Some people think parents should read or tell stories to children. Others think parents needn't do that as children can read books or watch TV, or movies by themselves. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:

Sample 1:
Some people believe that it's essential for parents to read or tell stories to their children, while others argue that it's not necessary as children can read books or watch TV and movies on their own. In my opinion, although it is true that children can read books or watch TV and movies on their own, parents still have an essential role to play in promoting literacy and instilling valuable lessons.
On the one hand, those who believe that parents need not read or tell stories to their children argue that children can read books or watch TV and movies on their own. They argue that in today's digital age, children have access to a wide range of media that can be both educational and entertaining. For instance, nowadays, there are numerous channels dedicated to teaching children about science, history, and other topics in fun and engaging ways. Moreover, this can also promote independence and self-reliance in children. To illustrate, a child who is allowed to choose what TV shows or movies they want to watch will learn to make decisions for themselves and develop their own interests
On the other hand, reading and telling stories to children is an important way for parents to bond with their children. Storytelling helps to create a special bond between parents and children and can be an effective way of teaching values, morals, and life lessons. A child who grows up hearing bedtime stories from their parents may look back on those memories with fondness and appreciation. Additionally, children can benefit from the improved language and listening skills that come with being read to or told stories. By being read regularly, a child will be exposed to a wider range of vocabulary and sentence structures that they have not had yet.
In conclusion, my opinion is that parents should read or tell stories to their children because the importance of literacy and growing awareness of moral lessons is crucial for a child’s developmental progress.
Sample 2:
Parents take care of their children at every step. While some people believe that parents should teach children different stories, others believe that parents should not be involved in that as children have the ability to understand and analyse those stories and lessons by themselves.
There are many benefits of teaching children by parents on stories. Children can understand stories by reading themselves, but not up to the level as older people can. As they grow up their analysing ability also will increase. Hence if parents make them understand stories by reading and translating, they can understand much better. Not only that, if children start reading and watching stories by themselves, there is a possibility of misunderstanding the concept of stories (If Moral stories), and also possibility of choosing the bad programs and stories by themselves. For instance, old people always advise parents to teach children good moral stories, which are used for them to improve and understand the values of a human being.
However, some people believe that parents should not always hold children for each and every step, as they read books, watch TV, so have the ability to understand the stories by reading themselves. People say that there are a lot of differences in today’s children compared to older days. It is proved that these days children have the ability to understand the situations and act according to that, they not only read stories but also can teach others. For example, in today’s schools, children who have just started schooling can learn and be involved in multiple tasks much faster than their parents.
To sum up, though today’s children have the ability to analyse situations and stories much better, it is always the responsibility of parents to look after on how well they understand it. It depends on each child; how good they analyse.
Sample 3:
A group of people believe that it is the responsibility of parents to read or share some stories with their children. On the contrary, another group of people disagree with it as they believe that every child could read their own books or find other kind entertainments by themselves. The following essay will discuss both views, but in my personal opinion, I do believe that children should be read or told some books by their parents.
For a number of reasons, many people think that it is mandatory for parents to tell stories or to read some books to their children. Firstly, based on some scientific research, it is found that children usually start reading from the age of five. And before they have the capability to read, it is recommended that children should be told and read some stories by their parents. Secondly, reading some books to children could increase the imaginative thinking of children. As parents read some stories to them, they will start in imaging the stories in their mind, which would positively impact on their brain's development. Lastly, by reading and telling stories to children, it could strengthen the relationship between both sides.
On the other hand, other people think that children should be taught to read books or find other kinds of entertainment by themselves. These people believe that as parents, they are busy with their business, work or household activities; therefore, they would not have time for reading books or accompanying the children. Besides that, they also believe that children should learn to be independent at the earliest age.
In conclusion, people have different views about spending time telling or reading stories to children. I personally believe that as a parent, people should provide time for reading some books to their children, since it brings a lot of benefits for both parents and children.
Sample 4:
It has been rightly said that ‘There have been great societies that did not use the wheel, but there have been no societies that did not tell stories.’ The question of debate is whether parents should read or tell stories to children or whether children should come to know about stories themselves by reading books or by watching TV or movies. In this essay, I intend to discuss both views followed by my opinion.
There are many benefits of reading bedtime stories to children. First of all, it encourages family bonding. In this day and age of hectic lives and busy schedules, reading together is a simple and enjoyable way for parents to take time out and focus on the family. Children also feel wanted and loved. What is more, it moulds children into becoming readers, and this significantly increases the child’s potential for academic success as well as lifelong success in general. It also helps children master language development as by listening to stories, children learn pronunciation and vocabulary. It also builds listening skills, increases a child’s attention span, and develops the ability to concentrate. It develops children’s ability to express themselves more confidently, easily, and clearly in spoken and written terms. It develops and fosters a child’s natural curiosity.
Furthermore, it develops creativity and a child’s ability to use his imagination. It expands children’s horizons by exposing them to new situations and teaches them appropriate behaviour. Reading children’s stories to children provides the best opportunities for true teaching moments as most of these stories have morals. Reading picture books develops a young child’s appreciation for the arts through exposure to many different styles of art and illustrations.
On the other hand, some opine that children should themselves read stories from books or watch them on TV and in movies. This would be much easier for the parents who are too busy nowadays, but then all the above benefits would not ensue. What is more, parents can start telling stories to children much before children can themselves read. Watching TV does not help the child to develop imagination, and this may be detrimental in the long run. Moreover, it would be difficult to monitor what children are learning.
To sum up, I pen down saying that it is always better for the parents as well as the children, if parents read aloud to their children. This would give them quality time together and loads of other benefits which I have discussed above. I pen off with a famous quote of Robert Mackee “Stories are the creative conversion of life itself into a more powerful, clearer, more meaningful experience. They are the currency of human contact.”
Sample 5:
Some people believe that it is the parents' responsibility to read or share stories with their children. On the other hand, another set of people disagrees, believing that every youngster can read their own books or find other forms of pleasure on their own. The following essay will examine both points of view, however in my opinion, children should be read or told stories by their parents.
Many individuals believe that it is mandatory for parents to tell stories or read books to their children for a variety of reasons. To begin with, according to scientific study, children typically begin reading at the age of five. It is also advised that youngsters be told and read stories by their parents before they are able to read. Second, reading books to children can help them develop their inventive thinking. As their parents tell them stories, they will begin to imagine the story in their minds, which will benefit their brain development. Finally, reading and sharing stories with youngsters has the potential to develop both sides' relationships.
Others believe that youngsters should be taught to read books or find other forms of pleasure on their own. These people assume that because they are parents, they are too busy with their businesses, jobs, or domestic chores to read books or accompany their children. They also believe that children should learn to be autonomous from an early age.
Finally, various people have varied perspectives on spending time telling or reading stories to children. Personally, I believe that as parents, we should make time to read books to our children because it has numerous benefits for both parents and children.
Sample 6:
Parents have been reading storybooks to their children since the beginning of time. Throughout history, mothers, in particular, have read stories with lessons to be learned. Some believe that parents should read to their children and teach them nice stories, while others argue that they can do it all on their own. These perspectives will be presented in this sequence.
Some people feel that parents should read to their children and tell them stories. Erik Erikson's psycho-social development theory. It states that children should be able to effortlessly acquire knowledge from early childhood to school-age, is one viewpoint that supports this. It may be claimed that parents, particularly women, should be the ones to provide this. As a result, it's easy to see why some people lean towards this viewpoint.
Many argue, however, that parents are not required to do so because their children are capable of doing so on their own. My father and mother, for example, are both intellectual people who think that genes are passed down through families. As a result, they knew that from the time I was a toddler until I graduated from primary school, I could read books that they had purchased for me on my own. After examining these data, it is evident why so many people believe this assertion.
In conclusion, many people agree and disagree over whether or not parents should read and tell stories to their children. For reasons relating to Erikson's psychosocial development theory and the heritability of parents' intellectual qualities. However, after considering these two points of view, it is apparent that children must be accompanied by their parents when acquiring lessons through story-reading. As a result, the case for fathers and mothers reading and telling stories to their children may be made. As a result, doing this with your children before night is highly advised.
Sample 7:
Some people believe that parents should read or tell stories to children, while others believe that children can come to know about stories themselves by reading books or by watching TV or movies. In this essay, I shall discuss both views. I believe that self-reading and watching TV and movies themselves can never be compared with a parent reading stories to children.
There are many reasons why some people believe that parents should read bedtime stories to children. To begin with, it encourages family bonding. In this day and age of hectic lives and busy schedules, reading together is a simple and enjoyable way for parents to take time out and focus on the family. Children also feel wanted and loved when parents spend time with them. In addition, it builds listening skills, increases a child's attention span, and develops the ability to concentrate.
On the other hand, those who opine that children should themselves read stories from books or watch them on TV and in movies, give their reasons as follows. Firstly, they say that the parent's role should be limited to surrounding their children with books worth reading. When children read books on their own, they become much more independent with their studies, and this helps them academically as well later on. Secondly, TV programs and movies specially cater to children's stories in audio-visual format, which has a more lasting impact on children.
I believe that parents should read out stories to children. The main reason is that this can be started much before children can read themselves. When parents read out stories, children automatically start picking up books and read them. Otherwise, it is very difficult to motivate the children of today to read. Moreover, I consider letting children watch TV all the time as passive parenting, as parents lose control over what their children are picking up from the TV shows.
To sum up, it is always better for parents as well as children, if parents read aloud to their children. This would give them quality time together and loads of other benefits, which I have discussed above. Someone has rightly said that "Stories are the currency of human contact."
Sample 8:
For many people, listening to their parents reading or telling stories before bedtime has become part of their childhood memory. Yet others argue that it is quite unnecessary for parents to do so because their children can learn about these stories by reading or watching TV themselves.
Admittedly, reading or telling stories to children costs a lot of time on the part of the parents. Quite often, this means that parents have to spend one or two hours, or even longer than that, trying to put their curious children to dreams by reading or telling stories. Meanwhile, if children are left reading or watching TV by themselves, their general ability of comprehension may be better developed because they have to rely on themselves figuring out the meaning of the stories they are reading or watching on TV.
Nevertheless, a great majority of parents still choose to read or tell stories to their children. They regard it necessary not just when their kids are too young to read, but when they grow old enough to read themselves. Reading or telling stories, besides providing an opportunity for parents to stay together with their children, is also often considered as a wonderful occasion for parents to share their life's lesson or wisdom with their children. So, the fairy tale about a fox is often not just an interesting story, but one that tells the kids about the risks of greed, and similarly, the story of George Washington cutting a cherry tree makes the kids realize the importance of honesty.
So, far from a waste of time, sharing stories with kids can be an occasion with both emotional and instructional value. Parents should not stop reading and telling stories to their kids until they become old enough to read independently.
Sample 9:
In modern society, the debate on whether parents should read or tell stories to their offspring has garnered significant attention. Some believe that it’s pivotal for parents to engage in such activities, whereas others argue that children can independently access information from books or visual mediums like TV and movies. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and offer my viewpoint.
On the one hand, reading or narrating tales to children by parents has myriad benefits. Firstly, it cultivates a profound emotional bond between the child and the parent, nurturing a sense of security and love. This interaction is often cherished and becomes an indispensable memory of childhood. Secondly, when parents read out loud, it exponentially augments a child’s vocabulary and linguistic prowess. The nuances of intonation, pronunciation, and the rhythm of language are best captured when heard from a loved one.
Conversely, allowing children to explore books or visual content on their own carries its own merits. By doing so, children nurture a sense of independence and self-learning. They not only learn to interpret information on their own but also foster critical thinking. Furthermore, the diverse content available on TV and in movies exposes children to a plethora of knowledge, cultures, and ideas, broadening their horizons.
In my perspective, a balanced approach is paramount. While it’s invaluable for parents to share stories and spend quality time with their children, it’s equally crucial to let them navigate and interpret the world on their own.
In conclusion, both strategies have their unique benefits in aiding a child’s growth. It’s imperative for parents to strike a balance, ensuring they remain involved yet also allowing their child the freedom to explore.
Sample 10:
Some people believe that in today’s modern times, with increased access to various forms of entertainment, it is no longer necessary for parents to spend time reading to children or telling them stories. While it may be true that children today have access to more stimulation than ever before, I fear this argument overlooks the many other benefits of story time to both the children and parents.
The increased availability of a variety of stories through varied platforms gives children of all ages greater access to new and exciting worlds. Where parents would traditionally be able to share one or two stories in a day, a child today can engage with a different story every hour or two. This helps build creativity and grows a child’s sense of the world around them. Because of the range of mediums, children learn to interpret and engage with a story through other senses beyond just listening. The improved graphics in TV and movies have opened up whole worlds of characters that come to life in a new and exciting way that was not previously possible.
However, an in-person story allows children to interact with it - asking questions, adding their own creative input and immersing themselves in this new world, with their parents along for the adventure. The interpersonal nature of reading to a child allows them to use their own imagination to create a visual world for the story, an important form of creative expression for growing minds. The aspect of time spent together is also important to a child’s development. In a world where children spend time alone with screens for stimulation from a very young age, it’s important that they also receive one-on-one time with parents to develop interpersonal skills and meaningful relationships.
There is no denying that access to a wide range of stimulation for children can provide many of the benefits of traditional storytelling such as stimulating concentration, imagination and curiosity., but in my opinion, it is not a replacement for the tradition of telling stories. One-on-one time, interaction and different forms of creative expression are only some of these benefits that would be lost if we left all forms of entertainment up to books, TV or movies.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
- Sổ tay Hóa học 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- 250+ Công thức giải nhanh môn Toán 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay lớp 12 các môn Toán, Lí, Hóa, Văn, Sử, Địa, KTPL (chương trình mới) ( 36.000₫ )
- Tuyển tập 30 đề thi đánh giá năng lực Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội, TP Hồ Chí Minh (2 cuốn) ( 150.000₫ )
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.
Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.
At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.
In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.
Sample 2:
Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.
To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.
Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.
To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.
Sample 3:
There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.
The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.
There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.
In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.
Sample 4:
Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.
To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.
However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.
In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.
Sample 5:
Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.
In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.
In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.
Lời giải

Sample 1:
The line chart illustrates how many people participated in 4 distinct types of sports in a particular area from 1985 to 2005.
Overall, rugby was the most popular sport in the first half of the period while tennis took the lead in the second half. In addition, rugby saw a downward trend while tennis took the opposite direction; moreover, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable.
In 1995, the number of people playing rugby stood at just under 250, surpassing the figure for tennis players by around 100. Basketball and badminton had comparatively lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 participants in turn.
Afterwards, the number of people participating in rugby plunged, hitting a low of 50 in 2005, equal to the figure for badminton in the same year. In contrast, the trend for tennis was upward, with its participation rate increasing to roughly 220 people at the end of the period, establishing it as the leading sport. Finally, the figures for basketball and badminton underwent negligible changes, hovering around 80 and 50 participants respectively.
Sample 2:
The line graph illustrates how many people participated in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005. Overall, there was a significant decrease in the number of people playing rugby in this region, whereas tennis showed a gradual upward trend to become the most popular sport in the second half of the period. Additionally, throughout the period, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable and comparable, with the latter sport remaining the least common.
In the first decade, rugby had the highest number of players, despite witnessing a steady fall from nearly 250 to exactly 200 participants. From 1995 onwards, this sport kept losing popularity as its figure plummeted, reaching parity with badminton (at 50 people) in the final year.
In contrast, tennis was gaining popularity and had become the dominant category by the end of the timeframe. Specifically, starting at the second highest (at 150), the number of people engaging in tennis rose continually, overtaking that of rugby in 1995 before ending at approximately 250 players.
Meanwhile, roughly 80 people played basketball initially, after which it stayed virtually unchanged until the end of the period. Badminton almost exactly mirrored this trend, albeit at a lower rate, consistently hovering around the 50 mark.
Sample 3:
The line chart compares the number of participants in basketball, tennis, badminton and rugby over a 20-year period from 1985 in a specific area.
Overall, more people played tennis throughout the period, and it was the most common sport since 1995, while rugby's popularity declined. Notably, basketball and badminton mostly had stable numbers of players.
In terms of tennis and rugby, both sports indicated inverted trends. Although rugby started at the highest point with nearly 250 players, the figure declined continually to about 200 players in 1995, when this sport was no longer the most popular. Since then, the number of people playing rugby dropped more steeply, reaching 50 in 2005. In contrast, from 1985 onwards, the figure for tennis increased steadily from second place with 150 participants. By 2005, it had reached its highest point of roughly 220 players.
In comparison, there were far fewer people who took up basketball and badminton. However, these sports remained relatively stable, with basketball having about 70 participants every year, while badminton was always the least popular with approximately 50 players each year.
Sample 4:
The line graph provides information about the number of individuals engaging in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.
Overall, while tennis underwent a surge in popularity, rugby experienced a decrease in participation within this region over time, with basketball and badminton remaining relatively stable. Moreover, the most drastic shift in popularity was witnessed in rugby.
At the start of the period, in 1985, rugby was the most played sport, with 240 individuals participating, and it significantly outnumbered the next sport, tennis, which had only 150 participants. Thereafter, the number of people playing rugby dropped to 200 in 1995, before plummeting to a 20-year low of 50 in the final year. This stood in stark contrast to the rise in the popularity of tennis, which saw a steady increase in participants to a peak of about 220 in 2005, making it by far the most played sport at the end of the period.
Turning to the remaining sports, in the first year, 80 individuals played basketball, almost 25 more than badminton. Over the following decade, the participant numbers for basketball rose to about 90, while those for badminton dropped to a low of 45 in 1995. In the remaining period, these two sports maintained their popularity, as the numbers participating stayed at roughly the same level until 2005.
Sample 5:
The line chart delineates the participation levels in four distinct sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.
Primarily, rugby emerged as the most favored sport in the initial half of the period, while tennis took precedence in the latter half. Moreover, rugby exhibited a declining trend, whereas tennis experienced a converse trajectory. Meanwhile, the engagement rates for basketball and badminton remained relatively consistent.
In 1985, the number of rugby participants stood at just below 250, exceeding the tennis players by approximately 150 individuals. Simultaneously, basketball and badminton showcased lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 individuals involved in each sport, respectively.
Subsequently, rugby participation plummeted significantly, reaching a nadir of 50 participants in 2005, akin to the number engaged in badminton during the same year. Conversely, tennis experienced an upward trend, escalating to nearly 220 individuals by the conclusion of the period, solidifying its status as the predominant sport. In contrast, the figures for basketball and badminton remained relatively stable, with approximately 80 and 50 participants, respectively, throughout the entire duration.
Sample 6:
The given line graph delineates the participation levels in 4 different sports, namely basketball, tennis, badminton, and rugby within a specific region over a span of 20 years.
Overall, it is evident that the number of individuals participating in tennis witnessed a consistent and notable increase, contrasting sharply with the downward trend observed in rugby participation. Meanwhile, while basketball and badminton recorded lower participation rates compared to other sports, they remained relatively stable throughout the entire period.
Turning to the number of tennis players, the figures began at a relatively moderate level of 150 individuals in 1985. Subsequently, it experienced a gradual and consistent increase in participation, reaching a pinnacle of nearly 230 participants by 2005. In stark contrast, the trend of rugby involvement presented a distinctive pattern. Commencing at a relatively high level of almost 240 people, the numbers steadily declined over time and by the end of the 20-year period, rugby participants had dwindled to 50, matching the level of engagement observed in badminton. Interestingly, a point of convergence occurred in 1995, where both tennis and rugby shared a similar number of participants, with approximately 200 individuals engaging in each sport.
In regard to the remaining sports participants, the numbers for both badminton and basketball remained relatively stable over the given time frame. Beginning with approximately 50 individuals engaging in badminton and around 80 individuals involved in basketball in 1985, these figures persisted with little variation until 2005. Consequently, by the end of the period, both sports witnessed a culmination with nearly the same number of participants as they had at the beginning.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.