The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Sample 1:

A large number of media channels these days are too focused on negative news, probably to increase viewership. However, many people often say that they prefer more good news being covered in the media. I personally agree with this idea and will explain my reasoning in my essay below.

Bad news dominating the headlines is having an undesirable influence on society. Psychologically, this type of news, unless managed properly, may keep readers in a state of stress and lead them to experience trauma. Stories about ISIS slaughtering innocent citizens, for example, caused massive damage to people’s mental states and instilled fear into their minds. Also, frequent exposure to negative news can distort readers’ perception of reality. In Vietnam for example, it seems that members of the media do not focus on keeping the public informed of current events anymore, both locally and globally. Instead, they are trying to publish articles with the primary aim of attracting more viewers and therefore increasing profits. This, unfortunately, shapes readers’ outlook on society in a negative way.

On the other hand, including good news in the media may have positive effects on the general public. It helps restore our faith in humanity, which inspires moral courses of action to uphold ethical social values. Media stories of good news, as opposed to bad news, can also have a positive psychological implication. Such stories can uplift people to become more optimistic and generally improve both physical and mental health.

In conclusion, I believe recounting more stories of good news can positively affect the moral behavior of a group of people and therefore should receive more attention. Although negative news still has an important place in our life, its severity should be realized so that readers can fully reap all the benefits that the media has to offer.

Sample 2:

It is sometimes argued that news coverage should focus more on good news. While I partly agree with this view, I also consider that bad news should continue to be reported when necessary.

There is a good case for believing that good news is under-reported. It is rare to read a positive story which makes front-page headlines. Yet it is undoubtedly essential that the public is kept informed about some of the good things which are happening in the world. In recent years, for example, breakthroughs have been achieved in the treatment of certain types of cancer. It should form part of editorial policy to carry stories such as these because they have a positive impact on public morale.

However, it would be misguided to introduce restrictions on the reporting of tragic news events. Civil wars and natural disasters, for example, may sadden viewers and readers, but they are an unfortunate reality of the world today. While sensational journalism may at times exaggerate, the public needs to keep abreast of these happenings, to have some informed knowledge of contemporary issues. Sadly, for instance, there is relatively little good news to report on the host of environmental problems facing the world. If these problems are ignored by the media, in the interests of reporting cheerful news, then the chances will surely increase of an ecological crisis. The media must act as watchdogs in the fight against climate change and environmental degradation.

In conclusion, while I agree that important positive messages should be given more publicity, it is also necessary for the media to continue reporting all the significant bad news in the world today.

Sample 3:

In contemporary society, there is a growing opinion advocating for the media to prioritize the dissemination of positive events. However, I staunchly oppose this notion.

Certainly, proponents argue that media outlets should amplify uplifting narratives for several compelling reasons. One primary argument is that exposure to positive news enables individuals to access messages of hope and optimism. Witnessing stories of triumph and resilience can inspire viewers, instilling a sense of encouragement and optimism for the future. Consequently, such narratives serve as catalysts for personal growth and societal betterment. Furthermore, these stories can serve as educational tools for younger generations, illustrating the values of perseverance and resilience through examples of success and adversity. Ultimately, this fosters self-confidence, paving the way for personal success and fulfillment.

Nevertheless, I firmly contend that a balanced approach, encompassing both positive and negative news, yields greater benefits for society and individuals alike. Firstly, by highlighting the challenges and threats present in the world through coverage of crime, corruption, and violence, media platforms raise awareness and prompt discussions on potential solutions. This awareness empowers communities to address complex issues effectively. Moreover, the exposure of negative events can serve to denounce undesirable behaviors and spur positive change. Criticism and disapproval generated by media coverage of unethical actions can catalyze societal progress and encourage constructive transformations, ultimately contributing to the overall well-being of society.

In conclusion, I vehemently oppose the idea that the media should exclusively focus on positive news. Instead, I advocate for a balanced approach that incorporates both positive and negative coverage. This approach not only raises awareness about potential dangers but also encourages societal condemnation of negative behaviors and fosters meaningful change.

Sample 4:

In today's society, there is a growing belief that the media should prioritize showcasing more positive events. However, I firmly disagree with this standpoint.

Undoubtedly, some people argue that media platforms should feature additional narratives for various reasons. One significant rationale is that uplifting news assists residents in accessing positive and optimistic messages. When people witness meaningful stories, they are inspired, fostering a sense of encouragement and hope for the future. As a result, these stories serve as motivation for personal growth and societal contribution. Moreover, this phenomenon can set an example for the younger generation to emulate. For instance, both success stories and examples of overcoming harsh challenges contribute to educating young people about the value of perseverance and resilience. Ultimately, this fosters self-assurance, leading to the attainment of success and happiness.

However, I firmly contend that we should strike a balance between positive and negative news since it confers more benefits for society and individuals. The first reason is to raise awareness about potential dangers in real-world situations. If media platforms feature news about crime, corruption, and violence, residents will recognize the root causes and viable solutions to avoid such situations, thereby helping society address numerous potentially complicated issues. Additionally, the spreading of negative events can condemn negative behaviors and foster positive change. When the media showcases detrimental and unethical actions, it can provoke criticism and disapproval. Therefore, this evokes societal progress and positive transformations which can enhance the community and well-being of residents.

In conclusion I firmly disagree with the perspective that the media should solely focus on positive news. Instead, I advocate for striking a balance between positive and negative news to raise awareness about potential dangers, condemn negative behaviors, and foster positive change.

Sample 5:

In recent years, arguments over mass media have mushroomed in many parts of the world. While I am convinced that good news should be disseminated widely as a resource of inspiration and motivation, I believe unfortunate incidents are also essential to cover on such channels to prevent people from unduly immersing themselves in overly naive and optimistic worldviews.

On the one hand, it is essential to know that reports delivering meaningful and motivating stories are believed to boost humans’ productivity and thus deserve considerable media coverage. Specifically, people with outstanding achievements on their career paths appeal to journalists as role models for others to imitate. Such reports encourage people to break their comfort zones and pursue their ambitions, which attributes significantly to their success. Moreover, meaningful things should be reported to promote benevolence around the world. If community work, ranging from collecting garbage and doing charity work to rescue and adopt abandoned animals, is spread and valued, modern humanity will be enhanced, especially in a competitive society.

On the other hand, because the media’s role is to provide an overview of society, on both dark and bright sides, bad stories are essential to be disseminated to awaken people to reality, which is full of severe hardships and dangers. Indeed, the information about global issues, infectious diseases, and notorious criminals enables people to equip themselves with essential skills and knowledge to deal with them actively and successfully. Conversely, the lack of preparation and alertness can lead to a pessimistic scenario when people make light of those problems, which results in unforeseeable consequences. Take the Covid-19 pandemic as an example. Although broadcasting the number of deaths and new cases frightens people and makes them feel suspicious about authorities’ ability, this news can act as a warning that requires people to obey the government’s strict rules contributing to the fight’s success against the lethal pandemic.

In conclusion, the media keeps people posted on their real lives and the world’s development, which is a precondition to brighten their prosperity. Therefore, either positive or negative news should be reported to help this industry function effectively.

Sample 6:

The determination of types of stories published in the media has been debated for an extended period. And a significant proportion of people stated that more good news should be included in the stories. Personally, I think the media should respect the variety of stories to report to deliver the maximum level of truth for the readers. in this essay, evidence and information are given to clarify my point of views.

On the one hand, the better news may be defined as an increase in stories with positive meanings or including motivated aspects for the readers. In detail, an object often possesses both the positivity and the negativity, and this action means nighlighting the bright sides and partly avoid the drawbacks. To some extent, this may be beneficial as the positivity can increase the motivation to read and the interest of readers leading to better behaviors and reactions. For example, stories about good people doing charity works or helping voluntarily the elderly may increase the will to do similar things in the society. Additionally, stories about the increase in the GDP always include the rapid escalation in the competitiveness of the market, but mainly reporting the positivity of GDP increases the motivation of workers.

On the other hand, understanding ultimately an object is crucial to the process of increasing the acknowledgment of human beings. Specifically, focusing mainly on the positivity can lead to the lack of realization about a specific situation, such as economy or education. Leading to the fact that people can make wrong decisions and fail to understand their current reality. Consequently, the transparency and the variety of news are essential for the development of the society in general.

To conclude, good news in some situations can be beneficial, but the role of the media should be focusing on pointing both sides of a circumstance to increase the process of the acknowledgment and the realization.

Sample 7:

It is now not uncommon to see negative news hit the headlines and appear frequently in the mass media. For this reason, many people believe that media positivity should be encouraged, and I do agree with this idea for two main reasons.

First, audiences are increasingly bombarded with negative stories and therefore, good news should be reported more often to balance it out. In fact, journalism’s commitment to being society’s watchdog is understandable, but excessive negativity in the news can be harmful. For instance, after a tragic plane crash in Malaysia was broadcast, news agencies the world over started to report similar accidents during the next months. This created collective fear for air travel, which consequently hurt the aviation industry despite the fact that air transport is still the safest option, with incident rates far lower than those for road and rail transport. In this way, an excessive amount of bad news causes distorted views, and this is why the more good news is worth reporting.

Secondly, happiness is highly contagious, hence the need for positive media coverage. Good news can inspire readers or viewers to take action, which can benefit themselves and even society as a whole. The success of Flappy Bird, a mobile game created by Dong Nguyen that caused a global sensation in 2013, has been an encouraging story. Thousands of Vietnamese app developers have subsequently tried to start their own businesses in order to follow in Dong Nguyen’s footsteps. Although very few of them can achieve similar success, entrepreneurship is promoted, which comes as good news for both developers themselves and the country’s economy.

In conclusion, my belief is that news agencies should dedicate more to positive news because it can create a healthy journalism balance and also spread positivity.

Sample 8:

Many people contend that the media should attempt to convey more positive news to their audience. While I accept that delivering good news is beneficial, I believe there should be a balance between positive and negative information being shown on TV or other channels.

On the one hand, it is imperative to bring good news to viewers. Firstly, when receiving more positive information during the day, people can become more optimistic in their life. This improves their overall well-being, and they can enjoy their life more and have greater motivation for working or studying. Secondly, when the media reports news about good citizens who have accomplished something useful for the community, others will be stimulated to take the same action. For example, during the Covid-19 pandemic when many residents lost their income, a group of volunteers in Hanoi launched a campaign in which food and clothing were sent to needy people in deprived areas. This campaign was promoted widely on TV, which encouraged many other individuals to donate their money.

On the other hand, I believe the transmission of negative news is equally important. The first reason is that residents need to be aware of the threats going on around them, and they can therefore find ways to protect themselves and their families. For instance, when there is news about an accelerating number of cases of kidnapping in the area, parents will need to supervise their children more carefully when going out. Additionally, it is necessary for residents to acknowledge that there are still many acute problems such as pollution or corruption that need to be addressed, and they, as individuals, need to take drastic actions to mitigate these issues. If good news is dominant in the media, people may have a false belief that they do not need to do anything to improve the situation.

In conclusion, I believe that positive and negative pieces of news are equally crucial, and therefore they should share similar amounts of time on the media.

Sample 9:

The idea that the media should report on positive events more frequently has been brought forward by many individuals. Contrary to the opposing viewpoint, I hold a supportive position.

First and foremost, a greater proportion of encouraging media coverage can diminish the likelihood of “copycat” crimes and suicides. Constant crime cases, rather than events featuring good news, can occasionally give criminals popularity and induce regular people to commit crimes they otherwise would not think of. Therefore, extensive and widely disseminated negative news reporting may result in a rise in crimes that are in similar manner. As a result, there is a pressing need for increased reporting that contains messages of optimism due to the amplifying effect such messages have on the crime rate.

Even more importantly, sharing positive news boosts morale in the community. Undoubtedly, it is a credible reason that reports concerning crimes and accidents can remind people of the threats and so prevent them from being victimized. In contrast to how beautiful stories make people feel that they live in a society where justice, love, and equality are respected, this increases the likelihood that citizens will feel isolated from one another. In this manner, a strong faith in governments, authorities, and individuals in the surrounding area can be cultivated. For instance, more individuals might drop their guard against strangers and offer assistance, as opposed to regarding the difficulties of others as scams. Only with such faith can society remain functional and sustain a healthy way of life.

In conclusion, sufficient time and space should be reserved for positive news due to its positive impact on both the crime rate and social confidence.