Câu hỏi:
10/01/2025 294The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60-64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
The bar charts illustrate the percentage of senior demographics from 60-64 who were still members of the labour force, classified by genders, in 1970 and 2000.
Looking at the graph from a general perspective, it is readily apparent that regardless of countries, there were fewer and fewer senior employees over the time with women witnessing a more drastic downturn than men. Also, Belgium recorded the most rapid decline in the percentage of working old people regarding both genders.
In 1970, 79% and 76% of men aged 60-64 were employed in Belgium and Japan in turn, a bit lower than those of the USA (86%) and Indonesia (84%). 30 years later, these figures declined by 8 to 13% in three countries namely the USA, Japan and Indonesia whilst a substantial drop of 27% was seen in the proportion of working males in Belgium.
Meanwhile, there was a wider discrepancy among employed women aged 60-64 in four nations compared to men. In 1970, the USA headed the list with 78% working females. Next came Indonesia (65%), Belgium (63%), and last position was Japan with only 56%. In 2000, there were remarkable falls to around 45 to 50% in the figures for USA, Japan and Indonesia, approximately six times higher than that of Belgium, representing a negligible 8%.
Sample 2:
Illustrated in the bar chart is the proportion of men and women aged between 60 and 64 who were employed in four countries.
Overall, the employment rate for both males and females in all four listed countries saw a substantial decline after 30 years. Moreover, the proportion of employed males aged 60-64 was invariably higher than that of their counterpart in the two given years, regardless of the country.
In 1970, roughly 83% of Indonesian men aged 60-64 were employed, which was second only to the USA’s 86%. Employed women of the same age bracket in Indonesia and USA represented 50% and 76% respectively. In 2000, while employment rates for males in both mentioned countries declined by roughly 10%, the percentage of employed females in Indonesia rose to surpass that of the USA (50% compared to 45%).
Initially, Japan was the country where the statistical difference between employed males and females was the largest, with 75% for the former compared to 56% for the latter. However, after the next 30 years, the largest gap was to be seen in Belgium where 51% of males were employed – approximately 40% higher than the figure for their counterpart.
Sample 3:
The bar chart depicts the employment rates of individuals aged 60 to 64, categorized by gender, in four different countries.
In general, there was a significant decrease in employment rates for both men and women across all four countries over a span of 30 years. Additionally, regardless of the country, the percentage of employed males in the 60-64 age group consistently exceeded that of females in both years.
In 1970, 86% of men aged 60-64 in the USA were employed, which was the highest among the four countries and was a slight margin ahead of Indonesia’s male employment rate by a mere 2%. Similarly, the employment rate for women in the same age group was much higher in the former than in the latter, at 78% and 65% respectively. By 2000, there was a decline of 8% and 10% in employment rates for males in the USA and Indonesia respectively. Mirroring the same trend, albeit much more pronounced, female employment rates fell to 45% and 50% respectively.
Initially, Japan ranked fourth in employment of this age cohort, with 76% for males compared to 56% for females, but both figures went down to 63% and 47%, concluding at the third position. Belgium had 79% of males and 63% of females aged 60-64 employed in 1970, higher than Japan’s; however, thereafter, 52% of males at that age still worked while a minority of senior women in this nation were employed (8%), both of which were lowest among these nations.
Sample 4:
The bar chart depicts the employment rates of individuals aged 60 to 64, categorized by gender, in four different countries.
In general, there was a significant decrease in employment rates for both men and women across all four countries over a span of 30 years. Additionally, regardless of the country, the percentage of employed males in the 60-64 age group consistently exceeded that of females in both years.
In 1970, the male employment rates did not present significant discrepancies, with 86% of men in the United States aged 60-64 being employed, closely followed by 84% in Indonesia, 78% in Belgium and 76% of Japanese males. Female job participation repeated the same pattern. To specify, 78% of American women in this cohort still secured employment, which was highest, while the lowest female employment rate was recorded in Japan (56%). Belgium and Indonesia had relatively similar proportions for 60-64-year-old employed females, at 63% and 65%.
After three decades, employment rates of 60- to 64-year-old people in all nations experienced a decline. While three out of the four countries, namely the USA, Japan, and Indonesia, recorded similar decreases of around 10% for males, to 78%, 63% and 74% respectively, the figures for their female counterparts fell by 33%, 9%, and 15%, respectively. Employees in Belgium aged 60-64 presented the most noticeable change, with proportions decreasing by 27% for males and 55% for females.
Sample 5:
The bar chart provided compares the proportions of male and female employees whose ages ranged from 60 to 64 in four different countries over 30 years.
Overall, more males were employed than females in the given age range. The year 2010 witnessed declines in the number of both men and women employed in all four countries, with Belgian and American females being the worst hit.
In 1970, America was the country that had the highest employment rate of citizens aged 60-64, approximately 86% for males and 78% for females. Following this, Indonesia had nearly the same percentage of employed men at roughly 84% but a much lower proportion of women at 65%. Although Belgium and Japan had similar proportions for males at just over three quarters, fewer Japanese women were able to find employment at the age of over 60.
In 2000, the 60-64-year-olds in all nations suffered from a drop in job opportunities. While three out of four countries namely the USA, Japan, Indonesia recorded similar decreases of around 10% for males, the figures for their counterparts fell by 33%, 9% and 15% respectively. Employees who were 60-64 in Belgium were the worst affected, with the proportions decreasing by 27% for males and 55% for females.
Sample 6:
The given bar charts delineate the employment proportion of senior citizens in four countries namely Belgium, the USA, Japan, and Indonesia in 1970 and 2000
Overall, there was a downward trend in the employment rate in the examined period. In addition, a pronounced gender disparity was displayed as that of men surpassing that of women in each country.
Looking at the chart in more detail, Belgium experienced a plummet in the percentage of senior women employed, from 63% in 1997 to approximately 8 times smaller, at 8%. In the US, that of women was deducted from 78% and to 45%.
Meanwhile, a milder decrease occurred in the two Asian countries. Japan had over half of the senior women citizens joining the labour workforce in 1970 then this figure declined to 47%; the percentage of elderly working women in Indonesia, similarly, decreased to a half from 65% in 1970.
The proportion of males saw a minimal downward trend. The rate of employment for senior men in Japan and Indonesia witnessed a decrease to 63% and 74% respectively, while that of the USA only dropped by 8% to 78% – the most insignificant rate among all. Belgium had the most dramatic decrease as only roughly half of senior men in this country in 2000 were employed.
Sample 7:
The given bar graphs depict the information about the number of old age males and females who got jobs during the year 1970 and 2000 in four different nations are Belgium, USA, Japan and Indonesia. The data is calibrated in percentage.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that more men were engaged in the jobs than women during the given years, and with passing years the number has decreased to some extent.
It can be seen that in 1970, 79 % of men who were above the age of 60 in Belgian got jobs with the difference of ten per cent with the fairer sex of same age. The gradual decline was noticed in the year 2000 when 51 % of men in the same age group got employment while women did not even touch the one-tenth part. In USA and Japan during the year 1970, there were 85 % and 75 % men and 79 %and 55 % women of senior age were working respectively. After three decades, the percentage declined in regard with the women in USA more men in Japan more, whereas much decline was not observed among the men in USA and women in Japan.
Moving ahead, observing the employment trend in Indonesia for senior citizens, over four-fifths of the men had got the jobs while 64 % of women had acquired these opportunities. After thirty years, the percentage decreased by 10-12 % in both the genders in the same age group in the same country.
Sample 8:
The given column graphs compare the percentages of employed males and females in four countries namely – Belgium, the USA, Japan and Indonesia in 1970 and 2000. It is manifest from the graph that in both the given years more males were employed than females.
In 1970, the USA had the highest employment rate with 86% males and 78% females doing jobs. Indonesia came in second with 84 and 65% employed men and women respectively. 79% Belgian males and 64% females were working in 1970. The lowest employment rate was in Japan, where 76% males and only 56% females were employed.
In 2000, the percentage of men and women employed was far lesser than that in 1970 in all the four given countries. In USA, the percentage of employed males and females fell by 8% and 33% respectively from the figures of 1970. Indonesia also witnessed a decrease in employment among men and women by 10 and 15% respectively. In Japan the percentage of employed men and women dropped by 13% and 9% respectively. 27% lesser Belgian men were employed in 2000. The biggest brunt of recession was faced by the Belgian women, with the figures falling from 63% in 1970 to 8% in 2000.
Overall, the year 2000 witnessed a period of recession in all the four given countries, but the Belgian and the American women were the worst hit.
Sample 9:
The bar graphs compare the percentage of men and women aged 60-64 who were employed in four countries - Belgium, the USA, Japan, and Indonesia - in the years 1970 and 2000.
Overall, the employment rates for men in this age group decreased in all four countries over the 30-year period. Women also experienced a significant decline in employment in Belgium and the USA, while the rates in Japan and Indonesia were relatively stable.
In 1970, a significant proportion of men aged 60-64 were employed in all four countries, with the highest employment rate observed in the USA at 86%, followed by Indonesia at 84%. In Japan and Belgium, the rates were slightly lower, at 76% and 79%, respectively. However, by 2000, the percentage of employed men had dropped significantly in Belgium and Japan, to 52% and 63%, respectively. In contrast, the decline was less pronounced in the USA and Indonesia, where the figures fell to 78% and 74%.
The employment rates for women were considerably lower than those for men in both years. In 1970, the USA had the highest proportion of employed women at 78%, but by 2000, this number had dropped to 45%. Belgium saw the most dramatic decrease, from 63% in 1970 to just 8% in 2000. In contrast, the employment rates for women in Japan and Indonesia showed relatively little change, with Japan’s rate decreasing from 56% in 1970 to 47% in 2000, while Indonesia saw a more modest drop from 65% to 50%.
Sample 10:
The bar charts compare the employment rate of four countries' men and women aged 60-64 in 1970 and 2000. Overall, while the levels in all nations had declined by 2000, the employment of American men was highest in both years. In addition, the percentage of working elderly women in the US ranked first in 1970, but in 2010, this figure for Indonesia was the largest.
In 1970, all countries recorded more than 75% of employed men between 60 and 64 years old. The US stood on top with 86%, while Indonesia, Belgium and Japan showed slightly lower figures of 84%, 79% and 76%, respectively. America also displayed the highest employment level for elderly women, with 78%, whereas that for Japan was the lowest, with 56%. The gap between men and women's data was least significant in the
US.
By 2000, employment in this age group had decreased across the board. Despite this decline, the US continued to show the largest percentage of working men, with 78%. This was followed by 74% in Indonesia and 63% in Japan, whereas Belgium reported the lowest level, with 52%, two-thirds that of America. Regarding women, the 50% employment rate in Indonesia outstripped any other data of this type. Meanwhile, with 8%, the figure for Belgian women stood at the bottom, and it also amounted to under one-sixth of that for elderly men in this country.
Sample 11:
The graphs illustrate the employment rates among men and women aged 60 to 64 in four countries - Belgium, the USA, Japan, and Indonesia in the years 1970 and 2000.
Overall, it is evident that the proportion of seniors in the workforce declined over the 30-year period in all countries, with a more pronounced drop among women. Notably, Belgium experienced the most significant decrease in employment levels for both genders.
In 1970, the USA showcased the highest male employment level in this age group at 86%, slightly ahead of Indonesia at 84%. In Belgium, 79% of men aged 60 to 64 were employed, while Japan recorded a similar rate of 76%. By 2000, the proportions of male employees aged from 60 to 64 dropped across the board, with the USA and Indonesia falling to 78% and 74%, respectively. Meanwhile, the figure for Belgium decreased to 52%, and Japan saw a slight decline to 63%.
As for women, the USA led in 1970 with 78% of women in this age group, followed by Indonesia (65%), Belgium (63%), and Japan, which exhibited the lowest rate at 56%. By 2000, female employment rates underwent notable declines, particularly in Belgium, where the rate plummeted to just 8%. In contrast, the USA, Japan, and Indonesia recorded figures ranging between 45% and 50%.
Sample 12:
Given are two graphs comparing the employment rate between males and females, in four different nations between 1970 and 2000. Overall, the proportion of employed men was more prevalent than that of women in all four countries for both periods. Additionally, the rate of employment for both genders in all countries decreased.
Concerning males, in 1970, the rate of working American men was the highest, at 86%. Despite a significant drop by 2000, this figure still remained the highest, at 78%. While the male employment percentage of Indonesia decreased from 84% to 74% during the recorded period, that of Belgium fell more rapidly from 79% to 52%. Meanwhile, a considerable fall was also seen in the rate of Japan, from 76% to 63%.
Regarding females, starting at the highest result of 78%, the figure for America fell enormously to 45%. Although the rate of employed Indonesian women fell from 65% in 1970 to 50% in 2000, this surpassed America in the final year. There were 56% of Japanese women and 63% of Belgian ones working in 1970, after which the former dropped to 47% and the latter saw the most significant fall, plummeting to 8% in the final year.
Sample 13:
The bar chart illustrates 4 different countries in terms of the porportion of employed males and females at the age group from 60-64 over the period of 30 years, starting from 1970. Generally, it is evident that the percentages of both genders who were still working at the age of 60-64 of all countries dramatically declined throughout the given period, with Belgium witnessing a more significant rate of decrease. Additionally, the figures for males of all countries were noticeably higher than those for females over the two given years.
In 1970, it is evident that the proportions of employed men aged 60-64 outnumbered those of women, ranging from 8% to 16%. Of all countries, the USA topped the list for both genders, with 86% for men and 78% for women. Following this, Idonesia and Belgium respectively took the second and third position, accounting for 84% and 79% for men, and 65% and 63% for women. However, the proportions of both employed genders at this age group were the lowest, representing 76% of men and 56% of women.
By 2000, both genders experienced a downward trend, especially in women, making the gap between men and women wider. Looking more closely, the figures for the USA and Indonesia had slightly fell down by 8% and 10%, respectively, but they still maintained their positions as the first and the second. However, with a more dramatic fall of 27%, the figure for Belgium was overtaken by that of Japan, accounting for 63%. As for females, there was a plummet in the figures for the USA and Belgium, hitting the lowest points of 45% and 8%, respectively.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.
Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.
At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.
In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.
Sample 2:
Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.
To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.
Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.
To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.
Sample 3:
There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.
The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.
There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.
In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.
Sample 4:
Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.
To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.
However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.
In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.
Sample 5:
Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.
In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.
In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Everyone has different dreams when it comes to where they wish to live. Personally, I think it is very desirable to live in a large city. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, cities offer a great environment for raising children, and I am a person who values family above all else. Urban areas have numerous parks and recreation centers which encourage children to lead vital and healthy lives, and they also have well-funded community centers which contribute to the intellectual development of young people. My own experience demonstrates the value of such facilities. Both my husband and I work full time jobs and are not home when our two sons finish school. This is not a problem, though, as both of them go directly to a local community center when their classes are over. Our eldest son participates in a computer club there, while our youngest son practices photography. Their participation in these programs sets my mind at ease, as without access to the community center they would just sit at home all alone. This situation compares favorably to a friend of mine who lives in a small town and recently had to hire an expensive babysitter to watch her children when they get home from school, as she was not able to locate any meaningful activities for them to take part in.
Secondly, large cities offer cultural experiences that adults can enjoy and appreciate. Most major cities have a plethora of museums, ethnic restaurants, libraries, theater groups and other stimulating and cosmopolitan facilities. My city is no exception. For instance, my colleagues and I spend every Friday evening visiting a new ethnic restaurant for dinner. Over the past three months we have enjoyed food from more than a dozen different national cuisines. Meanwhile, my sons and I go to a different museum once a month and I have found that I enjoy our visits almost as much as they do. These are the sort of outings that are only possible in a heavily populated urban area. Small towns offer easy access to beautiful natural scenery, but I prefer the intellectual and cultural stimulation that my city offers.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that living in a large city is preferable to living in a small town. This is because cities are better places to raise children, and because they offer stimulating intellectual and cultural experience that grown-ups can enjoy.
Sample 2:
I grew up in a small town and then moved to a big city, so I have experienced the good and bad
sides of both. I never thought that I would like to live in a big city, but I was wrong. After ten years of living in one, I can't imagine ever living in a small town again.
Small towns and big cities both have some problems in terms of transportation. In a small town, you have to own a car to ensure comfortable living. You can't get around without one because
there isn't any kind of public transportation. Big cities generally have heavy traffic and expensive
parking, but there you have a choice of taking public transportation. It's not free, but it's often cheaper than driving when you consider gas and time. Especially if you don't have a car, you're
better off in the city.
I love the excitement of big cities. Small towns have a slow pace. Large cities mean you have to
adapt to a variety of situations, like finding a new route to work or trying a new restaurant. I enjoy that challenge very much. Another source of the excitement of city living is the variety of cultural activities available. There is a wide assortment of theatre, music and dance performances
available in big cities. These things are rare in small ones.
The final thing I like about large cities is the diversity of the people. The United States is made up of people of different races, religions, abilities, and interests. However, you seldom find such a variety of people in a smaller town. I think that living in an area where everyone was just like me would quickly become boring.
Of course, security is a concern, and that's one area where small towns are superior to big cities.
Still, I would rather be a bit more cautious and live in a large city than feel secure but bored.
Sample 3:
Where should we live? Some may choose to live in big cities, while others like the natural and quiet surroundings in the countryside. As far as I am concerned, I would like to live in a big city because living in a big city has more advantages than living in the countryside.
To begin with, the city is the symbol of human civilization and there are many facilities for living, recreation and health care. Therefore, living there is more convenient than living in countryside. For example, we can find plenty of malls around our neighborhood, where we can buy everyday necessities at a low price. Furthermore, people are more concerned about their health and safety than other things in their lives. In big cities, medical facilities and emergency services are more easily accessible than in the countryside. Big cities also have convenient transportation and utility systems. They also offer faster Internet connections. These all make our life easier in big cities.
In addition, we can take part in a variety of events in big cities. Human beings like to live together and need to interact with each other. In a big city, the population density is high therefore there are always plenty of social activities, sports events and concerts. There are more recreational places in big cities, such as opera houses, movie theatres, clubs, and swimming pools. You will have many kinds of entertainment in big cities and meet many people. In the countryside, however, life may be dull and quiet, and you may only have a few neighbors. Living alone with few activities can easily cause mental diseases.
Some may argue that the pollution in cities makes people sick. However, with automobiles and modern highways we can easily take a break to expose ourselves to fresh air in the countryside and sunshine on the beach.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that living in big cities is much better than living in countryside because of the advanced facilities and social activities in cities. Moreover, the autos and highways
enable us to enjoy the natural and quiet surroundings in the countryside.
Sample 4:
In our modern world, people have different opinions on where the best place would be to live, and many argue that living in a small town is the ideal location, while others argue that living in a big city is preferred. Both places have their benefits and drawbacks, but I would prefer to live in a big city. This is because big cities offer diverse job opportunities, cultural experiences, and convenient amenities.
Big cities have a broader range of job opportunities than small towns. In a big city, one will have a chance to secure a job in various sectors and pursue a career. Many big companies and industries are typically located in larger cities, which means that job seekers have plenty of options. Moreover, a big city offers numerous opportunities for growth, as one can change jobs and pursue their passion. The job market in big cities also offers higher salaries and better benefits. Hence, for those who want to make a radicle career change and those who want to earn a decent living, a big city is the ideal place to live.
Cultural experiences are another reason why I prefer to live in a big city. Big cities offer diverse and unique cultural experiences that small towns
cannot, such as trying new foods and attending cultural festivals. In big cities, there is always a movie or a theatre show to attend, a concert or sporting event to watch, a museum or an art gallery to visit. The diversity of cultural experiences in big cities provides people with various opportunities to learn and broaden their horizons, which is an enriching experience.
Convenient amenities are also reasons why I prefer to live in big cities. Cities are often equipped with modern infrastructure. Cities have better medical facilities, public transportation systems, and essential services like banks and grocery stores. Big cities have a good public transportation system that is well-planned and suitable for people who do not own private cars. People in big cities have access to modern medical facilities with well-trained medical specialists.
Despite the benefits, big cities have some drawbacks. One of the most significant drawbacks is the high cost of living. Housing and rent are expensive in larger cities compared to small towns. Moreover, noise pollution and air pollution are common in big cities. Residents must always be aware of their surrounding environments to protect themselves from the effects of pollution. Additionally, congestion and crowding are other issues that plague many big city neighborhoods.
In conclusion, while big cities have their issues, I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Big cities offer more job opportunities, an array of cultural experiences, and convenient amenities. Therefore, for me, getting the chance to live and experience all of this makes living in a big city very appealing.
Sample 5:
People seldom agree with one another, even on such trivial issues as the preference between living in a big city and a small town. It’s a bit hasty to claim that it is better to live in a big city than in a small town, or vice versa.
Living in a big city has several benefits. First, there are more job opportunities readily available in big cities compared to small towns. Furthermore, not only are there more job positions in big cities, but the quality of these positions is much higher as well. In addition, the pay is often more competitive.
Second, children are likely to receive a higher-quality education compared to their counterparts in small towns. For families, children’s education is always a top priority.
Finally, big cities generally offer a superior overall standard of living compared to small towns. There are more commodities and services available in city markets, more public utilities, and even a greater variety of television channels.
However, living in a small town also has its advantages. People in small towns often enjoy a more comfortable lifestyle. Most are free from the high work-related stress common in big cities. Although the average pay is lower, the cost of daily necessities, such as vegetables and meat, is usually more affordable.
Instead of experiencing the loneliness often prevalent in big cities, children in small towns may grow up more healthily due to harmonious relationships among residents. People in small towns don’t have to wake up as early in the morning, as there are no traffic jams, and drivers tend to be more cautious, reducing the likelihood of accidents. While they may have fewer television channels, they have more friends readily available for socializing and entertainment.
As for my current situation, although I long for the cozy atmosphere and close relationships among neighbors and friends, which are often unique to small towns, I have chosen to live in one of the biggest cities in my country - Beijing. This is because I have found a good job here with a decent salary. I think I would prefer living in a small town when I retire one day.
Sample 6:
In English, there is a well-known fairy tale about a poor country boy, Dick Whittington, who goes to London believing that the streets of the city are “paved with gold.” The story is a classic “rags to riches” tale. Dick eventually becomes the Lord Mayor of London. Like the hero of that story, I always find wonder and adventure in cities.
Cities contain a fascinating assortment of people. Whenever I walk around a shopping precinct at midday on a weekend, I am captivated by the variety of individuals hurrying through the shops. Sometimes, I simply sit on a public bench and observe the diverse streams of shoppers passing by.
Today, in the age of globe-trotting transport and advanced communication, city life is more diverse than ever. Capital cities are now highly cosmopolitan and eager to attract foreign trade and currency. There is a contemporary English joke that says, “You can never find an Englishman in London.”
Whether rightly or wrongly, governments and local authorities tend to prioritize building public amenities in big cities. Money is invested in transportation, libraries, parks, and museums. Often, countries compete to construct the most impressive “showcase” buildings. For example, Malaysia has built a skyscraper taller than anything in New York. Similarly, within large countries, regions compete with each other: New York against Chicago, Shanghai against Hong Kong, or Beijing.
All of this benefits city dwellers. The magic of the Dick Whittington story is rekindled in me whenever I enter a library housed in a magnificent building. For university students studying art or music, large cities often offer galleries and public performances. Even as a teenager, I appreciated living in a city because it gave me the opportunity to attend rock concerts by my favorite bands several times a year.
Architecture shapes the urban landscape. For those who appreciate it, a city can be as visually exciting as the Himalayas. A modern metropolis resembles a mountain range with its height, light, and solidness. At the same time, old buildings add to its charm - quaint, unspoiled side streets, or shops and homes from distant ages. Even someone who spends their entire life in one large city could continue discovering its architectural secrets well into old age.
Humans are “social animals.” They talk, interact, and create. Cities provide libraries, universities, and café bars where people can meet and share ideas with others of their kind.
Sample 7:
Some people would like to live in a small town because the surroundings could be more picturesque, and people are friendlier compared to people in a big city. However, in my opinion, living in a big city is more effective and beneficial based on the following reasons.
First, living in a big city is convenient. Thanks to public transportation, any place in a big city is usually accessible. Without driving, you have many options among buses, trains and subway. Taxis are also available on almost every corner of the city. Besides, it is easy to find a restaurant or food stands in your neighborhood within walking distance whenever you are hungry. There are also convenience stores all over, so city residents can buy any stuff easily at any time without bothering to drive to a certain place to get what they need. Convenience is the best what a city can offer while a small town is less likely to.
In addition, a big city provides more education opportunities. The residents have easier access to schools and education resources, so do they to faculty and advanced facilities. Take teachers for example, they are willing to teach in a big city because of the better salary and there are more resources they need available in libraries and related institutes when they want to go further to sharpen their teaching skills. Similarly, when children plan to take some talented courses such as piano, art, and the like, a city with more options and business activities is where parents want their children to live and grow.
Here is another perfect example to illustrate my preference of a city. I used to be a volunteer in an elementary school in a small town. Although the town was lovely and clean, there was some inconvenience caused in daily life. First, less bus service was provided, so people usually had no choice but to wait a long time to take the bus. Second, restaurants and food stands were all closed after nine o’clock, so it’s hard to find something to eat if you are hungry late in the evening. Lastly, teachers in the elementary school might need to teach many courses with different subjects, when necessary, because of a lack of faculty, that is, an English teacher could be asked to teach math or science as well. Also, the facilities in the classroom and the science lab were old- fashioned. From my observation, people can live peacefully in a small town but actually there are more opportunities and availability a big city can offer.
Last but not least, infrastructure and public services are usually prominently featured in a big city. When I want to exercise on a rainy day, I can go to the sport center without worrying about places to go. In contrast, I might be trapped at home in a small town in the same situation. Besides, public services like medical care and care centers are fully developed for people with a pressing need. Libraries also provide better book circulation and activities to cater for their readers, which is not very likely to take place in a town with the number of people which is small. For people who like tranquility and secure, small towns are the best choice. However, for those who prefer economic prosperity, a variety of things to do, places to go and activities to join, the better choice is in a big city. I happen to be the one who prefers the latter and enjoys the lives in it.
Sample 8:
It is crucial to choose a place which suits you to live because where you live has influence over the quality of your life and happiness. Compared to those who prefer to live in a small town with a quiet environment, living in a big city to take advantage of the modern conveniences that it can offer is my choice.
First of all, the public transportation system is one of amenities people can benefit from. Big cities usually provide a well-developed transportation network, such as bus, train, subway and airport, so people in the city have very easy access to the vehicles that can help them reach any destination they want to. In contrast, the convenience of public transportation is usually not found in a small town, where people might tend to drive or use other means of transport to get about.
Besides, there are more opportunities for either finding a job or taking education. With a larger population, more jobs are available for everyone to find than those in the countryside. Take where I live for example, although the job market is very competitive, university graduates often move to Taipei, which is the major city in Taiwan. If you need to develop a skill, it is also likely that you will achieve it and then get a job successfully. More importantly, there are also more educational opportunities and a lot of different courses and institutions available. There is always availability of learning something new or developing practical skills in a big city.
Furthermore, cities can provide a variety of entertainment options every day. There is always something fun to do in a big city to keep people of all different interests from getting bored. Cities provide a lively nightlife, all types of shows, museums and sports facilities. Additionally, you will be able to connect with other people who share the same hobbies at different events.
While the lifestyle in a small town is less stressful, the city lifestyle has a lot of opportunities for people. Personally, I prefer to live in a big city which offers a variety of many options. In the meanwhile, I like the energy and the convenience in a big city. City life can have many positive impacts compared to rural life.
Sample 9:
There are many differences between living in a big city and a small town. Therefore, we must choose based on our personal preferences and needs. If you prefer a calm and peaceful environment, small towns are suitable for you. However, if you want to develop yourself, big cities are the best places to learn and acquire skills essential for your future.
In life, the most important thing for everyone is, of course, health. If someone’s health deteriorates, they might lose everything they have. Small towns often provide a healthier environment. You can enjoy peaceful rivers, mountains, abundant greenery, and a clear night sky filled with stars. Life there is calm and free from the excessive noise of big cities, as the population and number of cars are much smaller. However, living in a small town can mean missing out on global news, fashion trends, and other advancements.
On the other hand, living in a big city provides more opportunities for personal growth and the chance to enhance your competitive skills. Over time, this can help you establish your own identity and attitude in society. People in big cities are often motivated to work hard to support their families. However, city life comes with challenges, such as air pollution and waste management issues. If we do not address these problems, they could have serious consequences for our future.
In conclusion, small towns offer comfort and tranquility, while big cities are dynamic and full of opportunities. Personally, I would choose to live in a big city first to improve myself. Later, when I want to rest and prioritize my health, I would move to the countryside or a small town.
I hope you can choose the place that best suits your needs and appeals to you.
Sample 10:
I grew up in a small town and then moved to a big city. I didn't think I would like to live here, but I was wrong. I think life is much better in a big city. Transportation is much more convenient, everything is more exciting, and there is a greater variety of people. I can't imagine ever living in a small town again.
Transportation is easier in a city. In a small town, you have to have a car to get around because there isn't any kind of public transportation. In a city, on the other hand, there are usually buses and taxis, and some cities have subways. Cities often have heavy traffic, and expensive parking, but it doesn't matter because you can always take the bus. Using public transportation is usually cheaper and more convenient than driving a car, but you don't have this choice in a small town.
City life is more exciting than small town life. In small towns usually nothing changes. You see the same people every day, you go to the same two or three restaurants, everything is the same. In a city things change all the time. You see new people every day. There are many restaurants, with new ones to choose from all the time. New plays come to the theaters and new musicians come to the concert halls.
Cities have a diversity of people that you don't find in a small town. There are much fewer people in a small town and usually they are all alike. In a city you can find people from different countries, of different religions, of different races - you can find all kinds of people. This variety of people is what makes city life interesting.
Life in a city is convenient, exciting, and interesting. After experiencing city life, I could never live in a small town again.
Sample 11:
If you were asked to choose between living in a big city or a small town, where would you prefer to live? Some people might choose to live in a small town because the environment is cleaner, and it fosters closer relationships with others. This suggests that living in a small town has its benefits. However, I believe there are three key reasons why living in a big city is more advantageous.
First, living in a big city provides greater opportunities to gain advanced knowledge and develop oneself. In contrast, the range of educational options in a small town is often limited. Furthermore, the presence of many students in a city creates a competitive environment that encourages us to work harder. While education may not be the only important aspect of life, it remains essential because we rely on knowledge throughout our lifetime.
Second, living in a city allows us to meet more people and adapt to society more easily. For example, interacting with diverse individuals helps us learn about their personalities and characteristics. Building relationships and making friends in a city can greatly benefit us as we grow older. By communicating with people in a big city, we gain a better understanding of how society functions and what we need to do to thrive. Therefore, city life prepares us to navigate societal challenges more effectively.
Lastly, living in a big city offers more job opportunities. Securing employment is a crucial aspect of life, and cities typically provide a wider variety of workplaces, such as companies, factories, and universities. For instance, becoming a professor is more achievable in a city where universities are abundant. In contrast, small towns cannot guarantee the same level of employment opportunities.
In conclusion, while small towns have advantages like friendlier communities and a cleaner environment, I believe living in a big city is more beneficial. Cities offer better educational opportunities, greater chances to meet people and adapt to society, and more job prospects. For these reasons, I would prefer living in a big city over a small town.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Bộ câu hỏi: [TEST] Từ loại (Buổi 1) (Có đáp án)
Bài tập chức năng giao tiếp (Có đáp án)
Bộ câu hỏi: Các dạng thức của động từ (to v - v-ing) (Có đáp án)
500 bài Đọc điền ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 1)
15000 bài tập tách từ đề thi thử môn Tiếng Anh có đáp án (Phần 1)
Bộ câu hỏi: Thì và sự phối thì (Phần 2) (Có đáp án)
Trắc nghiệm Tiếng anh 12 Tìm từ được gạch chân phát âm khác - Mức độ nhận biết có đáp án
500 bài Đọc hiểu ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 21)