The charts below show the number of working hours per week, in the industrial sector, in four European countries in 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The charts below show the number of working hours per week, in the industrial sector, in four European countries in 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
Quảng cáo
Trả lời:


Sample 1:
The given column graphs compare the number of hours spent on work per week by industrial workers in France, Denmark, Sweden and the UK in 2002. In three countries, it can be seen that the maximum workers worked 36-40 hours, but in France the maximum workers worked 31-35 hours per week.
In France, approximately half the workers worked for 31-35 hours per week. The percentage of people who worked for 36-40 hours and 46-50 hours was 35% and 20% respectively. The figures for the rest of the working hours accounted for around 10% workers each.
Denmark and Sweden witnessed the highest proportion of people working for 36-40 hours, which was quite different from that of France. The second and the third place came from 31- 35 hours and 41-45 hours workers (25% and 10% in Denmark; 35% and 30% in Sweden). The proportion of people working for the remaining hours was higher in Denmark than in Sweden.
It is interesting to note that in the UK, the percentage of people working 50+ hours was the maximum. Almost 50% worked 36-40 hours per week.
Overall, France was a country where the people worked for the least hours, whereas the Swedish people spent the most time on work among the people from four different countries.
Sample 2:
The bar graphs illustrate the number of hours spent on work per week, in industrial sectors in France, Denmark, Sweden, the UK in 2002. Overall, it is apparent that the maximum workers worked 36-4- hours and least spending time 1-14 hours, but in France, the maximum workers worked 31 to 35 hours per week.
An in-depth analysis of the bar graphs reveals that, in France, approximately, half the workers work for 31 -35 and 36-40 hours, 50% and 38% respectively. Only 20% of workers are worked in 4650 hours. Other working hours are accounted for around 12%, and fewer workers each Denmark, Sweden and the UK witnessed the highest proportion of people working fr 36-40 hours, which was quite different from France. The second and third highest proportion for (31-35 and 41-45) Denmark and Sweden. Comparatively, Sweden’s little increase showed in the number of the hours who spent the time of workers almost 10%.
Furthermore, the percentage of workers time comparatively less in the UK workers hours and 46-50 hours and 50+ hours almost 20% of workers worked. On the other hand, comparatively, other European countries place 46-50 and 50+hours, only less than 10% witnessed by Sweden.
Sample 3:
The bar charts compare the number of weekly working hours of European citizens in the industrial sector in 2002 across four different countries: France, Denmark, Sweden, and the UK. Overall, the majority of employees in all countries worked more than 30 hours per week, with the most common working hours falling between 36 and 40 hours per week, except for France. It is clear that British people were most likely to work overtime.
Regarding France and Denmark, in both countries, a relatively small percentage of the population worked less than 30 hours or more than 40 hours, at just under 20%. By contrast, the most common working hour durations in France were 31-35 hours per week and 36-40 hours per week, demonstrated by around 50%, and 35% of the French population respectively. Experiencing a reverse trend, the former in Denmark was about half that of France, at 25%, while the latter range was twice as high as that in France, at around 70%.
Sweden had the highest percentage, at around 80%, of workers spent 36-40 hours in their workplace per week, followed by approximately 40% who worked 31-35 hours, and 30% who worked 41-45 hours. Meanwhile, approximately 50% of British employees worked for around 36-40 hours per week, which was higher than the percentage of those who dedicated 41-50 hours, at around 20%.
Sample 4:
The given column graphs illustrate the number of hours worked per week by industrial workers in France, Denmark, Sweden, and the United Kingdom in 2002.
In Denmark, Sweden, and the United Kingdom witnessed the highest proportion of workers worked for 36-40 hours, with figures 70, 80, and 50 respectively, while in the case of France, the proportion was 35%. In contrast, the majority in France at 50% worked for 31-35 hours. The figures for those working 31-35 hours stood at 22%, 35%, and 10% in Denmark, Sweden, and the United Kingdom respectively.
The percentage of employees working less than 30 hours was a minority in almost all countries, with only 10-15% of employees working this number of hours in all countries. The percentage of people working more than 40 hours was also very low, and in all countries, the figure was 10-25%.
Overall, it can be seen that the maximum workers worked 36-40 hours, but in France, the maximum workers worked 31-35 hours per week. France was a nation where the people worked for the least hours, whereas the Swedish people spent the most time on work among the people from four different countries.
Sample 5:
The given bar charts illustrate the weekly working hours in an industrial area amongst four countries, namely France, Denmark, Sweden and the United Kingdom, within the year 2002. Overall, most of the workers spent 36 to 40 hours working per week, except for French people. Moreover, British employees tended to work overtime more than the other countries.
Regarding France, the working population in the industry sector of this country usually spent around 31-35 hours a week working, followed by those who worked from 36 to 40 hours. This working hour pattern was, however, contradictory in Denmark, as the proportion of laborers allocating around 40 hours at work was significantly higher than that of the French counterpart, at nearly 75%. Noteworthily, the percentage of employees working fewer than 30 hours and more than 40 hours in these two countries did not exceed 20%.
In terms of the other two countries, it could be observed that Sweden had a similar pattern as Denmark, since the percentage of workers working 36-40 hours weekly took the highest position, at 80%. This figure was twice as great as those spending 31-35 hours at work in this European country. Meanwhile, the UK possessed the lowest percentage of employees working fewer than 31 hours within a week; yet the country had the highest rate of overtime workers, as more than one-fifth of the working populace spent over 50 hours per workweek laboring.
Sample 6:
The charts below show the number of working hours per week, in the industrial sector, in four European countries in 2002.
The charts provide data on the working hours which laborers employed in industrial sectors had to fulfill in four particular European countries in 2002.
Overall, it is evident that the majority of workers in four countries worked for 36 to 40 hours, with the exception of those in France, with the majority of them working for only 31 to 35 hours. It is also more likely for a British worker to dedicate more than 40 hours to their job every week, while it is quite rare for employees to commit only 30 hours or less a week.
Sweden was the country which saw the largest percentage of people having to fulfill a 36-hour-and-above workweek, 80% of them having to work for 36 to 40 hours. The figure for Denmark was slightly behind, at 70%, while only half of the industrial laborers in the UK and France were required to fulfill the same work hour.
It is significantly less likely for laborers in this sector to work for more than 40 hours, with figures hardly ever exceeding 20%. Around 15% to 20% of people employed in this sector in the UK had. The same is true for France, but at a lower proportion. Sweden saw a noticeable proportion working for 41 to 45 hours (around 30%), but the other two figures were negligible, while Denmark's data was minimal, with none surpassing 10%.
Having to dedicate less than 35 hours to working a week was uncommon for UK and Danish industrial workers, with only 10% and 20% of them having such commitment respectively. This working practice was more prevalent in Sweden, with two in five people, and most common in France, with around half of the workers in total.
France was the country with the highest proportion of people having to fulfill 30 hours of work per week; and figures scarcely (hiếm khi) exceeded 10% for all the countries surveyed.
Sample 7:
The bar graphs given illustrate the information about the work hours per week in the industrial sector in France, Denmark, Sweden and the UK, over the time period of 2002.
Overall, it can be seen that the highest workers worked 36-4 hours and the least 1-14 hours, but in France, the maximum worked 31 to 35 hours per week.
The bar graphs show that the ratio of employees who work 14 hours in France and Denmark was 10%; however, the percentage of people slightly inclined and reached 15% in France. Whilst the figure was similar in Denmark to work for 21-30 hours. 50% of employees work in trade for 31 to 35 hours in France, whereas it was half of Denmark. In Denmark, labourers work 36 to 40 hours, 70% of which is half of France. The ratio of workers in France and Denmark was similar, 10 in 50 hours. It is interesting to note that it was 20% in 46 to 50 hours in France.
Analyzing the data further, it is manifested that the workers working 36-40 hours in Sweden were 80% which is 30% less than in the UK. The ratio was less than 10% of 1-14, 46-50 and 50+ hours in Sweden. However, 31-45 hours was approximately 35% of workers in the UK. The figure of employees below 10% who work 35 hours. However, 20% work 50 hours.
Sample 8:
The yielded bar charts illustrate the percentage of week wise hours in the commercial side in four European countries, namely France, Denmark, Sweden, the UK.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that 30 to 40 hours works had the highest percentage whereas, over 50 and 1 to 14 had the least in all given countries.
For France, nearly a quarter proportion of workers work 1 to 30 hours although, 31 to 35 hours job percentage was a half. Only 12% less jober did 36 to 40 hours. Above 41 hours proportion was same as 1 to 14 had except 46 to 50 which had one-fifth percentage. For Denmark, 21% of citizens worked 31 to 35 hours while 36 to 40 hours had 70%. The rest of hours workers proportion was the same, its 10%.
For Sweden, only 3% of people did 1 to 14 hours work which rose slightly as hours rose. With the zenith, four-fifth percentage of jober had 36 to 40 hours job. 41 to 45 and 46 to 50+ had 22% and 5% respectively.
For the UK, for 1 to 35 hours, workers proportion was roughly 10%. It had the same percentage of workers in 36 to 40 hours as France had in 31 to 35. Additionally, 15% was in 41 to 45 whereas, for 46 to 50+ proportion remained same.
Hot: Danh sách các trường đã công bố điểm chuẩn Đại học 2025 (mới nhất) (2025). Xem ngay
CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ
Lời giải

Sample 1:
The line graph gives data about the number of users of five different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.
Overall, all services experienced some growth over the 10-year period, with cell phone and Internet services experiencing the most growth and becoming the most popular forms of communication.
In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5% of the population. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the highest position in 2008, with more than 60% percent of the population using this type of service. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.
Meanwhile, throughout the 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of landline services, at about 15% of the population. Also, the use of mobile and fixed broadband services was minimal before 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5% of the population by the last year.
Sample 2:
The line graph gives data about the number of users of 5 different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.
Overall, cell phone and Internet services became more and more popular, and others similarly experienced minimal growth over the years.
In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5 per 100 inhabitants. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the higher position in 2008, at more than 60 users per 100 in habitants. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.
Meanwhile, throughout this 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of the landline service, with about 15 users per 100 inhabitants. Also, mobile and fixed broadband had yet to be introduced by 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5 users per 100 inhabitants in the last year.
Sample 3:
The line graph illustrates the number of people in the world who used five categories of communication services at two-year intervals from 1998 to 2008.
Overall, although all kinds of communication services tended to grow during the entire time period, only the increase in popularity in cellular phone service was significantly higher than the rise in that of other means of communication.
In 1998, the figure for cellular phone service was round about 500 people, as same as Internet service’s. From 1998, the number of individuals using cellular phone services increased dramatically to exactly 6000 people and became the most common means of communication in the year 2008. Additionally, the figure for Internet service was about five times higher than during the period of 10 years.
With 1500 people used, the figure for landline service was the highest number in 1998. However, that figure had a minor increase to 2000 people in 2006 before it dropped slightly to approximately 1800 people in 2008. The figure for mobile broadband and fixed broadband remained nearly 0 throughout the first six-year period. They were also the least popular kinds of communication services despite rising up to 500 people in 2008.
Lời giải

Sample 1:
The chart illustrates a comparison of the three kinds of foreign tourist visits to a certain European nation during a twenty-year period, beginning in 1987 and ending in 2007.
Overall, the majority of survey years showed that most foreign visitors flocked to coastal locations, while mountainous places received the fewest. Furthermore, the number of visitors visiting all three locations rose throughout this time frame.
Over 40,000 tourists from outside of this European nation visited its shore in 1987. Its number plummeted to roughly 35,000 in 1992 but has steadily increased since then, peaking at over 75,000 in 2007. Meanwhile, the annual number of international visitors to the mountains ranged from 20,000 to 30,000 in the first half of the decade and then jumped to 35,000 in 2007.
For the first fifteen years, the number of international visitors to this country's lakes steadily increased, reaching a high of 75,000 in 2002. In the following years, however, this number dropped dramatically, reaching 50,000 in 2007.
Sample 2:
The chart presents a comparative analysis of three categories of foreign tourist visits to a specific European nation from 1987 to 2007.
In general, there was a consistent increase in the number of tourists across all three locations throughout the specified period. Coastal areas witnessed the highest influx of foreign tourists in almost all the periods.
The year 1987 marked the arrival of over 40,000 foreign tourists to the nation’s coastal regions. However, this figure experienced a decline, dropping to approximately 35,000 visitors by 1992. The numbers then surged significantly, peaking at over 75,000 visitors by 2007. Conversely, visits to mountainous locations started at the second highest level of 20,000, progressing to over 30,000 in 1997. Thereafter, this figure stayed unaltered towards 2002 before a modest increment to about 38,000 in 2007.
The volume of international tourists visiting the country’s lakes saw consistent growth over the initial fifteen years, reaching a pinnacle of 75,000 visitors in 2002. Subsequently, there was a substantial decline in visitation, plummeting to 50,000 by the year 2007.
Sample 3:
The graph illustrates the number of tourists to three distinct regions in a European country, spanning from 1987 to 2007. Overall, the places have experienced an increased tourist attraction from the past two decades.
Initially, the coast, with around 40,000 visitors, was known to be the most popular region among the three. On the contrary, the lakes were the least liked, only comprising around 10,000 visitors. It is also notable that both the coast and the lakes had the same number of maximum visitors in this period, which was around 75,000.
By 2007, the coast had become the most popular tourist destination, having visited by almost 75,000 visitors. Although the lakes too saw a steep rise initially, the visitors started to decline, gaining the maximum attraction of approximately 75,000 tourists in 2002. By 2007, it had declined to 40,000 visitors. The mountains surprisingly did not experience any great inclination. They only had around 15,000 more visitors since 1987.
Sample 4:
The given graph illustrates the number of overseas travellers who visited three different attractions in a European country from 1987 to 2007. It is noticeable that the number of tourists visiting all the areas witnessed an upward trend over the given period.
In 1987, the coast attracted the most overseas visitors, with 40 thousand while the converse held true for the lakes, with only 10 thousand. Over the next two decades, the number of overseas tourists opting for the lakes rose gradually to approximately 35 thousand. Similarly, there was a dramatic jump in the number of visitors to the lakes to about 75 thousand, followed by a drop to 50 thousand in 2007.
At the beginning of the period, 20 thousand tourists from other countries visited the mountains. The mentioned attractions welcomed 30 thousand visitors in 1997 and the figure remained relatively stable until 2002. At the end of the period, the number of tourists to the mountains reached the highest point of 35 thousand.
Sample 5:
The given line graph depicts information about how many foreigners visited three separate regions in a European nation, during the span of a 20-year period from 1987 to 2007.
Overall, the most notable detail is that those three regions all attracted an increasing number of foreigners. In addition, the lakes’ tourist figures witnessed the most dramatic change among those given.
In more detail, at approximately 10,000 visitors in 1987, the quantity of foreign travelers who were attracted to the lakes gradually rose to around 50,000 in 2000, before peaking at approximately 75,000 tourists in 2002, This figure then dropped back down to approximately 50,000 people in 2007.
With regards to tourist numbers in coastal and mountainous areas, the overall figures increased, however mountainous areas remained the least attractive travel option out of the three. In 1987, the number of those who chose the coast as a travel destination stood at 40,000, compared to only 20,000 travelers who went to the mountains. In the next 14 years, the coast witnessed a slight decrease in the quantity of visitors by a few thousand, which was followed by a significant climb to around 60,000 people, whereas the number of those visiting mountainous areas went up remarkably to 30,000 in 2001.
In the final 6 years, while the quantity of overseas tourists going to the coast rose moderately to above 70,000, there was a slight climb in those who paid a visit to the mountains to about 35,000.
Sample 6:
The line chart details statistics about foreign travellers to three types of tourist destinations in an unspecified nation in Europe from 1987 to 2007. Overall, all categories witnessed an upswing with the most significant growth being seen in the number of tourists to the lakeside areas.
The coastal region welcomed the highest level of alien sightseers in the first year, at 40,000. Despite dipping to about 35,000 five years later, it recovered rapidly and consistently to approximately 76,000 in the final year.
Regarding the visitors to the mountainous attractions, this figure rose moderately from 20,000 in 1987 to 30,000 in 1997. Subsequently, it documented a period of stability until 2002, followed by a rise of nearly 7,000 by the end.
Finally, starting at the lowest result of 10,000 in the beginning, the number of overseas tourists to the lakes surged to 40,000 by 1997. In the next five years, it increased more sharply to a peak of just over 75,000 which surpassed the coast, before dropping quickly back to second position with 50,000 by 2007.
Sample 7:
The given outline is the number of people who have gone to the distinctive three places (the coast, the mountains, and the lakes) in the European nation from 1987 to 2000. Looking at the by-and-large structure it is quickly clear that the number of worldwide guests to the coast has diminished over the past five years. In spite of the first moo numbers, there has been a sharp increment in the number of guests to the lake by the conclusion, whereas those going to the mountains have expanded slowly.
After dissecting the chart, it can be seen that in 1987, 40% of worldwide people went by the coast which declined to around 35% in 1992. After that, the esteem expanded to roughly 75% in 2007. While, in 1987, 20% of universal people went to see the mountains which expanded consistently to around almost 33% in 2007.
In 1987, the rate of outside guests was 10%, expanding to 40% by 1997. This figure rose to 72% in 2002, sometime recently dropping to 50% in 2007. The coast had the most elevated guest numbers among the three zones. In the interim, both the coast and the mountains experienced development in their guest tallies.
Sample 8:
The line chart outlines the number of universal sightseers gone by the diverse three places in a European nation from 1887 to 2007. The unit is measured in thousands. By and large, it can be apparent that an expansive lion's share of guests went to Europe in 2002 and 2007, and a few thousand individuals in 1987. A look at the chart reveals that more at that point 70 thousand people went by the lakes in 2002, and the same number of individuals went to the mountains in 2007. Within the same year, a decrease was observed in the number of guests who went to lakes as it was 50 thousand. In 1987, as it was, 40 thousand individuals visited the coastal regions, and after that sudden expanded drift watched from 1992 to 2007.
For the mountain ranges, 20 thousand individuals went in 1987, and exceptionally few increases were observed over a period of time. Around 35 thousand sightseers went by the mountains in 2007.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.
Lời giải
Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.