Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:
Giải bởi Vietjack
Sample 1:
Freedom is always a matter of controversy as there is no particular rule or limit to it. Each person has their own definition of freedom. In a similar way, allowing young children to make their own decisions on basic matters has brought up different views from different groups of people. In this essay, different avenues on the given topic will be explored to help us decide on the amount of freedom children should be given without hampering their personality.
It is a common belief that to make one strong, one should be allowed to take their own decisions and fight their fears, even if they do not succeed in the end. In the same way, in the developing years of a child, he/she should be allowed to make decisions, even if they are minor ones, like clothes, food, entertainment. If their decision-making qualities are cultivated from an early age, they will become independent individuals when they grow up. But some people think that the trait of individuality is synonymous with being selfish or caring less about other individuals. This is because they tend to generalize the concept that if one takes own decisions without taking others into consideration, it is selfishness. Being self-centered has nothing to do with making own decisions from a young age. They can be egotistical for different reasons like pampering, lack of guidance, dearth of awareness between right and wrong, among others.
In some cases, young children tend to get used to making decisions on their own and get diverted in the process. For example, a child is allowed to eat junk food all the time and spend his time idling with friends. If he continues to do this on his own, after a certain time, his health might be affected, or he might end up with wrong ‘friends’. As they grow up, they are accustomed to the idea that as it is their life, all decisions should be theirs alone. This might make them impervious to the needs of others or their needs before others.
To conclude, I would like to say that the role of parents or elders is extremely crucial in the development of decision-making and the amiable personality of an individual. If the child is not properly guided at home, he/she can become narrow-minded. So, it is the close relatives who can mentor the young generation to grow on their own and at the same time instill a sense of responsibility and help them understand the difference between right and wrong. It will not only help them in the long run but also create a better society for everyone.
Sample 2:
One common area of debate among parents is the extent to which children should be trusted to make their own decisions and the potential impact this will have on their sense of responsibility. Although decision-making skills will help in some ways, I believe parents should dictate choices for children in order to make them more aware of others.
On the one hand, children who have been allowed to make their own choices will eventually develop a keen sense of responsibilty. This can be best seen in two contrasting examples of helicopter parents and more liberal parents. Helicopter parents smother their children with attention and make the majority of their decisions for them. Over time, these kids will likely become dependent on their parents. If your parents always pick out your clothes then you never have to check weather forecasts, make choices about what colours match or concern yourself with trends in fashion. Later in life, these kids will not have developed any of these skills because of their parents. Contrast this with children who pick out their own clothes; they will have to consider these factors carefully and it will make them more responsible when it comes to shopping and taking care of their wardrobe.
On the other hand, I still believe that parents should make the majority of choices so that children will be more responsible towards others. For example, some parents have made the logical and ethical choice to be vegetarians, and they force their children to do the same. This can have a positive effect not only on their individual health but also on the environment. Moreover, it is a learning opportunity for parents to teach their offspring about ethics. Parents can make the argument that industrial farming is inhumane, and animals should be treated with more respect. This may have a carry-over effect resulting in their children growing up to be more thoughtful towards others.
In conclusion, parents should make most decisions for children to guide them to be more empathetic. They should work with teachers in their efforts to raise conscientous future citizens.
Sample 3:
Critics are concerned that children will be endangered if they are given freedom of choice, while others believe that they will be better equipped to handle the future consequences of their acts if given such freedom. In this essay, I'll compare and contrast the two perspectives in question and express my conclusion.
First, there is the risk that letting kids use their thinking will have undesirable results. Several studies have found that youngsters who are more capable of making their own decisions are more likely to disobey parental rules and expectations. In addition, they don't have the life background or perspective to make some choices. Children will inevitably make numerous blunders if they do not heed parental guidance.
In addition, kids might be able to pick up some useful lessons from this conduct. The experience could help kids learn to be accountable for their actions. If they have been trained by their parents to look out for themselves, they will be able to make good decisions and prioritise what matters most to them. Furthermore, it may help kids learn to make ethical choices as adults. Finally, children may be better prepared to respond correctly when faced with challenging situations.
In conclusion, allowing adolescents to make their own decisions may have a wide range of unintended consequences. However, this strategy could be effective if parents take the time to teach their children about right and wrong in the actual world. Students will be able to make informed decisions since they will have access to criteria and resources.
Sample 4:
Individuals in modern societies are given more and more freedom as they mature, including the freedom to decide for themselves how they will spend their time and what they will consume as part of their daily routines. While some may think that this trait reflects a person's inherent selfishness, others may disagree. I see this as a good thing since it has the ability to make them feel more accountable.
One benefit of letting children pursue their interests in their daily life is that they become mature and responsible people. Because of what they've done, they have no choice but to strive for perfection rather than just the highest possible degree and settle for nothing less than world supremacy. The opposite may be true, young people may become more egocentric if they utilise this approach. If people could simply learn about themselves and accept that as the ideal, they would stop appreciating the differences among others.
In my opinion, the formation of such a style makes adults more successful when attempting to take action by helping them see their own bad and positive sides. If they stop to think about their actions and learn from them, they might be able to accomplish more of what they set out to do. It is the responsibility of parents to instill in their children a healthy level of tolerance and acceptance of the needs and points of view of others.
To sum up, allowing newborns some autonomy in the day-to-day decisions that affect their development and success is crucial. However, you should approach this from an entirely selfish perspective.
Sample 5:
Few people believe that allowing children to make their judgments about everyday tasks would lead to our society being more egotistical. On the other hand, some people believe that it is vital for parents to make decisions that will have an impact on their children's minds. The article that follows both supports the viewpoint of individuals who hold the opposing view and presents reasons in support of my position.
First, some people believe that giving young adults greater independence has had a variety of unfavourable effects, including the general public's propensity to think exclusively of themselves and the erasure of the foundation of humanity, which stipulates that we must help our neighbours in need. Additionally, as time has passed, people have grown to have nothing more than respect for the poor, homeless, and orphaned. As a result, the country is in a jungle-like environment where everyone is focused on their family members.
Furthermore, supporters of the idea contend that the implementation of this plan is essential because it would result in the development of children's minds, ideas, and perspectives by relieving them of any concerns that might divert their attention from the activities of their day-to-day lives and the responsibilities they face. In addition, they would be able to exhibit an adequate amount of self-assurance when confronted with challenges in their future lives and when required to make challenging decisions. In addition, the children who take part in this program develop into responsible adults far more quickly than their peers.
In conclusion, I believe that the latter strategy, which was briefly stated above, is preferable since it is incredibly helpful for children's mental and physical health to avoid having too many limits placed on them in their personal lives. So that's why I agree with this viewpoint.
Sample 6:
Some people claim that if children are allowed to make everyday decisions, society may become full of selfish individualists, while others argue that it is important for children to make up their own minds about matters that impact them. I agree with the former viewpoint because children may develop the habit of being self-centered if given the right to decide on mundane matters.
On the one hand, empowering children to make choices in their daily lives hones their decision-making skills. The reason is that if they don't weigh their options carefully and make the right decisions, there will be consequences. For example, children who choose to indulge in ice cream every day may become overweight and be laughed at by their peers. Consequently, they learn the importance of choosing healthy food over short-term pleasure. However, I do not think this is a good way to help children become better at decision-making because they are too young to be mentally strong enough to face the consequences of their bad decisions.
On the other hand, complying with all of children's everyday wishes may result in them forming the habit of selfishness. This is because when allowed to choose whatever they want to eat or wear on a daily basis, they may become accustomed to not caring about other people's preferences when making a decision. This habit will stay with them as they grow up, creating a selfish society. I agree with this argument because I have seen many second-generation rich children raised like this and become very self-centered adults as a result.
In conclusion, although children may become better decision-makers if allowed to decide on ordinary matters, I think this is more likely to lead them to develop the habit of selfishness, thus producing a society of self-centered individuals.
Sample 7:
The question of whether children should be allowed to make their own choices on everyday matters is a complex one. Some argue that giving children too much autonomy will lead to a society of individuals who only think about their own desires, while others believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them.
On one hand, some argue that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters can lead to a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. This can include children becoming picky eaters, choosing to only wear certain types of clothing, and only engaging in activities that they find entertaining. These children may become accustomed to always getting what they want and may not learn the value of compromise and patience.
On the other hand, some argue that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them. This can include allowing children to choose what they eat, what they wear, and what activities they engage in. This can help children to develop autonomy and self-confidence, as well as learning how to make decisions and take responsibility for their actions. Additionally, giving children the opportunity to make decisions about matters that affect them can help them to learn the value of independence.
To sum up, giving them the autonomy and the opportunity to make their own choices allows them to learn and grow, but it is also important to teach them the importance of concession as well as give and take, and not to let them become too self-centered. This can be achieved by setting boundaries and providing guidance on decision making, while still giving children the opportunity to express their own preferences.
Sample 8:
The ongoing debate surrounding whether children should have the autonomy to make decisions on daily matters has raised questions about its potential impact on society. While some argue that granting children this freedom may lead to a self-centered society, others emphasize the importance of nurturing decision-making skills to foster autonomy and responsibility.
Advocates for children making their own choices believe that this autonomy contributes to the development of independent thinkers. Allowing children to decide on aspects like food, clothes, and entertainment empowers them to explore preferences and interests, cultivating a strong sense of self and the ability to make informed decisions. This approach is seen as crucial for shaping responsible individuals capable of navigating life’s complexities with confidence.
However, opponents express concerns about the potential for a self-centered society if decision-making is left unchecked in early stages. They argue that a lack of guidance may result in children growing up with limited understanding of the consequences their choices can have on themselves and others.
In my view, a balanced approach is essential. Providing children with decision-making opportunities is crucial, yet equally important is instilling a sense of responsibility and consideration for others. Parents and educators play a pivotal role in guiding children, offering support and teaching the importance of thoughtful decision-making.
In conclusion, finding the right balance between autonomy and responsibility is key when allowing children to make choices on everyday matters. Empowering them to make decisions can foster independence and critical thinking skills, but this should be accompanied by guidance to ensure the development of a sense of responsibility and an awareness of the impact of their choices on the broader society.
Sample 9:
Allowing children to make their own decisions regarding food, clothing, and entertainment is a topic that is frequently debated. Others argue that it is important for children to make decisions that affect them, despite the fact that some believe it may contribute to the development of egocentric individuals. This essay will examine both perspectives and present my own viewpoint.
On the one hand, proponents of allowing children to make their own decisions contend that it promotes autonomy and critical thinking. Allowing children to make their own decisions helps them develop a sense of autonomy, learn from their errors, and mature into responsible adults. In addition, it encourages children to investigate their preferences and form their own distinctive identities.
On the other hand, critics argue that an excessive amount of freedom can lead to egotism and disregard for others. They believe that guidance and structure are necessary for children to develop a sense of empathy and comprehend the repercussions of their actions. Without proper guidance, children may prioritise their own wants without regard for the impact on others or on society as a whole.
I believe that a balanced approach is essential. Children should be encouraged to make decisions that directly influence them, such as selecting their own clothing and extracurricular activities. This helps them develop self-assurance, autonomy, and decision-making abilities. However, it is equally essential for parents and guardians to provide guidance and establish boundaries when it comes to issues with broader implications or those affect the well-being of others.
Ultimately, enabling children to make their own decisions can foster autonomy and critical thinking skills. Nonetheless, it is crucial to achieve a balance by providing guidance and teaching children to consider the repercussions of their choices. Empowering children while imparting empathy and responsibility can contribute to their development as well-rounded people.
Sample 10:
People have different views about whether children should be given the privilege of making their own decisions. While giving them absolute freedom to make choices in daily life is likely to encourage selfishness, I tend to agree with the idea that independent decision-making is of paramount importance for adulthood.
A common criticism of giving children too much freedom is that they would become narrow-minded and self-centred. Allowing children to always choose the things they want and not have to follow the advice of others may lead them to be too independently minded. This character trait may be a hindrance in later life, in terms of cooperating with other people in a team and especially when leading an organisation. In these situations, listening to and considering the ideas and opinions of others is of great importance. Take, for example, a group presentation in which a team has to work together, meaning a lot of decisions have to be made. Each group member will have to point out the pros and cons of their own ideas and learn to be tolerant and accept other viewpoints at the same time.
However, the possibility of becoming uncooperative does not necessarily mean children’s rights to make decisions should be restricted. Firstly, overprotective parents, who always intervene and dictate every aspect of their children’s lives, would definitely create bad habits for children, making them dependent and even losing the ability to manage their own lives in the future. This is evidenced by the fact that in many fields employers wouldn’t hire an employee who cannot think for themself and use their own initiative. Secondly, effective decision-making skill, which is difficult and involves various steps, such as evaluating situations, considering alternatives…needs prolonged, consistent practice over a long period to master. That is why giving children opportunities to make their own choices is so beneficial.
In conclusion, the advantages of encouraging independent decision-making during childhood are more significant than the possibility of children growing up to be selfish. This includes effective team working skills and being tolerant of others’ opinions. Parents should therefore give up strict control over their children’s choices and play their part in guiding and advising children to make their own informed decisions.
Sample 11:
The question of whether children should be given autonomy to make their own choices on daily matters or guided by adults has been a subject of debate in parenting and educational circles. On one hand, some argue that empowering children to decide on various aspects of their lives is advisable. Conversely, others contend that excessive freedom may lead to self-centeredness and a lack of consideration for societal norms. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own stance on the issue.
When teens are given room to make their own decisions, their brains learn how to make hard choices by weighing both sides of their decision. More importantly, it helps them reduce the stress of feeling helpless or controlled by someone else. In school, teachers boost students’ self-reliance and independence when they allow students to make choices, explain the purpose of an assignment, and seek feedback about the helpfulness of their homework rather than spoon-feeding them. This also fosters a mentor relationship and demonstrates respect, while growing their students’ critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
Although parents owe their children to experience everything possible, letting children decide on every decision all the time is an irrational thing to do. Since teens are not mature enough to deal with the true realities of real life, they usually rush to a decision and then encounter many unexpected consequences. A more serious counterproductive effect is they become more selfish because they may never take the benefits of others into consideration. For instance, children who are at liberty to eat, wear and play whatever they like will never think of whether their parents can afford their interests or share the same tastes.
In conclusion, while allowing children to make decisions about matters that affect them can promote autonomy and decision-making skills, it is crucial for adults to provide guidance and boundaries to ensure their well-being and the development of empathy and social responsibility. A balanced approach that combines autonomy with guidance is essential to nurture confident, independent individuals who are mindful of the needs and values of society.
Sample 12:
Children in the current generation are advanced in terms of their behaviour and psychology while their mentality differs from their parent's generation. While some believe that children need to be allowed to make decisions of their own which especially are based on their own lives. However, some people believe that allowing children to make their own decisions would make them selfish. The following essay would discuss both sides of the argument and I would eventually give my opinion.
Some people believe that parents’ involvement in every decision made by children, from the clothes they wear to the food they choose, is essential. People argue that children might grow up to become a person who only thinks about their own wishes and needs if they are allowed to make decisions solely on their own.
However, contrary to this opinion is another argument which considers that children should be allowed to make their own decisions on things which affect them. Whether it's the choice of clothes or the type of entertainment they watch, children should be allowed to make their own choices. This is an important requirement which would help children learn from their mistakes, understand what is good or bad and grow as more mature people. It would make them more confident as a human being who has the knowledge to make their own decisions.
Thus, in my opinion, allowing children to make their own decisions which affect them would make them more confident and the involvement of parents can be considered when necessary for their children.
Sample 13:
People believe that when children are allowed to make decisions on their own in terms of food or clothes or entertainment, they tend to grow up thinking only about themselves. However, some people argue that children need to make their own decisions in places that affect them. In lieu of discussing both sides, I would present my opinion in support of the latter.
People consider that children are young and do not have the ability to make their own decisions. Some people consider that children making their own decisions might end up focusing only on their own wishes. Moreover, people think that allowing children to make decisions in food and clothing might make them self-centres and hence, not consider other’ opinions for their lives.
However, some people argue that making their own decisions by children from a young age would help them become self-dependent and they would be able to grow as confident people. Having an opinion on things is important especially if it affects the person and their lives. Accordingly, having the trait of an independent person makes them more efficient and helps them overcome their fears effectively. However, it is important to consider the fact that children need to be guided by their parents and elders in terms of their choices like food, which needs to be healthy rather than junk and the need for a healthy lifestyle by being physically active.
To conclude, I might opine that children need to be raised in a way that they are able to make their own decisions thereby being independent of their choices. However, it is the responsibility of the parents to allow them to make decisions while simultaneously also guiding them towards making better choices.
Sample 14:
Whether children should make their own decisions is a contentious issue, with some opposing the idea because they believe children may become self-centered, while others argue that children should have a say in decisions that affect their lives. While I would discuss both sides of the opinion, my support would be placed for the latter.
People consider that when children are growing up, they need to be trained and guided by their parents and any decision regarding their life needs to be made by them. From choice of clothes to type of entertainment, people consider that children should not be allowed to make decisions whether big or small. People argue that making their own decisions from a young age would make children self-centred and thereby overlook others’ requirements and needs. However, considering parents’ guidance, children need that to understand the differences between what is good or bad for them. For instance, parents' guidance is required for imparting knowledge about healthy food, exercise and a healthy lifestyle rather than junk food and an inactive lifestyle.
On the other hand, some people argue that children should be allowed to make decisions of their own, especially the ones where their lives are affected. Accordingly, children should be self-dependent and need to know from a young age about how to live an independent life whether washing one’s own clothes, choosing a career field or playing a sport. This makes them not only independent of their choices but also develops their confidence, making them trust themself and believe that their parents respect their choices.
Hence, people might argue that children would become selfish if they are let to make their own decisions, I certainly believe that independence of one’s choices and decisions should be allowed from a young age.
Sample 15:
The goal of good parenting is to empower children to develop well. All humans are required to make millions of decisions throughout their lives, and their capacity to do this has a direct effect on their happiness and success. Certain individuals restrict their children’s decisions because they want to make sure that their kids always go down the right path; others, however, give freedom of choice to their kids so that they develop independence. I believe that a balance of both, whereby parents guide their children’s decisions, is best for children’s development.
Certain parents control their children’s daily decisions on diet, clothing, exercise and learning because they believe that they know better what has beneficial results, and they desire to minimize harm and maximize benefit for their offspring. I noticed that my friend, Andrew, never allows his four-year-old son, Alex, to eat what he desires, instead he is always feeding him with fruits, vegetables and fish; otherwise, Alex would eat chocolate for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Nevertheless, this leads children, like Alex, to lack confidence when needing to make choices.
In light of this notion, many parents encourage their children to make choices for themselves, and to learn from their own mistakes, by allowing them to eat, wear and watch whatever they want. My friend, Susan, lets her eight-year-old son, Tim, watch violent superhero cartoons, because she feels that he enjoys this more than watching educational shows, and that he can learn right from wrong in other ways, and develop a sense of independence quickly. However, at times this can be risky as highly independent children may encounter much conflict during their upbringing in society.
Therefore, I believe that the optimal approach for children’s decision-making process is to give kids the ability to choose withing certain parameters and with feedback. In this way, children are not only kept safe and happy, but also encouraged to develop critical thinking and self-reliance which is of great benefit for them and society. In fact, with my four-year-old daughter Sybella, I always discuss options for food and entertainment whereby she gets to choose from a healthy selection. As a result, I feel that she is confident in making her own choices while developing nicely, both mentally and physically.
In conclusion, there are logical reasons for both parenting styles, those parents that give great freedom to their kids and those that do not. However, an extreme in each case does carry with it negative repercussions. So, it is my belief that a balanced approach provides optimal nurturing of offspring which in turn leads to a confident future society.
Sample 16:
In some cases, it’s a good signal for children to make their own decisions, but everything has both positive and negative effects, none can be done perfectly. We should provide necessary guidance to help them grow up.
I may only agree with the point that children can make their own choices in some matters, and the time goes by, more rights should be given to them, because it’s almost impossible for children to make their own choices when children are 4 years old, and it’s a bit unrealistic, but it can be possible that children can choose what they eat, what they wear when they are in secondary schools, then children can choose what they want to do when they are college students. During the life of their growing up, children usually fail to control themselves like adults due to a lack of experience, a necessary guidance is of great importance to them.
What’s more, I strongly agree that children should learn to make decisions, if every decision is made by their parents, they may lose the ability to make any choices in their later life and become too dependent on other people. What the parents’ responsibility is to help them to live independently, children should acquire most kinds of skills, including decision making.
As for myself, my parents often told me to pay more attention to self-security and healthy eating, but they rarely interfered with my decision making in my daily life. I felt so lucky, because I could do what I wanted to do, but as to my friends, most of them were under rigid control by their parents, they had to study and be at home without caring about other things, I felt sympathy for them. Anyway, we all grow up, I become a postgraduate and continue to study, but they no longer have a chance to be admitted into a university. In a large part, I can do what I am willing to do, but they just can’t master their fate anymore.
All in all, there is no doubt that making decisions in their childhood is indispensable, parents should put much emphasis on it.
Sample 17:
To what extent children should be given freedom of choice on everyday issues like food, clothes, TV programmes, and free-time activities has sparked heated debate. With unlimited freedom, according to many, children are likely to become self-centred and they naturally think of their own desires only. However, others believe children should make their own decisions as it helps grow a sense of responsibility in them. But, in my opinion, parents ought to dictate their children’s choices so as to make them more conscious of others.
Children who have absolute freedom in daily matters start believing that they can do whatever they want. And when those children grow up, they are likely to believe that their own wishes are important while everything else is secondary. Consequently, they become egocentric adults resulting in a society of selfish individuals.
On the contrary, children who are allowed to make their own decisions will naturally develop a keen sense of responsibility. That is to say, they will learn how to take responsibility for their actions. Also, this practice helps them develop problem-solving skills through trial and error. The rationale behind the view is that natural consequences are the best teacher.
However, I firmly believe that parents should often dictate children’s choice as these children are not fully mature and capable of making suitable decisions. Many a time, children’s decisions are not based on experience or knowledge. A case in point is junk food which is detrimental to health, but a favourite for most children. If given the freedom, many children would prefer to eat fast food all day long. If parents allow them to eat such junk food regularly, children will become morbidly obese, which in turn will increase the risk of heart disease and reduce their lifespan. Therefore, parents should give dietary advice and often control what their offsprings eat.
To conclude, how much liberty children should be given on everyday matters is a controversial topic. Although decision-making rights help them in some ways, I think parents ought to dictate their choices to some extent so that they can make the right choices and they can learn to honour others’ opinions and decisions.
Hot: 1000+ Đề thi cuối kì 1 file word cấu trúc mới 2025 Toán, Văn, Anh... lớp 1-12 (chỉ từ 60k). Tải ngay
Sách thầy cô Vietjack biên soạn:
- Sổ tay dẫn chứng nghị luận xã hội năm 2025 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay Giáo dục Kinh tế & Pháp luật 12 (chương trình mới) ( 18.000₫ )
- Sổ tay lớp 12 các môn Toán, Lí, Hóa, Văn, Sử, Địa, KTPL (chương trình mới) ( 36.000₫ )
- Tuyển tập 30 đề thi đánh giá năng lực Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội, TP Hồ Chí Minh (2 cuốn) ( 150.000₫ )
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải
Sample 1:
In the current era, with the level of scientific advancement that has been achieved, technology has become a necessitous part of our existence and has eased many issues in our lives. This has led many people to think that all vehicles will be automated and will no longer require drivers in the imminent decades. From my perspective, I think the advantages of driverless automobiles eclipse their drawbacks.
Firstly, automated conveyances will reduce the risk of accidents caused by drivers. The element of human error, which is responsible for making 94% of all accidents, will be terminated. People will be able to travel safely even when they are too weary or otherwise unfit to drive. Additionally, senior citizens and others who may have problems with driving can commute safely in driverless cars. It will allow people to disburse the time spent commuting in other ways. Lastly, research has suggested that the introduction of automated vehicles on roads will reduce energy expenditure and pollution, which indicates that they will be a much more environmentally friendly option of transport.
However, there are some disadvantages to ushering in driverless modes of transport. Firstly, it will eliminate the jobs of several drivers whose livelihoods are directly contingent on them driving vehicles. Some people may also struggle with comprehending the technological aspects of automated transportation which may lead them to be fearful of such vehicles. Lastly, the costs involved in driverless conveyances may not be affordable, leading those to be inaccessible to several people.
Thus, in conclusion, it can be said that while automated transportation may have a few shortcomings, its beneficial aspects largely overshadow them, making driverless vehicles a welcome technological innovation for the future.
Sample 2:
In the future, vehicles can function without drivers, and the only ones inside will be passengers. In my opinion, the benefits this trend can bring totally outweigh the drawbacks.
On the one hand, the use of driverless vehicles may put human drivers out of work, which increases the unemployment rate in this sector. This situation can cause a number of financial and social problems that both the unemployed drivers and the authorities have to deal with. However, it can soon be compensated as there are still a range of other employment opportunities for unemployed bus or truck drivers. For example, businesses that use driverless vehicles will need more people in other departments such as vehicle maintenance, and this can bring work to those who have lost their job as drivers.
On the other hand, autonomous cars can offer a number of benefits once broadly developed. First, they can reduce the number of road fatalities as computer drivers are not prone to common mistakes like drunk driving or speeding that human drivers often make. This can ensure better road safety in general. Second, this development is beneficial for those who are restricted from driving, such as the handicapped or the elderly. With driverless cars, they can travel by themselves and no longer have to depend on other people or public transport.
In conclusion, I believe that the development of driverless vehicles is a beneficial trend. It may cause human drivers to lose their jobs, but these vehicles can increase road safety and allow even those unable to drive, like the handicapped, to travel on their own.
Sample 3:
In the face of rapid technological advancements, the emergence of driverless vehicles has become a reality, and it is projected that within a couple of decades, all cars will operate without human intervention. From my perspective, the benefits of driverless cars will far outweigh the potential drawbacks.
Firstly, it is important to acknowledge that driverless cars pose certain risks, including accidents and casualties, in the event of technological malfunction. As these vehicles are controlled by software and technology, the risk of devastating accidents due to bugs or hacking cannot be entirely eliminated. Furthermore, not all roads, particularly those in developing nations with poor infrastructure and insufficient road signals, are suitable for autonomous vehicles to operate smoothly.
However, the benefits of driverless cars far outweigh the potential risks. In terms of road safety, technology-made mistakes are significantly fewer than those made by human drivers. According to statistics, human drivers are responsible for hundreds, if not thousands, of casualties each day worldwide. With the introduction of autonomous cars, accidents would reduce dramatically, making roads safer for all. Additionally, millions of hours could be saved each day as individuals would no longer need to spend time driving, leading to increased productivity and a boost in the national economy.
In conclusion, driverless vehicles offer numerous benefits such as road safety and economic benefits. While there are potential drawbacks, these can be mitigated through proper regulation and addressing software-related issues. Overall, driverless cars represent a revolutionary technology that has the potential to greatly benefit society.
Sample 4:
As technological advancements continue to accelerate, the emergence of autonomous vehicles has become a tangible reality, with projections suggesting that within the next several decades, all cars will operate without the need for human intervention. In my opinion, the advantages of these driverless cars will far outweigh any potential drawbacks.
One of the primary drawbacks of autonomous cars is the risk of accidents and casualties resulting from technological malfunctions. The vehicles are controlled by software and technology, and while efforts are being made to minimize the potential for bugs or hacking, the possibility of devastating accidents cannot be entirely eliminated. Additionally, not all roads, particularly those in developing nations with inadequate infrastructure, are suitable for the operation of these vehicles.
Nevertheless, when it comes to road safety and casualties, technology-related mistakes are significantly fewer than those made by human drivers. Despite isolated incidents involving accidents with driverless cars, it is important to note that human drivers are responsible for a vast number of casualties on a daily basis worldwide. The widespread implementation of autonomous cars has the potential to greatly reduce accidents and improve road safety for all. Furthermore, the elimination of the need for human drivers would result in saving millions of hours each day, increasing productivity and boosting the national economy.
In conclusion, while there are potential drawbacks to the widespread use of driverless vehicles, the advantages, particularly in terms of road safety and economic benefits, far outweigh any potential negatives. It is expected that through proper regulation and addressing software-related issues, we can fully realize the benefits of this revolutionary technology.
Sample 5:
A future filled with driverless vehicles is an inevitability. In my opinion, though there are concomitant moral risks, the practical import for health of such a seismic shift will be positive on the whole.
Critics of this trend suggest that machines should not be responsible for the potential loss of human life. This argument rests on the fact that when there is an accident involving humans, it is possible to either assess blame and assign punishment or accept that human error played a role. In contrast, an individual severely injured as the result of a collision caused by a machine may justly feel that all human autonomy and free will is absent from their fate. This is analogous to a natural disaster with the crucial distinction being that humanity has engineered the situation. It is human nature to prefer to control a situation rather than surrender the outcome to an autonomous machine.
Proponents of automated vehicles, on the other hand, argue the tangible ramifications concerning public safety. The evidence overwhelmingly suggests that driverless vehicles cause fewer accidents than humans. The reason for this is that humans are prone to errors related to fatigue, distractions such as smartphones, and, in some cases, altered states. Machines might experience the occasional technical error; however, they are far more consistent by comparison. In fact, the few accidents that have occurred with automated vehicles were the fault of human drivers. If all cars were driverless, this would enable a greater level of sophistication that could, theoretically, all but eliminate automobile accidents.
In conclusion, though many accidents will occur without human agency playing a role, safer roads fully justify this innovation. Companies and consumers must be wary of the influence of automation while also embracing its most transparent benefits.
Sample 6:
Autonomous technology and its implementation vehicle manufacture have gained enormous publicity in the past few years. Since the first car with limited self-driving capabilities was on trial, progress in this field has gathered pace rapidly. For this reason, driverless vehicles are believed to rule the roadways in the future. While such development brings certain benefits, I believe that the drawbacks are far more significant.
On the one hand, there are some major advantages when automated vehicles are delivered on the roads. Firstly, these models provide easy access to individuals with physical difficulties. To illustrate, disabled travelers normally have to rely on other people if they need a ride. Yet when their cars can automatically handle driving, they enjoy the travel autonomy, getting food from a restaurant or picking up the laundry themselves. In other words, the mobility obstacles they have to encounter day to day will be surmounted. Secondly, automation may help reduce the detrimental effects that regular vehicles have on the environment. As drivers often misuse gas and brakes, they carelessly allow the car to burn more fuel than it needs; conversely, self-driving vehicles can be programmed to work in an energy-efficient way, and to travel on the most convenient routes, hence consuming less fuel, curbing the emissions released into the air.
On the other hand, I think the hurdles that stem from hands-free driving cannot be overlooked, one of which includes the difficulties in ensuring its reliability. Resembling a computer system, programmable driverless vehicles are prone to technical glitches, which cause them to malfunction on their journey. To make matters worse, if a collision occurs with passen- mat gers (occupants) on board, the consequence must be destructive. In addition, the fact that drivers are no longer needed for vehicle operation can deprive people of their livelihoods. For example, those who work in trucking, public transits, and delivery services would find their roles obsolete in an autonomous future. This can contribute to the increasing unemployment rate of the nation.
In conclusion, although the introduction of fully driverless vehicles could lead to both positive and negative consequences, I am of the opinion that its advantages are shadowed by the grave disadvantages.
Sample 7:
The advent of autonomous vehicles heralds a transformative era in transportation, envisaging a future where cars, buses, and trucks navigate without human intervention. This essay contends that the benefits of driverless vehicles, particularly in enhancing safety and optimizing traffic flow, substantially outweigh their potential drawbacks. The ensuing discussion will delve into the implications for road safety and traffic efficiency.
Primarily, the integration of driverless technology promises a significant reduction in traffic accidents, which are predominantly caused by human error. Autonomous vehicles, equipped with advanced sensors and artificial intelligence, can react to hazards more swiftly than a human driver, thereby mitigating the risk of collisions. For instance, Google's autonomous car project has demonstrated an exemplary safety record in trial phases, underscoring the potential for such technology to save lives. Moreover, driverless vehicles can communicate with each other to maintain optimal speed and distance, effectively reducing the incidences of traffic congestion and enhancing the overall flow on roadways.
Furthermore, the advent of autonomous transport systems offers the prospect of optimizing traffic management, leading to more efficient use of infrastructure and reduced environmental impact. Driverless vehicles can operate closer together and at higher speeds in a coordinated manner, maximizing road capacity and significantly curtailing traffic jams. This coordination could lead to smoother traffic patterns and lower emissions due to decreased idle times. Additionally, the increased efficiency and predictability in transportation networks can bolster economic productivity by reducing the time wasted in traffic, showcasing a profound impact beyond mere convenience.
In summary, despite challenges such as technological reliability and legal hurdles, the merits of driverless vehicles, notably in enhancing safety and improving traffic flow, are persuasive. They offer a significant reduction in road fatalities and the promise of transforming urban mobility into more efficient, less congested systems. Thus, the advantages of adopting autonomous vehicles decidedly eclipse the drawbacks, heralding a major leap towards a safer, more streamlined future in transportation.
Sample 8:
The horizon of transportation is on the brink of a revolution with the advent of driverless technology, promising a landscape where vehicles operate without human drivers, ferrying passengers alone. This essay posits that the advantages, particularly in revolutionizing urban mobility and reducing environmental impact, significantly outshine the drawbacks. The focus will be on the transformation of urban spaces and the environmental benefits.
Driverless vehicles stand to redefine urban landscapes significantly by liberating vast tracts of land currently consumed by parking lots and garages. With these vehicles in constant use rather than sitting idle, cities can repurpose these areas to facilitate the creation of lush green spaces and vibrant pedestrian zones, thus markedly enhancing the quality of urban life. For example, Singapore's ambitious Smart Nation initiative aims to reduce the need for private vehicle ownership, envisioning a future city enriched with more green spaces and communal areas, made possible through the adoption of autonomous vehicles. This visionary approach exemplifies how driverless technology could transform urban environments, making them more livable and sustainable.
Furthermore, the environmental advantages of driverless cars are both profound and wide-reaching. By utilizing advanced algorithms to optimize routes, these vehicles can significantly reduce traffic congestion, thereby lowering emissions. Additionally, autonomous vehicles can accelerate the shift towards electric cars, as their efficient operation aligns perfectly with the charging requirements of electric batteries. In pioneering cities like Los Angeles, where pilot programs for autonomous, electric fleets are already making strides, early data suggests a potential reduction in carbon emissions by up to an impressive 60% with a full transition to these cleaner, more efficient fleets. This underscores the critical role driverless technology can play in achieving environmental sustainability goals and reducing our carbon footprint on a global scale.
In conclusion, despite potential cybersecurity and ethical challenges, the benefits of driverless vehicles - transforming urban spaces and enhancing environmental sustainability - are clear. They promise a future of efficient, eco-friendly transport, leading to more livable, greener cities. Thus, embracing driverless technology is a key step forward in solving today's urban and environmental issues.
Sample 9:
While transportation revolution, driven by the relentless evolution of artificial intelligence, might introduce new concerns such as technological reliability and job displacement, the potential of these vehicles to significantly enhance road safety and boost productivity, coupled with the emergence of new job opportunities in sectors related to autonomous technology, solidifies my belief that the advantages of this transportation revolution outweigh the associated drawbacks.
Delving into the potential pitfalls first, one major apprehension is the reliability of this advanced technology. For instance, a glitch in the machine learning algorithms or sensor systems that guide these autonomous vehicles could have catastrophic implications for passenger safety and broader traffic flow. In addition, the transition towards driverless vehicles could significantly impact on the livelihood of those employed in the transportation industry, from taxi drivers to truck operators. This abrupt shift could exacerbate unemployment rates and subsequently stir social unrest. Nonetheless, juxtaposing these challenges with the benefits offered by autonomous vehicles offers a brighter outlook.
Technological concerns, while valid, are mitigated by the fact that meticulously maintained machines are less error-prone than humans, who often cause accidents due to driving under the influence, fatigue, or distraction. Thus, autonomous vehicles could contribute markedly to road safety enhancement. Additionally, self-driving vehicles could revolutionize productivity. Freed from the necessity to drive, professionals could utilize travel time for work tasks. A recent McKinsey study predicts productivity gains equivalent to 50 minutes per person per day with widespread adoption of autonomous vehicles. In addition, the technological shift causing job displacement is undoubtedly a pressing concern. However, history shows that when certain jobs become obsolete, new opportunities arise. The autonomous vehicle industry could create jobs in areas like data analysis, vehicle service, and software development.
In conclusion, despite apprehensions regarding technology reliability and job losses, I maintain that, with prudent regulation, autonomous vehicles hold the potential to significantly improve road safety and productivity. Therefore, while cars, buses and trucks will be driverless, the transition to this phase will promise a safer and more efficient journey in the future.
Sample 10:
As we witness the relentless march of technology, the prophecy of fully autonomous vehicles becoming the norm rather than an exception looms on the horizon. Despite the plausible challenges that this transition might present, I am firmly convinced that the potential benefits engendered by driverless vehicles profoundly outweigh the attendant disadvantages.
One of the fundamental challenges of this evolution pertains to the reliability of artificial intelligence. A slight malfunction in the system, such as a flaw in the navigation algorithms or sensor technology, could have dire implications for passenger safety and could disrupt the harmony of traffic flow. Furthermore, the tidal wave of automation threatens to engulf countless jobs in the transportation industry, potentially triggering spikes in unemployment and consequent social instability.
Nevertheless, these prospective impediments should be assessed in the context of the transformative advantages offered by autonomous vehicles. Technological worries, albeit valid, can be alleviated by the reality that machine errors, assuming regular maintenance and software updates, are substantially less frequent than human-induced accidents. Current traffic mishaps primarily stem from human fallibility, such as impaired or distracted driving. Autonomous vehicles, devoid of these frailties, could significantly elevate road safety standards.
Moreover, the dawn of self-driving vehicles could herald an era of unparalleled productivity. Liberated from the reins of the steering wheel, individuals could effectively utilise travel time for personal or professional purposes. A study by Stanford University suggests that the widespread adoption of autonomous vehicles could potentially save billions of productive hours annually. Furthermore, the challenge of job displacement, while significant, could trigger the emergence of new, unforeseen employment sectors, such as advanced vehicle maintenance, autonomous vehicle route management, and data analysis related to autonomous transport.
In conclusion, although the advent of autonomous vehicles presents genuine concerns pertaining to technological reliability and job loss, the potential for significant enhancements in road safety and productivity, coupled with the emergence of new employment sectors, tips the balance in favour of this technological revolution.
Sample 11:
There is a belief that some land vehicles such as cars, buses and lorries will serve without any drivers in the coming years. So, people in these machines will just be passengers. This situation may result in a lack of job opportunities and immediate interventions. In contrast, transferring drivers’ salaries into other areas and decreasing traffic accidents are essential benefits. In my opinion, considering these positive effects the advantages of non-driver vehicles outweigh the disadvantages.
Firstly, driverless vehicles mean losing jobs for some people. In this case, it will be hard to learn a new skill to afford living costs and it cannot be achieved in the short term. To be more precise, most drivers are non-university graduates, and they do not have any option to work except their current jobs. Secondly, there may not be any individuals to take action in an emergency, such as heart attack, to administer first aid or take the person to the hospital quickly.
On the other hand, it is an advantage to invest in other areas such as proper vehicle maintenance and purchasing environmentally-friendly ones. Thus, it will be more beneficial for society in the long term. These investments will be possible because there will not be any drivers who must be paid wages. Additionally, the most important benefit of this attempt is the possibility of less traffic accidents. According to a survey which was done globally by Allianz, being sleepy and exhausted are mostly the reasons for car crashes. The rate of accidents can be decreased by eliminating drivers from the traffic.
In conclusion, there is an increasing trend to release driverless vehicles into the market. Although there are drawbacks such as less job positions and a lack of expert in emergent cases in vehicles, advantages, namely decreased traffic accidents and increased investments, outweigh disadvantages.
Sample 12:
Driverless vehicles, such as automobiles, buses, lorries, and public transportation, will be available in the future as technology advances. Personally, I feel that automated cars will offer more advantages to traffic participation than drawbacks.
To begin with, self-driving automation can assist people reduce traffic accidents since some individuals do not follow traffic regulations. Furthermore, while employing autopilot vehicle services, businesses. It would not need to engage drivers to deliver their items to clients and assure the safety of passengers. Furthermore, it is appropriate for older and impaired travellers while moving someplace and reacting swiftly. When there is an impediment ahead or something unexpectedly passed by, such as animals or reckless pedestrians. For example, if you utilise a vehicle with an automatic driver, you may spend more time doing other things while driving.
Meanwhile, we still have numerous disadvantages, such as the loss of drivers, which will result in increased unemployment in the future. Another concern is that autonomous cars would have substantial repair or yearly maintenance expenditures, which would be both inconvenient and costly. For example, it would be a long-term procedure that wastes time and money for organisations. This would have removed all old moto drivers instead of driverless autos with training that costs an arm and a leg. However, if the government has a suitable policy for the people, problems will be handled, and automation may assist to drastically lowering the rate of accidents.
Finally, as far as I am concerned, I believe that autonomous cars will have more advantages than disadvantages. Furthermore, in recent years, numerous firms and academics have developed autonomous automobiles to meet the needs of inhabitants.
Sample 13:
Some individuals are opposed to self-driving automobiles, claiming that such technology would reduce driver employment prospects. Nevertheless, I feel that the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the negatives.
There are several benefits to autonomous automobiles, but I believe the most important thing is their safety. Vehicle-control technology can prevent major accidents by eliminating human mistakes. Despite the development and installation of new features that protect drivers' or passengers' safety. Such as airbags and alarm systems, the number of individuals killed in automobile accidents is steadily increasing nowadays. The rationale for this is that if humans continue to grasp handles in the driver's seat, stupid mistakes will never be avoided. On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that a level 4 automatic driving system. It allows driving entirely without human intervention and may reduce incidents by more than 90%. This point is important because life should come first.
In terms of opponents' arguments emphasizing the significance of safeguarding present employees, our history gives a remedy to such worry. Whenever a new technology developed, such as during the industrial revolution. With the introduction of the Internet, the general people were concerned about their job security. Nonetheless, in such times, there were plenty of employment opportunities in the workplace, and totally new occupations were created instead of being lost. As a result, worrying about opponents is pointless.
In conclusion, while some individuals may be concerned about their jobs, the benefits of autonomous automobiles outweigh the risks. Safety considerations, per se, directly connected to human life, should be the most vital to account for.
Sample 14:
All vehicles, including automobiles, buses, and lorries, will be operated autonomously by artificial intelligence. The only individuals inside the car are passengers. When communities embrace driverless vehicles, I believe there will be more benefits than drawbacks.
For starters, having a driverless vehicle allows society to be more productive since people have time to do so while riding in the automobile. People can, for example, join an online meeting, read a book, or take a break while driving to work or another location. Furthermore, because autonomous cars do not require drivers, they can save money on driver expenses. This circumstance will have a favorable influence on the overheating costs of firms that have a large number of drivers to deploy their staff.
Then, because the cars will be handled by a robotic system rather than people, communities will gain from driverless vehicles. This is in terms of resource efficiency, particularly in public transit. For example, public transportation just needs a skilled programmer in the control centre to manage its mobilisation. They do not require driver allocation in all buses or other modes of transportation. Despite certain security concerns, researchers are creating artificial intelligence behaviour technology to minimise vehicle accidents. So robotic systems may learn from human behaviour when they have to make a judgement on the road.
In conclusion, driverless technology will provide more advantages to society in terms of effectiveness and efficiency. Nevertheless, there is a basic worry connected to security technology, which researchers will tackle.
Sample 15:
Some people have speculated that in the near future some modes of transport will be automated. Although there could be certain dangers connected to unemployment and flexibility, I tend to believe that there are more benefits.
Foremost amongst these advantages is the likelihood that less time would be spent on driver training. If driving is computerised, there will be less need to learn how to drive, so more time could be spent on more productive activities such as work. Related to this idea of efficient time use, less time will also be spent on reading maps and programming GPS for human use. Once cars, buses, and trucks have become driverless, people will be less distracted by having to read maps which could reduce traffic congestion and some road accidents. Similarly, driverless vehicles do not require sleep, so the chances of accidents related to the drivers falling asleep while driving could be minimised.
However, there could be certain risks connected to vehicles operating without a driver. In the case of driverless buses and lorries, people who used to drive such vehicles will be made redundant which could contribute to high levels of unemployment. Though this may be a problem in the short term, in the long term it may be possible for jobless drivers to find a new field. For example, former drivers can become new mechanics for driverless cars, so this could address any employment deficit. Less easily addressed might be the benefits that come with having a human driver. For instance, people may be more adept at driving in certain places such as mountain ranges which may require more versatile off-road driving skills.
To conclude, there are numerous positive aspects to the implementation of driverless vehicles including greater efficiency and safety. While these advantages may have drawbacks connected to unemployment, there is reasonable scope to address them.
Sample 16:
All automobiles, buses, and lorries will be operated automatically by artificial intelligence. Only passengers are present inside the car. When towns embrace autonomous cars, there will be more benefits that outweigh the drawbacks, in my view.
First, when societies have autonomous vehicles, they will be more efficient with their time since they will be able to become more productive in the automobile. People may, for instance, participate in an online meeting, read a book, or relax while travelling to the workplace or another location. Moreover, it may cut costs since autonomous cars do not need drivers, which eliminates driver-related expenses. This circumstance will have a good effect on the cost of overheating for companies with a large number of vehicles used to transport personnel.
Then, communities will get resource efficiency benefits from autonomous cars, particularly in public transit, since the vehicles will be driven by a robotic system rather than people. For instance, a skilled programmer in the control room is sufficient to oversee the mobilisation of public transit. They do not need driver assignments for every bus or other mode of transportation. Even if there are security concerns, researchers are creating behaviour technology in artificial intelligence to prevent vehicle accidents, so that robotic systems may learn about human behaviour while making decisions on the street.
In conclusion, driverless technology will give higher benefits to society in terms of efficacy and efficiency, despite a fundamental security risk for which researchers will uncover a solution. These benefits will come about despite the fact that driverless technology poses a lil danger.
Sample 17:
I feel that the advantages of autonomous vehicles outweigh their disadvantages, despite the fact that some individuals are opposed to them on the grounds that they may reduce employment prospects for drivers.
There are several benefits to autonomous automobiles, but I believe their safety is the greatest. As vehicle control technology may minimise human mistakes, it can lessen the severity of collisions. Despite the development and installation of new safety features for drivers and passengers, including airbags and alarm systems, the number of individuals killed in automobile accidents is rising quickly in the present day. The reason for this is because careless errors cannot be eliminated as long as humans continue to grasp handles in driving seats. On the other hand, it has been shown that a level 4 automated driving system, which permits driving without any human input, may reduce incidents by more than 90%. As life should take precedence over everything else, this notion is crucial.
Regarding the opposition's arguments emphasising the significance of safeguarding present employees, our past offers a remedy for this worry. Whenever a new technological innovation appeared, such as during the industrial revolution or the introduction of the Internet, the general population expressed concern about their job security. However, throughout such epochs, there were many employment prospects in the workplace, and instead of job loss, totally new occupations had been established. Therefore, worrying about adversaries is pointless.
In conclusion, the benefits of autonomous automobiles exceed the potential concerns of a part of the population over their employment. Safety problems per se, which are directly tied to the priceless lives of humans, should be given the highest priority.
Sample 18:
Current developments in the automotive industry indicate a future with self-driving automobiles, buses, and trucks. It may seem to be a scenario from a science fiction film, but the likelihood that it will become a reality is strong. This invention based on artificial intelligence may seem to be the perfect situation, but I believe the drawbacks outweigh the benefits.
People's trust is the most crucial element for the success of such developments; however, it seems that people are dubious. For instance, a pedestrian was recently killed in an accident involving a Tesla autonomous vehicle. People cannot accept even 0.1% inaccuracy, which is the primary drawback of this invention. Some may claim that, just as individuals do damage to others when driving, so do these vehicles. However, it is difficult to determine liability and administer justice in incidents involving autonomous cars.
On the other side, the primary argument in favour of these cars is that driving patterns will be uniform if all vehicles are driverless. Even if accidents occur, they may also attempt to limit the damage to human beings. Again, this needs people to constantly adhere to rules. It is practically difficult to attain such perfect conditions, and undesirable occurrences will occur. Extremely unusual situations are exceedingly challenging for artificial intelligence to predict. During each of these circumstances, the media will focus more on the negatives than the positives. It will build distrust among the populace.
Because it is a question of life and death, the disadvantages outweigh the rewards. Even the loss of one life is unacceptable, and people would see it as an injustice if no one is to blame. People may use AI in any other gadget except for automobiles and buses.
Sample 19:
Recently, there have been great strides made in technology required to transition to a system of driverless cars and it has been suggested that one day all vehicles will be automated, with humans merely passengers. This essay will argue that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
The primary reason for adopting driverless cars is the improvement in safety that would inevitably come. At present, cars are immensely dangerous and yet humans continue to drive them. The vast majority of accidents are caused by human error, but this would be totally eliminated in a system whereby all vehicles are automatically updated on the presence of other vehicles. Accidents would be reduced, thereby saving millions of lives per year. Beyond that, the system on which these cars function would ensure that they optimise their routes to avoid traffic, which would not only save people time but reduce the number of emissions produced by idling engines.
Of course, there are some disadvantages, but these are comparatively minor. One thing that worries most people is the loss of freedom that will come from driverless car systems. At present, in most western countries, the road is viewed as a symbol of freedom and people enjoy getting behind the wheel to move around. In a driverless car, this small pleasure would be diminished. However, this is of course trivial in comparison to the safety and environmental benefits of the proposed driverless system.
In conclusion, the advantages of driverless vehicles vastly outweigh the disadvantages. Although there are a few negatives, the fact that so many lives would be saved makes this future comparatively bright.
Sample 20:
With the rapid technological development, driverless vehicles are becoming a reality, and within a couple of decades, all cars will run without the intervention of a human driver. I personally believe that driverless cars will bring far more benefits than the possible drawbacks they have.
To begin with the drawbacks, driverless cars pose some risks, including accidents and casualties, should technology malfunction. Since the vehicles would be run and controlled by software and technology, the risk of devastating accidents due to bugs or hacking could not be eliminated. It will make us more susceptible to hackers and software glitches. An accident, in which a woman died, caused by a driverless car while still in beta mode, caused a great uproar a few years ago. Moreover, not all roads, especially those in poor nations with ditches, holes and insufficient road signals, are suitable for those automated cars to run smoothly.
However, technology-made mistakes are astronomically fewer than man-made blunders when it comes to road safety and casualties, and this is where driverless automobiles can make a significant improvement. Though we point out a single accident made by a driverless car, human drivers are responsible for hundreds, if not thousands, of casualties each day all around the world. With the introduction of automated cars, accidents would reduce remarkably, making roads safer for all. On top of that, millions of hours could be saved each day since we would no longer need to sit behind the wheel. It will increase our productivity and boost the national economy.
In conclusion, driverless vehicles have many great benefits including road safety and economic benefits, and it is expected that we could eliminate the software related issues to reap the maximum benefits of this marvellous technology.
Sample 21:
Driverless cars, thanks to the phenomenal development of technology, are no longer fiction, but a reality, and it is expected that most vehicles will be autonomous in the future. Despite both benefits and demerits, the writer of this essay does think that the advantages of driverless vehicles do not outweigh the disadvantages.
One of the major advantages of driverless vehicles is that they reduce the number of accidents on the road. Such cars provide better traffic efficiency since driverless vehicles can travel efficiently at an optimized and safe distance from each other by communicating among themselves in real-time, on the road, and by telling which routes to take. It reduces accidents and casualties to a great extent.
However, the systems or the technologies used to operate driverless vehicles can malfunction or stop working at any time, without any prior notice. And, if that happens, an autonomous vehicle could actually put the passengers in more danger than if a human driver was driving it. Besides, self-driving cars lack the ability to make judgments among multiple unfavourable scenarios and outcomes. For example, let’s say that a self-driving car had to face a situation with only two possible options: one is to veer to the left and strike a pedestrian, and the other one is to turn to the right and hit a tree, potentially injuring the passengers inside the vehicle. Now, since both options are undesirable, which option would the driverless car choose? The Moral Machine, developed by a group at MIT in the USA, is seeking to address this critical issue by collecting data on real-life people’s decisions, but the data collected, so far, shows broad differences amongst different groups of people, making it very difficult to programme any definitive answer for autonomous cars. Thus, autonomous cars are good to have but are not great to ride in!
So, based on the discussion above, we can fairly conclude that the shortcomings of driverless automobiles outweigh their possible benefits.
Sample 22:
The concept that all cars will be driverless has been gaining traction lately as advancements in technology have made it increasingly feasible and demonstrations have already been successful. The concept of a future where vehicles are solely occupied by passengers presents both benefits and drawbacks. However, in my opinion, the benefits of driverless vehicles outweigh the potential disadvantages.
One of the main drawbacks of driverless cars is the potential loss of jobs for millions of drivers. This is particularly concerning in industries, such as trucking, taxi service and ride-sharing, where driving is the primary occupation. Another major shortcoming of fully automated vehicles is the potential for hackers to gain control of the vehicle and cause mayhem. This could be a significant security concern, as technology is still in its infancy, and vulnerabilities may not yet have been identified.
On the other hand, several major advantages of driverless vehicles make them an attractive option for the future. To begin with, driverless automobiles are expected to remarkably reduce the number of road accidents caused by human error, as the vehicles are controlled by advanced software and sensors that are less prone to mistakes. Additionally, automated vehicles have the potential to improve traffic flow and reduce congestion, as they can communicate with one another and adapt to changing traffic conditions in real-time. Furthermore, driverless vehicles could also have positive impacts on the environment as they will reduce fuel consumption and emissions, for example.
In conclusion, while there could be some disadvantages to the notion of driverless conveyances, the advantages of such vehicles far outweigh the drawbacks. The fewer road accidents, improved traffic conditions, and environmental benefits that driverless vehicles will bring us, make them an appealing choice for the future.
Sample 23:
Due to the rapid development of technology, it is reasonable to claim that a wide range of vehicles will be autonomous in the near future. In my opinion, although this development raises certain safety concerns, the benefits in regard to reduced accidents and costs involved in traffic facilities make this development a change for the better.
Detractors of driver-free vehicles point out the potential unreliability of such vehicles. Specifically, some worry that when there is a technical problem such as malfunction of the navigation system, this may jeopardize passengers in both the vehicle and traffic. In fact, Tesla, a prominent corporation specializing in driverless automobiles, has received a number of complaints regarding the reliability of its driverless cars, making some skeptical about whether such cars are sophisticated enough to work consistently in varied weather and road conditions. However, the aforementioned issues have been minimized as technological advances.
I believe the popularity of driverless automobiles should be encouraged as it helps reduce human errors and expenditure on traffic facilities. Given numerous road accidents result from reckless driving behaviors such as speeding and driving while intoxicated, automated cars are a practical solution for such causes of accidents. This does not imply that automated cars are not prone to technical errors; however, these errors are rare, and in most cases, incidents with these cars have been the fault of human drivers. The wide application of driverless cars can also help governments save budgetary expenses on maintaining and upgrading traffic facilities. When vehicles are controlled by machines, there would be fewer need for installing speeding cameras, maintaining road signs and paying traffic police, allowing more funds for other key areas.
In conclusion, although some worry about the consistency of self-driving vehicles, I believe decreased spending on traffic facilities and increased road safety fully justify this innovation. Governments and corporations should therefore invest more in this promising technology.
Sample 24:
Recent years have seen the emergence of technologies to develop vehicles that can effectively drive themselves, and this may eventually make human drivers redundant. On the whole, I think that the benefits of this development will outweigh any drawbacks.
Automated vehicles have the potential to massively improve road safety because they could massively reduce accidents caused by human error. People are prone to making mistakes, often caused by getting tired or distracted while driving, leading to serious accidents. Computers which control vehicles don’t suffer from these weaknesses, and so as long as they are programmed correctly, errors like these should be eliminated. For instance, cars can be made to brake automatically in emergencies or if the distance from the car ahead is too small. Admittedly, we occasionally hear of fatalities caused by driverless vehicles being tested, but these are statistically insignificant when compared to deaths caused by human error both now and in the future.
An additional benefit to driverless vehicles would be a reduction in transport and haulage costs since there is no driver to pay. This would make food and other goods cheaper. For example, a major factor in food prices in supermarkets is the wages paid to delivery drivers.
However, there is a downside to this since drivers would lose their jobs. In modern economies, tens of thousands of people are employed as HGV drivers, as well as drivers of taxis and delivery vans, so the widespread adoption of automated vehicles would have a major impact on job opportunities. Nevertheless, this problem can be mitigated against with investment in training and job creation in other areas.
In conclusion, I do feel that despite the job losses it will entail, the benefits in terms of cost and road safety make driverless vehicles something to welcome.
Sample 25:
The debate relating to transportation has been in the spotlight for an extended period of time. Recently, there is a belief that automated vehicles like cars, buses and trucks will be dominated in the future. From a personal perspective, such a trend, though detrimental to a certain extent, could be considered as a major step forward.
On the one hand, the driverless system of transportation has proven itself to be adverse. To begin with, personal driver's security may be deteriorated. In fact, many criminals now are gradually having more sophisticated and cunning plans in stealing the important information of other people. Thus, just by successfully accessing the storage systems, hackers can take the necessary data and control over a whole engine, easily triggering accidents on the road. Moreover, this trend may cause people to be unemployed. To illustrate, thousands of individuals are likely to lose their job as a taxi driver or bus controller since all the vehicles are substituted by automated ones, which may affect negatively their quality of life.
On the other hand, this trend seems to be advantageous from two aspects, as follows. First, humans' safety will be guaranteed. There is no denying that the majority of accidents nowadays are attributed to drivers' inferior awareness like using stimulants or crossing the traffic light. Therefore, driverless vehicles are promised to decrease unwanted cases as they can automatically control the speed themselves and utilize computer-based system to avoid collisions. Second, this trend may bring about a civilized traffic system. The fact is that there will no longer be traffic congestion and need police on the road since no more human could break the rules and the distance between two cars might be rigorously calculated in order to minimize collisions.
In conclusion, in spite of several demerits mentioned above, this essay still believes that putting more driverless vehicles on the road is revolutionary to the contemporary society.
Sample 26:
In the future, all vehicles will be autonomous. Passengers will be the only people inside them. I believe businesses can cut costs by using driverless cars, and this advantage far outweighs any potential disadvantages.
One downside of self-driving cars might be that they could lead to large employment losses. Nowadays, in many countries, a great number of people are making a living by driving, be they truckers, bus drivers, or delivery couriers. Imagine all these people are made redundant by autonomous cars. That would raise the unemployment rates in these countries significantly. However, I think this can be avoided if drivers reskill to get themselves a job in a new sector.
On the positive side, driverless cars could help businesses reduce operating expenses. This is because, with these cars, they would not need to hire drivers to deliver their products or services to their customers. For example, the American logistics company UPS currently has hundreds of thousands of truck drivers and pays them an average of 60,000 dollars per year, which adds up to tens of billions of dollars annually. Replacing these drivers with autonomous cars would mean that these huge salary payments could be eliminated. I think this could create a great advantage for society as a whole because companies could devote the money they save on labor to other aspects of their business, which could mean cheaper, better goods for consumers.
In conclusion, although self-driving vehicles would result in many job losses, I believe this downside is greatly outweighed by the upside that these vehicles could help businesses save operating costs.
Sample 27:
Technological advancements in automobile industries are leading toward a future when vehicles would be driverless. The benefits of autonomous vehicles, run by artificial intelligence and software technology, would far outweigh the disadvantages.
The possible downside of autonomous vehicles pertains to the technology itself. Since they would be run by software technology, hackers could take control of a vehicle and use it for their own nefarious purposes. They could even evade police chasing or use vehicles to cause vandalism. Moreover, the situation would lead to an increase in unemployment in many parts of the world where millions of people are employed as drivers.
But the advantages of autonomous vehicles are many. To begin with, it would allow people to use their travel time more constructively. Imagine the millions of hours saved each day because manual driving would no longer be required. It would be added up to the total man-hours of people to boost the national economy. Moreover, human drivers often compete on the roads and create traffic gridlocks. It would be a thing of the past with driverless, AI-driven cars. Finally, driverless cars would eliminate the drunk-driving, man-made blunders behind the wheels and make the roads safer. It would thus save thousands of lives each year that are lost due to road accidents. A recent research data by the automobile industry points out that road accidents with driverless cars would reduce by 85% – which is a hugely encouraging figure.
In conclusion, autonomous vehicles can reduce accidents and make the road safer while also allowing people more time to enjoy or work. Considering the benefits it offers; it is realistic to conclude that its advantages far outweigh its drawbacks.
Sample 28:
All vehicles, including cars, buses and trucks, are expected to go driverless in the future, leaving behind the passengers travelling inside. In my view, the benefits cannot outweigh the disadvantages because driverless cars will lead to unemployment and financial burden.
Admittedly, there are certain benefits of driverless cars such as smooth drive and fewer accidents. Firstly, driverless vehicles can ensure a smoother drive because these are going to be equipped with adequate technology to follow exact traffic rules, managing a safer ride. Secondly, these cars will eliminate the risk of accidents caused by drunken or sleepless drivers. For instance, most of the accidents in my country occur on highways due to sleep deprived and overworked drivers.
On the other hand, despite the latest sophisticated technology, going driverless in public transport is very risky. If there is a medical emergency, for instance, the driverless car will not be able to stop instantly and reroute to hospital if required. Another notable point is the need to adjust decisions according to road traffic, driverless cars can never match a real person in this case.
Launching driverless vehicles will also mean snatching jobs away from a significant portion of the population. Most of these drivers have no other skills, therefore managing the economic burden of this unemployed lot will be difficult for many countries. Additionally, although some people might be able to afford these expensive cars, lower socio-economic countries are not financially ready for such a big change in their transport system.
In conclusion, despite the few benefits, there is compelling evidence that not all types of vehicles can be driven without drivers, and it will be deleterious in many scenarios.
Lời giải
Sample 1:
Some people opine that trees should be planted in the unoccupied regions of significant towns and cities. Others insist that it is more critical to build residential complexes there. In my opinion, planting trees in vacant cities is more effective than building homes there.
On the one hand, there are numerous benefits of planting trees for residents. Firstly, it is omniscient that in the present times, air pollution and noise pollution are booming with every passing day due to fewer trees leading to harmful diseases. Therefore, sowing plants and trees in the city’s open space is indispensable for living things and the environment. To illustrate, plants take up dust and harmful gases like carbon dioxide and provide pure air. With the help of trees, the air pollution levels would decrease. Secondly, planting trees gives shelter to numerous birds. Several bird species have become bygones, and some are on the verge of extinction with the minuscule number of plants. Hence, more and more dreams in cities are required.
Additionally, these plants assist in keeping the environment cool by various natural processes. Experts have discovered that tree leaves are excellent absorbers, especially carbon dioxide and dust, giving out oxygen and water vapour. Besides, trees play a consequential role in bringing rain, thereby making it a crucial factor in maintaining a balance in the environment that is being disturbed by humans.
On the flipper side, lack of shelter will have many extreme downsides. Firstly, in urban regions, the majority of people migrate. Undoubtedly, the price of rented houses is too high. More masses might become homeless, resulting in crime rates increasing. Secondly, economic development may suffer if there are only a few buildings in the town. Subsequently, fewer shopping malls, banks, restaurants, and other shops will impact financial earnings and affect daily lives. Ultimately, the construction of more houses in an urban area is essential.
In conclusion, I believe that a significant part of the vacant spaces should be utilised for afforestation. This will help enrich the area with pure air and oxygen, allowing people to have a healthy life.
Sample 2:
The utilization of open areas for planting or building more houses has become a debatable issue. In my opinion, I agree that trees and gardens play a vital role in human development. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I shall explain my point of view and give supporting reasons.
To begin with, the cultivation of more trees in urban settings benefits city dwellers in a variety of ways. For example, extra tree shade is generated when more trees are planted in open areas, which not only promotes the aesthetics of the city but also helps to lower the city’s temperature. Also, it provides more space for elderly people and youngsters to do some physical activities in this relaxing environment.
Additionally, these plants assist in reducing urban air pollution and noise levels and promote higher living standards. Experts have discovered that tree leaves are great absorbers, especially of carbon dioxide and dust. In addition, trees generate oxygen, which can help to reduce pollution in cities and improve air quality.
However, it is true that more housing means more places to live. But it cannot be ignored that people are suffering from urbanisation induced air pollution and the only solution to protect them is to plant more trees.
To sum up, due to mass urbanization, the need for trees and gardens has drastically increased to improve the quality of life in overcrowded cities. Moreover, trees and gardens are natural combats that can help protect against various man-made disasters.
Sample 3:
Many city and town planners believe that trees, instead of residential buildings, are crucial for the development of the modern city. In my agreement, I agree with this contention despite the legitimate benefits to increased housing in cities.
Those who would rather build more residential buildings argue that both town and city populations are surging. Population figures globally are on the rise, and it is logical to provide quality housing for all citizens. This is particularly true in rapidly growing nations such as China and India. The migration of individuals from the countryside to cities and outlying towns means that higher residential numbers have led to deteriorating sanitary conditions and increased pressure on the services that sustain cities such as public transportation. More housing would at least partly alleviate the issues that urban planners face and allow for more cogent plans for densely populated environments.
Nonetheless, the importance of trees transcends the purely practical. For the average city and town resident, trees have aesthetic value. Take for example some of the best-known cities in the world including Paris and New York City. The parks and gardens stand out and mitigate living apart from the natural world. Moreover, the more underprivileged segments of society are unlikely to be able to afford trips outside their immediate living vicinity. There is therefore a good chance that many younger children, particularly those in inner cities, will rarely experience nature and their lives will be limited to the dreary confines of the city. Over time, this can have a demoralising effect that is evidenced in the defeatist attitude common among less affluent children.
In conclusion, the importance of housing to meeting rising population demands does not overshadow the importance of trees. Towns and cities must naturally balance these concerns to foster better living environments for residents.
Sample 3:
Many people argue that the planting of trees should take precedence over the construction of additional accommodation for residents in town and cities. I largely agree that planting more trees brings about greater environmental benefits overall, though erecting more residence is justifiably beneficial.
Supporters of added residential areas argue that they help combat overpopulation and stimulate economic growth. The growing influx of rural inhabitants seeking greater opportunities for education, healthcare, and services has recently driven a boom in the world populations and created the modern mega-city. While this trend is economically beneficial, it has also led to inflated real estate prices, higher rates of unemployment and exacerbated social issues related to overcrowding. Hence, the construction of residential properties would not only provide city dwellers with places to reside but also effectively offset potential bubbles in the real estate market. This development would also create millions of employment opportunities within the building sector.
Nonetheless, these temporary fixes have concomitantly brought about more pressing environmental hazards, all of which can be sustainably mitigated by growing more trees. One salient example of this is a natural phenomenon called "the urban heat island". Compared to natural landscapes, buildings absorb and reradiato a higher volume of sunlight which is then trapped by the city's smog, resulting in wider temperature fluctuations, deteriorating infrastructures, and compromised human health and comfort. Urban vegetation, in the forms of trees, provides shade, emits water vapors that cool infrastructures, and shields residents from extreme ultraviolet exposure. At the same time, they are also effective natural curtains that absorb and filter pollutant particulates out of the air by trapping them on leaves and bark, while simultaneously releasing oxygen into the atmosphere, thus contributing towards more habitable living conditions that are far more beneficial for human health in the long run.
In conclusion, despite the short-term economic gains that extra housing offers, I believe with few reservations that planting more trees would have a greater overall impact as it would significantly improve the standard of living and reduce the severity of environmental changes. In my opinion, a combination of both would ensure the sustainable development of cities.
Sample 4:
It is believed that it is more meaningful to plant trees in open urban areas, rather than building more houses. While housing is needed to meet the demands of the growing population, I strongly agree that trees should be planted in open areas as trees provide environmental, social, and economic benefits.
Admittedly, housing is essential to meet the demands of the burgeoning population; however, high-rise buildings should be constructed instead of spreading out low-rise houses, allowing open spaces to be preserved for planting more trees. New housing can also be built in the countryside to convert villages into towns. In fact, many people are opting to live there because of the fresh air and quiet atmosphere.
The main benefit of planting trees in cities is to the environment. Trees help purify the polluted air in the cities and towns. Research has proven that 100 trees can remove tonnes of carbon dioxide annually. Trees are also known to cut down the everyday noise of cities, thus tackling noise pollution. To add to it, rainwater doesn't run off into drains if there are trees in urban areas. It is filtered into the ground, thus saving the city money that is spent on drains and artificial controls. Finally, trees provide shade to homes, roads, office areas, and parking spaces, thus reducing energy consumption. In parking lots also, trees help keep cars cooler, which leads to less pollution.
Planting trees in cities helps the city grow socially and economically as well. They provide an area where people can meet, socialize, and also exercise. Children also get close to nature, where they can play. The commercial value of an urban property with trees is more than one without trees. Retail outlets and businesses located in areas with trees attract more customers.
To sum up, although houses are needed in cities to live in, trees are needed more to strengthen and improve the quality of life in overcrowded cities. They play a vital role in combating climate change and provide numerous economic and social benefits.
Sample 5:
Nowadays, there is an increasing concern about greenery around the country. However, whether these trees should be planted in a city’s open places rather than giving way to more accommodation remains a controversial debate. I agree with the view that if housing supply in a city has surpassed demand, the open areas should mainly be covered by trees.
Firstly, with enough housing for locals to live, trees are needed to cool down the cities and towns. While many cities have to heavily rely on air-conditioning to decrease the indoor temperature during summer, with more trees planted, the outside temperature can be adjusted to a lower level. As a benefit, it will be cooler in people’s homes.
Moreover, trees can function well to clean up the toxic substances in the air. If we want more people to stay away from some health issues that are caused by environmental degradation, trees can definitely help. And this is something those housing buildings cannot contribute to.
Of course, when the majority of residents in some towns cannot be provided with comfortable housing, it is a different case. As shelter is one of the most important elements for human survival, it should be considered as a priority in these places. As long as shelter is not an urgent problem, then greenery can be prioritised for open areas.
In summary, both trees and housing play an important role in urban lifestyle. When most city residents already have a home to live in, open spaces ought to be given to trees. On the other hand, building more accommodation on the available land is a wiser choice, vice versa.
Sample 6:
In present, there are a plenty of wide empty spaces in both cities and towns which can take advantage to plant trees or construct more building. Some opinions suggest planning more greenery in these spaces due to their necessity, I completely agree with that valuable statement.
Initially, the main benefit of growing more trees in cities and towns is that it will promote the amount of fresh air. More trees mean more carbon dioxide will be absorbed leading to more oxygen is produced. It is a nice way out for the hottest issues in some big cities and towns nowadays when these places release a large amount of air pollution every day because of the crowd and overpopulation. Secondly, planting more greens is directly raise citizen's awareness about protecting environment. Residents take more responsibility to conserving and develoing more green space in their living area. In addition, when more people are concerned about the environment and health, they will immediately lead to a healthier lifestyle.
Moreover, green trees also decorate the cities looking more peaceful and beautiful, which will attract more tourists to come. Because of the new trends of visiting an enviromentally-friendly place, a green city or town will be an interesting destination for all visitors. Therefore, national tourism will be developed while national reputation also significantly climbs. Another benefit is that more jobs will be created for the environment such as sanitation workers. Consequently, the unemployment rate of those cities and towns will dramatically decrease.
In conclusion, for several reasons mentioned above, I maintain the opinion that the government should reserve spare spaces for growing more greens instead of building more houses.
Sample 7:
Many people have views on how to absolutely utilize vacant spaces in cities and towns. While some believe that planting trees in blank spaces in cities and towns is more necessary than building houses, I partly agree with this method.
On the one hand, I agree that planting trees in open spaces in cities and towns is essential to help citizens get a fresher atmosphere in cities and towns. Firstly, the atmosphere in big cities and towns is getting worse than before due to the appearance of industrial parks and increasing in vehicles. Therefore, planting trees has contributed a pure green space to big cities and towns, helping people get a better life. Secondly, the forest area of the world has been narrowed nowadays, so a lack of wood resources to serve business activities as well as constructing activities is an unavoidably serious problem. Thus, cultivating trees becomes one of the most useful measures to help people to solve partially emptied wood resources today.
On the other hand, I do not believe that the benefits of building houses in cities or towns are outweighed by planting trees. First and foremost, the population of big cities or towns is increasing these days because of the immigration of people from the countryside or mountainous areas. Therefore, building houses or apartments to meet accommodation for everyone is really indispensable. Besides, some economic centers need to be constructed to widen infrastructure as well as provide jobs for citizens here. Secondly, planting trees in big cities or towns, especially big trees along streets, will cause some grave traffic accidents for citizens in the rainy season when these trees are fallen down by a storm, strong winds, or are struck by lightning.
In summary, I can clearly come to the conclusion that although growing trees in cities or towns help to avoid wasting blank spaces, this solution has its negative impacts.
Sample 8:
It is an irrefutable fact that, nowadays, a great deal of attention has been paid to Green or sustainable planting; while some believe that it must be necessary to plant trees everywhere in society rather than constructing mud and mortar building in open areas, others reject this notion. However, I totally agree with the former statement that will analyse my views by taking examples to demonstrate my points and prove my arguments.
On the one hand, the advantages of planting more trees are indisputable. The most significant benefit is that trees purify the air and reduce CO2 emissions in an environment polluted by transportation and construction. Furthermore, clean and fresh air contributes to a stress-free life and helps maintain a healthy atmosphere around living spaces. For example, floods in Jagrata affect health, safety, and prosperity due to soil erosion caused by deforestation for urbanization. Therefore, increasing green spaces could be an effective solution to avoid these predictable problems.
On the other hand, although there has been a dramatic rise in the population almost in all nations due to the enhancement in healthcare amenities. As a result, the average death rate has decreased, yet the majority of the populace still resides in countries. For example, the unemployment problem has been contributed significantly by increasing the number of people who have been residing in multicultural cities.
In conclusion, from my viewpoint, it is most agreeable to focus more on planting trees for a friendly environment, though building houses are essential. However, the balance between them should be an effective solution for environmental protection.
Sample 9:
It is argued that growing trees in vacant places in sub-urban areas or metropolitan areas are crucial rather than constructing homes for the people. I completely agree with the statement as it will make the place pollution-free, and linking people with nature can heal their mental and physical problems.
First off, planting trees in open spaces will make the urban and town areas pollution free. To elaborate on it, people drive their vehicles to move from one place to another. When the fuel burns, it produces toxic gases. These gases mix in the environment and create pollution. Therefore, having more trees will absorb them and purify the air, and our biodiversity will not experience the problem of pollution. The absence of vegetation and congested places due to having more homes can exaggerate this problem. Thus, it is better to grow more trees. For instance, Chandigarh is a beautiful city for having more green spaces, and the rate of pollution is less than in any other city.
Moreover, greenery helps establish a link between human beings and nature and cures the public of various physical and mental illnesses. To explain it, nature has the power to heal the illnesses of humanity. Having plants, trees, and flowers all around makes the individuals feel ecstasy. In the lap of nature, people forget their anxiety and sadness and develop strong feelings of positivity. In addition, they do some exercises or run in the parks for gardens and burn their extra fat as well as improve the functions of the body organs. Individuals can keep themselves fit both psychologically and physiologically. For example, many physicians advise patients to walk over grass or to do meditation or yoga in a park or a garden. So, these places help a lot of humanity to cure itself. Even great writers or storytellers consider green spaces ideal for writing any work of art. Their writings also remove the depression of the person and make them cheerful.
To conclude, it is clear that planting trees in unoccupied places in cities or towns will make the place clear, and nature has the power to treat the physical as well as mental problems of individuals. They can get a feeling of glee at those places.
Sample 10:
As metropolitan areas are becoming more overpopulated and tree density is dropping, many people think we should focus on planting more trees rather than building housing. I strongly support this idea.
There are many direct advantages as to why people should plant more trees in urban areas. Firstly, many scientists proved that trees improve a lot of environmental metrics within a short time. For example, planting more trees results in cleaner air, lower average temperature, and a reduced carbon footprint. Secondly, allocating more space to trees can improve the aesthetic look of cities. For example, cities can build more botanical gardens that host various flowers and other beautiful plants. From an architectural aspect, this can add more contrast between the sharp look of buildings and the softer look of plants and flowers.
Moreover, there are indirect benefits when there are more open spaces dedicated to trees. The first one is that to implement this policy, the government might need to demolish many old residential areas to have areas for parks. This decision is beneficial in many ways. For example, new apartment buildings can accommodate more people and ensure a higher quality of life. The second one is that with more parks, citizens can witness an improvement in both their physical and mental health. Children can hang out and exercise in these parks and botanical gardens, thus improving their physical health. Senior citizens and even working people can take afternoon or night walks to relax, thus improving their mental health.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that urban areas should plant more trees due to their various benefits, both directly and indirectly.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Nhắn tin Zalo
Hỏi bài tập