In some countries, parents expect their children to spend long time studying both in and after school and have less free time. What are the positive and negative effects on children and society they live in?

Sample 1:

People have diffrent opinions about whether or not children should extend their sudying time after their school time. While there are some benefits for children to keep learning when they return home from school, I still believe that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages in the long term.

In some nations, parents keen on the idea expecting their children to spend time on studying rather than playing in their pastime. In my personal perspective, it can be explained that by working on homework after school, children are given the chance to learn how to cope with challenges and problems by their own, therefore developing their independent learning habits as well as consolidating their background knowledges. Besides, spending more time on studying means children are able to learn some vital subjects such as technology, science and languages which are required by most companies in this modern world. An intellectual population certainly benefit to society’s economy.

In spite of aforementioned advantages, I believe that there are a variety of issues that might negatively affect to either children themselves or society. Firstly, children who are forced to study for long time might suffer from unecessary burdens. As a result, they easily loose their interests in academic achievements and tend to feel more stressed and depressed which potentially lead to mental health problems. Secondly, spending too much time for abstract subjects can result in their lack of practical skills such as communication, problem solving skills which are essential for their aldult working in the future. This is undeniable that happy, healthy, and skilled chidren surely grow up to become talented individuals who play an important role in contributing into their countries’ prosperity.

In conclusion, while there are some positive effects on youngsters and society by extending children’ learning time after school, I maintain the idea that the drawbacks caused by that are far more than the benefits.

Sample 2:

It is true that education plays an indispensable role in children's development. While many people argue that students will gain benefits if they spend most of their time on study, I believe that it has negative influences on both children and society.

On the one hand, there are two primary reasons why children should not only study well at school but also reinforce knowledge at home. Firstly, they can gain countless opportunities to broaden their horizons in all fields like science, technology, and art, leading to comprehensive development. This article is from Laokaoya website. For instance, a schoolboy who took a long time learning in and after school was proficient in both English and Japanese, because he had many chances to listen, read, write and speak constantly. Secondly, in terms of society, this helps decline the juvenile delinquency rate and maintain social order. They could not be exposed to all sorts of temptations such as drugs or gangs, as they spent too much time on studying means less time spent on elsewhere.

On the other hand, I suppose that these are outweighed by the drawbacks. One reason is that children who are addicted to learning, instead of playing outdoor activities, are more prone to obesity and encounter health problems. To be specific, when they keep their eyes glued to books or screens for several hours, it may cause headaches and eye diseases. In addition, if they are forced to sit all day long for researching, the majority of them might lack not only social skills but also practical experience. They would not know how to choose suitable clothes to pay attention or how to build a strong relationship with other people.

In conclusion, it is certainly true that a long time on studying brings many advantages, but this is by no means pupils are not obtained negative impacts.

Sample 3:

Nowadays, it is a widely common opinion among parents that children should not only do well in school but also reinforce acknowledge after school. As a result, sending children to extra training school is not unfamiliar to any of us, which leads to a significant decrease in children's free time. Though there is a belief that the press increases motivation, I argue that the over-loaded press will cause negative effects.

To start with, long-time sitting in front of a computer or a desk is harmful to children's health since they do not exercise adequately which is reported very helpful to enhance their physical conditions. This article is from Laokaoya Website. The increasing number of fat children is to a certain extent due to the lack of exercise. In the future, these children are very likely to be sub-healthy. Besides, it is not sure that the longer time children study the better outcomes they can get. Low efficiency will result in nothing.

When it comes to the effects on society, from my understanding, the minus impact overweighs the positive ones. First of all, the whole society looks undynamic since the fresh blood of the society-children-are not activated. Secondly, the building of diversity of the world will slow down for children who are limited to books lack creativity. Lastly, the social relationship will become weaker and weaker because the number of people who care about it is falling while the opinion of competition will become more prevalent as a result of the repetitive stress on the success from the adults.

In short, overlong time on studying has negative effects on both children and society. Children should be released from books after school so that they will find the wonderful aspects of society, so that they would like to pay some efforts to make the world more colorful in the future.