Câu hỏi:
08/01/2025 134Nowadays, a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
In recent years, an increasing number of ill people prefer alternative medicines and treatments over conventional medical treatments. This trend may have some positive sides, but they are insignificant compared to its negative side. Therefore, I strongly believe that it is a negative development.
Alternative medicines and treatments are often not backed by scientific evidence. Many of these treatments are based on ancient practices or anecdotal evidence, and therefore their effectiveness and safety are not guaranteed. Patients who opt for such treatments risk their health and well-being by avoiding treatments that are proven to work. For instance, some people who opt for alternative medicines for chronic illnesses like cancer may put their health at risk.
Moreover, the use of alternative medicines can result in delays in receiving proper medical care. In some cases, patients choose to forego or delay necessary medical treatments in favour of alternative options, which can result in the progression of their illness or condition. This can lead to complications, higher medical costs, and even death in severe cases. An example of the negative impact of relying solely on alternative medicines is the case of Steve Jobs, the co-founder of Apple Inc. Jobs was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. He initially chose to rely on alternative medicine and delayed conventional medical treatment. By the time he eventually sought medical intervention, it was too late.
In conclusion, while the use of alternative medicines and treatments may seem like an appealing option for some and its popularity is increasing, it is ultimately a negative development. It is therefore essential to educate the public on the risks associated with alternative treatments and to prioritize the use of evidence-based medical treatments.
Sample 2:
In recent years, there has been a noticeable increase in the number of individuals with health problems turning to alternative medicines and treatments as an alternative to traditional medical care. This trend raises the question of whether this shift towards alternative medicine is a positive or negative development. In this essay, I will present my viewpoint that it is a positive development.
One major positive aspect of individuals opting for alternative medicines and treatments is the emphasis on holistic and natural approaches to healthcare. Alternative medicine often focuses on treating the root cause of ailments rather than merely addressing symptoms. Practices such as herbal remedies, acupuncture, and meditation are believed to promote overall well-being and balance in the body. For instance, many poeple who suffer from chronic headaches decide to explore alternative medicine instead of relying solely on painkillers to alleviate the symptoms. The holistic approach of alternative medicines often offers them a more comprehensive and long-lasting solution enhancing their well-being beyond the immediate ailment.
Moreover, alternative medicines give individuals a sense of control over their health, empowering them to actively participate in their own healing process. An example of this is mindfulness meditation, a popular alternative practice that focuses on training the mind to cultivate awareness and reduce stress. By incorporating mindfulness into their daily routine, individuals can take an active role in managing their mental and emotional well-being.
In conclusion, the growing interest in alternative medicines and treatments can be seen as a positive development in healthcare. It highlights individuals' desire for holistic approaches and greater involvement in their own well-being.
Sample 3:
Nowadays, an increasing number of individuals with health problems are turning to alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their regular doctors. This trend has sparked a debate on whether it is a positive or negative development. In my opinion, while trying alternative medicines and treatments can empower individuals to take charge of their own health, it is crucial for governments to regulate untested alternative medicines to safeguard against the potential risks they pose. Thus, I believe that this is both a positive and negative development.
To begin with, it is important to acknowledge that relying solely on alternative medicines and treatments can potentially lead to higher risks of physical harm. While there are other contributing factors, trying alternative medicines and treatments remains a fundamental one. Research conducted by Dr. Kim from Hanbat University in Korea revealed that over 75.6% of individuals who attempted alternative remedies for health problems experienced adverse effects due to incorrect usage of medicines. This highlights the significant negative impact that opting for alternative medicines can have on one's physical well-being. Consequently, it is imperative for governments to prioritize the regulation of untested alternative medicines.
Furthermore, alternative medicines and treatments, if not properly regulated, can exacerbate physical harm. Although they are not the sole cause, they play a pivotal role in increasing the likelihood of harmful outcomes. For instance, in Korea, the government's initiative, "Happy Together," a health program that regulates untested alternative medicines, has successfully reduced the occurrence of physical harm resulting from incorrect usage of medicines. This exemplifies how trying alternative medicines can have detrimental effects. Thus, it is clear that proper regulation of such practices is essential.
In conclusion, while trying alternative medicines and treatments can empower individuals, it is crucial for governments to implement regulations. The potential risks of physical harm, as evidenced by the adverse effects of incorrect usage, support the necessity for regulation. Balancing the positive effects of personal empowerment with the potential negative consequences, governments should take proactive measures in ensuring the safety of individuals seeking alternative treatments.
Sample 4:
At present, a growing number of individuals have switched to alternative medicines and treatments rather than seeking help from medical professionals. In my opinion, although alternative remedies potentially pose hidden dangers, the adoption of these treatments can be significantly less costly and reduce pressure on the healthcare industry, which make this modern propensity unequivocally positive.
Those who oppose the use of alternative medicines argue their alleged ineffectiveness. Individuals seeking treatment without the help of licensed healthcare providers may obtain and consume drugs with little to no efficacy, leaving their conditions potentially untreated. This can be potentially dangerous as certain diseases can cause serious complications if they remain untreated for extended periods. For instance, the only available option for those suffering from a well-researched condition such as diabetes to date is receiving regular insulin injections to prevent the onset of life-threatening complications.
However, proponents of alternative medicines justifiably point to the lower costs. Less well-off individuals can still gain access to effective medical treatments without having to incur the overwhelming medical bills associated with hospitals. A pertinent example of this reality is in the US’s healthcare system, where many patients are burdened with severe medical debts ranging from prescription drugs to diagnosis. Alternative treatments not only serve as financially viable options for unwell individuals from less privileged backgrounds, but also as a way to reduce the strain placed on hospital capacity and available resources. This tangible benefit was best illustrated during the Covid-19 pandemic as infected individuals were often able to research and provide treatments at home, lowering the risks of hospitals being pushed past optimal capacity.
In conclusion, despite being ineffective in certain cases, the shift to alternative remedies far outweighs the perceived drawbacks due to the positive ramifications concomitant within the context of the healthcare system. Governments should enforce strict regulations to ensure the efficacy and safety of these alternative options.
Sample 5:
In recent years, there has been a noticeable trend of individuals with health issues turning to alternative medicines and treatments rather than seeking traditional medical care. This essay will discuss both the negative and positive aspects of this development.
There are several reasons why the growing reliance on alternative medicines and treatments can be seen as a negative development. Firstly, alternative theraples often lack scientific evidence to support their effectiveness. Unlike conventional medicine, which undergoes rigorous testing and research, alternative treatments are often based on anecdotal evidence or personal testimonials. This can lead to individuals wasting time and money on treatments that may have no real benefit. Secondly, the reliance on alternative medicines can be dangerous when it replaces necessary medical intervention. In some cases, individuals may delay seeking proper medical care, believing that alternative treatments alone will cure their ailments. This delay can have serious consequences, as certain health conditions require immediate medical attention for successful treatment. Relying solely on alternative theraples can put individuals at risk and exacerbate their health problems.
However, there are also some positive aspects to the increasing popularity of alternative medicines and treatments. Firstly, alternative therapies often focus on holistic well-being, addressing not only physical symptoms but also mental and emotional aspects of health. This approach can provide individuals with a more comprehensive and personalized treatment plan, which may lead to improved overall well-being. Secondly, alternative medicines and treatments can offer individuals a sense of empowerment and control over their health. Many people feel frustrated with the impersonal nature of traditional medical care, where doctors often have limited time to spend with each patient. By exploring alternative options, individuals can actively participate in their own healing process and make informed decisions about their health.
In conclusion, the growing rellance on alternative medicines and treatments instead of traditional medical care has both negative and positive effects. While the lack of scientific evidence and potential dangers of alternative theraples are concerning, the focus on holistic well-being and individual empowerment are positive aspects. It is important for individuals to strike a balance between alternative and conventional medicine, ensuring they receive appropriate medical care while also exploring alternative options that align with their personal beliefs and preferences.
Sample 6:
In the present era, an increasing number of individuals grappling with health problems are resorting to alternative medicines and treatments, sidelining conventional medical practitioners. This essay explores how this shift is a negative development, considering the potential drawbacks it entails for healthcare outcomes and patient welfare.
From my standpoint, the growing reliance on alternative medicines harbours several negative implications. Firstly, the lack of standardized regulations and scientific scrutiny poses a significant concern. Unlike traditional medicine, alternative treatments often lack rigorous testing and solid empirical evidence. This absence of robust validation raises doubts about their efficacy and safety. Consequently, individuals opting for alternative therapies may unknowingly expose themselves to unproven or potentially harmful practices, compromising their well-being and exacerbating their health conditions.
Moreover, alternative medicine practitioners often lack the comprehensive medical training and qualifications required to address complex health issues. For example, in cases where serious conditions such as cancer or cardiovascular diseases are misdiagnosed or not adequately addressed, the consequences can be dire. Patients may experience delays in receiving appropriate medical interventions, leading to the progression of their illnesses and reduced chances of successful treatment outcomes. Additionally, the reliance on alternative medicines can create a false sense of security and discourage individuals from seeking timely medical care. Delaying or avoiding conventional medical diagnosis and treatment can have serious consequences, as underlying health conditions may go undetected or worsen over time, potentially leading to more severe complications or irreversible damage.
In conclusion, the surge in reliance on alternative medicines is a negative development. The absence of standardized regulations, scientific scrutiny, and comprehensive medical training among alternative practitioners poses significant risks to patients’ health and well-being. While alternative therapies may provide hope and offer a broader range of treatment options, the lack of evidence-based practices and the potential for misdiagnosis outweigh these benefits.
Sample 7:
In an era where health concerns proliferate, many are diverging from traditional medical consultations, gravitating instead towards alternative medicines and treatments. This shift, though contentious, heralds a positive development, driven by enhanced personal agency in health decisions and the holistic benefits these alternatives offer.
Central to this discussion is the empowerment of individuals in managing their health effectively and autonomously. Traditional healthcare often adopts a prescriptive, one-size-fits-all approach, marginally serving those with nuanced needs or conditions resistant to conventional treatments. In stark contrast, alternative medicines empower individuals by providing a plethora of options outside the mainstream norm, from herbal remedies to acupuncture, allowing for personalized treatment plans that deeply align with personal beliefs and bodily responses. For instance, a study revealed that patients with chronic pain found solace and significant relief in acupuncture where traditional analgesics failed, showcasing the tangible benefits and underscoring the critical need for diverse medical paradigms that respect patient preferences and physiological uniqueness.
Moreover, the holistic nature of many alternative treatments meticulously addresses not just the symptoms but the root cause of ailments, often incorporating mental and emotional wellness alongside physical health, fostering a comprehensive health perspective. This comprehensive approach encourages a balanced lifestyle, significantly reducing reliance on pharmaceuticals prone to side effects and promoting long-term well-being. Yoga and meditation, for example, have been scientifically validated to reduce stress and anxiety, illustrating how these practices not only complement physical health with mental fortitude but also contribute to emotional stability, thereby nurturing a well-rounded, integrative approach to health that champions the totality of human wellness.
In conclusion, the embrace of alternative medicines marks a positive shift in healthcare, focusing on patient autonomy and holistic well-being. It diversifies health management tools and aligns with the comprehensive nature of health, reflecting an advanced healthcare approach.
Sample 8:
In the contemporary health paradigm, an increasing number of individuals are veering towards alternative medicines and therapies, forsaking traditional medical avenues. This trend is not merely a deviation but a profound evolution, signifying a leap towards self-guided health management and the recognition of holistic healing virtues. It encapsulates a move towards embracing diverse healing practices, including those rooted in ancient wisdom, as fundamentally positive.
