Some people think that sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts, should be banned from TV as well as from international sporting competitions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Giải bởi Vietjack
Sample 1:
Some people suggest that sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts, should be banned from television broadcasts and international sporting competitions. I agree with the notion that such sports should be prohibited from these platforms due to the potential harm they can inflict on athletes and the promotion of aggressive behaviour as a form of entertainment.
One captivating reason for banning violent sports from TV and international competitions is the significant physical and psychological risks involved. Sports like boxing, wrestling and mixed martial arts are inherently dangerous, as they involve deliberate and forceful strikes to opponents' bodies. Such physical confrontations can lead to severe injuries, including concussions, fractures, and long-term brain damage. According to a comprehensive survey conducted by the American Journal of Sports Medicine, the injury rate in sports like boxing, wrestling, and mixed martial arts is remarkably high, with an average of 52.8 injuries reported per 1,000 athlete exposures.
Moreover, repeated exposure to violent sports may desensitize viewers to acts of aggression and violence, normalizing behaviors that can be harmful to society. According to a study conducted by the American Psychological Association, individuals who frequently watch violent sports on television or attend such events may experience a desensitization to acts of aggression and violence. Children and adolescents are particularly vulnerable to the impact of violent sports on their psychological development. Studies have shown that exposure to violence in sports at a young age can lead to an increase in aggressive behaviours.
In conclusion, the debate over whether violent sports should be banned from TV and international sporting events is a contentious one. However, I firmly believe that taking such measures is necessary to protect the physical and psychological well-being of athletes and to uphold ethical standards in society.
Sample 2:
Some believe that fierce sports like mixed martial arts, fencing, and boxing promote aggression and desensitize viewers to violence, and therefore should be banned from media and international competitions. I tend to disagree as I understand that these sports have cultural and historical significance, their portrayal can be seen as a form of artistic expression, and they are conducted in a controlled environment with safety protocols in place.
One crucial reason for the acceptance of such sports in media and international competitions is their cultural and historical significance. These sports often have deep-rooted traditions and rituals that hold great importance for specific communities and societies. For instance, traditional martial arts like judo and kung fu are not only competitive sports but also essential elements of cultural heritage in their respective countries. Banning such sports could result in the loss of valuable cultural practices that have been passed down through generations.
Furthermore, the representation of fierce sports in media and competitions can serve as a platform for promoting understanding and appreciation of different cultures. Consider the Olympic Games, where combat sports like boxing and taekwondo are celebrated as part of the global event. The inclusion of such sports allows athletes from diverse backgrounds to showcase their skills and foster mutual respect among nations. The controlled and regulated environment in which these events take place makes sure that they are not violent and harmful. Organizations governing such sports have implemented strict rules and safety measures to ensure the well-being of athletes. For example, in professional boxing matches, referees closely monitor the bout, and medical teams are present to provide immediate assistance in case of injuries.
In conclusion, while there are concerns about the potential negative effects of violent sports in media and international competitions, their cultural and historical significance, as well as the controlled environment in which they take place, provide valid justifications for their acceptance.
Sample 3:
The debate over whether sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts, should be banned from television broadcasts and international sporting competitions has stirred considerable discussion. In this essay, we firmly contend against a complete ban on these sports. While acknowledging the concerns surrounding violence, we advocate for responsible regulation rather than outright prohibition. We will emphasize the importance of personal freedom, safety through regulation, cultural significance, and the positive aspects of these sports. Additionally, we will address concerns related to media sensationalism and children’s influence.
Opponents of a complete ban on violent sports emphasize the value of personal freedom and choice. Individuals should have the liberty to decide whether to watch or participate in these sports. A ban would infringe upon these personal freedoms, limiting the choices available to individuals. Instead of an outright ban, a more effective approach involves regulating these sports to ensure the safety of athletes and participants. Proper safety measures, equipment, and medical supervision can significantly reduce the risks associated with violent sports, making them safer for all involved.
In addition to personal freedom and safety through regulation, we must consider the historical and cultural significance of these sports. Many sports involving violence, such as martial arts, have deep roots in various cultures around the world. A complete ban would disregard the historical and cultural importance of these practices to certain communities. Moreover, when practiced responsibly, these sports offer numerous benefits, including discipline, physical fitness, and mental strength. Banning them entirely would deprive individuals of the opportunity to gain these advantages.
In conclusion, advocating for the complete ban of sports involving violence from television broadcasts and international sporting competitions may be an extreme solution to a complex issue. Instead, responsible regulation can strike a balance between personal freedom and safety, respecting the historical and cultural significance of these sports, and recognizing the positive aspects they offer. Concerns related to media sensationalism and children’s influence can be addressed through responsible broadcasting and parental guidance. In a society that values personal choice and cultural diversity, regulating rather than banning these sports is a more balanced approach.
Sample 4:
Sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts, have always been a topic of debate when it comes to their portrayal on TV and participation in international sporting competitions. While some argue that these sports should be banned due to their violent nature, I believe that they should not be prohibited entirely.
On the one hand, it can be argued that the violent nature of these sports can have a negative impact on viewers, especially children. The sight of two individuals engaging in physical combat can be distressing for some, and there is a concern that it may promote aggression and violence among the audience. Furthermore, the risk of serious injury or even death in these sports cannot be overlooked, and broadcasting such events on TV may desensitize people to the potential dangers involved.
On the other hand, it is important to acknowledge that these sports have a long-standing cultural and historical significance in many societies. Boxing and martial arts, for example, have been practiced for centuries and hold a special place in the hearts of millions of people around the world. Banning these sports would not only infringe on the freedom of individuals to participate in activities of their choice, but it would also disregard the rich traditions and values associated with these sports.
Instead of banning these sports, measures should be put in place to ensure that they are conducted in a safe and responsible manner. This includes implementing strict regulations to minimize the risk of injury, providing proper training and protective gear for athletes, and enforcing age restrictions for viewers. Additionally, TV networks can consider airing these sports during appropriate times and with appropriate warnings to ensure that they do not have a negative influence on vulnerable audiences.
In conclusion, while there are valid concerns about the violent nature of sports like boxing and martial arts, I believe that an outright ban is not the solution. By implementing appropriate safety measures and regulations, these sports can continue to thrive without posing a significant risk to society.
Sample 5:
For at least a few millennia, and perhaps longer, humans have enjoyed sports that could be considered violent. From the Roman gladiators to modern heavyweight boxing championships, it is evident that people like to watch men fighting one another. However, in the twenty-first century, some people believe there is no place for such barbaric activities.
The leading argument in favor of banning violent sports from TV is that it leads to the protection of children, who might otherwise see these events and attempt to copy them. Campaigners against violence on TV cite evidence that suggests children are highly impressionable and would idolize sportsmen who use violence. This could lead to an increase in violent activity among children in the wider society, with other children getting hurt.
On the other hand, it should be noted that actual violence and so-called violent sports are quite different. In sport, there are very definite rules to be followed. If someone breaks these rules, he or she is punished by a referee. While boxing or martial arts may seem violent to an uninformed spectator, they are events featuring highly skilled athletes who have agreed to participate, and are watched by medical professionals at all times. This seems rather different to other forms of violence.
In conclusion, it is possible that banning certain sports from TV or halting their inclusion in international sporting competitions may be beneficial to society, but the argument is not wholly convincing. These sports are not violent in the traditional sense, and they probably don’t send a bad message to children.
Sample 6:
The debate surrounding the broadcasting of violent sports such as boxing and martial arts is multifaceted, with proponents arguing for freedom and tradition, and detractors concerned about societal impact. I contend that while these sports should not be completely banned, stricter regulations on broadcasting are necessary. The key issues revolve around the potential glorification of violence and its impact on young viewers.
Critics of violent sports often highlight the inherent risk of glamorizing aggressive behaviour. Boxing, martial arts, and similar activities showcase physical confrontations as a form of entertainment, which can desensitize viewers, particularly impressionable children, to the seriousness of violence. Studies suggest that repeated exposure to simulated violence in media can increase aggression in young people, potentially leading to increased bullying in schools and aggressive behaviour in other social settings. This is not to undermine the skill and discipline involved in these sports, but to emphasize the need for responsible broadcasting that does not obscure the dangerous and painful realities of such violent encounters. Properly contextualizing these sports within broadcasts can help maintain a responsible narrative.
On the other hand, supporters argue that sports like boxing and martial arts are steeped in tradition and discipline, often embodying cultural histories and personal achievement. Banning these sports would not only infringe on personal freedoms but also neglect the potential for positive influence. These disciplines teach values such as respect, perseverance, and self-control, virtues that extend beyond the sports themselves into personal and professional realms. They are often highlighted in detailed athlete profiles and thoughtful commentary, which can serve as powerful narratives of overcoming adversity. Thus, the focus should be on promoting these aspects rather than the purely combative elements, ensuring broadcasts provide a balanced view that can inspire rather than incite. By emphasizing the holistic development of athletes, media can showcase the true spirit of these disciplines.
In conclusion, the broadcasting of sports involving violence should be carefully regulated rather than completely banned. By focusing on educational and respectful presentations, broadcasters can mitigate the adverse effects of exposure to violence while still celebrating the rich traditions and personal disciplines these sports offer.
Sample 7:
The question of whether sports involving violence such as boxing and martial arts should be restricted on television and international sporting competitions raises significant concerns. I firmly believe these sports should indeed be banned due to their promotion of violence and their potentially harmful influence on viewers, particularly young audiences. The following discussion will explore the detrimental societal impact and the normalization of aggression these sports can perpetuate.
Firstly, violent sports contribute to the normalization of aggression. Activities like boxing and martial arts, when broadcast widely, send a clear message that violence is not only acceptable but also a celebrated means to achieve victory and fame. This message can be particularly influential on the youth, who are in their formative years and susceptible to imitating such behaviours. The glamorization of physical assault in these sports can diminish the seriousness of violence in the eyes of young viewers, potentially leading to increased aggression in schools and social interactions. The implication here is profound: what is intended as sport could be misconstrued as a legitimate way to resolve conflicts in everyday life.
Moreover, the international broadcasting of these sports often sidelines the serious long-term physical and psychological effects experienced by the athletes involved. The focus on victory and strength overshadows the numerous cases of brain injuries, trauma, and long-term health issues that athletes suffer. By banning these sports from TV and international arenas, the media would cease to endorse an activity that risks the health and wellbeing of its participants. Additionally, this would promote sports that emphasize health, teamwork, and personal development without resorting to violence, thereby fostering a healthier view of sportsmanship globally.
In conclusion, the prohibition of violent sports from television and international competitions is a necessary step toward cultivating a more peaceful and respectful society. By eliminating these sports from mainstream media, we help prevent the glorification of violence and protect the physical and mental health of athletes, setting a more positive example for our youth.
Sample 8:
The proposal to ban violent sports such as boxing and martial arts from television and international sporting competitions sparks a contentious debate. I staunchly oppose such a ban, arguing that these sports are not only an essential part of cultural heritage but also play a significant role in promoting discipline, resilience, and fitness. This essay will elaborate on the merits of these sports and the implications of preserving their presence in the media.
Firstly, sports like boxing and martial arts are much more than mere displays of violence; they are disciplines steeped in rich tradition and rigorous training that instill values such as respect, self-control, and perseverance. Removing these sports from public view underestimates the capacity of audiences to discern the context of controlled sporting environments from real-world violence, thereby simplifying complex cultural practices into negative stereotypes. Furthermore, these sports offer a platform for individuals from diverse backgrounds to achieve personal growth and international recognition, often providing life-changing opportunities for the underprivileged. These opportunities can propel individuals towards economic stability and social mobility, significantly impacting their communities.
Secondly, banning these sports on television and in competitions would not effectively address the root causes of societal violence and could even be counterproductive by driving fans to seek unregulated, potentially more hazardous viewing. Such a shift could lead to underground events lacking proper oversight and safety measures, increasing risks for participants and spectators. The regulated environment of professional sports ensures safety standards and ethical guidelines are upheld, which educates viewers about the importance of rules and fair play. Moreover, the presence of martial arts and boxing in mainstream media encourages healthy physical activity and provides a constructive outlet for aggression under professional supervision, serving as a model for handling conflicts and challenges in a disciplined way.
In conclusion, the outright ban of violent sports from television and international arenas is an excessive measure that overlooks the positive impacts of these activities. Preserving their visibility promotes not only cultural enrichment but also educational and physical benefits that contribute to societal well-being.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.
Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.
At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.
In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.
Sample 2:
Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.
To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.
Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.
To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.
Sample 3:
There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.
The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.
There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.
In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.
Sample 4:
Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.
To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.
However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.
In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.
Sample 5:
Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.
In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.
In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
The line chart illustrates how many people participated in 4 distinct types of sports in a particular area from 1985 to 2005.
Overall, rugby was the most popular sport in the first half of the period while tennis took the lead in the second half. In addition, rugby saw a downward trend while tennis took the opposite direction; moreover, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable.
In 1995, the number of people playing rugby stood at just under 250, surpassing the figure for tennis players by around 100. Basketball and badminton had comparatively lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 participants in turn.
Afterwards, the number of people participating in rugby plunged, hitting a low of 50 in 2005, equal to the figure for badminton in the same year. In contrast, the trend for tennis was upward, with its participation rate increasing to roughly 220 people at the end of the period, establishing it as the leading sport. Finally, the figures for basketball and badminton underwent negligible changes, hovering around 80 and 50 participants respectively.
Sample 2:
The line graph illustrates how many people participated in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005. Overall, there was a significant decrease in the number of people playing rugby in this region, whereas tennis showed a gradual upward trend to become the most popular sport in the second half of the period. Additionally, throughout the period, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable and comparable, with the latter sport remaining the least common.
In the first decade, rugby had the highest number of players, despite witnessing a steady fall from nearly 250 to exactly 200 participants. From 1995 onwards, this sport kept losing popularity as its figure plummeted, reaching parity with badminton (at 50 people) in the final year.
In contrast, tennis was gaining popularity and had become the dominant category by the end of the timeframe. Specifically, starting at the second highest (at 150), the number of people engaging in tennis rose continually, overtaking that of rugby in 1995 before ending at approximately 250 players.
Meanwhile, roughly 80 people played basketball initially, after which it stayed virtually unchanged until the end of the period. Badminton almost exactly mirrored this trend, albeit at a lower rate, consistently hovering around the 50 mark.
Sample 3:
The line chart compares the number of participants in basketball, tennis, badminton and rugby over a 20-year period from 1985 in a specific area.
Overall, more people played tennis throughout the period, and it was the most common sport since 1995, while rugby's popularity declined. Notably, basketball and badminton mostly had stable numbers of players.
In terms of tennis and rugby, both sports indicated inverted trends. Although rugby started at the highest point with nearly 250 players, the figure declined continually to about 200 players in 1995, when this sport was no longer the most popular. Since then, the number of people playing rugby dropped more steeply, reaching 50 in 2005. In contrast, from 1985 onwards, the figure for tennis increased steadily from second place with 150 participants. By 2005, it had reached its highest point of roughly 220 players.
In comparison, there were far fewer people who took up basketball and badminton. However, these sports remained relatively stable, with basketball having about 70 participants every year, while badminton was always the least popular with approximately 50 players each year.
Sample 4:
The line graph provides information about the number of individuals engaging in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.
Overall, while tennis underwent a surge in popularity, rugby experienced a decrease in participation within this region over time, with basketball and badminton remaining relatively stable. Moreover, the most drastic shift in popularity was witnessed in rugby.
At the start of the period, in 1985, rugby was the most played sport, with 240 individuals participating, and it significantly outnumbered the next sport, tennis, which had only 150 participants. Thereafter, the number of people playing rugby dropped to 200 in 1995, before plummeting to a 20-year low of 50 in the final year. This stood in stark contrast to the rise in the popularity of tennis, which saw a steady increase in participants to a peak of about 220 in 2005, making it by far the most played sport at the end of the period.
Turning to the remaining sports, in the first year, 80 individuals played basketball, almost 25 more than badminton. Over the following decade, the participant numbers for basketball rose to about 90, while those for badminton dropped to a low of 45 in 1995. In the remaining period, these two sports maintained their popularity, as the numbers participating stayed at roughly the same level until 2005.
Sample 5:
The line chart delineates the participation levels in four distinct sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.
Primarily, rugby emerged as the most favored sport in the initial half of the period, while tennis took precedence in the latter half. Moreover, rugby exhibited a declining trend, whereas tennis experienced a converse trajectory. Meanwhile, the engagement rates for basketball and badminton remained relatively consistent.
In 1985, the number of rugby participants stood at just below 250, exceeding the tennis players by approximately 150 individuals. Simultaneously, basketball and badminton showcased lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 individuals involved in each sport, respectively.
Subsequently, rugby participation plummeted significantly, reaching a nadir of 50 participants in 2005, akin to the number engaged in badminton during the same year. Conversely, tennis experienced an upward trend, escalating to nearly 220 individuals by the conclusion of the period, solidifying its status as the predominant sport. In contrast, the figures for basketball and badminton remained relatively stable, with approximately 80 and 50 participants, respectively, throughout the entire duration.
Sample 6:
The given line graph delineates the participation levels in 4 different sports, namely basketball, tennis, badminton, and rugby within a specific region over a span of 20 years.
Overall, it is evident that the number of individuals participating in tennis witnessed a consistent and notable increase, contrasting sharply with the downward trend observed in rugby participation. Meanwhile, while basketball and badminton recorded lower participation rates compared to other sports, they remained relatively stable throughout the entire period.
Turning to the number of tennis players, the figures began at a relatively moderate level of 150 individuals in 1985. Subsequently, it experienced a gradual and consistent increase in participation, reaching a pinnacle of nearly 230 participants by 2005. In stark contrast, the trend of rugby involvement presented a distinctive pattern. Commencing at a relatively high level of almost 240 people, the numbers steadily declined over time and by the end of the 20-year period, rugby participants had dwindled to 50, matching the level of engagement observed in badminton. Interestingly, a point of convergence occurred in 1995, where both tennis and rugby shared a similar number of participants, with approximately 200 individuals engaging in each sport.
In regard to the remaining sports participants, the numbers for both badminton and basketball remained relatively stable over the given time frame. Beginning with approximately 50 individuals engaging in badminton and around 80 individuals involved in basketball in 1985, these figures persisted with little variation until 2005. Consequently, by the end of the period, both sports witnessed a culmination with nearly the same number of participants as they had at the beginning.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Nhắn tin Zalo