Câu hỏi:
10/01/2025 86Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
It is a well-known fact that the idea of sports can be a magnificent approach to address and ameliorate sensitive issues. In the past, republics have been known to settle controversial situations through the medium of sports. Thus, it is widely believed that global sports events are a remarkable avenue to maintain world peace and harmony. I am a strong supporter of this notion. In the following paragraphs, I will delve deeper into the topic and justify my views with relevant instances.
First of all, we must acknowledge the ability of sports in bringing people together. Regardless of caste, creed, race or gender, sports enthusiasts recognize each other’s passion and love for their favourite game and the players. The realm of sports is a model for being tolerant of the differences between people and showcasing positive values and sportsmanship. One of the prime examples of this is the Olympic Games which are held every four years. It is an international multi-sport event where nations from all over the globe take part in and display the prowess of their nationals in various sporting contests. These competitions are an outstanding platform for athletes to exhibit their talents and also for the entire world to appreciate these individuals and their nations.
Furthermore, international sports have a positive impact on the citizens of nations as well. There is no doubt that every democracy has numerous difficulties that they suffer from, and sports serve as a healthy distraction for the people of a country. When the national team of any sport performs well in international competitions and tournaments, the spirit of the entire nation is elevated. Additionally, such inter-nation sports tournaments also attract a lot of foreign investment, thereby bringing in economic as well as an amalgamation of cultures.
Although, sometimes, the emotions of sports fans get the better of them and unfavourable outcomes even spark controversy. Nevertheless, the overall impact of sports is far more optimistic to consider little bickering, which the management can regulate.
Finally, I would like to add that international sports are essential for maintaining cordial relations between nations, as well as keeping the general populace of a country’s content.
Sample 2:
Sports used to be considered a youthful practice in ancient times that was limited only to parks and indoors. While sports today pushed the boundaries and attracted competitors and national and international audiences. Therefore, there is no doubt that sport can unite the world and preserve global peace.
There is no question that sport plays a sterling role in diplomatic relations between different nations at an international level. Not all nations are at peace with each other for historical or political reasons. Sport, of course, evokes the same pleasure and satisfaction as a triumph in battle, but it brings together nations. Also, major sporting events can be more icebreaker as national participants create a common forum for global leaders, organizations, and athletes to connect more easily and sophisticatedly. The Olympic Games, in which the entire world can be put together, are a good illustration, and this has a positive impact on ensuring global peace.
Sport also evokes strong nationalistic sentiments for the country and provides a platform for the release of patriotic emotions. To show one’s patriotic feelings is a constructive way. Also, international game activities like games from the Commonwealth offer attention to small countries. For example, it is hard to locate the West Indies and Bermuda on the world map, but they are well-known countries just because of their cricket teams that always take part in the World Cup Cricket. Finally, sport is the only practice that sends a strong message of peace and paves the way for world harmony to be established.
Sport activity, to reiterate, is positive energy: Flannel that kills negativity and brings peace Ind joy to the world.
Sample 3:
International sporting events are often viewed as platforms that foster global harmony, with some arguing they contribute significantly to peace and stability. While I agree that such events promote international cooperation, I believe their influence is limited in addressing deeper global conflicts. This essay will discuss how sporting events enhance cultural exchange and diplomacy but will also highlight their limitations in solving political and social issues.
Firstly, international sporting events serve as an excellent means of promoting cultural exchange and understanding among nations. Competitions like the Olympics or the FIFA World Cup bring together athletes and fans from different cultures, fostering a sense of unity and mutual respect. This interaction promotes tolerance, as people get exposed to diverse ways of life, reducing stereotypes and prejudices. For example, during the 2018 FIFA World Cup, fans from around the world gathered in Russia, sharing their cultures, languages, and traditions in a peaceful environment. Such events create an atmosphere where countries interact not only as competitors but also as collaborators, which contributes to building peaceful relationships at a grassroots level.
However, while these events can bridge cultural divides, they are not equipped to resolve deep-seated political or social conflicts. Major international sporting events often take place against the backdrop of ongoing geopolitical tensions or human rights issues, but the temporary peace they bring rarely translates into long-term stability. For instance, the 2008 Beijing Olympics were held during a period of tension between China and several Western nations over human rights issues. Although the event showcased China's openness, it did little to resolve the underlying political disputes. This highlights the limitations of sports diplomacy, which is often symbolic rather than substantive in addressing real-world conflicts.
In conclusion, while international sporting events can foster cultural understanding and provide a platform for diplomacy, their impact on global peace and stability is limited. They create temporary goodwill but are not effective in addressing the root causes of global conflicts, which often require sustained political and diplomatic efforts.
Sample 4:
It is often argued that international sporting events play a crucial role in promoting global peace and stability. However, I strongly disagree with this notion. While these events may momentarily unite nations through competition, their effects are fleeting, and they fail to address the underlying causes of global instability. This essay will argue that such events often exacerbate political tensions and are frequently overshadowed by commercial interests, making them ineffective in fostering long-term peace.
One significant reason why international sporting events do not contribute to global peace is that they can intensify political tensions rather than alleviate them. Many sporting events are marred by boycotts, protests, and diplomatic disputes, revealing the fragility of international relations. For instance, the 1980 Moscow Olympics were boycotted by numerous countries, including the United States, due to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. This boycott did nothing to resolve the conflict and, in fact, deepened the political divide between nations. Such instances demonstrate that sporting events, far from promoting peace, often become platforms for countries to showcase their disagreements and rivalries on a global stage.
Moreover, the commercialisation of international sports further detracts from any potential peace-building effects. Major events like the Olympics or the World Cup are driven by profit, with hosting countries investing billions in infrastructure and marketing rather than addressing pressing domestic or global issues. The focus on financial gain and international prestige often leads to corruption, exploitation, and neglect of social concerns. For example, Brazil’s 2014 World Cup saw significant public protests over government spending, as citizens felt the money could have been better utilised to tackle poverty and inequality. In such cases, the event not only fails to promote peace but also fuels domestic unrest, highlighting its inability to contribute to global stability.
In conclusion, while international sporting events may offer a brief respite from global tensions, they do not contribute meaningfully to peace and stability. Instead, they often highlight political conflicts and prioritise commercial interests over genuine diplomatic efforts, rendering them ineffective in fostering long-term global harmony.
Sample 5:
It is widely believed that international sporting events significantly contribute to fostering peace and global stability. I fully agree with this view, as such events create opportunities for diplomatic engagement and build bridges between diverse cultures. This essay will discuss how international sports enhance diplomatic relations and serve as a powerful tool for promoting cultural exchange and unity.
Firstly, international sporting events serve as a platform for diplomacy, encouraging nations to engage in peaceful dialogue even when formal channels remain closed. These events often compel countries with strained relations to cooperate, fostering positive diplomatic exchanges both on and off the field. For instance, the 2018 Winter Olympics in South Korea facilitated a rare diplomatic meeting between North and South Korea, allowing the two countries to set aside their long-standing political differences, albeit temporarily. The athletes marched under a unified flag, a symbolic gesture of reconciliation that eased tensions between the two nations. Such interactions provide a unique setting for countries to collaborate in a non-political atmosphere, reducing tensions and building goodwill in ways that traditional diplomacy often struggles to achieve. The shared enthusiasm for sport can transcend political rivalries, creating an environment where peaceful discussions can occur more naturally, offering the possibility of lasting diplomatic breakthroughs.
Secondly, these events promote cultural understanding and global unity by facilitating meaningful connections between people of diverse backgrounds. Sporting competitions such as the Olympics or the World Cup bring together individuals from different nations, promoting mutual respect and deepening appreciation for various cultural practices and values. Athletes and fans from all corners of the globe interact, exchange traditions, and celebrate diversity, effectively breaking down barriers of prejudice and misunderstanding that often fuel conflict. For example, during the 2012 London Olympics, the cultural showcase of each participating country allowed millions of viewers worldwide to experience and learn about other nations’ unique customs, values, and traditions. This celebration of global diversity fosters a sense of international camaraderie, helping to reshape public perceptions and strengthen bonds between countries and their citizens. Such deepened connections contribute to a more enduring and meaningful global peace, beyond the event’s immediate impact.
In conclusion, international sporting events play a crucial role in promoting global peace and stability by facilitating diplomatic engagement and fostering cultural exchange. By bringing people together in the spirit of friendly competition, these events encourage mutual respect and cooperation among nations, ultimately contributing to a more peaceful and interconnected world.
Sample 6:
Some people express their view that international sporting events play pivotal roles in promoting peace and stability across the globe. I wholeheartedly agree that these events contribute greatly to fostering harmony and stability on a global scale as they provide a unique platform for countries to come together, transcend political differences, and embrace the spirit of healthy competition.
One compelling reason why international sporting events enhance peace and stability is their capacity to foster diplomacy and cultural exchange. When nations participate in these events, they build connections and engage in dialogue beyond geopolitical disputes. The Olympics, for instance, have historically seen instances of athletes from rival nations coming together, exchanging handshakes and expressing mutual respect, promoting a sense of unity that transcends borders. Such moments of camaraderie help build bridges and promote understanding, potentially easing tensions that may exist between nations.
Furthermore, international sporting events promote economic interdependence among nations, which can lead to enhanced cooperation and reduced conflicts. Hosting such events demands extensive collaboration between countries in various sectors, including infrastructure development, hospitality, and logistics. Through these cooperative efforts, nations become mutually reliant, realizing the benefits of peaceful collaboration. For example, the FIFA World Cup hosted by various countries encourages trade and investment, promoting long-term partnerships that extend beyond the event. Such economic interdependence can serve as a strong deterrent against conflicts, as nations have a vested interest in maintaining peaceful relations for continued prosperity.
In conclusion, international sporting events undoubtedly play a crucial role in fostering peace and stability worldwide. By providing a platform for nations to engage in diplomacy, cultural exchange, and economic cooperation, these events contribute to a sense of global unity and mutual understanding.
Sample 7:
The impact of international sporting events on peace and stability in the world is a subject of ongoing debate. While some argue that these events contribute significantly to promoting harmony and stability, I hold a different view. In my opinion, while international sporting events can foster temporary goodwill and camaraderie, they do not address the underlying root causes of conflicts and tensions among nations, and thus their impact on global peace and stability is limited.
One reason why international sporting events may not be effective in promoting peace and stability is that they often serve as temporary distractions from deeper political and economic issues. While athletes from different nations come together to compete in a spirit of sportsmanship, the underlying political tensions and conflicts between their countries remain unresolved. For example, the Olympic Games have witnessed instances where athletes from nations with historical disputes compete, yet the root causes of those conflicts persist beyond the sporting event. The peace achieved during such events tends to be short-lived and does not address the complex issues at the heart of international disputes.
Moreover, international sporting events can sometimes exacerbate existing tensions between nations, especially when they are hosted in politically sensitive regions. The bidding process for hosting such events can become highly competitive and politically charged, leading to controversies and disputes. For instance, the selection of Qatar as the host for the FIFA World Cup sparked debates over human rights concerns and allegations of corruption. Such issues not only overshadow the spirit of the event but can also strain relations between participating nations.
In conclusion, while international sporting events may foster fleeting cordiality and harmony among nations, their impact on promoting lasting peace and stability in the world is limited. Therefore, instead of diverting resources to host large-scale sporting events with the hope to get a positive result to maintain global peace, it is essential for nations to address the root causes of conflicts and work towards meaningful solutions that can lead to lasting peace and stability.
Sample 8:
Today's world is wobbling under conflicts, terrorism and wars that make global peace a distant reality. Even in this gloomy moment, many people think that international sporting events can play an essential role in restoring global peace and harmony. I agree with this viewpoint primarily because I believe that global sporting events have the power to bring people and nations closer and promote the message of peace.
One major reason why I believe that international sporting events are effective in maintaining global peace is that such events bring people closer and let them all appreciate sportsmanship and share compassion. Regardless of race, religion, nationality and gender, sportsmen and fans share the same passion and enthusiasm. And when they gather in a venue, they tend to learn from each other and see the human side of people. It gives them an extraordinary opportunity to share their compassion for others. For instance, the Olympic Games event gives a perfect opportunity for athletes and fans from all around the world to gather and display their athletic prowess and support to a global audience where people appreciate their performance and talents and forget their dissimilarities.
Moreover, such global events promote the message of peace as the spirit of games overcomes the barriers and conflicts nations have. This is why millions of people become one when their national team performs to bring glory to the nation. They forget the differences in their ethnicity, background and class, and it helps positively promote nationality; thus, paving the way for peace and unity. For instance, when players of two rival nations like India and Pakistan, or Iran and the USA, show amicable behaviours on and off the field, millions of audiences learn to appreciate their relationship with the people of the rival nation. This is immensely helpful in paving the way to maintaining global peace.
To conclude, major global sporting events not only bring people from different parts of the world together but also ease tensions and promote the message of peace. Thus, they are immensely effective in restoring and maintaining global peace and stability.
Sample 9:
Major international sporting events are often considered by many as platforms for athletes and sportspersons to perform and bring glory to their nations while positively promoting global harmony. However, it is a cruel reality that such international events fail to promote global peace and accord and are often subject to controversy and conflicts. This is why I disagree with the opinion that such international sporting competitions contribute positively towards global stability, peace and unity.
To begin with, when players display excellent sportsmanship in a major sporting event, the global audience tent to enjoy the performance. But, it has almost no impact on the politics of the two rival nations and lasting peace between them. For instance, millions of people enjoy when players of India and Pakistan perform in cricket stadiums. It often brings citizens of these two countries together, but it fails to make any positive impact on the political relationships between these two nations.
Moreover, major sporting events are the stages for competitions, and there is always a winning and a losing team. The same decision made by a match referee is welcomed by the fans of a nation while vehemently opposed by the supporter of another team. It is not a conducive approach to supporting peace, unity and brotherhood among people from different nations. Rather, it sparks argument and controversy. For instance, after most World Cup competitions, people have diving opinions about the decisions made by referees, and they never tend to agree with the opposing supporters. It has even sparked fights and conflicts in and out of stadiums.
To conclude, international sporting events may be effective in bringing people of different nations to the same playground, but due to their competitive natures and controversies, and no lasting impacts on the politics and policies of rival nations, they fail to help promote peace and harmony among nations.
Sample 10:
Sports, in the past, used to be considered a juvenile activity confined to parks and indoors only. But, these days, they have pushed the boundaries and attracted national and international players and audiences by bringing people closer. So, there is no denying that sports have the power to unite the world and maintain global peace, and I completely agree with this viewpoint.
Undoubtedly, sports at the international level play a sterling role in diplomatic relations among different nations. Owing to historical or political reasons, not all countries are at peace with each other. Admittedly, sports evoke similar pleasure and satisfaction as a victory in a war does, but it brings nations together. Moreover, global sports events can be icebreakers as competitors from nations create a common platform for global leaders, organizations, and athletes to interact in a more convenient and sophisticated way. A good illustration is the Olympic games in which the whole world can be brought together, and this has a positive impact on maintaining global harmony.
Furthermore, sports evoke high nationalistic passions towards the country along with providing a platform for patriotic emotions to be released. It is a constructive way to exhibit one's patriotic emotions. Even international sporting events such as the Commonwealth Games bring recognition to small countries. For instance, it is difficult to know about the West Indies and Nepal, however, they are well-known countries just because of their cricket teams. By and large, sport is the only activity that delivers a clear message of peace and paves the road to building world harmony.
To reiterate, sports involve positive activity that kills negativity and brings peace and joy to the world by bringing people and global leaders together. Thus, international sporting affairs have the power to maintain and mend global stability, conformity and peace.
Sample 11:
International sporting events, such as the Olympics and the World Cup, have become an integral part of the global community of sports and fans. Many people argue that these events not only promote friendly competition and national pride but also contribute greatly to peace and stability in the world. I strongly agree with this view, and in this essay, I will elaborate on the reasons why.
Firstly, international sporting events provide a platform for nations to come together and showcase their talents and achievements. This can help to foster positive relationships between countries, promoting a sense of unity and cooperation. For example, the 2018 Winter Olympics held in Pyeongchang, South Korea, helped to ease tensions between North and South Korea, leading to a historic meeting between the two country's leaders.
Secondly, these events have the power to inspire and unite people, transcending language, culture, and political differences. The shared experience of watching and supporting one's team or country can create a sense of common purpose and identity, helping to overcome conflicts and misunderstandings. This was evident during the 2010 World Cup held in South Africa, where the tournament brought together a divided nation and helped to heal the wounds of apartheid.
Finally, international sporting events can also serve as a platform for promoting peace and social justice. For example, the Olympics and the Paralympics have a tradition of promoting human rights and equality, while the FIFA World Cup has been used as a platform to raise awareness about social issues such as racism and poverty.
In conclusion, international sporting events are an important tool for promoting peace and stability in the world. They provide a platform for nations to come together, inspire and unite people, and promote peace and social justice. Therefore, it is important to continue to support and encourage these events, as they have the potential to bring about positive change in the world.
Sample 12:
International sporting events are often touted as a way to bring about peace and stability in the world, but I disagree with this view. While sports may provide temporary distraction from conflicts or tensions, I do not believe they have a significant impact on global peace and stability.
Firstly, it is important to acknowledge that sporting events are inherently competitive, and competition can lead to tensions and even violence. For example, there have been instances where sporting events have actually escalated conflicts between countries, rather than diffusing them. In the 1969 Football War between Honduras and El Salvador, a series of football matches between the two countries acted as a trigger for a full-blown military conflict.
Secondly, it is important to consider the limited reach of sporting events. While they may attract international attention and media coverage, they only impact a small portion of the world's population, mainly those who are interested in sports. Many people, particularly those living in poverty or war-torn regions, may not have access to sports or may not view them as a priority. Moreover, sporting events are often marred by issues such as corruption, doping, and discrimination, which can overshadow any positive impact they may have on peace and stability. For example, the Russian doping scandal at the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics raised questions about the fairness and integrity of international sports.
In conclusion, while international sporting events may provide a temporary respite from conflicts or tensions, I do not believe they are a significant factor in promoting global peace and stability. Other measures, such as diplomacy, conflict resolution, and humanitarian aid, are likely to have a much greater impact.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.
Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.
At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.
In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.
Sample 2:
Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.
To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.
Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.
To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.
Sample 3:
There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.
The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.
There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.
In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.
Sample 4:
Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.
To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.
However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.
In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.
Sample 5:
Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.
In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.
In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Everyone has different dreams when it comes to where they wish to live. Personally, I think it is very desirable to live in a large city. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, cities offer a great environment for raising children, and I am a person who values family above all else. Urban areas have numerous parks and recreation centers which encourage children to lead vital and healthy lives, and they also have well-funded community centers which contribute to the intellectual development of young people. My own experience demonstrates the value of such facilities. Both my husband and I work full time jobs and are not home when our two sons finish school. This is not a problem, though, as both of them go directly to a local community center when their classes are over. Our eldest son participates in a computer club there, while our youngest son practices photography. Their participation in these programs sets my mind at ease, as without access to the community center they would just sit at home all alone. This situation compares favorably to a friend of mine who lives in a small town and recently had to hire an expensive babysitter to watch her children when they get home from school, as she was not able to locate any meaningful activities for them to take part in.
Secondly, large cities offer cultural experiences that adults can enjoy and appreciate. Most major cities have a plethora of museums, ethnic restaurants, libraries, theater groups and other stimulating and cosmopolitan facilities. My city is no exception. For instance, my colleagues and I spend every Friday evening visiting a new ethnic restaurant for dinner. Over the past three months we have enjoyed food from more than a dozen different national cuisines. Meanwhile, my sons and I go to a different museum once a month and I have found that I enjoy our visits almost as much as they do. These are the sort of outings that are only possible in a heavily populated urban area. Small towns offer easy access to beautiful natural scenery, but I prefer the intellectual and cultural stimulation that my city offers.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that living in a large city is preferable to living in a small town. This is because cities are better places to raise children, and because they offer stimulating intellectual and cultural experience that grown-ups can enjoy.
Sample 2:
I grew up in a small town and then moved to a big city, so I have experienced the good and bad
sides of both. I never thought that I would like to live in a big city, but I was wrong. After ten years of living in one, I can't imagine ever living in a small town again.
Small towns and big cities both have some problems in terms of transportation. In a small town, you have to own a car to ensure comfortable living. You can't get around without one because
there isn't any kind of public transportation. Big cities generally have heavy traffic and expensive
parking, but there you have a choice of taking public transportation. It's not free, but it's often cheaper than driving when you consider gas and time. Especially if you don't have a car, you're
better off in the city.
I love the excitement of big cities. Small towns have a slow pace. Large cities mean you have to
adapt to a variety of situations, like finding a new route to work or trying a new restaurant. I enjoy that challenge very much. Another source of the excitement of city living is the variety of cultural activities available. There is a wide assortment of theatre, music and dance performances
available in big cities. These things are rare in small ones.
The final thing I like about large cities is the diversity of the people. The United States is made up of people of different races, religions, abilities, and interests. However, you seldom find such a variety of people in a smaller town. I think that living in an area where everyone was just like me would quickly become boring.
Of course, security is a concern, and that's one area where small towns are superior to big cities.
Still, I would rather be a bit more cautious and live in a large city than feel secure but bored.
Sample 3:
Where should we live? Some may choose to live in big cities, while others like the natural and quiet surroundings in the countryside. As far as I am concerned, I would like to live in a big city because living in a big city has more advantages than living in the countryside.
To begin with, the city is the symbol of human civilization and there are many facilities for living, recreation and health care. Therefore, living there is more convenient than living in countryside. For example, we can find plenty of malls around our neighborhood, where we can buy everyday necessities at a low price. Furthermore, people are more concerned about their health and safety than other things in their lives. In big cities, medical facilities and emergency services are more easily accessible than in the countryside. Big cities also have convenient transportation and utility systems. They also offer faster Internet connections. These all make our life easier in big cities.
In addition, we can take part in a variety of events in big cities. Human beings like to live together and need to interact with each other. In a big city, the population density is high therefore there are always plenty of social activities, sports events and concerts. There are more recreational places in big cities, such as opera houses, movie theatres, clubs, and swimming pools. You will have many kinds of entertainment in big cities and meet many people. In the countryside, however, life may be dull and quiet, and you may only have a few neighbors. Living alone with few activities can easily cause mental diseases.
Some may argue that the pollution in cities makes people sick. However, with automobiles and modern highways we can easily take a break to expose ourselves to fresh air in the countryside and sunshine on the beach.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that living in big cities is much better than living in countryside because of the advanced facilities and social activities in cities. Moreover, the autos and highways
enable us to enjoy the natural and quiet surroundings in the countryside.
Sample 4:
In our modern world, people have different opinions on where the best place would be to live, and many argue that living in a small town is the ideal location, while others argue that living in a big city is preferred. Both places have their benefits and drawbacks, but I would prefer to live in a big city. This is because big cities offer diverse job opportunities, cultural experiences, and convenient amenities.
Big cities have a broader range of job opportunities than small towns. In a big city, one will have a chance to secure a job in various sectors and pursue a career. Many big companies and industries are typically located in larger cities, which means that job seekers have plenty of options. Moreover, a big city offers numerous opportunities for growth, as one can change jobs and pursue their passion. The job market in big cities also offers higher salaries and better benefits. Hence, for those who want to make a radicle career change and those who want to earn a decent living, a big city is the ideal place to live.
Cultural experiences are another reason why I prefer to live in a big city. Big cities offer diverse and unique cultural experiences that small towns
cannot, such as trying new foods and attending cultural festivals. In big cities, there is always a movie or a theatre show to attend, a concert or sporting event to watch, a museum or an art gallery to visit. The diversity of cultural experiences in big cities provides people with various opportunities to learn and broaden their horizons, which is an enriching experience.
Convenient amenities are also reasons why I prefer to live in big cities. Cities are often equipped with modern infrastructure. Cities have better medical facilities, public transportation systems, and essential services like banks and grocery stores. Big cities have a good public transportation system that is well-planned and suitable for people who do not own private cars. People in big cities have access to modern medical facilities with well-trained medical specialists.
Despite the benefits, big cities have some drawbacks. One of the most significant drawbacks is the high cost of living. Housing and rent are expensive in larger cities compared to small towns. Moreover, noise pollution and air pollution are common in big cities. Residents must always be aware of their surrounding environments to protect themselves from the effects of pollution. Additionally, congestion and crowding are other issues that plague many big city neighborhoods.
In conclusion, while big cities have their issues, I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Big cities offer more job opportunities, an array of cultural experiences, and convenient amenities. Therefore, for me, getting the chance to live and experience all of this makes living in a big city very appealing.
Sample 5:
People seldom agree with one another, even on such trivial issues as the preference between living in a big city and a small town. It’s a bit hasty to claim that it is better to live in a big city than in a small town, or vice versa.
Living in a big city has several benefits. First, there are more job opportunities readily available in big cities compared to small towns. Furthermore, not only are there more job positions in big cities, but the quality of these positions is much higher as well. In addition, the pay is often more competitive.
Second, children are likely to receive a higher-quality education compared to their counterparts in small towns. For families, children’s education is always a top priority.
Finally, big cities generally offer a superior overall standard of living compared to small towns. There are more commodities and services available in city markets, more public utilities, and even a greater variety of television channels.
However, living in a small town also has its advantages. People in small towns often enjoy a more comfortable lifestyle. Most are free from the high work-related stress common in big cities. Although the average pay is lower, the cost of daily necessities, such as vegetables and meat, is usually more affordable.
Instead of experiencing the loneliness often prevalent in big cities, children in small towns may grow up more healthily due to harmonious relationships among residents. People in small towns don’t have to wake up as early in the morning, as there are no traffic jams, and drivers tend to be more cautious, reducing the likelihood of accidents. While they may have fewer television channels, they have more friends readily available for socializing and entertainment.
As for my current situation, although I long for the cozy atmosphere and close relationships among neighbors and friends, which are often unique to small towns, I have chosen to live in one of the biggest cities in my country - Beijing. This is because I have found a good job here with a decent salary. I think I would prefer living in a small town when I retire one day.
Sample 6:
In English, there is a well-known fairy tale about a poor country boy, Dick Whittington, who goes to London believing that the streets of the city are “paved with gold.” The story is a classic “rags to riches” tale. Dick eventually becomes the Lord Mayor of London. Like the hero of that story, I always find wonder and adventure in cities.
Cities contain a fascinating assortment of people. Whenever I walk around a shopping precinct at midday on a weekend, I am captivated by the variety of individuals hurrying through the shops. Sometimes, I simply sit on a public bench and observe the diverse streams of shoppers passing by.
Today, in the age of globe-trotting transport and advanced communication, city life is more diverse than ever. Capital cities are now highly cosmopolitan and eager to attract foreign trade and currency. There is a contemporary English joke that says, “You can never find an Englishman in London.”
Whether rightly or wrongly, governments and local authorities tend to prioritize building public amenities in big cities. Money is invested in transportation, libraries, parks, and museums. Often, countries compete to construct the most impressive “showcase” buildings. For example, Malaysia has built a skyscraper taller than anything in New York. Similarly, within large countries, regions compete with each other: New York against Chicago, Shanghai against Hong Kong, or Beijing.
All of this benefits city dwellers. The magic of the Dick Whittington story is rekindled in me whenever I enter a library housed in a magnificent building. For university students studying art or music, large cities often offer galleries and public performances. Even as a teenager, I appreciated living in a city because it gave me the opportunity to attend rock concerts by my favorite bands several times a year.
Architecture shapes the urban landscape. For those who appreciate it, a city can be as visually exciting as the Himalayas. A modern metropolis resembles a mountain range with its height, light, and solidness. At the same time, old buildings add to its charm - quaint, unspoiled side streets, or shops and homes from distant ages. Even someone who spends their entire life in one large city could continue discovering its architectural secrets well into old age.
Humans are “social animals.” They talk, interact, and create. Cities provide libraries, universities, and café bars where people can meet and share ideas with others of their kind.
Sample 7:
Some people would like to live in a small town because the surroundings could be more picturesque, and people are friendlier compared to people in a big city. However, in my opinion, living in a big city is more effective and beneficial based on the following reasons.
First, living in a big city is convenient. Thanks to public transportation, any place in a big city is usually accessible. Without driving, you have many options among buses, trains and subway. Taxis are also available on almost every corner of the city. Besides, it is easy to find a restaurant or food stands in your neighborhood within walking distance whenever you are hungry. There are also convenience stores all over, so city residents can buy any stuff easily at any time without bothering to drive to a certain place to get what they need. Convenience is the best what a city can offer while a small town is less likely to.
In addition, a big city provides more education opportunities. The residents have easier access to schools and education resources, so do they to faculty and advanced facilities. Take teachers for example, they are willing to teach in a big city because of the better salary and there are more resources they need available in libraries and related institutes when they want to go further to sharpen their teaching skills. Similarly, when children plan to take some talented courses such as piano, art, and the like, a city with more options and business activities is where parents want their children to live and grow.
Here is another perfect example to illustrate my preference of a city. I used to be a volunteer in an elementary school in a small town. Although the town was lovely and clean, there was some inconvenience caused in daily life. First, less bus service was provided, so people usually had no choice but to wait a long time to take the bus. Second, restaurants and food stands were all closed after nine o’clock, so it’s hard to find something to eat if you are hungry late in the evening. Lastly, teachers in the elementary school might need to teach many courses with different subjects, when necessary, because of a lack of faculty, that is, an English teacher could be asked to teach math or science as well. Also, the facilities in the classroom and the science lab were old- fashioned. From my observation, people can live peacefully in a small town but actually there are more opportunities and availability a big city can offer.
Last but not least, infrastructure and public services are usually prominently featured in a big city. When I want to exercise on a rainy day, I can go to the sport center without worrying about places to go. In contrast, I might be trapped at home in a small town in the same situation. Besides, public services like medical care and care centers are fully developed for people with a pressing need. Libraries also provide better book circulation and activities to cater for their readers, which is not very likely to take place in a town with the number of people which is small. For people who like tranquility and secure, small towns are the best choice. However, for those who prefer economic prosperity, a variety of things to do, places to go and activities to join, the better choice is in a big city. I happen to be the one who prefers the latter and enjoys the lives in it.
Sample 8:
It is crucial to choose a place which suits you to live because where you live has influence over the quality of your life and happiness. Compared to those who prefer to live in a small town with a quiet environment, living in a big city to take advantage of the modern conveniences that it can offer is my choice.
First of all, the public transportation system is one of amenities people can benefit from. Big cities usually provide a well-developed transportation network, such as bus, train, subway and airport, so people in the city have very easy access to the vehicles that can help them reach any destination they want to. In contrast, the convenience of public transportation is usually not found in a small town, where people might tend to drive or use other means of transport to get about.
Besides, there are more opportunities for either finding a job or taking education. With a larger population, more jobs are available for everyone to find than those in the countryside. Take where I live for example, although the job market is very competitive, university graduates often move to Taipei, which is the major city in Taiwan. If you need to develop a skill, it is also likely that you will achieve it and then get a job successfully. More importantly, there are also more educational opportunities and a lot of different courses and institutions available. There is always availability of learning something new or developing practical skills in a big city.
Furthermore, cities can provide a variety of entertainment options every day. There is always something fun to do in a big city to keep people of all different interests from getting bored. Cities provide a lively nightlife, all types of shows, museums and sports facilities. Additionally, you will be able to connect with other people who share the same hobbies at different events.
While the lifestyle in a small town is less stressful, the city lifestyle has a lot of opportunities for people. Personally, I prefer to live in a big city which offers a variety of many options. In the meanwhile, I like the energy and the convenience in a big city. City life can have many positive impacts compared to rural life.
Sample 9:
There are many differences between living in a big city and a small town. Therefore, we must choose based on our personal preferences and needs. If you prefer a calm and peaceful environment, small towns are suitable for you. However, if you want to develop yourself, big cities are the best places to learn and acquire skills essential for your future.
In life, the most important thing for everyone is, of course, health. If someone’s health deteriorates, they might lose everything they have. Small towns often provide a healthier environment. You can enjoy peaceful rivers, mountains, abundant greenery, and a clear night sky filled with stars. Life there is calm and free from the excessive noise of big cities, as the population and number of cars are much smaller. However, living in a small town can mean missing out on global news, fashion trends, and other advancements.
On the other hand, living in a big city provides more opportunities for personal growth and the chance to enhance your competitive skills. Over time, this can help you establish your own identity and attitude in society. People in big cities are often motivated to work hard to support their families. However, city life comes with challenges, such as air pollution and waste management issues. If we do not address these problems, they could have serious consequences for our future.
In conclusion, small towns offer comfort and tranquility, while big cities are dynamic and full of opportunities. Personally, I would choose to live in a big city first to improve myself. Later, when I want to rest and prioritize my health, I would move to the countryside or a small town.
I hope you can choose the place that best suits your needs and appeals to you.
Sample 10:
I grew up in a small town and then moved to a big city. I didn't think I would like to live here, but I was wrong. I think life is much better in a big city. Transportation is much more convenient, everything is more exciting, and there is a greater variety of people. I can't imagine ever living in a small town again.
Transportation is easier in a city. In a small town, you have to have a car to get around because there isn't any kind of public transportation. In a city, on the other hand, there are usually buses and taxis, and some cities have subways. Cities often have heavy traffic, and expensive parking, but it doesn't matter because you can always take the bus. Using public transportation is usually cheaper and more convenient than driving a car, but you don't have this choice in a small town.
City life is more exciting than small town life. In small towns usually nothing changes. You see the same people every day, you go to the same two or three restaurants, everything is the same. In a city things change all the time. You see new people every day. There are many restaurants, with new ones to choose from all the time. New plays come to the theaters and new musicians come to the concert halls.
Cities have a diversity of people that you don't find in a small town. There are much fewer people in a small town and usually they are all alike. In a city you can find people from different countries, of different religions, of different races - you can find all kinds of people. This variety of people is what makes city life interesting.
Life in a city is convenient, exciting, and interesting. After experiencing city life, I could never live in a small town again.
Sample 11:
If you were asked to choose between living in a big city or a small town, where would you prefer to live? Some people might choose to live in a small town because the environment is cleaner, and it fosters closer relationships with others. This suggests that living in a small town has its benefits. However, I believe there are three key reasons why living in a big city is more advantageous.
First, living in a big city provides greater opportunities to gain advanced knowledge and develop oneself. In contrast, the range of educational options in a small town is often limited. Furthermore, the presence of many students in a city creates a competitive environment that encourages us to work harder. While education may not be the only important aspect of life, it remains essential because we rely on knowledge throughout our lifetime.
Second, living in a city allows us to meet more people and adapt to society more easily. For example, interacting with diverse individuals helps us learn about their personalities and characteristics. Building relationships and making friends in a city can greatly benefit us as we grow older. By communicating with people in a big city, we gain a better understanding of how society functions and what we need to do to thrive. Therefore, city life prepares us to navigate societal challenges more effectively.
Lastly, living in a big city offers more job opportunities. Securing employment is a crucial aspect of life, and cities typically provide a wider variety of workplaces, such as companies, factories, and universities. For instance, becoming a professor is more achievable in a city where universities are abundant. In contrast, small towns cannot guarantee the same level of employment opportunities.
In conclusion, while small towns have advantages like friendlier communities and a cleaner environment, I believe living in a big city is more beneficial. Cities offer better educational opportunities, greater chances to meet people and adapt to society, and more job prospects. For these reasons, I would prefer living in a big city over a small town.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Bộ câu hỏi: [TEST] Từ loại (Buổi 1) (Có đáp án)
Bài tập chức năng giao tiếp (Có đáp án)
Bộ câu hỏi: Các dạng thức của động từ (to v - v-ing) (Có đáp án)
500 bài Đọc điền ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 1)
15000 bài tập tách từ đề thi thử môn Tiếng Anh có đáp án (Phần 1)
Bộ câu hỏi: Thì và sự phối thì (Phần 2) (Có đáp án)
Trắc nghiệm Tiếng anh 12 Tìm từ được gạch chân phát âm khác - Mức độ nhận biết có đáp án
500 bài Đọc hiểu ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 21)