Câu hỏi:

12/01/2025 292

The table below shows the production of milk annually in four countries in 1990, 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified
Giải bởi Vietjack

 

Amount in litres

Nations

1990

2000

2010

Netherlands

11,262,000

11,155,000

11,466,000

Australia

11,246,000

11,105,000

9,165,000

Tanzania

87,000

142,000

155,000

Guatemala

26,000

55,000

84,000

Sample 1:

The table illustrates the yearly production of milk in the Netherlands, Australia, Tanzania, and Guatemala in 1990, 2000 and 2010.

Overall, in 1990, Netherlands and Australia had the highest milk output with almost identical volumes. In 2010, however, Australia was the only country witnessing a downward trend while other countries increased.

Considering the Netherlands and Australia, the two leading countries in 1990, milk production in these nations began at almost the same level (11.262 million and 11.246 million). In the decade that followed, the populations of both countries decreased by around 100,000. In 2010, the Netherlands regained first place by increasing to 11,466,000 liters, while Australia continued to decline further to 9,165,000 liters.

In contrast, Tanzania and Guatemala started with much lower milk production figures in 1990, with 87,000 liters and 26,000 liters, respectively. However, over the next twenty years, both countries experienced a significant surge in milk production, with Tanzania nearly doubling its production to 155,000 liters, and Guatemala almost tripling its production to 84,000 liters.

Sample 2:

The table compares four nations in terms of annual milk production in 1990, 2000, and 2010.

In general, the Netherlands does not show a remarkable increase in its production of milk, although this country outdid the others. Noticeably, while the data for Australia displays a decline, that for Tanzania and Guatemala indicates extensive increases.

As mentioned, the Netherlands, albeit the largest milk producer, did not grow significantly. The figures record that it dropped by 107,000 liters in the first decade, and although it climbed back to 11,466,000 liters in the following decade, the gap between the initial and final levels is relatively insignificant. Starting at roughly the same level as the Netherlands in 1990, Australia even plummeted by approximately 2,000,000 liters by 2010.

Tanzania and Guatemala both show a rise, but while figures for the former increased nearly twofold (87,000–155,000 liters), those for the latter almost quadrupled (26,000–84,000 liters). Despite that, Guatemala still remained in the lowest rank during the given period.

Sample 3:

The data given in the table shows the changes in the annual production of milk in four different nations during 1990, 2000 and 2010.

In general, while the production of milk annually in Netherlands, Tanzania and Guatemala showed an increasing trend, that of Australia declined over the given period. Netherlands was the largest producer of milk throughout the period.

In 1990, the annual production of milk was higher in Netherlands than in other countries and it produced 11,262,000 litres of milk. This production rate dropped moderately to 11,155,000 litres in 2000 before showing a significant rise to 11,466,000 litres in 2010. Tanzania’s milk production annually was much lower than Netherlands. Its production inclined noticeably from 87000 litres in 1990 to 155,000 litres in 2010. Likewise, the quantity of milk produced in Guatemala showed an upsurge to more than double in 2000 and reached 55,000 litres from 26,000 litres in 1990, thereafter it considerably improved to 84,000 litres in 2010.

In contrast, the annual milk production rate in Australia showed a steady drop from 11,246,000 litres in 1990 to 9,165,000 litres in 2010 after reaching 11,105,000 in 2000.

Sample 4:

The table demonstrates the annual milk production of four countries, namely Tanzania, Guatemala, Australia, and the Netherlands in the years 1990, 2000, and 2010.

Overall, the data reveals a significant increase in milk production for Tanzania and Guatemala during the given period. The Netherlands remained the top milk producer among the countries, while Guatemala recorded the lowest milk production.

Looking specifically at Tanzania and Guatemala, Tanzania’s milk production rose from 87,000 liters in 1990 to 155,000 liters in 2010, while Guatemala’s increased from 26,000 liters in 1990 to 84,000 liters in 2010. Despite these improvements, both countries still recorded the lowest milk production compared to Australia and the Netherlands.

On the other hand, Australia’s milk production decreased noticeably between 1990 and 2010, from 11,246,000 liters to 9,165,000 liters. In contrast, milk production in the Netherlands increased slightly from 11,262,000 liters in 1990 to 11,466,000 liters in 2010, which made it the biggest milk producer among the four nations.

Sample 5:

The given table illustrates the yearly production of milk in the Netherlands, Australia, Guatemala and Tanzania in 1990, 2000 and 2010. A cursory glance at the graph is enough to make it clear that the maximum production of milk was in the Netherlands throughout the given period.

The Netherlands produced 11,262,000 litres of milk in 1990, but in 2000, the production fell slightly to 11,155,000 litres, but after that it picked up again and reached an all time high of 11,466,9000. Australia was closely behind the Netherlands in the production of milk in 1990. It produced 11,246,000 litres of milk in 1990, but the production fell gradually and reached 9,165,000 litres by 2010. Tanzania, and Guatemala increased their milk production from 87,000 and 26,000 in 1990 to 155,000 and 84,000 litres respectively in 2010. The least milk production was in Guatemala throughout the period of twenty years. However, the biggest proportionate increase was also seen in Guatemala as the milk production more than doubled from 1990 to 2000.

Overall, the production of milk increased in all given countries except for Australia, where it decreased over the given period of two decades.

Sample 6:

The table illustrates annual milk production volumes in the Netherlands, Australia, Tanzania, and Guatemala over a span of two decades, specifically the years 1990, 2000, and 2010.

Overall, this period marked a notable increase in milk production for the Netherlands, Tanzania, and Guatemala, with only Australia showing a reduction. The data highlights not only the dominance of the Netherlands and Australia in terms of volume but also the significant growth trajectories of the emerging producers, Tanzania and Guatemala.

It is evident that the Netherlands and Australia were leading producers, with their figures markedly surpassing those of Tanzania and Guatemala. Initially, in 1990, both countries reported production slightly exceeding 11 million litres. However, by the turn of the millennium, a modest dip occurred in the Dutch figures, followed by a rebound to 11.5 million litres in 2010, indicating a resilient dairy sector. In contrast, Australia experienced a gradual decrease over the 20-year period, concluding with 9.2 million litres, reflective of a sustained downward trend.

Tanzania, starting from a modest base of 87,000 litres, saw a substantial proportional increase over the next twenty years, reaching 155,000 litres by 2010. This growth, although significant, pales in comparison to Guatemala, which, despite starting as the smallest producer at 26,000 litres, expanded production more than threefold, culminating at 84,000 litres.

Sample 7:

The table provides a comparative analysis of the production of milk annually in four countries: the Netherlands, Australia, Tanzania, and Guatemala, at three pivotal points in time - 1990, 2000, and 2010.

Overall, the Netherlands and Australia dominated the production of milk annually, though with contrasting trajectories over the two decades. While the Netherlands showed resilience and an eventual increase in production, Australia’s figures declined steadily. Conversely, Tanzania and Guatemala, starting from lower production levels, exhibited substantial relative increases by 2010.

In detail, the Netherlands started with a production of 11,262,000 litres in 1990, which slightly decreased to 11,155,000 litres in 2000, before rising to 11,466,000 litres in 2010. Australia, on the other hand, saw a gradual decline from an initial production nearly identical to the Netherlands at 11,246,000 litres, descending to 11,105,000 litres in 2000, and further down to 9,165,000 litres by the end of the period.

Shifting focus to Tanzania and Guatemala, both countries' dairy sectors were marked by growth. Tanzania's production was a mere 87,000 litres in 1990, which then experienced more than a seventeen-fold increase to 155,000 litres in 2010. Guatemala, despite producing the least milk initially, at 26,000 litres, managed a significant escalation in its dairy industry, with production climbing to 84,000 litres in 2010, demonstrating more than a threefold increase.

Sample 8:

The provided table delineates the annual milk production in the Netherlands, Australia, Tanzania, and Guatemala during the years 1990, 2000, and 2010.

Overall, both the Netherlands and Australia emerged as the leading milk producers. Australia was the sole country witnessing a decline in milk production, while the other nations experienced an upward trajectory.

Examining the Netherlands and Australia, the top producers in 1990, both commenced their milk output at nearly identical levels, standing at 11.262 and 11.246 million liters, respectively. Subsequently, over the ensuing decade, both countries encountered a marginal decrease in production by approximately 100,000 liters. However, in 2010, the Netherlands reclaimed the leading position by augmenting its production to 11,466,000 liters, whereas Australia continued its descent, plummeting further to 9,165,000 liters.

In contrast, Tanzania and Guatemala initiated the 1990 period with considerably lower milk production figures, registering 87,000 liters and 26,000 liters, respectively. Over the subsequent two decades, both nations underwent substantial expansions in milk production. Tanzania nearly doubled its production, reaching 155,000 liters, while Guatemala nearly tripled its output, reaching 84,000 liters by 2010.

Sample 9:

The table illustrates how annual milk production in various countries changed over three years, 1990, 2000 and 2010. Overall, the amount of milk increased in all countries except for Australia, whose milk yield dropped. It can also be seen that the Netherlands possessed the highest figure in all years.

In 1990, the Netherlands and Australia were dominant in milk production, with 11,262,000 and 11,246,000 liters, respectively. These numbers dwarfed those of the remaining countries, as Tanzania produced 87,000 liters, whereas Guatemala reported merely 26,000 liters.

Ten years later, the levels of the Netherlands and Australia had decreased slightly, but they remained close, at over 11 million liters. The other two countries’ yield, meanwhile, rose significantly, as Tanzania recorded 142,000 liters in 2000, and the figure for Guatemala doubled to 55,000. By 2010, the milk production in the Netherlands climbed to nearly 11,500,000 liters, which remained as the top figure that year. Australia’s milk yield, in contrast, dropped significantly to 9,165,000 liters, which amounted to four-fifths of the data in the Netherlands. The level for Tanzania increased to 155,000, and while Guatemala continued to rank in last place, this country experienced the largest margin of growth. There were 84,000 liters of milk produced in Guatemala in 2010, which was over three times its 1990 figure.

Sample 10:

The table compares milk production volumes of four countries over two decades.

In general, there was a decrease in the total output over the period surveyed, despite growth recorded for most of the countries.

More specifically, the top contributors were the Netherlands and Australia. Both countries recorded slightly over 11.2 million liters of milk yield in 1990, which declined by 107,000 liters and 141,000 liters, respectively, over the subsequent decade. By 2010, the former had bounced back to a record high (11,466,000 liters), while a 2-million-liter drop was documented in the latter.

Production volumes in the remaining two countries were much smaller despite substantial growth there. Despite having doubled its production capacity, Tanzania merely collected 155,000 liters, a little over one percent of the Dutch figure, in 2010. Smaller numbers were reported for Guatemala, where cows only generated 26,000 liters in 1990. Even after a threefold increase, milk yield here (84,000 liters) remained by far the lowest in 2010.

Sample 11:

The table presents data on the annual milk production in four countries, namely the Netherlands, Australia, Tanzania, and Guatemala, over the period from 1990 to 2010.

Overall, the table demonstrates that milk production in the Netherlands and Australia remained consistently high, although showing some fluctuation, while Tanzania and Guatemala experienced significant growth in their production.

The Netherlands and Australia were the top milk producers, with annual output exceeding 11 million liters in all three years. The Netherlands maintained a relatively stable production, ranging from 11,262,000 liters in 1990 to 11,466,000 liters in 2010. In contrast, Australia witnessed a slight decline in production from 11,246,000 liters in 1990 to 9,165,000 liters in 2010.

Tanzania and Guatemala displayed a contrasting pattern. While Tanzania’s milk production witnessed a substantial increase from 87,000 liters in 1990 to 155,000 liters in 2010, Guatemala experienced a gradual rise from 26,000 liters to 84,000 liters in the same period. This indicates a significant development in milk production in Tanzania compared to Guatemala.

Sample 12:

The table provides information about annual milk production in four nations at ten-year intervals from 1990 to 2010.

Overall, the Netherlands was reported to be the leading milk producer among the four. In addition, the production levels in Australia underwent a consistent fall, while those in the other countries showed a general upward trend after three decades.

The first impression from the data is that the Netherlands’ figures in 1990 and 2000, at over 11.2 million and 11.1 million litres, respectively, almost equated to Australia’s. Dutch milk production, after undergoing similar declines, rose to nearly 11.5 million litres in 2010, whereas Australian counterparts reduced their yield by almost 2 million.

Milk production in Tanzania and Guatemala was relatively modest compared to the aforementioned countries. Tanzania’s milk yield started at 87,000 litres and experienced a massive surge to exceed 1.5 million litres at the end. Seeing a less considerable rise, meanwhile, the amount of milk produced in Guatemala reached 84,000 litres in the final year from a starting figure of 26,000.

Sample 13:

The table charts compare the production of milk in the Netherlands, Australia, Tanzania, and Guatemala in the years 1980, 2000, and 2010 presented in liters. Overall, it is noticeable that Netherlands, Tanzania, and Guatemala followed an increasing trend, while there was a decrease in milk production in Australia over the given timeframe.

To begin with, the Netherlands had the highest milk output throughout the given years. In 1990, 11,262,000 liters of milk were produced in the Netherlands, with only a 46,000-liter difference in Australia. It dropped to 11,155,000 liters in 2000 before it showed a significant rise to 11,466,000 liters in 2010.

However, Tanzania produced much lesser milk than the Netherlands, with 87000 liters of milk in 1990, and it noticeably inclined to 1,55,000 liter in 2010; likewise, the production of milk in Guatemala witnessed an upsurge over the years, and an amount of 84, 000 liters was produced 2010.

In contrast, milk production in Australia showed a steady decline from 11,246,000 in 1990 to 9,165,000 in 2010 after reaching 1,42,000 in 2000.

Sample 14:

The table chart gives information about the manufacture of milk in four different nations (Netherlands, Australia, Tanzania, and Guatemala) between 1990 and 2010.

Overall, in terms, the Netherlands remained constant to the biggest produced throughout these periods, but in the second period, it dropped slowly. While decreasing milk liters in Australia compared to Tanzania and Guatemala, these intervals rapidly increase significantly.

On the one hand, by 1990, Netherlands and Australia had a rise in construction, about 11,262,000 – 246,000, respectively. By contracts, Tanzania creates 87,000 higher than Guatemala, whose liters about 26,000.

However, in 2000 milk production in the Netherlands had dropped slightly. Likewise, Australia had approximately 11,105,000 liters. Furthermore, (Tanzania and Guatemala) have increased substantially. During 2010 the Netherlands was growth to 11,466 000 liters, similar to Tanzania and Guatemala, had soared enormously to nearly 1,55,00 Tanzanian liters, and thus, 84,000 to other countries except for Australian manufacture of milk had declined to around 9,165,000.

Sample 15:

The graph provides data on how much milk was produced annually in the Netherlands, Australia, Tanzania, and Guatemala over three decades, from 1990 to 2010.

Overall, the amount of milk in the Netherlands, Tanzania, and Guatemala witnessed a rising trend, while the opposite was true for Australia. In addition, Guatemala consistently had the least milk production among the four given countries throughout the examined years.

In 1990, the Netherlands and Australia, which were the first and second leading countries, produced 1,1262,000 litres and 11,246,000 litres of milk, respectively. Although the Netherlands experienced a minor drop in milk production in 2000 to 11,155,000 liters in 2000, this figure witnessed a recovery of 11,466,000 litres in the following 10 years. In contrast, the figure for Australia bottomed out at 9,165,000 litres at the end of the period.

Tanzania and Guatemala began the examined period with a modest milk production of 87,000 litres for the former and 26,000 litres for the latter. Significantly, in the next two decades, both of these figures rocketed to peak at 1,55,000 litres and 84,000 litres in the same order.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

The plans below show a bookstore in 2000 and the bookstore now.  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The maps show changes in the layout of a bookstore between 2000 and the present. 

In general, the layout of the bookstore has been significantly changed, especially on the left-hand side of the room. A number of features have been moved and modified, while other facilities have been added. 

In 2000, there was a large section dedicated to fiction books on the left-hand side of the store. However, that section has been divided into four new sections, in which books on art, hobbies, cookery, and fiction are now displayed.

The area for fiction books in the rear left corner of the store is now used for non-fiction books, while the old non-fiction section has been transformed into a new cafe. The central area of the room, which used to be for art, cookery, and hobby books, is now occupied by tables and chairs. Meanwhile, the space for travel books, new books, and the service desk, has remained unchanged over the years. 

Sample 2:

The maps depict the layout changes of a bookstore from 2000 to the present. Overall, the bookstore has undergone significant modifications, including the relocation of several book sections, the introduction of a seating area, and the addition of a café.

In 2000, the bookstore’s central area was occupied by the art, hobbies, and cookery sections. These sections have now been moved to the top left corner, next to the fiction area. As a result, the fiction section, which previously spanned across two large areas, has been reduced in size. The central space, once home to art, hobbies, and cookery, now accommodates three tables for customers to sit and read.

Additionally, the non-fiction section, originally located at the bottom of the store, has been relocated to the top right corner, where the larger fiction area once stood. The space formerly used for non-fiction has been transformed into a café, providing customers with refreshments. Despite these transformations, some areas have remained unchanged. The travel section, new books, service desk, and entrance have all stayed in their original positions throughout the period.

Sample 3:

The two maps depict the transformation of a bookshop over the course of two decades, from the year 2000 to the present.

Overall, the layout of the store has undergone significant changes over time, particularly with regard to the arrangement of the different sections. While the centre of the store is now fully occupied, the relocation of the cooking, hobbies, and art units to the north has resulted in a more balanced distribution of content throughout the store. The addition of a café has also enhanced the shopping experience for customers, offering a comfortable space for reading, relaxing, and enjoying a cup of coffee.

In the year 2000, the central area of the bookshop was primarily occupied by cooking, hobbies, and art units, while the northeast and north edges were dominated by large fiction units. The west and east west corners housed travel, new books, and a service desk, and a non-fiction section was situated on the east side of the store.

Fast forward to the present, and the bookshop has undergone a significant transformation. The central tables are now completely occupied, forcing the cooking, hobbies, and art units to be relocated to the north. The previous large fiction unit in the northeast corner has been replaced by a non-fiction section, and a café now occupies the south side of the store, where the non-fiction department once stood.

Sample 4:

The two maps show the evolution of a bookshop from the year 2000 to the present. Overall, the tables in the centre have been totally occupied, pushing the units for hobbies, literature, and cooking to the north. Also, a café has replaced a non-fiction section in the present bookstore.

The centre of the bookshop included cooking, hobbies, and art areas in 2000. Large fiction units were occupying the northeast and north edges. After the entry area, on the west and east west corners were travel, new books, and a service desk. A non-fiction section was also located on the east side of the bookstore.

The present bookshop has three attached circular tables with four chairs surrounding each one in the centre, displacing the cooking, hobbies, and art units to the north side where there used to be a huge fiction arrangement. Additionally, a non-fiction section has taken the place of the other fiction unit that was in the northeast corner. In fact, the south side of the bookshop, which is currently home to a café, used to house the nonfiction department.

Sample 5:

The two maps depict the changes that have taken place in a bookstore from 2000 to the present day. Overall, the central area has been completely packed with tables, pushing cookery, hobbies, and fiction units on the north side. Meanwhile, at the expense of a non-fiction unit, a café has appeared in the current bookstore.

In 2000, there were cookery, hobbies, and art sections at the centre of the bookstore. Both the north and the northeast sides were occupied by large fiction units. Travel, new books, and service desk were on the west and east west corner right after the entrance area. Moreover, there was a non-fiction unit on the east side of the bookstore.

In the current bookstore, pushing cookery, hobbies, and art units to the north side, where previously there was a large fiction setup, the central space is packed with three round tables attached with four seats around each one. Furthermore, the other fiction unit, which was located at the northeast corner, is now replaced with a non-fiction area. In fact, the nonfiction section was previously on the south side of the bookstore, which is now occupied by a café.

Sample 6:

The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now.

Overall, several scattering book sections have been consolidated to make space for the introduction of some new services.

In 2000, fiction was the most dominating genre, occupying the largest L-shaped shelves running along the top wall and half of the right-side one. Hobbies, cookery, and art took up a modest space in the middle of the bookstore.

Currently, the area right after the entrance has been kept intact with space dedicated to the travel and new book sections. The L-shaped area has been divided into four nearly equal sections to accommodate art, cookery, and fiction at the top, and non-fiction on the right, which has allowed the removal of the four separate display areas. The non-fiction section from 2000 has been removed to establish a café, enhancing customers' experience.

Sample 7:

The maps illustrate the reorganization of a bookstore at present in comparison to its arrangement in 2000.

According to the floor plan of the store, the area right at the entrance has been kept intact with space dedicated to the travel and new books sections. Also, in the near right-hand corner after the front entrance, still stands the service desk.

However, after reshuffling, the fiction section stretching along the left wall in 2000 has been reduced to only a quarter of its original size in the back corner of the store. This leaves room for the art, hobbies, and cookery sections which have been removed from the middle of the store to make way for three sets of tables and chairs. At the back of the store, people now keep non-fiction books where there used to be fictions. Meanwhile the non-fiction section in 2000 has been removed to establish a café which customers can reach when they walk past the service desk on the right of the store.

Overall, the maps demonstrate the resizing and relocation of the same sections of books in the store to accommodate a new in-house café.

Sample 8:

The map illustrates the evolution of a bookstore's layout from the year 2000 to the present day. A comparative analysis reveals a significant reconfiguration of various sections, notably a reduction in the area allocated to fiction, which has been supplanted by new facilities and sections.

Commencing with the left side of the entrance, the original fiction area has undergone a notable transformation, segmenting into four distinct categories: Art, Hobbies, Cookery, and Fiction. This diversification enhances the variety available to customers. Furthermore, the upper right section, which initially housed a dedicated fiction area, has now been occupied by a Non-Fiction section. In contrast, the Travel section, located directly opposite the entrance, has remained unchanged over the years, indicating a stable demand for this genre.

On the right side of the entrance, the sections for New Books and the Service Desk have retained their original positions. However, a Non-Fiction area that existed in 2000 has been converted into a café, reflecting a shift towards a more leisure-oriented experience for patrons. Additionally, the middle section, which previously included Cookery, Hobbies, and Art areas, has transitioned into a cluster of tables, providing customers with spaces to sit, relax, or read while enjoying their visit to the bookstore.

Sample 9:

The changes which occurred to the physical layout of a bookstore since 2000 are portrayed in the given maps. Overall, it is clear that there have been done significant alterations in the store for the introduction of a Cafe and a reading area.

In 2000, the bookstore was a square-shaped building with its entrance at the West. The service desk was there towards its extreme right, crossing the sections for travel and new books. Most area of the store was occupied by books on fiction: at the North and towards the North-east. Non-fiction books were arranged to the South, towards the East of the service desk. At the centre, there were books on cookery, hobbies and art.

The first major change as a part of re-arrangement is seen at the centre, when the area is seen cleared up for reading. The area for fiction at North is seen shrunken by a quarter of its previous size. Books on art, cookery and hobbies occupied the other three portions. The area in the North-east, where fiction books were there in 2000, is seen occupied by non-fiction books now. At the place where the non-fiction books were seen, a café came to existence.

Sample 10:

The two maps illustrate the layout of a bookstore in 2000 and the present day.

Overall, while the core structure of the bookstore remains the same, there have been some noteworthy changes in the arrangement of bookshelves and the addition of a café and tables.

In 2000, the largest section in the bookstore was allocated to fiction books, located on both sides of the store. Non-fiction books occupied the space at the bottom right corner, while genres such as travel, art, hobbies, and cookery were arranged in the middle part of the store. A section labeled “new books” was placed near the entrance, along with a service desk on the left-hand side.

In contrast, the current layout has undergone several modifications. The fiction section has been reduced in size, and the space previously occupied by non-fiction books is now a café. The non-fiction section has been moved to the top right corner, replacing part of the old fiction area. In the center of the store, three tables have been introduced, creating a more communal space. Additionally, the sections for travel, art, hobbies, and cookery books have remained in the same area, but their positions have been slightly adjusted.

Lời giải

The line graph shows the number of people who used different communication services in the world.  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The line graph gives data about the number of users of five different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.

Overall, all services experienced some growth over the 10-year period, with cell phone and Internet services experiencing the most growth and becoming the most popular forms of communication.

In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5% of the population. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the highest position in 2008, with more than 60% percent of the population using this type of service. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.

Meanwhile, throughout the 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of landline services, at about 15% of the population. Also, the use of mobile and fixed broadband services was minimal before 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5% of the population by the last year.

Sample 2:

The line graph gives data about the number of users of 5 different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.

Overall, cell phone and Internet services became more and more popular, and others similarly experienced minimal growth over the years.

In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5 per 100 inhabitants. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the higher position in 2008, at more than 60 users per 100 in habitants. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.

Meanwhile, throughout this 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of the landline service, with about 15 users per 100 inhabitants. Also, mobile and fixed broadband had yet to be introduced by 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5 users per 100 inhabitants in the last year.

Sample 3:

The line graph illustrates the number of people in the world who used five categories of communication services at two-year intervals from 1998 to 2008.

Overall, although all kinds of communication services tended to grow during the entire time period, only the increase in popularity in cellular phone service was significantly higher than the rise in that of other means of communication.

In 1998, the figure for cellular phone service was round about 500 people, as same as Internet service’s. From 1998, the number of individuals using cellular phone services increased dramatically to exactly 6000 people and became the most common means of communication in the year 2008. Additionally, the figure for Internet service was about five times higher than during the period of 10 years.

With 1500 people used, the figure for landline service was the highest number in 1998. However, that figure had a minor increase to 2000 people in 2006 before it dropped slightly to approximately 1800 people in 2008. The figure for mobile broadband and fixed broadband remained nearly 0 throughout the first six-year period. They were also the least popular kinds of communication services despite rising up to 500 people in 2008.

Vietjack official store
Đăng ký gói thi VIP

VIP +1 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 1 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +3 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 3 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +6 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 6 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay

VIP +12 - Luyện thi tất cả các đề có trên Website trong 12 tháng

  • Hơn 100K đề thi thử, đề minh hoạ, chính thức các năm
  • Với 2tr+ câu hỏi theo các mức độ Nhận biết, Thông hiểu, Vận dụng
  • Tải xuống đề thi [DOCX] với đầy đủ đáp án
  • Xem bài giảng đính kèm củng cố thêm kiến thức
  • Bao gồm tất cả các bậc từ Tiểu học đến Đại học
  • Chặn hiển thị quảng cáo tăng khả năng tập trung ôn luyện

Mua ngay