The ascendancy of alternative medicine underscores a pivotal shift towards personalized health care, where treatments are tailored to the individual’s unique physiological and psychological makeup. Conventional medicine, often criticized for its reliance on a standardized approach, can sometimes overlook the patient's personal experience of their condition. Alternative therapies, such as Ayurveda and homeopathy, champion the individual’s role in the healing process, advocating for treatments that are not only symptom-focused but also seek to restore overall balance and wellness. For example, Ayurveda’s personalized approach has been instrumental in addressing lifestyle diseases with remarkable success, offering a blueprint for incorporating traditional knowledge into contemporary health practices.
Additionally, the holistic ethos of alternative therapies, deeply integrating the mind, body, and spirit, unveils a more comprehensive understanding of health. This enlightened philosophy fully acknowledges the intricate interconnectedness of various well-being aspects, actively promoting practices like mindfulness and yoga. These practices, now globally acclaimed, have proven efficacy in significantly reducing stress and boosting mental clarity. They underscore the paramount importance of mental and emotional well-being as foundational pillars for achieving optimal health. This approach not only elevates the concept of health beyond physicality but also enriches life quality, advocating for a unified and harmonious state of well-being.
In conclusion, the growing preference for alternative medicines represents a positive evolution towards a holistic, personalized healthcare model. It enriches healthcare choices and promotes a comprehensive approach to well-being, promising a future of more integrated and holistic healing.
Sample 9:
The advent of alternative medicine as a preferred treatment method among a significant portion of the population presents a fascinating paradigm shift in the health industry. Although I recognize the potential advantages of such treatments, my conviction lies in the belief that these should serve as complementary elements rather than substitutes to conventional medicine.
Alternative medicine has been utilized for centuries and can often be an effective adjunct to mainstream medical treatments. Instead of resorting exclusively to alternative methods, individuals should first seek proper diagnoses from trained physicians and then potentially incorporate alternative remedies into their treatment regimen. Take, for instance, the case of urinary tract infections. While antibiotics are the frontline defense, physicians often recommend cranberry supplements, which have been clinically proven to help alleviate symptoms. In cases of minor ailments, the utilization of alternative treatments could also lessen the load on overburdened healthcare systems, allowing medical professionals to focus on more severe cases.
Nevertheless, alternative treatments should be treated as an auxiliary, not a substitute for modern medicine. A thorough diagnosis involving physical examinations, blood tests, and imaging methods is crucial to understand the body's exact condition and provide appropriate treatment. Serious chronic diseases like cancer require multidisciplinary treatment protocols such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Opting solely for alternative treatments in such instances may jeopardize patients' health due to the lack of comprehensive scientific evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of these methods. Conversely, pharmaceutical drugs undergo rigorous multi-stage clinical trials spanning several years to ensure safety and effectiveness.
In conclusion, the increasing reliance on alternative medicine is a double-edged sword. While it can offer supplementary benefits and lighten the load on the healthcare system, it should not replace conventional medicine. Therefore, striking a balance between traditional and alternative medicine could be the best way forward, leveraging the benefits of both while mitigating potential risks.
Sample 10:
The trend of individuals turning to alternative medicines and treatments rather than seeking conventional medical care has sparked considerable debate regarding its implications. While there are both positive and negative aspects to this phenomenon, the overall impact largely depends on various factors such as the specific health condition, the effectiveness of the alternative treatment, and the individual’s informed decision-making process.
On the positive side, alternative medicines often offer holistic approaches that focus on treating the root cause of ailments rather than merely addressing symptoms. Practices like acupuncture, herbal medicine, and chiropractic care have been reported to provide relief for certain conditions where conventional treatments may fall short. For instance, acupuncture has shown promising results in managing chronic pain and alleviating stress-related disorders.
Furthermore, alternative treatments can sometimes offer solutions for individuals who have not found success with traditional medical interventions. In cases of chronic illnesses or conditions with limited treatment options, exploring alternative therapies can provide hope and improve overall quality of life. This is particularly evident in conditions like autoimmune diseases, where lifestyle modifications and complementary therapies may complement conventional treatments.
However, there are also risks associated with relying solely on alternative medicines. One significant concern is the lack of regulation and standardized practices within the alternative medicine industry, which can lead to misinformation and ineffective treatments. Additionally, some alternative therapies may interact adversely with conventional medications or delay necessary medical interventions, posing potential health hazards.
In conclusion, while the growing popularity of alternative medicines reflects a desire for more personalized and holistic healthcare approaches, it also necessitates careful consideration and informed decision-making. Integrating alternative therapies with evidence-based conventional medicine under the guidance of qualified healthcare professionals can optimize health outcomes and ensure patient safety.
Sample 11:
The increasing preference for alternative medicines and treatments over conventional medical care represents a multifaceted shift in healthcare dynamics. While this trend offers potential benefits in terms of personalized approaches and holistic healing, it also raises significant concerns regarding safety, efficacy, and the broader implications for public health.
One of the notable advantages of alternative medicines is their emphasis on personalized care and patient empowerment. Unlike conventional medicine, which often adopts a one-size-fits-all approach, alternative therapies recognize the uniqueness of each individual’s health journey. Practices such as naturopathy and traditional Chinese medicine prioritize understanding the patient’s lifestyle, dietary habits, and emotional well-being to tailor treatments accordingly. This personalized approach fosters a deeper connection between the practitioner and the patient, enhancing trust and facilitating more comprehensive healthcare delivery.
Furthermore, alternative treatments often integrate complementary modalities that address the physical, emotional, and spiritual aspects of health. For example, mindfulness-based interventions like meditation and yoga not only alleviate physical symptoms but also promote mental clarity and emotional resilience. Such holistic approaches resonate with individuals seeking comprehensive wellness solutions beyond symptom management.
However, the widespread adoption of alternative medicines also poses significant challenges. The lack of regulation and scientific scrutiny in the alternative healthcare sector raises concerns about treatment safety and efficacy. Without standardized protocols and rigorous research, patients may be vulnerable to misleading claims, unproven therapies, and potential adverse effects. Moreover, reliance on alternative treatments without proper medical oversight can delay or deter individuals from seeking timely conventional care, exacerbating health conditions and compromising outcomes.
In conclusion, the growing popularity of alternative medicines reflects a shift towards more patient-centered and holistic healthcare paradigms. While these approaches offer personalized solutions and integrative therapies, they also warrant cautious consideration due to safety and efficacy concerns. To navigate this evolving landscape effectively, it is imperative to promote evidence-based practices, foster interdisciplinary collaboration, and prioritize patient education and informed decision-making.
Sample 12:
The burgeoning trend of individuals opting for alternative medicines and therapies in lieu of conventional medical treatments reflects a paradigm shift in healthcare attitudes and practices. While this shift may be indicative of a desire for more personalized and holistic approaches to wellness, it also underscores a critical need for informed decision-making, evidence-based practices, and robust regulatory oversight to ensure patient safety and optimize health outcomes.
At the heart of the appeal of alternative medicines lies their emphasis on holistic healing and individualized care. Unlike conventional medicine, which often focuses solely on alleviating symptoms, alternative therapies take into account the interconnectedness of the mind, body, and spirit in promoting overall well-being. Practices such as acupuncture, Ayurveda, and homeopathy not only address physical ailments but also consider factors such as emotional stress, dietary habits, and lifestyle choices in tailoring treatment plans. This holistic approach resonates with individuals seeking comprehensive solutions that address the underlying causes of their health issues rather than merely masking symptoms.
Moreover, the growing popularity of alternative medicines highlights a broader shift towards patient empowerment and active participation in healthcare decision-making. By exploring alternative therapies, individuals are taking proactive steps toward managing their health and exploring treatment options beyond conventional medical interventions. This empowerment fosters a sense of autonomy and responsibility for one’s own well-being, promoting a more collaborative relationship between patients and healthcare providers.
In conclusion, while the growing interest in alternative medicines reflects a commendable shift towards more holistic and patient-centered healthcare paradigms, it also underscores the importance of maintaining critical scrutiny, evidence-based practices, and interdisciplinary collaboration in healthcare delivery. By integrating the strengths of both conventional and alternative approaches while prioritizing patient safety and informed decision-making, healthcare systems can better meet the diverse needs and preferences of individuals seeking optimal health and wellness.
Sample 13:
More and more people with health issues are now choosing alternative medicines and therapies over conventional treatment recommended by their practitioners. I believe this is a negative development because many alternatives are not held to the same standards as mainstream treatments and are often less useful in emergencies.
Many alternatives are not strictly regulated. In most countries, alternative medicines are not classified as drugs and are, therefore, not subject to the same regulations in terms of efficacy and safety, or in the way that they are marketed. This can be seen in herbal remedies which falsely claim to have special ingredients that affect effectiveness, when there is no evidence of this. The same can be said for alternative therapies. Many of these therapies are not conducted by registered practitioners who are permitted to work by a regulatory board. As a result, there is nothing to stop unethical or, even, unsafe practice from taking place.
In addition, non-conventional medical treatments would not be as useful in emergency situations. They take time to work, whereas conventional treatments are developed to take effect fast. If people with conditions or symptoms that need to be relieved right away opt for alternative therapies, they might miss the window of opportunity to cure their diseases. Consider patients who require tumor removal as soon as possible. If they delay surgery in the hopes that a non- mainstream treatment would work, the tumor might grow and spread to other parts of their bodies.
In conclusion, the increased use of alternative medicines and therapies should be viewed as a negative development due to a lack of regulation and their ineffectiveness in emergency situations.
Sample 14:
More and more people with health issues are now choosing alternative remedies and therapies rather than conventional treatment recommended by their physicians. This essay will point out the overwhelmingly negative development of this phenomenon.
On the one hand, non-mainstream medicines and treatments also bring certain positive advances. Admittedly, people can save money and time from medical institutions. For instance, herbal medicines would be much more affordable, compared with the costly therapies in the government hospitals. Moreover, patients have to take turns queuing to get diagnosed in the hospitals which is satisfied by alternative treatment such as acupuncture and aromatherapy.
On the other hand, non-mainstream medicines and treatments pose negative development. Firstly, it leads to health-related dangers which are unsafe for people. Certain vitamins and minerals, according to several medical experts, are reported to raise the risk of cancer or other illnesses, especially if huge medicines are taken. Secondly, alternative therapies would have late diagnosis of serious diseases. To illustrate, people with symptoms such as cancer or tumor that need to be relieved immediately, might not be cured fast and scientifically by alternative medicines and treatment. Last but not least, if people opt for non-mainstream remedies, graduating in the medical field would be unemployment.
In conclusion, despite the fact that alternative medicines offer several benefits in limited ways, I generally believe that the tendency towards such non-standard treatments has been changed for the worse.
Sample 15:
These days, alternative medicine has become increasingly popular among many individuals who prefer to opt for treatments that differ from conventional medical practices. However, I believe that this trend is a tremendously dangerous development as alternative medicines and treatments are often touted to heal serious diseases without any backing from scientific research.
Firstly, alternative medicine may not have undergone the same level of rigorous testing and scientific evaluation as conventional medicine, which could pose a great risk to the health and safety of individuals. There have been cases where individuals have suffered from severe health problems and even died due to the use of untested treatments, and this could be a major concern for those who prefer alternative medicine. If those patients had used conventional and scientifically proven medicines and treatments, in many cases their lives could have been saved. Herbs, oils and other natural ingredients that alternative natural treatment providers or healers often use have no connection whatsoever with curing simple diseases like headaches let alone serious ailments like cancers.
Secondly, reliance on alternative medicine could lead to delays in receiving effective medical care. Alternative medicine may not provide a cure for health problems, and the delay in seeking conventional medical treatment could exacerbate health conditions, leading to further complications or the demise of the patient. Furthermore, the promotion of alternative medicine could lead to distrust in conventional medicine and a reluctance to seek necessary medical attention. This could be particularly harmful in the case of serious medical conditions that require immediate medical attention.
In conclusion, while alternative medicine may seem like an attractive option for some individuals, I believe that it is a serious negative development due to the potential risks it poses to individual health and the potential delay in receiving effective medical care. It is important to seek medical attention from qualified healthcare professionals to ensure the best possible outcome for one’s health.
Sample 16:
An increasing number of people, these days, are using alternative medicine and treatment than they did at any time in the past. I believe that this is a positive development because alternative medicine and treatments are whole-body care and a safer approach.
The biggest benefit of adopting alternative medicine is the fact it is focused not just on a patient’s body, but also on his mind. Unlike typical treatment, which just treats the symptoms of an individual’s disease, alternative medical practitioners think that the body and mind are interconnected. This means a patient’s illness could be developed by a purely physical cause but could also be stemmed from his or her mental or spiritual health. Therefore, they take the whole body into consideration. Instead of focusing on one’s back pain, for example, alternative medical practitioners consider his or her lifestyle as a part of the healing process.
Likewise, alternative medicine places the main emphasis on the power that stems from a natural and healthy approach. It uses natural substances like oils and herbs in order to cure a patient’s illness and usually does not cause side effects that are detrimental to one’s body. Many studies reveal that alternative therapies have no side effects and are highly effective in treating various health issues such as diabetes, chronic fatigue, allergies, and premenstrual syndrome to mention but a few. Alternative medicine is thus a safer way to treat diseases.
In conclusion, a burgeoning number of sick people, today, are adopting alternative medicine and treatments, and I think this is a positive trend because it is a whole-person treatment and relies on natural remedies, thereby having no side effects.
Sample 17:
In recent times, more and more individuals with health issues are opting for alternative medicine and treatments as an alternative to conventional medical care. This essay aims to critically analyze this trend and explain why this can be a positive development if the authority strictly maintains the alternative medicine industry, and people opt for conventional medical treatments when they have serious illnesses.
The rise in the utilization of alternative medicine can be seen as a positive development. Alternative treatments often adopt a holistic approach that focuses on addressing the underlying causes of health problems rather than merely treating the symptoms. This approach may provide individuals with a sense of empowerment and control over their own well-being. Moreover, alternative medicine often emphasizes natural and non-invasive methods, which may result in fewer side effects and complications compared to many conventional medical interventions. For example, practices like yoga and herbal remedies have been found to effectively alleviate chronic pain and enhance overall well-being.
However, there are potential drawbacks associated with the increasing preference for alternative medicine. One concern is the lack of regulation and standardized practices in the field. Unlike conventional medicine, alternative therapies are not always subjected to rigorous scientific testing and validation. This raises questions regarding the safety and efficacy of certain treatments. So, the authority must strictly regulate this sector. Moreover, by relying solely on alternative medicine, individuals with serious diseases may delay or neglect seeking timely medical care, which can have serious consequences for their health outcomes. So, individuals should always consult with medical practitioners when they have any serious ailment.
In conclusion, the growing inclination towards alternative medicine presents both advantages and disadvantages. So, it is expected that the government would intervene and impose strict guidelines and monitor this sector so that we can reap the benefits of this trend while also minimising the potential drawbacks.
Sample 18:
It has been claimed that more people are now using alternative medical practices rather than using proper doctors. This essay will argue that it is a dangerous development.
To begin with, there is simply no good argument for using alternative medicines. Any alternative treatment that works will be incorporated into conventional medicine, so to go outside of the mainstream is to take a pointless risk. The vast majority of alternative medical practices, no matter how they are marketed, are at best useless and at worst highly dangerous.
Using any alternative treatment has two potential outcomes. The first is that nothing will happen because most of them are in fact fake. Take acupuncture, homeopathy, or folk medicine, for example. These are simply archaic or idealistic ideas that mostly rely upon the placebo effect. In most cases, they do nothing and any genuine use that they could pose has or will be incorporated into conventional medicine through the scientific method and peer review. In such cases, a patient with an illness will not recover and will waste time in seeking real treatment. In severe cases, these fraudulent practitioners will actually harm their patients because their treatments are dangerous. These alternative medicines are unregulated and used by people who have no proper training, which means that they will not only fail to help but may even introduce new health problems.
In conclusion, the trend of people seeking alternative forms of medicine is massively problematic and puts people at serious risk of illness and death.
Sample 19:
In contemporary times, it is seen that a burgeoning population with health issues are relying on homoeopathy, electropathy and Ayurveda for current rather than visiting a hospital and getting treated by a specialist. In my perspective, it is a negative development, particularly for fatal ailments that need the treatment of a doctor.
First, depending on alternative medicines can exacerbate a person’s illness. To elaborate, when people experience stomach pain, they adopt different ways to get rid of it. By applying those, they might get temporary relief. However, in the long run, they are amazed to see that stomach pain develops into stomach ulcers or cancer. Therefore, they make it a serious disease. Moreover, every individual has different body needs. Applying the same treatment to every person can have drastic consequences. To exemplify, some adverts are telecast on television, showing protein shakes, multivitamins and oil for those with physical issues. They might be children, oldsters or women. The same things have been suggested to all. Resultantly, people tend to buy if they find even a single symptom in that advertisement. Thus, they deteriorate their health.
Furthermore, homoeopathy Ayurveda was very conducive in the earlier times, when everything was pure. But now, due to adulteration, one cannot believe the ingredients used in making medicines. Intake of these medicines creates other health issues among people if they recover from one problem. In addition, people’s behaviour is one of the biggest obstacles to believing in medicinal technology. They consider the same ailments can be recovered on their own. They are superstitious. Thus, they avoid going to the doctor for treatment such as smallpox, and measles, to name a few.
To conclude, it is clear that many people have more belief in other ways of treating themselves than visiting a healthcare centre. In this way, they make their diseases more serious, and that behaviour of the multitudes now and then puts their life at risk. If they get to recover, the very next moment, they develop other kinds of health issues.
Sample 20:
Presently, more and more people cause health issues because they are using alternative drugs and treatments without proper medical help. I believe this is actually a negative development because it causes the disease to worsen.
To begin with, self-examination of health tends to aggravate an easily treatable disease. To make it clearer, by self–medicating without going to a doctor, they may not be able to detect the underlying disease, which may exacerbate their disease. For instance, many studies show that the main cause of cancer progression today is underdiagnosis in the early stages because they self-medicate for minor pains at the beginning and then go to the doctor when it gets worse.
To continue, in some cases, the use of alternative medicine can lead to another form of illness. As an explanation, other drugs are often not good for the body, leading to various types of body discomfort. For example, a study conducted by the health department in Kerala shows that 90 % of people are prone to allergies if a person takes medicine that is unsuitable for their body. On the contrary, using alternative drugs and treatments can reduce their time and cost. Therefore, most people depend on self medicines.
To sum up, nowadays, self-treatment is more popular because of the time-consuming and reduced cost of the medicaments. However, I believe this is a negative impact because it may exacerbate their illness and also it may lead to another disease.
Sample 21:
Currently, a number of citizens who suffer from health issues are trying to find alternative remedies and treatment rather than visiting their physicians. While such solutions can alleviate the pain, they are not being cured completely and properly. This essay will discuss why eventually such a trend can significantly exacerbate the problem instead of solving it.
More people are now trying to find a cure for their health problems rather than going to experts to get treated. Many find that visiting their doctors to get checked up is time-consuming and costly. For instance, going to public hospitals can be cost-efficient but it can take up a whole day before they can get diagnosed. On another hand, private hospitals can provide assistance faster but that comes with excessive fees. Those who earn a low income, cannot afford it. As a result, they choose to find alternative medicines and treatments rather than seeing their usual doctors.
Although an increasing number of citizens are trying to find home remedies and treatments, it can crucially worsen the condition. Many of the alternative medicines and cures are not scientifically proven. When used wrongly, it may seem to stop the irritation or ache for a period of time, but it can trigger the conditions to deteriorate in the future. For example, they might be using painkillers to lessen discomfort when they experience stomaches, but they do not know what is happening to their bodies. It might not be a normal stomach pain but cancer. If not treated properly by specialists, it might be too late to cure it. Hence, patients should visit their physicians instead of trying to find cures blindly by themselves.
In conclusion, the number of people finding other medicines and cures is increasing and avoiding seeing their doctors. For many, they see it as a solution that can save time and expense; while, ignoring the fact that it could cause more harm than good. In my opinion, such behaviour is a negative development that can cost them their lives.
Sample 22:
In recent years, a growing number of unwell individuals have begun to adopt the use of alternative medicines and treatments. In my opinion, though these can sometimes be effective, this trend is negative overall due to the superiority of modern medicine.
Those who support alternative remedies argue there is historical evidence in favor of their effectiveness. A pertinent example of this would be the popularity of traditional Chinese medicine in Asia. Many of their medicines and treatments date back hundreds or even thousands of years. Over that time, they have been tested and their effect verified in some cases. Contemporary health researchers are often able to later identify the scientific rationale, but it is possible there are remedies in use today that we still do not understand. This ignorance should not serve as a justification to question their overall importance.
However, the vast majority of viable medical treatment is modern. Scientists now understand more rigorously the underlying structures of cells, viruses, bacteria, cancers, and various other maladies. This has allowed for the creation of undeniably effective procedures such as surgery and the discovery of crucial medicines like penicillin. There is no doubt as to why these medicines work and therefore in the future, they will only become more refined and safer. In contrast, traditional medicine may be effective for unknown reasons, but its applicability is limited, and it will not advance overtime.
In conclusion, with few exceptions, traditional medicine is a better alternative to less verifiable treatments and pharmaceuticals. Individuals can attempt to use them but should rely on their usual doctors.
Sample 23:
Unwell individuals are more likely to seek out remedies that are contrary to mainstream medical advice these days. I mostly think this is problematic due to potential misdiagnoses and unproven therapies, although the burden on the traditional health care system could be reduced.
The main reason why I believe alternative medications could be detrimental is the higher likelihood of misdiagnosis. Patients could either diagnose themselves incorrectly with limited knowledge gained online or through unqualified practitioners with limited liability. This is in stark contrast to doctors who undergo years of training and are guided by strict professional codes of conduct to ensure appropriate treatment.
Furthermore, many of the substitute treatments are not backed by science. Mainstream medications prescribed by doctors are subject to peer-reviewed research to ensure that they are completely safe for the consumer. In contrast, many alternative medications are designed for different purposes and may have increased side effects or decreased efficacy. For example, many non-medical professionals promoted the use of Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19, even though it was designed for the prevention of parasites on animals. Needless to say, the results have been inconclusive, and its use has resulted in some severe side effects.
However, I consider the alternative treatments could be beneficial in terms of reducing the burden on public health care for treating minor conditions. Doctors are often overworked, and it is exceptionally expensive and time-consuming to train new medical professionals. If people with minor ailments were to seek out trustworthy alternative treatment providers, the pressure on the health care system could be significantly reduced and allow doctors to focus on more serious cases.
To conclude, I somewhat believe that sourcing alternative methods to alleviate ailments is negative, as although this could relieve under-resourced medical practitioners, there is a higher likelihood of patients relying on an incorrect assumption or unverified and inappropriate medications.
Sample 24:
It is a growing trend among the public that patients are turning to alternative medicines and treatments rather than their normal doctors. From my perspective, although this phenomenon displays some pluses, its minuses should not be overlooked.
On the one hand, advocates for alternative remedies can point out numerous advantages regarding efficiency for patients and the overall medical industry. Many medicines and treatment techniques have long existed and been proven to be true cures for a wide range of ailments. Native herbal medicines in mountainous areas of Vietnam can be considered a pertinent example, since they are valuable for the treatment of coronary artery disease, diabetes, and tuberculosis, among others. Alternative methods, moreover, can lessen the strain on the medical industry as a whole, as there has been a growing concern with respect to the shortage of medical practitioners, especially in big cities. Hardly would these treatments be questioned under decent authoritative control.
Nevertheless, traditional medicine would be counter-intuitive were it to be abused in various circumstances without proper professional consultation. Herbal remedies may induce adverse effects such as allergies and asthma, which further cost the patient time and money to deal with. Furthermore, acute diseases requiring complicated medical operations stand little to no chance of being cured by non-mainstream approaches. A cancer patient would definitely opt for modern, science-based techniques such as X-ray treatment or cancer surgery instead of taking in liquid natural herbs with uncertain efficacy.
In conclusion, despite the advantages of alternative remedies in certain cases, I would argue that the trend of people ignoring modern medical treatments is not ideal since unwanted effects and brutal illnesses should be taken into account.
Sample 25:
It is evident that with the advancement of technology new cures have been introduced for health problems. Masses are inclined towards implementing them to treat their medical conditions. I firmly believe it is a negating development and one should rather seek advice of a medical professional. The above opinion is further explained in the following paragraphs.
As known to many, doctors are experts in their field, and they have a lot of experience to diagnose and treat a particular health issue. Therefore, it is always beneficial to seek expert advice rather than being treated by an alternative source. Moreover, turning to other sources of treatment can have detrimental effects on a person's health, for instance consuming an herbal medicine or starting an exercise without having proper medical diagnosis from a doctor can make problem even worse. It might help to eradicate a particular health problem but give rise to another one as it might affect the underlying health issues. In addition to this, people also fall prey to quacks. They lack knowledge and take advantage of innocent people by making them pay for their services. People are robbed of their money as well as the time. Furthermore, many a times due to social influence people adopt treatments that others around them do. These can cause more harm than benefiting an individual. Their health issues can increase because laymen lack medical knowledge. Hence, following others blindly without conduct consulting a medical practitioner can lead to serious damaging effects to one’s health.
In the end, I would say that it is important to seek advice of an expert. Alternative treatments and medical medicines might work but they can prove harmful if consumed or adopted without medical guidance.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
It is increasingly common for families to rely on products from the fast-food industry to take care of their meals on a regular basis due to its lower cost and availability. This essay will explain why I believe its drawbacks outweigh the benefits of such unhealthy foods.
One of the most significant advantages of fast food is that it offers a complete meal at an affordable price. For example, a combo meal from some of today’s industry leaders costs only under five dollars, while it would have cost consumers half their month’s salary if they purchase organic and healthy food at supermarkets. Furthermore, the fast-food industry is extremely convenient. When people are exhausted after a long day at work, the last thing on their mind is spending hours preparing dinner for everyone, whereas they will have fast food ready to serve in five minutes or less at fast food establishments.
However, fast food consumption does present many drawbacks, the most obvious of which is that it can harm our health. The reason for this is that fast food contains a lot of oil, hazardous food coloring agents, and unhealthy trans fats. As a result, regular junk food intakeleads to long-term health problems such as obesity, emotional and self-esteem issues, and chronic illnesses in later life. Another danger of fast and processed food is it can create adverse effects on society. The growth of fast-food availability in the country seems to coincide with the growth of obesity, which puts a strain on/ places a huge burden on the healthcare system.
In conclusion, the main benefits of affordability and convenience that fast food has offered are outweighed by its dangers of severe health problems and effects on the healthcare system.
Sample 2:
The burgeoning availability and affordability of fast food across various nations sparks a multifaceted debate on its impacts. This phenomenon, while convenient, presents a complex interplay of advantages and disadvantages. On one hand, the ease and economy of fast food cater to the fast-paced lifestyle of contemporary society. Conversely, its health implications and the cultural erosion it potentially fosters cannot be overlooked. This essay endeavors to dissect these aspects, weighing their significance in the broader societal context.
The primary boon of fast food's growing accessibility lies in its alignment with the modern world's rapid tempo. For countless individuals juggling demanding schedules, fast food offers a quick, economical solution to daily sustenance, obviating the time-intensive preparation of traditional meals. This convenience is not just a matter of saving time; it also democratizes eating options for lower-income groups who might otherwise struggle to afford nutritious meals. Furthermore, the fast-food industry has been a catalyst for employment opportunities, providing countless jobs across the globe, thereby stimulating economic growth in numerous communities.
However, the shadow cast by these benefits is significant. Predominantly, the health ramifications of regular fast-food consumption are alarming. High in calories, trans fats, and sodium, these meals contribute to a myriad of health issues, including obesity, heart disease, and diabetes. This health crisis burdens not only the individual but also the healthcare systems at large. Additionally, the omnipresence of fast food undermines traditional culinary cultures, gradually eroding the rich tapestry of global food heritage in favour of homogenized, mass-produced meals. This cultural dilution diminishes the diversity that is crucial to the vibrancy of societies.
In conclusion, while the convenience and economic advantages of fast food's proliferation are undeniable, they are outweighed by its detrimental health consequences and cultural impact. The challenge lies in finding a balance that preserves cultural heritage and promotes healthy living while acknowledging the necessities of modern life. Engaging in this dialogue is essential for fostering a society that values both convenience and well-being.
Sample 3:
In an era marked by the unprecedented proliferation of fast food, its increasing affordability and accessibility have ignited a nuanced discourse. While this trend offers undeniable convenience and economic benefits, it also harbors potential health and cultural drawbacks. This essay aims to meticulously examine these facets, asserting that the disadvantages notably overshadow the advantages.
The allure of fast food lies in its immediate gratification and minimal impact on one's wallet, making it a staple in the fast-paced rhythm of modern existence. Particularly for individuals ensnared in the whirlwind of daily commitments, fast food serves as a lifeline, providing sustenance without the demands of traditional meal preparation. This sector also acts as a significant economic engine, creating employment opportunities and fostering community growth. However, this superficial veneer of benefits masks deeper, more detrimental impacts.
The crux of the argument against the fast-food culture pivots on its health implications. The habitual consumption of such meals, laden with excessive calories, fats, and sodium, acts as a catalyst for chronic diseases, including obesity and cardiovascular conditions. This not only diminishes individual quality of life but also exerts immense pressure on healthcare systems globally. Beyond the physical health concerns, the ascendancy of fast food erodes the rich mosaic of traditional cuisines, diluting cultural identities and culinary heritage in favor of uniformity and convenience.
Concluding, the convenience and economic allure of fast food, though appealing, are eclipsed by its adverse health effects and the erosion of cultural diversity. The challenge for contemporary society is to navigate this complex landscape, advocating for nutritional awareness and the preservation of culinary heritage. Embracing this dual approach can steer the global community towards a future where convenience does not come at the expense of health and cultural richness.
Sample 4:
The prices of instant food have reduced, and it has become ubiquitous almost all over the world. However, I believe that the downsides of this development outweigh the advantages, because the convenience that fast food brings to the people’s busy lifestyle is availed at the cost of their healthy diet.
Fast food provides a quick solution to fulfil the food requirements of busy individuals. Due to the fast-paced environment in which people live today, they hardly find time to cook food. In fact, as the living expenses have skyrocketed, people try to spend their maximum time at paid work, rather than preparing food at home. Therefore, fast food has become a convenient option for them. For example, after having hectic hours at office, individuals prefer to spend the rest of the day relaxed with their loved ones. So, they simply order fast food instead of going through all the hassles to prepare food ingredients and cook at home. However, this can be detrimental to one’s health in the long run.
Fast food contains high levels of carbohydrates and sugar which are obviously unhealthy if taken beyond a certain extent. Therefore, when someone consumes this type of food regularly, they get sick. Obesity and heart related diseases are mostly caused by the excessive intake of fast food. For instance, the USA has the greatest number of obesity patients in the world, and this is positively correlated with the increased consumption of fast food compared to that of the other countries. This is how, due to the availability and the low price, the trend of fast-food intake has a far-reaching negative consequence.
To conclude, although the instant food has become a quick fix to men and women who are too busy to manage their food requirements, I believe that it can have some serious health implications in the future that certainly outweighs the benefits that it brings.
Sample 5:
Many today are of the belief that the ubiquity of fast food provides enough enjoyment and economic positives to outweigh its impact on public health. In my opinion, the disadvantages related to health make this a negative development.
Those supporting the fast-food industry typically point to the pleasure consumers derive and the employment it provides. There is little to argue about in terms of enjoyment. Fast food is affordable and tastes good. That explains its popularity and makes it accessible for people from even the lowest socioeconomic backgrounds. Moreover, there are obvious economic benefits. Companies like McDonald’s, Burger King, Baskin Robbins, and Domino’s Pizza are some of the largest employers globally. Their economic contributions extend beyond providing poorly paid jobs as they are taxed and thereby strengthen the federal budgets of both developing and developed nations.
Nonetheless, fast food has a huge impact in the health sector. Most tangibly, this concerns to obesity. Studies have shown that obesity rates soar in countries where fast food has become entrenched in the local market. The best-known example of this is in the United States, where obesity is reaching epidemic proportions. Related and often symptomatic drawbacks include cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and high blood pressure. Foods high in fat, sugar, and overprocessed ingredients have been proven to exacerbate these conditions, with heart disease now the single greatest cause of death around the world. This cannot be blamed entirely on fast food but there are very few healthy options on most fast-food menus and the majority of companies specialise in quintessentially unhealthy foods like deep fried chicken, cheeseburgers, pizzas, and tacos.
In conclusion, despite the boons for enjoyment and the economy, fast food is a negative taken as a whole given its impact on well-being. It is therefore important to regulate fast food companies to curb their influence.
Sample 6:
The growing popularity of fast food at cheaper prices can be witnessed in many countries over a few recent years. While some are in favor of this trend due to the economic advantages and consumers’ pleasure that fast food provides, others argue that it is a negative development, especially for the overall health of society. From my viewpoint, the drawbacks of this trend are far more severe than its benefits.
Advocates of the expansion of fast-food chains typically subscribe to the convenient consumption and the employment opportunities it offers. Since junk food usually has an affordable price and delicious taste, it is accessible for the majority of the public. People can find and buy fast food almost anywhere and anytime, so it is a perfect option for people with hectic schedules and do not have time for home-cooked meals. Aside from the convenience for consumers, the fast-food industry also makes contributions to the economy. Companies like KFC, Lotteria, or McDonald’s are large employers that create jobs for millions of people every year, helping to lower the unemployment rate in many countries. Also, the tax gained from their business operation can strengthen the national budget, which is then allocated to and invested in other sectors.
However, the adverse impact of fast food on health is significant. Junk food itself is high in fat, sugar, salt and contains many artificial additives, all of which have been scientifically proven to be associated with many health issues such as obesity, diabetes, or hypertension. The rates of people getting these diseases are of large proportions in Western countries, where fast food consumption is also the highest. Furthermore, many fast-food manufacturers are profit-driven and thus may overlook the food safety standards. The sterilization process may be neglected, and ingredients may be reused constantly, doubling the threat posed on the health of consumers. Consequences range from food poisoning, diarrhea to digestive disorders and even death.
In conclusion, the widespread use of fast food implies many harms for consumers’ well-being, which overshadows the instant advantages it delivers.
Sample 7:
It is widely witnessed that fast food is becoming more and more popular in many countries. I hold the belief that the drawbacks of this development are far more significant than the benefits involved.
The fact that the prices of fast food are reducing, and its availability is increasing. Having more affordable fast-food options available bring many benefits to both individuals as well as the society. Delicious foods are offered at low prices and delivered in a short amount of time. Some chains, like McDonald's, have opened several drive-through restaurants selling foods less than one dollar, so people no longer need to leave their car. This can allow people to save money and time, which is suitable for working people with a busy schedule. On the societal level, when more people go to fast-food outlets for their regular meals, fast food businesses can quickly expand and thus increase the sales volumes. This expansion of fast-food chains might create more job opportunities for local people and result in higher employment rates.
Despite the aforementioned benefits, this trend can have several major downsides. Chief of these is that traditional dinners that serve as a bonding activity among family members in the past are now less common as a result of the growth of fast food. Long-term negative effects on family dietary patterns may result from this trend. Another reason worth mentioning is that eating too much fast food may actually increase one’s chance of developing a wide range of chronic conditions, such as diabetes or obesity. Additionally, chemical components included in convenience food, such as saturated fat and food coloring, can hasten this process.
In conclusion, the fact that fast food is becoming much more affordable and popular can bring certain benefits for some individuals and the economy. However, I believe that this development is more disadvantageous due to the negative effects on familial bonds and health.
Sample 8:
In this modern era, junk food is easily available all around the globe. It is readily accessible because of its lower/ reasonable price. It becomes popular with youngsters. Undoubtedly it has positive effects on the food industry, but its downside can not be ignored. So, this essay sheds light on the pros and cons of this situation in the upcoming paragraph/ before drawing a reasoned conclusion.
To begin with, the advantages of fast food. It is a convenience and time- saving, it is accepted the fact that nowadays people are busy in their job/ work/ business, so they don t have much time to enjoy their meal or can say they do not have time to prepare some traditional food for themselves and family, so they prefer to eat junk food. A second benefit is that people can buy fast food at any time. The internet makes it so easy that people can order food through ‘online websites at any time when they want. Another reason for eating fast food is that the government charges significantly less tax on food, which maintains its prices.
Moreover, it is open to various job opportunities. For example, nowadays, people order online applications that increase more jobs in the technical field, such as web designers, which design website correctly, and show more options to people that allure more customs. The second job is in the delivery field. If people order online, so the company definitely requires some delivery person. So, in that way, the popularity of junk food is suitable not only for food companies but also for unemployed people.
Furthermore, despite a few positive aspects, there are several drawbacks. However, fast food is very affordable and available everywhere at any time, but it affects health. For example, within a few years, there has been a shocking rise in the number of people suffering from obesity, heart diseases and other health problems. Fast food does not contain necessary vitamins, protein and nutrients, which are essential for health. In addition to this, there is no guarantee that fast food is cooked carefully and adequately or not, so it is not safe to consume junk food. Last but not least, it demolishes the culture and customs of societies because the number of people who are eating fast food is increasing at an alarming rate, and it is observed in developed countries where people are more interested in fast food rather than traditional cooking.
To sum up, even though street food is affordable and readily available, making life comfortable, it puts people’s health at risk. So, according to my perception, the disadvantages of this trend outweigh the advantages.
Sample 9:
The growth of fast-food companies globally, resulting in cheaper prices and greater availability, have become an increasing source of both excitement and apathy. In my opinion, this trend is in general quite harmful, since the cost to both the environment and to people is too great.
A benefit of the increasing ubiquity of fast food is that those in poorer areas will be able to afford to eat. Since fast food is both cheap and quick to make, this will appeal to those with not a lot of money and time. Furthermore, fast food restaurants are also a major employer of low skilled workers, and as such, can help to provide poorer individuals with jobs. For instance, fast food chains are one of the biggest employers in countries such as America, especially in isolated towns and counties.
On the other hand, it could be said that fast food does much more harm to society in the long run. Firstly, fast food has been shown to cause numerous health problems, such as increased blood pressure and risk of heart disease, which will be very costly to society. In addition, the meat necessary to uphold the supply chain of fast-food restaurants requires the wholesale slaughter of animals in factory farms, which could be said to be both environmentally and morally questionable. For example, McDonalds have been shown by numerous reports to be a frequent violator of environmental legislation.
Thus, I argue that while the short-term economic effect on society might look desirable, in the long run, the health and environmental effects of fast food mean that their growth is overall undesirable.
Sample 10:
The growing affordability of fast food is becoming prevalent in many parts of the world. I believe that the drawbacks of the ubiquity of convenience food outweigh the benefits it offers because although it proves to be an easily affordable food choice for lower-income families, these foods cause severe damage to health.
The main advantage of this phenomenon is the accessibility and convenience. The economical fast food makes it easily accessible to a generous portion of the population, especially those with meagre earnings. This, in fact, offers lower-income households an economy and convenient meal options, particularly those who lack access to costly food choices or face time constraints on home meal preparation. Single parents, for example, may seem it is highly convenient and economical to resort to a prompt and cost-effective fast-food meal for their family after a hectic day.
One considerable drawback of the affordability and prevalence of convenience food is that it can negatively impact health. The prevalent and affordable nature of junk food tends to drive individuals to frequent intake, thereby causing detrimental effects on health. This means that regular intake of fast food poses a grave risk of various diseases, such as obesity, diabetes and other non-communicable diseases. A study conducted in India revealed that regularly consuming fast food could have a negative effect on insulin sensitivity, and therefore poses an increased risk of type 2 diabetes. Fast food has also been proven to be the underlying cause of various mental diseases, including insomnia, depression, and anxiety.
To conclude, although it is a good thing that lower-income groups have easy access to affordable meal options, I think the diseases caused by consuming fast food frequently prove to be much more disadvantageous for individuals.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Rural-to-urban migration, in many countries around the world, is leading to a decline in the countryside's population. In my opinion, this constitutes a negative development with far-reaching implications. As rural areas depopulate, the social fabric weakens, vital agricultural practices diminish, and urban centres face overpopulation challenges.
One significant reason why the decreasing population in rural areas is a negative trend is the adverse impact it has on the social structure of communities. As people move to cities seeking better opportunities, rural areas lose their sense of close-knit community and shared values. This can lead to increased feelings of isolation and detachment among those who remain, as well as reduced social cohesion. For example, traditional farming communities that once thrived on collective efforts are now disrupted, weakening the support systems that were once the backbone of these societies.
Another key concern associated with the declining population in rural areas is the potential loss of vital agricultural practices and knowledge. As young people migrate to cities in search of education and employment, there is a risk of traditional farming methods and indigenous knowledge being abandoned. This trend could lead to a significant reduction in agricultural productivity and the abandonment of sustainable practices. For instance, the departure of skilled farmers could result in land degradation and a reliance on imported food, negatively impacting both the rural and urban populations.
In conclusion, the migration of rural populations to cities, resulting in a decline in the countryside's inhabitants, is undoubtedly a negative development. To address this issue, governments and policymakers must focus on promoting balanced regional development, providing incentives for young people to stay in rural areas, and preserving the cultural heritage and sustainable practices that are integral to rural life.
Sample 2:
In many countries, the population of the countryside is dwindling as rural residents leave for cities. I believe this should be seen as a negative trend because it not only hurts rural businesses but also creates challenges for maintaining essential services for rural communities.
A shrinking population in the countryside can have detrimental effects on local businesses. With fewer residents, there is reduced demand for goods and services, leading to a downturn in local businesses and therefore bringing inconvenience to the daily lives of the local community. For example, in the United States, low sales volumes caused by the decline in population in some rural areas made it financially unsustainable for Walmart to continue operating stores there. The closures of the Walmart stores meant that local residents lost a convenient and affordable shopping option that provided a range of products under one roof. Consequently, they had to travel long distances to access similar goods, which created hardships for those without reliable transportation.
Furthermore, a declining rural population poses challenges in sustaining essential local services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure in the area. Consider rural schools. As the population dwindles, they may struggle to maintain sufficient enrollment. This, in turn, can create financial challenges for the schools and make it difficult for them to retain qualified teachers and offer a diverse range of educational programs. As a consequence, the educational disparity between students in rural areas and their counterparts in cities may be further exacerbated.
In conclusion, the decreasing rural population is a negative development that poses challenges for rural businesses and the provision of essential local services. Efforts should be made to address this issue and find ways to revitalize rural communities, ensuring their sustainable growth and well-being.
Sample 3:
It is becoming increasingly common for residents to concentrate in urban areas, rather than the countryside. In my opinion, this is a decidedly negative phenomenon for human society as a whole despite the economic benefits.
Those who support the current prioritization of city life point out how it positively impacts the workforce. When the majority of a population is concentrated, this makes it easier for businesses to operate. For example, in cities such as Tokyo, there are millions of residents in the city itself and the outlying districts. The people support restaurants, cinemas, malls, arcades, parks, and various other recreational areas. These businesses in turn provide jobs for locals and this creates a positive feedback loop and greatly enriches the quality of life for the average person living in a big city. The best evidence for this is the number of people willing to move to cities for superior employment options.
However, the drawbacks associated with city lifestyles are more significant. In past generations, there was greater diversity in terms of where residents lived that enabled more varied lifestyle options. People living in the country were more likely to work outdoors and possess skills related to farming, hunting, and raising livestock. Today, most people live in cities and work corporate jobs and are experts in terms of marketing, finance, business, and customer service. These industries have a place in a healthy society but should not predominate over healthier, more active forms of gainful employment. As the world continues to transition to online-based jobs, the situation will only worsen.
In conclusion, although there are legitimate economic arguments to be made for urban migration, I would argue the effects on how humans live are overwhelmingly negative. Governments should therefore implement policies to encourage more rural infrastructure and economic activity.
Sample 4:
A pervasive trend across the globe, particularly noticeable in countries like Vietnam, is the accelerated migration from rural areas to urban cities, consequently resulting in rural depopulation. This development carries both positive and negative implications, which are equally important to consider in the broader context of socio-economic evolution.
On the bright side, urbanization often implies a world of expanded economic opportunities. Rural inhabitants moving to bustling cities like Ho Chi Minh or Hanoi may find a plethora of job prospects, often linked to higher remuneration, potentially enhancing their standard of living. For instance, jobs in the tech sector or manufacturing industries are more abundant in urban areas, providing higher salaries than traditional rural occupations like farming.
Furthermore, cities are recognized for their superior facilities. This migration not only grants access to top-notch healthcare and educational institutions but also opens doors to diverse lifestyle and entertainment options. Additionally, technological advancement is more concentrated in urban areas, enabling individuals to stay connected and benefit from online learning and e-commerce opportunities.
Beyond material benefits, urban life offers an enriching sociocultural milieu. The amalgamation of different cultures and perspectives in cities contributes to a vibrant, inclusive society, encouraging tolerance and mutual respect.
However, this trend is not without its drawbacks. Firstly, the exodus from the countryside may deplete the agricultural workforce, crucial for Vietnam's economy and food security. Also, burgeoning urban populations can exert immense pressure on city resources, leading to overcrowded, polluted environments and strained infrastructure. For instance, the rapid urbanization of Hanoi has led to increased traffic congestion and pollution levels.
Moreover, the shift could catalyze a loss of traditional rural culture, as individuals assimilate into the urban lifestyle, risking the erosion of rich cultural heritage. Inequality is another concern, as not everyone moving to cities finds better jobs or living conditions, potentially leading to increased disparities and urban slums.
Lastly, depopulation can lead to an economic downturn in rural areas, impacting local businesses and causing communities to become deserted. For example, in rural provinces of Vietnam, such as Dien Bien or Son La, an exodus of the younger population has resulted in an aging community and economic stagnation.
In conclusion, while urbanization offers undeniable advantages, the negative impacts on both rural and urban environments cannot be overlooked. Careful and sustainable planning, balancing the needs of both rural and urban areas, is imperative to harness the potential of urban growth while preserving the rural economy and culture.
Sample 5:
The phenomenon of rural-urban migration has become a global trend, fuelled by the promise of prosperity and enhanced quality of life in urban settings. While this shift offers several benefits, it is predominantly a negative development due to its far-reaching socioeconomic impacts.
One of the most profound effects of this migration is the exacerbation of economic disparities. As individuals migrate to urban areas in search of better employment opportunities, rural regions suffer a significant brain drain. This migration is not just a transfer of human resources but often results in a polarized economic scenario where cities become centres of wealth, while rural areas languish in poverty. The concentration of wealth and opportunities in urban locales often leads to inflated living costs, making these areas less accessible for the poorer sections of society. Consequently, this disparity discourages investment in rural infrastructure and services, leading to further economic decline. Thus, rather than creating opportunities for all, this trend often widens the economic divide.
Moreover, the depopulation of rural areas leads to severe underutilization of land and resources. Agriculture, which traditionally relies on human labour, is heavily impacted. This shift not only threatens food security but also the sustainability of rural economies dependent on agricultural outputs. The dwindling population makes it challenging to maintain and invest in rural infrastructure, leading to its decay and further discouraging people from staying or moving back to rural areas. However, technological advancements have begun to bridge some gaps. Telecommunication and remote work technologies offer some reprieve by providing educational and employment opportunities irrespective of location. For instance, e-learning platforms can deliver quality education to remote areas, potentially reducing the educational incentives of urban migration.
In conclusion, while urban migration presents certain advantages, it is largely a negative development that contributes to economic disparities, undermines rural economies, and necessitates unsustainable urban expansion.
Sample 6:
In this contemporary society, a growing number of people are moving from rural to cities for a variety of reasons, leaving fewer people in the countryside. I firmly believe that this urban migration is a negative development.
Foremost, the rapid urban migration separates people depending on their incomes because only those with a certain level of earnings can afford to move and live in cities, leaving poor people in the countryside. Once people move to cities, they have a higher number of job opportunities with better conditions, such as higher salaries and less working hours, to choose from. This indicates that rich people get to even earn more in better environments as they move to cities, while poor people have no choice but to continue their current jobs in the countryside. Thus, it is safe to say that the rapid urban migration widens the wealth gap. Moreover, as fewer people are left in the countryside, it becomes harder for them to find human resources. As there are some occupations in the countryside that are crucial to all citizens’ lives, such as farming, urbanisation can cause detrimental impacts on the entire society.
The disadvantages of remaining in the countryside cannot be disregarded, as they are the reasons behind the urban migration. For instance, students have a substantially lower number of schools and universities to choose from in the countryside compared to cities, possibly demanding them to have educations that are not suited to their levels. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that this disadvantage has been gradually resolved through technology. Using online applications such as Zoom, students gain the ability to take classes without physically attending a school or a university, enabling them to have a wider number of choices even if they reside in the countryside.
In conclusion, I am in complete concurrence with the notion that urban migration is a negative development because it widens the wealth gap and impacts the entire society negatively. Although there are some disadvantages in living in the countryside, they have been overcome gradually using technology.
Sample 7:
Across the globe, the migration from rural areas to urban centers has become a pronounced trend, leading to a decline in countryside populations. This essay contends that such a shift has both positive and negative implications, focusing on economic development and cultural erosion as key discussion points.
On one hand, the urban migration fuels economic growth significantly. Cities, renowned for their dynamic economic activities, offer a plethora of employment opportunities that are scarcely found in rural settings. This concentration of labor and capital in urban areas not only accelerates innovation and infrastructural development but also enhances the nation's economic landscape, driving substantial growth. For instance, tech hubs like Silicon Valley have become economic powerhouses due to the aggregation of talent and resources, contributing enormously to the United States' GDP. Furthermore, urbanization supports the proliferation of education and healthcare services, vastly enhancing the quality of life for many. The presence of diverse educational institutions and state-of-the-art healthcare facilities in urban areas underscores the benefits of urban migration.
However, this migration is not without its drawbacks, affecting both the social fabric and the environment. The exodus to cities often results in the depopulation of rural areas, leading to the gradual erosion of traditional cultures and lifestyles that have been the backbone of societies for centuries. Rural communities, with their rich heritage and traditions, play a pivotal role in preserving cultural diversity. As these communities dwindle, invaluable cultural practices and languages risk extinction, stripping humanity of its rich cultural tapestry. Additionally, the sudden surge in urban population exacerbates housing and infrastructural pressures, leading to overcrowded cities and the unchecked expansion of slums. This not only strains urban resources but also poses significant environmental and social challenges, such as increased pollution and social inequality.
In conclusion, while the movement towards urban areas champions economic advancement and access to better services, it concurrently poses a threat to cultural heritage and strains urban capacities. Balancing economic development with cultural preservation and urban planning is essential to mitigate the negative impacts of this global trend.
Sample 8:
The accelerating trend of rural people moving to cities, precipitating a decreasing population in the countryside, has captivated global attention. This essay contends that this urban migration is overwhelmingly beneficial for both individuals and nations at large. I will dissect its advantageous impact on economic opportunities in urban settings and debunk concerns regarding the alleged neglect of cultural heritage and environmental degradation in rural areas.
First and foremost, the migration from rural to urban settings serves as an impetus for economic invigoration and affords transformative personal opportunities. Cities are hotbeds for diverse job markets, cutting-edge healthcare facilities, and well-funded educational systems. For example, data from the World Bank reveals a staggering 20-30% wage differential favouring urban areas over their rural counterparts. Such figures validate the enhanced quality of life migrants can attain, propelling not just individual but also collective national prosperity. Moreover, the argument that urban migration depletes rural cultural heritage is misguided. Cities serve as hubs for cultural amalgamation where rural traditions don't just survive but thrive and adapt. The exposure to a broader audience can provide traditional arts and crafts with a platform for wider acceptance and commercial viability.
Skeptics often claim that this migration influx strains urban ecosystems, exacerbating pollution and resource depletion. However, it is essential to recognize that cities are at the forefront of pioneering sustainable initiatives. Due to their high-density populations, cities are more incentivized to invest in efficient public transport systems that reduce carbon footprints, as well as green architecture that emphasizes energy efficiency. For instance, cities like Copenhagen and Singapore have set global standards in sustainability, from waste management to renewable energy adoption. Therefore, rather than being detrimental, the increased population in urban areas can expedite the transition to more sustainable living practices, dispelling the misconception that urban growth inherently compounds environmental issues.
In conclusion, the rural-to-urban migration trend serves as an indispensable catalyst for economic growth, cultural enrichment, and environmental sustainability. Far from being detrimental, this shift is integral to the advancement of contemporary societies.
Sample 9:
The phenomenon of rural people moving to cities, thereby inducing a decreasing population in the countryside, has garnered considerable scholarly and policy attention. This essay asserts that such migratory patterns are not only advantageous but indeed vital for the individual and collective well-being of nations. I will delve into the financial prospects it avails in urban environments, while also addressing and dispelling the lingering doubts concerning cultural erosion and ecological detriment.
Primarily, the transition from rural to urban landscapes acts as a linchpin for economic rejuvenation and personal advancement. Urban locations are breeding grounds for a diverse array of professions, avant-garde medical facilities, and high-calibre educational institutions. A study conducted by the International Labour Organization corroborates that urban locales offer a wage surplus of approximately 25-35% compared to rural settings. Such metrics substantiate the notion that migration offers an escalator to augmented personal prosperity and contributes to macroeconomic vibrancy. Additionally, the diversification of job markets in cities fosters innovation, often leading to ground-breaking advancements in fields like technology, medicine, and social services.
Contrary to conventional wisdom, this migratory trend doesn't necessarily portend the extinction of rural culture. Cities often function as crucibles where native traditions find not just refuge but also fertile ground for evolution and propagation. Moreover, fears of ecological degradation in rural localities are largely misplaced. Many cities are fast becoming paragons of sustainability, adopting innovations like vertical farming and waste-to-energy technologies that offset their environmental impact. For example, metropolises like Tokyo and Stockholm are exemplars of integrating ecological initiatives within their urban planning, thus neutralizing the perceived environmental cost of migration.
To encapsulate, the urban migration trajectory serves as an invaluable engine for economic prosperity, cultural preservation, and environmental stewardship. This trend is far from a societal liability; rather, it is an indispensable asset in shaping resilient, modern societies.
Sample 10:
In numerous countries all around the world, there is an increasing number of individuals who preferring to move to urban, while the population of rural regions has a significant decrease. Some people argue that it can break the balance of generation between cities and countryside. However, I tend to think that the migration is a positive development to individuals. There are many reasons that why many people think keep stay in rural area rather than move to cities is necessary. Firstly, rural regions typically incur a lower cost of living compared to cities. For example, individuals live in countryside may spend less money to get the necessities of life. Secondly, some professional jobs only exist in countryside, such as farming and so on, so people with relevant expertise can get opportunities. Finally, the population of countryside is always less than in cities, so there is little competitive in employment, people work in rural areas may relief their pressure, while mitigate the congestion. In my opinion, there are some benefits of personal development can be promoted in urban areas. Metropolitan areas provide enhanced employment opportunities prospects and a high quality of life, offering a varied of job opportunities and sectors. In addition, cities often boast better infrastructure, essential services and recreational facilities, thereby elevating the overall standard pf living for its residents. Furthermore, in cities the differences between male and female are less pronounced. Cities have same opportunities between men and women on education and employment, while also set positive factors to promote the development of society. In conclusion, live in rural region can give people a leisure life. However, if individuals want to improve themselves on education, employment and even quality of life, move to urban is a good choice.
Sample 11:
Globally, an increasing number of individuals are migrating to urban areas. In my opinion, although this widespread propensity places great strain on urban infrastructure, it is decidedly positive on the whole as it engenders significantly improved living standards for urban migrants.
On the one hand, an influx of migrants from the countryside poses major challenges to urban planning. A sudden increase in the urban population typically translates to immediate overcrowding and more serious levels of pollution, potentially predisposing the general populace to chronic health problems. There is an overwhelming amount of research and statistical data that indicates the correlation between a rapid rise in exhaust fumes released from private vehicles and the elevated risk of respiratory disease that characterizes urban life. Increasing population density also leads to escalating rental property and housing prices that far exceed rises in pay grades, leaving many individuals without access to affordable and adequate housing. A standout example of extreme real estate prices can be seen in New York, where many citizens are forced to either live in cramped apartments with housemates or relocate to outlying neighborhoods and resign themselves to longer commute times.
However, those moving to cities are likely to experience better living standards. Urban migrants can gain access to superior educational and career opportunities that would have otherwise been impossible in rural regions, ensuring their financial security and allowing for more comfortable lifestyles in general. For instance, in Vietnam, most international corporations and banking institutions are concentrated in large cities, where workers can earn higher salaries and have more realistic promotion prospects. These tangible benefits even extend to future generations. Children of families that migrate to cities greatly benefit from their parents’ previously established connections and therefore are more likely to be more successful.
In conclusion, despite problems concomitant with overpopulated urban centers, the emergence of various opportunities for rural migrants makes this trend unequivocally positive overall. The government should devise initiatives to limit pollution and address the urban housing shortages.
Sample 12:
The increasing migration of rural populations to urban centers is a global trend with profound implications for societies worldwide. While this shift in populace distribution pattern presents opportunities for economic growth and social development, it also raises concerns about potential negative consequences for both urban and rural areas. This essay will further investigate how the depopulation of rural regions might do more harm than good.
One significant advantage of rural people moving to cities is the access to improved infrastructure. Urban areas typically boast more advanced transportation networks and communication facilities, enhancing the overall quality of life. For example, city residents can benefit from efficient public transport systems and reliable internet connectivity, significantly improving their daily routines and access to essential services. Moreover, cities often offer a wider range of educational and career opportunities. Access to universities, vocational schools, and specialized training programs can empower rural residents to acquire higher education and develop valuable skills. These opportunities can lead to increased earning potential and improved career prospects.
Having said that, the transition from rural to urban life often involves significant financial challenges. The exorbitant costs of living in cities, particularly major metropolitan areas, can present an obstacle for rural migrants to afford necessities like housing, food, and transportation. While rural areas may have their own challenges, the overall cost of living is generally lower, allowing individuals to stretch their income further. This disparity in living expenses can create a significant financial burden for those who migrate to cities. Furthermore, the concentration of people in urban areas can lead to a range of environmental and infrastructure problems. Overcrowding often results in pollution, traffic congestion, and inadequate public services. These issues can significantly impact the quality of life for both residents and newcomers, causing cities fewer desirable places to live.
In conclusion, the trend of rural people moving to cities, leading to a decline in the countryside populace, is jeopardizing the sustainable growth of society. While urbanization can offer certain economic opportunities, the associated challenges outweigh the potential benefits. The increased costs of living, environmental degradation, and strain on urban infrastructure all contribute to a less desirable quality of life for both migrants and existing city dwellers.
Sample 13:
In many countries around the world, there has been a significant increase in the number of rural people migrating to cities, resulting in a decrease in the population of the countryside. This phenomenon has sparked a debate on whether this trend is positive or negative. From my perspective, I believe that it is indeed a negative development due to the adverse consequences it brings.
Firstly, the decline in the rural population leads to the deterioration of rural areas. With fewer people engaging in farming and agricultural activities, the countryside loses its vibrancy and the land remains unused. Consequently, this makes rural areas attractive to corporations looking for suitable locations to establish their industries. Sadly, these companies often prioritize economic gains without considering the impact on the environment or the well-being of the local residents. For instance, they may pollute the surrounding ecosystems and deplete natural resources.
Secondly, the influx of people into cities exacerbates the issue of over-population. Urban areas have limited space to accommodate a large number of residents, resulting in crowded living conditions. When the population exceeds the city's capacity, people are forced to reside in congested areas. Consequently, individuals constantly endure noise pollution caused by the high population density and suffer from the lack of fresh air due to increased air pollution from transportation emissions. These circumstances have a detrimental effect on the overall quality of life for urban dwellers.
In conclusion, the rising trend of rural-to-urban migration has brought about negative consequences such as environmental degradation and over-population in cities. Therefore, it is important for governments to address this issue by implementing effective policies that promote sustainable development in rural areas and provide incentives for people to remain and invest in their hometowns.
Sample 14:
In recent years, there has been a significant global trend of rural populations migrating to cities and urban areas, resulting in a decline in the number of people residing in the countryside. While some may argue that this shift is a positive development, I firmly believe that it brings about several negative consequences for both rural communities and society as a whole. This essay will delve into the detrimental effects of this urban migration and highlight the potential drawbacks it poses.
Firstly, the migration of rural populations to cities exacerbates the problem of overcrowding in urban areas. As more and more people flock to cities seeking better opportunities and improved living standards, urban infrastructure struggles to keep pace with the rapid influx of residents. Consequently, issues such as housing shortages, increased traffic congestion, and strained public services become prevalent. This not only hampers the quality of life for urban dwellers but also places a burden on already overstretched resources.
Moreover, the exodus of rural communities to urban areas leads to a decline in agricultural productivity and self-sufficiency. As farmers and agricultural workers abandon their land, there is a decrease in agricultural output, which has detrimental effects on food security and local economies. Rural areas have historically played a crucial role in supplying food and sustaining rural livelihoods, and their abandonment jeopardizes the stability and resilience of the agricultural sector.
In conclusion, the movement of rural populations to cities and urban areas may appear to be a positive development on the surface, but it brings about several negative consequences. The overcrowding of urban areas, decline in agricultural productivity, widening urban-rural divide, and loss of cultural heritage are all detrimental effects of this rural-to-urban migration. Therefore, it is imperative for governments and policymakers to recognize the negative implications of this trend and take proactive measures to address the challenges faced by rural communities, ensuring a more balanced and sustainable development for both urban and rural areas.
Sample 15:
Statistics show that the world's population is increasing rapidly. It is expected that most of us will be living in cities within the next few decades. The question of whether urbanisation is a positive or negative development remains controversial.
A rapid influx of people moving from rural to urban areas is bound to cause problems. Firstly, pressure on resources such as housing and transportation intensifies. It is becoming difficult for many people to afford adequate housing in cities. A by-product of this is the creation of slums causing low-income families to group together in neglected parts of the city. These people often become trapped in a cycle of poverty that is difficult to escape.
As mentioned above, the growth of urban areas can also lead to severe traffic congestion because more and more vehicles travel into the city from the suburbs. This has many knock-on effects, such as problems with air quality. It also leads many city dwellers to experience mental health issues because travelling across large cities is tiring and stressful.
All of this being said, I don't believe that urbanisation is a wholly negative development. There are advantages to living in large cities that are well managed. For example, there are more schools which means more opportunities for education. Access to higher-quality health care is often better in cities. Some cities have also introduced ride-sharing services, e-bikes, and park and ride services that reduce environmental issues.
My opinion is that many of the problems associated with urbanisation are avoidable but dealing with increasing populations in cities is a formidable challenge. How governments, businesses and society respond to this challenge will dramatically affect the future of our world.
Sample 16:
In many nations across the globe, rural inhabitants are flocking to urban centers, resulting in a decline in the countryside population. Although this trend may have certain advantages, I would argue that the disadvantages are far greater.
On the one hand, the movement of rural residents to cities can bring certain benefits. First and foremost, urban areas tend to offer more employment opportunities and higher wages compared to the limited prospects available in the countryside. By relocating to cities, individuals can access a wider range of jobs and have better chances of improving their economic conditions. For instance, urban centers often house industries and businesses that require a large labor force, leading to an increase in employment rates. Moreover, cities generally provide better access to education, healthcare facilities, and other public services, ensuring a higher quality of life for those who make the move.
On the other hand, the drawbacks of this population shift are more pronounced. This is because the exodus of rural residents can lead to the decline of agricultural activities, which are essential for food production and sustainability. For instance, in Japan, the migration of young people to urban areas, coupled with the aging rural population, has resulted in a decrease in agricultural production. This has led to an increased reliance on imported food and a decline in food self-sufficiency, making the country vulnerable to fluctuations in global food prices and availability. This has led to an increased reliance on food imports, posing challenges to food security and self-sufficiency. Furthermore, the migration to cities often results in overcrowding and strain on urban infrastructure. A prime example of this can be seen in cities like Mumbai, India, where the rapid influx of rural migrants has given rise to overcrowded slums, inadequate sanitation facilities, and a significant burden on resources and services.
In conclusion, although the rural-to-urban migration may bring some advantages such as improved employment opportunities and access to services, I am convinced that the negative consequences, including the decline in farming activities and the strain on urban infrastructure, are more significant.
Sample 17:
In recent years, rural populations in many countries worldwide have been declining as more residents migrate to cities. In my opinion, this can be viewed as a negative development with various repercussions for both rural and urban communities.
One of the primary concerns associated with rural-to-urban migration is the strain it places on urban infrastructure and resources. As more people flock to cities, there is a surge in demand for housing, transportation, healthcare, and education, leading to overcrowding and increased pressure on existing facilities. This can result in inadequate infrastructure, overwhelmed public services, and a decline in the quality of life for urban dwellers. This can be seen in the increased demand for housing, where urban areas struggle to accommodate the influx of people. In many cities, the housing market becomes highly competitive, leading to soaring rental prices and a lack of affordable housing options. This puts pressure on low-income individuals and families, who may struggle to find suitable accommodation.
Furthermore, the mass exodus from rural areas harms agricultural lands, impacting food production and rural economies. With a declining rural population, there is a reduced agricultural workforce, impacting food production and supply. For example, in rural regions heavily dependent on agriculture, such as farming communities, the migration of people to cities results in a loss of skilled labor in the agricultural sector. As younger generations leave rural areas, the knowledge and expertise passed down from previous generations diminish, affecting farming practices and productivity. The dwindling workforce can struggle to keep up with the demands of cultivating and harvesting crops, potentially leading to decreased agricultural output and food scarcity.
In conclusion, the decline in the countryside population due to rural-to-urban migration has numerous negative implications. Principally, overcrowding in cities and food supply problems.
Sample 18:
People have different views on the influences that a large number of the country’s population choose to settle down in cities have on themselves and society. While there are some detrimental impacts on their children and their mental health, I do believe that they can benefit more from such migration.
On the one hand, it would cause adverse effects both individually and socially. To begin with, speaking from the megapolis side, the immigration of these disadvantaged people would cause a shortage of housing and even severer traffic congestion in urban centres. Furthermore, the draining of these valuable labourers would hinder the development of agriculture. For example, it would trigger the descending productivity of grains and rice. In addition, these villagers would experience a higher degree of marginalization, greater pressure from work and living and even more discrimination from people around them, which would impact their overall sense of well-being. Lastly, children of these disadvantaged individuals would be turned into leftover kids and feel much lonelier than their counterparts who are accompanied by their parents.
There are many reasons why I support the idea that these migrated populations would contribute a lot both to themselves and society as a whole. Firstly, these employees would earn more money and improve their quality of life. For instance, they would have more disposable income and decent savings to provide better medical conditions for their parents and better education for their kids. Besides, this behaviour would expand their horizon and enlarge their social connections and help them access higher social ladders. Thirdly, highly intensive competitiveness in cities can contribute to their rapid growth in career paths, enhance their professional skills and have a more prosperous future.
In conclusion, I can understand the reason why individuals are concerned about the prevalence of such behaviour, I would argue that it would bring more benefits than drawbacks including improved living standards, an expanded social circle and an advanced working ability, which are all valued in modern society.
Sample 19:
Rural decline is becoming an increasingly common phenomenon around the world as people leave their hometowns to move to metropolises. In this essay, I argue that this trend has a positive influence on the lives of some individuals, but it also gives rise to a host of large-scale adverse consequences on rural and urban societies.
From an individual standpoint, leaving the countryside can be a positive change for those who want to seek a better life in cities. Simply put, unsatisfied with farm work in the rural area, many young people decide to uproot their lives and go to cities to find alternative career paths with better pay and upward mobility. Many of them succeed in this goal and are more satisfied with their living standard.
Nonetheless, increased depopulation in rural regions can also stifle their economic growth. As more and more people migrate from the countryside to urban centers, most of whom are young people in working age, businesses will have a tougher time finding employees and customers. Furthermore, a smaller population often means that the local governing bodies and committees of these areas will be allocated less government funding. This can translate to a slow deterioration in the quality of public services and infrastructure, such as road systems, education and healthcare, negatively impacting the overall living standard of those who remain behind.
Along with the detrimental impacts on rural life, the mass exodus from the countryside has several negative implications that extend to big cities as well. In terms of environmental impact, the influx of new immigrants means that there will be more domestic waste and harmful emissions, which can further exacerbate the problem of pollution. Socially, price hikes in basic services, such as housing or food, resulting from an increased demand can put a lot of people in financial stress and potentially spark social unrest.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that although migrating to cities and suburban areas can prove beneficial for some individuals, it negatively impacts many different areas of rural and city life. Governments should take steps to make rural life more attractive to counteract these effects.
Sample 20:
In recent times, rural inhabitants in numerous countries are increasingly relocating to urban areas, leading to a decline in the countryside population. This phenomenon has elicited contrasting views, with some considering it beneficial for city dwellers due to the abundance of opportunities, while others argue that it has adverse effects on society. This essay will examine both perspectives before reaching a reasoned conclusion.
On one hand, the migration of rural people to cities provides them with a plethora of opportunities as a result of diverse social infrastructures. Urban areas boast numerous prestigious educational institutions, hospitals, public libraries, and extensive shopping malls, which surpass the offerings of rural regions. By utilising these facilities, individuals are more likely to broaden their knowledge and enhance their prospects of securing professional employment in the future. For instance, in South Korea, many families willingly relocate to the capital city, Seoul, seeking quality education for their children. With numerous esteemed universities, Seoul offers students the chance to acquire a high-quality education, ultimately leading to excellent job opportunities.
However, the influx of rural inhabitants to cities can lead to lopsided development between urban and rural areas. Consequently, rural regions may experience a dearth of young people, leaving predominantly elderly populations. This demographic shift not only results in a scarcity of human resources for essential social facilities such as schools and businesses in the countryside but also adversely impacts the economy. The lack of profits in these rural areas prompts the government and corporations to divert their investments elsewhere. Conversely, cities may grapple with the negative consequences of overpopulation, such as heightened competition for jobs and educational opportunities. This fierce competition often leads to mental health issues including depression, anxiety, and isolation.
In conclusion, although moving to cities offers numerous opportunities, the negative consequences of this phenomenon lead to an imbalanced development in societies across the globe. While urban areas enjoy the benefits of rural inhabitants’ relocation, rural regions suffer from a scarcity of young people, resulting in the decline of social facilities and economic setbacks. Overall, it is evident that the population shift from rural to urban areas poses significant challenges to societal progress.
Sample 21:
In today’s era, people live in cities as well as the countryside. The rural population is shifting from their villages to towns and cities, which has impacted the decline in the countryside’s population. However, I strongly believe that this has resulted in negative development. The following paragraphs will delve into the case scenario and highlight its impacts.
To begin with, the migration that is taking place from rural to urban areas is due to the need for a plethora of amenities such as education for children, health benefits, proper transportation, etc. This shift would bring a downfall for the cities, which would cause inflation to reach its peak. To illustrate, if there is more demand in any area or commodity, the prices will increase and vice versa. Similarly, if more and more people move from the green belt to larger towns, it would create chaos among people. There would be a hike in the prices of goods and services.
Furthermore, an additional number of people may reduce job opportunities, which in turn would increase competition among them. The percentage in crime rate would increase as people would become more involved in such activities to earn a living. For rural, it would not be easy to cope with the fast-paced life in the cities. The cost of living would be higher than in suburban areas. Everything from housing to water bills seems to have a higher price tag. Despite this, public transit might not be easily accessible due to the incline of the population.
To elucidate, hopping is basically done to live a better life. Consequently, there are cons to this as well in terms of crowds, competition, amenities, crime, lifestyle, and more. Relocation from rural to urban areas has more negative impacts than positive ones.
Sample 22:
In numerous nations across the globe, there is a noticeable trend of rural inhabitants relocating to urban centers, leading to a decline in the rural population. This phenomenon has sparked a debate regarding whether this shift should be perceived as positive or negative. In my opinion, there are both favorable and adverse aspects associated with this urban migration.
On the positive side, the migration from rural areas to cities can offer individuals enhanced opportunities for education, employment, and access to better healthcare facilities. Urban centers often provide a wider range of educational institutions, professional training programs, and job prospects. This can lead to personal growth and financial stability, as well as the improvement of overall living standards. For instance, a rural youth moving to a city might gain access to specialized education and subsequently secure a well-paying job, enabling them to uplift their family’s economic condition.
However, the rural exodus can also have negative implications. As more people leave rural communities, local economies can suffer due to a reduction in the workforce engaged in agriculture and other rural industries. This can result in decreased agricultural production and a potential increase in food prices. Moreover, the depopulation of rural areas may lead to the abandonment of traditional cultural practices and a loss of traditional knowledge and skills that have been passed down through generations. For example, the decline in rural population might lead to the disappearance of indigenous farming techniques and craftsmanship.
In conclusion, the movement of people from rural to urban areas brings both benefits and drawbacks. While it can provide better opportunities for education and employment, it can also lead to negative impacts on local economies and cultural heritage.
Sample 23:
The phenomenon of rural populations migrating to urban areas, resulting in dwindling countryside populations, is occuring globally. I believe that this urban drift is entirely negative, primarily because it leads to overpopulation in cities and the neglect of rural communities.
I consider the trend towards urban migration to be negative due to the severe overpopulation issues it causes in metropolitan areas. This influx results in overstretched city infrastructure, including public transport, healthcare, and housing. Urban centres struggle to accommodate this rapid population growth, leading to increased pollution, insufficient living conditions, and heightened stress on public services. I have personally witnessed the transformation of my own city as it has struggled to manage its growing population. Traffic congestion has worsened, and public transportation systems are often overwhelmed during peak hours, making daily commutes increasingly stressful and time-consuming for residents.
Furthermore, the movement from rural areas exacerbates the neglect and underdevelopment of the countryside. As young and able-bodied individuals relocate to urban centres in search of better opportunities, rural regions lose their most vital segment of the workforce, leading to economic stagnation and a decline in local industries such as agriculture and artisanal crafts. During visits to rural areas where I have conducted educational workshops, I observed a significant reduction in the active labour force, leaving mostly the elderly and very young behind. This demographic shift hinders the development and sustainability of rural communities, impacting their viability and quality of life.
In conclusion, I view the trend of rural-to-urban migration as completely negative. This development not only strains the resources and infrastructure of metropolitan areas but also leads to the deterioration of rural regions. Both the overwhelming challenges faced by expanding cities and the consequent neglect of the countryside underscore the detrimental effects of this demographic shift.
Sample 24:
Over recent years, there has been a marked shift in population demographics worldwide, with inhabitants of rural locales increasingly relocating to urban centres. I contend that this trend is largely deleterious, carrying far- reaching consequences for both metropolitan and bucolic communities.
A primary issue linked to this urban influx lies in the escalating burden it imposes on city resources and infrastructure. The mounting demand for facilities such as housing, public transportation, healthcare, and education precipitates a considerable strain on already stretched city resources, potentially leading to their insufficiency. A vivid illustration of this problem can be found in the housing sector where cities find themselves wrestling with the challenge of accommodating an ever-growing populace. The fierce competition in the housing market inflates rental rates and makes affordable accommodation increasingly elusive, thereby placing undue stress on those with limited financial means.
Moreover, the diminishing rural population inflicts severe damage on agricultural sectors and the broader rural economies. As fewer people remain in the countryside, the workforce engaged in agriculture contracts, directly affecting the capacity for food production. Particularly in regions heavily reliant on farming, this mass migration results in a notable loss of skilled labour. With younger generations abandoning their rural roots, the generational transmission of agricultural knowledge and expertise suffers, thereby negatively impacting traditional farming practices and overall productivity. This diminished workforce often struggles to meet the rigours of crop cultivation and harvesting, potentially causing a reduction in agricultural output and even food shortages.
In summary, the mass migration from rural regions to urban centres, and the consequent dwindling of countryside populations, has far-reaching and predominantly negative implications. The primary consequences are urban overcrowding and the potential compromise of food security, both of which are serious issues that warrant urgent attention.
Sample 25:
The migration of rural populations to urban centers is a global phenomenon, and its implications have sparked debates about whether this trend represents a positive or negative development. While there are both merits and demerits associated with this shift, I believe that, overall, it carries a mixture of benefits and challenges.
One of the primary advantages of rural-to-urban migration is economic opportunity. Cities often offer a wider range of employment options, higher wages, and better access to education and healthcare. This can bring about an improvement in the standard of living for individuals and their families. Additionally, the concentration of talent and resources in urban areas can foster innovation and economic growth, benefiting the entire country.
Furthermore, urbanization can lead to improved infrastructure and public services in both urban and rural areas. As more people move to cities, governments are compelled to invest in transportation, utilities, and healthcare facilities to accommodate the growing urban population. Some of these improvements can spill over into rural areas, enhancing the overall quality of life.
However, rural-to-urban migration also comes with significant drawbacks. Cities often struggle to provide adequate housing, transportation, and social services for the influx of newcomers, creating issues such as overcrowding, pollution, and inadequate urban planning. Moreover, the depopulation of rural areas can have adverse effects on agriculture, food production, and the preservation of cultural heritage.
Overall, while urbanization can offer economic opportunities and spur development, it also poses challenges related to urban infrastructure and the potential neglect of rural areas. The key lies in effective government policies that address these challenges while harnessing the benefits of urbanization to improve the overall well-being of the population, both in cities and the countryside.
Sample 26:
The mass migration of rural populations to urban areas has accelerated globally in recent years, and it has resulted in a steady decline in population in the countryside. In my opinion, this is an alarming and negative development because I believe that this phenomenon carries numerous adverse consequences for both rural and urban areas and society as a whole.
Firstly, the depopulation of rural areas has detrimental effects on agricultural practices and food security. As rural populations dwindle, the agricultural workforce diminishes, leading to decreased agricultural productivity. Consequently, there is a heightened reliance on imported food products, which can be expensive and less sustainable. Take, for example, the case of Smithville, a rural town in the Midwest. Over the past decade, Smithville has witnessed a steady outmigration of its young population seeking better economic opportunities in urban areas. With the departure of the youth, many farms in the region have struggled to find enough labour to maintain their operations.
Furthermore, rural-to-urban migration exacerbates the problems associated with urbanization. Cities become overpopulated, leading to increased pressure on infrastructure, healthcare, education, and housing. Overcrowding in cities results in traffic congestion, pollution, and a higher cost of living. These issues diminish the quality of life for urban dwellers and can create social disparities and unrest.
Another adverse effect of rural depopulation is the erosion of traditional cultures and community bonds. As rural communities decline, age-old traditions and customs face extinction, leading to a loss of cultural diversity and heritage. Consider the case of a remote village nestled in the mountains of Nepal. For generations, this village has been inhabited by a close-knit community with rich cultural traditions deeply rooted in their unique way of life. However, in recent years, many young people from the village have been lured away by the promise of better job opportunities in the city. As these young adults left their ancestral homes, the village’s population dwindled, and the community’s traditional way of life began to erode.
In conclusion, the dwindling population in rural areas due to mass migration to cities constitutes a negative development with far-reaching implications. It threatens food security, exacerbates urban challenges, and diminishes cultural diversity.
Sample 27:
In most parts of the world, rural populations are decreasing as people move to urban areas. This essay will explain why that could be perceived as either positive or negative, depending on one’s perspective.
The positive perspective says that urban areas offer better standards of living and allow for better management of populations. When people are concentrated in a single area, that means they can be provided access to food, healthcare, education, and other essential parts of life. Governments can more effectively provide for them and people can find more opportunities whilst participating easily in their nation’s economy. Meanwhile, the countryside can be returned to nature or used for responsible agriculture. With people taking up less space, the environment could be allowed to thrive once again.
On the other hand, when people live in the countryside, they have more space and access to a better environment. People living in such areas tend to have better lives because of the clean air, outdoor activities, and proximity to nature. Living in the countryside means people can have gardens and bigger homes, whilst they are father away from pollution, traffic, and noise. The atmosphere tends to be more peaceful, and people seem happier in such places, while cities can be unpleasant, oppressive places that stifle human nature and cause mental and physical health problems.
In conclusion, there are good arguments for both sides of this debate. Personally, I think that they are more or less balanced. It really depends on whether you believe that humans should pursue personal freedom and health or put the Earth first and live in more easily governable societies.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Bộ câu hỏi: [TEST] Từ loại (Buổi 1) (Có đáp án)
Bài tập chức năng giao tiếp (Có đáp án)
Bộ câu hỏi: Các dạng thức của động từ (to v - v-ing) (Có đáp án)
15000 bài tập tách từ đề thi thử môn Tiếng Anh có đáp án (Phần 1)
500 bài Đọc điền ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 1)
Bộ câu hỏi: Thì và sự phối thì (Phần 2) (Có đáp án)
Trắc nghiệm Tiếng anh 12 Tìm từ được gạch chân phát âm khác - Mức độ nhận biết có đáp án
Bộ câu hỏi: Cấp so sánh (có đáp án)
Hãy Đăng nhập hoặc Tạo tài khoản để gửi bình luận