Câu hỏi:
07/01/2025 106
In many workplaces, online communication is now more common than face-to-face meetings. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
In many workplaces, online communication is now more common than face-to-face meetings. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
These days, it is becoming more common for a lot of people to use the internet to communicate with their fellow employees in many workplaces. Personally, I believe that in most workplace situations the benefits would outweigh the drawbacks of this trend.
On the one hand, there are certainly several drawbacks to this trend. Firstly, communication via computers and the internet can sometimes lack emotion or feeling, or be misinterpreted, and this can lead to tensions between employees. For example, a simple email from one employee to another may be written in a way that offends the other employee or makes them feel inferior. Such a situation may have been avoided if the communication had taken place in person, with a friendly tone or smile. Secondly, communication via the internet can sometimes be unreliable, such as in times when the internet connection is slow or faulty. This can lead to missed messages, lost emails, and low productivity.
However, these days communicating via the internet has brought about far more advantages in most workplaces. Companies can now have several branches and departments located in different parts of the world while still allowing employees to communicate quite effectively. For example, a company CEO can hold a meeting with all branch managers in different cities around the world via video-conferencing, saving the company a lot of time and money that would be required for everyone to attend the meeting in person. Furthermore, online communications are usually saved online and therefore allow employees to double check messages, which helps to reduce any miscommunication or misunderstanding.
In conclusion, I believe that communicating via the internet is a positive trend overall and allows companies to save enormous amounts of time and money, and minimises misunderstandings between employees.
Sample 2:
In today's ever-increasingly digital world, online communication has become the norm for many workplaces. While this development offers numerous advantages for companies such as greater flexibility and efficiency, it also brings with it certain disadvantages like miscommunication, which must be weighed against its benefits.
One of the primary advantages of online communication is that it makes it easier for teams to stay in touch without having to physically convene. This is especially beneficial when individuals or groups are dispersed across vast distances. Reduced travel costs, as well as time saved from not having to travel to and from meetings, also represent meaningful savings for businesses. Additionally, online communication platforms often have a range of features designed to make collaboration more efficient, such as providing an easy way to share documents and other materials with remote team members. To illustrate, digital resources can be sent quickly and securely via email or other software services like Dropbox or Google Drive.
There is a potential drawback associated with relying too heavily on online communication at work, as the lack of physical proximity between members of a team can often lead to misunderstandings due to a loss of context or nonverbal cues that would otherwise be present during face-to-face meetings. However, in my opinion, issues of this nature can be solved by using written language more carefully to avoid any confusion or miscommunication among colleagues.
Sample 3:
The ascendancy of online communication over traditional in-person meetings within the professional realm marks a significant evolution in workplace dynamics. Asserting that the advantages, such as operational flexibility and the inclusion of a diverse workforce, decidedly outweigh the potential detriments like reduced personal interaction, forms the crux of this discussion.
Online communication channels have revolutionized workplace operations, offering unmatched flexibility and transforming traditional work paradigms. This innovation allows employees to participate from virtually anywhere, effectively dissolving geographical barriers and enabling a previously unattainable work-life balance that is critical in today's fast-paced world. Such flexibility not only attracts a wider talent pool, inclusive of individuals with different abilities and responsibilities, but also fosters a culture of productivity and satisfaction, crucial for long-term success. A notable example of this transformation is a multinational corporation that reported a substantial uptick in efficiency, directly attributing this to the adaptability and time management improvements afforded by remote work, underscoring the tangible benefits of such digital platforms.
However, this shift towards virtual engagement is not devoid of challenges, presenting a nuanced picture. The lack of physical presence can occasionally obscure the subtleties of communication, leading to potential misunderstandings that might impede operational efficiency. Moreover, the virtual workplace might catalyze a sense of isolation among employees, potentially affecting team cohesion and the natural growth of interpersonal relationships, which are essential for a thriving workplace culture. Despite these obstacles, the integration of advanced technological solutions like video conferencing and collaborative online platforms offers a mitigative pathway. These tools not only simulate a near-authentic interaction experience but also encourage a connected and engaged team environment, effectively bridging the gap between digital and physical workspaces and fostering a sense of unity and collaboration.
In conclusion, the shift to online communication offers significant advantages, such as improved flexibility and inclusivity, that outweigh its limitations. As technology advances, these platforms are expected to enhance virtual workplaces, making them as effective and connected as traditional ones.
Sample 4:
The digital era has ushered in a paradigm shift, where online communication in workplaces has eclipsed traditional face-to-face meetings. This essay posits that the benefits of this transition, including enhanced flexibility and broader accessibility, substantially outweigh its drawbacks, such as the potential for diminished personal interaction and misunderstanding.
Foremost among the advantages is the unparalleled flexibility offered by online communication. Employees can now engage from any corner of the globe, thereby facilitating a work-from-home culture that was unimaginable a few decades ago. This flexibility not only allows for a more diverse workforce but also caters to those with mobility issues or caregiving responsibilities, thereby enhancing productivity and job satisfaction. It also drastically reduces commute times, contributing to better work-life balance and lower stress levels. For instance, a recent survey by a leading tech company revealed a 40% increase in productivity among remote workers, underscoring the efficacy of digital communication tools. The ability to access a global talent pool further strengthens an organization's competitive edge in its industry.
Conversely, the shift to virtual interaction is not without its challenges. The absence of face-to-face contact can sometimes lead to misunderstandings, as non-verbal cues play a crucial role in communication. The lack of physical interaction may contribute to a sense of isolation among team members, potentially impeding the development of strong interpersonal relationships. This situation may necessitate more deliberate efforts to maintain team cohesion and morale. Additionally, the blurring boundaries between work and home life can lead to burnout if not managed properly. However, these disadvantages are mitigated by the advent of sophisticated online platforms that offer video conferencing and real-time collaboration tools, simulating a more immersive interaction experience. These technologies not only enhance clarity and understanding but also foster a sense of community among remote teams, partially bridging the gap created by physical distance.
In summary, despite its challenges, the shift to online workplace communication offers significant benefits in flexibility and inclusivity, outweighing the drawbacks. With the aid of advanced technology, businesses can navigate these challenges, embracing a more dynamic and accessible approach to professional interactions that aligns with the evolving needs of the global workforce.
Sample 5:
In this modernised era, using the Internet rather than in-person meetings, the way of communication in various work settings has altered, which has gained a massive publicity. In this essay, I will examine both merits and demerits of this phenomenon and explain why the negative aspects of this deed are eclipsed by its advantages.
To commence with, communicating online can bring some disadvantages to workplaces. Firstly, presenting a high-quality meeting via the Internet entails a high-paced Wi-Fi connection. There is always a possibility that wireless connection may go off during the gathering, which as a repercussion the conference’s outcome will be adversely affected. Secondly, online gathering usually lacks in terms of more interaction opportunities among participants. Hence, it might cause misunderstanding in some areas. For instance, changing in tone of speech and body gesture may vary during an online presentation.
On the flip side, the conferences and online communication can be beneficial for all the staff members of an organisation. To illustrate this, managers and CEOs are no longer required to travel long distances to attend a meeting. They can simply click on a button and talk to their counterparts all around the world. As the result of this trend, other sectors of a society also can get benefitted from fewer transports. To exemplify; the environment can be preserved to some extent from gas emission resulted from transportation means.
In conclusion, although communication via the Internet can lead some difficulties during a presentation, such as losing Wi-Fi connection, I opine that having web conferences can play a pivotal role in today’s working life by making meetings more convenient. Moreover, this online communication can help us mitigate the dangerous emission in the air by cutting down the fuel usage on journeys.
Sample 6:
Offices around the world these days are opting to hold meetings online to save both time and money. In my opinion, despite the potential loss of a strong rapport between co-workers, this is a positive considered as a whole.
Critics of these changes often point to their effect on interpersonal relationships in an office. The meeting itself is largely secondary as most information can be communicated just as easily through an online teleconference or an email. True value lies, instead, in the moments before, during and after meetings when colleagues have a chance to socialise or exchange ideas about what they have been working on. This is the reason some companies, famously Apple and Pixar, designed their offices to maximise opportunities for employees to chat with individuals from different departments. The strengthening of social bonds and the sharing of novel perspectives can both boost morale and help drive innovation.
Nonetheless, meeting online is more convenient for employees and saves money for companies. When employees must come in for their work already, many of the benefits listed above are already present and meetings mainly serve as a distraction. Remote workers will also appreciate not having to commute for a short meeting, especially if they have family or other working commitments. Moreover, companies benefit from the time that employees save because it allows them to better allocate their labour towards actual work, thereby increasing efficiency. There are also a range of costs that can be reduced once online communications become standard such as leasing less office space and savings related to office expenses and employee perks.
In conclusion, though communicating online can be detrimental to personal relationships in an office, they offer thoughtful conveniences to employees and help cut costs. Companies ought to shift as much training to online as possible.
Sample 7:
In today's digital age, online communication has become increasingly prevalent in the workplace. It offers convenience, efficiency, and flexibility, but it also raises concerns about miscommunication and the erosion of personal connections. To determine whether the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages, a careful evaluation of its impact is necessary.
One of the significant advantages of online communication in the workplace is its convenience and efficiency. It enables remote collaboration, allowing team members to connect and work together regardless of geographical boundaries. This flexibility in scheduling and participation can enhance productivity and reduce the need for extensive travel, thereby saving time and costs.
However, there are notable disadvantages to consider. One potential drawback is the risk of miscommunication. Online communication lacks the nuances of nonverbal cues, facial expressions, and body language that are crucial for understanding meaning and intent. This can lead to misunderstandings, misinterpretations, and conflicts. The absence of immediate feedback can further exacerbate these challenges.
Another concern is the reduced personal connections and rapport among team members. Face-to-face interactions foster a sense of camaraderie, trust, and collaboration that may be harder to cultivate in an online environment. Building relationships and establishing a strong team dynamic can be more challenging when primarily relying on digital communication platforms.
The evaluation of whether the advantages outweigh the drawbacks requires careful consideration. While online communication offers convenience and efficiency, the risks of miscommunication and reduced personal connections cannot be ignored. The extent to which convenience and efficiency offset the potential pitfalls must be weighed against the importance of effective communication and strong interpersonal relationships in the workplace.
Mitigating the disadvantages and maximizing the advantages is crucial. Incorporating video conferencing can enhance communication by allowing visual cues and real-time interactions. Additionally, promoting opportunities for face-to-face interactions and team-building activities can foster personal connections and strengthen team dynamics.
It is important to acknowledge the counterarguments that highlight increased productivity and the ability to connect with a geographically dispersed workforce. While these advantages are significant, they should be carefully weighed against the potential negative consequences of reduced communication effectiveness and diminished personal connections.
In conclusion, online communication in the workplace offers convenience and efficiency, but it also brings risks such as miscommunication and reduced personal connections. It requires a balanced evaluation of the benefits and drawbacks to determine whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. By mitigating the risks and maximizing the benefits, organizations can strike a balance that leverages the advantages of online communication while maintaining effective collaboration and strong interpersonal relationships.
Sample 8:
Conversing online at jobs is more popular than meeting in person. It may be due to the spread of technology and epidemics; however, this trend has more disadvantages like it has made people isolated, ostentatious, and by and by they disregard the social values.
First off, nowadays people have a very hectic schedule, so they consider talking to their colleagues online rather than meeting personally. They just perform their duty to stay in connection with them. Thus, they experience isolation. To exemplify, people usually converse when they experience any problem or need help only then they consider talking to them online. It becomes difficult for them to understand the real cause of their problem. They feel alone. Likewise, if they meet their co-workers in person, then they can share their feelings as well as troubles well. The personal touch is more important and remains for a long time than getting the same treatment online.
Moreover, masses tend to become gaudier and now and then they use jargon that becomes intelligible for others. Thus, this kind of behavior makes them unpopular among their staff members. In this way, they disregard the social values that are mandatory to have a cosmopolitan ambiance at the workplace. For instance, people equip themselves with cutting edge technology and build superiority complexes and want to show off their knowledge to their counterparts by making them feel inferior in the usage of technology. In this way, people lose social values and become more like machines.
In conclusion, though conversing online has made communication instant and clear; but it has made people isolated, people in order to make their colleagues feel inferior display their knowledge, and lose their reputation or dignity just because of their ostentatious nature. So definitely its disadvantages are greater than the advantages.
Sample 9:
Business conferences and training are taking place more and more on online platforms, replacing traditional face-to-face communication and information exchange. This has both benefits and drawbacks in equal measure
The trend seen in companies switching their training activities and business discussions to the online mode has many advantages. First of all, this offers staff increased flexibility and full control of their timetable, which is likely to diminish the unnecessarily high stress levels and thus boost their work productivity. For instance, working mothers find this incredibly helpful for them to multitask between rearing their children and joining meetings to keep abreast of developments in the company. Furthermore, this online mode of operation could help companies economize on expenditure by not having to pay for the electricity bill, printed documents or equipment for carrying out the meeting or training procedures, for instance.
On the other hand, this option has two major drawbacks. Firstly, communication via the internet can be a hindrance as there might be failures in the flow of information. To illustrate, in [country’s name] not many people can afford a high-speed internet connection, and as a consequence, lagging connection or computer crashing can cause disruptions, reducing the comprehension among meeting or training participants. In addition, there is little room for practice, and the lack of direct guidance also prevents people from fully grasping the skills. It would be less productive because employees receiving training cannot apply what they are taught on the internet or can be clumsy in their actual performance since there is no one to show them whether they are doing it the right way as reality is sometimes completely different from theory.
In conclusion, while there are some advantages to staying at home and participating in discussions or training sessions, there are also disadvantages showing that both sides of this development should be carefully viewed.
Sample 10:
Digital communication is becoming increasingly prevalent in modern workplaces. While there is a potential for the loss of camaraderie of colleagues, I put forward the notion that the benefits online communication brings for employees and managements outstrip the drawbacks it causes.
Critics of digitalization of workplaces very often point out that online communication erodes natural rapport between colleagues. The absence of physical proximity to co-workers affects a person’s ability to hone their interpersonal competencies, and therefore their ability to cement relationships in significant ways. They go on arguing that workers become isolated and lose their face-to-face interpersonal skills which ultimately impact negatively on the workplace relationship they have, and thereby impeding work progress. Moreover, “no physical cues” is another demerit of digital communication. In simple words, without gestures and facial expressions or the ability to react instantly, there is a huge risk of misunderstanding.
Despite the potential risk of ruining rapport between colleagues, communicating online is cost-effective for organizations and convenient for employees. This means that it reduces a range of costs such as less leasing office space as well as the remote working facility for employees. Not only is it time and cost-effective, but also communicating online helps reduce our carbon footprint by commuting less, this in turn, ameliorates the environment. A further advantage is increased efficiency and productivity. Put simply, online communication can ensure the flow of information and ease of communication between executives working at different tiers. Visually interactive video conference, for instance, provides employees and customers with vital images that enable them to interpret and collaborate appropriately over a vast distance. As a result, decisions are made more quickly, assignments are completed on time, and productivity increases accordingly.
To conclude, digital communication has come into vogue in the modern workplace and face-to-face meetings are decreasing as a result. Despite some demerits, which we can overcome by being more proactive and engaged in our interactions with our coworkers, this shift greatly streamlines the work process.
Sample 11:
In the modernized era, workplaces have started preferring online communication rather than choosing face-to-face meetings. I think this trend is far more advantageous than anything opposite.
To begin with, online communication is beneficial as it consumes far less time and effort than the conventional method of physical meetings. For instance, if an employee has an urgent meeting to attend, choosing to hold it online will evade the issues arising from being stuck in the traffic jams and entering the office premise later than the set time for the meeting. Or the need for appearing presentable as per the basic dressing ethics demanded by the organization. Rather, this additional time can be used to excel in their meetings and other skills. Furthermore, online communications are much more feasible, convenient and comfortable. To cite another example, during the times of covid-19, the work from home technology has proved to be worth it.
However, there are certain demerits that are associated with online communications. With online services, one requires stable electricity and data connection. Thus, failure of any one thing can lead to disruptions during essential talks, resulting in the wastage of time. At the same time, cybercrime is pertaining to computer technology; hence, susceptible to unwanted attacks by hackers and intruders.
In conclusion, I reiterate that technological advancements can be extremely beneficial in the communication aspect. It saves time and also helps in less expenditure, given that one has a stable connection, and everything is secured from hackers.
Sample 12:
In the era of modern technology, people, especially in the workplaces replaces old conservative methods of the communication like face-to-face meetings, instead utilizing the best of technology like online services, for instance, zoom online app or google meet to contact each other and gather whenever necessary. In my opinion, this is a great achievement, and I considered it more advantageous. Also, this essay would demonstrate that its advantages far exceed its disadvantages.
To begin with, online communication is far more advantageous as it consumes a lot less time as compared to conventional meetings. To cite an example, if an employee is going to attend the online meeting, he would not have to worry about traffic jams and to polish his shoes or to press his pant because these are hidden from the rest of colleagues. Moreover, this extra time can be utilized to excel in one’s own real work. Furthermore, online gathering is feasible from one’s own comfort zone and it makes life much easier. For example, people avoided physical interaction in the recent pandemic of COVID-19 and were also able to work from home. This is because of online technology which proves its worth.
Moving forward, some demerits are also associated with online services. Online services require a stable data connection and electricity. Hence, failure of any of these would cause disruption in important talks, and therefore wastage of precious time. Similarly, cybercrime is associated with computer technology thus susceptible to hacker attacks. For example, hackers from some unknown location hacked yahoo data servers which were considered major security threats even to other technological databases.
To conclude, I reiterate that technological advancements can be proved more beneficial and advantageous in terms of less time expenditure provided that one has a good data connection and secured from hackers.
Sample 13:
Undoubtedly, due to advancement in modern technology the ways of sharing information have changed. As a result of this, in a number of workplaces the digital way of exchanging ideas is becoming more popular than personal meetings. In this essay, I am going to discuss the reasons why the merits of online communication outweigh the demerits.
To commence with, online communication has numerous advantages from an individual and business point of view. As for the company, businesses need not spend huge amounts on the maintenance of the office equipment and the infrastructure. For example, there is no need to rent or lease a place to do face to face communication. From individuals’ point of view, online exchanging of ideas is time saving and convenient. Moreover, individuals do not need to travel long distances to reach the workplace. Furthermore, the digital way of communication is the fastest way. There is no need to book a venue or make other arrangements. There is only a need to set up an online link to invite employees to attend online meetings. Overall, it is less time consuming and involves low cost as compared to face-to-face interaction.
Nevertheless, online mode of exchanging ideas involves virtual and technical issues. For instance, in order to attend online meetings, there is a need to have high-quality internet connectivity to get good quality audio and video. In addition to this, some cyber criminals can hack the sensitive business information and may use it in appropriate manner. ieltsxpress.com
To conclude, the digital way of exchanging ideas is the most effective way, and it involves less cost compared to face-to-face meetings. It is fast and convenient. Sometimes technical issues may delay the sharing of information. Even so, in my opinion, the advantages it offers to individuals and companies outweigh the disadvantages.
Sample 14:
Digital communication in many work organizations is now getting more common instead of the traditional one meeting. I believe this innovation will help to improve the productivity of every employee and this essay will further elaborate on its advantages and disadvantages.
The world population is now equipped with gadgets which further help them in their day-to-day life, either personal or professional. And most corporate organizations are using digital communication via various platforms. For example, currently, I am working with an IT Firm and our department is share all kind of information on our Whatsapp group and if necessary, they send a video message so everyone can access from anywhere which helps to save the time from face-to-face meeting and utilize the same into their work.
Moreover, work organizations are now moving ahead with the Work from the home scenario and conduct an online conference if needed. Such as, my father is a Sales Manager he is performing all his tasks over the laptop and takes zoom sessions with the client to finalize the deal and also update all the information to their boss via zoom meeting which further helps him to more concentrate on work and improve his productivity. However, there are some drawbacks of this development as well, such as a manager or department head are unable to give a personal touch to his employees. For example, one of my friends is associated with a private firm and from the very first day he performs all his tasks from at home and till now he has not met his bosses, Result being he is now lacking motivational and emotional support from his company.
All in all, with the use of digital platforms nowadays the majority of workplaces are switch to online communication to save the time of their staff so that they can utilize the same to improve their productivity however there are few drawbacks, but these can be manageable.
