Câu hỏi:

10/01/2025 642 Lưu

Although there is a lot of translation software available, learning a language still could be advantageous. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified
Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

Advancement in technology has fostered the availability of operating systems that can translate text automatically. Despite this development, I hold the belief that the process of obtaining lingual knowledge is still beneficial in terms of career prospects and cultural experience.

It goes without saying that machine translation can bring greater benefits in terms of speed and a variety of languages. Regarding the former, it is undeniable that computer programs can translate texts much faster than human translators, making the former a much better option when the time given is limited or when only an approximate or summary translation is needed. Concerning the second advantage, artificial intelligence software is capable of translating multiple languages. A prime example of this is Google Translate, as it can instantly recognise and translate up to one hundred languages, thereby being used basically throughout the entire world.

Nevertheless, I think that having a clear comprehension of languages is more advantageous in working and experiencing the culture. Some may say that the more languages individuals can master, the more chances of job promotion they may be offered. Since the world has virtually been a global village in which international trade has enhanced cross-border communication and cooperation. The proficiency in languages, thus, provides people with many employment opportunities and eventual success in life. Another benefit that is worth considering is the cultural exposure that one may have when discovering any language. Undoubtedly, language is one of the authentic reflections of its culture; thus, linguistic learning would play a pivotal role in the provision of cultural experience that electronic translators fail to deliver.

In conclusion, although machine translation software can produce less accurate texts, faster translation and the range of language options it can offer are undeniably convenient. As such, I am of the opinion that studying languages still holds an irreplaceable role.

Sample 2:

It is beneficial for people to learn a language rather than rely heavily on translation programs. I totally agree with this notion as it engenders a deeper understanding of cultures and enhances conversations.

The first reason why people should learn a language is that they will gain a more profound insight into foreign cultures. As they acquire a language, they can truly understand local customs and traditions by reading original literary works or watching documentaries. For example, a Vietnamese student who is proficient in Hindi, one of the official languages in India, would know that head shaking in India does not mean no and the gesture for yes looks like a no in other cultures. As a result, mutual misunderstandings and cultural shock are more likely to be avoided, allowing them to better adapt to a new environment.

The second reason for my agreement is that language acquisition enables people to have more effective communication. They can feel more confident when entering a conversation in a foreign language, facilitating their understanding of how a sentence is structured or how a new word is applied in the right context. To illustrate, a tourist proficient in French tends to more actively interact with local people during his vacation in France, forging a stronger bond among them. As a result, this will bring an enlivening and memorable traveling experience. These benefits cannot be provided by using translation software as it will be a cold personal interaction.

In conclusion, I strongly believe language translation platforms cannot replace the need to learn a new language as it fosters a process of cultural exchange and improves speakers’ communication in certain situations. Therefore, people should consider learning a language and not just rely on translation software.

Sample 3:

In an era where digital tools offer instantaneous translations, the merit of mastering a language cannot be understated. This essay argues that despite the ubiquity of translation software, learning a language enriches one’s cognitive abilities and fosters deeper cultural connections, aspects where technology falls short.

The cognitive benefits of learning a new language extend beyond mere communication. Research consistently shows that bilingual individuals enjoy improved memory, problem-solving skills, and a greater capacity for multitasking. This cognitive flexibility is something that translation software, no matter how advanced, cannot replicate. For instance, navigating a conversation in a second language requires on-the-spot thinking and adaptation, processes that enhance brain plasticity. These mental exercises contribute to a sharper mind, capable of more nuanced thought processes compared to relying solely on translation software.

Moreover, the cultural immersion facilitated by learning a language is unparalleled. Language is a vessel for a culture’s nuances, idioms, and expressions that software can translate but not truly convey. Engaging with a culture through its language opens up a spectrum of subtleties and insights that are otherwise inaccessible. For example, understanding Japanese through study not only allows for basic communication but also unveils the layers of politeness and respect deeply embedded in the language, offering a richer, more authentic experience of the culture. Such depth of understanding fosters genuine connections and mutual respect, bridging gaps that technology alone cannot.

In conclusion, while translation software serves as a convenient tool for bridging linguistic gaps quickly, it falls short of offering the deep cognitive and cultural benefits that come with learning a language. The practice of language learning not only sharpens the mind but also connects hearts across cultural divides, underscoring its irreplaceable value in our globalized world. Hence, the pursuit of language mastery remains not just beneficial but essential, enriching both the individual and society at large.

Sample 4:

In the contemporary digital age, the prevalence of translation software has sparked debate on the necessity of language learning. This essay posits that, despite technological advancements, language acquisition remains crucial for enhancing cognitive dexterity and cultivating profound intercultural understanding.

Firstly, the cognitive advantages of language learning far surpass the capabilities of any translation tool. Engaging in language acquisition stimulates neurological pathways, enhancing cognitive functions such as memory, attention, and the ability to switch tasks efficiently. For instance, studies have demonstrated that individuals proficient in multiple languages exhibit a delay in the onset of age-related cognitive decline compared to monolinguals. This evidence suggests that the mental exercise involved in language learning fosters a resilience in the brain against degenerative conditions, a benefit translation software cannot offer.

Secondly, the depth of cultural insight gained through language learning cannot be replicated by translation software. Language is the soul of a culture, carrying its history, values, and worldview. By learning a language, one gains access to the subtle cultural nuances and untranslatable concepts that software overlooks. A poignant example is the word "saudade" in Portuguese, which encapsulates a deep emotional state of nostalgic longing for something or someone that is absent. Such rich, culturally specific concepts can only be fully appreciated through a deep engagement with the language and its cultural context, facilitating a more meaningful global connection.

In conclusion, while translation software serves as a useful aid in overcoming language barriers, it cannot replace the cognitive and cultural enrichment derived from language learning. The pursuit of learning languages enriches the mind, deepens cultural empathy, and bridges human connections across diverse societies. Therefore, in the quest for global understanding and personal growth, the value of learning languages remains unparalleled.

Sample 5:

Learning a foreign language is always beneficial even though there are a number of translation applications in the market. This essay completely agrees with this statement because, in case of interacting with other people, it is never comfortable to depend on software, rather knowing the language gives an incredible edge when it comes to engage with the people of that language.

Translation programs cannot be used in all situations in one's day-to-day life. When we communicate with a foreigner in real time, it might be less practical to use these translators. For interaction, resorting to a device is a cumbersome idea because it takes time for a translator to process the language which might irritate people when they do not get the response immediately. Moreover, it really looks awkward to hold a device in front of people’s face to translate. Also, this software might take time to translate a language. For instance, if a person speaks in a foreign language for 5 minutes, the other person will need a few more minutes to understand what was said, this waiting period could be really disturbing for both parties, that is why it is never a viable option in real life.

Another reason to support this view is that, learning a language will give the opportunity for foreigners to enjoy the local culture in its original form. This is because, when people can comfortably understand each other, they start to interact and explore things more easily and enjoy themselves. Knowing a foreign language gives an incredible advantage in terms of immersion into another tradition, history and culture. To demonstrate, the state of Qatar started a program to educate its tourists on the use of Arabic language to enable them better to understand the local culture of the country.

To conclude, learning a language is obviously good as it helps people to engage in other communities comfortably and enjoy their culture and tradition more easily. Whereas translation software cannot be comfortably used in all real-life circumstances because using a device for translation might cause irritation to the interacting people.

Sample 6:

In today's modern world, technology has made great progress, resulting in numerous translation tools; however, several individuals still believe that studying a new language still appears to be of great importance. From my perspective, I absolutely agree with this viewpoint.

On the one hand, learning a foreign language could support the development of inner brain functions. When switching between different languages, more neurons are put to work as the brain needs to detect new phrasing then convert it back to one's mother tongue. Such complicated lexical analysis being operated regularly can aid neurological development, especially in children. In fact, recent studies have shown that multilingual people appear to have higher intellectual capacity than the monolingual ones. Additionally, mastering a new language requires a great amount of time and effort, which assists the advancement of cognitive skills, promotes memory capacity and enhances perseverance. This can be seen as a long-term benefit owing to the necessity of these traits in different aspects of life.

On the other hand, acquiring a language could also bring about practical advantages in both private and professional life. Firstly, due to the inconsistent accuracy of common translation programs, along with costly premium softwares, mastering a language via self-study perhaps is the most viable option for individuals with limited budgets. In urgent situations without access to the Internet and portable devices, travelers having a grasp of the foreign tongue can converse with the locals, and therefore receive support on time. Besides, assimilating a new language demands considerable practice, hence verbal communication skills and self-assurance. As these are conducive key attributes of a competent employee, career prospects of the multilingual could be promoted.

In conclusion, despite the expansion of translation applications, studying new languages still holds a significant role because this supports brain development and leads to numerous benefits in real-life situations.

Sample 7:

While translation software has become increasingly sophisticated, learning a language remains a valuable endeavor. While translation software can provide a basic understanding of text, it cannot fully capture the nuances and complexities of human communication

Firstly, translation software often struggles with idiomatic expressions, cultural references, and subtle shades of meaning. These elements are crucial for effective communication, and they are often lost in translation. For example, the phrase "kick the bucket" translates literally as "to kick the bucket" in many languages, but it actually means "to die." This demonstrates how translation software can fail to convey the intended meaning, leading to misunderstandings

Secondly, learning a language fosters a deeper understanding of the culture and history of the people who speak it. By immersing oneself in a new language, one gains insights into the values, beliefs, and perspectives of a different society. This cultural understanding is invaluable for building meaningful relationships, fostering empathy, and appreciating the diversity of human experience

Furthermore, learning a language enhances cognitive abilities. Studies have shown that bilingualism improves memory, attention, and problem-solving skills. The act of learning a new language challenges the brain, forcing it to adapt and develop new neural pathways. This cognitive stimulation can have a positive impact on brain health and function overall.

In conclusion, while translation software can be a useful tool, it cannot replace the benefits of learning a language. Learning a language provides a deeper understanding of culture, enhances cognitive abilities, and fosters meaningful connections with others. Therefore, despite the availability of translation software, learning a language remains a valuable and enriching experience.

Sample 8:

Language translation software programs have gained popularity in recent times due to developments in the science and technology sector. Due to this development, web-based language translation applications have grown in the past few years. But learning a language from a human instructor can be far more beneficial. I agree with the statement that there are manifold benefits in learning a language. In the subsequent paragraphs, I shall explain why learning a language from a human instructor is beneficial.

Language translation apps are becoming increasingly famous nowadays because they are free and easily accessible. But there are a variety of reasons why learning a language is essential. Primarily, learning a language has innumerous benefits. People who speak more than one language have improved memory, problem-solving and critical thinking skills and acquire the ability to multitask. Also, there are still certain parts of the world where internet facilities are not available. Softwares for translation are not available in such places. Learning a new language becomes necessary in these scenarios.

Secondly, the translations provided by these web-based translators are word to word translations. It merely gives the meaning of the word and fails to provide the true essence of the sentence. Translations apps are built in such a way that they cannot understand the slang and idioms used by people in everyday life. In contrast, an instructor can help you understand the true significance of a sentence. Sometimes there are multiple meanings to one word, and translation apps fail to convey its exact meaning. As a result, it can cause a lot of confusion and misunderstanding.

Even though web-based translation softwares are readily available and pocket friendly, they fail to provide the true meaning of the sentences.

To sum up, translation tools are not reliable. It fails to provide the sentences' accurate meaning, and one should not rely on language translation apps just because they are readily available.

Sample 9:

People live in a linguistically varied world, and the necessity to study a foreign language has grown over time. Even though many individuals nowadays rely on numerous translation tools for improved communication, I personally feel that learning a new language is a superior alternative, which would be discussed during the course of this essay.

Although using translation software is simple and inexpensive, the information may not always be correct. Many of these applications have demonstrated a low degree of accuracy across multiple languages due to their inability to translate contexts. Also, a majority of translation apps can only function decently amongst major languages, ignoring the minor ones. As a response, learning a new language can help to overcome this problem.

There are several more advantages to learning a new language. One of them is that it aids in the development of one’s brain power. Because a language is a complicated system with many rules and structures, attempting to understand it increases cognitive thinking and problem-solving abilities. This is beneficial to both professional and personal development. Furthermore, learning a new language boosts the networking abilities. It allows people to engage with speakers from other cultural backgrounds, allowing everyone to broaden their social circle. It also aids in obtaining better professional opportunities. Large firms want people who speak numerous languages because they are deemed versatile and adaptive.

In conclusion, while learning a new language may be difficult, it is far superior to utilizing a translation software in my opinion since it helps build strong cognitive abilities, improves social interaction, and encourages connection with peers.

Sample 10:

Despite the ubiquity of translation applications, many believe learning languages can still be beneficial. I side with those who hold this view as language learning helps students broaden their knowledge of different cultures and communicate more effectively.

Admittedly, translation software allows individuals of various linguistic backgrounds to understand each other more easily. Most contemporary software such as Google Translate is able to generate high-quality translations due to advances in sophisticated linguistic translation algorithms. Therefore, those who travel to a new country can more easily communicate with locals by installing translation applications on their phones. Before these applications were prevalent, individuals would need to take language courses prior to visiting a new nation. It might have taken months or years to possess a solid command of a single given language. Certain languages such as Arabic, Chinese and Japanese are challenging to many learners even today, especially those from western countries. Thus, the emergence of translation software is naturally of great help.

Nevertheless, language learning is still necessary because it allows learners to gain a deeper insight into new cultures and become more effective language users. A language is meaningfully more than simply a means of communication as it establishes a vital connection with the cultural identity of the people who speak it. For example, in the process of learning Chinese, individuals can gradually understand more about Chinese culture via their lessons. Learners will then be more likely to know which manners are considered appropriate by the Chinese as well as which ones should be avoided, thereby avoiding offense when communicating with native language speakers. Additionally, it is inconvenient when individuals must consistently stop during conversations to seek help from translation software. By becoming proficient in a language, individuals can respond instantly and chat more comfortably with foreigners.

In conclusion, although translation applications are indeed helpful today, learning languages retains its relevance as it aids fluent communication and cultural awareness. Individuals can also reap other cognitive and intellectual benefits when mastering a language.

Sample 11:

Despite the availability of a great deal of language translation software, foreign language learning is still necessary. I completely agree with this statement because people tend not to interact with each other further when using a translation tool. Besides, they can have higher chances to succeed in life if they speak another language.

Translation software discourages further interaction. For example, if a tourist asks a local for directions by using a translation tool, the local would probably say nothing more than the directions since most people do not like communicating with a machine. By contrast, tourists who are able to speak the local language show that they respect and love local culture. Locals in turn would extend their hospitality, asking about where they are from or even showing them around.

In addition, speaking a second language increases a person’s chances of success in life. The Internet has made the world unbounded. This allows a person to easily make their voices heard by people in another country as long as they share a common language. Take for example the famous Norwegian YouTuber Nora Alex. His Channel wouldn’t have reached more than one million subscribers if he weren’t able to speak English well and just used translation software to add English captions to his videos.

In conclusion, even though there are many translation tools available, learning another language is still necessary. For one thing, these tools tend to put people off further interaction, and for another those who speak a second language can gain the advantage of reaching more people and thus raise the odds of success in life.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.

Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.

At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.

In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.

Sample 2:

Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.

To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.

Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.

To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.

Sample 3:

There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.

The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.

There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.

In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.

Sample 4:

Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.

To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.

However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.

In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.

Sample 5:

Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.

To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.

In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.

In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.

Lời giải

The graph shows the number of people taking part in 4 kinds of sports in a particular region between 1985 and 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The line chart illustrates how many people participated in 4 distinct types of sports in a particular area from 1985 to 2005.

Overall, rugby was the most popular sport in the first half of the period while tennis took the lead in the second half. In addition, rugby saw a downward trend while tennis took the opposite direction; moreover, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable.

In 1995, the number of people playing rugby stood at just under 250, surpassing the figure for tennis players by around 100. Basketball and badminton had comparatively lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 participants in turn.

Afterwards, the number of people participating in rugby plunged, hitting a low of 50 in 2005, equal to the figure for badminton in the same year. In contrast, the trend for tennis was upward, with its participation rate increasing to roughly 220 people at the end of the period, establishing it as the leading sport. Finally, the figures for basketball and badminton underwent negligible changes, hovering around 80 and 50 participants respectively.

Sample 2:

The line graph illustrates how many people participated in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005. Overall, there was a significant decrease in the number of people playing rugby in this region, whereas tennis showed a gradual upward trend to become the most popular sport in the second half of the period. Additionally, throughout the period, the trends for basketball and badminton were relatively stable and comparable, with the latter sport remaining the least common. 

In the first decade, rugby had the highest number of players, despite witnessing a steady fall from nearly 250 to exactly 200 participants. From 1995 onwards, this sport kept losing popularity as its figure plummeted, reaching parity with badminton (at 50 people) in the final year.

In contrast, tennis was gaining popularity and had become the dominant category by the end of the timeframe. Specifically, starting at the second highest (at 150), the number of people engaging in tennis rose continually, overtaking that of rugby in 1995 before ending at approximately 250 players.

Meanwhile, roughly 80 people played basketball initially, after which it stayed virtually unchanged until the end of the period. Badminton almost exactly mirrored this trend, albeit at a lower rate, consistently hovering around the 50 mark.

Sample 3:

The line chart compares the number of participants in basketball, tennis, badminton and rugby over a 20-year period from 1985 in a specific area.

Overall, more people played tennis throughout the period, and it was the most common sport since 1995, while rugby's popularity declined. Notably, basketball and badminton mostly had stable numbers of players.

In terms of tennis and rugby, both sports indicated inverted trends. Although rugby started at the highest point with nearly 250 players, the figure declined continually to about 200 players in 1995, when this sport was no longer the most popular. Since then, the number of people playing rugby dropped more steeply, reaching 50 in 2005. In contrast, from 1985 onwards, the figure for tennis increased steadily from second place with 150 participants. By 2005, it had reached its highest point of roughly 220 players.

In comparison, there were far fewer people who took up basketball and badminton. However, these sports remained relatively stable, with basketball having about 70 participants every year, while badminton was always the least popular with approximately 50 players each year.

Sample 4:

The line graph provides information about the number of individuals engaging in four types of sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.

Overall, while tennis underwent a surge in popularity, rugby experienced a decrease in participation within this region over time, with basketball and badminton remaining relatively stable. Moreover, the most drastic shift in popularity was witnessed in rugby.

At the start of the period, in 1985, rugby was the most played sport, with 240 individuals participating, and it significantly outnumbered the next sport, tennis, which had only 150 participants. Thereafter, the number of people playing rugby dropped to 200 in 1995, before plummeting to a 20-year low of 50 in the final year. This stood in stark contrast to the rise in the popularity of tennis, which saw a steady increase in participants to a peak of about 220 in 2005, making it by far the most played sport at the end of the period.

Turning to the remaining sports, in the first year, 80 individuals played basketball, almost 25 more than badminton. Over the following decade, the participant numbers for basketball rose to about 90, while those for badminton dropped to a low of 45 in 1995. In the remaining period, these two sports maintained their popularity, as the numbers participating stayed at roughly the same level until 2005.

Sample 5:

The line chart delineates the participation levels in four distinct sports in a specific area from 1985 to 2005.

Primarily, rugby emerged as the most favored sport in the initial half of the period, while tennis took precedence in the latter half. Moreover, rugby exhibited a declining trend, whereas tennis experienced a converse trajectory. Meanwhile, the engagement rates for basketball and badminton remained relatively consistent.

In 1985, the number of rugby participants stood at just below 250, exceeding the tennis players by approximately 150 individuals. Simultaneously, basketball and badminton showcased lower participation rates, with around 80 and 50 individuals involved in each sport, respectively.

Subsequently, rugby participation plummeted significantly, reaching a nadir of 50 participants in 2005, akin to the number engaged in badminton during the same year. Conversely, tennis experienced an upward trend, escalating to nearly 220 individuals by the conclusion of the period, solidifying its status as the predominant sport. In contrast, the figures for basketball and badminton remained relatively stable, with approximately 80 and 50 participants, respectively, throughout the entire duration.

Sample 6:

The given line graph delineates the participation levels in 4 different sports, namely basketball, tennis, badminton, and rugby within a specific region over a span of 20 years.

Overall, it is evident that the number of individuals participating in tennis witnessed a consistent and notable increase, contrasting sharply with the downward trend observed in rugby participation. Meanwhile, while basketball and badminton recorded lower participation rates compared to other sports, they remained relatively stable throughout the entire period.

Turning to the number of tennis players, the figures began at a relatively moderate level of 150 individuals in 1985. Subsequently, it experienced a gradual and consistent increase in participation, reaching a pinnacle of nearly 230 participants by 2005. In stark contrast, the trend of rugby involvement presented a distinctive pattern. Commencing at a relatively high level of almost 240 people, the numbers steadily declined over time and by the end of the 20-year period, rugby participants had dwindled to 50, matching the level of engagement observed in badminton. Interestingly, a point of convergence occurred in 1995, where both tennis and rugby shared a similar number of participants, with approximately 200 individuals engaging in each sport.

In regard to the remaining sports participants, the numbers for both badminton and basketball remained relatively stable over the given time frame. Beginning with approximately 50 individuals engaging in badminton and around 80 individuals involved in basketball in 1985, these figures persisted with little variation until 2005. Consequently, by the end of the period, both sports witnessed a culmination with nearly the same number of participants as they had at the beginning.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP