Schools should not force children to learn a foreign language, because some students don’t have a natural ability for languages. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Sample 1:

Most schools globally include learning a foreign language as a compulsory component of their curriculum. However, I do not believe that students should be forced to learn a foreign language since it will unnecessarily add to the already enormous pressure students are currently facing with their schoolwork.

Admittedly, one important benefit a student can gain in learning new languages is that they can be exposed to new and diverse cultures. As language is a defining characteristic of a nation’s culture, students can acquire a deeper understanding of how the citizens of that nation typically communicate with each other and by extension how their society operates culturally. For example, by learning French, students can form an impression of the way the French conduct a typical conversation in their language. Once they are fluent in French, they can begin to understand the social fabric of the country and how the language helps to hold it together.

However, the argument that students should not be compelled to learn foreign languages is decidedly stronger. The biggest reason for this is it greatly contributes to the already significant volume of schoolwork. Since students are often subjected to a hectic teaching curriculum with mounting homework and in-class assignments, the addition of a foreign language as a core subject may make it even more difficult for students to study effectively. Recently, the Vietnamese Ministry of Education attempted to incorporate English into the national curriculum for elementary students. However, it was met with backlash from parents as they complained that their children are already burdened with a heavy workload from other subjects.

In conclusion, I would assert that students should not be compelled to learn a foreign language since it will add unnecessary pressure to the growing levels of schoolwork they are currently facing. Instead, it is advisable that schools should make it optional to learn foreign languages and students should be encouraged to do so, not made to do it against their will.

Sample 2:

There has always been a debate about whether all young students should be introduced to learning second languages because some may not have the natural aptitude for learning other languages. While learning foreign languages can enhance socialization skills, it can also lead to potential frustration. In my opinion, both viewpoints have their merits, but finding balance is more important.

On the positive side, learning a foreign language is undeniably a valuable approach to enhancing social skills. This is particularly evident as foreign language acquisition can equip individuals with the ability to communicate effectively in diverse cultural settings. In addition, it not only enhances communication but also fosters a deeper cultural understanding. This knowledge allows individuals to navigate various cultural contexts with sensitivity to a language, learners can gain insights into the customs, traditions, and values of different cultures. If children do not learn a foreign language, they might encounter challenges in enhancing their social skills. This underscores the significance of acquiring proficiency in another language.

On the flip side, the process of learning a second language may pose potential frustration for some young students. In other words, while learning languages, they may face some difficulties due to the complexities of grammar, pronunciation challenges, or the initial difficulty in grasping vocabulary. These challenges, if not addressed appropriately, can lead to a sense of discouragement and hinder the overall language-learning experience. For instance, irregular verb conjugations or intricate grammatical rules can cause confusion and impact children’s confidence in their language abilities.

It is important to strike a balance between the differing viewpoints regarding learning a second language. While it can provide an opportunity to improve social skills, it can also lead to frustration, especially for young students who lack a natural ability for language learning. In my opinion, students who struggle with language learning should not be forced to continue with it, as it may cause discouragement. Instead, schools should focus on those students who have a natural ability for language learning, as the benefits of acquiring a second language can be significant.

In conclusion, while forcing children to learn another language can provide improvements in their social skills, it is also vital to consider other ones who do not have a natural aptitude for learning a language. Therefore, I advocate for a balance between them because teaching only students who can learn a language might be more beneficial than forcing all students.

Sample 3:

One school of thought holds that some children are unable to learn a new language, so many people believe that students should not be forced to learn foreign languages. While acknowledging the reasons behind this thinking, I firmly believe that it is inefficient to acquire new knowledge that students are not required to learn.

Many people believe that nothing is impossible unless we have never tried. This means that despite not having natural abilities to learn a new language, children have to make significant efforts, take their time, and try their best for their language skills to improve gradually. Additionally, foreign languages are seen as a key to unlocking future opportunities in this new era. Considering these factors, the argument that children need to learn new languages seems reasonable.

However, I firmly believe that schools should not force students to learn a foreign language. One primary reason is that it is a waste of time to acquire new knowledge that students are not eligible to learn. Instead, schools should allow children to focus on their strengths or choose to study subjects they are passionate about. For example, children can opt for mathematics and sciences if they are not completely talented in learning a new language.

Another reason is that not all future occupations necessitate foreign languages. People might only work with individuals in their own country, and when they communicate with foreigners, they can convey their ideas through an interpreter. For instance, students who aspire to become policemen do not necessarily need to know information in other languages. Therefore, foreign languages should not be compulsory for children in preparation for their future jobs.

In conclusion, while there are valid reasons supporting the belief that learning a new language is essential in school, I firmly believe that it is unnecessary for students to learn a new language if they are not inclined to do so.

Sample 4:

Many people debate whether or not children should be required to learn a foreign language as part of their compulsory education. While the benefits of learning another language are undeniable, I completely agree that it should not be mandatory.

On the one hand, there are various reasons why it is beneficial for youngsters to learn a new language. Exposure to other languages and cultures can provide students with invaluable insights and open up opportunities for foreign education and exchange programs. In addition, there is a wealth of information available online in other languages, particularly in English, which is widely spoken all over the world.

On the other hand, learning a new language should be a privilege rather than a requirement. Research has shown that schools forcing children to learn a new language can lead to negative attitudes and a lack of motivation. Instead, language learning should be made more engaging and stimulating to encourage children to take an interest in it. Furthermore, young people are more likely to be motivated to learn a foreign language if they can see its relevance to their future careers.

In conclusion, it is clear that children should be motivated to learn a foreign language, rather than being forced to do so.

Sample 5:

There exists a divergence of opinions when it comes to the role of foreign languages in schools, with some advocating for its compulsory inclusion, while others opt for providing it as an elective. In my view, while it is challenging to formulate a curriculum for teaching a second language that caters to the diverse array of cognitive faculties in students, learning a foreign language should be prioritized, as it can enhance the academic and professional prospects of future generations.

Detractors may contend that students have varying cognitive abilities, and forcing them to learn a non-native language can impede their process of language acquisition and overall educational well-being. The primary justification behind this argument is that children inherently possess a wide range of cognitive abilities, including memory capability, attention span, and processing speed. Some may naturally excel in certain cognitive domains but struggle in others. However, compulsory education in a non-native language disregards these natural cognitive differences, potentially leading to frustration, disengagement in the classroom, and diminished self-esteem among students less proficient in linguistic studies.

While these arguments carry a degree of validity, I firmly believe that learning a foreign language can have a positive impact on academic accomplishments and the ability to respond to evolving situations. One of the major advantages for those who excel in multiple languages is heightened cognitive adaptability. Learning another language necessitates quick shifts between different linguistic structures and rules, cultivating the ability to respond to evolving situations and think outside of the box. This enhancement in problem-solving skills and adaptable mindset can have a positive impact on academic accomplishments and facilitate engagement in the global economy.

Furthermore, proficiency in multiple languages exposes students to different cultures and ways of thinking, assisting them in gaining cultural competence and facilitating participation in the global economy and international collaboration. Students who can communicate in both their mother tongue and additional languages, while also having cross-cultural awareness, can have a competitive edge in various industries, thus enhancing employability and expanding career opportunities.

In conclusion, the benefits of learning a second language outweigh its drawbacks, as it boosts cognitive abilities and prepares students to become global citizens. Concerns related to individual variations in learning can be effectively addressed by implementing differentiated instruction strategies without hindering the overall progress of the class.

Sample 6:

It is irrefutable that languages are considered a communication barrier among the native and non-native speakers and play an integral role in individual life. Institution and schools should not pressurize the students to learn non-native speech and learners’ brains are not fully developed for acquiring the concept of a foreign language. I completely disagree with the statement. I would like to explicate it at length in the paragraph to come.

The first and foremost reason is that international languages must be taught in a school for the better development of teenagers. In other words, children are nature enthusiasts and can develop an interest in a foreign language through ample possible ways like fun and games, this leading to students being more willing to interact with these languages and enhance their innovation skills and knowledge towards their studies. For instance, children already in the language acquisition stage make the learning of a foreign language easier and get familiar with the non-native speech. To add to it, at a young age, children absorb information more easily, which eventually leads to there being numerous opportunities widely available that they can easily approach without any hurdles. In addition, if schools would apply these practices to overseas dialects, it which able students to become more multilinguistic in a short time period.

Another worth mentioning reason is that international speech is quite popular in modern society with buckets of positive assets. According to them, the age of children is a good stage for developing an interest in a foreign language and becoming a polyglot. Put in other words, teenagers are cognitively more natives and are therefore able to learn more with less input. Whereas children are more active than adults, if the schools have invested in proper training, then the lesson will not be boring, and there is a strong likelihood of success. For example, researchers have shown that language learning must be taught at the age of seven for better output and to perform well in their academics in the future. In addition, the management of the schools should criticise the students who are not willing for learning different speeches, and they must add the subjects for better performance and increase their stability in studies.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down and say that, in the modern era, foreign languages are crucial for every teenager. Without an abroad speech, student life eventually becomes mundane as well as idle and deprived of international amenities in the near future. Therefore, the school must give attention to possible arrangements to make the languages easier to pronounce.

Sample 7:

Learning a foreign language is a valuable skill in today’s globalized world, and schools play a crucial role in providing this education; while some children may struggle with language acquisition, they should not be exempt from learning a foreign language. I totally disagree with the statement that schools should not force students to learn a foreign language.

Firstly, proficiency in a foreign language can indeed enhance career prospects by opening doors to international job opportunities. In today's competitive job market, employers increasingly value candidates who can communicate across cultures. For instance, a friend of mine, Maria, secured a Marketing Assistant position due to her fluency in Spanish, which enabled her to effectively manage a Latin American clientele. This example demonstrates how language skills can significantly differentiate job applicants and lead to career advancement.

Secondly, learning a new language can be daunting for many students, presenting challenges that may initially seem insurmountable, but schools should prioritize providing adequate support rather than exempting students from this crucial skill. Tailored teaching methods, additional resources, and encouragement are instrumental in helping these learners overcome their difficulties. By focusing on creating an inclusive learning environment, educators ensure that every student, regardless of initial struggles, has the opportunity to thrive in mastering a foreign language. This approach not only fosters linguistic proficiency but also cultivates a sense of achievement and inclusivity among all learners.

In conclusion, the benefits of learning a foreign language far outweigh the challenges some students may face. Schools should not shy away from mandating foreign language education, as it provides cognitive, cultural, and career advantages that are crucial for students’ personal and professional development. By supporting all students through effective teaching strategies, schools can ensure that everyone has the opportunity to reap the rewards of bilingualism.

Sample 8:

Foreign languages are one of the necessary elements to integrate into the world. However, in my considered opinion, schools should not force their students who do not have the ability to study new languages.

In the first place, if students have to study things they do not like, it will result in them not liking it still. Children who learn under pressure will not do well in the examination. Their results are probably affected as a consequence. It leads students to lose their passion, aspiration not to mention motivation in studying. Another reason is that students would have more chance to focus on primary subjects. May children who do not have new-language-ability may have some special aptitudes such as high numeracy in math, physics and biology or literacy in literature and so on. Therefore, they should spend more time on studying their favorite subject in school or developing their creativity.

Some opponents reckon that if schools force them to study new language, they can still learn it. There is much evidence which shows the results of changing the way to teach language by creating special education classes or using more pictures and interactive activities. Despite the fact that the point of view may be true, the cost of opening these special education classes is much higher than normal ones. Therefore, in order to do that, schools need to obtain sufficient funds. It seems to be impossible while the global economy is suffering from the effects of recession.

In summary, although both suggestions are provided with the aim of supporting children’s development, no-force could be better than the other in this situation. It is not necessary to force children to do what they are not good at.

Sample 9:

Some feel that since it is challenging for children to learn a foreign language, schools should not emphasize this subject area. In my opinion, the challenge is the entire justification for supporting second language education.

Critics argue that the majority of children are simply incapable of learning an additional language. The best evidence for this is anecdotal and relates to the increasingly large burden of work placed on young children. Schools in many parts of the world, particularly in high-achieving nations such as South Korea and Japan, are in session for many hours and students learn an array of subjects. They are usually taught English, the world’s lingua franca, and this is especially difficult for speakers of Asian languages, where there is little shared linguistic history. The end result is often that students waste time and may feel discouraged and lack self-esteem.

However, children can learn languages better than adults and the challenge presented is itself an important lesson. If the schools have invested in proper training and use engaging materials, then the lessons will not be boring and there is a stronger likelihood of success. Research has shown that language learning is most effective before the age of 7, with pronunciation becoming a stumbling block for older learners who already have fixed vocal formations. Moreover, the difficulty of learning a language encourages children to work harder and expand their ability to learn in creative ways. This applies to all subjects, but languages stand out as students must seek novel memorization techniques and view the world from a completely different perspective.

In conclusion, despite the low rates of success in many cases, the impact of attempting to learn a language is itself tremendously beneficial. Schools should therefore continue funding this part of the curriculum.

Sample 10:

It is true that learning a foreign language is required in some schools. While some students may find it challenging, I totally believe that this is a discipline that all children should learn, which would be discussed objectively during the course of the essay.

To begin with, language helps to break down obstacles to communication. Because international travel is becoming a common occurrence in many people’s lives, it is necessary to engage with others when traveling for business or pleasure. Asking directions, for example, will almost certainly necessitate a rudimentary understanding of the country’s language. School is a good setting for learning a new language because children learn faster than adults. As a result, students should be required to acquire a decent command of a second, or even third, language during their school years.

Second, communication encompasses the formation of friendships. Taking up a language in school should include the opportunity to organize exchange visits between students of various nationalities or create chat rooms amongst language students utilizing social networking sites. Students will be placed into real-life circumstances where they will have to rely on their linguistic abilities to converse with a student from another country who speaks a different language, using cutting-edge technology. This serves as a motivator to overcome language hurdles and improve one’s ability to communicate smoothly. While the school curriculum already has a lot on its plate, time should be set out to learn a foreign language.

Finally, the school years provide a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to acquire a new language, and foreign languages should be a mandated part of the school curriculum.