Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 695

It is suggested that primary school children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals. Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages?

Xem lời giải

Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!

Bắt đầu thi

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

Lately, more emphasis has been put on teaching various skills to elementary school students. To this end, some argue that it would be beneficial to teach them how to grow agricultural produce and raise animals. While this practice poses certain risks to children, I believe overall it is a boon to their development.

There are some inherent dangers in allowing elementary school students to participate in said activities. First, the physical toil of cultivating plants and taking care of animals may be too much for children to handle. Furthermore, they could be exposed to viruses and harmful bacteria when they come in direct contact with animals or soil. Second, when the beings that children care for die, it could cause them great trauma given the strong attachment to these creatures that they have developed. For example, it would bring a child great sorrow when the cattle that he or she raises are slaughtered for meat or when their pets die, even of natural causes. These painful and potentially traumatic experiences are what makes some people averse to the idea of letting schoolchildren grow vegetables or keep animals.

However, I believe the aforementioned disadvantages pale in comparison to the huge upside that could be gained from children learning how to farm and keep animals. To begin with, this experience instills in children a variety of virtues and skills, such as independence, patience and empathy. Apart from these practical benefits, having such a close relationship with nature will widen children's knowledge about the environment and foster their appreciation for nature. Last but not least, taking care of plants or animals gives children an opportunity to be physically active on a regular basis. The life skills, environmental knowledge and physical benefits that youngsters could have make a strong case for teaching them how to grow vegetables and raise animals.

In conclusion, the advantages of introducing children to gardening and taking care of animals far outweigh the disadvantages, and this practice should be encouraged not only at school but also at home.

Sample 2:

It is advisable for primary children that they should learn to cultivate vegetable crops and also to keep pets and raise them. I believe there are advantages as well as disadvantages. In my opinion, the disadvantages are more than the advantages in this case because I believe it is too early for primary kids to learn this.

On the one hand, if we see the advantages of including the studies of crop cultivation and nurturing animals in the small kid’s syllabus, they can develop a sense of responsibility which can help mould their characters to be vigilant and liable members of society in the future. Also, they would become more empathetic towards the farmer, seeing them working hard and learning that hard labour is the reality for us for getting to eat food. It can also be an alternative career choice for the kids when they grow up. For instance, during the covid-19 pandemic, many people lost their jobs and relocated to rural areas. Some of them found their farming and livestock husbandry skills lifesaving.

On the contrary, one of the disadvantages of this can be exposed to various hazardous pesticides and herbicides to kids. This, in turn, can cause injuries like burning, poisoning, or respiratory illness. Apart from this, children are more likely to suffer injuries inflicted by animals. Not only do they suffer from injuries, but also certain infectious diseases, such as rabies or scratches from cats to name a few. Furthermore, children need to study and gain knowledge for various career prospects. So if they are engaged in farming or keeping animals, chances are they would feel more interested in it and less interested in academic studies.

To conclude, knowledge of crops and animals benefits school-going kids because it allows them to value it. However, its disadvantages outweigh its advantages. While it can harm the kid’s health by exposing them to hazardous fertilizers, they can also catch an illness from the pet if proper care is not taken. Moreover, it will often distract them from their studies.

Sample 3:

Some today have argued that it would be a sensible policy to teach children how to farm and raise animals at school. In my opinion, though this would require enormous resources, it would be beneficial in terms of both physical and intellectual development.

Those arguing against this proposal point out the resources needed. In order to implement such an ambitious program, schools would firstly need land nearby where animals and crops could be raised. This might be possible within a school’s pre-existing grounds, but there would still need to be significant investment in infrastructure. Schools would therefore have to reallocate a significant portion of their budget, potentially reducing the money for crucial facilities, staff, and teaching resources.

However, the advantages for the holistic development of children are overwhelming. Students today spend more time than ever before passively using technological devices. By spending more time outdoors learning about animals and crops, students will better understand their position within the natural food chain. Over time, this may lead them to adopt environmentally friendlier, compassionate lifestyle choices such as becoming vegetarians or shopping locally rather than buying from large chains. Moreover, the work outdoors would necessarily involve physical exercise. Since obesity is a growing concern in most countries, this time outside could help to improve standards of physical fitness and establish healthy lifelong habits.

In conclusion, despite the money this reform would require, schools should adopt it when possible so as to achieve a more complete education for students. Governments should consider the long-term effects when deciding on such policies.

Sample 4:

The life of a primary schooler is full of exciting discoveries, and some people argue that children should discover how to grow vegetables and raise pets as a part of early learning, while others express doubt. I would say the advantages of such a move outweigh the disadvantages.

Many parents express their worries when their children contact soils and fertilizers during the process of horticulture. It is true that a careless child can harm himself when he learns how to use a shovel, and there is always the risk of being infected with harmful bacteria from dirty soil. Some parents also avoid giving pets to children, as the risks are many: allergies from animal fur, being mauled by an aggressive dog, or infectious diseases from exotic pets. Therefore, it is understandable that parents can be overprotective when it comes to allowing their children to touch animals or garden vegetables.

However, most of the above risks can be completely avoided with good hygiene. We scarcely hear about an incident of children affected by infectious diseases from gardening, and even those who are unfortunate to get treated quickly. The experience of growing one's first vegetable is surely fun, children will be excited when they observe their own seeds grow into a tiny plant, then a ripe fruit. It also teaches children about the environmental awareness and the sense of belonging to the family's garden and its living species. The same can be said to animal pets, too. Raising a pet can mean so much to children, since the pet can essentially act as another family member and the children’s friend. Practicing relationships with their pets is a good way for children to develop their communication skills with human friends.

In conclusion, it is better to let children grow vegetables and keep pets.

Sample 5:

In the age of technological dominance, some people, quite interestingly, propose a retro teaching style for primary children: instructing them on vegetables and animal care. From my perspective, albeit some obvious advantages, they will be eclipsed by this educational method’s considerable disadvantages.

On the bright side, lessons on vegetable and animal caring can bring certain benefits to primary students. The first rationale is that this educational approach effectively teaches them about essential life skills for self-sufficiency. Growing vegetables and raising animals are practical skills that can accompany students throughout their life. Therefore, should they learn these skills at a young age, self-sufficiency will become a simpler task for primary students upon adulthood. Furthermore, learning these skills instils a sense of responsibility among primary pupils. Taking care of vegetables and animals requires tremendous agriculture-related knowledge and efforts, which can be done by a genuine sense of responsibility from the grower. Therefore, upon the learning process, schoolchildren will be moulded into conscientious citizens for the society who readily take accountability for their works.

On the flip side, however, these merits will be significantly outweighed by the demerits, one of which is the hurdle in facility provisions for this teaching method. Agriculture-related skills call for actual live animals and fertile land areas in order for students to truly understand what is entailed in the process of vegetable and animal caring. This poses an arduous predicament to most primary schools, especially in urban areas because the above facilities are difficult to establish in city settings. What is an even more glaring drawback is the dubious application of these farming skills in real life. As the world progresses towards the technology-driven era, most students will adopt a more technology-related career orientation, which makes these skills appear to little avail for their future. Also, vegetables and livestock products are easily available; therefore, primary students will consider learning to grow vegetables and keeping animals a redundant task or even a distractor to their study.

In conclusion, although learning to grow vegetables and keep animals may seem a novel idea with certain benefits, its drawbacks are so considerable that it is worth a second thought. Therefore, these skills should only be optional at primary schools since students’ long-term personal development is still given precedence.

Sample 6:

The proposal that young students should learn to grow vegetables and care for animals is an intriguing one, with both its merits and drawbacks. However, I would advocate that the benefits of teaching these abilities outweigh the detriments.

Introducing primary school children to agricultural practices and animal care initially seems as though it may detract from their focus on core academic subjects, thereby potentially disrupting their educational progression. Furthermore, facilitating such learning necessitates significant investment, not only financially, but also in terms of time and resource allocation. These could otherwise have been expended on subjects such as math, science or sports activities.

Yet, the benefits reap far outweigh the cons. Acquainting children with agriculture and animal care right from their formative years serves to deepen their understanding of these practices, opportunities for which may dwindle as they grow older. Moreover, hands-on skills in growing crops and looking after animals can bring children closer to nature, fostering in them a love for the environment. This can, if nurtured correctly, encourage emotional stability and engender a wide range of perceptive experiences.

In conclusion, although there are certain misgivings associated with teaching primary students about farming and animal care, I hold that the positives largely outstrip the negatives.

Sample 7:

Some people believe that children should learn how to grow vegetables and raise animals in primary school. I believe this is an absolutely necessary life skill that all children must learn, and that there are essentially no negative sides to this argument.

Firstly, alongside sunlight and water, food is one of the basic necessities of life. Without these three things, human beings cannot survive, so it only serves to reason that it is highly important for children to learn how to provide themselves with the necessities of life. The current state of the world proves that globalisation only causes more problems than it solves, and therefore people must return to living in smaller, community-based societies where they are responsible for sustaining themselves, which means growing their own food. In many poorer, developing nations, this is still the case, however it is rapidly changing. Teaching people, especially children, how to grow their own food, is the first step back towards sustainable living.

Furthermore, learning how to grow your own food not only provides people with a sense of independence and freedom, but also helps them to connect with nature, which is one of the most effective stress relieving activities for people of any age. By learning how to grow food, children can learn about nature and will have a closer connection and better awareness of the food they eat. In turn, this will help them to make smarter dietary choices, by avoiding genetically modified and chemically grown foods that negatively impact their health, and therefore create societies of healthier people, which will have countless positive outcomes.

In conclusion, while some people may believe that there are more important subjects to learn at school, I believe that learning to grow vegetables and raise animals is one of the most important and practical life skills that people of all ages should have.

Sample 8:

Many schools worldwide have proposed including a new, mandatory course in which students learn how to grow vegetables and raise animals. Although there are some drawbacks that schools should consider, I believe this idea is generally beneficial.

There are many direct and indirect advantages to learning about these topics. Firstly, children can develop an appreciation for farmers after this course. Many children, especially ones living in cities, never know where and how their vegetables and meat are produced. After knowing the amount of work and care put into making their food, they can appreciate and support local produce more. Secondly, this course can prepare them for growing vegetables at home. This skill will become important should they find themselves in a time when supplies are scarce, like during the COVID lockdown.

However, that is not to say that this proposal is without disadvantages. Firstly, there is a chance that few students will ever incorporate this knowledge into their daily lives. With students living in urban areas, most will never raise livestock, while many living in apartments cannot have pets. Learning about raising livestock in detail will not be helpful for them. Secondly, this course can add more stress to students. High school kids are already under pressure to perform well in their exams; thus, schools should not burden them more. Students’ objection to the home economics subject is a sufficient example to illustrate this point.

In conclusion, I believe the advantages of learning about how to grow vegetables and how livestock and other animals are raised far outweigh the disadvantages.

Sample 9:

The topic of which subjects should be included in a school curriculum has gained increasing attention in present day society. Certain people are of the opinion that elementary schoolers should acquire skills regarding horticulture and animal husbandry. The benefits which result from social skill development and improved health, in my opinion, will outweigh the shortcomings of this practice in terms of disease susceptibility.

On the one hand, children might be susceptible to certain potentially infectious diseases. This is because many living animals and plants may be host to pathogens, germs, and viruses. Ringworms, for example, is a skin infection from a parasite caused by close contact between humans and infected animals. Hence, children’s health is of great concern when it comes to the application of gardening and domesticating in schools.

Cultivation and domestication, on the other hand, may develop greater children’s social awareness which will be crucial for them later in life. A child who learns to care for an animal and a plant may get invaluable training in learning to treat people the same way. They could, in turn, gain a deeper sense of responsibility and understand the consequential effects of their actions on others.

These activities, in addition, play an important role in encouraging students to participate in physical exercises. Notoriously hectic school curricula with academic exercises and homework are positively correlated with students’ sedentary lifestyle. Consequently, many students are predisposed to ophthalmic and osteoarthritis diseases. Moreover, this trend might give them opportunities to be more physically active and reduce the risk of developing many chronic conditions.

In conclusion, although growing vegetables and raising animals can possess certain drawbacks such as exposure to contagious diseases, I am more inclined to the view that the sense of social responsibility and a healthy well-being they instill are of more vital significance. Where possible, schools should only include these activities in the course designs.

Sample 10:

There is a debate on whether school children, especially those in the primary years, should be encouraged to plant trees and vegetables as well as raise animals. Although I see potential negative effects from this, the benefits still outweigh the disadvantages.

There are two worth-concerning issues when vegetables and animals are cared after by young citizens, including health risks and the need for sufficient facilities. Firstly, children’s safety might not be guaranteed when coming into contact with certain types of animals and vegetables because some of which naturally contain lethal pathogens. Some kids may be allergic to animals’ fur or feathers, leading to a threat of respiratory distresses when physical contacts take place. Secondly, a range of wherewithal is required to nurture those plants and feed those animals well. The irrigation and captive systems have to be put into work effectively to maximize productivity. Understandably, the complexity of those facilities may pose a big challenge to manage for children.

Regardless, the difficulties discussed above should not be seen as significant obstacles to restrict children from flora and fauna caring, due to the advantages related to awareness of a readily available source of food at home, a heightened sense of responsibility, and a stronger set of life skills. Children learning to grow vegetables and care for animals may see these experiences useful for their well-being, leading to better health guaranteed foremost, compared to a consumption of food grown commercially that is chemically fertilized. Other greater benefits can also come from the cultivation of valuable virtues. Specifically, children in the primary school ages may hone their sense of duty and patience, both of which are certainly useful in later life regardless of their occupation or lifestyle.

To conclude, the potential risks to let children raise plants and animals must not be underestimated but the positive effects are very clear through encouraging our youngsters to have experience with nature.

Hot: 1000+ Đề thi cuối kì 1 file word cấu trúc mới 2025 Toán, Văn, Anh... lớp 1-12 (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay

Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:

Xem thêm »

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Câu 1

The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life. Why is it the case? Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future?

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

These days, people’s workplaces are constantly changing and evolving to meet the demands of modern society. Furthermore, the roles and responsibilities of jobs are also undergoing changes to adapt to new ways of working and living. This essay will discuss the possible reasons for these changes and suggest some ways that people can better prepare themselves for their future careers.

Firstly, due to the developments in hi-tech machines and artificial intelligence, millions of people all around the world are losing their jobs and being replaced by automated processes. For example, millions of factory workers have lost their jobs because they have been replaced by machines that are able to do their job quicker and more effectively. Furthermore, as a result of the ever-increasing desire to cut expenses and increase profits, many jobs are being outsourced to countries where the wages are lower. For instance, when a person calls a tech support help line in an English-speaking country, they will most likely be connected to someone in another country, like India or Philippines, where the wages are lower.

However, there are a number of ways that people can prepare for changes in their workplaces in the future. Firstly, students preparing to leave high school need to be advised about the sustainability of the career path they are choosing. To illustrate, autonomous vehicles are predicted to replace most delivery and taxi driver jobs in the very near future, so this is not a job that someone should expect to have for a very long time. Furthermore, while some jobs are being replaced by technology, many jobs are simply incorporating technology into their process, and therefore people will need to be able to keep up to date with these changes. To help achieve this, specific courses could be designed to help educate people on the use of modern technology in their workplaces.

In conclusion, although there are many changes in the workplace these days, educating people to carefully choose their career and to keep up to date with modern technology is the key to avoiding any major problems.

Sample 2:

The nature of labor in our modern world is changing at a fundamental level, with many workers worried that they will not be able to maintain their job conditions for long periods of time. Personally, I think this is the result of stagnating wages and the advances of automation, and can only be resolved with a universal basic income for the whole population.

Firstly, I argue that society is witnessing the worst wage stagnation in generations, which is causing people to constantly look for better paying jobs. As cost increases yet wages are not following suit, most of the workforce have to scramble to reach for managerial positions or risk losing their disposable incomes. This in turn creates a situation where many people have to take up multiple jobs in order to make ends meet. In the US and UK, for instance, it is estimated that millions of workers are on zero-hour contracts, which does not guarantee a set number of hours of work.

Secondly, as corporations seek to reduce expenditure as much as possible, they aim to replace the workforce with machines, leading to higher levels of unemployment and less stable job conditions. As machines encroach on the workforce, jobs become focused on the maintenance of the robots running our factories, and therefore there is higher competition for the dwindling number of jobs with gradually raising entry barriers. The end result is sure to be tension amongst socio-economic classes that can afford entry into the workforce if the effect of automation is not being mitigated.

I argue that in order to solve this, it is important to implement Universal Basic Income, which is an equal lump sum of money given to all citizens of countries every month or year. This would help people to keep their jobs and not have to take up precarious work, since they have enough money to buy basic necessities. This scheme can already be seen in Canada during the COVID-19 outbreak, for example, with citizens getting 2000 Canadian dollars a year. This has been hugely popular, as it allowed Canadians to have some level of stability even as the economy came to a halt.

Overall, I believe that stagnant wages and automation is leading to volatile work conditions, and as such, I contend that UBI is needed to stabilize this situation.

Sample 3:

It is a tendency that many people change their careers many times during their lifetime. This essay will identify the causes for these changes and recommend some ways to prepare for working in the future.

There are many reasons why one job for life seems to be over. One of the major reasons is our consumerism society. Therefore, job hopping for higher paid jobs or doing multiple jobs is no longer simply an option. Another reason is that the development of technology has changed the structure of work at such a fast pace that people have to constantly update themselves with the latest working methods. However, many are unable to adapt to the changes. For example, older workers might find it difficult to compete with younger workforce and have to find a new job or change their career field.

For those who want a stable life even in the rapidly changing future, they should realise that as long as we find a job which gives us satisfaction, there would be no need to change. My advice for those people is that if we stick to one job, life can be more stable. Of course, if one wants some employment changes, they should prepare for new job openings with a variety of working experience and skill set. Some should return to school to pursue courses that can lead them into new careers. Otherwise, some should take a fresh environment in which they can use and improve their skills and experience.

In conclusion, the process of job hopping is becoming very common because of social and technological development. I suggest that our knowledge and skills should be updated regularly, and we should have a balance between career changes and job satisfaction.

Sample 4:

It is true that the present working environment has witnessed a radical change. People now tend to switch jobs more frequently rather than have their occupations remain stable. While this phenomenon can be caused by several reasons, there are certain recommendations to help future workers prepare themselves for their careers.

First and foremost, the introduction of new technology might be the greatest cause for such changes. In other words, millions of workers all around the world are being replaced by high tech machines and artificial intelligence. For example, some staff working in the service industry are now on the verge of unemployment due to the rapid growth of online shopping websites and self-service supermarket checkouts. Another reason leading to this phenomenon is globalization. Due to globalization, employees have a wide range of choices between different positions among countries. As a result, many individuals tend to shift from one job to another with a view to higher salary as well as better standard of living.

However, there are several ways that people can get ready for changes in their future workplace. Firstly, workers should be well equipped with various skills by attending vocational courses and job training. Thus, they might keep up to date with the rapid development of robots and automated processes. In addition, individuals can get advice about the sustainability of their future position. This helps them to excel in one job rather than multiple, which lifts up the burden of switching jobs regularly.

In conclusion, although cutting-edge technology and globalization have made a great impact on the world of work, employees must be well-informed and flexible to achieve expected goals.

Sample 5:

It is irrefutable that the work scenario is altering at a fast pace. Working conditions are also different and the process of job-hopping is very common. This essay shall delve into the possible causes for these changes and suggest ways to prepare for work in the future.

To begin with, the development of science and technology has changed the structure of work. For example, people no longer need to do some heavy work by themselves. Instead, they can use machines. Secondly, competition has become intense, and people have to constantly update themselves with the latest materials and methods. Sometimes they cannot compete with the new techno-savvy workforce and so have to change jobs out of compulsion.

Furthermore, we belong to an era of consumerism. Being surrounded by so many choices, people today want to buy new things and for that, they do multiple jobs. In addition, the 24/7 society of today provides us with the opportunity to workday and night. For instance, in earlier times, there were very few jobs which were round-the-clock jobs. But, today, globalization has brought in a multitude of options of working day and night. The line between day and night has become dim and people have become workaholics.

There could be many suggestions to prepare for work in the future. People should have a set goal in their mind and get training accordingly. Moreover, it is important to draw a line somewhere. The stress and strain of the fast modern workplace is leading many to nervous breakdowns. In the developed countries, a new term called downshifting has already come where after a certain stage, people are saying ‘no’ to promotions and showing contentment with less. We should also realize that if we stick to one job, then life can be more stable, and we can enjoy our leisure also.

To put in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, although work conditions are different today and we have a need to update our knowledge regularly, we can plan our life in a meticulous way and have a balance between work and leisure.

Sample 6:

In today’s modern world, people tend to change jobs more often than before and don’t want to work permanently in one environment. I would like to explore the sources of this issue and suggest several solutions for future work.

Firstly, due to the global recession, many employers have to downsize and restructure their businesses. This leads to a number of redundant employees being forced to leave their jobs and find other ones. Another reason is that, as living costs are getting higher and higher, people want to earn as much money as they can to meet their needs. Hence, they seek better opportunities and well-paid jobs everywhere, every day. Some also look for new challenges. Last but not least, thanks to new technology, people nowadays are able to access information more easily, including information about job recruiting.

One of my suggestions for this problem is to create a comfortable working environment and build strong relationships between colleagues and between managers and workers. These will make employees find it harder to leave. To achieve this, courses such as leadership training and communication skill training should be carried out to help supervisors lead their team efficiently without causing any stress, and help employees fit inconveniently.

In conclusion, I would like to state that changing jobs is one of the notable signs of our technological times, and soft skills training courses can help people adapt to the working environment instead of seeking to escape it.

Sample 7:

Work culture lately has been dynamically transformed, mainly due to improvements in technology like transport and communication. Job security has become a dicey issue as employees now need to keep themselves updated with the advancements around them. This essay shall further explain the reasons and offer probable solutions.

In the last two decades, we have seen a remarkable spread of technology in all wakes of life. With easy access to the Internet and computers, work has become faster and easier. Innovation of office tools is encouraged everywhere so as to not let anything hinder the growth of trade and commerce. With each task becoming effortless, manual intervention at many places has been reduced. Ergo, rising insecurity is seen among employees. Additionally, employees are expected to multi-task in their jobs making it more difficult for older workers to sustain.

The remedial measures for such a situation are very few as of now. First of all, state-of-the-art employee training centers to help the employees stay well-versed with the high-tech upgradations. To solve this problem from an earlier level, universities should start imparting practical training in their curriculum, with the know-how of current on-the-job scenarios to prepare potential workers better. All this needs to be done as the employees losing their jobs also lose financial security for their families, and it is very difficult to start again from ground zero.

To conclude, I’d say we should accept the ever-changing technological advancements as they’re unlikely to stop. Better would be to equip ourselves and become flexible accordingly so as to welcome such developments.

Câu 2

The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is by providing free public transport 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Some argue that offering free bus and rail passes to all who need them is the best solution to traffic congestion. While this might be effective for many, I believe the government should also explore other strategies to address this problem.

On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why allowing individuals to use public transportation without paying a price is advantageous in various respects. Initially, using buses and trains would assist in improving traffic flow. To be specific, more individuals would utilise public transportation instead of driving their cars to get to work or education as long as the government provides free bus and train passes for citizens in their nations. Additionally, avoiding peak hour traffic bottlenecks may be accomplished by taking free public transportation. In this circumstance, it might result in a reduction in commute times.

However, for a variety of reasons, I vehemently disagree with this assertion. First of all, governments must spend a considerable sum of money to ensure free public happiness. Since the government’s resources are finite, when they focus their investments on this area, other crucial variables would be disregarded and undervalued. Nevertheless, there are solutions to resolve this dispute, notwithstanding what was just said. A suggestion is that the government might first provide incentives for remote jobs. People need not to physically be present at offices if they could work from home, which would end the daily drive. For instance, large corporations all across the world are experiencing this phenomenon, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak.

In conclusion, while providing free public transportation can indeed help reduce traffic, it should not be the sole focus of government efforts to solve this issue.

Sample 2:

It is generally believed that if the government wants to solve the traffic congestion problem, the most effective solution is to provide free public transportation, such as buses and trains. In my opinion, I agree with this idea because it really helps to ease the situation.

Firstly, I believe that free public transportation can reduce people's dependence on cars and improve traffic congestion. People who live outside the city centre tend to go to work because there are no buses or train stations around the area. Therefore, the government should consider building railway and bus lanes to cover all remote areas. In addition, dedicated lanes can be allocated to buses to avoid traffic jams. For example, Japan has done a very good job with its advanced subway system. Their stations are always overcrowded, and trains and buses are always on time. People rarely own cars and they rely on public transportation.

Secondly, the government should always carry out publicity activities to promote the advantages of using free public transportation. By doing so, people can break the mentality that public transportation is dirty, slow, and unreliable. As long as more people know, the transportation system is well designed, more comfortable and more convenient; people will soon start using public transportation. For example, Singapore has implemented 24/7 free public transportation, and its roads are unobstructed.

In short, I firmly believe that free transportation will reduce congestion by promoting awareness-raising campaigns and investment in buses and trains. Although it is a difficult task for the government to implement free public transportation in the community, once the government implements it successfully, it will have a major impact on everyone's life.

Sample 3:

Today with the increasing population and the exponential growth of urbanization, the transportation needs of the people have increased rapidly. Due to increasing transportation and the need for vehicles, traffic congestion has become a major problem of the countries with increasing populations. Therefore, looking into the problem deeply, I find that the best way to control this traffic congestion is for the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities. There are certain reasons for increasing traffic congestion as discussed below.

Firstly, the faster pace of population growth has increased the demand for more vehicles on the road. Since the transport facilities are less as compared to the people traveling, the demands have increased day by day which has contributed to more vehicles on the road and hence contributing to traffic congestion. Secondly, the increasing urbanization has caused more of the rural population to migrate to urban cities and metropolitan cities to find jobs and work. This increased migration of the population to urban cities is also one of the major causes of the traffic congestion on roads. For example, metropolitan cities of India like Delhi, Mumbai, Ahmedabad are highly traffic-congested cities of India due to increased urbanization and rapid migration of the rural population.

Traffic congestion is one of the major causes of carbon dioxide emission and increasing global warming of the earth. The harmful gases emitted from these vehicles pollute the environment. For example, the highly populated city of India is Delhi due to increased traffic congestion. The government must provide free transportation facilities to reduce the number of private vehicles on the road and must also encourage the population to compulsorily use these free public transportation facilities to reduce the problem of traffic congestion. Besides, in public transport, the use of environmentally-friendly electric vehicles like metro services, electric trains, electric buses, and taxis must be encouraged instead of fuel vehicles to reduce the emission of harmful gases in the environment.

Therefore, after analyzing all the points above, the conclusion drawn upon is that traffic congestion is the major problem faced by many countries at large and the best solution to this problem is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities to the people.

Sample 4:

The population has been increasing day by day and with the increasing number of people, urbanization is also at its peak. In such situations, the huge demands of vehicles have caused rapid traffic congestion on roads. However, some people argue that the best way to control traffic congestion is that the government must provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, but in my opinion, this may not be the correct way to control the traffic congestion.

Some of the major reasons for traffic congestion are urbanization and the migration of the people. This has caused an increased demand for vehicles in the market. Nowadays people tend to travel a lot, and, in such conditions, they find it easier to use their own vehicles rather than opting for public transport. A survey conducted in China states that a majority of people prefer their own vehicles rather than public transport and this has increased more vehicles on road contributing to the traffic congestions. Secondly, people find it easy to carry their own vehicle to travel to different corners of the country as it is more comfortable than public transport. Also, the conditions of the public transport facilities have also deteriorated, they are also very congestive and unhygienic. Besides, the public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners due to non motorable roads and hence, the best option for traveling to these areas are the private vehicles. Secondly, private vehicles like cars and motorbikes have become more affordable and budget-friendly for people.

For the government to provide 24/7 free public transport facilities, it will be a big burden on their exchequer. Instead, the government must focus on other measures like encouraging bicycles for school and college-going students, build wide tracks with separate lanes, build more expressways and flyovers to reduce the congestion. Also, they must subsidize the public transport fares but not completely free. A separate track for pedestrians and cyclists must be built to limit the number of vehicles on the road. Besides, an awareness campaign must be launched to inform people of the traffic rules and safety measures. Strict traffic rules must be followed, and a compulsorily fine system should be introduced.

Instead of providing free transport facilities for the public, the above-mentioned measures must be given more importance.

Sample 5:

To reduce traffic congestion, the government must provide free transport facilities to the public. But this step can be moderately implemented to reduce the congestion on roads. Some other measures should also be taken in equal proportion to deal with the issue of traffic congestion. Therefore, the statement, Government should provide 24/7 free public transportation to reduce traffic congestion is moderately correct. There are several reasons for the increasing traffic congestion on roads as mentioned below.

Population in many of the developing countries like India and China has been increasing at an alarming rate. This has caused an increasing number of people on the road either using public transport, their own vehicles or pedestrians resulting in increased traffic congestion. Also, a large-scale migration of the population to urban cities for work had deteriorated the traffic conditions of big cities. Secondly, the fares of the public transport are quite high compared to the service they render and are more congested and unhygienic. Now, when automobiles have become more affordable and fuel-efficient, people opt for quality and comfort over public facilities. Thirdly, people have started to travel more these days and public transport facilities are not available to the remote corners of the cities or towns. In such situations what people find better is the use of the facilities of the private vehicle. However, the use of private vehicles has resulted in increased traffic congestion and besides, these are the major cause of concern as they contribute to the emission of harmful gases polluting the environment.

To deal with the problem of traffic congestion, providing only free public transport may not contribute much. Besides, the government must encourage the use of electric vehicles and bicycles amongst the population. Secondly, it must focus on building more expressways and highways and separate lanes to reduce the congestion. Enough attention must be paid to constructing road facilities in remote corners of the cities and towns and especially in rural areas so that public transport can easily reach every corner of the world. Strict adherence to the traffic rules must be followed.

All these steps along with free transport facilities by the government together can contribute to reducing traffic congestion.

Sample 6:

The incidents of traffic congestion are increasing along with the population growth. Some contend that in order to lessen traffic congestion, the government ought to offer free public transportation. This solution, in my opinion, can only partially resolve the issue.

Most individuals now prefer to live in cities or towns rather than rural areas due to urbanisation. This is one of the primary causes of the heavy traffic on the roadways. At the same time, cars have also gotten cheaper and more fuel-efficient as a result of technological improvement. The number of automobiles on the roads has also increased as a result.

The government is undoubtedly attempting to reduce traffic by enhancing the efficiency and speed of public transit. For instance, the DMRC system, which facilitates bus stops across the entire city, has been installed in Delhi, a densely populated metropolis. The public can utilise this bus service 24 hours a day, seven days a week, but it is not free, thus many people opt to drive their own car instead. Because buses and trains are crowded and uncomfortable, many individuals will still choose to use their own vehicles even if public transportation is free. Free public transportation will also put a strain on the exchequer.

In my opinion, the government can take a number of additional steps to lessen traffic on the roads. For instance, it needs to create bigger roadways, additional flyovers, and separate lanes for cyclists and pedestrians. It should also strictly enforce traffic regulations and promote the use of environmentally friendly transportation.

In conclusion, making public transportation free will undoubtedly encourage more people to use it, but since those who value comfort and convenience over cost will still drive privately, this strategy is ineffective in easing traffic congestion.

Sample 7:

The traffic is getting worse in contemporary society, some citizens suggest that the authorities should provide free public transport every day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it's extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken at the same time.

We have to admit that this policy can increase the usage of public transport. Inhabitants will take it into consideration if it's free when they are facing traffic jam. To some extent, it can reduce traffic congestion. But we cannot turn a blind eye to the problems it caused.

This initiative will sharply increase the national budget. It's generally acknowledged that national funds are limited and should be used in a large variety of social aspects from education to environmental protection. The initiative will leave a burden on the financial budget and let the infrastructure cannot be maintained and guaranteed.

Furthermore, this policy cannot address the root of this issue. People use private cars not because of the high cost of the public transportation system, but because the line and route don't cover their destination or the low efficiency when they plan for a long-distance trip. No matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. In addition, traffic congestion only accrued during the rush hours, so it's pointless to provide it for free all day.

To sum up, I think the authority should reduce the price and develop the traffic infrastructure if they want to address this issue, rather than provide it for free simply.

Sample 8:

Some contend that the best way to combat traffic congestion is to always provide free bus and rail passes to everyone who needs them. While I acknowledge it may work for the vast majority of individuals, I think the government ought to offer other options to address this issue.

In conclusion, it is undeniably true that providing free public transit to citizens may be a significant element in reducing traffic, but this is by no means the main component that governments should take into account when trying to address this issue.

Sample 9:

In recent years, traffic jams have been increasingly ubiquitous particularly in big cities which cause great fatigue for commuters. In order to tackle this problem, it is argued by many that government should provide free public transport all day, yet there still remain some arguments against this issue as it is extremely costly. Overall, it is my personal view that offering free public transport is not the best way and other measures should be taken.

First of all, it is an indisputable fact that traffic congestion is not only attributed to the vast amount of private transport but also road systems. Moreover, no matter how attractive public transport is, people still use private cars in case of emergency and essence. Thus, providing free public transport alone just contributes to cutting down the volume of traffic to some extent. In fact, many big cities like Ho Chi Minh still suffer from traffic jams in narrow roads with obsolete infrastructure in spite of the rise in availability of public transport. Therefore, I strongly believe that road needs to be widened, and traffic lights and signs should be made more state-of-the-art to stem the root causes.

More importantly, though providing free public transport 24 hours per day is not necessary and what is more is that it may leave a burden on the national budget. According to the majority of reports, traffic jams mainly occur during the rush hours, so it is pointless to provide public transport all the time. On top of that, providing free public transport in the long term may be unachievable due to its tremendous cost. This measure not only costs governments a fortune but it is also unable to address the root of the issue. It would be far more economical if this amount of money was invested in enhancing road facilities.

By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that other measures rather than making public transport available may be far more efficient to traffic congestion. In years to come, I strongly believe that more investments in road systems should be adopted to make commuting more comfortable and time-saving.

Câu 3