Câu hỏi:

10/01/2025 197

Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified
Giải bởi Vietjack

Sample 1:

While some argue that visitors should observe local etiquette and customs, others think the host nation should be open to other cultures. Some individuals are questioning how tourists should act when they travel to a new state.  I'll analyse both sides in this essay and then argue why guests should be welcomed.

On the one hand, there are many in the general public who contend that a business should adhere to local customs. The key justification is that it fosters intercultural understanding and displays respect. If a foreigner doesn't adapt, locals may think they're rude, inconsiderate, and weird and avoid them. Additionally, breaking conventions might be deadly. For instance, Americans travelling to the UK must drive on the left side of the road in order to avoid traffic accidents.

On the other hand, some people think that residents should respect foreign cultures. People have the right to follow their own paths, which is the basic justification for this. No culture is superior to another, they contend, and the host nation has no right to require visitors to adhere to its cultural norms. Additionally, allowing visitors the flexibility to go their own way will improve tourism in the host nation. For instance, tight dress regulations and prohibitions on alcohol consumption prevent many people from travelling to other nations.

In conclusion, both arguments, in my opinion, have merit. All things considered, however, I tend to think that the host country has no right to oblige their visitors with a warm welcome because it can be challenging to change and adapt to new lifestyles when one has just moved to a new area, whereas I think that accepting differences is much easier for the hosts who are at home.

Sample 2:

There is no denying that there is cultural diversity on the planet. As a result, some members of the society think that locals should accept immigrants with their own cultural distinctions, while others say that visitors should respect local customs. I wholeheartedly concur with the first viewpoint. Both perspectives will be debated in this article, and it will conclude with a conclusion.

Cultural diversity is a natural phenomenon. As a result, locals in the host nation should openly embrace the immigrants with all of their customs and traditions. As a result, immigrants will feel at home and have no trouble making friends. For instance, they will find it simple to make acquaintances and ward off homesickness as a result. Additionally, the hosts will have the chance to acquire new lifestyles and technological practices from visitors, which will contribute to the diversification of cultures.

For those travelling to different parts of the world, it will be challenging to imitate the customs and way of life of the host nation. For instance, persons who travel for educational purposes may find it challenging to adapt to the local culture. As a result, they will expend a lot of energy discovering new ways to live and communicate. It will negatively affect their academic performance.

To put it briefly, though, some regions of the world require visitors to observe the locals' customs. However, the greatest option is to accept and respect others who have their own culture. Communities, in my opinion, should embrace the many customs of their visitors and support multiculturalism.

Sample 3:

Modern society's globalization and tourism push people to travel and immigrate for jobs and enjoyment. For societal safety, some feel travellers must respect local traditions and customs, while others believe the host country should welcome visitors' traditions. To prevent misunderstandings, I believe that visitors should respect the host nation's traditions and manners.

The benefits of embracing foreign visitors' cultures and habits are often touted by proponents. First, it would increase the host country’s tolerance and diversity of traditions. Many of the world's most industrialized nations have welcomed and benefited from immigrants' cultures. In the USA and Canada, numerous national and religious groups bring their own customs to enrich local people's cultural and diet traditions. Thus, people in Canada and the US now eat a variety of healthful foods from throughout the world. This case illustrates the idea that locals should adopt new customs for their own cultural enrichment.

However, despite the above justifications, not all nations should embrace the customs of guest nations, especially if travellers visit countries with rich, ancient civilizations that rigorously adhere to national and social conventions, patterns, and habits. Western tourists disrespecting local traditions have been assaulted by locals several times. Westerners frequently behave freely, dress formally, consume alcoholic beverages, and act freely. Gullible kids may forget their own customs and embarrass their friends and family by copying newcomers. All of the above could ruin local culture and customs and cause social friction and interethnic disputes due to cultural misunderstandings.

In conclusion, integrating newcomers' traditions and food may benefit the new nation by increasing diversity, however some ancient cultures should not follow visitors' practices. To prevent interethnic conflict and misunderstanding, it is crucial that visitors observe local traditions.

Sample 4:

There are different opinions on whether visitors should comply with local traditions, or whether the locals should accept foreign lifestyles. In my opinion, the host country should welcome new patterns of belief and culture.

On the one hand, there are several reasons why some people think tourists should adhere to the new customs. Firstly, such adherence would enable them to integrate more easily and quickly into the new environment. For example, if a person from the US understood table manners or learnt how to use chopsticks, he would have familiarized himself with Vietnamese tradition after a few days. Secondly, following the customs of the new country would help in avoiding social conflicts and, sometimes, hostility. A sense of isolation and loneliness could be the price for those who refuse to adapt to the new environment.

On the other hand, I would argue that the host country should accept the culture of the tourists. Culture diverges tremendously across different countries and regions, depending on their historical backgrounds. Therefore, it is rather absurd to compel tourists to comply with the new country’s lifestyles. Besides, being flexible would be a powerful way to develop the host country’s tourism industry. On being allowed to behave according to their cultural standards, visitors would feel respected and satisfied. Also of great significance is their recommendation to their friends and relatives to travel to those places, leading to the growth of tourism.

In conclusion, I would agree with the people who support the idea of appreciating new culture.

Sample 5:

The dilemma of whether tourists should be aware of the local practices when travelling to a foreign country or whether the natives should be considerate of the ethnic diversities among travellers is a common debate among many. In my opinion, the distinctive features of non-natives should be respected rather than forcing them to follow the conventions of an unfamiliar region. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I will discuss both sides of this topic in detail.

It is true that every country, locality, and community has certain customs. The traditions of a region are an illustration of the heritage of the people hailing from the locale. Such practices have been followed by generations of people who have resided in the locality. That being said, when tourists fail to understand such formalities, it creates a distance between them and the locals. Thus, it is always prudent to be cautious of the moeurs of a region to avoid sensitive situations.

Nevertheless, we must also acknowledge the subtle peculiarities of people from different cultures. Humanity is divided into several societies, and every society is unique in its own right. A certain custom might be the standard of one community, whereas the same might be deemed as bizarre for another. However, it is crucial to understand the faith and reverence that people have for their indigenous way of life. Therefore, expecting an individual to instantaneously adopt the ways in which they are alien, is an ungracious demand.

In conclusion, we must respect the lifestyle of the natives when visiting a new place. At the same time, it is essential to be courteous towards visitors from distinctive cultures, to create a positive impact and nurture social relations among all.

Sample 6:

With the trends of globalization, people are traversing the continent from west to east and vice versa more frequently than ever before. Many people think that tourists should respect local traditions and behaviour while others beg to differ and believe that the recipient country ought to welcome cultural diversity. In this case, I opine that both viewpoints have their merits.

To commence with, many argue that visitors should respect the local tradition, culture and lifestyle. According to them, by respecting the local way of life, foreigners will be welcomed by the local people. In consequence, they can develop a harmonious relationship with the host nation, which in turn stimulates greater integration. Apart from it, newcomers would get first-hand experience with local customs and traditions, which allows them to immerse themselves in the local lifestyle. As a result, they can acquire knowledge and skills. For instance, foreigners can learn the local language of the host country by taking the opportunity to have real-life practice to master the language.

Similarly, the host country also reaps the benefits of cultural diversity by welcoming tourists and their heterogeneity. A host country can create a vibrant cosmopolitan atmosphere, which in turn develops a keen sense of tolerance between foreigners and the local people. In fact, cultural differences help us comprehend different perspectives within the globe in which we live. As a result, it helps dispel negative prejudices and personal biases about various racial, cultural and ethnic groups. In addition to this, cultural diversity makes a country a more attractive place to live in. For example, citizens from diverse cultures contribute to different experiences, solving problems, language proficiency, and new approaches to thinking to name but a few.

In conclusion, a recipient country should always welcome people from diverse cultures and tourists ought to respect local ways of living as well since this attitude is mutually beneficial.

Sample 7:

There are differing views on whether visitors to other countries should conform to local customs and behaviour or if the host country should embrace cultural differences. While some argue for the importance of adhering to local customs, I believe that host countries should welcome cultural differences for several reasons.

On the one hand, proponents of conforming to local customs argue that it shows respect for the host country’s traditions and values. They assert that visitors should adapt to local norms in order to avoid causing offence or disrespecting the local culture. For example, in conservative societies where modesty is highly valued, it may be expected for visitors to dress modestly and adhere to specific codes of conduct.

On the other hand, those who advocate welcoming cultural differences emphasize the benefits of diversity and the enrichment it brings to societies. By embracing cultural differences, host countries can foster inclusivity, promote mutual understanding, and create opportunities for cultural exchange. This can lead to increased tolerance, acceptance, and appreciation of different perspectives and ways of life. For instance, when host countries allow visitors to express their own cultural practices, it can create a more vibrant and diverse social fabric that contributes to the overall cultural richness of the nation.

Furthermore, embracing cultural differences can have positive economic implications. In many countries, tourism plays a significant role in the economy. By allowing visitors to celebrate and share their own cultural practices, host countries can attract a broader range of tourists who are interested in experiencing diverse cultures. This, in turn, can lead to increased revenue from tourism-related industries and stimulate local businesses.

In conclusion, while some argue for visitors to conform to local customs and behaviour, I believe that host countries should welcome cultural differences. Embracing diversity not only promotes mutual understanding and inclusivity but also has economic benefits. By celebrating and accepting different cultures, host countries can create an enriching and vibrant environment that contributes to the cultural fabric of the nation.

Sample 8:

In modern times, travel has become an increasingly popular way of discovering new cultures and experiencing different lifestyles, and a large number of tourists travel to other countries as a result. While some people believe that visitors to other countries should be welcomed and allowed to behave as they wish, others believe that they should respect local customs and traditions. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and argue that it is important for visitors to respect local customs and behaviour.

On the one hand, some people believe that tourists should be allowed to behave as they wish, and that host countries should be welcoming and tolerant of different behaviours. They argue that local customs should not be imposed on visitors and that everyone should be free to express themselves as they wish. Moreover, some countries are known for their liberal attitudes, and visitors may feel uncomfortable if they are required to follow strict customs.

On the other hand, there are several reasons why visitors should follow local customs and behaviour. Firstly, local customs and traditions are often an important part of a country’s heritage, and visitors should respect them. Secondly, visitors who do not follow local customs and behaviour can cause offence and even create tension between themselves and locals. For example, visitors to Muslim countries who dress inappropriately or drink alcohol in public can cause offence to locals who consider such behaviour to be disrespectful.

In addition, visitors who follow local customs and behaviour are likely to have a more positive experience of the country they are visiting. By showing respect for local customs, visitors are more likely to be welcomed by locals, which can lead to more positive experiences and better cultural exchanges. In contrast, visitors who behave inappropriately can offend and create negative stereotypes.

In conclusion, while some people believe that visitors to other countries should be allowed to behave as they wish, it is important for them to respect local customs and traditions. By doing so, visitors are more likely to have a positive experience of the country they are visiting and create better cultural exchanges.

Sample 9:

The interaction between visitors and host nations raises concerns regarding cultural adaptation and acceptance. While some argue that visitors should conform to local customs and behaviour, others argue that the host nation should embrace cultural diversity. Both perspectives have merit, but I believe that a middle ground should be found that promotes regard for local customs while fostering inclusion and cultural exchange.

Proponents of the view that tourists should adhere to local customs contend that it is essential to respect the traditions, norms, and values of the host country. They believe that visitors are responsible for adapting their behaviour, dressing appropriately, and adhering to social decorum in order to avoid offending or upsetting the local populace. By adhering to and respecting local customs, visitors demonstrate cultural awareness and promote harmonious interactions with the local community.

Opponents of this view, on the other hand, advocate for the host nation to embrace cultural differences. They contend that cultural diversity enriches societies and fosters tolerance and understanding. Acceptance of diverse customs, languages, and traditions can improve social cohesion and foster an environment that celebrates diverse cultural heritage. They believe that the host nation should be receptive and accommodating, valuing the unique perspectives and customs that visitors bring with them.

I believe it is essential to strike a balance between these two perspectives. As a sign of cultural sensitivity and appreciation, visitors should demonstrate reverence for local customs and norms. Understanding and adhering to fundamental etiquette can assist in bridging cultural gaps and promoting positive interactions. However, it is equally essential for the host nation to be tolerant of cultural differences. Accepting diversity and facilitating cultural exchange can result in mutual learning, the destruction of stereotypes, and the promotion of global understanding.

In conclusion, visitors must respect local customs, but the host nation must also appreciate cultural differences to foster an inclusive and welcoming environment. A balance between cultural sensitivity and openness to diversity can result in significant cultural exchanges and foster mutual understanding. By embracing cultural differences, both visitors and the host country can benefit from enlightening experiences and contribute to the development of a more harmonious global community.

Sample 10:

Some people believe that foreign visitors should follow local norms while others argue that the host country should welcome other cultures. I think foreign visitors should do as the Romans do because otherwise their behavior might strike locals as being offensive.

On the one hand, embracing cultural differences is a good way to show hospitality. Imagine that an Asian is visiting a western country. If all the restaurants they go to offer chopsticks as well as knives and forks, they would probably feel more comfortable and at home. However, I think that if a host country tries too hard to cater to foreign tastes, it might lose elements that are unique to its culture, which in turn might make it a less interesting place to visit. Put in other words, why would a person go through the time and expense of traveling abroad to just do the same things they do at home, the same way?

On the other hand, by following local customs and behavior, visitors are safe not to offend locals. For instance, many Americans chat loudly in public places and talk about and share their lives with complete strangers. If they act like this in countries like Norway and Denmark, they would be considered rude. I agree with this argument because when a person is in another country, their behavior reflects on their whole country. If they do things against local norms. They might leave the impression that all people from that country are impolite or bizarre.

In conclusion, although a host country can be more hospitable if it welcomes other cultures, I believe it is more important that foreign visitors follow local norms to avoid offending local residents.

Sample 11:

No doubt, the tourism industry has experienced rapid expansion over the last 15 years, surpassing the growth observed in the preceding three decades. The question of whether visitors should adhere to local customs or whether the host country should embrace the culture of the guests to properly welcome them elicits differing opinions. This essay aims to delve into both perspectives.

Adopting the local customs of a host country offers several distinct benefits, primarily addressing the challenge of a communication gap when traveling. Having some understanding of local traditions and language significantly eases social interactions, fostering a more enriching travel experience. The ability to communicate in the native language allows tourists to engage with local people and explore tourist attractions more seamlessly. A study highlighted by the Times of India indicates that 70% of people feel more at ease while traveling to another country when equipped with a basic knowledge of the language and culture.

Conversely, when travelers share their own culture and behavior with indigenous people, it provides an opportunity for the locals to gain a deeper understanding of the visitors' culture and character. This exchange allows for mutual learning, enabling indigenous communities to identify and rectify any negative aspects within their own culture.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that tourists should acquire a basic knowledge of the culture and language of the country they are visiting. This not only enhances the travel experience by facilitating effective communication but also fosters a positive exchange between visitors and locals, leading to a more culturally enriching and harmonious coexistence.

Sample 12:

The tourist sector has witnessed rapid growth over the past 15 years, sparking a debate on whether international visitors should adhere to the traditions and conduct of the people in the host country or if efforts should be made to remove cultural barriers. This essay aims to explore both perspectives on this contentious issue.

While it's undeniable that international visitors significantly contribute to a country's growth, a substantial portion of tourists do not adhere to local customs, leading to resistance from native citizens. This lack of adherence often results in negative perceptions as tourists exhibit behavior that is disrespectful and detrimental to the local populace. For instance, tourists from western countries may display contempt for Asian cultures, reinforcing stereotypes about poverty, caste systems, and customs. Moreover, issues like drug use and excessive alcohol consumption among tourists further impact the well-being of local residents. Addressing these negative behaviors is crucial to fostering a positive relationship between tourists and the host community.

Despite these challenges, tourism boasts numerous advantages, particularly its ability to stimulate the national economy. Tourists from affluent areas contribute significantly to the local economy by spending money on holidays, thereby raising the currency rate and contributing to overall economic growth. Additionally, the tourism sector provides employment opportunities for indigenous people, making it an important source of livelihood.

To strike a balance, the government should invest in infrastructure and enact stringent regulations to ensure that visitors do not engage in unlawful or unethical activities that jeopardize the country's sovereignty. This approach allows for the positive aspects of tourism, such as economic stimulation and employment opportunities, while safeguarding the cultural integrity and well-being of the host community.

In conclusion, recognizing the importance of tourism to a country's growth, it becomes imperative for the government to establish rules and regulations that prohibit unethical activities in the sector. This balanced approach ensures that the benefits of tourism are maximized while minimizing any negative impacts on the host community.

Sample 13:

There is little doubt that the tourism industry has witnessed dramatic growth over the last 15 years, sparking a debate on whether foreign tourists should respect and adhere to native customs and behavior or if efforts should be focused on removing cultural barriers. This essay aims to delve into both perspectives on this contentious issue.

While it is acknowledged that visitors from other countries contribute significantly to a nation's development, a notable portion of them do not engage in local rituals. This lack of adherence often leads to resentment from the local populace, as false social behavior by tourists creates a negative impact on the people of the host nation. For instance, tourists from western nations may exhibit disrespect towards Asians, reinforcing stereotypes related to poverty, castes, and traditions. Moreover, the prevalence of drug addiction and excessive alcohol consumption among tourists further influences and harms the well-being of local residents.

Despite these challenges, tourism brings numerous advantages, particularly its potential to boost the national economy. Tourists from affluent regions contribute significantly to the local economy by spending money on vacations, leading to an increase in the currency rate. Additionally, the tourism industry creates job opportunities for native people, making it a crucial source of livelihood.

To strike a balance, the government should invest in infrastructure and enact strict regulations to ensure that visitors do not engage in illegal activities that harm the sovereignty of the country. This approach allows for the positive aspects of tourism, such as economic stimulation and employment opportunities, while safeguarding the cultural integrity and well-being of the host community.

In conclusion, recognizing the critical role of the tourism industry in a country's development, it becomes imperative for the government to enact laws and orders preventing unethical practices within its borders. This balanced approach ensures that the benefits of tourism are maximized while minimizing any negative impacts on the host community.

Sample 14:

There is little doubt that the tourism industry has experienced a significant surge in the last 15 years, surpassing the growth observed in the preceding three decades. The debate revolves around whether tourists visiting another country should familiarize themselves with the local customs and values or whether the host country should welcome them by accepting their culture and language. This essay aims to explore both perspectives on this intriguing issue.

Having knowledge about different customs and behaviors when visiting another country offers numerous advantages. One of the most significant benefits is that it allows visitors to immerse themselves in the culture of the country they are exploring. Tourists gain insights into the local history and savor famous cuisines, contributing to a richer travel experience. This is particularly achievable when visitors possess a good understanding of the local language and culture. According to a survey by the Times of India, 70% of people in the USA express a keen interest in traveling to different historical places worldwide. Moreover, a substantial number of individuals prioritize acquiring knowledge about local people and transportation facilities before embarking on their journeys.

Conversely, locals of the host country should embrace tourists from other nations by accepting their culture and values. This reciprocal exchange not only allows locals to enhance their own cultural understanding but also presents an opportunity to improve their communication skills. By fostering an environment of acceptance and cultural exchange, both tourists and locals contribute to creating a more enriching and harmonious travel experience.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that the host country should welcome tourists by accepting their culture and values. This approach not only promotes cultural exchange but also holds the potential to boost the economy of the host country through a thriving and mutually beneficial tourism industry.

Sample 15:

Some people are calling into question how tourists should behave when they visit a new country. While some argue visitors should follow local customs and etiquette, others believe the host country should welcome other cultures with open arms. This essay will discuss both views, and then I will give my own perspective which is that the visitors should be embraced as guests.

On the one hand, there are people who claim that visitors should follow a host country’s customs. The main reason is that this shows respect and promotes understanding between people. If a visitor retains their country’s customs and does not acclimate themselves to the new environment, then the locals might think they are inconsiderate, discourteous or odd and do not want to associate with them. In addition, it can be dangerous to not follow customs. For instance, the British drive on the left side of the road, so Americans must follow this when visiting the U.K. or they will have a traffic accident.

On the other hand, there are those who believe that locals should embrace other cultures. The main reason for this is that people should have a right to follow their own paths. They argue that no culture is better than another, and the host country has no right to oblige their visitors to behave like their own citizens. As well as this, the tourism of the host country will be enhanced by allowing visitors freedom to follow their own paths. For instance, many people do not visit certain countries due to strict dress codes and not being able to drink alcohol.

In conclusion, it’s my opinion that both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I tend to believe that the host country should give their visitors a heart-warming welcome as it is at times difficult to change and adapt to new lifestyles when someone has only just arrived in a new country, whereas I feel that accepting differences is a lot easier for the hosts who are in the comfort of their own country.

Sample 16:

Some encourage people to accept and welcome other cultures which have been brought to their countries by tourists and some others believe that tourists should behave as the frame of the host country's rules and customs. This essay tries to cover both the views.

The first groups who opine that people should respect tourists’ culture believe that introducing new cultures to a society can be suitable. In other words, people can learn new things from tourists, and it can be helpful for increasing society awareness about the way of living in each corner of the world. In the other hand, these groups believe that people and governments should be flexible and admit other cultures if they want to be successful in the tourism industry and attract more tourists. Actually, lots of countries are competing with each other for being the destination of visitors on holidays and without respecting different cultures, they may be lost in this competition.

By contrast, some others worry about their local customs and traditional cultures, and they think that bringing new cultures and behaviours to one country by visitors can make a serious threat to their cultures. Put another way, they believe that people may be interested in other countries’ cultures when tourists come to their countries and in this way, they forget their local customs. For example, a new style of dressing would replace local clothes, or new foods would be developed instead of traditional ones. Hence, they always want tourists to behave as the host country allows. For instance, in some Islamic countries, governments prohibit drinking alcohol for tourists or ask women tourists to wear some specific dresses.

I think, therefore, tourists always would like to learn and visit local customs when they go to new places, so, host countries can make a potential for tourists to be free and also encourage them to follow local rules and customs by introducing and showing their benefits. Undeniably visitors would be interested in behaving as similarly as local people if the proper strategies are considered.

Sample 17:

It is always debatable whether visitors should follow local customs and behaviours, or the country should be accustomed to cultural differences. First, I would like to discuss following local customs and behaviour. As a human being, we have consciousness which helps us to decide what is right or wrong that we apply in every sphere of our life. But everybody may not apply consciousness or may not have the same level of consciousness to apply.

If one does not follow local customs, he/she may not be taken warmly by people of that country. Due to this reason, I believe that everybody who visits other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Besides this, local customs and behaviours are mostly regulated by the religion of the country, which is very sensitive to most people. That is why I agree with the view of following local customs and behaviour.

In the other hand, there are many reasons to agree with the second view that the host country should welcome cultural differences. It is universally true that civilisation is evolving from the beginning of mankind and the main reason behind this is that people are travelling from one place to another to explore the world which brings new cultures to new places. If one fails to welcome cultural differences, he/she will not be able to cope with the cultures of other countries. This will impact on the economy in terms of tourism and modernization as well as evaluation of civilisation.

A good example of welcoming cultural differences is Malaysia. People of western countries are travelling to Malaysia and most of them are not used to follow local customs and being a Muslim country, Malaysia also providing freedom to visitors until laws are broken. Malaysia has become an example for other countries to welcome cultural differences. That is why cultural differences should always be welcomed until they hurt your philosophy or religion.

Sample 18:

Nowadays the tourism industry is growing at a tremendous speed. Due to the boom in transport industries and holiday packages, people often travel to other countries for holidays and on official trips. There is a debate ongoing on whether the visitors from other nationality should follow local customs and behaviours during their stay in host countries. I will discuss this in the paragraphs below.

Firstly, when the foreigners visit other countries, they carry their culture along with them. But, during their stay in the host country, if they adopt the local customs, it will be helpful for them to get better communication with the local people. Meanwhile, when they adjust themselves to the local people's behaviour, it will make it easier to socialise with them. Also, this will help local people to better understand the foreigners.

Secondly, this will help the foreigner to have a good idea about local cultures and rituals. This understating helps our culture to spread globally, thereby more and more people get attracted toward the local culture. This, in turn, attracts a number of visitors from different countries to visit. This will help to increase the tourism industry and also help in giving employment opportunities in the related industries.

On the other hand, when the foreigners share their culture and behaviour with the local people it gives an opportunity to local people to a better understanding of their culture and characters. This will have an immense influence on local people's opinion about foreigners and their culture. Also, this helps them to identify the negative aspects of their culture and gives them an opportunity to correct it.

To sum up, by considering the above benefits, I personally believe that the balanced exchange of cultures and behaviour of foreigners with local people will benefit both the countries to come together and calm down if there are any frictions between the countries. Also, this will have a positive impact on the economy of both countries.

Sample 19:

It is noticeable that people tend to travel more frequently these days than they used to do in the past. While I agree that the travellers should follow the host country’s traditions and cultures, I also think that the host country should welcome cultural differences.

On the one hand, travellers should adapt to the culture of their host country and feel happy with the idea of trying new things. Nowadays, people not only consider travelling as a way to relax but also, they think it is a chance for self-improvement and exploring the world. Travelling is a good opportunity to try new things such as traditional cuisine, music and customs and those who just travel to view landscapes waste a perfect chance to learn something new. For example, people who have visited places like India, Egypt or China have been very excited when they tried the local food or wore the traditional dress. An experience like this broadens people’s horizons and enriches their knowledge.

On the other hand, for many reasons the host country should accept and understand the different backgrounds of tourists. Firstly, for many visitors, it would be difficult to follow the host culture and customs because these are usually different from their own and, in some cases, they may even be incompatible with their beliefs and morals. For example, Indian or Arabs who go to European countries may find it difficult to get used to the European taste in food because it does not contain as much spices as they have in their food. In addition, if travellers feel they are welcomed in the new country despite the cultural differences they will feel more comfortable visiting this place again.

In conclusion, I believe that it could be beneficial for travellers to get exposed to different cultures and customs. However, tourist destinations should be opened to the cultural diversity of newcomers.

Sample 20:

With the growth of technology in the travel industry, travelling to other countries has increased at a rapid speed. Countries have a disparate set of customs and interpretation of behaviour. The visitors should be allowed to follow their own customs and behaviours, but they must be wary of offending local customs and beliefs. In my opinion, we should develop the world as a global village to create unity in diversity.

The focal point of humanity should be moral values which are common in all regions rather than customs and behaviors which are diverse in different regions. If a host country cannot entertain the culture of visitors, then its participation with other countries in economic, financial and other activities will be hampered. South Asian country India is the best example of unity in diversity. There people from all the religions live peacefully and even visitors from other countries can follow their own culture. In my opinion, it is the moral responsibility of visitors to respect important beliefs and customs of their host country.

Different countries could have different interpretations of the same practice. It is very important for the visitors to know some practices about the places they visit so that they don't hurt sentiments or misinterpret behaviours of local people. A good example of cultural differences is the eating habits in India. In India people always prefer to eat with their hands which is considered as inferior in some western countries. Therefore, if a western person is visiting India, he must be aware of this and not feel offended.

In conclusion, we can say that culture is basically a set of rules followed by people which may vary in different countries. Furthermore, cultural practices can't be used as a tool to measure morality or character of a person. In my opinion, host nations should understand that visitors may have different cultures. Visitors too must be wary of offending local customs and traditions.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

Sample 1:

Peer pressure is a pervasive phenomenon that significantly influences the behaviours of young individuals. While some argue that it plays a crucial role in positively shaping the lives of the youth, others contend that the disadvantages of peer pressure are very detrimental. 

Peer pressure, when harnessed positively, can have several advantages. Firstly, it can foster a sense of belonging and camaraderie among individuals within the same age group. Young people often seek acceptance and affirmation from their peers, and this can contribute to their emotional well-being and self-esteem. A further benefit is that positive peer pressure can encourage healthy behaviours, such as exercising or avoiding risky activities. For instance, a teenager might be motivated to quit smoking if their friends promote a smoke-free lifestyle.

However, peer pressure can also have distinct disadvantages. The most pressing concern is the potential for negative influences on impressionable minds. Young people may succumb to the pressure of engaging in harmful behaviours, such as substance abuse, criminal activities, or reckless behaviours like driving without a seatbelt, due to peer pressure, which can lead to long-lasting negative consequences and jeopardise their future.

Moreover, excessive pressure from peers can stifle individuality and creativity as young people may conform to the norms of their peer group instead of pursuing their own aspirations and dreams. This conformity may limit their personal growth and hinder their ability to think independently.

In conclusion, I would argue that peer pressure has more disadvantages as although it can foster a sense of belonging and promote healthy behaviours, it also carries the risk of leading young people astray and stifling their individuality. It is imperative for parents, educators, and society at large to guide young people in making informed choices and navigating the complexities of peer influence.

Sample 2:

The peer group tends to exert influence on the way teenagers behave. While many believe that the influence of peers is immensely important, others opine that it has its obvious drawbacks. I believe that the benefits peer pressure brings outweigh the disadvantages because it can instil a positive attitude towards education, despite the primary drawback, namely substance use, or so on it may cause.

Without any doubt, the influence of peers can inspire young people to build positive behaviours, make good choices, and strive for academic excellence. When friends place emphasis on education and academic performance, it can exert a positive impact on the young’s attitude toward learning. In fact, students who maintain a friend circle who are diligent students may feel a strong motivation to study diligently. Take my brother’s case for example. He works harder to obtain good marks in exams because his friends are determined to achieve academic excellence. They possess a solid work ethic, and now so does he.

However, peer pressure can also exert influence on young people to engage in deviant behaviours. It may make young adults feel obliged to take on bad habits like substance abuse to feel like they are part of the circle and not levelled as boring or weak. For example, if a group of friends get involved in substance abuse, underage drinking, and delinquent activities, a child may feel obligated to conform to these behaviours to avoid exclusion.

Considering all these, I would like to mention that there is no concrete evidence to endorse the view that peer pressure is the primary reason for unacceptable behaviours and substance abuse. There are other factors, like genetics, mental health issues, and social influences, that play a profound role in this case.

To reiterate, the fact that peer pressure can encourage to conform to a positive attitude toward learning clearly outweighs the flawed argument that it can influence young people to develop delinquent behaviour and bad habits.

Sample 3:

The debate surrounding peer pressure often hinges on whether its advantages outweigh its disadvantages or if it is the opposite. While peer pressure can sometimes encourage positive behaviours and foster social connections, I believe its drawbacks are significant and can have long-lasting consequences.

On the one hand, proponents of peer pressure argue that it can motivate individuals to adopt healthy habits, such as regular exercise, academic diligence, and community involvement. Positive peer pressure can serve as a source of encouragement, support, and accountability, leading to personal growth and self-improvement. For example, a teenager may be more likely to participate in volunteer work if their friends are also involved, leading to a greater sense of civic responsibility and altruism.

However, the disadvantages of peer pressure often outweigh these benefits. Negative peer pressure can lead individuals to engage in risky behaviours, such as substance abuse, reckless driving, and delinquent activities, in order to fit in or gain acceptance from their peers. The desire to conform to social norms and avoid rejection can override rational decision-making and moral judgment, leading to harmful consequences for both individuals and society. For instance, adolescents may experiment with drugs or alcohol due to peer pressure, resulting in addiction, legal troubles, and impaired cognitive function. Moreover, peer pressure can contribute to the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes, discrimination, and bullying within peer groups. Individuals who deviate from social norms or express dissenting opinions may face ostracism, ridicule, or even physical violence from their peers, leading to feelings of isolation, low self-esteem, and mental health issues.

In conclusion, while peer pressure can sometimes promote positive behaviours and social connections, its disadvantages far outweigh any potential benefits.

Sample 4:

Peer pressure refers to the influence young individuals experience within the same age group, affecting their behaviors. This essay will critically evaluate the drawbacks and benefits of peer pressure on young people.

Peer pressure often leads young individuals to engage in risky behaviors. For instance, teenagers may feel compelled to experiment with drugs due to the effect of their peers who engage in such activities. The desire to fit in and be accepted can override their better judgment, exposing them to serious short-term health risks and potential addiction later in life. Moreover, succumbing to negative peer pressure can adversely affect academic performance, as students may prioritize social acceptance over their studies. This desire for approval can result in poor grades, limited educational opportunities, and long-term negative consequences.

On the other hand, positive peer pressure can inspire young individuals to set higher goals, adopt healthier habits, and strive for academic excellence. Many teenagers are pressured by their peers to join a study group, leading to improved learning outcomes and academic success. Relatedly, supportive friends can inspire young individuals to engage in physical fitness activities or pursue positive hobbies and talents, promoting a healthier and more well-rounded lifestyle. This sense of camaraderie and mutual encouragement fostered within positive peer groups can contribute significantly to personal growth and self-confidence. Actively seeking out positive and active peer groups and engaging in behaviors aligned with one’s personal values can help mitigate the adverse effects of negative peer pressure while harnessing the advantages of positive influence.

In conclusion, although peer pressure encourages risky behaviors and hinders personal growth, the motivational and emotional advantage make it positive on the whole. Ultimately, striking some degree of balance between independence and positive peer interactions is crucial to minimizing the disadvantages and embracing the benefits.

Sample 5:

Peer pressure is the influence exerted by a peer group that encourages people to change their attitudes, values, or behaviours to fit into group norms. It plays a significant part in adolescent life. I agree that peers can help make a particular place comfortable for an individual but majorly they play an active role in helping an individual indulge in risky behaviours. So, in my opinion, the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages.

Peer pressure plays a crucial role in shaping adolescent behaviour and attitudes. It helps people promote unity and harmony in society. For instance, a teenager might be motivated to excel academically or engage in community service due to the influence of their high-achieving peers. It tends to encourage people to conform to societal norms and values. Moreover, it can help young people in preparing for the realities of adulthood. This is because it exposes them to different viewpoints and assists them in learning how to navigate social dynamics, which in turn enhances their social skills and emotional intelligence. 

However, there can be several ill effects of being influenced by one’s peers. Firstly, it may encourage youth to engage in dangerous activities such as smoking, drinking, or drug usage to make them fit into their groups. Excess peer pressure is the major cause of stress, anxiety, and low self-esteem in the younger generation as it builds this feeling that they are not able to match the expectations of their peers. In extreme cases, it can even lead to depression and other mental health issues. This can also stifle individuality and creativity, preventing young people from discovering their true selves and potential. 

In addition to this, there can be a loss of personal identity as young people may feel compelled to adopt the attitudes, behaviours, and tastes of their peers, even if they conflict with their values and beliefs. It also leads to academic pressure as students may feel forced to achieve the same grades as their peers, leading to unhealthy competition and burnout. This can result in a lack of motivation and interest in learning, which can have long-term effects on their academic and career prospects.

In conclusion, peer pressure does have an indispensable role in the societal development of young individuals. However, it also provides people with a sense of comfort and security in their formative years. However, its disadvantages such as promoting risky behaviours, causing mental health issues, stifling individuality, and leading to academic pressure are more significant. Therefore, parents, educators, and society as a whole must provide guidance and support to young people to help them navigate the complexities of peer pressure.

Sample 6:

Many feel that peer pressure can have a positive impact on an individual, while others claim that its effects are unequivocally detrimental. In my opinion, despite providing motivation for self-development, the downsides associated with mental health decline and behavioral problems make this phenomenon decidedly negative.

On the one hand, peer pressure can encourage personal development. Individuals leading sedentary lifestyles might be persuaded into going to the gym by their peers and therefore cultivate healthy exercise habits in the long term. Relatedly, those surrounded by punctual friends may be influenced to arrive on time not only for social gatherings, but this habit could possibly extend to important business meetings. The adoption of these good daily habits can engender higher levels of self-confidence, which better prepares an individual to strive for excellence in various aspects of life.

However, peer pressure can be the source of mental health deterioration. When observing other people of the same age reaching major milestones and success in life, an individual may feel compelled to make comparisons and potentially feel dissatisfied with oneself and their current achievements. A pertinent example of this can often be seen in classroom settings, where a student may develop anxieties related to other students and in rarer instances, more concerning mental problems. Negative peer pressure also makes an individual gravitate towards self-destructive behavior. Some teenagers may be tempted by their peers into smoking cigarettes or drinking alcohol in order to gain approval and inclusion within a given social group.

In conclusion, in spite of motivational advantages concomitant with peer pressure, the related mental health problems and risky behavior are unequivocally negative. Individuals should focus on personal growth instead of fixating on others’ achievements.

Sample 7:

In the vibrant tapestry of adolescence, peer pressure emerges as a potent force, shaping behaviors and attitudes among the youth. This essay posits that while peer influence harbors potential benefits, such as fostering social integration and encouraging positive habits, its drawbacks, particularly in promoting conformity and risky behaviors, significantly overshadow its advantages.

Peer pressure, often perceived as a vehicle for conformity, exerts a formidable influence on young individuals, compelling them to align with the group’s norms and values. This phenomenon, while reinforcing social cohesion, frequently nudges adolescents towards compromising their individuality and adopting behaviors that may not align with their personal or moral values. For instance, the prevalent trend of underage drinking can be attributed to the desire to fit in, illustrating how peer influence can foster detrimental habits rather than constructive ones.

Moreover, the inclination to engage in risky behaviors under peer influence constitutes a significant drawback. Adolescents, in their quest for acceptance and fear of ostracization, may find themselves partaking in activities fraught with peril, such as reckless driving or substance abuse. These actions, while momentarily gratifying, can have long-lasting adverse effects on their health and wellbeing, underscoring the inherent dangers of succumbing to peer pressure.

Conversely, peer pressure can serve as a catalyst for positive change, encouraging young people to adopt beneficial habits and attitudes through the influence of their contemporaries. For example, peers who prioritize academic excellence and healthy living can inspire similar values in their circle. However, while the potential for positive influence exists, it is frequently overshadowed by the more immediate and compelling lure of negative behaviors that promise social acceptance.

In summary, while peer pressure may occasionally lead to positive changes, its inclination towards promoting conformity and risky behaviors is a greater issue. The negatives, especially its encouragement of harmful habits and the erosion of individuality, clearly outweigh the positives. This underscores the importance of creating environments that champion personal integrity over conformity, vital for nurturing resilient and well-rounded individuals.

Sample 8:

In adolescence, young people are often influenced by their peer group, a force that can wield both immense power and significant peril. While there's undeniable value in the emotional support, encouragement, and sense of belonging that peers can offer, I argue that the drawbacks of peer pressure - especially the inclination toward conformity at the expense of individuality and the propensity for rash decision-making - far outweigh these advantages.

When young people carefully select their social circles, peer pressure can, indeed, serve as a catalyst for positive change. Consider an aspiring scholar who surrounds themselves with academically driven friends aiming for Ivy League schools. In this context, the group's collective ambition propels the individual toward academic excellence. Moreover, at an age when the brain is highly malleable, the right peer pressure can stimulate not just intellectual growth but also emotional intelligence. It can teach young people the intricacies of interpersonal dynamics, as they navigate the highs and lows of relationships, including conflict resolution and empathy.

Nevertheless, the potential pitfalls of peer pressure should not be underestimated, especially given the vulnerability of adolescents who are still in the process of forming their values and judgments. This makes them susceptible to external influences that may not always align with their best interests. For instance, research indicates that the popularity of smoking in high schools directly correlates with an uptick in teenage smoking rates; youngsters may succumb to the vice merely to conform. Additionally, the fear of ostracization can lead adolescents to limit their friendships to a monolithic group, thereby reducing their exposure to diverse perspectives and impeding their emotional growth, ultimately stunting their psychological development.

In conclusion, peer pressure is a double-edged sword; while it may catalyze academic aspiration and emotional development when managed judiciously, it can also usher in detrimental consequences. Given that young individuals are prone to impulsive actions and less-than-ideal decision-making, the perils introduced by peer pressure must be acknowledged and carefully managed.

Sample 9:

The influence of peer pressure is undeniably a double-edged sword, wielding the power to either uplift or undermine an individual's life trajectory. Picture a young prodigy immersed in a social milieu comprising peers laser-focused on gaining admission to prestigious Ivy League institutions. Such an environment becomes a crucible for the cultivation of academic rigor, driving the young mind toward unparalleled scholastic achievements.

Additionally, during the formative years of adolescence, the brain's neuroplasticity is at its zenith, making it an ideal period for the enhancement of emotional intelligence. Within this context, positive peer pressure becomes instrumental in instilling essential life skills such as empathy, resilience, and conflict resolution. For example, facing challenges together, whether it's academic competition or personal disagreements, teaches valuable lessons about collaboration and emotional regulation.

Yet, the specter of the adverse effects looms large, especially when considering the malleable and impressionable nature of youth. Focused research illustrates that social trends among teenagers, such as the unfortunate resurgence of smoking, can be attributed to the pervasive influence of peer pressure. The desire to conform eclipses rational judgment, compelling young people to engage in detrimental behaviors just to maintain their social standing.

Moreover, the dread of social exclusion often coerces adolescents into narrowing their social circles to homogenous groups, thereby stifling their emotional and intellectual growth. When confined to a single, like-minded cohort, the opportunity to interact with diverse perspectives and develop a more nuanced understanding of the world is severely curtailed.

In conclusion, the multifaceted impact of peer pressure should not be casually dismissed. While it has the capacity to be a catalyst for personal and academic growth, the pitfalls are equally compelling. The key, therefore, lies in a judicious selection of one's social circle and a heightened self-awareness that enables an individual to sift through external influences to embrace only those that align with their authentic selves.

Sample 10:

Youngsters have always been influenced by the conduct of acquaintances belonging to the same age group. While this has certain shortfalls, the favors it brings are far more in number, which shall be elucidated in the following paragraphs.

The impact of conduct of acquaintances on youngsters is overwhelming and although this can have an adverse impact on the young psyche, it will be unjustified to profess that these eclipse the favorable effects; it is the other way round.

To begin with, undeniably, the consequence of the push afforded by classmates, friends, colleagues and social contacts, have been found to be coaxing individuals into establishing their definitive academic, professional, social and even health goals with great enthusiasm. To corroborate, several individuals pursuing weight loss objectives have admitted that it was their social network that persuaded them to work to shed their flab and attain a trimmer waist. Similarly, millions of IT professionals credit joining this industry to their classmates and friends whose success and encouragement pushed the former to follow the precedents and embrace this occupation.

Moreover, it is quite commonly seen that the persona is partly carved by the interaction with the outer world, especially with those in social circles and friendship, and this determines the level of intellect of an individual. To illustrate, those with a high level of enlightenment about the surroundings, general and specific issues such as geo-politics and environment, generally hail from peer groups that comprise intelligent people.

However, the only conspicuous downside of this phenomenon is youngsters starting to harbor unrealistic expectations about various spheres of their life, chasing unattainable goals, becoming frustrated if those objectives are not accomplished, and going astray. Nonetheless, such situations can be circumvented by adopting a prudent approach and identifying their own limitations.

In hindsight, it can be safely asserted that the allegation of shortcomings of peer pressure exceeding its pros lacks substance; it is this force that has guided an umpteen number of triumphant personalities who owe their accomplishments to these undercurrents.  

Sample 11:

Peer pressure is a phenomenon widely observed among young people, influencing their behaviors, decisions, and perceptions. While some advocate for its importance in shaping social dynamics and fostering development, others highlight its distinct disadvantages. The debate revolves around whether the negatives of peer pressure outweigh the positives.

Advantages of peer pressure are evident in various aspects of adolescent life. It often plays a role in introducing new ideas, interests, and experiences. Young individuals may be motivated to adopt positive habits like academic excellence, sports participation, or community engagement through encouragement and inspiration from peers. Additionally, peer pressure can facilitate social integration and help young people develop critical social skills, fostering a sense of belonging and camaraderie within their peer groups.

However, the disadvantages of peer pressure cannot be disregarded. The most glaring issue arises when negative influences lead to risky or harmful behaviors. Young individuals might succumb to peer pressure to engage in substance abuse, delinquency, or other irresponsible actions, driven by the desire for acceptance or fear of exclusion. This can result in detrimental consequences, affecting not only their immediate well-being but also their long-term prospects and mental health.

Furthermore, excessive reliance on peer approval might hinder personal growth and individuality. Young people may conform to societal norms or trends without considering their own values, preferences, or aspirations. This conformity might lead to a lack of independent thinking and decision-making skills, affecting their ability to navigate challenges and make informed choices in the future.

The disadvantages of peer pressure, particularly when it leads to negative outcomes or inhibits personal development, can have a lasting impact on individuals. The pressure to conform can overshadow one’s authenticity and hinder the exploration of unique talents and interests.

In evaluating whether the disadvantages outweigh the advantages of peer pressure, it’s crucial to consider context and moderation. Positive peer influence can foster growth, but when peer pressure leads to detrimental behavior or stifles individuality, its drawbacks become more pronounced. Finding a balance where individuals are positively influenced without compromising their values or well-being is crucial in navigating the complexities of peer pressure.

In conclusion, while peer pressure can offer positive reinforcement and social integration, its disadvantages, especially when it results in negative behaviors or stifles individuality, should not be overlooked. Striking a balance between positive peer influence and personal autonomy is essential for young individuals to develop into well-rounded, independent individuals capable of making informed decisions while benefiting from the positive aspects of social interaction.

Lời giải

Sample 1:

In today’s school systems, tests and examinations are major features in many countries, where some citizens believe that these tests play an important role. Whereas on the same scale others argue that they are not mandatory. However, I feel that testing should not be major a one in the school system for the following reasons.

Firstly, a common advantage of examinations is that they differentiate between the best and poor performers, i.e., hard-working students are smart in tests compared to others. Similarly, school kids feel that if they want to upgrade for the next standard they should appear and pass exams. Hence this concept creates responsibility for studies. However, many nations in the world are preferring this testing format in education.

On the other hand, a few drawbacks are noticed such as slow learners cannot perform well in the test and this creates inferior complexity among students. If opportunity, time and new learning techniques are imparted to students, they can perform better in tests.

Moreover, suicide trends are seen by this examination system. Hence, developed countries are exempting testing features. This phenomenon created confusion in parents, children and teachers whether to continue with the test pattern or simply promote students to the next higher class. This brought a drastic change in many countries which headed toward the exemption of tests.

In conclusion, testing candidates has both advantages and disadvantages, with the major advantage being that slow learners benefit significantly from the exam system. If passing an exam is not mandatory, students can still improve, even if maturity and seriousness towards studies are not observed in childhood. However, tests do not always accurately reflect students' merit and are thus often biased.

Sample 2:

Much could be said about different ways of testing or checking students at schools or universities. The most popular ones have always been causing very exciting discussions and debates around the world. We all do realise that teachers need to have a system that helps them to test their students’ knowledge, so they can see how effective their teaching methods are. The question is, do we really need to put so much pressure on these features? Are they really so effective?

The first thing about tests and exams is that they do check the level of information the students managed to learn from the lectures. The questions usually cover the area that has been thought about at school, so if students can answer them correctly it means that the teaching was successful.

The other, equally important aspect is that due to the tests or exams that students are facing at school they get motivated to study more in order to get better marks and to improve their knowledge. Sometimes it might be just the fact that it is called an exam, that makes students get together and study harder.

On the other hand, some students might feel discouraged by the same fact that makes the others motivated what of course results in low marks in the actual exam. They also think that the results are very often not relevant to the efforts they put into studying. Because the marking system is not fair, they just do not feel like studying more for the exam.

Furthermore, many students find exams of different kinds very stressful, especially school ones. They often think that there could be another way of testing, less stressful, that should be introduced in schools or universities. The supporters of this opinion often bring out the fact that most students start smoking actually because of the stress they are exposed to at school. And that is definitely not beneficial for you or your health.

To put things together, is there really such a big need for exams at school? Is there really no other way to check how effective the teaching methods are? That is of course not that easy, but still, I am deeply convinced that things can be changed. It requires all the sides involved to think and come up with new ideas that could later be put into schools and that wouldn’t be that stressful anymore, so students can actually start enjoying them.

Sample 3:

Being the main characteristic of most academic institutions, the examination system helps a school to evaluate the knowledge and skills of its current and prospective students. It is well known that there are lots of debates around available scoring systems used by many schools. Some people believe that current testing methods are not effective anymore, while others think that it is not necessary to replace or amend the current scoring methods. In my opinion both sides are partially right.

It is well-documented that test questions reflect the academic material used at school lectures and seminars. Such questions cover the most part of the subject taught and evaluate the level information acquainted by the students during the classes. Besides, upcoming examinations make students to learn harder the appropriate field of study. Without evaluation, I think many students would lose their interest in learning.

On the other hand, modern testing systems require students to obtain huge amounts of academic information within a short period of time. It is widely believed that only knowledge of subjects is not enough to pass the test with higher results. The students are also required to possess strong time management skills in order to get high scores during examinations within the time limit. I think that this situation makes lots of students feel pressure which eventually leads to lower scores.

In my opinion, examinations at schools should be less stressful where students can reveal their true knowledge and will not be demotivated. I think that the time limit of the test questions should be extended since the students can have enough time to think and apply the knowledge, can get higher scores, and will be stimulated to learn further.

Sample 4:

In recent years, there has been a vast increase in discussions about how the examination systems should be at schools. Now students are undertaking too many tests and exams at school which do have many advantages both for the students and the teachers, but at the same time they also have certain drawbacks as well. The administration departments at schools need to think seriously about the outcomes of the examination systems they have, to test the students. In this essay I would like to give my own opinion after discussing both sides of the argument.

The first good thing about the exams and tests is that it is a method to test students how well they are learning from the lectures delivered in the class and how successful teachers are in conveying their knowledge. For instance, if a whole group of students show poor grades in a subject then the teacher teaching that subject can be encouraged to work harder and improve his or her teaching skills to bring the students to the top. This is a strong point that favours the argument because teachers are the key figures in a school system and exams are mandatory to check their level of teaching.

The other, equally important factor in favour of the issue is that exams encourage students as well to study, do more reading and writing and thus improve their general knowledge. If there are no exams and tests, then students will not put any effort into learning and education. Exams produce a state of terror that forces children to study. Moreover, exams bring students together, they do combine studies which help them to learn the essence of teamwork and they develop communication skills. Lastly, exams develop a sense of competition which also draws students towards books.

On the other hand, exams do have some disadvantages as well. While competition can be encouraging for some, it is a major source of immense pressure on students, often leading to depression. When students do not get good grades, they are discouraged and at the same time they are forced, both by the teachers and the parents, to work hard, putting them under more pressure. Now more and more students are involved in drug addiction to relieve exam pressure.

To recapitulate, I concede that exams can be discouraging for the students in some ways, but this does not mean that they should be removed from the system. The advantages of exams outweigh their disadvantages. Students should be tested and then upgraded but at the same time weaker students should be given special help to improve.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Vietjack official store
Đăng ký gói thi VIP

VIP +1 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 1 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +3 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 3 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +6 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 6 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +12 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 12 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay