In recent years, pressure on the school and university students is increasing and students are pushed to hard work when they are young. Why is it so? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

Sample 1:

It’s become increasingly common for students to experience stress in schools and colleges, often being compelled to work at a young age. This trend has both positive and negative implications, affecting various aspects of human life.

On one hand, I agree that academic pressure adversely impacts students’ mental well-being. Given their developmental stage, they may not possess full awareness or resilience to address all school-related challenges. This can lead to feelings of fatigue, anxiety, and low self-esteem. Consequently, they may turn to alcohol or cigarettes as coping mechanisms. Moreover, allocating excessive time to academic pursuits leaves little room for relaxation and family bonding.

On the other hand, there are benefits to this situation. Firstly, the adage ‘no pressure, no diamonds’ suggests that pressure can motivate individuals to achieve their goals. In fact, many individuals thrive under pressure and perform their best when challenged. Challenges faced by learners include academic competition, tackling complex exercises, and balancing schoolwork with extracurricular commitments such as volunteering or club activities. However, these challenges pale in comparison to the complexities encountered by employees, including hazardous working conditions. Therefore, early exposure to challenges enables individuals to develop problem-solving skills crucial for future employment. Employers gain insight into students’ ability to handle workplace pressures through their academic journey.

In conclusion, while hard work undoubtedly enhances students’ future job prospects, it must be balanced with leisure activities to mitigate mental health challenges.

Sample 2:

It is often considered that the strain on pupils and professors has been rising, and they are forced to perform with more effort, particularly young ones. I completely agree with this approach and reckon that this will lead to more effective results.

First and foremost, this approach brings the seriousness of children towards education. Those who tend to be lazy and lethargic in their studies will be influenced more. As a result, due to strictness in educational establishments, they will perform better and produce greater outcomes. For example, many children in my hometown are performing better than those in the nearby town, due to strict teachers and a tough education system. That is why it is clear that tough educational systems will make brighter students.

Moreover, firing teachers who are lenient and easygoing is a prudent technique. On the other hand, hiring educators in schools who are strict and tough is a good option, because many children will tend to perform effectively under pressure. Additionally, parents will also be satisfied with learning institutes, and they will happily pay a lump-sum amount of fees. To make it clearer, I would like to give an example. American parents pay huge amounts of money to schools for their children's education, because they know the learning institutes in the United States are second to none. They are happy paying the fees because they know their children are forced to work hard and complete the tasks timely. Thus, this approach brings a positive change.

In conclusion, I strongly agree that children should be trained to work harder and more effectively, in order to gain marvelous results.

Sample 3:

Improvement in living standards has brought about more chances for people to get access to education. These days, school and university pupils are facing increasing pressure, and they are forced to learn very hard from their early childhood. From my perspective, there are pros and cons associated with this trend.

On the one hand, this phenomenon can be advantageous in various ways. Youngsters tend to absorb knowledge much more quickly and effectively than old people. Therefore, they should try their best to study and broaden their mind during this ideal period. If students do not spend time learning in their childhood, they may find learning difficult in their later life. For example, the best time for kids to learn a new language is in their 7's as they will memorise new vocabulary and grammatical structure easily. Moreover, having a good education is one of the main factors leading to a successful career. People need to be knowledgeable and highly qualified to have a well-paid job in this competitive world.

On the other hand, forcing students to study too much may have various detrimental consequences on them. Firstly, pupils are likely to suffer from physical and mental health problems. Since they have to sit for lessons and homework all day, they do not have time for leisure and outdoor activities. As a result, being inactive and stressed will lead to diseases such as obesity, heart disease, and depression. Secondly, these pupils may lack interpersonal skills, which are important for their future. They may not know how to socialize well or cooperate with others because they are focusing too much on their studies and paying little attention to society. However, most companies these days require employees to have not only good qualifications but also life skills.

In conclusion, although increasing pressure on students has some benefits, I believe this phenomenon has its drawbacks. Students should try to balance their studies and their lives to lead a healthy lifestyle as well as acquire the necessary abilities.

Sample 4:

In this fast-paced life, people become success-oriented, and everyone is in the race to get high educational qualifications. Undoubtedly, this increases the tension among the school and tertiary level students to become good competitors and therefore, students are put under a high amount of pressure to work hard at a very early age. However, as stress can be a hindrance in the overall development of anyone, it certainly impacts negatively on students.

To begin with, when pupils are under pressure, they do not understand what they have learned, hence, to get a high score they generally prefer rote-learning method. Though this method of learning may be useful to get a good result, it does not make the students' basic knowledge clear. For example, to become a good engineer or a doctor, one must have a thorough understanding of any subject, which is only possible when the students' base is clear.

Moreover, school and college students are agile and impulsive. If they get a lot of burden on their shoulders, they may become aggressive and violent in several severe cases, which creates chaos in society. Furthermore, some students cannot tolerate the burden and they end up with their lives. For instance, a study by the Asia Education Centre, has revealed that more than twenty percent of students attempt suicide, because of the academic pressure. So that, teachers should teach students according to their learning capacity, rather than putting pressure on them.

To conclude, as students are the future of the nation, they should be lived freely without any burden. The overall development of children can evolve them into better citizens.

Sample 5:

Pressure on educational establishments such as schools and universities is growing and students put on assiduous work when they are young. Although hard work instils determination and resilience in the youthful generation, I believe this perspective has a negative impact. Let us consider some positive and pessimistic sides of this topic.

The first thing that needs to be said is nowadays academic institutions influence soft and hard skills which lead to future careers. An important point is that hardworking inspires one to strive for excellence, because to secure a well-paid job and be considered a highly qualified individual, one needs to be dedicated in studies and gain valuable skills and knowledge. Moreover, the current generation of students is lazy and sleepy. Force by university pushes effort to keep moving forward and making progress in various aspects of life.

Secondly, it is undeniable that curriculum complication leads to perpetual tension during the tuition period which has a disadvantageous effect on psychology and physical condition. It should be noted that a stressful state before an exam affects assessment, moreover, these aspects can decrease motivation and resilience in the future. In addition, plenty of pressure takes up great quantities of free time, and as a result students and pupils cannot find hobbies and other interests besides homework and learning educational materials. For instance, they don't have the opportunity to realize other talents and possibilities. Furthermore, resting and relaxing is like a breath of fresh air for the brain and leisure makes sense.

The conclusion, there are both merits as well as demerits of expanding pressure at schools and universities. I believe that if the mental load on the scholar stabilizes and stands out in countless pastimes of studying it will motivate and equipe with proficiency and knowledge.

Sample 6:

In the modern world, school and university students suffer from a growing amount of pressure. As a result, they start working at an early age. Although students can earn more money if they commence working as early as possible, in my opinion, it should be viewed as a negative situation since students cannot acquire patience.

On the one hand, pressure at academic facilities can make students cope with difficulties. Students need to go through exams and activities under constant pressure. As a result, this hard experience enables students to acquire patience. For instance, many prime ministers finished university, and they come to work under pressure. I agree with this opinion since patience is a lifetime skill that is crucial once students start their careers.

On the other hand, according to some individuals, students can earn more money if they work without finishing school. In general, people can receive more financial resources if they work for a long period. For example, in Japan, a person can receive a salary according to the duration of the engagement, thus a person who has worked for a long duration can receive a higher salary than those who do not. However, I disagree with this idea since students can obtain more fortune if they make a leap to self-employment and start a new business.

To conclude, even though students can obtain more money because they can work longer than others who finish university, in my perspective, it can be argued that this situation is a negative development as students are unable to become patient via studying under pressure.

Sample 7:

These days, in most developed countries, students are increasingly challenged at educational institutions. I believe such a phenomenon is rather beneficial as it not only teaches youngsters to endure and thrive in life but also enhances their mental abilities, which helps to avoid age diseases such as Dementia and Alzheimer’s.

First and foremost, when kids are pushed to work hard at school, they learn to overcome adversity at a young age. As a result, they acquire fundamental life skills, which prove essential to achieving further educational challenges. For example, if school attendants are pushed when they are young, they develop inner strength and confidence, therefore they believe they can succeed at every challenge imposed. Consequently, when these individuals become adults, they already have a strong sense of purpose and thus they achieve their goals much easier than their peers.

Additionally, owing to the fact that they endured stressful circumstances at a young age, young professionals have far healthier brains, which is fundamental to avoiding mental illnesses when elderly. For instance, it has been proven that young professionals that graduated under pressure showed surprising signs of enhanced mental activity, which contributed to the development of healthier minds at an older age. Furthermore, scientific research showed that those who reportedly struggle at the academy had half the chances of acquiring traditional age diseases such as Dementia and Alzheimer's. In other words, younger minds that overcome stressful academic situations develop better neuronal interfaces which keep their minds healthier for longer.

To conclude, while some debate whether it is a positive or negative development whether pupils should be pushed to work harder when attending school, I strongly believe that it is most advantageous that they get pushed and encouraged to become their best self in an educational aspect. This is because they will not only build a prosperous life but also keep a healthier mental state throughout their lives.

Sample 8:

In a constantly-changing world today, students are under much more pressure from schoolwork since they are forced to be diligent in academics from an early age. In my opinion, it should be considered negative on account of several reasons below.

To begin with, I believe that putting increasing academic pressure on students can leave many detrimental implications for their physical well-being. In particular, many young children have to suffer from fatigue and health deterioration when they are pushed to spend most of their time studying at school and in extra classes on a daily basis. In other words, too much time is allocated to studying hard, which means that they are likely to lead a sedentary lifestyle without any chances to do physical activities regularly.

In addition, with a tight study schedule, young children and university students can be put at risk of mental health issues such as stress and depression which are the main culprits of the increasing suicide rate. This can be exemplified by the cases in some Asian countries such as Korea and China where studying is very pressured due to tough competitiveness with prestigious universities. This leads many students to make a desperate decision to end their own lives to escape from all pressure.

Some parents hold an argument that it is beneficial for children to form a study routine and work hard at school at a young age. To be more specific, they strongly argue that with serious efforts, their offspring can gain fruitful achievements in their future. Although I accept that studying hard is of vital importance to children’s future jobs, I still support the view that learning should be enjoyable, so children need to have a carefree and happy childhood. In fact, children are vulnerable, and too much pressure can make them obsessed and unmotivated in the learning process.

In conclusion, in light of the aforementioned reasons including adverse effects on physical and mental health as well as children’s inner will to learn new knowledge, I firmly hold a belief that this trend is overall a negative development.