The table below shows the production of milk annually in four countries in 1990, 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:

|
Amount in litres |
||
Nations |
1990 |
2000 |
2010 |
Netherlands |
11,262,000 |
11,155,000 |
11,466,000 |
Australia |
11,246,000 |
11,105,000 |
9,165,000 |
Tanzania |
87,000 |
142,000 |
155,000 |
Guatemala |
26,000 |
55,000 |
84,000 |
Sample 1:
The table illustrates the yearly production of milk in the Netherlands, Australia, Tanzania, and Guatemala in 1990, 2000 and 2010.
Overall, in 1990, Netherlands and Australia had the highest milk output with almost identical volumes. In 2010, however, Australia was the only country witnessing a downward trend while other countries increased.
Considering the Netherlands and Australia, the two leading countries in 1990, milk production in these nations began at almost the same level (11.262 million and 11.246 million). In the decade that followed, the populations of both countries decreased by around 100,000. In 2010, the Netherlands regained first place by increasing to 11,466,000 liters, while Australia continued to decline further to 9,165,000 liters.
In contrast, Tanzania and Guatemala started with much lower milk production figures in 1990, with 87,000 liters and 26,000 liters, respectively. However, over the next twenty years, both countries experienced a significant surge in milk production, with Tanzania nearly doubling its production to 155,000 liters, and Guatemala almost tripling its production to 84,000 liters.
Sample 2:
The table compares four nations in terms of annual milk production in 1990, 2000, and 2010.
In general, the Netherlands does not show a remarkable increase in its production of milk, although this country outdid the others. Noticeably, while the data for Australia displays a decline, that for Tanzania and Guatemala indicates extensive increases.
As mentioned, the Netherlands, albeit the largest milk producer, did not grow significantly. The figures record that it dropped by 107,000 liters in the first decade, and although it climbed back to 11,466,000 liters in the following decade, the gap between the initial and final levels is relatively insignificant. Starting at roughly the same level as the Netherlands in 1990, Australia even plummeted by approximately 2,000,000 liters by 2010.
Tanzania and Guatemala both show a rise, but while figures for the former increased nearly twofold (87,000–155,000 liters), those for the latter almost quadrupled (26,000–84,000 liters). Despite that, Guatemala still remained in the lowest rank during the given period.
Sample 3:
The data given in the table shows the changes in the annual production of milk in four different nations during 1990, 2000 and 2010.
In general, while the production of milk annually in Netherlands, Tanzania and Guatemala showed an increasing trend, that of Australia declined over the given period. Netherlands was the largest producer of milk throughout the period.
In 1990, the annual production of milk was higher in Netherlands than in other countries and it produced 11,262,000 litres of milk. This production rate dropped moderately to 11,155,000 litres in 2000 before showing a significant rise to 11,466,000 litres in 2010. Tanzania’s milk production annually was much lower than Netherlands. Its production inclined noticeably from 87000 litres in 1990 to 155,000 litres in 2010. Likewise, the quantity of milk produced in Guatemala showed an upsurge to more than double in 2000 and reached 55,000 litres from 26,000 litres in 1990, thereafter it considerably improved to 84,000 litres in 2010.
In contrast, the annual milk production rate in Australia showed a steady drop from 11,246,000 litres in 1990 to 9,165,000 litres in 2010 after reaching 11,105,000 in 2000.
Sample 4:
The table demonstrates the annual milk production of four countries, namely Tanzania, Guatemala, Australia, and the Netherlands in the years 1990, 2000, and 2010.
Overall, the data reveals a significant increase in milk production for Tanzania and Guatemala during the given period. The Netherlands remained the top milk producer among the countries, while Guatemala recorded the lowest milk production.
Looking specifically at Tanzania and Guatemala, Tanzania’s milk production rose from 87,000 liters in 1990 to 155,000 liters in 2010, while Guatemala’s increased from 26,000 liters in 1990 to 84,000 liters in 2010. Despite these improvements, both countries still recorded the lowest milk production compared to Australia and the Netherlands.
On the other hand, Australia’s milk production decreased noticeably between 1990 and 2010, from 11,246,000 liters to 9,165,000 liters. In contrast, milk production in the Netherlands increased slightly from 11,262,000 liters in 1990 to 11,466,000 liters in 2010, which made it the biggest milk producer among the four nations.
Sample 5:
The given table illustrates the yearly production of milk in the Netherlands, Australia, Guatemala and Tanzania in 1990, 2000 and 2010. A cursory glance at the graph is enough to make it clear that the maximum production of milk was in the Netherlands throughout the given period.
The Netherlands produced 11,262,000 litres of milk in 1990, but in 2000, the production fell slightly to 11,155,000 litres, but after that it picked up again and reached an all time high of 11,466,9000. Australia was closely behind the Netherlands in the production of milk in 1990. It produced 11,246,000 litres of milk in 1990, but the production fell gradually and reached 9,165,000 litres by 2010. Tanzania, and Guatemala increased their milk production from 87,000 and 26,000 in 1990 to 155,000 and 84,000 litres respectively in 2010. The least milk production was in Guatemala throughout the period of twenty years. However, the biggest proportionate increase was also seen in Guatemala as the milk production more than doubled from 1990 to 2000.
Overall, the production of milk increased in all given countries except for Australia, where it decreased over the given period of two decades.
Sample 6:
The table illustrates annual milk production volumes in the Netherlands, Australia, Tanzania, and Guatemala over a span of two decades, specifically the years 1990, 2000, and 2010.
Overall, this period marked a notable increase in milk production for the Netherlands, Tanzania, and Guatemala, with only Australia showing a reduction. The data highlights not only the dominance of the Netherlands and Australia in terms of volume but also the significant growth trajectories of the emerging producers, Tanzania and Guatemala.
It is evident that the Netherlands and Australia were leading producers, with their figures markedly surpassing those of Tanzania and Guatemala. Initially, in 1990, both countries reported production slightly exceeding 11 million litres. However, by the turn of the millennium, a modest dip occurred in the Dutch figures, followed by a rebound to 11.5 million litres in 2010, indicating a resilient dairy sector. In contrast, Australia experienced a gradual decrease over the 20-year period, concluding with 9.2 million litres, reflective of a sustained downward trend.
Tanzania, starting from a modest base of 87,000 litres, saw a substantial proportional increase over the next twenty years, reaching 155,000 litres by 2010. This growth, although significant, pales in comparison to Guatemala, which, despite starting as the smallest producer at 26,000 litres, expanded production more than threefold, culminating at 84,000 litres.
Sample 7:
The table provides a comparative analysis of the production of milk annually in four countries: the Netherlands, Australia, Tanzania, and Guatemala, at three pivotal points in time - 1990, 2000, and 2010.
Overall, the Netherlands and Australia dominated the production of milk annually, though with contrasting trajectories over the two decades. While the Netherlands showed resilience and an eventual increase in production, Australia’s figures declined steadily. Conversely, Tanzania and Guatemala, starting from lower production levels, exhibited substantial relative increases by 2010.
In detail, the Netherlands started with a production of 11,262,000 litres in 1990, which slightly decreased to 11,155,000 litres in 2000, before rising to 11,466,000 litres in 2010. Australia, on the other hand, saw a gradual decline from an initial production nearly identical to the Netherlands at 11,246,000 litres, descending to 11,105,000 litres in 2000, and further down to 9,165,000 litres by the end of the period.
Shifting focus to Tanzania and Guatemala, both countries' dairy sectors were marked by growth. Tanzania's production was a mere 87,000 litres in 1990, which then experienced more than a seventeen-fold increase to 155,000 litres in 2010. Guatemala, despite producing the least milk initially, at 26,000 litres, managed a significant escalation in its dairy industry, with production climbing to 84,000 litres in 2010, demonstrating more than a threefold increase.
Sample 8:
The provided table delineates the annual milk production in the Netherlands, Australia, Tanzania, and Guatemala during the years 1990, 2000, and 2010.
Overall, both the Netherlands and Australia emerged as the leading milk producers. Australia was the sole country witnessing a decline in milk production, while the other nations experienced an upward trajectory.
Examining the Netherlands and Australia, the top producers in 1990, both commenced their milk output at nearly identical levels, standing at 11.262 and 11.246 million liters, respectively. Subsequently, over the ensuing decade, both countries encountered a marginal decrease in production by approximately 100,000 liters. However, in 2010, the Netherlands reclaimed the leading position by augmenting its production to 11,466,000 liters, whereas Australia continued its descent, plummeting further to 9,165,000 liters.
In contrast, Tanzania and Guatemala initiated the 1990 period with considerably lower milk production figures, registering 87,000 liters and 26,000 liters, respectively. Over the subsequent two decades, both nations underwent substantial expansions in milk production. Tanzania nearly doubled its production, reaching 155,000 liters, while Guatemala nearly tripled its output, reaching 84,000 liters by 2010.
Sample 9:
The table illustrates how annual milk production in various countries changed over three years, 1990, 2000 and 2010. Overall, the amount of milk increased in all countries except for Australia, whose milk yield dropped. It can also be seen that the Netherlands possessed the highest figure in all years.
In 1990, the Netherlands and Australia were dominant in milk production, with 11,262,000 and 11,246,000 liters, respectively. These numbers dwarfed those of the remaining countries, as Tanzania produced 87,000 liters, whereas Guatemala reported merely 26,000 liters.
Ten years later, the levels of the Netherlands and Australia had decreased slightly, but they remained close, at over 11 million liters. The other two countries’ yield, meanwhile, rose significantly, as Tanzania recorded 142,000 liters in 2000, and the figure for Guatemala doubled to 55,000. By 2010, the milk production in the Netherlands climbed to nearly 11,500,000 liters, which remained as the top figure that year. Australia’s milk yield, in contrast, dropped significantly to 9,165,000 liters, which amounted to four-fifths of the data in the Netherlands. The level for Tanzania increased to 155,000, and while Guatemala continued to rank in last place, this country experienced the largest margin of growth. There were 84,000 liters of milk produced in Guatemala in 2010, which was over three times its 1990 figure.
Sample 10:
The table compares milk production volumes of four countries over two decades.
In general, there was a decrease in the total output over the period surveyed, despite growth recorded for most of the countries.
More specifically, the top contributors were the Netherlands and Australia. Both countries recorded slightly over 11.2 million liters of milk yield in 1990, which declined by 107,000 liters and 141,000 liters, respectively, over the subsequent decade. By 2010, the former had bounced back to a record high (11,466,000 liters), while a 2-million-liter drop was documented in the latter.
Production volumes in the remaining two countries were much smaller despite substantial growth there. Despite having doubled its production capacity, Tanzania merely collected 155,000 liters, a little over one percent of the Dutch figure, in 2010. Smaller numbers were reported for Guatemala, where cows only generated 26,000 liters in 1990. Even after a threefold increase, milk yield here (84,000 liters) remained by far the lowest in 2010.
Sample 11:
The table presents data on the annual milk production in four countries, namely the Netherlands, Australia, Tanzania, and Guatemala, over the period from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, the table demonstrates that milk production in the Netherlands and Australia remained consistently high, although showing some fluctuation, while Tanzania and Guatemala experienced significant growth in their production.
The Netherlands and Australia were the top milk producers, with annual output exceeding 11 million liters in all three years. The Netherlands maintained a relatively stable production, ranging from 11,262,000 liters in 1990 to 11,466,000 liters in 2010. In contrast, Australia witnessed a slight decline in production from 11,246,000 liters in 1990 to 9,165,000 liters in 2010.
Tanzania and Guatemala displayed a contrasting pattern. While Tanzania’s milk production witnessed a substantial increase from 87,000 liters in 1990 to 155,000 liters in 2010, Guatemala experienced a gradual rise from 26,000 liters to 84,000 liters in the same period. This indicates a significant development in milk production in Tanzania compared to Guatemala.
Sample 12:
The table provides information about annual milk production in four nations at ten-year intervals from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, the Netherlands was reported to be the leading milk producer among the four. In addition, the production levels in Australia underwent a consistent fall, while those in the other countries showed a general upward trend after three decades.
The first impression from the data is that the Netherlands’ figures in 1990 and 2000, at over 11.2 million and 11.1 million litres, respectively, almost equated to Australia’s. Dutch milk production, after undergoing similar declines, rose to nearly 11.5 million litres in 2010, whereas Australian counterparts reduced their yield by almost 2 million.
Milk production in Tanzania and Guatemala was relatively modest compared to the aforementioned countries. Tanzania’s milk yield started at 87,000 litres and experienced a massive surge to exceed 1.5 million litres at the end. Seeing a less considerable rise, meanwhile, the amount of milk produced in Guatemala reached 84,000 litres in the final year from a starting figure of 26,000.
Sample 13:
The table charts compare the production of milk in the Netherlands, Australia, Tanzania, and Guatemala in the years 1980, 2000, and 2010 presented in liters. Overall, it is noticeable that Netherlands, Tanzania, and Guatemala followed an increasing trend, while there was a decrease in milk production in Australia over the given timeframe.
To begin with, the Netherlands had the highest milk output throughout the given years. In 1990, 11,262,000 liters of milk were produced in the Netherlands, with only a 46,000-liter difference in Australia. It dropped to 11,155,000 liters in 2000 before it showed a significant rise to 11,466,000 liters in 2010.
However, Tanzania produced much lesser milk than the Netherlands, with 87000 liters of milk in 1990, and it noticeably inclined to 1,55,000 liter in 2010; likewise, the production of milk in Guatemala witnessed an upsurge over the years, and an amount of 84, 000 liters was produced 2010.
In contrast, milk production in Australia showed a steady decline from 11,246,000 in 1990 to 9,165,000 in 2010 after reaching 1,42,000 in 2000.
Sample 14:
The table chart gives information about the manufacture of milk in four different nations (Netherlands, Australia, Tanzania, and Guatemala) between 1990 and 2010.
Overall, in terms, the Netherlands remained constant to the biggest produced throughout these periods, but in the second period, it dropped slowly. While decreasing milk liters in Australia compared to Tanzania and Guatemala, these intervals rapidly increase significantly.
On the one hand, by 1990, Netherlands and Australia had a rise in construction, about 11,262,000 – 246,000, respectively. By contracts, Tanzania creates 87,000 higher than Guatemala, whose liters about 26,000.
However, in 2000 milk production in the Netherlands had dropped slightly. Likewise, Australia had approximately 11,105,000 liters. Furthermore, (Tanzania and Guatemala) have increased substantially. During 2010 the Netherlands was growth to 11,466 000 liters, similar to Tanzania and Guatemala, had soared enormously to nearly 1,55,00 Tanzanian liters, and thus, 84,000 to other countries except for Australian manufacture of milk had declined to around 9,165,000.
Sample 15:
The graph provides data on how much milk was produced annually in the Netherlands, Australia, Tanzania, and Guatemala over three decades, from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, the amount of milk in the Netherlands, Tanzania, and Guatemala witnessed a rising trend, while the opposite was true for Australia. In addition, Guatemala consistently had the least milk production among the four given countries throughout the examined years.
In 1990, the Netherlands and Australia, which were the first and second leading countries, produced 1,1262,000 litres and 11,246,000 litres of milk, respectively. Although the Netherlands experienced a minor drop in milk production in 2000 to 11,155,000 liters in 2000, this figure witnessed a recovery of 11,466,000 litres in the following 10 years. In contrast, the figure for Australia bottomed out at 9,165,000 litres at the end of the period.
Tanzania and Guatemala began the examined period with a modest milk production of 87,000 litres for the former and 26,000 litres for the latter. Significantly, in the next two decades, both of these figures rocketed to peak at 1,55,000 litres and 84,000 litres in the same order.
Hot: Danh sách các trường đã công bố điểm chuẩn Đại học 2025 (mới nhất) (2025). Xem ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải

Sample 1:
The line graph gives data about the number of users of five different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.
Overall, all services experienced some growth over the 10-year period, with cell phone and Internet services experiencing the most growth and becoming the most popular forms of communication.
In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5% of the population. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the highest position in 2008, with more than 60% percent of the population using this type of service. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.
Meanwhile, throughout the 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of landline services, at about 15% of the population. Also, the use of mobile and fixed broadband services was minimal before 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5% of the population by the last year.
Sample 2:
The line graph gives data about the number of users of 5 different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.
Overall, cell phone and Internet services became more and more popular, and others similarly experienced minimal growth over the years.
In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5 per 100 inhabitants. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the higher position in 2008, at more than 60 users per 100 in habitants. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.
Meanwhile, throughout this 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of the landline service, with about 15 users per 100 inhabitants. Also, mobile and fixed broadband had yet to be introduced by 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5 users per 100 inhabitants in the last year.
Sample 3:
The line graph illustrates the number of people in the world who used five categories of communication services at two-year intervals from 1998 to 2008.
Overall, although all kinds of communication services tended to grow during the entire time period, only the increase in popularity in cellular phone service was significantly higher than the rise in that of other means of communication.
In 1998, the figure for cellular phone service was round about 500 people, as same as Internet service’s. From 1998, the number of individuals using cellular phone services increased dramatically to exactly 6000 people and became the most common means of communication in the year 2008. Additionally, the figure for Internet service was about five times higher than during the period of 10 years.
With 1500 people used, the figure for landline service was the highest number in 1998. However, that figure had a minor increase to 2000 people in 2006 before it dropped slightly to approximately 1800 people in 2008. The figure for mobile broadband and fixed broadband remained nearly 0 throughout the first six-year period. They were also the least popular kinds of communication services despite rising up to 500 people in 2008.
Lời giải

Sample 1:
The chart illustrates a comparison of the three kinds of foreign tourist visits to a certain European nation during a twenty-year period, beginning in 1987 and ending in 2007.
Overall, the majority of survey years showed that most foreign visitors flocked to coastal locations, while mountainous places received the fewest. Furthermore, the number of visitors visiting all three locations rose throughout this time frame.
Over 40,000 tourists from outside of this European nation visited its shore in 1987. Its number plummeted to roughly 35,000 in 1992 but has steadily increased since then, peaking at over 75,000 in 2007. Meanwhile, the annual number of international visitors to the mountains ranged from 20,000 to 30,000 in the first half of the decade and then jumped to 35,000 in 2007.
For the first fifteen years, the number of international visitors to this country's lakes steadily increased, reaching a high of 75,000 in 2002. In the following years, however, this number dropped dramatically, reaching 50,000 in 2007.
Sample 2:
The chart presents a comparative analysis of three categories of foreign tourist visits to a specific European nation from 1987 to 2007.
In general, there was a consistent increase in the number of tourists across all three locations throughout the specified period. Coastal areas witnessed the highest influx of foreign tourists in almost all the periods.
The year 1987 marked the arrival of over 40,000 foreign tourists to the nation’s coastal regions. However, this figure experienced a decline, dropping to approximately 35,000 visitors by 1992. The numbers then surged significantly, peaking at over 75,000 visitors by 2007. Conversely, visits to mountainous locations started at the second highest level of 20,000, progressing to over 30,000 in 1997. Thereafter, this figure stayed unaltered towards 2002 before a modest increment to about 38,000 in 2007.
The volume of international tourists visiting the country’s lakes saw consistent growth over the initial fifteen years, reaching a pinnacle of 75,000 visitors in 2002. Subsequently, there was a substantial decline in visitation, plummeting to 50,000 by the year 2007.
Sample 3:
The graph illustrates the number of tourists to three distinct regions in a European country, spanning from 1987 to 2007. Overall, the places have experienced an increased tourist attraction from the past two decades.
Initially, the coast, with around 40,000 visitors, was known to be the most popular region among the three. On the contrary, the lakes were the least liked, only comprising around 10,000 visitors. It is also notable that both the coast and the lakes had the same number of maximum visitors in this period, which was around 75,000.
By 2007, the coast had become the most popular tourist destination, having visited by almost 75,000 visitors. Although the lakes too saw a steep rise initially, the visitors started to decline, gaining the maximum attraction of approximately 75,000 tourists in 2002. By 2007, it had declined to 40,000 visitors. The mountains surprisingly did not experience any great inclination. They only had around 15,000 more visitors since 1987.
Sample 4:
The given graph illustrates the number of overseas travellers who visited three different attractions in a European country from 1987 to 2007. It is noticeable that the number of tourists visiting all the areas witnessed an upward trend over the given period.
In 1987, the coast attracted the most overseas visitors, with 40 thousand while the converse held true for the lakes, with only 10 thousand. Over the next two decades, the number of overseas tourists opting for the lakes rose gradually to approximately 35 thousand. Similarly, there was a dramatic jump in the number of visitors to the lakes to about 75 thousand, followed by a drop to 50 thousand in 2007.
At the beginning of the period, 20 thousand tourists from other countries visited the mountains. The mentioned attractions welcomed 30 thousand visitors in 1997 and the figure remained relatively stable until 2002. At the end of the period, the number of tourists to the mountains reached the highest point of 35 thousand.
Sample 5:
The given line graph depicts information about how many foreigners visited three separate regions in a European nation, during the span of a 20-year period from 1987 to 2007.
Overall, the most notable detail is that those three regions all attracted an increasing number of foreigners. In addition, the lakes’ tourist figures witnessed the most dramatic change among those given.
In more detail, at approximately 10,000 visitors in 1987, the quantity of foreign travelers who were attracted to the lakes gradually rose to around 50,000 in 2000, before peaking at approximately 75,000 tourists in 2002, This figure then dropped back down to approximately 50,000 people in 2007.
With regards to tourist numbers in coastal and mountainous areas, the overall figures increased, however mountainous areas remained the least attractive travel option out of the three. In 1987, the number of those who chose the coast as a travel destination stood at 40,000, compared to only 20,000 travelers who went to the mountains. In the next 14 years, the coast witnessed a slight decrease in the quantity of visitors by a few thousand, which was followed by a significant climb to around 60,000 people, whereas the number of those visiting mountainous areas went up remarkably to 30,000 in 2001.
In the final 6 years, while the quantity of overseas tourists going to the coast rose moderately to above 70,000, there was a slight climb in those who paid a visit to the mountains to about 35,000.
Sample 6:
The line chart details statistics about foreign travellers to three types of tourist destinations in an unspecified nation in Europe from 1987 to 2007. Overall, all categories witnessed an upswing with the most significant growth being seen in the number of tourists to the lakeside areas.
The coastal region welcomed the highest level of alien sightseers in the first year, at 40,000. Despite dipping to about 35,000 five years later, it recovered rapidly and consistently to approximately 76,000 in the final year.
Regarding the visitors to the mountainous attractions, this figure rose moderately from 20,000 in 1987 to 30,000 in 1997. Subsequently, it documented a period of stability until 2002, followed by a rise of nearly 7,000 by the end.
Finally, starting at the lowest result of 10,000 in the beginning, the number of overseas tourists to the lakes surged to 40,000 by 1997. In the next five years, it increased more sharply to a peak of just over 75,000 which surpassed the coast, before dropping quickly back to second position with 50,000 by 2007.
Sample 7:
The given outline is the number of people who have gone to the distinctive three places (the coast, the mountains, and the lakes) in the European nation from 1987 to 2000. Looking at the by-and-large structure it is quickly clear that the number of worldwide guests to the coast has diminished over the past five years. In spite of the first moo numbers, there has been a sharp increment in the number of guests to the lake by the conclusion, whereas those going to the mountains have expanded slowly.
After dissecting the chart, it can be seen that in 1987, 40% of worldwide people went by the coast which declined to around 35% in 1992. After that, the esteem expanded to roughly 75% in 2007. While, in 1987, 20% of universal people went to see the mountains which expanded consistently to around almost 33% in 2007.
In 1987, the rate of outside guests was 10%, expanding to 40% by 1997. This figure rose to 72% in 2002, sometime recently dropping to 50% in 2007. The coast had the most elevated guest numbers among the three zones. In the interim, both the coast and the mountains experienced development in their guest tallies.
Sample 8:
The line chart outlines the number of universal sightseers gone by the diverse three places in a European nation from 1887 to 2007. The unit is measured in thousands. By and large, it can be apparent that an expansive lion's share of guests went to Europe in 2002 and 2007, and a few thousand individuals in 1987. A look at the chart reveals that more at that point 70 thousand people went by the lakes in 2002, and the same number of individuals went to the mountains in 2007. Within the same year, a decrease was observed in the number of guests who went to lakes as it was 50 thousand. In 1987, as it was, 40 thousand individuals visited the coastal regions, and after that sudden expanded drift watched from 1992 to 2007.
For the mountain ranges, 20 thousand individuals went in 1987, and exceptionally few increases were observed over a period of time. Around 35 thousand sightseers went by the mountains in 2007.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.