Câu hỏi:

10/01/2025 192

Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified
Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

Freedom is always a matter of controversy as there is no particular rule or limit to it. Each person has their own definition of freedom. In a similar way, allowing young children to make their own decisions on basic matters has brought up different views from different groups of people. In this essay, different avenues on the given topic will be explored to help us decide on the amount of freedom children should be given without hampering their personality.

It is a common belief that to make one strong, one should be allowed to take their own decisions and fight their fears, even if they do not succeed in the end. In the same way, in the developing years of a child, he/she should be allowed to make decisions, even if they are minor ones, like clothes, food, entertainment. If their decision-making qualities are cultivated from an early age, they will become independent individuals when they grow up. But some people think that the trait of individuality is synonymous with being selfish or caring less about other individuals. This is because they tend to generalize the concept that if one takes own decisions without taking others into consideration, it is selfishness. Being self-centered has nothing to do with making own decisions from a young age. They can be egotistical for different reasons like pampering, lack of guidance, dearth of awareness between right and wrong, among others.

In some cases, young children tend to get used to making decisions on their own and get diverted in the process. For example, a child is allowed to eat junk food all the time and spend his time idling with friends. If he continues to do this on his own, after a certain time, his health might be affected, or he might end up with wrong ‘friends’. As they grow up, they are accustomed to the idea that as it is their life, all decisions should be theirs alone. This might make them impervious to the needs of others or their needs before others.

To conclude, I would like to say that the role of parents or elders is extremely crucial in the development of decision-making and the amiable personality of an individual. If the child is not properly guided at home, he/she can become narrow-minded. So, it is the close relatives who can mentor the young generation to grow on their own and at the same time instill a sense of responsibility and help them understand the difference between right and wrong. It will not only help them in the long run but also create a better society for everyone.

Sample 2:

One common area of debate among parents is the extent to which children should be trusted to make their own decisions and the potential impact this will have on their sense of responsibility. Although decision-making skills will help in some ways, I believe parents should dictate choices for children in order to make them more aware of others.

On the one hand, children who have been allowed to make their own choices will eventually develop a keen sense of responsibilty. This can be best seen in two contrasting examples of helicopter parents and more liberal parents. Helicopter parents smother their children with attention and make the majority of their decisions for them. Over time, these kids will likely become dependent on their parents. If your parents always pick out your clothes then you never have to check weather forecasts, make choices about what colours match or concern yourself with trends in fashion. Later in life, these kids will not have developed any of these skills because of their parents. Contrast this with children who pick out their own clothes; they will have to consider these factors carefully and it will make them more responsible when it comes to shopping and taking care of their wardrobe.

On the other hand, I still believe that parents should make the majority of choices so that children will be more responsible towards others. For example, some parents have made the logical and ethical choice to be vegetarians, and they force their children to do the same. This can have a positive effect not only on their individual health but also on the environment. Moreover, it is a learning opportunity for parents to teach their offspring about ethics. Parents can make the argument that industrial farming is inhumane, and animals should be treated with more respect. This may have a carry-over effect resulting in their children growing up to be more thoughtful towards others.

In conclusion, parents should make most decisions for children to guide them to be more empathetic. They should work with teachers in their efforts to raise conscientous future citizens.

Sample 3:

Critics are concerned that children will be endangered if they are given freedom of choice, while others believe that they will be better equipped to handle the future consequences of their acts if given such freedom. In this essay, I'll compare and contrast the two perspectives in question and express my conclusion.

First, there is the risk that letting kids use their thinking will have undesirable results. Several studies have found that youngsters who are more capable of making their own decisions are more likely to disobey parental rules and expectations. In addition, they don't have the life background or perspective to make some choices. Children will inevitably make numerous blunders if they do not heed parental guidance. 

In addition, kids might be able to pick up some useful lessons from this conduct. The experience could help kids learn to be accountable for their actions. If they have been trained by their parents to look out for themselves, they will be able to make good decisions and prioritise what matters most to them. Furthermore, it may help kids learn to make ethical choices as adults. Finally, children may be better prepared to respond correctly when faced with challenging situations.
In conclusion, allowing adolescents to make their own decisions may have a wide range of unintended consequences. However, this strategy could be effective if parents take the time to teach their children about right and wrong in the actual world. Students will be able to make informed decisions since they will have access to criteria and resources.

Sample 4:

Individuals in modern societies are given more and more freedom as they mature, including the freedom to decide for themselves how they will spend their time and what they will consume as part of their daily routines. While some may think that this trait reflects a person's inherent selfishness, others may disagree. I see this as a good thing since it has the ability to make them feel more accountable.

One benefit of letting children pursue their interests in their daily life is that they become mature and responsible people. Because of what they've done, they have no choice but to strive for perfection rather than just the highest possible degree and settle for nothing less than world supremacy. The opposite may be true, young people may become more egocentric if they utilise this approach. If people could simply learn about themselves and accept that as the ideal, they would stop appreciating the differences among others.

In my opinion, the formation of such a style makes adults more successful when attempting to take action by helping them see their own bad and positive sides. If they stop to think about their actions and learn from them, they might be able to accomplish more of what they set out to do. It is the responsibility of parents to instill in their children a healthy level of tolerance and acceptance of the needs and points of view of others.

To sum up, allowing newborns some autonomy in the day-to-day decisions that affect their development and success is crucial. However, you should approach this from an entirely selfish perspective.

Sample 5:

Few people believe that allowing children to make their judgments about everyday tasks would lead to our society being more egotistical. On the other hand, some people believe that it is vital for parents to make decisions that will have an impact on their children's minds. The article that follows both supports the viewpoint of individuals who hold the opposing view and presents reasons in support of my position.

First, some people believe that giving young adults greater independence has had a variety of unfavourable effects, including the general public's propensity to think exclusively of themselves and the erasure of the foundation of humanity, which stipulates that we must help our neighbours in need. Additionally, as time has passed, people have grown to have nothing more than respect for the poor, homeless, and orphaned. As a result, the country is in a jungle-like environment where everyone is focused on their family members.

Furthermore, supporters of the idea contend that the implementation of this plan is essential because it would result in the development of children's minds, ideas, and perspectives by relieving them of any concerns that might divert their attention from the activities of their day-to-day lives and the responsibilities they face. In addition, they would be able to exhibit an adequate amount of self-assurance when confronted with challenges in their future lives and when required to make challenging decisions. In addition, the children who take part in this program develop into responsible adults far more quickly than their peers.

In conclusion, I believe that the latter strategy, which was briefly stated above, is preferable since it is incredibly helpful for children's mental and physical health to avoid having too many limits placed on them in their personal lives. So that's why I agree with this viewpoint.

Sample 6:

Some people claim that if children are allowed to make everyday decisions, society may become full of selfish individualists, while others argue that it is important for children to make up their own minds about matters that impact them. I agree with the former viewpoint because children may develop the habit of being self-centered if given the right to decide on mundane matters.

On the one hand, empowering children to make choices in their daily lives hones their decision-making skills. The reason is that if they don't weigh their options carefully and make the right decisions, there will be consequences. For example, children who choose to indulge in ice cream every day may become overweight and be laughed at by their peers. Consequently, they learn the importance of choosing healthy food over short-term pleasure. However, I do not think this is a good way to help children become better at decision-making because they are too young to be mentally strong enough to face the consequences of their bad decisions.

On the other hand, complying with all of children's everyday wishes may result in them forming the habit of selfishness. This is because when allowed to choose whatever they want to eat or wear on a daily basis, they may become accustomed to not caring about other people's preferences when making a decision. This habit will stay with them as they grow up, creating a selfish society. I agree with this argument because I have seen many second-generation rich children raised like this and become very self-centered adults as a result.

In conclusion, although children may become better decision-makers if allowed to decide on ordinary matters, I think this is more likely to lead them to develop the habit of selfishness, thus producing a society of self-centered individuals.

Sample 7:

The question of whether children should be allowed to make their own choices on everyday matters is a complex one. Some argue that giving children too much autonomy will lead to a society of individuals who only think about their own desires, while others believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them.

On one hand, some argue that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters can lead to a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. This can include children becoming picky eaters, choosing to only wear certain types of clothing, and only engaging in activities that they find entertaining. These children may become accustomed to always getting what they want and may not learn the value of compromise and patience.

On the other hand, some argue that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them. This can include allowing children to choose what they eat, what they wear, and what activities they engage in. This can help children to develop autonomy and self-confidence, as well as learning how to make decisions and take responsibility for their actions. Additionally, giving children the opportunity to make decisions about matters that affect them can help them to learn the value of independence.

To sum up, giving them the autonomy and the opportunity to make their own choices allows them to learn and grow, but it is also important to teach them the importance of concession as well as give and take, and not to let them become too self-centered. This can be achieved by setting boundaries and providing guidance on decision making, while still giving children the opportunity to express their own preferences.

Sample 8:

The ongoing debate surrounding whether children should have the autonomy to make decisions on daily matters has raised questions about its potential impact on society. While some argue that granting children this freedom may lead to a self-centered society, others emphasize the importance of nurturing decision-making skills to foster autonomy and responsibility.

Advocates for children making their own choices believe that this autonomy contributes to the development of independent thinkers. Allowing children to decide on aspects like food, clothes, and entertainment empowers them to explore preferences and interests, cultivating a strong sense of self and the ability to make informed decisions. This approach is seen as crucial for shaping responsible individuals capable of navigating life’s complexities with confidence.

However, opponents express concerns about the potential for a self-centered society if decision-making is left unchecked in early stages. They argue that a lack of guidance may result in children growing up with limited understanding of the consequences their choices can have on themselves and others.

In my view, a balanced approach is essential. Providing children with decision-making opportunities is crucial, yet equally important is instilling a sense of responsibility and consideration for others. Parents and educators play a pivotal role in guiding children, offering support and teaching the importance of thoughtful decision-making.

In conclusion, finding the right balance between autonomy and responsibility is key when allowing children to make choices on everyday matters. Empowering them to make decisions can foster independence and critical thinking skills, but this should be accompanied by guidance to ensure the development of a sense of responsibility and an awareness of the impact of their choices on the broader society.

Sample 9:

Allowing children to make their own decisions regarding food, clothing, and entertainment is a topic that is frequently debated. Others argue that it is important for children to make decisions that affect them, despite the fact that some believe it may contribute to the development of egocentric individuals. This essay will examine both perspectives and present my own viewpoint.

On the one hand, proponents of allowing children to make their own decisions contend that it promotes autonomy and critical thinking. Allowing children to make their own decisions helps them develop a sense of autonomy, learn from their errors, and mature into responsible adults. In addition, it encourages children to investigate their preferences and form their own distinctive identities.

On the other hand, critics argue that an excessive amount of freedom can lead to egotism and disregard for others. They believe that guidance and structure are necessary for children to develop a sense of empathy and comprehend the repercussions of their actions. Without proper guidance, children may prioritise their own wants without regard for the impact on others or on society as a whole.

I believe that a balanced approach is essential. Children should be encouraged to make decisions that directly influence them, such as selecting their own clothing and extracurricular activities. This helps them develop self-assurance, autonomy, and decision-making abilities. However, it is equally essential for parents and guardians to provide guidance and establish boundaries when it comes to issues with broader implications or those affect the well-being of others.

Ultimately, enabling children to make their own decisions can foster autonomy and critical thinking skills. Nonetheless, it is crucial to achieve a balance by providing guidance and teaching children to consider the repercussions of their choices. Empowering children while imparting empathy and responsibility can contribute to their development as well-rounded people.

Sample 10:

People have different views about whether children should be given the privilege of making their own decisions. While giving them absolute freedom to make choices in daily life is likely to encourage selfishness, I tend to agree with the idea that independent decision-making is of paramount importance for adulthood.

A common criticism of giving children too much freedom is that they would become narrow-minded and self-centred. Allowing children to always choose the things they want and not have to follow the advice of others may lead them to be too independently minded. This character trait may be a hindrance in later life, in terms of cooperating with other people in a team and especially when leading an organisation. In these situations, listening to and considering the ideas and opinions of others is of great importance. Take, for example, a group presentation in which a team has to work together, meaning a lot of decisions have to be made. Each group member will have to point out the pros and cons of their own ideas and learn to be tolerant and accept other viewpoints at the same time.

However, the possibility of becoming uncooperative does not necessarily mean children’s rights to make decisions should be restricted. Firstly, overprotective parents, who always intervene and dictate every aspect of their children’s lives, would definitely create bad habits for children, making them dependent and even losing the ability to manage their own lives in the future. This is evidenced by the fact that in many fields employers wouldn’t hire an employee who cannot think for themself and use their own initiative. Secondly, effective decision-making skill, which is difficult and involves various steps, such as evaluating situations, considering alternatives…needs prolonged, consistent practice over a long period to master. That is why giving children opportunities to make their own choices is so beneficial.

In conclusion, the advantages of encouraging independent decision-making during childhood are more significant than the possibility of children growing up to be selfish. This includes effective team working skills and being tolerant of others’ opinions. Parents should therefore give up strict control over their children’s choices and play their part in guiding and advising children to make their own informed decisions.

Sample 11:

The question of whether children should be given autonomy to make their own choices on daily matters or guided by adults has been a subject of debate in parenting and educational circles. On one hand, some argue that empowering children to decide on various aspects of their lives is advisable. Conversely, others contend that excessive freedom may lead to self-centeredness and a lack of consideration for societal norms. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own stance on the issue.

When teens are given room to make their own decisions, their brains learn how to make hard choices by weighing both sides of their decision. More importantly, it helps them reduce the stress of feeling helpless or controlled by someone else. In school, teachers boost students’ self-reliance and independence when they allow students to make choices, explain the purpose of an assignment, and seek feedback about the helpfulness of their homework rather than spoon-feeding them. This also fosters a mentor relationship and demonstrates respect, while growing their students’ critical thinking and problem-solving skills.

Although parents owe their children to experience everything possible, letting children decide on every decision all the time is an irrational thing to do. Since teens are not mature enough to deal with the true realities of real life, they usually rush to a decision and then encounter many unexpected consequences. A more serious counterproductive effect is they become more selfish because they may never take the benefits of others into consideration. For instance, children who are at liberty to eat, wear and play whatever they like will never think of whether their parents can afford their interests or share the same tastes.

In conclusion, while allowing children to make decisions about matters that affect them can promote autonomy and decision-making skills, it is crucial for adults to provide guidance and boundaries to ensure their well-being and the development of empathy and social responsibility. A balanced approach that combines autonomy with guidance is essential to nurture confident, independent individuals who are mindful of the needs and values of society.

Sample 12:

Children in the current generation are advanced in terms of their behaviour and psychology while their mentality differs from their parent's generation. While some believe that children need to be allowed to make decisions of their own which especially are based on their own lives. However, some people believe that allowing children to make their own decisions would make them selfish. The following essay would discuss both sides of the argument and I would eventually give my opinion.

Some people believe that parents’ involvement in every decision made by children, from the clothes they wear to the food they choose, is essential. People argue that children might grow up to become a person who only thinks about their own wishes and needs if they are allowed to make decisions solely on their own.

However, contrary to this opinion is another argument which considers that children should be allowed to make their own decisions on things which affect them. Whether it's the choice of clothes or the type of entertainment they watch, children should be allowed to make their own choices. This is an important requirement which would help children learn from their mistakes, understand what is good or bad and grow as more mature people. It would make them more confident as a human being who has the knowledge to make their own decisions.

Thus, in my opinion, allowing children to make their own decisions which affect them would make them more confident and the involvement of parents can be considered when necessary for their children.

Sample 13:

People believe that when children are allowed to make decisions on their own in terms of food or clothes or entertainment, they tend to grow up thinking only about themselves. However, some people argue that children need to make their own decisions in places that affect them. In lieu of discussing both sides, I would present my opinion in support of the latter.

People consider that children are young and do not have the ability to make their own decisions. Some people consider that children making their own decisions might end up focusing only on their own wishes. Moreover, people think that allowing children to make decisions in food and clothing might make them self-centres and hence, not consider other’ opinions for their lives.

However, some people argue that making their own decisions by children from a young age would help them become self-dependent and they would be able to grow as confident people. Having an opinion on things is important especially if it affects the person and their lives. Accordingly, having the trait of an independent person makes them more efficient and helps them overcome their fears effectively. However, it is important to consider the fact that children need to be guided by their parents and elders in terms of their choices like food, which needs to be healthy rather than junk and the need for a healthy lifestyle by being physically active.

To conclude, I might opine that children need to be raised in a way that they are able to make their own decisions thereby being independent of their choices. However, it is the responsibility of the parents to allow them to make decisions while simultaneously also guiding them towards making better choices.

Sample 14:

Whether children should make their own decisions is a contentious issue, with some opposing the idea because they believe children may become self-centered, while others argue that children should have a say in decisions that affect their lives. While I would discuss both sides of the opinion, my support would be placed for the latter.

People consider that when children are growing up, they need to be trained and guided by their parents and any decision regarding their life needs to be made by them. From choice of clothes to type of entertainment, people consider that children should not be allowed to make decisions whether big or small. People argue that making their own decisions from a young age would make children self-centred and thereby overlook others’ requirements and needs. However, considering parents’ guidance, children need that to understand the differences between what is good or bad for them. For instance, parents' guidance is required for imparting knowledge about healthy food, exercise and a healthy lifestyle rather than junk food and an inactive lifestyle.

On the other hand, some people argue that children should be allowed to make decisions of their own, especially the ones where their lives are affected. Accordingly, children should be self-dependent and need to know from a young age about how to live an independent life whether washing one’s own clothes, choosing a career field or playing a sport. This makes them not only independent of their choices but also develops their confidence, making them trust themself and believe that their parents respect their choices.

Hence, people might argue that children would become selfish if they are let to make their own decisions, I certainly believe that independence of one’s choices and decisions should be allowed from a young age.

Sample 15:

The goal of good parenting is to empower children to develop well. All humans are required to make millions of decisions throughout their lives, and their capacity to do this has a direct effect on their happiness and success. Certain individuals restrict their children’s decisions because they want to make sure that their kids always go down the right path; others, however, give freedom of choice to their kids so that they develop independence. I believe that a balance of both, whereby parents guide their children’s decisions, is best for children’s development.   

Certain parents control their children’s daily decisions on diet, clothing, exercise and learning because they believe that they know better what has beneficial results, and they desire to minimize harm and maximize benefit for their offspring. I noticed that my friend, Andrew, never allows his four-year-old son, Alex, to eat what he desires, instead he is always feeding him with fruits, vegetables and fish; otherwise, Alex would eat chocolate for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Nevertheless, this leads children, like Alex, to lack confidence when needing to make choices.

In light of this notion, many parents encourage their children to make choices for themselves, and to learn from their own mistakes, by allowing them to eat, wear and watch whatever they want. My friend, Susan, lets her eight-year-old son, Tim, watch violent superhero cartoons, because she feels that he enjoys this more than watching educational shows, and that he can learn right from wrong in other ways, and develop a sense of independence quickly. However, at times this can be risky as highly independent children may encounter much conflict during their upbringing in society.

Therefore, I believe that the optimal approach for children’s decision-making process is to give kids the ability to choose withing certain parameters and with feedback. In this way, children are not only kept safe and happy, but also encouraged to develop critical thinking and self-reliance which is of great benefit for them and society. In fact, with my four-year-old daughter Sybella, I always discuss options for food and entertainment whereby she gets to choose from a healthy selection. As a result, I feel that she is confident in making her own choices while developing nicely, both mentally and physically. 

In conclusion, there are logical reasons for both parenting styles, those parents that give great freedom to their kids and those that do not. However, an extreme in each case does carry with it negative repercussions. So, it is my belief that a balanced approach provides optimal nurturing of offspring which in turn leads to a confident future society.  

Sample 16:

In some cases, it’s a good signal for children to make their own decisions, but everything has both positive and negative effects, none can be done perfectly. We should provide necessary guidance to help them grow up.

I may only agree with the point that children can make their own choices in some matters, and the time goes by, more rights should be given to them, because it’s almost impossible for children to make their own choices when children are 4 years old, and it’s a bit unrealistic, but it can be possible that children can choose what they eat, what they wear when they are in secondary schools, then children can choose what they want to do when they are college students. During the life of their growing up, children usually fail to control themselves like adults due to a lack of experience, a necessary guidance is of great importance to them.

What’s more, I strongly agree that children should learn to make decisions, if every decision is made by their parents, they may lose the ability to make any choices in their later life and become too dependent on other people. What the parents’ responsibility is to help them to live independently, children should acquire most kinds of skills, including decision making.

As for myself, my parents often told me to pay more attention to self-security and healthy eating, but they rarely interfered with my decision making in my daily life. I felt so lucky, because I could do what I wanted to do, but as to my friends, most of them were under rigid control by their parents, they had to study and be at home without caring about other things, I felt sympathy for them. Anyway, we all grow up, I become a postgraduate and continue to study, but they no longer have a chance to be admitted into a university. In a large part, I can do what I am willing to do, but they just can’t master their fate anymore.

All in all, there is no doubt that making decisions in their childhood is indispensable, parents should put much emphasis on it.

Sample 17:

To what extent children should be given freedom of choice on everyday issues like food, clothes, TV programmes, and free-time activities has sparked heated debate. With unlimited freedom, according to many, children are likely to become self-centred and they naturally think of their own desires only. However, others believe children should make their own decisions as it helps grow a sense of responsibility in them. But, in my opinion, parents ought to dictate their children’s choices so as to make them more conscious of others.

Children who have absolute freedom in daily matters start believing that they can do whatever they want. And when those children grow up, they are likely to believe that their own wishes are important while everything else is secondary. Consequently, they become egocentric adults resulting in a society of selfish individuals.

On the contrary, children who are allowed to make their own decisions will naturally develop a keen sense of responsibility. That is to say, they will learn how to take responsibility for their actions. Also, this practice helps them develop problem-solving skills through trial and error. The rationale behind the view is that natural consequences are the best teacher.

However, I firmly believe that parents should often dictate children’s choice as these children are not fully mature and capable of making suitable decisions. Many a time, children’s decisions are not based on experience or knowledge. A case in point is junk food which is detrimental to health, but a favourite for most children. If given the freedom, many children would prefer to eat fast food all day long. If parents allow them to eat such junk food regularly, children will become morbidly obese, which in turn will increase the risk of heart disease and reduce their lifespan. Therefore, parents should give dietary advice and often control what their offsprings eat.

To conclude, how much liberty children should be given on everyday matters is a controversial topic. Although decision-making rights help them in some ways, I think parents ought to dictate their choices to some extent so that they can make the right choices and they can learn to honour others’ opinions and decisions.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Peer pressure is a pervasive phenomenon that significantly influences the behaviours of young individuals. While some argue that it plays a crucial role in positively shaping the lives of the youth, others contend that the disadvantages of peer pressure are very detrimental. 

Peer pressure, when harnessed positively, can have several advantages. Firstly, it can foster a sense of belonging and camaraderie among individuals within the same age group. Young people often seek acceptance and affirmation from their peers, and this can contribute to their emotional well-being and self-esteem. A further benefit is that positive peer pressure can encourage healthy behaviours, such as exercising or avoiding risky activities. For instance, a teenager might be motivated to quit smoking if their friends promote a smoke-free lifestyle.

However, peer pressure can also have distinct disadvantages. The most pressing concern is the potential for negative influences on impressionable minds. Young people may succumb to the pressure of engaging in harmful behaviours, such as substance abuse, criminal activities, or reckless behaviours like driving without a seatbelt, due to peer pressure, which can lead to long-lasting negative consequences and jeopardise their future.

Moreover, excessive pressure from peers can stifle individuality and creativity as young people may conform to the norms of their peer group instead of pursuing their own aspirations and dreams. This conformity may limit their personal growth and hinder their ability to think independently.

In conclusion, I would argue that peer pressure has more disadvantages as although it can foster a sense of belonging and promote healthy behaviours, it also carries the risk of leading young people astray and stifling their individuality. It is imperative for parents, educators, and society at large to guide young people in making informed choices and navigating the complexities of peer influence.

Sample 2:

The peer group tends to exert influence on the way teenagers behave. While many believe that the influence of peers is immensely important, others opine that it has its obvious drawbacks. I believe that the benefits peer pressure brings outweigh the disadvantages because it can instil a positive attitude towards education, despite the primary drawback, namely substance use, or so on it may cause.

Without any doubt, the influence of peers can inspire young people to build positive behaviours, make good choices, and strive for academic excellence. When friends place emphasis on education and academic performance, it can exert a positive impact on the young’s attitude toward learning. In fact, students who maintain a friend circle who are diligent students may feel a strong motivation to study diligently. Take my brother’s case for example. He works harder to obtain good marks in exams because his friends are determined to achieve academic excellence. They possess a solid work ethic, and now so does he.

However, peer pressure can also exert influence on young people to engage in deviant behaviours. It may make young adults feel obliged to take on bad habits like substance abuse to feel like they are part of the circle and not levelled as boring or weak. For example, if a group of friends get involved in substance abuse, underage drinking, and delinquent activities, a child may feel obligated to conform to these behaviours to avoid exclusion.

Considering all these, I would like to mention that there is no concrete evidence to endorse the view that peer pressure is the primary reason for unacceptable behaviours and substance abuse. There are other factors, like genetics, mental health issues, and social influences, that play a profound role in this case.

To reiterate, the fact that peer pressure can encourage to conform to a positive attitude toward learning clearly outweighs the flawed argument that it can influence young people to develop delinquent behaviour and bad habits.

Sample 3:

The debate surrounding peer pressure often hinges on whether its advantages outweigh its disadvantages or if it is the opposite. While peer pressure can sometimes encourage positive behaviours and foster social connections, I believe its drawbacks are significant and can have long-lasting consequences.

On the one hand, proponents of peer pressure argue that it can motivate individuals to adopt healthy habits, such as regular exercise, academic diligence, and community involvement. Positive peer pressure can serve as a source of encouragement, support, and accountability, leading to personal growth and self-improvement. For example, a teenager may be more likely to participate in volunteer work if their friends are also involved, leading to a greater sense of civic responsibility and altruism.

However, the disadvantages of peer pressure often outweigh these benefits. Negative peer pressure can lead individuals to engage in risky behaviours, such as substance abuse, reckless driving, and delinquent activities, in order to fit in or gain acceptance from their peers. The desire to conform to social norms and avoid rejection can override rational decision-making and moral judgment, leading to harmful consequences for both individuals and society. For instance, adolescents may experiment with drugs or alcohol due to peer pressure, resulting in addiction, legal troubles, and impaired cognitive function. Moreover, peer pressure can contribute to the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes, discrimination, and bullying within peer groups. Individuals who deviate from social norms or express dissenting opinions may face ostracism, ridicule, or even physical violence from their peers, leading to feelings of isolation, low self-esteem, and mental health issues.

In conclusion, while peer pressure can sometimes promote positive behaviours and social connections, its disadvantages far outweigh any potential benefits.

Sample 4:

Peer pressure refers to the influence young individuals experience within the same age group, affecting their behaviors. This essay will critically evaluate the drawbacks and benefits of peer pressure on young people.

Peer pressure often leads young individuals to engage in risky behaviors. For instance, teenagers may feel compelled to experiment with drugs due to the effect of their peers who engage in such activities. The desire to fit in and be accepted can override their better judgment, exposing them to serious short-term health risks and potential addiction later in life. Moreover, succumbing to negative peer pressure can adversely affect academic performance, as students may prioritize social acceptance over their studies. This desire for approval can result in poor grades, limited educational opportunities, and long-term negative consequences.

On the other hand, positive peer pressure can inspire young individuals to set higher goals, adopt healthier habits, and strive for academic excellence. Many teenagers are pressured by their peers to join a study group, leading to improved learning outcomes and academic success. Relatedly, supportive friends can inspire young individuals to engage in physical fitness activities or pursue positive hobbies and talents, promoting a healthier and more well-rounded lifestyle. This sense of camaraderie and mutual encouragement fostered within positive peer groups can contribute significantly to personal growth and self-confidence. Actively seeking out positive and active peer groups and engaging in behaviors aligned with one’s personal values can help mitigate the adverse effects of negative peer pressure while harnessing the advantages of positive influence.

In conclusion, although peer pressure encourages risky behaviors and hinders personal growth, the motivational and emotional advantage make it positive on the whole. Ultimately, striking some degree of balance between independence and positive peer interactions is crucial to minimizing the disadvantages and embracing the benefits.

Sample 5:

Peer pressure is the influence exerted by a peer group that encourages people to change their attitudes, values, or behaviours to fit into group norms. It plays a significant part in adolescent life. I agree that peers can help make a particular place comfortable for an individual but majorly they play an active role in helping an individual indulge in risky behaviours. So, in my opinion, the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages.

Peer pressure plays a crucial role in shaping adolescent behaviour and attitudes. It helps people promote unity and harmony in society. For instance, a teenager might be motivated to excel academically or engage in community service due to the influence of their high-achieving peers. It tends to encourage people to conform to societal norms and values. Moreover, it can help young people in preparing for the realities of adulthood. This is because it exposes them to different viewpoints and assists them in learning how to navigate social dynamics, which in turn enhances their social skills and emotional intelligence. 

However, there can be several ill effects of being influenced by one’s peers. Firstly, it may encourage youth to engage in dangerous activities such as smoking, drinking, or drug usage to make them fit into their groups. Excess peer pressure is the major cause of stress, anxiety, and low self-esteem in the younger generation as it builds this feeling that they are not able to match the expectations of their peers. In extreme cases, it can even lead to depression and other mental health issues. This can also stifle individuality and creativity, preventing young people from discovering their true selves and potential. 

In addition to this, there can be a loss of personal identity as young people may feel compelled to adopt the attitudes, behaviours, and tastes of their peers, even if they conflict with their values and beliefs. It also leads to academic pressure as students may feel forced to achieve the same grades as their peers, leading to unhealthy competition and burnout. This can result in a lack of motivation and interest in learning, which can have long-term effects on their academic and career prospects.

In conclusion, peer pressure does have an indispensable role in the societal development of young individuals. However, it also provides people with a sense of comfort and security in their formative years. However, its disadvantages such as promoting risky behaviours, causing mental health issues, stifling individuality, and leading to academic pressure are more significant. Therefore, parents, educators, and society as a whole must provide guidance and support to young people to help them navigate the complexities of peer pressure.

Sample 6:

Many feel that peer pressure can have a positive impact on an individual, while others claim that its effects are unequivocally detrimental. In my opinion, despite providing motivation for self-development, the downsides associated with mental health decline and behavioral problems make this phenomenon decidedly negative.

On the one hand, peer pressure can encourage personal development. Individuals leading sedentary lifestyles might be persuaded into going to the gym by their peers and therefore cultivate healthy exercise habits in the long term. Relatedly, those surrounded by punctual friends may be influenced to arrive on time not only for social gatherings, but this habit could possibly extend to important business meetings. The adoption of these good daily habits can engender higher levels of self-confidence, which better prepares an individual to strive for excellence in various aspects of life.

However, peer pressure can be the source of mental health deterioration. When observing other people of the same age reaching major milestones and success in life, an individual may feel compelled to make comparisons and potentially feel dissatisfied with oneself and their current achievements. A pertinent example of this can often be seen in classroom settings, where a student may develop anxieties related to other students and in rarer instances, more concerning mental problems. Negative peer pressure also makes an individual gravitate towards self-destructive behavior. Some teenagers may be tempted by their peers into smoking cigarettes or drinking alcohol in order to gain approval and inclusion within a given social group.

In conclusion, in spite of motivational advantages concomitant with peer pressure, the related mental health problems and risky behavior are unequivocally negative. Individuals should focus on personal growth instead of fixating on others’ achievements.

Sample 7:

In the vibrant tapestry of adolescence, peer pressure emerges as a potent force, shaping behaviors and attitudes among the youth. This essay posits that while peer influence harbors potential benefits, such as fostering social integration and encouraging positive habits, its drawbacks, particularly in promoting conformity and risky behaviors, significantly overshadow its advantages.

Peer pressure, often perceived as a vehicle for conformity, exerts a formidable influence on young individuals, compelling them to align with the group’s norms and values. This phenomenon, while reinforcing social cohesion, frequently nudges adolescents towards compromising their individuality and adopting behaviors that may not align with their personal or moral values. For instance, the prevalent trend of underage drinking can be attributed to the desire to fit in, illustrating how peer influence can foster detrimental habits rather than constructive ones.

Moreover, the inclination to engage in risky behaviors under peer influence constitutes a significant drawback. Adolescents, in their quest for acceptance and fear of ostracization, may find themselves partaking in activities fraught with peril, such as reckless driving or substance abuse. These actions, while momentarily gratifying, can have long-lasting adverse effects on their health and wellbeing, underscoring the inherent dangers of succumbing to peer pressure.

Conversely, peer pressure can serve as a catalyst for positive change, encouraging young people to adopt beneficial habits and attitudes through the influence of their contemporaries. For example, peers who prioritize academic excellence and healthy living can inspire similar values in their circle. However, while the potential for positive influence exists, it is frequently overshadowed by the more immediate and compelling lure of negative behaviors that promise social acceptance.

In summary, while peer pressure may occasionally lead to positive changes, its inclination towards promoting conformity and risky behaviors is a greater issue. The negatives, especially its encouragement of harmful habits and the erosion of individuality, clearly outweigh the positives. This underscores the importance of creating environments that champion personal integrity over conformity, vital for nurturing resilient and well-rounded individuals.

Sample 8:

In adolescence, young people are often influenced by their peer group, a force that can wield both immense power and significant peril. While there's undeniable value in the emotional support, encouragement, and sense of belonging that peers can offer, I argue that the drawbacks of peer pressure - especially the inclination toward conformity at the expense of individuality and the propensity for rash decision-making - far outweigh these advantages.

When young people carefully select their social circles, peer pressure can, indeed, serve as a catalyst for positive change. Consider an aspiring scholar who surrounds themselves with academically driven friends aiming for Ivy League schools. In this context, the group's collective ambition propels the individual toward academic excellence. Moreover, at an age when the brain is highly malleable, the right peer pressure can stimulate not just intellectual growth but also emotional intelligence. It can teach young people the intricacies of interpersonal dynamics, as they navigate the highs and lows of relationships, including conflict resolution and empathy.

Nevertheless, the potential pitfalls of peer pressure should not be underestimated, especially given the vulnerability of adolescents who are still in the process of forming their values and judgments. This makes them susceptible to external influences that may not always align with their best interests. For instance, research indicates that the popularity of smoking in high schools directly correlates with an uptick in teenage smoking rates; youngsters may succumb to the vice merely to conform. Additionally, the fear of ostracization can lead adolescents to limit their friendships to a monolithic group, thereby reducing their exposure to diverse perspectives and impeding their emotional growth, ultimately stunting their psychological development.

In conclusion, peer pressure is a double-edged sword; while it may catalyze academic aspiration and emotional development when managed judiciously, it can also usher in detrimental consequences. Given that young individuals are prone to impulsive actions and less-than-ideal decision-making, the perils introduced by peer pressure must be acknowledged and carefully managed.

Sample 9:

The influence of peer pressure is undeniably a double-edged sword, wielding the power to either uplift or undermine an individual's life trajectory. Picture a young prodigy immersed in a social milieu comprising peers laser-focused on gaining admission to prestigious Ivy League institutions. Such an environment becomes a crucible for the cultivation of academic rigor, driving the young mind toward unparalleled scholastic achievements.

Additionally, during the formative years of adolescence, the brain's neuroplasticity is at its zenith, making it an ideal period for the enhancement of emotional intelligence. Within this context, positive peer pressure becomes instrumental in instilling essential life skills such as empathy, resilience, and conflict resolution. For example, facing challenges together, whether it's academic competition or personal disagreements, teaches valuable lessons about collaboration and emotional regulation.

Yet, the specter of the adverse effects looms large, especially when considering the malleable and impressionable nature of youth. Focused research illustrates that social trends among teenagers, such as the unfortunate resurgence of smoking, can be attributed to the pervasive influence of peer pressure. The desire to conform eclipses rational judgment, compelling young people to engage in detrimental behaviors just to maintain their social standing.

Moreover, the dread of social exclusion often coerces adolescents into narrowing their social circles to homogenous groups, thereby stifling their emotional and intellectual growth. When confined to a single, like-minded cohort, the opportunity to interact with diverse perspectives and develop a more nuanced understanding of the world is severely curtailed.

In conclusion, the multifaceted impact of peer pressure should not be casually dismissed. While it has the capacity to be a catalyst for personal and academic growth, the pitfalls are equally compelling. The key, therefore, lies in a judicious selection of one's social circle and a heightened self-awareness that enables an individual to sift through external influences to embrace only those that align with their authentic selves.

Sample 10:

Youngsters have always been influenced by the conduct of acquaintances belonging to the same age group. While this has certain shortfalls, the favors it brings are far more in number, which shall be elucidated in the following paragraphs.

The impact of conduct of acquaintances on youngsters is overwhelming and although this can have an adverse impact on the young psyche, it will be unjustified to profess that these eclipse the favorable effects; it is the other way round.

To begin with, undeniably, the consequence of the push afforded by classmates, friends, colleagues and social contacts, have been found to be coaxing individuals into establishing their definitive academic, professional, social and even health goals with great enthusiasm. To corroborate, several individuals pursuing weight loss objectives have admitted that it was their social network that persuaded them to work to shed their flab and attain a trimmer waist. Similarly, millions of IT professionals credit joining this industry to their classmates and friends whose success and encouragement pushed the former to follow the precedents and embrace this occupation.

Moreover, it is quite commonly seen that the persona is partly carved by the interaction with the outer world, especially with those in social circles and friendship, and this determines the level of intellect of an individual. To illustrate, those with a high level of enlightenment about the surroundings, general and specific issues such as geo-politics and environment, generally hail from peer groups that comprise intelligent people.

However, the only conspicuous downside of this phenomenon is youngsters starting to harbor unrealistic expectations about various spheres of their life, chasing unattainable goals, becoming frustrated if those objectives are not accomplished, and going astray. Nonetheless, such situations can be circumvented by adopting a prudent approach and identifying their own limitations.

In hindsight, it can be safely asserted that the allegation of shortcomings of peer pressure exceeding its pros lacks substance; it is this force that has guided an umpteen number of triumphant personalities who owe their accomplishments to these undercurrents.  

Sample 11:

Peer pressure is a phenomenon widely observed among young people, influencing their behaviors, decisions, and perceptions. While some advocate for its importance in shaping social dynamics and fostering development, others highlight its distinct disadvantages. The debate revolves around whether the negatives of peer pressure outweigh the positives.

Advantages of peer pressure are evident in various aspects of adolescent life. It often plays a role in introducing new ideas, interests, and experiences. Young individuals may be motivated to adopt positive habits like academic excellence, sports participation, or community engagement through encouragement and inspiration from peers. Additionally, peer pressure can facilitate social integration and help young people develop critical social skills, fostering a sense of belonging and camaraderie within their peer groups.

However, the disadvantages of peer pressure cannot be disregarded. The most glaring issue arises when negative influences lead to risky or harmful behaviors. Young individuals might succumb to peer pressure to engage in substance abuse, delinquency, or other irresponsible actions, driven by the desire for acceptance or fear of exclusion. This can result in detrimental consequences, affecting not only their immediate well-being but also their long-term prospects and mental health.

Furthermore, excessive reliance on peer approval might hinder personal growth and individuality. Young people may conform to societal norms or trends without considering their own values, preferences, or aspirations. This conformity might lead to a lack of independent thinking and decision-making skills, affecting their ability to navigate challenges and make informed choices in the future.

The disadvantages of peer pressure, particularly when it leads to negative outcomes or inhibits personal development, can have a lasting impact on individuals. The pressure to conform can overshadow one’s authenticity and hinder the exploration of unique talents and interests.

In evaluating whether the disadvantages outweigh the advantages of peer pressure, it’s crucial to consider context and moderation. Positive peer influence can foster growth, but when peer pressure leads to detrimental behavior or stifles individuality, its drawbacks become more pronounced. Finding a balance where individuals are positively influenced without compromising their values or well-being is crucial in navigating the complexities of peer pressure.

In conclusion, while peer pressure can offer positive reinforcement and social integration, its disadvantages, especially when it results in negative behaviors or stifles individuality, should not be overlooked. Striking a balance between positive peer influence and personal autonomy is essential for young individuals to develop into well-rounded, independent individuals capable of making informed decisions while benefiting from the positive aspects of social interaction.

Lời giải

Sample 1:

In today’s school systems, tests and examinations are major features in many countries, where some citizens believe that these tests play an important role. Whereas on the same scale others argue that they are not mandatory. However, I feel that testing should not be major a one in the school system for the following reasons.

Firstly, a common advantage of examinations is that they differentiate between the best and poor performers, i.e., hard-working students are smart in tests compared to others. Similarly, school kids feel that if they want to upgrade for the next standard they should appear and pass exams. Hence this concept creates responsibility for studies. However, many nations in the world are preferring this testing format in education.

On the other hand, a few drawbacks are noticed such as slow learners cannot perform well in the test and this creates inferior complexity among students. If opportunity, time and new learning techniques are imparted to students, they can perform better in tests.

Moreover, suicide trends are seen by this examination system. Hence, developed countries are exempting testing features. This phenomenon created confusion in parents, children and teachers whether to continue with the test pattern or simply promote students to the next higher class. This brought a drastic change in many countries which headed toward the exemption of tests.

In conclusion, testing candidates has both advantages and disadvantages, with the major advantage being that slow learners benefit significantly from the exam system. If passing an exam is not mandatory, students can still improve, even if maturity and seriousness towards studies are not observed in childhood. However, tests do not always accurately reflect students' merit and are thus often biased.

Sample 2:

Much could be said about different ways of testing or checking students at schools or universities. The most popular ones have always been causing very exciting discussions and debates around the world. We all do realise that teachers need to have a system that helps them to test their students’ knowledge, so they can see how effective their teaching methods are. The question is, do we really need to put so much pressure on these features? Are they really so effective?

The first thing about tests and exams is that they do check the level of information the students managed to learn from the lectures. The questions usually cover the area that has been thought about at school, so if students can answer them correctly it means that the teaching was successful.

The other, equally important aspect is that due to the tests or exams that students are facing at school they get motivated to study more in order to get better marks and to improve their knowledge. Sometimes it might be just the fact that it is called an exam, that makes students get together and study harder.

On the other hand, some students might feel discouraged by the same fact that makes the others motivated what of course results in low marks in the actual exam. They also think that the results are very often not relevant to the efforts they put into studying. Because the marking system is not fair, they just do not feel like studying more for the exam.

Furthermore, many students find exams of different kinds very stressful, especially school ones. They often think that there could be another way of testing, less stressful, that should be introduced in schools or universities. The supporters of this opinion often bring out the fact that most students start smoking actually because of the stress they are exposed to at school. And that is definitely not beneficial for you or your health.

To put things together, is there really such a big need for exams at school? Is there really no other way to check how effective the teaching methods are? That is of course not that easy, but still, I am deeply convinced that things can be changed. It requires all the sides involved to think and come up with new ideas that could later be put into schools and that wouldn’t be that stressful anymore, so students can actually start enjoying them.

Sample 3:

Being the main characteristic of most academic institutions, the examination system helps a school to evaluate the knowledge and skills of its current and prospective students. It is well known that there are lots of debates around available scoring systems used by many schools. Some people believe that current testing methods are not effective anymore, while others think that it is not necessary to replace or amend the current scoring methods. In my opinion both sides are partially right.

It is well-documented that test questions reflect the academic material used at school lectures and seminars. Such questions cover the most part of the subject taught and evaluate the level information acquainted by the students during the classes. Besides, upcoming examinations make students to learn harder the appropriate field of study. Without evaluation, I think many students would lose their interest in learning.

On the other hand, modern testing systems require students to obtain huge amounts of academic information within a short period of time. It is widely believed that only knowledge of subjects is not enough to pass the test with higher results. The students are also required to possess strong time management skills in order to get high scores during examinations within the time limit. I think that this situation makes lots of students feel pressure which eventually leads to lower scores.

In my opinion, examinations at schools should be less stressful where students can reveal their true knowledge and will not be demotivated. I think that the time limit of the test questions should be extended since the students can have enough time to think and apply the knowledge, can get higher scores, and will be stimulated to learn further.

Sample 4:

In recent years, there has been a vast increase in discussions about how the examination systems should be at schools. Now students are undertaking too many tests and exams at school which do have many advantages both for the students and the teachers, but at the same time they also have certain drawbacks as well. The administration departments at schools need to think seriously about the outcomes of the examination systems they have, to test the students. In this essay I would like to give my own opinion after discussing both sides of the argument.

The first good thing about the exams and tests is that it is a method to test students how well they are learning from the lectures delivered in the class and how successful teachers are in conveying their knowledge. For instance, if a whole group of students show poor grades in a subject then the teacher teaching that subject can be encouraged to work harder and improve his or her teaching skills to bring the students to the top. This is a strong point that favours the argument because teachers are the key figures in a school system and exams are mandatory to check their level of teaching.

The other, equally important factor in favour of the issue is that exams encourage students as well to study, do more reading and writing and thus improve their general knowledge. If there are no exams and tests, then students will not put any effort into learning and education. Exams produce a state of terror that forces children to study. Moreover, exams bring students together, they do combine studies which help them to learn the essence of teamwork and they develop communication skills. Lastly, exams develop a sense of competition which also draws students towards books.

On the other hand, exams do have some disadvantages as well. While competition can be encouraging for some, it is a major source of immense pressure on students, often leading to depression. When students do not get good grades, they are discouraged and at the same time they are forced, both by the teachers and the parents, to work hard, putting them under more pressure. Now more and more students are involved in drug addiction to relieve exam pressure.

To recapitulate, I concede that exams can be discouraging for the students in some ways, but this does not mean that they should be removed from the system. The advantages of exams outweigh their disadvantages. Students should be tested and then upgraded but at the same time weaker students should be given special help to improve.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Vietjack official store
Đăng ký gói thi VIP

VIP +1 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 1 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +3 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 3 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +6 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 6 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +12 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 12 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay