Câu hỏi:

10/01/2025 117

Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified
Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

Modern society is characterised by an abundance of choices, whether in the marketplace, the media or even in personal lives. While some people embrace this diversity, others feel overwhelmed by these choices. From my perspective, I believe that in modern days, we have too many options to choose from, and that can often lead to confusion, anxiety, and indecisiveness.

To begin with, the rise of online retailers has drastically increased the number of options available to consumers. With the development of e-commerce websites like Amazon, people are now presented with a seemingly infinite range of products. As a result, many individuals find it difficult to make purchasing decisions, as they are inundated with a vast number of options. Furthermore, this problem is exacerbated by the fact that online retailers use various marketing techniques, such as special offers and personalised recommendations, to encourage consumers to buy more, which only adds to the already overwhelming selection.

In addition, the proliferation of social media platforms and search engines has made it easier for people to access an immense amount of information. However, this also means that individuals are exposed to countless opinions, ideas, and news, leading to information overload. For example, when searching for a particular topic on Google or YouTube, users often receive a large number of search results. The volume of information can be overwhelming, and many people find it challenging to evaluate and make sense of what they have found.

In conclusion, the modern world has given us the option to have a wide range of choices, but it is never easy to make the right decision when we are presented with too many options. The overwhelming number of choices available to us can lead to confusion, anxiety, and decision paralysis. Therefore, it is crucial that we learn to filter and prioritise our needs to make informed choices and avoid the negative effects of having too many choices.

Sample 2:

In the modern world, it may appear that we are inundated with an overwhelming number of choices. However, upon closer examination, it becomes evident that the reality is quite the opposite. Despite the illusion of an abundance of options, we are, in fact, more restricted than ever before. The constraints imposed by limited resources, societal norms, and technological advancements curtail our freedom of choice and limit the opportunities available to us.

One of the primary factors that restricts our choices is the limitation of resources. While we may be presented with a multitude of products and services, our actual options are constrained by financial limitations. Economic constraints often dictate our choices, forcing us to settle for more affordable alternatives rather than selecting what truly aligns with our preferences. For example, a person with limited financial resources may have to forgo their dream vacation destination and opt for a more budget-friendly option. The illusion of choice is shattered by the reality of financial restrictions that narrow down the possibilities available to us.

Societal norms and expectations also play a significant role in limiting our choices. The pressures to conform to social standards and expectations can restrict our freedom to make choices that deviate from the norm. For instance, societal norms often dictate acceptable career paths, lifestyles, and even personal relationships, leaving individuals with limited options that align with societal expectations. This restriction of choices based on societal norms impedes personal growth and stifles individuality, creating a narrow range of acceptable choices.

Furthermore, technological advancements, while seemingly expanding our options, paradoxically limit our choices as well. With the rise of social media and online platforms, our decisions are increasingly influenced by algorithms and targeted advertisements that manipulate our choices. These algorithms create filter bubbles, presenting us with a limited range of options that align with our existing preferences and beliefs. As a result, our exposure to diverse perspectives and alternative choices diminishes, further restricting our ability to make informed decisions.

In conclusion, while the modern world may initially appear to offer an abundance of choices, the reality is that we find ourselves constrained by limited resources, societal expectations, and the influence of technology. These restrictions curtail our freedom to explore a wide range of options and limit the opportunities available to us.

Sample 3:

In today's modern era, with the advancement of technology and globalisation, people are offered a multitude of options and choices in almost every aspect of life, from the food we eat to the career we pursue. I strongly agree with this statement, and I believe that having too many choices can have negative outcomes as this abundance of choices leads to confusion, indecision, and a sense of being overwhelmed.

Firstly, when individuals are presented with too many options, it can lead to confusion and indecision. For example, when shopping online, there are often hundreds of options to choose from for a single product, such as a phone or a pair of shoes. This can lead to customers feeling overwhelmed and confused about which option to choose, which can result in them giving up and not making a purchase at all. This can also lead to buyers’ remorse, where individuals regret their choice and feel like they may have made the wrong decision.

Secondly, having too many options can result in a paradox of choice, where individuals may feel like they have missed out on better alternatives, leading to dissatisfaction and regret. For instance, when choosing a career, young adults often have a plethora of options, making it challenging to select the best fit. It can lead to individuals feeling as though they missed out on other careers that might have been a better choice. Consequently, this can create dissatisfaction with their current choice.

Lastly, having too many options can result in a waste of time and resources. For example, when a person is planning a trip, they may spend countless hours researching and trying to pick the perfect destination, accommodation, and activities. This can lead to frustration and the wasting of precious time, which could have been spent more productively.

In conclusion, while choices and options are vital in modern society, I believe that we have too many choices and this can lead to negative consequences such as confusion, indecision, and regret. It is important for individuals and businesses to recognise the value of simplicity and streamlined options to avoid a paradox of choice.

Sample 4:

Our world has become profoundly affected by unprecedented technological and globalization advancements, which have transformed the way we live and make decisions, both little and large. We have an enormous variety of options to choose from. However, some people argue that we don’t have the liberty of making multiple choices. In my opinion, with developing technology and resources, our freedom of choice has greatly enhanced. In the following paragraphs, I shall elaborate on my viewpoint.

Primarily, people can now access reliable information on the internet at any moment, due to technological advancements. Due to this, anyone can have quick access to an incredible number of materials online, and this freedom allows people to make educated decisions at every stage of their lives. When purchasing online, people are now confronted with a large array of options. Unlike conventional storefronts, e-commerce platforms like Amazon and eBay do not have space limits. As a result, when a customer searches for a product on these sites, hundreds or thousands of similar goods emerge.

Additionally, other technical improvements have made it easier to grow more foods, prepare new cuisines, preserve them, and alleviate the world’s hunger problem. Take the example of toothpaste where in the past, one just chose their favorite toothpaste brand and size. However, now, each brand offers a huge number of flavors and a variety of benefits. People can decide whether they want their toothpaste to whiten their teeth, strengthen them, make their gums healthier or freshen their breath.

Nevertheless, this multitude of options creates a lot of confusion when it comes to deciding which brand to buy their clothing and fashion items from or restaurant delicacies to try. Similarly, people have a variety of employment alternatives to choose from, but their options are limited when they choose to work in their respective hometown or establish a business.

To sum up, there are so many choices in today's contemporary period. Though there might not be as many choices at present, technological advancement is always expanding the list and presenting us with an abundance of choices.

Sample 5:

In this day and age, our lives and the choices we make, both major and small, have been significantly impacted by the enormous technical and globalisation breakthroughs that have occurred on our globe. The range of possibilities at our disposal is truly staggering. I firmly believe we have innumerable choices. I'll explain my points below.

The first and foremost reason is that technological progress has allowed us to constantly and easily access credible information online. Because of the ease of access to a vast trove of information online, we may now make well-informed choices at any point in our life. Now, consumers have a plethora of options to choose from when making purchases online. For instance, electronic marketplaces, such as Amazon and eBay, do not have the same physical constraints that brick-and-mortar stores do. Therefore, hundreds of comparable products will show up when a customer conducts a search on one of these sites.

In addition to this, more food can now be grown, processed, and preserved than ever before, and the world's hunger crisis has been greatly reduced as a result. Take toothpaste as an example. Once upon a time, buying toothpaste was as simple as picking out your preferred brand and size. This has changed, though, and now every label provides a plethora of options in both taste and utility. Choose a toothpaste based on whether you need it to whiten, strengthen, improve the health of your gums, or improve the smell of your breath.

In nutshell, the abundance of options available to us in the modern day is unquestionably a blessing. In spite of the fact that there aren't as many options available to us right now, that number is steadily growing as new technologies emerge.

Sample 6:

In this modernising era, the revolutionary development of contemporary technology has provided individuals with ample means for their survival. People are now able to pick and choose amongst irrevocably favourable prospects because of the wide range of options now available to them. I completely bolster this stance. My preference is justified below.

In recent times, due to a variety of factors, modern humans enjoy an unprecedented variety of choices in areas such as cuisine, mode of transportation, and commercial enterprise. First, the inventive ways in which food can be produced and preserved have benefited the human population by ensuring that important varieties of foodstuffs are available all year round. For instance, because of advances in food preservation techniques, non-seasonal items are available year-round at the grocery store.           

The advancement of technology gives us an advantage to get accurate information from the internet anytime we want. Today, we have access to an unprecedented wealth of information at our fingertips, empowering us to make well-informed choices at every stage of our lives. There is virtually no end to the ways in which our lives may be improved with the use of technology. With its help, we can choose where to go on vacation, where to buy our favourite products at the best prices, and even where to get the online education we require.

To sum up and offer my position, it's clear that while many people enjoy a wide variety of lifestyle options, these perks are not distributed equally. All people should have the same access to the benefits of contemporary technology, and basic human rights must be guaranteed at the very least.

Sample 7:

In this day and age experts are of the notion that we have a lot of opportunities to pick from. I truly believe that such a situation is advantageous. I am in complete unison with this stance. My preference is justified further. 

One of the main reasons for my stance is that we have a few choices and the development of technology. Thanks to technological progress, we now have numerous options from which to choose. Higher education applicants, for instance, can now do their school research online and make their final decision from among a variety of schools without leaving the comfort of their own homes. Social media platforms like Facebook and WhatsApp have also increased the pool of available partners for single adults. Moreover, job-seekers can send their applications to numerous businesses around the world with the click of a button.

Moreover, more freedom of choice may also contribute to the proliferation of options in the modern era. There used to be a lot of rules about who could be president and what students might study in school. In today's democratic democracies, citizens have a choice between various potential leaders. Kids today also have greater leeway in deciding what kind of adults they want to be in the future.

To recapitulate, the modern world certainly does provide a wide variety of options, that much is undeniable. Indeed, I agree that we have the chance to do this because of the availability of modern tools and the independence we enjoy.

Sample 8:

In today's era, the notion that we are inundated with an excessive array of choices is a topic of considerable debate. I concur with this perspective to a great extent and posit that this abundance can lead to decision fatigue and a paradox of choice, thereby diminishing overall satisfaction.

Firstly, the phenomenon of decision fatigue emerges as a direct consequence of the plethora of choices available in every facet of life, from simple daily decisions like choosing what to eat, to more complex ones like selecting a career path. This incessant barrage of options can be overwhelming, leading individuals to experience mental exhaustion more rapidly. For instance, a study by the American Psychological Association highlighted that individuals making numerous choices throughout the day exhibited a significant decline in their ability to make well-considered decisions by the day's end. This suggests that the cognitive load imposed by excessive choices can impair decision-making quality, thereby fostering a counterproductive environment.

Furthermore, the paradox of choice posits that beyond a certain threshold, an increase in the number of choices can lead to decreased satisfaction. When faced with numerous options, individuals often harbor heightened expectations and are prone to regret over the choices not taken, even if the decision made was entirely satisfactory. This is exemplified in the consumer behavior observed in markets with vast product varieties, where customers often report feeling less satisfied with their purchases due to the nagging feeling that a better option might have been missed. This phenomenon underlines the psychological discomfort and dissatisfaction stemming from having too many choices.

In conclusion, while options are beneficial to a degree, their excess can cause decision fatigue and a paradox of choice, harming well-being. Achieving a balance to satisfy diverse needs without overwhelming us is key to a happier, less stressed society.

Sample 9:

There is a prevalent contention that a plethora of choices can induce a sense of being swamped and overloaded, while there are others who contend that having numerous options is a prerequisite for individual autonomy and contentment. In my view, while excessive number of choices can lead to decision fatigue, it is still beneficial to have a wide range of choices, given that we can circumvent the drawbacks by honing our decision-making abilities and prioritizing the most significant factors while making a choice.

The availability of numerous options is an essential aspect of modern life as it provides individuals with the freedom to choose and tailor their preferences to their liking. However, excessive options can lead to decision fatigue, where people are overwhelmed and unable to make a choice. While decision fatigue can lead to a negative impact on productivity and well-being, it is important to note that the issue can be remedied by honing our decision-making abilities.

Developing better decision-making skills is a crucial strategy in managing an abundance of choices. One of the most effective ways to do this is by prioritizing the most significant factors that influence our decisions. By doing so, we can reduce the number of options that we need to evaluate and focus on the aspects that matter the most. Another strategy is to adopt a systematic approach when making choices, such as by setting clear criteria or establishing a decision-making process. With these techniques, we can alleviate the burden of decision fatigue and make informed choices that align with our preferences and goals.

To summarize, by refining our ability to make decisions and concentrating on the most critical factors when making a selection, we can reduce the drawbacks of having too many choices. Therefore, even though an excessive number of choices can cause decision fatigue, having a diverse range of options is still advantageous as it allows us to exercise our freedom to choose and personalize our preferences according to our liking.

Sample 10:

It is commonly believed that today we always have options to pick from a variety of choices. Regardless of the personal or professional implications, I firmly believe that we have a wide range of options in this rapidly evolving world.

Many choices make our life more satisfying because we can have access to more products due to lower prices, and to some opportunities, such as particular travels and cultural events, which were not available to many people just twenty or thirty years ago. In fact, it is undeniable that some products, which were more expensive in the past, are cheaper due to fierce market competition among identical products, and this is the ultimate result of the availability of choices. Furthermore, harnessing the benefits of multiple routes and destination options, nowadays we can travel to foreign countries more easily and satisfy the desire for exploring diverse art and culture.

Additionally, having a wide range of options allows us to have a greater feeling of freedom since we have access to knowledge through a large number of books that have been produced as well as several websites that cover both domestic and worldwide news. Today, we can easily find books online and offline on a variety of scientific and humanistic topics, as well as on reality and history. By reading these, we can understand the causes of current and past events. In addition, due to the widespread usage of computers and smartphones connected to internet, we can also know about all the information in which we are interested. As a result, we can feel freer because our freedom increases with knowledge.

In conclusion, the availability of many choices must be considered a great opportunity we have, because with this we can acquire more freedom and a more fulfilling life.

Sample 11:

In today’s society, we are faced with an abundance of choices. From the food we eat, to the clothes we wear, and even the way we spend our free time, the options available to us are seemingly endless. Some argue that this abundance of choice is a positive thing as it allows for greater freedom and personalization. However, others believe that having too many choices can be detrimental to our well-being and decision-making abilities.

On the one hand, having a wide range of options can be beneficial. It allows individuals to tailor their choices to their specific needs and preferences. For example, the rise of online shopping has made it possible for people to purchase products from all over the world. Additionally, the ability to make choices based on our own values and beliefs can be empowering and lead to greater satisfaction with our lives.

On the other hand, having too many choices can be overwhelming and can lead to feelings of anxiety and indecision. Studies have shown that when faced with too many options, people tend to procrastinate, make poor decisions, or simply avoid making a decision altogether. Furthermore, the constant comparison and evaluation of options can lead to feelings of dissatisfaction and even regret, regardless of the choice made.

In conclusion, while having a wide range of choices can be beneficial, it is important to recognize that too much choice can also have negative consequences. It is essential to find a balance between having enough options to make informed decisions while not being overwhelmed by the constant comparison and evaluation of options.

Sample 12:

We live in a world which has been tremendously shaped by the unparalleled advancements of technology and globalisation which in turn have revolutionised the way we live and make our choices- both little and big. Without any doubt, we have an incredible number of alternatives to pick from and this freedom of choice has enriched our lifestyle in the best possible way, and it has also increased global resources.

The advancement of technology has enabled us to get accurate information from the Internet anytime we want. We have an unimaginable number of resources online that we can access instantly, and this freedom enables us to make informed decisions in every step of our life. We can decide what our next holiday destination should be, which store offers our favourite merchandise at a cheaper price, and which university offers an online degree that we need; thus, the potential to enrich our lives with the help of technology is virtually limitless. Other technological advancements have enabled us to grow more crops, cook new dishes, preserve them and reduce the world’s hunger issue more conveniently.

In the present era, technology and globalisation and their benefits have exponentially expanded the number of options we can avail in different fields like education, food, transport, treatment, entertainment, jobs and business. For example, the number of majors a university offers and the related jobs and business opportunities in the future are incredible. We can take jobs that were never offered in the past and not to mention the impact of business opportunities due to globalisation and widespread acceptance of it. Moreover, we can produce crops and vegetables around the year and effective preservation methods have benefited the human population with the provision of significant types of edibles during the entire year. A faster transportation system leads to a revolution in transport hubs around the world and we can visit our friends and family more frequently than ever before and talk to them anytime we want no matter the distance.

In conclusion, we are blessed with so many options to pick from in this modern era and the innovation of technology is increasing the list day by day. We should just be careful and prudent enough to choose the best for us in our personal life and for the entire human race for our overall progress.

Sample 13:

People in the modern world, without any doubt, are blessed with technology and an incredible range of consumer products which they use in their daily life. From this perspective, it seems like we have so many choices in our life while the truth is hidden underneath and quite the contrary. I believe that sometimes we are overwhelmed with our options to buy trivial things while we are restricted in making important life choices.

To begin with, we have the internet to look for information and get our questions answered. In the past, we were required to go to a library or talk to our teachers to get an answer. From this perspective, it seems quite obvious that we now have better freedom to get information from the internet and it is not an exaggeration to say that our choices are far vaster now than in the past. However, the World Wide Web is still not accessible by a vast majority of the world population and not all the online information publicly available is authentic and genuine. Fabricated and fake news and information that we see or read online trigger social chaos and remind us how a plethora of information can sometimes be more misleading than helpful.

No doubt we have many satellite channels to enjoy, different brands to buy our dresses and fashion items from, different dishes in restaurants and many choices to take a job but the options of choices are restrained to trivial issues. For example, we have a lot of dishes for our dinner at a restaurant but when it comes to eating organic and farm-fresh fruits and vegetables, the options are limited. Similarly, we have different career options to pick from but when we want to do a job in our hometown or start a business, the options are restricted.

In conclusion, freedom of important choices like career, healthy food, living place and access to genuine information is far more important than our choices of plenty of consumer goods. Wistfully, we have many options for such trivial choices these days while not so much in making vital decisions.

Sample 14:

The increasing array of choices available in today’s society has sparked a debate among individuals. While some argue that we are overwhelmed with options, I firmly agree with this perspective. The vast array of choices offers numerous benefits, including personal empowerment and the fostering of innovation and competition.

One compelling reason why I agree that we have an abundance of choices is the freedom it provides for self-expression and individuality. In the past, people were often limited to a narrow range of options dictated by societal norms and constraints. However, in contemporary times, individuals have the liberty to choose from a plethora of career paths, hobbies, lifestyle choices, and even relationships. For instance, the advent of online platforms and social media has opened up new avenues for self-expression, enabling people to showcase their talents, connect with like-minded individuals, and explore their passions. The multitude of choices available ensure that everyone can find a path that aligns with their unique interests and aspirations.

Furthermore, the abundance of choices stimulates healthy competition and drives innovation. With numerous options available, companies and organizations are compelled to continually improve their products and services to attract customers. This competition results in higher quality, more affordable products, and enhanced customer experience. Moreover, the variety of choices fosters creativity and encourages individuals and businesses to think outside the box, leading to breakthroughs and advancements in various fields. For example, in the technology sector, the abundance of choices has led to rapid advancements, with each new iteration offering improved features and functionalities.

In conclusion, the freedom to choose empowers individuals, allowing them to express themselves, pursue their passions, and shape their lives according to their preferences. Moreover, the competition and innovation that arise from having numerous options benefit society as a whole, driving progress and enhancing the quality of products and services. Rather than being overwhelmed, we should embrace the opportunities presented by the abundance of choices and utilize them to lead fulfilling and enriched lives.

Sample 15:

In modern life, many people believe that over choice is becoming a phenomenon. I totally agree with this opinion, and this essay will attempt to find the reason for this.

Many people blame the increase of options to select on our modern life and modern technology that we use to find our options for each decision we make. Examples of having too many choices include university options or travel options if ones use search engines as advisors to find the best decision. Then, they have to make selection for one option from thousands of equivalent availabilities of choices. Not only that, but the decision-making process also tends to be overwhelming with the overloaded information about the outcomes and the risks of our selection.

On the other hand, many people would suggest many cases in which we do not have that many options. For example, if students are given an opportunity of lifetime to study at their desired university, they would not have a second thought to pick up this choice. However, I think that they are misjudged as there will always be possibilities that things could be done. Of course, some might have arrived at that decision immediately, but I think they have carefully considered the suggestions and advice on possible outcomes from other people like family. Alternatively, some students might select or at least consider other better options if they are offered full grant from other universities, for instance.

In conclusion, I agree with the idea that we have too many choices. While many people find modern life to be the main cause, I think that the decision making is complicated itself and choice overload is natural.

Sample 16:

It is argued that people today are confronted with an overload of options. I completely agree with this point of view because of the endless stream of information offered by online retailers and search engines.

People nowadays are bombarded with a vast selection of merchandise when shopping online. Unlike physical stores, e-commerce sites, such as Amazon and eBay, do not have space constraints. Thus, when a consumer searches for something on these sites, hundreds if not thousands of related products often appear. To compare them, they have to spend much time reading their descriptions and reviews. As a result, they may experience decision fatigue, which in turn paralyzes them.

In addition, search engines are making people suffer from information overload. In other words, people may feel overwhelmed by the number of search results they receive and end up learning nothing. Take for example those who are searching YouTube for how to get a band 7 on the IELTS writing test. In a second, they would get so many recommendations from the platform's algorithm. They may feel they need to watch all these videos so that they do not miss out on any valuable content. But in the end, they may get confused by the different advice given by those video creators, and still do not know the key to scoring high on the writing test.

In conclusion, I believe that people nowadays are faced with an excess of choices because of the number of suggestions they get from online retailers and search engines.

Sample 17:

It is often that modern life presents us with an overwhelming number of choices. I completely agree with this, and I believe that the Internet and globalisation are the two major factors involved.

It is undeniable that the Internet has led to a dramatic expansion in the number of choices that are available to us. The number of online media options, for instance, is now almost endless. There are countless websites offering entertainment, news, videos, on-demand TV and music streaming, many of which are free. I would argue that this abundance of media leads to confusion about the content that we consume. A personal example of this trend would be the fact that I had a choice of just four TV channels when I was a child, whereas I now have access to thousands of films and series through services like Netflix.

Alongside the influence of the Internet, globalisation is making the world smaller and compounding this problem of too much choice. Cheap international flights have made overseas travel possible for millions of people, but this also means that we are faced with a world of options when deciding where to go on holiday or even where to live. We no longer have the limited but simple travel choices of our grandparents' generation. The same is true if we look at the increasing tendency for young people to study abroad. While the opportunity for oversea study seems appealing, many students are confused about where to go and which path to take.

In conclusion, we are faced with a huge number of options in most areas of life nowadays, and this is often more bewildering than beneficial.

Sample 18:

It is common nowadays to hear people decrying the number of choices people have relative to the past and proclaiming the drawbacks of so many easily available options in a variety of areas of life. While I think that there is some truth in this, increased choice is ultimately a positive trend because it opens up options outside the mainstream.

The main reason why increased choice is considered a negative development is it makes life more complicated. Take for example the number of products people can choose from today. Supermarkets are filled with different brands with hardly any meaningful differences. This can cause people to waste time and energy making choices with little actual impact. This is also the case when it comes to online streaming services like Netflix, Hulu and HBO. Not only do people have to spend time researching these sites but once they make a choice, they are limiting what they will be able to watch in the future. If they decide to subscribe to all of them, suddenly they will be paying upwards of $40 a month for basic viewing content. These are a couple of ways in which choice can take up time and make life more complex.

Although choice introduces a level of complexity to life, the main benefit is that it opens up options for people outside dominant cultural trends. The best example of this is the changes that have taken place in the music industry over the last 20 years with the advent of iTunes and streaming services. In the past, the big pop acts dominated the radio and album sales. Now the music scene is much more fractured. This makes it more difficult for some artists but also opens up the possibility that you can find a niche of music that you and some other people love. This has been replicated in other areas like podcasting, painting, and film as well. People can find what interests them outside of what major companies are trying to push. That is why increased choice is positive taken as a whole.

In conclusion, the drawbacks of increased choice do not outweigh the advantages gained by allowing people to explore what interests them the most. In the future, this will continue and present challenges but also allow for a more diverse cultural experience for rich and poor alike, all over the world.

Sample 19:

In the present era, it’s a growing belief that people are kindled with numerous options in any situation they are pushed into. I tend to concur with this view and personally feel variety has made us indecisive about buying groceries, fashion and electronics and even to choose a life partner, options are myriad.

A finite number of options are healthy but too many of them paralyze us. In any circumstance where an individual has to choose and make a decision, a plethora of options places him/her in a paradox of choice. For instance: Visit any fashion street where niche brand stores are located. People get into a choice dilemma like which brand or clothing style will look good on them or are they not thrown into a situation of opportunity lost where they might end up buying something which they later regret.

Another situation has been cited from psychological realm. Satisfaction of mind is often observed to be lost by those who are encountered in such situations as a choice dilemma. Anxiety and hysteria are also the by product of unsatisfied mind. For example: People are in too much anxiety and stress when looking for a life partner. Earlier the spouse was selected from within the extended family or from within the same region, but today due to globalization people tend to move all over the world to choose a good life partner.

Finally, to conclude, no doubt the present time has provided was with innumerable options, but it is for us to align ourselves within limited options as more of it can destroy our discretion of selection.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.

Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.

At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.

In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.

Sample 2:

Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.

To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.

Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.

To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.

Sample 3:

There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.

The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.

There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.

In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.

Sample 4:

Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.

To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.

However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.

In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.

Sample 5:

Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.

To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.

In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.

In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Medical studies have shown that smoking not only leads to health problems for the smoker, but also for people close by. As a result of this, many believe that smoking should not be allowed in public places. Although there are arguments on both sides, I strongly agree that a ban is the most appropriate course of action.

Opponents of such a ban argue against it for several reasons. Firstly, they say that passive smokers make the choice to breathe in other people’s smoke by going to places where it is allowed. If they would prefer not to smoke passively, then they do not need to visit places where smoking is permitted. In addition, they believe a ban would possibly drive many bars and pubs out of business as smokers would not go there anymore. They also argue it is a matter of freedom of choice. Smoking is not against the law, so individuals should have the freedom to smoke wherever they wish.

However, there are more convincing arguments in favour of a ban. First and foremost, it has been proven that tobacco consists of carcinogenic compounds which cause serious harm to a person’s health, not only the smoker. Anyone around them can develop cancers of the lungs, mouth and throat, and other sides in the body. It is simply not fair to impose this upon another person. It is also the case that people’s health is more important than businesses. In any case, pubs and restaurants could adapt to a ban by, for example, allowing smoking areas.

In conclusion, it is clear that it should be made illegal to smoke in public places. This would improve the health of thousands of people, and that is most definitely a positive development.

Sample 2:

The earlier we can ban smoking in public places, the better it would be for humankind. Having foreseen the same, many offices and governing bodies imposed a strict ban on public smoking. This measure is generally applauded by the majority of mass. However, the opposing minority interrupts this ban as an act of arrest on one's free will. Let us discuss this moot issue below.

It is generally agreed and even proven with scientific studies, that smoking is injurious to health. The health problems that smoking can induce are numerous. Cancer is among the major detrimental effects of smoking on one’s health. As clearly shown on cigarette packages, smoking is a primary cause of cancer. Furthermore, the effects of smoking on the systemic and peripheral circulation in the human body are appalling, as put forward by medical experts. The havoc of this insane habit is so horrifying that research points towards its possible harmful effects on unborn children, even. Smoking is considered as a culprit among the many, behind congenital birth defects and anomalies.

Another factor significant to this context would be the financial constraints imposed by smoking. In many developing countries, where people work on daily wages, the habit of smoking has an atrocious impact on their quality of life. In the majority of the mediocre families, around the world, smoking drains the significant part of their family budgets. For example, I witnessed many problems with reference to my father being a chronic smoker and the financial crisis it caused.

The amount of carbon and other toxic elements exhaled into the atmosphere by active smokers has reached such dizzy heights that its effect on passive smokers is more or less a reality now. In fact, the effect of first-hand smoke is seen permeable to even the second and third-hand smokers in the spectrum. The significance of the public ban on smoking is not just justifying but a necessity as it calls for. As a result, it is widely banned in some offices and institutions. Awareness programmes are being conducted all around the world against this habit.

Though the public ban on smoking is an individual constraint to one's freedom, considering the passive effects of smoking I would strongly agree with the ban. In my view, this would be a punitive measure to safeguard the health and wealth of the public or the society.

Sample 3:

Smoking has inevitably been a concern of governments around the globe considering how to manage and educate smoking people. This is due largely to the danger of the substance contained in cigarettes, nicotine. As its drawback may also occur for the people near the smokers, policies related to this, particularly in public places, should be taken into account; whether it should be banned or not.

I personally think that forbidding such a dangerous activity will be much more beneficial, as it can prevent others from developing a vulnerable respiratory system. Moreover, this can keep the places so clean that people could always find them fascinating with less air pollution. However, governments should consciously provide some special places which, in this case, can be used for smoking.

On the other hand, people who have currently become addicted to smoke would find it hard to avoid smoking in such places. As a result, they may smoke, breaking the rule and not even feeling guilty. For this reason, there are two steps then to encounter this probable emerging problem. First, some strict laws and appropriate punishments, such as to pay more tax or to give any charity orphans or others needing. Second, education is one of the most prominent and essential ways to change people’s belief in terms of having their cigarette burnt.

However, banning such activity in public places is not merely a way to prevent others from harming smoke, but it will, to a larger extent, possibly be able to elevate people’s awareness of how dangerous smoking is.

To sum up, despite it being difficult for smokers to quit, the policy which bans smoking in public places should be applied in order to save others. Nonetheless, people’s education in terms of the drawbacks of smoking is a part of this aim.

Sample 4:

Smoking has been a major public health issue for decades, and despite numerous efforts to discourage the habit, it continues to be a prevalent problem in society. Not only does smoking harm the individual who partakes in the habit, but it also poses a significant risk to those who are in close proximity to the smoker. For this reason, many argue that smoking should be banned in public places in order to protect the health and well-being of the general population.

First and foremost, it is widely known that smoking causes a myriad of health issues for the individual who smokes. From lung cancer to heart disease, the negative impact of smoking on one's health is undeniable. However, what is often overlooked is the fact that secondhand smoke can also have serious consequences for non-smokers. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), secondhand smoke contains over 7,000 chemicals, hundreds of which are toxic and about 70 that can cause cancer. When non-smokers are exposed to these harmful chemicals, they are at an increased risk for developing the same health issues as smokers, including lung cancer, heart disease, and respiratory problems. This means that not only are smokers jeopardizing their own health, but they are also putting those around them in harm's way.

Furthermore, smoking in public places can have a negative impact on the overall environment. Cigarette butts, which are the most common form of litter, contain toxic chemicals that can leach into the soil and water, posing a threat to wildlife and polluting the ecosystem. In addition, the smoke itself contributes to air pollution, which can have detrimental effects on the environment and public health. By implementing a ban on smoking in public places, we can reduce the amount of secondhand smoke that non-smokers are exposed to and mitigate the environmental impact of smoking.

While some may argue that a ban on smoking in public places infringes upon an individual's right to smoke, it is important to consider the greater good of the population. The potential health risks and environmental impact of smoking far outweigh the desire of an individual to smoke in public spaces. By implementing a ban on smoking in public places, we can protect the health and well-being of both smokers and non-smokers, as well as the environment.

In conclusion, smoking not only harms the smoker, but also poses a significant risk to those who are nearby. With the potential health risks and environmental impact in mind, it is clear that smoking should be banned in public places. By doing so, we can create a healthier and safer environment for all members of society.

Sample 5:

In the present era, there is a rising trend of smoking, especially among the younger generation. Smoking has evident detrimental effects on both the smoker and the people in his surroundings. It is claimed that smoking should be prohibited in public areas. I strongly agree that smoking should be banned publicly to prevent its negative aspects on people.

To begin, there are many drawbacks of smoking which have progressive impacts on both individual and environmental level. First and foremost, it increases the risk of many health related issues in human beings, due to presence of disease producing chemicals in tobacco . For instance, a rising trend of lung related diseases, like tuberculosis and lung cancer, has been reported in smokers. Furthermore, smoke not only damages the body of the smoker, but also results in many unfavourable outcomes in the surrounding people. Moreover, it is very distressful and challenging for non-smokers to work in smoking places. So, there is urgent need to halt smoking in populated areas.

There is, however, a faction that claims that there are some challenges in preventing public smoking. Firstly, many resources will be consumed to construct specified smoking areas to restrict smoking at workplace and other public places. Simultaneously, there might be no checks and balances on people who are constrained to stay in specific smoking places.

To recapitulate, although there are few disadvantages of stopping people from smoking publicly, it has many beneficial impacts. I strongly agree to halt smoking in populated areas because it will remarkably decline the percentage of health related problems. Moreover, in the same way, it can aid in developing a comfortable environment at the workplace, as well as at other public places like shopping malls, restaurants and public transport.

Sample 6:

In the contemporary era, it is a moot point that smoking has detrimental effects on the smoker as well as the people living around him. A significant chunk of the community welcomes the conception, whereas the remaining members oppose the same. In this essay, I will explain this point of view in detail with the relevant examples to support my argument.

I am in agreement to a large extent with the aforementioned notion. Multifarious reasons can be discussed to justify my stance. The most conspicuous one is the smoker himself welcomes deadly diseases like cancer (mouth and lungs), kidney failure to his body. For instance, a cigarette contains killing components like tobacco, nicotine, and carbon monoxide these destroy the airbus of the lungs. As a consequence, a person’s digestive system starts to stop working. Its impacts do not appear overnight but if its consumption lasts for years a brutal death can knock at your door. Additionally, it is more harmful to passive smokers. To illustrate this, I would quote an instance of my friend who is suffering from lung cancer. However, he had never smoked in his life. He got infected just because his father is an active smoker. Having lived in the same house inhaling cigarette smoke he got affected.

On the other hand, I do have some grounds against the central idea. First and foremost, rationale is it may bring some of the businesses to an end. For instance, pubs and discos are usually visited by a proportion of 80% of smokers. If it is banned completely, it will wash off the above-mentioned businesses.

To put it in a nutshell, I personally believe that it is difficult to persuade people to quit but it must be prohibited in public places. Moreover, in clubs, there should be a separate area for smoking so passive smokers would not suffer.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP