Câu hỏi:

10/01/2025 171

Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are better prepared to deal with the problems of adult life than children brought up by wealthy parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Xem lời giải

Câu hỏi trong đề: 2000 câu trắc nghiệm tổng hợp Tiếng Anh 2025 có đáp án !!

Bắt đầu thi

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

I do agree with the statement that children brought up in poor families are better prepared to deal with the problems of adult life than children brought up by wealthy parents.

Children of poor parents are prematurely exposed to the problems of adult life. For example, learning to survive on a low family income and sacrificing luxuries for essential items. These children begin to see the ‘realities’ of life in their home or social environment. Their parents' own struggles serve as an example to them. These children are taught the necessary skills for survival as adults from a very early age. Many children work on the weekends or holidays to either collect some pocket money or even contribute to their family’s income. A good example is the many children who accompany their parents to sell products at the market. They are making a direct contribution to their families in terms of labor or income. Children of poor families also are highly motivated. They tend to set high goals to improve their economic and social situation. A relevant example would be Mr Bill Gates (founder of Microsoft Corporation). He had an impoverished background, but he used his talent and motivation to set up the world’s largest computer organisation.

However, there are some problems that children from poor backgrounds do encounter. Many of these children who are ‘robbed’ of their childhood while working may feel cheated. They often turn to crime. This, however, is a small group.

In summing up, children with impoverished backgrounds are able to deal with problems of adult life because of early exposure, family role models, and sheer motivation.

Sample 2:

These days, the more society has developed, the better life will be, leading to most children being raised in good conditions of both material and spirit. However, some people believe that it's true the poor give their children more experience than the rich give. I totally agree with this opinion.

First and foremost, almost all children living with difficulties are aware of undergoing hard work and seek a way to overcome it. In fact, because of the shortage of material conditions like a computer, phones, or means of transport, poor children always strive to get over their miserable situation. Incredibly, they make a great effort to get a higher position in society and reach higher income. As a result, poor children soon get more mature than one living in a sufficient environment.

Secondly, if a child stays in a terrible place, he will gather more skills than others. In other words, the challenges in many fields in life, such as earning money from a very young age, doing housework, help children learn a lot of soft skills which are necessary for their job in the future. For example, to help their parents, children have to do all housework, shaping their responsibility and how to care about others. Moreover, children living in poor conditions more frequently understand and sympathize with their parents' emotions than others of the same age.

In conclusion, although there are many views about whether it's true for children growing up in poor families to be prepared better for life, I completely believe that the children in families without affordable money will overcome their life’s problem easier and make a brighter scenario.

Sample 3:

One reason that people make money is to provide their children with a solid foundation for the future. However, the question has been raised as to whether children from wealthier families are really better prepared for life than those from poorer ones.

At first glance, it may seem obvious that children from wealthier families will be better prepared for life, since their parents can pay for a better education, usually at private schools, and can buy them the things they need or want, such as sports equipment and the latest technological gadgets. A better secondary education at a reputable private school gives a child a greater chance of attending a good university. Better sports equipment and the latest gadgets give a child an advantage over other children when competing in those fields. Wealthier people also tend to be better connected and are able to use these connections to get help from others.

Despite these possible advantages, some people claim that children from poorer families are better prepared for life because they are said to be more self-reliant. This is said to be because they rely on themselves more than on their parents. I agree that being self-reliant is good for later life when people cannot expect to receive everything they need from their parents. However, I know several people who attended private boarding school, and they were all encouraged to become self-reliant since they were away from their families.

My personal opinion is that children from wealthy families are better prepared for life than those from less well-off ones. However, I would not claim that this is the truth in every case. Wealthy parents can give their children more and this usually works to the advantage of the child. Having said that, a poor childhood can force a child to become more self-reliant and lead them on the path to a successful life.

Sample 4:

In today’s society, the assertion that children raised in families with limited financial resources are better equipped for life than those from affluent backgrounds has sparked a debate. This essay will argue in agreement with this notion, highlighting the character-building attributes that adversity fosters in children.

Firstly, growing up in financially constrained circumstances encourages resilience and adaptability in children. When faced with challenges such as economic hardship, they learn to find creative solutions, manage limited resources, and develop a strong work ethic. For instance, a study conducted by the Institute for Fiscal Studies in the United Kingdom found that children from economically disadvantaged families often exhibit a greater determination to succeed academically and pursue higher education as a means to uplift their socio-economic status.

Secondly, experiencing financial limitations can cultivate empathy and a deeper understanding of societal disparities. Children exposed to financial constraints are more likely to develop compassion and an awareness of the struggles faced by others. They tend to value non-material aspects of life, such as relationships and personal growth, which contribute to their overall well-being. A vivid example of this can be seen in the philanthropic efforts of individuals who have overcome adversity in their childhood, as they frequently channel their success towards uplifting their communities.

In conclusion, while financial difficulties may pose immediate challenges, they often lead to positive long-term outcomes for children. The skills and values instilled through these experiences are valuable assets that can equip them to navigate the complexities of adult life. As such, it is reasonable to assert that children raised in families with fewer financial resources are, in fact, better prepared for the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead.

Sample 5:

Though many people firmly believe that children from less wealthy families are better prepared for life than their rich counterparts, it is disputable. I disagree with the proposed opinion as I believe that several factors influence children’s preparedness for life including good parenting, education, skills and dedication, and sometimes not having proper means to support education by less wealthy families may be a hindrance than an advantage.

It is often pointed out by many that children from poor and middle-class families face hardships in life and have better adaptability. But it is important to acknowledge that children from economically disadvantaged families may face obstacles that hinder their preparation for life. Limited financial resources can restrict access to quality education, extracurricular activities, and essential support systems. For instance, a child growing up in a low-income household may lack the means to attend private tutoring or participate in enrichment programmes that could enhance their educational prospects. This lack of access to resources can potentially limit their opportunities for personal and professional growth, ultimately impacting their preparedness for life’s challenges.

Good parenting, regardless of economic conditions, puts us ahead in our life. Compassionate, loving and responsible parenting can make us ready to face challenges in life. This is because responsible parents, even if they have a huge fortune, will teach their children to face hardship in life. A good family bond gives us positive childhood and better mental health in adult life. This has a direct impact on the person we become and how prepared we are to face challenges. Moreover, in this era of technological marvels and democracy, people have access to education and online information. So, everyone with a desire for success and dedication can develop their skills to have a better career in life. This is why when we look at the list of most successful people in modern times, we do not see a particular pattern where only people from rich or poor families become successful.

In conclusion, despite the common belief that children from less affluent families are better prepared for the future than their rich counterparts, I strongly hold the opinion that preparedness in life depends on parameters like good parenting, education, skills and dedication and sometimes family wealth is a positive aspect rather than being a negative one.

Sample 6:

Childhood experience and learning ascertain someone’s personality and determination to prosper in life. Today, some people believe that children in wealthy households are overindulged and do not learn the vital lessons to confront future challenges while middle and low-class families prepare their offsprings. I feel that better parenting, irrespective of family prosperity, is much more important.

To start with, children in low-income and middle-class families learn how to face difficulties in life, talk about something with others, work hard to get a better life, and this is the reason it is believed that they are better prepared to face life. For instance, our school’s highest scorer was from a lower-middle course family, and he dedicated most of his time to study. He valued good grades more than any other student in our class. Somehow, he was convinced that the only way to escape from financial problems is to become the best scorer. On the contrary, kids from wealthy families get better amenities, education and livelihood opportunities.

I believe that parenting is much more important than money. It is not always the money of expertise that produces a responsible citizen. Instead, the morale of the parent’s enhancement in a child often determines how prepared he is to confront life.

To conclude, though it is usually believed that children from less fortunate families are much better prepared for the future, I, on the other hand, think that proper parenting is a lot more significant.

Sample 7:

Normally, wealthy families compensate for a better lifestyle for those kids. I feel that kids from wealthier households get improved chances and know much more to be ready for future struggles.

On the one hand, it is stated that households with less cash prepare their kids for a better future. It is correct that those kids learn the crucial elements of life within their youth, like the actual value of money and how hard it can be, the significance of family ties. Many times, those kids learn how to save money for their potential use. Therefore, they mechanically prepare for placing a goal in life and create plans for chasing them. As a result, many critical qualities of life are learned by these children from such households during their early phases of life.

However, they have all of the facilities that they need for their future and education. For example, they are equipped with all the essential requirements to initiate a company or combine a project with no hassle. Additionally, those families construct the basis for their kids to start their life. The schooling, facilities, and teaching those wealthy children get are much superior to the bad children’s instruction and instruction. Additionally, those wealthy children eventually understand the most crucial facets of life, might be modest later than the bad kids, but they have much greater facilities that finally give them benefits in life.

In conclusion, education and money construct a better future life. Owing to that, more intelligent children have a far better and elastic lifestyle than bad kids. Thus, I think children from affluent families receive a competitive edge compared to kids from low-income families concerning instruction and preparation for the long run.

Sample 8:

Over the past few decades, along with growing interest in child education, people's attention to the family environment where a child is brought up has also significantly increased. Some people have begun to feel that a child who has grown up in a poor family tends to be better prepared to deal with problems. In my opinion, however, family environment alone does not influence a child’s ability to solve problems much.

A child who was born into a poor family would have had more situations where they had to solve a problem or make a decision on their own. This is because in most unfortunate families, both parents are usually working, and children are put into situations where they have to take care of themselves. By contrast, due to their wealth, rich children can experience and learn things that unfortunate children cannot. For example, they usually go to the best schools and receive a higher education there, which prepares them better for solving problems in their life.

However, few would disagree with the fact that each individual is different. That is, problem solving skills come more from life experience. That is, the more a person experiences life, the more they can use these experiences to adjust, to adapt and to solve problems they encounter. Personality also can be a factor in dealing with problems. A person who is optimistic, outgoing, confident and open-minded can look at and solve problems more effectively.

As discussed above, nature and nurture have an equal influence on a child's ability to face challenges. Parents should spare no effort to figure out how they can help their children to be independent. I hope that in the future the next generation will grow up as mature citizens.

Sample 9:

Childhood "experience" and "learning" determine someone's personality and ascertainment to prosper in life. Some people believe that children in wealthy families are over-indulged and do not learn many important lessons to face future challenges while middle-class and lower-middle-class families better prepare their offsprings. Personally, I believe that better parenting, regardless of family wealth or status, is more important.

To begin with, children from less wealthy families learn to face difficulties in life from early childhood. They know that they need to work hard to succeed in life, and they start to appreciate the value of money and time. It gives them a competitive advantage to face life in the future. For instance, the highest scorer in our college was from a lower-middle-class family and he devoted most of his time to studying. He valued excellent academic results more than most students from wealthy families. He was convinced that the only way to get out of their financial problems was to become the top scorer and have a better career in the future. No doubt, this determination, hard work and mindset will help him become successful in life.

Reversely, children from wealthy families, most of the time, get better facilities, education and career opportunities. Despite being an average student, Patrick, one of my classmates, got admitted to the best private university in our country. This exemplifies that he has a better career prospect than the top scorer in our college. So, the connection, influence and money that rich families own often help them better educate their children while also giving them a head start in life.

Personally, I believe that parenting is more important than having and spending money on children. It is not always the money that makes someone successful and a good citizen. When parents implant good qualities among children, these qualities alone can make a difference in their life.

To conclude, though it is generally believed that children from less fortunate families are better prepared for the future, I believe that proper parenting is far more important than any other factor.

Sample 10:

Money plays a pivotal role in people's social and family life, and it influences the way a child grows up and prepares to meet future challenges. Usually, rich families compensate their children for a better life, but some people argue that children who are brought up in less wealthy families are often better prepared to face difficulties in life. However, I strongly believe that children from affluent families get better opportunities and better prepared for future challenges.

On the one hand, many believe that families with less money prepare their children more realistically. Those children admittedly learn to face obstacles in their childhood that give them an advantage when they grow up. They also learn to appreciate the value of money, savings, time and hard work, and the importance of family ties. They are not pampered with everything they want or need, rather they need to earn them through hard work. Therefore, they automatically prepare for setting a target in life and make plans for pursuing them.

On the other hand, children from wealthier families are sometimes a little behind in terms of learning many important lessons in childhood when compared with the mindset of their counterparts. However, they have all the facilities they need for their education and future career. For instance, they are well adorned to go to the best schools, have the best teachers to teach them, money and connections to start a business or join a job, and an affluent family to support them whenever needed. Furthermore, those families build the foundation for their children to begin their life - a much-needed push to have a better career. These rich children eventually learn the most important aspects of life, maybe a little later than the poor children, but they have far greater facilities that ultimately give them advantages in life.

To conclude, money and education build a better future life. Because of that, wealthier children have a much better and more flexible life than poor children. Therefore, I believe children from wealthy families get a competitive advantage over children from poor families in terms of education and preparation for the future.

Sample 11:

Who gets better prepared to face life - people who were raised lavishly or in a destitute condition, is debatable. I agree that children who were raised in a low-income family are better at facing life than those who came from an ultra-rich family.

For several reasons, many believe that children who are brought up in middle and low-income families are better prepared to face life. Firstly, these children are accustomed to living a simple lifestyle and they know the value of time, money and relationship. Instead of having their own room, with all the toys and comfortable beds in the room, they had to sleep with their siblings in a small room with a limited number of toys and facilities. They learn how to share important things, take care of others, manage the budgets and most importantly become contented with whatever they have. As these children do not have many luxuries in life, they would easily adapt to the harsh conditions. Secondly, these children are already taught to be independent at an early age. Many of their parents could not afford to pay school tuition fees, therefore they have to have a part-time job to pay the fees. Thus, they learn to be independent at an early age.

Moreover, children who are raised in rich families will face difficulties when they grow up and face the real world. One of the reasons is that their parents have always provided them with all the materials they wanted and needed. They get fancy clothes, expensive toys and the latest gadgets without having to work hard. As they rely heavily on their parents’ wealth, they will face problems if there is a financial crisis.

To conclude, the upbringing of children defines who they will become in the future. Since families with less money have to teach children to work hard, save money and become satisfied with things they have, they are better prepared in life than their rich counterparts who got everything ready for them by their family.

Sample 12:

The role of family atmosphere in a child’s development is a cause of concern. However, I disagree with the notion that children of poor families are better equipped to deal with the challenges of adult life than those of rich families. No doubt, adversity is a good teacher of life, but rich parents can also prepare their children to face the problems of adult life by good education and good nurturing.

A child of a poor family has more situations to solve a problem or make a decision as both parents are working to make ends meet and children have to look after themselves. They realize the value of money as they have to live with the barest minimum and as a result, they find it less difficult later on in life when they face financial challenges. In contrast, the children of wealthy families are born with a silver spoon in their mouths. They are completely ignorant of the value of money as everything is provided for them in their youth and expect the same situation in adulthood.

On the other hand, children of rich families study in the best schools and get the best higher education. They can learn problem-solving in such academic institutes. Moreover, a wealthy child may be well-guided by parents who possess strong financial knowledge. Such parents themselves know money management better and can pass on those skills to their children.

Life experiences also play a role. Children can have an innate ability to face problems in life. They may have personality traits such as being optimistic, outgoing, confident and open-minded. Due to these abilities, they can solve problems in a better way.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that a poor child may learn to get along without wealth and a wealthy child may be well trained by a parent to face hurdles of life by effective education. Therefore, I disagree that the economic situation of the family has a role in problem-solving skills.

Sample 13:

There is a common belief that children who grow up in financially disadvantaged families are better equipped to face the challenges of adult life compared to those raised by wealthy parents. While it is true that hardships can build resilience and problem-solving skills, it would be unfair to generalize that all children from families with limited means are better prepared for the future. The extent to which this opinion holds depends on various factors such as the individual's mindset, available opportunities, and support systems in place.

It is undeniable that experiencing financial difficulties during childhood can foster a sense of resourcefulness and adaptability in individuals. Children in low-income families often learn to make the most of limited resources, helping them develop practical skills and a strong work ethic. The real-life difficulties they encounter can prepare them to face adversity with resilience and determination. This can be seen in many success stories of individuals who emerged from poverty and achieved great success in their careers.

Furthermore, children from less affluent backgrounds may appreciate the value of money and understand the importance of financial planning better than their wealthier counterparts. Having to make tough decisions about expenditures and prioritize essential needs fosters a sense of frugality, budgeting, and long-term planning. These skills are crucial in navigating the complexities of adult life, regardless of one's financial background.

However, it is important to note that not all children from families with limited financial means are automatically prepared to face adult life challenges. The lack of opportunities and necessary resources can hinder their personal growth and limit their potential. Education and extracurricular activities, for example, play a vital role in a child's development, and without access to quality institutions or enrichment programs, their chances of attaining success could be constrained. This can lead to a cycle of disadvantages that are difficult to break free from.

In contrast, children from wealthy families typically have access to better education, healthcare, and a wider range of opportunities. They may be exposed to diverse experiences, fostering creativity, critical thinking, and broader perspectives. While it is true that an abundance of resources can sometimes lead to a sense of entitlement, their access to resources can better equip them to tackle certain challenges. It is worth noting that wealth can also come with its own set of problems, such as pressure to maintain a certain social status or expectations to conform to certain societal norms.

In conclusion, while there is some truth to the notion that children brought up in families with limited financial means can be better prepared for adult life challenges, it is essential to consider the multitude of factors that influence an individual's readiness. Resilience and resourcefulness can emerge from adversity, but access to opportunities and support systems are equally crucial for personal growth and success in adulthood. Ultimately, the extent to which this opinion holds true depends on the interplay of individual circumstances, upbringing, and available resources.

Sample 14:

It is primarily the responsibility of parents or family members to raise their children in a way that equips them to cope with real-life challenges in adulthood. Many people think that upbringing of a child in a family which is not financially stable can make a real difference in his personality than to a kid who is born with a silver spoon. This essay will discuss why I completely agree with this viewpoint.

In this fast-paced world, no one can survive but the 'survival of the fittest'. People with a humble background know the harsh realities of the world from the early stages of their lives, hence, well equipped to excel in practical life. They know how to control the desires and spend the money within limits. Another factor which enables them to make the best decisions in their life is the practical approach to every situation. Therefore, they are always on top in their respective professions unlike the ones who rely on wealth from their parents.

On the contrary, rich parents keep their kids away from real-world problems. Those kids always dependent on someone even for their tiny needs such as a driver to roam them around, maid to clean their clothes or a chef to cook food. Furthermore, they merely know the value of the money. They spend it without any check and balance and end up in shackles when they have to manage the financial matters by themselves. Overall, this sort of upbringing restricts a child from becoming independent which is the basic ingredient to be a successful person in the real world.

In conclusion, it is high time for parents to guide their children in a way that they can adjust to any situation. However, it is observed that many successful personalities belong to very humble families. This essay discussed why I completely agreed with this observation.

Hot: 500+ Đề thi thử tốt nghiệp THPT các môn, ĐGNL các trường ĐH... file word có đáp án (2025). Tải ngay

Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:

Xem thêm »

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Câu 1

Young people are often influenced in their behaviors by others in the same age group. Some argue that peer pressure is important while others feel it has distinct disadvantages. Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages?

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Peer pressure is a pervasive phenomenon that significantly influences the behaviours of young individuals. While some argue that it plays a crucial role in positively shaping the lives of the youth, others contend that the disadvantages of peer pressure are very detrimental.

Peer pressure, when harnessed positively, can have several advantages. Firstly, it can foster a sense of belonging and camaraderie among individuals within the same age group. Young people often seek acceptance and affirmation from their peers, and this can contribute to their emotional well-being and self-esteem. A further benefit is that positive peer pressure can encourage healthy behaviours, such as exercising or avoiding risky activities. For instance, a teenager might be motivated to quit smoking if their friends promote a smoke-free lifestyle.

However, peer pressure can also have distinct disadvantages. The most pressing concern is the potential for negative influences on impressionable minds. Young people may succumb to the pressure of engaging in harmful behaviours, such as substance abuse, criminal activities, or reckless behaviours like driving without a seatbelt, due to peer pressure, which can lead to long-lasting negative consequences and jeopardise their future.

Moreover, excessive pressure from peers can stifle individuality and creativity as young people may conform to the norms of their peer group instead of pursuing their own aspirations and dreams. This conformity may limit their personal growth and hinder their ability to think independently.

In conclusion, I would argue that peer pressure has more disadvantages as although it can foster a sense of belonging and promote healthy behaviours, it also carries the risk of leading young people astray and stifling their individuality. It is imperative for parents, educators, and society at large to guide young people in making informed choices and navigating the complexities of peer influence.

Sample 2:

The peer group tends to exert influence on the way teenagers behave. While many believe that the influence of peers is immensely important, others opine that it has its obvious drawbacks. I believe that the benefits peer pressure brings outweigh the disadvantages because it can instil a positive attitude towards education, despite the primary drawback, namely substance use, or so on it may cause.

Without any doubt, the influence of peers can inspire young people to build positive behaviours, make good choices, and strive for academic excellence. When friends place emphasis on education and academic performance, it can exert a positive impact on the young’s attitude toward learning. In fact, students who maintain a friend circle who are diligent students may feel a strong motivation to study diligently. Take my brother’s case for example. He works harder to obtain good marks in exams because his friends are determined to achieve academic excellence. They possess a solid work ethic, and now so does he.

However, peer pressure can also exert influence on young people to engage in deviant behaviours. It may make young adults feel obliged to take on bad habits like substance abuse to feel like they are part of the circle and not levelled as boring or weak. For example, if a group of friends get involved in substance abuse, underage drinking, and delinquent activities, a child may feel obligated to conform to these behaviours to avoid exclusion.

Considering all these, I would like to mention that there is no concrete evidence to endorse the view that peer pressure is the primary reason for unacceptable behaviours and substance abuse. There are other factors, like genetics, mental health issues, and social influences, that play a profound role in this case.

To reiterate, the fact that peer pressure can encourage to conform to a positive attitude toward learning clearly outweighs the flawed argument that it can influence young people to develop delinquent behaviour and bad habits.

Sample 3:

The debate surrounding peer pressure often hinges on whether its advantages outweigh its disadvantages or if it is the opposite. While peer pressure can sometimes encourage positive behaviours and foster social connections, I believe its drawbacks are significant and can have long-lasting consequences.

On the one hand, proponents of peer pressure argue that it can motivate individuals to adopt healthy habits, such as regular exercise, academic diligence, and community involvement. Positive peer pressure can serve as a source of encouragement, support, and accountability, leading to personal growth and self-improvement. For example, a teenager may be more likely to participate in volunteer work if their friends are also involved, leading to a greater sense of civic responsibility and altruism.

However, the disadvantages of peer pressure often outweigh these benefits. Negative peer pressure can lead individuals to engage in risky behaviours, such as substance abuse, reckless driving, and delinquent activities, in order to fit in or gain acceptance from their peers. The desire to conform to social norms and avoid rejection can override rational decision-making and moral judgment, leading to harmful consequences for both individuals and society. For instance, adolescents may experiment with drugs or alcohol due to peer pressure, resulting in addiction, legal troubles, and impaired cognitive function. Moreover, peer pressure can contribute to the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes, discrimination, and bullying within peer groups. Individuals who deviate from social norms or express dissenting opinions may face ostracism, ridicule, or even physical violence from their peers, leading to feelings of isolation, low self-esteem, and mental health issues.

In conclusion, while peer pressure can sometimes promote positive behaviours and social connections, its disadvantages far outweigh any potential benefits.

Sample 4:

Peer pressure refers to the influence young individuals experience within the same age group, affecting their behaviors. This essay will critically evaluate the drawbacks and benefits of peer pressure on young people.

Peer pressure often leads young individuals to engage in risky behaviors. For instance, teenagers may feel compelled to experiment with drugs due to the effect of their peers who engage in such activities. The desire to fit in and be accepted can override their better judgment, exposing them to serious short-term health risks and potential addiction later in life. Moreover, succumbing to negative peer pressure can adversely affect academic performance, as students may prioritize social acceptance over their studies. This desire for approval can result in poor grades, limited educational opportunities, and long-term negative consequences.

On the other hand, positive peer pressure can inspire young individuals to set higher goals, adopt healthier habits, and strive for academic excellence. Many teenagers are pressured by their peers to join a study group, leading to improved learning outcomes and academic success. Relatedly, supportive friends can inspire young individuals to engage in physical fitness activities or pursue positive hobbies and talents, promoting a healthier and more well-rounded lifestyle. This sense of camaraderie and mutual encouragement fostered within positive peer groups can contribute significantly to personal growth and self-confidence. Actively seeking out positive and active peer groups and engaging in behaviors aligned with one’s personal values can help mitigate the adverse effects of negative peer pressure while harnessing the advantages of positive influence.

In conclusion, although peer pressure encourages risky behaviors and hinders personal growth, the motivational and emotional advantage make it positive on the whole. Ultimately, striking some degree of balance between independence and positive peer interactions is crucial to minimizing the disadvantages and embracing the benefits.

Sample 5:

Peer pressure is the influence exerted by a peer group that encourages people to change their attitudes, values, or behaviours to fit into group norms. It plays a significant part in adolescent life. I agree that peers can help make a particular place comfortable for an individual but majorly they play an active role in helping an individual indulge in risky behaviours. So, in my opinion, the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages.

Peer pressure plays a crucial role in shaping adolescent behaviour and attitudes. It helps people promote unity and harmony in society. For instance, a teenager might be motivated to excel academically or engage in community service due to the influence of their high-achieving peers. It tends to encourage people to conform to societal norms and values. Moreover, it can help young people in preparing for the realities of adulthood. This is because it exposes them to different viewpoints and assists them in learning how to navigate social dynamics, which in turn enhances their social skills and emotional intelligence.

However, there can be several ill effects of being influenced by one’s peers. Firstly, it may encourage youth to engage in dangerous activities such as smoking, drinking, or drug usage to make them fit into their groups. Excess peer pressure is the major cause of stress, anxiety, and low self-esteem in the younger generation as it builds this feeling that they are not able to match the expectations of their peers. In extreme cases, it can even lead to depression and other mental health issues. This can also stifle individuality and creativity, preventing young people from discovering their true selves and potential.

In addition to this, there can be a loss of personal identity as young people may feel compelled to adopt the attitudes, behaviours, and tastes of their peers, even if they conflict with their values and beliefs. It also leads to academic pressure as students may feel forced to achieve the same grades as their peers, leading to unhealthy competition and burnout. This can result in a lack of motivation and interest in learning, which can have long-term effects on their academic and career prospects.

In conclusion, peer pressure does have an indispensable role in the societal development of young individuals. However, it also provides people with a sense of comfort and security in their formative years. However, its disadvantages such as promoting risky behaviours, causing mental health issues, stifling individuality, and leading to academic pressure are more significant. Therefore, parents, educators, and society as a whole must provide guidance and support to young people to help them navigate the complexities of peer pressure.

Sample 6:

Many feel that peer pressure can have a positive impact on an individual, while others claim that its effects are unequivocally detrimental. In my opinion, despite providing motivation for self-development, the downsides associated with mental health decline and behavioral problems make this phenomenon decidedly negative.

On the one hand, peer pressure can encourage personal development. Individuals leading sedentary lifestyles might be persuaded into going to the gym by their peers and therefore cultivate healthy exercise habits in the long term. Relatedly, those surrounded by punctual friends may be influenced to arrive on time not only for social gatherings, but this habit could possibly extend to important business meetings. The adoption of these good daily habits can engender higher levels of self-confidence, which better prepares an individual to strive for excellence in various aspects of life.

However, peer pressure can be the source of mental health deterioration. When observing other people of the same age reaching major milestones and success in life, an individual may feel compelled to make comparisons and potentially feel dissatisfied with oneself and their current achievements. A pertinent example of this can often be seen in classroom settings, where a student may develop anxieties related to other students and in rarer instances, more concerning mental problems. Negative peer pressure also makes an individual gravitate towards self-destructive behavior. Some teenagers may be tempted by their peers into smoking cigarettes or drinking alcohol in order to gain approval and inclusion within a given social group.

In conclusion, in spite of motivational advantages concomitant with peer pressure, the related mental health problems and risky behavior are unequivocally negative. Individuals should focus on personal growth instead of fixating on others’ achievements.

Sample 7:

In the vibrant tapestry of adolescence, peer pressure emerges as a potent force, shaping behaviors and attitudes among the youth. This essay posits that while peer influence harbors potential benefits, such as fostering social integration and encouraging positive habits, its drawbacks, particularly in promoting conformity and risky behaviors, significantly overshadow its advantages.

Peer pressure, often perceived as a vehicle for conformity, exerts a formidable influence on young individuals, compelling them to align with the group’s norms and values. This phenomenon, while reinforcing social cohesion, frequently nudges adolescents towards compromising their individuality and adopting behaviors that may not align with their personal or moral values. For instance, the prevalent trend of underage drinking can be attributed to the desire to fit in, illustrating how peer influence can foster detrimental habits rather than constructive ones.

Moreover, the inclination to engage in risky behaviors under peer influence constitutes a significant drawback. Adolescents, in their quest for acceptance and fear of ostracization, may find themselves partaking in activities fraught with peril, such as reckless driving or substance abuse. These actions, while momentarily gratifying, can have long-lasting adverse effects on their health and wellbeing, underscoring the inherent dangers of succumbing to peer pressure.

Conversely, peer pressure can serve as a catalyst for positive change, encouraging young people to adopt beneficial habits and attitudes through the influence of their contemporaries. For example, peers who prioritize academic excellence and healthy living can inspire similar values in their circle. However, while the potential for positive influence exists, it is frequently overshadowed by the more immediate and compelling lure of negative behaviors that promise social acceptance.

In summary, while peer pressure may occasionally lead to positive changes, its inclination towards promoting conformity and risky behaviors is a greater issue. The negatives, especially its encouragement of harmful habits and the erosion of individuality, clearly outweigh the positives. This underscores the importance of creating environments that champion personal integrity over conformity, vital for nurturing resilient and well-rounded individuals.

Sample 8:

In adolescence, young people are often influenced by their peer group, a force that can wield both immense power and significant peril. While there's undeniable value in the emotional support, encouragement, and sense of belonging that peers can offer, I argue that the drawbacks of peer pressure - especially the inclination toward conformity at the expense of individuality and the propensity for rash decision-making - far outweigh these advantages.

When young people carefully select their social circles, peer pressure can, indeed, serve as a catalyst for positive change. Consider an aspiring scholar who surrounds themselves with academically driven friends aiming for Ivy League schools. In this context, the group's collective ambition propels the individual toward academic excellence. Moreover, at an age when the brain is highly malleable, the right peer pressure can stimulate not just intellectual growth but also emotional intelligence. It can teach young people the intricacies of interpersonal dynamics, as they navigate the highs and lows of relationships, including conflict resolution and empathy.

Nevertheless, the potential pitfalls of peer pressure should not be underestimated, especially given the vulnerability of adolescents who are still in the process of forming their values and judgments. This makes them susceptible to external influences that may not always align with their best interests. For instance, research indicates that the popularity of smoking in high schools directly correlates with an uptick in teenage smoking rates; youngsters may succumb to the vice merely to conform. Additionally, the fear of ostracization can lead adolescents to limit their friendships to a monolithic group, thereby reducing their exposure to diverse perspectives and impeding their emotional growth, ultimately stunting their psychological development.

In conclusion, peer pressure is a double-edged sword; while it may catalyze academic aspiration and emotional development when managed judiciously, it can also usher in detrimental consequences. Given that young individuals are prone to impulsive actions and less-than-ideal decision-making, the perils introduced by peer pressure must be acknowledged and carefully managed.

Sample 9:

The influence of peer pressure is undeniably a double-edged sword, wielding the power to either uplift or undermine an individual's life trajectory. Picture a young prodigy immersed in a social milieu comprising peers laser-focused on gaining admission to prestigious Ivy League institutions. Such an environment becomes a crucible for the cultivation of academic rigor, driving the young mind toward unparalleled scholastic achievements.

Additionally, during the formative years of adolescence, the brain's neuroplasticity is at its zenith, making it an ideal period for the enhancement of emotional intelligence. Within this context, positive peer pressure becomes instrumental in instilling essential life skills such as empathy, resilience, and conflict resolution. For example, facing challenges together, whether it's academic competition or personal disagreements, teaches valuable lessons about collaboration and emotional regulation.

Yet, the specter of the adverse effects looms large, especially when considering the malleable and impressionable nature of youth. Focused research illustrates that social trends among teenagers, such as the unfortunate resurgence of smoking, can be attributed to the pervasive influence of peer pressure. The desire to conform eclipses rational judgment, compelling young people to engage in detrimental behaviors just to maintain their social standing.

Moreover, the dread of social exclusion often coerces adolescents into narrowing their social circles to homogenous groups, thereby stifling their emotional and intellectual growth. When confined to a single, like-minded cohort, the opportunity to interact with diverse perspectives and develop a more nuanced understanding of the world is severely curtailed.

In conclusion, the multifaceted impact of peer pressure should not be casually dismissed. While it has the capacity to be a catalyst for personal and academic growth, the pitfalls are equally compelling. The key, therefore, lies in a judicious selection of one's social circle and a heightened self-awareness that enables an individual to sift through external influences to embrace only those that align with their authentic selves.

Sample 10:

Youngsters have always been influenced by the conduct of acquaintances belonging to the same age group. While this has certain shortfalls, the favors it brings are far more in number, which shall be elucidated in the following paragraphs.

The impact of conduct of acquaintances on youngsters is overwhelming and although this can have an adverse impact on the young psyche, it will be unjustified to profess that these eclipse the favorable effects; it is the other way round.

To begin with, undeniably, the consequence of the push afforded by classmates, friends, colleagues and social contacts, have been found to be coaxing individuals into establishing their definitive academic, professional, social and even health goals with great enthusiasm. To corroborate, several individuals pursuing weight loss objectives have admitted that it was their social network that persuaded them to work to shed their flab and attain a trimmer waist. Similarly, millions of IT professionals credit joining this industry to their classmates and friends whose success and encouragement pushed the former to follow the precedents and embrace this occupation.

Moreover, it is quite commonly seen that the persona is partly carved by the interaction with the outer world, especially with those in social circles and friendship, and this determines the level of intellect of an individual. To illustrate, those with a high level of enlightenment about the surroundings, general and specific issues such as geo-politics and environment, generally hail from peer groups that comprise intelligent people.

However, the only conspicuous downside of this phenomenon is youngsters starting to harbor unrealistic expectations about various spheres of their life, chasing unattainable goals, becoming frustrated if those objectives are not accomplished, and going astray. Nonetheless, such situations can be circumvented by adopting a prudent approach and identifying their own limitations.

In hindsight, it can be safely asserted that the allegation of shortcomings of peer pressure exceeding its pros lacks substance; it is this force that has guided an umpteen number of triumphant personalities who owe their accomplishments to these undercurrents.

Sample 11:

Peer pressure is a phenomenon widely observed among young people, influencing their behaviors, decisions, and perceptions. While some advocate for its importance in shaping social dynamics and fostering development, others highlight its distinct disadvantages. The debate revolves around whether the negatives of peer pressure outweigh the positives.

Advantages of peer pressure are evident in various aspects of adolescent life. It often plays a role in introducing new ideas, interests, and experiences. Young individuals may be motivated to adopt positive habits like academic excellence, sports participation, or community engagement through encouragement and inspiration from peers. Additionally, peer pressure can facilitate social integration and help young people develop critical social skills, fostering a sense of belonging and camaraderie within their peer groups.

However, the disadvantages of peer pressure cannot be disregarded. The most glaring issue arises when negative influences lead to risky or harmful behaviors. Young individuals might succumb to peer pressure to engage in substance abuse, delinquency, or other irresponsible actions, driven by the desire for acceptance or fear of exclusion. This can result in detrimental consequences, affecting not only their immediate well-being but also their long-term prospects and mental health.

Furthermore, excessive reliance on peer approval might hinder personal growth and individuality. Young people may conform to societal norms or trends without considering their own values, preferences, or aspirations. This conformity might lead to a lack of independent thinking and decision-making skills, affecting their ability to navigate challenges and make informed choices in the future.

The disadvantages of peer pressure, particularly when it leads to negative outcomes or inhibits personal development, can have a lasting impact on individuals. The pressure to conform can overshadow one’s authenticity and hinder the exploration of unique talents and interests.

In evaluating whether the disadvantages outweigh the advantages of peer pressure, it’s crucial to consider context and moderation. Positive peer influence can foster growth, but when peer pressure leads to detrimental behavior or stifles individuality, its drawbacks become more pronounced. Finding a balance where individuals are positively influenced without compromising their values or well-being is crucial in navigating the complexities of peer pressure.

In conclusion, while peer pressure can offer positive reinforcement and social integration, its disadvantages, especially when it results in negative behaviors or stifles individuality, should not be overlooked. Striking a balance between positive peer influence and personal autonomy is essential for young individuals to develop into well-rounded, independent individuals capable of making informed decisions while benefiting from the positive aspects of social interaction.

Câu 2

Tests and examinations are a central feature of school systems in many countries. Do you think the educational benefits of testing outweigh any disadvantages?

Xem đáp án

Lời giải

Sample 1:

In today’s school systems, tests and examinations are major features in many countries, where some citizens believe that these tests play an important role. Whereas on the same scale others argue that they are not mandatory. However, I feel that testing should not be major a one in the school system for the following reasons.

Firstly, a common advantage of examinations is that they differentiate between the best and poor performers, i.e., hard-working students are smart in tests compared to others. Similarly, school kids feel that if they want to upgrade for the next standard they should appear and pass exams. Hence this concept creates responsibility for studies. However, many nations in the world are preferring this testing format in education.

On the other hand, a few drawbacks are noticed such as slow learners cannot perform well in the test and this creates inferior complexity among students. If opportunity, time and new learning techniques are imparted to students, they can perform better in tests.

Moreover, suicide trends are seen by this examination system. Hence, developed countries are exempting testing features. This phenomenon created confusion in parents, children and teachers whether to continue with the test pattern or simply promote students to the next higher class. This brought a drastic change in many countries which headed toward the exemption of tests.

In conclusion, testing candidates has both advantages and disadvantages, with the major advantage being that slow learners benefit significantly from the exam system. If passing an exam is not mandatory, students can still improve, even if maturity and seriousness towards studies are not observed in childhood. However, tests do not always accurately reflect students' merit and are thus often biased.

Sample 2:

Much could be said about different ways of testing or checking students at schools or universities. The most popular ones have always been causing very exciting discussions and debates around the world. We all do realise that teachers need to have a system that helps them to test their students’ knowledge, so they can see how effective their teaching methods are. The question is, do we really need to put so much pressure on these features? Are they really so effective?

The first thing about tests and exams is that they do check the level of information the students managed to learn from the lectures. The questions usually cover the area that has been thought about at school, so if students can answer them correctly it means that the teaching was successful.

The other, equally important aspect is that due to the tests or exams that students are facing at school they get motivated to study more in order to get better marks and to improve their knowledge. Sometimes it might be just the fact that it is called an exam, that makes students get together and study harder.

On the other hand, some students might feel discouraged by the same fact that makes the others motivated what of course results in low marks in the actual exam. They also think that the results are very often not relevant to the efforts they put into studying. Because the marking system is not fair, they just do not feel like studying more for the exam.

Furthermore, many students find exams of different kinds very stressful, especially school ones. They often think that there could be another way of testing, less stressful, that should be introduced in schools or universities. The supporters of this opinion often bring out the fact that most students start smoking actually because of the stress they are exposed to at school. And that is definitely not beneficial for you or your health.

To put things together, is there really such a big need for exams at school? Is there really no other way to check how effective the teaching methods are? That is of course not that easy, but still, I am deeply convinced that things can be changed. It requires all the sides involved to think and come up with new ideas that could later be put into schools and that wouldn’t be that stressful anymore, so students can actually start enjoying them.

Sample 3:

Being the main characteristic of most academic institutions, the examination system helps a school to evaluate the knowledge and skills of its current and prospective students. It is well known that there are lots of debates around available scoring systems used by many schools. Some people believe that current testing methods are not effective anymore, while others think that it is not necessary to replace or amend the current scoring methods. In my opinion both sides are partially right.

It is well-documented that test questions reflect the academic material used at school lectures and seminars. Such questions cover the most part of the subject taught and evaluate the level information acquainted by the students during the classes. Besides, upcoming examinations make students to learn harder the appropriate field of study. Without evaluation, I think many students would lose their interest in learning.

On the other hand, modern testing systems require students to obtain huge amounts of academic information within a short period of time. It is widely believed that only knowledge of subjects is not enough to pass the test with higher results. The students are also required to possess strong time management skills in order to get high scores during examinations within the time limit. I think that this situation makes lots of students feel pressure which eventually leads to lower scores.

In my opinion, examinations at schools should be less stressful where students can reveal their true knowledge and will not be demotivated. I think that the time limit of the test questions should be extended since the students can have enough time to think and apply the knowledge, can get higher scores, and will be stimulated to learn further.

Sample 4:

In recent years, there has been a vast increase in discussions about how the examination systems should be at schools. Now students are undertaking too many tests and exams at school which do have many advantages both for the students and the teachers, but at the same time they also have certain drawbacks as well. The administration departments at schools need to think seriously about the outcomes of the examination systems they have, to test the students. In this essay I would like to give my own opinion after discussing both sides of the argument.

The first good thing about the exams and tests is that it is a method to test students how well they are learning from the lectures delivered in the class and how successful teachers are in conveying their knowledge. For instance, if a whole group of students show poor grades in a subject then the teacher teaching that subject can be encouraged to work harder and improve his or her teaching skills to bring the students to the top. This is a strong point that favours the argument because teachers are the key figures in a school system and exams are mandatory to check their level of teaching.

The other, equally important factor in favour of the issue is that exams encourage students as well to study, do more reading and writing and thus improve their general knowledge. If there are no exams and tests, then students will not put any effort into learning and education. Exams produce a state of terror that forces children to study. Moreover, exams bring students together, they do combine studies which help them to learn the essence of teamwork and they develop communication skills. Lastly, exams develop a sense of competition which also draws students towards books.

On the other hand, exams do have some disadvantages as well. While competition can be encouraging for some, it is a major source of immense pressure on students, often leading to depression. When students do not get good grades, they are discouraged and at the same time they are forced, both by the teachers and the parents, to work hard, putting them under more pressure. Now more and more students are involved in drug addiction to relieve exam pressure.

To recapitulate, I concede that exams can be discouraging for the students in some ways, but this does not mean that they should be removed from the system. The advantages of exams outweigh their disadvantages. Students should be tested and then upgraded but at the same time weaker students should be given special help to improve.

Câu 3