Câu hỏi:
10/01/2025 152Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Sample 1:
It is true that majority of people work for the same company until they are retirement. However, others believe that changing jobs is a good way to develop, and I also agree with this idea.
It is undoubted that working for the only organization brings many benefits. Firstly, the employees will have more understanding about the job to improve their skills and experience. It is clear that if someone works for a long time, he or she may have more opportunities to become a major in this field. Secondly, the worker also has a chance to get a higher salary. In Japan, for example, many companies pay more bonus for their employees who done for a long time. Finally, longer time working in a company could be a crucial aspect to help someone promoted.
On the other hand, I believe that changing jobs will have more advantages. One of the most benefits is the employees become more active. This factor is vital in model society where demands and skills are becoming higher than ever. In addition, changing for a new job also brings a better choice. After working for the company, the worker would find another job which is more suitable for him. My brother, for instance, changed four different companies until he finding a relevant job now. Furthermore, a new job with new relationships and duties often gives everyone new energy and more satisfaction.
In conclusion, even although doing all of working time for only organization have many advantageous situations, I partially think that moving on to another job will bring more satisfaction.
Sample 2:
The choice between working for the same organization throughout one’s career or seeking opportunities with different organizations is a matter of personal preference and circumstances. This essay will examine both perspectives and provide an opinion that working for multiple companies is a better choice for an employee.
Some individuals believe that remaining loyal to a single organization is a far better career choice. Firstly, it allows for the development of strong professional relationships and a deep understanding of the company’s culture, values, and operations. This familiarity can lead to increased job satisfaction and a sense of belonging. Additionally, long-term employees often have access to better career advancement opportunities and benefits, as their experience and commitment are valued by the organization. For example, a study conducted by a leading management consultancy found that employees who had spent a significant amount of time with a single company were more likely to be considered for leadership roles and were offered greater responsibility, reflecting the organization’s trust in their abilities and dedication.
On the other hand, proponents of working for different organizations argue that it provides individuals with a broader range of experiences and opportunities for personal and professional growth. By moving across different companies and industries, employees can gain diverse skill sets, expand their professional networks, and adapt to new work environments. This exposure to different perspectives and practices can enhance adaptability, creativity, and innovation, which in turn prove to be more rewarding and less stressful. For instance, a study conducted by a global HR research institute showed that professionals who had worked in various sectors were more likely to bring unique insights to their roles, leading to higher levels of job satisfaction and a greater sense of accomplishment.
In my opinion, working for different organisation have better career prospects and offers more chances for growth. By working for different organizations, individuals can acquire a diverse range of experiences and gain exposure to various working environments, ultimately fostering personal and professional growth.
In conclusion, though the decision to work for the same organization or different organizations is subjective and depends on individual preferences and circumstances, working for multiple organisations and seeking career growth along with it, in my belief, offer a well-rounded career that combines deep knowledge and experience with adaptability and growth.
Sample 3:
Employment is not only a mode of earning income but a methodology to stand in society with esteem. Few individuals favour working for the same employer their whole life. Although some people opine that one should keep on switching jobs and getting employed by different organisations. Both the aspects will be discussed in the subsequent paragraphs before reaching a reasonable conclusion from my own perspective.
Commencing with the multifarious reasons why people prefer to do employment for the same company. First and foremost, job satisfaction plays a crucial role in attaining job stability. For instance, human beings are able to get a work life balance. Also, they are successful in achieving goals set by them in personal and professional life. Owing to which, they are not aspired towards resettling in another firm’s work culture. Moreover, by continuing in the same corporation for long time, management is aware about traits of a person and make them accountable for several tasks. It provides mental contentment to some humans when they are found reliable employees to do a task over other team members. Therefore, they want to be associated with that coalition for the distant future.
On the other hand, there are plethora of intellects because of which opponents like to explore opportunities in numerous establishments during their tenure. Primarily, a person will get more exposure as there is a sea change in the process of every alliance. Also, there will be diversity in work on account of which living beings are inclined towards changing jobs. Apart from this, moving companies gives a heavy salary boost in comparison to staying put at same place. It helps human race to meet their financial targets. Hence, they tend to transit from one workplace to another.
To recapitulate, career contentment plays a paramount role in homo sapiens lives otherwise it impacts their private as well as working world. However, after acquiring certain experience, one should try to sustain a place and climb the higher levels of career ladder by acquiring abundant managerial or technical skills.
Sample 4:
In the past, people were more inclined towards working in the same organisation for their entire life. Today, different individuals have a varied opinion about the work options. Some people prefer working for the same company throughout their life, while others believe in switching their companies. Both viewpoints will be critiqued before reaching a reasoned conclusion.
On the one hand, there are a group of individuals who dedicate their professional life to one corporation only. The primary reason for following this is the stability which can be achieved only by working at the same place for a longer time. This will not only allow employees to gain thorough knowledge about the application but also increase the chances of recognitions and promotions. Thus, it is obvious that professional life will be at the advantage in case he is employed in the same industry for a lifetime.
On the other hand, there are some individuals who believe that they are benefited by altering companies. This is because such folks can get exposure to different working environments, thereby allowing them to get trained about different systems available in the market. This can increase the market value of an individual, resulting in receiving offers with a higher salary, and hence, financial stability can be attained at an earlier stage. In conclusion, this will enable individuals to lead a successful and secure personal life.
After analysing both the views, it is apparent that varying jobs should be preferred over others since it can provide better family life. Thus, it is recommended that the public keep themselves motivated for shifting industries which can help them to enjoy their life and fulfil family requirements.
Sample 5:
Around the world, individuals are highly concerned about their career growth. However, different people have their own opinion about the path for achieving success in their profession. According to one camp, one should be employed with the same company for the entire period, while another camp considers shifting companies provide job attainment. Both these views will be critiqued before reaching a reasoned conclusion.
On the one hand, there are a group of individuals who prefer working at the same workplace throughout their life. These individuals will have a thorough understanding of the existing systems in their organisation and thereby can be termed as the most knowledgeable employee within the company. As a consequence, they will be always selected for the rewards and recognitions as well as for the promotions. Therefore, it is apparent that these employees can expect stable progress in their professional life.
For example, a professor working for the same university and getting involved in similar research would be preferred for bigger research work than those professors who have worked for many organisations in different positions.
On the other hand, some folks consider that changing their corporation promotes career advancement. These individuals get an opportunity to gather information about various applications used across different organisations and thus can be termed as multi-talented. This knowledge will not only help them to attract employers towards them but also help them to convince these employers for paying them higher wages, thus, their personal life will be comfortable. Looking at this, it is clear that benefits of switching jobs are difficult to debunk.
For instance, a software developer expert in different platforms and programming languages are better suited for large software companies and their careers often include working in different companies.
After analysing these two outlooks, it can be assumed that sticking to one company for life-long can offer professional growth, but altering companies can benefit both personal and professional life. Thus, it is expected that people will opt for shifting organisations for having a prosperous life.
Sample 6:
Many people argue that majority of people prefer to work in one company all their whole lifetime of employment and this is a better option for employees. However, another group of people would prefer to work for as many as they could work to get diverse kinds of experience. I would advocate the latter view for the following three main reasons. First, we need to build confidence with a variety of work experiences in our majored field. Second, we need to give us the opportunity to deal with bigger and new challenges. Finally, we need to be familiar with all types of industries to improve our knowledge and scope of learning.
First of all, as I mentioned before, we should build confidence with various kinds of work through facing different difficulties. If you work for only one organisation during all your lifetime, it becomes boring and monotonous, and you could not challenge yourself on different occasions. Your work will become easier for you, and you will not explore your hidden advantages to deal with new challenges. Thus, if you just adapt to your current work, you won’t be able to build your confidence. Therefore, you need to work with several companies with different responsibilities to improve and experience along with confidence.
Secondly, we need to give us the opportunity to pursue bigger challenges. It is considered that there must be bigger and new chances to expand your view in the new environment. You can meet a wide range of people who come from different backgrounds. Therefore, you can learn many things to develop and inspire your mind from them. After that, it is more open to thinking wider and further to pursue bigger challenges. So, you should flourish your development and always bring freshness into your knowledge and experience every single day. I can say that if you have to switch your job to a higher position in another company you should grab it. You never know what potential is waiting for you!
Finally, we need to familiarize ourselves with all types of products to increase our skills and knowledge in our field as there are so many products and areas we need to be familiar with. If you want to promote or develop yourself efficiently you should have optimal knowledge about all of them. For instance, if you are a marketing person, there are diverse kinds of products available in the market likely: electronic, consumer goods, foods, clothes, automobiles and others. All the products that I mentioned need marketing; however, they all have their own specific features and that means they have different customers and markets. Therefore, you need to be familiar with all industries products in your field to promote and accomplish your mission.
To conclude, we would prefer to work for different companies that could share with us specific advantages to build confidence as well as give us the opportunity to pursue bigger challenges and familiar with diverse kind of industries.
Sample 7:
Some people spend a lifetime working for the same company, while others say that it is more beneficial to work for different organizations. This essay will discuss both sides of this argument and explain why I believe that it is more advantageous to work for a variety of companies.
On the one hand, in this fast-moving world when people change jobs frequently, many companies value loyalty over anything else. Therefore, those who spend their lives staying with the same organization are often given better benefits, such as longer holidays or a more attractive pension scheme, than those who only work for their company for one or two years and switch to another organization. In addition, long-term employees have more opportunities to climb the corporate ladder due to their accumulation of skills and experience. In order for someone to get to the position of a manager or a CEO, for example, they have to make great contributions to their company for a long period of time.
In spite of the above argument, I support the view that it is better to work for various companies. Firstly, working in different environments gives people a chance to develop new sets of skills. For example, switching from a local firm to a multinational organization helps workers to improve their language skills and get a better insight into different cultures and traditions around the world. Another thing is that people might feel bored when working for a company for too long. By contrast, working for different organizations provides people with the opportunity to take on new challenges, which prevents feeling of monotony and makes their work much more interesting.
In conclusion, although some people say that employees should only stick with one company all their working life, I am of the opinion that it is worth spending their lives working for different organizations because it can help them learn valuable skill sets and adds excitement to their work.
Sample 8:
If we want to reach a high position in our career, we need to work for different organizations and not work for the same organization for a long time. People who work for the same organization all their working life don't reach hiwgh positions, unlike a person who moves between different organizations.
In my opinion, people who work for different organizations have more advantages than people who work for the same organization all their working life. While they work with different cultures, they have the opportunity to learn more and better and be promoted faster than people who work for the same organization forever. They can develop their careers and be promoted to better positions with great benefits. Working with different managers can develop their ways of thinking and teach them different ways of managing their teams in higher positions. In addition, working in different teams can promote their communication and interpersonal skills.
On the other hand, people who work for the same organization for all their working life are loyal to their working place, and this is a good thing. If their organization has limited positions or a tight management pyramid, these employees will stay in the same position more before they are promoted. Maybe some organization managers would love to have such kinds of employees. From my experience, good managers would prefer to have employees who want to develop their careers and not stay in the same position for a long time. It is great to stay in the same position for a maximum of two-three years and to move to the second level in their career, and if they can't do that in the same organization, they must move on to another one.
Finally, changing positions between organizations develops our careers faster than staying in the same organization, especially if we stay longer than two-three in the same position without being promoted to a higher position.
Sample 9:
For most people, when they get their first job, they have little idea whether or not they will remain in the same organization throughout their working life. If they decide to change, they need to consider how this will impact on their career overall.
People who stay with the same organization have the advantage of thoroughly understanding how it works and also becoming familiar with the staff and processes. If they work hard, their promotion prospects are good and there is likely to be greater job security, with the promise of a good pension when they retire. Employers value loyalty and may offer additional incentives to long-term employees, including bonuses and reward schemes.
However, one of the drawbacks of staying with the same organization is that the person may get stuck doing the same job year after year. in some cases, this can lead to boredom and disillusionment. Moving from one organization to another can be a strategic decision in order to have a variety and acquire a range of skills and experience. A friend of my father started out as a sociology teacher, he then joined the social services and is currently managing a care home in Western Australia. This has made him incredibly knowledgeable in a range of related fields and, in my view, has provided him with a much more interesting working life.
Although there are benefits to working for one organization. I feel that it is also valuable for an employee to be able to offer a wide range of experience having worked for different companies. as long as it is planned carefully, I feel that change is good and will ultimately benefit the employee and the employer.
Sample 10:
People have distinctive ideas about how to spend their working life. Meanwhile most people are looking for stability in their job by staying in an organisation for their entire careers, others think that it is better to try different workplaces instead of devoting themselves to sole organisation only. Personally, I tend to believe that stability is an important factor to consider in your working life, but I prefer to work for different organisations, so I can gain more experience and learn about new things every day.
Most people really enjoy spending their time working in the same company for their entire life since it gives them a sense of security and stability. By working in an organisation from the start until the end, they don't need to bother themselves with other job-seeking activities. They can keep their job while patiently waiting for their salary to rise every year. Furthermore, this condition gives them the chance to gain a higher position in their company in the future. It will be easier for people who have stayed for a long time in the company to get promotions than new employers who have entered the company recently. For example, an employee with 5 years’ working experience has a higher chance of being a manager than a new hire worker.
On the other hand, some people may think that it is boring to work only at a company, so they tend to move from one organisation to another. This condition brings them into new positions, new cultures, and new workplaces. Furthermore, changing workplaces makes them learn new things and get different experiences.
Sometimes, people also consider others factor such as salary, comfort, and distance from home as the main reason to move out to others company. There are so many cases where people move out to another organisation because they want to get higher salaries than before, or just because the distance of the new company is near their home so they can easily travel there.
From my point of view, indeed working in similar organisation for the rest of your career life is a good thing. It gives you a sense of stability and you have no need to look for another job. However, I prefer to work in some organisations, so I can gain many experiences from different workplaces, try dissimilar positions, meet new people, and learn new things.
Sample 11:
It is true that the question of whether to work for the same organization for the whole working life or work for different organizations remains a source of controversy in the labor market. While a number of people believe that individuals should work for an organization merely, I would argue that it is better to become a part of some companies.
On the one hand, it is believed that working in just only cooperation can bring several positive results to this problem for some justifications. Firstly, laborers might have a good chance to understand clearly and dig deep about the operation of their company. As a result, they can enable the company’s operation to operate in a smooth way and restrict a variety of unexpected problems. Secondly, working for a long time can assist people in gaining more promotion opportunities. This would lead to a rise in pay and benefits with their seniority.
On the other hand, I am in favor of the idea that people should have chances working for some different companies. It is indisputable that they might have more opportunities to choose which working environment is appropriate for them. As a consequence, laborers would be fresher and full of energy when they have to work daily. Another compelling reason for the idea is that individuals can think in imaginary ways instead of stereotypes when they have already understood clearly about their company. For example, in the marketing field where the imagination is encouraged usually, non-experienced laborers are still accepted.
In conclusion, although both views certainly have some validity, it seems to me that it is better to work for several organizations instead of just only one.
Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Peer pressure is a pervasive phenomenon that significantly influences the behaviours of young individuals. While some argue that it plays a crucial role in positively shaping the lives of the youth, others contend that the disadvantages of peer pressure are very detrimental.
Peer pressure, when harnessed positively, can have several advantages. Firstly, it can foster a sense of belonging and camaraderie among individuals within the same age group. Young people often seek acceptance and affirmation from their peers, and this can contribute to their emotional well-being and self-esteem. A further benefit is that positive peer pressure can encourage healthy behaviours, such as exercising or avoiding risky activities. For instance, a teenager might be motivated to quit smoking if their friends promote a smoke-free lifestyle.
However, peer pressure can also have distinct disadvantages. The most pressing concern is the potential for negative influences on impressionable minds. Young people may succumb to the pressure of engaging in harmful behaviours, such as substance abuse, criminal activities, or reckless behaviours like driving without a seatbelt, due to peer pressure, which can lead to long-lasting negative consequences and jeopardise their future.
Moreover, excessive pressure from peers can stifle individuality and creativity as young people may conform to the norms of their peer group instead of pursuing their own aspirations and dreams. This conformity may limit their personal growth and hinder their ability to think independently.
In conclusion, I would argue that peer pressure has more disadvantages as although it can foster a sense of belonging and promote healthy behaviours, it also carries the risk of leading young people astray and stifling their individuality. It is imperative for parents, educators, and society at large to guide young people in making informed choices and navigating the complexities of peer influence.
Sample 2:
The peer group tends to exert influence on the way teenagers behave. While many believe that the influence of peers is immensely important, others opine that it has its obvious drawbacks. I believe that the benefits peer pressure brings outweigh the disadvantages because it can instil a positive attitude towards education, despite the primary drawback, namely substance use, or so on it may cause.
Without any doubt, the influence of peers can inspire young people to build positive behaviours, make good choices, and strive for academic excellence. When friends place emphasis on education and academic performance, it can exert a positive impact on the young’s attitude toward learning. In fact, students who maintain a friend circle who are diligent students may feel a strong motivation to study diligently. Take my brother’s case for example. He works harder to obtain good marks in exams because his friends are determined to achieve academic excellence. They possess a solid work ethic, and now so does he.
However, peer pressure can also exert influence on young people to engage in deviant behaviours. It may make young adults feel obliged to take on bad habits like substance abuse to feel like they are part of the circle and not levelled as boring or weak. For example, if a group of friends get involved in substance abuse, underage drinking, and delinquent activities, a child may feel obligated to conform to these behaviours to avoid exclusion.
Considering all these, I would like to mention that there is no concrete evidence to endorse the view that peer pressure is the primary reason for unacceptable behaviours and substance abuse. There are other factors, like genetics, mental health issues, and social influences, that play a profound role in this case.
To reiterate, the fact that peer pressure can encourage to conform to a positive attitude toward learning clearly outweighs the flawed argument that it can influence young people to develop delinquent behaviour and bad habits.
Sample 3:
The debate surrounding peer pressure often hinges on whether its advantages outweigh its disadvantages or if it is the opposite. While peer pressure can sometimes encourage positive behaviours and foster social connections, I believe its drawbacks are significant and can have long-lasting consequences.
On the one hand, proponents of peer pressure argue that it can motivate individuals to adopt healthy habits, such as regular exercise, academic diligence, and community involvement. Positive peer pressure can serve as a source of encouragement, support, and accountability, leading to personal growth and self-improvement. For example, a teenager may be more likely to participate in volunteer work if their friends are also involved, leading to a greater sense of civic responsibility and altruism.
However, the disadvantages of peer pressure often outweigh these benefits. Negative peer pressure can lead individuals to engage in risky behaviours, such as substance abuse, reckless driving, and delinquent activities, in order to fit in or gain acceptance from their peers. The desire to conform to social norms and avoid rejection can override rational decision-making and moral judgment, leading to harmful consequences for both individuals and society. For instance, adolescents may experiment with drugs or alcohol due to peer pressure, resulting in addiction, legal troubles, and impaired cognitive function. Moreover, peer pressure can contribute to the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes, discrimination, and bullying within peer groups. Individuals who deviate from social norms or express dissenting opinions may face ostracism, ridicule, or even physical violence from their peers, leading to feelings of isolation, low self-esteem, and mental health issues.
In conclusion, while peer pressure can sometimes promote positive behaviours and social connections, its disadvantages far outweigh any potential benefits.
Sample 4:
Peer pressure refers to the influence young individuals experience within the same age group, affecting their behaviors. This essay will critically evaluate the drawbacks and benefits of peer pressure on young people.
Peer pressure often leads young individuals to engage in risky behaviors. For instance, teenagers may feel compelled to experiment with drugs due to the effect of their peers who engage in such activities. The desire to fit in and be accepted can override their better judgment, exposing them to serious short-term health risks and potential addiction later in life. Moreover, succumbing to negative peer pressure can adversely affect academic performance, as students may prioritize social acceptance over their studies. This desire for approval can result in poor grades, limited educational opportunities, and long-term negative consequences.
On the other hand, positive peer pressure can inspire young individuals to set higher goals, adopt healthier habits, and strive for academic excellence. Many teenagers are pressured by their peers to join a study group, leading to improved learning outcomes and academic success. Relatedly, supportive friends can inspire young individuals to engage in physical fitness activities or pursue positive hobbies and talents, promoting a healthier and more well-rounded lifestyle. This sense of camaraderie and mutual encouragement fostered within positive peer groups can contribute significantly to personal growth and self-confidence. Actively seeking out positive and active peer groups and engaging in behaviors aligned with one’s personal values can help mitigate the adverse effects of negative peer pressure while harnessing the advantages of positive influence.
In conclusion, although peer pressure encourages risky behaviors and hinders personal growth, the motivational and emotional advantage make it positive on the whole. Ultimately, striking some degree of balance between independence and positive peer interactions is crucial to minimizing the disadvantages and embracing the benefits.
Sample 5:
Peer pressure is the influence exerted by a peer group that encourages people to change their attitudes, values, or behaviours to fit into group norms. It plays a significant part in adolescent life. I agree that peers can help make a particular place comfortable for an individual but majorly they play an active role in helping an individual indulge in risky behaviours. So, in my opinion, the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages.
Peer pressure plays a crucial role in shaping adolescent behaviour and attitudes. It helps people promote unity and harmony in society. For instance, a teenager might be motivated to excel academically or engage in community service due to the influence of their high-achieving peers. It tends to encourage people to conform to societal norms and values. Moreover, it can help young people in preparing for the realities of adulthood. This is because it exposes them to different viewpoints and assists them in learning how to navigate social dynamics, which in turn enhances their social skills and emotional intelligence.
However, there can be several ill effects of being influenced by one’s peers. Firstly, it may encourage youth to engage in dangerous activities such as smoking, drinking, or drug usage to make them fit into their groups. Excess peer pressure is the major cause of stress, anxiety, and low self-esteem in the younger generation as it builds this feeling that they are not able to match the expectations of their peers. In extreme cases, it can even lead to depression and other mental health issues. This can also stifle individuality and creativity, preventing young people from discovering their true selves and potential.
In addition to this, there can be a loss of personal identity as young people may feel compelled to adopt the attitudes, behaviours, and tastes of their peers, even if they conflict with their values and beliefs. It also leads to academic pressure as students may feel forced to achieve the same grades as their peers, leading to unhealthy competition and burnout. This can result in a lack of motivation and interest in learning, which can have long-term effects on their academic and career prospects.
In conclusion, peer pressure does have an indispensable role in the societal development of young individuals. However, it also provides people with a sense of comfort and security in their formative years. However, its disadvantages such as promoting risky behaviours, causing mental health issues, stifling individuality, and leading to academic pressure are more significant. Therefore, parents, educators, and society as a whole must provide guidance and support to young people to help them navigate the complexities of peer pressure.
Sample 6:
Many feel that peer pressure can have a positive impact on an individual, while others claim that its effects are unequivocally detrimental. In my opinion, despite providing motivation for self-development, the downsides associated with mental health decline and behavioral problems make this phenomenon decidedly negative.
On the one hand, peer pressure can encourage personal development. Individuals leading sedentary lifestyles might be persuaded into going to the gym by their peers and therefore cultivate healthy exercise habits in the long term. Relatedly, those surrounded by punctual friends may be influenced to arrive on time not only for social gatherings, but this habit could possibly extend to important business meetings. The adoption of these good daily habits can engender higher levels of self-confidence, which better prepares an individual to strive for excellence in various aspects of life.
However, peer pressure can be the source of mental health deterioration. When observing other people of the same age reaching major milestones and success in life, an individual may feel compelled to make comparisons and potentially feel dissatisfied with oneself and their current achievements. A pertinent example of this can often be seen in classroom settings, where a student may develop anxieties related to other students and in rarer instances, more concerning mental problems. Negative peer pressure also makes an individual gravitate towards self-destructive behavior. Some teenagers may be tempted by their peers into smoking cigarettes or drinking alcohol in order to gain approval and inclusion within a given social group.
In conclusion, in spite of motivational advantages concomitant with peer pressure, the related mental health problems and risky behavior are unequivocally negative. Individuals should focus on personal growth instead of fixating on others’ achievements.
Sample 7:
In the vibrant tapestry of adolescence, peer pressure emerges as a potent force, shaping behaviors and attitudes among the youth. This essay posits that while peer influence harbors potential benefits, such as fostering social integration and encouraging positive habits, its drawbacks, particularly in promoting conformity and risky behaviors, significantly overshadow its advantages.
Peer pressure, often perceived as a vehicle for conformity, exerts a formidable influence on young individuals, compelling them to align with the group’s norms and values. This phenomenon, while reinforcing social cohesion, frequently nudges adolescents towards compromising their individuality and adopting behaviors that may not align with their personal or moral values. For instance, the prevalent trend of underage drinking can be attributed to the desire to fit in, illustrating how peer influence can foster detrimental habits rather than constructive ones.
Moreover, the inclination to engage in risky behaviors under peer influence constitutes a significant drawback. Adolescents, in their quest for acceptance and fear of ostracization, may find themselves partaking in activities fraught with peril, such as reckless driving or substance abuse. These actions, while momentarily gratifying, can have long-lasting adverse effects on their health and wellbeing, underscoring the inherent dangers of succumbing to peer pressure.
Conversely, peer pressure can serve as a catalyst for positive change, encouraging young people to adopt beneficial habits and attitudes through the influence of their contemporaries. For example, peers who prioritize academic excellence and healthy living can inspire similar values in their circle. However, while the potential for positive influence exists, it is frequently overshadowed by the more immediate and compelling lure of negative behaviors that promise social acceptance.
In summary, while peer pressure may occasionally lead to positive changes, its inclination towards promoting conformity and risky behaviors is a greater issue. The negatives, especially its encouragement of harmful habits and the erosion of individuality, clearly outweigh the positives. This underscores the importance of creating environments that champion personal integrity over conformity, vital for nurturing resilient and well-rounded individuals.
Sample 8:
In adolescence, young people are often influenced by their peer group, a force that can wield both immense power and significant peril. While there's undeniable value in the emotional support, encouragement, and sense of belonging that peers can offer, I argue that the drawbacks of peer pressure - especially the inclination toward conformity at the expense of individuality and the propensity for rash decision-making - far outweigh these advantages.
When young people carefully select their social circles, peer pressure can, indeed, serve as a catalyst for positive change. Consider an aspiring scholar who surrounds themselves with academically driven friends aiming for Ivy League schools. In this context, the group's collective ambition propels the individual toward academic excellence. Moreover, at an age when the brain is highly malleable, the right peer pressure can stimulate not just intellectual growth but also emotional intelligence. It can teach young people the intricacies of interpersonal dynamics, as they navigate the highs and lows of relationships, including conflict resolution and empathy.
Nevertheless, the potential pitfalls of peer pressure should not be underestimated, especially given the vulnerability of adolescents who are still in the process of forming their values and judgments. This makes them susceptible to external influences that may not always align with their best interests. For instance, research indicates that the popularity of smoking in high schools directly correlates with an uptick in teenage smoking rates; youngsters may succumb to the vice merely to conform. Additionally, the fear of ostracization can lead adolescents to limit their friendships to a monolithic group, thereby reducing their exposure to diverse perspectives and impeding their emotional growth, ultimately stunting their psychological development.
In conclusion, peer pressure is a double-edged sword; while it may catalyze academic aspiration and emotional development when managed judiciously, it can also usher in detrimental consequences. Given that young individuals are prone to impulsive actions and less-than-ideal decision-making, the perils introduced by peer pressure must be acknowledged and carefully managed.
Sample 9:
The influence of peer pressure is undeniably a double-edged sword, wielding the power to either uplift or undermine an individual's life trajectory. Picture a young prodigy immersed in a social milieu comprising peers laser-focused on gaining admission to prestigious Ivy League institutions. Such an environment becomes a crucible for the cultivation of academic rigor, driving the young mind toward unparalleled scholastic achievements.
Additionally, during the formative years of adolescence, the brain's neuroplasticity is at its zenith, making it an ideal period for the enhancement of emotional intelligence. Within this context, positive peer pressure becomes instrumental in instilling essential life skills such as empathy, resilience, and conflict resolution. For example, facing challenges together, whether it's academic competition or personal disagreements, teaches valuable lessons about collaboration and emotional regulation.
Yet, the specter of the adverse effects looms large, especially when considering the malleable and impressionable nature of youth. Focused research illustrates that social trends among teenagers, such as the unfortunate resurgence of smoking, can be attributed to the pervasive influence of peer pressure. The desire to conform eclipses rational judgment, compelling young people to engage in detrimental behaviors just to maintain their social standing.
Moreover, the dread of social exclusion often coerces adolescents into narrowing their social circles to homogenous groups, thereby stifling their emotional and intellectual growth. When confined to a single, like-minded cohort, the opportunity to interact with diverse perspectives and develop a more nuanced understanding of the world is severely curtailed.
In conclusion, the multifaceted impact of peer pressure should not be casually dismissed. While it has the capacity to be a catalyst for personal and academic growth, the pitfalls are equally compelling. The key, therefore, lies in a judicious selection of one's social circle and a heightened self-awareness that enables an individual to sift through external influences to embrace only those that align with their authentic selves.
Sample 10:
Youngsters have always been influenced by the conduct of acquaintances belonging to the same age group. While this has certain shortfalls, the favors it brings are far more in number, which shall be elucidated in the following paragraphs.
The impact of conduct of acquaintances on youngsters is overwhelming and although this can have an adverse impact on the young psyche, it will be unjustified to profess that these eclipse the favorable effects; it is the other way round.
To begin with, undeniably, the consequence of the push afforded by classmates, friends, colleagues and social contacts, have been found to be coaxing individuals into establishing their definitive academic, professional, social and even health goals with great enthusiasm. To corroborate, several individuals pursuing weight loss objectives have admitted that it was their social network that persuaded them to work to shed their flab and attain a trimmer waist. Similarly, millions of IT professionals credit joining this industry to their classmates and friends whose success and encouragement pushed the former to follow the precedents and embrace this occupation.
Moreover, it is quite commonly seen that the persona is partly carved by the interaction with the outer world, especially with those in social circles and friendship, and this determines the level of intellect of an individual. To illustrate, those with a high level of enlightenment about the surroundings, general and specific issues such as geo-politics and environment, generally hail from peer groups that comprise intelligent people.
However, the only conspicuous downside of this phenomenon is youngsters starting to harbor unrealistic expectations about various spheres of their life, chasing unattainable goals, becoming frustrated if those objectives are not accomplished, and going astray. Nonetheless, such situations can be circumvented by adopting a prudent approach and identifying their own limitations.
In hindsight, it can be safely asserted that the allegation of shortcomings of peer pressure exceeding its pros lacks substance; it is this force that has guided an umpteen number of triumphant personalities who owe their accomplishments to these undercurrents.
Sample 11:
Peer pressure is a phenomenon widely observed among young people, influencing their behaviors, decisions, and perceptions. While some advocate for its importance in shaping social dynamics and fostering development, others highlight its distinct disadvantages. The debate revolves around whether the negatives of peer pressure outweigh the positives.
Advantages of peer pressure are evident in various aspects of adolescent life. It often plays a role in introducing new ideas, interests, and experiences. Young individuals may be motivated to adopt positive habits like academic excellence, sports participation, or community engagement through encouragement and inspiration from peers. Additionally, peer pressure can facilitate social integration and help young people develop critical social skills, fostering a sense of belonging and camaraderie within their peer groups.
However, the disadvantages of peer pressure cannot be disregarded. The most glaring issue arises when negative influences lead to risky or harmful behaviors. Young individuals might succumb to peer pressure to engage in substance abuse, delinquency, or other irresponsible actions, driven by the desire for acceptance or fear of exclusion. This can result in detrimental consequences, affecting not only their immediate well-being but also their long-term prospects and mental health.
Furthermore, excessive reliance on peer approval might hinder personal growth and individuality. Young people may conform to societal norms or trends without considering their own values, preferences, or aspirations. This conformity might lead to a lack of independent thinking and decision-making skills, affecting their ability to navigate challenges and make informed choices in the future.
The disadvantages of peer pressure, particularly when it leads to negative outcomes or inhibits personal development, can have a lasting impact on individuals. The pressure to conform can overshadow one’s authenticity and hinder the exploration of unique talents and interests.
In evaluating whether the disadvantages outweigh the advantages of peer pressure, it’s crucial to consider context and moderation. Positive peer influence can foster growth, but when peer pressure leads to detrimental behavior or stifles individuality, its drawbacks become more pronounced. Finding a balance where individuals are positively influenced without compromising their values or well-being is crucial in navigating the complexities of peer pressure.
In conclusion, while peer pressure can offer positive reinforcement and social integration, its disadvantages, especially when it results in negative behaviors or stifles individuality, should not be overlooked. Striking a balance between positive peer influence and personal autonomy is essential for young individuals to develop into well-rounded, independent individuals capable of making informed decisions while benefiting from the positive aspects of social interaction.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
In today’s school systems, tests and examinations are major features in many countries, where some citizens believe that these tests play an important role. Whereas on the same scale others argue that they are not mandatory. However, I feel that testing should not be major a one in the school system for the following reasons.
Firstly, a common advantage of examinations is that they differentiate between the best and poor performers, i.e., hard-working students are smart in tests compared to others. Similarly, school kids feel that if they want to upgrade for the next standard they should appear and pass exams. Hence this concept creates responsibility for studies. However, many nations in the world are preferring this testing format in education.
On the other hand, a few drawbacks are noticed such as slow learners cannot perform well in the test and this creates inferior complexity among students. If opportunity, time and new learning techniques are imparted to students, they can perform better in tests.
Moreover, suicide trends are seen by this examination system. Hence, developed countries are exempting testing features. This phenomenon created confusion in parents, children and teachers whether to continue with the test pattern or simply promote students to the next higher class. This brought a drastic change in many countries which headed toward the exemption of tests.
In conclusion, testing candidates has both advantages and disadvantages, with the major advantage being that slow learners benefit significantly from the exam system. If passing an exam is not mandatory, students can still improve, even if maturity and seriousness towards studies are not observed in childhood. However, tests do not always accurately reflect students' merit and are thus often biased.
Sample 2:
Much could be said about different ways of testing or checking students at schools or universities. The most popular ones have always been causing very exciting discussions and debates around the world. We all do realise that teachers need to have a system that helps them to test their students’ knowledge, so they can see how effective their teaching methods are. The question is, do we really need to put so much pressure on these features? Are they really so effective?
The first thing about tests and exams is that they do check the level of information the students managed to learn from the lectures. The questions usually cover the area that has been thought about at school, so if students can answer them correctly it means that the teaching was successful.
The other, equally important aspect is that due to the tests or exams that students are facing at school they get motivated to study more in order to get better marks and to improve their knowledge. Sometimes it might be just the fact that it is called an exam, that makes students get together and study harder.
On the other hand, some students might feel discouraged by the same fact that makes the others motivated what of course results in low marks in the actual exam. They also think that the results are very often not relevant to the efforts they put into studying. Because the marking system is not fair, they just do not feel like studying more for the exam.
Furthermore, many students find exams of different kinds very stressful, especially school ones. They often think that there could be another way of testing, less stressful, that should be introduced in schools or universities. The supporters of this opinion often bring out the fact that most students start smoking actually because of the stress they are exposed to at school. And that is definitely not beneficial for you or your health.
To put things together, is there really such a big need for exams at school? Is there really no other way to check how effective the teaching methods are? That is of course not that easy, but still, I am deeply convinced that things can be changed. It requires all the sides involved to think and come up with new ideas that could later be put into schools and that wouldn’t be that stressful anymore, so students can actually start enjoying them.
Sample 3:
Being the main characteristic of most academic institutions, the examination system helps a school to evaluate the knowledge and skills of its current and prospective students. It is well known that there are lots of debates around available scoring systems used by many schools. Some people believe that current testing methods are not effective anymore, while others think that it is not necessary to replace or amend the current scoring methods. In my opinion both sides are partially right.
It is well-documented that test questions reflect the academic material used at school lectures and seminars. Such questions cover the most part of the subject taught and evaluate the level information acquainted by the students during the classes. Besides, upcoming examinations make students to learn harder the appropriate field of study. Without evaluation, I think many students would lose their interest in learning.
On the other hand, modern testing systems require students to obtain huge amounts of academic information within a short period of time. It is widely believed that only knowledge of subjects is not enough to pass the test with higher results. The students are also required to possess strong time management skills in order to get high scores during examinations within the time limit. I think that this situation makes lots of students feel pressure which eventually leads to lower scores.
In my opinion, examinations at schools should be less stressful where students can reveal their true knowledge and will not be demotivated. I think that the time limit of the test questions should be extended since the students can have enough time to think and apply the knowledge, can get higher scores, and will be stimulated to learn further.
Sample 4:
In recent years, there has been a vast increase in discussions about how the examination systems should be at schools. Now students are undertaking too many tests and exams at school which do have many advantages both for the students and the teachers, but at the same time they also have certain drawbacks as well. The administration departments at schools need to think seriously about the outcomes of the examination systems they have, to test the students. In this essay I would like to give my own opinion after discussing both sides of the argument.
The first good thing about the exams and tests is that it is a method to test students how well they are learning from the lectures delivered in the class and how successful teachers are in conveying their knowledge. For instance, if a whole group of students show poor grades in a subject then the teacher teaching that subject can be encouraged to work harder and improve his or her teaching skills to bring the students to the top. This is a strong point that favours the argument because teachers are the key figures in a school system and exams are mandatory to check their level of teaching.
The other, equally important factor in favour of the issue is that exams encourage students as well to study, do more reading and writing and thus improve their general knowledge. If there are no exams and tests, then students will not put any effort into learning and education. Exams produce a state of terror that forces children to study. Moreover, exams bring students together, they do combine studies which help them to learn the essence of teamwork and they develop communication skills. Lastly, exams develop a sense of competition which also draws students towards books.
On the other hand, exams do have some disadvantages as well. While competition can be encouraging for some, it is a major source of immense pressure on students, often leading to depression. When students do not get good grades, they are discouraged and at the same time they are forced, both by the teachers and the parents, to work hard, putting them under more pressure. Now more and more students are involved in drug addiction to relieve exam pressure.
To recapitulate, I concede that exams can be discouraging for the students in some ways, but this does not mean that they should be removed from the system. The advantages of exams outweigh their disadvantages. Students should be tested and then upgraded but at the same time weaker students should be given special help to improve.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Bộ câu hỏi: [TEST] Từ loại (Buổi 1) (Có đáp án)
Bài tập chức năng giao tiếp (Có đáp án)
Bộ câu hỏi: Các dạng thức của động từ (to v - v-ing) (Có đáp án)
500 bài Đọc điền ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 1)
15000 bài tập tách từ đề thi thử môn Tiếng Anh có đáp án (Phần 1)
Bộ câu hỏi: Thì và sự phối thì (Phần 2) (Có đáp án)
Trắc nghiệm Tiếng anh 12 Tìm từ được gạch chân phát âm khác - Mức độ nhận biết có đáp án
500 bài Đọc hiểu ôn thi Tiếng anh lớp 12 có đáp án (Đề 21)