorcycles are prohibited in the city center every Friday through Sunday, which has resulted in an increased number of cyclists. Furthermore, improving infrastructure to guarantee road safety for cyclists is essential. This includes the introduction of dedicated bike lanes, traffic calming measures and the reduction of speed limits. This not only enhances the safety of cyclists but also contributes to a more pleasant and efficient cycling experience.
In conclusion, the decline of cycling as a mode of transport stems from the advent of more sophisticated transportation options and safety apprehensions among cyclists. To incentivize cycling, implementing regulations on vehicle access in specific locations or during designated periods, coupled with improvements to road safety for cyclists, are imperative.
Sample 6:
While riding a bicycle to work or school is widely considered both healthy and environmentally friendly, there has been a decline in the popularity of this means of transport in recent decades. This essay will discuss the major factors contributing to this trend and suggest some measures that may be taken to make cycling a more appealing choice to commuters.
The populace's preference for driving or riding motorbikes over cycling could be attributed to several reasons. One possible explanation is that bike riding is rather time-consuming and strenuous, particularly for long-distance travel: therefore, most people would be hesitant to fit it into their already hectic and demanding schedule. Furthermore, this mode of transport is deemed impractical in many areas which do not have dedicated paths for cyclists. Hanoi exemplifies this situation, where bike riders are bound to share the same lane with motorized vehicles, making it possible for conflicts or even accidents to happen.
Correspondingly, several viable solutions can be implemented to incentivize the public to pedal to their office or class. First, the imposition of heavy taxes on automotive vehicles along with higher petrol prices would likely dissuade commuters from using these modern means of transportation and put bicycles forward as the optimal option. Second, it is necessary that municipal authorities design and plan the construction of cycle paths, especially in traffic hotspots, to facilitate the safe entry of bike riders to the roads. In this way, public concern over the potential dangers of cycling during rush hours can be allayed; hence, people would be more willing to use bicycles as the primary way to commute.
In conclusion, people's reluctance to opt for bicycles is likely due to their inconvenience compared to other alternatives, and the unavailability of cycling lanes in certain cities. Accordingly, promoting this form of transportation would require the government to increase the price of petrol and impose a heavy tax on petrol-driven vehicles, in addition to designing dedicated cycling paths on city roads.
Sample 7:
People nowadays do not opt for bicycles as a means of transport. This trend stems from several reasons, and I think the government and companies can take certain measures to promote the use of bicycles for commuting.
There are decent reasons why people refuse to use bikes for their daily commute. Many urban areas lack bike-friendly infrastructure such as designated cyclist lanes or parking spaces, and cyclists often have to share the road and parking with motor vehicles. This poses safety risks of accidents and collisions, thereby discouraging people from commuting by bike. In addition, many people now have a hectic work and life schedule, leaving them limited time and energy for commuting. Therefore, people opt for cars or public transportation instead of cycling for convenience and effort saving. Besides, the lack of shower facilities at the workplace discourages people from cycling to work. In fact, cycling to work leaves people sweaty and disheveled, and this inconvenience deters people from commuting by bike.
The government and companies can take actions to promote cycling as a viable commuting option. For one, local governments should allocate more funds for cyclist-friendly infrastructure, including dedicated lanes, bike-sharing programs, and secure parking facilities. This can eliminate the safety concerns and encourage more people to cycle for leisure or their daily commute. In addition, companies should consider installing on-site showers or allowing flexible dress codes so that people can maintain hygiene and a professional appearance at work.
In conclusion, people choose not to use bicycles as a means of transport due to the inadequate infrastructure and the inconvenience this mode of transport brings. However, there are practical measures that the government and companies can implement to address the safety and convenience concerns.
Sample 8:
In recent years, the use of bicycles as a means of transport has declined significantly. This trend mainly stems from the rise of motorized vehicles and urban planning that prioritizes cars over bicycles. Nevertheless, some effective strategies can be implemented by metropolises to encourage more people to cycle regularly.
One noticeable reason for the decrease in bicycle use is the superior convenience and speed of motor vehicles. Clearly, cars and motorcycles can offer drivers a quicker and more comfortable mode of transport, especially for longer distances and in inclement weather. Additionally, many cities lack adequate cycling infrastructure, making biking less safe and less appealing to residents. For example, in crowded urban areas like Ho Chi Minh City, where bike lanes are scarce or poorly maintained, cyclists often struggle to navigate through heavy traffic during rush hours, which can be both dangerous and discouraging.
To address these issues and significantly enhance the appeal of bicycles, cities can invest in better cycling infrastructure, including the construction of dedicated bike lanes that are separated from car traffic. A major city that has tremendously benefited from this method is Copenhagen, where extensive bike lanes and bike-friendly policies have successfully promoted cycling among residents. Another effective measure is the implementation of bike-sharing programs, which have largely succeeded in cities like Paris and New York. These programs seek to make bicycles readily available and affordable, encouraging more people to use them for short trips and daily commutes.
In conclusion, the declining trend towards bicycle use can be attributed to the convenience of motor vehicles and inadequate infrastructure. However, by improving the existing cycling facilities and introducing bike-sharing initiatives, cities can make cycling a more attractive and practical option for daily transportation.
Sample 9:
In contemporary urban settings, the choice of transportation mode profoundly impacts daily routines. While bicycles offer a sustainable alternative, their adoption faces challenges due to time and effort constraints. However, there are solutions to improve this.
The decision to opt for alternative transportation modes over bicycles stems from two primary causes. Firstly, commuting via bicycles consumes considerable time due to the faster-paced nature of modern life. Since modern life is getting much busier than in the past, individuals nowadays want to spend as little time on transport as possible. They prefer to use other types of vehicles such as motorbikes or cars, which would take less time. Secondly, the physical exertion required for cycling discourages individuals, particularly in adverse weather conditions or over long distances. In cities like New York or Tokyo, where traffic congestion is prevalent, cycling can be less practical than using public transportation or driving. This discourages many commuters from choosing cycling, particularly during rush hour or when navigating crowded streets.
There are many solutions to improve. Firstly, to mitigate the time constraint, adopting bicycle-sharing programs akin to those in Singapore can offer a solution. These initiatives provide user-friendly mobile apps and extensive bike lane networks, facilitating seamless rentals and rides. A real-life example of a successful bicycle sharing program similar to those found in developed countries like Singapore is Citi Bike in New York City. Citi Bike boasts a network of thousands of bicycles stationed at hundreds of docking stations across the city. The program provides users with easy access to bikes for short trips around the city, with a user-friendly mobile app allowing for seamless rental and return. Additionally, constructing dedicated bicycle lanes, as exemplified in cities like Copenhagen, reduces physical exertion and enhances cycling efficiency, thus addressing the reluctance to choose bicycles.
In conclusion, there are many reasons why bicycles are not popular. By embracing innovative solutions such as bicycle-sharing programs and infrastructure improvements, cities can encourage the widespread adoption of bicycles as a viable and sustainable mode of transportation, enriching urban mobility and promoting environmental conservation.
Sample 10:
In recent years, the utilization of bicycles as a mode of transportation has dwindled, with people increasingly opting for other means of getting around. This shift can be attributed to several factors, and there are steps that can be taken to encourage a resurgence in bicycle use and promote its benefits to individuals and society as a whole.
One of the primary reasons for the decline in bicycle usage is the inadequacy of urban infrastructure to support safe and convenient cycling. Many cities lack dedicated bike lanes or proper cycling infrastructure, making it unsafe and inconvenient for cyclists to navigate busy streets. Moreover, the cultural shift towards motorized transportation has also played a significant role in the decline of bicycle usage. As cities have become more dependent on cars, with an emphasis on speed and convenience, bicycles are often perceived as slower and less practical for commuting purposes.
To reverse this trend and encourage more people to use bicycles as a form of transport, several measures can be implemented. Firstly, there needs to be a concerted effort to invest in cycling infrastructure, including the development of dedicated bike lanes, bike-sharing schemes, and secure bike parking facilities. By creating a more accessible environment for cyclists, cities can encourage more people to choose bicycles for their daily commute. Furthermore, promoting cycling as a sustainable and environmentally friendly mode of transportation can help change cultural attitudes towards biking. Additionally, offering incentives such as tax breaks or subsidies for purchasing bicycles and related equipment can make cycling more financially appealing to individuals.
In conclusion, while the decline in bicycle usage as a form of transport is a multifaceted issue influenced by various factors, by investing in cycling infrastructure, promoting cycling as a sustainable mode of transportation, and offering incentives for bicycle use, cities can encourage more people to embrace biking as a practical and environmentally friendly way to get around.
Sample 11:
Cycling has long been considered an effective way of improving physical health and reducing the risk of obesity. However, in recent decades, there has been a prevalent trend for people to use bicycles less to commute. This trend could be ascribed to the overdependence on motorised vehicles and the shortage of dedicated paths for bicycles. To address this problem, the government should impose a tax on cars and motorcycles and use this money to construct more bicycle lanes.
There are several reasons as to why people hesitate to choose bicycles as a form of transport. The most prominent reason is the overreliance on modern means of transport, such as cars and motorbikes, which are faster and thus perceived to be more suitable for long journeys than bicycles. Another convincing reason is that in many countries in the world, including Vietnam, there are no dedicated cycling paths for bicycles. This means that cyclists in these places would have to ride in the same lane as motor vehicles, which is without doubt a dangerous practice.
To promote the use of bicycles as a means of transport, the government should adopt both of the following measures. The authorities should first impose a heavy tax on motor vehicles. This tax would discourage people from using cars and motorbikes, and encourage them to switch to bicycles, a human-powered land vehicle. The government should then allocate this tax money to the construction of cycling paths for citizens. If a system of cycling paths was well-developed, people would use bicycles more because they may then consider these vehicles a safe and convenient mode of transport.
In conclusion, the unpopularity of bicycles could be attributed to the overdependence on modern means of transport and the shortage of designated cycling paths. To motivate people to cycle more, the authorities should therefore introduce a tax on cars and motorbikes and spend the money collected from this tax on constructing dedicated paths for cyclists.
Hot: 1000+ Đề thi cuối kì 1 file word cấu trúc mới 2025 Toán, Văn, Anh... lớp 1-12 (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Some argue that offering free bus and rail passes to all who need them is the best solution to traffic congestion. While this might be effective for many, I believe the government should also explore other strategies to address this problem.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.
However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.
In conclusion, while providing free public transportation can indeed help reduce traffic, it should not be the sole focus of government efforts to solve this issue.
Sample 2:
It is generally believed that if the government wants to solve the traffic congestion problem, the most effective solution is to provide free public transportation, such as buses and trains. In my opinion, I agree with this idea because it really helps to ease the situation.
Firstly, I believe that free public transportation can reduce people's dependence on cars and improve traffic congestion. People who live outside the city centre tend to go to work because there are no buses or train stations around the area. Therefore, the government should consider building railway and bus lanes to cover all remote areas. In addition, dedicated lanes can be allocated to buses to avoid traffic jams. For example, Japan has done a very good job with its advanced subway system. Their stations are always overcrowded, and trains and buses are always on time. People rarely own cars and they rely on public transportation.
Secondly, the government should always carry out publicity activities to promote the advantages of using free public transportation. By doing so, people can break the mentality that public transportation is dirty, slow, and unreliable. As long as more people know, the transportation system is well designed, more comfortable and more convenient; people will soon start using public transportation. For example, Singapore has implemented 24/7 free public transportation, and its roads are unobstructed.
In short, I firmly believe that free transportation will reduce congestion by promoting awareness-raising campaigns and investment in buses and trains. Although it is a difficult task for the government to implement free public transportation in the community, once the government implements it successfully, it will have a major impact on everyone's life.
Sample 3:
Today with the increasing population and the exponential growth of urbanization, the transportation needs of the people have increased rapidly. Due to increasing transportation and the need for vehicles, traffic congestion has become a major problem of the countries with increasing populations. Therefore, looking into the problem deeply, I find that the best way to control this traffic congestion is for the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities. There are certain reasons for increasing traffic congestion as discussed below.
Firstly, the faster pace of population growth has increased the demand for more vehicles on the road. Since the transport facilities are less as compared to the people traveling, the demands have increased day by day which has contributed to more vehicles on the road and hence contributing to traffic congestion. Secondly, the increasing urbanization has caused more of the rural population to migrate to urban cities and metropolitan cities to find jobs and work. This increased migration of the population to urban cities is also one of the major causes of the traffic congestion on roads. For example, metropolitan cities of India like Delhi, Mumbai, Ahmedabad are highly traffic-congested cities of India due to increased urbanization and rapid migration of the rural population.
Traffic congestion is one of the major causes of carbon dioxide emission and increasing global warming of the earth. The harmful gases emitted from these vehicles pollute the environment. For example, the highly populated city of India is Delhi due to increased traffic congestion. The government must provide free transportation facilities to reduce the number of private vehicles on the road and must also encourage the population to compulsorily use these free public transportation facilities to reduce the problem of traffic congestion. Besides, in public transport, the use of environmentally-friendly electric vehicles like metro services, electric trains, electric buses, and taxis must be encouraged instead of fuel vehicles to reduce the emission of harmful gases in the environment.
Therefore, after analyzing all the points above, the conclusion drawn upon is that traffic congestion is the major problem faced by many countries at large and the best solution to this problem is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities to the people.
Sample 4:
The population has been increasing day by day and with the increasing number of people, urbanization is also at its peak. In such situations, the huge demands of vehicles have caused rapid traffic congestion on roads. However, some people argue that the best way to control traffic congestion is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, but in my opinion, this may not be the correct way to control the traffic congestion.
Some of the major reasons for traffic congestion are urbanization and the migration of the people. This has caused an increased demand for vehicles in the market. Nowadays people tend to travel a lot, and, in such conditions, they find it easier to use their own vehicles rather than opting for public transport. A survey conducted in China states that a majority of people prefer their own vehicles rather than public transport and this has increased more vehicles on road contributing to the traffic congestions. Secondly, people find it easy to carry their own vehicle to travel to different corners of the country as it is more comfortable than public transport. Also, the conditions of the public transport facilities have also deteriorated, they are also very congestive and unhygienic. Besides, the public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners due to non motorable roads and hence, the best option for traveling to these areas are the private vehicles. Secondly, private vehicles like cars and motorbikes have become more affordable and budget-friendly for people.
For the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, it will be a big burden on their exchequer. Instead, the government must focus on other measures like encouraging bicycles for school and college-going students, build wide tracks with separate lanes, build more expressways and flyovers to reduce the congestion. Also, they must subsidize the public transport fares but not completely free. A separate track for pedestrians and cyclists must be built to limit the number of vehicles on the road. Besides, an awareness campaign must be launched to inform people of the traffic rules and safety measures. Strict traffic rules must be followed, and a compulsorily fine system should be introduced.
Instead of providing free transport facilities for the public, the above-mentioned measures must be given more importance.
Sample 5:
To reduce traffic congestion, the government must provide free transport facilities to the public. But this step can be moderately implemented to reduce the congestion on roads. Some other measures should also be taken in equal proportion to deal with the issue of traffic congestion. Therefore, the statement, Government should provide 24/7 free public transportation to reduce traffic congestion is moderately correct. There are several reasons for the increasing traffic congestion on roads as mentioned below.
Population in many of the developing countries like India and China has been increasing at an alarming rate. This has caused an increasing number of people on the road either using public transport, their own vehicles or pedestrians resulting in increased traffic congestion. Also, a large-scale migration of the population to urban cities for work had deteriorated the traffic conditions of big cities. Secondly, the fares of the public transport are quite high compared to the service they render and are more congested and unhygienic. Now, when automobiles have become more affordable and fuel-efficient, people opt for quality and comfort over public facilities. Thirdly, people have started to travel more these days and public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners of the cities or towns. In such situations what people find better is the use of the facilities of the private vehicle. However, the use of private vehicles has resulted in increased traffic congestion and besides, these are the major cause of concern as they contribute to the emission of harmful gases polluting the environment.
To deal with the problem of traffic congestion, providing only free public transport may not contribute much. Besides, the government must encourage the use of electric vehicles and bicycles amongst the population. Secondly, it must focus on building more expressways and highways and separate lanes to reduce the congestion. Enough attention must be paid to constructing road facilities in remote corners of the cities and towns and especially in rural areas so that public transport can easily reach every corner of the world. Strict adherence to the traffic rules must be followed.
All these steps along with free transport facilities by the government together can contribute to reducing traffic congestion.
Sample 6:
The incidents of traffic congestion are increasing along with the population growth. Some contend that in order to lessen traffic congestion, the government ought to offer free public transportation. This solution, in my opinion, can only partially resolve the issue.
Most individuals now prefer to live in cities or towns rather than rural areas due to urbanisation. This is one of the primary causes of the heavy traffic on the roadways. At the same time, cars have also gotten cheaper and more fuel-efficient as a result of technological improvement. The number of automobiles on the roads has also increased as a result.
The government is undoubtedly attempting to reduce traffic by enhancing the efficiency and speed of public transit. For instance, the DMRC system, which facilitates bus stops across the entire city, has been installed in Delhi, a densely populated metropolis. The public can utilise this bus service 24 hours a day, seven days a week, but it is not free, thus many people opt to drive their own car instead. Because buses and trains are crowded and uncomfortable, many individuals will still choose to use their own vehicles even if public transportation is free. Free public transportation will also put a strain on the exchequer.
In my opinion, the government can take a number of additional steps to lessen traffic on the roads. For instance, it needs to create bigger roadways, additional flyovers, and separate lanes for cyclists and pedestrians. It should also strictly enforce traffic regulations and promote the use of environmentally friendly transportation.
In conclusion, making public transportation free will undoubtedly encourage more people to use it, but since those who value comfort and convenience over cost will still drive privately, this strategy is ineffective in easing traffic congestion.
Sample 7:
The traffic is getting worse in contemporary society, some citizens suggest that the authorities should provide free public transport every day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it's extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken at the same time.
We have to admit that this policy can increase the usage of public transport. Inhabitants will take it into consideration if it's free when they are facing traffic jam. To some extent, it can reduce traffic congestion. But we cannot turn a blind eye to the problems it caused.
This initiative will sharply increase the national budget. It's generally acknowledged that national funds are limited and should be used in a large variety of social aspects from education to environmental protection. The initiative will leave a burden on the financial budget and let the infrastructure cannot be maintained and guaranteed.
Furthermore, this policy cannot address the root of this issue. People use private cars not because of the high cost of the public transportation system, but because the line and route don't cover their destination or the low efficiency when they plan for a long-distance trip. No matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. In addition, traffic congestion only accrued during the rush hours, so it's pointless to provide it for free all day.
To sum up, I think the authority should reduce the price and develop the traffic infrastructure if they want to address this issue, rather than provide it for free simply.
Sample 8:
Some contend that the best way to combat traffic congestion is to always provide free bus and rail passes to everyone who needs them. While I acknowledge it may work for the vast majority of individuals, I think the government ought to offer other options to address this issue.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.
However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.
In conclusion, it is undeniably true that providing free public transit to citizens may be a significant element in reducing traffic, but this is by no means the main component that governments should take into account when trying to address this issue.
Sample 9:
In recent years, traffic jams have been increasingly ubiquitous particularly in big cities which cause great fatigue for commuters. In order to tackle this problem, it is argued by many that government should provide free public transport all day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it is extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that traffic congestion is not only attributed to the vast amount of private transport but also road systems. Moreover, no matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. Thus, providing free public transport alone just contributes to cutting down the volume of traffic to some extent. In fact, many big cities like Ho Chi Minh still suffer from traffic jams in narrow roads with obsolete infrastructure in spite of the rise in availability of public transport. Therefore, I strongly believe that road needs to be widened, and traffic lights and signs should be made more state-of-the-art to stem the root causes.
More importantly, though providing free public transport 24 hours per day is not necessary and what is more is that it may leave a burden on the national budget. According to the majority of reports, traffic jams mainly occur during the rush hours, so it is pointless to provide public transport all the time. On top of that, providing free public transport in the long term may be unachievable due to its tremendous cost. This measure not only costs governments a fortune but it is also unable to address the root of the issue. It would be far more economical if this amount of money was invested in enhancing road facilities.
By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that other measures rather than making public transport available may be far more efficient to traffic congestion. In years to come, I strongly believe that more investments in road systems should be adopted to make commuting more comfortable and time-saving.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
These days, people’s workplaces are constantly changing and evolving to meet the demands of modern society. Furthermore, the roles and responsibilities of jobs are also undergoing changes to adapt to new ways of working and living. This essay will discuss the possible reasons for these changes and suggest some ways that people can better prepare themselves for their future careers.
Firstly, due to the developments in hi-tech machines and artificial intelligence, millions of people all around the world are losing their jobs and being replaced by automated processes. For example, millions of factory workers have lost their jobs because they have been replaced by machines that are able to do their job quicker and more effectively. Furthermore, as a result of the ever-increasing desire to cut expenses and increase profits, many jobs are being outsourced to countries where the wages are lower. For instance, when a person calls a tech support help line in an English-speaking country, they will most likely be connected to someone in another country, like India or Philippines, where the wages are lower.
However, there are a number of ways that people can prepare for changes in their workplaces in the future. Firstly, students preparing to leave high school need to be advised about the sustainability of the career path they are choosing. To illustrate, autonomous vehicles are predicted to replace most delivery and taxi driver jobs in the very near future, so this is not a job that someone should expect to have for a very long time. Furthermore, while some jobs are being replaced by technology, many jobs are simply incorporating technology into their process, and therefore people will need to be able to keep up to date with these changes. To help achieve this, specific courses could be designed to help educate people on the use of modern technology in their workplaces.
In conclusion, although there are many changes in the workplace these days, educating people to carefully choose their career and to keep up to date with modern technology is the key to avoiding any major problems.
Sample 2:
The nature of labor in our modern world is changing at a fundamental level, with many workers worried that they will not be able to maintain their job conditions for long periods of time. Personally, I think this is the result of stagnating wages and the advances of automation, and can only be resolved with a universal basic income for the whole population.
Firstly, I argue that society is witnessing the worst wage stagnation in generations, which is causing people to constantly look for better paying jobs. As cost increases yet wages are not following suit, most of the workforce have to scramble to reach for managerial positions or risk losing their disposable incomes. This in turn creates a situation where many people have to take up multiple jobs in order to make ends meet. In the US and UK, for instance, it is estimated that millions of workers are on zero-hour contracts, which does not guarantee a set number of hours of work.
Secondly, as corporations seek to reduce expenditure as much as possible, they aim to replace the workforce with machines, leading to higher levels of unemployment and less stable job conditions. As machines encroach on the workforce, jobs become focused on the maintenance of the robots running our factories, and therefore there is higher competition for the dwindling number of jobs with gradually raising entry barriers. The end result is sure to be tension amongst socio-economic classes that can afford entry into the workforce if the effect of automation is not being mitigated.
I argue that in order to solve this, it is important to implement Universal Basic Income, which is an equal lump sum of money given to all citizens of countries every month or year. This would help people to keep their jobs and not have to take up precarious work, since they have enough money to buy basic necessities. This scheme can already be seen in Canada during the COVID-19 outbreak, for example, with citizens getting 2000 Canadian dollars a year. This has been hugely popular, as it allowed Canadians to have some level of stability even as the economy came to a halt.
Overall, I believe that stagnant wages and automation is leading to volatile work conditions, and as such, I contend that UBI is needed to stabilize this situation.
Sample 3:
It is a tendency that many people change their careers many times during their lifetime. This essay will identify the causes for these changes and recommend some ways to prepare for working in the future.
There are many reasons why one job for life seems to be over. One of the major reasons is our consumerism society. Therefore, job hopping for higher paid jobs or doing multiple jobs is no longer simply an option. Another reason is that the development of technology has changed the structure of work at such a fast pace that people have to constantly update themselves with the latest working methods. However, many are unable to adapt to the changes. For example, older workers might find it difficult to compete with younger workforce and have to find a new job or change their career field.
For those who want a stable life even in the rapidly changing future, they should realise that as long as we find a job which gives us satisfaction, there would be no need to change. My advice for those people is that if we stick to one job, life can be more stable. Of course, if one wants some employment changes, they should prepare for new job openings with a variety of working experience and skill set. Some should return to school to pursue courses that can lead them into new careers. Otherwise, some should take a fresh environment in which they can use and improve their skills and experience.
In conclusion, the process of job hopping is becoming very common because of social and technological development. I suggest that our knowledge and skills should be updated regularly, and we should have a balance between career changes and job satisfaction.
Sample 4:
It is true that the present working environment has witnessed a radical change. People now tend to switch jobs more frequently rather than have their occupations remain stable. While this phenomenon can be caused by several reasons, there are certain recommendations to help future workers prepare themselves for their careers.
First and foremost, the introduction of new technology might be the greatest cause for such changes. In other words, millions of workers all around the world are being replaced by high tech machines and artificial intelligence. For example, some staff working in the service industry are now on the verge of unemployment due to the rapid growth of online shopping websites and self-service supermarket checkouts. Another reason leading to this phenomenon is globalization. Due to globalization, employees have a wide range of choices between different positions among countries. As a result, many individuals tend to shift from one job to another with a view to higher salary as well as better standard of living.
However, there are several ways that people can get ready for changes in their future workplace. Firstly, workers should be well equipped with various skills by attending vocational courses and job training. Thus, they might keep up to date with the rapid development of robots and automated processes. In addition, individuals can get advice about the sustainability of their future position. This helps them to excel in one job rather than multiple, which lifts up the burden of switching jobs regularly.
In conclusion, although cutting-edge technology and globalization have made a great impact on the world of work, employees must be well-informed and flexible to achieve expected goals.
Sample 5:
It is irrefutable that the work scenario is altering at a fast pace. Working conditions are also different and the process of job-hopping is very common. This essay shall delve into the possible causes for these changes and suggest ways to prepare for work in the future.
To begin with, the development of science and technology has changed the structure of work. For example, people no longer need to do some heavy work by themselves. Instead, they can use machines. Secondly, competition has become intense, and people have to constantly update themselves with the latest materials and methods. Sometimes they cannot compete with the new techno-savvy workforce and so have to change jobs out of compulsion.
Furthermore, we belong to an era of consumerism. Being surrounded by so many choices, people today want to buy new things and for that, they do multiple jobs. In addition, the 24/7 society of today provides us with the opportunity to workday and night. For instance, in earlier times, there were very few jobs which were round-the-clock jobs. But, today, globalization has brought in a multitude of options of working day and night. The line between day and night has become dim and people have become workaholics.
There could be many suggestions to prepare for work in the future. People should have a set goal in their mind and get training accordingly. Moreover, it is important to draw a line somewhere. The stress and strain of the fast modern workplace is leading many to nervous breakdowns. In the developed countries, a new term called downshifting has already come where after a certain stage, people are saying ‘no’ to promotions and showing contentment with less. We should also realize that if we stick to one job, then life can be more stable, and we can enjoy our leisure also.
To put in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, although work conditions are different today and we have a need to update our knowledge regularly, we can plan our life in a meticulous way and have a balance between work and leisure.
Sample 6:
In today’s modern world, people tend to change jobs more often than before and don’t want to work permanently in one environment. I would like to explore the sources of this issue and suggest several solutions for future work.
Firstly, due to the global recession, many employers have to downsize and restructure their businesses. This leads to a number of redundant employees being forced to leave their jobs and find other ones. Another reason is that, as living costs are getting higher and higher, people want to earn as much money as they can to meet their needs. Hence, they seek better opportunities and well-paid jobs everywhere, every day. Some also look for new challenges. Last but not least, thanks to new technology, people nowadays are able to access information more easily, including information about job recruiting.
One of my suggestions for this problem is to create a comfortable working environment and build strong relationships between colleagues and between managers and workers. These will make employees find it harder to leave. To achieve this, courses such as leadership training and communication skill training should be carried out to help supervisors lead their team efficiently without causing any stress, and help employees fit inconveniently.
In conclusion, I would like to state that changing jobs is one of the notable signs of our technological times, and soft skills training courses can help people adapt to the working environment instead of seeking to escape it.
Sample 7:
Work culture lately has been dynamically transformed, mainly due to improvements in technology like transport and communication. Job security has become a dicey issue as employees now need to keep themselves updated with the advancements around them. This essay shall further explain the reasons and offer probable solutions.
In the last two decades, we have seen a remarkable spread of technology in all wakes of life. With easy access to the Internet and computers, work has become faster and easier. Innovation of office tools is encouraged everywhere so as to not let anything hinder the growth of trade and commerce. With each task becoming effortless, manual intervention at many places has been reduced. Ergo, rising insecurity is seen among employees. Additionally, employees are expected to multi-task in their jobs making it more difficult for older workers to sustain.
The remedial measures for such a situation are very few as of now. First of all, state-of-the-art employee training centers to help the employees stay well-versed with the high-tech upgradations. To solve this problem from an earlier level, universities should start imparting practical training in their curriculum, with the know-how of current on-the-job scenarios to prepare potential workers better. All this needs to be done as the employees losing their jobs also lose financial security for their families, and it is very difficult to start again from ground zero.
To conclude, I’d say we should accept the ever-changing technological advancements as they’re unlikely to stop. Better would be to equip ourselves and become flexible accordingly so as to welcome such developments.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.