Some people say that international sporting events contribute greatly to peace and stability in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:

Sample 1:
It is a well-known fact that the idea of sports can be a magnificent approach to address and ameliorate sensitive issues. In the past, republics have been known to settle controversial situations through the medium of sports. Thus, it is widely believed that global sports events are a remarkable avenue to maintain world peace and harmony. I am a strong supporter of this notion. In the following paragraphs, I will delve deeper into the topic and justify my views with relevant instances.
First of all, we must acknowledge the ability of sports in bringing people together. Regardless of caste, creed, race or gender, sports enthusiasts recognize each other’s passion and love for their favourite game and the players. The realm of sports is a model for being tolerant of the differences between people and showcasing positive values and sportsmanship. One of the prime examples of this is the Olympic Games which are held every four years. It is an international multi-sport event where nations from all over the globe take part in and display the prowess of their nationals in various sporting contests. These competitions are an outstanding platform for athletes to exhibit their talents and also for the entire world to appreciate these individuals and their nations.
Furthermore, international sports have a positive impact on the citizens of nations as well. There is no doubt that every democracy has numerous difficulties that they suffer from, and sports serve as a healthy distraction for the people of a country. When the national team of any sport performs well in international competitions and tournaments, the spirit of the entire nation is elevated. Additionally, such inter-nation sports tournaments also attract a lot of foreign investment, thereby bringing in economic as well as an amalgamation of cultures.
Although, sometimes, the emotions of sports fans get the better of them and unfavourable outcomes even spark controversy. Nevertheless, the overall impact of sports is far more optimistic to consider little bickering, which the management can regulate.
Finally, I would like to add that international sports are essential for maintaining cordial relations between nations, as well as keeping the general populace of a country’s content.
Sample 2:
Sports used to be considered a youthful practice in ancient times that was limited only to parks and indoors. While sports today pushed the boundaries and attracted competitors and national and international audiences. Therefore, there is no doubt that sport can unite the world and preserve global peace.
There is no question that sport plays a sterling role in diplomatic relations between different nations at an international level. Not all nations are at peace with each other for historical or political reasons. Sport, of course, evokes the same pleasure and satisfaction as a triumph in battle, but it brings together nations. Also, major sporting events can be more icebreaker as national participants create a common forum for global leaders, organizations, and athletes to connect more easily and sophisticatedly. The Olympic Games, in which the entire world can be put together, are a good illustration, and this has a positive impact on ensuring global peace.
Sport also evokes strong nationalistic sentiments for the country and provides a platform for the release of patriotic emotions. To show one’s patriotic feelings is a constructive way. Also, international game activities like games from the Commonwealth offer attention to small countries. For example, it is hard to locate the West Indies and Bermuda on the world map, but they are well-known countries just because of their cricket teams that always take part in the World Cup Cricket. Finally, sport is the only practice that sends a strong message of peace and paves the way for world harmony to be established.
Sport activity, to reiterate, is positive energy: Flannel that kills negativity and brings peace Ind joy to the world.
Sample 3:
International sporting events are often viewed as platforms that foster global harmony, with some arguing they contribute significantly to peace and stability. While I agree that such events promote international cooperation, I believe their influence is limited in addressing deeper global conflicts. This essay will discuss how sporting events enhance cultural exchange and diplomacy but will also highlight their limitations in solving political and social issues.
Firstly, international sporting events serve as an excellent means of promoting cultural exchange and understanding among nations. Competitions like the Olympics or the FIFA World Cup bring together athletes and fans from different cultures, fostering a sense of unity and mutual respect. This interaction promotes tolerance, as people get exposed to diverse ways of life, reducing stereotypes and prejudices. For example, during the 2018 FIFA World Cup, fans from around the world gathered in Russia, sharing their cultures, languages, and traditions in a peaceful environment. Such events create an atmosphere where countries interact not only as competitors but also as collaborators, which contributes to building peaceful relationships at a grassroots level.
However, while these events can bridge cultural divides, they are not equipped to resolve deep-seated political or social conflicts. Major international sporting events often take place against the backdrop of ongoing geopolitical tensions or human rights issues, but the temporary peace they bring rarely translates into long-term stability. For instance, the 2008 Beijing Olympics were held during a period of tension between China and several Western nations over human rights issues. Although the event showcased China's openness, it did little to resolve the underlying political disputes. This highlights the limitations of sports diplomacy, which is often symbolic rather than substantive in addressing real-world conflicts.
In conclusion, while international sporting events can foster cultural understanding and provide a platform for diplomacy, their impact on global peace and stability is limited. They create temporary goodwill but are not effective in addressing the root causes of global conflicts, which often require sustained political and diplomatic efforts.
Sample 4:
It is often argued that international sporting events play a crucial role in promoting global peace and stability. However, I strongly disagree with this notion. While these events may momentarily unite nations through competition, their effects are fleeting, and they fail to address the underlying causes of global instability. This essay will argue that such events often exacerbate political tensions and are frequently overshadowed by commercial interests, making them ineffective in fostering long-term peace.
One significant reason why international sporting events do not contribute to global peace is that they can intensify political tensions rather than alleviate them. Many sporting events are marred by boycotts, protests, and diplomatic disputes, revealing the fragility of international relations. For instance, the 1980 Moscow Olympics were boycotted by numerous countries, including the United States, due to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. This boycott did nothing to resolve the conflict and, in fact, deepened the political divide between nations. Such instances demonstrate that sporting events, far from promoting peace, often become platforms for countries to showcase their disagreements and rivalries on a global stage.
Moreover, the commercialisation of international sports further detracts from any potential peace-building effects. Major events like the Olympics or the World Cup are driven by profit, with hosting countries investing billions in infrastructure and marketing rather than addressing pressing domestic or global issues. The focus on financial gain and international prestige often leads to corruption, exploitation, and neglect of social concerns. For example, Brazil’s 2014 World Cup saw significant public protests over government spending, as citizens felt the money could have been better utilised to tackle poverty and inequality. In such cases, the event not only fails to promote peace but also fuels domestic unrest, highlighting its inability to contribute to global stability.
In conclusion, while international sporting events may offer a brief respite from global tensions, they do not contribute meaningfully to peace and stability. Instead, they often highlight political conflicts and prioritise commercial interests over genuine diplomatic efforts, rendering them ineffective in fostering long-term global harmony.
Sample 5:
It is widely believed that international sporting events significantly contribute to fostering peace and global stability. I fully agree with this view, as such events create opportunities for diplomatic engagement and build bridges between diverse cultures. This essay will discuss how international sports enhance diplomatic relations and serve as a powerful tool for promoting cultural exchange and unity.
Firstly, international sporting events serve as a platform for diplomacy, encouraging nations to engage in peaceful dialogue even when formal channels remain closed. These events often compel countries with strained relations to cooperate, fostering positive diplomatic exchanges both on and off the field. For instance, the 2018 Winter Olympics in South Korea facilitated a rare diplomatic meeting between North and South Korea, allowing the two countries to set aside their long-standing political differences, albeit temporarily. The athletes marched under a unified flag, a symbolic gesture of reconciliation that eased tensions between the two nations. Such interactions provide a unique setting for countries to collaborate in a non-political atmosphere, reducing tensions and building goodwill in ways that traditional diplomacy often struggles to achieve. The shared enthusiasm for sport can transcend political rivalries, creating an environment where peaceful discussions can occur more naturally, offering the possibility of lasting diplomatic breakthroughs.
Secondly, these events promote cultural understanding and global unity by facilitating meaningful connections between people of diverse backgrounds. Sporting competitions such as the Olympics or the World Cup bring together individuals from different nations, promoting mutual respect and deepening appreciation for various cultural practices and values. Athletes and fans from all corners of the globe interact, exchange traditions, and celebrate diversity, effectively breaking down barriers of prejudice and misunderstanding that often fuel conflict. For example, during the 2012 London Olympics, the cultural showcase of each participating country allowed millions of viewers worldwide to experience and learn about other nations’ unique customs, values, and traditions. This celebration of global diversity fosters a sense of international camaraderie, helping to reshape public perceptions and strengthen bonds between countries and their citizens. Such deepened connections contribute to a more enduring and meaningful global peace, beyond the event’s immediate impact.
In conclusion, international sporting events play a crucial role in promoting global peace and stability by facilitating diplomatic engagement and fostering cultural exchange. By bringing people together in the spirit of friendly competition, these events encourage mutual respect and cooperation among nations, ultimately contributing to a more peaceful and interconnected world.
Sample 6:
Some people express their view that international sporting events play pivotal roles in promoting peace and stability across the globe. I wholeheartedly agree that these events contribute greatly to fostering harmony and stability on a global scale as they provide a unique platform for countries to come together, transcend political differences, and embrace the spirit of healthy competition.
One compelling reason why international sporting events enhance peace and stability is their capacity to foster diplomacy and cultural exchange. When nations participate in these events, they build connections and engage in dialogue beyond geopolitical disputes. The Olympics, for instance, have historically seen instances of athletes from rival nations coming together, exchanging handshakes and expressing mutual respect, promoting a sense of unity that transcends borders. Such moments of camaraderie help build bridges and promote understanding, potentially easing tensions that may exist between nations.
Furthermore, international sporting events promote economic interdependence among nations, which can lead to enhanced cooperation and reduced conflicts. Hosting such events demands extensive collaboration between countries in various sectors, including infrastructure development, hospitality, and logistics. Through these cooperative efforts, nations become mutually reliant, realizing the benefits of peaceful collaboration. For example, the FIFA World Cup hosted by various countries encourages trade and investment, promoting long-term partnerships that extend beyond the event. Such economic interdependence can serve as a strong deterrent against conflicts, as nations have a vested interest in maintaining peaceful relations for continued prosperity.
In conclusion, international sporting events undoubtedly play a crucial role in fostering peace and stability worldwide. By providing a platform for nations to engage in diplomacy, cultural exchange, and economic cooperation, these events contribute to a sense of global unity and mutual understanding.
Sample 7:
The impact of international sporting events on peace and stability in the world is a subject of ongoing debate. While some argue that these events contribute significantly to promoting harmony and stability, I hold a different view. In my opinion, while international sporting events can foster temporary goodwill and camaraderie, they do not address the underlying root causes of conflicts and tensions among nations, and thus their impact on global peace and stability is limited.
One reason why international sporting events may not be effective in promoting peace and stability is that they often serve as temporary distractions from deeper political and economic issues. While athletes from different nations come together to compete in a spirit of sportsmanship, the underlying political tensions and conflicts between their countries remain unresolved. For example, the Olympic Games have witnessed instances where athletes from nations with historical disputes compete, yet the root causes of those conflicts persist beyond the sporting event. The peace achieved during such events tends to be short-lived and does not address the complex issues at the heart of international disputes.
Moreover, international sporting events can sometimes exacerbate existing tensions between nations, especially when they are hosted in politically sensitive regions. The bidding process for hosting such events can become highly competitive and politically charged, leading to controversies and disputes. For instance, the selection of Qatar as the host for the FIFA World Cup sparked debates over human rights concerns and allegations of corruption. Such issues not only overshadow the spirit of the event but can also strain relations between participating nations.
In conclusion, while international sporting events may foster fleeting cordiality and harmony among nations, their impact on promoting lasting peace and stability in the world is limited. Therefore, instead of diverting resources to host large-scale sporting events with the hope to get a positive result to maintain global peace, it is essential for nations to address the root causes of conflicts and work towards meaningful solutions that can lead to lasting peace and stability.
Sample 8:
Today's world is wobbling under conflicts, terrorism and wars that make global peace a distant reality. Even in this gloomy moment, many people think that international sporting events can play an essential role in restoring global peace and harmony. I agree with this viewpoint primarily because I believe that global sporting events have the power to bring people and nations closer and promote the message of peace.
One major reason why I believe that international sporting events are effective in maintaining global peace is that such events bring people closer and let them all appreciate sportsmanship and share compassion. Regardless of race, religion, nationality and gender, sportsmen and fans share the same passion and enthusiasm. And when they gather in a venue, they tend to learn from each other and see the human side of people. It gives them an extraordinary opportunity to share their compassion for others. For instance, the Olympic Games event gives a perfect opportunity for athletes and fans from all around the world to gather and display their athletic prowess and support to a global audience where people appreciate their performance and talents and forget their dissimilarities.
Moreover, such global events promote the message of peace as the spirit of games overcomes the barriers and conflicts nations have. This is why millions of people become one when their national team performs to bring glory to the nation. They forget the differences in their ethnicity, background and class, and it helps positively promote nationality; thus, paving the way for peace and unity. For instance, when players of two rival nations like India and Pakistan, or Iran and the USA, show amicable behaviours on and off the field, millions of audiences learn to appreciate their relationship with the people of the rival nation. This is immensely helpful in paving the way to maintaining global peace.
To conclude, major global sporting events not only bring people from different parts of the world together but also ease tensions and promote the message of peace. Thus, they are immensely effective in restoring and maintaining global peace and stability.
Sample 9:
Major international sporting events are often considered by many as platforms for athletes and sportspersons to perform and bring glory to their nations while positively promoting global harmony. However, it is a cruel reality that such international events fail to promote global peace and accord and are often subject to controversy and conflicts. This is why I disagree with the opinion that such international sporting competitions contribute positively towards global stability, peace and unity.
To begin with, when players display excellent sportsmanship in a major sporting event, the global audience tent to enjoy the performance. But, it has almost no impact on the politics of the two rival nations and lasting peace between them. For instance, millions of people enjoy when players of India and Pakistan perform in cricket stadiums. It often brings citizens of these two countries together, but it fails to make any positive impact on the political relationships between these two nations.
Moreover, major sporting events are the stages for competitions, and there is always a winning and a losing team. The same decision made by a match referee is welcomed by the fans of a nation while vehemently opposed by the supporter of another team. It is not a conducive approach to supporting peace, unity and brotherhood among people from different nations. Rather, it sparks argument and controversy. For instance, after most World Cup competitions, people have diving opinions about the decisions made by referees, and they never tend to agree with the opposing supporters. It has even sparked fights and conflicts in and out of stadiums.
To conclude, international sporting events may be effective in bringing people of different nations to the same playground, but due to their competitive natures and controversies, and no lasting impacts on the politics and policies of rival nations, they fail to help promote peace and harmony among nations.
Sample 10:
Sports, in the past, used to be considered a juvenile activity confined to parks and indoors only. But, these days, they have pushed the boundaries and attracted national and international players and audiences by bringing people closer. So, there is no denying that sports have the power to unite the world and maintain global peace, and I completely agree with this viewpoint.
Undoubtedly, sports at the international level play a sterling role in diplomatic relations among different nations. Owing to historical or political reasons, not all countries are at peace with each other. Admittedly, sports evoke similar pleasure and satisfaction as a victory in a war does, but it brings nations together. Moreover, global sports events can be icebreakers as competitors from nations create a common platform for global leaders, organizations, and athletes to interact in a more convenient and sophisticated way. A good illustration is the Olympic games in which the whole world can be brought together, and this has a positive impact on maintaining global harmony.
Furthermore, sports evoke high nationalistic passions towards the country along with providing a platform for patriotic emotions to be released. It is a constructive way to exhibit one's patriotic emotions. Even international sporting events such as the Commonwealth Games bring recognition to small countries. For instance, it is difficult to know about the West Indies and Nepal, however, they are well-known countries just because of their cricket teams. By and large, sport is the only activity that delivers a clear message of peace and paves the road to building world harmony.
To reiterate, sports involve positive activity that kills negativity and brings peace and joy to the world by bringing people and global leaders together. Thus, international sporting affairs have the power to maintain and mend global stability, conformity and peace.
Sample 11:
International sporting events, such as the Olympics and the World Cup, have become an integral part of the global community of sports and fans. Many people argue that these events not only promote friendly competition and national pride but also contribute greatly to peace and stability in the world. I strongly agree with this view, and in this essay, I will elaborate on the reasons why.
Firstly, international sporting events provide a platform for nations to come together and showcase their talents and achievements. This can help to foster positive relationships between countries, promoting a sense of unity and cooperation. For example, the 2018 Winter Olympics held in Pyeongchang, South Korea, helped to ease tensions between North and South Korea, leading to a historic meeting between the two country's leaders.
Secondly, these events have the power to inspire and unite people, transcending language, culture, and political differences. The shared experience of watching and supporting one's team or country can create a sense of common purpose and identity, helping to overcome conflicts and misunderstandings. This was evident during the 2010 World Cup held in South Africa, where the tournament brought together a divided nation and helped to heal the wounds of apartheid.
Finally, international sporting events can also serve as a platform for promoting peace and social justice. For example, the Olympics and the Paralympics have a tradition of promoting human rights and equality, while the FIFA World Cup has been used as a platform to raise awareness about social issues such as racism and poverty.
In conclusion, international sporting events are an important tool for promoting peace and stability in the world. They provide a platform for nations to come together, inspire and unite people, and promote peace and social justice. Therefore, it is important to continue to support and encourage these events, as they have the potential to bring about positive change in the world.
Sample 12:
International sporting events are often touted as a way to bring about peace and stability in the world, but I disagree with this view. While sports may provide temporary distraction from conflicts or tensions, I do not believe they have a significant impact on global peace and stability.
Firstly, it is important to acknowledge that sporting events are inherently competitive, and competition can lead to tensions and even violence. For example, there have been instances where sporting events have actually escalated conflicts between countries, rather than diffusing them. In the 1969 Football War between Honduras and El Salvador, a series of football matches between the two countries acted as a trigger for a full-blown military conflict.
Secondly, it is important to consider the limited reach of sporting events. While they may attract international attention and media coverage, they only impact a small portion of the world's population, mainly those who are interested in sports. Many people, particularly those living in poverty or war-torn regions, may not have access to sports or may not view them as a priority. Moreover, sporting events are often marred by issues such as corruption, doping, and discrimination, which can overshadow any positive impact they may have on peace and stability. For example, the Russian doping scandal at the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics raised questions about the fairness and integrity of international sports.
In conclusion, while international sporting events may provide a temporary respite from conflicts or tensions, I do not believe they are a significant factor in promoting global peace and stability. Other measures, such as diplomacy, conflict resolution, and humanitarian aid, are likely to have a much greater impact.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
- Sổ tay Hóa học 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- 250+ Công thức giải nhanh môn Toán 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay lớp 12 các môn Toán, Lí, Hóa, Văn, Sử, Địa, KTPL (chương trình mới) ( 36.000₫ )
- Tuyển tập 30 đề thi đánh giá năng lực Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội, TP Hồ Chí Minh (2 cuốn) ( 150.000₫ )
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.
Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.
At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.
In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.
Sample 2:
Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.
To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.
Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.
To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.
Sample 3:
There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.
The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.
There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.
In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.
Sample 4:
Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.
To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.
However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.
In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.
Sample 5:
Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.
In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.
In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.
Lời giải

Sample 1:
The line chart illustrates how many people participated in 4 distinct types of sports in a particular area from 1985 to 2005.
Overall, rugby was the most popular sport in the first half of the period while tennis took the lead in the second half. In addition, rugby saw a downward trend while tennis took the opposite direction; moreover, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable.
In 1995, the number of people playing rugby stood at just under 250, surpassing the figure for tennis players by around 100. Basketball and badminton had comparatively lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 participants in turn.
Afterwards, the number of people participating in rugby plunged, hitting a low of 50 in 2005, equal to the figure for badminton in the same year. In contrast, the trend for tennis was upward, with its participation rate increasing to roughly 220 people at the end of the period, establishing it as the leading sport. Finally, the figures for basketball and badminton underwent negligible changes, hovering around 80 and 50 participants respectively.
Sample 2:
The line graph illustrates how many people participated in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005. Overall, there was a significant decrease in the number of people playing rugby in this region, whereas tennis showed a gradual upward trend to become the most popular sport in the second half of the period. Additionally, throughout the period, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable and comparable, with the latter sport remaining the least common.
In the first decade, rugby had the highest number of players, despite witnessing a steady fall from nearly 250 to exactly 200 participants. From 1995 onwards, this sport kept losing popularity as its figure plummeted, reaching parity with badminton (at 50 people) in the final year.
In contrast, tennis was gaining popularity and had become the dominant category by the end of the timeframe. Specifically, starting at the second highest (at 150), the number of people engaging in tennis rose continually, overtaking that of rugby in 1995 before ending at approximately 250 players.
Meanwhile, roughly 80 people played basketball initially, after which it stayed virtually unchanged until the end of the period. Badminton almost exactly mirrored this trend, albeit at a lower rate, consistently hovering around the 50 mark.
Sample 3:
The line chart compares the number of participants in basketball, tennis, badminton and rugby over a 20-year period from 1985 in a specific area.
Overall, more people played tennis throughout the period, and it was the most common sport since 1995, while rugby's popularity declined. Notably, basketball and badminton mostly had stable numbers of players.
In terms of tennis and rugby, both sports indicated inverted trends. Although rugby started at the highest point with nearly 250 players, the figure declined continually to about 200 players in 1995, when this sport was no longer the most popular. Since then, the number of people playing rugby dropped more steeply, reaching 50 in 2005. In contrast, from 1985 onwards, the figure for tennis increased steadily from second place with 150 participants. By 2005, it had reached its highest point of roughly 220 players.
In comparison, there were far fewer people who took up basketball and badminton. However, these sports remained relatively stable, with basketball having about 70 participants every year, while badminton was always the least popular with approximately 50 players each year.
Sample 4:
The line graph provides information about the number of individuals engaging in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.
Overall, while tennis underwent a surge in popularity, rugby experienced a decrease in participation within this region over time, with basketball and badminton remaining relatively stable. Moreover, the most drastic shift in popularity was witnessed in rugby.
At the start of the period, in 1985, rugby was the most played sport, with 240 individuals participating, and it significantly outnumbered the next sport, tennis, which had only 150 participants. Thereafter, the number of people playing rugby dropped to 200 in 1995, before plummeting to a 20-year low of 50 in the final year. This stood in stark contrast to the rise in the popularity of tennis, which saw a steady increase in participants to a peak of about 220 in 2005, making it by far the most played sport at the end of the period.
Turning to the remaining sports, in the first year, 80 individuals played basketball, almost 25 more than badminton. Over the following decade, the participant numbers for basketball rose to about 90, while those for badminton dropped to a low of 45 in 1995. In the remaining period, these two sports maintained their popularity, as the numbers participating stayed at roughly the same level until 2005.
Sample 5:
The line chart delineates the participation levels in four distinct sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.
Primarily, rugby emerged as the most favored sport in the initial half of the period, while tennis took precedence in the latter half. Moreover, rugby exhibited a declining trend, whereas tennis experienced a converse trajectory. Meanwhile, the engagement rates for basketball and badminton remained relatively consistent.
In 1985, the number of rugby participants stood at just below 250, exceeding the tennis players by approximately 150 individuals. Simultaneously, basketball and badminton showcased lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 individuals involved in each sport, respectively.
Subsequently, rugby participation plummeted significantly, reaching a nadir of 50 participants in 2005, akin to the number engaged in badminton during the same year. Conversely, tennis experienced an upward trend, escalating to nearly 220 individuals by the conclusion of the period, solidifying its status as the predominant sport. In contrast, the figures for basketball and badminton remained relatively stable, with approximately 80 and 50 participants, respectively, throughout the entire duration.
Sample 6:
The given line graph delineates the participation levels in 4 different sports, namely basketball, tennis, badminton, and rugby within a specific region over a span of 20 years.
Overall, it is evident that the number of individuals participating in tennis witnessed a consistent and notable increase, contrasting sharply with the downward trend observed in rugby participation. Meanwhile, while basketball and badminton recorded lower participation rates compared to other sports, they remained relatively stable throughout the entire period.
Turning to the number of tennis players, the figures began at a relatively moderate level of 150 individuals in 1985. Subsequently, it experienced a gradual and consistent increase in participation, reaching a pinnacle of nearly 230 participants by 2005. In stark contrast, the trend of rugby involvement presented a distinctive pattern. Commencing at a relatively high level of almost 240 people, the numbers steadily declined over time and by the end of the 20-year period, rugby participants had dwindled to 50, matching the level of engagement observed in badminton. Interestingly, a point of convergence occurred in 1995, where both tennis and rugby shared a similar number of participants, with approximately 200 individuals engaging in each sport.
In regard to the remaining sports participants, the numbers for both badminton and basketball remained relatively stable over the given time frame. Beginning with approximately 50 individuals engaging in badminton and around 80 individuals involved in basketball in 1985, these figures persisted with little variation until 2005. Consequently, by the end of the period, both sports witnessed a culmination with nearly the same number of participants as they had at the beginning.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.