Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 273 Lưu

Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

Some people believe that raising the minimum driving age is the best solution to enhance road safety. I disagree with this idea because I believe that other methods are equally important and should be taken into account as well.

On the one hand, I agree that increasing the minimum age for getting a driving licence can be an effective road safety measure. Firstly, since people are often more mature and have more life experience when they get older, they can make quicker and wiser decisions to avoid dangerous situations on the road compared to younger drivers. My father, for example, will never use his phone when driving as he knows that he could easily lose his concentration and cause an accident. Secondly, raising the minimum driving age can allow adolescents to have more time to sharpen their driving skills. They can attend defensive driving courses to learn how to deal with different driving scenarios, which will help them minimize the risk of accidents when driving in the future.

On the other hand, I think that better road safety can be achieved by other more effective methods without increasing the driving age. To begin with, more stringent traffic regulations should be imposed, which would act as a deterrent to would-be traffic law breakers. In Singapore, people who run red lights are fined heavily, and therefore this will make them more responsible in order to avoid future punishments. In addition, governments should allocate financial resources to improving public transport, which would encourage citizens to drive their private cars or motorbikes less. As a result, these residents will no longer worry about the risks that they may face when driving their own vehicles, such as drunk driving or falling asleep at the wheel.

In conclusion, while raising the legal driving age can make our roads safer to some extent, I believe that governments should also introduce other road safety measures that are discussed above.

Sample 2:

In response to the alarmingly high rate of traffic accidents, some people think that we should increase the legal driving age. Although I think this solution can be somewhat beneficial, it is not effective in general.

Firstly, lifting the legal driving age will increase pressure on public transport systems and parents to accommodate this sudden surplus of people without a driving license. For example, raising the driving age from 18 to 21 means tens of thousands of people will not be able to drive. As a result, more buses, taxis, and other urban public transport means must be put into use, or parents will have to continue driving their children around. Secondly, the most common causes of traffic accidents are drinking while driving and driving in the wrong lanes. These have little to do with the legal driving age but more with driving etiquette. Therefore, increasing the legal driving age could do more harm than good for society.

However, I can also understand why some people would advocate for this idea. Firstly, by lifting the minimum driving age, driving schools will have more time to educate young adults on road safety, leading to future generations driving more carefully. For example, currently, if you want to get a driving license, most people do not attend a driving school. They only need to take a quiz and a driving test. That certainly can be improved. Secondly, it is evident that some traffic accidents also occur due to immature decisions, such as hosting races or riding a motorbike with more than two people. Lifting the minimum age can help to reduce these short-sighted behaviors.

In conclusion, despite some potential benefits that lifting the legal driving age can bring to society, I still think that this solution can do little to prevent traffic accidents in Vietnam.

Sample 3:

Some argue that raising the minimum age at which individuals may legally operate a car or motorcycle is the most effective strategy to improve road safety. To some extent, while I agree that this strategy may reduce the number of traffic accidents, I believe harsher punishments are significantly more effective and are currently in place in several nations.

Admittedly, a higher legal driving age will help considerably minimize road accidents. The reality is that many vehicle accidents may be traced back to reckless driving by young people. Many of these drivers are underage and, as a result, do not yet have the maturity to fully appreciate the severity of the risks they pose when they engage in dangerous behaviours like speeding or drinking while driving. Increasing the minimum age to drive may ensure that even the youngest drivers are mature enough to drive safely, protecting themselves and others on the road.

On the other hand, I believe this strategy has limited success since many young people today still operate automobiles without proper licensing. Therefore, increasing the severity of the penalties for those who are found guilty of driving offenses is a more efficient strategy to protect the safety of roadway traffic. For instance, a person convicted of driving while under the influence of alcohol in Canada faces a possible jail term of up to five years and a ten-year driving suspension. These penalties have the ability to dissuade would-be offenders and reduce offender recidivism.

In conclusion, increasing the legal age to drive may improve road safety; however, I think stricter penalties would have a far greater impact on reducing road accidents.

Sample 4:

Road safety is often a topic worth concerns because it is directly related to the number of fatalities and injuries caused by traffic accidents. While increasing the minimum legal age for driving motor vehicles has been touted as the optimal solution to improving road safety, there exist other measures which can disprove this statement.

Raising the minimum driving age can achieve some goals, one of which is reducing the number of inexperienced drivers. It could be argued that young drivers tend to be less familiar with participating in traffic than average, so they are more prone to being involved in safety incidents. If such a policy is introduced, the youth would have more time to study traffic laws before they become full-fledged drivers. In the long run, the population’s proficiency in navigating the road is likely to rise, reducing the probability of unfortunate incidents further. Given these points, it is not difficult to understand the praise for increasing the minimum driving age.

However, requiring young people to wait a few more years before being allowed to drive is overshadowed by other measures. Restricting the type of vehicles operated based on age, which is a possible course of action, can reduce traffic hazards without hampering young people’s access to motor vehicles. In Vietnam, for instance, while it is legal to drive at 16 years old, people under 18 are prohibited from operating anything more powerful than a 50cc motorcycle. Moreover, the government can require schools to introduce mandatory traffic safety courses in the curriculum. Safety lessons in civic education could work just as well, as either option addresses young people’s inexperience, a concern which has led to a need for an increased driving age in the first place.

In conclusion, while reasons exist to advocate for a higher minimum driving age, I do not believe that this policy is the most consequential to road safety. To effectively tackle traffic hazards, it will be wiser to consider other options.

Sample 5:

It is argued that raising the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes is the most effective method of increasing road safety. While I consent to this approach, I am more convinced that it is far from the best solution.

To begin with, there is a certain ground to increase the minimum legal driving age in an attempt to enhance road safety. Numerous traffic incidents are the results of young people’s reckless driving behaviour. Their actions are often the product of peer pressure or under the influence of alcohol. Raising the driving age, therefore, can prevent these careless drivers from controlling the wheels and posing threats to others, contributing to the improvement of traffic safety. However, the aforementioned policy is not necessarily the optimal solution.

The government should inflict more severe punishments on traffic violators such as longer prison sentences or higher fines which could act as a deterrent to potential offenders. In other words, if drivers can foresee the severe consequences of their actions, they will be more likely to drive responsibly regardless of their legal driving age. Furthermore, citizens need to undergo more thorough training and extensive tests to ensure a person is physically and mentally fit to operate a vehicle. Age factor, as a result, should only be considered as one among many determinants.

In conclusion, although increasing the legal age for driving can help improve the safety of roads to a certain extent, I believe that its effectiveness pales in comparison with that of some other measures. As members of society, individuals are obliged to drive carefully to protect themselves and other people’s lives.

Sample 6:

Enhancing road safety is a paramount concern, and the proposition of elevating the minimum legal age for driving a motorised vehicle has garnered attention as a potential solution. I firmly support the idea of raising the minimum legal driving age as an effective strategy to enhance road safety.

Firstly, adolescents and young adults are more prone to risk-taking behaviours due to their underdeveloped decision-making faculties. Increasing the driving age would allow these individuals more time to mature emotionally and mentally, resulting in more cautious and responsible drivers. For example, countries like Japan and Germany have successfully implemented higher minimum driving ages, leading to statistically lower rates of accidents involving young drivers.

Furthermore, the advent of modern technology and distractions exacerbates the risks associated with young drivers. Smartphones, social media, gaming devices and other digital platforms divert attention away from the road and young people are more addicted users of those digital technologies. By postponing the age at which individuals can drive, authorities can therefore ensure that new drivers are better equipped to navigate the complexities of modern driving environments without succumbing to distractions like this. This could result in fewer accidents caused by impaired concentration. For instance, more percentages of young drivers are prone to use their mobile phones than their adult counterparts while driving. Thus, they are at more risk of road accidents due to distractions by mobile technology.

In conclusion, the proposal to elevate the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike is a practical step towards improving road safety. The inherent immaturity and susceptibility to distractions among young drivers render them more prone to accidents. By providing these individuals with additional time to mature and develop sound decision-making skills, we can reduce the incidence of road accidents and create a safer environment for all road users.

Sample 7:

Many people propose increasing the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike as they believe it is the most effective approach to ensure road safety. However, I hold a contrasting viewpoint on this matter. I think that more effective alternative strategies are there that we should explore to address road safety rather than simply raising the legal age to be eligible for a driver's license.

