Câu hỏi:
11/01/2025 150The diagrams below compare the layout of a typical Japanese office and a typical American office.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
The pictures compare the layout of a typical office in Japan and America.
Overall, the office setups in Japan and America are diametrically different, with the former encouraging collaboration at the workplace and the latter reflecting the independent working style.
In Japan, tables of members in the same team are placed together to facilitate group discussions, forming two large areas, each of which is overseen by a section manager. Meanwhile, the space of an American office is divided into separate cubicles with high walls to minimize distractions. The working station of the Japanese department manager directly faces the joint desks of his subordinates, offering him an overall view to monitor all the activities in the office. By contrast, the working spaces of the management team including two section managers and one department manager are located separately with partitions on the East side of the American office.
There is only one window at the back of the department manager's seat in the Japanese layout whereas two windows are set up to stretch across the Western and the Eastern walls in the American office. While the office in America is equipped with a printer copier, a storage and two conference rooms, there are no such facilities in the Japanese office.
Sample 2:
The diagrams provide an insight into the layouts of a typical American and Japanese office, highlighting the main features and the functional areas of each.
The foremost contrast between the two office setups is the arrangement of desks and the presence or absence of certain facilities. While the American office demonstrates individualized workspaces and various amenities, the Japanese model features communal workspace divisions under the direct supervision of management. In terms of workspace arrangement, the Japanese model groups desks into two larger areas, each overseen by a section manager. In contrast, the American office designates individual cubicles for each employee, suggesting a distinct preference for personal workspaces. Interestingly, while the Japanese office has one window situated at the back of the department manager's seat, the American counterpart is equipped with two windows on the left and right walls, possibly indicative of differing considerations for natural lighting.
Regarding the provision of facilities, the Japanese layout is notably minimalistic, featuring no additional amenities beyond a solitary chair placed in the far corner. In stark contrast, the American office houses a printer, copier, and storage space on the left side, with conference rooms also available for use. Additionally, the section managers and the department manager are situated on the right side of the American office.
Sample 3:
The illustrations compare the configurations of a typical office in Japan and America. Generally, Japanese offices are designed to facilitate discussions among employees and supervision of managers, while offices in America emphasize individual privacy and hierarchy.
Regarding the arrangement of seating, in Japan, personnel are organized by sections. The employees are positioned parallel to each other around a rectangular table, which allows effective communication and exchange of ideas. The section manager is seated between the two lines so that he or she can supervise the work of their team members, while the department manager occupies the central seat to oversee the entire office’s operations. In comparison, offices in America are compartmentalized into distinct functional areas. In the middle are several separated L-shaped tables, each of which serves as the working space for an employee. Managers are arranged in adjoining rooms on one side of the office, highlighting the hierarchical framework of the institution.
Turning to other features, Japanese offices are equipped with a single large window and two doors, all situated behind the department manager’s workspace. Conversely, American offices leverage natural light with windows on two sides, whereas the doors are placed in each corner of the room. There is also a designated section for photocopiers, storage, and conference rooms in American offices, which are the features absent from the more spacious Japanese offices.
Sample 4:
The floor plans illustrate two distinct office layouts, one typical of Japanese design and the other representative of American style.
Overall, the office layout in Japan tends to be designed to facilitate a hierarchical yet communal working environment, with the provision of only tables and chairs. In contrast, the American office provides individual workspaces and incorporates additional rooms for specific functions.
In a typical Japanese office, the department manager’s desk is located at the head of the office where they can overlook the employees in the room. In front of the department manager’s desk are two section manager desks, one on either side of the room. Likewise, the section managers are able to monitor their subordinates sitting at a block of six desks in front of them.
On the other hand, the department manager’s working space in an average American office is situated in one corner of the room, adjacent to which are two section manager offices. Meanwhile, the staff desks are individually organized in rows in the middle of the office space. Unlike the Japanese office, that of the American includes a printer room, storage space, and two conference rooms on the opposite side of the room. Finally, the latter typically has more windows than the former, with large windows installed on two sides of the room.
Sample 5:
The maps present the differences between typical offices in America and Japan. Overall, Japanese companies prefer an open working space, and it also has a more hierarchical structure with managers presented with clear views of employees, whereas an American office is divided into designated sections and rooms for managers and work-related facilities.
Looking at the entrance and windows, an office in the United States generally has twice as many doors and windows as one in Japan. Specifically, the diagram presents four doors at each corner of the rectangular floor plan and two long sets of windows on either wall of an American office area, whereas a Japanese working space is presented with just two doors and one window installed along a wall at the top.
Regarding the interior layout, there are two rooms for section managers and a larger one for a department manager on the right side of an American office. Desks for employees are arranged in two rows in the center, with a printer room, storage area and two conference rooms located to the left of the office. In comparison, the seating arrangement of a Japanese office reflects a clearer management hierarchy with a wide department manager desk and two smaller section manager desks at the top of the single room. Their subordinates face each other and share large rectangular tables in the lower section of the layout.
Sample 6:
The diagrams vividly juxtapose Japanese and American office designs, illustrating the cultural dichotomy in workplace ethos.
Overall, the Japanese layout, with its open-plan structure, fosters collective engagement and managerial transparency. Conversely, the American design, with its emphasis on individual spaces and defined hierarchy, mirrors a preference for privacy and organizational stratification.
Commencing with the Japanese office, it is characterized by a central, prominent desk for the department manager, positioned to oversee the entire workspace. This pivotal location facilitates an efficient supervisory role. Flanking this central command are desks for the section managers, leading to two parallel rows of employee desks. This arrangement promotes an open and collective working environment where interaction and oversight are seamlessly integrated.
Transitioning to the American office, the layout shifts to a more compartmentalized design, indicative of a preference for privacy and individual workspaces. Here, windows punctuate both sides of the office, bathing the space in natural light. The layout is thoughtfully divided into functional zones, with a printer/copier room and storage space anchoring the left corner. This strategic placement underscores the emphasis on operational efficiency. Furthermore, two conference rooms are tactically located to foster collaborative yet private meetings. The section managers' spaces, situated adjacent to the department manager’s room, suggest a clear hierarchical structure, while the employee desks are arranged in isolated clusters, providing each individual with a defined personal area.
Sample 7:
The provided Layouts offer an insightful comparison between a typical American and a Japanese office, each reflecting distinct cultural nuances in workplace design.
Overall, the layouts reveal that the Japanese preference for open, collaborative spaces, against the American emphasis on individualized, hierarchical work environments, each mirroring their respective cultural work values.
The Japanese office layout, characterized by its open-plan structure, places the department manager's desk centrally, serving as a strategic vantage point for overseeing the workspace. This central positioning not only signifies managerial importance but also facilitates an interactive and collective environment, vital in Japanese work culture. Surrounding this are the section manager's desk and parallel rows of employee desks, arranged to promote accessibility and seamless communication.
In contrast, the American office presents a markedly different approach. The layout, favouring compartmentalization, features individualized spaces, reflecting the American emphasis on personal workspace and privacy. Windows flank the sides of the office, ensuring ample natural light, which is a thoughtful touch to enhance work comfort. The office is thoughtfully segmented into distinct zones: a printer/copier room and storage space are located on one side, optimizing operational efficiency, while conference rooms are situated to facilitate private and collaborative meetings. The department and section managers' spaces are strategically positioned to denote a clear hierarchical system, reinforcing the American workplace ethos of structure and individuality.
Sample 8:
The maps compare the typical workspace of Japanese office workers with that of Americans.
The two models display striking differences, including the organization of tables and chairs, along with the arrangement of windows. Another difference involved is the number of facilities available within the office’s capacity.
As for the distribution of tables and chairs, the Japanese use large collaborative group tables, with a row of chairs for staff along each side. At one end of these tables lies a chair for a section manager, adjacent to an individual table and chair for the department manager. In contrast, American staff is assigned independent L-shaped tables together with chairs, all placed in the middle of the room. The working area for managers, located to the right, is separated from that for staff.
Windows in the Japanese office are concentrated behind the department manager, while those in the American workspace are installed on the sides.
Unlike their Japanese counterparts, American office workers are provided with several facilities, such as a printer and copier, a storage zone, and two conference rooms, right inside the office.
Sample 9:
The comparative images delineate the contrasting layouts of a standard office in Japan and America.
Overall, Japan favors a collective working environment, while America emphasizes an individualistic work style.
In the Japanese office, the arrangement is notably centered around promoting collaboration among team members. Tables are clustered together, organized into two expansive areas, each overseen by a section manager. The department manager’s workstation is strategically positioned to overlook the joint desks of subordinates, granting them a comprehensive view to supervise office activities. Conversely, the American office space is compartmentalized into distinct cubicles, demarcated by tall partitions, aimed at minimizing distractions and fostering individual focus. The managerial team’s workstations, including two section managers and one department manager, are situated separately, partitioned off on the east side.
There is a discernible contrast in the presence of natural light sources. The Japanese office layout is characterized by only one window positioned behind the department manager’s seat. In contrast, the American office features two windows stretching across the western and eastern walls, illuminating the workspace. Additionally, while the American office is equipped with amenities such as a printer, copier, storage facilities, and two conference rooms, the Japanese office lacks these provisions.
Sample 10:
The pictures compare the layout between an ordinary American office and a Japanese one. Overall, the American style is more accessible with extra doors and windows, along with separate amenity rooms. Additionally, Japanese offices feature collaborative workspaces, whereas American ones facilitate individual workstations.
Regarding conventional Japanese offices, windows are positioned between the two entrances situated in the upper extremities of the space. A department manager desk is located in the top midsection with its back against the windows. Below this are two workstations housing section managers facing downwards to a collection of staff tables and chairs that are adjacent to one another.
Concerning regular American offices, four doors are situated in the four corners and windows are placed on both sides. Working areas for employees are spatially separated and arranged in the center of the office, from the top to bottom, each consisting of an L- shaped table and a chair. A printer and copier section, storage, and two conference rooms are constructed separately from the top to the lower left, respectively; meanwhile, two individual section manager rooms and a department manager office are located on the right.
Sample 11:
The visual comparison illustrates two distinct office setups: the traditional Japanese office and the contemporary American office.
Overall, Japanese offices typically embrace an open-plan layout, with no private rooms and a preference for communal workspaces. In contrast, American offices tend to follow a more traditional layout, featuring a higher proportion of private offices and cubicles.
Regarding Japanese offices, private rooms are usually absent, and departments are often grouped together. These offices adhere to a hierarchical structure, positioning the department manager centrally, flanked by two section managers within their respective teams. The workspace consists of expansive communal tables with chairs lined up on each side, promoting direct interaction among employees. Windows are only situated behind the department managers, while the rest of the office lacks windows.
Conversely, American-style offices feature an open space at the center, furnished with L-shaped tables and chairs designated for individual employees. On one side, each manager occupies a private room, with the department manager having the largest one. On the opposite side, there are additional facilities such as a copy room, storage space, and two conference rooms, amenities notably absent in Japanese offices. Windows are installed on both sides of these American offices.
Sample 12:
The given diagrams illustrate the structural differences between a standard office in Japan and the United States.
The office configurations in the two countries are markedly distinct, reflecting divergent approaches to workspace organization. While the Japanese office prioritizes collaborative work, the American office embraces an independent working style.
In Japan, employees are strategically positioned in joint desks, fostering group interactions. The workspaces of the section and department manager, which follow a hierarchy design, are placed to overlook the workstations of subordinates, allowing comprehensive monitoring. Conversely, in America, where the size of one’s workspace corresponds directly to their position. Each staff member is allocated in individual cubicles with high walls and high-ranking executive officers have their own private rooms, both of which ensure privacy.
When it comes to utilization, the team-oriented layout of Japan can accommodate a greater number of workers with its minimalism style compared to American space. However, the U.S setting has more windows and specific function facilities like copier, storage and conference rooms.
Sample 13:
The diagrams depict variances in office layouts between the United States and Japan.
In general, a Japanese office has the characteristic of being an open-plan and hierarchical workspace, allowing managerial oversight of subordinates. In contrast, an American office is divided by partition walls and segmented into various designated cubicles for work-related purposes and rooms for management positions.
Starting with entrances and windows, an American office typically features twice as many doors and windows compared to its Japanese counterparts. Specifically, four entry doors for the American office are positioned at each of the four corners of its rectangular office layout, along with two expansive windows that largely span the western and eastern walls.
On the contrary, a Japanese office consists of only two entrance doors located in the front left and right corners, along with windows that cover one third of the northern wall.
Regarding the interior layout, upon entering the American office through the northeast door, managers have access to two areas designated for section managers and one for a department manager. Desks and chairs are arranged in two rows in the central area of the office. On the left side, there is a room for printers and copiers, as well as a storage area. To the south of these areas, there are two conference rooms.
In contrast, the seating arrangement in a Japanese office clearly reflects the management hierarchy, with a long desk for the department manager positioned just behind the windows. Across the two sections reserved for managers, six workers share a common work table within each section, arranged to face each other and supervised by a section manager.
Sample 14:
The two diagrams illustrate the arrangement in a standard American office compared with that in a Japanese office.
Overall, both offices represent significantly different layouts and functional facilities. The Japanese office prefers a communal working area for supervisors and subordinates, whereas Americans prefer simplicity which provides private space for managers and employees.
The whole sitting area in a Japanese office is shaped like a pyramid, with employees sitting around rectangular tables adjacent to the section managers and department managers. In the American office, however, there are eight semi-closed cubicles in the central area where employees can intermingle. The department and section managers are evenly separated in different cabins.
Another main difference is that there are many specific areas in the American office, such as conference room, storage, and copy. Yet, no such office facilities can be seen in the Japanese office. Besides, the Japanese office enjoys a huge window towards the north behind the department manager, while the windows in the American office are sited on either side, nearly stretching across the whole wall.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Many young people work on a voluntary basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.
Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of work ahead of them when they finish their studies.
At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.
In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion, we should not make this compulsory.
Sample 2:
Some individuals nowadays feel that youngsters should accomplish unpaid volunteer work in their leisure time for the benefit of society. I completely believe that it is critical to involve children in volunteer activity. The primary issues will be discussed with examples in this essay.
To begin with, teenagers who participate in unpaid employment are more responsible for local society. When adolescents interact with other individuals, they become aware of the issues that people face daily, such as poverty, pollution, and others. Furthermore, we have all been affected by the present COVID-19 outbreak, and many people have suffered a loss. According to "The Voice of Vietnam - VOV” a volunteer who is anti-virus and empathizes with the mental pain that the patients are experiencing, he always gives oxygen and food to those who need it the most. As a result, volunteering helps students become the most responsible citizens in the country.
Furthermore, unpaid employment can assist youngsters in broadening their social contacts and developing soft skills. Because when they work in an unpaid job, they will meet a variety of individuals and acquire a range of skills and abilities from others, such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and dealing with challenging situations. For example, a recent study in Japan discovered that students who participate in volunteer work are more sociable, enthusiastic, and tolerant of others. They will grow more extroverted, energetic, and hard-working as compared to youngsters who do not perform unpaid employment.
To conclude, I feel that rather than paying, young people should perform unpaid social work because they can acquire many important skills and are more responsible to society.
Sample 3:
There is a growing debate about whether all adolescents should be asked to perform mandatory volunteer work in their leisure time to help assist the surrounding area. Although there are a variety of benefits associated with this topic, there are also some notable drawbacks, as will now be discussed.
The advantages of teenagers doing voluntary work are self-evident. The first relevant idea is work experience. A valid illustration of this would be to increase their tangible skills. For example, an adolescent who volunteers to help in a customer service department will learn how to communicate effectively with people in different age groups. On a psychological level, the youth’s life skills will also be enhanced by having empathy towards others. This can be demonstrated by volunteering and assisting families living in low socio-economic backgrounds with their day-to-day tasks.
There are, however, also drawbacks that need to be considered. On an intellectual level, the teenager may get distracted from their study. This situation, for instance, can be seen when voluntary work is also being undertaken during school terms. There would be time constraints for both areas. On a physiological level, youth might experience fatigue as they are unaware of the acceptable working or volunteering hours and, as a result, sometimes they can be overworked.
In summary, we can see that this is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages. I personally believe that it would be better not to encourage the youths to do compulsory work because their studies might take them to a higher level in society, whereas volunteering could restrict this progress.
Sample 4:
Children are the backbone of every country. So, there are people who tend to believe that youngsters should be encouraged to initiate social work as it will result in flourished society and individualistic growth of youngsters themselves. I, too, believe that this motivation has more benefits than its drawbacks.
To begin with, social work by children can be easily associated with personality development because, during this drive, they tend to communicate with the variety of people, which leads to polished verbal skills. For example, if they start convincing rural people to send their children to school, they have to adopt a convincing attitude along with developed verbal skills to deal with the diverse kinds of people they encounter. This improved skill will help them lifelong in every arena. Apart from this, the true values of life like tolerance, patience, team spirit, and cooperation can be learned. Besides that, young minds serve the country with full enthusiasm that gives the feeling of fulfillment and self-satisfaction. This sense of worthiness boosts their self-confidence and patriotic feelings. Moreover, experiencing multiple cultures and traditions broadens their horizons and adds another feather to their cap.
However, it is truly said, no rose without thrones. Can the drawbacks of this initiation be ignored? Children go to school, participate in different curriculum activities, endure the pressure of peers, parents, and teachers and in the competitive world, they should not be expected to serve society without their self-benefits. This kind of pressure might bring resentment in their mind.
In conclusion, I believe, the notion of a teenager doing unpaid work is indeed good but proper monitoring and care should be given to avoid untoward consequences.
Sample 5:
Youngsters are the building blocks of the nation and they play an important role in serving society because at this age they are full of energy not only mentally but physically also. Some people think that the youth should do some voluntary work for society in their free time, and it would be beneficial for both of them. I agree with the statement. It has numerous benefits which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, they could do a lot of activities and make their spare time fruitful. First of all, they can teach children to live in slum areas because they are unable to afford education in schools or colleges. As a result, they will become civilized individuals and do not indulge in antisocial activities. By doing this they could gain a lot of experience and become responsible towards society. It would be beneficial in their future perspective.
In addition to this, they learn a sense of cooperation and sharing with other people of the society. for instance, they could grow plants and trees at public places, and this would be helpful not only to make the surrounding clean and green but reduce the pollution also to great extent. Moreover, they could arrange awareness programmes in society and set an example among the natives of the state. This will make the social bonding strong between the individuals and this will also enhance their social skills.
In conclusion, they can “kill two birds with one stone” because it has a great advantage both for the society and for the adolescents. Both the parents, as well as teachers, should encourage the teens to take part in the activities of serving the community in their free time.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Everyone has different dreams when it comes to where they wish to live. Personally, I think it is very desirable to live in a large city. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, cities offer a great environment for raising children, and I am a person who values family above all else. Urban areas have numerous parks and recreation centers which encourage children to lead vital and healthy lives, and they also have well-funded community centers which contribute to the intellectual development of young people. My own experience demonstrates the value of such facilities. Both my husband and I work full time jobs and are not home when our two sons finish school. This is not a problem, though, as both of them go directly to a local community center when their classes are over. Our eldest son participates in a computer club there, while our youngest son practices photography. Their participation in these programs sets my mind at ease, as without access to the community center they would just sit at home all alone. This situation compares favorably to a friend of mine who lives in a small town and recently had to hire an expensive babysitter to watch her children when they get home from school, as she was not able to locate any meaningful activities for them to take part in.
Secondly, large cities offer cultural experiences that adults can enjoy and appreciate. Most major cities have a plethora of museums, ethnic restaurants, libraries, theater groups and other stimulating and cosmopolitan facilities. My city is no exception. For instance, my colleagues and I spend every Friday evening visiting a new ethnic restaurant for dinner. Over the past three months we have enjoyed food from more than a dozen different national cuisines. Meanwhile, my sons and I go to a different museum once a month and I have found that I enjoy our visits almost as much as they do. These are the sort of outings that are only possible in a heavily populated urban area. Small towns offer easy access to beautiful natural scenery, but I prefer the intellectual and cultural stimulation that my city offers.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that living in a large city is preferable to living in a small town. This is because cities are better places to raise children, and because they offer stimulating intellectual and cultural experience that grown-ups can enjoy.
Sample 2:
I grew up in a small town and then moved to a big city, so I have experienced the good and bad
sides of both. I never thought that I would like to live in a big city, but I was wrong. After ten years of living in one, I can't imagine ever living in a small town again.
Small towns and big cities both have some problems in terms of transportation. In a small town, you have to own a car to ensure comfortable living. You can't get around without one because
there isn't any kind of public transportation. Big cities generally have heavy traffic and expensive
parking, but there you have a choice of taking public transportation. It's not free, but it's often cheaper than driving when you consider gas and time. Especially if you don't have a car, you're
better off in the city.
I love the excitement of big cities. Small towns have a slow pace. Large cities mean you have to
adapt to a variety of situations, like finding a new route to work or trying a new restaurant. I enjoy that challenge very much. Another source of the excitement of city living is the variety of cultural activities available. There is a wide assortment of theatre, music and dance performances
available in big cities. These things are rare in small ones.
The final thing I like about large cities is the diversity of the people. The United States is made up of people of different races, religions, abilities, and interests. However, you seldom find such a variety of people in a smaller town. I think that living in an area where everyone was just like me would quickly become boring.
Of course, security is a concern, and that's one area where small towns are superior to big cities.
Still, I would rather be a bit more cautious and live in a large city than feel secure but bored.
Sample 3:
Where should we live? Some may choose to live in big cities, while others like the natural and quiet surroundings in the countryside. As far as I am concerned, I would like to live in a big city because living in a big city has more advantages than living in the countryside.
To begin with, the city is the symbol of human civilization and there are many facilities for living, recreation and health care. Therefore, living there is more convenient than living in countryside. For example, we can find plenty of malls around our neighborhood, where we can buy everyday necessities at a low price. Furthermore, people are more concerned about their health and safety than other things in their lives. In big cities, medical facilities and emergency services are more easily accessible than in the countryside. Big cities also have convenient transportation and utility systems. They also offer faster Internet connections. These all make our life easier in big cities.
In addition, we can take part in a variety of events in big cities. Human beings like to live together and need to interact with each other. In a big city, the population density is high therefore there are always plenty of social activities, sports events and concerts. There are more recreational places in big cities, such as opera houses, movie theatres, clubs, and swimming pools. You will have many kinds of entertainment in big cities and meet many people. In the countryside, however, life may be dull and quiet, and you may only have a few neighbors. Living alone with few activities can easily cause mental diseases.
Some may argue that the pollution in cities makes people sick. However, with automobiles and modern highways we can easily take a break to expose ourselves to fresh air in the countryside and sunshine on the beach.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that living in big cities is much better than living in countryside because of the advanced facilities and social activities in cities. Moreover, the autos and highways
enable us to enjoy the natural and quiet surroundings in the countryside.
Sample 4:
In our modern world, people have different opinions on where the best place would be to live, and many argue that living in a small town is the ideal location, while others argue that living in a big city is preferred. Both places have their benefits and drawbacks, but I would prefer to live in a big city. This is because big cities offer diverse job opportunities, cultural experiences, and convenient amenities.
Big cities have a broader range of job opportunities than small towns. In a big city, one will have a chance to secure a job in various sectors and pursue a career. Many big companies and industries are typically located in larger cities, which means that job seekers have plenty of options. Moreover, a big city offers numerous opportunities for growth, as one can change jobs and pursue their passion. The job market in big cities also offers higher salaries and better benefits. Hence, for those who want to make a radicle career change and those who want to earn a decent living, a big city is the ideal place to live.
Cultural experiences are another reason why I prefer to live in a big city. Big cities offer diverse and unique cultural experiences that small towns
cannot, such as trying new foods and attending cultural festivals. In big cities, there is always a movie or a theatre show to attend, a concert or sporting event to watch, a museum or an art gallery to visit. The diversity of cultural experiences in big cities provides people with various opportunities to learn and broaden their horizons, which is an enriching experience.
Convenient amenities are also reasons why I prefer to live in big cities. Cities are often equipped with modern infrastructure. Cities have better medical facilities, public transportation systems, and essential services like banks and grocery stores. Big cities have a good public transportation system that is well-planned and suitable for people who do not own private cars. People in big cities have access to modern medical facilities with well-trained medical specialists.
Despite the benefits, big cities have some drawbacks. One of the most significant drawbacks is the high cost of living. Housing and rent are expensive in larger cities compared to small towns. Moreover, noise pollution and air pollution are common in big cities. Residents must always be aware of their surrounding environments to protect themselves from the effects of pollution. Additionally, congestion and crowding are other issues that plague many big city neighborhoods.
In conclusion, while big cities have their issues, I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Big cities offer more job opportunities, an array of cultural experiences, and convenient amenities. Therefore, for me, getting the chance to live and experience all of this makes living in a big city very appealing.
Sample 5:
People seldom agree with one another, even on such trivial issues as the preference between living in a big city and a small town. It’s a bit hasty to claim that it is better to live in a big city than in a small town, or vice versa.
Living in a big city has several benefits. First, there are more job opportunities readily available in big cities compared to small towns. Furthermore, not only are there more job positions in big cities, but the quality of these positions is much higher as well. In addition, the pay is often more competitive.
Second, children are likely to receive a higher-quality education compared to their counterparts in small towns. For families, children’s education is always a top priority.
Finally, big cities generally offer a superior overall standard of living compared to small towns. There are more commodities and services available in city markets, more public utilities, and even a greater variety of television channels.
However, living in a small town also has its advantages. People in small towns often enjoy a more comfortable lifestyle. Most are free from the high work-related stress common in big cities. Although the average pay is lower, the cost of daily necessities, such as vegetables and meat, is usually more affordable.
Instead of experiencing the loneliness often prevalent in big cities, children in small towns may grow up more healthily due to harmonious relationships among residents. People in small towns don’t have to wake up as early in the morning, as there are no traffic jams, and drivers tend to be more cautious, reducing the likelihood of accidents. While they may have fewer television channels, they have more friends readily available for socializing and entertainment.
As for my current situation, although I long for the cozy atmosphere and close relationships among neighbors and friends, which are often unique to small towns, I have chosen to live in one of the biggest cities in my country - Beijing. This is because I have found a good job here with a decent salary. I think I would prefer living in a small town when I retire one day.
Sample 6:
In English, there is a well-known fairy tale about a poor country boy, Dick Whittington, who goes to London believing that the streets of the city are “paved with gold.” The story is a classic “rags to riches” tale. Dick eventually becomes the Lord Mayor of London. Like the hero of that story, I always find wonder and adventure in cities.
Cities contain a fascinating assortment of people. Whenever I walk around a shopping precinct at midday on a weekend, I am captivated by the variety of individuals hurrying through the shops. Sometimes, I simply sit on a public bench and observe the diverse streams of shoppers passing by.
Today, in the age of globe-trotting transport and advanced communication, city life is more diverse than ever. Capital cities are now highly cosmopolitan and eager to attract foreign trade and currency. There is a contemporary English joke that says, “You can never find an Englishman in London.”
Whether rightly or wrongly, governments and local authorities tend to prioritize building public amenities in big cities. Money is invested in transportation, libraries, parks, and museums. Often, countries compete to construct the most impressive “showcase” buildings. For example, Malaysia has built a skyscraper taller than anything in New York. Similarly, within large countries, regions compete with each other: New York against Chicago, Shanghai against Hong Kong, or Beijing.
All of this benefits city dwellers. The magic of the Dick Whittington story is rekindled in me whenever I enter a library housed in a magnificent building. For university students studying art or music, large cities often offer galleries and public performances. Even as a teenager, I appreciated living in a city because it gave me the opportunity to attend rock concerts by my favorite bands several times a year.
Architecture shapes the urban landscape. For those who appreciate it, a city can be as visually exciting as the Himalayas. A modern metropolis resembles a mountain range with its height, light, and solidness. At the same time, old buildings add to its charm - quaint, unspoiled side streets, or shops and homes from distant ages. Even someone who spends their entire life in one large city could continue discovering its architectural secrets well into old age.
Humans are “social animals.” They talk, interact, and create. Cities provide libraries, universities, and café bars where people can meet and share ideas with others of their kind.
Sample 7:
Some people would like to live in a small town because the surroundings could be more picturesque, and people are friendlier compared to people in a big city. However, in my opinion, living in a big city is more effective and beneficial based on the following reasons.
First, living in a big city is convenient. Thanks to public transportation, any place in a big city is usually accessible. Without driving, you have many options among buses, trains and subway. Taxis are also available on almost every corner of the city. Besides, it is easy to find a restaurant or food stands in your neighborhood within walking distance whenever you are hungry. There are also convenience stores all over, so city residents can buy any stuff easily at any time without bothering to drive to a certain place to get what they need. Convenience is the best what a city can offer while a small town is less likely to.
In addition, a big city provides more education opportunities. The residents have easier access to schools and education resources, so do they to faculty and advanced facilities. Take teachers for example, they are willing to teach in a big city because of the better salary and there are more resources they need available in libraries and related institutes when they want to go further to sharpen their teaching skills. Similarly, when children plan to take some talented courses such as piano, art, and the like, a city with more options and business activities is where parents want their children to live and grow.
Here is another perfect example to illustrate my preference of a city. I used to be a volunteer in an elementary school in a small town. Although the town was lovely and clean, there was some inconvenience caused in daily life. First, less bus service was provided, so people usually had no choice but to wait a long time to take the bus. Second, restaurants and food stands were all closed after nine o’clock, so it’s hard to find something to eat if you are hungry late in the evening. Lastly, teachers in the elementary school might need to teach many courses with different subjects, when necessary, because of a lack of faculty, that is, an English teacher could be asked to teach math or science as well. Also, the facilities in the classroom and the science lab were old- fashioned. From my observation, people can live peacefully in a small town but actually there are more opportunities and availability a big city can offer.
Last but not least, infrastructure and public services are usually prominently featured in a big city. When I want to exercise on a rainy day, I can go to the sport center without worrying about places to go. In contrast, I might be trapped at home in a small town in the same situation. Besides, public services like medical care and care centers are fully developed for people with a pressing need. Libraries also provide better book circulation and activities to cater for their readers, which is not very likely to take place in a town with the number of people which is small. For people who like tranquility and secure, small towns are the best choice. However, for those who prefer economic prosperity, a variety of things to do, places to go and activities to join, the better choice is in a big city. I happen to be the one who prefers the latter and enjoys the lives in it.
Sample 8:
It is crucial to choose a place which suits you to live because where you live has influence over the quality of your life and happiness. Compared to those who prefer to live in a small town with a quiet environment, living in a big city to take advantage of the modern conveniences that it can offer is my choice.
First of all, the public transportation system is one of amenities people can benefit from. Big cities usually provide a well-developed transportation network, such as bus, train, subway and airport, so people in the city have very easy access to the vehicles that can help them reach any destination they want to. In contrast, the convenience of public transportation is usually not found in a small town, where people might tend to drive or use other means of transport to get about.
Besides, there are more opportunities for either finding a job or taking education. With a larger population, more jobs are available for everyone to find than those in the countryside. Take where I live for example, although the job market is very competitive, university graduates often move to Taipei, which is the major city in Taiwan. If you need to develop a skill, it is also likely that you will achieve it and then get a job successfully. More importantly, there are also more educational opportunities and a lot of different courses and institutions available. There is always availability of learning something new or developing practical skills in a big city.
Furthermore, cities can provide a variety of entertainment options every day. There is always something fun to do in a big city to keep people of all different interests from getting bored. Cities provide a lively nightlife, all types of shows, museums and sports facilities. Additionally, you will be able to connect with other people who share the same hobbies at different events.
While the lifestyle in a small town is less stressful, the city lifestyle has a lot of opportunities for people. Personally, I prefer to live in a big city which offers a variety of many options. In the meanwhile, I like the energy and the convenience in a big city. City life can have many positive impacts compared to rural life.
Sample 9:
There are many differences between living in a big city and a small town. Therefore, we must choose based on our personal preferences and needs. If you prefer a calm and peaceful environment, small towns are suitable for you. However, if you want to develop yourself, big cities are the best places to learn and acquire skills essential for your future.
In life, the most important thing for everyone is, of course, health. If someone’s health deteriorates, they might lose everything they have. Small towns often provide a healthier environment. You can enjoy peaceful rivers, mountains, abundant greenery, and a clear night sky filled with stars. Life there is calm and free from the excessive noise of big cities, as the population and number of cars are much smaller. However, living in a small town can mean missing out on global news, fashion trends, and other advancements.
On the other hand, living in a big city provides more opportunities for personal growth and the chance to enhance your competitive skills. Over time, this can help you establish your own identity and attitude in society. People in big cities are often motivated to work hard to support their families. However, city life comes with challenges, such as air pollution and waste management issues. If we do not address these problems, they could have serious consequences for our future.
In conclusion, small towns offer comfort and tranquility, while big cities are dynamic and full of opportunities. Personally, I would choose to live in a big city first to improve myself. Later, when I want to rest and prioritize my health, I would move to the countryside or a small town.
I hope you can choose the place that best suits your needs and appeals to you.
Sample 10:
I grew up in a small town and then moved to a big city. I didn't think I would like to live here, but I was wrong. I think life is much better in a big city. Transportation is much more convenient, everything is more exciting, and there is a greater variety of people. I can't imagine ever living in a small town again.
Transportation is easier in a city. In a small town, you have to have a car to get around because there isn't any kind of public transportation. In a city, on the other hand, there are usually buses and taxis, and some cities have subways. Cities often have heavy traffic, and expensive parking, but it doesn't matter because you can always take the bus. Using public transportation is usually cheaper and more convenient than driving a car, but you don't have this choice in a small town.
City life is more exciting than small town life. In small towns usually nothing changes. You see the same people every day, you go to the same two or three restaurants, everything is the same. In a city things change all the time. You see new people every day. There are many restaurants, with new ones to choose from all the time. New plays come to the theaters and new musicians come to the concert halls.
Cities have a diversity of people that you don't find in a small town. There are much fewer people in a small town and usually they are all alike. In a city you can find people from different countries, of different religions, of different races - you can find all kinds of people. This variety of people is what makes city life interesting.
Life in a city is convenient, exciting, and interesting. After experiencing city life, I could never live in a small town again.
Sample 11:
If you were asked to choose between living in a big city or a small town, where would you prefer to live? Some people might choose to live in a small town because the environment is cleaner, and it fosters closer relationships with others. This suggests that living in a small town has its benefits. However, I believe there are three key reasons why living in a big city is more advantageous.
First, living in a big city provides greater opportunities to gain advanced knowledge and develop oneself. In contrast, the range of educational options in a small town is often limited. Furthermore, the presence of many students in a city creates a competitive environment that encourages us to work harder. While education may not be the only important aspect of life, it remains essential because we rely on knowledge throughout our lifetime.
Second, living in a city allows us to meet more people and adapt to society more easily. For example, interacting with diverse individuals helps us learn about their personalities and characteristics. Building relationships and making friends in a city can greatly benefit us as we grow older. By communicating with people in a big city, we gain a better understanding of how society functions and what we need to do to thrive. Therefore, city life prepares us to navigate societal challenges more effectively.
Lastly, living in a big city offers more job opportunities. Securing employment is a crucial aspect of life, and cities typically provide a wider variety of workplaces, such as companies, factories, and universities. For instance, becoming a professor is more achievable in a city where universities are abundant. In contrast, small towns cannot guarantee the same level of employment opportunities.
In conclusion, while small towns have advantages like friendlier communities and a cleaner environment, I believe living in a big city is more beneficial. Cities offer better educational opportunities, greater chances to meet people and adapt to society, and more job prospects. For these reasons, I would prefer living in a big city over a small town.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Bộ câu hỏi: [TEST] Từ loại (Buổi 1) (Có đáp án)
Bài tập chức năng giao tiếp (Có đáp án)
Bộ câu hỏi: Các dạng thức của động từ (to v - v-ing) (Có đáp án)
500 bài Đọc điền ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 1)
15000 bài tập tách từ đề thi thử môn Tiếng Anh có đáp án (Phần 1)
Bộ câu hỏi: Thì và sự phối thì (Phần 2) (Có đáp án)
Trắc nghiệm Tiếng anh 12 Tìm từ được gạch chân phát âm khác - Mức độ nhận biết có đáp án
500 bài Đọc hiểu ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 21)