Overconsumption of sugar is unhealthy. Some people think that the government should take responsibility to control it. Others think that individuals should take responsibility for sugar intake. What is your opinion on this?

Excess intake or exposure to anything can be vicious for the human body, and sugar is one of the many evils. While excess consumption of sugar is causing health emergencies worldwide, people are tussling with their opinion about whether individuals should curb and control this themselves or should the government step in. This essay will discuss the same.

Sweets are a savoury delight that almost everyone enjoys. Found in sweets, sugar is among the most addictive substances known to us. Consuming it without a cap is detrimental to us. Additionally, if resolute, an individual’s resolve is virtually unbreakable, and many people opt to either stop consuming sugar or switch to alternatives like Stevia and Sugarfree. This constitutes how individuals can be responsible for their own sugar consumption.

However, the government also contributes to this cause. One way to do this is by taxing the sugary delights and confectionary items. On top of that, the government can promote sugar alternatives and a healthy lifestyle or create their own choice which matches the taste of sugar since the existing substitutes have a flavor that requires time to get used to it, which can hold people back. From a personal standpoint, I feel people should take greater responsibility in this scenario. For instance, I’ve seen people who have diabetes forgo anything that has sugar in it. Similarly, cautious consumption can do greater good than government taxations and awareness campaigns.

To conclude, the growing concern regarding sugar consumption is indeed valid, as it causes various illnesses in the body. I feel that the people can take charge of changing the current setting, and the government can assist them in doing so.

Sample 2:

People know that overconsumption of sugar is detrimental for health but how that should be controlled is somewhat controversial. Many believe that governments ought to shoulder the onus of controlling sugar consumption, yet others place accountability for curbing sugar intake on the individuals. This essay will expound on both views, and I believe that both individuals and governments should take responsibility.

To commence with, controlling sugar intake is an obligation of the authority so as to keep the nation fit and healthy. The authorities spend millions of dollars to treat and prevent diseases, and increasing sugar intake can be responsible for many people falling victim to those diseases. With a comprehensive set of policies, governments can curb overconsumption of sugar efficiently and effectively. They can set standards for sugary foods and restrict the production and sale of harmful sugar items. They can also monitor food supplied to hospitals, workplaces and schools, and run campaigns to make the masses aware of the dangers of higher consumption of sugar and sweet items. Likewise, another effective policy the government can implement is the restriction on sugary food advertising and commercial promotion. Put simply, governments ought to tighten regulations on food advertising to children, including sugary items so that the acceptability, awareness and availability of sugary food advertised are reduced.

On the flip side, individuals are the cornerstone of any business and the money they spend shapes the products sold in the market. In other words, the more consumers tend to purchase sugary products, the more they are produced. If people do not purchase such products enriched in sugar, then it would definitely reduce their production. The boycott of plastic packaging in many places has brought plastic production to a lower level and this is the best example of public responsibility. Similarly, the production of sugary foods will be cut if the individuals boycott those products.

To conclude, excessive sugar intake is harmful to people and both the authority and people should shoulder the onus of reducing the production and intake of sugar. Their collaborative efforts will improve the situation and public health.

Sample 3:

Eating too much sugar may cause some serious problems with health. It is why society wants the law of a country to do something about that. However, there are people who believe that everyone has to take care of themselves. I think that individuals have to decide alone what they prefer to eat. This essay agrees with this statement.

The government may decrease the possibility of having a chance to buy some sugar which would push humanity to stop feeding themselves with it so often which would have a good impact on their body. However, there may come a situation where some people would still keep purchasing as many sweets as before as it is delicious and addicting. For instance, if someone does not have self-control, they will still do everything just to get that bar of chocolate, unless sugar is going to be forbidden in every shop they will visit.

On the other hand, humans may decide alone about the number of sweets they eat. If he reduces it, he may see soon enough some positive results of it. Which would be getting slimmer. Moreover, once he starts to avoid desserts, he tries his best to keep that in mind and choose more nutritious meals. For example, if he sees a snack in a supermarket, he makes his own decision if he is going to get it or not. This means that if he takes it, he will have to face the consequences alone, which may give him a lesson for the future.

In conclusion, people may wait for the government to make sweets more unavailable around the world, or simply to control their eating habits which is a much better option. As it may teach them to be patient. Also, no power can control your appetite if not you by yourself.

Sample 4:

It is often argued that for the excess usage of glucose, the ministry shall be responsible and should take the control measures, while others believe that it is a personal responsibility for the well-being of their health. In my opinion, I believe that the duty belongs to both, while it is more of a self-responsibility to control the intake of sucrose

First of all, a growing body of research suggests that the government can regulate the measures of carbohydrate consumption by regulating taxes. One key benefit is that by increasing the taxes, the masses would restrict themselves from purchasing, and thereby would reduce the utilization of glucose. Moreover, imposing taxes is only one part of control measures, it is clear that local bodies shall make campaigns, and raise more awareness amongst people for the ill effects of overconsumption of sugar.

However, there are also regulatory paths that must be considered by the population. One major issue is that overconsumption of sucrose leads to serious health effects. This means that it leads to obesity, tooth decay, and worst-case diabetes. For instance, WHO has reported that there is an increase in diabetic patients across the world by 10% per annum.

In conclusion, while authority contributes to controlling the sugar intake by raising awareness, it is also the duty of individuals to be self-aware and help themselves from the consequences like tooth decay, overweight, and majorly diabetes. In my opinion, I believe a person is more responsible for their health. However, I would argue that government should act more aggressively by imposing high duties on sugar and monitoring diabetic patient records via hospitals.

Sample 5:

It is true that sugar is not healthy food, and over consuming it is the primary factor that makes people obese. While some people argue that the government should take some measures to diminish sugar consumption, others believe that controlling sugar intake is up to the individual. In this essay, I am going to examine this question from both sides and explain why I think ordinary people should be responsible for their diet.

There are some people who believe that the government should create a way to control the consumption of sugar. First, they believe the government should run campaigns to teach people how unhealthy those carbohydrates are. For example, there are some commercials that try to convince people that smoking is harmful to their health, and the authorities should create commercials with regards to sugar. In addition, they argue that the government is responsible for public health, which means governors should do what is necessary to improve people's health condition.

On the other hand, there are those who argue that individual freedom should be respected. In other words, the government should not worry about their diet because people have the right to decide what they eat. To illustrate, they believe there is numerous the government’s interference in our lives, and campaigning against sugar would be another one. Besides, many people think the authorities can solve all the problems of society, such as over-consuming sugar. Nevertheless, necessary changes come from the society as a whole, not from politicians, and, as a consequence, if society understands that over-consuming carbohydrates is harmful, they will adjust their habits naturally.

In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I feel that individuals should decide whether they will consume carbohydrates. This is because ordinary people know what is better for them and their freedom to eat what they want has to be respected.

Sample 6:

Eating carbohydrate in an amount more than necessary is not healthy. According to a few individuals, the state should take care of this matter while the rest think that people should take control of their own sugar consumption. In my opinion, I believe that everyone should keep a track of their carbohydrate intake. However, this essay will discuss both views.

To begin with, the excess amount of sweetness in food items harms our energy. Likewise, if anyone is practicing this, then he is at a risk of serious well-being problems relating to heart and moreover, it leads to premature aging. Therefore, it is very important to limit sugar going inside our body. For instance, a diabetic patient should monitor and curb the carbohydrates and carbohydrates he is including in his diet, and he should know the consequences of not doing so.

Contrastingly, the government should also take the initiative in this matter in order to protect the fitness of its citizens. Since it has the power to reach a mass crowd, it should organise awareness campaigns to create a sense among people regarding this issue. This should be done often in order to create a sense of awareness among a maximum number. For example, they can organise health programs to educate people about nutrition and obesity and the dangers it can cause.

To conclude, I opine that although the government should take measures to decrease the usage of this substance, I believe that it is self-duty to eat well and maintain the soundness of the body.

Sample 7:

Eating vast amount of sugar is harmful for health. While some individuals opine that it is a state's work to limit the amount, some people believe it is self-liability. In my opinion, the consumer's concern is obvious to choose a proper food-chart for them; however, this essay will discuss both views.

On the one hand, a person himself only can ensure a proper diet. This is because not everyone's body has the same requirement of nutritions and additives; that means, the same volume of sweet intake is not dreadful for all. Likewise, the taste and the recipes also vary among the people; some individuals prefer sugary meals, while some salty. Therefore, it is not possible to identify individuals’ demands, rather people own self can select what is good and bad for their own. Meaning that, if a certain measure of sugar consumption makes anyone sick, he has to cut the amount of it from regular cuisines. For example, a diabetic patient usually curbs carbohydrates from daily dishes to maintain fitness.

On the other hand, awareness programs organized by the administration could prevent citizens from over-eating glucose. Because the government has the power to reach mass people and educate them, which will create a sense among them to avoid white poison. For instance, they can organize medical campaigns to promote the importance of taking nutritionally dense food items, and ignore the items that cause diseases, like obesity. Despite this, no matter how many actions are taken by the country to distribute the knowledge of proper diet, the program will surely fail if individuals have no such concern to follow the plan.

In conclusion, adding too much glucose definitely has negative impacts on the human body. Although the government can inaugurate programmes to decrease the intake of this substance, I believe it is the self-duty to eat well and maintain soundness of body.

Sample 8:

Eating sugar in excessive amounts can lead to health problems. According to some people, governments are responsible for their citizens’ health and hence they ought to control sugar consumption while others opine that it is the duty of individuals. In my opinion, everyone should take care of their own health and control the intake of sugar as they understand their body requirements better than others.

It is the moral duty of the government to keep the nation healthy and fit. There are many ways through which excess sugar consumption can be controlled by the government. Firstly, the government should impose higher taxes on sugar and sugary products. For example, if the government levies a high tax rate on these products, their selling prices will be increased, and people will be discouraged to buy them. Therefore, consumption will automatically go down. Secondly, governments should run health awareness programs to educate people about the adverse ramifications of over sugar intake. If they are aware of the negative side of having excess sugar, they will share the same with their family and friends too and this will motivate them not to include excess sugar in their diet.

On the other hand, no one can take care of a person’s health better than themselves as individuals know their own body requirements better. Also, everyone is different and cannot be measured on the same scale. For instance, if someone has a family history of diabetes then he should take precautions and consume less sugar than the others because he is more likely to develop diabetes. In addition, there are multiple ways through which people can regulate their sugar cravings. For example, they can use sugar-free products instead of real sugar.

To conclude, although governments should take the initiative to control excessive sugar intake, in my opinion, largely, it is the responsibility of individuals to restrict themselves from consuming more sugar and take precautions to avoid any negative consequences on health.

Sample 9:

It is irrefutable that health is the biggest jewel one can possess. People often consider sugar as a slow poison, being said that there is a debate going on among a different group of people. Some people consider that the government should take initiatives to keep sugar consumption under control. While others argue that it is the responsibility of an individual to keep track of one's health. I tend to agree with the latter part of the argument and in this essay, will present my views with examples.

The most significant step that the government bodies can take is passing an amendment to limit sugar in soft drinks. This would help in restricting the sugar contents among all the soft drinks. For example, it has been discovered that sodas are considered as the biggest source of rising obesity, especially in the developed countries. It is because most of these products help in getting rid of food cravings. As a result, a large percentage of people skip their meal and lack nutrients to maintain health.

On the other hand, everyone should give priority to their health. Nowadays, fast food has gained so much attention, as it is easy to get and saves time. People around the globe have forgotten the downside of fast food. To illustrate this, a regular McDonalds meal of two-hundred calories, contains fifty percent more sugar, in contrast to a meal cooked at home of equivalent calories. As a consequence, everyone is less prone to being healthier and more attracted to viruses.

In conclusion, the government support is a huge plus in maintaining a healthy country, by restricting sugar. In my opinion, everyone's health begins at home, and it takes one's own effort to maintain it. We should conserve our health in a similar manner as we conserve our treasures.