Firstly, the effectiveness of raising the minimum driving age is debatable. While it is true that younger drivers may lack experience and mature decision-making abilities, these shortcomings can be mitigated through comprehensive driver education and training programmes. By enhancing the quality of driver education and instilling responsible driving habits at an earlier age, authorities can equip young drivers with the skills needed to navigate complex road situations. Perhaps, this is why, countries that facilitate comprehensive training and skills as a means to obtaining a driver's license have better road safety records than their counterparts.

Additionally, age-based restrictions overlook individual variations in cognitive and emotional development. Not all individuals mature at the same pace, and imposing a blanket age limit may unfairly penalise responsible and capable young drivers. Rather than focusing solely on age, evaluating the readiness of each individual through rigorous driving tests and assessments can ensure that only competent drivers are granted licenses.

Finally, the modern driving landscape is evolving rapidly, with advancements in technology reshaping the way vehicles are operated and controlled. Instead of limiting young drivers' access to vehicles, policymakers should invest in incorporating advanced safety features and driver-assistance technologies into vehicles. This would provide an added layer of protection for all drivers, regardless of their age or experience level. For instance, a recent survey conducted in many Asian countries proves that cars with the latest safety features are less likely to cause serious casualties than older cars that lack the proper safety features.

In conclusion, the notion of increasing the minimum legal age for driving as a means to enhance road safety oversimplifies the multifaceted nature of the issue. Effective driver education, personalized assessments of readiness, and the integration of advanced safety technologies offer more nuanced and equitable strategies to promote safer roads without stifling the mobility and opportunities of young individuals.

Sample 8:

There are some people who believe that the best way to minimise traffic accidents and increase safety on the road is to increase the minimum legal age for having a car or motorbike licence. Personally, I completely disagree with this idea for several reasons which will be outlined below.

Firstly, while there are many accidents on the road that are caused by young people, I do not believe that restricting them from driving a motorbike or car until a later age will have any serious impact on the current rate of traffic accidents. Certainly, many young people lack adequate experience driving in busy traffic, however stopping them from getting their licence until a later age does not allow them to gain the necessary driving experience which they need in order to drive safely. By allowing young people to drive on the road and gain the experience they need, the risk of a traffic accident occurring will be reduced.

Furthermore, traffic accidents are generally caused by people of all ages and are quite often due to other issues besides experience, such as poor concentration, dangerous driving, or a lack of awareness and skill. Old people, in particular, are more likely to suffer from poor concentration and lack of awareness, when compared to younger people who tend to have a better general awareness of their surroundings and have a higher level of physical ability and reaction timing. Additionally, dangerous driving is likely to be performed by anyone at any age, not necessarily young people.

In conclusion, it is believed that age is not necessarily the main factor when it comes to traffic accidents, and therefore increasing the minimum age for driving is not the best way to increase road safety.

Sample 9:

Road safety is a pressing issue that affects all aspects of society. While I reckon that increasing the minimum legal age for driving could enhance safety, it may lead to unintended negative consequences on the economy and the overall development of a country.

One major factor for my agreement is that younger drivers are more susceptible to peer pressure, which can lead to risky driving behaviors, such as speeding or using mobile phones while controlling their vehicles. Furthermore, there are scientific studies suggesting that the areas in the human brain that are responsible for decision-making and impulse control are not yet fully developed until the individual is in their mid-20s. This underdevelopment can impair their ability to assess risks accurately and make safe choices. These elements combined underscore the potential dangers posed by young drivers on the road, making a strong case to increase the minimum legal age for driver license acquisition.

Despite the compelling evidence to advocate raising minimum driving age, the adverse effects on the economy caused by this enforcement should not be overlooked. Young people constitute a large portion of the population, and a majority of this demographic rely on personal vehicles to commute to work, school and other activities. Thus, restricting their ability to drive can hinder their mobility and independence. This limitation can lead to a cascade of economic implications, as the reduced availability of young drivers may result in decreased workforce participation, increased demand for public transportation, and potential delays in reaching destinations. Consequently, on a broader scale, the overall efficiency of transportation may suffer, creating more challenges to the young generation and discouraging them to contribute to the development of their country.

In conclusion, while I agree that raising the minimum legal driving age could potentially reduce the risks associated with young drivers, it is crucial to consider the broader implications brought about by this enforcement.

Sample 10:

It is believed that raising the minimum driving age is the most effective method to improve road safety. While I accept that this approach has some effects in the short term, I believe that a longer-term and better solution is to impose stricter punishments for driving offences.

I think that increasing the minimum legal driving age can help reduce traffic accidents, thus improving the safety of roads. This is because a large number of traffic incidents are caused by young people’s careless driving. Many of them are not mature enough to fully understand the serious consequences of their actions or to be responsible for what they caused. Raising the driving age, therefore, can make sure that the youngest drivers are mature enough to take driving seriously and to protect their own lives and other people’s lives when driving.

In my opinion, however, this approach is only effective to a limited extent, due to the fact that nowadays many youngsters still drive without a driving licence. So, a more effective way to ensure road traffic safety is to impose more severe punishments on those who commit driving offences. For example, a longer prison sentence could be given for very serious offences and a heavier fine could be imposed for running a red light or driving without a helmet. These punishments could help deter potential offenders and prevent people from re-offending.

In conclusion, I believe that introducing stricter regulations for driving offences is a much better measure to increase road safety in comparison with increasing the minimum driving age.

Sample 11:

It is argued that the most effective measure to improve road safety is raising the minimum age of eligibility for drivers. I mostly disagree with this notion since it can reduce careless driving; however, I am of the opinion that it is ideal to combine it with other approaches such as imposing stricter punishments and upgrading public transportation.

Admittedly, increasing the minimum legal driving age can reduce traffic accidents which boosts the safety of roads. More specifically, this practice deters young commuters who are immature and unaware of the repercussions of their actions from reckless driving. As people get older, they are more mature and responsible when they are in traffic, therefore, potentially mitigating traffic incidents, generating a safer environment for other commuters.

However, this proposal is not optimal by itself since there are two other effective measures which should sit alongside older licensing ages for the best outcome. Chief of these is that the government should enact more severe punishments to prevent drivers from committing traffic-based infringements. For example, drivers who exceed the speed limit or drink alcohol while driving should have to pay a heavy monetary fine or have their driver’s licence revoked. As a result, more drivers will obey the rules while joining the traffic. Another approach is for the government to enhance the public transportation infrastructure such as bus and train services to encourage citizens to use them in their daily life. This can lead to a decline in the number of people utilising private vehicles and therefore safer roads.

In conclusion, I somewhat disagree that increasing the legal driving age can encourage safer travelling, as I believe that other solutions in conjunction with it, such as the introduction of more grave punishments on those who violate traffic laws and the enhancement of public transportation, combine to make the most viable solution since not all accidents are caused by underage drivers. It is advisable that all three options should be considered by authorities to address traffic problems effectively.

Sample 12:

Many concerned policy makers today believe that raising the legal age for acquiring a license would improve road safety. In my opinion, though this might engender a negligible impact, there are superior solutions.

Proponents of this policy reform argue that a disproportionate number of accidents today are caused by younger people. In most countries, it is possible to apply for a learner’s permit at the age of 16 and soon after that a license. Teenagers often lack the maturity and experience required to drive responsibly and respond to challenging road conditions such as inclement weather and reckless drivers. If the legal age for driving was increased, it would enable young people to spend more time learning the rules of the road and becoming more mature generally. This would presumably lead to a reduction in accidents, though there is little scientific evidence to support this particular hypothesis.

In fact, the causes of collisions are more closely correlated with other underlying problems. The chief cause of vehicular accidents globally relates to driving under the influence of alcohol. Most teenagers are not able to purchase alcohol legally and therefore the majority of accidents are caused by individuals over the legal age for drinking. This statistic is also more prominent among older individuals whose reflexes are in decline. Furthermore, altering the designs of towns and cities would have far greater tangible ramifications. Many urban environments, for example, were built long ago and more modern understandings of motorist behaviour could be beneficial. This might include emphasising subways and other public transport as opposed to motorways.

In conclusion, despite the marginal relationship between maturity and vehicular accidents, the most effective reforms would involve stricter drinking laws and better urban planning. These changes would be more likely to bring about the desired improvements.

