Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 404 Lưu

The chart below shows the percentage of people born in and outside of Australia living in cities, towns, and rural areas in 1950 and 2010.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified Giải bởi Vietjack
The chart below shows the percentage of people born in and outside of Australia living in cities, towns, and rural areas in 1950 and 2010.  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The chart gives information about the percentage of people living in cities, towns, and rural areas in Australia in 1950 and 2010, in terms of those born in Australia and those born elsewhere.

Overall, it is clear that living in a city was far more common for both groups of people in both 1950 and 2010. Furthermore, the percentage of both groups of people living in cities increased over the period.

In 1950, around 50% of people born in Australia lived in a city. Meanwhile, 20% of people born in Australia lived in a town, compared with around 30% living in rural areas. By 2010, the number of those living in cities had increased to approximately 65%, while the percentage of those living in towns and rural areas dropped to a little over 15% each.

On the other hand, the percentage of people born outside of Australia that lived in cities was around 60% in 1950, and 80% in 2010. Notably, a significant portion of those who weren’t born in Australia lived in rural areas in 1950 (40%); however, this figure dropped substantially in 2010 to around 5%.

Sample 2:

The graph depicts the proportion of Australians living in cities, towns, and rural regions between 1950 and 2010 based on whether they were born in Australia or overseas.

Overall, it is evident that city life was far more prevalent for both categories in both 1950 and 2010. Moreover, the proportion of both populations residing in urban areas rose over time.

In 1950, over fifty percent of Australians were born in cities. Around 30% of those born in Australia resided in rural regions, whereas 20% lived in cities. In 2010, roughly 65% of the population resided in cities, while the percentages of people residing in towns and rural regions fell to around 15% each.

In contrast, over 60% of those born outside of Australia resided in cities in 1950, compared to 80% in 2010. Interestingly, a large proportion of non-Australians (40% in 1950) resided in rural regions; nevertheless, this percentage declined significantly to 5% in 2010.

Sample 3:

The given bar chart depicts the living area of Australian and non-Australian from 1995 to 2010. Overall, there was significant shift towards urban living amonth both groups, as opposed to a dramatic decline in rural populations, with those living metropolitans dominating the chart in both years.

Regarding 1995 residential preferences, nearly half of the Australian-born citizens lived in cities, which was approximately 15% lower than the figure for their foreign counterparts. Rural areas ranked second in both charts, with 30% and 40% of local and overseas inhabitants, respectively. Only about 10% of the non-Australian nationals preferred to stay within urban areas, while the corresponding figure for native Australians was double the former in the same year.

In terms of 2010 tendency, both local and foreign inhabitants living in cities remain dominante in the chart, after substaintial rises to around 66% of native Australians and 80% of their foreign counterparts. In contrast, the rural population underwent the most dramatic drops in 2010 when rural regions became the least popular, at about 17% of native Australians and 5% of foreign residents. A less remarkable decline was seen in the percentage of Australian and non-Australian citizens opting for towns, to below 20% in 2010, at about 17% and 10% in order.

Sample 4:

The graph delineates the distribution of Australians in cities, towns, and rural areas from 1950 to 2010 based on their birthplaces, whether in Australia or overseas.

Overall, city dwelling emerged as the dominant trend for both native-born and overseas-born Australians in 1950 and 2010. Furthermore, there was a surge in the urban population over the years while the percentage of living in town and rural areas decreased.

In 1950, cities hosted more than half of the Australian-born population, compared to nearly 30% residing in rural areas and about 20% in towns. By 2010, the urban population had increased substantially to approximately 65%, while the proportions in towns and rural regions dropped to nearly 15% each.

60% of non-Australians resided in cities in 1950, which surged to 80% by 2010. Notably, a significant percentage of foreign-born Australian nationals (40% in 1950) lived in rural areas, yet this declined remarkably to a mere 5% by 2010. Living in towns was the least preferred option of people born outside Australia in 1950, amounting to just over 10%, which stayed unchanged in 2010 but became the second favorite living site before rural areas.

Sample 5:

The bar charts illustrate the percentage of Australia-born and foreign-born people who reside in cities, towns, and rural areas in Australia from 1995 to 2010.

Overall, the percentages of people living in cities both in and outside Australia were highest and moderately increased over the years. Meanwhile, the percentages of residents in towns and rural areas both in and outside Australia significantly decreased.

Regarding the Australia-born population, the figure for city dwellers in Australia was 50% in 1995, compared to 20% of people living in towns and 30% of those residing in rural areas. 15 years later, while the percentage of urbanites rose by 10%, the figures for town and rural residents experienced declines of 3% and 13%, respectively, to both end at 17%.

Moving on to the foreign-born populations in Australia, 60% of people dwelled in cities, followed by 40% of town residents and 10% of people inhabiting rural areas in 1995. In 2010, the figure for city dwellers grew to 80%, while the percentages of people settling down in towns and rural areas dropped to 10% and 8%, respectively.

Sample 6:

The provided charts illustrate the proportion of individuals living in cities, towns, and rural areas in Australia in 1950 and 2010, in terms of those born in Australia and those born everywhere.

Taken as a whole, a brief assessment of the information reveals that living in a city was far more common for both groups of people in both 1950 and 2010.

To begin with, the statistics of citizens in 1950 who were born in Australia accounted for roughly 50% and experienced substantial growth of approximately 65% after exactly 60 years in cities. Meanwhile, the figures for people born in Australia witness a downward trend, from 20% in 1950 to approximately 17% in 2010. Furthermore, there was a substantial decline in the ratio of rural areas in Australia, which dropped moderately from roughly 30% to around 17% during the period from 1950 to 2010.

For the rest of the chart, the rate of living outside Australia peaked between 60% and 80% in 1950 and 2010. There were also two downward trends in towns and rural areas, from around 15% to approximately 13% and exactly 40%, which decreased sharply by 5% in 1950 and 2010.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

The line graph shows the number of people who used different communication services in the world.  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The line graph gives data about the number of users of five different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.

Overall, all services experienced some growth over the 10-year period, with cell phone and Internet services experiencing the most growth and becoming the most popular forms of communication.

In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5% of the population. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the highest position in 2008, with more than 60% percent of the population using this type of service. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.

Meanwhile, throughout the 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of landline services, at about 15% of the population. Also, the use of mobile and fixed broadband services was minimal before 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5% of the population by the last year.

Sample 2:

The line graph gives data about the number of users of 5 different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.

Overall, cell phone and Internet services became more and more popular, and others similarly experienced minimal growth over the years.

In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5 per 100 inhabitants. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the higher position in 2008, at more than 60 users per 100 in habitants. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.

Meanwhile, throughout this 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of the landline service, with about 15 users per 100 inhabitants. Also, mobile and fixed broadband had yet to be introduced by 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5 users per 100 inhabitants in the last year.

Sample 3:

The line graph illustrates the number of people in the world who used five categories of communication services at two-year intervals from 1998 to 2008.

Overall, although all kinds of communication services tended to grow during the entire time period, only the increase in popularity in cellular phone service was significantly higher than the rise in that of other means of communication.

In 1998, the figure for cellular phone service was round about 500 people, as same as Internet service’s. From 1998, the number of individuals using cellular phone services increased dramatically to exactly 6000 people and became the most common means of communication in the year 2008. Additionally, the figure for Internet service was about five times higher than during the period of 10 years.

With 1500 people used, the figure for landline service was the highest number in 1998. However, that figure had a minor increase to 2000 people in 2006 before it dropped slightly to approximately 1800 people in 2008. The figure for mobile broadband and fixed broadband remained nearly 0 throughout the first six-year period. They were also the least popular kinds of communication services despite rising up to 500 people in 2008.

Lời giải

The table and the chart below provide a breakdown of the total expenditure and the average amount of money spent by students per week while studying abroad in 4 countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The bar graph illustrates the overseas students' spending on accommodation, tuition, and living expenses, while the table depicts information about the average weekly expenses by international students in four countries: A, B, C, and D.

Overall, foreign students need to spend the highest in country A and the lowest in D. In nearly every nation, the international students’ weekly average living expenses are the greatest, while their housing cost registers the lowest.

The costliest country for studying is A, with a weekly average expense of 875 dollars. This is followed by B, C, and D, which have weekly expenses of 735, 540, and 435 dollars, respectively. However, foreign students always pay the least for accommodation, which incurs on average weekly 220, 280, 240, and 200 dollars in the nations A, B, C, and D, respectively.

On the other hand, living expenditures account for the highest portion of average weekly costs for international students in countries A, B, and C, with 430, 350, and 275 dollars, correspondingly. Tuition fees in the same countries (A, B and C) come in second with the weekly averages of 358, 320, and 250 dollars in order. However, D is the only nation where education accounts for the highest average spending area, coming in at USD 235, followed by the cost of living (USD 225) and housing (USD 200).

Sample 2:

The table illustrates information regarding the weekly spendings by overseas students in four countries, A, B, C and D, while the bar graph depicts the students’ expenditure on the sectors, housing, education fees and living expenses.

Overall, the cost of studying abroad is the highest in country A and the lowest in D. Apart from country D, living costs account for the most part of the weekly spendings in all countries, while accommodation registers the least.

Regarding the total cost of studying, A is the most expensive country with weekly average 875 dollars, followed by B, C and D with 735, 540 and 435 dollars, respectively. On the other hand, the overseas students always spend the least on accommodation, which are on average weekly 220, 280, 240 and 200 dollars in the corresponding countries A, B, C and D.

Considering the living cost, it takes the largest share of foreign students’ average weekly expenses in countries A, B, and C with 430, 350 and 275 dollars, respectively, while tuition fees in the same countries hold the second place with weekly average 358, 320 and 250 dollars, sequentially. However, D is the only country where tuition fee occupies the highest expenditure with average weekly 235 dollars, followed by living cost (USD 225) and accommodation (USD 200.)

Sample 3:

The table and bar graph depict information regarding the weekly spendings by overseas students in countries A, B C and D.

Overall, there are three elements, housing, school fees and living costs that contribute to the total weekly spendings. The total expenditure in country A is the highest while it is the lowest in country D. Living costs account for the most part of the weekly spendings in all countries except D.

The total mean weekly cost for pupils to study in country A is US$875, next by country B at US$735, and then by country C at US$540, and finally by country D at US$435. The living costs are always the biggest component of the expenditure except for country D, with about US$10 less than the major spending which is the school fees.

Accommodation accounts for the least among all spendings in all countries. The most expensive housing is found in country B, at US$280, and the cheapest in country D at US$200. The middle range can be seen in country A at US$220 and country C at US$240, respectively. Costs of the tuition fee range between US$ 358 and US$235 in country A and D, in order.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP