Câu hỏi:

19/08/2025 1,005 Lưu

The table and pie chart give information about the population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

Quảng cáo

Trả lời:

verified Giải bởi Vietjack
The table and pie chart give information about the population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas.  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The pie chart gives information on the percentages of people from different countries who live in Australia while the table illustrates the proportions of inhabitants in rural and urban areas.

Looking from an overall perspective, the most striking feature of the pie chart is the predominance of native Australians living in this country. Regarding the table, it is apparent that the vast majority of people, regardless of their nationality, choose to live in cities.

In terms of the pie chart, Australians account for nearly three-quarters of the population in this country, which is almost ten times as large as the segment of people from Britain residing in Australia. New Zealand ranks third, at 3 percent, followed by China and the Netherlands, at 2 percent and 1 percent respectively while 14 percent of the Australian population is made up of residents from other countries.

Regarding their living areas, although the percentage of Australians living in rural areas is the highest among all demographics, at 20 percent, the majority of them still live in cities. A similar pattern can be observed in the figures for the Dutch, the British and New Zealanders with 83 per cent, 89 per cent and 90 percent of them opting for urban areas. Almost all Chinese residents live in these parts of the country (99 percent).

Sample 2:

The given pie chart illustrates the percentage of people of different nationalities residing in Australia, whereas the table shows demographical figures which are classified according to urban and rural areas. The initial impression from the pie chart is that the vast majority of Australian people claim their ancestry to be of Australian origin. It is also noticeable that most Australian people, regardless of their ethnicity, are city dwellers.

According to the pie chart, Australian ethnicity makes up nearly three fourths of the total population. This is followed by the figure for people coming from the UK (7%) and New Zealand (3%). People of Chinese and Dutch ethnicity, on the other hand, made up a negligible 1-2%.

As is seen from the table, roughly 80% of people from Australia and New Zealand live in cities, whereas only around 20% lived in the countryside. A similar picture is evident in the figures for people from China and New Zealand, with their urban population amounting to a high of 90-99%.

Sample 3:

The given pie chart illustrates the percentages of different nationalities that make up the Australian population, while the table gives information about whether they live in urban or rural areas.

In general, it is evident that the vast majority of Australia’s population is of Australian nationality. Furthermore, most people in this country, irrespective of their nationality, opt to live in cities.

The percentage of the Australian population that are of Australian nationality is 73%, whereas the figures for people of British or other nationalities are significantly lower, at 7% and 14% respectively. Meanwhile, 3% of the population come from New Zealand, while 2% are of Chinese nationality. 1% of Australia’s population comes from the Netherlands.

From the table it can be seen that 80% of Australians choose to reside in cities, along with 89% of the British and 90% of the New Zealanders. SImilarly, 99% of Chinese live in the city, as do 83% of the Dutch.

Sample 4:

The pie chart depicts the constitution of those residing in Australia with respect to their nationalities, whereas the table details where these people live in an unspecified year.

Overall, what stands out from the graph is that Australian demographics hold the lion’s share in the population of this nation. Another interesting point is that most residents opt for the city regardless of ethnicity.

With regards to the pie chart, local Australian people represent nearly three fourths (73%) of the total population. Next came other countries with 14%, whilst 7% come from the UK. Those whose home countries are in Dutch, China and New Zealand hold a negligible 1-3% of total people residing in Australia.

In terms of the table, the vast majority of surveyed Australian demographics favour living in the city with 8 out of 10. A similar pattern can be seen in the figures for Dutch, British and New Zealander residents, amounting to 83%, 89% and 90% respectively. This trend is particularly evident in Chinese people with 99% choosing to live in the city.

Sample 5:

The pie chart and table detail population figures in Australia and if residents tended to live in rural or urban areas. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the vast majority of the population is Australian, followed by sizeable numbers for other and British nationals, and more marginal figures for New Zealanders, Chinese, and the Dutch. All demographics live overwhelmingly in cities, especially individuals from China.

The pie chart indicates that 73% of the Australian population is made up of Australians themselves. This figure is followed distantly by other at 14%, residents from Great Britain at 7%, New Zealanders at 3%, Chinese at 2%, and people from the Netherlands at just 1%.

In terms of livings areas, Australians are most likely to live outside cities, though 80% still live in urban environments. Similarly, 83% of the Dutch live in cities and 17% in the countryside. British and New Zealand residents display nearly identical proportions with around 90% in cities. Finally, the Chinese live predominately in the cities (99%).

Sample 6:

The pie chart illustrates a demographic breakdown of the Australian population by nationality, and the table shows the proportions of these nationalities living in urban and rural areas.

Overall, Australian nationals are the predominant group in the entire country. In addition, the vast majority of the population gravitates towards city life regardless of their nationalities, with nearly the entire Chinese immigrant community doing so.

Looking first at the different nationalities, nearly three quarters (73%) of the population are Australian, which is more than ten times higher than the figure for British people, at 7%. Meanwhile, New Zealanders, Chinese, and Dutch nationals are also smaller minorities, with their respective figures being 3%,2% and 1%, and all other unnamed nationalities account for 14%.

Regarding the locations of these communities, almost all Chinese people reside in cities, specifically 99%. Similarly, the majority of people from the UK and New Zealand live in urban areas, at 89% and 90% respectively. Finally, 83% of people originating from the Netherlands have settled and remained in cities, which is only 3% more than that of Australians.

Sample 7:

The pie chart depicts the percentage of people of various nationalities living in Australia, whereas the table displays demographic data divided into urban and rural areas.

Overall, the pie chart gives the impression that the vast majority of Australians claim to have ancestors of Australian origin. It is also notable from the table that most Australians, regardless of ethnicity, are urban dwellers.

According to the pie chart, ethnicity accounts for nearly three-quarters of the total population in Australia. This is followed by figures for people from the United Kingdom (7%), and New Zealand (3%). People of Chinese and Dutch origin, on the other hand, made up a negligible 1-2% of the population.

Looking at the table, roughly 80% of Australians and New Zealanders live in cities, with only about 20% living in the countryside. A similar picture can be seen in the figures for people from China and New Zealand, where the urban population is 90-99%.

Sample 8:

The given pie chart shows the percentage of people of different nationalities residing in Australia, while the table shows demographic figures which are classified according to urban and rural areas.

Overall, Australians are the largest nationalities, residents, almost three-quarters of the major population, and they tend to live in the urban area. This figure is followed distantly by other citizens who are almost twice the residents from Great Britain (7%), New Zealanders at 3%, Chinese at 2%, and people from the Netherlands at just 1%.

It is readily apparent that Chinese live predominantly in the cities up to 99%, whereas only 1% live in the countryside. The other vast majority of city dwellers is New Zealanders and British, which display nearly identical proportions around 90%. In terms of living areas, Australians are few likely to live outside the cities, nearly 20%, while the rest still live in urban environments. Similarly, 83% of the Dutch live in cities and 17% in the countryside.

Sample 9:

The pie chart illustrates the proportion of people of different nationalities in Australia while the table shows their whereabouts.

Overall, the majority of the population has Australian nationality. It is also apparent that people mostly reside in urban areas.

According to the pie chart, a hefty 73% of people living in Australia are Australians. This is followed by the figure for those who hold other nationalities (14%), which is twice as much as that for people of British origin (7%). The remaining groups only account for a minority of the population, with New Zealanders comprising 3%, the Chinese occupying 2% and the Dutch making up 1%.

Regarding the table, it is evident that an overwhelming proportion of residents in Australia are city dwellers regardless of their nationality. Almost all Chinese people, New Zealanders and British people live in cities, at 99%, 90% and 89%, respectively. Likewise, the figures for people of Australian and Dutch descent also show a preference for urban areas, with a ratio of around 8 urbanites to 2 country dwellers.

Sample 10:

Given is the table illustrating how many people residing in Australia based on different nationalities, and the pie chartdelinates the demograph in this country in rural and urban areas.

Overall, the percentage of Australians who dwell in this country dominates the pie chart. By contrast, when it comes to thetable, city dwellers accounts for a vast majority of australia’s population.

According to the pie chart, the proportion of Australiansstand at the top position, at 73%, followed by that of the Britishwith 7%. Simultaneously, the next position belongs to the figure for New zealanders, at 3%. At the same time, around 2%was recorded for the figure of Chinese and Dutch, compared to 14% that of other nationalities.

As seen from the table, regarding the cosmopolitan area, the share of Chinese people ranks first at 99%, which wasapproximately 9% higher than that of NewZealander and British. In the meantime, a mere 82% of Dutch and Australianschoose to live in this area. In terms of the countryside, while the proportion of Australian residents is highest, at 20%, the figures for British, NewZealander and Dutch were comparable, at around 15%. However, Chinese people only have 1% oits population living there, which also occupies the lowest share in the table.

Sample 11:

The provided pie chart illustrates the percentage of people from various nationalities residing in Australia, while the table presents demographic data categorized by urban and rural areas. At first glance at the pie chart, it is evident that the majority of Australians identify their ancestry as Australian. Moreover, a notable observation is that the majority of Australians, regardless of their ethnic background, live in urban areas.

According to the pie chart, individuals of Australian descent constitute nearly three-quarters of the total population. This is followed by individuals from the UK (7%) and New Zealand (3%). Conversely, people of Chinese and Dutch descent account for a marginal 1-2%.

According to the table, approximately 80% of Australians and New Zealanders reside in urban areas, whereas only about 20% live in rural regions. A similar trend is observed among Chinese and New Zealand residents, where the urban population ranges from 90% to 99%.

Sample 12:

The pie chart illustrates the percentage of individuals from various nationalities residing in Australia, while the table presents demographic data categorized into urban and rural areas.

In summary, the pie chart suggests that the majority of Australians claim ancestry of Australian origin. The table also indicates that a significant proportion of Australians, irrespective of ethnicity, reside in urban areas.

According to the pie chart, ethnicity constitutes almost three-quarters of the total Australian population. This is followed by percentages for individuals from the United Kingdom (7%) and New Zealand (3%). Conversely, people of Chinese and Dutch descent account for a negligible 1-2% of the population.

Analyzing the table, approximately 80% of Australians and New Zealanders live in urban areas, with only around 20% residing in rural regions. A similar trend is observed for individuals from China and New Zealand, where the urban population ranges from 90% to 99%.

CÂU HỎI HOT CÙNG CHỦ ĐỀ

Lời giải

The line graph shows the number of people who used different communication services in the world.  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The line graph gives data about the number of users of five different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.

Overall, all services experienced some growth over the 10-year period, with cell phone and Internet services experiencing the most growth and becoming the most popular forms of communication.

In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5% of the population. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the highest position in 2008, with more than 60% percent of the population using this type of service. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.

Meanwhile, throughout the 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of landline services, at about 15% of the population. Also, the use of mobile and fixed broadband services was minimal before 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5% of the population by the last year.

Sample 2:

The line graph gives data about the number of users of 5 different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.

Overall, cell phone and Internet services became more and more popular, and others similarly experienced minimal growth over the years.

In 1998, the figures for cell phone and Internet users started at around 5 per 100 inhabitants. They both increased over the remaining years, with cell phone service gaining the higher position in 2008, at more than 60 users per 100 in habitants. This number was approximately three times as much as that of Internet service in the same year.

Meanwhile, throughout this 10-year period, little change was seen in the use of the landline service, with about 15 users per 100 inhabitants. Also, mobile and fixed broadband had yet to be introduced by 2002. The figures for these two services rose slightly to roughly 5 users per 100 inhabitants in the last year.

Sample 3:

The line graph illustrates the number of people in the world who used five categories of communication services at two-year intervals from 1998 to 2008.

Overall, although all kinds of communication services tended to grow during the entire time period, only the increase in popularity in cellular phone service was significantly higher than the rise in that of other means of communication.

In 1998, the figure for cellular phone service was round about 500 people, as same as Internet service’s. From 1998, the number of individuals using cellular phone services increased dramatically to exactly 6000 people and became the most common means of communication in the year 2008. Additionally, the figure for Internet service was about five times higher than during the period of 10 years.

With 1500 people used, the figure for landline service was the highest number in 1998. However, that figure had a minor increase to 2000 people in 2006 before it dropped slightly to approximately 1800 people in 2008. The figure for mobile broadband and fixed broadband remained nearly 0 throughout the first six-year period. They were also the least popular kinds of communication services despite rising up to 500 people in 2008.

Lời giải

The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007.  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. (ảnh 1)

Sample 1:

The chart illustrates a comparison of the three kinds of foreign tourist visits to a certain European nation during a twenty-year period, beginning in 1987 and ending in 2007.

Overall, the majority of survey years showed that most foreign visitors flocked to coastal locations, while mountainous places received the fewest. Furthermore, the number of visitors visiting all three locations rose throughout this time frame.

Over 40,000 tourists from outside of this European nation visited its shore in 1987. Its number plummeted to roughly 35,000 in 1992 but has steadily increased since then, peaking at over 75,000 in 2007. Meanwhile, the annual number of international visitors to the mountains ranged from 20,000 to 30,000 in the first half of the decade and then jumped to 35,000 in 2007.

For the first fifteen years, the number of international visitors to this country's lakes steadily increased, reaching a high of 75,000 in 2002. In the following years, however, this number dropped dramatically, reaching 50,000 in 2007.

Sample 2:

The chart presents a comparative analysis of three categories of foreign tourist visits to a specific European nation from 1987 to 2007.

In general, there was a consistent increase in the number of tourists across all three locations throughout the specified period. Coastal areas witnessed the highest influx of foreign tourists in almost all the periods.

The year 1987 marked the arrival of over 40,000 foreign tourists to the nation’s coastal regions. However, this figure experienced a decline, dropping to approximately 35,000 visitors by 1992. The numbers then surged significantly, peaking at over 75,000 visitors by 2007. Conversely, visits to mountainous locations started at the second highest level of 20,000, progressing to over 30,000 in 1997. Thereafter, this figure stayed unaltered towards 2002 before a modest increment to about 38,000 in 2007.

The volume of international tourists visiting the country’s lakes saw consistent growth over the initial fifteen years, reaching a pinnacle of 75,000 visitors in 2002. Subsequently, there was a substantial decline in visitation, plummeting to 50,000 by the year 2007.

Sample 3:

The graph illustrates the number of tourists to three distinct regions in a European country, spanning from 1987 to 2007. Overall, the places have experienced an increased tourist attraction from the past two decades.

Initially, the coast, with around 40,000 visitors, was known to be the most popular region among the three. On the contrary, the lakes were the least liked, only comprising around 10,000 visitors. It is also notable that both the coast and the lakes had the same number of maximum visitors in this period, which was around 75,000.

By 2007, the coast had become the most popular tourist destination, having visited by almost 75,000 visitors. Although the lakes too saw a steep rise initially, the visitors started to decline, gaining the maximum attraction of approximately 75,000 tourists in 2002. By 2007, it had declined to 40,000 visitors. The mountains surprisingly did not experience any great inclination. They only had around 15,000 more visitors since 1987.

Sample 4:

The given graph illustrates the number of overseas travellers who visited three different attractions in a European country from 1987 to 2007. It is noticeable that the number of tourists visiting all the areas witnessed an upward trend over the given period.

In 1987, the coast attracted the most overseas visitors, with 40 thousand while the converse held true for the lakes, with only 10 thousand. Over the next two decades, the number of overseas tourists opting for the lakes rose gradually to approximately 35 thousand. Similarly, there was a dramatic jump in the number of visitors to the lakes to about 75 thousand, followed by a drop to 50 thousand in 2007.

At the beginning of the period, 20 thousand tourists from other countries visited the mountains. The mentioned attractions welcomed 30 thousand visitors in 1997 and the figure remained relatively stable until 2002. At the end of the period, the number of tourists to the mountains reached the highest point of 35 thousand.

Sample 5:

The given line graph depicts information about how many foreigners visited three separate regions in a European nation, during the span of a 20-year period from 1987 to 2007.

Overall, the most notable detail is that those three regions all attracted an increasing number of foreigners. In addition, the lakes’ tourist figures witnessed the most dramatic change among those given.

In more detail, at approximately 10,000 visitors in 1987, the quantity of foreign travelers who were attracted to the lakes gradually rose to around 50,000 in 2000, before peaking at approximately 75,000 tourists in 2002, This figure then dropped back down to approximately 50,000 people in 2007.

With regards to tourist numbers in coastal and mountainous areas, the overall figures increased, however mountainous areas remained the least attractive travel option out of the three. In 1987, the number of those who chose the coast as a travel destination stood at 40,000, compared to only 20,000 travelers who went to the mountains. In the next 14 years, the coast witnessed a slight decrease in the quantity of visitors by a few thousand, which was followed by a significant climb to around 60,000 people, whereas the number of those visiting mountainous areas went up remarkably to 30,000 in 2001.

In the final 6 years, while the quantity of overseas tourists going to the coast rose moderately to above 70,000, there was a slight climb in those who paid a visit to the mountains to about 35,000.

Sample 6:

The line chart details statistics about foreign travellers to three types of tourist destinations in an unspecified nation in Europe from 1987 to 2007. Overall, all categories witnessed an upswing with the most significant growth being seen in the number of tourists to the lakeside areas.

The coastal region welcomed the highest level of alien sightseers in the first year, at 40,000. Despite dipping to about 35,000 five years later, it recovered rapidly and consistently to approximately 76,000 in the final year.

Regarding the visitors to the mountainous attractions, this figure rose moderately from 20,000 in 1987 to 30,000 in 1997. Subsequently, it documented a period of stability until 2002, followed by a rise of nearly 7,000 by the end.

Finally, starting at the lowest result of 10,000 in the beginning, the number of overseas tourists to the lakes surged to 40,000 by 1997. In the next five years, it increased more sharply to a peak of just over 75,000 which surpassed the coast, before dropping quickly back to second position with 50,000 by 2007.

Sample 7:

The given outline is the number of people who have gone to the distinctive three places (the coast, the mountains, and the lakes) in the European nation from 1987 to 2000. Looking at the by-and-large structure it is quickly clear that the number of worldwide guests to the coast has diminished over the past five years. In spite of the first moo numbers, there has been a sharp increment in the number of guests to the lake by the conclusion, whereas those going to the mountains have expanded slowly.

After dissecting the chart, it can be seen that in 1987, 40% of worldwide people went by the coast which declined to around 35% in 1992. After that, the esteem expanded to roughly 75% in 2007. While, in 1987, 20% of universal people went to see the mountains which expanded consistently to around almost 33% in 2007.

In 1987, the rate of outside guests was 10%, expanding to 40% by 1997. This figure rose to 72% in 2002, sometime recently dropping to 50% in 2007. The coast had the most elevated guest numbers among the three zones. In the interim, both the coast and the mountains experienced development in their guest tallies.

Sample 8:

The line chart outlines the number of universal sightseers gone by the diverse three places in a European nation from 1887 to 2007. The unit is measured in thousands. By and large, it can be apparent that an expansive lion's share of guests went to Europe in 2002 and 2007, and a few thousand individuals in 1987. A look at the chart reveals that more at that point 70 thousand people went by the lakes in 2002, and the same number of individuals went to the mountains in 2007. Within the same year, a decrease was observed in the number of guests who went to lakes as it was 50 thousand. In 1987, as it was, 40 thousand individuals visited the coastal regions, and after that sudden expanded drift watched from 1992 to 2007.

For the mountain ranges, 20 thousand individuals went in 1987, and exceptionally few increases were observed over a period of time. Around 35 thousand sightseers went by the mountains in 2007.

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP

Lời giải

Bạn cần đăng ký gói VIP ( giá chỉ từ 199K ) để làm bài, xem đáp án và lời giải chi tiết không giới hạn.

Nâng cấp VIP