Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 395 Lưu

The graph and chart below give information on the average daily maximum and minimum temperature in degrees Celsius and the average number of days with rainfall each month for two Australian cities.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified Giải bởi Vietjack
The graph and chart below give information on the average daily maximum and minimum temperature in degrees Celsius and the average number of days with rainfall each month for two Australian cities.  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The graphs show the average daily temperatures in two Australian cities and the average number of days per month with rainfall.

Overall, the minimum and maximum temperatures in Brisbane were higher than those in Canberra in general. Additionally, while the average daily temperature trends were similar between the two cities, with cooler weather occurring from April to September, the rainfall trends were opposite.

In Brisbane, the hottest average daily maximum temperature occurs in February, reaching around 30℃. Canberra’s hottest average maximum daily temperatures occur from December to February and reach approximately 27℃. The lowest average daily minimum temperature in both cities occurs in July, dropping to around 10℃ in Brisbane and 1℃ in Canberra.

Meanwhile, the highest average number of days with rainfall in Brisbane are in December to April, with the highest figures occurring in February and March at 14 days with rainfall per month. Canberra, on the other hand, experiences its rainiest months from June to August, at an average of 10 days with rainfall per month.

Sample 2:

The charts compare the lows and highs in average daily temperatures (°C) as well as the average number of rainy days during a year between two Australian cities, Brisbane and Canberra.

The statistics reflect that Brisbane is much warmer than Canberra. However, they both have in common that their temperatures tend to be higher in the first and last quarters of the year. As for rainfall, Brisbane generally experiences more rainy days than Canberra, except between June and October.

Maximum temperatures in Brisbane peak in February (30°C) and December (28°C), lowering towards June and July (21°C). Canberra’s warmest months also coincide with Brisbane’s, although the temperature is not as high (27°C). Nevertheless, in June and July, Canberra’s maximums (11–12°C) almost equal Brisbane’s minimums (10–11°C), while its minimums even get close to freezing point (1–2°C).

At its summit, Brisbane records up to 13–14 days of rainfall in the first quarter, while Canberra shows only half of that figure. In April, May, November, and December, the gap lessens, yet Brisbane’s figures (10–12) are still significantly higher than Canberra’s (7). Only from June to October does the reverse happen: Canberra experiences 8–10 days of rainfall compared to 7–8 days in Brisbane.

Sample 3:

The line graph juxtaposes the mean daily temperature in Brisbane and Canberra throughout a year, whilst the bar graph delineates the frequency of precipitation each month in these two cities.

It is readily apparent that Canberra experiences lower temperatures than Brisbane during both winter and summer. An intriguing observation is the higher incidence of rainfall in Brisbane's summer, whereas Canberra records a greater number of wet days in the winter.

Focusing on temperature, Brisbane witnesses similar patterns of daily maximum and minimum temperatures, approximately 27 and 25 degrees respectively, during the months of January and March. However, July records a notable disparity of 10 degrees. In stark contrast, Canberra maintains a steady monthly temperature variation of about 7 degrees, demonstrating a less pronounced fluctuation compared to Brisbane.

Turning to precipitation, Brisbane registers the highest frequency of rainy days in February and March with 14 days each, followed closely by January with 13 days and 12 days each in April and December. On the other hand, Canberra's weather pattern displays a distinct consistency from June to August, with each month experiencing 10 wet days. Interestingly, the rainfall days in Canberra in October align with Brisbane's November, equating to a third of the month.

Sample 4:

The line graph provides a comparative study of the average daily temperature fluctuations in Brisbane and Canberra over the span of a year, while the bar graph elucidates the frequency of rainy days on a monthly basis in the aforementioned cities.

Upon analysis, it is indisputable that Canberra is generally cooler than Brisbane during both winter and summer. Notably, Brisbane experiences a higher incidence of precipitation in the summer, whilst Canberra sees more rainy days in the winter season.

With regards to the temperature variations, the peak and the trough temperature during January and March in Brisbane are strikingly similar, at around 27 degrees and precisely 25 degrees respectively. Contrastingly, the greatest temperature variance is observed in July with a divergence of 10 degrees. Conversely, Canberra presents a uniform temperature difference of around 7 degrees each month, underscoring its lesser temperature fluctuation as compared to Brisbane.

In terms of precipitation, Brisbane endures the most rainfall with 14 rainy days in February and March, 13 days in January and 12 days in both April and December. However, Canberra sees a steady rate of rainfall from June to August, with each month recording 10 rainy days. Intriguingly, the occurrence of rainy days in Canberra in October mirrors that in Brisbane's November, tallying to approximately a third of the month.

Sample 5:

The graph and chart illustrate the average daily temperatures and the average number of rainy days between two cities in Australia: Brisbane and Canberra.

The data indicate that Brisbane is significantly warmer than Canberra. However, both cities share a similar temperature pattern, where the temperature tends to be higher in the first and last quarters of the year. In terms of rainfall, Brisbane generally has more rainy days than Canberra, except for the period between June and October.

Brisbane experiences its highest maximum temperatures in February (30°C) and December (28°C), which then decrease towards June and July (21°C). Similarly, Canberra's warmest months coincide with Brisbane's, although the temperature is not as high (27°C). However, in June and July, Canberra's maximum temperatures (11-12°C) almost match Brisbane's minimum temperatures (10-11°C), while its minimum temperatures can even reach a freezing point (1-2°C).

Brisbane has up to 13-14 days of rainfall in the first quarter, while Canberra only has half that figure. In April, May, November, and December, the difference between the two cities lessens, but Brisbane's figures (10-12) are still significantly higher than Canberra's (7). Only from June to October does the situation reverse, with Canberra experiencing from 8 to 10 days of rainfall compared to 7-8 days in Brisbane.

Sample 6:

The graph and chart provide information on the average daily temperatures in degrees Celsius and the number of rainy days per month for Brisbane and Canberra in Australia.

Overall, Brisbane has a higher temperature than Canberra all year round, with the highest temperature in Brisbane recorded in February. Brisbane experiences more rainy days each month from November to May, whereas Canberra has more rainy days from June to October.

Brisbane's maximum daily temperature reaches 30°C in February before dropping to 21°C in April. After rising to 23°C, it again falls to 21°C in June and July. In comparison, Canberra's temperature drops to approximately 11°C in July, only half of Brisbane's temperature. In the last five months of the year, both cities experienced an increase in temperature, with Brisbane reaching around 29°C and Canberra around 27°C in December. Regarding the minimum daily temperature, Brisbane starts at around 21°C in January and gradually decreases to 10°C in July and August before rising to 20°C at the end of the year. Canberra's minimum daily temperature follows a similar pattern, starting at 18°C in January, dropping to 1°C in June and July, and rising to approximately 12°C in December.

In addition, Brisbane experiences an increase in rainy days from 10 in November to 14 in February and March before decreasing to 10 in May. Canberra experiences around six rainy days per month for most of the year. From June to October, Brisbane has only 7 or 8 rainy days per month, while Canberra has 8 to 10 rainy days.

Sample 7:

The graph and charts compare the temperatures in degrees Celsius and the number of rainy days monthly in Brisbane and Canberra, Australia.

Despite similar periodic fluctuations, Brisbane’s maximum and minimum temperatures are consistently higher than Canberra’s. Moreover, the largest numbers of days with rainfall in Brisbane fall in the first half of the year, but an opposite pattern is recorded in Canberra.

Brisbane’s maximum and minimum temperatures start at 28 and 27 degrees, the gap of which widens from April to July and ultimately makes a striking difference of 10 degrees. The temperatures soar in the remaining months and similarly end at under 30 degrees. Meanwhile, Canberra’s statistics maintain a gap of 8-10 degrees throughout the period. Standing at 22 and 13 degrees in January, this city’s maximum and minimum temperatures experience a significant drop, reaching troughs of 10 degrees and 1 degree in July, before starting to rise again later in the year. Regarding the number of days with rainfall, Brisbane experiences 10-14 rainy days in the first five months, with the peaks recorded in February and March. After a plateau of 10 days between June and August, this figure reduces by three days in December. Meanwhile, Canberra experiences seven rainy days from January to September, with eight days in March being the exception. In the last quarter of the year, this figure sees a 50% surge to end at 12 days.

Sample 8:

The provided graph displays the average daily maximum and minimum temperatures in degrees Celsius (°C) for Brisbane and Canberra, while the accompanying chart illustrates the average number of days with rainfall in each city per month.

Overall, both cities experienced a decline in average daily temperatures from February to July. Brisbane consistently recorded higher temperatures than Canberra. Furthermore, Brisbane generally experienced a greater number of rainy days than Canberra, although Canberra showed a higher number of rainy days between June and October.

In January, both cities had similar average daily maximum temperatures, around 27°C. Brisbane reached its peak average daily maximum temperature of 30°C in February, while Canberra's remained relatively constant. From February to July, both cities experienced a decline in maximum temperatures; Brisbane's dropped to 21°C and Canberra's to 11°C. Subsequently, temperatures in both cities gradually rose, reaching 29°C in Brisbane and 27°C in Canberra by December.

Concerning rainfall, Brisbane saw a relatively constant number of rainy days, fluctuating between 12 and 14 days from December to March. This contrasted with a lower average of 7 days from June to September. Canberra, conversely, exhibited more stable rainfall patterns, with 7 or 8 rainy days from November to May, increasing to 10 days from June to August.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

The line graph shows the number of people who used different communication services in the world.  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The line graph gives data about the number of users of five different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.

Overall, all services experienced some growth over the 10-year period, with cell phone and Internet services experiencing the most growth and becoming the most popular forms of communication.

In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5% of the population. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the highest position in 2008, with more than 60% percent of the population using this type of service. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.

Meanwhile, throughout the 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of landline services, at about 15% of the population. Also, the use of mobile and fixed broadband services was minimal before 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5% of the population by the last year.

Sample 2:

The line graph gives data about the number of users of 5 different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.

Overall, cell phone and Internet services became more and more popular, and others similarly experienced minimal growth over the years.

In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5 per 100 inhabitants. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the higher position in 2008, at more than 60 users per 100 in habitants. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.

Meanwhile, throughout this 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of the landline service, with about 15 users per 100 inhabitants. Also, mobile and fixed broadband had yet to be introduced by 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5 users per 100 inhabitants in the last year.

Sample 3:

The line graph illustrates the number of people in the world who used five categories of communication services at two-year intervals from 1998 to 2008.

Overall, although all kinds of communication services tended to grow during the entire time period, only the increase in popularity in cellular phone service was significantly higher than the rise in that of other means of communication.

In 1998, the figure for cellular phone service was round about 500 people, as same as Internet service’s. From 1998, the number of individuals using cellular phone services increased dramatically to exactly 6000 people and became the most common means of communication in the year 2008. Additionally, the figure for Internet service was about five times higher than during the period of 10 years.

With 1500 people used, the figure for landline service was the highest number in 1998. However, that figure had a minor increase to 2000 people in 2006 before it dropped slightly to approximately 1800 people in 2008. The figure for mobile broadband and fixed broadband remained nearly 0 throughout the first six-year period. They were also the least popular kinds of communication services despite rising up to 500 people in 2008.

Lời giải

The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007.  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The chart illustrates a comparison of the three kinds of foreign tourist visits to a certain European nation during a twenty-year period, beginning in 1987 and ending in 2007.

Overall, the majority of survey years showed that most foreign visitors flocked to coastal locations, while mountainous places received the fewest. Furthermore, the number of visitors visiting all three locations rose throughout this time frame.

Over 40,000 tourists from outside of this European nation visited its shore in 1987. Its number plummeted to roughly 35,000 in 1992 but has steadily increased since then, peaking at over 75,000 in 2007. Meanwhile, the annual number of international visitors to the mountains ranged from 20,000 to 30,000 in the first half of the decade and then jumped to 35,000 in 2007.

For the first fifteen years, the number of international visitors to this country's lakes steadily increased, reaching a high of 75,000 in 2002. In the following years, however, this number dropped dramatically, reaching 50,000 in 2007.

Sample 2:

The chart presents a comparative analysis of three categories of foreign tourist visits to a specific European nation from 1987 to 2007.

In general, there was a consistent increase in the number of tourists across all three locations throughout the specified period. Coastal areas witnessed the highest influx of foreign tourists in almost all the periods.

The year 1987 marked the arrival of over 40,000 foreign tourists to the nation’s coastal regions. However, this figure experienced a decline, dropping to approximately 35,000 visitors by 1992. The numbers then surged significantly, peaking at over 75,000 visitors by 2007. Conversely, visits to mountainous locations started at the second highest level of 20,000, progressing to over 30,000 in 1997. Thereafter, this figure stayed unaltered towards 2002 before a modest increment to about 38,000 in 2007.

The volume of international tourists visiting the country’s lakes saw consistent growth over the initial fifteen years, reaching a pinnacle of 75,000 visitors in 2002. Subsequently, there was a substantial decline in visitation, plummeting to 50,000 by the year 2007.

Sample 3:

The graph illustrates the number of tourists to three distinct regions in a European country, spanning from 1987 to 2007. Overall, the places have experienced an increased tourist attraction from the past two decades.

Initially, the coast, with around 40,000 visitors, was known to be the most popular region among the three. On the contrary, the lakes were the least liked, only comprising around 10,000 visitors. It is also notable that both the coast and the lakes had the same number of maximum visitors in this period, which was around 75,000.

By 2007, the coast had become the most popular tourist destination, having visited by almost 75,000 visitors. Although the lakes too saw a steep rise initially, the visitors started to decline, gaining the maximum attraction of approximately 75,000 tourists in 2002. By 2007, it had declined to 40,000 visitors. The mountains surprisingly did not experience any great inclination. They only had around 15,000 more visitors since 1987.

Sample 4:

The given graph illustrates the number of overseas travellers who visited three different attractions in a European country from 1987 to 2007. It is noticeable that the number of tourists visiting all the areas witnessed an upward trend over the given period.

In 1987, the coast attracted the most overseas visitors, with 40 thousand while the converse held true for the lakes, with only 10 thousand. Over the next two decades, the number of overseas tourists opting for the lakes rose gradually to approximately 35 thousand. Similarly, there was a dramatic jump in the number of visitors to the lakes to about 75 thousand, followed by a drop to 50 thousand in 2007.

At the beginning of the period, 20 thousand tourists from other countries visited the mountains. The mentioned attractions welcomed 30 thousand visitors in 1997 and the figure remained relatively stable until 2002. At the end of the period, the number of tourists to the mountains reached the highest point of 35 thousand.

Sample 5:

The given line graph depicts information about how many foreigners visited three separate regions in a European nation, during the span of a 20-year period from 1987 to 2007.

Overall, the most notable detail is that those three regions all attracted an increasing number of foreigners. In addition, the lakes’ tourist figures witnessed the most dramatic change among those given.

In more detail, at approximately 10,000 visitors in 1987, the quantity of foreign travelers who were attracted to the lakes gradually rose to around 50,000 in 2000, before peaking at approximately 75,000 tourists in 2002, This figure then dropped back down to approximately 50,000 people in 2007.

With regards to tourist numbers in coastal and mountainous areas, the overall figures increased, however mountainous areas remained the least attractive travel option out of the three. In 1987, the number of those who chose the coast as a travel destination stood at 40,000, compared to only 20,000 travelers who went to the mountains. In the next 14 years, the coast witnessed a slight decrease in the quantity of visitors by a few thousand, which was followed by a significant climb to around 60,000 people, whereas the number of those visiting mountainous areas went up remarkably to 30,000 in 2001.

In the final 6 years, while the quantity of overseas tourists going to the coast rose moderately to above 70,000, there was a slight climb in those who paid a visit to the mountains to about 35,000.

Sample 6:

The line chart details statistics about foreign travellers to three types of tourist destinations in an unspecified nation in Europe from 1987 to 2007. Overall, all categories witnessed an upswing with the most significant growth being seen in the number of tourists to the lakeside areas.

The coastal region welcomed the highest level of alien sightseers in the first year, at 40,000. Despite dipping to about 35,000 five years later, it recovered rapidly and consistently to approximately 76,000 in the final year.

Regarding the visitors to the mountainous attractions, this figure rose moderately from 20,000 in 1987 to 30,000 in 1997. Subsequently, it documented a period of stability until 2002, followed by a rise of nearly 7,000 by the end.

Finally, starting at the lowest result of 10,000 in the beginning, the number of overseas tourists to the lakes surged to 40,000 by 1997. In the next five years, it increased more sharply to a peak of just over 75,000 which surpassed the coast, before dropping quickly back to second position with 50,000 by 2007.

Sample 7:

The given outline is the number of people who have gone to the distinctive three places (the coast, the mountains, and the lakes) in the European nation from 1987 to 2000. Looking at the by-and-large structure it is quickly clear that the number of worldwide guests to the coast has diminished over the past five years. In spite of the first moo numbers, there has been a sharp increment in the number of guests to the lake by the conclusion, whereas those going to the mountains have expanded slowly.

After dissecting the chart, it can be seen that in 1987, 40% of worldwide people went by the coast which declined to around 35% in 1992. After that, the esteem expanded to roughly 75% in 2007. While, in 1987, 20% of universal people went to see the mountains which expanded consistently to around almost 33% in 2007.

In 1987, the rate of outside guests was 10%, expanding to 40% by 1997. This figure rose to 72% in 2002, sometime recently dropping to 50% in 2007. The coast had the most elevated guest numbers among the three zones. In the interim, both the coast and the mountains experienced development in their guest tallies.

Sample 8:

The line chart outlines the number of universal sightseers gone by the diverse three places in a European nation from 1887 to 2007. The unit is measured in thousands. By and large, it can be apparent that an expansive lion's share of guests went to Europe in 2002 and 2007, and a few thousand individuals in 1987. A look at the chart reveals that more at that point 70 thousand people went by the lakes in 2002, and the same number of individuals went to the mountains in 2007. Within the same year, a decrease was observed in the number of guests who went to lakes as it was 50 thousand. In 1987, as it was, 40 thousand individuals visited the coastal regions, and after that sudden expanded drift watched from 1992 to 2007.

For the mountain ranges, 20 thousand individuals went in 1987, and exceptionally few increases were observed over a period of time. Around 35 thousand sightseers went by the mountains in 2007.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP