Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 1,712 Lưu

The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and present day.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified Giải bởi Vietjack
The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and present day. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The maps give information on the transformation the ground floor of an art gallery has undergone between 2015 and the present day. Overall, we can see that there has been a removal of one of the exhibitions, with new amenities in its place. Meanwhile, a few facilities have also been shifted around.  

The large exhibition room directly to the left of the entrance hall has been replaced by a temporary exhibition and children’s area. The receptionist table, meanwhile, has also been moved closer to the entrance compared to where it was in 2015, now sitting next to the temporary exhibition. Additionally, the gallery office and cafe have also been dismantled, with a vending machine and gallery shop taking their place. The stairs have been moved slightly leftward, with the space on its right being made available for a lift. Lastly, the three exhibition rooms that occupy the whole right side of the building have remained unchanged from what they were in 2015.  

Sample 2:

The maps illustrate the changes that the ground floor of an art gallery has undergone from 2015 to today.

Overall, the art gallery has been modernized to include more facilities to cater for its visitors. The only parts that have remained unchanged are the entrance hall and the three exhibition rooms on the right-hand side.

The entrance is located at the southern side of the layout. Walking past the entrance, visitors should see an entrance hall that leads to a reception desk, which lies at the very centre of the gallery. This reception desk used to be further up north, towards the far end of the gallery. To the north of the reception desk are the stairs, which now have been slightly moved to the left to make room for a new lift on the right. It is interesting to note that the three exhibition rooms to the right of the ground floor remain the same both in size and location.

On the left of the art gallery ground floor, there used to be exhibition room number 4 in 2015. However, this room has been separated into two different rooms now, with one being the children’s area and the other (being) a temporary exhibition. Adjacent to the present-day exhibition was once a gallery office, which has been torn down to free up space for a vending machine, where visitors can pick up snack or a drink. The left-hand corner coffee shop to the end of the gallery has also been converted into a smaller shop for people to buy gallery souvenirs.

Sample 3:

The maps illustrate the layout of an art gallery and how it has changed from 2005 to now.

Overall, the building has undergone several changes internally, with the addition of several new rooms and facilities, and access for the disabled.

In 2005, the gallery contained four exhibition rooms, a gallery office, and a cafe. Exhibition rooms 1, 2, and 3 have remained unchanged, however Exhibition room 4 has now been split into a children’s area, and a temporary exhibition room. The gallery office previously located behind Exhibition room 4 has now been removed and the space opened up to become a part of the entrance hall area.

Previously, a cafe was located to the left of the stairs, but has now been replaced with a gallery shop, however the space is much smaller now. A new vending machine facility has been placed outside the gallery shop where the gallery office used to be. The reception desk has been moved closer to the front of the entrance hall, and new disabled access facilities have been added, including a wheelchair ramp at the front of the building and a lift located next to the stairs.

Sample 4:

The maps depict modifications to the ground floor of an unspecified art gallery from 2015 to the present day. Overall, the ground floor underwent a complete transformation with various facilities being relocated, replaced or added.

Between 2015 and the present day, the reception desk was relocated to a position where it is closer to the entrance. The hall was further expanded to the right-hand side of the ground floor, taking up the space where there once was a gallery office. There is now a lift adjacent to the former stairs, and the café on the top left corner of the ground floor was converted into a gallery shop with a vending machine located just outside.

Another major change to the area was the re-arrangement of the exhibition rooms. The exhibition room 4 on the left-hand side of the room was divided into a temporary one and an area for children, while the three exhibition rooms on the right-hand side remain unchanged. The final change made to the layout of the ground floor is the additional ramp for wheelchairs, which makes the gallery become more accessible to the disabled. 

Sample 5:

The maps illustrate the changes that have taken place in an art gallery from 2015 up to the present time.

In general, the main changes have been the use of the west side for other purposes and the addition of some new facilities.

The entrance remains the same at the middle of the southern wall, and there is a new ramp for wheelchairs outside the establishment at present. The lobby has been expanded with the extra space now occupying the site of the initial gallery office. The reception area has been relocated to the central part of the art gallery, and a new elevator now exists to the right of the stairs, which have been moved a little to the west.

The café at the top left corner of the floor plan has been remodelled to become a gallery shop, and a vending machine has appeared alongside its southern wall. In the place of exhibition room 4, which has been removed, are currently a temporary exhibition space and an area for children. The east side of the art gallery remains unchanged with three separate exhibition rooms 1,2,3 aligned in a south-north direction.

Sample 6:

The floor plans give information on the changes made to a gallery between 2005 and the present day. Overall, most of the changes are confined to the left side of the floor while the right side remains the same.

The doorsteps of the entrance witnessed an alteration, where a ramp for wheelchair users was added alongside the steps. In the middle of the room, there is now a reception desk which in 2005 had been placed further northwest of the present position, facing the left corner of the room. The current desk is also an oval one, replacing the old rectangular desk. In the upper left corner of the room, a former cafe and shop is now replaced by a gallery shop, with three vending machines installed in front. Meanwhile, an area for temporary exhibitions, as well as an interactive children’s play area, has been built in place of exhibition 4. Further, the stairs to the upper floor have been made smaller and are now fitted with a lift next to them. Finally, the three exhibition rooms on the right of the room remained unchanged.

Sample 7:

The maps reveal some changes taking place to the layout of an art gallery’s ground floor between 2005 and the present day.

In general, while the eastern part of the gallery has remained more or less intact over time, the opposite side has undergone significant transformations, with the whole area becoming more accessible for the disabled.

Originally, the gallery was designed merely for its exhibition purpose and visitors could enter the hall through the entrance in the south of the building. Inside the hall, there was a reception desk to welcome visitors, which led to a staircase in the north end. The remaining part simply consisted of functional areas with a set of 3 exhibition rooms on the eastern wing, one large exhibition space together with an office taking up the entire southwestern corner, and a café in the northwest.

At present, the location has become modernized and versatile, providing more facilities for visitors, especially with the addition of a wheelchair slope right outside the entrance to the west and a lift next to the stairs. To the west, exhibition room 4 was converted into a children’s indoor playground and one smaller room for temporary display, while a gallery shop and a vending machine were opened in place of the original gallery office and the cafe. The final alteration that happened was the relocation of the reception towards the entrance of the gallery.

Sample 8:

The floor plans illustrate the differences in the layout of an art gallery ground floor between 2015 and the current layout. Overall, it can be seen that there have been a lot of changes to the interior design of the ground floor with the replacement of Exhibition room 4 being the most significant change.

On the left-hand side of the ground floor, there used to be Exhibition Room 4, but it has been removed to make room for the construction of a new temporary exhibition room and children’s play area in the bottom-left corner. A gallery, whose original space is now used for a vending machine, has been relocated to occupy the space of the cafe on the top-left side.

A set of stairs in the middle at the top and three exhibition rooms on the right-hand side of the plan still remain the same, with a new lift being added next to Exhibition Room 3 on the left. There was an entrance hall in the center of the floor and a receptionist in front of the stairs set. While there has been no change ro the entrance hall, the receptionist has been moved beside the temporary exhibition room on the right.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

The table and the chart below provide a breakdown of the total expenditure and the average amount of money spent by students per week while studying abroad in 4 countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The bar graph illustrates the overseas students' spending on accommodation, tuition, and living expenses, while the table depicts information about the average weekly expenses by international students in four countries: A, B, C, and D.

Overall, foreign students need to spend the highest in country A and the lowest in D. In nearly every nation, the international students’ weekly average living expenses are the greatest, while their housing cost registers the lowest.

The costliest country for studying is A, with a weekly average expense of 875 dollars. This is followed by B, C, and D, which have weekly expenses of 735, 540, and 435 dollars, respectively. However, foreign students always pay the least for accommodation, which incurs on average weekly 220, 280, 240, and 200 dollars in the nations A, B, C, and D, respectively.

On the other hand, living expenditures account for the highest portion of average weekly costs for international students in countries A, B, and C, with 430, 350, and 275 dollars, correspondingly. Tuition fees in the same countries (A, B and C) come in second with the weekly averages of 358, 320, and 250 dollars in order. However, D is the only nation where education accounts for the highest average spending area, coming in at USD 235, followed by the cost of living (USD 225) and housing (USD 200).

Sample 2:

The table illustrates information regarding the weekly spendings by overseas students in four countries, A, B, C and D, while the bar graph depicts the students’ expenditure on the sectors, housing, education fees and living expenses.

Overall, the cost of studying abroad is the highest in country A and the lowest in D. Apart from country D, living costs account for the most part of the weekly spendings in all countries, while accommodation registers the least.

Regarding the total cost of studying, A is the most expensive country with weekly average 875 dollars, followed by B, C and D with 735, 540 and 435 dollars, respectively. On the other hand, the overseas students always spend the least on accommodation, which are on average weekly 220, 280, 240 and 200 dollars in the corresponding countries A, B, C and D.

Considering the living cost, it takes the largest share of foreign students’ average weekly expenses in countries A, B, and C with 430, 350 and 275 dollars, respectively, while tuition fees in the same countries hold the second place with weekly average 358, 320 and 250 dollars, sequentially. However, D is the only country where tuition fee occupies the highest expenditure with average weekly 235 dollars, followed by living cost (USD 225) and accommodation (USD 200.)

Sample 3:

The table and bar graph depict information regarding the weekly spendings by overseas students in countries A, B C and D.

Overall, there are three elements, housing, school fees and living costs that contribute to the total weekly spendings. The total expenditure in country A is the highest while it is the lowest in country D. Living costs account for the most part of the weekly spendings in all countries except D.

The total mean weekly cost for pupils to study in country A is US$875, next by country B at US$735, and then by country C at US$540, and finally by country D at US$435. The living costs are always the biggest component of the expenditure except for country D, with about US$10 less than the major spending which is the school fees.

Accommodation accounts for the least among all spendings in all countries. The most expensive housing is found in country B, at US$280, and the cheapest in country D at US$200. The middle range can be seen in country A at US$220 and country C at US$240, respectively. Costs of the tuition fee range between US$ 358 and US$235 in country A and D, in order.

Lời giải

The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The bar chart and pie chart give information about why US residents travelled and what travel problems they experienced in the year 2009.

It is clear that the principal reason why Americans travelled in 2009 was to commute to and from work. In the same year, the primary concern of Americans, with regard to the trips they made, was the cost of travelling.

Looking more closely at the bar chart, we can see that 49% of the trips made by Americans in 2009 were for the purpose of commuting. By contrast, only 6% of trips were visits to friends or relatives, and one in ten trips were for social or recreation reasons. Shopping was cited as the reason for 16% of all travel, while unspecific ‘personal reasons’ accounted for the remaining 19%.

According to the pie chart, price was the key consideration for 36% of American travellers. Almost one in five people cited safety as their foremost travel concern, while aggressive driving and highway congestion were the main issues for 17% and 14% of the travelling public. Finally, a total of 14% of those surveyed thought that access to public transport or space for pedestrians were the most important travel issues.

Sample 2:

The bar chart compares the figures for Americans going out for five reasons and the pie chart illustrates the percentage of six problems that concerned them when travelling in 2009. Overall, it is clear that the main reason why people in the US went out in 2009 is to commute to work, and the cost of travelling is the problem concerning them the most.

Looking first at the bar graph, the proportion of Americans going out for commuting to work stood at 49%, while the figure for those leaving their house for personal reasons accounted for 19%. In addition, the rate of people in the US going out for shopping and recreation made up 16% and 10%, respectively, while visiting friends or relatives accounted for the lowest percentage, at only 6%.

Turning to the pie chart, the cost of travelling was the most concerning problem of Americans when going out, with the figure making up 36%, while the proportion of safety concerns is half of that, at 19%. In addition, 17% of US citizens were concerned about aggressive drivers, while highway congestion made 14% of them worried when leaving their house. Access to public transportation and places for people to walk accounted for the lowest percentages, at only 8% and 6%, respectively.

Sample 3:

The provided charts offer insights into the reasons for travel and the primary concerns faced by the traveling public in the United States during the year 2009. The data is presented through a bar chart illustrating travel purposes and a pie chart highlighting key issues.

Notably, the primary motivation for travel among Americans in 2009 was commuting to and from work. Simultaneously, the major concern for the traveling public during their trips revolved around the cost associated with travel.

Examining the bar chart in detail reveals that almost half of the trips made by Americans in 2009, precisely 49%, were attributed to commuting. Conversely, visits to friends or relatives accounted for a mere 6%, while social or recreational trips constituted one in ten journeys. Shopping emerged as the purpose for 16% of all travel, leaving the remaining 19% for unspecific ‘personal reasons.’

Turning attention to the pie chart, it becomes evident that cost was the primary consideration for 36% of American travelers. Safety closely followed, with nearly one in five people, or 19%, expressing it as their foremost travel concern. Aggressive driving and highway congestion were significant issues for 17% and 14% of the traveling public, respectively. Additionally, 14% of respondents identified access to public transport or space for pedestrians as the most crucial travel issues.

Sample 4:

The bar chart shows why American people chose to travel, and the pie chart shows the main issues for the travelling public in the USA, both for 2009. The trend suggests that the reason and price were the main issues for travel in the United States. It is clear that commuting from work was reported as the biggest contribution to travel, at 49%. People who went travelling for personal reasons and shopping accounted for 35% when these two groups are combined. However, interaction with friends and relatives only accounted for 25% less than the above categories. And social and recreational activities took up only 6%, which was the lowest figure by more than 43%. The travelling public’s main issues were related to price and safety, with 55% of respondents reporting these two issues. While other issues accounted for a relatively small part. Only 17% of the respondents reported issues with aggressive drivers, while highway congestion accounted for even less at 14% of the issues reported. The percentage of access to public transport and space for pedestrians was much lower than the other categories at less than 10% for both. To conclude, price and commuting time were the dominant factors relating to travel in the US in 2009.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 250K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP