Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 535 Lưu

The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified Giải bởi Vietjack
The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001.  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The bar charts illustrate the duration of time that teachers in four countries spent teaching across three different educational levels in 2001.

Overall, American teachers worked for the most extended hours while Japanese teachers worked for the least. In addition, there was a significant contrast in the hours worked between upper-secondary and lower-level teachers in Ireland.

In Japan, primary school teachers worked 600 hours, 50 hours less than those in Spain but 10 hours more than in Ireland. In the United States, primary school teachers worked over 750 hours, equivalent to the number of hours worked by middle school teachers in Spain.

In all four countries, the number of hours worked by lower secondary teachers was higher than that of primary school teachers, with American teachers working the most extended hours of over 1,000. In Spain and Ireland, upper secondary teachers worked 900 hours, 150 and 200 hours more than middle school teachers in Spain and high school teachers in Japan, respectively. Upper-level teachers in the United States spent the most time working nearly 1,200 hours at schools.

Sample 2:

The column graph represents data on average teaching hours by each educator in 2001 in Japan, Spain, Iceland and the USA in the primary, lower secondary and higher secondary school levels. Generally speaking, a US tutor on an average spent more hours on schooling than that of Japanese, Spanish and Icelandic teachers in 2001 and the time spent on teaching increases with the class levels in all countries.

According to the illustration, an instructor in Japan, Spain and Iceland typically spent around 600 hours in 2001 to teach elementary level students. This duration in the USA was the highest, roughly 750 hours. A US mentor taught lower secondary students for exactly 1000 hours in the same year, and it was roughly 600 hours in Iceland and Japan. However, lower secondary teachers in Spain disbursed roughly 750 hours each to their students. Finally, the time spent to teach higher secondary pupil in the USA was approximately 1200 hours which was 300 hours less in Iceland and Spain and precisely 700 hours in Japan.

Sample 3:

The bar graph outlines the average duration a teacher spent on three different levels in four different countries in 2001.

Overall, the teaching hours at the secondary level were higher than those of primary level and the US tutors spent more time teaching than the teachers in the other three countries did.

A US teacher spent more than 700 hours to teach primary students in 2001 while a Japanese educator disbursed exactly 600 hours for teaching the same graders. Time allocated to teaching elementary student by a Spanish teacher was 50 hours higher than that of Japanese teacher, but it was less than 600 hours in Iceland. An American teacher’s average schooling duration in 2001 for lower secondary students was 1000 hours which was 300 to 400 hours higher than the teaching duration by a teacher in the other three countries.

Finally, higher secondary students received almost 1200 hours’ lectures by a teacher in the US and this duration was noticeable higher than that of other countries. In Japan, an upper secondary level teacher taught for 700 hours in 2001, almost 500 hours less than that of a US teacher. In Iceland and Spain, teaching duration by a higher secondary level teacher was approximately 900 hours, about 300 hours less than that of an American teacher.

Sample 4:

The bar chart compares the number of teaching hours undertaken by primary and secondary school lecturers in Japan, Spain, Iceland, and the USA in 2001. Overall, teachers in Japan and Spain had a similar workload in primary and lower secondary levels. The duration of work appeared to be highest in upper secondary across all countries, with the exception of Iceland. Furthermore, American teachers worked the longest hours.

The minimum number of working hours for teachers was 600 hours, which was observed in Japanese schools; primary and lower secondary schools in Spain. In Iceland, this figure was only witnessed in primary schools and increased to 800 hours in lower secondary schools, which marked the longest working hours for teachers in that country. There was a slight reduction in the number of hours in upper secondary schools.

Shifting focus to the United States, primary school teachers spent approximately 850 hours in the classroom. The longest duration was reported in lower and upper secondary schools, with each amounting to around 1100 hours, more or less. The workload in Spain’s upper secondary schools came closest to this figure, reaching 1000 hours.

Sample 5:

The given bar chart demonstrates the number of hours taught primary, lower secondary, and upper secondary by teachers in the US, Japan, Spain, and Iceland in 2001.

Overall, lower secondary and upper secondary teachers in the US taught significantly more hours than their counterparts in the other three countries. In addition, teachers in the primary grades put in comparable hours in all four countries.

Primary and lower secondary teachers in Iceland had the fewest working hours (at approximately 600). Notably, upper-level secondary school teachers in Iceland undertook an enormous workload of about 900 hours. In Japan, teachers at all levels worked between 600 and 700 hours, with hardly any variation between grade levels.

Primary teachers in the US and Spain worked similar hours, at around 650. However, lower secondary and upper secondary teachers in Spain worked 750 and 900 hours, respectively, whereas lower secondary and upper secondary teachers in the US worked 1000 and 1200 hours, respectively. Finally, teachers' workload gradually grew in Spain as they progressed from lower classes to higher grades, but in the United States, this increase was more dramatic.

Sample 6:

The bar charts describe how much time a teacher spent at three school levels in four different countries in 2001.

Overall, teachers in the US had to work the longest hours, while Japanese teachers spent the least time at schools. Notably, there was a stark difference in working hours between upper secondary teachers and two lower-level ones in Iceland.

Teachers at primary school in Japan worked for 600 hours, 50 lower than in Spain and 10 higher than in Iceland. This figure in the USA was the highest, at over 750 hours, equivalent to the number of hours Spanish middle school teachers spent at work. On average, lower secondary level educators in all four countries worked more hours than primary ones by over 50 hours and higher, and the figure for the USA stood highest at 1000.

Both Spain and Iceland recorded a number of 900 working hours from upper secondary teachers. This number was 150 and 200 hours more than their Spanish colleagues at middle school and Japanese high school teachers, respectively. At nearly 1200 hours, upper-level American educators spent most time at schools.

Sample 7:

The bar chart delineates a comparison of the average working hours among elementary, middle, and high school teachers across four distinct countries in 2001.

Notably, it is evident that teachers in the USA dedicated longer hours to work than their counterparts. Additionally, the working hours of high school teachers exceeded those at primary and lower secondary levels.

At the primary school level, teachers in the USA logged approximately 750 hours, surpassing Spain’s working hours by a notable margin of 100. Meanwhile, Japan and Iceland registered slightly lower working durations, approximately 600 and 580 hours, respectively. Moving to the lower secondary school level, teachers in the USA experienced a considerable increase of around 250 hours compared to primary educators. Spain demonstrated a moderate rise of 100 hours, while Japan and Iceland showcased marginal differences, with an increase of approximately 50 hours or less.

Examining the upper secondary school teachers’ workload, the USA maintained the highest working hours, totaling just under 1200 hours, while Japan recorded the lowest at 700 hours. Teachers in Spain and Iceland reported similar working durations, at approximately 900 hours each.

Sample 8:

The bar chart illustrates the number of teaching hours per year undertaken by educators at three distinct educational levels in four countries during the year 2001.

Overall, it is evident that teachers in the United States were required to work the most extensive hours, while their counterparts in Japan logged the fewest. Strikingly, there was a pronounced discrepancy in working hours between the upper secondary educators and the other two levels in Iceland.

In Japan, primary school teachers worked for 600 hours, 50 hours fewer than in Spain and 10 hours more than in Iceland. The figure in the USA topped the chart at over 750 hours, mirroring the number of hours that Spanish middle school teachers devoted. On average, educators at the lower secondary level in all four countries exceeded the primary level by more than 50 hours, with the USA's figure being the highest at 1000 hours.

Moving onto upper-secondary teachers' data, both Spain and Iceland observed about 900 working hours, 150 hours more than Spanish middle school teachers and 200 hours more than Japanese high school educators. American upper-level teachers, with nearly 1200 hours, invested the most time in schools.

Sample 9:

The bar chart illustrates the number of hours each teacher spent teaching at primary, lower secondary, and upper secondary levels across four countries - Japan, Spain, Iceland, and the USA - in 2001.

Overall, teachers in the USA dedicated the highest number of hours to teaching across all educational levels compared to their counterparts in Japan, Spain, and Iceland. Notably, the time committed to teaching progressively increased from primary to upper secondary levels in each country.

In greater detail, Japanese, Spanish, and Icelandic teachers devoted approximately 600 hours to teaching primary students, while American teachers spent around 750 hours, marking the highest figure for primary education. For the lower secondary level, teachers in the USA spent a substantial 1000 hours, contrasting with about 600 hours in both Japan and Iceland. Meanwhile, Spanish lower secondary teachers dedicated approximately 750 hours to their teaching duties.

At the upper secondary level, the number of hours each teacher spent teaching was highest in the USA, reaching nearly 1200 hours. In comparison, Spanish and Icelandic teachers spent about 900 hours teaching upper secondary students, while Japanese teachers recorded the lowest time commitment at roughly 700 hours. This shows a clear disparity in teaching hours among countries, with American educators consistently leading across all educational levels.

Sample 10:

The bar chart illustrates the number of hours each teacher spent teaching across three educational levels - primary, lower secondary, and upper secondary - in Japan, Spain, Iceland, and the USA in 2001.

In general, the number of hours each teacher spent teaching increased with the level of education in all four countries. American teachers consistently dedicated the highest amount of time to teaching at each educational level, while Japanese teachers recorded the lowest hours, particularly at the upper secondary level.

Specifically, teachers in the USA invested more than 700 hours in primary education, compared to exactly 600 hours in Japan. Spanish teachers spent around 650 hours at the primary level, while Icelandic educators recorded slightly less than 600 hours. Moving to lower secondary education, American teachers led again, committing 1000 hours, a figure that was around 300-400 hours more than the time spent by teachers in Japan, Spain, and Iceland.

In upper secondary education, American teachers once again allocated the most hours, with nearly 1200 hours spent teaching. In comparison, teachers in Iceland and Spain each spent approximately 900 hours, while Japanese upper secondary teachers dedicated around 700 hours, marking the lowest figure. These differences highlight the variation in teaching hours among these countries, with the USA consistently requiring the highest teaching workload across all educational stages.

Sample 11:

The bar chart presents data on the number of hours each teacher spent teaching at three educational stages - primary, lower secondary, and upper secondary - across four countries (Japan, Spain, Iceland, and the USA) in 2001.

Overall, teachers in the USA dedicated the most hours to teaching at all levels, while Japan consistently reported the fewest hours, especially at the upper secondary level. Additionally, across all four nations, the hours spent teaching generally rose with each advancing educational stage.

Breaking down the data, Japanese, Spanish, and Icelandic teachers spent a similar amount of time in primary education, approximately 600 hours, with the USA leading by a wider margin, as American teachers invested around 750 hours at this level. For lower secondary students, the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in Japan and Iceland remained close to 600, while in Spain, it increased to around 750 hours and surged in the USA to approximately 1000 hours.

At the upper secondary level, American teachers committed nearly 1200 hours, which was notably higher than their counterparts in other countries. Iceland and Spain recorded around 900 hours for their upper secondary educators, while Japan trailed significantly with its teachers spending about 700 hours. This data highlights a considerable variation among countries in terms of teaching hours, with the USA demonstrating a significantly higher teaching workload across all school levels.

Sample 12:

The bar chart displays the number of hours each teacher spent teaching at primary, lower secondary, and upper secondary levels in four countries - Japan, Spain, Iceland, and the USA - during 2001.

Overall, it is evident that the number of hours each teacher spent teaching generally increased with the level of education across all countries. Additionally, American teachers recorded the highest teaching hours at each level, contrasting with Japan, where teachers committed the least time, particularly at the upper secondary level.

In more detail, primary school teachers in the USA dedicated over 700 hours to their teaching duties, exceeding the teaching hours of their Japanese, Spanish, and Icelandic counterparts, who each spent close to 600 hours. In lower secondary education, American teachers continued to lead, with around 1000 hours, which was significantly higher than the hours recorded in Japan and Iceland, where lower secondary teachers averaged close to 600 hours. Spanish lower secondary teachers, meanwhile, devoted approximately 750 hours.

When it comes to upper secondary education, American teachers again recorded the highest figure, with nearly 1200 hours spent teaching. In contrast, teachers in Spain and Iceland each spent roughly 900 hours at this level, while Japanese upper secondary teachers committed about 700 hours. This data underscores the considerable differences in teaching hours among these countries, with the USA consistently at the top across all education levels.

Sample 13:

The bar chart illustrates the average teaching time in different school categories in Japan, Spain, Iceland and USA in 2001.

Overall, it is apparent that USA teachers spent the most hours teaching in all 3 types of schools. In addition, while teaching time for upper secondary students was the least in Japan, that for primary and lower secondary was the lowest in Iceland.

Almost 1200 hours, the highest figure in the chart, was spent on teaching upper secondary classes in the USA. The second highest data in this category belonged to Iceland, standing at slightly more than 900 hours. In comparison, there was only 700 hours of teaching by Japan teachers, almost half the figure of USA.

Regarding primary schools, Iceland, Japan and Spain's teaching hours fluctuated around less than 600 to 650. The USA, on the other hand, recorded a significantly higher number of approximately 750 hours. Pupils in lower secondary schools in America had 1000 hours of studying, while those in Iceland spent less than that around 300 hours, which was also reported as the lowest statistics in this category.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

The line graph shows the number of people who used different communication services in the world.  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The line graph gives data about the number of users of five different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.

Overall, all services experienced some growth over the 10-year period, with cell phone and Internet services experiencing the most growth and becoming the most popular forms of communication.

In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5% of the population. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the highest position in 2008, with more than 60% percent of the population using this type of service. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.

Meanwhile, throughout the 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of landline services, at about 15% of the population. Also, the use of mobile and fixed broadband services was minimal before 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5% of the population by the last year.

Sample 2:

The line graph gives data about the number of users of 5 different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.

Overall, cell phone and Internet services became more and more popular, and others similarly experienced minimal growth over the years.

In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5 per 100 inhabitants. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the higher position in 2008, at more than 60 users per 100 in habitants. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.

Meanwhile, throughout this 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of the landline service, with about 15 users per 100 inhabitants. Also, mobile and fixed broadband had yet to be introduced by 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5 users per 100 inhabitants in the last year.

Sample 3:

The line graph illustrates the number of people in the world who used five categories of communication services at two-year intervals from 1998 to 2008.

Overall, although all kinds of communication services tended to grow during the entire time period, only the increase in popularity in cellular phone service was significantly higher than the rise in that of other means of communication.

In 1998, the figure for cellular phone service was round about 500 people, as same as Internet service’s. From 1998, the number of individuals using cellular phone services increased dramatically to exactly 6000 people and became the most common means of communication in the year 2008. Additionally, the figure for Internet service was about five times higher than during the period of 10 years.

With 1500 people used, the figure for landline service was the highest number in 1998. However, that figure had a minor increase to 2000 people in 2006 before it dropped slightly to approximately 1800 people in 2008. The figure for mobile broadband and fixed broadband remained nearly 0 throughout the first six-year period. They were also the least popular kinds of communication services despite rising up to 500 people in 2008.

Lời giải

The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007.  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The chart illustrates a comparison of the three kinds of foreign tourist visits to a certain European nation during a twenty-year period, beginning in 1987 and ending in 2007.

Overall, the majority of survey years showed that most foreign visitors flocked to coastal locations, while mountainous places received the fewest. Furthermore, the number of visitors visiting all three locations rose throughout this time frame.

Over 40,000 tourists from outside of this European nation visited its shore in 1987. Its number plummeted to roughly 35,000 in 1992 but has steadily increased since then, peaking at over 75,000 in 2007. Meanwhile, the annual number of international visitors to the mountains ranged from 20,000 to 30,000 in the first half of the decade and then jumped to 35,000 in 2007.

For the first fifteen years, the number of international visitors to this country's lakes steadily increased, reaching a high of 75,000 in 2002. In the following years, however, this number dropped dramatically, reaching 50,000 in 2007.

Sample 2:

The chart presents a comparative analysis of three categories of foreign tourist visits to a specific European nation from 1987 to 2007.

In general, there was a consistent increase in the number of tourists across all three locations throughout the specified period. Coastal areas witnessed the highest influx of foreign tourists in almost all the periods.

The year 1987 marked the arrival of over 40,000 foreign tourists to the nation’s coastal regions. However, this figure experienced a decline, dropping to approximately 35,000 visitors by 1992. The numbers then surged significantly, peaking at over 75,000 visitors by 2007. Conversely, visits to mountainous locations started at the second highest level of 20,000, progressing to over 30,000 in 1997. Thereafter, this figure stayed unaltered towards 2002 before a modest increment to about 38,000 in 2007.

The volume of international tourists visiting the country’s lakes saw consistent growth over the initial fifteen years, reaching a pinnacle of 75,000 visitors in 2002. Subsequently, there was a substantial decline in visitation, plummeting to 50,000 by the year 2007.

Sample 3:

The graph illustrates the number of tourists to three distinct regions in a European country, spanning from 1987 to 2007. Overall, the places have experienced an increased tourist attraction from the past two decades.

Initially, the coast, with around 40,000 visitors, was known to be the most popular region among the three. On the contrary, the lakes were the least liked, only comprising around 10,000 visitors. It is also notable that both the coast and the lakes had the same number of maximum visitors in this period, which was around 75,000.

By 2007, the coast had become the most popular tourist destination, having visited by almost 75,000 visitors. Although the lakes too saw a steep rise initially, the visitors started to decline, gaining the maximum attraction of approximately 75,000 tourists in 2002. By 2007, it had declined to 40,000 visitors. The mountains surprisingly did not experience any great inclination. They only had around 15,000 more visitors since 1987.

Sample 4:

The given graph illustrates the number of overseas travellers who visited three different attractions in a European country from 1987 to 2007. It is noticeable that the number of tourists visiting all the areas witnessed an upward trend over the given period.

In 1987, the coast attracted the most overseas visitors, with 40 thousand while the converse held true for the lakes, with only 10 thousand. Over the next two decades, the number of overseas tourists opting for the lakes rose gradually to approximately 35 thousand. Similarly, there was a dramatic jump in the number of visitors to the lakes to about 75 thousand, followed by a drop to 50 thousand in 2007.

At the beginning of the period, 20 thousand tourists from other countries visited the mountains. The mentioned attractions welcomed 30 thousand visitors in 1997 and the figure remained relatively stable until 2002. At the end of the period, the number of tourists to the mountains reached the highest point of 35 thousand.

Sample 5:

The given line graph depicts information about how many foreigners visited three separate regions in a European nation, during the span of a 20-year period from 1987 to 2007.

Overall, the most notable detail is that those three regions all attracted an increasing number of foreigners. In addition, the lakes’ tourist figures witnessed the most dramatic change among those given.

In more detail, at approximately 10,000 visitors in 1987, the quantity of foreign travelers who were attracted to the lakes gradually rose to around 50,000 in 2000, before peaking at approximately 75,000 tourists in 2002, This figure then dropped back down to approximately 50,000 people in 2007.

With regards to tourist numbers in coastal and mountainous areas, the overall figures increased, however mountainous areas remained the least attractive travel option out of the three. In 1987, the number of those who chose the coast as a travel destination stood at 40,000, compared to only 20,000 travelers who went to the mountains. In the next 14 years, the coast witnessed a slight decrease in the quantity of visitors by a few thousand, which was followed by a significant climb to around 60,000 people, whereas the number of those visiting mountainous areas went up remarkably to 30,000 in 2001.

In the final 6 years, while the quantity of overseas tourists going to the coast rose moderately to above 70,000, there was a slight climb in those who paid a visit to the mountains to about 35,000.

Sample 6:

The line chart details statistics about foreign travellers to three types of tourist destinations in an unspecified nation in Europe from 1987 to 2007. Overall, all categories witnessed an upswing with the most significant growth being seen in the number of tourists to the lakeside areas.

The coastal region welcomed the highest level of alien sightseers in the first year, at 40,000. Despite dipping to about 35,000 five years later, it recovered rapidly and consistently to approximately 76,000 in the final year.

Regarding the visitors to the mountainous attractions, this figure rose moderately from 20,000 in 1987 to 30,000 in 1997. Subsequently, it documented a period of stability until 2002, followed by a rise of nearly 7,000 by the end.

Finally, starting at the lowest result of 10,000 in the beginning, the number of overseas tourists to the lakes surged to 40,000 by 1997. In the next five years, it increased more sharply to a peak of just over 75,000 which surpassed the coast, before dropping quickly back to second position with 50,000 by 2007.

Sample 7:

The given outline is the number of people who have gone to the distinctive three places (the coast, the mountains, and the lakes) in the European nation from 1987 to 2000. Looking at the by-and-large structure it is quickly clear that the number of worldwide guests to the coast has diminished over the past five years. In spite of the first moo numbers, there has been a sharp increment in the number of guests to the lake by the conclusion, whereas those going to the mountains have expanded slowly.

After dissecting the chart, it can be seen that in 1987, 40% of worldwide people went by the coast which declined to around 35% in 1992. After that, the esteem expanded to roughly 75% in 2007. While, in 1987, 20% of universal people went to see the mountains which expanded consistently to around almost 33% in 2007.

In 1987, the rate of outside guests was 10%, expanding to 40% by 1997. This figure rose to 72% in 2002, sometime recently dropping to 50% in 2007. The coast had the most elevated guest numbers among the three zones. In the interim, both the coast and the mountains experienced development in their guest tallies.

Sample 8:

The line chart outlines the number of universal sightseers gone by the diverse three places in a European nation from 1887 to 2007. The unit is measured in thousands. By and large, it can be apparent that an expansive lion's share of guests went to Europe in 2002 and 2007, and a few thousand individuals in 1987. A look at the chart reveals that more at that point 70 thousand people went by the lakes in 2002, and the same number of individuals went to the mountains in 2007. Within the same year, a decrease was observed in the number of guests who went to lakes as it was 50 thousand. In 1987, as it was, 40 thousand individuals visited the coastal regions, and after that sudden expanded drift watched from 1992 to 2007.

For the mountain ranges, 20 thousand individuals went in 1987, and exceptionally few increases were observed over a period of time. Around 35 thousand sightseers went by the mountains in 2007.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP