Câu hỏi:

10/01/2025 99

Some people say that international sporting events contribute greatly to peace and stability in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified
Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

It is a well-known fact that the idea of sports can be a magnificent approach to address and ameliorate sensitive issues. In the past, republics have been known to settle controversial situations through the medium of sports. Thus, it is widely believed that global sports events are a remarkable avenue to maintain world peace and harmony. I am a strong supporter of this notion. In the following paragraphs, I will delve deeper into the topic and justify my views with relevant instances.

First of all, we must acknowledge the ability of sports in bringing people together. Regardless of caste, creed, race or gender, sports enthusiasts recognize each other’s passion and love for their favourite game and the players. The realm of sports is a model for being tolerant of the differences between people and showcasing positive values and sportsmanship. One of the prime examples of this is the Olympic Games which are held every four years. It is an international multi-sport event where nations from all over the globe take part in and display the prowess of their nationals in various sporting contests. These competitions are an outstanding platform for athletes to exhibit their talents and also for the entire world to appreciate these individuals and their nations.

Furthermore, international sports have a positive impact on the citizens of nations as well. There is no doubt that every democracy has numerous difficulties that they suffer from, and sports serve as a healthy distraction for the people of a country. When the national team of any sport performs well in international competitions and tournaments, the spirit of the entire nation is elevated. Additionally, such inter-nation sports tournaments also attract a lot of foreign investment, thereby bringing in economic as well as an amalgamation of cultures.

Although, sometimes, the emotions of sports fans get the better of them and unfavourable outcomes even spark controversy. Nevertheless, the overall impact of sports is far more optimistic to consider little bickering, which the management can regulate.

Finally, I would like to add that international sports are essential for maintaining cordial relations between nations, as well as keeping the general populace of a country’s content.

Sample 2:

Sports used to be considered a youthful practice in ancient times that was limited only to parks and indoors. While sports today pushed the boundaries and attracted competitors and national and international audiences. Therefore, there is no doubt that sport can unite the world and preserve global peace.

There is no question that sport plays a sterling role in diplomatic relations between different nations at an international level. Not all nations are at peace with each other for historical or political reasons. Sport, of course, evokes the same pleasure and satisfaction as a triumph in battle, but it brings together nations. Also, major sporting events can be more icebreaker as national participants create a common forum for global leaders, organizations, and athletes to connect more easily and sophisticatedly. The Olympic Games, in which the entire world can be put together, are a good illustration, and this has a positive impact on ensuring global peace.

Sport also evokes strong nationalistic sentiments for the country and provides a platform for the release of patriotic emotions. To show one’s patriotic feelings is a constructive way. Also, international game activities like games from the Commonwealth offer attention to small countries. For example, it is hard to locate the West Indies and Bermuda on the world map, but they are well-known countries just because of their cricket teams that always take part in the World Cup Cricket. Finally, sport is the only practice that sends a strong message of peace and paves the way for world harmony to be established.

Sport activity, to reiterate, is positive energy: Flannel that kills negativity and brings peace Ind joy to the world.

Sample 3:

International sporting events are often viewed as platforms that foster global harmony, with some arguing they contribute significantly to peace and stability. While I agree that such events promote international cooperation, I believe their influence is limited in addressing deeper global conflicts. This essay will discuss how sporting events enhance cultural exchange and diplomacy but will also highlight their limitations in solving political and social issues.

Firstly, international sporting events serve as an excellent means of promoting cultural exchange and understanding among nations. Competitions like the Olympics or the FIFA World Cup bring together athletes and fans from different cultures, fostering a sense of unity and mutual respect. This interaction promotes tolerance, as people get exposed to diverse ways of life, reducing stereotypes and prejudices. For example, during the 2018 FIFA World Cup, fans from around the world gathered in Russia, sharing their cultures, languages, and traditions in a peaceful environment. Such events create an atmosphere where countries interact not only as competitors but also as collaborators, which contributes to building peaceful relationships at a grassroots level.

However, while these events can bridge cultural divides, they are not equipped to resolve deep-seated political or social conflicts. Major international sporting events often take place against the backdrop of ongoing geopolitical tensions or human rights issues, but the temporary peace they bring rarely translates into long-term stability. For instance, the 2008 Beijing Olympics were held during a period of tension between China and several Western nations over human rights issues. Although the event showcased China's openness, it did little to resolve the underlying political disputes. This highlights the limitations of sports diplomacy, which is often symbolic rather than substantive in addressing real-world conflicts.

In conclusion, while international sporting events can foster cultural understanding and provide a platform for diplomacy, their impact on global peace and stability is limited. They create temporary goodwill but are not effective in addressing the root causes of global conflicts, which often require sustained political and diplomatic efforts.

Sample 4:

It is often argued that international sporting events play a crucial role in promoting global peace and stability. However, I strongly disagree with this notion. While these events may momentarily unite nations through competition, their effects are fleeting, and they fail to address the underlying causes of global instability. This essay will argue that such events often exacerbate political tensions and are frequently overshadowed by commercial interests, making them ineffective in fostering long-term peace.

One significant reason why international sporting events do not contribute to global peace is that they can intensify political tensions rather than alleviate them. Many sporting events are marred by boycotts, protests, and diplomatic disputes, revealing the fragility of international relations. For instance, the 1980 Moscow Olympics were boycotted by numerous countries, including the United States, due to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. This boycott did nothing to resolve the conflict and, in fact, deepened the political divide between nations. Such instances demonstrate that sporting events, far from promoting peace, often become platforms for countries to showcase their disagreements and rivalries on a global stage.

Moreover, the commercialisation of international sports further detracts from any potential peace-building effects. Major events like the Olympics or the World Cup are driven by profit, with hosting countries investing billions in infrastructure and marketing rather than addressing pressing domestic or global issues. The focus on financial gain and international prestige often leads to corruption, exploitation, and neglect of social concerns. For example, Brazil’s 2014 World Cup saw significant public protests over government spending, as citizens felt the money could have been better utilised to tackle poverty and inequality. In such cases, the event not only fails to promote peace but also fuels domestic unrest, highlighting its inability to contribute to global stability.

In conclusion, while international sporting events may offer a brief respite from global tensions, they do not contribute meaningfully to peace and stability. Instead, they often highlight political conflicts and prioritise commercial interests over genuine diplomatic efforts, rendering them ineffective in fostering long-term global harmony.

Sample 5:

It is widely believed that international sporting events significantly contribute to fostering peace and global stability. I fully agree with this view, as such events create opportunities for diplomatic engagement and build bridges between diverse cultures. This essay will discuss how international sports enhance diplomatic relations and serve as a powerful tool for promoting cultural exchange and unity.

Firstly, international sporting events serve as a platform for diplomacy, encouraging nations to engage in peaceful dialogue even when formal channels remain closed. These events often compel countries with strained relations to cooperate, fostering positive diplomatic exchanges both on and off the field. For instance, the 2018 Winter Olympics in South Korea facilitated a rare diplomatic meeting between North and South Korea, allowing the two countries to set aside their long-standing political differences, albeit temporarily. The athletes marched under a unified flag, a symbolic gesture of reconciliation that eased tensions between the two nations. Such interactions provide a unique setting for countries to collaborate in a non-political atmosphere, reducing tensions and building goodwill in ways that traditional diplomacy often struggles to achieve. The shared enthusiasm for sport can transcend political rivalries, creating an environment where peaceful discussions can occur more naturally, offering the possibility of lasting diplomatic breakthroughs.

Secondly, these events promote cultural understanding and global unity by facilitating meaningful connections between people of diverse backgrounds. Sporting competitions such as the Olympics or the World Cup bring together individuals from different nations, promoting mutual respect and deepening appreciation for various cultural practices and values. Athletes and fans from all corners of the globe interact, exchange traditions, and celebrate diversity, effectively breaking down barriers of prejudice and misunderstanding that often fuel conflict. For example, during the 2012 London Olympics, the cultural showcase of each participating country allowed millions of viewers worldwide to experience and learn about other nations’ unique customs, values, and traditions. This celebration of global diversity fosters a sense of international camaraderie, helping to reshape public perceptions and strengthen bonds between countries and their citizens. Such deepened connections contribute to a more enduring and meaningful global peace, beyond the event’s immediate impact.

In conclusion, international sporting events play a crucial role in promoting global peace and stability by facilitating diplomatic engagement and fostering cultural exchange. By bringing people together in the spirit of friendly competition, these events encourage mutual respect and cooperation among nations, ultimately contributing to a more peaceful and interconnected world.

Sample 6:

Some people express their view that international sporting events play pivotal roles in promoting peace and stability across the globe. I wholeheartedly agree that these events contribute greatly to fostering harmony and stability on a global scale as they provide a unique platform for countries to come together, transcend political differences, and embrace the spirit of healthy competition.

One compelling reason why international sporting events enhance peace and stability is their capacity to foster diplomacy and cultural exchange. When nations participate in these events, they build connections and engage in dialogue beyond geopolitical disputes. The Olympics, for instance, have historically seen instances of athletes from rival nations coming together, exchanging handshakes and expressing mutual respect, promoting a sense of unity that transcends borders. Such moments of camaraderie help build bridges and promote understanding, potentially easing tensions that may exist between nations.

Furthermore, international sporting events promote economic interdependence among nations, which can lead to enhanced cooperation and reduced conflicts. Hosting such events demands extensive collaboration between countries in various sectors, including infrastructure development, hospitality, and logistics. Through these cooperative efforts, nations become mutually reliant, realizing the benefits of peaceful collaboration. For example, the FIFA World Cup hosted by various countries encourages trade and investment, promoting long-term partnerships that extend beyond the event. Such economic interdependence can serve as a strong deterrent against conflicts, as nations have a vested interest in maintaining peaceful relations for continued prosperity.

In conclusion, international sporting events undoubtedly play a crucial role in fostering peace and stability worldwide. By providing a platform for nations to engage in diplomacy, cultural exchange, and economic cooperation, these events contribute to a sense of global unity and mutual understanding.

Sample 7:

The impact of international sporting events on peace and stability in the world is a subject of ongoing debate. While some argue that these events contribute significantly to promoting harmony and stability, I hold a different view. In my opinion, while international sporting events can foster temporary goodwill and camaraderie, they do not address the underlying root causes of conflicts and tensions among nations, and thus their impact on global peace and stability is limited.

One reason why international sporting events may not be effective in promoting peace and stability is that they often serve as temporary distractions from deeper political and economic issues. While athletes from different nations come together to compete in a spirit of sportsmanship, the underlying political tensions and conflicts between their countries remain unresolved. For example, the Olympic Games have witnessed instances where athletes from nations with historical disputes compete, yet the root causes of those conflicts persist beyond the sporting event. The peace achieved during such events tends to be short-lived and does not address the complex issues at the heart of international disputes.

Moreover, international sporting events can sometimes exacerbate existing tensions between nations, especially when they are hosted in politically sensitive regions. The bidding process for hosting such events can become highly competitive and politically charged, leading to controversies and disputes. For instance, the selection of Qatar as the host for the FIFA World Cup sparked debates over human rights concerns and allegations of corruption. Such issues not only overshadow the spirit of the event but can also strain relations between participating nations.

In conclusion, while international sporting events may foster fleeting cordiality and harmony among nations, their impact on promoting lasting peace and stability in the world is limited. Therefore, instead of diverting resources to host large-scale sporting events with the hope to get a positive result to maintain global peace, it is essential for nations to address the root causes of conflicts and work towards meaningful solutions that can lead to lasting peace and stability.

Sample 8:

Today's world is wobbling under conflicts, terrorism and wars that make global peace a distant reality. Even in this gloomy moment, many people think that international sporting events can play an essential role in restoring global peace and harmony. I agree with this viewpoint primarily because I believe that global sporting events have the power to bring people and nations closer and promote the message of peace.

One major reason why I believe that international sporting events are effective in maintaining global peace is that such events bring people closer and let them all appreciate sportsmanship and share compassion. Regardless of race, religion, nationality and gender, sportsmen and fans share the same passion and enthusiasm. And when they gather in a venue, they tend to learn from each other and see the human side of people. It gives them an extraordinary opportunity to share their compassion for others. For instance, the Olympic Games event gives a perfect opportunity for athletes and fans from all around the world to gather and display their athletic prowess and support to a global audience where people appreciate their performance and talents and forget their dissimilarities.

Moreover, such global events promote the message of peace as the spirit of games overcomes the barriers and conflicts nations have. This is why millions of people become one when their national team performs to bring glory to the nation. They forget the differences in their ethnicity, background and class, and it helps positively promote nationality; thus, paving the way for peace and unity. For instance, when players of two rival nations like India and Pakistan, or Iran and the USA, show amicable behaviours on and off the field, millions of audiences learn to appreciate their relationship with the people of the rival nation. This is immensely helpful in paving the way to maintaining global peace.

To conclude, major global sporting events not only bring people from different parts of the world together but also ease tensions and promote the message of peace. Thus, they are immensely effective in restoring and maintaining global peace and stability. 

Sample 9:

Major international sporting events are often considered by many as platforms for athletes and sportspersons to perform and bring glory to their nations while positively promoting global harmony. However, it is a cruel reality that such international events fail to promote global peace and accord and are often subject to controversy and conflicts. This is why I disagree with the opinion that such international sporting competitions contribute positively towards global stability, peace and unity.

To begin with, when players display excellent sportsmanship in a major sporting event, the global audience tent to enjoy the performance. But, it has almost no impact on the politics of the two rival nations and lasting peace between them. For instance, millions of people enjoy when players of India and Pakistan perform in cricket stadiums. It often brings citizens of these two countries together, but it fails to make any positive impact on the political relationships between these two nations.

Moreover, major sporting events are the stages for competitions, and there is always a winning and a losing team. The same decision made by a match referee is welcomed by the fans of a nation while vehemently opposed by the supporter of another team. It is not a conducive approach to supporting peace, unity and brotherhood among people from different nations. Rather, it sparks argument and controversy. For instance, after most World Cup competitions, people have diving opinions about the decisions made by referees, and they never tend to agree with the opposing supporters. It has even sparked fights and conflicts in and out of stadiums.

To conclude, international sporting events may be effective in bringing people of different nations to the same playground, but due to their competitive natures and controversies, and no lasting impacts on the politics and policies of rival nations, they fail to help promote peace and harmony among nations.

Sample 10:

Sports, in the past, used to be considered a juvenile activity confined to parks and indoors only. But, these days, they have pushed the boundaries and attracted national and international players and audiences by bringing people closer. So, there is no denying that sports have the power to unite the world and maintain global peace, and I completely agree with this viewpoint.

Undoubtedly, sports at the international level play a sterling role in diplomatic relations among different nations. Owing to historical or political reasons, not all countries are at peace with each other. Admittedly, sports evoke similar pleasure and satisfaction as a victory in a war does, but it brings nations together. Moreover, global sports events can be icebreakers as competitors from nations create a common platform for global leaders, organizations, and athletes to interact in a more convenient and sophisticated way. A good illustration is the Olympic games in which the whole world can be brought together, and this has a positive impact on maintaining global harmony.

Furthermore, sports evoke high nationalistic passions towards the country along with providing a platform for patriotic emotions to be released. It is a constructive way to exhibit one's patriotic emotions. Even international sporting events such as the Commonwealth Games bring recognition to small countries. For instance, it is difficult to know about the West Indies and Nepal, however, they are well-known countries just because of their cricket teams. By and large, sport is the only activity that delivers a clear message of peace and paves the road to building world harmony.

To reiterate, sports involve positive activity that kills negativity and brings peace and joy to the world by bringing people and global leaders together. Thus, international sporting affairs have the power to maintain and mend global stability, conformity and peace. 

Sample 11:

International sporting events, such as the Olympics and the World Cup, have become an integral part of the global community of sports and fans. Many people argue that these events not only promote friendly competition and national pride but also contribute greatly to peace and stability in the world. I strongly agree with this view, and in this essay, I will elaborate on the reasons why.

Firstly, international sporting events provide a platform for nations to come together and showcase their talents and achievements. This can help to foster positive relationships between countries, promoting a sense of unity and cooperation. For example, the 2018 Winter Olympics held in Pyeongchang, South Korea, helped to ease tensions between North and South Korea, leading to a historic meeting between the two country's leaders.

Secondly, these events have the power to inspire and unite people, transcending language, culture, and political differences. The shared experience of watching and supporting one's team or country can create a sense of common purpose and identity, helping to overcome conflicts and misunderstandings. This was evident during the 2010 World Cup held in South Africa, where the tournament brought together a divided nation and helped to heal the wounds of apartheid.

Finally, international sporting events can also serve as a platform for promoting peace and social justice. For example, the Olympics and the Paralympics have a tradition of promoting human rights and equality, while the FIFA World Cup has been used as a platform to raise awareness about social issues such as racism and poverty.

In conclusion, international sporting events are an important tool for promoting peace and stability in the world. They provide a platform for nations to come together, inspire and unite people, and promote peace and social justice. Therefore, it is important to continue to support and encourage these events, as they have the potential to bring about positive change in the world.

Sample 12:

International sporting events are often touted as a way to bring about peace and stability in the world, but I disagree with this view. While sports may provide temporary distraction from conflicts or tensions, I do not believe they have a significant impact on global peace and stability.

Firstly, it is important to acknowledge that sporting events are inherently competitive, and competition can lead to tensions and even violence. For example, there have been instances where sporting events have actually escalated conflicts between countries, rather than diffusing them. In the 1969 Football War between Honduras and El Salvador, a series of football matches between the two countries acted as a trigger for a full-blown military conflict.

Secondly, it is important to consider the limited reach of sporting events. While they may attract international attention and media coverage, they only impact a small portion of the world's population, mainly those who are interested in sports. Many people, particularly those living in poverty or war-torn regions, may not have access to sports or may not view them as a priority. Moreover, sporting events are often marred by issues such as corruption, doping, and discrimination, which can overshadow any positive impact they may have on peace and stability. For example, the Russian doping scandal at the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics raised questions about the fairness and integrity of international sports.

In conclusion, while international sporting events may provide a temporary respite from conflicts or tensions, I do not believe they are a significant factor in promoting global peace and stability. Other measures, such as diplomacy, conflict resolution, and humanitarian aid, are likely to have a much greater impact.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.

Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.

At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.

In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.

Sample 2:

Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.

To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.

Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.

To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.

Sample 3:

There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.

The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.

There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.

In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.

Sample 4:

Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.

To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.

However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.

In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.

Sample 5:

Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.

To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.

In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.

In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Medical studies have shown that smoking not only leads to health problems for the smoker, but also for people close by. As a result of this, many believe that smoking should not be allowed in public places. Although there are arguments on both sides, I strongly agree that a ban is the most appropriate course of action.

Opponents of such a ban argue against it for several reasons. Firstly, they say that passive smokers make the choice to breathe in other people’s smoke by going to places where it is allowed. If they would prefer not to smoke passively, then they do not need to visit places where smoking is permitted. In addition, they believe a ban would possibly drive many bars and pubs out of business as smokers would not go there anymore. They also argue it is a matter of freedom of choice. Smoking is not against the law, so individuals should have the freedom to smoke wherever they wish.

However, there are more convincing arguments in favour of a ban. First and foremost, it has been proven that tobacco consists of carcinogenic compounds which cause serious harm to a person’s health, not only the smoker. Anyone around them can develop cancers of the lungs, mouth and throat, and other sides in the body. It is simply not fair to impose this upon another person. It is also the case that people’s health is more important than businesses. In any case, pubs and restaurants could adapt to a ban by, for example, allowing smoking areas.

In conclusion, it is clear that it should be made illegal to smoke in public places. This would improve the health of thousands of people, and that is most definitely a positive development.

Sample 2:

The earlier we can ban smoking in public places, the better it would be for humankind. Having foreseen the same, many offices and governing bodies imposed a strict ban on public smoking. This measure is generally applauded by the majority of mass. However, the opposing minority interrupts this ban as an act of arrest on one's free will. Let us discuss this moot issue below.

It is generally agreed and even proven with scientific studies, that smoking is injurious to health. The health problems that smoking can induce are numerous. Cancer is among the major detrimental effects of smoking on one’s health. As clearly shown on cigarette packages, smoking is a primary cause of cancer. Furthermore, the effects of smoking on the systemic and peripheral circulation in the human body are appalling, as put forward by medical experts. The havoc of this insane habit is so horrifying that research points towards its possible harmful effects on unborn children, even. Smoking is considered as a culprit among the many, behind congenital birth defects and anomalies.

Another factor significant to this context would be the financial constraints imposed by smoking. In many developing countries, where people work on daily wages, the habit of smoking has an atrocious impact on their quality of life. In the majority of the mediocre families, around the world, smoking drains the significant part of their family budgets. For example, I witnessed many problems with reference to my father being a chronic smoker and the financial crisis it caused.

The amount of carbon and other toxic elements exhaled into the atmosphere by active smokers has reached such dizzy heights that its effect on passive smokers is more or less a reality now. In fact, the effect of first-hand smoke is seen permeable to even the second and third-hand smokers in the spectrum. The significance of the public ban on smoking is not just justifying but a necessity as it calls for. As a result, it is widely banned in some offices and institutions. Awareness programmes are being conducted all around the world against this habit.

Though the public ban on smoking is an individual constraint to one's freedom, considering the passive effects of smoking I would strongly agree with the ban. In my view, this would be a punitive measure to safeguard the health and wealth of the public or the society.

Sample 3:

Smoking has inevitably been a concern of governments around the globe considering how to manage and educate smoking people. This is due largely to the danger of the substance contained in cigarettes, nicotine. As its drawback may also occur for the people near the smokers, policies related to this, particularly in public places, should be taken into account; whether it should be banned or not.

I personally think that forbidding such a dangerous activity will be much more beneficial, as it can prevent others from developing a vulnerable respiratory system. Moreover, this can keep the places so clean that people could always find them fascinating with less air pollution. However, governments should consciously provide some special places which, in this case, can be used for smoking.

On the other hand, people who have currently become addicted to smoke would find it hard to avoid smoking in such places. As a result, they may smoke, breaking the rule and not even feeling guilty. For this reason, there are two steps then to encounter this probable emerging problem. First, some strict laws and appropriate punishments, such as to pay more tax or to give any charity orphans or others needing. Second, education is one of the most prominent and essential ways to change people’s belief in terms of having their cigarette burnt.

However, banning such activity in public places is not merely a way to prevent others from harming smoke, but it will, to a larger extent, possibly be able to elevate people’s awareness of how dangerous smoking is.

To sum up, despite it being difficult for smokers to quit, the policy which bans smoking in public places should be applied in order to save others. Nonetheless, people’s education in terms of the drawbacks of smoking is a part of this aim.

Sample 4:

Smoking has been a major public health issue for decades, and despite numerous efforts to discourage the habit, it continues to be a prevalent problem in society. Not only does smoking harm the individual who partakes in the habit, but it also poses a significant risk to those who are in close proximity to the smoker. For this reason, many argue that smoking should be banned in public places in order to protect the health and well-being of the general population.

First and foremost, it is widely known that smoking causes a myriad of health issues for the individual who smokes. From lung cancer to heart disease, the negative impact of smoking on one's health is undeniable. However, what is often overlooked is the fact that secondhand smoke can also have serious consequences for non-smokers. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), secondhand smoke contains over 7,000 chemicals, hundreds of which are toxic and about 70 that can cause cancer. When non-smokers are exposed to these harmful chemicals, they are at an increased risk for developing the same health issues as smokers, including lung cancer, heart disease, and respiratory problems. This means that not only are smokers jeopardizing their own health, but they are also putting those around them in harm's way.

Furthermore, smoking in public places can have a negative impact on the overall environment. Cigarette butts, which are the most common form of litter, contain toxic chemicals that can leach into the soil and water, posing a threat to wildlife and polluting the ecosystem. In addition, the smoke itself contributes to air pollution, which can have detrimental effects on the environment and public health. By implementing a ban on smoking in public places, we can reduce the amount of secondhand smoke that non-smokers are exposed to and mitigate the environmental impact of smoking.

While some may argue that a ban on smoking in public places infringes upon an individual's right to smoke, it is important to consider the greater good of the population. The potential health risks and environmental impact of smoking far outweigh the desire of an individual to smoke in public spaces. By implementing a ban on smoking in public places, we can protect the health and well-being of both smokers and non-smokers, as well as the environment.

In conclusion, smoking not only harms the smoker, but also poses a significant risk to those who are nearby. With the potential health risks and environmental impact in mind, it is clear that smoking should be banned in public places. By doing so, we can create a healthier and safer environment for all members of society.

Sample 5:

In the present era, there is a rising trend of smoking, especially among the younger generation. Smoking has evident detrimental effects on both the smoker and the people in his surroundings. It is claimed that smoking should be prohibited in public areas. I strongly agree that smoking should be banned publicly to prevent its negative aspects on people.

To begin, there are many drawbacks of smoking which have progressive impacts on both individual and environmental level. First and foremost, it increases the risk of many health related issues in human beings, due to presence of disease producing chemicals in tobacco . For instance, a rising trend of lung related diseases, like tuberculosis and lung cancer, has been reported in smokers. Furthermore, smoke not only damages the body of the smoker, but also results in many unfavourable outcomes in the surrounding people. Moreover, it is very distressful and challenging for non-smokers to work in smoking places. So, there is urgent need to halt smoking in populated areas.

There is, however, a faction that claims that there are some challenges in preventing public smoking. Firstly, many resources will be consumed to construct specified smoking areas to restrict smoking at workplace and other public places. Simultaneously, there might be no checks and balances on people who are constrained to stay in specific smoking places.

To recapitulate, although there are few disadvantages of stopping people from smoking publicly, it has many beneficial impacts. I strongly agree to halt smoking in populated areas because it will remarkably decline the percentage of health related problems. Moreover, in the same way, it can aid in developing a comfortable environment at the workplace, as well as at other public places like shopping malls, restaurants and public transport.

Sample 6:

In the contemporary era, it is a moot point that smoking has detrimental effects on the smoker as well as the people living around him. A significant chunk of the community welcomes the conception, whereas the remaining members oppose the same. In this essay, I will explain this point of view in detail with the relevant examples to support my argument.

I am in agreement to a large extent with the aforementioned notion. Multifarious reasons can be discussed to justify my stance. The most conspicuous one is the smoker himself welcomes deadly diseases like cancer (mouth and lungs), kidney failure to his body. For instance, a cigarette contains killing components like tobacco, nicotine, and carbon monoxide these destroy the airbus of the lungs. As a consequence, a person’s digestive system starts to stop working. Its impacts do not appear overnight but if its consumption lasts for years a brutal death can knock at your door. Additionally, it is more harmful to passive smokers. To illustrate this, I would quote an instance of my friend who is suffering from lung cancer. However, he had never smoked in his life. He got infected just because his father is an active smoker. Having lived in the same house inhaling cigarette smoke he got affected.

On the other hand, I do have some grounds against the central idea. First and foremost, rationale is it may bring some of the businesses to an end. For instance, pubs and discos are usually visited by a proportion of 80% of smokers. If it is banned completely, it will wash off the above-mentioned businesses.

To put it in a nutshell, I personally believe that it is difficult to persuade people to quit but it must be prohibited in public places. Moreover, in clubs, there should be a separate area for smoking so passive smokers would not suffer.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP