Some people think that best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. Others, however, believe that there are other alternatives ways of reducing crime. Discuss your opinion?

Sample 1:

People have different views with regard to which is the most effective way to deter crime. While I admit that putting people in jail for an extended time is an excellent measure, I would argue that there are other alternatives that are equally important.

On the one hand, I believe giving longer prison sentences to criminals could do wonders for the battle against crime. Firstly, this method would act as a deterrent since it may discourage people from breaking the law. Knowing they would serve a long prison sentence, those who have the idea of committing a crime would think carefully and realize that it would not be worth the risk. Furthermore, a longer time in incarceration may help rehabilitate offenders. This is because they have more time to think about what they have done and feel remorse for their wrong behavior. Therefore, when being released, they would be afraid of engaging in activities that could lead to criminality.

On the other hand, other alternatives are also essential to reduce the crime rate. The first measure is for authorities to hold more workshops which educate people on legal knowledge. These programs would help people realize how risky breaking the law is, and therefore could raise people's awareness. Another good step is for the government to install more surveillance cameras and have more policemen patrolling the streets. This clearly could prevent pre petty criminals like shoplifters and pickpockets, since they are less likely to operate when being watched. Last but not least, ensuring that ex- prisoners will have a decent job when they are free is a great relapse prevention plan. Being able to support themselves and their family, they have no reason to turn back to crime.

In conclusion, although letting people serve long prison sentences can be a great contributor to preventing crime, there are other effective measures that need to be taken simultaneously.

Sample 2:

Crime is a serious problem across the globe and all countries are trying to deal with this pressing issue. A section of society believes that prison sentences for a longer duration can help reduce crime, whilst others disagree and argue that there are other better ways to solve this. This essay agrees with the argument that alternative ways such as educating people and giving them resources to earn are far more beneficial than confining them to a prison cell. This essay will discuss both points of view.

To begin with, many people believe that offenders should be punished with long prison sentences because this phenomenon can invoke fear among other criminals. In other words, if a person is already aware of the intensity of punishment before committing any crime, it will discourage him from becoming a criminal. For example, in the UAE, the rapist and the murderer usually get lifetime prison sentences, resulting in making people think twice before committing any serious crime. Hence, imposing strict punishment deters people from committing atrocities.

However, I believe that alternative ways such as providing proper education facilities and employment can solve the issues far more effectively. Sufficient education and job opportunities keep the masses busy and away from crimes. To exemplify, in Sweden education is free for everyone and the country’s authority is continuously working for more employment opportunities. That is the reason why Sweden tops the list of peaceful countries where the crime rate is almost ignorable.

In conclusion, longer prison terms certainly instill fear in the minds of potential criminals and discourage them from committing offences. However, eradicating the root cause of crime by providing education and employment opportunities is a far better option.

Sample 3:

In the modern century, the world suffers from an increase in the crime rate throughout many nations. This eventually breeds the fear of innocent civilians and forces them to demand stronger punishment for those who committed a crime. Some insist giving prisoners longer prison sentences, and others insist alternative ways will be more effective and I lay my thoughts alongside the alternative ways as well.

There are many benefits of sentencing offenders for a longer prison period. The longer the criminals who committed serious damage to others such as stealing, violence, arson and murder are separated from society, the higher the chances of the innocence being safe increases dramatically. During their time in prison, the offenders will have an opportunity to get them rehabilitated through many services available inside. For instance, they could reflect on their own behaviour and educate themselves in a way not to re-offend once they are released. Moreover, this long period of the prison sentence will work as a deterrent to future criminals.

On the other hand, others argue that there are more effective ways to reduce the crime rate. They insist that sparing their life after committing serious crimes involving one’s life will be only wasting the tax that citizens paid. Hence to sentence to death will show a powerful warning to other, which result in a stiff drop-in crime rate. In my opinion, these people can be of service to the whole community during their imprisonment. The labour force from these criminals will be a great contribution to society. It does not imply that these violent and dangerous people will be released and walk around the inner city freely. They will be under heavy supervision. For example, they will be tied to heavy chains and placed in construction sites to assist the building companies, or they could be working as farmers when the harvesting season comes.

To summarise, there are clear grounds both for and against long imprisonment. Thus, the government must protect innocent lives from brutal and reckless criminals by researching the best method out of all these fine arguments.

Sample 4:

Crime levels have been increasing at an exorbitant rate in the recent decades. The methods with which to curb the rising levels of crime are often a debated topic. Some argue that the best way to reduce delinquency is to give longer prison sentences, while others contend that there are better alternatives to tackle this epidemic. Both sides of this debate will be analysed in this essay before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.

Many believe that handing out longer jail sentences is the right measure to be employed, this makes sense as the main purpose of such punishments is to deter individuals from committing crimes in the first place. For instance, Saudi Arabia, where ramifications for committing a crime are much harsher than the rest of the world, has much lower crime rates than even the most developed nations. This example illustrates the fear that harsher sentences can instill in the hearts of potential criminals. Hence, it is obvious why this point of view has garnered support.

On the contrary, some argue that there are better alternatives than longer prison sentences such as educational programs and community services. Take a study conducted by a non-profit organisation in my area, for example, which found out that people become more empathetic after spending time with people from disadvantaged backgrounds. As a result of this increased sympathy, people are less likely to commit heinous crimes. Therefore, it is comprehensible why this is a popular opinion among many.

After musing upon both sides of this argument, it is felt that a balance should be struck between handing out longer prison sentences and other measures. It is hoped that felony rates will decrease in the coming years and the world will become a safer place to live in.

Sample 5:

Nowadays, crime rates are inclined and there has been a discussion on possible steps that could be implemented to tackle the scenario. However, a debate has arisen between two groups of citizens. While the majority thinks that an extended imprisonment would be the best way, some are of the opinion that better options are required to be explored and implemented.

To begin with, long-term incarceration is a practical and effective method of removing criminals from society. Thinking about a long-term prison term will deter someone from committing an offense psychologically. Elaborating on it, they will consider a wretched life in prison before engaging in any unlawful activity. Especially, crimes like murder, rape, or arson which are completely the intention of the criminal deserve severe penalties. Thus, extended prison punishment would work in reducing crime rates.

However, it is not completely acceptable to consider long imprisonment as the best way to tackle the situation. Criminals are humans, after all, any living being is capable of adapting to changes, small or big. Illustrating it, being in jail for a long period can crush them into guilt and aggression, on the other hand, organizing rehab centers or labor training can help them engage themselves in productive activity. This will not only imply productivity but also flexibility in switching aspects of life. 

In conclusion, lengthy prison sentences are an effective way to stop people from committing crimes but to reduce the overall crime rate, a change in criminal perception along with a chance to show abilities to do something productive is necessary and effective too. I strongly believe that criminals should be provided with different ways to improve themselves rather than putting an end to his/her life for a long time. 

Sample 6:

There are numerous negative effects on the country that could possibly result from rising crime. Long-term incarceration is seen to lessen this occurrence by some, although others claim that rehabilitation may assist lower the ratio. However, I will go over both points of view and then state my position.

To start with, crime rates are a major challenge to society as a whole. We need to identify the contributing elements to crime if we want to lower the rate. Social problems including a lack of possibilities in life, poverty, and low educational attainment might inspire people to engage in an illegal activity instead of just being motivated by malice. Hence exploring different ways to provide at least basic amenities to poor families, especially the criminal or culprits’ families could be very helpful. Moreover, charity organizations should be organized and promoted by the public sector, which supports the objectives of the culprits’ well-being.

However, there are many benefits of sentencing offenders to a longer prison period. A convincing argument for the incapacitating effect of prison is that while convicted, a criminal cannot commit more crimes in public. Because of the dread that this occurrence can inspire in other criminals, many people think that culprits should be punished with lengthy prison terms. In other words, if someone is informed of the severity of the penalty beforehand, it will deter them from committing any crimes.

To summarize, rates of crime shall be reduced by any means, but more efficient ways could be used rather than long prison sentences. Extended jail punishment can be considered effective for the short term, but it cannot be called an idle way to improve the country’s position as far as crimes are concerned. Hence, reducing overall crime rates should be done by way of facilitating education and charity.

Sample 7:

Crime is a major issue that needs to be addressed nationwide, and all nations are working to do so. Whilst others in society feel that longer jail terms can help reduce crime, others disagree and contend that there are alternative, more effective solutions. This essay supports the claim that less harmful alternatives to locking individuals up in a cell include educating them and providing them with the means to support themselves. Both perspectives will be discussed in this essay.

To begin with, many people opine that criminals should be sentenced to imprisonment for a longer time than usual. I think this opinion must have arrived from a victim-conscious perspective where people have either witnessed an illegal deed or have actually been driven by looking at how its consequences affect other people. Basically, the motive behind this opinion is to send a message to other ill-motivated people so that further crimes may stop. 

However, I think alternative approaches, including establishing suitable educational facilities and employment opportunities, can address the challenges far more successfully. Setting up a message would not win against setting up hope for similar culprits out there in society. Intricating it, the government should provide education in order to make them aware of their own abilities to achieve things by legal means. A little confidence could lift their hope to give another try to their journey.

In conclusion, longer prison sentences undoubtedly induce fear in would-be offenders and deter them from committing crimes. However, my opinion is that it is far preferable to eradicate the primary source of crime by offering education and economic possibilities.

Sample 8:

The upsurge in crime rates across numerous countries in the twenty-first century is a problem for the entire planet. As a result, dread soon spreads among innocent bystanders, driving them to call for harsher penalties to be meted out to criminals. I place my opinions alongside the alternative methods because some people think that handing offenders lengthier prison terms will be more beneficial.

Longer prison terms for offenders have several advantages. The likelihood that the innocent will remain secure grows considerably the longer offenders who have caused serious harm to others such as theft, violence, arson, and murder are exiled from society. Through a variety of services offered inside, criminals will have the chance to get themselves rehabilitated while they are incarcerated. For instance, individuals should examine their own actions and educate themselves on how to avoid committing crimes again after being freed. Additionally, the lengthy prison term will serve as a deterrent to potential criminals.

Others, though, contend that there are more practical ways to lower crime. They maintain that if their life is spared after committing heinous crimes affecting human life, the tax that the public has already paid will be wasted. Therefore, a death sentence will serve as a potent deterrent to others, which will sharply reduce crime. It does not suggest that these threatening and aggressive individuals would be freed and allowed to roam the inner city. These individuals, in my opinion, may benefit the entire community while they are incarcerated.

In conclusion, arguments are quite convincing for and against lengthy imprisonment. Therefore, the government must investigate the best strategy out of all these excellent arguments in order to defend innocent lives from harsh and careless offenders. I think that the government should be concerned about the root causes and explore more practical and effective ways accordingly.

Sample 9:

Crime is a serious and growing problem in most societies. Although many people believe that the best way to tackle this is to place people in prison for longer periods, others are of the opinion that other measures will be more effective.

There are benefits of giving offenders longer prison sentences. Firstly, spending a long time in prison provides an opportunity for the prison services to rehabilitate a prisoner. For example, someone who has committed a serious offence such as assault will need a long time in prison in order to be sure they can be re-educated not to re-offend. In addition to this, longer prison sentences will act as a deterrent for someone who is thinking of committing a crime.

However, some people argue that leaving people in prison for a long time means that they will mix with other criminals and so their character will not improve. One alternative is community service. This gives an offender the opportunity to give something positive back to society, and so it may improve their character. Also, the government could focus its resources on the causes of crime, which would lead to less crime in the future.

In my opinion, it is important to look at alternative methods. Many countries have lengthy prison sentences, but crime has continued to increase throughout the world, so it is clear that this is not completely effective. That said, long prison sentences should remain for those who commit serious crimes such as assault or murder, as justice for the victim and their family should take priority.

To conclude, there are good arguments for and against long sentences, so governments must continue to research the various methods of crime reduction to ensure effective policies are in place.

Sample 10:

At this time, there's hardly any country that has got no crime. The rate of crime is increasing day by day and has caused a serious problem to deal with across the globe. This has led to fear in the minds of innocent people and has forced the law to give stronger punishment to those who are committing it. Many people believe that increasing the sentence of a prisoner can be the solution to reducing the rate of crime while others believe in other alternatives to reduce crime.

To start with, many people believe that there are advantages of long sentencing to a prisoner. Firstly, a prisoner can understand the mistakes he committed during his time in prison. For example, he can start a new life by availing free education from the government inside the prison and learning productive activities. This will help him to get motivated and he can start an honest life by proper means of earning. Another important aspect of a long prison is that, if the sentence is too long then the person will think twice before committing a crime. The intensity of the punishment will generate fear in his mind.

However, some people think long prison sentences can hurt the mind of the prisoner and have adverse effects on him. Inside the prison, they get to stay with other prisoners which may motivate them to plan things worse. Hence staying long with other prisoners will not change the character of the person but give rise to more serious issues. The only solution for this issue is to give separate schooling and proper counseling. The government needs to give jobs to the unemployed as most crime is committed due to a lack of financial stability. With proper opportunities and jobs, one can feel positivity in their mind which will keep negative thoughts away.

In the end, I believe that a longer sentence can reduce crime because of its intensity, but the government should also take steps to stop the crime before it gets committed by providing proper jobs and facilities to the people.

Sample 11:

People have different views regarding the reduction of crimes. Some think long tenure can be the solution for it and some prefer other solutions for it. Both ways have different outcomes.

On one hand, there are certain benefits of long prison sentences. The criminals will not commit a crime when they realize that they have to spend a long time in prison in a harsh way. Moreover, the citizens will feel safe and secure when the offender is behind bars. For example, many people used to be afraid while passing from the Araku Jungle near Andhra Pradesh due to the heists performed by the dacoits, so the local people who used to pass nearby from the jungle or tourists were very worried. When the dacoits were caught by the police and put behind bars, the people felt secure and comfortable while passing from that forest.

On the other hand, there are people who believe in other ways rather than giving long prison sentences. The offender can be put in a rehabilitation center. The police should maintain the law and order more strictly. The prisoner should be given vocational training so that he can earn a living after getting out of prison. There are also counseling sessions inside the prison and there are reports of offenders becoming good after the counseling and in return getting their sentence reduced by the government.

In conclusion, I think the government should intervene more in helping society to become better and thus reduce the negativity in people's minds.

Sample 12:

These days crimes are hitting an unbelievable high rate. The news channels and dailies are flooded with the commencement of illegal acts. With the advancement of technology, the crime rate has increased for its loopholes. Now the offender does not need to be present physically to commit a crime. In this topic, I would like to throw some light on increasing the sentence of prison and other alternative ways to reduce crime.

There are instances where prisoners commit more serious crimes after their release from jail. I believe the punishment should be as harder and longer in the same context of the crime. Most prisoners do not learn from their mistakes if the intensity of the punishment is low. They do the same violation against the law even after serving the penalty. Thus, the sentence should be long and hard enough to reduce the rate of crime.

However, some people agree with others on performing other alternatives to reduce the rate of crime. Here the government has a big role to play. Prisoners who can be re-educated by numerous penalties and punishment by getting trained and skilled must be under strict government observation. Sometimes they do catch nasty habits from their mates inside the jail. Overall, the government needs to focus more attention on unemployment. This will scrape the major reasons for performing criminal acts.

Therefore, in my opinion, the government should punish the offenders according to the severity of the crime, and punishment should be given after proper investigation and thinking of alternative ways to improve the person.