Sample 15:
Digitalization has transformed the 21st century into a magnificent era. A benefit of this shift is the progressive improvisation of communication around the globe. Owing to this, people are getting interacted electronically rather than manually. This trend has an equal number of demerits as well as merits, which are elucidated below.
A bunch of significant advantages of wireless communication is speed, flexibility, and, importantly, cost-effectiveness. To explain in detail, firstly, modernization has opened new doors of creativity, and one among them is the internet. Due to the ease of accessibility, people tend to conduct work, organize meetings, and even perform rituals online. Consequently, instead of conducting a meeting by gathering people, workplaces prefer computer-assisted applications that can be operated with added acceleration. Secondly, international organizations can perform their meticulous tasks and meeting irrespective of their different time zones due to online momentum and availability.
The other edge of this technological advancement is minimal capital investment. For instance, funding for workers can be controlled at given meetings. Instead of which a one-time investment of electronic gadgets can be installed that carry out the work effortlessly.
On the flip side, the drawbacks which occur due to this wired communication are many. One such thing is the tone of delivery. To quote an example, English is a flexible language. The content delivered depends on the viewership. Sometimes, the message is wrongly conveyed due to the fault in language. This can be controlled in face-to-face communication. Another impediment is the quality of work diminishes when the interaction is just through computers. For example, when a company orders cloth for their clothing industry when they do not test it with touch, and deals are closed online. The end product may vary, eventually leading to the downfall of their business.
To sum up, even though in the millennial era, articulation is merely online, it can be effective through an amalgamative effort of both eyes to the eye as well as electronic operation.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
- Sổ tay Giáo dục Kinh tế & Pháp luật 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay Lịch Sử 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay lớp 12 các môn Toán, Lí, Hóa, Văn, Sử, Địa, KTPL (chương trình mới) ( 36.000₫ )
- Bộ đề thi tốt nghiệp 2025 các môn Toán, Lí, Hóa, Văn, Anh, Sinh, Sử, Địa, KTPL (có đáp án chi tiết) ( 36.000₫ )
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Although fossil fuels still remain the most important energy sources in many places, some countries are now already using alternative sources like solar or wind power. In my opinion, it can be difficult for a country to move towards using alternative energy at first, but this development brings about several benefits in the long run.
On the one hand, the change towards using alternative types of energy would probably put a heavy financial burden on the government and companies as they will have to invest millions of dollars in purchasing and developing new equipment and facilities for harnessing solar, wind or hydro-electric power. For example, the average cost of installing a wind turbine for generating electricity is about $3 million, and an average country would require a wind farm with hundreds of turbines to supply power to all companies and households. In addition, the production cost of large solar panels is still very high, which is why many countries, especially those with a poor economy, are still unable to use this power source.
However, I still believe that shifting towards using alternative energy is a worthwhile investment due to the great benefits it brings. Firstly, fossil fuels are the main cause of air pollution nowadays since petroleum-powered vehicles and factories are releasing tremendous amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere every day. Therefore, replacing coal and petroleum with wind or solar power will help to reduce the level of emissions in the atmosphere and improve air quality. Secondly, fossil fuels, like natural gas or oil, are finite resources and will soon be depleted, which will potentially threaten the economy if there are no alternative sources. This fact emphasizes the need to develop renewable energy to gradually replace traditional sources when fossil fuels inevitably run out.
In conclusion, I hold the view that despite the high initial cost of new equipment and facilities, the switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources is still necessary for the long-term development of the planet.
Sample 2:
The debate around our primary sources of energy has been intensifying in recent decades, with some pushing for more sustainable energy while others arguing that fossil fuels should remain the main source of power globally. I personally think renewable energy production should be encouraged, since it’s important that nations should seek to reduce their own carbon emissions to divert the dangers of climate change as well as build a more sustainable economy.
Firstly, fossil fuel should be discouraged because it could bring about the existential threat of climate change. As a result, biodiversity is at an all-time low, with shifting climates and rising sea levels slowly eroding the delicate tapestry of food webs across the globe. As scientists are convinced this is directly the cause of human activity, such as in agriculture and fossil fuel consumption, renewable energies would help slow this threat immediately and might be our only solution to salvaging the planet.
Secondly, one could argue that renewable energies are more sustainable and would therefore be better for the economy in the long run. While oil and coal are a finite resource and take millions of years to replenish, energy from wind and solar can in theory never run out. Therefore, making a switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy can be a solution that thinks of the longer term, since it could avert an economic crash when oil fully depletes. Many analysts have warned that with the current trajectory, oil could run out by 2050; when this happens, it could sharply affect the biggest economies in the world that are still heavily dependent on oil.
Overall, I argue that the climate effects as a result of fossil fuels consumption combined with the economic benefits of renewable energies mean that we should encourage the development of these forms of energy.
Sample 3:
Fossil fuels, such as coal, oil, and natural gas, have long been the dominant sources of energy in many countries. However, their extensive use has resulted in significant environmental harm, prompting the need for alternative sources of energy. In response to this, many countries are encouraging the adoption of renewable energy sources like wind and solar power. This essay will discuss the reasons behind the promotion of alternative energy sources and argue that it is a positive development.
One of the key reasons for the promotion of alternative energy sources is their potential to mitigate the negative environmental impacts associated with fossil fuels. Unlike fossil fuels, renewable energy sources produce little to no greenhouse gas emissions during operation, thereby reducing the contribution to climate change. For instance, countries like Germany have implemented strong incentives and subsidies to support the development of solar power, leading to a significant increase in the share of renewable energy in their energy mix. This shift towards cleaner sources of energy is driven by the recognition of the urgent need to combat climate change and reduce dependence on finite fossil fuel reserves.
The encouragement of alternative energy sources has numerous positive implications and is a positive trend. It promotes energy diversification, reducing reliance on a single energy source and increasing energy security. By harnessing the power of wind, solar, and other renewable sources, countries can decrease their vulnerability to fluctuations in fossil fuel prices and geopolitical tensions related to energy resources. Additionally, the transition to renewable energy stimulates innovation and job creation. As governments invest in renewable energy infrastructure and technologies, new industries and employment opportunities emerge.
In conclusion, the encouragement of alternative energy sources, such as wind and solar power, is driven by the need to address environmental concerns and promote sustainable development. By reducing greenhouse gas emissions, diversifying energy sources, and fostering economic growth, the adoption of renewable energy brings numerous benefits. Therefore, it is crucial for countries to continue investing in research, technology, and policy frameworks that support the widespread adoption of renewable energy, ensuring a cleaner and more sustainable energy future.
Sample 4:
Fossil fuel, though extensively used, is not eco-friendly, and its usage comes with huge environmental costs. Considering global warming and climate change, and the detrimental effects fossil fuels have on the environment, green fuel, such as solar, hydro and wind power, is increasingly being used in many countries. It is a good thing that many countries have already started using these green power sources.
The promotion of alternative sources of energy has gained significant momentum in numerous countries because of a growing concern about the adverse effects of fossil fuels on the environment such as greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution. Governments and environmental organizations recognize the urgent need to transition to cleaner and more sustainable energy options. For instance, countries like Germany have implemented ambitious renewable energy targets, investing heavily in wind and solar power to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels and combat climate change.
The stock of fossil fuels is limited and would get exhausted at a certain point. So, alternative and green sources, which are renewable, would be the main source of our energy in the future. Despite the shift from fossil fuel to green energy being expensive and labour-intensive, green energy like wind and solar energy is renewable, their use should be as much encouraged as possible from right now, and it is a good thing that the trend has already started. Alternative sources of power, such as solar and wind power, do not pollute the environment, have lower carbon emissions and are eco-friendly. So, their use could save the planet from the disaster of global warming which is already visible around us. Wind power and solar power are in use in countries like Denmark, Germany and France, and more and more countries are joining the list. We already have extremely efficient technology to produce solar and wind power, and the trend is quite encouraging.
To conclude, the energy demand is increasing at a fast pace, and the stock of fossil fuels is diminishing. So, we should turn to alternative green energy sources and share the technology and expertise with all nations so that the transition happens all around the world to save our otherwise dying planet due to climate change and greenhouse effects.
Sample 5:
Every year the energy demand is increasing globally. So, the strains on the current and already limited resources are high. Since these energy resources, like fossil fuels, are mostly imported by countries, some countries have opted for alternative sources of energy to enjoy greater energy security. I wholeheartedly believe that it is a positive trend.
Alternative sources of energy offer greater energy security and independence and that is why their production and use is increasing. Relying on traditional energy sources, often imported from other countries, can leave nations vulnerable to price fluctuations and geopolitical tensions. Embracing renewable energy sources, such as hydroelectric, geothermal, or biomass, allows countries to tap into their own natural resources and reduce dependence on foreign energy imports. This is why it has already gained popularity.
Fossil fuels, like coal and oil, are not unlimited. A few countries like Germany and Japan, for example, are completely dependent on the import of such resources. For all these countries, alternative energy, also known as green energy, is the answer for the future, and it is a welcoming trend that many countries have already started producing green energy. By embracing renewable energy options, countries can address climate change, enhance energy independence, create employment opportunities, and drive technological progress. Countries like France and Norway, among others, have invested in the technology needed to produce extremely efficient solar panels to store energy from the sun or produce wind power. The positive impacts of this development are innumerable, and many countries are following in their footsteps.
In conclusion, the use of green energy sources is gaining traction because many countries want to become energy self-sufficient. This is definitely a positive trend as it reduces reliance on energy imports, helps countries fight climate change, advances technology and creates more employment.
Sample 6:
These days, the environment is being severely affected by the excessive use of nonrenewable energy resources, such as petrol, diesel, coal and natural gas. However, eco-friendly and renewable power sources like wind and solar power are being adopted in many countries mainly because they do not harm the environment, and I wholeheartedly think that it is a positive trend.
The shift towards renewable energy sources in many countries is primarily to fight global warming and climate change. Fossil fuels are often the reason climate change is so severe and threatens the existence of humans on the mother planet. Many countries, including Germany, Norway and France, have adopted the use of green energy like solar and wind power to reduce our dependency on fossil fuels to save the environment.
It is a positive trend as it greatly reduces the carbon content of the environment and makes the planet more sustainable. Without extensive use of green energy, we will soon transform our planet into an uninhabitable one. To save our planet from destruction, we need to produce and use more green and renewable energy. Moreover, it is cheaper to produce such clean energy than to extract coal or natural gas which makes these eco-friendly energies affordable to mass people. A recent study by Oxford University reveals that the production of solar power is 30% cheaper than that of fossil fuel. This finding again emphasizes how important it is for all nations to opt for renewable energy sources, and how beneficial it is that many countries have already invested in generating clean power.
In conclusion, even though we have harmed our mother planet to a great extent by indiscriminately using fossil fuels, some countries have already shown us a better way to produce and use power. It is expected that more countries will invest in alternative sources of energy to make the planet green again and make energy affordable for all.
Sample 7:
While fossil fuels have been the backbone of our energy supply for centuries, they have severe harmful impacts on our environment. Therefore, some countries have started relying on green energy to reverse the situation. And it is a positive trend that we have started researching and using alternative sources of energy, also known as green energy, that are sustainable and do not cause long-term damage to our environment.
One of the main reasons alternative energy sources are being used to produce green energy in many countries is their ability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which are a major contributor to climate change. According to the International Energy Agency, the use of renewable energy sources can help reduce global CO2 emissions by up to 70% by 2050. This is a significant step towards protecting our planet from the devastating effects of climate change, including rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and loss of biodiversity.
The use of renewable sources to generate energy is a positive development for a variety of reasons. For instance, investing in renewable energy can also create jobs and boost the economy. According to the Renewable Energy and Jobs Annual Review 2020, the renewable energy sector employed around 11.5 million people worldwide in 2019, a 6% increase from the previous year. This growth in employment opportunities can help to stimulate local economies and provide new job opportunities for people in both developed and developing countries. For example, in Germany, the government's decision to phase out nuclear power plants and invest in renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar power, has created over 300,000 jobs and contributed to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.
In conclusion, the shift towards green energy sources is a positive development that can help to protect our environment and create new job opportunities. While it may take time and investment to transition away from fossil fuels, it is a necessary step to ensure a sustainable future for generations to come.
Sample 8:
Many nations are now supporting the adoption of various energy alternatives in order to reduce fossil fuel consumption. In my opinion, though there may be short-term economic downsides, this is a decidedly positive development due to the implications on the environment generally.
Those who feel the sudden adoption of alternative energies is a negative point out the financial repercussions. There are economies around the world that are currently dependent on exporting fossil fuels, in particular in The Middle East, South America, and Eastern Europe. Many of these countries are still developing and have few other natural resources or industries that could replace a decline in the energy sector. The economic effects will extend far beyond exporters though. Both developed and developing nations ranging from the United States and Vietnam to China and Russia exploit oil for private vehicles and various industries. Substituting cheap oil for a more expensive alternative might result in economic catastrophe with wide-ranging repercussions.
However, the environmental effect is overwhelmingly more important for the long-term health of the planet. The economic results of less dependence on fossil fuels will cause short-term problems but the issues caused by climate change are also becoming a present reality. For instance, there has been a rise in the number of cataclysmic natural disasters related to rising ocean temperatures and deforestation. Even more troubling are the less noticed problems such as habitats being destroyed in remote areas like Antarctica and the Amazon Rainforest. Beyond the animals becoming endangered and extinct, it is only a number of years before human life is affected. This existential threat is the reason alternative energies are a pressing need.
In conclusion, despite the economic drawbacks of a sudden shift to alternative power sources, this reorientation will have a markedly positive long-term impact on the environment. Governments should therefore implement and bolster alternative energy initiatives.
Sample 9:
The development of renewable energies like wind power, wave power, or solar energy to replace the electricity generated from burning fossil fuels has become an increasingly popular trend in the world. I believe this is a green movement in the energy sector with countless benefits that people should welcome.
The most palpable advantage one can recognize at once when mentioning renewable energies is that they reduce the burden on the environment. The use of solar power creates no emission at all, and thus provides for the need of power at almost no environmental cost. It is similarly clean and sustainable when wind, wave, and water moving around the Earth eternally can be used in energy production. Also, the independence from fossil fuels in electricity generation saves the world from a rapid depletion of coal, oil and natural gases, and slow down the imminent energy crisis which may even cause wars over energy sources among countries.
Moreover, the production of green energy also benefits individuals and the country as a whole. Thanks to less burning of fossil fuels in thermal energy plants, workers in energy companies face less risks of occupational health problems especially those related to respiratory diseases and may lead to early death. On the large scale of a country, the utilization of wind, wave, sunlight, and even geothermal heat to produce electricity will diversify the energy portfolio of different nations, making them free from reliance on limited natural resources to generate electricity due to their unfavourable geographical locations.
In conclusion, the movement of the world towards more use of renewable energy is completely positive when it solves multiple problems of environmental pollution, dependence on natural resources for energy, and poor health of workers in thermal power plants.
Sample 10:
Governments across continents have turned their attention to more sustainable sources of energy as alternatives to fossil fuels. In my opinion, this could be seen as a progress for the following reasons.
First, there is no arguing that producing energy from buried dead organisms lacks sustainability, which means such production could not guarantee the survival of humans in the long term. In fact, the consumption of energy generated from fossil fuels tends to accelerate in direct correlation with the growth of the world population. With the current rate of exploitation, this valuable resource would dwindle away in no time, leaving no other choice than seeking additional reserves such as nuclear power or hydroelectricity. This is a safe solution to the fear of energy scarcity and ensures the future development of the human race.
Second, dependence on fossil fuel for worldwide energy supply would cause environmental degradation while using solar power, for example, is considered an ultimate choice of energy conservation. The combustion of fossil fuels is the culprit of greenhouse gas emissions and other air pollutants, leading to tremendous damage to the environment. Such suffering of the Earth could not be justified by the growing need of humans. By contrast, this would never be the case when it comes to other alternatives as mentioned above. If governments continue to invest in exploiting those new sources, there will be an unlimited amount of inexpensive energy in the long run.
In conclusion, I believe that the use of other potential energy sources to replace fossil fuels is obviously an important step forward.
Sample 11:
Fossil fuels, such as coal, oil, and natural gas, are extensively used in many countries and cause harm to the environment. The use of alternative sources of energy, including wind and solar power, however, is being encouraged in many countries. Is this a positive or negative development?
In several nations, non-renewable sources of energy, namely coal, petroleum, and gasoline, are used inordinately, which is severely damaging the ecosystem. However, other countries are promoting the usage of non-conventional sources of power, such as wind and solar energy. I personally consider that this has been a positive development because the non-traditional approach will aid in efficient energy output and protect the ecosystem from feasible hazards.
Primarily, the remarkable advantage of the aforementioned alternative sources is that they are renewable. These energy sources have a constant supply of power and there is no requirement for significant raw materials. Although it could be argued that the initial cost of setting up solar panels and wind farms is extremely high, I would assert that once the installation cost has been met with, their maintenance is practically negligible. Apart from this, it is widely accepted that fossil fuels take millions of years to form, and once consumed, they cannot be re-used. To illustrate, if modern individuals burn immense petroleum and coal, these resources are likely to vanish, and future generations would not be capable of using these precious energy sources.
Another major benefit of eco-friendly energy sources is their non-polluting nature. The intensive usage of natural resources forms carbon emissions and emits noxious gases that are nurturing global warming and depleting the ozone layer. Even worse, by inhaling such poisonous gases and carbon fumes, human beings are susceptible to various health ailments such as asthma and lung cancer. However, when energy is harnessed from wind turbines and solar panels there are no such deleterious by-products. Unlike other automobiles, for instance, commuting through a solar car would not emit carbon dioxide.
In conclusion, not only do alternative sources provide an inordinate amount of energy supply constantly, but they also preserve the environment in a very effective way. Therefore, I completely believe that this trend is a wholly positive development and one that authorities ought to promote.
Sample 12:
In this day and age, the consumption of non-renewable resources is burgeoning day by day. Owing to this it reached an alarming rate. It takes millions of years to form. However, some nations are taking a step forward and using non-conventional sources of power. This essay will highlight that this is certainly an optimistic approach that needs to be opted.
At the outset, non-conventional sources can be recycled and utilized again. Although, the use of alternative sources has some hurdles like the initial cost of setting up solar panels and wind farms is very high and these also rely on geographical locations. When masses use this energy source for a long period of time, the energy can be renewed and produced, no extra cost will have more economic benefit than the others. Besides this, the use of renewable energy could help to conserve foreign exchange and generate local employment if conservation technologies are designed, manufactured, assembled, and installed locally.
Moving further, alternative sources- wind power, tidal power, solar power – sources are totally safe for the environment, have lower carbon emission, and are eco-friendly. The research concluded that there are some countries that have utilized alternative sources namely German, France, and Denmark as these nations save the planet from a disaster of global warming. Some countries use automobile cars that work on solar power. Consequently, it has reduced the carbon footprint of such countries and made its greenery.
Based on this study it can be reiterated that the use of alternative sources of energy is an optimistic evolvement, which can save the whole globe from the catastrophic impact of greenhouse emissions as well as global warming. Furthermore, more and more folks should adopt renewable sources to ameliorate the conditions of the environment. In this way, by taking joint efforts individuals can preserve the world.
Sample 13:
Due to the shortage of fossil fuels, whether other natural power resources should be encouraged to harness or not, becomes a paramount concern for many countries. I believe, while this advancement may decrease awareness among people about protecting the fuels, it also solves the problem of the lack of energy sources.
First of all, fossil fuels which are the major energy resources in many nations are facing the threats of becoming obsolete due to the overuse by the human race in daily life. As a result, people should be encouraged to raise awareness of fuel conservation. However, the utilization of alternative natural energy sources could prevent people from doing this by reducing the fears of coal or oil that might be running out. Because there are other sources to use, they would use more energy generated from gas or oil without hesitation. In my personal opinion, the negative sides of using different resources of power could deteriorate the shortage of fuels.
Harnessing alternative power sources (such as solar or wind power), in contrast, could reduce the usage of fossil fuels in generating energy for a range of demanding activities such as heating and driving. While coal and oil mines are limited, natural resources such as wind and solar power are considered unlimited. This wind power or solar energy is consequently able to produce enough energy for human demand without the help of fossil fuels. As a result, it should be encouraged to be utilized in more countries in the world to gradually cut down the usage of fossil fuels.
To sum up, the encouragement of using natural resources (such as solar or wind) for producing energy has both negative and positive sides. However, I deem that humankind should consider using more power from solar or wind and less from coal and gas to protect the remaining parts of fossil fuels.
Sample 14:
Coals, oil, and gas are some fossil fuels that are the most common sources of energy for the majority of countries. On the other hand, some countries encourage the use of renewable resources like wind and solar energy. I believe this is a strongly positive development as we will be in grave danger if the world runs out of these natural non-renewable resources like fossil fuels.
Fossil fuels are used in almost all industries and for running motor vehicles. We can minimize this by using alternatives wherever possible. If it goes on like this, we will soon have such a shortage of these fuels that can pose a threat to running things efficiently. For example, some industries can only run on coal or oil, though this is not the case for cars. Automobiles can easily run on electricity, and so we should limit the use of such fuels. Burning too much of these fossil fuels also contributes to air pollution. Thus, it is important to minimize usage wherever possible.
On the other hand, wind energy and solar energy take comparatively longer time to generate, and they are largely dependent on the sun and the wind. We do not have any control over them, so the production of goods might slow down if there is less generation of energy as we cannot, in fact, control the weather. Perhaps tropical countries, where there is an abundant amount of sunshine and wind, can be encouraged to use these natural sources and not waste fossil fuels. However, for temperate climates, this might not be an option. Dependency on nature can have slower production rates and lead to not meeting the deadline or having scarcity in the market.
On the whole, I believe all the countries should be aware of the hazards of wasting too much of our natural reserves of energy and use them consciously and responsibly. Initiatives such as building consciousness about the issue should be taken to build a more environmentally friendly atmosphere.
Sample 15:
Fossil fuels harm the environment and to save our planet we need to encourage the use of green energy. The use of alternative sources of energy, or ‘green’ energy, is a positive trend of development, and indeed their use should be encouraged further.
As the demand for energy worldwide is increasing the strains on the existing and already limited resources also increase. To solve this problem, we must consider two issues: how to better use the existing, limited fossil fuel resources and how we can encourage the use of alternative energy sources.
It is universally acknowledged that there is a limitation on the use of fossil fuels, especially coal and oil. Some countries are rich in oil deposits like OPEC, whereas China is rich in coal deposits and Russia in natural gas. Others, such as Japan and Germany, are completely dependent on the import of resources. For all countries- resource-rich versus resource-poor, alternative energy should be encouraged and utilised to reduce the dependence on fossil fuels as well as to keep the global environment in balance and ‘healthy’.
The only way is to turn to other sources to get energy supply. Wind power and solar power are at present feasible alternatives. France is one country that has the advanced technology needed to produce extremely efficient solar panels to store energy from the sun. Both kinds of power can reduce a country’s dependence on fossil fuels. Furthermore, they do not pollute the environment and in turn, help keep the ecosystem stable.
To conclude, while fossil fuel resources are diminishing, the energy demand continues to increase year after year. It is a positive trend to develop other alternative sources of power and experiences should be shared and promoted. If this switch to alternative energy is encouraged early enough, then we may yet avoid the pending energy crisis and environmental disaster.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
The issue of environmental crisis has been a major concern in recent decades, both globally and nationally. With the increasing urgency of the problem, many organizations have been working tirelessly to find solutions to these issues. However, there is a debate about who should be responsible for addressing these problems. Some believe that tackling an environmental crisis should be the job of a single global governing body, while others argue that the government should be in charge.
Advocates for a global governing body argue that world organizations can do a better job of solving environmental challenges because they have a global perspective and can collaborate with all nations to promote the best potential global development. Furthermore, international organizations have access to funding from many wealthy countries, which can help them quickly solve issues that may be beyond the reach of underdeveloped countries. Moreover, international organizations are not affected by political conditions in the same way that national governments are, allowing them to think and act objectively.
On the other hand, proponents of the government being responsible for environmental issues argue that they are better equipped to understand and address their own country's environmental problems. The government also has a better understanding of how these problems arise, as well as how to involve their people in problem-solving. Furthermore, the government is in charge of the country's education and can ensure that the people have easy access to information. Additionally, foreign organizations may not always be familiar with local difficulties, which can lead to changes in future plans.
In conclusion, both arguments have their merits, and the solution may lie in a combination of the two. If the host country supports and communicates their problems to international organizations and collaborates with them, it could lead to a more comprehensive and effective solution to environmental issues. Global organizations have always been objective in their functioning and have the support of many nations, which can contribute to positive outcomes. However, it is important to recognize the strengths of the government in addressing environmental problems and to utilize their knowledge and expertise to achieve the best possible results.
Sample 2:
The 21st century witnessed the dawn of industrialization, due to which numerous factories were set up. To generate higher revenues these factories increased their production manifold, which has put stress on the environment. Some factions of society contemplate that national authorities should take steps to resolve these, while I agree that international organisations can control this situation, and the following essay will cite the reasons for the same.
Firstly, international organisations can sign an understanding among various geographies to use green energy fuels, consequently the emissions from the set-ups will be cleaner. The G20 nations, for instance, have decided to use water to generate 50% of the nation’s electricity, as opposed to coal, and they will share the surplus power with the deprived nations. Furthermore, the developed nations have more exposure to technology for controlling poisonous emissions, therefore, the learnings can be shared with developing geographies, which can be implemented to lower the contaminations.
Secondly, the global bodies can implement a treaty to do some financial support, which will bolster the weaker nations to swap the setup in their factories with some advanced technologies, which will enable production units to utilize cleaner fuels, hence lower pollution levels. For example, Germany is helping Jordan to set up various dams to generate electricity, as opposed to coal being used. Moreover, because these latest technologies require less space as compared to traditional ones, as a result, the extra land can be used to plant vegetation, and they act as natural air purifiers.
In conclusion, due to the above explanations, I am inclined to say that international bodies have a more crucial role to play to combat the pollution of the atmosphere, as compared to national lawmakers.
Sample 3:
The statement that solving environmental problems is the responsibility of international organisations rather than the national government is a topic of debate. I firmly disagree with this, as even though international organisations have some role to play, the primary responsibility is of the national government only as they are directly accountable to their citizens and can mobilize local resources and increase public participation.
Although Environmental problems are global, they often have local causes and effects that can only be addressed by national governments. They are the closest to the issue, so they have the best potential to understand and address it. They can form policies that reflect their unique environmental challenges and socio-economic context. For example, a country that has abundant forests might prevent deforestation, while a country that has high industrial output might prioritise the reduction of air pollution. Moreover, national governments are directly answerable to their citizens and have a direct right to hold them responsible for the increase in environmental problems. This accountability helps governments to take these issues seriously and make big decisions.
While international governments play a crucial role in facilitating cooperation and setting global standards, they often lack the power to ensure that all of the policies they are forming are implemented or not. They may also not be able to fully grasp the specific circumstances and complexities of each country, leading to the formation of one-size-fits-all solutions that will not be effective. Furthermore, international organizations are often hampered by political considerations and disagreements among various countries’ members, which can slow down decision-making and implementation of environmental initiatives. On the other hand, national governments are sovereign entities, having a greater freedom to act decisively and swiftly in response to environmental crises.
To conclude, while international organisations have a role to play in solving environmental problems, the primary responsibility lies with the national governments. They have the authority, accountability and the capacity to effectively address environmental issues within their borders.
Sample 4:
There is no doubt that environment-related issues ought to be held responsible for by an international organization instead of individual countries. I disagree with this statement for some reasons.
There are numerous environmental issues such as climate change, melting glaciers and intensifying greenhouse effect happening on a global scale. As the argument goes, an international organization would act as a leader, issuing principles for all member countries to conform to or it will have sufficient financial capabilities to support the improvement of the environment. Cited cases are the Kyoto protocol has contributed to the slowing down of climate change on the earth, or the United Nations’ support for Third World countries have helped improve the air quality there. This argument, however, fails to take into consideration the fact that compulsion often backfires if an individual nation has no intention to cooperate, or the incentives provided can make recipient countries over reliant and avoid coming up with innovative ideas to resolve their country’s environmental situation. This in the long term exerts a negative overall global effect.
I side with those who think that each governmental body should take responsibility for addressing domestic environmental problems. Firstly, this practice would have a chain effect, benefiting not only the host country but also neighboring nations. For instance, if China diminishes its emissions by downsizing its industrial activities to a certain acceptable level, the air contamination in Hanoi would be reduced as a consequence. Secondly, the root of a complete resolution of environmental issues comes at grassroots level, only achieved by the efforts of a country’s government. If walking or cycling are promoted amongst those with an inclination to use private vehicles, this can help diminish the colossal volumes of exhaust gas and ameliorate the communal air quality. Or, if people are encouraged to participate in the international Earth Hour when everyone is asked to turn their lights off in sixty minutes, huge amounts of power can be minimized. Enacting such events which are aimed at creating a mindset shift in the public regarding environmental protection and promoting a simple lifestyle can only be conducted by a country’s government.
In conclusion, uprooting environment problems should be the responsibility of each national government rather than an international organization.
Sample 5:
People hold different views about how to cope with environmental problems. While some people argue that it is the duty of international organization, rather than a single country, to solve environment-related issues, I believe that both parties/ sides should join hands in solving this problem.
On the one hand, many countries may share the same environmental concerns; however, they would stem from various causes. Therefore, each nation should implement different policies and measures to address the problem. For example, over-exploitation of natural resources and deforestation are identified as the biggest culprit for desertification in the USA, whereas the growing rate of desertified land in China has been mainly caused by rapid urbanization. In addition, the priority environmental issue is also varied in each country, calling for different approaches and strategies to tackle the problem. To illustrate, in emerging economies such as Vietnam, reducing the worrying level of air pollution from industrial activities is of highest priority.
On the other hand, the problems that each government is experiencing are indeed interconnected, hence, concerted efforts by all nations are necessary. Thus, international organizations such as the United Nations play a vital role in promoting and coordinating global action to reduce carbon footprint and curb the global warming threat. Furthermore, wealthy countries should provide financial and technological support for poor nations in the fight against green issues, since the detrimental effects of environmental problems could spread beyond national borders. In other words, an international effort is needed to yield an efficient environment protection scheme.
In conclusion, while international organizations could exert huge impact on a global scale, the combination of international and governmental efforts would have even more profound influences on the environment.
Sample 6:
It is often argued that sorting out ecological issues should be the responsibility of an international administration, while others believe that individual countries’ governments should solve environmental problems. In my opinion, solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of an international organization rather than each national government because environmental issues are global concerns that affect the entire planet. Therefore, their solutions require global cooperation.
To begin with, the environment is a global problem that requires a global response. To be more precise, a lot of ecological issues are available worldwide, such as climate change, global warming, carbon dioxide emissions and air pollution. Moreover, individual national governments can try their best to solve issues, but their efforts may not have a noticeable impact on the environment without the support of other nations. Therefore, an international organization is trying to make rules which are followed by all nations and can help to reduce the rate of environmental issues worldwide. Furthermore, if an international organization passes away an agreement, then every individual nation must follow the acts and take them seriously without arguing anything. For instance, recently, new rules were made by the United Nations Environment Programme [UNEP] for reducing greenhouse gases, which are followed by all nations in the world because it is an international action.
In contrast, each individual nation better knows about their nation’s own climate conditions. More specifically, every country faces unique environmental challenges that are best understood by its government, and there are specific solutions tailored to these issues. While international organizations address common global concerns, they do not focus on the unique environmental problems of individual nations due to the diversity of issues across countries. For example, in India, a wide range of mountains contain in northern areas, so there are various issues such as melting and snow falling, while in southern India has a lot of forests, so there are various problems like over rainfall and storm. Hence, every nation has different environmental problems, and they know better solutions than an international organization.
In conclusion, although every individual nation is well introduced to various types of problems, and they know solutions in a better way. In my opinion, international organizations are likely more responsible for solving some common global issues, such as global warming and air pollution, because cooperation must be required to solve environmental issues.
Sample 7:
Environmental problems are a major concern for the whole world, and addressing these problems requires a concerted effort from all nations. In my opinion, solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of both international organizations and national governments, as both have a role to play in creating a sustainable future for all.
International organizations, such as the United Nations and its specialized agencies, are important players in addressing global environmental issues. These organizations can provide a platform for international cooperation and coordination on environmental issues, such as climate change, deforestation, and biodiversity loss. They can also facilitate sharing of knowledge, resources, and best practices among countries to achieve common environmental goals.
At the same time, national governments also have a crucial role to play in addressing environmental problems. National governments are responsible for implementing policies and regulations that can protect the environment within their own countries. They can also allocate funding for environmental protection measures, enforce environmental laws, and work with their citizens to promote sustainable practices.
In addition, national governments have more direct responsibility for the well-being of their citizens and the environment within their own borders. They are better positioned to understand the unique environmental challenges facing their own countries and communities and tailor their responses accordingly.
Therefore, while international organizations can provide important support and coordination in addressing global environmental problems, it is ultimately up to national governments to take action within their own countries. This does not mean that international cooperation is not important. In fact, international cooperation is essential in addressing environmental problems that cross national borders, such as air and water pollution and climate change.
In conclusion, solving environmental problems requires a joint effort from both international organizations and national governments. It is essential that both work together to create a sustainable future for all. While international cooperation is important, national governments have a direct responsibility to protect their citizens and their environment and must take action accordingly.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.