Câu hỏi:

10/01/2025 148

Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Xem lời giải

Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!

Bắt đầu thi

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

Engaging in team activities has long been recognized as a valuable means of acquiring life skills. This essay agrees with the statement that team activities teach more skills for life than individual activities because collaborative endeavours foster effective communication, leadership abilities, and teamwork, which are essential qualities for personal and professional success.

Team activities provide ample opportunities for enhancing communication skills. In team settings, individuals must actively listen, express their thoughts clearly, and understand diverse perspectives to work towards a common goal. For instance, participating in team sports like soccer or basketball necessitates constant communication to coordinate plays, make quick decisions, and adapt to changing game situations. By engaging in these activities, individuals develop the ability to articulate their ideas effectively, understand others' viewpoints, and collaborate towards shared objectives.

Furthermore, team activities cultivate leadership skills in individuals. Within a team, individuals have the chance to take on leadership roles, delegate tasks, and motivate others to achieve collective success. A prime example is participating in group projects or clubs at school, where students assume leadership positions and guide their peers towards completing assignments or organizing events. Through such experiences, individuals develop crucial leadership qualities such as decision-making, problem-solving, and the ability to inspire and influence others.

In conclusion, team activities provide individuals with a wealth of life skills that extend beyond what can be acquired through individual activities. By promoting effective communication, fostering leadership abilities, and instilling a sense of teamwork, these activities equip individuals with essential qualities for personal and professional success.

Sample 2:

The belief that team activities teach more skills for life than individual activities is a topic of ongoing debate. While team activities certainly offer unique benefits, it is important to recognize that individual activities have more value and advantages. This essay disagrees with the statement and argues that individual activities can foster crucial life skills such as self-reliance, discipline, and self-motivation which are essential for a successful life.

Engaging in individual activities promotes self-reliance and independence, which are vital skills for personal growth and success. When individuals participate in activities such as painting, writing, or practising a musical instrument on their own, they learn to rely on their own abilities, make independent decisions, and take responsibility for their progress. For example, a budding artist who spends hours alone perfecting their craft learns to trust their artistic instincts and develop their unique style without relying on the input or approval of others. This cultivates resilience, self-confidence, and the ability to persevere in the face of challenges.

Individual activities also foster discipline and self-motivation. In these pursuits, individuals set personal goals, create their own schedules, and maintain consistent practice and dedication. Take the example of an aspiring athlete who engages in individual training sessions. They must discipline themselves to adhere to a rigorous training regimen, set performance targets, and push themselves beyond their comfort zones. By developing discipline and self-motivation, individuals gain the ability to prioritize tasks, manage time effectively, and strive for continuous self-improvement.

In conclusion, while team activities offer valuable opportunities for collaboration and interpersonal skills, it is crucial to recognise that individual activities offer more significant benefits for personal and professional growth. Engaging in solitary pursuits fosters self-reliance, discipline, and self-motivation, which are essential life skills.

Sample 3:

It is argued that team activities can teach more life skills than companionless exercises. An individual encounters team exercises throughout his life – in school or college, a group presentation, a collective project, or at work. I agree that such activities can inculcate life skills in an individual.

The primary skills one can learn from team exercises include communication, leadership, and playing for the team. For example, performing a university-assigned group task will include individuals learning how to communicate verbally and non-verbally. In addition, the person who takes the initiative to allot tasks will inculcate leadership lessons, which everyone will function towards achieving maximum cohesion.

Through team exercises, one can also learn various social skills, gain a deeper knowledge of the workings around them and encounter a quintessential skill – conflict resolution, for conflicts are bound to happen when people start working together. Conflict resolution is an enormous life skill to possess, something autonomous activities cannot teach.

It is true that standalone activities have their own benefits. For example, a person tends to become more responsible, competitive and crafty when he/she is in charge of himself/herself. But we cannot ignore the importance of the life skills that group activities teach us.

In conclusion, an individual surely learns a lot through independent activities but also learns some essential life skills from team activities that help them to deal with various situations in life and finally achieve success.

Sample 4:

Unequivocally, every individual has different perspectives on how to carry out their tasks and responsibilities, whether with or without the assistance of others. For example, while some people believe that working or playing alone is better, others opine, including me, that teamwork is more practical and can teach more life skills. Therefore, I shall put forth my views in the following paragraphs.

To begin, collaborating with team members to complete any task increases efficiency and quality while also instilling fundamental skills like brainstorming, idea development, communication, and team management. Individuals can also benefit from team activities since they help them develop strong leadership abilities and provide a different perspective on the task and project, making problem-solving easier. In addition, people who lead the team instill active listening skills and leadership skills. For instance, children learn diverse skills when they play together as a team, such as cooperating, communicating, sharing, working/playing together, and assisting one another.

Furthermore, children and adults gain considerably more life skills when they play, work, or participate in group activities than when they work alone. Individuals can build strong interpersonal skills by working as a team. For example, if they encounter any difficulties while completing a task, they can seek help from the other team members, which they would not be able to do if they were working alone. As a result, the connection formed through a tough moment will undoubtedly last a lifetime.

Although individual activities reduce disputes and increase job efficiency, team activities allow for the pooling of ideas and the viewing of problems from various angles, resulting in the acquisition of important life skills. For this reason, the value of team activities should not be overlooked.

To summarise, team activities instill practical skills, generate diverse thoughts, and provide differing opinions on the task, contributing to the activity’s ultimate success. Furthermore, team activities promote a wide range of life skills that we need in our daily lives.

Sample 5:

The debate over whether collective activities impart more significant life skills than solitary endeavours is a compelling one. It is my conviction that teamwork and group interactions are indeed more beneficial for acquiring essential life competencies. This essay will elucidate the value of collaboration for learning vital communication and problem-solving skills.

Engaging in group or team activities cultivates communication skills unparalleled by solitary tasks. In a team setting, individuals must articulate their ideas, listen to others, and negotiate differences to achieve a common goal. For instance, when students collaborate on a research project, they learn to express their thoughts clearly and consider their peers' suggestions, thereby enhancing their ability to convey messages effectively. Such interactions are critical in developing interpersonal skills that are indispensable in both personal and professional spheres. Furthermore, teamwork encourages empathy and emotional intelligence as individuals learn to understand and appreciate diverse perspectives, fostering a more inclusive and harmonious society.

Moreover, problem-solving skills are honed significantly through group activities. The dynamic nature of working in a team presents complex challenges that require collective brainstorming, critical thinking, and innovative solutions. A noteworthy example is when a sports team encounters a strong opponent; strategizing together to overcome difficulties not only strengthens analytical skills but also teaches resilience and adaptability. These experiences equip individuals with the ability to tackle real-world problems, making them more competent and confident decision-makers.

In conclusion, while solitary activities have their merits, the benefits of group and team activities in imparting vital life skills are incontrovertible. Through enhancing communication and problem-solving abilities, collaborative endeavors prepare individuals for the complexities of the modern world. Emphasizing the importance of these skills through group activities is crucial for nurturing well-rounded, adaptable, and effective members of society.

Sample 6:

The debate over whether group or solo activities foster more vital life skills is a multifaceted one. At its core, this discussion touches upon the essence of learning and personal development. I assert that collaborative endeavors offer a richer, more diverse learning environment, crucial for acquiring essential life competencies. This essay will explore the significance of teamwork and interpersonal skills, alongside the unparalleled experience of navigating diverse perspectives, as key facets of group activities that solo ventures may not provide effectively.

Collaborative tasks naturally cultivate interpersonal skills and empathy, attributes indispensable in today’s globally connected world. When individuals engage in group activities, they are thrust into situations where communication is not just beneficial but necessary. For instance, a team project necessitates active listening, articulate expression of ideas, and the negotiation of roles and responsibilities. Such environments are microcosms of broader societal interactions, where the ability to work harmoniously with others can spell the difference between success and failure. Moreover, empathy is honed through understanding and accommodating differing viewpoints, a skill that solo activities rarely demand to the same extent.

Furthermore, group activities introduce individuals to the complexities of diverse perspectives, fostering adaptability and problem-solving skills. In a team setting, the convergence of various viewpoints can lead to innovative solutions that might not emerge in isolation. For example, when brainstorming for a community project, the amalgamation of unique insights can pave the way for creative outcomes that address the needs of a wider audience. This process not only enhances cognitive flexibility but also prepares individuals for the unpredictable nature of real-world challenges, where solutions are seldom straightforward and often require a blend of different perspectives.

Group activities foster essential life skills superior to solo endeavors, enhancing interpersonal communication, empathy, and problem-solving through diverse perspectives. Teamwork offers a rich learning environment, preparing individuals for real-world challenges by encouraging adaptability and innovative solutions. Ultimately, collaborative efforts enrich one's skill set for both personal and professional success, proving the value of collective experiences.

Sample 7:

Sometimes it is argued that more valuable life skills may be taught through group or team activities than through solo ones. However, this essay strongly disagrees with that statement because working alone can teach us better to be self-reliant and self-disciplined which are important life skills that can only be developed through solitary pursuits.

When working alone, an individual is solely responsible for their own work. They do not have the support or guidance of a group or team and must rely on their own skills and abilities to complete the task at hand. This can help them to develop self-reliance, as they learn to trust in their own abilities and take ownership of their work. When working with a team, an individual may rely on others to complete the task and may not develop the same level of self-reliance. For example, a writer who chooses to work from a secluded cabin in the woods with no internet or phone connection. This lack of access to technology and distractions allows the writer to fully immerse themselves in their work and increase their productivity.

In addition, during self-directed work, an individual can set their own pace and schedule, which can help them to develop a sense of self-discipline by sticking to their own plan and avoiding distractions. When there is no distraction, an individual can easily resist the temptation to procrastinate, which can help to strengthen the individual's self-discipline and ability to focus on their goals. In other words, working alone can help an individual to develop the ability to stay on track and manage their time effectively. For example, a freelance graphic designer who sets a daily schedule for themselves and sticks to it, even without a boss or co-worker to hold them accountable. This self-motivation and ability to manage their own time effectively helps to build self-discipline and improve their work quality.

In conclusion, freedom to determine own pace and schedule, ability to stay self-disciplined and gain more thorough self-motivation, all these life skills can only be developed through solitary pursuits.

Sample 8:

Working in a team provides us with more essential life lessons than the skills that we can gain doing tasks alone. I strongly agree with this statement because team activities give us incredible opportunities to clarify complex conceptual issues and avail ourselves of social skillsets that are vital to live a better life.

Being in a group can be incredibly helpful in clarifying any doubts or confusing thought. When you are not understanding a concept or struggling to decipher something, and no one is around you to spell it out and decode, it can be a very frustrating moment. For that reason, working in a team environment is a major benefit as it enables us to ask the co-workers if something does not make sense. Moreover, being in a groupwork incentivises us to outsmart each other, and motivates us to showcase the individual contributions to the upper echelon. In fact, a teamwork environment helps us derive energy and look forward to discussing, learning, and conducting a job with fellow workers and come up with a brainstormed output.

In addition, team activities help us share the workloads which in turn can reduce our mental stress and improve our health in general. For example, large firms usually have assigned teams for individual sections, and the outcomes are viewed as group productions where both successes and failures are attributed to the concerned groups. Also, teamwork prevents us from growing up as an antisocial person, because team members from diverse backgrounds help us get used to interacting properly. Thus, working in a team or group can foster skills that are necessary for life.

In conclusion, undertaking group or team tasks can provide with better mental health, and important skills like socialising and interacting which are key elements of life.

Sample 9:

Without a doubt, everyone has their own thoughts on the best way to complete their responsibilities and chores, with or without the aid of others. I believe working in groups may be more beneficial and teach more useful skills for everyday life. My opinion is detailed below.

To begin with, there are two primary benefits to working alone. First, individual consent can be granted. A computer engineer, for instance, would benefit from working alone since he would be able to give full attention to his duties. If he wants to make a video programme, he can do so alone by going online and downloading the appropriate software. On top of that, this approach has the potential to yield greater financial rewards. A team's earnings from product sales should be split among its members, however a sole professional can keep all of the profit for themselves.

Nonetheless, despite the benefits of working alone, I believe that collaborative efforts are the most effective. In particular, eBay, a thriving international e-commerce trade that has dominated its competitors over the past decade, would not have become one of the most successful companies of the 2000s if its employees hadn't collaborated. Also, this approach takes less time overall. Each member of the team brings unique skills to the table, and when everyone is pulling in the same direction, it's much easier to solve any issues that arise. For instance, patients would benefit more from a healthcare team's combined efforts than from individual doctors attempting to perform the tasks of nurses and other healthcare workers.

To recapitulate, there are times when it's best to work alone. However, in my opinion, group tasks are preferable because they take less time, and participants are more actively motivated to be productive.

Sample 10:

It has been stated that teamwork and participation in a group setting are more effective ways to learn important life skills than working on a project alone. However, I disagree with that notion, arguing that the opposite is true: that engaging in solo activities is the best way to learn the vital life qualities of independence and self-discipline. My opinion is justified in the following paragraphs.

The onus of quality control falls squarely on the shoulders of the lone worker. If one is on his side, then he can achieve anything he wants without the aid of a team or group. Their confidence in themselves and their work can grow as a result of this. When working as a team, it's easy to become reliant on your teammates rather than on yourself to get the job done. For instance, like a writer who prefers to avoid distractions by working from a remote log cabin in the middle of nowhere. With no internet or other distractions, the writer can focus entirely on the task at hand.

In addition to this, self-directed work allows the employee to establish their own pace and schedule, which can help them to develop self-discipline. A person's self-discipline and capacity to focus on their goals can be strengthened by planning well and minimizing the distractions. As this means that solo work can help one hone their focus and time management skills. Without a supervisor or coworker to keep them on track, a freelance graphic designer may still be able to maintain a strict daily plan.

To put it in nutshell, via independent activities one can learn the independence to choose one's own pace and plan, maintain self-discipline, and motivate oneself more thoroughly.

Sample 11:

It has been stated that teamwork is superior to other activities for skill development because it forces individuals to work together to solve problems. It's true that each individual's pace of skill development is unique, but I firmly believe that group projects offer a more conducive environment for gaining proficiency in a wide range of areas. Both my perception and the other side are discussed in the paragraphs below.

The first and foremost reason for my opinion is that every member of a team usually has their own preferred method of handling situations. Specifically, one person's method for solving an issue is unlikely to be similar to another's. Everyone in the group would be exposed to these many skills and have plenty of chances to actively or passively learn them.

However, in other situations, such chances are scarce, and learning would be less efficient as a result. There is a lower probability of acquiring numerous skills when, for instance, a person works alone or with the aid of any other media. A nurse in a hospital's emergency room is a great illustration of this. She would learn more quickly and efficiently than a nurse in solo practice by working as part of a team.

All in all, I agree that the external influence in skill acquisition is undoubtedly secondary to the importance of the individual's own efforts. Even when working independently, there are situations in which a person will acquire numerous skills. Such an event, however, occurs infrequently. There are exceptions to this rule, but in general, working in a group is the best way for a person to develop their talents.

Sample 12:

People can learn more important life skills through group activities than through solitary activities. I completely disagree with this point of view because individual activities can train people's abilities to concentrate on and solve problems.

To begin with, solitary activities can help people improve their concentration. This is because when doing these activities, they do not have someone else by their side to monitor and motivate them. As a result, they need to use their own willpower to resist temptations, such as Instagram posts and Youtube videos. As they exercise their willpower in solo activities, they could become better at focusing on a task for a long period of time. Since the ability to concentrate well allows a person to acquire new knowledge quickly and therefore increases their competitiveness, it can be more valuable than the skills they can develop in team activities.

In addition, those who take part in solitary activities can become better problem solvers. This is because when facing a challenge, they have to deal with it themselves instead of leaning on their team members. For example, solo travelers in a foreign country tend to become more resourceful and faster learners in order to overcome the language barrier. The ability to tackle problems independently is extremely crucial because in life there are many crisis situations in which a person has no one to rely on.

In conclusion, I believe solitary activities teach more important skills for life than group activities because they allow people to improve concentration and problem-solving skills.

Sample 13:

Both teamwork and individual work require different skills and teach different things. Most of our daily life depends on teamwork, like doing a job and raising a family. Therefore, I agree with the statement that team activities teach more skills for life than solo activities. In the following paragraphs, I shall support my view with my arguments.

Some important skills of life are communication skills, co-operation and conflict management skills. All these are only learnt through teamwork. In solo activities, we do not need to communicate, and so we do not learn these skills. However, when we step into daily life, we realise that communication skills are the most needed skills. We also have to co-operate with our family members, colleagues, friends and neighbours in daily life. When we do team activities, we also learn about cooperation. Conflict management skills are also learnt when we do team activities. You have differences of opinion, and you learn to manage tough situations very diplomatically. All these are very necessary skills in life.

Furthermore, we also learned leadership skills, decision-making, and critical thinking skills while doing team activities. We know how to make our voices heard, and we also learn how to accept the correct suggestions of others. Finally, we learn sportsmanship which is a very good trait. We learn to take victory with modesty and defeat with grace. This is an important life skill.

On the other hand, we learn many skills of life through solo activities. We learn a sense of competition and perseverance through individual activities. All life skills are important for us. We cannot forget that man is a social animal and cannot live alone. So, what we learn in teams can be applied more in our daily lives.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that team activities and individual activities – both teach important skills of life, but team activities are definitely better teachers of life skills than solo activities.

Sample 14:

In today's society, both individual and team activities play an important role in the development of people's skills for life. Some argue that team activities provide more opportunities for skill-building than individual activities. In my opinion, I completely agree with this statement.

On the one hand, it is undeniable that individual activities such as reading, painting, or writing can bring about significant benefits. Such activities foster self-motivation and discipline, as individuals have to rely on their own efforts to achieve goals. For example, an individual who wants to master a skill has to practice persistently and stay focused. As a result, they develop strong perseverance, creativity and independence.

On the other hand, team activities provide a unique opportunity for people to acquire a wide range of skills. Teamwork skills, for instance, are critical in almost every aspect of life. When working in a group, people have to learn how to communicate effectively, share ideas, and manage conflicts. Moreover, team activities encourage people to develop leadership skills, critical thinking, and problem-solving abilities. For instance, participating in a team project at work requires individuals to work collaboratively, think strategically and contribute their strengths to the team.

In conclusion, although individual activities are crucial in developing certain skills, I strongly believe that team activities can provide more opportunities for people to acquire skills for life. By participating in team activities, individuals can hone their teamwork, leadership and problem-solving skills, which are essential in both personal and professional life. Therefore, it is important for individuals to engage in team activities to enhance their overall skills.

Sample 15:

Nowadays, people who perform tasks individually have the ability to concentrate and have resilience to time management. I completely agree that group work can help participants gain more important skills to cope with challenges in the future.

On the one hand, individual works such as drawing and writing are useful for increasing patience and perseverance, as they need to focus on doing one thing for a long period of time on their own. For example, J. K. Rollin, one of the most famous authors in the world, spent a lot of time writing books for many years before her famous fiction book, Harry Potter, was published.

On the other hand, globalization creates conditions for people of different backgrounds to work together. In this case, group activities play an important role in developing critical skills in youth, including communication and collaboration. Above all, good communication skills can convey a message clearly to others and prevent misunderstandings. Secondly, teamwork allows young people to be open and responsive, which is good for acquiring new experience and knowledge. Take early childhood education settings for example: teachers typically allow students to work together as teams to complete tasks, which can not only help children get to know their peers, but also gain access to different points of view.

In conclusion, although participants can improve their professional performance by working individually, it is inevitable that the influence of globalization will continue to grow, so I believe that it is extremely important to acquire various abilities in group activities.

Sample 16:

It is widely acknowledged that group or team activities can equip individuals with a broader range of crucial life skills compared to solitary pursuits. While individual activities can impart valuable skills, I believe that collaborative activities provide a richer learning ground for essential life skills.

Regarding group activities, they foster numerous life skills that are critical in both personal and professional settings. A primary skill learned from working in a group is the honing of communication skills. Group projects necessitate the understanding of diverse perspectives, active listening and the ability to articulate oneself persuasively. When working in groups, differences in opinions and approaches are inevitable. Team members have to express their thoughts clearly, navigate the potential conflicts, and find mutually acceptable solutions. This not only fosters interpersonal communication but also conflict-resolution skills, both of which are valuable in real-world scenarios. Additionally, team activities cultivate leadership skills. Group work often involves taking turns leading tasks or projects, allowing individuals to develop the ability to guide and motivate others. For instance, a student assuming a leadership role in a school project learns to organize tasks, delegate effectively, and inspire their peers. Through such experiences, they acquire leadership qualities such as decision-making and the ability to inspire others.

On the other hand, life skills offered by individual activities are also crucial. One of such primary skills is self-regulation, where individuals learn to manage their time and resources effectively. Working alone requires a high level of discipline and motivation, which is essential for personal development and achieving long-term goals. Additionally, self-reflection is a key skill acquired through solo activities. When working alone, individuals have the opportunity to reflect on their performance, identify their strengths and weaknesses, and make necessary improvements. However, group activities can encourage these skills to some extent, as team members must manage their individual contributions to meet deadlines and achieve common goals.

In conclusion, communication, leadership, and conflict-solving skills are crucial in today's interconnected world, and these are best learned through collaborative efforts. Therefore, I believe that the benefits of group activities outweigh those of individual pursuits in teaching essential life skills.

Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay

Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:

Xem thêm »

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Câu 1

Young people are often influenced in their behaviors by others in the same age group. Some argue that peer pressure is important while others feel it has distinct disadvantages. Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages?

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Peer pressure is a pervasive phenomenon that significantly influences the behaviours of young individuals. While some argue that it plays a crucial role in positively shaping the lives of the youth, others contend that the disadvantages of peer pressure are very detrimental.

Peer pressure, when harnessed positively, can have several advantages. Firstly, it can foster a sense of belonging and camaraderie among individuals within the same age group. Young people often seek acceptance and affirmation from their peers, and this can contribute to their emotional well-being and self-esteem. A further benefit is that positive peer pressure can encourage healthy behaviours, such as exercising or avoiding risky activities. For instance, a teenager might be motivated to quit smoking if their friends promote a smoke-free lifestyle.

However, peer pressure can also have distinct disadvantages. The most pressing concern is the potential for negative influences on impressionable minds. Young people may succumb to the pressure of engaging in harmful behaviours, such as substance abuse, criminal activities, or reckless behaviours like driving without a seatbelt, due to peer pressure, which can lead to long-lasting negative consequences and jeopardise their future.

Moreover, excessive pressure from peers can stifle individuality and creativity as young people may conform to the norms of their peer group instead of pursuing their own aspirations and dreams. This conformity may limit their personal growth and hinder their ability to think independently.

In conclusion, I would argue that peer pressure has more disadvantages as although it can foster a sense of belonging and promote healthy behaviours, it also carries the risk of leading young people astray and stifling their individuality. It is imperative for parents, educators, and society at large to guide young people in making informed choices and navigating the complexities of peer influence.

Sample 2:

The peer group tends to exert influence on the way teenagers behave. While many believe that the influence of peers is immensely important, others opine that it has its obvious drawbacks. I believe that the benefits peer pressure brings outweigh the disadvantages because it can instil a positive attitude towards education, despite the primary drawback, namely substance use, or so on it may cause.

Without any doubt, the influence of peers can inspire young people to build positive behaviours, make good choices, and strive for academic excellence. When friends place emphasis on education and academic performance, it can exert a positive impact on the young’s attitude toward learning. In fact, students who maintain a friend circle who are diligent students may feel a strong motivation to study diligently. Take my brother’s case for example. He works harder to obtain good marks in exams because his friends are determined to achieve academic excellence. They possess a solid work ethic, and now so does he.

However, peer pressure can also exert influence on young people to engage in deviant behaviours. It may make young adults feel obliged to take on bad habits like substance abuse to feel like they are part of the circle and not levelled as boring or weak. For example, if a group of friends get involved in substance abuse, underage drinking, and delinquent activities, a child may feel obligated to conform to these behaviours to avoid exclusion.

Considering all these, I would like to mention that there is no concrete evidence to endorse the view that peer pressure is the primary reason for unacceptable behaviours and substance abuse. There are other factors, like genetics, mental health issues, and social influences, that play a profound role in this case.

To reiterate, the fact that peer pressure can encourage to conform to a positive attitude toward learning clearly outweighs the flawed argument that it can influence young people to develop delinquent behaviour and bad habits.

Sample 3:

The debate surrounding peer pressure often hinges on whether its advantages outweigh its disadvantages or if it is the opposite. While peer pressure can sometimes encourage positive behaviours and foster social connections, I believe its drawbacks are significant and can have long-lasting consequences.

On the one hand, proponents of peer pressure argue that it can motivate individuals to adopt healthy habits, such as regular exercise, academic diligence, and community involvement. Positive peer pressure can serve as a source of encouragement, support, and accountability, leading to personal growth and self-improvement. For example, a teenager may be more likely to participate in volunteer work if their friends are also involved, leading to a greater sense of civic responsibility and altruism.

However, the disadvantages of peer pressure often outweigh these benefits. Negative peer pressure can lead individuals to engage in risky behaviours, such as substance abuse, reckless driving, and delinquent activities, in order to fit in or gain acceptance from their peers. The desire to conform to social norms and avoid rejection can override rational decision-making and moral judgment, leading to harmful consequences for both individuals and society. For instance, adolescents may experiment with drugs or alcohol due to peer pressure, resulting in addiction, legal troubles, and impaired cognitive function. Moreover, peer pressure can contribute to the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes, discrimination, and bullying within peer groups. Individuals who deviate from social norms or express dissenting opinions may face ostracism, ridicule, or even physical violence from their peers, leading to feelings of isolation, low self-esteem, and mental health issues.

In conclusion, while peer pressure can sometimes promote positive behaviours and social connections, its disadvantages far outweigh any potential benefits.

Sample 4:

Peer pressure refers to the influence young individuals experience within the same age group, affecting their behaviors. This essay will critically evaluate the drawbacks and benefits of peer pressure on young people.

Peer pressure often leads young individuals to engage in risky behaviors. For instance, teenagers may feel compelled to experiment with drugs due to the effect of their peers who engage in such activities. The desire to fit in and be accepted can override their better judgment, exposing them to serious short-term health risks and potential addiction later in life. Moreover, succumbing to negative peer pressure can adversely affect academic performance, as students may prioritize social acceptance over their studies. This desire for approval can result in poor grades, limited educational opportunities, and long-term negative consequences.

On the other hand, positive peer pressure can inspire young individuals to set higher goals, adopt healthier habits, and strive for academic excellence. Many teenagers are pressured by their peers to join a study group, leading to improved learning outcomes and academic success. Relatedly, supportive friends can inspire young individuals to engage in physical fitness activities or pursue positive hobbies and talents, promoting a healthier and more well-rounded lifestyle. This sense of camaraderie and mutual encouragement fostered within positive peer groups can contribute significantly to personal growth and self-confidence. Actively seeking out positive and active peer groups and engaging in behaviors aligned with one’s personal values can help mitigate the adverse effects of negative peer pressure while harnessing the advantages of positive influence.

In conclusion, although peer pressure encourages risky behaviors and hinders personal growth, the motivational and emotional advantage make it positive on the whole. Ultimately, striking some degree of balance between independence and positive peer interactions is crucial to minimizing the disadvantages and embracing the benefits.

Sample 5:

Peer pressure is the influence exerted by a peer group that encourages people to change their attitudes, values, or behaviours to fit into group norms. It plays a significant part in adolescent life. I agree that peers can help make a particular place comfortable for an individual but majorly they play an active role in helping an individual indulge in risky behaviours. So, in my opinion, the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages.

Peer pressure plays a crucial role in shaping adolescent behaviour and attitudes. It helps people promote unity and harmony in society. For instance, a teenager might be motivated to excel academically or engage in community service due to the influence of their high-achieving peers. It tends to encourage people to conform to societal norms and values. Moreover, it can help young people in preparing for the realities of adulthood. This is because it exposes them to different viewpoints and assists them in learning how to navigate social dynamics, which in turn enhances their social skills and emotional intelligence.

However, there can be several ill effects of being influenced by one’s peers. Firstly, it may encourage youth to engage in dangerous activities such as smoking, drinking, or drug usage to make them fit into their groups. Excess peer pressure is the major cause of stress, anxiety, and low self-esteem in the younger generation as it builds this feeling that they are not able to match the expectations of their peers. In extreme cases, it can even lead to depression and other mental health issues. This can also stifle individuality and creativity, preventing young people from discovering their true selves and potential.

In addition to this, there can be a loss of personal identity as young people may feel compelled to adopt the attitudes, behaviours, and tastes of their peers, even if they conflict with their values and beliefs. It also leads to academic pressure as students may feel forced to achieve the same grades as their peers, leading to unhealthy competition and burnout. This can result in a lack of motivation and interest in learning, which can have long-term effects on their academic and career prospects.

In conclusion, peer pressure does have an indispensable role in the societal development of young individuals. However, it also provides people with a sense of comfort and security in their formative years. However, its disadvantages such as promoting risky behaviours, causing mental health issues, stifling individuality, and leading to academic pressure are more significant. Therefore, parents, educators, and society as a whole must provide guidance and support to young people to help them navigate the complexities of peer pressure.

Sample 6:

Many feel that peer pressure can have a positive impact on an individual, while others claim that its effects are unequivocally detrimental. In my opinion, despite providing motivation for self-development, the downsides associated with mental health decline and behavioral problems make this phenomenon decidedly negative.

On the one hand, peer pressure can encourage personal development. Individuals leading sedentary lifestyles might be persuaded into going to the gym by their peers and therefore cultivate healthy exercise habits in the long term. Relatedly, those surrounded by punctual friends may be influenced to arrive on time not only for social gatherings, but this habit could possibly extend to important business meetings. The adoption of these good daily habits can engender higher levels of self-confidence, which better prepares an individual to strive for excellence in various aspects of life.

However, peer pressure can be the source of mental health deterioration. When observing other people of the same age reaching major milestones and success in life, an individual may feel compelled to make comparisons and potentially feel dissatisfied with oneself and their current achievements. A pertinent example of this can often be seen in classroom settings, where a student may develop anxieties related to other students and in rarer instances, more concerning mental problems. Negative peer pressure also makes an individual gravitate towards self-destructive behavior. Some teenagers may be tempted by their peers into smoking cigarettes or drinking alcohol in order to gain approval and inclusion within a given social group.

In conclusion, in spite of motivational advantages concomitant with peer pressure, the related mental health problems and risky behavior are unequivocally negative. Individuals should focus on personal growth instead of fixating on others’ achievements.

Sample 7:

In the vibrant tapestry of adolescence, peer pressure emerges as a potent force, shaping behaviors and attitudes among the youth. This essay posits that while peer influence harbors potential benefits, such as fostering social integration and encouraging positive habits, its drawbacks, particularly in promoting conformity and risky behaviors, significantly overshadow its advantages.

Peer pressure, often perceived as a vehicle for conformity, exerts a formidable influence on young individuals, compelling them to align with the group’s norms and values. This phenomenon, while reinforcing social cohesion, frequently nudges adolescents towards compromising their individuality and adopting behaviors that may not align with their personal or moral values. For instance, the prevalent trend of underage drinking can be attributed to the desire to fit in, illustrating how peer influence can foster detrimental habits rather than constructive ones.

Moreover, the inclination to engage in risky behaviors under peer influence constitutes a significant drawback. Adolescents, in their quest for acceptance and fear of ostracization, may find themselves partaking in activities fraught with peril, such as reckless driving or substance abuse. These actions, while momentarily gratifying, can have long-lasting adverse effects on their health and wellbeing, underscoring the inherent dangers of succumbing to peer pressure.

Conversely, peer pressure can serve as a catalyst for positive change, encouraging young people to adopt beneficial habits and attitudes through the influence of their contemporaries. For example, peers who prioritize academic excellence and healthy living can inspire similar values in their circle. However, while the potential for positive influence exists, it is frequently overshadowed by the more immediate and compelling lure of negative behaviors that promise social acceptance.

In summary, while peer pressure may occasionally lead to positive changes, its inclination towards promoting conformity and risky behaviors is a greater issue. The negatives, especially its encouragement of harmful habits and the erosion of individuality, clearly outweigh the positives. This underscores the importance of creating environments that champion personal integrity over conformity, vital for nurturing resilient and well-rounded individuals.

Sample 8:

In adolescence, young people are often influenced by their peer group, a force that can wield both immense power and significant peril. While there's undeniable value in the emotional support, encouragement, and sense of belonging that peers can offer, I argue that the drawbacks of peer pressure - especially the inclination toward conformity at the expense of individuality and the propensity for rash decision-making - far outweigh these advantages.

When young people carefully select their social circles, peer pressure can, indeed, serve as a catalyst for positive change. Consider an aspiring scholar who surrounds themselves with academically driven friends aiming for Ivy League schools. In this context, the group's collective ambition propels the individual toward academic excellence. Moreover, at an age when the brain is highly malleable, the right peer pressure can stimulate not just intellectual growth but also emotional intelligence. It can teach young people the intricacies of interpersonal dynamics, as they navigate the highs and lows of relationships, including conflict resolution and empathy.

Nevertheless, the potential pitfalls of peer pressure should not be underestimated, especially given the vulnerability of adolescents who are still in the process of forming their values and judgments. This makes them susceptible to external influences that may not always align with their best interests. For instance, research indicates that the popularity of smoking in high schools directly correlates with an uptick in teenage smoking rates; youngsters may succumb to the vice merely to conform. Additionally, the fear of ostracization can lead adolescents to limit their friendships to a monolithic group, thereby reducing their exposure to diverse perspectives and impeding their emotional growth, ultimately stunting their psychological development.

In conclusion, peer pressure is a double-edged sword; while it may catalyze academic aspiration and emotional development when managed judiciously, it can also usher in detrimental consequences. Given that young individuals are prone to impulsive actions and less-than-ideal decision-making, the perils introduced by peer pressure must be acknowledged and carefully managed.

Sample 9:

The influence of peer pressure is undeniably a double-edged sword, wielding the power to either uplift or undermine an individual's life trajectory. Picture a young prodigy immersed in a social milieu comprising peers laser-focused on gaining admission to prestigious Ivy League institutions. Such an environment becomes a crucible for the cultivation of academic rigor, driving the young mind toward unparalleled scholastic achievements.

Additionally, during the formative years of adolescence, the brain's neuroplasticity is at its zenith, making it an ideal period for the enhancement of emotional intelligence. Within this context, positive peer pressure becomes instrumental in instilling essential life skills such as empathy, resilience, and conflict resolution. For example, facing challenges together, whether it's academic competition or personal disagreements, teaches valuable lessons about collaboration and emotional regulation.

Yet, the specter of the adverse effects looms large, especially when considering the malleable and impressionable nature of youth. Focused research illustrates that social trends among teenagers, such as the unfortunate resurgence of smoking, can be attributed to the pervasive influence of peer pressure. The desire to conform eclipses rational judgment, compelling young people to engage in detrimental behaviors just to maintain their social standing.

Moreover, the dread of social exclusion often coerces adolescents into narrowing their social circles to homogenous groups, thereby stifling their emotional and intellectual growth. When confined to a single, like-minded cohort, the opportunity to interact with diverse perspectives and develop a more nuanced understanding of the world is severely curtailed.

In conclusion, the multifaceted impact of peer pressure should not be casually dismissed. While it has the capacity to be a catalyst for personal and academic growth, the pitfalls are equally compelling. The key, therefore, lies in a judicious selection of one's social circle and a heightened self-awareness that enables an individual to sift through external influences to embrace only those that align with their authentic selves.

Sample 10:

Youngsters have always been influenced by the conduct of acquaintances belonging to the same age group. While this has certain shortfalls, the favors it brings are far more in number, which shall be elucidated in the following paragraphs.

The impact of conduct of acquaintances on youngsters is overwhelming and although this can have an adverse impact on the young psyche, it will be unjustified to profess that these eclipse the favorable effects; it is the other way round.

To begin with, undeniably, the consequence of the push afforded by classmates, friends, colleagues and social contacts, have been found to be coaxing individuals into establishing their definitive academic, professional, social and even health goals with great enthusiasm. To corroborate, several individuals pursuing weight loss objectives have admitted that it was their social network that persuaded them to work to shed their flab and attain a trimmer waist. Similarly, millions of IT professionals credit joining this industry to their classmates and friends whose success and encouragement pushed the former to follow the precedents and embrace this occupation.

Moreover, it is quite commonly seen that the persona is partly carved by the interaction with the outer world, especially with those in social circles and friendship, and this determines the level of intellect of an individual. To illustrate, those with a high level of enlightenment about the surroundings, general and specific issues such as geo-politics and environment, generally hail from peer groups that comprise intelligent people.

However, the only conspicuous downside of this phenomenon is youngsters starting to harbor unrealistic expectations about various spheres of their life, chasing unattainable goals, becoming frustrated if those objectives are not accomplished, and going astray. Nonetheless, such situations can be circumvented by adopting a prudent approach and identifying their own limitations.

In hindsight, it can be safely asserted that the allegation of shortcomings of peer pressure exceeding its pros lacks substance; it is this force that has guided an umpteen number of triumphant personalities who owe their accomplishments to these undercurrents.

Sample 11:

Peer pressure is a phenomenon widely observed among young people, influencing their behaviors, decisions, and perceptions. While some advocate for its importance in shaping social dynamics and fostering development, others highlight its distinct disadvantages. The debate revolves around whether the negatives of peer pressure outweigh the positives.

Advantages of peer pressure are evident in various aspects of adolescent life. It often plays a role in introducing new ideas, interests, and experiences. Young individuals may be motivated to adopt positive habits like academic excellence, sports participation, or community engagement through encouragement and inspiration from peers. Additionally, peer pressure can facilitate social integration and help young people develop critical social skills, fostering a sense of belonging and camaraderie within their peer groups.

However, the disadvantages of peer pressure cannot be disregarded. The most glaring issue arises when negative influences lead to risky or harmful behaviors. Young individuals might succumb to peer pressure to engage in substance abuse, delinquency, or other irresponsible actions, driven by the desire for acceptance or fear of exclusion. This can result in detrimental consequences, affecting not only their immediate well-being but also their long-term prospects and mental health.

Furthermore, excessive reliance on peer approval might hinder personal growth and individuality. Young people may conform to societal norms or trends without considering their own values, preferences, or aspirations. This conformity might lead to a lack of independent thinking and decision-making skills, affecting their ability to navigate challenges and make informed choices in the future.

The disadvantages of peer pressure, particularly when it leads to negative outcomes or inhibits personal development, can have a lasting impact on individuals. The pressure to conform can overshadow one’s authenticity and hinder the exploration of unique talents and interests.

In evaluating whether the disadvantages outweigh the advantages of peer pressure, it’s crucial to consider context and moderation. Positive peer influence can foster growth, but when peer pressure leads to detrimental behavior or stifles individuality, its drawbacks become more pronounced. Finding a balance where individuals are positively influenced without compromising their values or well-being is crucial in navigating the complexities of peer pressure.

In conclusion, while peer pressure can offer positive reinforcement and social integration, its disadvantages, especially when it results in negative behaviors or stifles individuality, should not be overlooked. Striking a balance between positive peer influence and personal autonomy is essential for young individuals to develop into well-rounded, independent individuals capable of making informed decisions while benefiting from the positive aspects of social interaction.

Câu 2

Tests and examinations are a central feature of school systems in many countries. Do you think the educational benefits of testing outweigh any disadvantages?

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

In today’s school systems, tests and examinations are major features in many countries, where some citizens believe that these tests play an important role. Whereas on the same scale others argue that they are not mandatory. However, I feel that testing should not be major a one in the school system for the following reasons.

Firstly, a common advantage of examinations is that they differentiate between the best and poor performers, i.e., hard-working students are smart in tests compared to others. Similarly, school kids feel that if they want to upgrade for the next standard they should appear and pass exams. Hence this concept creates responsibility for studies. However, many nations in the world are preferring this testing format in education.

On the other hand, a few drawbacks are noticed such as slow learners cannot perform well in the test and this creates inferior complexity among students. If opportunity, time and new learning techniques are imparted to students, they can perform better in tests.

Moreover, suicide trends are seen by this examination system. Hence, developed countries are exempting testing features. This phenomenon created confusion in parents, children and teachers whether to continue with the test pattern or simply promote students to the next higher class. This brought a drastic change in many countries which headed toward the exemption of tests.

In conclusion, testing candidates has both advantages and disadvantages, with the major advantage being that slow learners benefit significantly from the exam system. If passing an exam is not mandatory, students can still improve, even if maturity and seriousness towards studies are not observed in childhood. However, tests do not always accurately reflect students' merit and are thus often biased.

Sample 2:

Much could be said about different ways of testing or checking students at schools or universities. The most popular ones have always been causing very exciting discussions and debates around the world. We all do realise that teachers need to have a system that helps them to test their students’ knowledge, so they can see how effective their teaching methods are. The question is, do we really need to put so much pressure on these features? Are they really so effective?

The first thing about tests and exams is that they do check the level of information the students managed to learn from the lectures. The questions usually cover the area that has been thought about at school, so if students can answer them correctly it means that the teaching was successful.

The other, equally important aspect is that due to the tests or exams that students are facing at school they get motivated to study more in order to get better marks and to improve their knowledge. Sometimes it might be just the fact that it is called an exam, that makes students get together and study harder.

On the other hand, some students might feel discouraged by the same fact that makes the others motivated what of course results in low marks in the actual exam. They also think that the results are very often not relevant to the efforts they put into studying. Because the marking system is not fair, they just do not feel like studying more for the exam.

Furthermore, many students find exams of different kinds very stressful, especially school ones. They often think that there could be another way of testing, less stressful, that should be introduced in schools or universities. The supporters of this opinion often bring out the fact that most students start smoking actually because of the stress they are exposed to at school. And that is definitely not beneficial for you or your health.

To put things together, is there really such a big need for exams at school? Is there really no other way to check how effective the teaching methods are? That is of course not that easy, but still, I am deeply convinced that things can be changed. It requires all the sides involved to think and come up with new ideas that could later be put into schools and that wouldn’t be that stressful anymore, so students can actually start enjoying them.

Sample 3:

Being the main characteristic of most academic institutions, the examination system helps a school to evaluate the knowledge and skills of its current and prospective students. It is well known that there are lots of debates around available scoring systems used by many schools. Some people believe that current testing methods are not effective anymore, while others think that it is not necessary to replace or amend the current scoring methods. In my opinion both sides are partially right.

It is well-documented that test questions reflect the academic material used at school lectures and seminars. Such questions cover the most part of the subject taught and evaluate the level information acquainted by the students during the classes. Besides, upcoming examinations make students to learn harder the appropriate field of study. Without evaluation, I think many students would lose their interest in learning.

On the other hand, modern testing systems require students to obtain huge amounts of academic information within a short period of time. It is widely believed that only knowledge of subjects is not enough to pass the test with higher results. The students are also required to possess strong time management skills in order to get high scores during examinations within the time limit. I think that this situation makes lots of students feel pressure which eventually leads to lower scores.

In my opinion, examinations at schools should be less stressful where students can reveal their true knowledge and will not be demotivated. I think that the time limit of the test questions should be extended since the students can have enough time to think and apply the knowledge, can get higher scores, and will be stimulated to learn further.

Sample 4:

In recent years, there has been a vast increase in discussions about how the examination systems should be at schools. Now students are undertaking too many tests and exams at school which do have many advantages both for the students and the teachers, but at the same time they also have certain drawbacks as well. The administration departments at schools need to think seriously about the outcomes of the examination systems they have, to test the students. In this essay I would like to give my own opinion after discussing both sides of the argument.

The first good thing about the exams and tests is that it is a method to test students how well they are learning from the lectures delivered in the class and how successful teachers are in conveying their knowledge. For instance, if a whole group of students show poor grades in a subject then the teacher teaching that subject can be encouraged to work harder and improve his or her teaching skills to bring the students to the top. This is a strong point that favours the argument because teachers are the key figures in a school system and exams are mandatory to check their level of teaching.

The other, equally important factor in favour of the issue is that exams encourage students as well to study, do more reading and writing and thus improve their general knowledge. If there are no exams and tests, then students will not put any effort into learning and education. Exams produce a state of terror that forces children to study. Moreover, exams bring students together, they do combine studies which help them to learn the essence of teamwork and they develop communication skills. Lastly, exams develop a sense of competition which also draws students towards books.

On the other hand, exams do have some disadvantages as well. While competition can be encouraging for some, it is a major source of immense pressure on students, often leading to depression. When students do not get good grades, they are discouraged and at the same time they are forced, both by the teachers and the parents, to work hard, putting them under more pressure. Now more and more students are involved in drug addiction to relieve exam pressure.

To recapitulate, I concede that exams can be discouraging for the students in some ways, but this does not mean that they should be removed from the system. The advantages of exams outweigh their disadvantages. Students should be tested and then upgraded but at the same time weaker students should be given special help to improve.

Câu 3