Câu hỏi:

10/01/2025 126

Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Xem lời giải

Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!

Bắt đầu thi

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

Climate change has become a pressing and complex issue today. The question arises whether we should refrain from taking further preventative measures and resign ourselves to this devastating circumstance. In my view, I strongly disagree with the notion that we should accept climate change as inevitable and instead argue for proactive methods to prevent its adverse consequences due to their long-term effects.

On one hand, adaptation is often seen as a contemporary solution to climate change. For instance, in many flood-prone coastal regions, the construction of flood defenses has taken place to combat rising sea levels caused by global warming. Similarly, new building codes have been implemented to ensure that homes can withstand more extreme weather events. While these measures have mitigated environmental damage to some extent, it is important to recognise that they provide only short-term solutions. They fail to address the underlying causes of climate change, such as deforestation and non-renewable energy exploitation, which continue to exert irreversible consequences to ecology and human life.

On the other hand, prevention should be the primary focus on account of its far-reaching impacts. One typical preventive measure is public campaigns playing a crucial role in reshaping community awareness and attitudes toward global warming. By educating younger generations about climate change and the importance of protecting the Earth from an early age, we can foster an eco-friendly lifestyle that includes energy conservation and waste reduction. Therefore, this proactive approach ensures that global warming is addressed not only in the present but also in the long term.

Additionally, advancements in climate technologies, such as the development of renewable energy sources, contribute to sustainable climate control by significantly reducing carbon footprints resulting from human activities.

In conclusion, while adaptation measures like flood defenses and building codes serve as short-term solutions, they do not address the root causes of climate change. Meanwhile, prevention, through public education and technological advancements, holds greater potential for long-lasting influences. Therefore, I firmly support prioritising preventive methods over accepting and living with the environmental problem.

Sample 2:

Climate change represents a major threat to life on Earth, but some people argue that we need to accept it rather than try to stop it. I completely disagree with this opinion since such a practice might lead to irreversible consequences which could be avoided if efforts are put into protecting the environment and minimizing human footprint on the Earth’s climate.

Firstly, trying to live with climate change is a false belief which might result in disastrous implications. To give just one example, I am not optimistic that we would be able to cope with continuing rises in sea levels due to climate change. Millions of people would be displaced by flooding, particularly in countries that do not have the means to safeguard low-lying areas. These people would lose their homes and their jobs, and eventually be forced to migrate to nearby cities or perhaps to other countries. The potential for human suffering and financial loss would be huge, which would be compounded by the outbreaks of disease and famine, as well as increased homelessness and poverty.

Secondly, the idea of slowing climate change is feasible through the implementation of various measures carried out by governments and individuals. Governments could introduce laws to limit the carbon dioxide emissions that lead to global warming, which might include imposing “green taxes” on drivers, airline companies and other polluters and investing in renewable energy production from solar, wind or waterpower. As individuals, people should also try to limit their contribution to climate change, by becoming more energy efficient, by flying less, and by using bicycles and public transport. Furthermore, the public can affect the actions of governments by voting for politicians who propose to tackle climate change, rather than for those who would prefer to ignore it.

In conclusion, it is clear to me that we must address the problem of climate change since finding ways to live with it might lead to irreversible consequences. Rather than enduring, individuals and governments can join hands to slacken the speed of climate change by imposing green policies and saving resources.

Sample 3:

Perhaps the greatest threat to the world is not regional conflicts, terrorism, or political instability, but climate change and environmental degradation. If we do not address this greatest danger properly and in time, we will be responsible for our own extinction, and I do not believe that we should find ways to live with it by doing nothing about it.

To commence with, the rising global temperature, Arctic ice melting, deforestation, air pollution and depletion of the ozone layer are all connected and would lead to a single event - the destruction of the world. We have already harmed the environment to a great extent, and the time has come for all nations to work together to reduce the environmental damage caused by our actions and greed. The sudden floods in the USA, intense storms in Asia, and unpredictable droughts in Africa are all resulting from climate change, and this change is occurring more rapidly than ever before. If we let this continue, the future would be even more perilous. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, consequences of climate change include the increased intensity of storms including tropical cyclones, increased risks of drought, wetter Asian monsoons, and, possibly, more intense mid-latitude storms.

The last thing humans should do is to turn a blind eye to this imminent problem and learn to live with it, of course, unless we want the termination of the human race! There is a lot to do, and we should start implementing regional cooperation right now. Every individual should contribute by emitting fewer fumes and planting as many trees as possible while the use of fossil fuel should be globally prohibited. Industrial countries have more responsibilities as they contribute more to environmental degradation and an international panel should be formed by giving it supreme power to make any legislation to curb environmental damage.

To conclude, for our existence on Mother Earth, we should take immediate actions at individual, regional and international levels to check climate change. Otherwise, we will fail to save our planet and future generations.

Sample 4:

Climate change is one of the most pressing issues of our time, and there is a growing consensus among scientists and policymakers that urgent action is needed to prevent its worst effects. In light of this, the idea that we should simply learn to live with climate change is misguided and dangerous. While it may be true that some level of adaptation will be necessary as temperatures continue to rise and weather patterns become more extreme, this should not be seen as a substitute for efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate the impacts of climate change.

One reason why the "live with it" approach is problematic is that it fails to account for the immense costs that climate change is likely to impose on society. According to the United Nations, climate change could cost the world economy as much as $360 billion per year by 2030, and up to $1.2 trillion per year by 2060. This includes both the direct costs of climate impacts, such as damage to infrastructure and property, as well as indirect costs such as lost productivity, health impacts, and displacement of people.

Furthermore, the idea of simply living with climate change ignores the fact that it is likely to disproportionately affect the most vulnerable members of society. For example, low-income communities and people living in coastal areas or areas prone to drought or extreme weather events are likely to bear the brunt of climate impacts. This is already being seen in many parts of the world, where communities are experiencing more frequent and severe heatwaves, floods, and storms.

In addition, taking a "live with it" approach could also undermine efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and prevent further warming. If people believe that it is futile to try and stop climate change, they may be less likely to support measures such as transitioning to renewable energy or reducing consumption.

To conclude, climate change and its dire consequences are real. We need to take every measure possible to revert to the damage caused to the mother planet and take initiatives to prevent climate change for our own survival. This is why "learning to live with it" is misguided and a dangerous approach which will only accelerate our destruction and extinction.

Sample 5:

As climate change increasingly becomes an urgent global issue, some argue that our focus should shift from thwarting its progress to learning to coexist with it. However, this perspective is not without its merits and drawbacks, particularly in the context of Vietnam.

Proponents of the view that we need to live with climate change often highlight the inevitability of the phenomenon. For instance, given Vietnam's elongated coastline, rising sea levels have already manifested in the form of recurrent floods in urban areas like Ho Chi Minh City. Traditional measures to combat this, such as building barriers, are deemed unsustainable in the long run. Moreover, the nation's agriculture, largely based in the Mekong Delta, is susceptible to increasing salinity due to these rising sea levels. It's argued that strategies should be designed to adapt crops, rather than futilely combating an inexorable force. Nevertheless, a counterargument arises when considering the potential for human ingenuity. In the past, Vietnamese farmers have been known to develop innovative farming techniques in response to challenges, signifying that perhaps preemptive action against climate change might not be as hopeless as believed.

However, I believe that solely adapting to climate change is a perilous approach. Whilst mitigation measures might not offer immediate relief, their long-term implications for the environment and socio-economic structures are invaluable. Taking Vietnam as a case in point, its burgeoning tourism industry, which thrives on natural attractions such as Ha Long Bay and Phong Nha Caves, stands at risk if we merely accept the wrath of climate change. Were these treasures to be compromised, not only would the nation's economy suffer, but an irreplaceable part of its cultural identity would be lost forever. In the face of such potential devastation, striving to prevent, rather than simply endure, is the more sagacious choice.

In conclusion, while the immediate realities of climate change in places like Vietnam might prompt some to advocate for acclimatization over prevention, I firmly opine that efforts to halt this global crisis should remain paramount. By doing so, we not only safeguard our present but also bequeath a sustainable legacy to future generations.

Sample 6:

Climate change represents a major threat to life on Earth, but some people argue that we need to accept it rather than try to stop it. I completely disagree with this opinion, because I believe that we still have time to tackle this issue and reduce the human impact on the Earth's climate.

There are various measures that governments and individuals could take to prevent, or at least mitigate, climate change. Governments could introduce laws to limit the carbon dioxide emissions that lead to global warming. They could impose “green taxes” on drivers, airline companies and other polluters, and they could invest in renewable energy production from solar, wind or waterpower.

As individuals, we should also try to limit our contribution to climate change, by becoming more energy efficient, by flying less, and by using bicycles and public transport. Furthermore, the public can affect the actions of governments by voting for politicians who propose to tackle climate change, rather than for those who would prefer to ignore it.

If instead of taking the above measures we simply try to live with climate change, I believe that the consequences will be disastrous. To give just one example, I am not optimistic that we would be able to cope with even a small rise in sea levels. Millions of people would be displaced by flooding, particularly in countries that do not have the means to safeguard low-lying areas. These people would lose their homes and their jobs, and they would be forced to migrate to nearby cities or perhaps to other countries. The potential for human suffering would be huge, and it is likely that we would see outbreaks of disease and famine, as well as increased homelessness and poverty.

In conclusion, it is clear to me that we must address the problem of climate change, and I disagree with those who argue that we can find ways to live with it.

Sample 7:

Some suggest that we adapt to climate change rather than try to prevent it. I take issue with this assertion for two main reasons, which will be explained below.

To begin with, adapting to climate change is a short-term solution. This is because the Earth’s climate is largely unpredictable and still poorly understood despite the advances in climate prediction technologies. Thus, adaptation measures that seem effective for today’s climate may fail to address the long-term effects of climate change. For instance, city planners can relocate cities further inland in response to rising sea levels, but these cities may eventually suffer from low precipitation and water shortage due to a sudden change in cloud formation. In this sense, adaptation proves a short-sighted measure to a phenomenon yet to be fully understood.

Furthermore, preventing climate change would be a more sensible course of action. This is because while adaptation deals with the effects of climate change to some degree, preventative measures tend to target the root causes of climate change. One prime example of a prevention strategy would be switching to renewable energy in order to curb human carbon output – a primary contributor to global warming. This measure serves humankind longer than adaptation measures like large-scale installation of air-conditioning in cities to bring down temperature levels.

In conclusion, I am adamantly opposed to the idea of adapting to climate change not only because it is a half measure but also because its alternative – prevention – is far more practical from a long-term future perspective.

Sample 8:

Climate change has been the most challenging problem that has ever faced humankind. Nevertheless, from some people’s perspective, the best solution to sustain the life of people through the drastic changes in climate is to adapt to reduce the damage that it causes, rather than prevent it. From my personal standpoint, I find this statement partially justifiable due to the reasons that are going to be detailed demonstrated in this writing.

On the one hand, without both the authorities' and the public’s full preparation for climate change, its impacts can be quite detrimental. There is no doubt that the intensity of climate change events is escalating. A clear example to illustrate this point is hurricane Maria which struck Puerto Rico. Due to the complicated relationship between the US and Puerto Rico, the island’s constructions specializing in the defense against storms and floods have not received much careful treatment. After the destructive hurricane Maria, most of Puerto Rico’s building structure has been severely affected and its citizens are living without electricity and daily supply. Therefore, governments, local communities, and organizations concerning environmental protection must cooperate to upgrade facilities, as well as inform and educate people about the skills and knowledge required to survive the frequency of extreme weather events.

On the other hand, climate change prevention holds increasing importance to the future of our generation. It is unavoidable truth that humans cause climate change. Owing to human deforestation for agriculture or residency, and burning fossil fuels for energy, numerous natural habitats have vanished. This leads to global warming and rising sea levels, which are the key factors in the increasing appearance of natural disasters. If the climate crisis is not adequately addressed, more severe issues, such as food shortage, lack of accommodation, and housing will be imminent. Thus, not only the governments must invent laws that regulate the level of carbon emissions of factories and vehicles, but companies must also invent the proper method to make production more environmentally friendly. Most importantly, the public must acknowledge the impacts of climate change in order for them to adjust their living standards in favor of the environment.

In conclusion, owing to the emergency and the destructiveness of climate change, it is relatively urgent that governments and local authorities must upgrade their facilities to ensure their stability if any natural disasters occur. Nevertheless, methods that involve preventing climate change are seriously required so that the continuity of these extreme climate change events would drop.

Sample 9:

The debate around climate change has led some to argue that instead of solely focusing on preventing it, we should also find ways to adapt to its inevitable impacts. While I acknowledge the importance of both approaches, I believe that the best strategy is to combine prevention with adaptation.

To begin with, either prevention or adaptation only can not solve the problem of climate change completely. On the one hand, focusing only on prevention may not be entirely effective, as climate change is, to some extent, unavoidable. Despite global efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy, the effects of climate change - such as rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and shifts in ecosystems - are already occurring. This suggests that even with the most rigorous preventative measures, some degree of climate change is inevitable. Thus, solely relying on prevention is not a comprehensive solution. On the other hand, focusing exclusively on adaptation is also not a viable strategy. The rapid pace of climate change outstrips the speed at which human development can counteract its effects. While technological advancements and adaptation strategies, like building resilient infrastructure and developing sustainable agricultural practices, are crucial, they may not be sufficient to keep pace with the escalating impacts of climate change. Relying solely on adaptation could lead to a scenario where we are constantly reacting to crises rather than proactively addressing the root causes.

A more effective approach to tackling climate change lies in the integration of both prevention and adaptation strategies. Preventative measures work to slow down the progression of climate change, while adaptive strategies ensure that we are prepared for the changes that do occur. This dual approach allows us to tackle the problem from multiple angles, reducing the risk of catastrophic outcomes and enhancing our capacity to thrive in a changing world. Ultimately, integrating prevention and adaptation is not just a pragmatic response, but a necessary one to ensure the long-term sustainability of our planet and the well-being of future generations.

In conclusion, while both prevention and adaptation are important, a combined approach is essential for effectively addressing climate change. By integrating these strategies, we can achieve a more sustainable and resilient future.

Sample 10:

Climate change has started threatening our very existence on this planet. The soaring temperatures have already caused the extinction of many species. Some people feel that it is difficult or impossible to stop climate change. In their opinion, we need to find ways to live with it. I disagree with this view because climate change can be prevented to a great extent. And when it can be prevented, we do not have to find ways to live with it.

The argument that instead of preventing climate change we need to explore alternative ways to live with it shows our unwillingness to change our irresponsible ways. We need to accept the fact that climate change didn't happen on its own. It was triggered by our actions. Since the days of industrialization, we have been consuming natural resources without thinking about the consequences of our actions. When we burn fossil fuels, we produce many gases that increase global warming. The last decade saw a dramatic increase in the number of vehicles on the road. All of them emit dangerous carbon dioxide. Refrigerators and air conditioners are now found in almost all homes. They also produce greenhouse gases. Unfortunately, what we do to reduce the heat inside our homes and offices increases global warming. This is a vicious cycle, and we must get out of it.

The best way to reduce climate change is to use our resources responsibly. We need to invest in alternative energy sources like solar and wind. In addition, the government should encourage people to use public transport systems. Imposing 'green taxes' on private vehicles and airlines could be a step in the right direction. Everyone needs to make a conscious effort to reduce their carbon footprint by consuming less energy. Both the government and the media need to create awareness about the growing threat caused by rising temperatures and changing climate.

To conclude, there are several ways to prevent climate change and hence the argument that we need to find ways to cope with it does not hold water. It merely shows our unwillingness to reduce our carbon footprint.

Sample 11:

Significant climate changes have been observed in many parts of the world. Some people believe that figuring out a way to adapt to the changing climate rather than preventing it from happening is the best solution to this problem. In my opinion, I agree with this statement to some extent. I think people should try to mitigate the negative effects caused by climate change so that they can live with it. Meanwhile, they should also take some measures to prevent it from getting worse.

It is undeniable that it is necessary for people to find a way to live with the changing climate because it has already happened. We cannot actually prevent something that has already happened. All people must face the truth that the changing climate has brought us a variety of negative impacts. For example, the temperature is increasing, and the sea level is rising. Finding a way to mitigate the demerits of these phenomena is, therefore, critical to human beings. Only in this way will the development of human society not be inhibited by the effects of climate change.

While it is impossible for us to prevent the climate change that has already happened, it does not mean that we can allow the situation to get worse. People still need to find out the reason for climate change and try to come up with a practical solution to prevent it from getting worse. If we only focus on how to adapt the changes but ignore the problem itself, the change of climate will become more significant. The more significantly the climate has changed, the more difficult it is for us to deal with it. We have to adopt some measures to prevent it from being unmitigable. Otherwise, the world may suffer from catastrophic consequences.

To conclude, we have to admit the fact that climate change has already happened therefore we must find a way to adapt to these changes. However, a series of prevention measures still need to be figured out to avoid the predictable worse situation in the future.

Sample 12:

Many people suggest that we should adapt to and live with climate change rather than try to prevent it. I strongly disagree with this viewpoint because it is a short-sighted idea and ignores the urgent need to address the root causes and mitigate the severe consequences of global warming. In my opinion, it is essential that we prioritize efforts to prevent climate change rather than resign ourselves to its consequences.

One compelling reason to prioritize prevention is the potential scale of the impacts of climate change. Rising global temperatures, sea-level rise, and extreme weather events pose significant risks to ecosystems, human health, and the global economy. By taking proactive measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, we can mitigate these risks and work towards a more sustainable and resilient future.

Furthermore, preventing climate change aligns with the principles of sustainability and environmental stewardship. We have a responsibility to protect the planet and its resources for future generations. Embracing a mindset of living with climate change without addressing its underlying causes would be short-sighted and detrimental to the long-term well-being of both people and the planet. A notable example of the importance of preventing climate change is the Paris Agreement. This global accord aims to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius and pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. The agreement recognizes the urgent need for collective action to reduce emissions and transition to low-carbon economies. By working together to prevent climate change, countries can foster international cooperation and make significant strides towards a sustainable future.

In conclusion, the idea of living with climate change instead of preventing it is misguided. We must prioritize prevention by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, transitioning to renewable energy sources, and adopting sustainable practices. By doing so, we can mitigate the risks and ensure a healthier and more sustainable future for generations to come.

Sample 13:

Perhaps the best danger to the planet is not the nuclear bombs, but the regional conflicts, terrorism, and an epidemic of people or governmental instability, however also the climate change and ecological degradation. If we do not handle this best risk properly, we will be liable for our very own temptations, and I do not feel that we ought to allow it to occur by doing nothing about that.

The unexpected flooding in the United States, a severe storm in Asian nations, inconsistent droughts in African American nations are entirely resulting in climate change, and this shift is happening rapidly than previously. If we allow this to continue, the future could be much riskier. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, effects of climate fluctuations include the higher intensity of storms such as tropical cyclones, raised risks of drought and also, a neighbouring Asian monsoon, and also, perhaps, more extreme mid-latitude storms. Based on a 2001 report, global warming could lead to sea levels to grow around 4 ft by 2100, and several nations such as some South Asian nations would suffer considerably from this.

The final thing that humans must do in order to develop a blind eye on this impending issue and learn how to live with this, needless to say, when we do not need to have the conclusion of this human race. There is a great deal to do, and also, we ought to begin executing regional collaboration at the moment. Every person should donate by emitting fumes and planting as many trees as you can while the usage of fossil fuel ought to be internationally banned. Industrial nations have more duties since they contribute more to ecological degradation, and a global panel ought to be shaped with providing it with a supreme ability to earn any laws to kerb the ecological damages.

In conclusion, for our life at the mother, Earthwe must take prompt action both in-person and global level to inspect the climate shift. Otherwise, we will fail to conserve our world.

Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay

Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:

Xem thêm »

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Câu 1

Young people are often influenced in their behaviors by others in the same age group. Some argue that peer pressure is important while others feel it has distinct disadvantages. Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages?

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Peer pressure is a pervasive phenomenon that significantly influences the behaviours of young individuals. While some argue that it plays a crucial role in positively shaping the lives of the youth, others contend that the disadvantages of peer pressure are very detrimental.

Peer pressure, when harnessed positively, can have several advantages. Firstly, it can foster a sense of belonging and camaraderie among individuals within the same age group. Young people often seek acceptance and affirmation from their peers, and this can contribute to their emotional well-being and self-esteem. A further benefit is that positive peer pressure can encourage healthy behaviours, such as exercising or avoiding risky activities. For instance, a teenager might be motivated to quit smoking if their friends promote a smoke-free lifestyle.

However, peer pressure can also have distinct disadvantages. The most pressing concern is the potential for negative influences on impressionable minds. Young people may succumb to the pressure of engaging in harmful behaviours, such as substance abuse, criminal activities, or reckless behaviours like driving without a seatbelt, due to peer pressure, which can lead to long-lasting negative consequences and jeopardise their future.

Moreover, excessive pressure from peers can stifle individuality and creativity as young people may conform to the norms of their peer group instead of pursuing their own aspirations and dreams. This conformity may limit their personal growth and hinder their ability to think independently.

In conclusion, I would argue that peer pressure has more disadvantages as although it can foster a sense of belonging and promote healthy behaviours, it also carries the risk of leading young people astray and stifling their individuality. It is imperative for parents, educators, and society at large to guide young people in making informed choices and navigating the complexities of peer influence.

Sample 2:

The peer group tends to exert influence on the way teenagers behave. While many believe that the influence of peers is immensely important, others opine that it has its obvious drawbacks. I believe that the benefits peer pressure brings outweigh the disadvantages because it can instil a positive attitude towards education, despite the primary drawback, namely substance use, or so on it may cause.

Without any doubt, the influence of peers can inspire young people to build positive behaviours, make good choices, and strive for academic excellence. When friends place emphasis on education and academic performance, it can exert a positive impact on the young’s attitude toward learning. In fact, students who maintain a friend circle who are diligent students may feel a strong motivation to study diligently. Take my brother’s case for example. He works harder to obtain good marks in exams because his friends are determined to achieve academic excellence. They possess a solid work ethic, and now so does he.

However, peer pressure can also exert influence on young people to engage in deviant behaviours. It may make young adults feel obliged to take on bad habits like substance abuse to feel like they are part of the circle and not levelled as boring or weak. For example, if a group of friends get involved in substance abuse, underage drinking, and delinquent activities, a child may feel obligated to conform to these behaviours to avoid exclusion.

Considering all these, I would like to mention that there is no concrete evidence to endorse the view that peer pressure is the primary reason for unacceptable behaviours and substance abuse. There are other factors, like genetics, mental health issues, and social influences, that play a profound role in this case.

To reiterate, the fact that peer pressure can encourage to conform to a positive attitude toward learning clearly outweighs the flawed argument that it can influence young people to develop delinquent behaviour and bad habits.

Sample 3:

The debate surrounding peer pressure often hinges on whether its advantages outweigh its disadvantages or if it is the opposite. While peer pressure can sometimes encourage positive behaviours and foster social connections, I believe its drawbacks are significant and can have long-lasting consequences.

On the one hand, proponents of peer pressure argue that it can motivate individuals to adopt healthy habits, such as regular exercise, academic diligence, and community involvement. Positive peer pressure can serve as a source of encouragement, support, and accountability, leading to personal growth and self-improvement. For example, a teenager may be more likely to participate in volunteer work if their friends are also involved, leading to a greater sense of civic responsibility and altruism.

However, the disadvantages of peer pressure often outweigh these benefits. Negative peer pressure can lead individuals to engage in risky behaviours, such as substance abuse, reckless driving, and delinquent activities, in order to fit in or gain acceptance from their peers. The desire to conform to social norms and avoid rejection can override rational decision-making and moral judgment, leading to harmful consequences for both individuals and society. For instance, adolescents may experiment with drugs or alcohol due to peer pressure, resulting in addiction, legal troubles, and impaired cognitive function. Moreover, peer pressure can contribute to the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes, discrimination, and bullying within peer groups. Individuals who deviate from social norms or express dissenting opinions may face ostracism, ridicule, or even physical violence from their peers, leading to feelings of isolation, low self-esteem, and mental health issues.

In conclusion, while peer pressure can sometimes promote positive behaviours and social connections, its disadvantages far outweigh any potential benefits.

Sample 4:

Peer pressure refers to the influence young individuals experience within the same age group, affecting their behaviors. This essay will critically evaluate the drawbacks and benefits of peer pressure on young people.

Peer pressure often leads young individuals to engage in risky behaviors. For instance, teenagers may feel compelled to experiment with drugs due to the effect of their peers who engage in such activities. The desire to fit in and be accepted can override their better judgment, exposing them to serious short-term health risks and potential addiction later in life. Moreover, succumbing to negative peer pressure can adversely affect academic performance, as students may prioritize social acceptance over their studies. This desire for approval can result in poor grades, limited educational opportunities, and long-term negative consequences.

On the other hand, positive peer pressure can inspire young individuals to set higher goals, adopt healthier habits, and strive for academic excellence. Many teenagers are pressured by their peers to join a study group, leading to improved learning outcomes and academic success. Relatedly, supportive friends can inspire young individuals to engage in physical fitness activities or pursue positive hobbies and talents, promoting a healthier and more well-rounded lifestyle. This sense of camaraderie and mutual encouragement fostered within positive peer groups can contribute significantly to personal growth and self-confidence. Actively seeking out positive and active peer groups and engaging in behaviors aligned with one’s personal values can help mitigate the adverse effects of negative peer pressure while harnessing the advantages of positive influence.

In conclusion, although peer pressure encourages risky behaviors and hinders personal growth, the motivational and emotional advantage make it positive on the whole. Ultimately, striking some degree of balance between independence and positive peer interactions is crucial to minimizing the disadvantages and embracing the benefits.

Sample 5:

Peer pressure is the influence exerted by a peer group that encourages people to change their attitudes, values, or behaviours to fit into group norms. It plays a significant part in adolescent life. I agree that peers can help make a particular place comfortable for an individual but majorly they play an active role in helping an individual indulge in risky behaviours. So, in my opinion, the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages.

Peer pressure plays a crucial role in shaping adolescent behaviour and attitudes. It helps people promote unity and harmony in society. For instance, a teenager might be motivated to excel academically or engage in community service due to the influence of their high-achieving peers. It tends to encourage people to conform to societal norms and values. Moreover, it can help young people in preparing for the realities of adulthood. This is because it exposes them to different viewpoints and assists them in learning how to navigate social dynamics, which in turn enhances their social skills and emotional intelligence.

However, there can be several ill effects of being influenced by one’s peers. Firstly, it may encourage youth to engage in dangerous activities such as smoking, drinking, or drug usage to make them fit into their groups. Excess peer pressure is the major cause of stress, anxiety, and low self-esteem in the younger generation as it builds this feeling that they are not able to match the expectations of their peers. In extreme cases, it can even lead to depression and other mental health issues. This can also stifle individuality and creativity, preventing young people from discovering their true selves and potential.

In addition to this, there can be a loss of personal identity as young people may feel compelled to adopt the attitudes, behaviours, and tastes of their peers, even if they conflict with their values and beliefs. It also leads to academic pressure as students may feel forced to achieve the same grades as their peers, leading to unhealthy competition and burnout. This can result in a lack of motivation and interest in learning, which can have long-term effects on their academic and career prospects.

In conclusion, peer pressure does have an indispensable role in the societal development of young individuals. However, it also provides people with a sense of comfort and security in their formative years. However, its disadvantages such as promoting risky behaviours, causing mental health issues, stifling individuality, and leading to academic pressure are more significant. Therefore, parents, educators, and society as a whole must provide guidance and support to young people to help them navigate the complexities of peer pressure.

Sample 6:

Many feel that peer pressure can have a positive impact on an individual, while others claim that its effects are unequivocally detrimental. In my opinion, despite providing motivation for self-development, the downsides associated with mental health decline and behavioral problems make this phenomenon decidedly negative.

On the one hand, peer pressure can encourage personal development. Individuals leading sedentary lifestyles might be persuaded into going to the gym by their peers and therefore cultivate healthy exercise habits in the long term. Relatedly, those surrounded by punctual friends may be influenced to arrive on time not only for social gatherings, but this habit could possibly extend to important business meetings. The adoption of these good daily habits can engender higher levels of self-confidence, which better prepares an individual to strive for excellence in various aspects of life.

However, peer pressure can be the source of mental health deterioration. When observing other people of the same age reaching major milestones and success in life, an individual may feel compelled to make comparisons and potentially feel dissatisfied with oneself and their current achievements. A pertinent example of this can often be seen in classroom settings, where a student may develop anxieties related to other students and in rarer instances, more concerning mental problems. Negative peer pressure also makes an individual gravitate towards self-destructive behavior. Some teenagers may be tempted by their peers into smoking cigarettes or drinking alcohol in order to gain approval and inclusion within a given social group.

In conclusion, in spite of motivational advantages concomitant with peer pressure, the related mental health problems and risky behavior are unequivocally negative. Individuals should focus on personal growth instead of fixating on others’ achievements.

Sample 7:

In the vibrant tapestry of adolescence, peer pressure emerges as a potent force, shaping behaviors and attitudes among the youth. This essay posits that while peer influence harbors potential benefits, such as fostering social integration and encouraging positive habits, its drawbacks, particularly in promoting conformity and risky behaviors, significantly overshadow its advantages.

Peer pressure, often perceived as a vehicle for conformity, exerts a formidable influence on young individuals, compelling them to align with the group’s norms and values. This phenomenon, while reinforcing social cohesion, frequently nudges adolescents towards compromising their individuality and adopting behaviors that may not align with their personal or moral values. For instance, the prevalent trend of underage drinking can be attributed to the desire to fit in, illustrating how peer influence can foster detrimental habits rather than constructive ones.

Moreover, the inclination to engage in risky behaviors under peer influence constitutes a significant drawback. Adolescents, in their quest for acceptance and fear of ostracization, may find themselves partaking in activities fraught with peril, such as reckless driving or substance abuse. These actions, while momentarily gratifying, can have long-lasting adverse effects on their health and wellbeing, underscoring the inherent dangers of succumbing to peer pressure.

Conversely, peer pressure can serve as a catalyst for positive change, encouraging young people to adopt beneficial habits and attitudes through the influence of their contemporaries. For example, peers who prioritize academic excellence and healthy living can inspire similar values in their circle. However, while the potential for positive influence exists, it is frequently overshadowed by the more immediate and compelling lure of negative behaviors that promise social acceptance.

In summary, while peer pressure may occasionally lead to positive changes, its inclination towards promoting conformity and risky behaviors is a greater issue. The negatives, especially its encouragement of harmful habits and the erosion of individuality, clearly outweigh the positives. This underscores the importance of creating environments that champion personal integrity over conformity, vital for nurturing resilient and well-rounded individuals.

Sample 8:

In adolescence, young people are often influenced by their peer group, a force that can wield both immense power and significant peril. While there's undeniable value in the emotional support, encouragement, and sense of belonging that peers can offer, I argue that the drawbacks of peer pressure - especially the inclination toward conformity at the expense of individuality and the propensity for rash decision-making - far outweigh these advantages.

When young people carefully select their social circles, peer pressure can, indeed, serve as a catalyst for positive change. Consider an aspiring scholar who surrounds themselves with academically driven friends aiming for Ivy League schools. In this context, the group's collective ambition propels the individual toward academic excellence. Moreover, at an age when the brain is highly malleable, the right peer pressure can stimulate not just intellectual growth but also emotional intelligence. It can teach young people the intricacies of interpersonal dynamics, as they navigate the highs and lows of relationships, including conflict resolution and empathy.

Nevertheless, the potential pitfalls of peer pressure should not be underestimated, especially given the vulnerability of adolescents who are still in the process of forming their values and judgments. This makes them susceptible to external influences that may not always align with their best interests. For instance, research indicates that the popularity of smoking in high schools directly correlates with an uptick in teenage smoking rates; youngsters may succumb to the vice merely to conform. Additionally, the fear of ostracization can lead adolescents to limit their friendships to a monolithic group, thereby reducing their exposure to diverse perspectives and impeding their emotional growth, ultimately stunting their psychological development.

In conclusion, peer pressure is a double-edged sword; while it may catalyze academic aspiration and emotional development when managed judiciously, it can also usher in detrimental consequences. Given that young individuals are prone to impulsive actions and less-than-ideal decision-making, the perils introduced by peer pressure must be acknowledged and carefully managed.

Sample 9:

The influence of peer pressure is undeniably a double-edged sword, wielding the power to either uplift or undermine an individual's life trajectory. Picture a young prodigy immersed in a social milieu comprising peers laser-focused on gaining admission to prestigious Ivy League institutions. Such an environment becomes a crucible for the cultivation of academic rigor, driving the young mind toward unparalleled scholastic achievements.

Additionally, during the formative years of adolescence, the brain's neuroplasticity is at its zenith, making it an ideal period for the enhancement of emotional intelligence. Within this context, positive peer pressure becomes instrumental in instilling essential life skills such as empathy, resilience, and conflict resolution. For example, facing challenges together, whether it's academic competition or personal disagreements, teaches valuable lessons about collaboration and emotional regulation.

Yet, the specter of the adverse effects looms large, especially when considering the malleable and impressionable nature of youth. Focused research illustrates that social trends among teenagers, such as the unfortunate resurgence of smoking, can be attributed to the pervasive influence of peer pressure. The desire to conform eclipses rational judgment, compelling young people to engage in detrimental behaviors just to maintain their social standing.

Moreover, the dread of social exclusion often coerces adolescents into narrowing their social circles to homogenous groups, thereby stifling their emotional and intellectual growth. When confined to a single, like-minded cohort, the opportunity to interact with diverse perspectives and develop a more nuanced understanding of the world is severely curtailed.

In conclusion, the multifaceted impact of peer pressure should not be casually dismissed. While it has the capacity to be a catalyst for personal and academic growth, the pitfalls are equally compelling. The key, therefore, lies in a judicious selection of one's social circle and a heightened self-awareness that enables an individual to sift through external influences to embrace only those that align with their authentic selves.

Sample 10:

Youngsters have always been influenced by the conduct of acquaintances belonging to the same age group. While this has certain shortfalls, the favors it brings are far more in number, which shall be elucidated in the following paragraphs.

The impact of conduct of acquaintances on youngsters is overwhelming and although this can have an adverse impact on the young psyche, it will be unjustified to profess that these eclipse the favorable effects; it is the other way round.

To begin with, undeniably, the consequence of the push afforded by classmates, friends, colleagues and social contacts, have been found to be coaxing individuals into establishing their definitive academic, professional, social and even health goals with great enthusiasm. To corroborate, several individuals pursuing weight loss objectives have admitted that it was their social network that persuaded them to work to shed their flab and attain a trimmer waist. Similarly, millions of IT professionals credit joining this industry to their classmates and friends whose success and encouragement pushed the former to follow the precedents and embrace this occupation.

Moreover, it is quite commonly seen that the persona is partly carved by the interaction with the outer world, especially with those in social circles and friendship, and this determines the level of intellect of an individual. To illustrate, those with a high level of enlightenment about the surroundings, general and specific issues such as geo-politics and environment, generally hail from peer groups that comprise intelligent people.

However, the only conspicuous downside of this phenomenon is youngsters starting to harbor unrealistic expectations about various spheres of their life, chasing unattainable goals, becoming frustrated if those objectives are not accomplished, and going astray. Nonetheless, such situations can be circumvented by adopting a prudent approach and identifying their own limitations.

In hindsight, it can be safely asserted that the allegation of shortcomings of peer pressure exceeding its pros lacks substance; it is this force that has guided an umpteen number of triumphant personalities who owe their accomplishments to these undercurrents.

Sample 11:

Peer pressure is a phenomenon widely observed among young people, influencing their behaviors, decisions, and perceptions. While some advocate for its importance in shaping social dynamics and fostering development, others highlight its distinct disadvantages. The debate revolves around whether the negatives of peer pressure outweigh the positives.

Advantages of peer pressure are evident in various aspects of adolescent life. It often plays a role in introducing new ideas, interests, and experiences. Young individuals may be motivated to adopt positive habits like academic excellence, sports participation, or community engagement through encouragement and inspiration from peers. Additionally, peer pressure can facilitate social integration and help young people develop critical social skills, fostering a sense of belonging and camaraderie within their peer groups.

However, the disadvantages of peer pressure cannot be disregarded. The most glaring issue arises when negative influences lead to risky or harmful behaviors. Young individuals might succumb to peer pressure to engage in substance abuse, delinquency, or other irresponsible actions, driven by the desire for acceptance or fear of exclusion. This can result in detrimental consequences, affecting not only their immediate well-being but also their long-term prospects and mental health.

Furthermore, excessive reliance on peer approval might hinder personal growth and individuality. Young people may conform to societal norms or trends without considering their own values, preferences, or aspirations. This conformity might lead to a lack of independent thinking and decision-making skills, affecting their ability to navigate challenges and make informed choices in the future.

The disadvantages of peer pressure, particularly when it leads to negative outcomes or inhibits personal development, can have a lasting impact on individuals. The pressure to conform can overshadow one’s authenticity and hinder the exploration of unique talents and interests.

In evaluating whether the disadvantages outweigh the advantages of peer pressure, it’s crucial to consider context and moderation. Positive peer influence can foster growth, but when peer pressure leads to detrimental behavior or stifles individuality, its drawbacks become more pronounced. Finding a balance where individuals are positively influenced without compromising their values or well-being is crucial in navigating the complexities of peer pressure.

In conclusion, while peer pressure can offer positive reinforcement and social integration, its disadvantages, especially when it results in negative behaviors or stifles individuality, should not be overlooked. Striking a balance between positive peer influence and personal autonomy is essential for young individuals to develop into well-rounded, independent individuals capable of making informed decisions while benefiting from the positive aspects of social interaction.

Câu 2

Tests and examinations are a central feature of school systems in many countries. Do you think the educational benefits of testing outweigh any disadvantages?

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

In today’s school systems, tests and examinations are major features in many countries, where some citizens believe that these tests play an important role. Whereas on the same scale others argue that they are not mandatory. However, I feel that testing should not be major a one in the school system for the following reasons.

Firstly, a common advantage of examinations is that they differentiate between the best and poor performers, i.e., hard-working students are smart in tests compared to others. Similarly, school kids feel that if they want to upgrade for the next standard they should appear and pass exams. Hence this concept creates responsibility for studies. However, many nations in the world are preferring this testing format in education.

On the other hand, a few drawbacks are noticed such as slow learners cannot perform well in the test and this creates inferior complexity among students. If opportunity, time and new learning techniques are imparted to students, they can perform better in tests.

Moreover, suicide trends are seen by this examination system. Hence, developed countries are exempting testing features. This phenomenon created confusion in parents, children and teachers whether to continue with the test pattern or simply promote students to the next higher class. This brought a drastic change in many countries which headed toward the exemption of tests.

In conclusion, testing candidates has both advantages and disadvantages, with the major advantage being that slow learners benefit significantly from the exam system. If passing an exam is not mandatory, students can still improve, even if maturity and seriousness towards studies are not observed in childhood. However, tests do not always accurately reflect students' merit and are thus often biased.

Sample 2:

Much could be said about different ways of testing or checking students at schools or universities. The most popular ones have always been causing very exciting discussions and debates around the world. We all do realise that teachers need to have a system that helps them to test their students’ knowledge, so they can see how effective their teaching methods are. The question is, do we really need to put so much pressure on these features? Are they really so effective?

The first thing about tests and exams is that they do check the level of information the students managed to learn from the lectures. The questions usually cover the area that has been thought about at school, so if students can answer them correctly it means that the teaching was successful.

The other, equally important aspect is that due to the tests or exams that students are facing at school they get motivated to study more in order to get better marks and to improve their knowledge. Sometimes it might be just the fact that it is called an exam, that makes students get together and study harder.

On the other hand, some students might feel discouraged by the same fact that makes the others motivated what of course results in low marks in the actual exam. They also think that the results are very often not relevant to the efforts they put into studying. Because the marking system is not fair, they just do not feel like studying more for the exam.

Furthermore, many students find exams of different kinds very stressful, especially school ones. They often think that there could be another way of testing, less stressful, that should be introduced in schools or universities. The supporters of this opinion often bring out the fact that most students start smoking actually because of the stress they are exposed to at school. And that is definitely not beneficial for you or your health.

To put things together, is there really such a big need for exams at school? Is there really no other way to check how effective the teaching methods are? That is of course not that easy, but still, I am deeply convinced that things can be changed. It requires all the sides involved to think and come up with new ideas that could later be put into schools and that wouldn’t be that stressful anymore, so students can actually start enjoying them.

Sample 3:

Being the main characteristic of most academic institutions, the examination system helps a school to evaluate the knowledge and skills of its current and prospective students. It is well known that there are lots of debates around available scoring systems used by many schools. Some people believe that current testing methods are not effective anymore, while others think that it is not necessary to replace or amend the current scoring methods. In my opinion both sides are partially right.

It is well-documented that test questions reflect the academic material used at school lectures and seminars. Such questions cover the most part of the subject taught and evaluate the level information acquainted by the students during the classes. Besides, upcoming examinations make students to learn harder the appropriate field of study. Without evaluation, I think many students would lose their interest in learning.

On the other hand, modern testing systems require students to obtain huge amounts of academic information within a short period of time. It is widely believed that only knowledge of subjects is not enough to pass the test with higher results. The students are also required to possess strong time management skills in order to get high scores during examinations within the time limit. I think that this situation makes lots of students feel pressure which eventually leads to lower scores.

In my opinion, examinations at schools should be less stressful where students can reveal their true knowledge and will not be demotivated. I think that the time limit of the test questions should be extended since the students can have enough time to think and apply the knowledge, can get higher scores, and will be stimulated to learn further.

Sample 4:

In recent years, there has been a vast increase in discussions about how the examination systems should be at schools. Now students are undertaking too many tests and exams at school which do have many advantages both for the students and the teachers, but at the same time they also have certain drawbacks as well. The administration departments at schools need to think seriously about the outcomes of the examination systems they have, to test the students. In this essay I would like to give my own opinion after discussing both sides of the argument.

The first good thing about the exams and tests is that it is a method to test students how well they are learning from the lectures delivered in the class and how successful teachers are in conveying their knowledge. For instance, if a whole group of students show poor grades in a subject then the teacher teaching that subject can be encouraged to work harder and improve his or her teaching skills to bring the students to the top. This is a strong point that favours the argument because teachers are the key figures in a school system and exams are mandatory to check their level of teaching.

The other, equally important factor in favour of the issue is that exams encourage students as well to study, do more reading and writing and thus improve their general knowledge. If there are no exams and tests, then students will not put any effort into learning and education. Exams produce a state of terror that forces children to study. Moreover, exams bring students together, they do combine studies which help them to learn the essence of teamwork and they develop communication skills. Lastly, exams develop a sense of competition which also draws students towards books.

On the other hand, exams do have some disadvantages as well. While competition can be encouraging for some, it is a major source of immense pressure on students, often leading to depression. When students do not get good grades, they are discouraged and at the same time they are forced, both by the teachers and the parents, to work hard, putting them under more pressure. Now more and more students are involved in drug addiction to relieve exam pressure.

To recapitulate, I concede that exams can be discouraging for the students in some ways, but this does not mean that they should be removed from the system. The advantages of exams outweigh their disadvantages. Students should be tested and then upgraded but at the same time weaker students should be given special help to improve.

Câu 3