Sample 13:

Some individuals believe raising the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes is the most effective method of increasing road safety. While I accept that this policy is acceptable to some extent, I believe it is not the best because there are much better measures to reduce traffic accidents.

It might be a good idea to increase the minimum age required for driving because of some reason. Firstly, since younger people are usually less mature and less responsible with their manners, they might not be aware of the importance of following the rules. Therefore, it is reasonable to ban them from travelling on the street to prevent them from breaking the law and causing accidents. Secondly, as older people are more experienced, they can know how to react quickly to handle dangerous situations on the road, while younger ones might not be able to. To illustrate, if the brakes of a car suddenly stop working, a young driver might panic, and accidents are more likely to occur.

However, I would argue that there are much better methods of ensuring road safety. The first one is to have stricter punishments for driving offenders. For example, people who break traffic rules should be required to pay huge fines or be banned permanently from commuting on the street. This makes commuters more likely to respect the law, and traffic accidents can be limited. Another solution is to encourage people to use public transport rather than private vehicles. This can be done by reducing the price and increasing the frequency of buses and tubes to make it more convenient for users.

In conclusion, I believe that apart from increasing the legal age for driving, there are more effective ways to make sure that travelling on the street is safe for everyone.

Sample 14:

Some opine that increasing drivers' and motorcyclists' minimum legal age should be regarded as the best approach to improve road safety. Personally, I totally disagree with this statement because neither can the policy help people understand the significance of safe driving nor enable them to realise how seriously accidents may impact victims and themselves.

The major reason why I am strongly against increasing the minimum legal age for driving vehicles being decisive to road safety is that drivers' safety awareness will not be altered. Although it seems people will naturally know how to drive safely with age, the fact runs the other way around. Many males, for instance, always drive fast to show some of their masculinity, regardless of their age. Therefore, even if there was a rise in the minimum driving age, they would do the same; in other words, numerous car accidents would still happen.

Another point supporting my stance is that simply adopting measures regarding driving age is not enough to encourage reckless drivers to know the adverse consequences their actions may entail owing to a dearth of sanctions imposed on them. If drivers perceive that they will not be punished, it is highly likely that they will keep involving themselves in dangerous behaviours, such as fatigue and drunk driving. In contrast, prioritising punishment can be more effective.

In conclusion, I completely approve of the viewpoint that delaying the minimum legal age for driving cars and motorbikes is by no means the best way to reduce the increasing number of road accidents. This method is impossible to boost drivers' awareness of safe driving; meanwhile, it cannot make them consider the severe results of their negligence. Obviously, there is more to improving road safety than increasing the minimum legal age, such as organising programmes that can promote people's consciousness of safe driving and implementing punitive strategies.

Sample 15:

Many argue that elevating the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes is the optimal solution to enhance road safety. I partly agree with this assertion as I believe that while age restrictions can contribute to safer roads, they are not a panacea and must be accompanied by other measures.

Firstly, increasing the minimum legal age for drivers and riders can lead to a reduction in road accidents, primarily because older individuals tend to possess better judgment and more self-control than younger ones. For instance, statistical data often shows a higher incidence of road accidents among teenagers due to their lack of experience and propensity for risk-taking. By raising the age limit, potentially reckless young drivers would be kept off the road, thus decreasing the likelihood of accidents.

However, age alone cannot be the sole determinant of driving safety. Competence, not age, should be the main criterion. There are numerous individuals in their late teens who are more responsible and have better driving skills than some adults. Therefore, instead of imposing stricter age limits, a more effective approach would be to enhance the quality of driving tests and ensure that all drivers, regardless of age, have the necessary skills and mindset for safe driving.

Moreover, educational campaigns focusing on road safety can significantly influence drivers' behavior. These programs can teach drivers about the dangers of speeding, the importance of wearing seat belts, and the perils of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Awareness can lead to a more conscientious driving culture where safety is prioritized over speed or convenience.

In conclusion, while raising the minimum legal age for driving can contribute to road safety, it should not be viewed as the sole solution. A multifaceted approach, including stricter driving tests and educational campaigns, is essential to create a safer driving environment. Ultimately, improving road safety is a collective responsibility that requires the efforts of not only the drivers but also the government and society.

Sample 16:

There are a number of people who believe that increasing the minimum permissible age for driving motor vehicles can be an effective solution to ensure safety on roads. However, I do not agree with this statement. In this essay, I will discuss that minimum age is not the only risk factor for accidents on road, but drinking is a more responsible factor.

First of all, driving is a skill, and age is not a factor for learning a skill. As long as the person is physically capable of handling the vehicle he/she is as good as an adult person while driving a car or motorbike. Accidents mainly happen due to the lack of concentration while driving. For example, texting or receiving a call while driving is more hazardous while driving. A person can lose balance over the vehicle in such situations irrespective of age. There are only a handful of cases when the driver of the vehicle in case of a road accident is a minor.

Apart from that, the greatest number of accidents on the road are triggered by drunk driving. The minimum age for drinking is already more than the minimum age for driving in most countries. Thus, it could be deduced that more adults are causing accidents on the road as compared to the number of underage drivers and riders. In this way, there is a lack of correlation between age and road accidents and increasing the minimum age for driving cars and bikes should not help much, rather people need to be made aware of not drinking while driving.

In conclusion, increasing the minimum permissible age for driving vehicles would be less effective than preventing people from drink and drive.

Sample 17:

Some people believe that the ideal way to ensure road safety is to raise the minimum age for getting a driving license. I believe that this may help, but it is certainly not the best method, and other solutions should be considered as well.

Proponents of the given statement say that an experienced and highly skillful driver usually needs long training and practice. Therefore, drivers who are under the age of 18, in most cases, fail to have sufficient time to perfect their driving techniques. Moreover, teenage drivers are more likely to have collisions on the road, compared to drivers in other age groups because they like to take risks to get the excitement of driving. This is because young drivers, especially those who are in adolescence, tend to overestimate their driving abilities and underestimate the dangers on the road. Nevertheless, apart from controlling the legal age strictly, I believe that other measures must be taken to prevent deaths and serious injuries.

Firstly, the government should set higher standards for testing drivers’ ability to drive and prolong the training time since better-prepared drivers and riders can reduce the number of mishaps on roads. Besides, eating, drinking or talking on the phone while driving should be strictly prohibited as these activities might distract the driver’s attention and cause some untoward consequences. Additionally, for those disqualified drivers, who have caused some accidents, a retest should be mandatory.

Finally, the stricter age limitation for drivers is especially suitable for those senior drivers who have failing eyesight or problems with night vision. Although senior drivers might be adept at driving a car, their energy, eyesight and reaction time sometimes cannot make them cope with some unexpected traffic conditions.

In conclusion, although raising the lowest legal age can prevent some road mishaps, other considerations are equally important in tackling the issue.

Sample 18:

Many concerned policymakers today believe that raising the legal age for acquiring a license would improve road safety. In my opinion, though this might engender a negligible impact, there are superior solutions.

Proponents of this policy reform argue that a disproportionate number of accidents today are caused by younger people. In most countries, it is possible to apply for a learner’s permit at the age of 16 and soon after that a license. Teenagers often lack the maturity and experience required to drive responsibly and respond to challenging road conditions such as inclement weather and reckless drivers. If the legal age for driving was increased, it would enable young people to spend more time learning the rules of the road and becoming more mature generally. This would presumably lead to a reduction in accidents, though there is little scientific evidence to support this particular hypothesis.

In fact, the causes of collisions are more closely correlated with other underlying problems. The chief cause of vehicular accidents globally relates to driving under the influence of alcohol. Most teenagers are not able to purchase alcohol legally and therefore the majority of accidents are caused by individuals over the legal age for drinking. This statistic is also more prominent among older individuals whose reflexes are in decline. Furthermore, altering the designs of towns and cities would have far greater tangible ramifications. Many urban environments, for example, were built long ago and more modern understandings of motorist behaviour could be beneficial. This might include emphasizing subways and other public transport as opposed to motorways.

In conclusion, despite the marginal relationship between maturity and vehicular accidents, the most effective reforms would involve stricter drinking laws and better urban planning. These changes would be more likely to bring about the desired improvements.

Sample 19:

It is commonly believed that the ideal way to ensure road safety is to raise the minimum age for getting a driving license. I believe that raising the legal age of driving would lead to more problems and other methods like banning the use of mobile phones and stricter punishments for traffic violators would turn out to be more effective.

I believe raising the minimum driving age would rather increase accidents. Today, most people are busy, and they don’t have time to drive their children. Thus, teenagers and youngsters knowing driving is no more an option but a necessity. If driving is not allowed, it doesn’t deter youngsters from driving but rather makes them drive illegally. For example, many teenagers are caught driving without a license in India as the legal driving age is on the higher side. Driving illegally means youngsters driving without knowing about traffic rules and driving fast to avoid police which leads to more accidents.

A more effective solution to reduce traffic accidents would be to ban mobile phone use while driving. Nowadays, the major reason for accidents is distracted driving, which means reading messages or taking calls while driving. Reckless and rash driving, which is associated with young age and lack of maturity, are certainly not the main reason for accidents. Thus, banning the use of mobile phones and inculcating a habit of undivided attention among people while driving would prove more effective.

Another solution that I think can prove more beneficial would be to have stringent fines and punishments for traffic violations and especially for repeat offenses. In India particularly, many traffic accidents are caused by breaking the traffic rules, like jumping red lights or driving on the wrong side of the road to save time. Thus, a healthy culture of people following rules and regulations needs to be developed and this can be done by having harsher punishments like high fines, suspension of driving license and so on.

In conclusion, I think there are better alternatives to raising the legal age for driving as this could lead to more problems.

Sample 20:

When it comes to road safety, some people argue that the most effective way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. In my opinion, I think the age limit for the drivers and motorbike uses should be increased in order to elevate road safety.

To start with, increasing the minimum age requirement for driving is a good idea. First and foremost, the motorcycles are killer machines and that its riders, usually teenagers, are more vulnerable than accidents of cars because of their two-wheel design. And it is also seen that youngsters often drive rashly which leads to accidents. This is because they are not mature enough and the lack of experience is also a serious fact for accidents. Secondly, age between 15 to 17 years, teenager’s body and mind are changing rapidly and they have many distractions that they cannot concentrate on one task. This may result in deadly accidents. Therefore, there would be fewer accidents if the legal age limit for driving is raised to 18 years. Again, teenagers are reckless drivers and driving at a high speed and doing competition each other on the highway is quite common among them.

However, I would like to argue that there are other better approaches to reduce road accidents. We can substantially reduce traffic accidents by the means of stiff punishment for traffic offenders. This would be effective in two ways. First of all, once a strict law is imposed and, it prevents people’s attempt to make an offense a second time. Secondly, when a person is punished severely is considered as a mirror at which other people may look and they try to avoid the same incidents.

Based on the above discussion, it is easily said that there are some effective measures along with the age bar. The other ways should be considered in order to ensure road safety.

Sample 21:

It is said that raising the lowest legal age for driving a car or riding a motorbike is the most effective way to prevent accidents. While I agree that driving age rise makes a significant contribution to reducing road accidents, I believe that other factors are equally important.

On the one hand, I agree that increasing the minimum driving age would decrease deaths and injuries. Youngers tend to break the rules and get involved in accidents because of the lack of responsibility, maturity and experience. Therefore, the older they are, the more experience they gain. Clearly, older drivers find a solution to dangerous and unpredicted situations more quickly while driving than younger ones. If a person crosses the road suddenly, for example, younger drivers might be frightened and panic, older drivers might brake or turn the steering wheel instead. To sum up, I approve of the increase in driving age.

Nevertheless, I believe that there are better measures to maintaining road safety. Firstly, the government should encourage commuters to use public transports instead of private ones in order to reduce the level of traffic. Secondly, traffic police should fine commuters heavily or forfeit their driving license if they break the law. As a result, drivers are likely to obey the law and car accidents decrease. Finally, the authorities should invest more money in improving transportation infrastructures with a view to creating better conditions for drivers.

In conclusion, while raising the driving age certainly affects the number of car crashes, I do not believe that it outweighs all other measures.

Sample 22:

Due to the rapidly increasing number of veheicles on the road, chances of meeting accidents are greater for the walkers as well as for the motorist and driver. I completely disagree with the statement that the best way to escalate road safety is to enhance the minimum legal age for the above-mentioned vehicles. This articulation will elucidate the justification of my standpoint in the subsequent paragraphs.

First and foremost, in this modern era youngsters are found of keeping new bikes or luxurious cars. Thus, if legal age is escalated, being impulsive, they would not wait for a long period of time, and they will drive in an illegal way, and they will become a real threat for the walkers and also for themselves. For instance, minors who drive recklessly on the road and even without having a license drive and in their ignorance regarding rules of driving on the road, damage public property as well as harm the pedestrian. Thus, the rising legal age is not a wise decision as it will be responsible for making traffic congestion and accident on the road.

In addition, enhancing age for driving or riding motorbikes is not the best decision. Instead, increasing the training period, which is inadequate to learn driving, should be enhanced. So that people can learn well and would obey the rules. Besides, any disobedience on the part of drivers in the initial six months will make them realize to abide by the rules and wear safety gear while driving. Thus, it will be more fruitful for increasing road safety to save humankind.

In conclusion, Human life is precious, and to protect human beings, road safety is essential but not on the cost of enhancing legal age for driving and motorbikes as it will make way for the people to drive illegally as well as other measures must be adopted namely rising training period and too name but a few.

Sample 23:

As more and more people can now afford cars and motorbikes, the growing number of traffic accidents are becoming one of the most pressing problems for countries around the world. To resolve this problem, some people have proposed that the minimum legal age for using motorized vehicles ought to be raised. However, the question of whether this is the optimal method to improve our current traffic situation is one that cannot be answered easily.

A higher age limit for drivers and riders of vehicles does indeed address one of the leading causes of traffic accidents: mistakes in driving resulting from the inexperience of young drivers. Young people, who often lack caution and patience, tend to have more trouble with controlling their vehicles than older and more matured people. In traffic situations where a high level of concentration and responsibility is required, these characteristics of young drivers can easily lead to serious accidents. By changing the age requirement for car driving and motorbike riding, we could reduce the number of young and often inexperienced people on the road, and therefore lower the death toll associated with traffic accidents.

However, there are still important aspects of traffic problems that cannot be targeted with only the given approach. Drunk driving, for example, is usually associated with a high percentage of traffic accidents, but it is something that can happen to both old and young people. Similarly, traffic accidents that are caused by factors such as bad weather or badly built roads and bridges can still harm drivers and bikers regardless of their age and experience. In short, it appears that raising the age of driving and riding alone is insufficient to improve road safety.

In conclusion, while I agree that by raising the minimum age of driving and riding, we can reduce the number traffic accidents caused by young people, I am still skeptical of the idea that this alone is the best solution. A more suitable approach, in my opinion, would be a combination of multiple changes in different aspects of traffic that can address all the causes of traffic accidents.

Sample 24:

In order for a prospect of safer roads, some people suppose that raising the driving age is the best option. From my perspective, I partly agree with this initiative because of some reasons which will be clarified in the essay below.

On the one hand, the reasons why the requirement of higher legal driving age is worth considering are varied. As can be seen, being usually known as less mature and responsible for their manners, teenagers seem to be potential risk-takers on the roads, who usually cause crashes. In fact, Europe has registered a disproportionate number of young drivers, especially under 18-year-old, who are involved in 20% of traffic accidents or commit deliberate violations such as speeding, undertaking, and jumping red lights. However, this approach could be pointless since the main cause does not stem from age but from the awareness and experience that new drivers gain from formal training and practices.

On the other hand, I think that there are more effective measures to ensure road safety. First, young people should be involved early in stricter pre-driver training which provides them with safety awareness and driving skills as well. This can make them more well-prepared and responsive to unexpected incidents on roads. Second, as poor traffic infrastructure is also a key root of road danger, it should be improved in many aspects including traffic lights, the quality of road surface or lane fences. Take Vietnam as an example, many accidents have usually occurred on many bump and narrow streets.

In conclusion, I believe that equipping new drivers with necessary skills and experience and improvement of traffic infrastructure are more able to prove its effects on ensuring road safety rather than raising the minimum driving age.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

It is increasingly common for families to rely on products from the fast-food industry to take care of their meals on a regular basis due to its lower cost and availability. This essay will explain why I believe its drawbacks outweigh the benefits of such unhealthy foods.

One of the most significant advantages of fast food is that it offers a complete meal at an affordable price. For example, a combo meal from some of today’s industry leaders costs only under five dollars, while it would have cost consumers half their month’s salary if they purchase organic and healthy food at supermarkets. Furthermore, the fast-food industry is extremely convenient. When people are exhausted after a long day at work, the last thing on their mind is spending hours preparing dinner for everyone, whereas they will have fast food ready to serve in five minutes or less at fast food establishments.

However, fast food consumption does present many drawbacks, the most obvious of which is that it can harm our health. The reason for this is that fast food contains a lot of oil, hazardous food coloring agents, and unhealthy trans fats. As a result, regular junk food intakeleads to long-term health problems such as obesity, emotional and self-esteem issues, and chronic illnesses in later life. Another danger of fast and processed food is it can create adverse effects on society. The growth of fast-food availability in the country seems to coincide with the growth of obesity, which puts a strain on/ places a huge burden on the healthcare system.

In conclusion, the main benefits of affordability and convenience that fast food has offered are outweighed by its dangers of severe health problems and effects on the healthcare system.

Sample 2:

The burgeoning availability and affordability of fast food across various nations sparks a multifaceted debate on its impacts. This phenomenon, while convenient, presents a complex interplay of advantages and disadvantages. On one hand, the ease and economy of fast food cater to the fast-paced lifestyle of contemporary society. Conversely, its health implications and the cultural erosion it potentially fosters cannot be overlooked. This essay endeavors to dissect these aspects, weighing their significance in the broader societal context.

The primary boon of fast food's growing accessibility lies in its alignment with the modern world's rapid tempo. For countless individuals juggling demanding schedules, fast food offers a quick, economical solution to daily sustenance, obviating the time-intensive preparation of traditional meals. This convenience is not just a matter of saving time; it also democratizes eating options for lower-income groups who might otherwise struggle to afford nutritious meals. Furthermore, the fast-food industry has been a catalyst for employment opportunities, providing countless jobs across the globe, thereby stimulating economic growth in numerous communities.

However, the shadow cast by these benefits is significant. Predominantly, the health ramifications of regular fast-food consumption are alarming. High in calories, trans fats, and sodium, these meals contribute to a myriad of health issues, including obesity, heart disease, and diabetes. This health crisis burdens not only the individual but also the healthcare systems at large. Additionally, the omnipresence of fast food undermines traditional culinary cultures, gradually eroding the rich tapestry of global food heritage in favour of homogenized, mass-produced meals. This cultural dilution diminishes the diversity that is crucial to the vibrancy of societies.

In conclusion, while the convenience and economic advantages of fast food's proliferation are undeniable, they are outweighed by its detrimental health consequences and cultural impact. The challenge lies in finding a balance that preserves cultural heritage and promotes healthy living while acknowledging the necessities of modern life. Engaging in this dialogue is essential for fostering a society that values both convenience and well-being.

Sample 3:

In an era marked by the unprecedented proliferation of fast food, its increasing affordability and accessibility have ignited a nuanced discourse. While this trend offers undeniable convenience and economic benefits, it also harbors potential health and cultural drawbacks. This essay aims to meticulously examine these facets, asserting that the disadvantages notably overshadow the advantages.

The allure of fast food lies in its immediate gratification and minimal impact on one's wallet, making it a staple in the fast-paced rhythm of modern existence. Particularly for individuals ensnared in the whirlwind of daily commitments, fast food serves as a lifeline, providing sustenance without the demands of traditional meal preparation. This sector also acts as a significant economic engine, creating employment opportunities and fostering community growth. However, this superficial veneer of benefits masks deeper, more detrimental impacts.

The crux of the argument against the fast-food culture pivots on its health implications. The habitual consumption of such meals, laden with excessive calories, fats, and sodium, acts as a catalyst for chronic diseases, including obesity and cardiovascular conditions. This not only diminishes individual quality of life but also exerts immense pressure on healthcare systems globally. Beyond the physical health concerns, the ascendancy of fast food erodes the rich mosaic of traditional cuisines, diluting cultural identities and culinary heritage in favor of uniformity and convenience.

Concluding, the convenience and economic allure of fast food, though appealing, are eclipsed by its adverse health effects and the erosion of cultural diversity. The challenge for contemporary society is to navigate this complex landscape, advocating for nutritional awareness and the preservation of culinary heritage. Embracing this dual approach can steer the global community towards a future where convenience does not come at the expense of health and cultural richness.

Sample 4:

The prices of instant food have reduced, and it has become ubiquitous almost all over the world. However, I believe that the downsides of this development outweigh the advantages, because the convenience that fast food brings to the people’s busy lifestyle is availed at the cost of their healthy diet.

Fast food provides a quick solution to fulfil the food requirements of busy individuals. Due to the fast-paced environment in which people live today, they hardly find time to cook food. In fact, as the living expenses have skyrocketed, people try to spend their maximum time at paid work, rather than preparing food at home. Therefore, fast food has become a convenient option for them. For example, after having hectic hours at office, individuals prefer to spend the rest of the day relaxed with their loved ones. So, they simply order fast food instead of going through all the hassles to prepare food ingredients and cook at home. However, this can be detrimental to one’s health in the long run.

Fast food contains high levels of carbohydrates and sugar which are obviously unhealthy if taken beyond a certain extent. Therefore, when someone consumes this type of food regularly, they get sick. Obesity and heart related diseases are mostly caused by the excessive intake of fast food. For instance, the USA has the greatest number of obesity patients in the world, and this is positively correlated with the increased consumption of fast food compared to that of the other countries. This is how, due to the availability and the low price, the trend of fast-food intake has a far-reaching negative consequence.

To conclude, although the instant food has become a quick fix to men and women who are too busy to manage their food requirements, I believe that it can have some serious health implications in the future that certainly outweighs the benefits that it brings.

Sample 5:

Many today are of the belief that the ubiquity of fast food provides enough enjoyment and economic positives to outweigh its impact on public health. In my opinion, the disadvantages related to health make this a negative development.

Those supporting the fast-food industry typically point to the pleasure consumers derive and the employment it provides. There is little to argue about in terms of enjoyment. Fast food is affordable and tastes good. That explains its popularity and makes it accessible for people from even the lowest socioeconomic backgrounds. Moreover, there are obvious economic benefits. Companies like McDonald’s, Burger King, Baskin Robbins, and Domino’s Pizza are some of the largest employers globally. Their economic contributions extend beyond providing poorly paid jobs as they are taxed and thereby strengthen the federal budgets of both developing and developed nations.

Nonetheless, fast food has a huge impact in the health sector. Most tangibly, this concerns to obesity. Studies have shown that obesity rates soar in countries where fast food has become entrenched in the local market. The best-known example of this is in the United States, where obesity is reaching epidemic proportions. Related and often symptomatic drawbacks include cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and high blood pressure. Foods high in fat, sugar, and overprocessed ingredients have been proven to exacerbate these conditions, with heart disease now the single greatest cause of death around the world. This cannot be blamed entirely on fast food but there are very few healthy options on most fast-food menus and the majority of companies specialise in quintessentially unhealthy foods like deep fried chicken, cheeseburgers, pizzas, and tacos.

In conclusion, despite the boons for enjoyment and the economy, fast food is a negative taken as a whole given its impact on well-being. It is therefore important to regulate fast food companies to curb their influence.

Sample 6:

The growing popularity of fast food at cheaper prices can be witnessed in many countries over a few recent years. While some are in favor of this trend due to the economic advantages and consumers’ pleasure that fast food provides, others argue that it is a negative development, especially for the overall health of society. From my viewpoint, the drawbacks of this trend are far more severe than its benefits.

Advocates of the expansion of fast-food chains typically subscribe to the convenient consumption and the employment opportunities it offers. Since junk food usually has an affordable price and delicious taste, it is accessible for the majority of the public. People can find and buy fast food almost anywhere and anytime, so it is a perfect option for people with hectic schedules and do not have time for home-cooked meals. Aside from the convenience for consumers, the fast-food industry also makes contributions to the economy. Companies like KFC, Lotteria, or McDonald’s are large employers that create jobs for millions of people every year, helping to lower the unemployment rate in many countries. Also, the tax gained from their business operation can strengthen the national budget, which is then allocated to and invested in other sectors.

However, the adverse impact of fast food on health is significant. Junk food itself is high in fat, sugar, salt and contains many artificial additives, all of which have been scientifically proven to be associated with many health issues such as obesity, diabetes, or hypertension. The rates of people getting these diseases are of large proportions in Western countries, where fast food consumption is also the highest. Furthermore, many fast-food manufacturers are profit-driven and thus may overlook the food safety standards. The sterilization process may be neglected, and ingredients may be reused constantly, doubling the threat posed on the health of consumers. Consequences range from food poisoning, diarrhea to digestive disorders and even death.

In conclusion, the widespread use of fast food implies many harms for consumers’ well-being, which overshadows the instant advantages it delivers.

Sample 7:

It is widely witnessed that fast food is becoming more and more popular in many countries. I hold the belief that the drawbacks of this development are far more significant than the benefits involved.

The fact that the prices of fast food are reducing, and its availability is increasing. Having more affordable fast-food options available bring many benefits to both individuals as well as the society. Delicious foods are offered at low prices and delivered in a short amount of time. Some chains, like McDonald's, have opened several drive-through restaurants selling foods less than one dollar, so people no longer need to leave their car. This can allow people to save money and time, which is suitable for working people with a busy schedule. On the societal level, when more people go to fast-food outlets for their regular meals, fast food businesses can quickly expand and thus increase the sales volumes. This expansion of fast-food chains might create more job opportunities for local people and result in higher employment rates.

Despite the aforementioned benefits, this trend can have several major downsides. Chief of these is that traditional dinners that serve as a bonding activity among family members in the past are now less common as a result of the growth of fast food. Long-term negative effects on family dietary patterns may result from this trend. Another reason worth mentioning is that eating too much fast food may actually increase one’s chance of developing a wide range of chronic conditions, such as diabetes or obesity. Additionally, chemical components included in convenience food, such as saturated fat and food coloring, can hasten this process.

In conclusion, the fact that fast food is becoming much more affordable and popular can bring certain benefits for some individuals and the economy. However, I believe that this development is more disadvantageous due to the negative effects on familial bonds and health.

Sample 8:

In this modern era, junk food is easily available all around the globe. It is readily accessible because of its lower/ reasonable price. It becomes popular with youngsters. Undoubtedly it has positive effects on the food industry, but its downside can not be ignored. So, this essay sheds light on the pros and cons of this situation in the upcoming paragraph/ before drawing a reasoned conclusion.

To begin with, the advantages of fast food. It is a convenience and time- saving, it is accepted the fact that nowadays people are busy in their job/ work/ business, so they don t have much time to enjoy their meal or can say they do not have time to prepare some traditional food for themselves and family, so they prefer to eat junk food. A second benefit is that people can buy fast food at any time. The internet makes it so easy that people can order food through ‘online websites at any time when they want. Another reason for eating fast food is that the government charges significantly less tax on food, which maintains its prices.

Moreover, it is open to various job opportunities. For example, nowadays, people order online applications that increase more jobs in the technical field, such as web designers, which design website correctly, and show more options to people that allure more customs. The second job is in the delivery field. If people order online, so the company definitely requires some delivery person. So, in that way, the popularity of junk food is suitable not only for food companies but also for unemployed people.

Furthermore, despite a few positive aspects, there are several drawbacks. However, fast food is very affordable and available everywhere at any time, but it affects health. For example, within a few years, there has been a shocking rise in the number of people suffering from obesity, heart diseases and other health problems. Fast food does not contain necessary vitamins, protein and nutrients, which are essential for health. In addition to this, there is no guarantee that fast food is cooked carefully and adequately or not, so it is not safe to consume junk food. Last but not least, it demolishes the culture and customs of societies because the number of people who are eating fast food is increasing at an alarming rate, and it is observed in developed countries where people are more interested in fast food rather than traditional cooking.

To sum up, even though street food is affordable and readily available, making life comfortable, it puts people’s health at risk. So, according to my perception, the disadvantages of this trend outweigh the advantages.

Sample 9:

The growth of fast-food companies globally, resulting in cheaper prices and greater availability, have become an increasing source of both excitement and apathy. In my opinion, this trend is in general quite harmful, since the cost to both the environment and to people is too great.

A benefit of the increasing ubiquity of fast food is that those in poorer areas will be able to afford to eat. Since fast food is both cheap and quick to make, this will appeal to those with not a lot of money and time. Furthermore, fast food restaurants are also a major employer of low skilled workers, and as such, can help to provide poorer individuals with jobs. For instance, fast food chains are one of the biggest employers in countries such as America, especially in isolated towns and counties.

On the other hand, it could be said that fast food does much more harm to society in the long run. Firstly, fast food has been shown to cause numerous health problems, such as increased blood pressure and risk of heart disease, which will be very costly to society. In addition, the meat necessary to uphold the supply chain of fast-food restaurants requires the wholesale slaughter of animals in factory farms, which could be said to be both environmentally and morally questionable. For example, McDonalds have been shown by numerous reports to be a frequent violator of environmental legislation.

Thus, I argue that while the short-term economic effect on society might look desirable, in the long run, the health and environmental effects of fast food mean that their growth is overall undesirable.

Sample 10:

The growing affordability of fast food is becoming prevalent in many parts of the world. I believe that the drawbacks of the ubiquity of convenience food outweigh the benefits it offers because although it proves to be an easily affordable food choice for lower-income families, these foods cause severe damage to health.

The main advantage of this phenomenon is the accessibility and convenience. The economical fast food makes it easily accessible to a generous portion of the population, especially those with meagre earnings. This, in fact, offers lower-income households an economy and convenient meal options, particularly those who lack access to costly food choices or face time constraints on home meal preparation.  Single parents, for example, may seem it is highly convenient and economical to resort to a prompt and cost-effective fast-food meal for their family after a hectic day.

One considerable drawback of the affordability and prevalence of convenience food is that it can negatively impact health. The prevalent and affordable nature of junk food tends to drive individuals to frequent intake, thereby causing detrimental effects on health. This means that regular intake of fast food poses a grave risk of various diseases, such as obesity, diabetes and other non-communicable diseases. A study conducted in India revealed that regularly consuming fast food could have a negative effect on insulin sensitivity, and therefore poses an increased risk of type 2 diabetes. Fast food has also been proven to be the underlying cause of various mental diseases, including insomnia, depression, and anxiety.

To conclude, although it is a good thing that lower-income groups have easy access to affordable meal options, I think the diseases caused by consuming fast food frequently prove to be much more disadvantageous for individuals.

Lời giải

Sample 1:

In the digital era, the rise in computer access has significantly boosted video gaming among children, leading to concerning physical and mental health effects. This essay will examine the negative impacts, such as increased obesity, vision issues, social isolation, and emotional problems, and will propose mitigation strategies, including parental control, physical activity promotion, and digital literacy education, to counterbalance these adverse outcomes.

Firstly, the immersion in virtual gaming can significantly impair physical health. Children, ensconced for hours in front of screens, fall prey to sedentary lifestyles, leading to obesity, vision problems, and reduced physical fitness. For instance, a study by the World Health Organization found a direct correlation between increased screen time and a rise in childhood obesity rates globally. Furthermore, the mental health of young gamers is at risk, with increased exposure contributing to issues such as anxiety, depression, and social isolation. The immersive nature of these games often substitutes real-life interactions and experiences with virtual accomplishments, diminishing the development of critical social skills and emotional intelligence.

To counteract these adverse effects, a multifaceted approach is necessary. Parents and educators play a crucial role in setting and enforcing limits on screen time, ensuring a balance between digital entertainment and physical activity. Implementing 'tech-free' zones or times can encourage children to engage in physical play or hobbies that foster social connections and physical health. Additionally, educational institutions could integrate lessons on digital literacy and health into the curriculum, teaching children the importance of moderation and the risks associated with excessive gaming.

In conclusion, while computer games offer a form of entertainment and can have educational benefits, their overuse poses significant health risks to children. By implementing structured guidelines and fostering awareness around the importance of balance and moderation, it is possible to mitigate these negative impacts and promote a healthier, more balanced lifestyle for the younger generation.

Sample 2:

In the contemporary digital age, the pervasive access to computers has catalyzed an upsurge in video gaming among the youth, raising concerns about its effects. This discourse posits that such engagement, while seemingly benign, harbors potential negative ramifications on both the physical and psychological well-being of children. It further advocates for a balanced approach, through parental guidance and institutional support, to mitigate these effects.

Central to the discourse is the alarming trend of diminished physical activity among children, attributed largely to prolonged gaming sessions. This sedentarism precipitates not only obesity but also contributes to musculoskeletal disorders and a myriad of vision ailments, including digital eye strain and myopia. For instance, research in the Journal of Pediatric Health noted a 30% uptick in childhood obesity correlated directly with increased screen time. Equally perturbing is the psychological domain, where excessive gaming is linked to elevated instances of social isolation, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. The virtual worlds become sanctuaries, detracting from real-world interactions and the development of essential social skills.

To counterbalance these adverse impacts, a dual-faceted approach is imperative. Foremost, parental control mechanisms should be rigorously applied, encompassing both the regulation of gaming duration and the curtailment of age-inappropriate content. Concurrently, educational frameworks must prioritize digital literacy, ensuring children understand the importance of a balanced lifestyle. Extracurricular activities, particularly those fostering physical exertion and social interaction, should be promoted to divert attention from virtual engagements.

In summation, while video gaming is an indelible aspect of modern childhood, its unchecked proliferation poses significant health risks. Through judicious parental oversight and educational reforms aimed at instilling digital prudence, it is feasible to safeguard our youth's health, ensuring they thrive in both virtual and real worlds.

Sample 3:

In this modern age, with the ubiquitous access to computers, video games have become a popular activity among children. This trend is causing childhood obesity and other related diseases that arise from too much computer gaming. However, proper familial and institutional interventions by engaging the children in outdoor activities can significantly prevent this damage.

With the easy access to computers, children are increasingly preferring onscreen gaming to outdoor recreational activities that involve physical movement. This sedentary video gaming habit is leading them to develop childhood obesity, a well above the normal and healthy weight range for their age. These children are at increased risk of breathing problems and other high blood pressure related diseases. Studies suggest that children, who weigh 20 percent more than their standard average weight, are 50 percent more likely to become obese adults, which is associated with a number of serious health conditions including heart disease, types 2 diabetes, and even cancer.

However, family members can address it smartly by attracting their children to outdoor sports and entertainment that involve enough physical movement. They can enrol them at art/cultural schools for extracurricular activities which divert the children's attention from too much video gaming. By providing these facilities to the youngsters, parents can help prevent or compensate the damage occurred by the excessive computer gaming. Studies support the idea that the children, who spend at least 8 hours a week for outdoor physical activities, are 40 percent less likely to become obese adults than the children who do not do this.

In conclusion, obesity is the major problem that children develop from incredibly easy access to computers which eventually lead to an excessive gaming habit. However, regular outdoor family hangout and institutional involvement for extra-curricular lessons could be the best possible measures to address this issue.

Sample 4:

In today's world where we all have access to the internet, more and more children are playing computer games, and their popularity is increasing all the time. This essay will look at the positive aspects these games can have and also the negative effects on children.

Firstly, as education is becoming more demanding for many young people, computer games can provide a way of relaxing and reducing stress. Computer games can take us into different worlds where we can escape from reality. In addition to this, computer games today are very advanced and can help children develop their thinking skills. Instructions need to be understood, and games often include complicated problems which need to be solved.

However, there are also many problems with the increasing popularity of computer games. Many children become addicted to them, and they play for hours, sometimes through the night. In South Korea, the government has banned children from playing games after midnight as the problem was so great and the effect on education was very negative. Furthermore, some children find it difficult to identify what is real and what is virtual. Some people argue that this has led to a rise in crime inspired by video games. This is not proven, but it is undeniable that games today can be very violent.

To sum up, there are both advantages and disadvantages with computer games and it seems that parents need to exercise caution and monitor their children's activity as some games may be more suitable than others.

Sample 5:

It is a fact that more and more children are playing computer games. There's no denying this has a lot of positive and negative effects. I will give my point in this essay and what we should do to minimize the bad effects.

On the one hand, playing computer games is very beneficial for children. First, children will be smarter and more responsive when playing games. Scientists have shown that when playing games, children will increase their problem-solving ability, their eyes and hands will be faster. For example, if you want to win, you have to be patient and focused. Second, playing games will help children get along with friends. After school, children playing games together will be fun and reduce stress.

On the other hand, playing computer games also has some negative effects on young children. First, if children play games for a long time, their eyesight will be reduced. For example, playing games that are not qualified, lack of light, ... all of the above factors will cause damage to the eyes. Second, they will become inactive, just sitting in place playing games. Therefore, they will have a high risk of obesity.

To minimize the negative effects, parents should pay attention to choosing healthy and safe games for children. Let your child play games for up to 1 to 2 hours after completing the homework, this will help the child to be happy and relax.

Incluction, children playing computer games have both positive and negative effects. Although parents need to control their children so that they can play games in a healthy way.

Sample 6:

In recent years, the use of computers has become increasingly widespread, and this has led to a rise in the number of children who play computer games. While computer games can have positive effects, they can also have negative impacts on children. This essay will discuss the negative effects of playing computer games and what can be done to minimize these effects.

One negative impact of playing computer games is that it can lead to addiction. Children can become so engrossed in the games that they spend hours playing without taking breaks, which can have negative effects on their physical and mental health. To illustrate, children who spend too much time sitting in one place for gaming can suffer from a lack of sleep, poor eating habits, and a decrease in physical activity. Another negative impact of playing computer games is the exposure to violent and inappropriate content. Nowadays, most computer games include violent and graphic content, which can have negative effects on children's mental health and can desensitize them to real-world violence.

To minimize the negative effects of playing computer games, it is important to set limits on the amount of time children spend on the computer. For instance, parents could set a rule that their child is only allowed to use the computer for a maximum of one hour per day. Besides, parents can encourage their children to engage in other activities, such as playing sports or spending time outdoors. For example, parents could plan a day trip to a nearby park or nature reserve, go for a family bike ride, or play a board game together. 

In conclusion, while computer games can have positive effects, they can also have negative impacts on children. It is important for parents to be aware of these negative effects and take steps to minimize them.

Sample 7:

In recent years, with the increasing popularity of technology and machinery, access to computers has become more and more common. And the large number of children playing computer games has grown sharply, too. Because of this expansion, whether they have more advantages than disadvantages or not has drawn much discussion among the general public. In this essay, I am going to clarify the positive and negative impacts of playing computer games and suggest some solutions to reduce the probably bad effects.

It is believed that playing game online will give us some disadvantages. One of the cogent reasons for playing computer games is that it helps us contact our friends, classmates, siblings faster and more effectively than in the past, which is called communication virtually. Additionally, playing computer games can be quite a good point to a child's growth into an adult. For instance, this merit is altering the traditional learning methods because it allows children to solve some basic problems and use logic in many of the games currently. Consequently, playing computer games seems highly utilitarian to the communication and development of children.

Beneficial as it is, playing computer games also causes some problems. To begin with, playing them has wasted a great deal of time and money. It makes children unconsciously lose track of time when they go online with man distractions. Besides that, being susceptible to fake news is one main demerit of playing computer games. As anyone plays any online game without verification, this paves the way for a large amount of unreliable information to be sent to uninformed netizens and supplies them with incorrect knowledge, especially children. For example, many games even provide the wrong information about violence, politics and killing. This may lead to increase aggressive feelings, thoughts and behaviors. Considering all of these downsides, playing computer games also can strongly affect their awareness and growing up.

In order to minimize these bad side impacts, parents need to solve them in a careful and slow way. First step, parents should choose age-appropriate games and monitor the content for violence or inappropriate themes. Moreover, we can also select games that have educational value or promote problem-solving skills and set limits on the length of time games are played. In particular, our children only spend no more than 180 minutes a day playing computer games.

In conclusion, there are both pros and cons to everything, and playing computer games is not an exception. In my opinion, the negatives of this phenomenon clearly outweigh its positives. However, if we keep an eye on this activity, the bad things can be avoided safely.

Sample 8:

In recent years, computer and internet usage has increased excessively, and it is a fact that almost everybody from all kinds of age groups has access to them, including children. Children's access to inappropriate internet data, such as adult video games, may have some serious adverse effects on them. This essay will discuss the problems computer games can cause and suggest some possible solutions regarding this topic.

The most important negative impact of playing computer games on a child is the risk of their psychology being adversely affected by the inappropriate imagery shown in these games. The majority of popular computer games these days all include the same type of war elements, such as shooting, murder, blood, and hatred, etc. These elements can easily cause trauma in the mind of an innocent child. If that child continues to grow up playing these types of violent games, he/she will possibly have a higher risk of becoming a criminal in the future. According to an article I've read, the vast majority of teenage school shooters in the United States all had a personal history with these kinds of games.

My suggested solution to this problem is age restriction. Children under the age of 16 should not have any type of access to games where these violent images are present. Nowadays, there are already some small warnings regarding the game content on top of the cases, but this is not enough. The sale of games with violent content to minors should be illegal, and the people responsible for this action should get prosecuted. This restriction should also include online sales. People need to acknowledge the fact that the possible side effects of computer games may be as severe as the usage of alcohol and tobacco.

In conclusion, it has to be stated that not every computer game has negative effects on a child, and some games can even be a good tool for them to get used to technology and spend free time. However, parents should be aware that the violent content of some computer games is highly dangerous for a child's mind, and they need to take immediate action on this matter.

Sample 9:

People use computers more extensively these days than ever before, and it is so widespread in our modern world that even children have access to these devices for playing games. This essay discusses the adverse impacts of playing digital games on computer devices by youngsters and suggests some measures to reduce its negative effects.

Concerning the adverse impacts of young children playing video games, the most devastating one is the addiction these games create. Millions of dollars are spent to make computer games so that they attract a large number of audiences and keep them glued to the computer screens. So they are addictive by design. And this obsession hampers children's outdoor activities, studies and even time to socialise and learn important life skills. To illustrate, many research works suggest that children who spend many hours playing computer games each day end up performing poorly in schools and avoid social events and outdoor activities. It results in physical and psychological issues including poor eyesight and despair. Moreover, violent games cloud the youngsters' judgement and make their rational thinking unstable. Oftentimes, youngsters who play violent games develop violent behaviours. To cite an example, an unfortunate shooting event that claimed many innocent lives, that took place in an American school a few years ago, was carried out by a teenager who was addicted to shooting games.

To minimise the severity of these negative impacts, parents must monitor what their children are doing, especially on computers. They should not be allowed to play computer games for more than a couple of hours each week, and parents can actively participate in those games with their children so that it becomes family time. An ideal example of it could be my aunt and uncle who play video games with their children, and as a result, children are also interested in doing outdoor activities with them. Finally, parents can use parental control over the digital content and games their children watch or play. These measures would deter children from downloading and playing games that are not suitable for their age.

To conclude, computer games, when played excessively by children, have many detrimental effects. Proper parenting and monitoring seem like the best solution to solve these problems.

Sample 10:

In recent times, the widespread availability of computers has led to an increase in the number of children playing computer games. While these games can provide entertainment and educational benefits, there are also negative impacts associated with excessive gaming. This essay will examine the negative effects of children playing computer games and suggest strategies to minimize the harmful effects.

One of the major negative impacts of children playing computer games is the potential for addiction. Children can become so engrossed in gaming that they neglect other important activities, such as homework, physical exercise, and socialising with friends and family. Moreover, prolonged gaming can lead to physical problems, such as eye strain, poor posture, and repetitive stress injuries. Additionally, excessive gaming can affect a child's emotional well-being, leading to increased aggression and mood swings. A study published in the journal "Pediatrics" found that children who played video games for more than three hours a day were more likely to have behavioural and emotional problems, including hyperactivity, problems with peers, and difficulties with conduct and emotional regulation.

To minimize the negative effects of children playing computer games, parents and educators can take a number of steps. Firstly, parents should limit the amount of time their children spend on gaming while also encouraging them to participate in other activities, such as sports, reading, and creative hobbies. Secondly, educators can incorporate digital literacy programs into their curriculum, teaching children how to use computers and technology responsibly and healthily. Finally, gaming companies can develop games that promote healthy habits, such as physical activity and socialisation.

In conclusion, while computer games can be a source of entertainment and education, excessive gaming can have negative impacts on children's physical and emotional health. To minimise these effects, parents, educators, and gaming companies can take steps to encourage responsible and healthy gaming habits.

Sample 11:

Children these days have abundance of ways to relax after stressful time study at school. Some choose to take part in sports and outdoor activities. However, since people have many methods to log on to computers on a widespread source, there is a large number of children prefer spending time on playing games on the computers. This may lead to many defective influences on those who enjoy computer games. Those matters can be worked out by guardians' control and self-conscious awareness, which are discussed in detail in this essay.

Playing computer games has metamorphosed into a severe matter that is damaging youngsters' future prospects. Along with the progress of technology, many attractive game titles have appeared on the computer systems that players can engage in with online status to chat and talk to others. It is time-consuming that children spend mostly leisure time on computers for unhelpful activities. Seriously, some are even addicted to games and willing to pay a great amount of money to own items in games as a means of enjoying the games properly.

Creating mental health problems is the persistence of playing computer games for the simple reason that online games sometimes include violence. This content of game affects seriously and directly to children's aware-established process. It will play a role in forming children's characteristics as violent and rough. A clear proof of this is some children when grown up will have dreadful behavior such as burglaries, that turn into homicides. Gravely, game addiction also forces children to be in a delusion.

Another incisive evidence that computer games influence badly on children is it causes eye diseases. Playing computer games means players have to keep eyes on the screen at whole time without resting. The eyes are affected directly by the light from the computer and get myopic and suffer from dry eyes diseases.

This concern while pressing and critical is not bereft of a workable remedy in the form of guardians' control. Parents should not ban children from computer games but set time limitation and content of the games. Besides, children must be strictly self-conscious about what they engage in on the computer which assist them to establish healthy mindset and behavior.

Sample 12:

Technology and its reach in human life have significantly increased over the past few years. This has had a lot of implications, including a dramatic increase in the number of children playing computer games. This essay will examine various impacts of this change and discuss possibilities to avoid any negative effects.

Talking about the positive aspects, playing computer games has numerous benefits. These can range from helping children develop cognitive skills to increase their logical reasoning. Games have developed into a whole industry. These have allowed children to test their abstract and logical thinking skills. Many of these games require children to follow various commands and try to solve complex problems with the use of logic. Such games are surely advantageous for a child’s mental progress.

On the other hand, people are raising concerns over the prolific use of violence and sanguinary elements that these games contain. These may be highly addictive, in the sense that they reward the players for being more violent, thereby setting a wrong example. Apart from being addictive, they contribute to arresting a child’s social development and lead to the inculcation of aggressive feelings of anger and hate in their thoughts and habits.

However, there are many steps that can be taken to minimize negative impacts. Firstly, video games are rated for different ages and parents can choose them for the children in order to avoid unsuitable content. Secondly, parents can limit the duration of playing games for the children to keep addiction at bay. Finally, parents should take an active interest in the children’s activities and encourage them to play outdoor games.

To sum it up, video games have a lot of advantages along with an array of disadvantages. Parents should supervise their children and take precautions to avoid any negative effects these might have on children.

Sample 13:

Access to computers has increased significantly over recent decades, and the number of children playing games on computers has increased too. This essay will consider the positive and negative impacts of this and discuss ways to avoid the potential negative effects.

With regards to the positive effects, playing computer games can develop children’s cognitive skills. Many popular games require abstract and high-level thinking skills in order to win, skills that may not be taught at school. For example, children need to follow instructions, solve complex problems and use logic in many of the games that are currently popular. Such experience will be beneficial to a child’s progression into an adult.

However, concerns have been raised about the prolific use of computer games by children, much of this related to the violence they contain. The problem is that in many of the games, children are rewarded for being more violent, and this violence is repeated again and again. For instance, many games involve children helping their character to kill, kick, stab and shoot. This may lead to increased aggressive feelings, thoughts, and behaviours.  

In order to minimize these negative impacts, parents need to take certain steps. Firstly, some video games are rated according to their content, so parents must check this and ensure their children are not allowed to have access to games that are unsuitable. Parents can also set limits on the length of time games are played. Finally, parents should also take an active interest in the games their children are playing so they can find out how they feel about what they are observing. 

To sum up, there are benefits of computer games, but there are disadvantages too. However, if parents take adequate precautions, the severity of these negative impacts can be avoided.

 

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP